but was reduced back and centred again in its own proper sphear and that not by any compulsive power but as if the succeeding Pope Adrian had felt som compunction of Spirit for detaining that which of Right belonged to the Civill Magistrate he did freely and by consent of a Councell at Lateran give power to Charles the Great to appoint the Bishop of Rome and to dispose of his See Apostolick which so remained in him and his Successours for a long time and since diverse Popes of Rome by vertue hereof have been deposed as Benedict 5th by Otho the first and Leo placed in his roome and Gelasius deposed by Hen. 5. and several others which came not in in right of the Emperours as may appear by the German and Italitan Histores wherefore the pretence of some Popes Parasite that Ludovious Pius successour to Charles the Great should release this priviledge of Collation back again is vain and utterly false as is evident by these transactions of succeeding Ages The Romans bound themselves to Henry 3d the Emperour by Oath not to meddle with the appointing the Emperour which after within four years when the Emperour was absent was violated the Clergy of Rome choosing Stephen 9th anno 1057. which being but an usurpation in the Clergy so to doe the Cardinalls thought they had as much right as those Clergy-men and therefore upon the Rule that one Thief may rob another did by the assistance of Pope Nicholas 2d and Hildebrand his Cardinal Chaplain take it to themselves so that whosoever is Pope by their Election hath no right to the Chair for that the Title of the Cardinalls is surreptitious and illegall in its Commencement Et quod ab initio valet in tractu Temporis non convaliscat For the Pope being a Spiritual man ought not to plead possession when as his claim is by Intrusion and prescribe he cannot for that these Records are extant to the contrary since therefore by primitive right and by reduction after a separation thereof and that made good by Authority of Pope and Councell and after by Oath confirmed it doth belong to the Emperour of the West or the King of France to appoint the Bishop of Rome Let the present Emperour look to his Right as he will be served and let him beware of too long a discontinuance of this priviledge for should the gnawing rusty teeth of time worm-eat and rase all his Records and Testimonies that prove him a right to this Collation he shall never repair his losse when as he may be sure the Vactitan Hill shall be stored with old and new additions to the Bishop of Rome a right to appoint Germany an Emperour And as the Emperour had right to Collate to the See of Rome so likewise had he the same right to other Metropolitan Sees of Germany till over looking his Right to Rome the rest fall from him according to the Rule Dato uno absurdo mille sequuntur But I return back to England and will shew what right the Civill Magistrate hath to appoint Bishops in England without consent of the Pope By the Antient Lawes and Constitutions of this Kingdome The Kings of England appoint Bishops without the Pope the King was Patrone of all the Bishopricks in the Land for the Rule is Patronum faciunt dos edificatio fundus they were all donative and of the Kings gift Per traditionem annuli Pastoralis baculi as appears by the Law-books 7 Edw. 4. Cook 10. Report 73. and Matthew Paris History fol. 62. The King by Edward the Confessours Lawes cap. 19. is declared to be Vicarius which was long before acknowledged by Eleutherius in his Epistle before recited summus persona mixta cum sacerdote Constitutus est ut Populum dominii super omnia ecclesiastica Regat By the Judges of old it was declared that Papa non potest mutare leges Angliae none can Found or Erect a Colledge Church Abbey c. without the Kings Warrant Dyer 271. the Priviledges of the Church were growing out of the Civil Magistrates power and therefore by the Articles Super clerum made 9 Edw. 2. no suite was to be before the Bishops for any matter whatsoever but a prohibition lay and there it is expressed in what cases it shall be allowed 16 Edw. 3. Excom 4. and 2 R. 3.22 Excom by the Pope is no disability of any suit within this Kingdome which resolutions are grounded upon the Common Law of this Kingdome which Common Law is but certain reasonable Customes and usages of the Land refined by the experience of succeeding Ages and drawn into forme by Edward the Confessor which gathered it out of Divine natural and moral principles and as I said the antient reasonable usages of the precedent Ages and that the King is by antient Custome Vicarius sumus and with the advice of his nobles did appoint Bishops is proved by Eleutherius who was the first Bishop of Rome that ever had any entercourse concerning Church affaires in this Land which was onely to assist and further the Ministry but in no means to take from the King what was his right or what formerly belonged to him nor was this Antient right ever invaded till Beckets businesse that I can find 't is true that some strangers were sent hither and recommended by the Bishop of Rome to be by him preferred to English Benefices which were out of courtesie accepted but this did not prove any right of Collation in the Bishop of Rome at all nor did ever he set up his pretence to that Right till Hen. 2. time Which quarrel the advantage of the troubled times did occasion not the Justice of the Popes Cause to spur him to clear his title thereto he knew well enough that the King had the sole Power and just Title without him to set up what Bishops he pleased And whereas it may be objected that the Bishops of England are elegible it is true they are so but that was by the consent of King John for before that they were not elegible but were made elegible by a Roll 15 Jan. 17. of K. John but notwithstanding that grant is so restrained that they cannot be elected without the Kings Writ of Conge Deslier As for the Pope excommunicating the King about Beckets quarrell Tho. Becket that doth not prove the Popes power so to do For to argue de facto ad jus brings with it an absurd consequence it pleased the King to submit to it not being able to oppose the Factions then stirred up against him Infra 90. 11 chap. But it cannot from thence be evinced that the Kings voluntary submission out of policy of State doth make the Popes claim to excercise that power in anothers Province lawfull I have more at large treated of this particular businesse in the 11 chapter to which I refer you But the main businesse insisted upon by the Papists is the grand contest between Innocent the third and
the Decrees of the Provincial he was to appeal to the General Council within a yeer And by the Council of Antioch can 13. if any thing of controversie did arise in any Province and the Metropolitane could not in his Provincial Synod decide the matter the Metropolitane might call upon his neighbour-Provinces for assistance in Council a shame therefore for the Church of Rome to affirm that no Council is of validity without the Pope which canon of the Popes to that purpose is contrary to the practice and doctrine of the Primitive Church Ante Chap. 10. and therefore to be rejected By the ninth canon of the Councel of Antioch the Metropolitane of every Province has the Government of that Province assigned to him By all and every of which canons it is plain that one Bishop should not intermeddle in the Diocess of another Ante Ch. 2 nor one Metropolitane in the Province of another for that every Metropolitane has the government of his own distinct Province committed to him that he may call a council within his own Province and if there the matter in question cannot be determined may desire the assistance of his neighbour-Provincials which makes by that means a general Council by calling in the neighbour-Provincials as the cause shall require and this is declared by these Councils for to be lawful so to do without any reservation to the See of Rome as if without her Provincial this might not be done who by the sixth canon of the first Council of Nice is but equal with Alexandria and Alexandria Antioch Rome and other Provinces have like priviledges reserved to them by the express words of that canon This was the practice of