ove tout lour puissance The observations I shall make from this great Judgment shall be two 1. That above 300. Years ago there was not the least scruple or fancy that the Commons of England of which the Citizens and Burgesses were then undoubtedly a part ought not and were not to be present in the Commune Concilium Regni or Parliament of King Johns Reign and to have assented to that Kings resignation An. 14. to make it legal and valid as well as the Prelates Earls and Barons 2. If the Commons had never been a part of the Parliament before 49 H. 3. but that the King and great Lords only made Laws and had an inherent power as some of our Modern Writers say to tax the whole Kingdom de alto basso ad libitum suum jure repraesentationis surely they would not have left recorded to posterity so great a testimonial of the antiquity and right of the Commons of England then so distinguished from the great Lords as is expressed in the Roll May it not then be admitted they spoke nothing but what was an undisputable truth in diebus illis unless we must believe that the great and learned Authors of this Age better understand the constituent parts of the Communia Concilia or Parliaments of King Johns time and so upward above 460. Years since than the whole Parliament of 40 E. 3. the Parliaments of their Grand-Fathers time as was the Reign of King John And indeed this famous resolution was no other than a Declaration of the antient Common Law of the Land before the Norman Duke gained the Imperial Crown of England as appears by King Harolds Answer to his Ambassadors requiring the performance of the Kings Oath to take the Dukes Daughter to Wife and to preserve the Crown for him De Regno addebat praesumptuosum fuisse quod absque generali Senatus populi Conventu Edicto alienam illi haereditatem juraverit Which is recorded by William of Malmsbury Lib. 3. p. 56. l. 24. in vita Williemi I. an Author without all exception who flourished in the time of H. 1. and therefore could not be ignorant where and in whom the Legislative Power of England did reside there being but 33. Years from the coming in of the Norman Duke till the Reign of that King and of this Historian the learned Balaeus gives this Eulogium Vir erat suo seculo in omni genere bonarum literarum plene eruditissimus in eruendis antiquitatibus ingenio diligentia industria singularis Angliae nostrae nationis studosissimus illustrator Upon the Death of Arthur Duke of Bretaign the Annals of England tell us that King John was Summoned by the French King as Duke of Normandy to appear at his Court and judicially to answer the pretended murder of Arthur his Nephew whereupon the Bishop of Ely and Hubert de Burgo after Earl of Kent and Chief Justice of England nuntii solemnes prudentes were sent to the French King to whom the Bishop thus spake Domine Rex non possit Dux Normanniae ad Curiam vestram venire nisi veniret Rex Angliae cum una persona sint Dux Rex Quod non permitteret aliquo modo Baronagium Angliae etsi ipse Rex hoc vellet So careful was the Baronage or Parliament to preserve the antient rights safety and honour of the King and Kingdom An. 3 Joh. before any difference happened between him and his Subjects Anno 29 E. 1. the King sent Ambassadors to the French King ut quid de truga de guerra de pace deliberasset nunciaret and was answered se non posse sine duodecim paribus qui occupati fuerunt circa novam guerram tam ardua tractare but that he expected their coming in fifteen daies Quo tempore transacto ipsis consentientibus they declare that they could not determine thereof inconsultis secum Scotis Whereupon those Ambassadors returned Igitur convocato Parliamento Londoniis recitatisque frustratoriis dilationibus falsis machinationibus praedictorum Ambassadors were again sent and received this answer Quod Rex Angliae adveniret personaliter inter duos Reges de optima pace conveniretur Whereupon the King of England Aliud habuit Parliamentum in quo talia recitata displicuerunt ex totius Regni Concilio or Parliament definitum est Regem pro aliquo mandato vel suggestionibus ab Anglia egredi non debere From what hath been said the Reader may easily observe 1. That the weighty and great affairs which concerned the King and Kingdom both in the Saxons time and after were by a fundamental principle and law of the Nation to be consulted of and resolved in the Communia Concilia or Parliaments and that no particular person or order of men did take upon them such power sine consensu Regni and this H. 3. and his Council well knew when he told Otto the Popes Nuntio Quod solus non potuit definire nec debuit negotium quod omnes Cleriâ—os Laiâ—os generaliter totius Regni tangebat which E. 1. and his Council in the 23 th Year of his Reign thus confirms Quod omnes tangit ab omnibus approbetur 2. That the Generalis Senatus Populi Conventus Edictum or Saxon Wittena Gemott the Baronagium Angliae in King Johns time and the Concilium Regni or Parliamentum in the Reign of E. 1. were verba synonyma differing in phrase but one and the same Assembly in substance The FOURTH ARGUMENT From several Records inter alia de Annis 28 32 3â— 42 48 H. 3. mentioning Parliaments then held and their proceedings in some of w 〈…〉 the word Commons are expresly mentioned as well as the Prelates Magnates to be part of those Parliaments THE general Council at Runningmead held 17 Jâ—â— is 29. Years after and 20. Years before 49 H. 3. called Parliamentum de Runemed Memorandum quod in Parliamento a die Pasch. in tres septimanas Anno Regni Regis H. 3. 