Selected quad for the lemma: england_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
england_n	bishop_n	earl_n	john_n	2,658	5	5.5650	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A36231	Judge Dodaridge, his law of nobility and peerage wherein the antiquities, titles, degrees, and distinctions, concerning the peeres and nobility of this nation, are excellently set forth : with the knights, esquires, gentleman, and yeoman, and matters incident to them, according to the lawes and customes of England.; Magazine of honour	Bird, William, 17th cent.; Doddridge, John, Sir, 1555-1628.	1658 (1658)	Wing D1794; ESTC R11125	103,063	198

person with us Wherefore by the Councell and consent of the Prelats Dukes Earls Viscounts and Barons of our Kingdom being in our present Parliament we have made and created and by these presents make and create him the said Edward Prince of Wales and Earl of Chester and to the same Edward we give and grant and by this Charter have confirmed the Name Stile Title State Dignity and the honour of the said Principality that he may therein in governing rule and in ruling direct and defend We by a Garland upon his head by a Ring of Gold upon his Finger and a Virge of Gold have according to the manner invested him to have and to hold to him and to his Heirs the Kings of England for ever Wherefore we will and straightly command for us and our Heirs that Edward our Sonne aforesaid shall have the Name Stile Title State Dignity and honour of the Principality of Wales and of the County of Chester aforesaid unto him and his Heirs the Kings of England aforesaid for ever These being witnesses the Reverend Father John Cardinall and Archbishop of Canterbury Primate of all England our Chancellor and William Archbishop of York Primate of England Thomas Bishop of London John Bishop of Lincolne and William Bishop of Norwich our most welbeloved Cousins Richard Duke of York Humphry Duke of Buckingham our welbeloved Cousin Richard Earl of Warwick Richard Earl of Salisbury John Earl of Wiltshire and our welbeloved and faithfull Cousins Ralph Cromwell Chamberlain of our House William Falconbridge and John Sturton Knights Dated at Our Palace at Westminster the fifteenth day of March and in the yeer of Our Raign thirty two And here by the way may be observed that in ancient time and in the time of the English Saxon Kings the use was as well in penning the Acts of Parliament as of the Kings Letters Patents when any lands franchises or hereditaments did passe from the King of any estate of inheritance as also in their creations of any Man unto honour and dignity the conclusion was with the signe of the Crosse in forme aforesaid that is his Testibus c. But long time that forme hath been discontinued so that at this day and for many yeares past all the Kings Patents for lands franchizes and hereditaments doe conclude with teste me ipso neverthelesse in all creations of honour and dignity by Letters Patents the ancient forme of concluding with his testibus is used at this day Cookes 8. part 19. And it hath been resolved by the Judges that all Acts of Parliament and Statutes whien doe concerne the Prince who is the first begotten son of the King and heire apparant to the Crowne for the time being Perpetuis futuris temporibus in all succession of ages and times be such Acts whereof the Judges and all the Realme must take conusance as of generall Statutes for every subject hath interest in the King and none of his subjects who is within his Lawes be divided from him being his head and Soveraigne so that the businesse and things of the King doth touch all the Realme and namely when it doth concerne the Prince the first begotten sonne of the King and Heire apparant to the Crowne Corruscat enim Princeps radiis Regis Patris sui censetur una persona cum ipso For the Prince shineth with the beames of the King his Father and is holden to be one person with him Cookes 8. part 28. Although the Prince by expresse words hath no priviledge by the great Charter of the Forrest 9 H. 3. cap. 11. for hunting in the Kings Forrests or Parks passing by them and sent for by the Kings commandment yet by construction the Prince is to take benefit and advantage thereby as well as Bishops Earls or Barons who are expressed Crompt Courts des Justices de Forrests 167. In the Parliament 31 H. 8. c. 10. an Act concerning the placing of the Kings children and Lords in the Parliament and other assemblies were amongst other things made as followeth First it is enacted by the authority aforesaid that no person or persons of what degree estate or condition whatsoever he or they be except only the Kings children shall at any time hereafter attempt or presume to sit or have place at any side of the cloth of state in the Parliament chamber neither of the one hand of the Kings Highnesse or of the other whether the Kings Majesty be there personally present or not The Prince shall not find pledges for the prosecution of any Action and therefore shall be amerced more then the King should be or the Queen his wife Vide Cooks 8. part 61. b. Of the most noble and excellent Prince that now is it is truly said that he is omni nomine numine magnus by destiny name providence of God the greatest before Cook to the Reader before his 8. Book the last leaf Neverthelesse as he is a distinct person by nature from the King so is he distinct by the