bee saued by his owne merits or by any other meanes but by the merit of his passion This manner forme of Intergatories was prescribed generally to all Priests for their visitation of the sicke and the sicke partie accordingly was taught to make answer to these and the like questions Respondeat infirmus credo All this I beleeue Vpon this confession the Priest concluded with this instruction to the sicke partie Go to therefore Hosius in Cōfessione Petriconens c. 73. as long as thy soule remaineth in thee place thy whole confidence in this death onely haue confidence in no other thing commit thy self wholly to his death with this alone couer thy selfe wholly intermingle thy selfe wholly in this death wrap thy whole selfe in this death And if the Lord God will iudge thee say Lord I oppose the death of our Lord Iesus Christ betwixt mee and thy iudgement and no otherwise do I contend with thee And if he say vnto thee that thou art a sinner say Lord I put the death of our Lord Iesus Christ betwixt thee and my sins If he say vnto thee thou hast deserued damnation say Lord I set the death of our Lord Iesus Christ betwixt thee and my bad merits and I offer his merit instead of the merits which I ought to haue but yet haue not If he say that he is angrie with thee say Lord I interpose the death of our Lord Iesus Christ betwixt mee and thine anger This point of faith was publiquely professed in the Church of England and generally practised shortly after the Conquest both by Priests and people and as the word was rightly preached in those dayes according to the now Protestant faith and contrarie to the Tenet of the now Romane Church so likewise you shall obserue the two Sacraments of Baptisme and the Lords Supper were publiquely taught and duly administred in the same faith and doctrine before the Conquest as they are now declared and receiued in the Church of England PARAG. 2. The Sacrament of the Lords Supper and the doctrine of Transubstantiation FIrst concerning the Sacrament of Baptisme I thinke there is none so blinde or stupid that will denie the Baptisme now vsed in our Church both for matter and forme to be substantially the same that the Primitiue Church euer vsed that the Romish additions of Salt and Spittle and other Ceremonies vsed by them neither cause a Transubstantiation in the element nor the want of them inforceth Rebaptization in the protestant so that concerning the truth of our Baptisme there can bee no question and as concerning the Sacrament of the Lords Supper The Sacrament of the Eucharist in the daies of Aelfrick about the yeere 996 there was a Homily appointed publiquely to be read to the people on Easter day before they did receiue the Communion wherein the same faith and doctrine which our Church now professeth was publikely taught and receiued and the doctrine of the Reall presence which at that time had got footing in the Church was plainely confuted and reiected Neither was this the particular doctrine of one Bishop but at the same time the same matter was deliuered to the Clergy by diuers Bishops at their Synods out of two other writings published by the same Aelfrick one whereof was directed to Wulfstius then Bishop of Sherbourne the other writtē to Wulfstane Arch-bishop of York wherein both Priests people by their Command and directions were instructed and taught the doctrine of the Eucharist in these words There is a great difference betwixt the body wherein Christ suffered Aelfricks Homilie B. Vsher in his answer to a challenge c. cap Real pres p 78. 79. and the body which is receiued of the faithfull The body truly that Christ suffered in was borne of the flesh of Mari◠with blood and with bone with skinne and with sinewes in humane limbs with a reasonable soule liuing and his spirituall bodie which nourisheth the faithfull spiritually is gathered of many cornes without blood and bone without limbe without soule and therefore there is nothing to bee vnderstood bodily but spiritually c. this I say and the like doctrine was approued by the Abbot of Malmsbury by the Arch-bishop of Yorke by the Bishop of Sherbourne by diuers Bishops at their Synods and by them commended to the rest of the Cleargie who were commanded to reade it publiquely to the common people vpon Easter day for their better preparation and instruction in the Sacrament If this Protestant Faith then publiquely professed had beene taught onely by a multitude of seditious and factious persons or had it beene receiued by some few excommunicate members in the same Church our aduersaries might haue some colour some plea to deny the Visibility of our Church but when it appeares it was generally published by the chiefe Bishops and Pastors of seuerall Congregations when it appeares these Doctors had their Calling and succession in the Romane Church when it appeares it was approued by a publique Synod at their meetings I cannot but account it a Iesuites vaine flourish to tell vs Camp Rat. 3. That we cannot espie out so much as one towne one village one house for 1500 yeares that sauoured of our doctrine and that you may know Aelfrick the Abbot was not the first author of this Homilie but was anciently receiued in the Church before his daies it appeares plainely Aelfricus Abbas vulstano Archiepiscopo salutem in Christo ecce paruimus vestrae almitatis iussionibus trās ferentes Anglice duas Epistolas quas Latino eloquio