28. London celebrato negotium Crucis in Anglia una cum collectione decimae benefiâ—â—â—rum Ecclesiasâ—â—corum Domino Regi in Subsidium terrae Sanctae à sede Apostolica deputat was treated of An Utlary against William de Hastingcott was reversed and he restored to all he had lost thereby and this done Coram Rege toto Parliamento Inter Communia Hilar. 17 E. 3. penes Rememoratorem Domini Regis in Scaccario It appears in a Plea between the King and the Prior of Coventry that 29 32 H. 3. quaedam subsidia per Magnates Communitatem Regni spontanea mera voluntate Regi concessa or as Bracton phraseth it Ex consensu Communi totius Regui being one and the same with Magnates Communitas towards the marrying of the Kings Eldest Daughter and also the Kings Sister to Frederick the Emperour which was done in Parliament for the
many of the great Clergy and Temporal Nobility instead of Cum multis aliis hath these words multis praeterea illustrissimis virorum personis Regum Principibus diversi Ordinis omissis qui similiter huic confirmationi piissimo affectu testes fautores fuerunt Hii autem illo tempore à Regia potestate diversis Provinciis Urbibus ad universalem Synodum pro causis cujustibet Christianae Ecclesiae audiendis tractandis ad praescriptum celeberrimum Synodum quod Westmonasterium dicitur convocati c. In the margine of the Book I find writ this note Nota hic hos omnes convocari à Rege sua auctoritate ad causas Religionis tractandas tam Nobiles de Clero quam Principes Regni cum aliis inferioris gradus Conventio quorum videtur esse Parliamentum And in the Year-Book of E. 3. above 330. years since in a Case touching the exemption of the Abbey of Bury from the Bishops of Norwich we have mention of a Parliament held en temps de W. Conqueror à son Parlement King William the Second KIng William the First being dead William his second Son then living succeeded him in the Kingdom who designing to prevent his elder Brother Robert of the Crown finding Lanfranc Archbishop of Canterbury not altogether consenting with him therein to the compleating his desire and fearing lest the delay of his Consecration might prejudice his desired honor he begun by giving large gifts and rewards to the people and as well by himself as all others whom he could engage fide sacramentoque Lanfranco promittere by his Faith and Oath to promise unto Lanfranc Si Rex foret Justitiam aequitatem misericordiam se per totum Regnum in omni negotio servaturum he would in all actions observe and keep Justice Equity and Mercy through the whole Kingdom that he would defend the Peace Liberty and safety of the Church against all men and also that he would in and through all things obey the Precepts and Counsels of the Arch-Prelate thereupon in Regem eligitur consecratur But not long after Odo Bishop of Baiox Earl of Kent Geffrey Bishop of Constance Robert Earl of Morton Roger Earl of Shrewsbury and the greatest part of all the Norman Prelates and Nobility in England entred into a Conspiracy to make Robert King and to deliver King William to his Brother alive or dead and thereupon they took Arms the King hearing these things and foreseeing his inevitable ruine if the English power did not preserve him caused the English to be assembled together and shewed them the Treason of the Normans and intreats and begs them to help and defend him upon this condition that if they would be faithful to him in that his necessity and distress he would grant them better Laws which they should chuse and would forbid or interdict all unjust Scotts Taxes or Tallages and grant to all persons their Woods and Hunting Upon which assurance and promise the English did faithfully assist him and by thier power valiantly overthrew the Normans and preserved and fixed the Crown upon Williams head But whatsoever he promised he kept but a short time the words of the Author are His auditis Rex fecit congregari Anglos ostendit eis traditionem Normannorum rogavit ut sibi auxilio essent eo tenore ut si in hac necessitate sibi fideles existerent meliorem legem quam vellent eligere eis concederet omnem injustum Scottâ—m interdixit concessit omnibus sylvas suas venationem Sed quicquid promisit parvo tempore custodivit Angli tunc fideliter eum juvabant 'T is therefore evident from hence that William the Second did not claim the Crown jure gladii by the power of the Sword nor did he affirm that he had a despotical right to make or change Laws ad libitum suum sine assensu Regni or Parliament And 't is a great observation to me that from the pretended Conquest to this day I never read of any King of England that declared and publickly owned any such prerogative or right but only that miserable and unfortunate Prince Richard the Second which the Parliament Roll thus expresseth Item Idem Rex nolens justas leges consuetudines Regni sui servare seu protegere sed secundum suae arbitrium voluntatis facere quicquid desideriis ejus occurreret quandoque frequentius quando sibi expositae declaratae fuerant leges regni sui per Justiciarios alios de Concilio suo secundum leges illas petentibus justitiam exhiberet dixit expresse vultu austero protervo quod leges suae erant in ore suo aliquotiens in pectore suo quod ipse solus possit mutare condere leges regni sui opinione illa seductus quampluribus de ligeis suis justitiam fieri non permisit sed