WEST SEAXNA CYNING I Ine by the Grace of God King of the West Saxons in his preamble to his Laws But until about our Henry the Third it was not of so constant use as that the Stile of the King necessarily required it This Stile of Dei Gratia is frequently given in old time Given to Spiritual Lords and yet in use to Spiritual Lords nothing being more common in the Instruments of Bishops and Abbats in the Chartularies of Monasteries and it is given from Kings to them in the Summons of Parliament and Writs to Assemble or Prorogue Convocations in this form Jacobus c. Reverendissimo in Christo â—â—tri praedilectoque fideli Consiliario nostro Georgio eadeâ—◠〈…〉 Archiepiscopo Cantuariensi c. But at this day though it 〈◊〉 â—â—ven to them they use it not in the first Person but Deâ— (i) Rosula Novella 〈◊〉 cap. 111. â—â—mentia or Providentia Divina and in older times when they writ to the Pope Emperor or King they were not to write Dei Gratia of themselves but only such or such licet indignus vel immerens Bononiae Episcopus c. By all these Titles we cannot but observe that the dignity of Kings and Sovereigns was looked upon in all Ages as deriving Authority from God Almighty and his Vicegerents here upon Earth having the Attributes of God that as he was Supreme over all things in Heaven and Earth so they within their Districts upon Earth I shall end this Chapter with this Observation That the Attribute of Dei Gratia applied to Sovereigns and Bishops might probably have Authority from the Constitution of Justinian (k) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Just Noâ— 6. init 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ibid. which runs thus The greatest Gifts which Gods goodness from above hath conferred on Men are the Priesthood and Empire both of which proceed from one and the same Principle and are for the ordering and disposing of the Affairs of Mankind Concerning the peculiar Title of our Kings of England Defender of the Faith the learned Spelman having given us thâ— Copy of the Bull and discoursed so fully of it I shall 〈◊〉 the curious Reader to him for satisfaction CHAP. XVII Of the Soveraignty of the Kings of England according to our Histories and Laws THE Titles and Attributes which other Soveraign Princes have either assumed The Kings of England have used all the Titles proper to Sovereign Princes or have been given to them our Kings of England have used as might be made appear by innumerable Examples But I shall treat but of a few and shew wherein the Soveraignty is discovered and what ancient Prerogatives they have by their acts of Grace quitted and lastly how the long Parliament of 1641. would have cramped the King's Authority First as to the Title of King or Emperor promiscuously So our Edgar frequently in his Charters calls himself Albionis Anglorum Basileus As King Emperour Lord. and I have noted before that the Grecians esteemed the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to be of full as eminent Signification as Emperor So in a Charter (a) Cod. Wigorn. to Oswald Bishop of Worcester he is called Anglorum Basileus omniumque Regum Insularum Oceanique Britanniam circumjacentis cunctarumque Nationum quae infra eam includuntur Imperator Dominus In which we may note that one of our Kings of England writ himself not only Basileus according to the Grecian usage which signified King and Emperor but also Emperor and Lord three of the fullest Attributes either the Grecian or Roman Emperors ever used as also Lord of the British Sea as Canutus his Successor challenged So in a Charter to (b) Mon. Ang. par 1. p. 64. Peterburg Ego Edgar sub ipso sidereo Rege praesidens Regno Magnae Britanniae I have seen another (c) Lib. MS. Roberti de Swapham c. Fundationis Burgensis Coenobii p. 38. of his Charters prefaced thus Gratia Domini nostri Jesu Christi omnium seculorum omnia suo Intuitu distribuentis Regna terrarum moderantis habenas rerum Ego Edgar sub ipso eodem Rege praesidens Regno Britanniae c. So King (d) Id. p. 39. Edward in the same Book stiles himself Ego Edwardus Rex Anglorum Monarchiam Regiminis tenens hoc decretum Patris mei per deprecationem Abbatis Aidulfi perhenniter affirmavi In which we may note that Edgar owns himself subject to Jesus Christ God And King Edward saith he holds the single Command of Government So King Edward in a (e) Coke Praefat. 4. Reports Rex Anglorum totius Britanniae Telluris Gubernator Rector Angligenum Orcadarum necnon in Gyro jacentium Monarcha Anglorum Induperator Charter to Ramsey stiles himself Totius Albionis Dei moderante Dominatione Basileus King of all Albion and King Edwin in a Charter to Crowland calls himself King of England and Governour and Ruler of all the Land of Britain So Ethelred in his Charter to Canterbury stiles himself Of all the English born and the Oreades lying in Circuit about it Monarch and Emperor of the English So that by Orcades must be understood all the Isles about Britain So William Rufus dates his Charter to the Monastery of Shaftsbury secundo Anno Imperii mei By all which it appears that the Kings of England have justly assumed the Supream Imperial Command in their own Dominions and though the Title of Emperor hath been disused Kings of England as much Sovereigns as Emperours yet we shall find the substance of it sufficiently challenged in that of (f) Ipse omnes libertaâ—â—s 〈◊〉 Râ—gno habebat suo quas Imperator vendicabat in Imperio Matt. Paris in vita Willielmi 2. William Rufus to Arch-Bishop Anselm when he told him That he had all the Liberties in his Kingdom which the Emperor challenged in the Empire And in a Constitution (g) Râ—gâ—um Angliae ab omâ—i subjectione Imperiali liberrimum Claus 13 E. 2. m. 6. dorso of King Edward the Second it is declared That the Kingdom of England is most free from all Imperial Subjection which excluded all public Notaries who were made by the Emperor or Popes and by this Constitution were utterly rejected The Statutes for it This further appears in the (h) Stat. Anno 23 E. 3. c. 1. Vide Coke Instit 2. 111. 4 part 6. 8. 3. Instit 120 125. Statute of Praemunire made 23 Ed. 3. which runs thus That it being shown by the grievous and clamorous Complaints of the great Men and Commons how that divers of the People be and been drawn out of the Realm to answer of things whereof the Cognizance pertaineth to the King's Court and also that the Judgments given in the same Court be impeached in another Court in prejudice and dis-inherison of our Lord the King and of his Crown c. Therefore it was enacted That none of the King's Liege-People of
what condition soever shall draw any out of the Realm in Plea whereof the Cognizance appertaineth to the King's Court or of things whereof Judgments be given in the King's Court c. This Statute as well as that of Provisors 25 Ed. 3. was made to hinder the Subjects Appeals to Rome or to any other Court in such things whereby the King's Soveraignty might be diminished and this Statute relates to one made by King Edward the First Also in the Statute of Provisors 25 Ed. 3. reference is made to the (i) Anno 35 Regni Statute made at Carlisle by King Edward the First The Statute of (k) 16 R. 2. c. 5. Praemunire for purchasing Bulls from Rome gives an account of the preceding Statutes and further saith Whereas our Lord the King and all his Liege-People ought of right and of long time were wont to sue in the King's Court to receive their Presentments to Churches Prebends and other Benefices of Holy Church which they had right to present to the Conisance of Plea of which Presentment belongeth unto the King's Court of the old right of his Crown used and approved c. then particularly enumerates the Encroachments of the Bishop of Rome by Processes Excommunications of Bishops for executing Judgments given in the King's Courts and the translating of Prelates out of the Realm or from one spiritual Living to another against the King's Laws and Regality c. The Statute expresly declares That the Crown of England hath ever been so free that it is in no Earthly Subjection but immediately subject to God in all things touching the Regality of the Crown and to no other Under King Henry the Eighth (l) 24 H. 8. c. 12. the whole Parliament say that by sundry old and authentick Histories and Chronicles it is manifesty declared and expressed that this Realm of England is an Empire and so hath been accepted in the World governed by one Supream Head and King having the Dignity and Royal Estate of the Imperial Crown of the same unto whom a Body Politick compact of all sorts and degrees of People divided in Terms by names of Spirituality and Temporalty have bounden and owen to bear next to God a natural and humble Obedience The next (m) 25 H. 8. c. 21. Year in another Statute it is stiled the Imperial Crown and Royal Authority recognizing no Superior but only Your Grace and in the Chapter following the Kings of England are stiled Kings and Emperors of this Realm and in (n) 28 H. 8. c. 7. another of the same King it is called The most Royal Estate of the Imperial Crown of this Realm So in the same (o) Stat. Hilâ—â—◠〈…〉 8. c. 2. Year before the Title of Lord of Ireland was altered into King the Stile is Kings and Emperors of the Realm of England and of the Land of Ireland and in several other Statutes it is called the Imperial Crown I have inserted these to clear that by our Laws the Kings of England are under no Subjectjon to any foreign Prince or Potentate whatsoever And Mr. (p) Tit. Hâ—â— p. 21 22. Selden saith that the Supremacy is not only used by the English Sovereigns but hath been challenged by the Kings of Spain Denmark Poland the Czars of Muscovy and other free Princes over all within their own Dominions exclusive of all foreign Powers and upon the like ground of Supremacy was that Law made by King James the Third of Scotland in these words Our Sovereign Lord has full Jurisdiction and free Empire within this Realm c. A Confirmation of this Supremacy of our Kings appears in what is reported of our King Edward the Third That when Lewis (q) Quod Râ—x Anglix non se submisit ad osâ—ula pedum suorum of Bavier the Emperor had an Interview with him the Emperor stomached that the King of England submitted not himself to kiss his Feet But the King answered That he was (r) Rex inunctus habet vitam membrum in potesâ—ate sua ideirâ—â— non debet se submittere tantum sicut Rex alius an anointed King and had Life and Member in his Power therefore he ought not to submit himself to him as other Kings Whence it was that Alsonso the ninth King of Castile defining what Kings were after he had dispatched the Particulars that belonged to the Emperor says That they are every one in their Kingdoms the Vicars or Vicegerents of God placed over the People to govern them (s) Bien assi come el Emperador en su Imperio Partid 2. tit 1. Ley 5. 8. no otherwise than as the Emperor is in his Empire Whoever desires further Satisfaction in this Point may have recourse to the voluminous Collections of Mr. Pryn and other Authors that have treated of the Kings Supremacy Most of what I have hitherto discoursed relates to the King's Supremacy ab extra that he hath no foreign Superior that ought to impose any thing upon him or his Subjects contrary to his Pleasure and his Laws in his Dominions I shall now give a short Abridgement of what I find our learned Lawyers have writ concerning the King's Authority and Sovereignty in his Kingdom of England and how Wherein the King's Sovereignty consists according to our Laws in former Ages Kings have quitted some of their Royal Prerogatives In our Laws the King is stiled in Ecclesiastical matters the Supreme Ordinary (t) Cokâ— 11. 86. Calvin's Case 215. in Civil matters caput Reipublicae Pater Patriae totius Regni Pater-Familias Chief Justice c. being furnished with plenary Power to render Justice and Right to every Member and part of the whole Body (u) Coâ—â— 2 part 1 2. 24 H. 8. c. 1. 24 Eliz. c. 1. without the help of Foreign Jurisdiction Some Attributes of God in a similitudinary way say (w) 〈◊〉 8◠〈◊〉 177 2â—8 212 〈…〉 the great Lawyers are aseribed to him for the Excellency of his Person and the greatness of his Office as Sovereignty and Power Omnipresence Majesty Immortality c. In his Political (x) 〈…〉 Grand Abâ—iâ—gment part 3. p. 44. Capacity not subject to the Infirmities of others as Nonage Death Attainder c. So no Laches Negligences Defects or Stops of Blood can be imputed to or fastned upon him as is well known in the case of King Henry the Seventh (y) St. Albans vita â—en 7. p. 29. wherein it was unanimously resolved by the Judges That his Natural Capacity doth so far participate with the Politic which is superadded to the Body natural of the King that these become consolidate consubstantiate and indivisible in one and the same Royal Person and the Body Politic which is the more worthy and of a sublimer Nature is in no ways obnoxious to the Humane Imbecillity of Death Infamy Crime or the like but doth draw from the Natural Body all Imperfections and Incapacities whatsoever So that there is
