But 't is left to the Gentlemen of the Long Robe to determin in this Point However tho' this Doctrin of Non Obstantes invented perhaps first to enlarge the Prerogative for the People's benefit and made use of afterwards to extend it to the King and People's Damage may have heretofore receiv'd Countenance in Westrninster-hall there is another Place where in no Age it has met with Favour And the Reasons why so many Resumptions have been made might be First That it gave Offence to the Legislative Authority to see the Ministers make use of this dispensing Power Secondly That it appear'd the Suggestions were wrong upon which the Grants were grounded That is that the Soveraign did not proceed Ex certa Scientia namely that he was surpris'd and misinform'd in the value of the Thing given That he did not proceed Ex mero motu but that the Gift was wrested from him by his importunate and undeserving Courtiers That he did not proceed Ex Speciali Gratia but was rather induc'd to bestow the Favour through the necessity of his Affairs to quiet some great Man or to please some powerful Party And in all probability upon such or the like Accompts Parliaments have look'd into Grants and the best Princes have not thought it dishonorable to join in Revoking what had been thus Extorted from them And as to the distinction which the Lawyers make between Directive and Coercive Admit the Forms by which the Law has directed all Grants shall pass should be only Directive to the Soveraign and devised for his greater Ease and Safety yet without doubt they are Coercive to his Ministers No Law-givers ever intended that a solemn Law made upon mature Deliberation and prescribing a Rule in high Affairs of State should have no effect at all But the 27 Hen. VIII which Chalks out to the Secretary Lord Privy Seal and Lord Chancellor the regular Steps they are to make in passing Grants would be of no sort of signification if they may pass per Saltum and by immediate Warrant without being enter'd in the several Offices When Parliaments advise the Prince 't is humbly submitted to his Wisdom whether or no he thinks fit to approve of their Councils But when by a written Law they give Advice and lay down Rules and Directions in Matters of State for the Ministers to walk by and observe without doubt they intend Advice so solemnly given should be follow'd Hitherto we have mention'd the Cautions Provisions Restrictions and Forms which our Ancestors establish'd and made use of to preserve the King's Revenue by which the Publick was to be supported But notwithstanding all this the Wickedness of Men was either too Cunning or too Powerful for the Wisdom of the Laws in being And from time to time Great Men Ministers Minions and Favourites have broken down the Fences contriv'd and settled in our Constitution they have made a Prey of the Common-wealth plum'd the Prince and converted to their own Use what was intended for the Service and Preservation of the State We shall therefore proceed to show That to obviate this Mischief the Legislative Authority has all along interpos'd with Inquiries Accusations and Impeachments till at last such dangerous Heads were reach'd For as Courts have been watchful to Rob the Prince so antiently the Barons and afterwards Parliaments from time to time have been as vigilant to prevent his Ruin showing in the progress of their Councils great Wisdom mixt with Duty and Temper join'd with Courage The first Great Person whom we find question'd since the Norman Government was Ranulphus Bishop of Durham who bore the Office of what we now call * Dugdale Series Chronica p. 1. Lord Treasurer of England in the time of William Rufus This Man had been the Principal Instrument of the Profusion and of what is its Consequence those Extortions that disgrac'd the Reign of Rufus Of whose times William of Malmsbury speaking says None were then Rich but such as dealt with the Exchequer * Will. Malms p. 123. Nullus Dives uisi Nummularius This wicked Minister was brought to Punishment by Henry I. who cast him into Prison and loaded him with Chains Matthew Paris says †Mat. Paris p. 56. De Communi Consilio Gentis Anglorum posuit eum Rex in vinculis Malmsbury gives him this Character * Wil. Malms p. 123. Radulphus Clericus ex infimo genere hominum Lingua Assiduitate provectus ad summum Expilator Divitum Exterminator Pauperum Confiscator alienarum Hereditatum Invictus Caussidicus cum verbis tum rebus immodicus nec aliorum curaret odium dummodo complaceret Dominum It seems he was a little insolent Fellow who by his fluent Tongue and cringing at Court had got Power enough to do much hurt in England A mischievous Tool against the Publick as well as an Oppressor of private Men Subtle to invent Wickedness and Bold to put it in Execution and one who would stick at nothing to raise himself Matthew Paris speaking of him says he was †Mat. Paris p. 56. Homo perversus