Selected quad for the lemma: england_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
england_n earl_n lord_n marquis_n 4,055 5 10.9183 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A27541 Ludlow no lyar, or, A detection of Dr. Hollingworth's disingenuity in his Second defence of King Charles I and a further vindication of the Parliament of the 3d of Novemb. 1640 : with exact copies of the Pope's letter to King Charles the first, and of his answer to the Pope : in a letter from General Ludlow, to Dr. Hollingworth : together with a reply to the false and malicious assertions in the Doctor's lewd pamphlet, entituled, His defence of the King's holy and divine book, against the rude and undutiful assaults of the late Dr. Walker of Essex. Ludlow, Edmund, fl. 1691-1692.; Bethel, Slingsby, 1617-1697.; Charles I, King of England, 1600-1649. Reply to the pope's letter [of 20 April 1623]; Gregory XV, Pope, 1554-1623. 1692 (1692) Wing B2068; ESTC R12493 70,085 85

There are 2 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

a Secret Whether I then had or not you bring one into my Remembrance by your enquiry whether the King had been to blame if he had chop'd off some of the Scotch Commissioners Heads and you shall have it I have heard and do believe that the King having against all Justice imprisoned the Earl of Lowdon one of the Commissioners from the Scotch Parliament in the Tower he about three of the Clock in the Afternoon sent his own Letter to Sir William Balfour Lieutenant of the Tower commanding him to see my Lord of Lowdon 's Head struck off within the Tower before nine the next Morning Upon the Receipt of this Command the Lieutenant of the Tower that his Lordship might prepare for Death gave him notice of it He being surprized as well he might prevailed with Sir William to find out the Marquess of Hamilton then in great favour with the King and Master of the Horse and to tell him that he esteemed him to be engaged in Honour to interpose in this matter The Letter being thereupon carried and shewn to the Marquess it struck him with Astonishment and with no small difficulty he made his way to the King being then in Bed and humbly enquired whether his Majesty had given such a Command for beheading the Earl of Lowdon the King answered Yes and I will be obeyed therein he shall die The Marquess finding him inexorable told his Majesty that he would kiss his Hand and instantly take his Horse and be gone for he would not stay to see his Majesty massacred as most certainly he would for before the next Night the whole City would come upon him Hereby the King was wrought upon to hold his Hand and countermand the fatal Warrant This is so incredible a piece of Tyranny that I cannot expect you should believe it upon my bare Assertion I shall therefore shew you that it seems to be pointed at in Bishop Burne●'s Memoirs Page 161. in these words There were some ill Instruments about the King Bishops no doubt on'● who advised him to proceed capitally against Lowdon which is believed went very far But the Marquess of Hamilton opposed this vigorous●y assuring the King that if that were done Scotland was for ever lost Now if Curiosity shall lead you to enquire further into this matter you may do well to learn what is meant by the obscure Expression which is believed went very far and if that do not open the whole business to you you will not fail of Satisfaction if you can by any Friend make way to the Original Papers from which my Lord Bishop of Salisbury took his Memoirs and which now are in the Hands of his Grace my Lord Duke of Hamilton A word or two more about Scotland and we will cast an Eye on your Impeachment against our own Nation you very often term the Actions of that Kingdom factious seditious rebellious traiterous Now let me shew you how the Scotch Parliament defined Treason We entreat our Adversaries say they to shew us in good earnest and not by way of Railing in what sense we have incurred the Censure of Rebellion and Treason We cannot be moved to think but the Mitre of a usurping Prelate by the Authority of a National Council may be thrown to the ground without the Violation or smallest Touch of the Crown or Scepter of Imperial Majesty To dethrone a Prelate and to overturn Prelacy we judg it no Treason against the King Traitors to God and their Country must be Traitors to the King and such as are faithful to God and their Country must be the King 's best Subjects The Right of his Majesty's Crown and the Acts of Parliament command all the Subjects to rise with the King and to assist him when he riseth for God and the Country but no Law nor Act of Parliament forbiddeth to stand for God and the Country in the case of publick Invasion Take now from Bp. Burnet's Memoirs a true