of Peace between their Neighbours Congratulations Embassages and such like Viand But what moves you to let slip King John Edward II. Richard II. Henry VI. and Richard III. Selv. Not for that they were free from foreign Expences which is not possible for it oppressed them all but for that most of them omitted such necessary charge as in policy they ought to have undergone both for strengthening themselves with Friends and weakning their suspected Enemies such as when occasion serv'd were like to do them damage For if Edw. III. had not by this means fortify'd himself with the alliance and friendship of the noble Knight Sir John of Henault the Dukes of Brabant and Gelderland the Arch-bishop of Colein the Marquess Gulâ—ck Sir Arnold de Baquetien the Lord Walkenbargh and others and also greatly impaiâ—'d the power of the French King by winning the Flemings from the obedience of the Earl of Flanders his assured friend and by procuring the stay of much of the aid by him expected out of the Empire Scotland and other places he had not only fail'd in his French attempts but also put his Kingdom of England in hazard by the Scots who were sure of all the help and backing that France could any way afford them So had it not been for the aid and friendship of the French King the Earls of Bullogne St. Paul the Gascoines and other foreigners Henry III. had been bereav'd of his Kingdom by his own Subjects which notwithstanding he held with great difficulty So the rest likewise But on the contrary part the others whom you nam'd neglecting this right precious tho' costly ground work not only wanted it when need required but with the ruine of their People State and Kingdom lost their Crown and dearest lives by the infernal hands of cursed Murtherers their rebellious Subjects getting once the better hand Viand But Edw. II. used means also to have procured the amity and assistance of divers foreigners as the Duke of Britain the Lord Biskey the Lady Biskey Governess of the King of Castile and Leon James King of Arragon and others And Rich. II. sought the like of the hands of the French King and so the rest likewise of others Selv. True not examining the dependencies of time present they imagined in their prosperity that things to come would ever have good success and therefore deferr'd still the doing of it till extream necessity compell'd them to it and then their Estates being utterly desperate and ruinated no man willingly would lend them aid or ear Knowing that when the fury of the disease hath once possessed the vital places it is then too late to apply Physick This reason made the Princes you speak of to refuse King Edward II. And as for Richard II. when the French King saw how he was entangled and overladen with dangerous Rebellions and Divisions of his Nobles and Commons at home war in Scotland Flanders Spain Portugal Ireland sending forces against the Infidels releiving the expell'd King of Armenia and many other such turbulent affairs he then thought and truly that there was more to be gotten by being his Enemy than his Friend and taking advantage of that opportunity defied him also and warr'd upon him So that King Richard wholly void of aid and hope fell into the hands of his proud Barons and lost both Crown and Life In like miserable sort stood the case with Henry VI. For being once descended to the lowest exigent who almost durst releive him or any of the rest for fear as our Proverb saith of pulling an old house upon his own head Whereas if in their flourishing estate they had employ'd their treasure to encounter future perils being yet afar off they had no doubt securely held their Crowns and perhaps without much business illuded all the practices of their Enemies drawing nearer Had Richard II. at the time when being in France he bestow'd the value of 10000l. in gifts upon the fickle French King stay'd there and employ'd the other 300000. and odd marks by him also wasted at that bravery in gaining the amity of his neighbour Princes to serve his turn when need should be it is not unlikely but afterwards it might have sav'd all the rest For it is a good rule that is taught us in the art of Fencing to break the blow or thrust that might endanger us as far from our Bodies as we can For as I said before when things be drawn to the last period the time of help is past according to the saying of Hecuba to her betray'd husband being about to arm himself Quae mens tam dira miserrime conjux Impulit his cingi telis aut quo ruis inquit Non tali auxilio nec defensoribus istis Tempus eget non si ipse meus nunc afforet Hector Most Royal therefore are the Providence and Expences of her Excellent Majesty who as it were with Linceus eyes looking into the lowest secrets of the practices of her Enemies hath not only for these 36. years utterly cancell'd and made them frustrate but foreseeing also what mighty consequences may depend on mean beginnings omitteth no diligence to defeat them whilst they are yet in the shell or so to environ the mark whereat they are levell'd as being hatch'd they shall be able to perform nothing Knowing it to be far greater wisdom to preserve the body whilst it is sound from all infirmities than by admitting a dangerous disease to gain the credit of an excellent cure And tho' mony be the Blood wherein the Life of all Common-wealths as in a nest is cherisht yet nature teacheth that to preserve health and cure an impostumate disease we ought to let blood out and that sometimes in great abundance And as Themistocles said Pecunia nervus belli mony is also the sinews of war and look how necessary Peace is in a Common-wealth so necessary is War to beget Peace for Peace is Belli filia the daughter of war But to return to our matter lest we fare like the unskilful hounds that undertake a fresh hare when they have hunted the first till she be almost spent It appeareth by that that hath been said that a main Port by which our treasure hath been vented from us heretofore is now shut God be thank'd and that instead thereof no new is opened So that thereby our store must needs remain better by us than it hath and we by consequence must be the richer It is also to be added that whereas in former times much of the treasure that came into the land was buried up in superstitious employments as about Images Shrines Tabernacles Copes Vestiments Altar-cloaths Crucifixes Candlesticks c. by means whereof the Common-wealth became no whit richer than if that part so employed had never come within the Land Now we do not only retain that Idolatrous charge still in our purses which makes us much the wealthier but the rest also which for many hundred years together was so employ'd is
Earldoms But say they tenue neant moiens en fief a vie c. holden notwithstanding as a fief for life not hereditary nor patrimonial in the beginning as afterward they were This change they assign to have been begun about the end of the first line of their Kings who being at that time weak and simple men the Dukes and Earls took opportunity to make their Estates hereditary But it continued not long for the first Kings of the second line reduced them presently to conformity Yet some there were in the remote Provinces that maintain'd themselves hereditary in despight of the Kings whereupon ensued many wars Thus far both these Authors do concur and then Loyseau addeth further That at the end of the second line Hugh Capet having made himself King of France permitted all to hold their Dukedoms Earldoms and Seigneuries hereditarily and taking homage of them as of hereditary Fiefs each party obliged themselves to support the other and their posterity in those dignities as hereditarily This happened in France a little before the Conquest of England and from this precedent of Hugh Capet's did our William the Conquerour make the Earldoms and Feuds in England first hereditary as we have already shewed in the second Chapter So that I conclude as I assumed in the beginning that the Saxon Earldoms were not hereditary nor otherwise Feodal if we shall so term them than for life whereon neither Wardship nor Marriage c. could depend Yet I confess that the Dukes and Earls of the Saxon times both had and might have great possessions in other lands as patrimonial and hereditary namely their Thaneland and in what condition they possessed them it shall appear anon when we come to speak more at large of Thanes and Thane-lands CHAP. VII Of Ceorls and that they were ordinarily but as Tenants at will or having lands held not by Knight-service THe division before mentioned which the Saxons made of their own degrees leadeth me in this next place tho' not orderly to speak of the Ceorle that is of the Carle or Churle and Husbandman The Ancients called him in Latin Villanus not as we ordinarily take it for a Bondman but for him that dwelling in a Village or Country Town lived by the Country course of Husbandry Mr. Lambard therefore to decline the misconceiving of the word Villanus doth render it in the Saxon laws by Paganus which signifieth the same that Villanus doth according to the