Selected quad for the lemma: england_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
england_n earl_n king_n northumberland_n 2,516 5 11.4024 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A66769 Anarchia Anglicana: or, the history of independency. The second part Being a continuation of relations and observations historicall and politique upon this present Parliament, begun anno 16. Caroli Primi. By Theodorus Verax.; History of independency. Part 2. Walker, Clement, 1595-1651. 1649 (1649) Wing W317B; ESTC R219912 224,193 273

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

the Commons and the Commissioners Names inserted consisting of diverse Lords Commons Aldermen Citizens Country Gentlemen and Souldiers that the more persons of all sorts might be engaged in so damnable and treasonable a designe and because this Ordinance and the proceedings thereupon had no foundation in Divinity Law reason nor practice The Commons to give it a foundation and ground from the authority of their Votes declared as followeth Resolved Diurnall from 1. Ian. to the 8. of Ian. 1648. Numb 286. c. That the Lords and Commons assembled in Parliament doe declare and adjudge That by the fundamentall Lawes of the Realme it is Treason in the King of England for the time to come to levie War against the Parliament and Kingdome of England So together with this declaratory Vote the said Ordinance was carried up to the Lords by that Renegado Lord Gray of Grooby Ian 2. 1648. 55. And sent up to the Lords The Lords met that day farre more than ordinary 16. in number and promising to send an Answer by Messengers of their owne The first Question started by some Lords who had rather have had a thinner House was 56. and Debated Whether it should be presently debated which passed Affirmatively The first Debate was upon the said Declaratory Vote The Earle of Manchester told them The Parliament of England by the fundamentall Laws of England consisted of three Estates 1. King 2. Lords 3. Commons the King is the first and chief Estate He calls and dissolves Parliaments and confirmes all their Acts and without him there can be no Parliament therefore it is absurd to say The King can be a Traytour against the Parliament The Earle of Northumberland said The greatest part at least twenty to one of the People of England were not yet satisfied whether the King levied war first against the Houses or the Houses against Him 57. The Zealots of the H. of Com offended with the Lords for casting forth the Ordin for Triall of the King And if the King did leavie Warre first against the Houses we have no Law to make it Treason in Him so to doe And for us to declare Treson by an Ordinance when the matter of fact is not yet proved nor any Law extant to judge it by is very unreasonable so the Lords cast off the Debate and cast out the Ordinance and adjourned for seven daies Ian. 3. The Zealots of the Commons were very angry at the Lords and threatned to clap a Pad-lock on the Dore of their House but at last they sent up some of their Members to examine the Lords Book and see what they had done who brought word back that their Lordships had passed 2. Votes 1. That they doe not concurre to the said Declaratory Vote 2 That they had rejected the Ordinance for Triall of the King 58. Votes passed by them thereupon Hereupon the Commons resolved to rid their hands of King and Lords together and presently they voted That all Members of the House of Commons and others appointed by order of that House or Ordinances of both Houses of Parliament to act in any Ordinance wherein the Lords are joyned shall be empowred and enjoyned to sit and act and execute in the said severall Committees of themselves notwithstanding the House of Peers joyne not with them therein Upon the debate many hot-brain'd men insisted upon it That the Lords who rejected the Ordinance should be themselves Impeached for favouring the grand Delinquent of England you see the King was likely to have much justice when his Iudges must either condemne Him or be condemned others thought it more prudence to touch their Priviledges and let alone their Persons Die Iovis 4. Ian. 1648. The Commons passed these 3. Votes A question in Divinity voted in Parliament never agreed to by Divines This we find de facto in the subversion of our Religion Lawes Liberties and Properties though not de jure You see that since both Houses ravish'd the Supremacy from the King and a petty Faction from the Houses our Lawes are first shrunke into arbitrary Ordinances of both Houses and now into Orders of a remaining Faction of one House 1. That the People that is their owne faction according to their said Principle are under God the originall of all just power 2. That the Commons of England in Parliament assembled being chosen by and representing the People have the Supreme power of this Nation 3. That whatsoever is enacted or declared for Law by the House of Commons assembled in Parliament hath the force of Law and all the People of this Nation are concluded thereby although the consent or concurrence of the King or House of Peers be not had thereunto This chain-shot sweeps away King Lords Laws Liberties property and fundamentall Government of this Nation at once and deposites all that is or can be neer or deare unto us in scrinio pectoris in the bosomes and consciences of 50. or 60. factious covetous Saints the dregs and lees of the House of Commons sitting and acting under the power of an Army and yet the House of Commons never had any Power of Iudicature nor can legally administer an Oath but this in pursuance of their aforesaid Principle That they may passe through any forme of Government to carry on their Designe The Diurnall tells you there was not a Negative Voice this shevves under vvhat a terror they sit vvhen in things so apparently untrue no man durst say No so the said Declaratory Vote and Ordinance for Triall of His Majesty by a Court Martiall if the Diurnall speake true and yet the King no Prisoner of VVar vvas passed onely in the name and by the Authority of the Commons Notvvithstanding the Order of the House That the Clerke should not deliver a Copy of the said Ordinance to any man I here present the Reader vvith a Copie thereof 59. The Act for Triall of the King An Act of Parliament of the House of Commons for Tryall of Charles Stuart King of England WHereas it is notorious that Charles Stuart the now King of England was not content with the many incroachments which his Predecessors had made upon the People in their Rights and Freedome hath had a wicked Designe to subvert the antient and fundamentall Lawes and Liberties of this Nation and in their place to introduce an Arbytrary and Tyrannicall Government and that besides all evill waies to bring His Design to passe He hath prosecuted it with fire and sword Quaere VVhether the Faction doe not translate these Crimes from themselves to the King with many others leavied and maintained a Civill VVarre in the Land against the Parliament and Kingdome whereby this Country hath been miserably wasted the publique Treasure exhausted Trade decayed thousands of People murdered and infinite of other mischiefs committed sor all which high offences the said Charles Stuart might long since have been brought to exemplary and condigne punishment VVhereas also