with the People or that he must worship Bread and Wine as his God or that he may give a half-Sacrament of Bread without Wine contrary to Christs Institution the Apostles Doctrine 1 Cor. 11. and all the Churches constant practice till of late And that instead of a Commemoration he offereth a real present Sacrifice for the quick and dead Will all agree to their Image-worship Why then did so many Councils condemn it Will all agree that the Assemblies pray in an unknown tongue He is mad with errour who believeth that ever the Church Universal will receive all these and the rest which pretended Infallibility maketh to be uncurable Errours in the impenitent Roman Sect. 3. And briefly as to the rest there is no Calvinist believeth that ever all the Churches will receive the Lutherane Consubstantiation or Church-Images Nor any Lutherane that believeth that ever all the Church will be of the way called Calvinism a Name even here in England honoured by many that yet disown it as a note of Schism and reproached with the bitterest scorn and accusations by others Indeed the Behmenists the Quakers and some Anabaptists have said that all the Churches would at last and shortly be of their mind But few others believe them nor have cause Sect. IV. That which hath divided the Churches will never be the cement of their Concord But every one of these parties as Sects by that whence others denominate and oppose them have done something to divide the Churches what the Greeks Armâ—â—ans Nestorians Eutychians or Jacobites have done the Papists and others tell you at large what the Abassines do by their Baptizings and other Fopperies I need not declare What the Papists do above all oâ—â—ers I have opened before What the Anabaptists do by differing from almost all other Christians is known What the Diocesans have done in Councils and by silencing others c. enow have shewed What Independents and their way have done towards Divisions and Separations it is in vain in this Age in England to recite And many wise men think that the Presbyterians over violent rejecting of all Episcopacy setting up unordained Elders and National Churches as headed by National Assemblies c. are divisive and unwarrantable As the same men think their making by the Scots Covenant the renouncing of the Prelacy to be the test of National Concord also was And who can think that Erastianism deposing the true use of Church-Government as it hath begun will not still more divide than heal Sect. V. I deny not but Universal Concord may take in almost all such parties but not as such by receiving any of their Errours but as Christians who agree in the common Essentials of Faith and Piety We can unite with sober Anabaptists but not by becoming Anabaptists Christïanity is our Religion and with all that hold the Essentials of Christianity we can hold essential Unity And with those that hold the Integrals most purely we have more and neerer Concord than with the rest that have more errours And if any of these parties be sounder than the rest we love and honour them above the rest and preferre their Assemblies for our local Communion But though my Parlour or Bed-chamber be a cleaner part of my house than my Kitchin or my Coâ—-house I will not say therefore that the whole house must be a Parlour or Bed-chamber or that the hand and the foot are no parts of the body because they are not the head or heart or that all the body must be an Eye or one of the Noblest parts St. Paul hath taught me better than so 1 Cor. 12 We must expect that each party should labour to propagate that which they take to be the truth But to force all to their sayings or persecute or cast off all Dissenters is schismatical whatever be pretended CHAP. IX The pretended Necessity of an uninterrupted Canonical or Episcopal Ordination will never unite the Church but is Schismatical Mr. Henry Dodwells Sâ—hismatical Treatise against Schism considered and confuted § 1. BEcause the City of Rome hath not been conquered and kept by Infidels nor Christianity thence ejected the Papists think that they excell other Churches in an uninterrupted Succession of ordained Pastors and therefore they bend their wits to prove this necessary to every true Church and then to prove others to be no true Churches or Ministers of Christ that want it And because they think that our Pastors can prove no such continued Succession unless as derived to us from Rome and that to acknowledge such a derivation is to acknowledge them a true Church on which we have and must depend therefore they most earnestly manage this Argument against us as their strength Sect. II. And there is lately a young unordained Student of Trinity-Colledge neer Dublin come out of Ireland to propagate this and such like Doctrines in London to which end he hath lately written a large and wordy Volume as if it were only against the Non-conformists Which being new and the most audacious and confident attempt that ever I knew made against the reformed Churches by one that saith himself he is no Papist and being the moâ—t elaborate enforcement of the Papists grand Argument on which of late they build their cause I think it needful to the Readers satisfaction not to pass it by though it will not stand with the order of this undertaken work nor with my want of leisure to write a particular Answer to all the words of so exceeding prolix and tedious a discourse Sect. III. I have oft handled this case already especially in my Disput of Church-Government Disp of Ordination and in my Ecclesiastical Cases in my Christian Directory and that more largely than I must here doe And the Reader that would see more may read the Protestants Cause fully vindicated against Cornelius Jansenius a stronger adversary by Gisb. Voetius in a full Volume de desperata causa Papatus But I shall here first briefly assert the Truth Sect. IV. 1. Christ and his Spirit in his Apostles have already instituted and described the Office of the sacred Ministry and determined what Power and what Obligations to the work it doth contain and what the work is to which they are designed so that it is not left to any Church now to make or amend or change the Oâ—â—â—ce what it is I have described in the Second â—art Sect. V. 2. Christ also and his Spirit in his Apostles have told us what are the necessary qualifications of such as shall receive this Office and be received into it viz. what is necessary to the Being and what to the Well-being of a Minister of Christ And consequently who are utterly uncapable so that Men may by Canons enforce the Execution of these Canons of Christ and may instruct each other how to understand them but they cannot make a Pastor of an uncapable unqualified person no more than they can make currant Coin of forbidden Mettal or Meat of
all 21. What if a thousand honest weak Men mistake and think that the things imposed as necessary to their Sacramental Communion are great Sins and it be not so as our Doubts against Conformity are thought to be Mistakes yea the Anabaptists Error Can he prove that all such are damning Errors for want of Sacraments 22. Gods Oath is also to confirm our Faith And if a Man may be saved that beâ—ieveth Gods 〈◊〉 and knoweth not of his Oath why not he that believeth it and knoweth not of the Sacrament 23. Doth not his Doctrine make the Priests the absolute Lords of all Mens Souls that can deny Salvation to any or all Men by denying them the Sacrament Is this the sense of their having the Power of the Keys 24. Is not this abuse of Tibi dabo Claves and the office of Key-bearing the knack by which Popes have subdued Kings and Kingdoms 25. Is not the Argument which this Man manageth against the Reformed Churches to prove them â—o Churches and to have no Ministery and Sacrament the Achilles of the Papists in which is their chief coâ—fidence but often baffled as by Voetius against Jarâ—nius aforesaid 26. Nay the Papists themselves are far more moderate than this Man for they take a Laymans Baptism yea a Womans to be sufficient to salvation when this Man denieth it of all the most learned and holy Pastors that have not uninterrupted Episcopal Ordination 27. Bishops have too oft conspired to corrupt Gods Sacraments witness the Lateran Council sub Innc. 3. and to interdict Kingdoms and oppress Princes and People and may do so again And have the People no remedy against them 28. A Minister justly ordained and unjustly suspended or silenced by a Bishop hath more authority than Laymen and their Sacraments are not Nullities by the Romanists Confession 29. Is not this Mans Doctrine far grosser than Cyprians and the Africans yea the Dâ—natists that denied the validity of Heretick Baptism 30. A Lay-Chancellor in these mens judgments useth the Keys of Excommunication and Absolution validly and yet are not the Sacraments or Ordination of the Reformed Churches aforesaid valid 31. Surrogate Priests by the Bishops consent validly Excommunicate that are no Bishops 32. No People can be sure by this Mans Rule that they have Sacraments or shall be saved except by faâ—lible presumption not knowing that their Priest hath uninterrupted successive Ordination 33. When your presumptuous Ordination is discovered to be Null must all the People be Re-baptized 34. The Church of England giveth none the Lords Supper till 16 years old Doth it become absolutely necessary to Salvation just at that Age and not before 35. The Burial Office pronounceth all saved that never Communicated so they be Baptized and not Excommunicate nor kill themselves 36. What work would this Man make for Rebaptizers if all the Protestanâ—s of all Nations must be Re-baptized that have not the foresaid Ordination 37. Is it suitable to the description of God and his grace in Scripture to believe that he layeth all mens Salvation upon Sacraments performed by men Ordained as he describeth 38. Are not we Reproached Silenced Ministers as like to be good Protestants as such men as this that say that 1. The Reformed Churches that have not Episcopal Ordination from uninterrupted Succession are no true Churches 2. Have no true Ministers 3. Nor true Sacraments 4. Nor part in the Covenant of Grace 5. Nor hope of Salvation by promise from God 6. That their Ministery and Sacraments is the Sin against the Holy Ghost 7. That the Church of Rome hath this uninter rupted Succession as he tells me 8. That as will hence follow the French Protestant were better turn Papists than be as they are Sect. XXXI There are as many and greater Objections that I should lay before him about his Doctrine of an Universal Church-Policy and that sort of Episcopacy which he rather supposeth than proveth necessary and such other Points But I will no more tire the Reader herein Sect. XXXII All the definition of the Protestant Religion that I can extort from him is Communicating with the Church of England and those that it holds communion with 1. And so did the Papists saith Dr. Heylin in the beginning of Queen Elizabeths Reign till the Pope forbad them 2. The Church of England never renounced Communion with the Reformed Churches which he renounceth 3. A particular Church is no Standard of Religion Nor England more than the rest Sect. XXXIII If he renounce Communion with all these Reformed Churches and with the Romans also what a Separatist is this Man and how narrow is his Communion and into how small a number hath he reduced the Universal Church If neither Papists nor any Churches that have not Ordination from uninterrupted Succession be parts of the Catholick Church it is very little if not invisible Sect. XXXIV He thus teacheth almost all the Christian world instead of Love and Concord to Unchurch Unchristen and Condemn each other The Romans on such accounts already Unchurch all the rest The rest will far more easily prove that Simony Heresie uncalled Popes uncapable ones and manifold Schisms have oft interrupted his described Succession at Rome And so Turks and Heathens have matter given them against us all Already by such kind of Schismatical Principles there are few parts of the Church on Earth that are not by others Unchurched and Unchurch not others But yet it is but few of them that have proceeded to that Anabaptistical height as to nullifie all their Sacraments and to expect that almost all the Christian world should be again baptized Yea this is far more Schismatical than common Anabaptism For the Anabaptists with us Re-baptize not them that were baptized at age by such Ministers as this Writer and such others degrade much less do they damn almost all the Christian world or other Reformed Churches and say They have no part in Gods Covenant of Grace and Promise of Salvation and that they sin against the Holy Ghost as this Man doth CHAP. X. None of these terms will unite a National Church or any Associated Churches nor well any single Church Though by other means a competent Vnion may be kept in some Churches notwithstanding such Schismatical Courses § I. THE same Reasons which prove that none of these terms will ever unite the Universal Church but that all are fitted to promote Divisions will prove also that they tend of themselves to the dividing and distracting of all lesser Church Societies and Communions Though yet we do not deny but de facto a particular Church may easilier agree in an Error or be kept in some Concord under the same Pastor where a Sin or Error prevaileth than the Universal Church on Earth can As the Church of Rome may agree in Popery but all the Christian world will not And as a great part hath agreed in Arianism called Christians and a great part in Nestorianism and to this day in Eutychianism