descriptas antē annum vobis destinauimus Transcrip ex lib. Ms in Bibl. publ Iames in his corrupt of Fathers p. 55. that Aelfrick by the command of the Arch-bishop of Yorke did but translate those Sermons into English which were anciently published in Latine so that if there were any surmise of a Faction then raised in the Church it was caused by the receiuing of an ancient doctrine not by bringing in a new and that also was performed with the consent of all the Bishops nay more if that the faith of Gregorie the Great published here in England 400 yeares before that time If I say his faith and doctrine continued the same here in our Iland without alteration till the comming of Luther which our aduersaries confidently maintaine either this Homily published by the Bishops was the faith of Gregorie and so our Church continued Visible in the same faith from his time till ours or else the Romane doctrine now taught and beleeued hath not continued the same without alteration vntill the daies of Luther Thus the Word and Sacraments taught by Christ and his Apostles were published and proclaimed by the Bishops and Arch-bishops of those times for the sauing knowledge and knowne saluation both of Priests and people so that the most substantiall points of our Religion were visibly knowne and generally published not in priuate corners but in publique Libraries not in
was vsed by the Apostles their successors not deuised by Luther If therefore the three Creeds the two principall Sacraments of the Church the 22. bookes of Canonicall Scripture the first foure generall Councels the Apostolique Traditions the ancient Lyturgies the ordination of Pastors If I say all these were anciently taught and vniuersally receiued in all ages in the bosome of the Romane Church euen by the testimonies of our aduersaries themselues it is but a silly and senslesse question to demand of vs where our Church was before Luther The positiue doctrine which we teach is contained in a few principall points those also haue Antiquity and Vniuersality with the Consent of the Romane Church The points in controuersie which are sub Iudice in question are for the most part if not all additions to the Church and certainely frō those additions and new Articles of faith the question doth truly and properly result vpon themselues Where was your Church that is Where was your Trent doctrine and Articles of the Romane Creed receiued de Fide before Luther But admit our doctrine lay inuolued in the bosome of the Romane Church which no Romanist can deny I say admit it became hidden as good corne couered with chaffe or as fine gold ouerlayed with a greater quantitie of drosse was it therefore new and vnknowne because Poperie sought by a preuailing faction to obscure it was there no good corne in the Granary of the Church because till Luthers dayes it was not seuered from the chaffe no pure gold because our aduersaries would not refine it by the fire of Gods word If the chaffe and drosse be ours or if our Church sauour of nothing but Noueltie and heresie as some of these men pretend let them remoue from the bosome of their owne Church that new and hereticall doctrine which they say was neuer heard of before Luther and tell mee if their Church will not prooue a poore senslesse carkasse a dead body without a soule Take away the three Creeds which we professe our two Sacraments the 22. bookes of Canonicall Scripture the Apostolicall Traditions the foure first general Councels and tell me such light chaffe new heresies as they how stile them being remoued if their twelue new Articles their fiue base Sacraments the Apostolicall Scriptures their vnwritten verities and Traditions will make a true visible Church It is true that wee denie their additions there aliquod amplius because they are grounded on humane authoritie and want the foundation of the Scriptures wee denie Purgatorie Inuocation of Saints Works of Supererrogation worship of Images and the like and if our Religion be therfore termed Negatiue for deniall of those things who sees not but for the like reason they themselues wil stand guiltie of the same aspersion Do not they denie the substance of bread after Consecration doe not they denie the Scriptures to the Laitie Marriage to the Priests the Cup to the Lay people the Supremacie to their Soueraigne in his own dominions and may not we for these and the like reasons protest against them that therfore theirs is a Negatiue Religion But that the world may know wee obtrude not these things by way of recrimination it shall appeare by their owne confession the Traditions which we deny are declined by the best learned amongst themselues Nay more they doe not onely acknowledge those things which we hold but the most ingenious of them are ashamed also of those additions which wee denie As for instance we charge them with the worship of Images they denie it or leastwise excuse their manner of adoration but they condemne not vs for not worshipping We accuse them for praying in an vnknowne tongue they excuse it that God knowes the meaning of the heart but they do not condemne vs for praying with the spirit and with vnderstanding Wee condemne them for adoring the elements of bread and wine in the Sacrament because it depends vpon the intention of the Priest they excuse it Jnnocentius the third Adoro te si tu es Christus that they adore vpon condition If the