the primitive Churches England equal with Rome and when those constitutions were made and long before was England a province and had her Metropolitane who after King Lucius conversion did publikely exercise the Jurisdiction of a Metropolitane which was 120 yeers before that Council of Nice and by the words of that canon the several Provincials then in being having equal Jurisdiction reserved to them England may by vertue hereof claim equality with the Church of Rome the same Authority making them equal in power and jurisdiction nor had she so much as primacie of Order till the ensuing Council of Constantinople can 2. gave it her onely for honour to the city of Rome and no other respect Nor doth it appear that England had any Suffragan in that Council so that had it not in after-times been confirmed by other Councils England had not been hereunto bound Which council of Constantinople was not called till 26 yeers after the council of Nice So that for the Doctor to alleadge against us as he doth positively in his book fol. 221. that we cannot call a Council seems something strange to me to proceed from a Doctor for it is an argument that he is ignorant of those canons or else if he have read them those copies he has perused are of Rhemish print and much vary from the Originals However I must needs wonder at his harsh censure against his native country and his quondam-mother-Church that he should deny her that priviledge and jurisdiction which is not due to her alone but common to all Provincials which by the authority of Councels and by the practice of the Primitive and by the ensamples of later ages have and do call Provincial Councils within their respective territories and precincts and do there decree Rules of faith to be observed of all within the Province as may appear by these ensuing presidents There was a Provincial Council called at Ancyra in Galitia of eighteen Bishops Provincials called of old and that other of Neocaesaria of fourteen Bishops before any General Council and after the General Council of Nice were held several Provincial Councils in the East as that Council of Grangene of sixteen Bishops that of Antioch of thirty Bishops of several Provinces in the East in which respect it rather deserves the name of a General Council then a Provincial Synod Likewise the Council of Laodicea of several Provinces of Asia Councils held without the Bishop of Rome and this without the Bishop of Rome for he was not to govern the Asian churches but the Bishops of Asia and Alexandria the Churches in Egypt and the Bishop of Pontus them in Pontus according to the Council of Constant can 2. Hereupon likewise the African Province held several Councils under Theodosius the third without any dependencie upon Rome which upon the authority of the Primitive Churches and Councils hath been continued down to these days not onely in those of the Eastern Asian and African Provinces but in other of the Western European Provinces it being a Right equally due to every Province and therefore I need not travel so far for Presidents I might have saved labour and answered the Doctor with presidents neerer home and have instanced in France those of Arles Tours Tholouse c. which Genebrard in his Chronicle lib. 4. anno 814. calls Concilia reformatoria and in Germany those of Worms Mentz Brixia Frankfort Noremberg and Ratisbone And in Spain those of Toledo and one of Sardis called by Osius Bishop of Corduba a little afore the Council of Nice And in England the Councils of London Winchester Gloucester and many and several even to this day the Pope never intermedling in any of them but in most of the afore-mentioned Provincial Councils was opposed and declared upon several questions started that he ought not to intermeddle Provincial Councels not to appeal to the Bishop of Rome nor any Appeals ought from those Provincials to be made unto him it being against the priviledges of the several Provincials to allow of Appeals to him And as it was their ancient Right Ante Ch. 2. so was it maintained by the Princes of later times who like careful nursing fathers would not suffer their Provincial Rights to be invaded by the ambitious and covetous incroaching Popes of Rome Hereupon Ludovicus Pius the Emperour did by publike Edict prohibit all exactions of the Popes which Ludovicus perceiving they began to grow proud upon the freedom and donation his predecessor Charles the Great had bestowed upon them did hereby shew unto the world that the clemencie and indulgencie of the Imperial Crown should not be an occasion to make other Princes suffer in their Ecclesiastical Rights by the Popes of Rome under colour of shelter from the Emperour to invade them in their said Ecclesiastical priviledges belonging to any Provinces within their proper dominions and therefore by publike Edict did the said Emperour prohibit all exactions of the Popes Court within his Realm The like was done in France by Philip the fair prohibiting all Appeals to Rome 1246. and that was confirmed by Charles the 5 and 6. punishing some as traitors for appealing And in the Reign of Charles the 7. was set forth a Decree against the annates reservations
never have obeyed him had not the holy Father of Rome perswaded them of the legality thereof So now Pepin was mindful of this great courtesie and makes good the Proverb Manus manum fricat These employments and great Authorities which the Pope had thus acquired though the onely ship of this advancement was that unconscionable perswading the people of France contrary to their Faith and Allegiance pledged to depose Childeric made him proud and puffed him up so that he began to insult over the people who not liking of such tyrannous proceedings especially from a Ghostly father and knowing that he was but a Deputy and had not right inherent in himself to govern and command them did therefore expel Leo the third from Rome who appealing to his Patron Charles King of France Charles the Great made Patron by Adrian predecessor to Leo. Ante ch 4. wrought so much with that King that he came to Rome and appeased the matter of difference and pacified the people and restored Leo by which action he did not onely please the people but the Pope likewise Wherefore the people having a long time conspired to shake off their obedience to the Eastern Empire and now that opportunity was offered them by reason that that Empire was much decayed and for that at that present there was but a woman to govern them Irene being the Empress they did with one consent proclaim Charles Emperour of Rome giving him the title of Cesar and Augustus and he was crowned by Pope Leo anno 801. Charles the Great son of Pepin being thus by the consent of the Romanes climbed up into the Imperial Chair began to reflect upon the justice and right of his possession Wherefore as Blandus and Platina two Popish Writers affirm he fearing to have too many irons in the fire and not altogether relying upon the Peoples choice and consent to have him Emperour for that it might not be lawful for many of them so to do in respect they stood already bound by stipulation made with the Empress not to cast off their Allegiance from her which Covenant could not lawfully be dissolved without consent of parties or that Irene had forfeited her interest to their obedience did therefore make his peace with Irene the Empress and Nicephorus her successor that by their consents and approbations he might rule in the western Empire which was by them confented unto And thus it continued in the blood of Charles till the yeer 920. when Henricus Auceps was chosen Emperour by the Saxons and Francones Henricus Auceps which continued in his blood by way of succession till the Empire was made Elective and Henricus Claudus 1002. was by vertue thereof elected Emperour Now I submit to the Readerâ— whether any thing from hence may be evinced to prove any right in the Pope to dispose of the Empire First it is evident that the Bishops of Rome were subject to the Emperours and were but equal with them of Alexandria And though they were in after-times made Universal Head yet still they remained subject to the Emperour having nothing to do with the disposing thereof And when