Selected quad for the lemma: england_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
england_n catholic_n church_n communion_n 6,739 5 9.8919 5 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A66393 The difference between the Church of England, and the Church of Rome in opposition to a late book, intituled, An agreement between the Church of England, and Church of Rome. Williams, John, 1636?-1709. 1687 (1687) Wing W2701A; ESTC R38648 38,428 98

There are 8 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

Ancient and most other Churches in viz. Episcopacy and a Liturgy and it had been to the like purpose if he had also shewed their Agreement in the great Doctrines of Christian Religion And yet even here he fails again for he that concludes In a word the Agreement between the English Clergy and the Romanist about the immediate Divine Right of Episcopacy is so full c. doth before acknowledg that Ordination by Presbyters is granted in the Church of Rome to be valid and regular and that all those that hold the Supreme Jurisdiction of the Pope over the whole Catholick Church visible do hold the Divine Right of Bishops to be but mediate mediante Papa So that he is gone from an Agreement of Churches to an Agreement between Persons from a full Agreement in Opinion to an Agreement in Government and Worship from Worship to some parts of Worship from Demonstrations to Inferences and framed Propositions of his own from an Agreement at last to a Disagreement And now we may look back with some comfort to his bold offer and clear demonstration at the beginning when he saith The Author hath with some clearness demonstrated the Agreement of Opinion between the Church of England Men and the Church of Rome to be so exact and full that if the Government should so design it were but dictum factum according to their Doctrine and a Cassandrian Peace might be patch'd up presently with Rome He advances as if he were a kind of Plenipotentiary but it may be suspected he that has this way of Demonstration is not like to be very fortunate in the Negotiation Thus much shall suffice for our Author's way of Demonstration and his Attempt to shew the Agreement between the Church of England and Church of Rome leaving a fuller Answer to some of his particular Discourses to an abler Pen. But yet there remains another part toward a just state of the Controversy and that is as he well observed to let the World know how far these Churches differ as well as wherein they are agreed But that was a Province he had no mind to Prosecute as being tho more to the purpose yet not so much to his design For certainly he that will demonstrate the Agreement to be full and exact must either suppose there is no Difference or if there be that the Difference is not considerable enough to hinder the Agreement But if there be a Difference and the Difference in points Diametrically opposite and irreconcilable it is to no purpose to shew their Agreement were it so to be full and exact in others And that this is the case and the Disagreement far greater than the Agreement I shall endeavour to prove and that not from an Author or two or far-fetched Consequences and forced Interpretations and dubious Expressions but from sufficient Authorities and the avowed Principles of both Churches Such are the 39 Articles the Catechism the Homilies and Liturgy of the Church of England Such again are the Councils more especially the Council of Trent the Catechism ad Parochos the Rhemists Annotations the Missal and Breviaries according to which and the like a Papist Represented as the Mode of speaking has been of late doth believe In order to which I shall premise 1. That there are some Articles which both Churches do in express Terms agree in called by our Author the great Doctrines of Religion viz. Art. 1. of the Holy Trinity and so how Socinians can subscribe the Articles of the Church of England as this Author affirms I understand not Art. 2. of the Word or Son of God Art. 3. of the going down of Christ into Hell Art. 4. of the Resurrection of Christ Art. 5. of the Holy Ghost Art. 7. of the Old Testament Art. 8. of the Three Creeds Art. 12. of good Works Art. 16. of Sin after Baptism Art. 18. of obtaining eternal Salvation only by the Name of Christ Art. 23. of Ministring in the Congregation Art. 26. of the unworthiness of Ministers Art. 27. of Baptism Art. 33. of Excommunicate Persons Art. 38. of Christian mens goods Art. 39. of a Christian mans Oath Against these the Jesuit Johan Roberti hath little or nothing to object in his small Tract purposely written in Opposition to our Articles But of these Articles it is to be observed there are some which each party differs as much from the other in when they come to explain themselves as if there had been no agreement in Terms Thus it happens in Articles 3 d 7 th and 15 th as shall afterwards in part be shewed 2. There are other Articles wherein both Churches do agree in the Sence tho they differ in Terms or that are not so much Controversies between Church and Church as between private Doctors in each Church Of this Opinion is a Learned Forreigner of the Reformed Religion about the matter contained in Articles the 10 th and 17 th of Free will and of Predestination and Election Of the former he saith The difference that our Adversaries will object between them and us upon this point of Free-will is only imaginary and a meer cavil Of the latter he concludes Since we agree in the Fundamentals of this Doctrine as we have already set forth and that our Dissent is but with a few of their Doctors it would not be very hard I should think to find out such a bias of Temperament drawn from the Word of God in proposing of these Opinions and in Terms so proportioned to their Sublimity as all humble and moderate Spirits would find sufficient for their Satisfaction 3. There are other Points which are matter of Liberty and left undetermined in the Church of England And so She doth receive into her Communion as well those that deny as affirm But on the contrary the Church of Rome hath determined several Points of this Nature to be Matters of Faith and anathematized those that do not so receive them Thus they are accursed by the Council of Trent that say We are formally justified by the Righteousness of Christ the only formal cause of our Justification being the Justice of God as it s there declared cap. 8. or that we are justified by the alone Imputation of Christ's Righteousness Or that shall say Justifying Faith is nothing else than a trust or confidence in the Divine Mercy forgiving Sins for Christs sake c. In which and the like unless the Church of England will curse those whom She doth bless and cast out of her Communion such as She receives into it She can no more be reconciled to the Church of Rome than in those other Points that for the matter of them are held and declared by her self to be false and erroneous 4. There are Articles which the two Churches do in whole or in part so differ in that the Doctrine of the Church of England cannot be the Doctrine of the Church of Rome nor the Doctrine