per minas terrores quamplures à prosecutione communis justitiae cessare coegit But far different were the sentiments and Judgment of his Grandfather Great Edward the third who tells us Because that by divers Complaints made to us we have perceived that the Law of the Land which we by our Oath are bound to maintain is the less well kept and the Execution of the same disturbed many times by maintenance and procurement as well in the Court as in the Country We greatly moved of Conscience in this matter and for this cause desiring as much for the pleasure of God and ease and quietness of our Subjects as to our Conscience and for to save and keep our said Oath We have ordained c. And wise King James saith That not only the Royal Prerogative but the Peoples security of Lands Livings and Priviledges were preserved and maintained by the antient fundamental Laws Priviledges and Customs of this Realm and that by the abolishing or altering of them it was impossible but that present confusion will fall upon the whole state and frame of this Kingdom And his late Majesty of ever blessed memory was of the same mind and opinion when he said The Law is the Inheritance of every Subject and the only security he can have for his Life or Estate and the which being neglected or dis-esteemed under what specious shew soever a great measure of infelicity if not an irreparable confusion must without doubt fall upon them Henry the First AFter the Death of King William the Magnates Angliae not knowing what was become of Robert Duke of Normandy Eldest Brother of the deceased King the said Duke having been absent for five years in a Voyage to the Holy Land were afraid to be long without a King which Henricus fratrum ultimus juvenis sapientissimus cum callide cognovisset congregato Londoniis Clero Angliae Populo universo promisit emendationem legum quibus oppressa fuit Anglia tempore patris sui fratris
nuper defuncti ut animos omnium in sui promotionem accenderet amorem ut illum in Regem susciperent patronum to which it was generally answered That if he with a willing mind would grant and by his Charter confirm to them illas libertates consuetudines antiquas which their Ancestors enjoyed in the time of Edward the Confessor in ipsum consentirent in Regem unanimiter consecrarent Henry willingly granted this and taking an Oath that he would perform it consecratus est in Regem at Westm. upon Lady day favente Clero populo and so forthwith he was Crowned by Maurice Bishop of London and Thomas Archbishop of York After such his Coronation he granted and confirmed to the Nation for the advancement of Holy Church and preservation of the peace of his people a Charter of their antient Liberties The Charter the Reader may find in that industrious Revivor and Restorer of decayed and forgotten Antiquities Mr. Lambard as also in Matth. Paris Where it appears that the Archbishops Bishops Barons Earls Vicounts or Sheriffs Optimates totius Regni Angliae were Witnesses to the Charter And that at the Coronation of the King those Laws were made de Communi Consilio assensu Baronum Regni Angliae by the common advice and assent of the Barons of England It being usual in succeeding ages at the Coronations of our English Kings to confirm make and ordain Laws De assensu Baronum Regni per Commune Concilium Regni or Parliament I shall from hence observe two things 1. That these Laws were granted and confirmed assensu Baronum Regni or Baronagii Angliae there being a clear difference between Barones Regis and Barones Regni as appears in the very bowels of those Laws and elsewhere for the K. Saith Si quis Baronum nostrorum c. but who were comprehended under those first phrases Mr. Camden will tell us Nomine Baronagii Angliae omnes quodammodo Regni ordines continentur and so the Commons as we now call them were there and assented to those Laws 2. Clero Populo universo Angliae congregatis We read King Stephen assensu Cleri Populi in Regem Angliae electus per Dominum Papam confirmatus 10 H. 2. Congregato Clero Populo Regni or as Fitz-Stephens Generali Concilio the King made the Assise or Statute of Clarendon which Council the learned Selden calls a full Parliament King John was Crowned mediante tam Cleri quam Populi unanimi consensu favore Anno 50 H. 3. Per providentiam Cardinalis meaning the Popes Legate apud Kenilworth Clerus Populus convocantur which the Patent Roll of that year thus confirms The King a le request de honourable pier Sire Ottobon Legat d'Engleterre son Parlement eust sommons à Kenilworth where the Statute or Dictum de Kenilworth was made between the King and his Communante or Parlement Rex primo postmodum Clerus Populus juraverunt quod Dictum inviolabiliter observarent Thus have I at length I hope fully ascertained and explained the Historians phrase Clerus Populus and proved it to be a Parliament from the Pat. Roll of H. 3. Yet I do not think that the Lords Temporal only were the Populus nor the Lords Spiritual the Clerus for I agree with Dr. Heylyn that there is no Record either of History or Law which I have observed in which the word Clerus serves to signifie the Archbishops and Bishops exclusive of the other Clergy or any writing whatsoever wherein it doth not either signifie the whole Clergy generally or the inferior Clergy only exclusive of the Archbishops Bishops and other Prelates and 't is my opinion as far as I can find that the word Populus following Clerus was Thema