Christian Faith puts upon the ill-nature of Divines when they are disputing about matters of Religion 'T is common for Philosophers Lawyers Physicians c. to differ about matters which concern their Professions and write one against another But you will find some Temper and Decorum observed in their Writings But let the Controversy be about any Branch of Christian Faith and then see the Odium Theologorum the Malice of Divines in the late Writings of two of your Church Doctors against each other at least this shews that Christian Faith doth not improve the Temper of such Men who are of mean Birth and narrow Education And I cannot but observe that your Protestant Malice is under a worse Management than the Popish they only thirst for the Blood of Protestants but you are for sucking one anothers Blood as when for the Service of King Charles the II. who was Head of your Church and his Popish Brother the Blood of the best Protestants in England and some of them of your own Church was to be spilt the Court Blood-suckers viz. Attorney general and Judges besides Juries and Evidence were all of 'em chosen Men out of your own Church and the Posse of the Clergy was raised to hold their Heads to the Block by Preaching the Doctrine of Passive Obedience But in requital it must be confessed that your Clergy require the King to do their Persecuting Journey-work with the same Insolence as the Popish Priesthood use For must not the Sovereign Monarch of England Scotland France and Ireland by his Authority Royal execute the Decrees and Anathema's of the Arch-deacons and Bishops Chancellors by Imprisoning his loyal and useful Subjects for not conforming to their Ceremonies If a King will submit to this Drudgery he shall have the vox Cleri of his side and be as great as Noise and fulsom Flattery can make him but in the mean time is really King but of one Moiety of his People whilst the danger which the other half apprehend from the Secular Arm directed by Spiritual Power of Necessity weaneth their Hearts from the Government Thus Charles the II. who for two Years after his Return reigned in the Hearts of all his People was by the Act of Uniformity reduced to be King of the Church-party and at last whilst the Popish and Protestant Priesthood zealously contended whose Property he should be like the Truth among Controversial Divines he was lost in the Scuffle He instanced in likewise the late King James who said he had it in his power to be universally beloved and obey'd beyond any King of England this Age has produced His Right to the Crown was owned by all his Wilfulness had passed upon the Church of England Party for Magnanimous Resolution which struck such an Awe upon them that they were coming to a Temper and would have consented to a Toleration of Protestant Dissenters and Roman Catholicks too provided their Maintenance might be continued to them Thus the Heart of all England had been set upon the King but the Popish Priesthood would be content with nothing less than delivering the whole Nation to Satan and their King must execute the dreadful Anathema though 't was manifest that he must thereby lessen himself to the size of one of the 7 Kings of Kent for he could be Sovereign of no more than the Two hundredth part of the People For King Charles in numbering the People had found that the Proportion between Papist and Protestant was as 1 to 200 whereas had his own Priesthood been so favourable to him as to have excused him from executing that Satanical Power which by a Right purely Divine was vested in Sacred Majesty his Reign might have been happy and his Memory precious What an unhappy Effect had the Spirit of Father Laud upon King Charles the First And what hath brought Lewis the XIV to the present Diminution of his Glory but that haughty Insolence and unnatural Cruelty in Persecuting his own Subjects which Father la Chaise has inspired him with What Figure will this Grand Monarch make in Story His Name will pollute the Annals of this Age and his cowardly Conquests be the Scorn of Posterity Now from all that he had said he concluded that for Luck-sake as well as to preserve his good Nature he would be cautious of being at least a zealous Christian 8. 'T was not long since I met one of my old Acquaintance who told me that he had lately cast off these Prejudices he had conceived against the Christian Faith by the Assistance of a Book called The Five Letters of Inspiration By the last of those Letters he was convinced of the reality of reveal'd Religion from the Intrinsick value and Excellency thereof and he was fully confirmed in his Judgment by a late Book called The Reasonableness of Christianity as delivered in the Scripture Upon this he had read over the Old-Testament once and the New several times with great attention of Mind Indeed he always thought the Moral part of the Bible very good but then he also thought that by the strength of his own Reason he could have written as good a Moral himself But by the last of these Books he was convinced that he was indebted to Revelation more than he thought of and considering how long the Ceremonial Law had obtain'd among the Jews and what a profound respect they paid to the Scribes Pharisees and Spiritual Guides and Rulers he plainly saw that there was need enough of Miracle to bear down their Prejudices to make 'em leave their Ceremonies and listen to that excellent Moral which Christ gave 'em nay he was convinced that no Miracles were strong enough to prevail over the Priest or a Priest-ridden People to become Proselytes to