life and character of Christs disciples and to cause wrath envy hatred and strife when God saith He that hateth his brother is a murderer and no murderer hath eternal life in him 1 Joh. 3. 15. It grieveth me to see preachers against preachers and Churches against Churches and in Press and Pulpit Learning and Oratory imployed to render brethren odious and keep up a heart war against each other and all this O fearful as in the name of Christ and as for the safety of the Church and Kingdome To see families against families and father against son and as Guelphes and Gibelines Cities and Countreys in their ordinary discourses at the least accusing contemning and reproaching one another It grieveth me to think how much first the honour and then the success of the Ministry on both sides is hereby hindered and what temptations some have to further injuries which I am loth to name And how by all this the wicked and Infidels are hardened the weak are scandalized the Papists are encouraged to despise us all and many turn to them scandalized by our discord sects are advantaged the Church and Kingdome by divisions weakened and the King denyed the comfort which he might have in a loving united and concordant people I believe that you dislike all this as well as I All the question hath been and still is which is the true way of Cure And one would think that 1. the nature of the thing and 2. the experience of all the Christian world 3. and our own new experience these seventeen or eighteen years might resolve men of lower parts than ours Is there no better way to the Churches concord than that which must cast out either such men as you or I and that so many Can a wise Physicion a true Peace-maker find out no remedy which may better avoid the foresaid evils O what a loss had England in the removal of such healing men as Bishop Vsher Hall Davenant Brownrig c. Far was I and am I from liking any former injury to such men by Covenant or abuse But it hath been ever the just misery of the persecutors of worthy men to have the stone fly back on their own heads and to be themselves undone by striving to undo others while they first make and then stir up a multitude of enemies for their own defence who else would be friends and live in peace I am fully perswaded that in this book I have told you a righter way of Christian Church concord more divine sure harmless and comprehensive fitted by Christ himself to the interest of all good men yea of the Church and all the world I offer it first to you that you and posterity may see what it was that I desired and that if I here err you will faithfully detect my errour that I may repent before I die and may leave behind me the recantation of this and all my other mistakes and miscarriages as I intend to do upon just conviction But do it quickly or else I am not like to see it And I purpose not to provoke you by any confutation but to improve your evidence for my self And to answer the earnest demand of our Reasons by you the Lord Bishop of Eli I have also published an Historical Narrative of our case and judgement in another Book called The Non-conformists Plea for Peace If much contrary to my expectation you should be convinced that These Terms of Vnity and Concord are righter than those which you above all men that I know have effectually helpt to bring us under I humbly crave that you will use as much earnestness and diligence to procure the Churches concord by promoting them as you did for that which you then thought righter I have here opened those reasons which made me believe that the fourteenth and fifteenth Chapter to the Romans decideth our controversie and is to be understood as I then maintained If it prove the necessary Truth which is here offered you I beseech you see that prejudice resist it not It would be a happy work could we procure the reviving of Christian Love Unity and Concord that all Christs servants might strive together for the hallowing of Gods name the promoting of his Kingdome and the doing of his will with Love and Concord as it is done in Heaven And when instead of worldly wealth and grandure we are contented with our daily bread and instead of cruelty to the innocent or weak we bewail our own sins and forbear and forgive one another and instead of tempting men to the evil of wrath and making battering Cannons and tearing engines of Schism we cease to be over-wise in our own conceits and to judge despise and ruine others then we shall be in a hopeful way to this we shall then receive him that is weak even in the faith much more about our lesser matters even as Christ received us and not to doubtful disputations and he that pleaseth God by that in which his Kingdome doth consist will be also approved by us and we shall better learn what that meaneth I will have mercy and not sacrifice and that none of our Church power is given for destruction but for edification and so we shall not condemn the guiltless nor smite the Shepherds and scatter the flocks and then hunt them about as Schismaticks and see the mote of dissent from a formality ceremony or word in their eye while we see not this great beam in our own How joyfully should we die might we leave behind us by our endeavours a healed Church and Nation and see first this desired unity which would be the strength ease and joy of Ministers and people King and Subjects and a hopeful pattern to the divided Churches abroad to imitate If you will not contribute your help hereto those will who shall have the honour and comfort of being the blessed instruments of our concord if God have so much mercy for us I once more repeat to you the pacificators old despised words Si in Necessariis sit Vnitas in non-necessariis Libertas In utrisque Charitas optimo certe loco essent res nostrae Pardon this freedome and accept this Account of the reasons of all his former and later dissent from your judgement words and way to Nov. 15. 1679. Your unfeigned well-willer RICHARD BAXTER A Premonition Reader UPon the review of this book I find some things which may be to some an occasion of offence if this premonition prevent it not I. Some may think when I say Diocesan Prelacy Arch-Bishops and Patriarchs are not to be made necessary to Universal or subordinate Church Concord as being uncapable terms or means thereof that I speak against the Lawfulness of all Episcopacy when I speak but against such necessity of that sort Know therefore 1. that I meddle not with the question Whether every particular Church of Pastor and people associate for personal Church Communion such as Ignatius describeth should have a Bishop with
his Presbyters and Deacons 2. Nor with the question whether these should have Arch-Bishops over them as successours to the Apostolical and other general Overseers of the first age in the ordinary continued parts of their office 3. Nor whether Patriarchs Diocesans and Lay Chancellours as officers of the King exercising under him such Government of the Church as belongeth to Kings according to our Oath of Supremacy be lawful to which in such exercise all subjects must for Conscience sake submit 4. Nor whether it was well done or of Divine appointment that about temporal matters as well as Church Controversies the Bishops were chosen arbitrators by the ancient Christians and so did that which Christian Magistrates now must do till upon the conversion of Princes and States the said Power of externals circa sacra fell into their hands 5. Nor yet if Diocesans become the sole Bishops infimi ordinis over many hundred Parishes all the Bishops and Parish Churches under them being put down and turned into Curates and Chapels partes ecclesiae infimae speciei whether a Minister and every Subject ought yet to live quietly and peaceably under them It is none of these that are the questions which I decide II. In my confutation of Mr. Dodwell some may mistake me as if I denied that our Religion had come down to us by a continued succession from the Apostles or that the ministerial office in specie or that the Vniversal Church had ever been without a true Ministry or Religion I have proved where our Church was in all ages before Luther in my second book against Johnson alias Terret Nor do I say what I do to avoid deriving our Ministerial succession from Rome For History puts me out of doubt that the multitude of uncapable Popes and Schisms will prove a far greater interruption of Canonical and Legitimate succession at Rome than can be proved of England and perhaps than hath happened to almost any other Church in the world And I am fully satisfied that the present Church of England as National deriveth its succession from the ancient Brittish and Scottish Church and not from Rome and that Christianity was the Religion of England long before Gregory or Augustine the Monks days and that notwithstanding Gildas his smart reproofs when the Brittish and Scottish Clergy and people disclaimed all obedience to the Pope and would not so much as eat or lodge in the same house with Gregory's Clergy the persons were better or at least their doctrine and Religion more sound than that which Rome did afterwards obtrude And as the blood of this nation though called English will upon just consideration be found to be twenty if not an hundred fold more British than either Roman Saxon or Norman so the Ordination of the Bishops is derived so much more from the Brittains and Scots than from Rome as that Augustine the Monks successours were afterward almost quite extinct only one Wini a Simonist being left in anno 668. the rest of the Bishops being all of Brittish ordination All which with much more of great importance is so fully proved after Usher by M. T. Jones of Oswestree late Chaplain to the Duke of York in an excellent Historical Treatise hereof called Of the Heart and its right Soveraign that I am sorry that book is no more commonly bought and read But withal I must say that this our certain succession disproveth the Papists and Mr. Dodwells plea for the necessity of their sort of Episcopal Canonical uninterrupted succession For as the Bishops of Denmark have their succession but from Bugenhagius Pomeranus a Presbyter his ordination so Aidan and Finan that came from Scotland out of Columbanus Monastery were no Bishops as Beda and others fully testifie And after Beda and others Mr. Jones hath cleared it that it was not only the Northern Bishops that were ordained by Aidan and Finan and Dhuma but that the Bishops of the whole land had their ordination derived from them and such as they and those whom they ordained so that the denying of the Validity of the Ordination by Presbyters shaketh the succession of the Episcopal Church of England and proveth it on that supposition interrupted And if they derive it from Rome it will be as much shaken III. In perusal I find that I have more than once mentioned some things in this treatise and the repetition may be an offense to some To which I say 1. That this is usual in controversies where several objections and occasions call for the same material answer 2. But I confess it is the effect of my hast and weakness And it is my judgement while I think that I write no needless books that I should rather write any one that is truly useful with such imperfections of manner and style as only so far disgrace the author than for want of time to leave it undone to the loss of others But if it be needless it is a greater fault to write it than to write it no more accurately My dear friend and judicious brother Mr. John Corbett hath newly published a small book to the same purpose with this of the true state of Religion and Interest of the Church with a discourse of Schism which I commend to the Reader as much worthy of his perusal and which if written on the hearts of Rulers and Teachers and people according to its certain truth and weight would heal us all The Lord forgive our heinous sins which deserve that he should excommunicate and forsake us and save England from English men and save us all from our selves our most dangerous enemies and Christians and Pastors and friends from one another For as Mr. Jones his Welsh Proverb saith Though thy dog be thy own trust him not when he is mad IV. I hear some say of my book that cometh out with this of the case of the Non-conformists and may say of this that 1. It is unseasonable to mention our own differences when we are called to unite against the Papists 2. And that too hard-accusations of conformity are intimated I answer to the first 1. That it is never more seasonable to write for Vnity than when we are most obliged to unite Though indeed it can never be unseasonable And to take Non-conformists for heinous Schismaticks and call on Magistrates to silence and imprison and ruine them is not the way to unity nor consisteut with it and therefore to deprecate such unpeaceable ways is the necessary work of a Peacemaker 2. I have waited in vain these seventeen years for a fit season And with me in likelyhood it must be Now or Never for there is no doing it in the grave and I dare not die and leave it undone on pretence that it was not seasonable To the second I say 1. I have professed that I write not to accuse Conformists but if men accuse us as enemies to order obedience and peace and as fit for silencing and utter ruine and tell the
