again accus'd Articles exhibited against him for procuring Grants of the Crown-Revenues The Judgmeut The Record 324 Symon de Beurle Lord Chamberlain impeach'd by the Commons among other Crimes for having perswaded the King to make Grants of the Crown-Revenue to Foreigners The Record 333 The First Article against Richard the Second when he was Abdicated That he had given the Possessions of the Crown to Persons unworthy 338 William de la Pool Duke of Suffolk impeach'd by the Commons 28 Hen. 6. for having procur'd to himself and those of his Alliance and Party Grants of the Crown-Revenue from 340 to 352 The Judgment against him 353 An Act of Resumption could not be obtain'd till the corrupt Minister was impeach'd and banish'd 356 Articles against the Duke of Buckingham 385 to 364 Character of the Duke of Buckingham 365 How Favourites since have differ'd from him 366 An Article against the Earl os Strafford ibid. An Article against the Lord Chancellor Clarendon 367 Articles against the Earl of Arlington 368 369 Articles against the Earl of Danby Lord Treasurer of England 370 371 How a Statesman is to behave himself when he finds his Prince in danger of being hurt by his Liberalities 373 A Minister who cannot prevent the doing of irregular Things ought to quit his Employment what Simon Normannus did upon the like Occasion 374 A faithful Minister ought to be contented with moderate Rewards 378 Why Attaindures have been repeal'd in England 380 Other Countries as well as England have resum'd the Crown-Revenues The Authorities for it cited by Grotius 380 381 Male-Administration in the publick Revenues punish'd in other Countries 381 The Crimen Peculatus ibid. In France several have been capitally punish'd for Frauds committed in the King's Revenue 382 Girard de Possi made a Restitution of his own accord ibid Engherand le Portier punish'd capitally for Frauds committed in the Revenue 383 Peter de Remy Sieur de Montigny pnnish'd in the same Manner 384 John de Montaigu capitally punish'd for the same Crime Mezeray's Character and Description of this Man 384 385 SECT V. That the Forfeited Estates in Ireland ought to be applied towards Payment of the Publick Debts AN Accompt of the Deficiencies 387 388 The Nation engaged in Honour to make 'em good 389 Fonds very difficult to find ibid. The usual Ways and Means of raising Money considered 390 Remote Fonds dangerous to Liberty 391 Of Exchequer Bills ibid. Whither a Resumption of the late Grants especially the forfeited Estates in Ireland may not save England the Land-Tax 393 Three Points therein to be consider'd 1st How far it may be consistant with the Honour of a Prince to promote an Act of Resumption 394 The most Magnanimous of our Kings the most free in doing good to the People Examples of it 394 395 Henry the 4th desired his Privy-Council might be nam'd and appointed in Parliament The Record 395 Good Kings frugal of the Nations Treasure Examples of it 397 Galant Princes desire to make their People easie instanc'd in Henry the 4th of France ibid. Clamorous Debts dishonourable to a Prince 401 How many great and warlike Kings in England have resum'd 402 2dly What Interest the People of England have in the Lands granted away 403 How far a Prince can alienate c. The Opinion of several eminent Civilians in the Case 403 404 What a Prince conquers at his private Expence is at his own Disposal 407 But 't is otherwise if the Expedition be made at the common Expence of his People 409 An Accompt of the Expences for the Reduction of Ireland 410 411 The Four Millions expended in this War give the People of England a Title to the Irish Forfeitures 411 Whether this Title be lost or laps'd for want of putting in a Claim 416 Proceedings in Parliament in relation to the Irish Forfeitures 417 to 427 3dly How far in an Act of Resumption it is just and reasonable to look backwards 428 How the Presidents run 428 to 430 The generality of the Presidents reach only to the present or the Reign immediately preceding 431 Whether by the Rules of Justice the Grants made by King Charles the Second may be resumed 440 441 The Difference stated between his Grants and these lately made 442 to 444 Conclusion 446 ADVERTISEMENT THis BOOK having been Printed off in haste some Litteral Errors may probably have escaped Correction which the Reader is desir'd to amend with his Pen. BOOKS Printed for and sold by J. Knapton at the Crown in St. Paul's Church-yard DIscourses on the Publick Revenues and on the Trade of England In Two Parts viz. I. Of the Use of Political Arithmetick in all Considerations about the Revenues and Trade II. On Credit and the Means and Methods by which it may be restored III. On the Management of the King's Revenues IV. Whether to Farm the Revenues may not in this Juncture be most for the Publick Service V. On the Publick Debts and Engagements By the Author of The Essay on Ways and Means Part 1. To which is added A Discourse upon Improving the Revenue of the State of Athens Discourses on the Publick Revenues and on the Trade of England which more immediately treat of the Foreign Traffick of this Kingdom viz. I. That the Foreign Trade is beneficial to England II. On the Protection and Care of Trade III. On the Plantation Trade IV. On the East-India Trade By the Author of The Essay on Ways and Means Part II. To which is added the late Essay on the East-India Trade By the same Hand An Essay upon the probable Methods of Making a People Gainers in the Ballance of Trade Treating of these Heads viz. Of the People of England or the Land of England and in what Manner the Ballance of Trade may be thereby affected That a Country cannot increase in Wealth and Power but by private Men doing their Duty