Pepin was made King of France it was not by the donation of the Pope but by the people of France onely the Pope declared his opinion concerning the lawfulness of their casting off Childeric And when the Popes were by Pepin made Governours of Italy it was but as substitutes to Pepin and not in their own right And for Charles the Great being made Emperour it was the People of Rome that did it it may be that the Pope was instrumental to perswade the people thereunto but that which made him Emperour was the salutation of the People Salve Cesar c. Besides Charles the Great procured the consents of the Empress and her Successor to confirm him in his Regiment which is a manifest proof that no right of donation was at all in the Pope as Sigebert and others testifie concerning this very point That the Pope never took upon him an absolute right solely to dispose of the Empire but as instrumental to the People to inaugurate and crown him after the People had consented to have him over them Che crowning of the Emperours And the Popes crowning of the Emperours doth not prove any right at all in him to be disposer of that Crown any more then the Bishops of Canterbury their inaugurating the Kings of England doth prove a right in them to dispose of that Crown for this was the Office of the Priests as may appear by the examples of Samuel who anointed Saul and Zadok who anointed Solomon and Jehoiadah who anointed and crowned Joash Which act of theirs was done as they were Priests not as they had any Temporal right to dispose of those Kingships 'T is true Emperour elective that Gregory the fifth being neer kinsman to Otho the third did by his favour and consent procure that the Empire should be Elective the Emperours thereof to be chosen by seven Electors the Archbishops of Mentz Triers and Collen the King of Boheme the Duke of Saxony the Marquess of Brandenburg and the Count Palatine of Rhene This Constitution was enacted anâ—o 994. and was done by the approbation of the Emperour the Pope not so much as having any right at all appointed to him to give a voice in the Election And I wonder how they can pretend any title to dispose thereof for by reason of their spiritual Function they cannot and by colour of any Temporal right they may not And although the Councel of Lateraneâ— heâ—d under Innocent the third did declare them to be above Kings yet the succeeding Popes did not rely upon that Edict as being too little to be given to their Pontifical Seat in regard it was declared conditionally i. e. in case any King became Ethnick and therefore Boniface the eighth did make a Law himself more full and of ampler power for says Appendix Puldensis Constitutionem fecerat in qua se dominum spiritualem temporaleÌ„ in universo mundo asserebat And if from this Edict this Regal power must be ascribed to them it is strange and unreasonable Shall the Pope by a Decree of his own making rob others of their right I am sure there is no right in such a Constitution To transfer a property in any thing requires the consent of the owners otherwise it is Robbery not a lawful Contract And yet because this is done by his Holiness who cannot erre as his flatterers tell him it must be construed against all Principles and Rules of Law and Nature to be a lawful Constitution and binding unto Kings Which if they be so tame as to suffer themselves to be fettered with this Paper-gin when the heirs of their bodies may not succeed them they will finde but few to pity them This is the Popes Royal Charter by which he entitles himself to this Celestial power and this is the chief and principal Canon of the
them and to flie away from them in their sight to fetch down vengeance from Heaven upon them and the day being appointed he began to take his flight in mount Capitolinus into the air and that Peter by the power of the Lord Jesus brought him down and broke his bones which act of Peters occasioned his persecution for that Simon Magus was beloved of Cesar this Story is in the Roman Legends I could wish the Pope to make this moral use of this story to wit to beware how he exalts Rome above the heavenly Hierusalem for if he continue to cuff the Heavens with his towring waxen pinions he must expect the divine majestick rayes of the heavenly Sun to melt his proud supporters into nothing he must not think to exalt himself against God and prosper Is it not enough for him to be primus Episcoporum ordine but he will contrary to Gods Word be Supremus Potestate c. God gives wings to the Ant. that she may destroy her self the sooner let Romes Bishop be content with his own Province for it is a rule that that State that goes beyond the lists of mediocrity passes the bounds of safety all Churches of Europe would honour her as a sister but 't is unnaturall to love a stepmother we are all fellow members of Christ let not Rome therefore despise her sister England Let us strive together in love and let the Church that is at Rome salute the Church that is in England and let us greet each other with an holy kisse she must not rob England of her name of a Church if she think not to bastard her self for we are all ingrafted in the same stock and baptized into one faith by the spirit of Jesus it is not for her to be busy in anothers diocess to judge of our matters of discipline or doctrin in that wherein we differ from her any further then that if she conceive we erre to give admonishment to those of her own Province they fall not into the like cōdemnation she must not upon this score deny the society of Christian believers the name of a church Admit the unfriendly appellations of Schismaticks and hereticks which they bestow upon us were deserved Haereticus est pars ecclesiae because we do not in all points agree and communicate w th Rome yet we must not therefore be denyed to be a church for this assertion I have the authority of the Councell of Trent I say which was wholly gathered of men against the reformed churches and men totally for the Popes supremacy yet they did not deny but that Schismatichs and Hereticks were in the Catholike Church and might confer orders administer and baptize and the councel of Florens agrees herewith sum Sacrament Rom. Ecclesiae Sect. 136.28 and therefore it is very harsh dealing in the Doctor to deny us this which their own Councels allow so that Saint Pauls saying is verified in him Heb. 12.15 when one falls away from the faith a root of bitternesse springs up in him and that 's the reason the Doctor is so harsh against the English Church The name Protestant The name Protestant and English Protestant which the Dr. so much spurns at doth not at all speak us members cut off from the old stock the Catholick Church for as the Doctor maintains that the name Romane Catholick is proper and significant language and sense so may we as well say English Protestant and with more reason for we will note by the Doctors distinction thereby the difference between our discipline doctrine only for our particular selv s assert the Catholick faith thereby to manifest the readinesse of us a particular member of the Catholick Church to give the head thereof our Master Christ for the word Protestant is comprehensive of Catholick and is no more but to assert the faith which faith is Catholick so that an English Protestant may be said truly to be he that will hold stick to and to his power maintain the Catholick faith taught and maintained in the English Church For the word Protestant though of a new addition proves not the Religion new or profession not agreeable to the Old Faith and profession of the Primitive Churches but being added with reference to their profession is an evidence of their zeal and affection to maintain and professe that ancient and Catholike truth For we do not professe our selves to have left the Catholike faith once preached and professed at Rome but that Rome has left of to be a Catholick Church bringing in strange delusions and perswading people to believe lies which especially since her pretence to universality has been much studied to make her new claims good whereas we desire only to impugne her late errors and to protest against them to maintain the ancient faith and though in this we may to some