the Homily shews The third part of the Homily of Salvation The meaning of this Proposition or saying We be justified by Faith in Christ only according to the meaning of the old ancient Authors is this we put our Faith in Christ that we be justified by Him only that we be justified by Gods free Mercy and the Merits of our Saviour Christ only and by no vertue or good Works of our own The Church of Rome The Council of Trent Justification is not only the Remission of Sins but the Sanctification and Renovation of the inward man from whence a man of unjust is made just If any one shall say That men are justified either by the only imputation of Christs rightousness or by the alone Remission of our Sins excluding the Grace and Love which is spread in their Hearts by the Holy Ghost and doth inhere in them or that the Grace by which we are justified is only the favour of God let him be accursed It s call'd our Righteousness because we are justified by it inhering in us If any one shall say That the wicked is justified by Faith alone so that he understands nothing else to be required which may co-operate to obtain the Grace of Justification and that it is not at all necessary that he be prepared and disposed by the motion of his own will let him be accursed The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome 1. Placeth the nature of Justification in the forgiveness of Sin. 1. Saith Justification is not only the forgiveness of Sin but also that it is the Sanctification of our natures confounding Justification with Sanctification and that whoever holds the contrary is accursed 2. Saith We are accounted Righteous only for the merit of Christ. 2. Saith We are justified by a righteousness inhering in us The 12 th Article of the Church of England Of good Works Albeit that good Works which are the Fruits of Faith and follow after Justification cannot put away our Sins and endure the Severity of Gods Judgment yet are they pleasing and acceptable to God in Christ and do spring out necessarily of a true and lively Faith insomuch that by them a lively Faith may be as evidently known as a Tree discerned by the Fruit. Homily of good Works And first of Fasting To have any Affiance or to put any Confidence in our Works as by merie and deserving of them to purchase to our selves and others Remission of Sin and so consequently everlasting Life is meet Blasphemy of Gods Mercy and great Derogation to the Blood-shedding of our Saviour Jesus Christ. Sermon of Salvation part 3. Our own Imperfection is so great through the Corruption of Original Sin that all is unperfect that is within us Faith Charity Hope Dread Thoughts Words and Works and therefore not apt to merit or deserve any part of our Justification for us The Church of Rome The Council of Trent Justified persons are esteemed to have truly deserved eternal life If any one shall say The good Works of the justified are so the gifts of God that they are not also the good Merits of the person justified or that by the good Works which are done by him through the Grace of God and merit of Christ he doth not truly Merit an increase of Grace eternal Life and the obtaining of eternal Life if he shall depart in Grace and also an increase of Glory let him be accursed The Rhemists Annotations This place convinceth for the Catholicks that all good Works done by God's Grace after the first Justification be truly and properly Meritorious and fully worthy of everlasting Life and that thereupon Heaven is the due and just Stipend Crown or Recompence which God by his Justice oweth to the persons so working by his Grace for he rendreth or repayeth Heaven as a just Judg and not only as a merciful Giver and the Crown which he payeth is not only of Mercy or Favour or Grace but also of Justice The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome 1. The best Works are imperfect and cannot endure the severity of God's Judgment 1. The good Works of the justified do truly merit eternal Life 2. To put any confidence in our Works and to think they merit everlasting Life is blasphemy 2. Whosoever saith they do not properly merit is accursed The 13 th Article of the Church of England Of Works before Justification Works done before the Grace of Christ and the Inspiration of his Spirit are not pleasant to God forasmuch as they Spring not of Faith in Jesu Christ neither do they make men to receive Grace or as School Authors say deserve Grace of Congruity Yea rather for that they are not done as God hath willed and commanded them to be done we doubt not but they have the nature of Sin. The Church of Rome It was a common Opinion in the Church of Rome that Works done before the Grace of Christ do make men meet to deserve Grace of Congruity or that man by the power of Nature can dispose himself for Justification Of this Opinion were Scotus Durandus Biel Cajetan c. Council of Trent If any one shall say That all Works before Justification for whatever reason they are done are truly sins or deserve the hatred of God Let him be accursed The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome 1. Works done before Justification do not deserve Grace of Congruity 1. Works done before Justification do merit it of Congruity 2. Works done before Justification have the nature of Sin. 2. Whoever shall say Works done before Justification are truly Sins is accursed The 14 th Article of the Church of England Of Works of Supererogation Voluntary Works besides over and above God's commandments which they call works of Supererogation cannot be taught without arrogancy and impiety For by them men do declare that they do not only render unto God as much as they are bound to do but that they do more for his sake than of bounden Duty is required ‡ Whereas Christ saith plainly When ye have done all that are commanded to you say we are unprofitable Servants Second Part Of the Sermon of good VVorks Which Sects and Religions in the Church of Rome had so many hypocritical and feigned VVorks in their State of Religion as they arrogantly named it that their Lamps as they said run always over able to satisfie not only for their own Sins but also for all their Benefactors Brothers and Sisters of Religion as most ungodilly and trustily they had perswaded the Multitude of ignorant People keeping in divers places as it were Marts or Markets of Merit being full of their Holy Relicks Images Shrines and VVorks of overflowing Abundance ready to be sold. The Church of Rome The Catechism In this the goodness and clemency of God is to be praised who hath granted to our weakness that one may satisfie for another