to the Publick and but by a steady Course of Henesty and Wisdom in such as are trusted with the Administration of Affairs By the Author of The Essay on Ways and Means Dampier's Voyages In 2 Vol. 80 Wafer's Descriptions of the Isthmns of Darien In Octavo Hacke's Collection of Voyages In Octavo Clark's Essay In Octavo Reflection on Amintor Wingate's Arithmetick The Memoirs of Monsieur Pontis who served in the French Armies 56 Years Translated by Ch. Cotton Esq Fol. Malbranch's Treatise of Morality In Octavo A DISCOURSE UPON GRANTS SECT I. INTRODUCTION ALL Governments well and wisely constituted as soon as they began to form themselves into a Politick Existence have separated from Private Use a certain Proportion of their Wealth and assign'd it to the Uses of the Publick And this has not only been thought a point of Wisdom by Particular Nations but Confederated Cities and States have done the same for the Grecians had a Common Treasury kept in the Temple of Apollo Delphicus ready at all times to supply such Affairs as they manag'd with united Councils 'T is so necessary
Value if it cannot be given away without great Damage to the Crown if by reason of such Gift he is hindred from paying his just Debts or from having wherewithal to defray the Charges of the Government or to provide for the Kingdoms Defence or if by this and other Gifts he must be driven through the failing of his own Revenue to lay heavy Burthens upon the People 't is the Duty of the Lord Treasurer to represent the whole Matter honestly and impartially to the King and to hinder the Grant from proceeding any further And as a Tie upon him he takes the following Oath Ye shall swear That well and truly ye shall serve the King our Soveraign Lord and his People in the Office of Treasurer and ye shall do right to all manner of People Poor and Rich of such Things as toucheth your Office And that King's Treasure truly ye shall keep and dispend And truly ye shall counsail the King and his Counsel ye shall layn and keep And that ye shall neither know nor suffer the King 's Hurt nor his dis-heriting nor that the Rights of his Crown be distressed by any means as far forth as ye may let And if ye may not let it ye shall make knowledge thereof clearly and expressly to the King with your true Advice and Counsel And ye shall do and purchase the King's Profit in all that ye may reasonably do as God you help and the Holy Evangelists It was hardly possible to devise a more binding Oath And the Words Ye shall well and truly serve the King our Soveraign Lord and his People in the Office of Treasurer are an Evidence that our Forefathers took themselves to have some kind of Interest in what was call'd the Crown-Revenue If the Grant meets with no Objection at the Treasury the King signs a Warrant directed to the Attorny or Sollicitor-General who is another Great Officer impowering him to prepare a Bill containing such a Grant And if the Grant be of Mony appropriated by Act of Parliament or of Lands annex'd to the Crown by Act of Parliament or if the Grant be any ways illegal or prejudicial to the Crown it is the Attorny or Sollicitor-General's Duty to advertise thereof After Mr. Attorny has pass'd it it goes to the Signet the Custody whereof is in the Secretary of State who being a Minister in high Office is presum'd by the Laws to be watchful for the King 's Good and to inquire into all Matters relating to the Weal Publick He is presum'd to be apris'd of the Persons Merits to whom the Grant is to be made and likewise to understand either the Affluence or Want in the King's Coffers and the general Condition of his Revenue And having an Allowance for Intelligence he is presum'd to know the Discourses and Opinions of the People and how such Grants are relish'd If therefore the Person suing out the Grant has no Merit at all or at least no sort of pretention to so great a Reward or if he knows the Publick to be press'd with Wants and Debts or if he hears that the People murmur at the Taxes which Profusion introduces and Clamour to see the Nations Mony wasted by his Duty as Privy Councellor and by his Oath he is bound faithfully and plainly thereof to inform the King From the Signet it should go to the Privy Seal who is likewise another Great Officer who being near the Person of the King is presum'd to know the Condition of the Kingdom and therefore the Law has made him another Check He takes this Oath Ye shall as far forth as your Cunning and â—â—â—cretion sufficeth truly justly and evenly execute and exercise the Office of Keeper of the King 's Privy Seal to you by his Highness committed not leaving or eschewing so to do for Affection Love Meed Doubt or Dread of any Person or Persons c. So that if the Lord Privy Seal finds that through Corruption in other Offices or that by Power Importunity or partial Favour a Grant tending greatly to the Publick Damage and to the Diminution of his Prince's Revenue has pass'd so far as to his Office he ought to stop it there and is bound in Duty and by his Oath to lay the whole Matter before the King From the Privy Seal it goes to the Great Seal in the Custody of the Lord Keeper or Lord Chancellor of England who is accompted the Kingdom 's as well as the King's Officer and there the Grant is compleated upon which score in the Eye of the Law this Great Minister is most look'd upon his Oath is the same with that of the Lord Treasurer He swears Well and truly to serve the King and his People in the Office of Chancellor truly to Counsel the King not to suffer his Hurt or Dis-heriting nor that the Rights of the Crown be distress'd by any Means as far forth as he may let And if he may not let it he is to make it clearly and expresly known to the