Law viz. a Subject and holdeth his principalities and seigniories of the King neither shall he have all those Prerogatives which the King shal have for example when the King seizeth his Subjects lands or taketh away his goods from him having no title by order of the Law so to do In this case the Subject is to sue to his Soveraign Lord by way of Petition onely for other remedy hath he not but suit by Petition can be to none other then to the King for no such suit shall be made to the Prince but Actions as the case requireth as against a Subject Stamf. praerog ca. 22. And in token of subjection the Prince doth not upon his Posie of his Arms disdain the old Saxon word Ich dien I serve as Lambert doth mention in his Book of Perambulation of Rent 364. And there is a case that Gascoin chief Justice of Engl in the time of H. 4. did commit the Prince who would have taken a prisoner from the Bar in the Kings Bench and the Prince did humbly obey and did go at his command in which the King did greatly rejoyce that hee had such a Judge who durst minister justice upon his son and also that hee had a son so gracious as to obey Court de Banco Regis 79. Crompton A question was moved to the Justices in the first yeer of H. 7. what order should be in that present parliament for the anulling and making void certain attainders for so much as divers who were returned of that Parliamēt did stand attainted of treason and all the Justices resolved That so many of the Knights of the shires or Citizens or Burgesses as stood then attainted of treason should depart out of the Parliament house at the reversall of the Act of Parliament for their attainders But as soon as the Act of Parliament was reversed and annuld that they and every of them that is to say Lords and Commons should come into their places and

in Latine therefore called Vicecomes as it is to be read at large in Cambden The Earls in recompence of their travell concerning the Officers of the County received a Sallary namely the third peny of the profits of the said County which custome continued a long time after the Conquest and was inserted as a Princely benevolence or gift in their Patents of Creation as by divers ancient Patents thereof may appear which afterwards were turned into pensions for the better maintenance of that honour as appeareth by a Book Case upon the pleading of a Pattent whereby King Henry the sixth Created that worthy Knight Sir John Talbott Earl of Shrewsbury which pension is so annexed to their dignity as that by any means of Alienation it cannot be at any time severed and disjoyned from the same and therefore in respect of such pensions which were the third part of the profits of the County or such other sum given in lieu thereof some men have not without probability thereof imagined quod Comites nominabantur quia in multis fiscu Regii Socti et Comites item participes essent vide Cooks 7 part 34. a. Of the single Earls and not Palatine within the Realm of England there were and have been principally two kindes but every of them subdivided into severall branches for they either take name of a place or hold their title without any place at all Those that take their name of a place are of two kindes for either the same place is a County and this is most usuall as the Earl of Devon-Shire Cornwall Kent c. or else of some other place being no County as a Town Castle Honour or such like of which later sort some are most ancient having their originall even from the Conquerer or shortly after as the Earldome of Richmond in York-Shire Clarence in Suffolk Arundel ni Sussex all which had their originall in the time of the Conquerer by Donation of those Castles and Honors the Earldome of Bath in the time of H. 7. and after in the time of H. 8. erected in the Family where it now remayneth and the Earldome of Bridgewater whereof Giles Dawbery was created in the time of H. 7. Earldomes which have their titles without any place are likewise of two kindes either in respect of office as is the Earl Marshall of England for it is granted in this or the like manner Officium Marescalli Angliae with further words viz. A. B. c. Comitem Marescall●●● Anglia creamus ordinavimus constituimus c. By which it appeareth that the very Office is an Earldom which title of Earl Marshall of England King Richard 2. gave first to Thomas Newbray Earl of Nottingham whereas before they were simply stiled Marshalls of England Cambden 167. The second sort of Earls by birth and so are all the Sonnes of the Kings of England if they have no other dignity bestowed upon them and therefore it was said that John afterwards King of England in the life of his Father Hen. 2. was called countiscane terrae before he was affied to Alice the daughter of the Earl of Moreton in France though Hollenshed fol. 103. writing of the degrees of people in England saith That the Kings younger Sonnes are but Gentlemen by birth till they have received creation from the King of high estate Earls and all others of the degree of Nobility and honour have Offices of great trust and confidence being for two principall purposes ad consulendum Regi tempore Pacis to Councell the King in time of peace the other ad defendendum Regem Patriam tempore belli to defend the King and Country in time of Warre and therefore Antiquity hath given unto them two Ensignes to resemble both the said duties For the first