c. And such as are endued with Divine Grace can pay in the name of another what is due to God. Rhemists Annotations The works which we do more then Precept be called Works of Supererogation and whereby that is from what was abovesaid it is also evident against the Protestants that there be such Works This place proveth plainly that the fastings and satisfactory Deeds of one man be available to others Yea and that holy Saints or other vertuous Persons may in measure and proportion of other Mens necessities and deservings allot unto them as well the Supererogation of their Spiritual Works as those that abound in worldly Goods may give Alms of their Superfluities to them which are in necessity We infer most assuredly that the satisfactory and penal Works of Holy Saints suffered in this Life be communicable and applicable to the use of other faithful men and to be dispensed according to every mans necessity and deserving by them whom Christ hath constituted over his Family and hath made the Dispensers of his Treasures The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome 1. That men may do more for Gods sake than of bounden Duty is required cannot be taught without Arrogancy and Impiety 1. That men may do Works of Supererogation and more than is commanded 2. That any may be able not only to satisfie for their own Sins but also for the Sins of others is a most ungodly Doctrine 2. That what they do more than is commanded may be allotted to others and which such may have the benefit of The 15 th Article of the Church of England Of Christ alone without Sin. Christ in the Truth of our nature was made like unto us in all things Sin only except from which he was clearly void both in his Flesh and in his Spirit c. But all we the rest although Baptized and born again in Christ yet offend in many things and if we say we have no Sin we deceive our selves and the Truth is not in us The Church of Rome The Council of Trent If any one shall say That any one can avoid all Sins such also as are venial in the whole course of his Life except by special priviledge from God as the Church doth hold concerning the Blessed Virgin Let him be accursed The Rhemists Our Lady had so much Grace given her that she never sinned not so much as venially in all her Life The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome Christ alone is without Sin but all the rest of mankind offend in many things none being excepted The Virgin Mary is excepted having never sinned so much as venially The 19 th Article of the Church of England Of the Church The visible Church of Christ is a Congregation on of faithful men in which the pure Word of God is Preached and the Sacraments be duly ministred according to Christs Ordinance in all those things that of necessity are requisite to the same As the Church of Jerusalem Alexandria and Antioch have erred So also the Church of Rome hath erred not only in their Living and manner of Ceremonies but also in matters of Faith. § 1. Of the Church The Visible Church is where the Word of God is Preached and the Sacraments be duly Ministred in all things of necessity requisite The Church of Rome The 5 th General Council of Lateran The Sacred Doctors have affirmed That the Vnity of the Church doth consist in two things 1. In the Conjunction of the Members of the Church one with another 2. In their Order to one Head the Vicar of Christ according to the saying of the Apostle Not holding the Head. The Catechism of the Council of Trent Of the Notes of the True Church The first Note is That it be One. And it is called One as there is one Lord one Faith one Baptism There is one Governour the Invisible Christ the Visible who being the lawful Successor of Peter Prince of the Apostles doth possess the Roman Chair The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome The Notes of a True Church are the pure word Preached and the due Ministration of the Sacraments The necessary Note of the true Church is the being united to the Bishop of Rome § 2. Of the Falibility of the Church of Rome The Church of Rome hath erred as well as other Churches in Living Ceremonies and Faith. The Church of Rome hath erred in Ceremonies The Common-Prayer Book Of such Ceremonies as be used in the Church and have had their beginning by the Institution of man some are put away because the great excess and multitude of them hath so increased in these latter days that the burden of them was intolerable This our excessive multitude of Ceremonies was so great and many of them so dark that they did more confound than declare and set forth Christs benefits unto us Furthermore the most weighty cause of the abolishment of some Ceremonies was that they were so far abused partly by the superstitious blindness of the rude and unlearned and partly by the unsatiable avarice c. The 2d part Of the Homily of Place and Time of Prayer They have prophaned and defiled their Churches with Heathenish and Jewish abuses with Images and Idols with numbers of Altars too too superstitiously and intolerably abused with gross abusing and filthy corrupting of the Lord 's Holy Supper the blessed Sacrament of his Body and Blood with an infinite number of toyes and trifles of their own devices to make a goodly outward shew and to deface the plain simple and sincere Religion of Christ. The Church of Rome The Council of Trent The Church hath appointed Ceremonies as mystical Benedictions Lights Incensings Garments and such like that the Majesty of so great a Sacrifice might be recommended and the minds of the faithful be excited c. If any one shall say That the Ceremonies Garments and external signs which the Catholick Church doth use in the Celebration of Mass are rather Icitements of Impiety than helps to Piety Let him be accursed If any one shall say They are injurious to the Holy Spirit that give some virtue to the Holy Chrism of Confirmation Let him be accursed The Catechism The Sacrifice of the Mass hath many and those very remarkable and solemn Rites none of which is to be esteemed needless sand vain The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome 1. The Ceremonies in the Church of Rome were for their multitude an intolerable burden 1. The Ceremonies used are many but solemn and for the Majesty of Worship 2. They do more confound than set forth Christs benefits and do deface the plain and sincere Religion of Christ. 