the Doctrine of universal Love and Charity for said he if a Teacher should now be sent from Heaven with this Message that all the Protestant Parties in England should be reconciled and live well with one another making nothing necessary to their religious Communion but what Christ had appointed and such Circumstances as Time and Place and what in the nature of the thing was needful and if this Teacher's Mission were confirm'd by Miracle it would have as he thought no better effect upon our several Sects of Clergy and those who are bigotted to their Parties than it had upon the Pharisees and their Disciples of old Having heard him speak so sharply against the Clergy after his old way I could not but tell him that I perceived he was but almost a Christian for he who loveth the Institution of Christ cannot but respect those who are the Ministers thereof at least I hoped that he would pay a respect to the Clergy of the Church of England which was the best Reformed Church in the World and therefore I expected that he was already a Member of our Church He reply'd that he should always be ready to pay his respect to every good Man of what Order or Degree
thereby render them uncapable to make good their Oath of Allegiance in yielding their Aid and Assistance Nor do's he find that the Presbytery claims any inferior Powers each Party alledge Scriptures and Fathers on their side and for ought I can see says this Gentleman they are all in the right Through an excess of Prejudice thus occasion'd he makes a further step towards Deism and Reasons after this manner 'T is not impossible continues he that the ancient Clergy might be possess'd with the same Spirit of Pride which has prevail'd over the modern If those Writings which they call Holy Scriptures are of their side as they all say they are I make no doubt but they were of their own inventing and if Jesus Christ their Patron laid the Foundation of those Powers which both Popish and Protestant Clergy claim to themselves from under him I think the old Romans did him right in punishing him with the death of a Slave After this manner I have heard it said of late by another of the same Constitution that as the Church of Rome was a modelled Faction against all other Christians so was the Church of England by Law Established against all other Protestants who were by Law excluded from every Office of Profit and Trust who were made subject to the Piques and Malice of every Church-man and became a constant Revenue to Apparitors and Spiritual Catch-poles And though at present there be a Toleraration by Law granted yet 't is still opposed by the Spirit of the Church as appears by Sermons Preached at Visitations and the constant ordinary Discourses of the Clergy in which the Church of England is always represented as at this time in greater danger than ever it was though I should think the danger had been as great in King James's Time And notwithstanding the Toleration said he no Man can enjoy a place of Profit or Trust though he be ever so dutiful a Subject and ever so able or honest a Man unless he hath a Conscience by Law Established By which Church-device Men are deprived of the Privileges of their Country to which they are born and for the discharge whereof they never did in any respect incapacitate themselves and hereby it comes to pass that the Nation cannot act vigorously in its own defence being debarr'd the Use of one Moiety of it self and notwithstanding this they have the Confidence to tell us Lay-men that we ought to love our Neighbours as our selves Now if this be the way of the Christians concluded he let my Soul be with the Philosophers 2. And this brings to my Thoughts what another Deist said jestingly to me viz. That since I was a Christian 't was lucky for me that I was of the Bishop's Church for though you were ever so Loyal said he to the King yet if you did not pay as dutiful an Allegiance to the Bishops you could not hold the Place you now enjoy for as certain as the Cross is above the Crown so sure a thing is it that the Bishop will be above the King which he undertook would appear to me if I looked back to King Charles's Restoration or King William's Revolution The Presbyterians though they quarrelled with Charles the First yet became the loving Subjects of Charles the Second joined with the Episcopalians in assisting him to the Throne and made no scruple of Swearing their Allegiance to him and owning his Supremacy But after all this the King was not able to support these his Loving Subjects against the Power of the Bishops who in two Years time outed 'em of their Livelihoods and after that drove 'em five Miles distance from all Market-Towns and at last the Acts made against Papists were extended to them But since King William's Revolution the Case is alter'd for the Jacobite Clergy though turn'd out of their Livings by Law for refusing Allegiance to the King yet from the Allegiance they bare to the Bishops they find such Favour from their Lordships that if the Livings they lose are in the Bishops gift he shall present any Friend which the dispossessed Jacobite shall recommend now what can be more by them desired than to enjoy the Profits of their Livings and put in what Curate they please And after all that they may enjoy the full Profits of their Livings and pay their Curates another way these Jacobites may hold their Conventicles where they please nay Preach publickly and seditiously in an open Church near Cheap-side London without the least offence to the Spiritual Power And is it not plain said