the head is adorned with a Cap of honour and a Coronet and the body with a Robe in resemblance of Councell Secondly They are girt with a sword in resemblance that they must be faithfull and true to defend the Prince and Country Cooks 7. part 34. a. But to come to the Kings high Councell of Parliament No man ought to presume before he hath received the Kings-Writ of Summons for the rule is ad consilium ne accedas antequam voceris the forme of a writ of Summons to an Earl is as followeth Rex c. Unto his welbeloved Cosin Edward Earl of Oxford greeting Because by the assent and advise of our Councell for certain weighty and urgent businesse concerning us the State and defence of our Kingdom and Church of England we have ordai●ed to be holden a certain Parliament at our Citie of Westminster the 22. day of November next coming and there together with you and with the Prelates the great and noble men of our said Kingdom to have conference and treaty commanding and firmely enjoyning you upon your faith and alleageance whereby you are holden unto us that the dangers and perills imminent of that businesse considered and all excuse set a part you be present the said day in the same place with us and with the Prelates and great and noble men aforesaid to treat and give Councell upon the aforesaid businesse and hereof fail you not as you tender us our honour and the safeguard and defence of our Kingdom and Church aforesaid Witnesse our self at Westminster in the second day of March in the first yeer of our Raign Cromptons Courts tit Parliam 1. which is recited out of the Book of Entries 594. Upon this Writ three things have been observed First A priviledge incident to an Earl or other of degree above him for the Kings doth salute him by the name of his Cosin although he peradventure be of no consanguinity to the King Secondly When the King doth summon an Earl or any other Peer of the Realm of the Parliament he doth send his Writ directed to himself particularly and not to the Sheriff of the County as the generall Summons are for Knights and Burgesses for the Parliament Thirdly The Writ is to the Earl of Oxford greeting not naming him Knight though he be a Knight and though that degree be parcell of his name as appeareth 3. Hen. 6. fol. 29. And Priscot chief Justice in the 32. H. 6.29 That i● an Esquire be made Knight he looseth the name of Esquire But if a Knight be made a Nobleman he doth still retain the name of Knight and so ought to be stiled in all Writs And Cooks 4. part fol. 118. a. saith That if a Baron be created an Earl yet his title of Baron doth continue But in Plowdens Book 213. It is agreed That if the Crown of England do descend to a Duke within England his name of Duke is gone for omne majus tollit minus The increase of Name by the Addition of Honour AFter a Man is created an Earl Viscount or into any other title of honour above them his title is become parcell of his name and not an addition only and in

judiciall proceedings onely by such name and title as he hath received from the King of this Realm whose Subject he is and if by the King of England he be not advanced to Title of Honour then shall he bear the name of his Baptism onely and Surname unlesse he be a Knight 20 Ed. 4.6 Cook 7. part 16. a. A Duke of Spain or of other forraign Nation cometh into England by the Kings safe-Conduct in which also the King doth stile him Duke according to his Creation neverthelesse in all proceedings in the Kings Courts he shall not be stiled by his name of dignity Cook in the last Book before And though the said Noble person be also by the Kings Letters Patents and by his forraign name and title of dignity made Denizen for that is the right name so called because his legitimation is given unto him for if you derive Denizen from Denizee as one born within the Allegiance or Obedience of the King then such a one should be all one with a naturall born Subject wherein a Denizen faileth in many things or if they be naturalized also by the authority of Parliament whereby he seemeth to be in all things made as a Subject born in England yet he shall not be stiled with his forraign title of dignity Cooks 7 part 15. a. And so it is if a Noble man of France c. come into England as Ambassadour and here by lawfull Marriage hath issue a sonne the father dieth the son is by birth a naturall English-man yet he shall not bear the Title of Honour of his father and the cause and reason hereof is Because the title of his Nobility had his originall by a French King and not by any naturall peration which thing is well proved both by authority of Law and experience in these dayes for in the book last mentioned in that leaf is resolved a more stranger case that is albeit that a Postnatus of Scotland or Ireland who is in these dayes a naturall Subject to the King of England or any of his posterity be he the heir of a Noble man of Scotland or of Ireland yet he is none of the Nobility of England But if that Allien or stranger born or Scot be summoned by the Kings Writ to come unto his Parliament and is therein stiled by his forraign stile or by other Title whereunto he is invested withi● England by the Kings grant then from thenceforth he is a Peer of this Realm and in all Judiciall and legall proceedings he ought to be so stiled and by no other name 39 Ed. 3.36 And it was the case of Guilbert Humphreyvile Earl of Anger 's