King with true Advice and Counsel And in all that he may he is to do and purchase the King's Profit So that more than any other as the highest Officer and as the last Check the Laws presume him to consult for the King 's good Therefore if the Grant be exorbitant if it be made to an undeserving Person if it notoriously surpasses the Merits of the Suitor if it was obtain'd upon wrong Suggestions if it occasions Obloquy to the Government or Discontent among the People if the King's Debts are many and clamorous if the Nation labours at the same time as the Gift is made under heavy Taxes and if the Grant tends greatly to the Hurt and Impoverishment of the Crown with all which Matters the Law presumes so great a Minister in the State to be acquainted he is bound in Duty and by his Oath not to fix the Great Seal to the said Grant but thereupon faithfully and impartially to advise the King And Chancellors who have acted otherwise and who contrary to the Trust of their Office have ventur'd to pass outragious Gifts Douns Outrageuses as the Records call 'em whereby the Crown has been impoverish'd have been heretofore as we shall show by and by question'd impeach'd and attainted in Parliament These were the ancient Steps in Passing Grants from the Crown which were afterwards inforc'd by a positive * Anno 27 Hen. 8. Cap. 11. Law in the Reign of Henry the Eighth a Prince jealous enough of the Regal Authority 'T is true by the Suggestion in the Preamble it looks as if the Act were made to preserve the Fees belonging to the Clerks of the Signet but bringing in Fees to Officers being never the Object of a Parliaments Care we ought to conclude that the House of Commons gave that fair Colour in the Reign of a Suspicious and Arbitrary Prince to the Regulations they intended to make as to Passing Grants from the Crown First the Law directs That the King's
Grants shall be brought to the Principal Secretary or to one of the King's Clerks of his Grace's Signet for the time being to be at the said Office of the Signet pass'd accordingly And be it also ordained and enacted That one of the Clerks of the said Signet to whom any of the said Writings signed with the King 's most gracious Hand or the Hand of any other aforesaid or any of them fortune to be deliver'd may and shall by Warrant of the same Bills and every of them within the space of eight days next after he shall have receiv'd the same unless he have Knowledge by the said Secretary or otherwise of the King's Pleasure to the contrary make or cause to be made in the King's Name Letters of Warrant subscrib'd with the Hand of the same Clerk and sealed with the King's Signet to the Lord Keeper of the King 's Privy Seal for further Process to be had in that behalf And that one of the King's Clerks of the said Privy Seal upon due Examination had by the said Lord Keeper of the said Privy Seal of the said Warrant to him addressed from the Office of the said Signet as afore may and shall within the space of eight days next after he shall have receiv'd the same unless the Lord Keeper of the Privy Seal do give them Commandment to the contrary make or cause to be made by Warrant of the foresaid Warrant to the said Lord Keeper of the Privy Seal Address from the Office of the Signet aforesaid other Letters of like Warranty subscribed with the Name of the same Clerk of the Privy Seal to the Lord Chancellor of England Lord Keeper of the Great Seal Chancellor of the Dutchy of Lancaster Chancellor of the King's Land of Ireland Treasurer and Chamberlains of the Exchequer and Chamberlains of any of his Counties Palatines or Principality of Wales or other Officer and to every of them for the writing and ensealing with such Seals as remain in their Custody of Letters Patent or Closed or other Process making due and requisite to be had or made upon any the said Grants according to the Tenor of the Warrant to them or any of them directed from the Officer of the Privy Seal as is afore specified These Cautions show how carefully our Constitution has provided that nothing shall be done which may turn in Despendium Regis aut Regni But here some flattering Lawyers will affirm That these Methods are Directive not Coerceive Or as Hobart says †Hobart's Reports Colt and Glover P. 146. That these kind of Statutes were made to put Things in ordinary Form and to ease the Sovereign of of Labour but not to deprive him of Power according to this Maxim of the same Judge That * Lord Sheffeild ver Ratcliffe p. 335. Dare Prerogativam est nobile Officium Judicis Debitum And truly heretofore Westminster-hall did so order it that these Fences intended to keep the Publick Revenues from the Hands of Spoilers were all broken down and that all these Statutes were evaded For the Force of all these wholsome Laws was enervated by Clauses afterwards incerted into the Letters Patents viz. Ex certa Scienta mero motu Gratia speciali Ex certa Scientia was very antiently made use of but the words became more necessary afterwards to defeat the 1st of Henry IV. where 't is enacted †Rot. Parl. 1 Hen. 4. Num. 98. That the true and express Value of the thing to be granted shall be incerted in the Letters Patents otherwise the Grant to be void So that these words suppose the King to have certain knowledge in every Circumstance of the thing he is to give away which happens very rarely to be the Case But notwithstanding these words if certain Proof can be made that the King was misinform'd by false Suggestion no Lawyer will say the Grant is good Ex mero motu imports the Honor and Bounty of the King who Rewards the Patentee for Merit without his Suit These words suppose the King to be truly appris'd of the Person 's Merit and were brought in to