Selected quad for the lemma: england_n
Text snippets containing the quad
ID |
Title |
Author |
Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) |
STC |
Words |
Pages |
A77390
|
A breif account of the Popes pretences of a civil right to the Crown of England, and the answer thereunto
|
|
1679
(1679)
|
Wing B4513; ESTC R232458
|
3,727
|
1
|
breif account of the Popes pretences of a Civil Right to the Crown of England and the Answer thereunto 1 IOHANNES COMES WARENN 2 THOMAS COMES LANCASTRââ 3 RADÌâ DE MONTE COMES GâLOC 4 HUMFRIDVS DE âOHVN COMES HâREF 5 ROGERVS BIGOT COMES NORFOLK 6 GVIDO COMES WARUVICI 7 RICARDVS COMES ãâã 8 ADOMAâVS DE VALENCIA 9 HENRICVS DE LANCASTâIA 10 IOHANNES DE HASTING 11 HENRICVS DE PERCY 12 EDMUNDVS MORTâOMARI 13 ROBERTVS ãâã WALTâââ 14 WILLMÌS DNÌS DE MOLâNS 15 IOHANNES DNÌS DE HANACRE 16 HVGO DE VER 17 WILLMÌS DE âREWOSE 18 ROBERTVS DE MONTEALTâ 19 ROBERTVS DE TATESHALE 20 REGINALDVS ãâã DE ãâ¦ã N 21 HENRICVS ãâã DE COâHNâR 22 HVGO BARDOLE 23 ROBERTVS DE TONEY 24 WILLMÌS DE ROOS 25 ROBERTVS DE CLIFFORD 26 PETRVS DE MALOLâCâ 27 PHILIPPVS DNÌS DE ãâã 28 ROBERTVS ââââIVS ROGEââ 29 IOHANNES DE MOHVN 30 ALMARICVS DE SCÌO AMANDO 31 WILLMÌS DE FERRARâIA 32 ALANVS âA ZUCHE 33 THEOBALDVS DE VERDOVN 34 THOMAS DE âURNYVAâ 35 THOMAS DE MULTOÌN 36 WILLMÌS LE LATIMER 37 THOMAS DNÌS DE BERKââE 38 ââââO ãâã WARINI 39 IOHANNES DNÌS DE ãâã 40 EDMUN DNÌS DE EYNCOVRT 41 PETRVS COBBE ãâã ãâã 42 WILLMÌS DE CANTE ââPO 43 IOHANNES DE BELLOCAMPO 44 ROGERVS DE MORTUOMAâââ 45 IOHANNES FâââVS REGINALD 46 RANULPHVS DE NEVLLâ 47 ââIANVS âââVS ALANI 48 WILLMÌS MARESCALLVS 49 WALTERVS DNÌS DE HUNTERCOMBE 50 WILLMÌS MARTIN 51 HENRICVS LE TYEIS 52 ROGERVS Lâ WARRE 53 IOHANNES DE ââPAâââ 54 IOHANNES DE LANCASTRE 55 ROBERTVS EââVS PAGANI 56 HENRICVS TREGOTâ 57 RADVS PYPARD 58 WALTERVS DOMINVS DE EAâââIMâââ 59 ROGERVS LE ESTRANGE 60 IOHANNES LE ESTRANGE 61 THOMAS DE CHAURTE 62 WALTERVS DE ââLLO CAMPO 63 RICVS TALEâOT 64 IOHANNES BUTTECOVRT 65 IOHANNES ENGAYN 66 HVGO POYNâ 67 ADAM DNÌS DE WELL 68 SIMON DNÌS DE MONTE ACâTO 69 IOHANNES DNÌS DE SULLEE 70 IOHANNES DE MOELES 71 EDMUNDVS BARO STAFFORD 72 IOHANNES LOVEL 73 EDMUNDVS DE HASTING 74 RADVÌS âââIVS WILLMÌ 75 ROBERTVS DE CALANIS 76 WILLMÌS TOUCHBT 77 IOHANNES ABAâAM 78 IOHANNES DE HAUERINGââ 79 ROBERTVS LA WARDE 80 NICHOLAVS DE SEGRAVE 81 WALTERVS DE TEYE 82 IOHANNES DE INSULA 83 EUSTACHIVS DNÌS DE âACCHE 84 GILBERTVS PECCHE 85 WILLMÌS PAYNELL 86 BOGO DE KNOVILL 87 FVLCO LE ESTRANGE 88 ââââICVS DE PINKENEY 89 IOHANNES DE HUDLESTON 90 ROGERVS DE HUNTINGFâELD 91 HUGO FILIVS HENRICI 92 IOHANNES LE BRETON 95 THOMAS DNÌS DE LA ROCHE 93 NICHVS DE CARRAV 95 WALTERVS DE MUNCY 96 IOHANNES EâLIVS MARMADââCI 97 IOHANNES DNÌS DE KYNGESTON 98 ROBERTVS HASTANG 99 RADVÌS DNÌS DE GRANDON 100 WILLMÌS DNÌS DE LEYBORN 101 IOHANNES DE GRASTOCK 102 MATHEVS âILIVS 103 NICHVS DE MâYNILL 104 IOHANNES PAYNEL Argent Sable Gules Vert. Azure Or. Purpure Tenne Sanguine Mich. Burgh sculp THat the Pope of Rome hath for some Ages last past pretended âa Soveraign Right over Christian Kings and Princes cannot be unknown to any who are acquainted with the writings of their most approved Authors the Decrees of their councils or the Instances of such uâped authority recorded in Histoâ for these Five Hundred years The judgment of their Licenced Auâors their Councils and their Laws ãâã this Case is excellently published by the Learned Pen of the Right Reârend Bishop of Lincoln and