Account of these Scotch Troubles which have now been so troublesome to you and me and I 'll return to Old England The Lord 's of the Council saith he Page 31 not 782. laid the greatest blame upon Bishops which appears from the Earl of Traquaire's Letter to the Marquess of Hamilton date 27. Aug. 1631. viz. At the meeting of the Council 23 d Instant we found so much appearance of Trouble and Stir like to be amongst People of all Qualities and Degrees upon the urging of this New-Service-Book that we durst no longer forbear to acquaint his Majesty therewith Some of the leading Men of the Clergy are so violent and many times without ground or true judgment that their want of right Understanding how to compass business of this nature and weight doth often breed as many Difficulties and their rash and foolish Expressions and Attempts have bred such a Fear and Jealousy in the Hearts of many that if his Majesty were rightly informed thereof he would blame them and justly think that from them arises the ground of many Mistakes amongst us This Business in good Faith is by the Folly and Misgovernment of some of our Clergy come to that height that the like has not been seen in this Kingdom of a long time No more of Scotland Let 's see what 's next You declare your Resolution to apply your self to the Defence of what you had formerly said in behalf of King Charles and proceed thus Page 26. You say That those Gracious Acts which I mention were bought of him and what then What hath been more usual ever since Parliaments had a being in England Pray look into the Statute-Book and tell me what Gracious Favours can you find bestowed by the several Kings of this Realm upon their People that those People have not made their acknowledgments for them by presenting their Soveraigns with great Sums of Money What ridiculous Stuff is this Gracious Acts Gracious Favours c. It hath been heretofore well observed that some who call themselves Church-men have left their Station to become ignorant and unhappy States-men who have made the Church and the Tenets thereof an Instrument of Bondage to the Subject These Men tell us that Parliaments are not assembled to ease the Grievances of the Subject but to fill the Coffers of the Prince These Men teach Princes that all the Rights and Liberties of the Subject and the maintenance of them are Doals of Grace and Gifts of meer Favour proceeding from the Prince and not the true Birth-right of the Subject which they may truly challenge which are to be continued or changed as Princes shall think fit But pray let us see what these Gracious Acts these Gracious Favours were which we bought as in your Opinion we ought They were Acts to declare the levying Money by way of forced Loan Ship-Money Coat and Conduct-Money to be illegal and against the undoubted Liberty of the Subject to suppress the most accursed and tyrannical Courts called the Star-Chamber and High-Commission
pag. 9. Many weak Persons who by the Heat of their Tempers are inclined to entertain Prejudices hold that Addressing to God in Prayer and the being gaided by the inward Motions of Grace and God's Holy Spirit are but illusions of Fancy if not the Contrivances of designing Men. Pag. 10. Earnestness in Prayer and depending on the inward Assistances of God's Holy Spirit How have Men who know or value these things little themselves taken occasion to disparage them with much Impudence and Scorn Now Sir upon the whole Matter I do think it might tend to the Publick Peace if my Lord Bishop of London would please to suspend such a dry and insipid Doctor as you are from publishing even ex-tempore and unpremeditated Defences and to injoin you a well-framed Form of Defending so that it may be performed with Order and Decency and not be exposed to Contempt and Scorn by reason of any rude and undigested Addresses bold and saucy Applications to their most Sacred Majesties the Most Reverend and Right Reverend the Arch-Bishops and Bishops c. For I perswade my self that the Ex-tempore Rhimes of some Antick Iack-Pudding may deserve Printing better than your empty and nonsensical Pamphlets and that it had been better to have set some Ballad-Singer to have bewailed the King's Misfortunes than so ridiculous an Orator as you are found to be who are so insipid that there 's not the least Spirit in any thing you say Where are you now Sir I but this Bold face says This Liturgy for Scotland was not only composed by Bishop Laud but sent by him to the Pope and Cardinals for their Approbation and this Story I must not dare to deny But with your leave Mr. Modesty I will venture upon that piece of Confidence as to tell you I do not believe it and that because you assert it Now I do agree that I did say so and I am indeed a Bold-face if I have