Cabedo Pract. Obs par 2. decis 40. would himself For it is essential to Majesty and Soveraignty and cannot be abdicated while he remaineth King nor separated without the diminution or destruction of Majesty How both King and People are obliged to defend the Rights of the Crown will appear in the Laws ascribed to King Edward the Confessor in the 17.35 and 56. As to the Particular How absolutely necessary the Royal Assent is to all Laws in the Act of Recognition to King James the First it is fully expressed thus Which if Your Majesty shall be pleased as an Argument of your Gracious acceptation to adorn with Your Majestie 's Royal Assent without which it can neither be Compleat and Perfect nor remain to all Posterity according to our Desire as a Memorial of your Princely and tender Affection towards us c. Against what I have laid down those who were for co-ordinate Powers in the two Houses object many things Answers to some Objections against the King's sole establishing of Laws some I have answered in the Chapter of the King's Sovereignty and I shall meet with others in the Chapters of Parliaments And shall here only take notice of some omitted or not fully answered there Against the assertion That the Liberties granted by King Henry the Third were by way of Charter they produce the Preamble (r) Coke 2 Instit fol. 525. to the Confirmation of King Edward the First of Magna Charta La Charte des Franchises la Charte de la Forest les queux fuerent faitz per Commen de tout Royalm en le temps le Roy Henry pier soient tenue c. and Charta de Foresta wherein he saith that the Charter of Liberties and the Charter of the Forest made by the Community of all the Realm in the time of King Henry our Father shall be kept c. To which with the Judicious Doctor (s) General Preface to Compleat History p. 41. The ancient Kings sealing of Charters of Liberties reputed Laws Brady may be answered that these were the Petitions and Requests of the Community of the Kingdom and may be said to be made that is digested by them into the form of a Charter So the Barons offered King John's Magna Charta to him ready drawn in a Schedule and forced him to grant it and cause his Seal to be put to it and the whole strength and validity of the Charter lay in his Grant and the Confirmation of it under his Seal This was the only Security they desired and demanded no other and the Tenour of all the Charters were accordingly We grant We confirm We give for us and our Heirs to them and their Heirs c. Which Grants and Concessious were always in these times accepted and acknowledged to be sufficient without the least doubting or scruple There was no other Power or Authority that gave them being but the King's so that it seemed the great Councils or Parliaments of those times owned the Kings Charters under Seal and the Grants made by them to the People to be of good force and effect and that their Petitions to which he gave his assent and caused to be put under his Seal were by them accepted and from time to time acknowledged as firm and valid Laws The same learned (t) Idem p. 67. The Laws planted by Kings Doctor Brady observes that Sir Edward Coke hath a formal way of speaking The Law doth this and The Law doth that This is Law That is by Common Law of England abstracting it from any dependance upon or Creation by the Government as if it had been here before there was any and had grown up with the first Trees Herbs and Grass that grew upon English Ground and had not been of our antient Kings and their Successors planting by assistance and advice of their great Councils in all Ages as it was found expedient either by them or upon Petition and Request of their People which is acknowledged by all the Bishops Earls Barons and People present at the (u) Claus 1 E. 2. m. 10. dorso Coronation of King Edward the Second in these words Sir Will you grant and keep and by your Oath confirm to the People of England the Laws and Customs granted to them by the antient Kings of England your Predecessors true and devout to God and namely the Laws and Customs and Liberties granted to the Clergy and People by the glorious King Edward your Predecessor Another Objection some make against the Absoluteness of the King's Power Second Objection when it is said in antient Statutes The King ordains The King wills that it hath been resolved by many of the Judges (w) Coke 8. Report s 20. b. that if these Statutes be entred in the Parliament Rolls and allowed as acts of Parliament it shall be intended they were by Authority of Parliament With the Judicious Dr. Brady I shall not enquire how such Entry and such Allowance without any Words in the Statutes to that purpose can make them to be by Authority of Parliament But we may he sure those Words The King ordains The King wills being pronounced in Parliament and recorded in the Rolls thereof do clearly prove the King's Authority and Power in making Laws to be far greater than many Men would allow him or have him to enjoy (x) Lib. 3. c. 9. Bracton and the Author of (y) Lib. 1. c. 17. â—leta applying the Passage of the Civil Law Quod Principi placet Legis habet vigorem to the King of England say That Clause ought not to be understood of every thing that is rashly presumed to be his Will but of that which is justly determined upon good Advice and Deliberation by the Counsel of his Magistrates (z) Râ—ge Authoritatem prastante the King giving it Authority and confirming it for a Law and from hence (a) Cum ipse sit Author Juris non debet inde Injuriarum nasci occasio unde Jura nascuntur infer That when he himself is the Author of the Law Injustice ought not to spring from the same Fountain from whence the Law doth spring It is no diminution of the Sovereignty of a Prince in the matter of making Laws or repealing them to have the Assent of the Nobles and such a select Body of Great and Wise Men as the House of Commons are But when as in the Parliament 1641. the Two Houses claim a Co-ordinate Power and would make their Advices be swallowed as Commands it is this that all Loyal Persons should oppose We generally understand that the Persian Monarchy was as Absolute as any yet in it we have a manifest Discovery of the Concurrence of the Nobles in preparing a Decree The Persian manner of making Laws yet they wanted the King's establishing the Decree by his signing it whereby it might not be changed and Grotius thinks they signed it also (b) Dan. cap. 6. v. 7 8
as well as Norway which was the reason why William the Conquerour understanding that the Danish Law was used in that part where the Danes had settled themselves he preferred them before other Laws because his Country of Normandy was sprung from the Danes and Norwegians and it was with much difficulty that he was perswaded against imposing them upon the whole Kingdom saying the Danes and Norwegians were as sworn Brothers with the Normans These Danes entred about the year 790. and were at last overcome by King Alfred and by agreement betwixt him and Guthrun King of the Danes who governed the Kingdom of the East Angles and Northumbrians Guthruns People enjoyed the Danish Laws which differed from the other in nothing so much as the proportion of the Mulcts King Edward the Elder Aethelstan Edmund and Edgar made Laws but from the time of Edgar to Edward the Confessour the Danes having the principal Command the Danish Laws mostly prevailed But Edward the Confessour of these three Laws composed one which saith the Monk of (d) Lib. 1. c. 50. Edward the Confessor 's Laws composed of all Chester are called the Common Laws and to his Days were called the Laws of King Edward By all I have hitherto noted concerning the Laws either made in Germany France Lombardy Burgundy Bavaria or other Countries after they came to have any established Government of their own or in England during the Heptarchy It is apparent whoever was Soveraign imposed the Laws which as to the Saxons in the next Chapter I shall make particularly appear When the Roman Imperial Law began to be disused That the Roman Laws begun to be disused as soon as their Empire declined and was broken is as manifest for these several Nations by the appointment of their Soveraigns had their unwritten Customs and Laws revised and according to the suitableness of them to the Government of their People had them writ into Books and enjoyned them to be observed by their Subjects To make it evident that the Imperial Roman Law was much disused after Justinian's time upon the account of other Soveraignties being established which acknowledged not that dependence upon the Empire as formerly I shall offer something from Mr. (e) Notes upon Fortescue p. 20. Selden who if any other is to be credited in this kind of reading after I have said something of Justinian The Emperour Justinian (f) Proaem de Consirmatione Institutionum Of Justinian 's Laws in the year of our Lord 565 by the help of Tribonian Master and Exquaestor of the Sacred Palace and Exconsul and of Theophilus and Dorotheus Illustrious Men of whose Skill and Knowledge in the Laws and their Fidelity in observing his Commands the Emperour had manifold experience of Although he had commanded them by his Authority and Perswasions to compose those Institutions that the Subjects might not learn the Law from (g) Non ab Antiquis Fabulis discere sed ab Imperiali splendore appetere Breviter expositum quod antea obtinebat quod postea desuetudine inumbratum Imperiali remedio illuminatum est Legimus recognovimus plenissimum nostrarum constitutionum robur eis accommodavimus Ancient Fables but from the Imperial Splendor as he calls it desire them and after fifty Books of Digests or Pandects and four Books of Institutions were made in which were expounded whatever before-time was used and what by disuse was obscured by the Imperial Remedy was Illuminated and he had accomodated to them his fullest Authority and had appointed them to be read and taught at Rome Berytus and Constantinople and no where else Yet the body of the Civil Law was so neglected that till Lothar the Second about the year 1125. took Amalsi and there found an old Copy of the Pandects or Digests it was in a manner wholly disused Under that Lothar the Civil Law began to be profest at Bologna and one Irner or Werner made the first Glosses upon it about the beginning of Frederick Barbarossas's time in Anno 1150. and Bologna was by Lothar constituted to be Legum Juris Schola una sola (h) Sigon de Regno Italiae lib. 11. 7. This Book Lothar gave to the Pisans by reason whereof saith Mr. Selden it is called Litera Pisana and from thence it is now removed to Florence where in the Dukes Palace it is never brought forth but with Torch-light and other Reverence By this account we may note That even before Justinian's time some Laws had been rather by old Traditions which he calls old Fables than by certain Authority received others were by long disuse forgot and after they were thus established by Imperial Authority yet the succeeding Barbarity of the Ages and the new Kingdoms erected caused other Laws to obtain Force the first of which we find very rude All the first Laws we read of in any Nation seem either so comparatively to the refinedness of the Laws in these Ages or else the Digesters and Authorizers of them complain how obscure rude or indigested those were out of which they extracted theirs The great Subversion the Saxons made by their Conquest The Saxons made so great and universal a Subversion in the State that scarce any City Dwelling River Hill or Mountain retained its former Roman or British name so that we have less reason to expect any satisfactory account either of British History Polity or Laws when we only know where they had Camps Stations or Cities Palaces or Fortifications or Temples by the Coyns Brick tessellated Pavements Glass Earthen or Jett Fragments of Cups and other Houshold-stuff or Urns and Sacrificing Dishes which by chance have been found in the Rubbish of many Towns that have been certainly fired and totally demolished which sufficiently disâ—â—ver the noble Structures and rich Furniture the Romens and Britans had before the Saxon Invasions Besides which we may consider not only the continual Wars and Depredations the Saxons made one upon another but that the Daves like a fatal Hurricane or Whirlwind tore up Root and Branch every where overturning ransacking burning and destroying all that they could not peaceably possess Having thus far treated of the State of the Britans and something of the Laws in general A short Glossary of the Names or Titles of the Constituent Parts of Great Councils as a Praeliminary to the better understanding who are meant by the Persons who we find do constitute the great Councils I shall out of Sir Henry Spelman Somner and Doctor Brady give a very short Glossary referring the curious Reader to the Books themselves The most common Words in the Saxon Laws that are used besides the Bishops The Witan or Wites Einhard divides the Germans into four sorts of Degrees the Noble Free-men those made free and Servants his words are Quatuor differentiis gens illa consistiâ— Nobilium sâ—iliâ—et Liberorum Libertorum atque Servorum Adam Brem Hâ—â—t Eccles c. 5. to express the Persons