this Gentleman from all this that on this side the Water as well as on the other the Clergies Zeal for their Communion Church and Religion is only meant to support their own Party Dominion and Empire 3. Now the oldest Deists of my Acquaintance having conceiv'd so great a Prejudice against the Christian Faith from the Behaviour of the Clergy and having levened their Disciples therewith it has fal'n out unhappily that the late Revolution has by another way also confirmed them in this their Prejudice For the late happy Revolution which came on too soon and was cut off too short though it was not so highly beneficial to us as was by some expected was yet of very great Importance But as there is nothing in this World ever so good but what hath some appending disadvantage so by meer Accident this Revolution which has saved not only the Church of England but as I hope the whole Protestant Interest throughout the World has wonderfully encreased Mens Prejudices against the Clergy and so by false Consequence such as Men through Resentment will make against the Truth of Religion it self The old Deists tell those of their Pupils who never travelled abroad that there is now no need of going over the Water to discover that the name Church signifieth only a Self-interested Party and that the Clergy have no Godliness but Gain Have you not say they for many Years together heard them Preach up the Divine Right and indefeizable Authority of Kings together with Passive Obedience as the chief distinguishing Doctrines whereby their Church approved it self Apostolick beyond all other Churches Nay were not the Doctrines of Loyalty to the King insisted upon more than Faith in Christ and yet when their particular Interest required it their Doctrine of Non-Resistance was qualify'd by Non-Assistance the whole Stream of Loyalty was turn'd from the King to the Church the indefeizable Right was superseded by a miraculous Conquest without Blood the Oath of Allegiance to the Divinely Rightful King James has its force allay'd by another Oath of the same Importance made to the de facto King William and Queen Mary and all this is Sanctify'd by the name of the Church i. e. their own Party and Interest for the sake whereof it is done This is indeed keeping to the Text Rem rem quocunque modo rem And the wretched Defence they make for this their Apostacy say the Deists
maketh the matter worse For notwithstanding King James is as they will have it Conquer'd and his Throne which was declared vacant is legally filled by one who by Act of Parliament is declared our Rightful King yet after all this Dr. S will reserve a Right to King James though through Success and Settlement he will allow a Right also to King William And this Notion the Clergy generally adhere to because thereby they kill two or three Birds with one stone 1st They preserve to themselves their ancient Right of giving Titles to Sovereignty For though both King and Parliament have disclaimed and damned the Conquest yet the Clergy still insist upon it 2ly They make fair Weather with King James by keeping his Title alive and by still asserting his Right open him a Door to recover his Possession again For what honest Christian can oppose a Rightful King in regaining the Possession of his Throne which is kept from him by a Successful Usurper and 3ly They think they have obliged King William sufficiently by the formality of an Oath and owning him in his Possession Put all this together and 't will prove that When all the Argument is out 'T is Interest still resolves the doubt Thus cry they you plainly see that your Church is nothing but a Party to which whosoever joineth himself shall find his Account thereby notwithstanding any Error Heresy Immorality or Disloyalty to the present Government whatsoever whilst any other who is conformable to the Rubricks and Canons whose Learning and Morals are an Honour to his Gown and who is truly dutiful to his Majesty shall be excluded from all those benefits his Profession would entitle him to Thus the bold Asserters of King James's Right enjoy some of the best Preferments and particularly Dr. S sits D of St. P whilst honest Mr. Johnson is starving upon Charity The Church of England is a meer Party say they again and has a Watch-word whereby they know one another which they can vary upon occasion Non-Resistance was the Word in King Charles's days For though at that time you did conform to every tittle and ceremony injoin'd by Rubrick and Canon yet if you failed in the Point of Non-Resistance you were a Phanatick and Republican a Rebel and what not Now if this Doctrine be contain'd in the Book of Homilies as the Jacobites say 't is a Sacred Record of the Unjustice of some of those who concurred in the late Revolution The Shiboleth of the Church now is King William's de facto Title And no Conformity to Homilies and Rubricks will make you owned by the present Church if you should acknowledge the King to be otherwise said than a meer de facto Now say they although we grant that Men will submit to the Government upon their own particular Principles and therefore 't is reasonable that the King should admit the Obedience of his Subjects upon what Grounds they please yet we know no Reason why the Church should set up the de facto as the only Principle of Obedience And when the King had better Titles to his Crown as the Consent of the People in Parliament and his Matrimonial Title with the Queen yet he must be made to pay the greatest price for the weakest and worst of all Titles and give Dr. S Sixteen