of such things indifferent as the Church had not setled by any Law and would not so settle but that it 's nothing to such as the Church either hath or will so command This opinion hath carried it in England and other Nations of the world Being once commissioned to plead this cause by his Majesty among others I then presumed to say 1. That St. Paul here writeth not only to the laity but to all the Roman Church That therefore he writeth as Christ Rev. 2. 3. to the Angels of the seven Churches to the Rulers of the Church as well as to the People 2. And therefore he forbiddeth those Rulers what he forbiddeth others and so forbiddeth them the imposing of any thing contrary to this his full determination 3. Yea himself was an Apostle and a Church-Governor of as great authority as those that he wrote to And these his words signified his own judgement and what he would do himself Yea they were as good a Law as any the Romans could make that he wrote to Therefore when an Apostle by the Spirit of God shall write thus plainly and peremptorily to Priests and people thus to tolerate and receive each other he that now expoundeth it with an except the Church otherwise decree maketh this the sence I do by all these great reasons charge and perswade you not to judge despise or reject one another unless you decree to do it or not to make such rejecting Laws unless you make them And the Holy Ghost speaketh not in the holy Scriptures at this rate § 10. Yea I prove from the arguments used by St. Paul that he extended his speech to the Clergy or Rulers as well as to the people and so forbad them making such Laws And indeed the knack of making Church-Laws without the Holy Ghost in Apostolick persons was not as then learnt and used by the Churches 1. Because St. Paul argueth from Universal reasons 2. and from Moral and necessary arguments and 3. Speaketh by the Spirit and Apostolical Authority § 11. I. His reasons touch not only some singular persons and case but the case of all Churches in all Ages He argueth from the difference between well-meaning Christians as Weak and Strong as doubting and as assured as mistaken and as in the right as in danger of being damned if they act doubtingly and of stumbling and being offended c. Now such weak mistake◠Christians in such matters ever have been and ever will be and so the reason from their case and necessity will hold in all Countreys and Ages to the end § 12. II. And many great and pressing Moral reasons that all Christians are bound by are here heaped up 1. One is from Christian Love to brethren 2. Another from humane Compassion to the weak 3. Another is from Gods own example who receiveth such whom therefore we must not reject 4. Another is from Gods prerogative to judge 5. and another from his propriety in his own servants 6. Another is from our having no such judging power in such cases 7. Another is from Gods Love and mercy that will uphold such 8. Another is because what men do as to please God must not be condemned without necessity but a holy intention cherished so it be not in forbidden things 9. Another is that men must not go against Conscience in indifferent things 10. Another is from Christs dreadful judgement which is near and which we our selves must undergo and must be that final decider of many things which here will not be fully decided 11. Another is from the sin of laying stumbling-blocks and occasions of offence 12. Another is from the danger of crossing the ends of the death of Christ destroying souls for whom he dyed 13. Another is that it will make our good to be ill spoken of 14. Another is that the Kingdom of God or the Constitution of Christianity and the Church lyeth in no such matters but in righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Ghost 15. And another that Christ is pleased in this without the other and God accepteth such 16. Another is that such are approved of men that is This righteousness peace and holy joy without agreement in such Ceremonies and by-matters beareth its own testimony for approbation to the judgement of all impartial men humanity and Christianity teach us to love and honour such 17. Another is from our common obligation to live in peace with all 18. Another is from our obligation to do all to the edifying of one another 19. Another is because Gods work else is destroyed by us 20. And our own lawful acts are turned into sin when they hurt another 21. Another from the obligation that lyeth on us to deny our own liberty in meat wine c. to avoid the hurting of another that is weak 22. Another is from the damnation of such as are driven or drawn to act doubtingly 23. Another is from the special duty and mercy of the strong that should bear the infirmities of the weak 24. Another is from the common duty of pleasing others for their good and edifying 25. Another is from the example of Christ himself that pleased not himself 26. Another is from Gods patience to us 27. Another is from our great obligation to imitate Christ 28. Another because indeed this is the true way to Love and unity that with one mind and one mouth we may glorifie God while we lay not our concord on impossible terms 29. Another is in the concluding precept because Christ receiveth us and it is to Gods Glory therefore we must thus receive each other If all these moral arguments signifie no more than this Receive and tolerate such till you make Laws against it I cannot understand the argumentations of God or holy men § 13. III. And to conclude Paul spake by the Holy Ghost and by Divine authority himself and his words recorded are part of Christs Law indited by the Spirit and no man that cometh after him or to whom he wrote had power to contradict or obliterate it All this methinks should satisfie men of the meaning of so full a decision of an easie case about things indifferent which it's strange that so many yet for nothing do oppose And that the authority of an Apostle in Sacred Scripture the peace of the Church and the souls and peace of all dissenters and doubting persons should seem so contemptible to them as not to weigh down their humour and domineering will in an unnecessary and indifferent thing But it is the nature of sin especially Pride to be unreasonable and unpeaceable and the troubler of the soul the Church the world § 14. The same Apostle in the Epistles to the Corinthians 1. c. 1. v. 10. c. importuneth them to peace and unity and sharply reprehendeth their divisions 1. c. 3. He desireth them to be perfectly conjoyned in the same mind and in the same judgement But what are the terms and means of such a
Baptism the term of Christian Catholick unity and concord as necessary ad esse and the Creed as needful and apt ad bene esse ordinarily § 22. There is a controversie raised as aforesaid by Donatists and other Sectaries so now by the Papists whether the person baptized must not also own 1. the Ministry in general 2. the particular Minister that baptizeth him 3. and the particular Church into which he is received 4. and subject himself by profession to such pastoral power To all which I shall distinctly answer § 23. I. To the first 1. what is connoted is not alwayes a necessary part of the contract A man cannot be baptized but he must know that some one hath power to baptize him 2. It is more needful of the two that the Apostolical office and power be known and believed than the successive ordinary Ministry Because the belief of the truth of the Gospel more dependeth on their testimony as commissioned and qualified with those extraordinary gifts of the spirit which are its seal and proof 3. It is of great use to our faith and obedience to understand that Christ hath settled an authorized Ministry to preserve and preach his Word and administer his Sacraments and guide his Churches to the end of the world and he that knoweth not this wanteth an integral part of Christianity and a great and needful help to his edification and salvation 4. Yet none of these are absolutely necessary to the essence of Christianity If any lived where the ministerial office were not known or should by misleading so far err as to think that any judicious Christian or any Christian Magistrate or master of a family might preach and administer the Sacraments if yet this man believe in God the Father Son and Holy Ghost as his Creator Redeemer and Sanctifier and be accordingly devoted to him in baptism this man shall be saved notwithstanding his ignorance or errour about the Ministry yea though he knew not of the office of the Apostles but took them for lay men For the promise is that whoever believeth in Christ shall not perish but have everlasting life Joh. 3. 16 18. by what means soever he was converted to the faith It is not only He that is converted by a Priest shall not perish Nor is it ever said He that believeth in the Apostles or Priests shall not perish but he that believeth in Christ which essentially includeth the belief in the Father and the Holy Ghost And therefore Paul calleth them carnal as guilty of Schism that said I am of Paul and I of Cephas because they were not baptized into the name of Paul or Cephas but of Christ And he thanketh God that he had baptized few of them lest they should say that he had baptized them into his own name And yet are the Apostles foundations or bases and pillars in the Church because Christ used them as the first great keepers of his word and seals and the means of converting unbelievers and it 's hard and rare to believe in Christ without knowing and believing that they were his commissioned Ministers § 24. II. But though it be a duty to choose a true Minister to be baptized by yet it is not at all necessary to the validity of baptism to know that the baptizer is such Indeed not one of many can be sure as not having seen his ordination nor knowing of his necessary qualifications Many things may deceive them and all baptism by Lay-men is not null as the Fathers held and the Papists now hold and confess § 25. III. And as to reception into a particular Church I have proved before that it is no work of baptism as such but a consequent act in order of nature alwayes and oft of time The Eunuch Act. 8. was baptized into no Church but the Universal There be some few rigid mistaken brethren called Independents in New England that think indeed that all baptized persons must be baptized into a particular Church but others even of that party are wiser herein It is very fit that every one that can be a member of some particular Church But some cannot as Travellers Merchants Ambassadors c. who reside among Infidels only and those that live in Countreys where the Pastors by tyranny refuse to admit any to their communion who will not say or do some unlawful thing But yet