2. They do recommend the Worship and excite the minds of the Faithful 3. They are toyes and trifles 3. None of them are needless and vain but have a virtue in them 4. They do
prophane and defile the Churches where they are used 4. Whosoever shall say That they are incitements of impiety is accursed See Articles 6 th and 34 th The Church of Rome hath erred in matters of Faith. The 2d part Of the Homily concerning the Holy Ghost If ye will compare the Notes of a true Church with the Church of Rome as it is presently and hath been for the space of Nine hundred years and odd you shall well perceive the state thereof to be so far wide from the nature of the true Church that nothing can be more Where is then the Holy-Ghost which they do so stoutly claim to themselves Where is now the Spirit of truth that will not suffer them in any wise to err c. It is but a vain brag and nothing else The Church of Rome The Council of Trent The Holy Synod delivering that sound and sincere Doctrine which the Catholick Church being taught by Jesus Christ himself and the Apostles and by the Holy Spirit suggesting all Truth from day to day to her hath retained and will preserve to the end of the World doth straightly charge all the faithful of Christ that they dare not after this believe or teach otherwise concerning the holy Eucharist than is explained and defined in this Decree The Catechism The Church cannot err in delivering the Discipline of Faith and Manners The Rhemists Annotations By this Promise we are assured That no Heresies or other wicked attempts can prevail against the Church builded upon Peter which the Fathers call Peter's See and the Roman Church The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome 1. The Church of Rome hath erred in matters of Faith. 1. The Church of Rome cannot err in matters of Faith. 2. The pretence of the Church of Rome to Infallibility is nothing but a vain brag 2. The Church of Rome is guided by the Holy Spirit from day to day and cannot err The 20 th Article of the Church of England Of the Authority of the Church It is not lawful for the Church to ordain any thing that is contrary to God's Word written c. wherefore although the Church be a witness and keeper of Holy Writ yet as it ought not to decree any thing against the same so besides the same ought it not to enforce any thing to be believed for necessity of Salvation The Church of Rome The Council of Constance Altho Christ hath instituted and did Administer the Sacrament of the Eucharist in Bread and Wine yet this nowithstanding the Authority of the sacred Canons and the approved custom of the Church is to be preserved that it be not received after Supper c. And likewise that altho the Sacrament was received in both kinds in the Primitive Church yet the custom is reasonably introduced that the Laicks receive in one kind c. And we do command that no Presbyter doth communicate the People in both The Council of Trent This Holy Synod being taught by the Holy Spirit doth declare and teach That Lay-men are obliged by no Divine Precept to receive in both kinds and that Communion in one is sufficient for Salvation Furthermore she declares That this power hath always been in the Church that in dispensing the Sacraments the substance of them being preserved she might appoint and change those things which she doth judg more expedient for the profit of the Receivers and the reverence of the Sacrament c. Wherefore Holy Mother Church acknowledging avowing this her Authority c. for weighty and just causes doth decree That the Eucharist be communicated in one kind 1. General Council of Lateran We do altogether forbid Presbyters Deacons and Monks to contract Matrimony and we do determine that Marriages so contracted be disjoyned The Creed of Pius 4th In which it 's declared That the Church of Rome is the Mother and Mistriss of all other Churches That the Pope is Successor of St. Peter and Vicar of Christ. That in the Mass is a real Transubstantiation of the Elements into the Body and Blood of Christ c. And that all things professed in that Creed are the Catholick Faith Out of which no man can be saved The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome 1. Saith that it is not lawful for the Church to ordain any thing contrary to God's written Word 1. The Church of Rome hath ordained things contrary to God's written Word as in requiring the Sacrament to be administred in one kind in forbidding and disannulling the Marriage of Priests 2. The Church ought not to enforce any thing besides the written Word to be believed for necessity of Salvation 2. The Church of Rome doth require things at least besides the Word to be believed as necessary to Salvation As that the Pope is vicar of Christ and St. Peter's Successor that there are properly and truly Seven Sacraments instituted by Christ c The 21. Article of the Church of England Of the Authority of General Councils General Councils may not be gathered together without the commandment and will of Princes And when they be gathered together forasmuch as they be an Assembly of Men whereof all be not governed with the Spirit and Word of God they may err and sometime have erred in things pertaining unto God. Wherefore things ordained by them as necessary to Salvation have neither strength nor Authority unless it may be declared that they be taken out of Holy Scripture The Church of Rome Council of Trent It belongs to the Popes to call and direct General Councils The Holy Vniversal and General Synod of Trent lawfully gathered together in the Holy Ghost taught by the Holy Spirit which is a Spirit of Wisdom and Vnderstanding