seem to set our selves against the Church of Rome to forfeit our interest in the Catholike Church because as they suppose we claimed our Religion from her yet there is nothing lesse for we are a Province and had a Metropolitane of our own and might call a Councell and reform things amisse by the authority Ecclesiasticall without appealing to Rome nor do we hereby forfeit the title of a Church But rather justifie the same in respect we differ in nothing but we would submit it to a free Generall Councel and though we were hereticall in some points yet having a society of believers in Jesus and having Apostolicall orders amongst us we still may without offence to any retain the name and appellation of a Church CHAP. IV. Of the right of Collation to Bishopricks and of the Ordination of Bishops of succession of Pastors and particularly of the Succession in England that the Pope ought not to intermedle in the appointing of Bishops in England THe Doctor has a great spleen towards our succession of Bishops in our Church and would fain perswade the world we are not of the Catholick Church for our defect therein It rests therefore that I clear our Church from that new devised scandall Ecclesia non consistit in hominibus ratione potestatis vel dignitatis Ecclesiasticae vel secularis quia multi Principes summi Pontifices inventi sunt qui à fide apostatasse propter quod ecclesia consistit in illis personis in quibus est notitia vera confessio fidei veritatis Could we not prove one line of succession it much matters not for we may notwithstanding lay claim to be of the Catholick Church and having a society of believers in Christ do notwithstanding make a Church If we agree with the Apostles and Fathers of the Primitive Church it is sufficient saith Tertullian to give us the name of Catholike Church Ecclesia quae licet nullum ex Apostolis authorem suum praeferant tamen in eadem fide conspirantes non minus Apostolicae reputantur pro consanguinitate doctrinae Though our first planter
Joseph of Arimathea is not certainly known to have come whether from Rome from Paul or from Philip out of France or immediately from the East it is no great matter for by the confession of the Church of Rome we had the true faith amongst us before Eleutherius time and had Pastors then and since have continued a lawfull succession of governing Bishops Succession of Bishops in England even to the last late reverend father William of Cant. and whereas the Dr. twits against our succession of Bishops that we cannot maintain it unlesse we fetch it from Rnme I answer that we being a distinct Province the Bishop of Rome hath no power of Ordination here for by the Councell of Nice the 22. Can. a Bishop is not to ordain in anothers Diocesse Et si quis tale facere tentaverit irrita sit ejus ordinatio and though we be different of late from Rome and that it were time we had our order of Episcopacie from thence yet the late Bishops which were so different from Rome might ordain others within their own Province though Hereticks for that as I said before Haereticus est pars Ecclesiae Moreover it is decreed in the Councell of Florens that ordo imprimit characterem indelebilem therefore children baptized by an heretick are not to be rebaptized which the Councell of Trent hath decreed against the opinion of Cyprian Nam licet male utuntur potestate ministri sibi tradita prosint aliis non sibi Sicut enim per asinam Balaam loquutus est Deus ita per malos ministros Sacramenta praestat And Sum. Sacr. Rom. eccl Sect. 136. Episcopi haeretici veros ordines conferent vera praestant Sacramenta So that by the rules of the Papists themselves we notwithstanding we be hereticks or Schismaticks yet having once lawfull orders which gave an indelible character and in that a power of conferring the same upon others as long as we remain Christians and believe in the holy and blessed Trinity though we differ in other points yet we remain still members in the Catholick Church and have a power of conferring orders and I much wonder the Doctour should be so harsh against our Hierarchy unlesse he sometimes made a bait to fly at a Bishoprick and being canvassed in Peters net it stirred up some atra bilis which since would never be allayed he is so much incensed against it that he utterly denyes our succession upon the interruption of Romane Bishops in H. 8. and Queen Eliz. time for my part his allegations against it do not much trouble me nor I hope will they find entertainment with many sith they carry with them no more weight then the bare opinion of himself he positively affirming upon his own authority that our ministers are not in legal Orders insomuch that if one of our Priests came to Rome he must be ordained a new which if it be true it is contrary to the decrees of Popish Councells and will be a sufficient testimony to the world to convince them of falshood and jugling with the world that they should profess one thing and practise another to declare in Councells that a Heretick confers true and perfect orders and yet will not in their practice allow of it however for them to affirm us Hereticks is to beg the question and therefore we may safely within our own province continue a succession of Orders without any approbation of theirs at all nor is this any more then of right is due to us as may appear by the 1 Councell of Nice Provincial Ordination of Bishops 4 Can. a Bishop ought to be ordained by the severall Bishops of the Province but if they cannot conviently all meet to this purpose then three shall serve to perform the ordination which is also confirmed by the Councell of Antioch 19 Can. and the Councell of Carthage 13 Can. and it is the opinion of some learned Divines that in case of necessity the Ministers may Ordain where Bishops are wanting for that the Presbytery or Ministry have right to impose hands and the Keyes are said to be Claves ecclesiae non claves episcoporum seu presbyterorum Infra 43.5 chap. yet God be blessed England was never put to this strait we still had a continuing succession of Bishops notwithstanding the deprivation of the Popish Prelates and so according to that Canon did ordain in our own Precincts which as it is of right our due and belonging to us so it is likewise practised and hath been the antient Custom of other Provinces as wel as this as the Eastern Provinces ordain without the assistance of Rome and in these Western parts even in France and Germany and other places which right of Ordination being thus by decrees of the Generall Councels annexed to distinct Provinces I much wonder the moderate Papists of France and Germany should suffer themselves to be trampled upon by the Ignatian tribe sworn Servants to the imperious Pope who dayly exercises strange dominion over them making no other use of them then the Turk doth of his slaves to wit to do his drudgery whilst he himself reaps the fruits of their labours It argues a cowardly spirit to be afraid to right themselves herein because some of their Princes have fallen in the attempt amongst whom the 4th Henries of both Countries were sacrificed to the ambition and rapine of the encroaching Popes such horrid attempts as these should rather stir up their noble spirits to a just revenge upon the bloudied conclave for putting into act such cursed designes then through the base treachery of an ignoble nature slavishly to submit themselves to the Antichristian yoke of Rome when as if they would noblely withstand his unjust intrusions upon them they might restore to themselves a Church free from such Babylonish bondage and in some commendable measure imitate the heavenly Hierusalem which is above free and the Mother of us all For though their Consciences be not convinced of Romes Errours yet they may having distinct Provinces within themselves hold Councels ordain Bishops and performe other ecclesiastical rights and duties without being appointed thereunto from Rome or being commanded to give an account thither of their proceedings therein The Bishop of Rome being onely equal to other Sees in a Pastorall institution and lockt up within certain provinciall precincts by decrees of the primitive Councels and let them be sure of this as long as they continue themselves Saints to the Church of Rome they shall be sure to be fed with step-mothers shives whereas if th y would put their Churches under natural and proper heads of their own they might be sure to find more indulgent cherishing and tender care whereby they would in the eyes of their husband look more comely and the French Lillies would more neerly represent Christ his Spouse But I return to the Doctor The Doctor urges that our succession of Bishops in England was last for that it was interrupted by