Hundred Pounds a Year for a Defactoship only You see Sir that the Deists want not Occasions for their Prejudices how far soever they are from having Reason o' their side And pray resolve me why must this false Title be set up as 't were by the King's Consent to worm out the only true one Why must none be preferr'd to Church-Dignities but such who come in upon this Title only And those who own the King 's Right upon the Consent of the People be still labouring under the Church's highest displeasure and poor Johnson a Man against whom no Immorality was ever objected that is an Object even of the Deists Compassion be left to starve for the Cause Nay they have gone so far upon the Strength of Dr. S Convocation-Title in Opposition to that of Parliament that since the good Queen is dead and the Consent of the People according to them null and void they have left the King a bare Possession without any Title at all 4. I am acquainted with a Gentleman who for some Years has not gone to Church having taken offence at those Practices I was now writing upon This Man you must know had an extraordinary Veneration for the profound Learning so he thinks much reading and common-placing to be of a certain Eminent Divine who had a fat Bishoprick bestow'd on him by King William and Queen Mary But he to requite their Kindness when a Bill was brought before the Lords declaring the King and Queen's rightful and lawful Title to the Crown not only opposed and voted against it in the House but when it had passed he entred his Protestation against it in the Journal Nay said this Gentleman if King William be only King de facto then the Bishop is de facto only Truly Sir you may believe me that I was amaz'd at this Relation for as I then said though most Men look no further than only to get Mony de facto and do not with much strictness inquire quo jure yet 't was strange that any Man should protest that he had no right to that Estate which he openly continued in Possession of But I was soon answer'd by this his former Admirer that if that Bishop had strengthened his own Title to the Bishoprick from King J. I might cease my wonder I am indeed sorry to hear Stories of this Nature especially when they assure me of the Truth of 'em and when I see the ill Consequences of them For though nothing be more certain than that the Baseness and Falshood of Man can never disprove the Truth of God yet when Men are highly Scandaliz'd and greatly deceived by those for whom they had Esteem and by whose Authority they in great measure governed themselves they will stretch their Conclusion beyond their Premisses and disown Religion in their Principle because 't is disregarded by some great Men in their Practice But though to strict Reasons such Arguments for Deism appear ridiculous yet from the Promotion of these de facto Men I am told hath arisen great disadvantage to the King and those Subjects whose Principles and Practices have been always faithful to his Majesties Interest Since hereby it is that it hath always been in the power of the open and professed Enemies of the King to oppress his most dutiful Subjects For these de facto-men and the Jacobites were but lately the same sort of People both of the same Principle and Temper And though the Jacobites do now rail at them for their base Complyances as they term it with the P. of O's Revolution yet the de factos are unwilling for old Acquaintance sake to pass by their Railing and underhand
Religion that is distinguished from their particular Interest To what end have so many Perfecutions and Penal Laws been set a foot by the Clergy in Christendom was it to bring Men to any one Point of that full Description of Christian Religion which you cited from Sir Matthew Hale or only to bring them to that short Article of their Clergy Religion i. e. to submit to their Power Did not the Honourable Sir R. H. lately write a Treatise wherein with great Learning and accurate Judgment he distinguished betwixt Religion and Priest-craft and was he not treated for it with a true Priestly Insolence and Malice in the Pulpit at White-hall by A. one of their Majesties Chaplains and represented as a Scorner and an Atheist because he scorns to submit to any Religion but what is of Christ's Institution Suppose a Man should govern himself by the Law of Christ and go no further is there any Christian Church which would own such an one for a Member If you will be a Son of the Church of England you must hold Kings and Bishops to be jure divino the Apostolical Doctrine of Passive Obedience you must not be indifferent to their Ceremonies though declar'd but indifferent things and the Reason is because you must have a profound Respect for the Power of the Bishops by which these Ceremonies were ordain'd And besides this you must shew a perfect Abhorrence of all who do not submit to the Spiritual Royalties of their Diocesan Bishops for your Churchmanship will not appear by any Mark so well as by the Hatred you bear to all Dissenters in Conjunction with a deep aversion to all the ancient Rights and just Liberties of your Native Country In fine said he when your Clergy Preach the Law of Christ without turning it to any By-end or false Interest you shall meet me at Church You know the Clergy love Precedency of the Laity Let them turn Christians first and I can follow 6. I have known some who have alledged as a Reason why they have forsaken the Christian Faith the impossibility of Believing Many Doctrines say these are made necessary to Salvation which 't is impossible to believe because