c. doth declare and teach The Rhemists Annot. To teach all Truth and preserve in Truth and from Error the Holy-Ghost is promised and performed only to the Church and the chief Governor and General Councils thereof The Rhemists Annot. The Holy Councils lawfully kept c. have ever the assistance of God's Spirit and therefore cannot err in their Sentences and Determinations concerning the same because the Holy-Ghost cannot err from whom as you see here jointly with the Council the Resolution proceedeth The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome 1. General Councils may not be gathered without the Command and Will of Princes 1. It belongs to the Pope to call General Councils 2. General Councils have erred and may err 2. General Councils called by the Pope cannot err The 22. Article of the Church of England Of Purgatory The Romish Doctrine concerning Purgatory Pardons Worshipping and Adoration as well of Images as of Relicks and also Invocation of Saints is a fond Thing vainly invented and grounded upon no warranty of Scripture but rather repugnant to the Word of God. § 1. Purgatory THE Romish Doctrine concerning Purgatory is a fond thing vainly
Christ's Ordinance reserved carried about lifted up and worshipped Rubrick at the end of the Communion Service Do Adoration ought to be done either unto the Sacramental Bread and Wine there bodily received or unto any corporal Presence of Christ's natural Flesh and Blood. For the Sacramental Bread and Wine remain still in their very natural Substances and therefore may not be adored for that were Idolatry to be abhorred of all Faithful Christians And the natural Body and Blood of our Saviour Christ are in Heaven and not here it being against the Truth of Christ's natural Body to be at one time in more Places than one The Church of Rome The 4 th General Council of Lateran The Body and Blood of Christ are truly contained in the Sacrament of the Altar under the Species of Bread and Wine the Bread being transubstantiated into the Body and the Wine into the Blood by the Power of God c. The Council of Trent Whosoever shall deny that the Body and Blood together with the Soul and Divinity of our Lord Jesus Christ and so whole Christ is contained in the Sacrament of the Eucharist let him be accursed Whosoever shall deny that wonderful and singular Conversion of the whole Substance of the Bread into the Body and of the whole Substance of the Wine into the Blood the Species only of Bread and Wine remaining which Conversion the Catholick Church most aptly calls Transubstantiation let him be accursed If any one shall say That the Body and Blood of Christ is only in use not before and after and that the true Body of Christ doth not remain in the particles of it reserved after the Communion let him be accursed If any one shall say That Christ is not to be worshipped in the Eucharist with Divine Worship c. or that he is not solemnly to be carried about and shewed to the People that he may be worshipped and that the Worshippers are Idolaters let him be accursed If any one shall say That Christ is only eaten spiritually let him be accursed The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome 1. The Sacramental Bread and Wine after Consecration remain in their very natural Substances 1. There are after Consecration only the Species of the Bread and Wine in the Eucharist and the Substance of Bread and Wine is converted into the Body and Blood of Christ. 2. The natural Body and Blood of Christ are in Heaven and not here 2. The Body and Blood of Christ together with his Soul and Divinity is contained in the Eucharist 3. Transubstantiation is repugnant to the plain words of Scripture c. 3. Whosoever shall deny Transubstantiation is accursed 4. The Body Blood of Christ is in the Supper only eaten after an heavenly spiritualmanner 4. Whosoever shall say Christ is eaten only spiritually is accursed 5. The Sacrament of the Lord's Supper was not by Christ's Ordinance reserved 5. Whosoever shall say That the Body and Blood of Christ is only in use and remains not in what is reserved is accursed 6. The Sacramental Bread and Wine may not be adored for that is Idolatry 6. If any shall say Th● Host is not to be worshipped or that to worship i● is Idolatry he is accursed So that the Church of England is upon this Article under six Anathema's at least of the Church of Rome as appears The 29. Article of the Church of England Of the Wicked which eat not the Body of Christ in the use of the Lord's Supper The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome The wicked and such as be void of a lively Faith altho they do carnally and visibly press with their Teeth as St. Augustine saith the Sacrament of the Body and Blood of Christ yet in no wise are they partakers of Christ c. Ill Men receive the Body and Blood of Christ be they Infidels or Ill Livers Rhem. Annot. in 1 Cor. 11. 27. The 30. Article of the Church of England Of both kinds The Cup of the Lord is not to be denied to the Lay-People For both the parts of the Lord's Sacrament ought by Christ's Ordinance Commandment to be ministred to all Christian Men alike The Church of Rome The Council of Trent Altho our Redeemer hath instituted the Sacrament in his last Supper and hath delivered unto the Apostles in both Kinds yet it is to be confessed that whole and intire Christ and a true Sacrament is taken under one kind only and furthermore that as to the benefit of it they are defrauded of no Grace necessary to Salvation who receive only in one kind The Synod hath decreed That it should be received for a Law that the Sacrament be administred in one kind Whosoever shall say That by the command of God all the Faithful ought to receive in both kinds let him be accursed Whosoever shall say That the holy Catholick Church hath not been induced for just causes and reasons to order that Lay-People and Priests not officiating should communicate only under the Species of Bread or that she hath erred therein let him be accursed Whosoever shall deny whole and intire Christ to be taken under one Species let him be accursed The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome 1. The Cup is not to be denied to the Lay-People 1. The Cup for just Reasons is denied to the Lay-People 2. The Ministration in one kind is but part of a Sacrament 2. Whole Christ and an whole Sacrament is under one kind alone 3. The Sacrament ought to be administred in both