in Scotland For it appertaineth to the Royall prerogative of the King to call and to admit any Alien born to have voyce and place in his Parliament at his Parliament at his pleasure although it is put in practice very rarely and seldome time and that for very great and weighty considerations of State And if after such Parliamentary Summons of such a stranger born question do arise and the issue whether he is of that title or no it may well be tryed by the Records which is the onely lawfull tryall in that case Cooks 7. part 15. a 6 part 53. But there is a diversity worthy the observation for the highest and lowest dignities are universall and therefore a Knight in all place soever he received his title of dignity and so ought of right and by Law be named in the Kings Courts 26 Ed. 4.6.39 Ed. 3.36 Also if the Emperour or the King of Denmark or any other forraigne King come into this Realm by safe-Conduct as he ought For a Monarch or an absolute Princ● though he be in League cannot come into England without License and safe-Conduct of the King of England but any subject to such forraigne King in league may come into this Realm without License Cook 7. part 21.6 In this c●se he shall sue and be sued by the name of Emperour or King otherwise the writ shall abate There is a notable president cited out of Fleta where treating of the Jurisdiction of the Kings Court of Marshalsey it is said And these things he may lawfully do by Office that is to say the Steward of the Kings Houshold notwithstanding the liberty of any other although in another Kingdom where the offender may be found in the Kings house according to that which happened at Paris held in the 14 yeer of Ed. 1. of one Engleam of Nogent taken in the Houshold of the King of England the King himself being then in Paris with Silver dishes lately stollen at which deed the King of France being present and whereupon the Court of the King of France did claym cognizance of the plea concerning that theft by Jurisdiction of the Court of Paris the matter being diversly debated in the Councell of the King of Fr●n●e at length it was ordered that the King of England should use and enjoy that his Kingly prerogative of his Houshold where being convicted by Sir Robert Fitz. John Knight Steward of the Kings Houshold of the theft by consideration of the same Court was hanged on the Gallows in St Germans fields Cooks 7. part 15.6 And there by the way may also be noted from the reason in the recited Books alleadged the person of a King in another Kings Dominions is not absolutely priviledged but that he may be impleaded for debt or trespasse or condemned for Treason committed within the said Dominions for it is a generall Law of Nations That in what place an offence is committed according to the Law of that place they may be judged without regard of any priviledge neither can a King in another Kingdom challenge any such prerogative of immunity from Laws for a King out of his proper Kingdom hath no merum Imperium absolute power but onely doth retain bonoris titulos dignitatis the Titles of Honour and Dignity so that w●ere he hath offended in his own person against the King of the Nation where he is per omnia distringitur etiam quo●d personam he may be distrayned even to his own person And the same Law is of Ambassadours ne occasio daretur delinquendi lest occasion of offence be given like as a sanctuary will save a mans life from man-slaughter but not when man-slaughter is committed within the Sanctuary for then he doth wilfully wave the benefit of all priviledges and prerogatives and neverthelesse it bindeth firm that Ambassadours are called Legats because they are chosen as fit men out of many and their persons be sacred both at home and abroad so that no man injuriously may lay violent hands upon them without breach of the Law of Nations and much lesse upon the person of a King in a strange Land Bracton a Judge of this Realm in the Raign of King Hen. 3. in his first Book 8 saith in effect as followeth There is no respect of persons with God because God is no accepter of persons

Nobiles non torquentur in quibus plebeij torquerentur nobiles non suspenlantur sed decapitantur and so it is almost growne into a Custome in England by the favour of the Prince for rare is it to have a Nobleman executed in other forme yet Thomas Fines Lord Dacres of the South in 33. H. 8. and Lord Sturton 4. Mar. were hanged Brooke Iury 48. Jn the first yeare of the late Queene Eliz cap. 1. in the Acts of Parliament for the uniformity of Common Prayer c. there is contained this proviso and be it enacted and ordained that all the Lords of Parliament for the third offence above mentioned shall bee tryed by their Peeres and not by any Ecclesiasticall Courts reade the Statute at large At the Common Law it was lawfull for any Nobleman or ignoble to retaine as many Chaplaines as hee would for their Instruction in Religion but by a Statute made 21. Hen. 8. cap. 13. A restraint was made and a certaine number onely allowed to the Nobility and such Chaplaines for their attendance have Immunities as by the Statute at large may appeare viz Every Archbishop and Duke may have sixe Chaplaines whereof every one shall or may purchase Lycence or dispensation and take receive and keepe two Personages or Benefices with cure of Soules and that every Marquesse or Earle may have five Chaplaines whereof