universale in significando and comprehended as well the Commons as the Lords and indeed the subject matter of the Historians speaks it William the Second Henry the First King Stephen and King John were to be elected and created Kings of England having no hereditary right 't was but reasonable then and according to the Laws and precedents of other Countries in like Cases Quod omnes tangit ab omnibus approbari debet and so was the solemn Resolution of both Lords and Commons in the Parliament 40 E. 3. That neither King John nor any other could put the Realm or people of England into subjection sanz assent de eux without their assent or as the Parliament 29 H. 3. declared sine assensu Regni or as Malmesbury says in vita Willielmi primi absque generali Senatus Populi conventu Edicto But now to close the Reign of Henry the first I will out of that excellent Historian Matthew Paris transcribe the Oration or Speech of that King to the Common Council or Parliament in the seventh year of his Reign his elder Brother Robert Duke of Normandy then claiming the Crown of England and ready to invade this Nation with a great Force the Speech of the King the learned Monk thus delivers to us MAgnatibus igitur Regni ob hoc Londoniam Edicto Regio convocatis Rex talibus alloquiis mel favum oleumque mellitis mollitis blandiens dixit Amici fideles mei indigenae ac naturales nostis veraci sama referente qualiter frater meus Robertus electus per Deum vocatus ad regnum Hierosolymitanum foeliciter gubernandum quam frontosè illud infoeliciter refutaverit merito propterea à Deo reprobandus Nostis etiam in multis aliis superbiam ferocitatem illius quia vir bellicosus pacis impatiens est vosque scienter quasi contemptibiles quos desides vocat glutones conculcare desiderat Ego vero Rex humilis pacificus vos in pace in antiquis vestris libertatibus prout crebrius jurejur ando promisi gestio confovere vestris inclinando consiliis consultius ac mitius more mansueti principis sapienter gubernare super his si provideritis scripta subarata roborate iteratis juramentis praedicta certissime confirmare omnia videlicer quae sanctus Rex Edwardus Deo inspirante providè sancivit inviolabiliter jubeo observari ut mecum fideliter stantes fratris mei immò mei totius Regni Angliae hostis cruentissimi injurias potenter animose ac voluntarie propulsetis Si enim fortitudine Anglorum roborer inanes Normannorum minas nequaquam censeo formidandas Talibus igitur promissis quae tamen in fine impudenter violavit omnium corda sibi inclinavit ut pro ipso contra quemlibet usque ad capitis expositionem dimicarent This Speech to me is another strong Confirmation and Argument against the Norman Conquest for 't is luce clarius 1. That King Henry the First did not pretend to hold the Crown Jure Victoris 2. That the English were not totally subdued and destroyed by his
Regni totis reretroactis temporibus in the times of E. 1. and his Progenitours if so then in the time of King John Grandfather to E. 1. and so before H. 3. 1. THE Burgesses of St. Albans in their Petition to King E. 2. An o 8 o say that they sicut â—â—eteri Burgenses Regni ad Parliamentum Regis when it should happen to be summoned per duos Comburgenses suos venire debeant prout totis retroactis temporibus venire consueverunt tam tempore domini Ed. nuper regis Angliae patris regis as well in the time of E. 1. the Kings Father Progenitorum suorum as in the time of E. 2. semper ante instans Parliamentum and declared that the names of such Burgesses coming to Parliament were always inrolled in the Rolls of the Chancery notwithstanding all which the Sheriff of Hartford at the procuration and favour of the Abbot of St. Albans and his Council refused Burgenses praedictos praemunire seu nomina eorum retornare prout ad ipsum pertinuit c. and therefore they pray remedy Respons Scrutentur Rotuli c. de Cancellaria si temporibus Progenitorum Regis Burgenses praedicti solebant venire vel non tunc fiat eis super hoc justitia vocatis evocandis si necesse suerit I do not think there needs much enforcing this Record since the prescription of sending duos Comburgenses ad Parliamentum Regis sicut caeteri Burgenses Regni did is that they and their Predecessors were always accustomed to send two Burgesses to Parliament in all former Ages not only in the time of E. 1. but his Progenitors therefore in King Johns time his Grandfather at least and so before H. 3. And though the answer to the Petition which in that Age was given in Parliament per Concilium or all the Judges of England and others the Kings Learned Council say Scrutentur Rotuli si temporibus progenitorum Regis which may go to the whole Reign of King John as before Burgenses praedicti solebant venire vel non yet that grave and wise Council do not in the least scruple but clearly admit and confirm the general prescription that there were Boroughs that sent Burgesses to Parliament temporibus E. 1. Progenitorum suorum which goes higher than H. 3. his Father and it cannot in common reason be supposed much less believed that the Burgesses of S t Albans or the Lawyer or Pen-man of the Petition should dare to tell the King and Learned Council in the face of a Parliament a Novelty so great and ridiculous and that Recorded to Posterity by the Council that they and their Predecessors in the time of E. 1. and his Progenitors had sent two Burgesses to every Parliament when all the World then knew if the