French for a Villager but not according to our English for a Bondman Our Saxons otherwhile did term them like the Dutchmen Boors that is such as live by tilth or grasing and by works of husbandry Such were the Ceorls among the Saxons but of two sorts one that hired the Lord's Outland or Tenementary land called also the Folcland like our Farmers the other that tilled and manured his Inland or Demeans yielding operam not censum work and not rent and were thereupon called his Socmen or Ploughmen These no doubt were oftentimes his very Bondmen I therefore shall not meddle with them but will hold me to the first sort who having ordinarily no lands of their own lived upon the Outlands before mentioned of their Lord the Thane as custumary Tenants at his will after the usual manner of that time rendring unto him a certain portion of victuals and things necessary for Hospitality This rent or retribution they called Feorme but the word in the Saxon signifieth meat or victuals and tho' we have ever since Henry II's time chang'd this reservation of victuals into money yet in letting our lands we still retain the name of Fearms and Fearmers unto this day The quantity of the Fearme or rent for every plough-land seemeth in those times to have been certain in every Country according to the nature of the place King Ina in his laws did make it so through all the territory of the West-Saxons as you may see with much more touching this matter in my Glossary verbo Firma But insomuch as the chiefest part of the fruit and profits of the lands thus manured by the Ceorls or Husbandmen redounded to the benefit of their Lords and not of the Ceorls themselves the Romans counted them to be as bondmen and not freemen Caesar therefore speaking of them while they were yet in Germany saith Plebs pene servorum habebatur loco That their common people were in a manner bondmen And Tacitus to the same purpose Caeteris servis meaning these Ceorls or Husbandmen non in nostrum morem descriptis per familiam ministeriis utuntur suam quisque sedem suos penates regit Frumenti modum Dominus aut pecoris aut vestis ut colono injungit Et servus hactenus paret But this service was no bondage For the Ceorl or Husbandman might as well leave this land at his will as the Lord might put him from it at his will and therefore it was provided by the laws of Ina in what manner he should leave the land when he departed from it to another place And the Writ of Waste in Fitz-Herbert seemeth to shew that they might depart if they were not then well used It is apparent also that the Ceorl was of free condition for that his person was valued as a member of the Common-wealth in the laws of Aethelstan and his least valuation is there reckoned to be 200s. whereas the Bondman was not valued at all for that he was not as I said any part of the Common-wealth but of his Master's substance nor was he capable of any publick office But the Ceorl tho' he had no land might rise to be the leader of his Country-men and to use the armour of a Thane or Knight viz. an Helmet an Habergeon and a gilt Sword And if his wealth so increased as that he became owner of five hides of land the valuation of his person which they call'd his Were or Weregild was increased to two thousand thrimsas that is six thousand shillings and being then also adorned with other marks of dignity he was counted for a Thane as you shall see in the next Chapter But for all this a Ceorl or Husbandman tho' he were a Freeman was not by the Feodal law of that and later times capable of a Knights-fee or land holden by military service and therefore what land soever he purchased was to be intended land of no such tenure And it appeareth further by the laws of Aethelstan that the five hides of land before mentioned purchased by the Ceorl were descendable to his posterity which sheweth also that they were not feodal land for that feuds at that time were not here descendable as we have often declared So that I hope I may conclude that the Ceorls or Husbandmen among the Saxons held no land by our tenure of Knight-service CHAP. VIII Of Thanes and their several kinds SEeing then the weight of the question will rest wholly upon the
by the Saxons it casteth anchor chiefly on Reliefs as a thing most evident and unanswerable the rest save Wardship it scarcely fortifieth with a breath besides the bare assertion This it saith was common and in pursuit thereof addeth these words For Reliefs we have full testimony in the Reliefs of their Earls and Thanes for which see the laws of King Canutus Cap. 68 and 69. the laws of Edw. the Confessor cap. de Heretochiis and what out of the book of Doomsday Coke hath in his Instit Sect. 103. Camden in Berkshire Selden in Eadmer 154. Great authorities secumque Deos in praelia ducunt We must not meddle with them all at once let us try them singly The law cited out of Canutus is in these words And beon ða heregeata Let the heriot which was to be paid after the death of great men be according to their dignities An Earl's eight Horses four sadled and four unsadled four Helmets four Corslets eight Spears and as many Shields four Swords and two hundred marks of Gold The heriot of a Thane next to the King four Horses two sadled and two unsadled two Swords four Spears four Shields one Helmet one Corslet and fifty marks Of the inferiour or midling Thane an Horse furnished and his weapon c. And he that less hath and less may let his heriot be two pound Here is speech indeed of an heriot but none of Relief I shall anon shew the difference between them and then hath this law nothing against me Touching the law alledged to be Edward the Confessor's the words be these Qui in bello ante Dominum suum ceciderit sit hoc in terra sit alibi sint ei relevationes condonatae c. Here I confess is mention of Reliefs but I deny this to be the law of Edward the Confessor 't is true that it is published by Lambard among his receiv'd laws but if you mark it in a differing letter as noting it to be an addition In an ancient MS. therefore which I have of those laws it is not sound nor in the printed copy of Roger Hoveden who wrote till the third year of King John that is 134. years after the Confessor's time with reverence therefore be it spoken it is mistaken both in the Report and by my Ld. Coke himself whom it followeth if they say that these words were part of the law of Edw. the Confessor yea the text it self maketh ..... of William the younger call'd Rufus But to conceal no truth it is delivered by Jornalensis Monachus in the very same words as a law of an elder King amongst us than the Confessor namely of Canutus our Danish King who in the 157. Chap. of his laws speaking of one slain in battel in the presence of his Lord saith expresly Sint ei relevationes condonatae Now the game seemeth to be wonn but stay a while and remember what I said before of the translations of our Saxon Laws and Charters into Latin The Saxons and the Danes whose Language and Laws differ'd little in those days wrote their Laws only in their own tongue and the translating of them hath begotten much variety and many controversies we must therefore resort to the original Saxon where this passage is in the 75 th Chap. of the second part of his Laws in these words se man ðe aet ðam syâ—dung toforan his hlaâ—ord â—ealle sy hit innan lande sy hit of lande beon herogeata forgyfene which is thus verbatim The man that in a military Voyage is slain before or in the presence of his Lord be it upon land or off of land let the Heriots be forgiven him He saith not let the Releifs but let the Heriots be forgiven him and I deny not but this might be one of the Danish Laws which Edward the Confessor took out of Canutus's Laws when he compos'd the Common Law out of the West Saxon Law Mercian Law and Dane Law if the copies of them were extant and it is very probable that William the Conquerour or one of his sons did turn that Law of Heriots into this of Reliefs For that which my Lord Coke hath out of Doomsday is the same which Mr. Cambden hath in Barkshire touching all that County Vt Tainus vel Miles Regis Dominicus moriens pro releviamento dimittebat Regi omnia arma sua Equum unum cum sella alium sine sella quod si essent canes vel accipitres praestabantur Regi ut sivellet acciperet Here is releviamentum us'd in the Conquerour's time which I doubt not but our Question is of it in the time of the Saxons That also cited by and out of Mr. Selden is of the same nature and one answer therefore serveth to all the three Yet by way of corollary I shall anon discover another error of this sort rising even from Doomsday it self and the Normans possessing this Kingdom of the Saxons but not well instructed in their Laws and Customs which is as followeth CHAP. XVIII Difference between Heriots and Reliefs HEriots were usual among the latter Saxons Reliefs among the elder Normans before their coming into England This according to the custom of the Feudal Law and other Nations that ordain'd by Ludovicus al. Clodoveus King of France about the year 511. to tame the Almans whom he