consecrated bread be Christ but they doe not cōdemne vs for adoring Christs reall body in heauen we accuse them for taking away the Cup from the Lay people they excuse it that it was not taken vp by the Commandement of the Bishops Coster Enchirid de commun sub vtraque specie Anno 1414. but it crept in the Bishops winking thereat saith Costerus but they did not condemne vs for following Christs example and receiuing in both kinds Lastly we accuse them for their priuate Masses contrarie to Christs institution and the custome of the Primitiue Church Harding in B. Jewel ca. Priuat Masse they excuse it That it is through their own default and negligence whereof saith Master Harding the godly and faithfull people since the time of the Primitiue Church haue much complained and which is remarkable and comfortable to all beleeuing Protestants we charge them with flat idolatrie in the adoration of the Sacrament in Reliques in Saints in Images and howsoeuer they excuse themselues in distinguishing their manner of adoration yet I say to our endlesse comfort be it spoken they cannot charge vs in the positiue doctrine of our Church no not with the least suspition of idolatrie Sect. 9. The testimonies of our Aduersaries touching the Protestant and the Romane faith in the particulars PARAG. 1. Iustification by faith onely THese things premised I will proceed to the examination of witnesses both for the Antiquitie of our doctrine and the Noueltie of theirs but before I go to publication I will present you with two Records for two principall points of our faith by which euidences it shal appeare that the Word and Sacraments the proper marks of a true Church were rightly preached and duely administred here in England in the most obscure ages long before Luthers daies I say it shall appeare that before and after the Conquest the Priests and professors of those times protested openly against the doctrine of Romish merits preaching saluation through Christ alone and withall publikely professed and administred the same Sacraments in the same faith and truth which wee teach and administer at this day In the dayes of Anselme Archbishop of Canterburie about the yeare 1080. there was a set and publique forme of prayer prescribed for the visitation of the sicke Cass in append ad opus Jo. Roffen de fiducia misericordia Dei. and this forme saith Cassander in Bibliothecis passim obuia was commonly to be had and read in all Libraries The wordes are plaine and fully consonant to the faith our Church professeth Ordo Baptizandi visitandi edit venet Anno 1575. Dost thou beleeue to come to glorie not by thine owne merits but by the vertue and merit of the passion of our Lord Iesus Christ dost thou beleeue that our Lord Iesus Christ did dye for our saluation and that none can
Via tuta THE SAFE WAY Leading all Christians by the testimonies and confessions of our best learned Aduersaries to the true ancient and Catholique faith now professed in the Church of England By HVMFREY LYNDE Knight IEREMIAH 6.16 Stand ye in the wayes and see and aske for the old pathes where is the good way and walke therein and you shall find rest for your soules but they said we will not walke therein LONDON Printed by G. M. for Robert Milbourne and are to be sold at his shop in Pauls Churchyard at the signe of the Gray-hound 1628. To the Religious and well affected Gentrie of this Kingdome IF for no other cause yet for this alone that the world may know it is no difficult matter for a meane Lay-man to prooue the ancient visibilitie of the Protestant profession I haue attempted to send foorth this Essay of my poore endeuours in this cause being thereunto prouoked by a challenge heretofore sent vnto me by a Iesuite in these words viz. That Sir Humfrey or his friends should prooue out of some good Authors that the Protestant Church was in all ages visible especially in the ages before Luther It is not my profession I must confesse to returne challenges or publish works of this nature yet knowing that Truth is iustified of her children I haue presumed as a child of that Mother to vindicat her cause and maintaine my owne reputation and in answer hereunto I shall present such proofes as are warranted by Certificat and confession not onely of the most orthodox Fathers but of the Romish Bishops and Cardinals and other moderne Writers in the Romane Church It is an vndoubted truth subscribed by both parties that the faith which Christ and his Apostles taught in the first age had visible professors in al ages It were therefore sufficient without any further recital of succeeding witnesses to proue that the now Faith of the Church of England is that Faith which was once deliuered to the Saints by Christ and his Apostles but I rather condescend to meete the Aduersarie vpon his owne ground and to deale with him at the same weapon which himselfe hath chosen wherein on our part the Ancient Fathers shall be my Champions and his owne Romish Bishops and Cardinals and Schoolemen shall be my Seconds as being Testes veritatis witnesses of Gods truth professed in our Church Of what strength and force is Truth shal appeare 〈◊〉 his that shee extorts a full and ample testimonie from her sworne enemies to make good the visibility of our Church nor that only but she denyes antiquity and vniuersalitie to the principall Articles of the new Romane Creed wherin she points forth that