Selected quad for the lemma: england_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
england_n catholic_n church_n communion_n 6,739 5 9.8919 5 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A26854 Richard Baxter his account to his dearly beloved, the inhabitants of Kidderminster, of the causes of his being forbidden by the Bishop of Worcester to preach within his diocess with the Bishop of Worcester's letter in answer thereunto : and some short animadversions upon the said bishops letter.; Account to his dearly beloved, the inhabitants of Kidderminster, of the causes of his being forbidden by the Bishop of Worcester to preach within his diocess Baxter, Richard, 1615-1691.; Stillingfleet, Edward, 1635-1699. Letter to a friend for vindication of himself from Mr. Baxter's calumny. 1662 (1662) Wing B1179; ESTC R1412 40,242 54

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

that will they nill they must be involved in the ruine of it as the Presbyterians have found by their own experience also who by their groundlesse and needlesse separation from us have given example and ground enough for others to separate from them till by dividing and subdividing from one another there was nothing of Uniformity or unity or order or decency left in that Church which was formerly and I hope by the Prudence and Piety of publick Authority will be now again the Glory and Pattern of all other Protestant and Reformed Churches in the world of which by the way there is not one which doth not use as great severity for the preserving of Unity by Uniformity as we do even in this particular for do not the Protestant Churches in France enjoyn Standing the Churches of Holland Scotland and the Church of Germany that follow Calvin enjoyne sitting and the Churches that follow Luther there and elsewhere enjoyn Kneeling as we do and all of them upon the same penalty of not receiving it otherwise And is it not as lawful for our Church as for all other Protestant and all other Christian Churches to require of her children the like conformity to her laws under the like penalty for the same end to prevent the same danger yes replyed Mr. Baxter when this question was asked him just as lawful that is not lawful at all such an injunction upon such a penalty being sinful wheresoever and by whomsoever it is enjoyned A happy England that hath such an Aristarchus as is worthy to censure all the Churches of the world whose Catholick practise if it cross Mr. Baxters opinion must presently without more adoe be condemn'd as sinful and all the world must be Lyars rather then Mr. Baxter must not be justified in his sayings You have before seen the ingenuity and veracity you now see the humility and the modesty of the Man and indeed in proportion of the whole party for crimine ab uno Disce omnes But doth Mr. Baxter and the rest of his perswasion think indeed that it is so great and grievous a punishment to be kept from the Sacrament when men will not receive it in that way and upon those terms that the Church offers if they doe why then do they deny it to so many that hunger and thirst after it whensoever either by reason of Age or Lameness or sicknesse or some other bodily infirmity they cannot come to Church for it especially when the Catholick Church in the Twelfth Canon of the first General Council commands it be given even to those that are Excommunicate if they desire it when they are in Extremis or going out of the world Secondly why have they suffered so many whole Parishes in England under their charge to have been without a Communion so many years together as I am credibly informed they have Thirdly why do they reject those from the Sacrament that will not come before hand to them to be examined by them there being neither precept nor practise in the Gospel nor Canon in the Church either to warrant them to require it or to oblige the People to submit to it upon any such penalty I am sure St. Paul when he chides those of the Church of Corinth for coming ignorantly to the Sacrament and for behaving themselves prophanely at the Sacrament that which he prescribes for avoiding the same or the like faults for the future is not that every man should come and be examined by the Minister but that every man should examine himself before he eat of that Bread and drink of that Cup And yet I will not deny but that every man before he Communicates ought to be well Catechis'd and instructed by the Minister and thereby enabled to examine himself the better nor will I deny neither but that every man may and ought in Case of scruple of mind or trouble of conscience to advise with and to be advised by him that hath the cure of his Soul but that every man as often as he intends to receive the Sacrament should be obliged under the penalty of being rejected from it this is that which I utterly deny and which I take to be the same thing in other words with that of Auricular Confession so that they who exact the one have no reason to condemn the other unlesse it be because they would ingrosse it wholly unto themselves Howsoever if refusing the Sacrament to those that will not kneel when the Church enjoyns it be a penalty so far transcending the offence how much more must the same penalty transcend the offence when there is indeed no offence at all for where there is no 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 there can be no 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 where there is no Law there can be no transgression and consequently there being no Law of God nor Man that requires all Communicants to be pre-examined by the Minister those that are refused the Sacrament because they will not be pre-examined are punished with the same punishment which they complain of for no offence at all And therefore si maximè digna essem may our Church say ista contumelia indigni vos qui faceretis tamen for Who art thou O Man that judgest another nay that judgest thy Mother when thou doest the same or worse thing then those are for which thou condemnest her and how can any man of reason be so scrupulous as to quit his Calling rather then deny the Sacrament to those that will not receive it kneeling when the Church commands it should neither be taken nor given otherwise and yet make no scruple at all of denying it to whole Parishes of denying it to those that cannot come to Church for it though desirous of it and qualified for it and such as have most need of it to strengthen their faith in their last Agony and lastly of denying it to such as refuse to be pre-examined by them and all this without any command or warrant from Gods Word and contrary to the Command and Custome of Gods Church whereby it plainly appears that either they do not think the receiving of the Sacrament of so great importance as indeed it is nor the denying of it so great an injury or punishment as they pretend it to be or else that they would have every Minister to be a Monarch or Soveraign Law-giver in his own Parish and this indeed is that they would fain be at now they have lost their hopes of Governing the whole Kingdome for you see by what Mr. Baxter adds that if they may not be suffered to give or deny the Sacrament to whom they please and in effect to doe what they list in their own Parishes they threaten to quit their Stations which he calls being Ejected because they dare not put away all that will not kneel at the Sacrament And this menace they often repeat upon all occasions as if they were the only men that could carry on the work