then had brought to servitude I find it not in England till the Soveraigntie of the Danes The first Laws which I find that mention it are those of Canutus before mentioned who perhaps for the assurance of his throne us'd this politick device to have all the Armour of the Kingdom at his disposition in this manner when he had dismissed his Danish Army But it falling so out as the Heriot being to be paid at or after the death of the Old Tenant and the Relief at or before the entry of the new the Normans in this did like our Ancestors the Saxons who because our Christian Pascha or Passover fell out yearly to be celebrated about the time of the Feast of their Idol Easter call'd our Passover by the name of their Easter so they seem to have conceiv'd the Saxon heriot to be the same that their Norman Relief was and therefore translated the word heriot by Releviamentum or Relevium and raising the form of their Feudal Law in England drew the Saxon customs to cohere therewith as much as might be But there is great difference between Heriots and Reliefs for Heriots were Militiae apparatus which the word signifieth and devised as I said before to keep the conquered Nation in subjection and to support the publick strength and military furniture of the Kingdom the Reliefs for the private commodity of the Lord that he might not have inutilem proprietatem in the Seignory The Heriots were therefore properly paid in habiliments of war the Reliefs usually in money The Heriot for the Tenant that died and out of his goods the Relief for the Tenant
the others lost their priviledge and came to be Term-days I cannot find it sufficeth that Custome hath repealed them by confession of the Canonists Yet it seemeth to me there is matter for it in the Constitutions of our Church under Islepe Arch-bishop of Canterbury in the time of Edward III. For tho' many ancient Laws and the Decretals of Gregory IX had ordained Judicialem strepitum diebus conquiescere feriatis yet in a Synod then holden wherein all the holy-days are appointed and particularly recited no restraint of Judicature or Forensis strepitus is imposed but a cessation only ab universis servilibus operibus etiam Reipublicae utilibus Which tho' it be in the phrase that God himself useth touching many great Feasts viz. Omne servile opus non facietis in iis yet it is not in that wherein he instituteth the seventh day to be the Sabbath Non facies omne opus in eo without servile Thou shalt do no manner of work therein Now the Act of Judicature and of hearing and determining Controversies is not opus servile but honoratum plane Regium and so not within the prohibition of this our Canon which being the latter seemeth to qualifie all the former Yea the Canonists and Casuists themselves not only expound opus servile of corporal and mechanick labour but admit twenty six several cases where even in that very kind dispensation lieth against the Canons and by much more reason then with this in question It may be said that this Canon consequently giveth liberty to hold plea and Courts upon other Festivals in the Vacations I confess that so it seemeth but this Canon hath no power to alter the bounds and course of the Terms which before were settled by the Statutes of the Land so that in that point it wrought nothing But here ariseth another question how it chanceth that the Courts sit in Easter-Term upon the Rogation-days it being expresly forbidden by the Council of Medard and by the intention of divers other Constitutions It seemeth that it never was so used in England or at least not for many ages especially since Gregory IX insomuch that among the days wherein he prohibiteth Forensem strepitum clamourous pleading c. he nameth them not And tho' he did yet the Glossographers say that a Nation may by Custom erect a Feast that is not commanded by the Canons of the Church Et eodem modo posset ex consuetudine introduci quod aliqua quae sunt de praecepto non essent de praecepto sicut de tribus diebus Rogationum c. To be short I find no such priviledge for them in our Courts as that they should be exempt from suits tho' we admit them other Church rites and ceremonies We must now if we can shew why the Courts sitting upon so many Ferial and holy-days do forbear to sit upon some others which before I mention'd the Purification Ascension St. John Baptist All-Saints c. For in the Synod under Islepe before mention'd no prerogative is given to them above the rest that fall in the Terms as namely St. Mark and St. Philip and Jacob when they do fall in Easter-Term St. Peter in Trinity-Term St. Luke and SS Simon and Jude in Michaelmass-Term It may be said that although the Synod did only prohibit Opera servilia to be done on Festival-days as the offence most in use at that time yet did it not give licence to do any Act that was formerly prohibited by any Law or Canon And therefore if by colour thereof or any former use which is like enough the Courts did sit on lesser Festivals yet they never did it on the greater among which as majoris cautelae gratia those Opera servilia are there also prohibited to be done on Easter-day Pentecost and the Sunday it self Let us then see which are the greater Feasts and by what merit they obtain the priviledge that the Courts of Justice sit not on them As for Sunday we shall not need to speak of it being canonized by God himself As for Easter and Whitsunday they fall not in the Terms yet I find a Parliament held or at least begun on Whitsunday But touching Feasts in general it is to be understood that the Canonists and such as write De Divinis Officiis divide them into three sorts viz. Festa in totum duplicia simpliciter duplicia semiduplicia And they call them duplicia or double Feasts for that all or some parts of the service on those days were begun Voce Duplici that is by two singing-men whereas on other days all was done by one Our Cathedral Churches do yet observe it I mean not to stay upon it look the Rationale which Feasts were of every of these kinds The ordinary Apostles were of the last and therefore our Courts made bold with them But the Purification Ascension St. John Baptist with some others that fall not in the Term were of the first and because of this and some other prerogatives were also called Festa Majora Festa Principalia dies novem Lectionum ordinarily double Feasts and Grand days Mention is made of them in an Ordinance 8. Edw. III. That Writs were ordained to the Bishops to accurse all and every of the perturbers of the Church c. every Sunday and double Feast c. But we must needs shew why they were called Dies novem Lectionum for so our old Pica de Sarum styleth them and therein lyeth their greatest priviledge After the Arian Heresie against the Trinity was by the Fathers of that time most powerfully confuted and suppressed the Church in memory of that most blessed victory and for better establishing of the Orthodox Faith in that point did ordain that upon divers Festival-days in the year a particular Lesson touching the nature of the Trinity besides the other eight should be read in their service with rejoycing and thanksgiving to God for suppressing that horrible Heresie And for the greater solemnity some Bishop or the chiefest Clergy-man present did perform that duty Thus came these days to their styles aforesaid and to be honoured with extraordinary Musick Church-service Robes Apparel Feasting c. with a particular exemption from Law-Tryals amongst the Normans who therefore kept them the more respectively here in England Festa enim Trinitatis saith Belethus digniori cultu sunt celebrandi In France they have two sorts of Grand days both differing from ours First they call them Les Grand jours wherein an extraordinary Sessions is holden in any Circuit by virtue of the King's Commission directed to certain Judges of Parliament Secondly those in which the Peers of France hold once or twice a year their Courts of Haught Justice all other Courts being in the mean time silent See touching these Loyseau De Seigneures To come back to England and our own Grand days I see some difference in accounting of them