obviate the 4th of Henry IV. whereby it was enacted * Rot. Parl. 4 Hen. 4. That no Lands should be given but to such as deserv'd them and if any made Demands without Desert that he should be punish'd And to the same purpose were added the words Ex Gratia speciali yet more to denote that the Gift proceeded meerly from the King's Favour and not at the Party's Sollicitation But besides all this because anciently it seem'd a Fundamental that the Crown-Lands were not alienable and because all along Parliaments had complain'd of these Alienations as looking upon 'em to be illegal the Lawyers of old Times endeavour'd to secure and cover all by a Clause of Non Obstante to be incerted in the Patents These Clauses of Non Obstante were not known in our original Constitution Mathew Paris says they grew rife in the Reign of Henry III. Anno Dom. 1250. * Mat. Paris p. 810. Sprsimque jam tales Literae in quibus inserta est haec detestabilis adjectio Non Obstante Priore Mandato vel haec Non Obstante Antiqua Libertate Suscitabantur Then he goes on Quod cum comperisset quidam vir discretus tunc Justitiarius scilicet Rogerus de Thurkeby ab alto ducens suspiria de praedictae adjectionis appositione dixit Heu heu hos ut quid dies expectavimus Ecce jam civilis Curia exemplo ecclesiasticae Coinquinatur a Sulphureo fonte intoxicatur But this Clause grew more necessary after the 11th of Henry IV. when it was plainly and directly enacted * Rot Parl. 11 Hen. 4. Num. 23. That all manner of Heriditaments which from thenceforward should fall into the Crown should not be alienated but remain to the King And this last Law being positive unrepeal'd as we know of and still in force as much as Magna Charta and the Doctrin of Non Obstantes seeming to be condemn'd by The Ast declaring the Rights and Liberties of the Subject in these Words That the pretended Power of Suspending of Laws or the Execution of Laws by Regal Authority without Consent of Parliament is Illegal That the pretended Power of dispensing with Laws or the Execution of Laws by Regal Authority as it hath been assum'd and exercis'd of late is Illegal There will arise a Question how far the Grants made since the passing this Act 1 Gul. Mar. are valid by the Laws as they stand at present For we may argue thus It was enacted 11 Hen. IV. That the Crown-Lands should not be granted away However the Practice was otherwise and the Grants were supported by Clauses of Non Obstante But these Non Obstantes or the dispensing with Laws in force being declar'd Illegal it should follow that the Grants of Crown-Land made for these last ten Years are void in Law and revokable at the King's Will and Pleasure
voie sy avaut come vous le poez destourber et sy vous ne poez destourber vous le ferez savoir clerement et expressement au Roy ensemblablement ove vostre loyal avis et Conseil et qe vous ferez et purchasarez le profit le Roy par tout ou vous le purrez faire resonablement Si dieu vous eide et les Seints Evangieles Prient qe ce lu et bien entendu et considerez les Circonstances de son dit responce sy bien Cest assavoir de ce qe nad pas dedit qe il ne receut du don le Roy puis qil estoit fait Conte estant en l office de Chanceller diverses Terres et Tenements come contenu est en le Empechement come qil ad conus ouvertement qil recent du Roy autres Terres et Tenements qe sont certeins et seures a la value de qatre Cents Marcs per an en Exchange de qatre Cents Marcs annuels qeux il avoit sur la Custume de Kyng ston sur Hull qe sont casuels et nemy sy seures nient enformant le Roy clerement de son damage celle partie et coment qil ad dit qil receut parties desdites Terres et Tenements issint pris en change devant qil estoit Chanceller les Communes dient qil estoit lors du Prive Conseil du Roy et a ce jurez et puis en la Creation del Office de Chanceller astrict de Nouel per serement et il en cel Office Agreant as Exchanges par luy devant suppliez prist et receust du Roy le remenant desdites Terres et Tenements en plein perfourmessement des Exchanges susdits et demandent Judgement du Parlement surtout son responce des susdits So that for the Insufficiency of his Answer the following Judgment was given Rot. ibid. Num. 13. Et purce qe le dit Conte ne allegea point â—n son Responce qil observe le effecte de son ferement en ce qil jurrast qe il ne saveroit ni ne suffreroit le damage ne la desheritison du Roy ne qe les droitures de la Corone fussent destruits par uulle voie sy evant come il les poiast destourber et si il ne les poet destourber il le feroit savoir derement expressement au Roy ensemblablement ove son loyal avise Counseil qil feroit purchasseroit le Profit le Roy per tout ou il le pourroit fair resonablement Et il tant come il estoit ainsy principal Officer du Roy Sachant le Estat necessite du Roy du Royalme prist du Roy tiels Terres Tenements come est suppose par le Empechment a luy en le dit premier Article surmis coment qil alleged en son responce qe les dons a luy issint faits furent confirmez par plein Parlement il ny a nul tiel record en Roulle de Parlement Purquoy Agardez est qe tous les Manoirs Terres Tenements Rents Services Feos Avoesons Reversions Profites ove lour Appurtenances per luy issint receus du Roy soient Reseisez reprises en les Mains du Roy a avoir tenir a nostre dit seigneur le Roy et ses Hoirs sy pleinement enheritablement come il les avoit tenoit devant le don eint fait al dit Conte et qe toutz les Issues et Profits ent receus ou leves al Oeps du dit Conte en le mesme temps soient levez al Oeps nostre Seignour le Roy des Terres et Chastelx du dit Conte illoques et aillours Mes ne est pas le Intention du Roy ne des Seignours qe celle Jugement sestende de luy faire perdre