modern opinion be true that there was never any Election of any Burgesses to Parliament before the 49 H. 3. which was but 50. Years before 8 E. 2. and at the time of the Petition fresh in their own memories No surely the Burgesses of S t Albans did not ground their Petition of Right upon a general allegation or an affirmation in nubibus but the justice and certainty of their claim as they themselves very well knew so they prayed it might be examined and tried by uncontroulable Witnesses Records the Rolls of Chancery The Chancellor and the rest of the Council did no less know there were such Rolls and therefore order the search but if the Petition had been notoriously false and idle instead of recording it to future Ages they would with contempt and scorn have rejected it nor would the great Abbot of S t Albans his Council and the Sheriff of Hertford against whom the Petition was exhibited have been wanting in their own defence to have shewed and proved that this antient prescription was a meer Chimaera and fable no they all were well satisfied that the Borough had sent two Burgesses to every Parliament in the time of E. 1. and his Progenitors and therefore it was in vain to oppose or contradict their just and antient right according to their prescription all which appears clearly by this that both before the time of the Petition and ever since they have sent two Burgesses to every Parliament The SECOND ARGUMENT From Records An. 15 Johannis Regis wherein the Citizens and Burgesses not so numerous then as after and now together with the Earls Barons Magnates Angliae were to give Consilium Auxilium ad honorem Regis suum statum Regni who shortly after met at London Convocatum Parliamentum de toto Clero tota secta laicali and so within the express Prescription of the Borough of S. Albans I Am not ignorant that some have dated the origine of the Commons being a part of the Parliament from the Parliament of Runningmead 17 o Reg. Joh. It may therefore be worth our pains to observe this great Record following and to consider whether from thence may not be proved this Conclusion That 〈◊〉 great Cities and Boro 〈…〉 s of the â—ingdom not so 〈…〉 merous then as after and now in the 16 o of King John before the granting of his Magna Charta or 〈◊〉 confirming the antient Laws in his 17 th year at Runningmead did send their Proxies and Representatives to the Commune Concilium Regni or Parliament for it cannot be supposed in reason that every individual Citizen and Burgess could come no more than every Parson of a Parish to a Convocation or to a meeting of the whole Clergy of England The Record saith That the King being in partibus transmarinis writes Majori Baronibus London Majori probis hominibus Winton Northampt. Lincoln Ebor. Oxon. Glouc. Heref. Exon. Worcestr Cantebr Hunt Bristol Norwich And all the great Boroughs of the Demesnes of the King giving them account of his proceedings and successes in his War against the French and that the Pope had by his Letters released the Interdict under which the Kingdom then lay which the King had then sent to Peter Bishop of Winton Chief Justice of England and therefore desired that they would believe what the Bishop should speak to them that Consilium Auxilium vestrum ad honorem nostrum vestrum statum Regni nostri in melius communicandum efficaciter super hoc apponatis and that majori festinatione expediretur Teste apud Rupellam 6 o die Martii In the same manner he writ to William Earl Marshal and to all the Earls Barons Magnatibus Angliae c. Teste apud Rupellam 8 o die Martii In order therefore to our proof of a Parliament from these Records let us make two observations 1. Negative 2. Affirmative Though the Writ be general and mentions not any time or place for meeting or coming to Parliament or the great Council the King referring that I suppose to his Regent or Chief Justice here yet it cannot be
intended that Peter Bishop of Winchester being then Chief Justice of England should go from County to County City to City Borough to Borough or as our Church-Wardens do from House to House rogare Consilium auxilium the proper business of a Parliament to desire and entreat for their Counsel and Aid for the Honour of the King their own statum Regni and the safety of the whole Kingdom surely that had been an imployment fitter for the wandring Jew or Johannes de Temporibus and such counsel must needs have been of a very different and various nature and both agreeing very ill with the words majori festinatione and urgency of the contents of the Writs Let us then enquire what were the effects and consequents of these Writs and that brings me to the second observation King John began his Reign 6 o Aprilis the Writs bear date 6 o 8 o Martii which was the Close of An. 15 o. It may be the Winds were very cross or for some other reason the Letters might not so speedily be brought over or published here or after the summons there might be above forty days before they met But sure it is in the beginning of July after that March being the sixteenth Year of his Reign we find Nicholaus Tusculanensis Episcopus Apostolicae sedis Legatus per nuntios memoratos Domini Papae Authenticum acceperat Rex Anglorum erat in partibus transmarinis sed quoniam idem Rex in recessu suo ab Anglia Legato jam dicto Willielmo Marescallo vices suas in hoc negotio commiserat idem Legatus in urbe Londinensi apud Sanctum Paulum grande congregavit Concilium ubi