Baptism as such is no such thing nor hath such an effect Much less is it a profession that such a particular Church is sound § 26. IV. And as to subjection to the Clergie It is true that Baptism essentially subjecteth us to Christ and this includeth an obligation to obey him in all things which we know to be his Law And it is true that just obedience to the Guides of the Church is his command But it followeth not that every man knoweth this nor that every disobedience unchurcheth us It is his command that we pray continually and in all things give thanks and that we speak not an idle word and use not vain jeasting c. But it nullifieth not Christianity that we culpably offend in one of these Nor doth our baptism contain our promise that we will never sin nor that we will obey a command which we understand not but that we will be Christs subjects and obey him sincerely so as that when we fail by weakness we will renew our repentance Christ also commandeth every child subject wife servant to obey their parents Princes and Magistrates Husband and Master And he that is baptized bindeth himself also to obey these Laws sincerely if he know them But it followeth not that it is essential to Baptism to oblige us to subjection to parents husbands masters but only to Christ who commandeth us to obey them Even as subjects take not an Oath of Allegiance to every Justice Constable or Messenger but only to the King who yet commandeth us to obey his Judges Justices Constables c. § 27. To pretend that Baptism as such doth subject men to the Bishop of Rome or to the Bishop of Alexandria Antioch Paris London or to the Pastor of a single Church is a perverting the sence of it and to be answered as the Apostle did others Were ye baptized into the Name of Paul CHAP. IV. II. What are the terms necessary for the continuance of Church-Communion and what are the lawful Causes of abscission or Excommunication § 1. IT is granted that as there is somewhat more necessary to the continuance of our pardon justification and right to glory than was to our first reception so also to our continuance as members of the Catholick Church That is the bare profession of faith and consent and subjection or Covenanting with Christ for future sincere obedience is enough to our first reception by baptism But some performance of this Covenant is necessary to our continuance The reasons are 1. Because the Covenant or promise is necessary not meerly for it self but for the
is called A particular or single Church and an association of Churches or a compound Church That we may not confound them nor make a meer gradual difference in the same species to pass for a specifick difference And there is more lyeth on this than most observe And therefore I determine it here in the definition 1. It is commonly granted that there must be Christian Assemblies fixed for ordinary Communion in Gods worship 2. And it is agreed that these Assemblies cannot be held without the officiating and conduct of Ministers of Christ authorized to teach and administer the Sacraments Though there be also another sort of assemblies even for some Religious exercises which may be held by Princes Judges and other Lay-men 3. And it is by Grotius and many others manifested that Christ formed his Churches more to the similitude of the Synagogue than the Temple state of order and worship 4. And it is agreed that though Apostles Evangelists and other itinerant Preachers might gather Sacred Assemblies where they came and were as transient temporary Pastors to them yet the Apostles were guided by the Spirit to settle Elders in every Church as is proved before But here men make a great and distracting Controversie 1. Whether this first Church-species may not consist of many Congregations yea many hundreds or thousands 2. And whether every Church of the lowest species must have a Bishop § 20. To decide this Controversie I do in the definition express the specification of this Church relation from the End as all such kind of relations must be It must be a fixed association of Christians for personal presential Communion and assistance in holy doctrine worship c. This definition is necessary and herein sufficient 1. It is necessary that a difference be noted between a single Church and a Composition of Churches Because 1. Several ends shew us that they are not univocaly called Churches but are of several sorts 2. The first is past controversie of Divine institution The other are by some men taken for Divine by some for Lawful humane and by some for sinful inventions and additions to Gods appointed order Things that so much differ must be differenced 2. It is sufficient as 1. Assigning the true specifying end 2. and avoiding all extreams 1. It assigneth the true end For that Churches of such a sort for that end were settled by the Apostles none deny 2. It justly differenceth them from all other societies 1. There may be occasional meetings of Part of a Church for want of room or liberty in private houses Chapels or Oratories Independents Presbyterians and Diocesans grant this But these still acknowledge themselves to be but parts of a larger society consenting to the same specifying ends and assembling sometimes with that larger body and sometimes apart by reason of impediments age weakness distance weather persecution c And though a Parish as many have far more than can meet at once together yet 1. Still the ends of the association is for that sort of Communion 2. Some of a family may meet one day and some another and some a third 3. Every error and corruption altereth not the species of the Church The individuals that fail and absent themselves make not Parochial Communion to be another thing for other ends A Parochial Church then is the lowest and first true species of Churches 2. And this distinguisheth it from all Compound Churches which are not for Present Ordinary Communion in publick worship and Discipline but only for Distant Communion by Officers Delegates or Letters 1. A Synod is for Consultation and not purposely congregated for ordinary Communion in worship and the Churches which send their Bishops or Pastors thither have not personal presential Communion one with another ever the more but only mediate by Delegates or Officers They may dwell a thousand miles or more from one another If all the Schoolmasters in several Kingdoms should hold Provincial National or much larger Synods for agreement in Teaching and Governing their Schools this would not confound such a Synod with a School as if they were of the same Species of society 2. This distinguisheth a single Church from the Papal pretended universal policy And from a Patriarchal Church and from a Provincial and a Diocesan Church in the sense now used For these are compounded of several single Churches and they are not a society at all associated for ordinary personal presential Communion in Gods worship and holy living Only they are all under one General Governour not using to meet themselves nor ever seeing one another Now if to be under one absent General Bishop be that which specifyeth a single or particular Church then All that called the Roman Catholick Church is but one single Church compounded of no Churches Or one Patriarchal or Provincial or National Church were the lowest species and a single Church and so the Diocesans were none But if that which maketh it a single Church of the lowest species were that no Bishop is under them but that they are under one sole Bishop then 1. If all England had but one Bishop as many tell us all Abassia hath but one called the Abunah or if a Patriarch put down all the Bishops under him this Church of his would be but a single Church 2. And then there would be no such thing as a Church associated for personal presential Communion which I have proved that the Apostles by the spirit settled § 21. Those that tell us that a Diocesan Church is the first or lowest species of Divine institution do either mean by a Diocess such a society as we now call a Parish associated for presential Communion or a Church made of many such associated under one Bishop If the first they differ only about the name in which they go against our common use and are not intelligible by the vulgar Though in old Church writers a Diocess is sometimes taken as greater than a Province and sometime as less and a Parish and a Diocess are sometimes used for the same and sometime not yet that diversity of naming hindreth us not from knowing the difference of the things either as defined or as commonly now denominated a Parish Church and a Diocess And if their meaning be to prove that single Churches essentiated by their Association for Present personal Communion are not of Gods institution no intelligent impartial Christians will believe them who understand the Scripture and the state of the primitive Churches and the reason of the thing Did men believe this they would believe that Christ had instituted no Church order or form at all Much less being to be said for the rest than this And even those few that say that no form of Church Government is settled by God do yet grant that setled congregations for ordinary worship and mutual help with their guiding Pastors are of Divine right and so confute themselves unless they mean only that Pastoral Government of compounded Churches
is not jure Divino § 22. And some called Presbyterians distinguish between a Worshipping Church and a Governed Church and tell us that the lowest Governed Church should consist of divers worshipping Churches It may sometime contein divers subordinate by-meetings as Chapels for them that must needs be oft absent from the full assembly But that it must have many such or that it must or may have many full settled worshipping Churches that personally communicate still distantly only in their several Parishes is contrary to Scripture antiquity and reason and denyeth the first instituted Church form Thorndikes first books which fetch the reason of Church Government from Assemblies were far truer than his later in which he seemed to dream of a humane universal Policy § 23. Either a Bishop as distinct in Order or Degree from Presbyters is necessary to the Being of a Church of Divine institution or not If not then it may be a Church without such a Bishop and have accordingly the rights of a Church in the proper political sense now intended by the word Church And then the old sayings would not be true 1. Of Ignatius that to every Church there is one Altar and one Bishop with his fellow Presbyters and Deacons 2. Of Cyprian that ubi Episcopus ibi Ecclesia 3. Of Hierome and others Ecclesia eft plâ—bs adunat a Episcopo If yea then 1. Our Parish Priests are true Bishops or else the Parish Churches are no true Churches but Chapels as wanting an essential part 2. And then there are no Churches in England of the lowest species for present Communion c. 3. And then it will be hard to confute them that say No form of Church Government is jure Divino or instituted of God 4. And the form of Government being the specifying form of the policy or Church it will follow that God hath instituted no Churches but the universal as headed by Christ 5. And if you will confess to the Separatists that we have no Churches of Gods institution you will never heal their separation § 24. I am therefore past all doubt that if it can be proved that a Bishop is necessary to every true Church that every Parish should have a Bishop and if Arch-bishops be good and meet the Diocesans should be their Arch-bishops And that deposing the Parish Bishops and Churches is a heinous corrupting crime But if Bishops be not necessary to a Church as such the case is otherwise § 25. It is therefore of great importance that single Churches be neither too great nor too small If too small they will want 1. the honour of fulness 2. and the cheering help of praising God in great assemblies 3. and the mutual counsel and vigilant help of many 4. and the safe guidance of many Presbyters or a Bishop and Presbyters which a few people cannot expect And if it be too great it will 1. hinder the comfort of those that want room in the Church assembly 2. or cause the Church to degenerate into another sort of society It is best therefore that it should be as Great as that all the people who are constant worshippers of God on the Lords days may meet in one place where they have liberty Chapels or lesser meetings being allowed to the aged weak sick or very distant yet all that are able coming sometime to the common Church § 26. The first degenerating of single Churches grew 1. out of the ambition of the Pastors to extend their power as far as they could 2. and out of a desire in the people to see their assemblies as honourable for greatness number and concord as they might 3. and out of a conceit that one City should have but one Bishop and so be one Governed Church And hereupon at Alexandria and Rome they began to have several fixed Chapels in the same City and neighbour villages and the Bishop to send Curate-Presbyters to them as he pleased yet so that at first they communicated frequently in the Bishops Church After that these Presbyters were fixed and gave them the Sacraments where they came After that they were tyed to come to the Bishops Church for communion but at Easter Whitsontide or some great and rare seasons After that they were so many and far off that they were no more obliged to come at all or to hear or see the Bishop but only to be distantly ruled by him and their Presbyters Then many Countrey Parishes got Bishops But the City Bishops disagreeing with them long after got them down § 27. Were it true that every City in the old sense should have a Bishop and but one it would follow that every Corporation or great Town or Borough called Market Towns in England should have one the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifying such of old And were it so and the Countrey Parishes adjoyning made Chapels and distributed accordingly to the several Towns it would be like the old state of the Church about three hundred and four hundred and five hundred years after Christ and much better than it is though not as it should be § 28. 