every one may purchase Lycence or Dispensation and take receive and keepe two Parsonages or Benefices with cure of Soules and that every Viscount and other Bishop may have foure Chaplaines whereof every one may purchase Lycence and receive have and keepe two Parsonages or Benefices with cure of Soules as aforesaid And that the Chancellour of England for the time being and every Baron and Knight of the Garter may have three Chaplaines whereof every one shall now purchase Lycence and Dispensation and receive have and keepe two Benefices with cure of Soules read the Statute at large And forasmuch as retaining of Chaplaines by Lords of great estates is ordinary and neverthelesse some questions in Law have beene concerning the true understanding of the said Statute J thinke it not impertinent to set downe some subsequent resolutions of the Judges touching such matters If a Bishop be translated to an Archbishop or a Baron to be created to an Earle c. yet within this Act they can have but onely so many Chaplaines as an Archbishop or Earle might have for although he have divers dignities yet he is still but one selfe-same person to whom the Attendance and service ●ould be done so if a Baron be made a Knight of the ●arter or Lord Warden of the Cinque-Ports hee ●all have but three Chaplaines in all sic de simi●●us Also if such an Officer allowed by the Statute to ●●ve one two or more Chaplaines doe retaine accor●ingly and after he is removed from his Office in this ●●se he cannot be now non-resident or accept of a se●ond Benefice if his Compliment were not full ●efore his remaining and yet in that case it behoveth ●●e Chaplaine to procure a non obstante otherwise ●e may be punished for his non-residency So if an Earle or Baron doe retaine a Chaplaine ●nd before his advancement his Lord is attainted of Treason as it was in the Case of the Earle of ●estmerland after the said Attainder such a Chap●aine cannot accept a second Benefice for though his Lord be still living according to nature yet after the Attainder he is a dead Person in the Law and therefore out of the case to have Priviledge for himselfe or for his Chaplaines If a Baron have three Chaplaines and every one of them have two Benifices and after the Baron dyeth yet they shall enjoy those benefices with cure which were lawfully setled in them before but in this case though the said Chaplaine be resident upon one of his Benifices yet now he is become unpunishable for being non-resident upon the other for cessante causa ces● effectus the same Law is if a Baron be attainted of tre●son or Fellony or if any Officer be removed from 〈◊〉 Office Et sic de similibus vide Actons Case Cooke 〈◊〉 part Fol. 117. for all those matters A Baron or others of degree of Honour doe retain● such number of Chaplains as are allowed by the Statute and after upon suite and request the said noble perso● doth retaine more Chaplaines In this Case they that are first retayned shall onely have priviledge nam qui prior est tempore potior est Iure● so if a Lord doe at any time retayne more Chaplai●● then are allowed by the Common Law the lawfull number onely shall have priviledge and in this case which of them first promoted shall have priviledge and the rest are excluded for in equali Iure inelior est condi●●● possidentes Jf a Nobleman doe retayne Chaplaines above the number at severall times if any of his first Chaplai●● die the next that was then retayned shall not succeed for his first retayner was void and therefore in thi● Case it doth behove him to have a new retayning after the death of the predecessour and before his advancement nam quod initio non valet in tractu temporis non co●valescit If a noble person retaine such a number of Chaplains as is by the Law allowed him but afterward upon some dislike or other cause doe discharge some of them from their attendance or service the Lord in this case cannot retaine others thereby to give them priviledge during the life of them so retained and discharged and the reason thereof is because the first Chaplaines were lawfully retained and by virtue thereof during their lives might purchase dispensations to have advantage according to the statute and therefore if the discharge of their service and attendance might give a liberty to the Lord to retaine others by such meanes the Lords might advance Chaplains without number by which the statute should be defrauded and the said statute must be construed strictly against non-Residents and Pluralities as a thing prejudiciall to the service of God and the ordinary instruction of the people of God These premises are to be read in Cooks 4 part fol. 90. Druries case By the statute of 3. H. 7. cap. 14. it is enacted as followeth viz. Forasmuch as by quarrels made to such as have been in great authority office and of counsell with the King of this Realme hath ensued the destruction of the King and thereby the undoing of this Realme so that it hath appeared evidently when the compassing of the death of such as were the Kings true subjects was laid the destruction of the Prince was imagined thereby and for the most part it hath growne and been occasioned by envie and malice of the Kings owne houshold servants and for that by the lawes of this land if actuall deeds were not there was no remedy for such false compassing imaginations and confederacies had against any Lord or any of the Kings