le nom et le Title de Conte ne les vingt livres Annuelx quex le Roy luy grana prendre des issues du Conte de Suffolk pur le Nom et Title avantdits Et outre purceqe le dit Conte nadpas dedit qil nestoit du prive Conseil du Roy et a luy jure quand il demanda primes du Roy la dit Exchange estre faite et ad conu qe devant les dites Exchanges perfourmes il fut fait Chanceller en qel Office il fust astrict per son serement faite en la forme avant dite So that it appears plainly from this Record That King Lords and Commons took it to be a Crime in the Lord Chancellor and against his Oath to take Lands in Gift or in Exchange from the King for upon the Chancellors Oath the Judgment was grounded it being in those Days thought and understood that he who was sworn to purchase the King's Profit should not inrich himself with the Revenues of the Crown and as the Record says that he chiefly ought not to do so who was le Principal Officer and who knew the State and Necessities both of King and Kingdom And it was a very odd Circumstance of those times that the Legislature should be necessitated to relieve the King against Frauds committed by the Principal Judge in Equity and by the Keeper of his Conscience Anno 11. Rich. II. The Legislative Authority was not satisfied with what had been done the Year before against this Chancellor but it was thought fit to proceed farther against Him and other bad Ministers who had attempted to overthrow the Constitution of this Kingdom The Duke of Glocester Uncle to the King and Constable of England the Earl of Darby the Earl of Arundel the Earl of Warwick and Thomas Earl Marshal accus'd Michael de la Pool and others of High Treason the Term then us'd was they Appeal'd 'em of Treason * Rot. Parl. 11 Rich. 2. p. 2. m. 7. Thomas Duc de Glocester Conestable d Engleterre Henry Conte de Derby Richard Conte de Arundel de Surry Thomas Conte de Warwick Thomas Conte Mareschal Appellons Alesandre Ercevesque Deverwik Robert de Verr Duc d Irland Michael de la Pool Conte de Suffolk Robert Treselian faux Justice Nicholas Brembre faux Chivalier de Londres de Hautes Trahisons par eux faits encâ—ntre nostre Seignour le Roy son Royalme Come Traitours Ennemies du Royalme Qeux Appel Trahison sont declarez Appointex Specesiez pleinement sy come est contenu en diverses Articles desous Escripts Et Priont qe les dits Appelles soient demandez et qe droit et Justice ent soit fait en cest present Parlement Then these Lords exhibited against Michael de la Pool and the rest 39 Articles of High Treason In the 5th 6th and 7th Articles they are accus'd for having procur'd to themselves and others and to their Kindred Grants of the Crown-Lands in England and Ireland besides Gifts of Mony to the Value of above One Hundred Thousand Marks by which the
and seid they were too horrible to speke more of theym and seid openly to the Kyng and all the Lordes that all the Articles comprehended in the seid Bille touchyng the Kyngs high Persone and thastate of his Royalme he trusteth to God he hath answered hem sufficiently for he hath denyed the Dayes the Yeres the Places and the Commumications hadd which were never thought nor wrought seying utterly they benâ—fals and untrue and in manner impossible for he seid soo grete thyngs coud not be done nor brought aboute by hymself alone onlesse that other Persones had doon her partie and be privy therto as well as he and he toke his Soule to perpetuel Damnation yf ever he knew more of thoo Maters than the Childe in the Moders Wombe And soo he not departyng from his seid Answers and Declaration submytted hym hooly to the Kynges Rule and Governance to doo with hym as hym list wheruppon the seid Chaunceller by the Kynges Commaundement seid unto hym ageyne in this Fourme Sire y conceyve you that ye not departyng from youre Answers and Declarations in the Matters aforeseyd not puttyng you uppon youre Parage submitte you hooly to the Kynges Rule and Governaunce Wherfore the Kynge commandeth me to sey you that as touchyng the grete and horrible thynges in the seid first Bille comprised the Kyng holdeth you nether declared nor charged And as touchyng the second Bille putte ayenst you touchyng Misprysions which be not Crymynal the Kynge by force of youre Submission by his owne Advyse and not reporting hym to thadvyse of his Lordes nor by wey of Judgment for he is not in place of Judgment putteth you to his Rule and Governaunce That is to say that ye before the first day of May next comyng shall absent your self out of his Reame of Englond And also from the seid first Day of May unto the end of five Yeres next following and fully complete ye shall absteyne to abyde in the Reame of Fraunce or in eny other Lordshippes or Places beyng under his Obeysaunce whersoever they be And that ye shull not shewe nor wayte nor no Man for you as far forth as ye may lette it no malice evil will harme ne hurte to eny Persone of what degree he be of or to eny of the Commons of this Parlement in noe manner of wyse for eny thing doon to you in this seid Parlement or elles where And forthwith the Viscount Beamount on the behalf of the seid Lordes both Spirituels and Temporelx and by their Advyse Assent and Desire recited seid and declared to the Kyngs Highnesse that this that was so decreed and doon by his Excellence concernyng the persone of the seid Duke proceded not by they re Advyse and Counseil but was doon by the Kyngs own demeanaunce and rule wherfore they besought the Kynge that this their seiyng myght be enacted in the Parlement Rolle for theyr more declaration hereafter with this Protestation that it should not be nor tourn in prejudice nor derogation of theym theyr Heyres ne of theyr Successors in tyme comyng but