9. The remote ends are mentioned in the definition viz. the right worshipping and obeying God the welfare of the Church-universal for the parts all contribute to the perfection of the whole and the glory and pleasing of God are the common ultimate end of all § 29. By all this it appeareth what is necessary to make a particular Church and to make a man a member of it And that it is not necessary hereto that the person be a member of a Compound Church Diocesan Provincial Patriarchial National or Papal whatever it be to some of these on any other accounts Nor yet that he make any unnecessary profession promise or Covenant § 30. But to the actual Communion with such a Church in exercise the nature of the thing maketh it necessary that the people consent and be guided by their Pastor in the circumstances belonging to his office which are necessary in genere to be some way determined but not necessary in specie vel individuo this rather than that For instance They that will have communion in publick worship must meet in some capacious place at some day some hour If any one will not come to that place at that time appointed he separateth from that Communion in that act The Scripture must be read in some Translation some order If any say I will not Communicate with you unless you use another translation another order without verses and Chapters or read some other parts he so far separateth from that Church In singing Psalms if he will not joyn in that Version that Psalm that Tune which the Church useth he so far separateth If he will not hear the Preacher unless he change his text his method or use notes or no notes and so in such cases will not follow but lead he separateth so far for all cannot be leaders and be of one mind But if the Minister
all Foxes tails cut off Or if it be about any point that Papists are concerned in that a man calleth men from erroneous Extremes to Truth and Peace he is presently suspected to be of the mind of Cassander Wicelius Grotius or such as they Even Jacob Behmens writing so much for Love and against Wrath hath made some suspect a Treatise that is written for any extensive Christian Love Could Satan but engage a man of ill fame to preach and write fervently for any fundamentall point of Religion I am afraid with many it would make it suspected Sect. XII It is also of great moment for the preventing or remedying of Schism to choose a sit season to manage the remedies Were not men very proud and selfish the fittest season would be times of Civil peace and prosperity And indeed a common peace of many Countreys will hardly be well prosecuted in any other times because it needeth sedate minds and quiet entercourse and friendly communication which warrs and exasperations are against Nor is it a fit time to heal a particular person when he is fined imprisoned persecuted or oppressed For his sense and passion will stop his ears and drive him further from those that he suffers by so far are they mistaken who take violence and severity to be the way But yet Prâ—sperity hath greater hinderances of Love and Peace than Sufferings for then usually the lovers of the World called in Scripture the Enemies of God as they strive most for wealth and power do obtain it and being made Lords and Prelates they think there is no sure and honourable Peace but by all mens submission to their wills and dictates Pride never knoweth the way of Peace but trusteth to insulting passionate violence which cureth Schism as Brandy will do a burning Feaver which may rarely be lodged in such frigid matter as may accidentally cure it which ordinarily would kill And a Schismatick may be such a timerous worldling as that suffering may drive him into outward complyance But Conscience so respecteth God as to count man and all that he can do as nothing Religion is a worshipping and obeying God as God and whoever preferreth any mans Power or Interest before him so far hath no true Religion at all But if a sufferer be to be cured it must not be by him by whom he suffereth but by another that pitieth him and lamenteth his sufferings But usually Pride and carnal Confidence in Prosperity hinder men from that condescension and moderation which is absolutely necessary to Love and Peace Wantonness and Contention are the usual fruits of greatness fullness and worldly ease so that Civil Peace and Religious are too often strangers and being dryed in the Sun-shine we are crumbled to dust And it is Gods ordinary way to cast contentious Wranglers into the Furnace and melt them till they may be cast into one mold Ridley and Hooper were reconciled in Prison When men that fell out are all taken Captives by a common Enemy they are sooner reconciled When men all suffer for the same common Cause and are together in Gaols or Banishment or reproach then go trie whether they will hearken to peace It was the great shame of the English Fugitives in Qu. Maries dayes to fall out at Frankford in their Exile In a word both Prosperity and Adversity have their proper helps and hinderances of Concord but usually times of common Civil Peace are the hopefullest times to treat for a common Religious peace but for smaller quarrelling parties common suffering is a better time Sect. XIII Whoever will be the Instruments of healing Schisms must necessarily preserve his Reputation with those that he would heal or at least with the common sort of religious persons For if once he be commonly ill spoken of the best things which he saith will be despised If he be a Prince if he be commonly reputed a sound and a good man all that he doth will have a good interpretation But if he be taken either for an enemy to Piety or to the Doctrine which prevaileth all that he doth will be suspected for acts of malice Constantius is praised by Hilary himself and many others for a man of laudable disposition and conversation and yet his being for the Arians made all ill taken that he did and he did much that deserved it Theodosius junior and Anastasius were very pious Emperours and great lovers of Peace and strenuously laboured to have kept the Bishops from Schism and Church-warrs but being supposed to favour most that party which the others called Hereticks all that they did was ill interpreted and suspected to be in favour to the Hereticks It is therefore very necessary that a Peace-making Prince be down-right honest and impartial and shew himself conscionable in all his Actions and a lover of Mankind and injurious to none but a special favourer of the good and an enemy to Wickedness Debauchery and Malignity in all For this will make people love and trust him without which nothing will be done And what I say of Princes I must say of Pastors and Preachers If a man be never so zealous for Concord if he be commonly supposed to be an ignorant man or a wicked man or an unconscionable crafty Politician or a Heretick or dangerously erroneous or one that is partial or hath any ill Principles or Designs or a Persecutor or whimsical Fanatick all his Endeavours are like to do but little good The general love and honour that Arch-bishop Usher Bishop Davenant Dr. Preston Mr. Gataker Mr. Fenner Mr. Watton Dr. Stoughton c. had with all sorts of sober men in England made those conciliatory moderating Principles to be regarded which from other men have been received with suspicion if not contempt and scorn Sect. XIV Were there no more said of all this subject but that of Rupertus Meldenius cited by Conradus Bergius it might end all Schisms if well understood and used viz. Si in NECESSARIIS sit UNITAS in NON-NECESSARIIS LIBERTAS in UTRISQUE CHARITAS optimo certe loco essent res nostrae Unity in things necessary Liberty in things unnecessary and Charity in both would do all our work Sect. XV. Or briefly all must be done 1. By the LIGHT of Reason and Sacred Truth adapted to the Understandings of the people and seasonably proposed with good advantage to convince them 2. By the LOVE of Pastors Rulers and Dissenters heaping coals of Fire on their heads 3. By the POWER of Magistrates encouraging men of Truth Piety and peace and restraining men from propagating intolerable Errors and all sorts from violating the Laws of Humanity Christian Sobriety and Charity and the publick peace and not permitting them on pretence of Religion openly to revile and abuse each other so as to keep up mutual hatred and diabolical Calumny and by licentious tongues to wrong each other These few things would better heal the Churches than all the violent and compound Medicines which worldly Jugâ—ers
us the Britains rejected them and the Scots would not eat or converse with them The Abassine Empire was never under them nor those of India and Persia And the Councils in which they had the first seat were but of one Empire as is after proved And as for the first three hundred years under Pagan Emperours their own Writers confess the Church of Rome was little set by that is it had no governing power over the rest nor is there any pretence to think they had The first that talk'd very high was Leo the first who called himself the Head of the Catholick Church But by Catholick was then meant usually the Churches in the Empire only and by Head he meant the prime Bishop in order but not the Governour of all Nor was his claim if he meant any more approved by the Churches in that Age. Though the Council of Chalcedon highly applauded him and his Epistle as an advantage to carry their Cause against Dioscorus who had excommunicated the Pope and took him for the prime member of their Council yet they thought meet in their Canons to declare that it was but by humane mutable right in the Roman Empire Let them shew us if they can when and where the universal Church on Earth ever subjected themselves at all to the Pope Much less can they bring any pretense of it for the first three hundred yeas Had they any Meeting in which they agreed for it Did they all receive Laws Ordination or Officers from Rome or from its Emissaries If we were so foolish as to believe that his precedence in General Councils was a proof of the Popes Monarchy yet it 's easie to prove 1. That for 300 years there was no General Council 2. And that it was not the Pope that presided at Nice 3. And that those Councils were but Imperial and not truly Universal But if all the Church ever had been subject to the Pope as being at first except Abassia almost confined to the Roman Empire it doth not follow that it will ever be so again when it is dispersed into so many Kingdoms of the World The Jesuites at first were all under the King of Spain and the Mahometans at first all under one Prince but they are not so now Is it likely that ever all Christian Mahometan and Heathen Kings will suffer all their Christian Subjects to be under the Government of a Foreign Priest But their own Writers agree that the Apostles at first were dispersed into many Countreys besides the Roman Empire and that Ethiopia was converted