congregatis Archiepiscopis Episcopis Abbatibus Prioribus Comitibus Baronibus aliis ad hoc negotium Interdicti the very business of the Writs spectantibus proposuit coram omnibus formam restitutionis And the Great Selden the Honour of the Inner-Temple or rather as the Learned Grotius Honos Britanniae to drive the nail home saith But we know by what is already shewed that divers former Parliaments were in this Kings time meaning before the granting of his Magna Charta An. 17 Joh. though the Laws made in them be lost And in the year before the Charter also which was An. 16 Joh. the Author of Eulogium sayes that Convocatum est Parliamentum Londoniis praesidente Archiepiscopo cum toto Clero tota secta laicali wherein per Domini Papae praeceptum illa obligatio quam Rex Domino Papae fecerat cum fidelitate homagio relaxatur omnino vii ' die Julii Having thus proved a Parliament in the 16 th of King John and that the Citizens and Burgesses had their Summons to it which is remarkable by a Writ particular and distinct from that of the Lords viz. the Earls Barons Magnates Angliae I will conclude this Argument with the Statute of 5 R. 2. Cap. 4. where it is enacted by the assent of the Prelates Lords and Commons That all and singular persons and Communalties be he Archbishop Abbot Prior Earl Baron c. which should have a Summons to Parliament should come from thenceforth to the Parliaments in the manner as they were bounden to do and had been accustomed within the Realm of England of old times and if they did absent themselves and came not he and they should be amerced or otherwise punished according as of old times had been accustomed to be done from hence I shall observe 1. That there were Summons to Parliament of old times as well to the Commonalties that is the Citizens and Burgesses as to the Archbishops Bishops Abbots Priors Earls and Barons and so the Statute may seem to affirm the prescription of S t Albans that saith that they had sent Duos Comburgenses sicut caeteri Burgenses regni did to every Parliament totis retroactis temporibus before E. 1. and his Progenitors 2. That the phrase of old times is in point of prescription and antiquity applied equally and without distinction or limitation as well to the great Lords as Commons But if the first had of old times as our modern Authors write been the only constituent parts of the Parliament it might in reason and prudence be thought they would not have consented to have admitted that Summons to Parliament for the Commons was Coeval with theirs nor would they have ratified and confirmed by a solemn Act the protestation or declaration of Right of the Commons of England in the Parliament 2 H. 5. n. 10. That the Commons had ever been a member of the Parliament and that no Statute or Law could be made without their assent 3. That if the Lords and Commons absented themselves and came not to Parliament they should be amerced or otherwise punished as of old times had been accustomed to be done this branch plainly agrees 1. With the Modus tenendi Parliamentum Written as M r Selden saith tempore E. 3. That the first day the Burgesses and Citizens should be called and if they did not come they should be amerced and so M r Prynn mistakes in his Animadversions when he saith that no absent Lord was fined before 31 H. 6. 2. It appears Ex vi terminorum of old times it had been so accustomed to be done that this prescription may well be applyed to the Parliament of 16 Joh. and long before for the Statute of Magna Charta 17 of that King saith Civitas London habeat omnes libertates suas antiquas by force and vertue of which word antiquas their old or ancient Liberties and Customs not only confirmed by the Magna Charta of William the First but used even in the Saxon times and before were in Parliament ratified and confirmed The THIRD ARGUMENT From the solemn and great Judgment of both Lords and Commons in the Parliament of 40 E. 3. against the Pope That if King John had An. 14. of his Reign which was three years before the granting of his Magna Charta made the Kingdom tributary to the Pope he had done it sanz lour assent which must be understood to be without the consent of the Lords and Commons and therefore void KIng John An. 14. of his Reign made himself and Crown tributary to the Pope But Anno 40 E. 3. The Prelats Dukes Counts Barons and Commons upon their full deliberation in Parliament resolved with one accord that neither the King nor any other could put the Realm nor people thereof into such subjection sanz assent de eux without their assent viz. as well of the Commons as of the Lords and that it appeared by many Evidences that if he had so done it was done sanz lour assent and contrary to the Coronation Oath And if the Pope attempted any thing against either having at the instance and sollicitation of the French King threatned to interdict or out-law both King and Kingdom They would oppose and resist him