according to the Title the Knights Agelnodus Walfricus Sywardus Godricus To the third Charter (d) Id. 636. when he dedicated St. Peter's Church Anno 1066. there are these more added to the Lay-Nobility besides Osbern Peter and Robert the King's Chaplain who are placed next after the Chancellor As to King Edward's Laws and their Confirmation by the Conqueror and the Addâ—â—ions and Amendments see Dr. Brady fol. 254. Aâ—gum Aâ—tinorm 296 298 299. As to the â—arallel betwixt the Saxon and Norman Laws see his Preface to the Norman Story before the Dukes Gud Comes Marheâ—â—s Comes Radulphus Minister Agelnodus Minister and besides that Wulfric Syward and Godrich in the aforesaid Charter are called here Knights there are added Colo and Wulsward Knights and the Conclusion of all is Omnes consentientes subscripsimus So that here may be noted the use of the Subscriptions of the Noblemen to the King's Charters which then were only by the mark of a Cross and in after times by their Seals to those we call Acts of Parliament as hereafter will be shown Having thus treated of the General Councils and such like Conventions under the Saxon and Danish Kings I shall pass to the Norman Kings and so descending to the present Age show the constituent Parts of the great Councils and Parliaments and by what variety of Expressions in the gradual Progress of the respective Kings Reigns the Soveraigns enacting of Laws was exhibited only before I enter I cannot but take notice that Mr. Selden by what compliance I know not Ab his vix alios ante Saxones comperio Custodes sub eis varie partitos c. Explent numerum Rex Conâ—â—â—â—â—ularius Cancellarius Thesaurarius Angliae Aldermannus Aldermannus Provinâ—â—arum Gravii Janus Angl. p. 40. with the mode of his time calls those which we make constituent Parts of the great Councils of the Saxon times Custodes and saith he scarce meets with any of these Guardians of the Laws different from these Lawmakers Yet he brings no Representatives of the Commons for he makes them the King the Lord High-Constable the Chancellor the Treasurer the Alderman of England the Aldermen of Provinces and the Graves I cannot but wonder that he should not at least give some hint what difference there was betwixt the King and his Graeve in the point of Law-making Surely he knew the Constitution of the great Councils as well as any but being a Sitting Member in that long Parliament was in that Particular tainted per contagionem uvaque livorem deducet ab uva CHAP. XXV Of the great Councils of the Norman Kings 'till the end of the Reign of King John WHAT Changes William the Conqueror made in the Government how he brought in the Feudal Laws of Normandy and many other Alterations Doctor Brady hath proved at large in his Argumentum Anti-Normanicum and the Preface to his Complete History so that I shall touch very little upon that Subject The Conqueror saith the learned Sir (a) Praefâ—tio ad LL. Willielmi primi pag. 155. Edit Wheeloch Three things the Conqueror designed Roger Twysden having obtained the Kingdom by dint of Sword and knowing that no Empire is firmly established by Arms without Justice applied his mind to three things First That he might have a sufficient Military Force Secondly That he might gratifie his French and Norman Adventurers yet so as the English might not by over much severity be instigated to rebel And Thirdly That the Husbandmen might live as Servants and to perform the Drudgery but not to be wholly extirpated As to the First He disposed the Militia so as (b) Lib. 4. p. 523. About his Militia and Revenue Ordericus Vitalis tells us it was reported That he could expend 1600 l. and 30 s. three Half-pence Sterling Money every day besides the Presents Fines for remitting of Punishments upon Transgressions of the Laws and many other ways whereby his Treasury was encreased and he made the Kingdom be surveyed and all his Tributes or Revenues Piscos as in the time of King Edward he made be truly described His Lands he so distributed to his Soldiers Disposed the Lands in Military Service and disposed them so that in the Kingdom of England he had 60000 Horsemen which he could with great readiness call together therefore in the 58 Law ascribed to him and which is in the Red Book of the Exchequer it is thus expressed We (c) Statuimus etiam sirmiter praecipimus ut omnes liberi homines totius Regni nostri sint fratres cenjurati ad Monarchiâ—m nostram ad Regnum nostrum pro viribus suis facultatihus contra inimicos pro posse suo defendendum viriliter servandum Pacem Dignitatem Coronae nostrae integram observandâ—m judicium rectum justitiam constanter omnibus modis pro posse suo sine delatione â—aciendam Fol. 171. appoint and firmly command that all the Liberi Homines such as held in Military Service to whom he had distributed all the Lands of the English except what he kept in his own Possession as in all Authors that treat of such matters is most evident of his whole Kingdom should be sworn Brothers to defend and manfully preserve his Monarchy and the Kingdom according to their Power against all Enemies and keeping entire the Peace and Dignity of his Crown and for the executing of right Judgment and Justice constantly in all ways according to their Power without Deceit or Delay I have inserted this at large because it seems the Primary Law upon which his Government was established and it seemeth to me to be the Substance of the Oath of Fealty that all the Subjects which held in Capite were to take or that the same Oath was to the same ends and purpose This Law is said to be made in the City of London But without doubt it was much according to the (d) Monsieur Berault Custom Norman fol. 86. usage of Normandy established by Rollo and what had been practised by the Francks when they conquered the Gauls in the declining of the Roman Empire who distributed their Lands among their Soldiers to whom was reserved the Dignity of Gentlemen and the Management of Arms and the use of them taken from the Ancient Gauls who were called Roturiers and they were only permitted to manage the matters of Husbandry and Merchandice So the Conqueror gave to some of his Followers (e) Brady's Preface Norm History p. 159. whole Counties to some two or three or more Counties with a great Portion of Land to others Hundreds Mannors or Towns who parcelled them out to their Dependants and Friends 'till at last though the Saxons most frequently held their own Estates of those new Lords and by new Titles from them some Soldiers and ordinary Men had some proportionable Shares for their Services though upon hard Conditions possessing them for the most part as Feudatories Of the Feudal Law and
its Mitigation So Matt. Paris saith Episcopatus Abbatias omnes quae Baronias tenebant eatenus ab omni servitute sâ—â—ulari libertatem habuerant sub servitute statuit militarâ— and according to the Rules of the Feudal Law which as it was the Law for the most part in Normandy as to Possession and Tenure so was it in England until by the Indulgence of Usurpers as well as of lawful Sovereigns to the great Men and of them to their Tenents and Followers their Tenures became more easie and were changed into Inheritances both Free and Bond. So by Compact or Agreement betwixt kind and favourable as well as indigent Lords and serviceable Tenents as also by the Introduction of the use of the Canon or Imperial Law the Rigor of the Feudal Law was abated and received several Alterations and Amendments by flux of Time and especially by Acts of great Councils or Parliaments and the Necessities or Indulgence of Princes So that instead of more rigid Tenures the soft ones of Fee-simple in all its kinds by Deed or Feofment or inheritable and qualified Copyholds were introduced As to the second Particular concerning William the Conqueror's setling Laws for the equal Government Of the Conqueror's Laws both of the Normans and English I shall first give an account out of (f) Parte posteriori fol. 346. Hoveden what these were and how they were procured He saith That the Danish Laws being understood by the Conqueror to be used in Norfolk Suffolk and Cambridg-shire others (g) Chron. Liâ—â—f See for the Conqueror's Charter and Laws Dr. Brady fol. 17 252 254 258 298 249. add the Deirans and the Isles concerning Forfeitures he preferred them before the other Laws of the Kingdom and commanded they should be observed and gives the reason for it that his and the Ancestors of most of the Barons of Normandy were come from Norway therefore the Laws of the Danes ought to be preferred before those of the Britains viz. of the English and Picts Which saith my (h) Quo audito mox universi compatriota qui legâ—s edixerant tristâ—s essecâ—i unanimiter deprecati sunt quatenus permitâ—eret lâ—ges sibi prâ—prias consueâ—udines â—â—iqua halere Id. num 10. Hoveden fol. 347 num 1. Author being heard by the great Men of the Country who had as hereafter I shall show been appointed to revize the Laws they all were very sorrowful and unanimously intreated him that he would permit them to have the Laws proper to themselves and their ancient Customs under which their Fathers lived and they were born and bred under for that it would be very hard for them to receive unknown Laws and to judge of those things they understood not See Brady's Answer to Argum. Aâ—tiâ—oâ—â— p. 298 299. But finding the King unwilling to be drawn to consent they follow on their suit praying for the Soul of King Edward who bequeathed him his Crown and Kingdom whose Laws they were that they might not have the Laws of strange Nations imposed on them but he would grant them the Continuance of their Countries Laws To which intreaty of his Barons after Counsel taken my Author saith I cannot conceive but here were many of the Saxon Nobility and Men of best Account otherwise they could not call them the Laws their Fathers had lived under and the Normans could not then know much of our Laws or Speech but this was before he had subdued all fully he acquiesced and from that day the Laws of King Edward were of great Authority and Esteem throughout England and were confirmed and observed before other Laws of the Country Our Author further notes That these were not the proper Laws of King Edward but of Edgar his Grandfather which had been little observed for 68 years as in one place and 48 years in another he saith by reason of the Danish Invasions c. and being revived repaired and confirmed by King Edward were called his Laws The Account the Chronicle (i) Anglos Nobiles Sapientes suaâ—â—ge eruditos Id. fol. 348. Spelm. Concil tom 1. fol. 619. of Lichfield gives is this That King William in the fourth year of his Reign at London by the Counsel of his Barons made to be summoned through all the Counties of England all the Noble Wisemen and such as were skilled in their Law that he might hear their Laws and Customs and then gives an account how he approved of the Danish Laws used in Norfolk c. Concerning the Kindness the Conqueror pretended in his first four Years and his Rigour after see at large Dr. Brady in his Answer to the Argumentum Antinormanicum especially p. 260. and 299. But afterwards at the Intreaty of the Community of the English he yielded to grant them King Edward's Laws Before I proceed any further I cannot but note that what Hoveden calls Compatriotae here is called Communitas Anglorum and in both of them afterwards it is called Concilio Baronum by which we may know who these Compatriotae and this Communitas were viz. the Barons or great Men. Our Author proceeds That by the King's Precept out of every County of England Twelve Wisemen were chosen who were enjoyned an Oath before the King that according to their utmost they should discover the establishments of their Laws and Customs (k) Vt quoad possent recto tramite incedentes nec ad dextram nec ad sinistram divertentes nihil addentes nihil praevarieando mutantes Omnia quae praedicti â—urati dixerunt going in a strait Path neither declining to the right or left Hand omitting adding or prevaricating nothing and Aldred Archbishop of York who crowned King William and Hugh Bishop of London by the King's command writ the Laws which the said sworn Persons did produce But it is to be noted that this Chronicle of Lichfield is of a later Date than other Writers and the Laws in it differ from those in Ingulphus The next Testimony is that of (l) Circa sinem Hist fol. 519. num 36. Leges aquiâ—â—mi Regis Edwardi quas Dom. meus inclitus Rex W. authenticas esse perpetuas c. proclamarat Ingulphus who tells us That he brought from London to his Monastery i.e. Croyland the Laws of the most just King Edward which his Lord the famous King VVilliam willed to be Authentic and Perpetual and had proclaimed under the severest Penalties to be inviolably kept through the whole Kingdom of England and commended them to his Justiciaries in the same Language they were set forth in c. of which I shall say something below The Author of Jus Anglorum ab Antiquo and the Argumentum Anti-Normanicum and Mr. Petyt in his Rights of the Commons asserted have writ largely to prove That the Conqueror made little Innovation in our Laws and on the contrary the profoundly learned (m) Answer to Petyt p. 14. Great Officers Normans Doctor Brady hath from undeniable Records