by the Eunuch mentioned Acts 8. initially its like before Rome and fullyer by St. Matthew And you may see in Godignus Alvarez Damianus a Goez and others full evidence that they were never Subjects to the Pope of Rome I conclude then 1. That Rome is not owned this day as the head of Unity by all Christians 2. That it never was so taken for the Governing and Uniting Head 3. And that the reason of the thing fully proveth that it never will be so I may adde that indeed it is not known among themselves who are the consenting Subjects of the Pope or Members of their Church It is indeed Invisible or a Church not knowable For 1. They are not agreed nor ever like to be what is the essential qualification of a Member of the Church Or what that Faith is that must make a Member Some say it must be the Belief of all the Creed explicitely others of some few Articles others that no more is necessary ad esse than to believe explicitly that God is and that he is a Rewarder of good works and to believe that the Church is to be believed Of which see Fr. a Sanct. Clara in his Deus Natura Gratia 2. And their forcing men into their Church with Tortures Fire and Sword leaveth it utterly uncertain who are Consenters and who are in the Church as Prisoners to save Limbs and Life And if they ever recover England Scotland Ireland Germany and the other Reformed Churches it must be by the Sword and Warrs and Violence and never by force of Argument And if they should conquer us all which is their hope and trust it will not follow that men are of their minds because they cannot or dare not contradict them no more than because they are dead Experience Reason and Scripture then do fully prove to men that are willing to know the truth that the Universality of Christians will never be united to the Roman Papacy Yea that this Papacy is the greatest of all Schisms 1. By setting up a false Head of Union and 2. By cutting off or renouncing three parts of the Christian World even all Christians except the Subjects of the Pope CHAP. V. The Vniversal Church will never unite in Patriarchs or any other humane Form of Church-Government Sect. I. WHether or how far such Forms may consist with Union is a Question that I am not now debating any further than shall be anon intimated by the way But that they will never become the Bond of Union or be received by all and that to make any such thought Necessary to universal Unity is Schism I am easily able to prove Sect. II. And this needeth no other proofs than what are given against uniting in the Papacy in the former Chapter As 1. Patriarchs and other humane Institutions being not of God but Man the whole Church can never unite in them 1. Because they will never all agree that any men have true Authority given them by God to make new Church-Officers and Forms that shall be necessary to the Unity or Concord of the Church Universal 2. They will never agree who those men are that God hath given such power to if they did suspect that such there are A Prince hath no Power out of his Dominions 3. They will never agree that if man made such Forms or Offices they may not unmake them again if they see cause or that their Acts bind all their Posterity never to rescind or change them 4. They will never find that all the Christian World ever agreed herein and so in all Posterity is obliged by their Ancestors 5. Much less will any ever prove that the Institution was Divine Sect. III. If any say that the Apostles settled this Form by the Spirit the Universal Church will never believe it For 1. No Scripture saith so 2. No true credible History saith so 3. If the Apostles settled Patriarchs it was either as their own Successors or as a new Office And it was either by joynt consent or man by man each one apart But 1. Had they settled them as their Successours they would have settled twelve or thirteen But there were but five settled at all besides some new petty Patriarchs as at Aquileia when they cast off Rome 2. No Writer tells us of any meeting of the Apostles to agree of such a Form 3. No nor that ever they settled them 4. History assureth
us that they were settled only in One Empire and not in the rest of the World 5. And that the Emperour and Councils of that Empire made them 6. And therefore when they were at first but three they added at their pleasure two more Constantinople and Jerusalem 7. And none of all these pretend to Apostolical Institution and Succession but Antioch that claimeth to be St. Peters first Seat and Rome to be his second and that but as Bishops when that also is a frivolous pretense Alexandria claimeth succession but from St. Mark and Jerusalem from that St. James who saith Dr. Hammond and others was none of the Apostles and Constantinople from none at all though above the rest Councils as Constant and Chalced. professing that the Fathers and Princes made them what they were Sect. IV. It is certain that the Christian World is not now united in Patriarchs nor ever was nor ever will be The Patriarchs of the rest of the Empire are all now broken off from the Church of Rome Constantinople Alexandria Antioch and Jerusalem are all against him The East had four and the West but one and are now at odds condemning each other The rest of the world have none and had none And it is commonly confessed that as men set them up so men may pull them down again Yea even in the old Empire many Churches were from under all the Patriarchs as is commonly known Sect. V. And how should these Patriarchs unite all the Church It must be either by meeting or at distance As for their meeting Princes that are some Mahometans and some Christians of divers Interests and Minds will not suffer it And neither by meeting or distance can we be secured that they will agree when even under one Emperour that laboured to unite them they were among their Clergy like the Generals of so many Armies distracting and at last destroying the Empire by hereticating and persecuting one another Those that have divided and undone that Empire are never like to unite the Christian World Sect. VI. And what I say of Patriarchs I say of all humane Forms of Churches or Church-government and so of such an Episcopacy as is not necessary to the being of the Church There are here three distinct questions before us 1. Whether the Pastoral Office be necessary to Church-unity 2. Whether Parochial Episcopacy be necessary to it 3. Whether Diocesan Bishops distinct from Archbishops be necessary to it And you may adde a fourth Whether Archbishops be necessary to it not disputing now the lawfulness of any of all these Sect. VII 1. Of the first I have spoken before No doubt but Christs universal Church hath ever had Teachers and Pastors as the most noble organical part And a Body may as well be without a Stomack Liver or Lungs as the Church be without them And to a particular Church as political organized or Governed they are a constitutive part But I have before shewed reasons to doubt whether yet it be necessary to salvation to every individual Christian to know that the Ministry is an instituted Office and to own such But this little concerneth our Cause Sect. VIII 2. Parochial Episcopacy that is the preeminence and government of one Presbyter called a Bishop over the rest in every single Church was early introduced to avoid the discord of the Presbyters and the Flock In the time when Ignatius's Epistles were written he tells us That every Church had One Altar and one Bishop with his fellow-Presbyters and Deacons Whether this was of Apostolical Institution or a humane Corruption is disputed in so many Volumes by Petavius Sancta Clara Faravia Whitenitto Downham Hammond Hooker Bilson c. on one side And Gersom Bucer Beza Cartwright Salmasius Didoclane Jacob Blondel Parker Paul Baine c. on the other that I think it not meet here to interpose my thoughts But that it is not essential to a Church and that all the Church will not unite in it appeareth as followeth Sect. IX 1. They are not united in it now The Reformed Churches in France Belgia Helvetia and many other parts are against such Bishops as necessary and a distinct Order And in England Scotland and Ireland New-England c. they are by some approved and by others not 2. Former Ages have had many pious Christians against them especially in Scotland and among the Waldenses 3. The School-men and other Papists are not themselves agreed whether Bishops and Presbyters are distinct Orders 4. The Church of England even while Popish denyed it and said they were but one Order as you may see in Spelman Aelfreds Laws or Canons 5. Hierome and Eutychius Alexandrinus tell us how and why Episcopacy was introduced at Alexandria and that the Presbyters made them there 6. The Scots were long governed without them as Major and Beda tell us And their Presbyters made the first Bishops in Northumberland as Pomeranus a Presbyter made those in Denmark 7. Almost all the Churches in East and West as far as I can learn have cast off Parochial Bishops of single Churches and in their stead set up Diocesans over multitudes of Parishes without any Bishops under them but Curats only 8. While there is no hope of all agreeing whether it be a Divine Institution and that of essential necessity there is no probability that ever the Universal Church will unite in them 9. The Diocesans we find will never yield to them 10. The reception of them will not unite the Church were it agreed on it being more and greater matters that they differ about I confess that the ancient reception of them was so general and the reason of the thing so fair that I am none of those that accuse such Episcopacy as unlawfull or Schismatical but rather think it conduceth to prevent Schisms But 1. I am satisfied that it will not be agreed to by all 2. Nor serve for universal Concord were it agreed on 3. And that it is Schismatical to make them more necessary than God hath made them and to cut off Christians or Churches that cannot receive them Sect. IX Diocesan Episcopacy by which I mean a single Bishop over many hundred or score Parishes and sacred Assemblies that have Altars and are large enough to be single Churches or at least Many such without any Bishops under him of those Churches will much less ever unite the Universal Church however it hath obtained over very much of the Christian world For first more Churches by far at this day are against it than against Parochial Episcopacy and more Volumes are written against it and Men have a far greater aversness to it as more dangerous to the Church Sect. X. 2. It is contrary to the Scripture Institution which set up Bishops in all single Churches whether the same with Presbyters I now dispute not but they were such as then were received And those that think such Single or Parish or City Bishops necessary will never agree to put them all