that make me think that our wealth should continue with us better now than in times past it hath done are for that the Roman-coffers are not now glutted as they have been with English-treasure continually flowing into them For it is a world to consider the huge stocks of mony that those cozening Prelates have heretofore extorted out of her Majesties Kingdoms by their Antichristian and usurpt Supremacie As by Pope Innocent constraining King John to redeem his Crown at his hands and to take it for ever in farm for the yearly rent of 1000. marks to be paid to him and his Successors By causing Henry III. to maintain his wars against Frederick the Emperor and Conrade King of Sicil By drawing from our Kings many contributions and benevolences By laying upon their Subjects as well temporal as spiritual tenths and taxes in most ravenous manner and that very often So that in the time of Henry III. the Realm was by such an extream tax mightily impoverished as our Chronicles witness as also at many other times since and before For when the Pope was disposed to use mony he would tax our people as if they had been his natural Subjects by many Congratulations of the Clergy as 11000. marks at one pull to Pope Innocent IV. by private Remembrances from single Bishops as 9500. marks from the Arch-bishop of York to Pope Clement V. in An. 34. or 35. Edw. I. and from divers of them jointly 6000. marks to the foresaid Innocent By their rich Revenue of the First-fruits and Tenths as well of the Archbishopricks as of all other Spiritual Livings now reannext unto the Crown by the Parliament in the first of her Majesty By Installing Consecrating and Confirming Bishops By dealing Benefices By appellations to the Church of Rome By giving definitive Sentences By distributing heavenly Grace By granting Pardons and Faculties By dispensations of Marriages Oaths and such like By selling their blessed trumpery and many such other things that I cannot reckon whereof that merchandizing Prelate knoweth full well how to make a Commoditie according to the saying of Mantuan Venalia nobis Templa Sacerdotes Altaria sacra Coronae Ignis thura preces coelum est Venale Deusque All this consider'd and that the summs of mony by them receiv'd before the time of Henry VIII were according to the value of our Coin at this day three times as much as before is shewed you must needs confess that the fat of the Land larded the Roman dishes whilst our selves teer'd upon the lean-bones Besides it must not be forgotten that one tenth granted to the Pope impoverisht the Realm more than ten unto the King For what the King had was at length return'd again among the Subjects little thereof going out of the Land much like the life-blood which tho' it shifteth in divers parts yet still continueth it self within the body But whatsoever came into St. Peter's pouch was lockt up with the infernal key Et ab infernis nulla est redemptio England might lick her lips after that it came no more among her people Thus we were made the Bees of Holy-Church suffer'd to work and store our hives as well as we could but when they waxed any thing weighty his Legates were sent to drive them and fetch away the honey Yea if his Holyness were sharp sett indeed he would not stick to use a trick of Husbandry rather burn the Bees than want the honey I may tell you too his Legates and Nuncio's were ever trim fellows at licking of the hive as in our Chronicles you may read abundantly Viand You have made the matter so plain that I must needs grant that our treasure goeth not out of the Land in any comparable measure as it did in times past For as you say tho' these actions of the Low-Countries France Portugal and other places hath somewhat suck'd us yet I consider that we have ever had such a vent even in the several days of our Kings as in the time of Queen Mary King Edw. VI. King Henry VIII c. Selv. Their occasions indeed are best known unto us because many men living were witnesses thereof But I will recite unto you cursorily somewhat of the rest that you may the better be satisfy'd that it is no novelty in England And for to begin with Henry II. what store of treasure think you was by him and his wasteful sons whereof two namely Henry and John were Kings as well as himself daily carry'd into France Flanders Saxony Sicil Castile the Holy-land and other places sometime about their wars and turbulent affairs other some time for Royal expence about meeting feasting and entertaining the French King the Pope foreign Princes and such other occasions the particular whereof were too long to recite But we may well think that England must needs sweat for it in those days to feed the riotous hands of three several Kings spending so much of their time on the other side the Seas as they did The like was done by Richard I. about his ransome and business with the Emperor and Leopold Duke of Austria about his wars in France and the Holy-land where it is said that by estimation he spent more in one month than any of his predecessors ever did in a whole year By Henry III. about the affected Kingdom of Sicil and his wars in Gascoigne and other parts of France and in bounty to strangers He at one time sent into France at the direction of the Poictovins 30. barrels of Starling Coin for payment of foreign Souldiers and at another time these his wasteful expences being cast up the summ amounted to 950000. marks which after the rate of our allay encreaseth to By Edw. I. about his Actions of Guien Gascoigne France Flanders and the Conquest of Scotland and the striking of a League with Adolph the Emperor Guy Earl of Flanders John Duke of Brabant Henry Earl of Bar Albert Duke of Austria and others against the French King and Earl Jo. of Henault his partaker By Edw. III. about his Victories and designs in France and elsewhere which exhausted so much treasure as little or none almost remain'd in the Land as before is shewed By Henry IV. about the stirs of Britain and in supportation of the confederate faction of Orleance By Henry V. about his Royal Conquest of France By Edw. IV. in aiding the Duke of Burgundy and in revenging himself upon the King of France By Henry VII about his wars in France in annoying the Flemings in assisting the Duke of Savoy and Maximilian King of the Romans I need not speak of Henry VIII whose foreign Expences as they were exceeding great so they are sufficiently known to most men Neither have I more than lightly run over the rest who besides these that I have spoken of had many other foreign charges of great burden and much importance and yet not so much as once touch'd by me as Marriage of their Children with foreign Princes Treaties
For which purpose Conradus Salicus a French Emperour but of German descent going to Rome about fourty five years before the time of our King Edgar viz. sub An. Dom. 915. to fetch his Crown from Pope John X. made a Constitution upon the petition of his Souldiers That filii or aviatici the sons or if no Sons were living the Nephews or Grandsons as they call them of some of them should succeed in the Feud of their Father See the Constitution in the beginning of the fifth book of Feuds But Gerardus noteth that this law settled not the Feud upon the eldest Son or any other Son of the Feudatarie particularly but left it in the Lord's election to please himself with which of them he would After this Feuds were continued in divers places by several increments to the third fourth fifth sixth and seventh generation and sometime for want of lineal issue collaterally to the brother as Gerardus testifieth but whether by some positive law or by the munificence of the Lords he doth not tell us nor when or by whom they were made perpetual and hereditary tho' he confesseth that at last they grew to be extended in infinitum and then they began to be settled upon the eldest Son who formerly had no preheminence above a younger brother But while they stood sometimes produced in this manner by the indulgence of Princes to the third fourth or fifth generation c. some men of learning have concluded them to be hereditary as tho' there were no medium between a limitation how far so ever extended and infinitum To pass by that let us now go on in examination when and how Feuds became Hereditary Some suggest a shew of such a matter under the two Othones German Emperours who succeeded one the other about the year 973. But to rest upon the common and received opinion which we shall hereafter more at large declare the truth is that when Hugh Capet usurped the Kingdom of France againgst the Carolinges he to fortifie himself and to draw all the Nobility of France to support his Faction about the year 987. granted to them in the year 988. that whereas till then they enjoyed their Feuds and Honors but for life or at pleasure of their Princes they should from thenceforth for ever hold them to them and their heirs in Feudal manner by the Ceremony of Homage and oath of Fealty And that he would accordingly maintain them therein as they supported him and his heirs in the Crown of France which they joyfully accepted This was a fair direction for William of Normandy whom we call the Conquerour how to secure himself of this his new acquired Kingdom of England and he pretermitted not to take the advantage of it For with as great diligence as providence he presently transfer'd his Country-customs into England as the Black book of the Chequer witnesseth and amongst them as after shall be made perspicuous this new French custom of making Feuds hereditary not regarding the former use of our Saxon Ancestors who like all other Nations save the French continued till that time their Feuds and Tenures either arbitrary or in some definite limitation according to the ancient manner of the Germans receiv'd generally throughout Europe For by the multitude of their Colonies and transmigrations into all the chiefest parts thereof they carried with them such Feodal rights as were then in use amongst them and planting those rites and customs in those several Countries