kinds according to Christ's Commandment 3. Whosoever shall say that the People ought to receive in both kinds by the Command of God is accursed The 31. Article of the Church of England Of the one Oblation of Christ finished upon the Cross. The offering of Christ once made is that perfect Redemption Propitiation and Satisfaction for the Sins of the whole World both Original and Actual and there is none other satisfaction for Sin but that alone Wherefore the Sacrifices of Masses in the which it is commonly said that the Priest did offer Christ for the quick and the dead to have Remission of pain or guilt were blasphemous Fables and dangerous Deceits The Church of Rome The Council of Trent Because in this Divine Sacrifice which is performed in the Mass the self-same Christ is contained and unbloodily offered that offered himself once upon the Altar of the Cross the Holy Synod doth teach That that Sacrifice is truly Propitiatory It is rightly offered not only for the Sins Punishments and Satisfactions and other Necessities of the Faithful living but also for the dead in Christ not as yet fully purged according to the Tradition of the Apostles If any one shall say That there is not offered to God in the Mass a true and proper Sacrifice let him be accursed If any one shall
and absolve their Subjects from Allegiance and exempt the Clergy from their Jurisdiction p. 67 70. Lastly The Church of Rome doth hold all things delivered defined and declared by the sacred Canons and General Councils and especially that of Trent c. And that this is the true Catholick Faith out of which none can be saved Creed of Pius IVth FINIS BOOKS lately Printed for Richard Chiswell THE Pillar and Ground of Truth A Treatise shewing that the Roman Church falsly claims to be That Church and the Pillar of That Truth mentioned by S. Paul in his first Epistle to Timothy Chap. 3. Vers. 15. 4 to The Peoples Right to read the Holy Scripture Asserted 4 to A Short Summary of the principal Controversies between the Church of England and the Church of Rome being a Vindication of several Protestant Doctrines in Answer to a Late Pamphlet Intituled Protestancy destitute of Scripture Proofs 4 to Two Discourses Of Purgatory and Prayers for the Dead An Answer to a Late Pamphlet Intituled The Judgment and Doctrine of the Clergy of the Church of England concerning one Special Branch of the King's Prerogative viz. In dispensing with the Penal Laws 4 to The Notes of the Church as laid down by Cardinal Bellarmin examined and confuted 4 to Preparation for Death Being a Letter sent to a young Gentlewoman in France in a dangerous Distemper of which she died The Difference between the Church of England and the Church of Rome in opposition to a late Book Intituled An Agreement between the Church of England and Church of Rome A PRIVATE PRAYER to be used in Difficult Times A True Account of a Conference held about Religion at London Sept. 29. 1687. between A. Pulton Jesuit and Tho. Tennison D. D. as also of that which led to it and followed after it 4 to The Vindication of A. Cressener Schoolmaster in Long-Acre from the Aspersions of A. Pulton Jesuit Schoolmaster in the Savoy together with some Account of his Discourse with Mr. Meredith A Discourse shewing that Protestants are on the safer Side notwithstanding the uncharitable Judgment of their Adversaries and that Their Religion is the surest Way to Heaven 4 to Six Conferences concerning the Eucharist wherein is shewed that the Doctrine of Transubstantiation overthrows the Proofs of Christian Religion A Discourse concerning the Pretended Sacrament of Extreme Vnction with an Account of the occasions and beginnings of it in the Western Church In three Parts With a Letter to the Vindicator of the Bishop of Condom Preface to the Agreement Page 1 Preface Page 2. Page 3. Page 6b Preface Page 16 18 30 31. De Concll l. 1. c. 7. Page 22 c. Preface Page 42 43 44. Page 44. Page 36 37. Page 42. Preface Page 2. A Papist Misrepres and Represented Introduct Agreement p. 2. Page 2. Ecclesiae Angl. Basis Impostura Luxemb 1619. Apology for the Protestants done out of French into English 1681. Part 4. Cap. 3. p. 135 150. Sess. 6. Can. 10 11 12 c. Art. 6. Art. 20. Sess 4. decret de Canon Script Council Trent Sess. 22. Cap. 5. Sess. 4. Decretum de edit usu Sacr. Libr. Regula 4. Azorius Instit. Mor. l. 8. cap. 26. ff Quaeritur ff Quaeres ART 7. Sess. 25. de invocat Catech. Trid. par 4. cap. 5. ff 8. ART 9. Sess. 36. Anno 1439. Sess. 5. ART 11. Sess. 6. cap. 7. Can. 11. Cap. 16. Can. 9. ART 12. Sess. 6. Cap. 16. Can 32. Annot. in 2 Tim. 4. 8. 1 Cor. 3. 8. and Hebr. 6. 10. ART 13. See Bishop Vshers Answer to a Challange Chap. 11. Sess. 6. Cap. 7. ART 14. Pars 2 de Sacram paenit ff 77. Luke 11 Ver. 35. 2 Cor. 8. 14. Annot. on 2 Cor. 2. 10. ART 15. Sess. 6. Can. 23. Annot. on Mar. 3. 34. ART 19. Orat. Archiep. Spalat Par. 1. de 9. Art. Symb. ff 11. N. 1. Rubrick Of Ceremonies why some be abolished c. Sess. 22. Cap. 5. Ibid. Can. 7. Sess. 7. Can. 2. Par. 2. Cap. 4. de Euchar. ff 81. N. 2. Sess. 13. init Par. 1. de 9. Artic. Symb. ff 18. On Matth. 16. 18. ART 20. Sess. 13. Sess. 21. Cap. 1. Ibid Cap. 2. Cap. 21. ART 21. Sess. 11. Bulla resump Decretum de resum Conc. Sess. 21. init cap. 1. Rhem. Annot. Joh. 16. 13. On Acts 16. 28. ART 22. Sess. 25. Decret de Purgat Sess. 6. Can. 30. Sess. 22. Can. 3. On Mat. 16. 19. Can. 11. Can. 3. Sess. 16. Sess. 21. Cap. 9. Sess. 25. Decret de Indulg Sess. 25. de Invocat Sess. 25. de Invocat Par. 4. Cap. 5. ff 8. ART 23. ART 24. ART 25. See the Homily of Common Prayer and the Sacraments Rubrick after the Com. Service Sess. 7. Can. 1. Can. 8. Sess. 22. Cap. 6. Can. 8. ART 28. Can. 1. Sess. 13. Cap. 1. and Can. 1. Cap. 4. and Can. 2. Can. 4. Can. 6. Can. 8. ART 29. ART 30. Sess. 21. Cap. 3. Cap. 2. Can. 1. Can. 2. Can. 3. ART 31. Sess. 2. Cap. 2. Can. 1. Can. 3. Can. 4. ART 32. Cap. 21. Can. 6. Sess. 24. Can. 6. Can. 9. ART 34. Sess. 4. Decret de Canon Script Sess. 14. Cap. 1. Sess. 22. Cap. 2. and 5. Can. 9. Par. 2. Cap. 7. ff 14. Cap. 4 ff 81. ART 35. ART 36. Sess. 23. Cap. 1. Catechis par 2. cap. 9. ff 11 12. On Joh. 10. 1. Erastus Senior Preface Anno. 1662. A Paper in the Vindication of Ordination c. Anno 1677. ART 37. On 5 th Commandment Sess. 19. Cap. 27. Can. 3. de Haereticis Sess. 3. Sess. 17. Sess. ult Decret de Reform Cap. 12. Cap. 14. Can. 43. Sess. 9. Sess. 25. De Reform Cap. 20. Agreement Preface Ibid.