old and true way and this is acknowledged on both sides to be Via tuta The safe Way vpon which ground it is likewise lawfull for me to frame a counterchallenge by demanding By what authoritie of Scriptures ancient Fathers they haue imposed new Articles of Christian beliefe vpon Priests people sure I am those twelue new coined Articles declared by their grād Councel of Trent and published by Pope Pius the fourth are so far short from the knowledge of antiquitie that as yet they are scarce vnderstood amongst their own Disciples for Articles of Faith And their best learned Romanists professe openly that most of them were vnknowne to former ages It is no wonder that a blind obedience and an implicit faith is so much obtruded to the ignorant of the Romane Church when their best learned Doctors are forced to confesse touching the chiefe Articles wherein they differ from vs that they can neither subsist by Antiquitie nor stand with the safety of the beleeuer Neither may it seeme strange that these mē should create new Articles of faith when as they dare alter and detract from the Commandements of God witnesse their Decalogue so often published by the Church of Rome here now prefixed wherein not only the second Commandement is left out as it is vsually in all their Psalters but the fourth Cōmandement touching the Sabbath day is changed into these words Remember thou sanctifie Holy-dayes But as for these peccadillos the recitall of them I account a sufficient refutation In the meane time those men who call for a Catalogue of names of such Protestants as taught and professed the 39. Articles of Religion of our Church in all ages let them in euery age produce one Ancient and orthodox Father who did teach and maintaine their twelue new Articles de Fide which they command vnder a curse to be beleeued of all men I say let them produce but one in euery age or but anyone in all the ages for 1500. yeares after Christ till the dayes of Luther that taught and beleeued all their twelue new Articles de Fide as points of faith and for that one good Authors sake I will be so liberal as to acknowledge their professors visible in al ages I will say their Bishops and Cardinals and Schoolemen which haue witnessed the Antiquitie of our doctrine were mistaken and ought to bee reformed by an Index Expurgatorius I will testifie the Reformed Churches are guiltie of Noueltie and submit my obedience with an implicit faith to the Romane Church And as touching my owne particular I professe through the prouocation of a Iesuite I haue vnwillingly thrust my sickle into other mens haruest yet I witnesse a true confession before God and man that I haue neither willingly nor wilfully falsified any one Author either in citation or translation in this Treatise If any slips haue hapned which I doe confesse for want of helpe and opportunitie may befall me let it be shewed mee by answer moderately plainely and faithfully and I will ingeniously confesse the weaknesse not of our doctrine but of my own handling So for this time vntill it please God to giue opportunitie to publish some further fruits of my labours in this kind I heartily desire good interpretation and fauourable acceptance of the beginnings and endeuours of him who is At your seruice in Christ and for his Truth H.L. THE NEW Creed of the Church of Rome Bulla Pij Quarti pro forma Iuramenti professionis fidei Datum Romae Anno 1564. 1. This new Creed is added to the Nicene Creed and prescribed by Pope Pius the fourth to be receiued with an oath as the true Catholique faith and that it might resemble the Apostles Creed they haue set it in an Apostolique forme in twelue Articles I Admit and embrace the Apostolicall Ecclesiasticall Traditions and the other obseruations and constitutions of the Church 2. I admit the holy Scriptures according to that sence which the holy Mother Church hath and doth hold whose right is to iudge of the true sence and interpretation of holy Scriptures neither will I euer receiue and expound it but according to the Vniforme Consent of the Fathers 3. I professe that there are truly and properly seuen Sacramēts of the new Law instituted by
may be thought a strange saying Si tollamus authoritatem praesentis Ecclesiae praesentis Concilij in dubium reuocari poteruÌ„t omnium aliorum Conciliorum decreta tota fides Christiana Idem ibid. that one testimonie of a late Councell might suffice for an Article of faith which by his owne Tenet requires Antiquitie Vniuersalitie and Consent yet this Cardinall proceeds further and tells vs the authoritie of this Councell is so auaileable for this point yea for all Articles of faith that if wee should take away the credit of the Roman Church and Councell of Trent the decrees of other Councels nay euen Christian faith it selfe might be called in question If by Christian faith the Cardinal vnderstand the present Romane faith without doubt this saying is most true See D. Fearly in his writ of Error against the Appealer p. 54. 