where they settled themselves did by that means make all those several Countries to hold a general conformitie in their Feuds and Military customs So by the Longobards they were carried into Italy by the Saliques into the Eastern parts of France by the Franks into the West part thereof by the Saxons into this our Britain by their neighbours the Western Goths who communicated with the Germans in manners laws and customs into Spain and by the Eastern Goths into Greece it self and the Eastern parts of Europe c. These I say carried with them into the parts of Europe where they settled such ancient Feudal customs as at the time of their transmigration were in use among them But the more prevalent and more generally receiv'd customs were those that were in use or taken up in the time of Conradus the Emperour and when Feuds became hereditary for on them especially is the Feudal Law grounded and composed tho' enlarg'd oftentimes by Constitutions of the Emperours and spread abroad into divers Nations by their example countenance or authority Wherein the Court of Milan was chiefly followed in rebus judicatis as appeareth by Duarenus and Merula but reserving unto every Nation their peculiar rights and customs For it was generally received into every Kingdom and then conceived to be the most absolute law for supporting the Royal estate preserving union confirming peace and suppressing robberies incendiaries and rebellions I conclude with Cujacius who upon the above-cited passages of Gerardus Niger saith Quam aliam Feudorum originem quaerimus His veluti incrementis paulatim feuda constituta sunt quae post Conradum usus recepit ut transirent ad liberos mares in infinitum c. The Military and Lay-Feuds being thus advanced from an arbitrary condition to become perpetual and hereditary did now in ordinary account leave their former name of Beneficia which were only temporary for years or life unto the Livings of the Clergy and retained to themselves the proper name of Feuds whereby they were produced to be perpetual and hereditary Cujacius therefore speaking of them both saith Feudum differt a beneficio quod hoc temporaneum fuit illud perpetuum And treating in another place of these beneficiarii and temporarii possessores he saith further Iisdem postea câ—pit concedi feudum in perpetuum quod est verum proprium Feudum Concluding in a third place that Propria Feudi natura haec est ut sit perpetua So that Cassineus in the Feuds of Burgundy saith that Omne Feudum quocunque modo acquisitum fit haereditarium cum successione sit redactum ad instar Allodialium That all Feuds by what means soever they be acquired are made hereditary in so much as by the continual succession of the children into the Feuds of their Fathers the Feuds are now brought to be like Allodial or patrimonial inheritances Thus Feudum which at first was but a tottering possession ad voluntatem Domini growing at length to be an irrevocable estate descending by many successions from son to son became at last to be an absolute inheritance and thereupon the words themselves Feudum and Haereditas in common use of speech Quem penes arbitrium est jus norma loquendi to be voces convertibiles and by a fair metonymia each to signifie other For as Horace further saith Verborum vetus interit aetas Et juvenum ritu florent modo nata vigentque Aptly
seqq a name not well agreeing with Feodal servitudes But it seemeth by divers Abby-books that some Estates for life which we call Frank tenements were also put in writing especially among the latter Saxons Yet were not these accounted bocland for they were laden commonly with many feodal and ministerial services whereas bocland as I said was free from all services not holden of any Lord the very same that Allodium descendable according to the common course of Nations and of Nature unto all the sons and therefore called Gavelkind not restrain'd to the eldest son as feodal lands were not at first but devisable also by will and thereupon called Terrae testamentales as the Thane that possessed them was said to be testamento dignus Folcland was terra vulgi the land of the vulgar people who had no estate therein but held the same under such rents and services as were accustomed or agreed of at the will only of their Lord the Thane and it was therefore not put in writing but accounted proedium rusticum ignobile But both the greater and the lesser Thanes which possessed Bocland or hereditary lands divided them according to the proportion of their estates into two sorts i. e. into Inland and Outland The Inland was that which lay next or most convenient for the Lord's Mansion-house as within the view thereof and therefore they kept that part in their own hands for supportation of their family and Hospitality The Normans afterwards called these lands terras dominicales the Demains or Lord's lands The Germans terras indominicatas lands in the Lord 's own use The Feudists terras curtiles or intra curtem lands appropriate to the Court or House of the Lord. Outland was that which lay beyond or out from among the Inlands or Demeans and was not granted out to any Tenant hereditarily but like our Copy-holds of ancient time having their original from thence meerly at the pleasure of the Lord. Cujacius speaking of this kind of land calleth it proprium feudum that is to say such land as was properly assigned for Feodal lands Proprium feudum est saith he extra curtem consistit in praediis As if he should say That land properly is a Feud or Feudal land which lyeth without the Demains of the Mannour and consisteth in land not in houses We now call this Outland the Tenants land or the Tenancy and so it is translated out of Biritrick's will in the Saxon tongue This Outland they subdivided into two parts whereof one part they disposed among such as attended on their persons either in war or peace called Theodens or lesser Thanes after the manner of Knights Fees but much differing from them of our time as by that which followeth shall appear The other part they allotted to their Husbandmen whom they termed Ceorls that is Carles or Churles And of them we shall speak farther by and by when we consider all the degrees aforesaid beginning with the Earl CHAP. VI. Of Earls among our Saxons AN Earl in the signification of Comes was not originally a degree of dignity as it is with us at this day but of Office and Judicature in some City or portion of the Country circumscribed anciently with the bounds of the Bishoprick of that Diocess for that the Bishop and the Earl then sat together in one Court and heard jointly the causes of Church and Common-wealth as they yet do in Parliament But in process of time the Earl grew to have the government commonly of the chief City and Castle of his Territory and withal a third part of the King's profits arising by the Courts of Justice Fines Forfeitures Escheats c. annexed to the office of his Earldom Yet all this not otherwise than at the pleasure of the King which commonly was upon good behaviour and but during life at most This is apparent by the severe injunction of King Alfred the Great labouring to plant literature and knowledge amongst the ignorant Earls and Sheriffs of his Kingdom imposed upon them That they should forthwith in all diligence apply themselves to the study of wisdom and knowledge or else forgoe their Office Herewith saith Asser Menevensis who lived at that time and was great with the King the Earls and Sheriffs were so affrighted that they rather choose insuetam disciplinam quam laboriose discere quam potestatum ministeria dimittere that is To go at last to the School of knowledge how painful soever rather than to lose their offices of Authority and degrees of Honour which Alfred there also declareth that they had not by Inheritance but by God's gift and his Dei saith he dono meo sapientium ministeria gradus usurpatis This is manifest by divers other authorities and examples in my Glossary in verbo Comes as the Reader if he please may there see Some conjecture that Deira and Bernicia in Northumberland and Mercia in the midst of England were Feudal and hereditary Earldoms in the Saxon times Those of Northumberland presently after their first arrival under Hengistus about the year 447. that of Mercia by the gift of Alfred the Great about the year 900. to Ethelredus a man of power in way of marriage with his daughter Ethelfleda but for ought I see it is neither proved by the succession of those Earldoms nor our Authors of Antiquity For my own part I think it not strange that there was not at the entry of the Saxons a Feudal and Hereditary Earldom in all Christendom As for this our Britain the misery of it then was such as it rather seemed an Anarchy and Chaos than in any form of Government Little better even in Alfred's days through the fury of the Danes tho' he at last subdued them for his time How soever three or four examples in five hundred years before the Conquest differing from the common use is no inference to overthrow it especially in times unsettled and tumultuous The noble Earldom of Arundel in our days of peace differeth in constitution from all the other Earldoms of England yet that impeacheth not their common manner of succession Loyseau and Pasquier learned Frenchmen speaking of the Dukes and Earls of France which England ordinarily followeth and sometimes too near the heels justifie at large what I have said shewing the Dukes and Earls in the Roman Empire from whose example others every where were derived were like the Proconsuls and Presidents of Provinces simple Officers who for their entertainment had nothing else but certain rights and customs raised from the people which we in England called Tertium denarium And that the Dukes and Earls of France were Officers in like manner but had the Seigneurie of their territory annexed to their Office so that they were Officers and Vassals both at once that is to say Officers by way of Judicature and Vassals whom we call Feodal tenants for their Seignories of Dukedoms and