Close Roll of that Year tells us of a Parliament Consideratum fuit in Curia nostra toto Parliamento nostro c. In a Parliament 37 H. 3. for so Mat. Westm. calls it pag. 352. Rex Magnates Communitas populi protestantur publice that they would never consent to any thing in the grand and terrible Excommunication then to be pronounced by the Clergy against the infringers of Magna Charta contra consuetudines Regni antiquas usitatas In cujus rei testimonium imposterum veritatis testimonium as well the King as the Earls of Norff. Heref. Fssex ad Warwick as Peter de Sabaudia at the instance and desire aliorum Magnatum populi praesentium scripto sigilla sua apposuerunt Rex c. Cum nuper in Parliamento nostro Oxon. communiter fuit ordinatum quod omnes excessus injuriae factae in Regno nostro inquirentur per quatuor milites singulorum Comitatuum ut cognita inde veritate facilius corrigantur c. I have an Abridgment or abstract of the Rolls of this Parliament writ by the hand of Mr. Elsing late Clark of the Parliament who saith my Lord Coke had it and some of the proceedings therein mentioned I have found in the Exchequer enrolled at that time The Articles of Peace à Domino Rege Domino Edwardo Praelatis Proceribus omnibus Communitate tota Regni Angliae communiter concorditer approbata were sealed by the Bishop of Lincoln the Bishop of Ely Earl of Norff. Earl of Oxon Humphry Bohun Will. de Monte Canisio Major London in Parliamento London Mense Junii Anno Domini 1264. de consensu voluntate praecepto Domini Regis nec non Praelatorum Baronum ac etiam Communitatis tunc ibidem praesentium And not only so but that Record tells us Quod quaedam Ordinatio facta in Parliamento London habito circa festum Nativitatis Sancti Johannis Baptistae proxime praeteritum pro pace Regni conservanda And we read in another Record Rex c. Cum super praeteritis guerrarum discriminibus in Regno Angliae subortis Quaedam ordinatio seu forma pacis de nostro Praelatorum Baronum totius Communitatis Regni praedicti unanimi voluntate assensu provida deliberatione inita fuerit c. â—n cujus rei testimonium huic Scripto nos Rex Angliae Comes Leyc Glouc. Jo. filuis Johannis Johannes de Burgo Sen. Will. de Monte Canisio Henr. de Hastings Gilbertus de Gaunt pro nobis caeteris Baronibus Communitate Regni Angliae Sigilla nostra apposuimus Dat. apud Cantuar. die Jovis proximè post Festum Nativitatis beatae Virginis Anno 1264. And therefore those that hold that there were no Commons or Citizens and Burgesses in Parliament before 49 Hen. 3. would do well to define and ascertain who the Communitas were after the words Praelati Barones Magnates in the before-expressed Records The FIFTH ARGUMENT From an Act of Parliament An. 2 H. 5. that famous Prince where it is declared and admitted that the Commons of the Land were ever a part of the Parliament and so consequently were part of the Parliament Annis 16 17 Joh. 28 32 37 42 48 H. 3. all within the prescription of the Borough of S. Albans THE Commons of England upon their claim or protestastation had as their undoubted and unquestionable right and inherent priviledge allowed and admitted in Parliament that they had ever been a member of Parliament then were they a member of that 16 Joh. before-mentioned of 17 Joh. 28 32 37 42 48 H. 3. and that no Statute or Law could be made without their assent The Record says That so as hit hath ever be their liberte and freedome that thar should no Statute ne Law be made of lass then they yaffe therto their Assent considering that the Commune of your Lond the which that is and ever hath be a membre of your Parliament ben as well Assentirs as Petitioners Yet was the affirmation of the Commons no other than a renovation or memorial of the ancient Law of the Land as is proved before and more fully explained and confirmed by the Petition to the King and his Learned Council and answer thereto in the Parliament of 8 E. 2. The Record is not unworthy of a serious perusal Erchevesque Evesque Prelatz Counts Barons autre gentz de la Comunyalte Dengleterre que tiegnent lour Manoirs en chief de nostre Seigneur as well within the Forest as without to which Mannors they had Gasz Wast appendant dont les Seignourages avantditz arentunt by the acre half acre per rode en approvaunt lour Manoirs Whereupon the Ministers of the King made seisure thereof Pur ceo qu' eux ne unt la licence le Roy d'entrer Therefore they pray that they may approver leur Manoirs le povre pueple eyser c. Responsum in dorso Il ne put estre fait sanz novele ley la quele chose fere la Comunalte de la terre ne vult my uncore assentir infra Coram rege From hence I make these Observations 1. It proves that the Law could not be altered without consent of the Commons of England though in a case particular to the King as this was for the Petition was coram Rege nor could the King and Commons without the Lords For E. 3. per avys des Prelatz Grauntz de la terre fist respondre as les petitions des Communes touchantes la leye de la terre que les leyes eues useez en temps passez ne le processe dycelle useez cea en arere ne se purrent changer sanz ent faire novel Estatute which as then they could not attend but shortly would 2. That they ought to agree to all new Laws and that no Statute could be made without their assent It is then remarkable 1. That the Commons of England as now we stile them gave their suffrage and vote in the enacting and making of all Statutes and Laws in the time of the Progenitors of H. 3. which taken extensivè is a very large prescription of right for that King by the Statute of Assisa panis cervisiae made after 49. when it is pretended the Commons began viz. An. 51. tells us That at his Parliament held the first year of his Reign he had granted that all good Statutes and Ordinances made in the time of his Progenitors and not revoked should still be held 2. But admitting the word Progenitors be restrained to two which I conceive was never intended by the Law-makers yet it cannot be denyed but that the Statute of Magna Charta for so it is called 5 H. 3. Fitz-herb Abrid tit Mordaunc n. 53. and by Fleta Lib. 1. Cap. 28. and all other Statutes made at least temporibus Johannis Ricardi I. Father and Uncle of Henry