not good Authority for what ● thus charge upon Arch-Bishop Laud for no Man's bare Assertion may pass in such a Case as this But there is more in this Matter than the Short-sighted Chaplain at Aldgate is aware of You may find the Story of Laud's sending the Scots Common-Prayer to be approved by the Pope and Cardinals as I told it in a Book of good Credit entituled A new Survey of the West-Indies wrote by a Reverend Divine of the Church of England Mr. Thomas Gage Minister of Deal in Kent 't is in Page 280 in the Folio Impression He there tells you That being a Friar he went to Rome with Letters of Recommendation to Cardinal Barbarini the Pope's Nephew intituled The Protector of England That coming acquainted with Father Fitz-Herbert Rector of the English Colledg of jesuits he highly praised Arch-Bishop Laud and said That he not long since sent a Common-Prayer Book which he had composed for the Church of Scotland to be first viewed and approved by the Pope and Cardinals and that they liked it very well for Protestants to be trained up in a Form of Prayer and Service yet the Cardinals first giving him Thanks for his Respect sent him word that they thought it was not fitting for Scotland That Father Fitz-Herbert told him he was Witness of all this being sent for by the Cardinal to give them his Opinion about it and of the Temper of the Scots And that Laud hearing the Censure of the Cardinals concerning his Intention and Form of Prayer to ingratiate himself the more in their Favour corrected some things in it and made it more harsh and unreasonable for that Nation This good Man Mr. Gage after he had there related the Matter as above expresses himself thus This most true Relation of Arch-Bishop Laud I have oft spoke of in private Discourse and publickly in Preaching and I could not in Conscience omit it here both to vindicate the just Censure of Death which the Parliament gave against him and to reprove the ungrounded Opinion and Error of some ignorant Spirits who have since his Death highly exalted and cried him up for a Martyr You may also find something like this of Mr. Gage in Bishop Burnet's Memoirs pag. 83. he relates That in the Year 1638 one Abernethy who from a Jesuit turned a zealous Presbyterian spread a Story in Scotland which took wonderfully of the Liturgy of that Kingdom being sent to Rome to some Cardinals to be revised by them and that Signior Con the Popes Nuncio to the Court of England had shewed it to Abernethy at Rome Indeed the Bishop adds ' That the Marquess of Hamilton wrote to Con about it but he protested seriously he never so much as had heard of a Liturgy designed for Scotland till he came last to England that he had never seen Abernethy at Rome but once and finding him light-headed had never again taken notice of him Now it takes not much from the Credit of Abernethy's Relation that Con denied it for it must be noted that he was a Jesuit and according to the Tenets of the Romish Church 't was lawful if not his Duty to lie for Holy Church You come next with a most convincing Argument to shew the Falshood of my last Assertion What! say you pag. 19. Bishop Laud send to the Pope and Cardinals for their Approbation of a Liturgy almost the same with ours I think this vexatious Ghost will never be laid I thought we had done with Laud but here he appears again What! Laud send to the Pope to approve a Liturgy almost the same with ours Ay Laud the most likely Bishop in England to do it You say That his Heart was set upon Designs of Vniformity And was not this the most probable Course to accomplish them Mr. Whitlock whom you will credit shews as I but now told you that Laud declared That the Protestant Religion and Romish Religion were all one and if the one was false so was the other That he brought the Romish and English Churches I think I must say Steeple-houses to be rightly understood to such a Vniformity that the Popish Priests knew no difference between theirs and ours Why then may we not believe that in pursuit of that Plot of Vniformity his Heart was so much set upon he sought the Pope's Approbation of the Liturgy whom as Mr. Whitlock himself declares he held to be the Metropolitan Bishop of the World so that Laud was to him as that Traitor Turner late Bishop of Ely to Sancrost but a younger Brother Proceeding to argue the Point you say Sure Sir you have forgot the Bull of the Pope in the 10 th of Queen Elizabeth which commands all his pretended Catholick Children not to attend upon the publick Liturgical Devotions of our Church and you have forgot that the Papists upon that account and by virtue of the Authority of that Bull have declined our Publick Service ever since and therefore it is very likely Bishop Laud should send a Liturgy to Rome for its Approbation