ought to be made to him from all I shall not with Mr. Prynne in his Epistle Dedicatory to his third Tome of Chronological Vindication meddle with the dispute how the Canonists argue from the Popes Crowning of Emperors and Kings that they acquire a Spiritual and Temporal Monarchy over them as their Sovereign Lords For that however some may hold the Doctrine yet it is exploded by most As to the Crowning and Anointing of some British and Saxon Kings I must refer the Reader to Mr. Selden (k) Tit. Hon. part 1. c. 8. fol. 149. and Mr. Prynne in the forecited Epistle The first of our Kings that is recorded in History to have taken an Oath at his Coronation was Canâ—tus of whom Sim. (l) De Gestis Regum Agg. col 173. Wigorn. Chro. 384. Dunelmensis and others give this account That after the death of Aethelred the Bishops Abbats Dukes and the Nobles of England and the most part of the men of the Kingdom as well of the Clergy as Laity met together with one consent at Southampton and chose Canutus for their King and swore Fealty to him to whom he also swore Quibus ille juravit quod secundum Deum secundum seculum fidelis esse vellet eis Dominus King Canutus his Oath that according to God and the World that is the Laws of God and the Kingdom he would be a faithful Lord unto them Mr. Prynne here noâ—es that Usurpers more frequently used to take such Oaths than lawful hereditary Kings So when the Citizens of London and some few Noblemen with unanimous consent chose (m) Clitonem Eadmundum unanimo consensu in Regâ—m levavere Matt. Westm p. 410. 411. Edmond called Ironside the eldest Son of Aethelred who was right Heir there is no mention of an Oath So when Harold reputed Son of Cnute was Crowned there is no Oath recorded nor of any taken by Hardicnute right Heir of Cnute So Anno 1041. (n) Flor. Wigorn. Chro. p. 404. Edward the Confessor 's Oath Edward the Confessor annuente Cleno Populo Londoniis in Regem eligitur and was Crowned Anointed and Consecrated yet not any of our Historians besides William of Malmsbury de gestis Regum Lib. 2. c. 13. p. 80. speaks of an Oath who saith that he being sent for by the Nobles upon terms proposed to him by Earl Godwyn there was (o) Nihil erat quod Edwardus pro necessilate temporis non polliceretur Ita utrinque fide datae quicquid petebatur sacramento sirmavit nothing that King Edward did not promise by reason of the necessity of the time so that Faith was given by either Party and what was desired he confirmed by Oath but this was in their private Consultation Yet Archbishop (p) In Regem Angliae sublimatus prius juravit se Leges Canuti inviolabiliter servaturum Spelm. Conc. tom 2. p. 342. Stratford in his Epistle to King Edward the First saith that St. Edward being raised to be King of England first Swore inviolably to keep the Laws of Canutus We find no Coronation Oath of Harold mentioned Matt. Westm Flor. Hist p. 433 saith that extorta fide a Majoribus Capiti proprio imposuit Diadema that having exacted Fealty of the great Men he put the Crown on his own Head and after when Crowned by Archbishop Alfred William the Conqueror 's Oath he took no Coronation Oath but as my Author saith Leges aequas coepit condere (r) Elo. Wigorn. Chro. p. 412. Hoveden part Annal. prior p. 450. Stubs Acta Pontif. col 1702. Coram Clero Populo jurando promittere se velle sanctas Ecclesias Rectores earum defendere necnon cunctum populum sibi subjectum justa Regali providentia regere rectam Legem statuere tenere Rapinas injustaque judicia penitus amovere interdicere Sim. Dunelm col 195. num 43. As to King q William the Conqueror Aldred Archbishop of York Crowned him and imposed on him an Oath The words of the Authors are Ipsa nativitatis die ab Aldredo Ebor. Archiepiscopo apud Westmon in Regem totius Angliae sublimiter Coronâ—um inunxit consecravit honorifice Having before as 〈◊〉 Archbishop required from him before the Altar of St. Peter the Apostle before the Clergy and People by Oath promised That he would defend Holy Church and the Governours of it which Clause occurs not before and likewise govern all the People subjected to him with a Just and Regal Providence and appoint and hold right Law and wholly remove and interdict all Rapines and unjust Judgments The Oath which he took to observe St. Edward's Laws was afterwards Anno 1072. when he entring into a Parly with the English Nobility who intended to have set up Edgar Atheling because King William had violated their ancient Laws and introduced new ones he by the Advice of Archbishop (r) Man Paris vita Fritherici Abbatis 13. St. Albani p. 30. Lanfrank Swore that bonas antiquas Leges Regni sc Leges quas Sancti pii Angliae Reges maxime Rex Edwardus statuit inviolabiliter observare Only William of Malmsbury (s) Modeste erga subjectos ageret aequo jurâ— Anglos quo Francos tractaret De Gestis Pontif. lib. 3. fol. 154. saith that Aldred the Archbishop would not consecrate him before he had exacted from him before all the People this Oath That he would modestly deport himself towards all his Subjects and with an equal Law treat the English as he did the French William Rufus promised to Lanfranck (t) Justitiam aequitatem misericordiam se per totum Regnum si Rex foret in omni negotio servaturum pace libertatem securitatem Ecclesiae contra omnes defensurum Eadmerus Hist Novel lib. 1. p. 13 14. If he were King King William Rufus's Oath in all his Affairs through all his Kingdom to preserve Justice Equity and Mercy and to defend the Liberty and Security of the Church in Peace against all H. Huntingdon Lib. 7. fol. 213. b. and Hoveden Anno 1088. fol. 264. b. say That when he needed the help of the English he promised them such desirable Laws or better than they would chuse But Malmsbury and others say he kept them not for Usurpers such as he was rarely observe the Laws or their Promises further than they serve their own Interest Therefore Mr. Prynne notes that the Promise Eadmerus and (u) Col. 214. Simeom Dunelm mention was before he was King and the other Promise was when most of the Norman Nobility except the Archbishop Lanfranck designed to make Robert his Brother King and then he called them together and then told them If they would be Faithful to him (w) R. Hoveden part 1. Annal. p. 264. b. num 20. Meliorem Legem quam vellent eligere eis concederet omne injustum Scottum interdixit (x) Lib. 7. fol. 213. b. Huntingdon saith the promised
Earls Barons Great Men and the whole body of the Tenents in Capite expressed by those words in the former Questions Clergy and People for by them these demands were made and no doubt they would first ask for themselves for the Vulgar or Rabble could not come near to make their Demands at such a Solemnity as this was so (y) Walsingham fol. 95. num 20. great and splendid there being at it Charles and Lewis Earls of Clermont two of the King of France's Brothers the D. of Brabant the Earl of Fens and the other great Men both of France and England with the Countess of Artois Whoever desires further satisfaction may consult the same learned (z) Elossary p. 24. Author who makes it clear That the word Plebs Vulgus Populus in the Writers of that Age was used for the Laity in way of contradistinction from the Clergy I shall at present leave this and note that for any thing appears to the contrary the same Interrogations Oath c. presented to Edward the Second and Third without the additions of King Richard's continued without any alteration to Henry the Eighth's (a) Book of Oaths fol. 1. time and in that we find the King promiseth he shall keep and maintain the Liberties of the Holy Church of old time granted by their Righteous Kings of England The Oath of King Henry the Eighth I find in the Heralds Office the words thus Do ye grant the rightful Laws and Cusioms to be holden and permit ye after your Strength and Power such Laws as to the Honour of God shall be chosen to the People by you to be strengthned and desensed Vid in Coll. Arm. p. 60. and that he shall keep all the Lands Honours and Dignities righteous and free of the Church of England in all manner Holy without any manner of minishments and the rights of the Crown hurt decay or loss to his Power shall call again into the ancient estate and that he shall keep the Peace of Holy Church and of the Clergy and of the People with good accord and that he shall do in his Judgment Equity and right Justice with Discretion and Mercy and that he shall grant to hold the Laws and Customs of the Realm and to his Power keep them and affirm them which the People and Flock have chosen and the evil Laws and Customs wholly to put out and stedfast and stable Peace to the People of this Realm keep and cause to be kept to his Power In this Oath King Henry the Eighth interlined for the right explication of it instead of People and Flock these Words which the Nobles and People have chosen with my Consent The Oath of King Edward the Sixth Oath of Edward the Sixth so far as relates to my purpose was this Do you grant to make no new Laws but such as shall be to the honour and glory of God and to the good of the Commonwealth and that the same shall be made by the consent of the People as hath been accustomed Oaths of Queen Mary and Queen Elizabeth not seen by the Author The Oaths of King James the First and King Charles the First The Oath of King Charles the Second Hist Coronationis Caroli 2. in Colleg. Arm. I have not seen any Transcripts of the Oaths of Queen Mary or Queen Elizabeth those which King James and King Charles the First took run thus Will you grant to hold and keep the Laws and Rightful Customs which the Commonalty of this Kingdom have and will you defend and uphold them to the Honour of God so much as in you lyeth That Branch of the Oath which relates to my purpose taken by King Charles the Second runs thus Sir Will you grant to keep the rightful Customs which the Commonalty of your Kingdom have c. The Oath that our present King James the Second took at his Coronation The Oath of King James the Second was in the same Words as that of his Royal Brother wherein the Word Customs is to be taken in the largest extent to include Laws also Now upon the whole we must consider First Considerations upon this Discourse of the Coronation Oaths That in the Eye of the Law the King never dyes so that he is King before any Solemnity of Coronation Secondly The variety of Forms and Precedents seem to prove that one precise form is not simply necessary so the interlining of Henry the Eighth upon Record also shews And if it had been of consequence to have retained the old form we should have heard of it either then or in some succeeding Parliaments Lastly it cannot be denied that if the King be bound by a lawful Oath to pass all Bills it is not the form of denying it but the not doing of it which makes the Perjury And so when the King is tender of a flat denial and attributing so much to the judgment of his great Council that he only useth the words avisera it would be a strange Doctrine that all the Kings of England who have given this Answer have been forsworn and neither Parliament nor Convocation taken notice of it in so many Ages But when by dint of Argument the Parliament Champions were driven from these Holds they fled to their last Burrow So one of them confesses that in Acts of Grace the King is not bound to assent nor in Acts wherein he is to depart from the particular right and interest of his Crown and lastly that if he do not consent however bound by Oath yet they are not binding Laws to the Subject How the Long Parliament Writers would have the King part with his Prerogative in Cases of necessity only But then comes the handful of Gourds which spoils the Pottage Except in cases of necessity If the safety of the People be concerned If it may prove dangerous or inconvenient to them then an extraordinary course may be taken This was the plausible Plea of 1641. to get the Militia into their hands for they urged that in case of apparent and imminent danger the Peoples safety was not to be neglected They might not be exposed as a prey to their Enemies therefore must be put into a posture of defence This was grateful to the People out of that real love they bare to themselves they must favour that side which pretends to take care of their safety Give to any Person or Society a Legislative Power without the King in case of necessity (b) Answer to Observ b. 76. permit them withal to be sole Judges of necessity when it is and how long it lasts and then it is more than probable the necessity will not determine till they have their utmost desires which is the same in effect as if they had the Legislative Power Further it must be considered that necessity upon that supposition must be very evident there needs no such great stir who shall be Judge of it when it comes indeed it