ad omne Scelus paratus quem Rex constituerat Procuratorem suum in Regno ut evelleret destraeret raperet disperderet omnia omnium bona ad Fifci Commodum comportaret We have thus painted out this Statesman in the Colours as he is represented by those two Venerable Writers And he so much resembles several bad Ministers who in the Ages since have succeeded both to his Post and Power that one would think they had chosen to take him for their Pattern In the 5 of Edward II. Pieres de Gaveston was accused in Parliament for having given the King ill Council and for having cheated the King of his Treasure and sent it beyond Sea and for having Estranged the King's Heart from his People so as he slighted their Councils and for having remov'd all faithful Ministers and plac'd only his own Creatures or Foreigners about the King and for having caus'd the King to grant Lands Tenements and Offices to himself and his Heirs and to divers other People insomuch that by his Wealth he was become dangerous to the great damage and injury of the King and his Crown For which he was Banish'd the Realm so as if he return'd he should be treated as an Enemy to the King Kingdom and People But take the Words of the Record because 't is very curious Rot. Ord. 5. Edw. 2. Num. 20. Purceo qe conue chose est per le examinement de Prelatz Countes Barouns Chivalers autres bones Gentz du Roialme trovez qe Pieres de Gaveston ad Malmeuez mal Conseillez nostre Seignour le Roy lad enticee a malfaire en divers Manieres deceivances en accoillant a lui toute le Tresor le Roi lad esloigne hors du Roialme en attreant a lui royal Poer royal Dignite come en aliaunce faire de Gentz par sermentz
Value if it cannot be given away without great Damage to the Crown if by reason of such Gift he is hindred from paying his just Debts or from having wherewithal to defray the Charges of the Government or to provide for the Kingdoms Defence or if by this and other Gifts he must be driven through the failing of his own Revenue to lay heavy Burthens upon the People 't is the Duty of the Lord Treasurer to represent the whole Matter honestly and impartially to the King and to hinder the Grant from proceeding any further And as a Tie upon him he takes the following Oath Ye shall swear That well and truly ye shall serve the King our Soveraign Lord and his People in the Office of Treasurer and ye shall do right to all manner of People Poor and Rich of such Things as toucheth your Office And that King's Treasure truly ye shall keep and dispend And truly ye shall counsail the King and his Counsel ye shall layn and keep And that ye shall neither know nor suffer the King 's Hurt nor his dis-heriting nor that the Rights of his Crown be distressed by any means as far forth as ye may let And if ye may not let it ye shall make knowledge thereof clearly and expressly to the King with your true Advice and Counsel And ye shall do and purchase the King's Profit in all that ye may reasonably do as God you help and the Holy Evangelists It was hardly possible to devise a more binding Oath And the Words Ye shall well and truly serve the King our Soveraign Lord and his People in the Office of Treasurer are an Evidence that our Forefathers took themselves to have some kind of Interest in what was call'd the Crown-Revenue If the Grant meets with no Objection at the Treasury the King signs a Warrant directed to the Attorny or Sollicitor-General who is another Great Officer impowering him to prepare a Bill containing such a Grant And if the Grant be of Mony appropriated by Act of Parliament or of Lands annex'd to the Crown by Act of Parliament or if the Grant be any ways illegal or prejudicial to the Crown it is the Attorny or Sollicitor-General's Duty to advertise thereof After Mr. Attorny has pass'd it it goes to the Signet the Custody whereof is in the Secretary of State who being a Minister in high Office is presum'd by the Laws to be watchful for the King 's Good and to inquire into all Matters relating to the Weal Publick He is presum'd to be apris'd of the Persons Merits to whom the Grant is to be made and likewise to understand either the Affluence or Want in the King's Coffers and the general Condition of his Revenue And having an Allowance for Intelligence he is presum'd to know the Discourses and Opinions of the People and how such Grants are relish'd If therefore the Person suing out the Grant has no Merit at all or at least no sort of pretention to so great a Reward or if he knows the Publick to be press'd with Wants and Debts or if he hears that the People murmur at the Taxes which Profusion introduces and Clamour to see the Nations Mony wasted by his Duty as Privy Councellor and by his Oath he is bound faithfully and plainly thereof to inform the King From the Signet it should go to the Privy Seal who is likewise another Great Officer who being near the Person of the King is