say The Sacrifice of the Mass is not Propitiatory and that it profits him that takes it only and that it ought not to be offered for the living and dead for Sins Punishments Satisfactions and other Necessities let him be Accursed If any one shall say That by the Sacrifice of the Mass there is Blasphemy offered to the Sacrifice of Christ upon the Cross or that thereby any thing is derogated from him let him be accursed The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome 1. The offering of Christ as a Propitiation was but once 1. In the Mass there is a Propitiatory Sacrifice offered daily 2. To say that the Priest offers for the living and the dead in the Mass is blasphemous Fables and dangerous Deceits 2. Whoever denies that Christ is offered for the living and dead or shall say Christ and his Sacrifice is thereby blasphemed is Accursed The 32. Article of the Church of England Of the Marriage of Priests Bishops Priests and Deacons are not commanded by God's Law either to vow the estate of single Life or to abstain from Marriage therefore it is lawful also for them as for all other Christian Men to Marry at their own Discretion as they shall judy the same to serve better to Godliness 2 d. Part of the Homily of Good Works This Pharifascal and Papistical levell of Man's feigned Religion in Monastical Vows which although it were before God most abominable and contrary to God's Commandments and Christ's pure Religion yet it was praised to be a most Godly Life and the highest State of Perfection The Church of Rome 1. General Council of Lateran We do altogether forbid Presbyters Deacons and Monks to have Concubines or to contract Matrimony and according to the Definitions of Sacred Canons we do decree that Marriages so contracted be separated and that the Persons ought to be brought to Penance The 2. General Council of Lateran We do decree that they who being in the Order of Sub-deacon and above have Married Wives and had Concubines shall not have an Ecclesiastical Benefice for seeing they are the Temple of God c. it is a shameful thing that they should serve Beds and Vncleannesses The Council of Trent If any one shall say That Matrimony confirmed not consummated is not dissolved by the solemn profession of Religion of either Party let him be accursed If any one shall say That Clerks in Holy Orders or Regulars having solemnly professed Chastity may contract Matrimony and that so contracted it is valid notwithstanding an Ecclesiastical Law and Vow c. And that all may contract Matrimony who perceive they have not the gift of Chastity though they have vowed it let him be accursed The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome 1. The Marriage of Priests is lawful 1. Priests ought not to Marry and if they Marry are to be separated 2. The Marriage of Priests may serve to godliness 2. The Marriage of Priests is a defiling the Temple of God. 3. To Vow against Marriage especially upon the account of Perfection and Purity is a feigned Religion and contrary to God's Commandment 3. Vows against Marriage do oblige though the Persons have not the Gift of Continency The 34. Article of the Church of England Of the Traditions of the Church It is not necessary that Traditions and Ceremonies be in all places one of utterly like for at all times they have been diverse and may be changed according to the diversity of Countries Times and Mens Manners so that nothing be ordained against God's Word Every particular or national Church hath Authority to ordain change and abolish Ceremonies or Rites of the Church ordained only by Man's Authority so that all things be done to edifying 2 d Part of the Sermon of Good Works Let us rehearse other kind of Papistical Superstitions and Abuses as of Beads Lady-Psalters Rosaries Purgatory Masses Stations and Jubilees feigned Relicks and hallowed Beads Bread Water Candles c. See before Article 6 and 9. The Council of Trent The Holy Synod doth receive and regard with the like affection of Piety and Reverence the Old and New-Testament and also those unwritten Traditions dictated as it were by word of Mouth by Christ and preserved by continual Succession in the Church The matter and form of Extream Vnction Mass for the Dead The pronouncing the Mass sometimes with a loud at other times with a low Voice Mystical Benedictions Lights Incensings Garments and many other such like things are from Apostolical Discipline and Tradition If any one shall say that the Rite of the Roman Church of saying some part of the Canon of the Mass in a low Voice is to be condemned let him be accursed The Catechism of Trent The Shaving of the Head like a Crown is from Apostolical Tradition None of the Rites in the Mass are useless and vain The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome 1. It is not necessary that Ceremonies ordained by Man's Authority be in all places alike and such may be changed 1. Unwritten Traditions are equally to be regarded as Scripture such are Lights Incensings Shaving the Head c. and so to be every where and always retained 2. Lights and other Ceremonies of the Romish Church are superstitious and abuses 2. None of the Ceremonies used in the Mass as Lights and Incensings are useless and vain The 35. Article of the Church of England Of Homilies The homilies contain a Godly and wholesome Doctrine c. The Homilies charge the Church of Rome with Error Superstition Idolatry and Usurpation The 36. Article of the Church of England Of Consecration of Bishops and Ministers The Book of Consecration of Arch-Bishops and Bishops and ordering of Priests and Deacons lately set forth in the Time of Edward the Sixth and confirmed at the same Time by Authority of Parliament doth contain all things necessary to such Consecration and Divering And therefore whosoever are consecrated or ordered according to the Rites of that Book or hereafter shall be consecrated or ordered according to the same Rites We decree all such to be rightly orderly and lawfully consecrated and ordered The Church of Rome Council of Trent A Sacrifice and Priesthood are so conjoyned by the Ordinance of God that both have existed in every Law. From the very beginning of the Church there were the Names of the following Orders the lesser viz. Acolythi Exorcists Readers and Door-keepers The greater and sacred viz. the Subdeacon Deacon and Priest. Rhemists Annotations Whosoever taketh upon him to Preach without lawful sending to Minister Sacraments and is not Canonically ordered of a true Catholick Bishop to be a Curate of Souls c. he is a Thief and a Murderer So came in all Hereticks and all that succeed them in Room and Doctrine It 's the common Opinion of the Members of the Romish Church of our Nation that our