the Kings Lieutenants in England as the Lords Justices were sometimes I suppose in Ireland before (t) Coram quibus non alibi nisi coram semetipso Concilio suo vel Aâ—ditoribus specialibus falsa Judicia Errores Justiciariorum reâ—ertuntur corriguntur whom and no where else unless before the King himself and his Council or special Commissioners false Judgments and Errors of Justices are reversed and corrected and there are determined Breeves of Appeals and other Breeves upon Criminal Actions and Injuries against the Peace of the King And Bracton saith That in Criminal Matters if they touched the King's Person as Treason they were tried coram Rege if concerning private matters then before the Justices only By many Records it appears The Kings of England used to fit in this Court that the King sometimes sate in this Court and that sometimes the King ordered it to follow his Court as particularly in 28 E. 1. (u) Cap. 5. it was established in the Statute of Articuli super Chartas Robert de Bruis was the first Capitalis Justiciarius ad placita coram Rege 8 March (w) Pat. 52. H. 3. m. 24. 52 H. 3. the Title of Justiciarius Angliae of whose great Power the learned (x) Glossary Spelman and (y) Sacred Laws Sir Henry Spelman about the Office of the Chief-Justice of England Mr. White have given an account having an end in Phillip Basset who was advanced to that place 45 H. 3. Who desires further satisfaction may consult Mr. Crompton's Jurisdiction des Courts c. 4. Sir Ed. Coke Sir William Dugdale Mr. Prynne and the Authors they cite who are many and learned and do at large treat of its Jurisdiction and the Practice in it which are foreign to my Design SECT 4. The Court of Common-Pleas The Common-Pleas THis Court of Common-Pleas appears to be as antient as Henry the First 's time for in his Charter to the (z) Coke's Reports part 8. Abbat of B. he grants Connusance of all Pleas so that neither the Justices of the one Bench or of the other or Justices of Assize should meddle Bracton (a) Cognoscunt de omnibus Placitis de quibus Authoritatem habent cognoscendi sine Warranto Jurisdictionem non habent nec Coercionem Lib. 3. c. 10. fol. 105 b. saith This Court had Cognizance of all Pleas of which Authority is given them without warrant they neither having Jurisdiction or Coercion Therefore Sir Edward Coke saith That regularly this Court cannot hold any Common-Plea in any Action real personal or mixt but by Writ out of Chancery returnable in this Court This Court proper for Pleas betwixt Party and Party Those that treat of this Court agree That it was for hearing and determining all Controversies in matters Civil betwixt Party and Party called the Common-Pleas as contradistinct from Pleas of the Crown and was anciently kept in the Kings own Palace Not to follow the King 's Court. In Magna Charta it is granted That the Common-Pleas shall not follow the Kings Court but shall be held in a certain place The Exchequer having been the place where these Causes were heard till (b) Articuli super Chartas cap. 4. 28 E. 1. that by Statute it was provided that no Common-Plea shall from henceforth be held in the Exchequer contrary to the form of the Great Charter The first who had the Appellation of Capitalis Justiciarius in this Court according to Sir William Dugdale was Gilbert de Preston who by that Title had his Livery of Robes (c) Liberat. 1 E. 1. m. 4. 1 E. 1. The number of the Justices (d) See Sir William Dugdale's Origines Juridiciales p. 39 b. The number of the Justices varied 3 E. 2. were Six 14 E. 3. they were Nine the latter end of Henry the Fourth and all the Reign of Henry the Seventh they were but Four Those that would be satisfied about the Jurisdiction of this Court may have recourse to Mr. Richard Crompton's Jurisdiction of Courts c. 7. fol. 91. the Year-Book quoted in Ash his Promptuary Sir Henry Spelman's Glossary tit Bancus Capitalis Justiciar de Banco Communi p. 417. Sir W. Dugdale's Origines Juridiciales Prynne's Animadversion p. 52. and many other good Authors cited by them SECT 5. Court of Chancery THE Court of Chancery in some Writers is placed the first Coâ—rt of Chancery in others as I have placed it Although it is true what Sir Edward (e) Sir Edw. Coke's Arguments for the Antiquity of the Chancery Coke saith That Kings had their Chancellors in the Saxon times indeed he adds the Brittish also of which little can be known yet I dare not avouch with him that the Court of Chancery was then as now the only Court out of which Original Writs do issue it is true that to the Charter of King (f) Spehran Tom. 1. Concil p. 631. Edward the Confessor maâ—e to the Abbat of Westminster amongst the Witnesses it is said Ego Swardus (g) Swyerg trius in Spelman Notarius ad vicem Reynbaldi Regiae dignitatis Cancellarii hanc cartam scripsi subscripsi So (h) Glossary fol. 106. Adulph is accounted Chancellor to King Edgar and Tâ—rketil to King Edred and King Edmund and Wolsine to King Athelstan and that the Chancellor had a Court may be presumed from what is found in the Book of Ely writ as it is supposed about King Stephen's time that King Aethelred who Reigned about Anno 978. appointed and granted Answer Canceliarius qui vel Regum praecepta aut Acta Judicum scribit Spelm. Gloss fol. 104. that the Ch. of Ely then and ever after in the Kings Court should have the dignity of the Chancery which albeit as Sir Edward Coke saith it was void in Law to grant the Chancellourship of England in Succession yet it proveth that then there was a Court of Chancery As to the first it is apparent that the Chancellor then had the power of composing the Charters and before Seals were in use might also subscribe with the Sign of the Cross as other of the Kings Officers did but this doth not prove what kind of Court he was made Judge of for there the Notary in the Chancellors room signs last and in the (i) Tom. 1. p. 486. Councils of Sir Henry Spelman's Edition I find Adulph stiled Herefordensis (k) Id. p. 489. Ecclesiae Catascapus signing last of the Abbats See Spelman Glossar p. 106. As to the Book of Ely I know not how to understand that the Church should have any dignity of Chancellorship in the Kings Court and if it be meant of the Bishop of that See only it might possibly be meant to be the principal Chirographer or drawer of the Kings Charters As to what is found in the Mirror it is of no great validity being writ according to the then custom of the Age wherein the Author
and Laity met it seemed most profitable that love and mutual benevolence through his whole Dominion should be cherished for it was (q) Et us eallum tha unribtlican menigfealdan gefrohâ—e the betwux us svlsum syndon irksom to them all that there should be unjust fighting among Christians and begins the Seventh Law thus It is the part (r) Witan seylon faeb the settan of the prudent to extinguish Capital Enmities For the better preservation of Peace King Aethelred appointed that every (s) That aele sreoman getreowne borb bebbe Freeman have sureties that if he be called in question for any Crime these Sureties may do justice to each one that is satisfie for the offender the Title of which is Be Borgum In the Law the duty of these Sureties is described at large and it appears by other Laws in after times that Nine Men were bound for every Tenth Man Whoever desires further satisfaction in this particular may consult the 19th Law of Canutus wherein he appoints (t) Et we willath that aele freoman beo on hundrede on Teothung gebrobt viz. the Tything security that every Free-man enter himself into an Hundred or into the Collegueship of the Ten. In other matters of preserving Peace they may consult the Second the Eighth and Twelfth Laws of the same Canutus the which Eighth Law is thus expressed Peace is so to be considered as that nothing can be more desirable that it to the Inhabitants and nothing more contrarily is offensive as Thieves which in the Saxon is thus Swa ymbe frythesbote Swathan bundan si selost tham Theoffon sy lathost swa ymb Heosbote Having met with a passage in the Laws of King (u) LL. Aethelstani fol. 53. Ethelstan which both illustrates the Care of the King to have the Peace preserved and likewise shews the readiness according to their duty of the Subjects to assist the King with their Persons and Estates I thought it not amiss to insert it as a Close to this Chapter and an Introduction to the next The words as to be rendred from the Saxon and the Latin Version of Mr. Lambard run thus I Aethelstan King do to all clearly signifie Cyth that I have diligently enquired the Cause wherefore our (w) Vre sryth is wyrs gehealden thonâ—e we lyst Peace was not kept as I desired and at Grantelee it was appointed and I received this Answer from (a) Et mine witan seigâ—h my Wise Men that it happened by my (b) That le hit to long forboren baebbe forbearance i.e. too much lenity in not punishing now of late when I staid at Exceter in the (c) Middum wintre Feast of the Nativity of our Lord attended by my Wise Men I found (d) â—t tha ealle syn 〈◊〉 mid bire sylfum midyfre which I signifying Heritage and though mis-placed in Lambard is by him translated Children mid wife mideallum thingum by Lâ—mbard translated properly all their Fortunes to faerenne thider thider le thonne will them â— most ready themselves with their Heirs with their Wives and all their Estates to go thither whither I will and will purge out or expel those Outlaws i. e. breakers of the Peace that are against this in such order or with such wisdom and consideration that they never after come on the Earth again i.e. that they be banished The Saxon of the latter part is thus Bretan hi offer this geswican willan on tha gerade the heo naefre aest on sorda ne cumen which Mr. Lambard translates thus Vt isti tandem pacis violatores Regno hand unquam redituri pellerentur Then it further is added And if these Men (e) And gif hi mon afre afâ— on thaem eorda gemit that hi syn swa seildig swa se the at hebbendra banda gefougen syn hereafter in these Lands be met with or found that they shall be so guilty as they are that are found hand having that is Stealing which Mr. Lambard renders Ac si eorum aliquis postea in Regno deprehenderetur pariter ac qui est in furto manifeste deprehensus plecteretur From all which we may observe That the Counsel of the Witan Nobles and Wise Men was at one of the times the King kept them in course viz. at Christmas called here Mid-winter Secondly That the King asks the Members of the Council their advice Thirdly They tell him that it happened that his Peace was not kept because of his forbearance in not putting the Laws in Execution that were established at Grantelee From whence we may observe that the King was to put these in Execution and that his Remisness Clemency or Indulgence increased the numbers of the breakers of the Peace Fourthly That for the suppressing of these breakers of the Peace the Nobles who met in Council at Exceter promiâ—e they will be in readiness provided themselves and their whoâ—e Families and all things they have to faerenne that is from faer to go forth in Expedition Armed as the King will appoint the signification of which word I have found in several Letters about the Wars betwixt England and Scotland in Henry the Eighth's and Edward the Sixth's time where when any considerable party of the Scots made an inrode into England to seize upon Men burn Towns or Houses or carry away Cattel it was called running a Forray Fifthly We may note that this shews that the Militia of the Subjects was at the Kings disposal to go whither then the King will which saves me a labour in the following Chapter to deduce the Kings Power over the Militia higher though I doubt not but a little looking into the Saxon Laws would afford me more Precedents as the Fifty ninth Law of William the (f) Statuimus etiam sirmiter praecipimus ut omnes liberi homines totius Regni noslri praedicli sint fratres conjurati ad Monarchiam nostram ad Regnum nostrum pro viribus suis facultatibus contra inimicos pro posse suo defendendum viriliter servandum Facem Dignitatem Coronae noslrae integram observandam ad Judicium rectum Justiciam constanter omnibus modis pro posse suo sine dolo sine dilatiene faciendam LL. Gul. 1. 59. fol. 171. Edit Wheeloch Conqueror doth expresly as before I have touched on another occasion but here think fit to recite it at length viz. The King appoints and firmly commands all the Free-men of his Kingdom that they be sworn Brothers to their Power to defend and manfully to keep his Monarchy and his Kingdom according to their might and Estates against Enemies and to observe or maintain the Peace and Dignity of his Crown entire and without delay without deceit to do right Judgment and Justice constantly all manner of ways according to their Power So that here we find these liberi Homines Conservators of the Peace also which I suppose was incumbent on them as well as