55 c. for if we consider their misinterpreting the Ancient Creed and there creating of a New it cannot possibly be defended but by the Romane Church the Trent Councel but if he mean the generall sauing faith of all true beleeuers I may truly say this Tenet is a foundation of Atheisme for who can truly say that the word of Christ is not alone sufficient for the faith of all beleeuing Christians It is the voice of the blessed Apostle I haue not shunned to declare vnto you all the counsell of God Acts 20.27 And Bellarmine himselfe is forced to confesse That all those things are written by the Apostles which are necessarie for all men and which the Apostles preached generally to all Besides how can the saith of Christians depend vpon a Church which is fallen from the faith or how can a generall beleefe of Christianitie relye safely vpon a Councel that is disclaimed by the greatest part of the Christian world viz. by England by France by Germanie c. But to let passe the Heluetian the Scottish the Germane and the English Churches what will become of the ancient Church of Rome nay what will become of their owne Schoolemen in the latter ages did they all beleeue and teach that there were neither more nor lesse then seuen Sacraments did they maintaine they were all instituted by Christ did they professe they were all truly and properly Sacraments of the new Law If any learned man or if all the learned men aliue shall prooue that the seuen Trent Sacraments were instituted by Christ that all the Fathers or any one Father in the Primitiue Church or any knowne Author for aboue a thousand yeares after Christ did teach that there were neither more nor lesse then seuen truely and properly so called and to be beleeued of all for an Article of faith all which is the constant doctrine of the Church of Rome let the Anathema fall vpon my head First it is agreed on both sides that the Sacraments of the new Law were instituted by Christ for he onely hath authoritie to seale the Charter in whose authority onely it is to grant it Now as Princes seales confirme and warrant their deeds and charters so doe the Sacraments witnesse vnto our consciences that Gods promises are true and shall continue for euer Thus doth God make knowne his secret purpose to his Church first he declareth his mercies by his word then he sealeth it and assureth it by his Sacraments In the word we heare his promises in the Sacraments wee see them The difference then betwixt the Church of Rome and vs stands in this In the two proper Sacraments of Baptisme and the Lords Supper wee haue the element and the institution in the other fiue there wanteth either of these and therefore in a right meaning are not be taken for Sacraments In Baptisme the element is water in the Lords Supper bread wine Baptisme hath the words of Institution Mat. 28.19 Teach all Nations baptizing in the name of the Father and the Sonne and the holy Ghost The Lords Supper likewise hath the wordes of Institution Luk. 22.19 Do this in remembrance of mee and therefore we say these two are properly and truly called Sacraments because in them the element is ioyned to the word and they take their ordinance from Christ and be visible signes of an inuisible sauing grace The other fiue we call them not Sacraments because they haue not the like institution Confirmation was ordained by the Apostles but the Trent Councell confesseth the Sacraments must bee ordained by Christ Pennance and Orders haue not any outward element ioyned to the Word and Matrimonie was not ordained by Christ in the new Testament but by God himselfe in Paradise Besides the grants and seales of Christ viz. the Sacraments are the peculiar and proper possession of the Church of Christ insomuch as Turks and Infidels may haue the benefit of marriage out of the Church yet cannot haue the benefit of Christs SacrameÌ„ts which belong onely to his Church And lastly how Marriage should bee a Sacrament which containeth not grace in it selfe nor power to sanctifie and how it should bee an holy thing as euery Sacrament is termed and yet must be forbidden or rather fornication in the Priests case must bee preferred be fore it Durus sermo This is an hard saâ—ing who can heare it If therefore a generall Councell shall accuse not onely those that denie the number but si quis dixerit If any shall say there are either more or lesse then seuen then woe be to all the ancient Fathers for if they be conuented before the Councel they will all stand guiltie of this curse De latere in cruce pendentis lancea percuffo Sacramenta Ecclesiae pro fluxerunt Aug. in Ioh. Tract 15. Accursed be Ambrose and Austin and Chrysostome and Bede for they taught that out of the side of Christ came the two Sacraments of the Church Bloud and Water but that there were neither more nor lesse then seuen they taught not they beleeued not Jsid OriginuÌ„ siue Etimolog lib. 6. Accursed be Isidore for he accounteth but of three Sacraments viz. Baptisme and Chrysme and the body and bloud of Christ. Part. 4. q. 5. membr 2. art 1. qu. 5. c. Accursed be Alexander ab Hales for hee saith there are onely foure which are in any sort properly to be said Sacraments of the new Law and the other three supposed Sacraments had their being before Cypr. Ablutio pedum Accursed bee the Author bearing the name of Cyprian for he mentioneth onely fiue Sacraments and one of them is Ablutio pedum washing of the Apostles feet which is none of the seuen Sacraments Accursed be Durand MatrimoniuÌ„ noÌ„ est SacramentuÌ„ stricteÌ„ proprie dictuÌ„ sicut alia Sacramenta nouae legis sed est c. In lib. 4. Dist 26. quaest 3. for he alloweth but sixe proper Sacraments for Matrimony saith he is not a Sacrament strictly and properly so called as other Sacraments are Accursed bee Cardinall Bessarion Haec