every feodal Lord and not begun in France 'till Feuds were there made hereditary by Hugh Capet nor in England till William the Conqueror did the like as before appears The reason of it was to preserve the memory of the Tenure and of the duty of the Tenant by making every new Tenant at his entry to recognize the interest of his Lord lest that the Feud being now hereditary and new heirs continually succeeding into it they might by little and little forget their duty and substracting the services deny at last the Tenure it self We see at this day frequent examples of it for by neglecting of doing homage and those services Tenures usually are forgotten and so revolv'd to the King by Ignoramus to the great evil of their posterity that neglect it But the Saxons having only two kind of lands Bocland and Folcland neither of them could be subject unto homage for the Bocland which belong'd properly to their greater Thanes tho' it were hereditary yet was it alodium and libera ab omni seculari gravedine as before is shewed and thereby free from homage And the Folcland being not otherwise granted by the King or his Thanes than at will or for years or for life the tenant of it was not to do any homage for it For Justice Littleton biddeth us note that none shall do homage but such as have an estate in fee simple or fee taile c. For saith he 't is a maxim in law that he which hath an estate but for term of life shall neither do homage nor take homage But admit the Saxons had the ceremony of doing homage among them yet was it not a certain mark of Knights-service for it was usual also in Socage-Tenure And in elder ages as well a personal duty as a praedial that is done to Princes and great Men either by compulsion for subjection or voluntary for their protection without receiving any feud or other grant of land or benefit from them And he or they which in this manner put themselves into the homage of another for protection sake were then called homines sui and said commendare se in manus ejus or commendare se illi and were thereupon sometimes called homines ejus commendati and sometimes commendati without homines as in Doomsday often Tho' we have lost the meaning of the phrase yet we use it even to this day Commend me unto such a man which importeth as much as our new compliment taken up from beyond the Seas let him know that I am his servant See the quotations here annexed and note that tho' the Saxons did as we at this day call their servants and followers homines suos their men yet we no where find the word Tenure or the ceremony of homage among them nor any speech of doing or of respiting homage CHAP. XXI What manner of Fealty among the Saxons SO for Fealty if we shall apply every oath sworn by Servants and Vassals for fidelity to their Lord to belong unto Fealty we may bring it from that which Abraham imposed upon his servant put thy hand under my thigh and swear c. For the Saxons abounded with oaths in this kind following therein their Ancestors the Germans who as Tacitus saith took praecipuum Sacramentum a principal oath to defend the Lord of the Territory under whom they lived and to ascribe their own valour to his glory So likewise the homines commendati before mention'd yea the famuli ministeriales and houshold servants of Noble persons were in ancient times and within the memory of our fathers sworn to be faithful to their Lords These and such other were anciently the oaths of Fealty but illud postremo observandum saith Bignonius a learned French-man of the King 's great Council fidelitatem hodie quidem feudi causa tantum praestari shewing farther that Fealty was first made to Princes by the Commendati and Fideles without any feud given unto them and that the Princes afterwards did many times grant unto them feuda vacantia as to their servants but whether the oath of fealty were so brought in upon feodal tenants or were in use before he doth not determine In the mean time it hereby appeareth that fealty in those days was personal as well as feodal or praedial which imposeth a necessity upon them of the contrary part in the Report that if they meet with fealty among the Saxons they must shew it to be feodal and not personal for otherwise it maintaineth not their assertion I will help them with a pattern of fealty in those times where Oswald Bishop of Worcester granting the lands of his Bishoprick to many and sundry persons for three lives reserv'd a multitude of services to be done by them and bound them to swear That as long as they held those lands they should continue in the commandments of the Bishop with all subjection I take this to be an oath of Fealty but we must consider whether it be personal or praedial If personal it nothing then concerneth Tenures and consequently not our question If praedial then must it be inherent to the land which here it seemeth not to be but to arise by way of contract And being praedial must either be feodal as for land holden by Knight-service or Colonical as for lands in Socage If we say it is feodal then must there be homage also as well as fealty for homage is inseperable from a feud by Knight-service but the estates here granted by Oswald being no greater than for life the Grantees must not as we have shewed either make or take homage And being lastly but Colonical or in Socage it is no fruit of a Tenure in Capite by Knight-service nor belonging therefore to our question So that if fealty be found among the Saxons yet can it not be found to be a fruit of Knight-service in Capite as the Report pretendeth it See Fidelitas in my Glossary CHAP. XXII No Escuage among the Saxons What in the Empire THe word Scutagium and that of Escuage is of such novelty beyond the Seas as I find it not among the feudists no not among the French or Normans themselves much less among the Saxons Yet I meet with an ancient law in the Novella of Constantine Porphyrogenita Emperour of Greece in the year 780. that gives a specimen of it tho' not the name Quaedam esse praedia militaria quibus cohaereat onus Militiae ita ut possessorem necesse sit se ad militiam comparare domino indicante delectum vel si nolit aut non possit se ad delectum exhibere certam eo nomine pecuniam fisco dependere quae feudorum omnium lex est c. This tells us that there were certain lands to which the burden of warfare was so adherent that every owner of them was tyed upon summons made by his Lord to make his appearance therein or else to pay certain money by way
another as it is to be seen in France it self When the Roman Emperors grew potent in Germany and the German Princes came to be Emperors the Germans generally forsook their ancient custom spoken of by Tacitus and received the Roman Law The rest of the Angli that remained in Germany and came not over into England made a Law about the year of our Lord 900. That it should be lawful for a Free-man to dispose his inheritance by Will as he pleased The Normans kept the old custom in part and left it in the other part They suffered him that had neither wife nor children if he were twenty year old to make a Will and bequeath his moveable goods as he listed either to or from his kindred So likewise if he were married and his wife dead Having children he could dispose but of a third part And so might man or woman of 16. years old But land which they according to the Civilians called immoveable goods no man amongst them might dispose of by his Will In some other parts of France as in Champain they disposed both moveable and immoveable that is goods and lands according to the Civil Law The Civil Law custom they called Lex Romana the other Lex Barbara Our Saxon Ancestors by direction of their Clergy who chiefly affected the Roman manners seem also to have observed the Civil Law in making of Wills both in substance for disposing Lands and Goods and much in the form and ceremony of making and publishing the same As Carolus Magnus in France disposed the Lands of his great dominions between his three sons Lewis Pepin and Charles by his last Will. So by his example King Ethelwulfus here divided his Lands by his Will between his three sons Aethelbald Aethelred and