Parliament of England knew they had no Power to make such an Act and we may conclude That such Politick and Temporary provisions find no approbation either by the Laws or succeeding ages who in all such cases judge more impartially therefore it is much more honourable for the Legislative Power to found their Laws upon Justice and Right rather than upon the humours and Interests of those who desire but the shadow of a Law to countenance their designs It must be owned that King Edward the Second was deposed The Injustice in deposing Kings for making use of Gaveston and the Spencers But how illegally all succeeding ages have acknowledged and it rather shews how extravagant the People and their Representatives are in their humors than how just their Powers are For by the same parity of Reason the horrid Murther of the blessed Martyr or the Murther of Edward the Second may be justified as his deposing may be and the like may be said of King Richard the Second against whom the Fourteenth Article was that he refused to allow the Laws made in Parliament which had been in effect to consent that the two Houses should have been the Soveraign and that he had transferred the Royal Power on them Whoever desires further satisfaction may consult Arnisaeus in that Treatise Quod nulla ex causa subditis fas sit contra legitimum Principem arma sumere Whereas Richard Duke of York in Henry the Sixth's time after he had been declared Heir Apparent was by another Act of Parliament declared uncapable of Succession all that can be inferred from it is When Acts of Parliament to be less esteemed That Acts of Parliament when they are bottomed upon private affections to Parties in times of Faction and civil War are not to be looked upon with that veneration as when they regularly pass in times that are calm when no potent Persons oppress Justice or usurping Powers hinder faithful Judges from expounding the Laws soundly Therefore we find in the claim of the said Duke of York that it is more consentaneously to Law expressed That no Act taketh place or is of force against him that is right inheritor of the Crown as accordeth saith the Record with Gods Laws and all natural Laws and we may observe that though there was a Succession of three Kings of the House of Lancaster who had usurped the Crown for Sixty Years yet all our Historians and the Laws call those Kings de facto and not de jure Such a true sence of just and right the uninterested Ages have had of that Usurpation ever since although there were Acts of Parliament carefully penned to corroborate â—he Title of the house of Lancaster during that time and all ways and means used to have established that Line yet by vertue of the Right of Lineal Succession Edward the Fourth Son to the said Duke of York came to be owned lawful King of England though the Right of his Family had been interrupted ever since Henry the Fourth usurped the Crown which might have been a sufficient document to all Ages not to have attempted any sort of praeterition of the Right Heir Yet we find that unsuccessful attempts were made by H. 8. contrary to the fundamentals of Succession which when rightly considered I hope will convince all of how little validity even such Acts are to be reputed Therefore because these have been made use of for Precedents I shall speak a little more fully to them In the 25 of H. 8. (f) Cap. 22. the Marriage with Queen Katherine is made void Concerning the several Entailings of the Crown by King Henry the Eighth and that with Queen Anne's declared good and an Entail made on the Issue Male or Female and the Penalty for hurting the Kings Person disturbing his Title to the Crown or slandering the present Marriage is judged High Treason and Anno 26. (g) Cap. 2. a strict Oath is injoyned to observe the Succession there appointed But 28 H. 8. (h) Cap. 7. it is declared that the former Act was made upon a pure perfect and clear foundation thinking the Marriage then had between his Majesty and the Lady Anne they are the words of the Act in their Consciences to have been pure sincere and perfect and good c. till now of late that it appeareth that the said Marriage was never good or consonant to the Laws but utterly void and of none effect and so both the Marriage with the Princess Katherine and the Lady Anne are declared void and their Issue made illegitimate and the perils are enumerated that might ensue to the Realm for want of a declared lawful Successor to the Crown and the Act impowers the King if he dye without Issue of his body that he may limit the Crown to any by his Letters Patents or his last Will in Writing and it is declared Treason to declare either of the Marriages to be good or to call the Lady Mary or Lady Elizabeth Legitimate and the former Oath is made void and this may be judged to be procured when he resolved to settle the Crown on Henry Fitz Roy Duke of Richmond his natural Son But after the Birth of Prince Edward 38 H. 8. (i) Cap. 1. another alteration is made whereby the Crown is entailed on Prince Edward and for want of his Issue on the Lady Mary and for want of her Issue on the Lady Elizabeth and for want of Issue of the King or them then the King is impowered by his Letters Patents or last Will to dispose of the Crown at his free will It is therefore to be considered that in such a juncture of affairs when the legality of the Kings Marriages were so disputable by reason that two of the legal Successors upon niceties not of nature but of the Popes 〈◊〉 for Divorcing were declared Bastards there was some â—eason (k) 25 H. 8. c. 22. that the Act should express that the Ambiguity of several Titles pretended to the Crown then not perfectly declared but that men might expound them to every ones sinister affection and sence contrary to the right legality of Succession and Posterity of the lawful Kings and Emperours of the Realm hath been the cause of that great effusion and destruction of mens blood and the like cause will produce the like effect as the words are Upon such grounds it was very plausible to declare by Act of Parliament the Succession But this does not prove that where the Right of nature is clear that the Parliament may invert the same and they teach us how dangerous it is to leave Parliaments to the Impression of Kings when it is too obvious the first of these Laws was made to gratifie the Kings affection to Queen Anne in the case of naming a Successor as it is also to expose Kings to the Arbitrariness of Parliaments And we may well infer H. 8. taking such care by his Parliaments to legitimate and illegitimate his
without citing or hearing them For if they had such Power we should be the greatest Slaves and live under the most arbitrary Government imaginable Therefore an absolute Prince cannot in an Hereditary Kingdom where the Successor is to succeed Jure Regni (z) Nulla clausula Successori Jus auferri potest modo succedat ille Jure Regni Aristaeus c. 7. num 5. prejudge the Successors right of Succession for the same right the present King hath to the Possession the next of Blood hath to the Succession Therefore Hottoman Lib. 2. de Regno Galliae affirms That ea quae Jure Regni primogenito competunt ne Testamento quidem Patris adimi possunt That in the absolute Monarchy of France The Father cannot by his last Will deprive the First-born of those things which belong to him by Royal right So when the King of France designed to break the Salique Law of Succession as in the Reign of Charles the Fifth it was found impracticable by the three States So when Pyrrhus would have preferred his younger Son to the Crown (a) Pausanias lib. 1. the Epirots following the Law of Nations and then own refused him So Anno 1649. when Amurat the Grand Signior left the Empire to Han the Tartarian passing his Brother Ibrahim the whole Officers of State did unanimously cancel the Testament and restored Ibrahim the true Heir though no other than a Fool. So if Kings could have inverted their Succession Saint Lewis had preferred his own Third Son to Lewis his Eldest and Alphonsus King of Leon in Spain had preferred his Daughter to Ferdinand his Eldest Son and Edward the Sixth of England had preferred and did actually prefer the Lady Jane Grey to his Sisters Mary and Elizabeth Thirdly It is undeniable in the opinion of all Lawyers That a King cannot in Law alienate his Crown but that the Deed is void nor can he in Law consent to an Act of Parliament declaring that he should be the last King For if such consents and Acts (b) Jus Regium p. 163. had been sufficient to bind Successors then weak Kings by their own simplicity and gentle Kings by the Rebellion of their Subjects or being wrought upon by the importunity of their Wives or Concubines or the mis-representation of Favourites might do great mischiefs to their People in raising up continual Factions of the miseries of which I shall speak hereafter This is owned in Subjects That the Honour and Nobility that is bestowed upon a man and his Heirs doth so necessarily descend upon those Heirs that the Father or Predecessor cannot exclude the Successor or derogate from his Right by renouncing resigning following base or mean Trades or such like For Fab. Cod. 9. tiâ— 28. say the Lawyers since he derives his Right from his old Progenitors and owes it not to his Father his Fathers Deed should not prejudge him so much more in Kings the ill consequences of such violations of Justice and Right being infinitely more destructive the Predecessor should not do any Act to prejudice his Successor For that right of blood which makes the Eldest First makes the other Second and all the Statutes that acknowledge the present Kings Prerogative acknowledge that they belong to him and his Heirs For as a Prince cannot even ex plenitudine potestatis legitimate a Bastard in prejudice of former Children though they have only but an hope of Succession much less can he bastardize or disinherit the Right Heir who is so made by God and honoured from him with the Character If therefore Kings how absolute soever cannot de jure invert the natural order of Succession there is no reason that the States of Parliament should have such a Power For by the known Laws they have no Legislative Power otherwise than by assenting to what the King does and all that their assent could do would be no more than that they and their Successors should not oppose his nomination because of their consent but that can never amount to a Power of transferring For if the States of Parliament had this Power originally in themselves to bestow why might they not reserve it for themselves and so perpetuate the Government in their own hands So Judge Jenkin asserts according to Law That no King can be named or in any time made in this Kingdom (d) Liberty of Subject p. 25. by the People Kings being before there were Parliaments and there is good reason for then the Monarchy should not be Hereditary but Elective the very Essence of Hereditary Monarchy consisting in the Right of Succession whereas if the Parliament can prefer the next save one they may prefer the last of all the Line and the same reason by which they can chuse a Successor which can only be that they have Power above him should likewise in the opinion of a very (e) Jus Regium p. 167. learned Person justify their deposing of Kings as we saw in the last Age that such reasons as of late have been urged to incapacitate the Children of King Charles the First from the hope of Succession viz. Popery and Arbitrary Government did embolden men to dethrone and murther the Father who was actual King For if it were once yielded that the Houses had a Right in themselves to take care for the Salus populi that none but such Princes should succeed who were approved of by the prevailing Faction in their body nothing but confusion would follow one Party having their Votes seconded by force one time and a quite contrary another yet all pretending the Publick Weal and so a large breach should be made by pretending to stop one dangerous Successor to the inflowing of successive Usurpers and thereby the Crown should not only by ambulatory but unstable upon every head that wore it and alwaies in danger of a bloody surprise till at last the Regalia being secured from the expectant Heir the Factious would find a way to pillage them from the present Soveraign and convert them into a Mace for an House of Commons I writ this Part with greater Enlargements in answer to the plausiblest Arguments for the Bill of Seclusion while that matter was in the hottest agitation But since there will be no need of dilating upon that Subject now that God Almighty hath so signally determined the Controversie by the peaceable settlement of his Majesty upon his Throne I shall close this Chapter with some few remarks of the miseries have been brought upon Kingdoms and especially upon this by the disjoynting the Succession So we read what dreadful (f) Jus Regium p. 166. mischiefs arose from Pelops preferring his younger Son to the Kingdom of Mycene The Miseries which Kingdoms have sustained where the Succession hath been interrupted from Oedipus commanding that Polynices his Youngest Son should reign interchangeably with the Eldest From Parisatis the Queen of Persia's preferring her Youngest Son Cyrus to her Eldest Artaxerxes From Aristodomus admitting