they may have and enjoy they re Lybertee and Freedome in case of theyr Parage hereafter as freely and as largely as ever they or eny of they re Auncesters or Pedecessours had and enjoyed before this tyme. Thus William de la Pool Duke of Suffolk the Kings Favourite and the Queens Minion was impeach'd by the Commons and banish'd by the Regal Authority Graft Chron. p. 609. Grafton speaking of him says He was notorious for enrychyng Hymself with the Kynges Goods and Lands gathering together and making a Monopoly of Offices Fees Wards and Ferms by reason whereof the Kynges Estate was greatly mynished and decayed and he and his Kin highly exalted and enriched Ibid. p. 610. Besides the same Author says He had dipp'd his hands in Blood having been a chief Instrument in contriving the Murther of Humphry Duke of Gloster But Sanguinary Men seldom escape unpunish'd for this Duke of Suffolk had his own Head struck off upon the side of a Cock-boat by a Servant belonging to the Duke of Exeter Cot. Post p. 280. In his Speech to the House of Commons Sir Robert Cotton cites an Old Author who gives an admirable Description of those times He says I will tell you what I found since this Assembly at Oxford written by a Reverend Man twice Vice Chancellor of this Place his Name was Gascoin a Man that saw the Tragedy of De la Pool He tells you that the Revenues of the Crown were so rent away by ill Council that the King was enforced to live deTallagiis Populi That the King was grown in debt quinque centena millia librarum That his great Favourite in treating of a foreign Marriage had lost his Master a foreign Duchy That to work his Ends he had caus'd the King to adjourn his Parliament In villis remotis partibus Regni where few People propter defectum hospitii victualium could attend and by shifting that Assembly from place to place to inforce I will use the Authors Words illos paucos qui remanebant de Communitate Regni concedere Regi quamvis pessima When the Parliament endeavour'd by an Act of Resumption the just and frequent way to repair the languishing State of the Crown for all from Hen. 3. but one till the 6 of Hen. 8. have used it this great Man told the King it was Ad dedecus Regis and forced him from it To which the Commons answer'd although Vexati laboribus Expensis quod nunquam concederent Taxam Regi until by Authority of Parliament Resumeret actualiter omnia pertinentia Coronae Angliae And that it was Magis ad dedecus Regis to leave so many poor men in intolerable want to whom the King stood then indebted Yet could not all good Council work until by Parliament that bad Great Man was banish'd which was no sooner done but an Act of Resumption followed the Inrollment of the Act of his Exilement Sir Robert Cotton that learned Antiqary is so intirely in the Right in this Assertion that whoever looks over the Records will find that there is not so much as a line interposed between the Proceedings against the Duke of Suffolk and the Act of Resumption so quickly they followed one another Which ought to be a perpetual Notice and Lesson to Posterity that when the People of England desire an Act of Resumption the Work must begin with Impeaching Corrupt Ministers We have hitherto produc'd Impeachments of elder Times which perhaps the Persons concern'd in point of Interest will call old musty Records We shall therefore now proceed to show some Presidents of a later date As our Ancestors held it a Crime for Men to procure to themselves Offices above their Capacity and Gifts and Grants from the Crown beyond their Deserts so in this latter Age the House of Commons have thought the like Proceedings not for the King's Honour and dangerous to the Publick 2
Coâ— 1. It was an Article against the Duke of Buckingham that he had such a Multiplicity of High Offices in the State as no one Person could well and truly discharge That for his own particular Gain he had sold Patents to be Peers of England to the prejudice of the Gentry and dishonour of the Nobility of this Kingdom That besides his great Employments and the Profits thereunto belonging which might have satisfy'd any moderate Ambition He had procur'd to himself several Grants of the Crown Revenue amounting to a high Value But that the Reader may have this matter of Impeachments more fully before him we shall here incert the three Articles which have Reference to our present subject tho they are already publish'd in Rushworth Rush Coll. 1 vol. p. 306. Art I. That whereas the Great Offices expressed in the said Duke's Stile and Title heretofore have been the singular Preferments of several Persons eminent in Wisdom and Trust and fully able for the weighty Service and greatest Employments of the State whereby the said Offices were both carefully and sufficiently executed by several Persons of such Wisdom Trust and Ability And others also that were employ'd by the Royal Progenitors of our Sovereign Lord the King in Places of less Dignity were much encouraged with the Hopes of Advancement And whereas divers of the said Places severally of themselves and necessarily require the whole care industry and attendance of a most provident and most able Person He the said Duke being young and unexperienced hath of late Years with exorbitant Ambition and for his own profit and advantage procured and ingrossed into his own hands the said several Offices both to the danger of the State the prejudice of that Service which should have been performed in them and to the great discouragement of others who by this his procuring and ingrossing of the said Offices are precluded from such hopes as their Vertues Abilities and Publick Employments might otherwise have given them p. 334. Art IX Whereas the Titles of