Bishops c. are none In the Church of England there are no Bishops no Pastors and so their's is no true Church The Ministers of the Church of England are no Priests because they want an essential part which is to offer Sacrifice c. Of this Mind were Harding Stapleton Sanders Bristow Champney c. formerly See Mason's Vindiciae Eccles. Angl. The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome 1. Besides Bishops there are but two Orders viz. Priests and Deacons 1. Besides Bishops and the four lesser Orders there were always three viz. Priests Deacons and Subdeacons 2. Arch-Bishops Bishops Priests and Deacons are rightly orderly and lawfully consecrated and ordered in the Church of England 2. Such Bishops and Priests as are consecrated and ordered in the Church of England are no Bishops nor Priests The 37. Article of the Church of England Of the Civil Magistrates The Queen's Majesty hath the chief power in this Realm of England and other her Dominions unto whom the chief Government of all Estates of this Realm whether they be Ecclesiastical or Civil in all Causes doth appertain and is not nor ought to be subject to any forreign Jurisdiction The Bishop of Rome hath no Jurisdiction in this Realm of England The 3d part Of the Sermon of Obedience The usurped Power of the Bishop of Rome which he most wrongfully challengeth as the Successor of St. Peter is false feigned and forged The Bishop of Rome teacheth That they that are under him are free from all Burdens and Charges of the Common-wealth and Obedience toward their Prince most clearly against Christ's Doctrine and St. Peter's He ought therefore rather to be called Antichrist and the Successor of the Scribes and Pharisees than Christ's Vicar or St. Peter's Successor St. Peter doth not say Submit your selves unto me as the Supream Head of the Church neither saith he submit your selves from time to time to my Successors in Rome but saith he submit your selves to the King the Supreme Head. The 2d part of the Sermon of Obedience Wicked Rulers have their Power and Authority from God and therefore it s not lawful for their Subjects to withstand them although they abuse their Power The necessary Doctrine and Erudition for any Christen Man set forth by Hen. 8. and compiled by Cranmer c. Subjects be bound not to withdrawn their Fealty Truth Love and Obedience towards their Prince for any cause whatsoever it be ne for any cause they may conspire against his Person ne do any thing towards the hinderance or hurt thereof nor of his Estate 3d Part of the Sermon against wilful Rebellion The speedy overthrow of all Rebels of what Number State or Condition soever they were or what Colour or Cause soever they pretended is and ever hath been such that God thereby doth shew that he alloweth neither the Dignity of any Person nor the Multitude of any People nor the Weight of any Cause as sufficient for the which the Subjects may move Rebellion against their Princes See the Oaths of Allegeance and Supremacy The Church of Rome §. 1. Of the Authority claim'd by the Church of Rome 1. The Roman Church is the Mother and Mistress of all Churches So the 4th General Council of Lateran Can. 2. The Council of Trent Sess. 7. Can. 3. c. This is made an Article of Faith in the Creed of Pope Pius the 4th 2. The Roman Bishop is the Vicar of God and Christ the Successor of St. Peter and hath the Supreme Pastorship over the Vniversal Church So the Council of Trent Sess. 6. de reform cap. 1. Sess. 14. cap. 7. c. This is also an Article of Faith in the aforesaid Creed §. 2. Of the Exercise of this Authority 1. The Church of Rome doth take upon her to command Sovereign Princes So it 's the Phrase of their Councils We do enjoyn Princes we do peremptorily require Kings c. So the 4th General Council of Later cap. 67 68. The 5th General Council of Later de pragmat Sanct. The Council of Trent 2. She doth overrule what Sovereign Princes have commanded So the Council of Constance Notwithstanding the safe Conducts granted by Emperors and Kings c. Yet Heretical Wickedness may be enquired after by a competent Judg and the Persons guilty be punished altho they should come to the place of Judgment considing in the safe Conduct and otherwise would not have come 3. The Church of Rome hath excommunicated such Sovereign Princes as have not submitted to what she hath commanded and hath deposed such as have been thus excommunicated and continued refractory and absolved their Subjects from Allegiance to them when deposed So The 3 d. General Council of Lateran We do forbid under an Anathema That any one presume to keep or maintain Hereticks in their Houses or Land or to exercise commerce with them And if they shall dye in this Sin there shall no Oblation be made for them And let Subjects know that they are released from all Debt of Fealty and Homage and all Obedience The 4 th General Council of Lateran Let secular Powers whatsoever Offices they execute be admonished perswaded and if it be necessary compelled by Ecclesiastical Censure That as they desire to be reputed and accounted Faithful so they would publickly take an Oath for the defence of the Faith that they would endeavour in good Faith according to their power to destroy exterminate all Hereticks marked by the Church out of the Lands of their Jurisdiction But if the Temporal Lord being required and admonished shall neglect to purge his Land from this Heretical Filthiness he shall be Excommunicated by his Metropolitan and the other Bishops of the Province And if he shall refuse to give satisfaction within a Year let it be signified to the Pope that he may forthwith denounce his Vassals absolved from their Allegiance and expose his Land to be possessed by Catholicks who having destroyed the Hereticks may possess it without contradiction and preserve it in the purity of the Faith saving the Right of the Principal Lord whilst that he doth make no hindrance to it Nevertheless the same Law is to be observed towards them who have No principal Lords The General Council of Lyons Ann. 1245. In this Pope Innocent the 4th deprived the Emperor Frederick the 2d after this manner We after diligent deliberation had with the Sacred Council do declare and denounce That he is deprived of all Honour and Dignity and by our Sentence do deprive him and do for ever absolve them from their Oath who have sworn Allegiance to him firmly forbidding by our Apostolical Authority that any one from henceforward obey him as Emperor or King c. And let those to whom the Election belongs freely choose a Successor in that Empire The Council of Constance It is decreed That all that should hinder the Emperor Sigismund from meeting the King of Arragon of what