Nec aliud adversus validissimas Gentes pro nobis utilius quam quod in commune non consulunt Vita Agricolae p. 308. but divided into Multitudes of little Kingdoms which made Tacitus observe That there was nothing more profitable to the Romans against the most puissant and valiant Nations than that they advised not in common CHAP. XXII Of the Government of the Britans and the Romans imposing their Laws upon them Antiquity of English Customs CHancellor (a) Regnum illud eisdem quibus jam regitur consuetudinibus continue regulatum suit De laudibus LL. Angliae c. 17. Fortescue affirms That in all the times of the Britans Saxons Danes and Normans and of their Kings this Realm was ruled with the self same Customs that it is now governed withal which he saith if they had not been right good some of those Kings moved either with Justice with Reason or Affection would have changed them or else altogether have abolished them and especially the Romans who did judge all the rest of the World by their own Laws So Sir Edward Coke (b) Epistle to the sixth Book of Reports saith the common Law of England was here before the Entry of the Romans Saxons Danes and Normans and it was never altered by any of them and so he (c) Proem to 2. Instit fol. 1. and 2. Instit fol. 3. makes Magna Charta Declaratory of the principal Grounds of the fundamental Laws of England and for the residue that it is additional to supply some Defects of the Common Law and was no new Declaration So Sir John Davis in his Preface to the (d) Leges mâ—â—ibus receptâ—â— majoris sunt Autoritatis quam leges scriptae Arist Polit. lib. 3. c. 12. Irish Reports magnifies the Common Law as Jus non scriptum better than all the written Laws in the World excelling Parliament Laws which are written coming nearest to the Law of Nature which is the Root and Touchstone of all good Laws When I read these Assertions I think it had been incumbent upon these learned Men to have deduced as far as they could by History some Testimonies of Ancient Writers to have confirmed their Positions But in none of them do we find the least offer of a Proof for what they say I think it would be a very commendable Work and very pleasant to all ingenious Persons The Benefit to have our Common Laws and Customs ascertained and compared with all Ancient Laws if some of the Long Robe would digest into Heads that which is owned as the Common Law For though Sir John Davis calls it unwritten and which had its beginning beyond the Memory of any Man living and that a Custom tryed and approved time out of mind doth become a Law to bind the People yet nothing can hinder but whatever is preserved in the Memory of Men living and owned as custom may be committed to writing Now I would not only desire it might be so written and published but that some judicious Lawyer who was likewise well versed in History and Antiquities would search out for some parallel written Laws among the Graecians and Romans as also compare all the Saxon Laws we have the Laws of the Lombards Boiarian Ripuarian and other Laws and then I doubt not but they would acquire a greater Veneration in the World and it would be known whether the Opinions of the learned Chancellor and Lord Chief Justice were to be relied upon as to the Antiquity of them before the Roman time The Glory of his Profession and of our Nation as to that learning he was versed in which was not small I mean (e) Notes upon Fortescue p. 14. ad 22. Mr. Selden hath given the best Solution to this point of the Antiquity of our Customs and Common Law that I have yet met with which I shall abstract in as summary a way as I can First he saith The Opinion of the Antiquity of our Common Law before the Civil is founded upon the Story of Brute of which the Chancellor speaks in his Thirteenth Chapter and that Story supposing him to be here more than three Hundred Years before Rome was built makes the Chancellor conclude our Common Law so Ancient but supposing there were some Truth in that Fiction how can the Chancellor be certain that the same kind of Law and Policy hath ever since continued unless an Oral Tradition may here find as great respect as it hath with some in spiritual matters The Antiquity of all Laws Therefore with Mr. Selden we may judge all Laws in general originally to be equally Ancient as being grounded upon Nature every Nation taking the grounds of their Laws from it and Nature being the same in all the beginning of all Laws must be the same Even from the first Peopling of the Land when Men by Nature being civil and sociable Creatures grew to plant common Society and I may add when they being under the Government of a Prince received Laws by his Appointment extracted out of the Laws of Nature the Necessity of Government and the Conveniences of the People we may date National Laws Now though the Law of Nature be truly said to be immutable yet it 's as true that it 's limitable and the limited Law of Nature is that now used in every State for the divers Opinions of Interpreters proceeding from the weakness of Mans Reason and the several conveniences of divers States have made those different Limitations which the Law of Nature hath suffered It falls out that in several Nations they are so disguised by the various Modifyings and Repairs that as to their first being they are like (f) Vbi nihil ex pristina materia supersit Jason's Ship that had nothing of the old Materials remaining Therefore the learned Selden adds That little follows in point of Honour or Excellency specially to be attributed to the Laws of a Nation in general by any Argument drawn from the difference of Antiquity which in substance is alike in all for as soon as Italy was peopled this beginning of Laws was there and so when there was first a State in that Land which the Common Law now governs there were natural Laws limited for the Convenience of civil Society here Notwithstanding the Opinion of the (g) De laudibus LLâ— Angliae c. 17. Chancellor that neither the Roman Civil Laws nor the Laws of the Venetians which above all other he saith are reported to be of most Antiquity nor the Laws of any Paynim Nation of the World are of so old and antient Years as the Customs or Common-Law of England and that they have weathered out the changes and overthrow of People by the Romans Saxons Danes and Normans Yet I cannot believe but every of those Nations when they obtained the Power of Government introduced their own Laws and abolished what they found not agreeable to their own Politie As to the British Laws Whence to learn the
acquired a Soccage Tenure and Fee-simple Estate Therefore the foresaid (q) Praefat. Reger Twysden fol. 155. The English possess their Lands by â—avour not otherwise Hereditarily So Mut. Paris saith Commilitonibus terras Anglorum possessiones affluentiori manu contulit illud parvum quod remansâ—rat sub jugo posuit perpetuae servitutis Gervase of Tilbury concludes this Observation thus Sic igitur quisquis de gente subacta fundos vel aliquid hujusmodi possidet non quod ratione successionis debere sibi videatur adeptus est sed quod solummodo meritis suis exigentibus vel aliqua pactione interveniente obtinuit viz. So every one of the conquered Nation possest their Lands or any thing else not that he should seem to get it by way of Succession but by his deserts or by some Compact or Covenant made with his Lord as it must be understood The most industrious Doctor Brady having on purpose writ so much of this Argument in his Answer to the Argumentum Anti-Normanicum and out of so many Historians confirmed it in the Answer to the Appendix Brady p. 313.314 I must refer the Reader that desires satisfaction to his Book being loth to crowd those matters which are not directly to my purpose Only I cannot but note that the reason why we so often find the same Lands that have been granted by a Father for him and his Heirs required and had a Confirmation by the Son was because the Tenure was so fickle for want of Homage or Omission of Service whereby they might be forfeited I now proceed to the great Councils that I have found in the Reign of William the Conquerour and shall begin with that wherein the Laws I have spoken before of out of Hoveden were made which are agreed by all to be in the Fourth year of his Reign In general we find Gervase of Tilbury telling us The Conqueror makes written Laws That when the famous Subduer of England King William had subjected to his Empire the utmost parts of the Island and by terrible examples had brought to perfect obedience the Minds of Rebels that they might not have liberty to fall into the same errors for the future he (r) Decrevit subjectum sibi populum Juri scripto legibusque sabjicere Quasdam reprobavit quasdam autem approbans Transmariâ—â—s Neustriae leges quae ad Regni pâ—â—â—m tuendam efficâ—teissionae videbantur adjecit Gerv. Tilb. lib. 1. c. 29. resolved to govern the People subjected to him by written Right and Law therefore the English Law being propounded according to their threefold distinction that is the Mercian Law Dane Law and West-Saxon Law he rejected some and approved others and added such Transmarine Norman Laws as seemed most efficacious to defend the Peace of the Kingdom In this account we may observe That the King solely is said to reject and approve and to add such of the Norman Laws as he thought fit for securing the Peace of the Kingdom and the Ingenious Dr. Brady thinks the 52 55 56 58 59 62 63 64. are those Norman Laws intimated Concerning the Oath which Frederick Abbat of St. Albans administred to the King on the Holy Gospel and the Reliques of the Church of St. Albans whereby he swore That for the good of Peace he would observe the good and approved ancient Laws of the Kingdom which the pious Kings of England and especially King Edward had inviolably observed I must refer the Reader to (s) Fol. 48. num 20 30 40. Matthew Paris to understand the occasion of it and Dr. (t) Argum. Antinorm p. 261. Brady's Exposition or Commentary upon it and how little he observed it What the Laws were that King William the First confirmed Authors agree not about as may be seen by comparing (u) Fol. 343. Hoveden (w) Fol. 138 149 Knighton Collect. 2354. N. 61. Lambard of Wheelocks Edition and Spelman in the First Tome of his Councils Fol. 624. Selden (x) In Eadmerum fol. 172. num 20. in his Notes upon Eadmerus writes very suspiciously of all the Laws that are attributed to King Edward except the Crowland Copy judging neither Hoveden Knighton or the Author of the Lichfield Chronicle well versed in Law matters and who writ long after Ingulphus of whom he gives this Character Qui in hac re testium non tam facile Princeps merito dicendus est quam solus forsan cui ut par fit credamus The Title of the Laws properly ascribed to William the Conquerour The Title of the Conqueror's Laws are in the Latin thus (y) Ces sont le Leis les Custumes que le Reis William grantut tut le peuple de Engleterre â—pres le Conquest de la Terre Ice les meismes que le Reis Edward sun Câ—sin tent devant luy LL. W. fol. 159. Hae sunt leges consuetudines quas Will. Rex concessit universo Populo Angliae post subactam terram Eaedem sunt quas Edwardus Rex cognatus ejus observavit ante eum In English thus These are the Laws and Customs (z) LL. W. 1. p. 170. which William the King granted to all his People of England after the subduing of the Land They are the same which Edward the King his Kinsman before him observed In this Preface we have only to note that the Laws are expresly said to be the Kings Grant and the Supplemental Laws after the 50th which were found in the Croyland Copy being writ in the Red Book of (z) LL. W. 1. p. 170. the Exchequer are by way of Charter or Grant thus Will. Rex Anglorum c. omnibus hominibus suis Francis Anglis salutem and all along the Authoritative parts expressed by statuimus volumus interdicimus prohibemus praecipimus decretum est The Terms used by the Conqueror in Law-giving The expressions Authors use concerning his Laws whereby the absolute Soveraignty of the Conquerour in the point of Law-giving is manifested are to be found in all those who have writ of his Life I shall content my self with a few Ordericus (a) Fol. 853. Vitalis saith eamque i. e. England Gulielmus Rex suis Legibus commode subegit that he subdued or rather subjected England profitably to his Laws Eadmer (b) Hist Nov. fol. 6. num 10 20 30. Vsus atque leges quas patres sui ipse in Normannia solehant in Anglia scribâ—re volens Cuncta divina simul humana ejus nutum expectabant Edit Gal. de Moulins saith That King William designing to establish in England those Usages and Laws which his Ancestors and he observed in Normandy c. all Divine and Humane Things he ordered at his pleasure The Chronology of Rouen saith Leges quas in hunc diem Angli observant idiomate Normanico promulgavit The Laws which at this day the English observe he published in the Norman Language Mr. Camden saith (c) Britan. fol. 109. That