presum'd to know the Condition of the Kingdom and therefore the Law has made him another Check He takes this Oath Ye shall as far forth as your Cunning and â—â—â—cretion sufficeth truly justly and evenly execute and exercise the Office of Keeper of the King 's Privy Seal to you by his Highness committed not leaving or eschewing so to do for Affection Love Meed Doubt or Dread of any Person or Persons c. So that if the Lord Privy Seal finds that through Corruption in other Offices or that by Power Importunity or partial Favour a Grant tending greatly to the Publick Damage and to the Diminution of his Prince's Revenue has pass'd so far as to his Office he ought to stop it there and is bound in Duty and by his Oath to lay the whole Matter before the King From the Privy Seal it goes to the Great Seal in the Custody of the Lord Keeper or Lord Chancellor of England who is accompted the Kingdom 's as well as the King's Officer and there the Grant is compleated upon which score in the Eye of the Law this Great Minister is most look'd upon his Oath is the same with that of the Lord Treasurer He swears Well and truly to serve the King and his People in the Office of Chancellor truly to Counsel the King not to suffer his Hurt or Dis-heriting nor that the Rights of the Crown be distress'd by any Means as far forth as he may let And if he may not let it he is to make it clearly and expresly known to the King with true Advice and Counsel And in all that he may he is to do and purchase the King's Profit So that more than any other as the highest Officer and as the last Check the Laws presume him to consult for the King 's good Therefore if the Grant be exorbitant if it be made to an undeserving Person if it notoriously surpasses the Merits of the Suitor if it was obtain'd upon wrong Suggestions if it occasions Obloquy to the Government or Discontent among the People if the King's Debts are many and clamorous if the Nation labours at the same time as the Gift is made under heavy Taxes and if the Grant tends greatly to the Hurt and Impoverishment of the Crown with all which Matters the Law presumes so great a Minister in the State to be acquainted he is bound in Duty and by his Oath not to fix the Great Seal to the said Grant but thereupon faithfully and impartially to advise the King And Chancellors who have acted otherwise and who contrary to the Trust of their Office have ventur'd to pass outragious Gifts Douns Outrageuses as the Records call 'em whereby the Crown has been impoverish'd have been heretofore as we shall show by and by question'd impeach'd and attainted in Parliament These were the ancient Steps in Passing Grants from the Crown which were afterwards inforc'd by a positive * Anno 27 Hen. 8. Cap. 11. Law in the Reign of Henry the Eighth a Prince jealous enough of the Regal Authority 'T is true by the Suggestion in the Preamble it looks as if the Act were made to preserve the Fees belonging to the Clerks of the Signet but bringing in Fees to Officers being never the Object of a Parliaments Care we ought to conclude that the House of Commons gave that fair Colour in the Reign of a Suspicious and Arbitrary Prince to the Regulations they intended to make as to Passing Grants from the Crown First the Law directs That the King's
Grants shall be brought to the Principal Secretary or to one of the King's Clerks of his Grace's Signet for the time being to be at the said Office of the Signet pass'd accordingly And be it also ordained and enacted That one of the Clerks of the said Signet to whom any of the said Writings signed with the King 's most gracious Hand or the Hand of any other aforesaid or any of them fortune to be deliver'd may and shall by Warrant of the same Bills and every of them within the space of eight days next after he shall have receiv'd the same unless he have Knowledge by the said Secretary or otherwise of the King's Pleasure to the contrary make or cause to be made in the King's Name Letters of Warrant subscrib'd with the Hand of the same Clerk and sealed with the King's Signet to the Lord Keeper of the King 's Privy Seal for further Process to be had in that behalf And that one of the King's Clerks of the said Privy Seal upon due Examination had by the said Lord Keeper of the said Privy Seal of the said Warrant to him addressed from the Office of the said Signet as afore may and shall within the space of eight days next after he shall have receiv'd the same unless the Lord Keeper of the Privy Seal do give them Commandment to the contrary make or cause to be made by Warrant of the foresaid Warrant to the said Lord Keeper of the Privy Seal Address from the Office of the Signet aforesaid other Letters of like Warranty subscribed with the Name of the same Clerk of the Privy Seal to the Lord Chancellor of England Lord Keeper of the Great Seal Chancellor of the Dutchy of Lancaster Chancellor of the