the turning out of the old ones in Hen. 8. and Q. Eliz. time and the temporall Authority prefering others in their roome The Civill Magistrate nominate Bishops within his Dominion I answer that of right it belongs to the Civil Magistrate to appoint Bishops within his own Territories and Dominions especially that in England it hath been an antient right and priviledge of the Magistracy nor is the Pope himself free from this right of the Civil Magistrate as I shall shew an none It doth not impugne any ecclesiasticall priviledge grounded upon Divine Authority to grant this to the Civil Magistrate For by this there is no intrusion upon the function the Bishops are not hereby deprived of their right of ordination for this doth not awarrant any to step into the Ministry unlesse he have Apostolicall mission according to Christs rule Mat. 28. and Saint Pauls declaration Rom. 10.15 By which Mission we understand the Imposition of Hands Imposition of Hands which is the outward signe of the invisible grace conferred in that holy Order and which is the means that Christ hath appointed outwardly for the conveighing of the holy Ghost and giving them Spiritual Grace 1 Tim. 4. and Acts 6. and it is according to Christs example Luke 24.50 Christ lifting up his hands blessed them and according to his precept he commanding Paul to go to Damascus and it should be told him what he should doe and accordingly he was warned in a Vision that Ananias should come unto him and â—ay his hands upon him and he should receive his sight Acts the 9. neither did he receive the holy Ghost before this ver 17. and this being the outward signe Christ hath appointed we ought not to admit any into the Ministry without it for by this they are devoted to us as true Shepherds coming in at the door and without it they should not excercise the Ministery thereby not assuring us they are no intruders for we are not to give credit to pretended Revelations to a Mission by a Vision or by dictates of any Spirit in regard Christ hath appointed this way and means for us to know to whom he hath in truth given his Spirit for as the outward means is nothing worth without the inward Grace neither ought we to be perswaded they have the inward grace without the outward means Christ having shewn the way how they must come into this holy Function if any enter not that way but climb in another way he is a thief Yet this doth not at all contradict the Civil Magistrates recommending any one to supply an empty See or other Benefice that being warranted by the example of the Apostles For Act. 6.3 when they considered that it was not meet to leave the Word of God to serve Tables The people elect Ministers they called the multitude and bade them look out amongst themselves seven men of honest report which they might appoint to the businesse and Acts 14.23 the Elders that is the Ministers of the Church were elected by the people and after ordained by Paul and Barnabas by which places it is evident that the election belonged to the Civil Power to the people where the Civil Magistracy is lodged in them to the Prince where he hath the Temporall Sword so that if we can shew jusgentis for this it is warrant enough which I purpose not onely to make clear for our selves in England but likewise that the Emperour hath right of Collation to the See of Rome Whilst the Emperours of Rome were Heathens The Pope appointed they had no regard to the Church either to endow it with Revenues or to take care who ruled or had the charge of the Ministry But as soon as Constantine received the Faith then not onely he but his Successors had especiall care towards the Rules thereof Constantine by an Edict confirming Silvester over the Church and his Successors after him he appointing who should succeed Silvester in the See neither was this unreasonable for it was fit that the Civil Magistrate should appoint who should succeed in that See because now they were to receive some certain benefit belonging to this See by the donation of the Magistrate and a thing so appropriated being part of his Temporall possessions as Lord Paramount within his own dominions and for which they become Homagers to their donor they not otherwise having any title to temporall possessions For as Ministers they are not to take care for the things of this world Mat. 7. and Christ denyed to medle with the temporal inheritance of the brethren and the Disciples were commanded not to carry scrip Luke 22. but having meat and drink to be therewith content 1 Tim. 6. Paul did not seek for gain Acts the 20 neither was he burthensome 2 Thes 3. yet notwithstanding though they ought not to be solicitous after these things they were to live of the Gospel 1 Cor. 9. and the labourer is worthy of his hire Mat. 10. and he that finds the Sheep must live of the Milk it is lawfull for them to require victum and vestitum and if through the bounty of any Prince under whom they reside they have any thing bestowed upon them which will amount over and besides this it ought to be bestowed in Hospitality For 1 Tim. 3. Episcopum oportet esse Hospitalem so that though they are not to seek for any thing more then meat or drink yet if any more be bestowed on them it is lawful for them to accept it provided it be bestowed upon Hospitality And in all Reason the founder of such overplus ought to have the nomination of the person that must distribute that revenue Nam cujus est dare ejus est disponere and for this reason have Princes right of Collation to Episcopall Sees and other ecclesiasticall places so endowed And for this reason the Emperours had right to Collation to the See of Rome as appears by Marsilius defensor pacis dict 2. cap. 21 c. as is manifest by what here ensues Boniface the third writ an Epistle to Honorius Infra 142.14 chap. 76 the 10 chapter that he would permit him to continue in his Seat at Rome he having been placed there before by division of the Empire and Honorius his coming to the West Anno 451. Leo Bishop of Rome writes a gratulatory Epistle to Marrian for his care to the Church in relation to his calling the Councell of Chalcedon by which peace was restored into the Church and as Boniface writ to Honorius so he entreats that by the favour of Marrian he might continue in his See by which it is evident that it belonged to the Emperour to appoint the Bishop of Rome And thus it did continue untill Anno 687. Constant Pogonot infra 141. 14 chap. that Benedict 2. obtained of Constantine the 4th that the Bishop of Rome should be created without the confirmation of the Emperour which continued not long in that state