Aelfred King Aelfred in the like manner disposed both his Lands and Goods by his Will now extant And many other Saxons by their Wills in writing bequeathed Lands and Goods with their Bodies unto Monasteries That herein they followed the Civil Law is manifest by the Saxon Will of Birtrick and Elfâ—uith his wife made about the year 980. according to the manner of that time by them both jointly First it seemeth to be made in calatis Comitiis that is in an assembly called together for that purpose Then whereas the Civil Law requireth necessarily VII witnesses here were a dozen least it might be defective in that one was a woman and some other under age or Bond-men The disposition of Lands as well as of Goods is by the Civil Law and therefore the course is more solemn Which also this well observeth both for disposing Land and Goods and also for the solemnity of the course But most evidently it appeareth to be according to the Civil Law in that the man and his wife joyn both together in it which was neither in use nor resolv'd to be good till the Novel Constitution of Theodosius and Valentinian did authorise it After this Constitution that kind of Testament became so common that Marculfus who lived about the year 660. hath left unto us an especial formula or precedent of it as it was then in use in France And saith in it that it was ut Romanae Legis decrevit authoritas And concludeth it with an imprecation or curse against such as should violate it as doth also the Will of Birtrick With the like solemnity of witnesses eight in number besides a Lady did Elfere another Saxon before Birtrick bequeath the Town or Land of Snodland to the Church of S. Andrews Of the Probate of Wills or Testaments After the Will was thus composed the Roman use was to have the Testator and Witnesses to subscribe it then binding it up close with thred to seal it with their Seals which upon producing of it they or many of them were to view and acknowledge before the Praetor or Judge And then rupto lino the thred being cut it was opened and published and copies of it delivered to the parties under a Publick Seal the Original remaining in the publick Register The ancient manner of opening publishing or as we call it proving of Wills before the Magister Census is described by John Fabri But nearer to our purpose is that in the Formulae of Marculfus of a Will proved in a City or Corporation before the Magistrate there or of a Town before the Defensor Plebis For a Will by the Civil Law and the use of our neighbour Nations might be proved before divers Officers and in divers places We already mentioned the Praetor but Justiman the Emperor ordained that in Rome none should be opened save by the Magister Census In the Provinces by a Constitution of Theodosius the Rectores Provinciarum and where the access to them was uneasy there Donations and Wills made in Cities and Corporations might be exhibited and proved before Magistratus Municipales the Magistrates there in other Towns before the Defensor Plebis According to these two last are the formulae of Marculfus and another in Brissonius From these Constitutions of the Emperors grew the various manner of Probate of Wills amongst us in ancient time With the Magister Census being proper only to the City of Rome we have nothing to do But as we were once a Province of the Empire so our Ancestors received and held the manner of Provinces For the Rectores Provinciarum which with us were the Earls of the Counties had the cognisance or Probation of Wills as shall by and by appear So also had divers of our Magistratus Municipales Magistrates of Cities and Corporations As that which I am best acquainted with my Neighbours of Lenn Episcopi now Kings Lynn in Norfolk And instead of the Defensores Plebis in an ordinary Town the Lord of the Town or Mannor both had and hath that priviledge with us in divers places All this while there is no mention of any Ecclesiastical Person which we must now look into The fourth Council of Carthage ordained that Episcopus tuitionem testamentorum non suscipiat and this Canon Gratian has taken into the Body of the Canon Law whereto the Gloss saith Tuitionem id est apertionem sc coram eo non apperiantur sed coram Magistro Census C. de testam L. Consulta And tho' it addeth vel dicatur quod non sit advocatus ad tuendum testamentum yet that seemeth an idle interpretation for tho' Epiphanius maketh mention that Bishops in old time judged Causes yet it was never known that they pleaded Causes But it is apparent that the Clergy-men in those days took upon them to prove Wills even in Justinian's time who flourished An. Dom. 530. And therefore he prohibited them not only by a Constitution but also by a mulct of 50. pound weight of Gold saying Absurdum est namque si promiscuis actibus rerum turbentur officia
Surrey 23. King Edgar's Charter of donation of certain Thane-lands 19. Another Charter granted by him to the Monastery of Hide near Winchester 20. By whose advice his Laws were made 61. King Edward the elder how he propos'd his Laws 61. The first that prohibited Law business on Festivals 77. King Edward the Confessor's Charter of donation to Thola 20. Several priviledges granted to the Cinque-Ports 26. His Laws by whom collected 61. His Constitution touching Festivals 79. Edward Earl of Norfolk and Marshal of England 168. Dyed in his minority ibid. Edwin son of Othulf gave certain lands to Arch-bishop Odo 29. Elfere a Saxon bequeath'd Snodland to the Church of St. Andrews 128. Publish'd his Will before Odo Arch-bishop of Canterbury c. 130. Elfstane Bishop of Rochester 130. Elfsy Priest of Croyden 130. Ellingham 161. Elmham 150. Erpingham 151. Erpingham Tho. Commissioner for executing the Office of Earl Marshal of England 169. Escheats the signification of the word 37. No feodal Escheats among the Saxons 37 38. Escuage what in the Empire 36. Neither its name nor rules us'd by the Saxons 37. Essoyning the manner of it not in use before the Conquest 27. King Ethelbald's Charter to the Monks of Croyland 22. Ethelbert the first Christian King of the Saxons 8. He causes his Laws to be put in writing ibid. He took somewhat from the Roman law 102 Etheldreda daughter of K. Alfred her dowry 8. King Etheldred ordain'd every eight Hides of land to find a man for the naval Expedition 17. His Charter of donation to Aethelwold 19. Another Charter granted by him to his Thane Sealwyne ibid. King Ethelstane whom he consulted in making his Laws 61. King Ethelwulfs Charter of priviledges 23. He divided his lands by Will among his three sons 128. Euricus King of the Goths 102. Exauctoratio Militis 185. Expeditio what it signifies in Latin 17. F Fakenham 150. Fasti or Law days among the Romans why so nam d. 72. Seldom two Fasti together 75. Fasti proprie ibid. Fasti intercisi ibid. Fasti Comitiales ibid. All the Fasti not apply'd to Judicature ibid. Fealty the definition of it 35. No Fealty but for a fee. 36. What manner of Fealty among the Saxons ibid. Felbrig 152. Felewell 161. Feodal words none among the Saxons 7 8 9. Feorme what it signifies in the Saxon tongue 15 Ferdwite 37. Festa majora vel principalia 91. Festivals how exempted from Law days 76. The differences of them 91. The Festivals of St. Peter and Paul 92. Of St. George 93. Of Gun-powder Treason ibid. A Feud what it is 1. It s general and particular definition 2. Feuds among the Jews ibid. Among the Gauls 3 Their original 4. Made perpetual and hereditary 5. When and how they became so ibid. Especially in England ibid. The difference between them and Benefices 6 9. The great growth of them ibid. No proper Feuds before the Conquest ibid. Feudal-law generally receiv'd in every Kingdom 5. It s youth infancy and full age 9. Where it had its original ibid. Feudatarii 9. Feudum militare nobile 4. Rusticum ignobile ibid. Feuda majora regalia ibid. The word Feudum or Feodum not us'd in K. Beorredus's days 9. Fideles who 4. Fidelity what 59. Fines for Licence of alienation 33. The Thane-lands free from them ibid. Not in use among the Saxons 34. Fitz-Alan Jo. Lord Maltravers Marshal of England 168. Fitz-Osborn Will. Lord Marshal to King William the Conquerour 165. Flegg 154. Flitcham 145. Flitchamburrough 52 145. Folcland what 12. Not alienated without licence 33 34. Free from homage 35. Ford-Park 110. Forests belong to the King alone 118. Subjects can have 'em only in custody ibid. Fouldage 162. Franc-almoin 2 7. Frank-tenements 12. Freeborgs or Tithings 51. Frekenham 153. G Garbulsham 158. Gavelkind what and why so call'd 12. Observ'd throughout all Kent 43. At first the general Law of all Nations ibid. Germans their Customs and Tenures carry'd into several Countries 5. They receiv'd the Roman Law 127. Gey-wood 143. Gilbert the third son of William the King's Marshal 166. Made Marshal of England ibid. Kill'd in a Tournament ibid. Gimmingham 152. Goths carry the German Laws into Spain Greece c. 5. They were the first that put their Laws in writing 102. Trusted Priests with the passing of wills 130 Government the ancient Government of England 49. c. 