Honour of this Kingdom of England were wont to be conferred as great Rewards upon such virtuous and industrious Persons as had merited them by their faithfull Service the said Duke by his importunate and subtle Procurement had not only perverted that antient and most honourable Way but also unduly for his own particular Gain he hath enforced some that were rich though unwilling to purchase Honour as the Lord R. Baron of T. who by practice of the said Duke and his Agents was drawn up to London in or about October in the Two and twentieth Year of the Reign of the late King James of famous Memory and there so threatned and dealt withal that by reason thereof he yielded to give and accordingly did pay the summ of Ten thousand pounds to the said Duke and to his use For which said Summ the said Duke in the Month January in the Two and twentieth Year of the said late King procured the Title of Baron R. of T. to the said Lord R. In which practice as the said Lord R. was much wronged in this particular so the example thereof tendeth to the prejudice of the Gentry and dishonour of the Nobility of this Kingdom p. 340. Art XII He the said Duke not contented with the great Advancement formerly received from the late King of famous Memory by his procurement and Practice in the fourteenth Year of the said King for the support of the many Places Honours and Dignities conferred on him did obtain a Grant of divers Manners Parcel of the Revenue of the Crown and of the Duchy of Lancaster to the yearly value of One thousand six hundred ninety seven pounds two shillings half-penny farthing of the old Rent with all Woods Timber Trees and Advowson part whereof amounting to the Summ of Seven hundred forty seven pounds thirteen Shillings and four Pence was rated at Two and thirty thousand Pounds but in truth of a far greater Value And likewise in the Sixteenth Year of the same Kings Reign did procure divers others Manners annexed to the Crown of the yearly value at the old Rent of Twelve hundred Pounds or thereabouts according as in a Schedule hereunto annexed appeareth In the Warrant for passing of which Lands he by his great Favour procured divers unusual Clauses to be incerted viz. That no Perquisites of Courts should be valued and that all Bailiffs Fees should be reprised in the Particulars upon which those Lands were rated whereby a President hath been introduced which all those who since that time have obtained any Lands from the Crown have pursued to the damage of his late Majesty and of our Sovereign Lord the King that now is to an exceeding great Value And afterwards he surrendred to his said Majesty divers Mannors and Lands parcel of those Lands formerly granted unto him to the Value of Seven hundred twenty three Pounds eighteen Shillings and two Pence Half-peny per annum in consideration of which surrender he procured divers other Lands of the said late King to be sold and contracted for by his own Servants and Agents and thereupon hath obtained Grants of the same to pass from his late Majesty to several Persons of this Kingdom and hath caused Tallies to be stricken for the Money being the Consideration mentioned in those Grants in the Receipt of the Exchequer as if any such Moneys had really come to his Majesties Coffers whereas the Duke or some other by his Appointment hath indeed received the same Summs and expended them upon his own Occasions And notwithstanding the great and inestimable Gain by him made by the sale of Offices Honours and by others Suits by him obtained from his Majesty and for the countenancing of divers Projects and other Courses burthensome to his Majesty's Realms both of England and Ireland the said Duke hath likewise by his procurement and practice received into his hands and disbursed to his own use exceeding great Summs that were the Moneys of the late King of famous memory as appeareth also in the said Schedule hereunto annexed And the better to colour his doings in that behalf hath obtained several Privy-Seals from his late Majesty and his Majesty that now is warranting the Payment of great Summs to Persons by him named causing it to be recited in such Privy-Seals as if those Summs were directed for seeret Services concerning the State whicâ— were notwithstanding disposed of to his own use and other Privy-Seals by him have been procured for the discharge of those Persons without Accompt and by the like fraud and practise under colour of free Gifts from his Majesty he hath gotten into his hands great Sums which were intended by his Majesty to be disbursed for the preparing furnishing and victualling of his Royal Navy by which secret and colourable devices the constant and ordinary course of the Exchequer hath been broken there being no means by matter of Record to charge either the Treasurer or Victualler of
the Lords to put them in mind of the said Bill and that Sir Robert Rich carry the said Message The Bill fell in the House of Lords by Reason of the shortness of the Session for on the 5th of January the Parliament was adjourn'd to the 31st of March and so by short Adjournments till the following Year But before the Recess his Majesty was graciously pleas'd in his speech to both Houses on the 5th of January to say as follows And I do likewise think it proper to assure you that I shall not make any Grant of the forfeited Lands in England or Ireland till there be another Opportunity of settling that matter in Parliament in such manner as shall be thought most expedient The following Sessions began 22 die Oct. 1691. Sabbati 16. die Jan. 1691. Order'd that leave be given to bring in a Bill to vest the Forfeited Estates in Ireland in their Majesties to be applied to the Uses of the War Order'd that