they are in their nature Absurdities I replied That these things were Mysteries and so above our Understanding But he asked me to what end could an unintelligible Doctrine be revealed not to instruct but to puzzle and amuse What can be the effect of an unintelligible Mystery upon our Minds but only Amusement That which is only above Reason must be above a rational Belief and must I be Saved by an irrational Belief If a Proposition be inconsistent with it self I cannot but believe it to be false 'T was once to serve a Turn against the Papists your Church held all Doctrines necessary to save Souls were plainly revealed in Scripture How could you say plainly revealed unless you understood the Revelation Besides I cannot think that the belief of any unprofitable Doctrines i. e. such as admit of no Application to Moral Duties can be a saving Faith so much as in part nor can I imagine that Faith tends to save a Soul because what we believe is only True for so the belief of Euclids Elements might have a saving Effect upon Souls but because our Belief is Good it has a practical Effect and tends to make us better Men. Besides you all agree the Belief of your Trinity is absolutely necessary to Salvation and yet widely differ in what we must believe concerning it whether three Minds or Modes or Properties or internal Relations or Oeconomies or Manifestations or external Denominations or else no more than a Holy Three or Three Somewhats or otherwise only one of these Three to be God in the highest Sense and each of the other two to be a God without Self-subsistence and Independence I am confident if I should be perswaded that an Explanation of the Trinity were necessary to save my Soul and see the Learned so widely differing and hotly disputing what it is I must believe concerning it I should certainly run mad through despair of finding out the Truth But since these Doctors cannot agree which Party of 'em shall captivate my Belief in Obedience to his Faith I will reserve it to be the Hand-maid of Truth whenever she appears she shall command it 7. I remember one Gentleman objected to the Christian Faith that it made Men insolent quarrelsom and ill-natur'd From whence I concluded as I told him that he had never read over the Gospels truly he could not say that he had read 'em carefully but yet that in reading the History of what had passed in Christendom he observed that most of the Quarrels in which this part of the World had been engaged arose from Contentions among the Christian Priesthood Church-History is chiefly a Relation of Church-mens Wrangles and D. Cave in a late Book of his had denominated every Century from some eminent Quarrel which arose among the Clergy But besides this what was the Holy War what all the holy Massacres and Croisados which filled Europe with Blood but the Inventions of Holy Church And what is holy Inquisition but a perpetual Series of Murthers carry'd on in barbarous Forms of Law against the common Sense of Mankind Does History account for any Barbarities so great as those committed by the Popes Any Cruelties so savage as those of the Holy Inquisition Any Murthers so solemn and religiously brutal as the Acts of Faith Any Pragmaticalness so insufferable as that of the Jesuits is not their Humanity extinguished by their Christian Religion such is their Malice that no Man can eat Bread where they have to do unless he submit his Faith to their guidance witness the present French Persecution Nor can any Sovereign Prince keep his Word or Oath though he had only sworn to maintain those Laws by which he Reigns as King any longer than this Spiritual Fatherhood will give him leave as Lewis XIV of France and James II. of England do witness Let these Inhumanities be considered as supported and carried on by the name of Catholick Church and if the Devils believe you may as decently say Church of Hell as Church of Rome And as Devotion continu'd our Deist to holy Church is the center upon which all things turn on the other side the Water so is it the same thing here Do not our Priesthood of England make as high Pretences to dispose of all Offices and Trusts in the Kingdom to those of their own Faction as those of Rome Have they not long since got their Bill of Exclusion to be passed into a Law whereby no Man can enjoy a Place of Profit or Trust in the State but whom they qualify at their Altars where Men were capacitated to be Bumbails keep Gaming-houses and sell Ale What was it but the Insolence of the Priesthood that brought about Father Laud's and Father Peter's Revolutions Besides said he do you not observe what a keen Edge
soever he should always be willing to hear a good Minister Preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ to him and exhort him to the sincere Practice of it That he was ready to contribute his share to the Maintenance of such Ministers and to join with that Church-of England Congregation near to which he liv'd in publick Worship but yet he could not condemn the Worship of other Congregations nor exclude himself from joyning with them as occasion should serve him So that as to Church-membership he could be a Member of any Church which would own him upon the terms of Faith and Practice contained in the Book he mentioned concerning the Reasonableness of the Christian Religion c. But still he conceiv'd that Church-Communion in holy Offices was designed only to raise his Devotion towards God not towards the Clergy which made him admire the unparallell'd Impudence of the Roman Priesthood who measure the Religion of all