that the ãâã me Doctrine hath been by them generally received I can bring no greater proofs than their common practise recorded in History How many Emârours Kings and Soveraign Prinâ have been de Facto deposed by them âw many great Maslacres and private Murders have been Encouraged and Defended how many Tortures and unheard of Cruelties how âny Treasons and Damnable Conâacies to the subversion of whole kingdoms have been contrived and âme executed by Jesuits and other âissaries of Rome would require a large Volumn to relate I shall refer the Reader to a few Authors for his abundant satisfaction herein Thuanus Bodinus and the Exact Collections of Mr. Fowlis Nor was there any place felt the weight of ãâã Popes Iron Rod more grievous ân the Kingdom of England hence ãâã he wont to exact vast summes of âney which were as readily paid ãâã of what esteem it was with him ãâã may gather from the Character he gives when he calls it Puteus inexhaustus And from the time it hath pleased God to set us at liberty from their yoak and burden which neither we nor our Fathers were able to bear what Damning Censures and Violent Excommunications have been sent out against us what Secret and Horrible Plots have been contrived to destroy our Kings and Kingdoms I hope will never be forgot and all this not so much to reestablish here the Religion as the Authority which the Pope hath lost and the right of that Title which he claims to this Kingdom he thinks equal to that pretended from Constantin's Donation And to this purpose his Sub-Collector Polidore Virgil tels us that Ina was the first King who made this Kingdom of England Tributary to the Pope But he forgets himself pag. 740. where he saith Peter pence was given Pietatis Religionis Causa for Gods sake and therefore not by way of Homage and Subjection This Gift was continued by Offa Atulphus Canutus and Edward the Confessor who calls it the Kings Almes William the Conqueror alloweth this gift but renounceth all Obedience to the Pope as appears by Lanfranks Epist Pope Pascal 2. in a Letter to Hen. 1. calls this Donation Beati Petri Eleemosyna and Bishop Andrews tells us that it was an Alms given to a Hospital at Rome where they used to entertain Pilgrims out of England The Second pretended Title is from King John's Resignation of the Crown to Pandulphus the Popes Legate and receiving it again under Fealty and Homage and at the yearly Tribute of a Thousand Marks Which Title upon several accounts will appear invalid First as to matter of Fact Sir Thomas Moor who could not want all advantages of informing himself in affairs of this nature denies it his words are these Some Writers say that King John made England and Ireland Tributary to the Pope by the grant of a thousand Marks we dare surely say again that this is untrue and that all Rome neither can shew such a grant nor ever could and if they could it were right nought worth For never could any King of England give away the Realm to the Pope or make the Land Tributary if he would nor no such money is there paid nor never was These are the words of that great States-man who was no enemy to the Popes Authority But granting there was something done to this purpose in the presence of a few Peers and without the Consent of Any as Mat. Paris a Monk of Saint Albans who lived at that time acquaints us I shall take my Second Argument to invallidate this Title from the words of Sir Thomas Moor before cited for if they could