leave be given to bring in a Bill for vesting the Forfeited Estates in England in their Majesties to be applied to the Uses of the War and 't is referred to Mr. Smith c. Sabbati 23 die Jan. 1691. Mr. Smith presented the two Bills Martis 26 die Jan. 1691. Each of the Bills were read a first time and order'd a second Reading Jovis 28. die Jan. 1691. Each of the said Bills were read a Second time and committed to a Committee of the whole House Lunae 1. die Feb. 1691. The House resolv'd it self into a Committee of the whole House c. Mr. Palmes Reported from the Committee that they had gone through the Bill for vesting the Forfeited Estates in England and had made some Progress in the Bill relating to Ireland Jovis 4. die Feb. 1691. Mr. Palmes Reported the Amendments made by the Committee to the Bill for vesting the Forfeited Estates in England c. which were read and agreed to by the House Several Clauses or Savings were offer'd and agreed to Among the Rest that nothing in the Bill contain'd should extend to Grants made to the Earls of Monmouth and Torrington Order'd That the Bill with the Amendments be engrossed Mr. Palmes also Reported the Amendments to the Bill for vesting the Forfeited Estates in Ireland Veneris 5. die Feb. 1691. The House proceeded to take into Consideration the Report of the Amendments to the said Bill and several of them were read a second time and agreed to c. Martis 9. die Feb. 1691. The House proceeded in the further Consideration of the Report c. A Clause was offered for their Majesties to grant to any Person or Persons as a Reward for their Service any of the Lands and Hereditaments vested in their Majesties by vertue of this Act so as such Lands and Hereditaments do not exceed ..... in Value of the whole Lands Tenements and Hereditaments so vested in their Majesties to any such Person or Persons as a Reward for his or their Service A Clause offer'd that it should be lawful for their Majesties to Grant to James Duke of Ormond and his Heirs any of the Forfeitures made by this Act or any other Means within or on any the Estate or Estates of the said Duke Twice Read and Agreed to Other Clauses Read and Agreed to Order'd That the Bill with the Amendments be engross'd Veneris 12. die Feb. 1691. An Engross'd Bill for vesting the Forfeited Estates in England in their Majesties to the use of the War was read the third time Riders offer'd and agreed to Resolv'd That the Bill do pass Order'd That Mr. Palmes do carry the Bill to the Lords and desire their Concurrence An Engross'd Billfor vesting the forfeited Estates in Ireland in their Majesties to be applied to the Use of the War was read the Third time Several Riders presented and agreed to Resolv'd That the Bill do pass Ordered That Mr. Palmes do carry the Bill to the Lords for their Concurrence Note In the Bill relating to the Irish Forfeitures there was reserv'd to their Majesties one third part of the Forfeitures To be disposed and given to such Military Officers and Soldiers as their Majesties should think fit who actually serv'd in the Wars in Ireland in Person there and to no other Person or Persons whatsoever During this Sessions Proposals were offer'd for raising Money upon the forfeited Estates Jan. 1st 1691. Resolv'd That a Committee be appointed to receive Proposals for raising Money upon the forfeited Estates in Ireland and it is referred to Mr. Smith c. Martis 26. die Jan. 1691. Order'd That the Committee to whom it was referr'd to receive Proposals for raising of Money upon the forfeited Estates in Ireland be impower'd to inquire into the disposal of forfeited Estates there Sabb. 13. die Feb. 1691. Order'd That the Report of the Committee appointed to receive Proposals c. be made upon Monday Morning next Mercurii 17. die Feb. 1691. The said Report was made 'T is very long but well worth the Perusal of all Members and is to be found in the Journal of 1691. Fol. 866. What pass'd in 1690 and 1691 is a sufficient Indication that the People of England had no mind this Matter should sleep The next Year viz. 1692 3. We may say a Claim to these Estates was continued and kept afoot by an humble Address from the House of Commons to the Throne Sabbati 4. die Martii 1692 3. where among other things it is thus pray'd And for asmuch as the Reducing of Ireland hath been of great Expence to this Kingdom We humbly beseech your Majesty That according to the Assurance Your Majesty hath been pleas'd to give No grant may be made of the forfeited Estates in Ireland till there be an opportunity of settling that Matter in Parliament in such manner as shall be thought most expedient That a true Accompt of the Escheats and Forfeited Estates both Real and Personal and Stores left by the late K. James may be laid before your Commons in Parliament assembled to the end that the said Escheats Forfeitures and Stores and the Embezzlement thereof may be inquired into Veneris 10. die Martii 1692 3. To this Address His Majesty was graciously pleased to give the following Answer Gentlemen I shall always have great Consideration of what comes from the House of Commons and I shall take great Care that what is amiss shall be remedied The Year following the Matter was again reviv'd and other Bills brought in of the same Purport with the former Veneris 12. die Jan. 1693. Order'd That a Bill be brought in to vest the forfeited Estates in Ireland in their Majesties to be applied to the use of the War The like Order for the forfeited Estates in England Mercur. 24. die Jan. 1693. The Honourable Henry Boyle Esq according to Order presented to the House a Bill to vest the forfeited Estates in Ireland in their Majesties to be applied to the Use of the War And also A Bill to vest