Christians by their Devotion to the See of Rome i. e. indeed to themselves and he doubted whether any Church were sufficiently Reformed from Popery which made any Doctrines of Faith necessary to Salvation that were not declared so in the Gospels and where the Clergy would always distinguish between Church and State and give the Precedency to themselves But yet he would join with any Church as far as it promoted the Honour of God and separate from it wherein on pretence of Religion he saw â—â—at it aimed at a By-end of its own Here I urged him again to joyn to our Church which had no other design but God's Glory To this he said that he should be glad that the Church of England would own him though he could not be of their Party He would willingly pass as a Church-man for his Credit-sake for said he though a Man doth ever so firmly believe Jesus Christ to be the Messiah whom God had of old promised and in due time sent to give us a perfect Rule of Life in order to make us truly religious here and ever happy hereafter and though a Man should shew forth his Faith by an agreeable course of Life in doing Justice loving Mercy and an humble walking with God yet if he were not owned as a Member of some Church he would by all Churches be accounted if not an Atheist yet a Sceptic a Man of no settled Principle but own who has his Religion to choose For if you look over the State of Religion as it standeth in Christendom there is no Church whatsoever which will accept you as a Member of its Communion but upon some particular terms of Belief or Practice which Christ never appointed and it may be such as an honest and a wise Christian cannot consent to I am not more able to give up my Reason to the Church of England than to give up my Senses to the Church of Rome it looks like a Trick in all Churches to take away the use of Mens Reason that they may render us Vassals and Slaves to all their Dictates and Commands But what greater slavery than to force on Men a Belief of such things as necessary to Salvation of which 't is not possible to form any Idea Though I am satisfied there is no such thing as a change of Bread into the Flesh of Christ yet I can form an Idea that such a thing may be that the same Power which changed Earth into a Man may change Bread into Flesh But I can frame to my self no Idea of what your Church Teacheth in the Sacrament that the Body and Blood of Christ are verily and indeed taken and received of the faithful And when I ask how can this be understood by a Protestant who believeth that there is no other Body but that of Bread I am told that the Church meaneth it in a Spiritual Sense Now I have try'd and find it impossible for me to form to my self an Idea of a Body verily and indeed in a Spiritual Sense And therefore I must say 't is an unwise and a hard Thing for any Church to impose absurd or unintelligible Notions especially such Speculations which tend to make no body the better as necessary to Salvation for Wise Men and such who will take Courage to examine what they Believe will not submit to such an Usurpation and weak Men are kept all their Life long in Fears and Doubts of their Eternal State as being always uncertain whether they firmly believe such Doctrines or no. Besides this said he your Church will require me to believe other Absurdities as bad as these as that Kings and Bishops have a Divine Right to that Power which they exercise over us whereas with my own Eyes I saw our Great and Gracious King accept the Crown of England as the Gift of the People And I see as plainly that Bishops are an Order of Men of their own not of Christ's making I was told that our Bishops Order was founded in that of the 12 Apostles and the Presbyters Order in the 70 Disciples Upon this I resolved to see if the 12 and the 70 were different Orders or no and read over the 10th Chap. of Matthew the 3d and 6th of Mark and the 9th of Luke in which places the Power which Christ gave to the 12 is set forth which amounteth to this viz. a Charge to Preach the Gospel a Power to work Miracles in casting out Devils healing the Sick c. And I also read in the 10th Chapter of Luke that the 70 were sent forth for the same Reason and with the same express Power as were the 12 viz. To preach the Gospel heal the Sick and cast out Devils vers 2.9.17 And he telleth the 70 at the 16th Verse That he who heareth them heareth him and he who despiseth them despiseth him as he had said to the 12 in Matthew 10.40 Indeed they were only added to the number of the 12 Because as 't is said there the Harvest was great and the Labourers few i. e. because Multitudes followed Christ and were disposed to become Christians therefore he encreased the number of his Apostles or Teaching Disciples I can find no Footsteps of any Jurisdiction given to the 12 over the 70 or indeed over any body else and in the 18th Chapter of Matthew where Christ speaketh of binding and loosing 't is manifest from the first Verse that his discourse was made to his Disciples So in the 20th of John the Holy-Ghost and Power of remitting and retaining Sins was given to the Disciples which met together after Christ's death vers 19. in which meeting there might be some of the 70 as well as some of the 12 'T is certain the 70 received the Holy-Ghost and if Baptism be a Key of Admission into the Church they had it If binding or loosing be declaring wherein we are bound in duty and wherein we may use our liberty if remitting and retaining Sins be declaring what Iniquity God will forgive and what he will not the 70 shared