King's Land of Ireland Treasurer and Chamberlains of the Exchequer and Chamberlains of any of his Counties Palatines or Principality of Wales or other Officer and to every of them for the writing and ensealing with such Seals as remain in their Custody of Letters Patent or Closed or other Process making due and requisite to be had or made upon any the said Grants according to the Tenor of the Warrant to them or any of them directed from the Officer of the Privy Seal as is afore specified These Cautions show how carefully our Constitution has provided that nothing shall be done which may turn in Despendium Regis aut Regni But here some flattering Lawyers will affirm That these Methods are Directive not Coerceive Or as Hobart says †Hobart's Reports Colt and Glover P. 146. That these kind of Statutes were made to put Things in ordinary Form and to ease the Sovereign of of Labour but not to deprive him of Power according to this Maxim of the same Judge That * Lord Sheffeild ver Ratcliffe p. 335. Dare Prerogativam est nobile Officium Judicis Debitum And truly heretofore Westminster-hall did so order it that these Fences intended to keep the Publick Revenues from the Hands of Spoilers were all broken down and that all these Statutes were evaded For the Force of all these wholsome Laws was enervated by Clauses afterwards incerted into the Letters Patents viz. Ex certa Scienta mero motu Gratia speciali Ex certa Scientia was very antiently made use of but the words became more necessary afterwards to defeat the 1st of Henry IV. where 't is enacted †Rot. Parl. 1 Hen. 4. Num. 98. That the true and express Value of the thing to be granted shall be incerted in the Letters Patents otherwise the Grant to be void So that these words suppose the King to have certain knowledge in every Circumstance of the thing he is to give away which happens very rarely to be the Case But notwithstanding these words if certain Proof can be made that the King was misinform'd by false Suggestion no Lawyer will say the Grant is good Ex mero motu imports the Honor and Bounty of the King who Rewards the Patentee for Merit without his Suit These words suppose the King to be truly appris'd of the Person 's Merit and were brought in to obviate the 4th of Henry IV. whereby it was enacted * Rot. Parl. 4 Hen. 4. That no Lands should be given but to such as deserv'd them and if any made Demands without Desert that he should be punish'd And to the same purpose were added the words Ex Gratia speciali yet more to denote that the Gift proceeded meerly from the King's Favour and not at the Party's Sollicitation But besides all this because anciently it seem'd a Fundamental that the Crown-Lands were not alienable and because all along Parliaments had complain'd of these Alienations as looking upon 'em to be illegal the Lawyers of old Times endeavour'd to secure and cover all by a Clause of Non Obstante to be incerted in the Patents These Clauses of Non Obstante were not known in our original Constitution Mathew Paris says they grew rife in the Reign of Henry III. Anno Dom. 1250. * Mat. Paris p. 810. Sprsimque jam tales Literae in quibus inserta est haec detestabilis adjectio Non Obstante Priore Mandato vel haec Non Obstante Antiqua Libertate Suscitabantur Then he goes on Quod cum comperisset quidam vir discretus tunc Justitiarius scilicet Rogerus de Thurkeby ab alto ducens suspiria de praedictae adjectionis appositione dixit Heu heu hos ut quid dies expectavimus Ecce jam civilis Curia exemplo ecclesiasticae Coinquinatur a Sulphureo fonte intoxicatur But this Clause grew more necessary after the 11th of Henry IV. when it was plainly and directly enacted * Rot Parl. 11 Hen. 4. Num. 23. That all manner of Heriditaments which from thenceforward should fall into the Crown should not be alienated but remain to the King And this last Law being positive unrepeal'd as we know of and still in force as much as Magna Charta and the Doctrin of Non Obstantes seeming to be condemn'd by The Ast declaring the Rights and Liberties of the Subject in these Words That the pretended Power of Suspending of Laws or the Execution of Laws by Regal Authority without Consent of Parliament is Illegal That the pretended Power of dispensing with Laws or the Execution of Laws by Regal Authority as it hath been assum'd and exercis'd of late is Illegal There will arise a Question how far the Grants made since the passing this Act 1 Gul. Mar. are valid by the Laws as they stand at present For we may argue thus It was enacted 11 Hen. IV. That the Crown-Lands should not be granted away However the Practice was otherwise and the Grants were supported by Clauses of Non Obstante But these Non Obstantes or the dispensing with Laws in force being declar'd Illegal it should follow that the Grants of Crown-Land made for these last ten Years are void in Law and revokable at the King's Will and Pleasure