down Sect. XI 3. They turn all the Parish-Churches into Chappels or meer parts of one Church and Unchurch them all in the judgment of those that take a Bishop to be essential to a Church And all will not agree to Unchurch all such Parishes Sect. XII 4. It maketh true Discipline as impossible as is the Government of so many score oâ— hundred Schools by one Schoolmaster or Hospitals by one Physician without any other Schoolmaster or Physician under him but Ushers and Apothecaries which all Christians will not agree to Sect. XIII 5. It is contrary to the Practice of the Primitive Churches and casteth out their sort oâ— Parochial Bishops as I have elsewhere fully proved 1. From the Testimonies of many such as that oâ— Ignatius before cited 2. From the custom of choosing Bishops by all the People 3. And of managing Discipline before all the Church 4. By the custom mentioned by Tertulliâ—â— and Justin Martyr of receiving the Sacrament onely from the hand of the Bishop or when he Consecrated it 5. By the custom of the Bishops onely Preaching except in case of his special appointment 6. In every Church the Bishop sate on a high Seat with the Presbyters about him 7. The Bishop onely pronounced the Blessing 8. Many Canons after when the Churches grew greater command all the People to be present and communicate with the Bishop on the great Festivals These and many more Evidences prove That in the Primitive Times the Bishops had but single Churches and every Altar and Church had a Bishop Sect. XIV 6. The very Species of the old Churches is thus overthrown and the old office of Presbyters therewith which was to be assistant Governors with the Bishop and not meer Preachers or Readers And all these Changes all Christians will not agree to Sect. XV. 7. Especially the sad History of Councils and Prelacy will deter them from such Concord when they find that their Aspiring Ambition and Contention hath been the grand Cause of Schisms and Rebellions and kept the Church in confusion and brought it to the lamentable state in East and West that it is in Sect. XVI 8. And constant Experience will be the greatest hinderance As in our own Age many good Men that had favourable thoughts of Diocesans are quite turned from them since they saw Two thousand faithful Ministers silenced by them and that it is the work of too many of them to cast out such and set up such as I am not willing to describe And such Experience After-Ages are like to have which will produce the same effects When Experience persuadeth Men That under the name of Bishops they are Troublers Persecutors and Destroyers they will account them Wolves and not agree to take them for their Shepherds It will be said That Good Bishops are not such It 's true and that there are Good Ones no sober Man doubteth But when 1300 years Experience hath told Men That the Good Ones are few in comparison of the Bad Ones ever since they had large Dominions and Jurisdictions And when Reason tells Men That the worst and most worldly Men will be the most diligent seekers of such Power and Wealth and that he that seeketh them is liker to find them than he that doth not and so that Bad men are still likest to be Diâ—cesans And when the divided scattered persecuted Flocks find that the work of such Men is to silence the most conscionable Ministers and to be Thorns and Thistâ—es to the People though they wear Sheeps cloathing Men will judge of theâ— by their fruits and the Churches will never be united in them Sect. XVII 9. The greatest Defenders of Episcopacy say so much to make Men against them as will hinder this from being an uniting course I wiâ—l instance now but in Petavius and Doctor Hamâ—â—d who followeth him and Scolus who saith 〈…〉 Clara led them the way These hold That the Apâ—stâ—â—s setled a Bishop without any subject sort of Presbyters in every City and single Congregational Church And Doctor Hammond Annot. in Act. 11. Dissertat adversus Blondel saith That it cannot be proved that there were any subject Presbyters in Scripture-times but that the word Presbyter every where in Scripture signifieth a Bishop And if so 1. Men will know that the Apostolical Form was for every Congregational Church to have a Bishop of its own 2. That no Bishop had more setled Congregations than one For no such Congregation could worship God and celebrate the Sacrament of Communion as then they constantly did without a Minister And one Bishop could be but in one place at once and so without Curates could have but one Assembly 3. And Men will be inquisitive By what Authority Subject Presbyters and Diocesan Bishops and Churches were introduced after Scripture-times in which they will never receive universal satisfaction If it be said that the Apostles gave Bishops Power to make a subject order of Presbyters and to turn Parish or Congregational Churches into Diocesan and so to alter the first Forms of Government when they were dead this will not be received without proofs which never will be given to satisfie all Nay it will seem utterly improbable and Men will ask 1. Why did not the Apostles do it themselves if they would have it done Was not their Authority more unquestionable than theirs that should come after If it be said that there were not qualified Men enow it will 2. Be asked Were there not like to be then greatest Choice upon the extraordinary pouring out of the Spirit 3. Do we not find in Corinth so many inspired gifted persons in one Assembly that Paul was put to limit them in their Prophecying yet allowing many to do it one by one And Acts 13. there were many Prophets and Teachers in Antioch And at Jerusalem more and at Ephesus Acts 20. and at Philippi Phil. 1. 1 2. there were many Bishops or Elders And such Deacons as Stephen and Philip c. would have served for Elders rather than to have none 4. Doth not this imply that after-times that might make so great a change may also do the like in other things 5. And that Diocesans and subject Presbyters be but humane Institutions and therefore Men may again change them 6. Doth it not dishonour the Apostles to say that they setled one Form of Government for their own Age which should so quickly be changed by their Followers into another species All these things and much more will hinder Universal Concord in Diocesans Sect. XIX Yet I must add that there is great difference between Diocesans both as to their Government and their Persons whence some Churches may comfortably live in Concord under them though 〈◊〉 be divided and afflicted under them 1. Some Diocesans have Diocesses so small that Discipline is there a possible thing Others as ours in England have some above a thousand some many hundred or score Parishes which maketh true Discipâ—â—â— impossible 2. Some Diocesans exercise
the Church Keys of Excommunication and Absolution only themselves Otheâ—â— delegate them to Presbyters and thereby tell the People that Presbyters are capable of them Others which is the Case with us in England do commit them to Lay-Chancellors who Excommunicate and Absolve by Sentence commanding a Priest to publish it 3. Some Diocesans may if they please allow the Parish-Priest to be Episcopus Gregis and to exercise so much of his true office in his Parish as shall keep up some tolerable Purity Order and Discipline themselves receiving Appeals and being Episcopi Pastorum 〈◊〉 this is rare I know none such But they leave the Parish-Priest no power so much as to suspend his own Act in administring Baptism or the Eucharist or pronouncing decreed Excommunications or Absolutionâ— when it is against his Knowledge and Conscience no though the People profess that they take him not for their Pastor or Guide at all or refuse to speak with him in case of Ignorance suspected Heresie or Scandal 4. Some Diocesans are learned good and holy Men and set themselves to promote Godliness and encourage the best Ministers such we have had in England as Grindall Jewel Usher and many more excellent Men. But others in jealousie of their places power and interest suspect and set themselves against painful Preachers and strict Men especially if they dissent from them and take them for dangerous Enemies and persecute them and countenance the ignorant Rabble to strengthen themselves against them So that particular Concord will be promoted by some Diocesans but Universal Concord will never be so attained by them Sect. XX. There are many Learned Divines who think that Forms of Church-Government are mutable and not necessary to all times and places and that as Prudence may change other Rites Circumstances and Orders so it may do this And some Papists are of this mind Read Card. Cusanus de Concordia and Gorson de Auferibilitate Papae And the Italian Bishops at Trent were for the dependance of Bishops on the Pope as the Maker of their Order or Giver of their Power And if so it is not capable of being necessary to Catholick Unity which may it self be changed And most Protestants and Papists hold that Men may turn Diocesan Bishops again into Parochial if they saw cause And all confess that Man may set up Bishops 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in every City which in the old sense was in every great Town like our Corporations or Market-Towns which is greatly different from the Roman or the English or the French or the Italian Diocesses Sect. XXI Yea there are very Learned Divines that think no Form of Church-Government is Jure Divino or of Divine determinate Institution so though Doctor Edward Reynolds late Bishop of Nâ—rwich and Doctor Stillingfleet doth not only think so himself but hath cited great and many Patrons of that opinion and brought a great many of Arguments for it in his Irenicon Be these in the right or wrong no Man of this opinion can believe any one Form of Government necessary to the Unity of the Church or fit to be the terms of Universal Concord And it is certain that some will still be of their opinion besides those that account Diocesans unlawful CHAP. VI. The Vniversal Church will never unite in General Councils as their Head or as necessary to Vnion Sect. I. THose that are not for the Absolute Sovereignty of the Bishop of Rome over all the World do yet many of them think that they are very moderate Men if they hold but the Superiority of Councils above the Pope or limit the Popes power to the advice and consent of Councils taking them to be necessary to Unity But the contrary is very easily proved much more their insufficiency Sect. II. 1. It is certain that the Church had Union before there was any General Council The first at Nice was 310 years at least if not more after the Birth of Christ There is none pretended to be before that by any judicious men They that instance in the Consultation of the Apostles Elders and Brethren at Jerusalem Acts 2. may easily see reason to convince them that those were but the Apostles Elders and Brethren that were ordinarily then resident at one City and Church And such as pretended not to be Governours of all the Apostles Elders and Brethren who then were absent about the world The Popes and his Cardinals may say they are a General Council but who will believe them These at Jerusalem were not sent from all the Churches but one of the Churches sent to them as fittest to advise them and as being men most certainly and eminently inspired by the Holy Ghost It 's true that Christ and his Apostles had a Governing power over all the Church And if they will impose on us no other sort of General Councils as so necessary but such as have such office power and infallibility and dwell together in one house or place and are not sent from other Churches as their Representatives and can prove such a Power we shall submit to such a Council Pighius hath said enough of that Novelty and against the Governing power of General Councils That which was not essential to the Church 310 years is not so now Sect. III. 2. If General Councils be the necessary means of Union it is either for their Laws or their Judgment and it is either past Councils or present ones or both 1. If it be the Laws of past Councils then one Council that can make Laws enough at first may serve without any After-Councils And if it be enough that there have been General Councils why is not the Church united by them Then it is no matter if there never be any more And why may not Christs own Laws serve for Church Union 2. But if it be present Councils that are necessary for Laws or Judgment then the Church is now no Church without them Sect. IV. 3. There is now no General Council in the world and yet the Church hath essential Union Nay as it is long since there was one in their own account so we know not whether ever there will be more the Interest of the Pope being against it Sect. V. 4. The great disagreement that is about Councils in the Christian World proveth that they can never be the terms of Universal Agreement 1. It is not agreed who must call them 2. Nor out of what Christian Countries they must come whether all or but some and which the Papists saying that three parts of Christians may be absent or have no right to send being Hereticks or Schismaticks and others think Papists to be Hereticks Schismaticks and Antichristian 3. Nor what Number are necessary to make a Council 4. Nor in what Countrey they must meet 5. Nor what their work is 6. Nor what Power they have 7. Nor how far they are to be believed 8. Nor which are to be taken for approved Councils and which not 9. Nor