53. Grand-days in France and England 92. Grand Serjeanty 2. Grantesmale Hugh Marshal under K. William I. 165. Greeks from whom they had much of their ancient Rites 74 127. Gresham 152. Gressenhall 150. Grey Rad. de exauctoratur 185. Guthrun the Dane 61 77. H Hales 156. Harkela Andr. de exauctoratur 185. Harleston ibid. Hartlebury-park 110. Hawkins Pet Keeper of Bramsil-park wounded by Arch-bishop Abbot 109 c. Hengham 157. King Henry I. imprison'd the Bishop of Durham 62. His Constitution about Festivals and Law-days 81. King Henry II. ratify'd the Laws of Edw. the Confess and Will the Conquerour 81. Henry Bishop of Winchester conven'd K. Stephen to his Synod 132. Heribannum what 17. Heriots paid after the death of great Men. 31 32 To whom forgiven 32. The difference between them and Reliefs 32 33. By whom and when first ordain'd 32. What the word Heriot signifies ibid. Heriots and Reliefs issuing out of the same lands 33. No badge of lands held by Knight-service ibid. Heydon 151. High Courts see Court of Justice Hikifricus Pugil quidam Norfolciensis 138. Hilary-Term its ancient bounds 82 83. The end of it sometimes held in Septuagesima 95. Hockwold 161. Holkham 149. Holland Tho Marshal of England 168. Holland Tho. Earl of Kent Duke of Norfolk 169. Made Earl Marshal of England ibid. Holland Tho. Farl Marshal of England during the minority of John Mowbray 165. Holme in Norfolk 147 152 Homage by whom first instituted 5. Feodal homage 34. Of two sorts ibid. When begun in France and England ibid. The reason of it 34 35. Who are to do it 35. Usual in Soccage-tenure 35. As well a personal as a praedial duty ibid. Homines commendati 35. Hominium homagium what 34. Homagium ligeum ibid Feodale aut praediale ibid. Hoveden Roger when he wrote 31. Howard Sir John Kt. created Duke of Norfolk and Earl Marshal of England 17â— Slain in Bosworth-field ibid. Howard Tho. the son of the former Earl of Surrey 170. Imprison'd in the Tower ibid. Defeated the Scotch under K. Henry VII ibid Made Lord Treasurer of England and restor'd to his fathers dignities ibid. Kill'd James IV. K. of Scotland in battel ib. Sent Ambassadour into France ibid. Made Vice-Roy of England ibid. Where he dy'd ibid. Howard Tho. the fourth Duke of Norfolk of that name and Earl Marshal of England 1â—1 Howard Tho. the Grand-son of the former Earl of Arundel and Surrey ibid. The first Earl of England ibid. Made Earl Marshal for life ibid. Hugh Bishop of Coventry exercis'd the Sheriffs place 116. Excommunicated ibid. De Humâ—z
that succeeded and out of his purse The Heriot whether the son or heir enjoy'd the land or not the Relief by none but him only that obtain'd the land in succession The Heriot whether the land were fallen into the Lord's hands or not the Relief in old time not unless it were fallen and lay destitute of a Tenant whose taking of it up out of the Lord's hands was in that sense called Relevium or Relevatio a taking up of that was fallen according to the French word Reliefe Bracton well observ'd the difference saying Fit quaedam praestatio quae non dicitur Relevium sed quasi sicut Heriotum quasi loco Relevii quod dari debet aliquando ante sacramentum fidelitatis aliquando post Hotoman saith Relevium dicitur honorarium munus quod novus Vassallus Patrono introitus causa largitur quasi morte alterius Vassalli vel alio quo casu feudum ceciderit quod jam à novo sublevetur Nov. Leo. 13. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 nominat I stand the longer herein for that not only the Report but even Doomsday it self and generally all the ancient Monkish writers have confounded Heriots and Releifs Yet might I have saved all this labour for nothing can make the difference more manifest than that we often see both of them are together issuing out of the same land But when all is done neither is Heriot nor Releif any badge of land holden by Knight's-service or in Capite for both of them are found in lands of ordinary Socage Yet I confess that Bracton saith de soccagio non datur Relevium and a little before de soccagio non competit domino Capitali Custodia nec homagium ubi nulla Custodia nullum Relevium sed è contra But this serveth my turn very well for that they in the Report having fail'd to prove that Releifs were in use in the Saxons time whereof they affirm'd they had full testimony it now inferreth on my behalf that if Releifs and Wardships were not in use among the Saxons that then also Tenure by Knight-service was not with them Besides all this the Heriot was a certain duty and settled by Law the Relief so various and uncertain as the Lords exacted what they listed for it when it fell into their hands constraining the heir of the Tenant as it were to make a new purchase of their Feud whereupon the Feudists called this Releif not only Renovatio and Restauratio feudi in Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 turning or bringing back of the Feud to the former condition or proper nature of it but also Redemptio a ransoming of it out of the Lord's hands That it thus stood with us in England by and by after the Conquest appears by that we have shewed before out of the Magna Charta of Henry I. CHAP. XIX No Fines for Licence of Alienation TOuching Fines for Licence of Alienation it is not said what kind of Tenants among the Saxons did pay them nor for what kind of land they were paid The Thane-land hereditary is apparently discharg'd thereof by the ordinary words of their Charters before mention'd where 't is said that the owners of lands may give and bequeath them cuicunque voluerint and that freely ab omni munduali obstaculo Doomsday also as we here shewed doth testifie as much and so doth the very word Alodium which the ancient Authors attribute to these lands So that the Thane-lands doubtless were free both from the Fine and Licence But as touching Folcland and land holden at will of the Lord tho' continued in ancient time to their children after the manner of Copy-holds it is no question but that they might both have Licence for aliening such lands and also pay consideration for it as our Copy-holders do at this day I find that one Brictrick in the time of King Etheldred about the year 984. bequeath'd legacies of good value unto his Lord's wife to intreat her Husband that this Brictrick's Will whereby he had devised many lands and goods to Monasteries and divers men might stand And that Thola the widow of Vrke a Thane of Edward the Confessor obtain'd licence from the same King Edward that she might devise both her lands and goods to the Monastery of Abbotsbury But of what nature these Licences were whether to alienate the land or to make a Will or to give the land to Monasteries as in Mortmain I cannot determine If they only intended alienation then I understand them only of Lands holden according to the custom of the time at will of the Lord or Folcland Yet in that Thola's Licence was as well to bequeath her goods expresly as her lands the Licence seemeth to be given therefore to make a Will which no man then could do if not a Thane Quaere But howsoever it be expounded it must not be extended to the Thane-lands or land hereditary for the reasons before alledged And as touching Fines for Licence of Alienation after our manner which the Report suggesteth they could not doubtless be in use among the Saxons for there are not found as I suppose here among us before the time of Edward I. and not established afterwards 'till 1. Edw. III. where the King granteth that from thenceforth lands holden in Chiefe should not be seized as forfeited which formerly they were for Alienation without Licence but that a reasonable Fine should be taken for the same See the Statute CHAP. XX. No Feodal Homage among the Saxons OUr word Man and homo in Latin have for many ages in old time been used by the German and Western Nations for a Servant or Vassal And from thence hominium and vassaticum afterwards homagium was likewise used for hominem agere to do the office or duty of a servant not to signifie Manhood as some expound it and so also Vassalagium But by little and little all these latter words have been restrain'd to note no more than our ceremonial homage belonging properly unto Tenures which I met not with among our Saxons nor any shew thereof in former ages unless we shall fancy that the Devil had it in his eye when he offered to give unto our Saviour all the Kingdoms of the world if he would fall down and worship him For here he maketh himself as Capital Lord our Saviour as the Feodal Tenant the Kingdoms of the world to be the Feud the falling or kneeling down to be the homage and the worshipping of him consisting as the Feodists expound it in six rules of service to be the Fealty Pardon me this idleness but from such missemblances rise many errors Homage as we understand it in our Law is of two sorts one more ancient than the other called homagium ligeum as due unto the King in respect of Soveraignty and so done more Francico to King Pipin by Tassilo Duke of Bavaria about the year 756. The other homagium feodale or praediale belonging to