it was superfluous for expressio eorum quae tacite insunt nihil operatur It doth but argue he is covetous and ambitious covetous in that he hereby makes himself master of anothers Interest and ambitious in that he would be thought the Author of Princes dignities As for King Hen. 8. his adding that stile to his other distinguishments of Dignity it did not proceed from any conceit that he could not have stiled himself so had not the Pope saluted him with that courteous appellation But only in respect it was grown into fashion to adde to their temporall Styles some denotement of their ecclesiasticall power as the Emperour of Ethiopia stiles himself the Pillar of Faith without deriving that dignity from Rome It is true the French embrace the stile of Christian and the Spaniard of Catholick King from Rome yet I suppose they might without that be so dignified As for England it is plain that her King may without any donation thereof from Rome for that it is warranted by her antient Lawes and Eleutherius called Lucius Gods Vicar the King was stiled Persona mixta cum sacerdote which was many hundred years known before Hen. 8. Ante 37. Cap. 4. and therefore sith by the antient Lawes of the Land the King is Vicarius sūmus infra Regnas He must nominate or ought to Authorise some by vertue of his power all forrain provinciall Jurisdiction being lockt up by consent of Councels within its proper provinciall precincts to appoint Bishops this antient right being grounded upon Gods Word in that I have proved that the Temporall Magistrate did elect such as should be ordained and therefore for the Doctor to deny us to be a Church because we want succession of Bishops the new ones being appointed by the Temporall Magistrate when as they wanted nothing to compleat their Order seemes to me strange and unreasonall If the Doctor when he denies our succession of Bishops No discontinuance of Succession of Bishops in England when Queen Elizabeth turned out the old ones could prove that the new ones had no Imposition of Hands by Bishops then his Argument touched us something though it be not absolute necessary that Bishops ordain Bishops Ante 33.4 chap. For what if all the Bishops should die so neer at one time that none were left ordained by them shall not the Presbytery make Bishops they have right to the Keyes which are called Claves ecclesiae non episcoporum and they are the remaining Pillars of the Church and certainly may confer the Order of Bishop upon others and that the rather because the Councells forbid Bishops of another Province to ordain in a forrain Province and though it may seeme strange to some that Ministers which are subordinate should ordain Bishops and so confer Superiour Orders it is not if rightly examined contradictory to reason For in this first ordination of Priests and Deacons they are infra ordines majores which orders are called Holy and Sacramentall and are the Highest Orders witness Pope Vrban decret dist 60. sum Sacr. Ro. Eccl. 226. as for the Order of Bishops it is no more then a Priest as to the Holy and Sacramentall Order onely more excellent in respect of the Order of Governing which is rather of Humane then Divine right Priests ordain Bishops for as it is Divine it is no more then what every Priest hath by the Sacramentall order but as it is Humane it is transcendent in relation to Discipline Ante 33.4 chap. and therefore the Presbytery may agree to ordain one over them to govern them in ecclesiasticall Rites as the people may choose a Prince to Govern in civill affairs Hence it was that the Apostles sent John to Ephesus Peter to Antioch and appointed James over the Churches at Hierusalem which before such their Consignations were but equal with the other Apostles in every respect but after that if any other of the Apostles came where they had the over-sight they were observant of them Hence was it that James was prolocutor of the Councel at Hierusalem and not Peter because James was Bishop there I may from thence infer that if Peter came to Rome for the same reason he was observant of Paul and therefore it is conceived that in case of necessity Priests may ordain Bishops for that Bishops in relation to their Jurisdiction are not a Sacramentall Order but onely as they are Priests But if this opinion be by the learned condemned I shall submit and yet with confidence affirme that we may in England claim a Church notwithstanding For when Queen Elizabeth turned out some Popish Bishops those that were put into their roomes were ordained by the remaining part of the old Bishops For all the old Bishops were not turned out then nor in Hen. 8. his time For first in Hen 8. time the controversie was about Supremacy which question the Insolencies of the Pope occasioned though I doe not justifie that Prince for all he did and being once started it gave occasion of further scrutiny into the primitive Fathers and Councels Reformation of England Infra 55.5 chap. which did so far perswade the Consciences of the then Clergy that many of them did adhere to the Prince against the Pope and by that and other after inquisitions they found they had primitive right of calling Councels and reforming things amisse in their Church without appealing to Rome and thereupon having the authority of Scriptures Councells and Fathers they restored to themselves their just rights and shook off their servile obedience to the See of Rome which the Popes continued over them by keeping them up in ignorance not allowing them their own judgements and illumination ecclesiasticall to understand the plain letter of any thing be it never so far demonstrated to the easiest capacity without his Holinesse interpretation and having thus shaken off that slavish yoke of Rome the scales of blind obedience fell from their eyes and they clearly perceived the Popes false cunning and damnable abusings of Scriptures Fathers Councels and what not thorow his unjust usurpations of universality and infallibility whereby he became a new Legislator of Divine rules of Faith which had in them too much of grosse and fleshly compositions tending meerly to enslave Christendome and to set up the Popes triple Crown for all the people to worship thereby making them forsake Christ and his Truth for the fables and traditions of that abominable Idoll And as In Hen. 8. time all the Bishops were not turned out so neither at the coming of Queen Elizabeth to the Crown but continued in their Bishopricks excercising their function ordaining others as formerly onely the Archbishop of York the Bishops of Elie Lincoln Bath Worcester and Excester were outed and the Bishops of Saint Asaph Bangor London and Chester fled the rest continued and ordained others The Queen her self being Enaugurated by Bishop Oglethorp one of Queen Maries Bishops and Bishop of Carlisle and Parker the Arch-bishop
was consecrated by the Imposition of Hands of Barlow Coverdale and Korey three of Queen Maries Bishops and two suffragan Bishops more as appears by the act of Consecration for that our succession was not totally interrupted or if it had I hold that succession of Bishops is no inseparable mark of a true Church for if so then where was the Church before Christ for he was not of Aarons succession Succession no inseparable mark of a true Church but after the order of Mesehisedeck and Peter was designed of Christ having none to go before him so that succession is no absolute mark of a true Church And whereas the Doctor objects that we are beholding to the Romish Bishops if our succession was not interrupted I have already proved that we had Sacramentall Orders at least if not governing Bishops before ever Eleutherius sent any Priests into England Ante 24.32 2 4 chap. our English writers say these two which were sent to Rome by Lucius were Bishops however they were in Holy Orders though I rather incline to think that none excercised any Episcopall Jurisdictions till by the Prince Christianity was publickly professed and being in Orders did consecrate others and there were others which had given to them the imposition of Hands from whom and not meerly from Rome we claim a succession of Pastors yet I might admit we had it from Rome and though all of the Romish Institution were extinct yet we continue a succession for that still we are pars ecclesiae though Hereticks But that 's but their begging of the question we appeal to the Scriptures primitive Councells and Fathers to Judge who are of us two the Scismaticks or Hereticks and I submit to the Judicious reader to censure or condemn us in the points here controverted whether Rome or we be in the Errour Thus briefly I have answered the Doctors condemning of us for want of Succession and have in some sort proved that the Church of Rome cannot properly be said a true Church in respect of her Succession Ante 9. Rome uncertain in her succession chap. 2 of which more in the next chapters for that she is uncertain in it and many of the Bishops of Rome usurpers in it so I will now proceed to examine the rest of his marks by which he hath distinguished her Truth and Catholickship and shall prove that she may not ascribe to her self the Title of the Catholick Church for and by reason of any of them CHAP. V. That the Church of Rome hath been and any particular Church may