set one Presbyter in degree above the rest Did not all the strife of Emperors for the power of investing Bishops signifie this much against the Popes opposition Both sides granted that the People and Clergy were to be the Choosers of a Bishop And it was the old Canon that no Bishop should remove from Seat to Seat so that only Presbyters and no former Bishops were made Bishops of any particular City or Deacons or Subdeacons sometime at Rome By which it appeareth that the Emperors power of Investiture amounted to a Negative voice in the making of a Bishop The Kings of Israel sent Levites to teach the People and Solomon chose who should be the High-Priest And when the Romans after sold the Office Christ bids the cleansed Lepers Go and shew themselves to the High-Priest and offer c. Sect. XIII The Case of the Reformed Churches nullified by the Papists and whose Ministers Office and Authority is denied by them is as followeth I. The old Bohemians and Waldenses had different degrees of Pastors of which the Superior were called Conseniors and Seniors of one Order who presided among the Elders but took not the Government of the Flocks out of their hands nor ruled without them and were chiefly above others in judging what Elders or Ministers were to be removed from lesser places to greater whose Form of Government most like the Ancients you may see at large in the Descriptions of Lascitius and Commenius II. The Churches called Lutherane Denmark Sueden Saxony c. have for the most part some Episcopacy called Superintendency but their Bishops take not the power of the Keys from the Pastors of the several Parishes And they take not the power of Ordaining to be proper to the Bishops For the Bishops of Denmark were made such by Bugenhagius Pomeranus a Presbyter which they suppose doth null their Successive Power And the English have Diocesane Bishops and Ordination by them and as good a Succession at least of Regular Ordination as Rome hath had III. The Churches called Presbyterian in Holland France Scotland and other Countries have Ordination by a Synod of the Pastors of particular Churches of which some are the chief Pastors of Cities and have Curates or assisting Presbyters and therefore are such Bishops as the Scripture Ignatius Tertullian yea and Cyprian describe so that 1. They think that as in Generation a Man begetteth not an Ape or Dog but a Man and an Horsâ— begetteth an Horse and every thing propagateth its own species And as Physicians make Physicians and Lawyers make Lawyers c. So Pastors make Pastorâ— as far as belongeth to an Ordainer that is preparing and determining the Receiver whom God shall give the Power to and oblige to the duty of that Office 2. But yet in the same Order they think they have a true Episcopacy as to degree first in the foresaid City Pastors that have Curates secondly in the President of the Synod 3. And they think that those Writers Papists and Protestants are in the right who expound the word Presbytery which laid hands on Timothy of a Session of Presbyters and therefore that such have power to Ordain 4. And they think that if after their faithfullest search they should in this be mistaken against their wills God will not therefore disown their Churches Ministry and Worship no more than he will reject the Prayers of private Christians for their Errors and Imperfections IV. Those that at present are called Nonconformists in England who were about 2000 Ejected and Silenced Anno 1662. Aug. 24. 1. Many of them yea most that were above 44 years old were Ordained by Bishops of whom I am one 2. The Generality of the rest lived when by the Rulers that had such possession as they could not resist Diocesane Ordination was forbidden and another set up and we heard not of five Bishops in England that did Ordain and hardly knew how to procure it of these And the Oath of Allegiance might have cost both the Bishop and the Ordained their Lives or Liberties at least in the Times of Usurpation 3. They were Ordained by a Classis or Synod of Ministers of whom some were chief City Pastors that had Curates which saith Grotius de Imper. Sum. Pol. were a sort of Bishops and they had a President 4. Some were not satisfied with this and were secretly Ordained by the deposed Bishops 5. Some desired Confirmation of their Ordination aforesaid by the Synods from such Bishops as owned it and had it from Bishop Usher at least of others I am uncertain 6. The Generality of them that had any Parsonages or Vicarages or any endowed Cures in England from the Year 1646 till the time that the Westminster Assembly was Dissolved had a formal authorizing Instrument of Approbation from the said Assembly or National Synod chosen by the Parliament of which the Catalogue in their Ordinance sheweth us that divers Bishops were by the Parliament chosen Members If any or all refused to be there the Countrey Ministers knew not that but justly took them to be parts of the Synod And though this was not an Ordination by Imposition of Hands they supposed that it was as valid to authorize them as the Acts before-mentioned of some ancient Bishops who ordained absent Men. And the main Body of the late Ejected Ministers very few excepted were thus called confirmed approved and put in having also the Consent or Election usually of the Patron and the People and the then Rulers Sect. XIV And there were many that in those Times were only Ordained Deacons and took the Synods Letters of Approbation for the substance of an Ordination to be Presbyters but wanting the Formality submitted to Diocesane Ordination when the Diocesanes returned of whom Dr. Manton was one Yea divers submitted to be Re-ordained by the Diocesanes that had been Ordained Presbyters before This is the Nonconformists Case except some few Independents that were not for formal Ordination at least so much as the rest yet even of them such as had Benefices in Anno 1646 1647 1648 had the Synods Approbation Sect. XV. To all this I must add That by the Diocesanes Silencing multitudes of those Ministers whom the most Religious accounted the most able holy powerful Preachers in the days of Queen Elizabeth King James King Charles I. besides the 2000 Silenced in the beginning of King Charles II. the People that were most serious in matters of Religion were except a few so alienated from the Diocesanes that most of the stricter Religious Sort would not choose a Minister that was for them and their Ordination and so it would have made a more dangerous Schism than was made Sect. XVI And as to the present state and practice of the Nonconformists premising that I speak only of meer Nonconformists as such and not Men of other Principles and Parties that Conform not as Jews Turks Socinians Papists Familists Quakers c. let it be understood 1. That they take all the Parishes
Clergy And must hearken to wise pious considerate peaceable and experienced Counsellors and avoid the examples both of Rehoboam and of Jeroboam and be neither an Oppressor nor a Corrupter § XV. And to conclude good and wise men may well know their duty whom to silence and eject and whom to tolerate if they are but true to God by this one Rule They may by hearing all the case and knowledge of the Persons discern whether that mans Preaching consideratis considerandis is clearly like to do more good or harm and do accordingly But then they must not judge of good and harm by carnal sinful lusts and interests and by the counsels of selfish partial men but by wise and just reason guided by the Word of God § XVI And in all doubtful Cases choose the safer side and when the danger of overdoing is the greater as in case of Persecution rather do too little than too much And prefer not Ceremonies before Substance nor tything Mint Annise and Cummin before Love Truth and Judgment and the great things of the Law And be sure that you learn what this meaneth I will have mercy and not sacrifice that you may not condemn or accuse the Guiltless CHAP. XV. The Catholick Church will never unite in a Reception and Subscription to every Word Verse or Book of the Holy Scripture as it is in any one Translation or any one Copy in the Original now known § I. THis needeth no other proof than the reason of the thing and common experience 1. All Translations are the work of imperfect fallible men we have none made by the Spirit as working infallibly in the Apostles unless as some think the Greek of St. Matthews Gospel be a Translation The pretences of Inspiration of the Seventy two that are said to be the Authors of that Greek Translation of the Old Testament is not yet agreed on in the Church nor whether it was more than the Pentateuch which they Translated The Authority and Reasons of Hierome still much prevail Sect. II. And the Vulgar Latine most valued by the Papists is yet so much matter of Controversie between them that when Sixtus Quintus had stablished a corrected Edition Clement the 8th altered it in many hundred places after Sect. III. And all Protestants acknowledge the imperfection of all their own Translations English Dutch French c. And in the same Church of England we have the publick prescribed Use of two different Translations of the Psalms one sometime directly contrary to the other as Yea and Nay and one leaving a whole Verse which the other hath Sect. IV. And we know of no man that pretendeth to be sure that he hath a Copy of the Hebrew and Greek Text which he is certain is perfectly agreeable to the autography or first draught And the multitude of various Readings put us out of all hope of ever having certainly so perfect a Copy All therefore have the marks of humane frailty which cannot be denied Sect. V. And no wise and good man should deliberately deny this and so justifie falsly every humane slip But yet there is no such difference among Copies or Translations as should any way shake our foundations or any point necessary to salvation doth depend upon For in all such points they all agree Sect. VI. Object But if Copies and Translations differ and err how can we make them our rule of judgment Answ I say again They agree in as many things as we need them for as a Rule of Judgment And where they differ it being in words of no such use and moment that hindereth not our being Ruled by them where they agree The Kings Laws may be written in divers Languages for divers Countries of his Subjects And verbal differences may be no hinderance to their regulating use no more than the King himself doth lose his authority if his hair turn white Sect. VIII Object 2. But what then must all subscribe to if not to all the Bible Have you any other measure or test Answ We must subscribe That we believe all Gods Word to be true and all the true Canon of Scripture to be his Word and that we will faithfully endeavor to discern all the Canon And we must expresly subscribe to the Essentials of Christianity of which before and after Sect. VIII It was a considerable time before many Churches received the Epistle of James the 2d of Peter that to the Hebrews the Revelation c. And no doubt they were nevertheless true Christians And if now any believe all the Essentials of Religion and should doubt only whether the Canticles or the Epistle to â—iâ—â—mon or the two last of John or that of Jude were Canonical he might for all that be a true Christian and more meet to be a Bishop than Synesius was before he believed the Resurrection or Neclarâ—us before he was baptized c. Sect. IX The Churches are not fully agreed to this day about the Canonical Books of Scripture more than the Papists call some Books Canonical which we call Apocryphal And it is said that the Abassines and Syrians have divers not only as Ecclesiastical but as Canonical which we have not nor know not of Though we have good cause to judge best of our own received number by the proof well produced by Bishop Consins and many others yet have we no cause to unchurch all Churches that differ from us Sect. X. No Church therefore ought to cast out all Ministers that doubt of some words in any Translation or Copy or of some Verse Chapter or Book who hold the main and all the necessary Doctrines No such Test was imposed on the primitive Christians And it 's sad to hear the report that even the sound and humble Churches of Helvetia should lately make it necessary to the Ministery to subscribe to the antiquity of the Hebrew points though it may be a true and useful Assertion CHAP. XVI The Catholick Church will never unite in the subscribing to any mens whole Commentaries on the Bible § I. THis is yet more evident than the former 1. They do not at this day nor ever did agree in any mens Commentary They have great respect to the Commentaries of some of the Ancients and others but subscribe them not as infallible Though the Trent Oath of Pope Pius swear men not to expound the Scriptures otherwise than according to the agreeing Exposition of the Fathers it is well known 1. That they never told and proved to us who are to be taken for Fathers and who not 2. It 's known that few of them have written large Commentaries and fewer on all the Bible if any 3. That they oft differ among themselves 4. And the best have confessed their own Errors 5. And more have been found erroneous by others and are by us at this day 6. Yea they have cast out and condemned one another as the Case of Nazianzene Epiphanius Chrysostom Theophilus Alexand. Cyril and Theodoret and many