times appointed through England and by his writing and Seal confirmed to Bishops and Abbats Charters of Priviledges whose Charter runs thus Hen. c. Baronibus fidelibus suis Francis Anglis salutem Sciatis me ad Honorem Dei Sanctae Ecclesiae pro communi emendatione Regni mei concessisse reddidisse praesenti Charta mea confirmasse c. and so confirms the Charter of King Henry the First his Grand-father As to the Council of Clarendon about (b) Answer to Petyt fol. 31. ult Edit See Selden's Correction of Matt. Paris in his Epinomis Thomas Becket Archbishop of Canterbury after he had once promised and his after refusing to set to his Seal in Confirmation of the Ancient Laws I must refer the Reader to what Doctor Brady hath collected and shall only touch upon that of (c) Matt. Paris fol. 84. num 20. ult Edit Clarendon Anno 1164. 10 Hen. 2. where those present by the King's Mandate were the Archbishops Bishops Abbats Priors Earls Barons and Noblemen of the Kingdom and there was a Recognition of parts of the Customs and Liberties of King Henry the King's Grandfather and of other Kings which were comprised in sixteen Chapters Concerning the Laws of this King see Selden's Epinomis These Matthew Paris calls wicked Customs and Liberties because they subjected the Clergy-men more to the Crown than he and others would have had them yet he saith the Archbishops Bishops Abbats Priors Clergy with the Earls Barons and Nobility swore to them all Proceres and promised firmly in the word of Truth to hold and observe them to the King and his Heirs in good Faith and without Evil and then adds decrevit etiam Rex by which it appears that the Members of the Great Council did not only assent but did bind themselves by Oath and solemn Promise obligatory to themselves and their Posterity to keep and observe them and upon the whole it is the King that decrees appoints and constitutes In all the great Councils of this King it is manifest that the Members were only such as in former Kings Reigns only in that of the 22 H. 2. (d) Ben. Abb. p. 77. Anno Dom. 1176. it is said Rex congregatis in urbe Londoniarum Archipraesulibus Episcopis Comitibus Sapientioribus Regni sui where Sapientiores are instead of Barones and for the Kings Summons it is always said Rex convocat congregavit praecepit convenire or mandavit as is most expresly said in that great Council Anno 1177. 23 H. 2. (e) Ben. Abbas p. 86. That the King sent Messengers through the whole Isle of England and commanded the Archbishops Bishops Earls and Barons of all England that they should be with him at London the next Sunday after the beginning of Lent Of the Great Councils in King Richard the First 's time THere are few great Councils met withal in his short Reign he being so great a part of it out of the Kingdom The first I find is in (a) Fol. 129. num 16 Matthew Paris Anno 1189. 1 Reg. That in the day following the Exaltation of the Holy Cross at Pipewel Archiepiscoporum Episcoporum aliorum Magnatum suorum fretus Concilio He supplied the Vacances of several Bishops Sees The Second I find is (b) Hoved. fol. 376. a. num 30. when he and the King of France agreed to go to the Holy Land where it is said that his Earls and Barons who took the Crusado in the General Council at London swore c. of which it is that (c) Fol. 155. num 50. Matthew Paris saith That the King of England convocatis Episcopis Regni Proceribus received the Oath from the Messengers of the King of France In the Fifth of King Richard (d) Hoved. fol 418. b. num 20. we have a full Example of the holding a Great Council by Commission for during the Imprisonment of King Richard Adam de Sancto Edmundo Clerk was sent from Earl John the Kings Brother to his Friends in England to defend his Castles against the King and dined with Hubert Archbishop of Canterbury boasting much of the French Kings assisting Earl John After Dinner the Mayor of London seized on him in his Lodgings and upon all his Breves and Mandates who delivered them to the Archbishop This occasioned the Archbishop being the Kings Commissioner to convene a great Council the next day A Great Council called on a Days warning but surely Summons had issued out before or else it is a great Instance that the great Councils might be called of such of the Clergy and Nobility as were nearest at Hand for my Author expresly saith (e) Qui iâ— crastino convocatis coram co Episcopis Comitibus Baronibus Regni ostendit eis literas Comitis Johannis earum tenuras statim per commune concilium Regni desinitum est quod Comes Johannes dissaisiretur Idem That the Archbishop the next day called before him the Bishops Earls and Barons of the Kingdom and showed to them the Letters of Earl John and the Tenor of them and adds that instantly by the Common Council of the Kingdom it was defined that Earl John should be disseised This Adam saith Hoveden came into England not long before King Richard's release from his Imprisonment The next great (f) Idem 419. â— 30. A Great Council of four Days Council I find was upon the Thirtieth of March summoned to meet the King at Nottingham and at this were present Alienor the Kings Mother Hubert Archbishop of Canterbury Geoffery Archbishop of York and seven Bishops more Earl David brother to the King of Scots Hamelin Earl Warren Ralph Earl of Chester William Earl Ferrers William Earl of Salisbury and Roger Bigot and names no more but saith the same day the King disseized (g) Rex dissaisivit Gerardum de Canvil de Comitatu Linc. Hug. Bardolf de Castro Comitat. Ebor. Gerard de Canvil and others It appears that this Council sat but four days on the second day the King required Judgment against Earl John his Brother on the third day the King (h) Rex constituit sibi dari c. deinde praecepit exigit Concerning the Form of Proceeding in the Pleas of the Crown the Assize of the Forest wherein the Laws made in this King's time are set down see Selden's Epinomis appointed to be given him 2 s. of every Carucate of Land through England and that every one should perform the third part of Military Service according to their respective Knights Fees to pass over Sea with him into Normandy and then exacted of the Cestertian Monks all their Wool of that year for which they compounded and the fourth and last day Complaints were heard against the Archbishop of York and further Prosecution of Gerard de Canvil Hoveden gives an account of the King's Progress till the 11th of the same Month to which time the
Regni nostri de Concilio nostro existentium providimus statuimus ordinavimus which (i) Pulton fol. 35. Anno 1279. 14. Nov. 7 E. 1. Pulton renders by the Advice of our Prelates Earls Barons and Subjects of our Kingdom being of our Council the King hath provided made and ordained whereas by Fideles is to be understood the Tenents in Capite The Statute of Acton Burnel or Statute Merchant 11 E. 1. according to Tottel was made by the (k) Ce Roy per luy per tout son Counsel ad ordain establâ—e Tottel fol. 49. 82. King himself and his whole Council That this was done in Parliament appears by the Statute of Merchants made in the 13th of the same King wherein it is said Our Lord the King by himself and by his Council at his (l) A son Parliament quâ—il â—â—â—â—t a Acton-Burnel c. Parliament which he held at Acton Burnel 11 Regni made and ordained these Establishments or as (m) Pulton fol. 36. Pulton hath it The King caused the Statute made by the King and his Council at Acton Burnel to be rehearsed and hath ordained and established Since the 49 of H. 3. to the 18 of Ed. 1. we find (n) Râ—t Pat. 20 E. 1. m. 15. no Writs for summoning of Knights Citizens and Burgesses but the 14 of June 18 Ed. 1. The King issued out the following Summons Rex c. The Form of Summons of Knights Citizens and Burgesses renewed at the Petition of the Nobles Two or three Knights to be chosen cum per Comites Barones quosdam alios de Proceribus Regni nostri nuper fuissemus super quibusdam specialiter requisiti tam cum ipsis quam cum aliis de communitatibus Regni illius colloquium habere volumus tractatum c. Tibi praecipimus quod duos vel tres de discretioribus ad laborandum potentioribus Militibus de Comitatu praedicto sine dilatione eligi eos ad nos c. venire facias c. cum plena potestate pro se communitate Comitatus praedicti ad consulendum consentiendum pro se communitate illa hiis quae Comites Barones Proceres praedicti tum duxerint concordanda vel concorditer ordinaverint in praemissis The English of which is Whereas we have been especially petitioned and requested by the Earls Barons and others of the great Men of our Kingdom concerning certain matters upon which we will have Conference and treat as well with themselves as with others of the Counties of that Kingdom We command thee that without delay thou makest to be chosen two or three of the most discreet and ablest Knights for dispatch of business of the Counties aforesaid and cause them to come to us c. with full Power for themselves and the whole Community of the County aforesaid to consult and consent for themselves and that Community to such things which the Earls Barons and great Men aforesaid shall think fit to agree upon From this we may observe That by Vertue of this Writ No Citizens and Burgesses but only Knights for Counties no Citizens or Burgesses could be chosen or sent to Parliament But only Knights for Counties Secondly The Scutage was granted in this Parliament as Doctor Brady hath noted fourteen days before the Writ for Election of Knights issued out and it is (o) Tottel's Stat. p. 85. apparent That the Statute of Westminster the Third was made the Eighth of July which was a week before they were to appear and consequently was made without them for the Preamble runs Dominus Rex in Parliamento suo apud Westmonasterium post Pascham Anno Regni sui 18. viz. in quindena S. Johannis Baptistae i.e. 8 July ad instantium Magnatum Regni sui concessit providit statuit From this Writ and the Variation of the following Writs and other Records the judicious Doctor Brady (p) Answer to Petyt fol. 151. notes That it was from the Kings Authority and at this time that the House of Commons came to be fixed and established in the present constant form it now is and hath been for many Kings Reigns and it doth appear that King Edward the First was not altogether confined to any certain number of Knights Citizens or Burgesses nor were several strict forms and usages now practised ever then thought of or some legal Niceties or Punctilioes now in use then judged of absolute Necessity The Statute of Quo (q) Pulton An. 1290. fol. 58. Warranto in the Eighteenth Year of Edward the First saith that the King of his special Grace and for the affection he beareth to his Prelates Earls and Barons and others of his Realm hath granted c. The Statute de (r) Idem Anno 1293. fol. 61. Malefactoribus in Parcis in the Twenty first Year of Edward the First saith Our Lord the King at his Parliament c. at the instance of the Nobles of the Realm hath granted c. Anno 1294. the King issues out his (s) Cl. 22 E. 1. m. 6. dorso Four Knights for a County Writs to cause two Knights out of every County to be chosen c. Dated the Eighteenth of October and the next day issues out Writs for other two to be chosen to meet at the same time and place Out of Mr. Ryley's (t) Fol. 241. Placita Parliamentorum it is clear that the Parliament which met on the Octaves of St. * Claus 28 E. 1. m. 3. dorso Hilary or the Twentieth of January in the Twenty eighth Year of Edward the First sate but eight days the Writ for the Commons Expences bearing date January the Thirtieth of the same Year and the Letter to the Pope signed by the Temporal Lords for themselves and the whole Community of the Kingdom of England is dated February the twelfth next following after the Commons had been dismissed fourteen days so that the Barons still continued to stile themselves the Community of England The Barons stay after the Commons dismissed and both Spiritual and Temporal Barons and others of the King's Council did stay and dispatch much Business after all others were dismissed as further appears in a (u) See Brady's Answer to Petyt fol. 152. Proclamation 21 March 33 Ed. 1. Wherein the King gives the Archbishops Bishops and other Prelates Earls and Barons Knights of Counties Citizens and Burgesses and other Persons of the Commons which by our Lord the King's Command came to this Parliament many Thanks for their coming and willeth that at present they return into their Counties so as they readily and without delay do come again at the time when they shall be remanded except the Bishops (w) Sauve les Evesques Countes Barons Justices autres qui sont du Conseil nostre Seigneur le Roy que ceux ne sen allient saunz especial conge du Roy. The King's Council prepare Laws Earls and