be Invisible THe first marks by which the Doctor hath laboured to prove Rome the true Church to wit Universality and Antiquity are already answered in that I have Proved others equall and some ancienter then the Church of Rome it now followes to look a little further after her whilst she may be found for shortly she shall be Invisible The Church Visible is a Company professing the Doctrine of the Law and the Gospell Visibility using the Sacraments according to Christs Institution in which company are many unregenerate as Hypothules as by the Parable of the seed and tares is manifest The Church Invisible is a company of those onely which are elect to Eternall life of whom it is said No man shall pluck my sheep out of my hands Joh. 10.28 is Universal or comprehensive of all the Elect which both now have heretofore living had one Faith The Church visible is Universall in respect of the dispersed Companies of those that professe one faith in Christ which must continue till the end of the world And the Visible Church is particular in respect of place and habitation and of diversity of Rites and Ceremonies as England Rome c. which particular Churches may becoming Invisible and particularly Rome hath been Invisible in respect of her Assemblies and is invisible in relation to the true Faith and Doctrine for though at present she hath companies of men which assemble to worship God and serve him in the Sacrament yet shee therein followes not Christs institution she is now invisible in respect of Faith and Doctrine and in respect of Men she cannot boast of this mark of Visibility but Tares grow as well as Wheat and as Rome hath been invisible in these respects so may any other particular Church be Invisible Elijah complained that he was left alone A particular Church may be Invisible and that the Prophets were slain that complaint of his saith the Doctor doth not prove that the true Church may be Invisible for saith he that complaint was uttered with relation to the Kingdome of Israel onely wherein Elijah then was and not with reference to the Kingdome of Judah where Elijah was not persecuted by Ahab and where the Church of God doth flourish This his Argument in my opinion proves what is objected against the Church of Rome It is true it is an Argument that the Church shall not be Universally Invisible but if by the true Church he mean the Church of Rome and I think he would not otherwise be understood it is no Argument but that it may be Invisible it is true at one instant of time the Church shall not be universally invisible God having promised his Spirit to be with the Apostles in their teaching of Nations to the worlds end but yet in any particular place it hath been and may be Invisible as he confesses himself he saith it was invisible in relation to the Kingdome of Israel and in Judah they knew not whether to resort when the Temple it self was defiled neither was there Place nor Sacrifice nor High Priest the Priest was wicked the Temple was defiled 2 King 19.2 and when the Doctor is charged with its being invisible in Judea he pleads it invisible in Ethiopia the Eunuch having received the Faith by Philip and so by these landskips he makes intervalls of darknesse proving that in particular places it was Invisible and if so then may not Rome being a particular Church boast of absolute truth by reason of this mark of Visibility we doe not go about to prove the Church universally invisible at one instant of time whilst we say that any particular Church as Rome may be Invisible but that no one particular Church but at some time may be Invisible Time was when both Rome and we agreed in the same Principles of Religion conform to the Rules of Scriptures Councels and Fathers but of later years Rome being grown above Apostolicall Orders abusing the indulgence of Christian Princes and other Churches towards her She hath turned the grace of God into wantonnesse converting Premacy into Supremacy and that Supremacy into Infallibility and so having acquired that uncontrolable Prerogative by the dull consent of some lame Princes and blind servile slavish People she became the onely evangellicall cradle accounting the Scriptures dead Letters and to receive articulate sense from her dictates and so for her own
be taxed for negligence herein so neither hath she heretofore been careless in this point It is true according to that of S. Paul 1 Cor. 11.19 that there must be heresies that they which are approved might be known But she was never wanting friendly to admonish and with motherly reasons to perswade her Christian sons to obedience as witnesseth the several publike Conserences had at Hampton and elsewhere which was all that of her self she was able to do Bishops cannot reform without approhation from the Parliament She may decree things in her Convocation and Church-assemblies but they are no binding Rules by the Laws of the Land without the approbation of the Civil power and therefore is it ordinarily that the Convocation sits when there is a Parliament that if there be any new Rules of Faith to be declared they may receive the approbation and allowance of the Temporal Magistrate by force whereof they become obligatory to the people As for the Bishops their sitting in Parliament they do not sit there as Bishops to judge but as Barons they judge as Bishops they onely advise left any Moral Law be made repugnant to Gods Word and so likewise the Judges sit in Parliament to advise lest any new Law be made either in it self irregular or contradictory to the fundamental Laws of the Kingdom but neither the Bishops as Bishops or the Judges sit in Parliament as Judges to decree and vote in the legislation of any new Rule Whereas in old Presidents it is said By assent of the King Bishops siâ— as Barons not as Bishops in Parliament by the advice of the Lords spiritual and temporal c. it is not hereby to be understood that as Spiritual Lords they judged in the making of the Municipal Law onely they were named before the Temporal Lords for that they were the greater number and all Barons or Peers were alike The Bishops Abbots and Priors which had Baronies annexed to them were far exceeding the number of the Temporal Lords as may appear by ancient Rolls there were 27 Abbots and 2 Priors which had Baronies annexed to their Spiritualties by vertue whereof both they and the Bishops which likewise had Baronies annexed to their Sees sate on Parliament in a distinct capacity from the Spiritualty as to the matter of Judicature Now that they were the greater number appears by this The Abbots Priors and Bishops which held by Barony were fifty and there were but few Noble-men of the Laity there were none or few Earls but of the Blood Royal Noble-men in England and therefore to this day they are termed by the Kings Writs Consanguinei nostri in after-time they were made more common insomuch that whereas Alfred had divided the Kingdom into Shires and committed the Government of every Shire and appointed a Lieutenant to every Shire to govern it and to rule and controul the outrageous subjects at home as well as to defend it from forraign enemies That Officer in after-times became a Count and the country over which he was appointed Governour was called a County which since was changed the King taking from the Earl or Count that power he not liking that this power should remain main in one hereditary and which had it not immediately from himself And because the Earl to whom such charge was committed was not so ready to be corrected if he did amiss and that the administration of justice might immediately proceed from the King himself it was therefore taken from the Earl and given to one yeerly appointed thereto who because he did execute that power which the Earl formerly had is called Vice-comes quia vicem Comit is suppleat Mirror cap. 1. sect 3. By which it appears that there were not many Peers of the Laytie And as for any other degrees of Nobility as Duke Marquess Nobility in England or Viscount they were but puisne names of titular dignity and doth not make them Peers or Judges of Parliament unless they have Baronies annexed to them as it is resolved by the Law of England 14 H. 4.7 and therefore in Parliament all Peers votes are equal without distinction of their titular dignities For as for the name Duke there was none in England after the Conquest before the Black Prince Edward son of Rich. 2. nor any Marquess before Robert Earl of Oxford was made Marquess of Dublin by R. 2. nor any Viscount before John de bello monte was made Viscount Bellamont or Beaumont by H. 6. By which it is manifest that the Nobility was but few in ancient time and therefore the Lords Spiritual being the greater number of Peers are named before the Lords Temporal not that they either have any superiority in Judicature or that they sit there as Judges in their Spiritual capacity as may likewise appear by Roll of Parliament 18 H. 3. m. 17. The Bishops sitting in a Convocation at Gloucester were inhibited to meddle of the Temporal state of the King or his Nobles c. upon pain of having their Baronies confiscate for they had distinct capacities as they are Bishops they were not to meddle with Temporal affairs wherefore were they inhibited in that Assembly at Gloucester which was meerly of spiritual men to proceed in matters temporal and as they are Barons and therefore sit in Parliament they may not there judge of things spiritual all transactions of that nature being to receive debate in the Convocation of the Clergie Wherefore it may not be laid to the charge of the Bishops that they sitting in Parliament did not reform the Schisms in the Church for that they were not proper Judges thereof as they sate in Parliament but onely when they sate in the Convocation which Convocation was prevented to be convened according to the old Rules and Customs of this Nation by the popular sort which then not knowing what they would have at all adventure cried down Episcopacie and having pulled down that stately glorious fabrick all that ever the then-busie Reformers could frame out of the timber of the old building was but to patch and cobble up a Presbyterian cottage and that so weakly joynted and set together that it was judged by the most of them that it could not stand above three yeers A pitiful change It is an evil bird defiles its own nest and must our English Sion which was the glory of this Land and the envie of other Nations be made a scorn unto her enemies by her own adopted sons If children live honestly says Solomon Ecclus 22. they shall put away the shame of their parents but if they be proud with haughtiness and foolishness they defile the nobility of their own kindred Wherefore I humbly beg of the chief Governours and Rulers of the people to reflect upon their mother-Church and to consider her in her sufferings to pray for her and to endeavour her peace Pray for the peace of Jerusalem they shall prosper that love her And to put to their helping
variations of mine from the Original not admitting of correction as the Author certifies without ravelling the whole piece and to use his own phrase picking out those knotty ends of mine The Stationer having made a large progress in the work before the Author knew thereof hath prevailed with him to let it pass with its present imperfections both he and I engageing to rectifie all such mistakes in the next Edition It now remains to crave your friendly acceptance hereof and with the help of these noted Erraat's to make a candid construction of the mistaken places Errata Page 5. line 23. read fanes p. 23. l. 29. polipus p. 24. l. 12. Rome p. 26. l. 26. dele only p. 30. l. 6. shall contain Christ till he come p. 31. l. 17. are p. 32. l. 24. Paschalis p. 33. l. 15. fourteenth p. 34. l. 14. fourth p. 36. l. 2. birds l. 20. Homagers l. 21. imperious p. 38. l. 12. their p. 40. l. 14. with Timothy p. 43. l. 17. ninth p. 44. l. 24. they that they might p. 46. l. 29. veruntamen Episcopus Constantinopolitanus habeat honoris primatum post Romanum propteria quod c. p. 48. l. 14. appointed p. 63. l. 10. seas p. 65. l. 20. his p. 71. l. 26. and. p. 25. cannot do it p. 76. l. 2. and although difference p. 90 l. 5. not l. 6. thereby note the difference l. 12. to give obedience to the head p. 91. l. 16. by setting p. 93. l. 1. qui. l. 15. Ecclesiae quae licet c. p. 94. l. 15. true p. 99. l. 18. rites l. 29. sonnes p. 100. l. 15. lost p. 102. denoted p. 104. l. 18. the thing p. 106. l. 16. the and Marcian l. 12. Boniface the first l. 18. 453. p. 108. l. 1. Pope Parasites l. 10. the appointing the Pope l. 29. quod ab inâ—ito non valet in tractu temporis non convalescat p. 109. l. 24. Vatican l. 26. new additions to prove the Bishop p. 112. Vicarius summus p. 114. presente p. 119. l. 24. for by this peace p. 121 l. 1. clasped l. 11. in England which who please p. 123. l. 26. Ignatian p. 124. l. 1. and. l. 23. and. p. 126. received p. 127. nos zelo fidei c. p. 130. l. 13. their l. 16. are by some called holy p. 134. l. 25. so p. 135. l. 24. and there were others in orders which c. p. 137. hypocrites p. 139. l. 20. did p. 140. l. 20. he pleads it visible in Aethiopia p. 141. l. 21. Tame l. 24. Oracle l. 28. Proselytes p. 143. l. 12. and l. 15. the. l. 17. Belinus p. 149. Geminis p. 151. l. 21. stood p. 155. l. 6. have l. 20. vide utrum c. p. 150. l. 14. looks p. 157. l. 1. Conâ—arenus l. 7. pasce l. 9. tame l. 24. constitutions p. 160. l. 2. failings and in the marg read thus Against railing at Princes p. 172. l. 6. worth l. 11. principi l. 13. approves p. 173. l. 5. she hereby drawes l. 26. he l. 29. Bolseck p. 175. l. 26. of the Bishops l. 6. Vrbane p. 176. l. 18. aliaco p. 177. l. 21. Guiciardine p. 178. strange mazes p. 179. l. 3. Bozius de signis l. 15. leud p. 181. these stories he strains at a Gnat. l. 9. he leaps o're blocks p. 182. Chapter of traditions p. 113. l. 29. smiles p. 184. l. 23. so sleightly over p. 188. l. 9. Bank l. 10. Zactan p. 161. l. 8. Plantations p. 193. l. 15. patronize p. 194. l. 1. bibulus l. 23. of this counterfeit l. 26. theirs p. 196. l. 26. those points wherein we differ upon which c. p. 200. Delphicus and minos and Faunus and fuisse p. 202. l. 24. Gentiles p. 203. l. 23. communicate with the Gentiles p. 206. Cheregatus p. 213. Tabescimus l. 12. Oh. p. 215. l. 24. communion and though p. 216. and. l. 13. rules l. 26. is p. 214. l. 26. into which Rome's Salomon enters p. 233. statutis and videamur p. 234. have this priviledge p. 237. l. 5. Constance p. 239. l. 2. did l. 17. irruptious p. 241. l. 3. and cause p. 242. l. 2. destroyes and Constance p. 246. l. 24. that can lay open all l. 26. and expound p. 249. an excuse p. 251. l. 2. contrary to that Councel l. 11. with Euliches p. 254. l. 14. these p. 267. l. 22. error and negligence p. 282. l. 1. are the onely infallible p. 283. l. 13. Austin Tom. 6. contra Donatistas cap. 3. p. 287. l. 19. immediately p. 294. l. 15. as appears by that Councel p. 297. l. 12. suit p. 307. l. 18. Greek p. 312. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 313. l. 19. our antient Fathers p. 319. her p. 316. l. 18. which p. 321. l. 3. Theodoret. p. 322. totum jam and dicatur l. 29. Dei docentis imperium p. 324. l. 2. Scriptures l. 8. the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 oâ—â—tted l. 21. one of the Churches Saints p. 327. l. 14. but not bodily on earth p. 333. l. 2. knacks l. 12. our p. 335. Vicar-General l. 14. equal with the Bishop in order to the derivation p. 348. hair-loomes p. 353. pro se p. 373. l. 11. my p. 374. l. 22. pater p. 376 moron p. 377. l. 24. till Shilo come again p. 378. l. 24. pearch p. 383. l. 26. thought p. 388. l. 18. summi l. 26. Aaron p. 393. l. 20. to claim an eigne portion p. 394. Totilas and Belliâ—arius p. 399. l. 24. of p. 401. l. 2. step p. 403. l. 18. Empire p. 410. are latum and miltiades p. 415. l. 21. agreeing p. 416. l. 9. testamur p. 417. l. 24. Parsons p. 442. passio Christi and causa formalis and gratia and causa finalis p. 457. vercella and l. 15. intualects p. 461. Cimmerian p. 470. l. 10. utraque p. 482. â—surienti and l. 10. charge p. 497. tradidi p. 499. l. 13. in these latter dayes p. 504. l. 29. their p. 508. l. 26. neither p. 510. l. 17. Pope p. 512. l. 5. sufficient and l. 7. notwithstanding and l. 15. real p. 521. l. 28. Aegyptiam and Aâ—mâ—niâ—m and Indicam p. 522 l. 13. in the Romane p. 526. l. 9. sheep l. 29. formerly