the Third had the assent of the Commons in Parliament to make them Laws Now the word Progenitors in the Statute must I conceive go higher than Ric. 1. for Bracton a Learned Judge who flourished in the time of Henry the Third and so by a reasonable computation of time may be supposed to have lived in the latter end of the Reign of Ric. 1. or beginning of King John's after he had declared to posterity that he had bent his mind ad vetera judicia perscrutanda diligenter non sine vigiliis labore and whatsoever he found Notatu dignum he reduced in unam summam perpetuae memoriae commendanda concludes this point thus Cum legis vigorem habeat quicquid de consilio de consensu Magnatum Reipublicae communi sponsione authoritate Regis sive Principis praecedente justè fuerit definitum approbatum And so just and excellent was the ballance of the Constitution of our legal Government in preventing any order or rank of the Subjects to impose upon or bind the rest without their common consent and in conserving as it were an universal liberty and property to every individual degree of men from being taken from them without their assent as the County Palatine of Chester ab antiquo were not subject to such Laws to which they did not consent for as well before the Conquest of England as after they had their Commune Concilium or Court of Parliament by authority of which the Barones Milites quamplures alii Rot. 44 H. 3. m. 1. dorso Barones liberi homines omnes alii fideles Rot. Pat. 3. E. 1. m. 6. or as the Supplication to H. 6. saith The Abbots Priors Clergy Barons Knights Esquires and Commonalty did with the consent of the Earl make or admit Laws within the same such as should be thought expedient and behoveful for the Weal of the Inheritors and inheritance of the said County and no Inheritors or Possessors within the said County were chargeable or liable or were bounden charged or hurt of their Bodies Liberties Franchises Lands Goods or Possessions unless the said County or Parliament had agreed unto it And I dare under submission affirm that neither this County Palatine nor Durham were ever subjugated to have their Estates given away at the good will and pleasure of the Earl or Bishop under any notion or fancy in those days of being their representatives in the Commune Concilium Regni or that being dependant Tenants their consents were included in their Lords assent and if the Commune Concilium Cestrense or Parliament was deduced from Records it would be of greater use to shew us as in a Mirror the Government of England in antient days than what I have yet seen published by any Author 3. That the Answer of the King to the Petition penned and made by all the Judges of the Land his Council in Parliament cannot be supposed to be grounded upon a modern usage of 59. years from the time of 49 H. 3. till then if the Tenants in Capite jure repraesentationis made the Parliament as some hold but was a Declaration of the ancient Custom and right of the Nation 4. That it was not in the power of all the Tenants in Capite of England or the greatest part who were the Petitioners though with the Kings consent to bind and oblige others or to make or alter a Law sine assensu Communitatis Regni who had votum consultivum and decisivum an Act of Authority and Jurisdiction as well in assenting to spiritual Laws as Temporal as may appear for an inâ—tance in their Declaration or Protestation to E. 3. in Parliament Que nul estatut ne Ordenance soit fait ne grante au Petition du Clergie si ne soit per assent de voz Communes ne que vous dites Communes ne soient obligez per nulles constitutions q'ils font pur lour avantage sanz assent de voz dites Communes Car eux ne veullent estre obligez nul de voz Estatuz ne Ordinances faitz sanz lour assent Fortescue cap. 8. pag. 40. tells us Sed non sic Angliae Statuta oriri possunt dum nedum Principis voluntate sed totius Regni assensu ipsa conduntur Et si Statuta licet tanta solennitate prudentia edita efficaciae tantae quantae conditorum cupiebat intentio non esse contingant Concito reformari ipsa possunt non sine Communitatis Procerum Regni illius assensu quali ipsa primitus emanarunt And that this was the antient Law and Right of the Kingdom appears by the answer of E. 1. an o 22. of his Reign to the Petition of the whole Clergy of England for the Clergy having given the King medietatem omnium bonorum tam temporalium quam spiritualium complaining that the Immunity of the Church laesa fuit violata petiit à Rege quosdam Articulos Rege jubente jussit enim Rex postquam votis ipsius paruerant in giving the Subsidy ut ipsi ab eo peterent remedia quae vellent Et petierunt imprimis ut Statutum de manu mortua quod in praejudicium Sanctae Matris Ecclesiae fuit editum deleretur Cui quidem Articulo respondit Rex quod idem Statutum de Consilio Magnatum suorum so phrased by the Historian fuerat editum ordinatum absque eorum Consilio non erat revocandum but a more certain authority tells us that the Statute was made per Commune Concilium Regni or Parliament as appears by Rot. Claus. 7 E. 1. m. 5. dorso Rot. Pat. 10 E. 1. m. 13. and then the Commons were unquestionably an essential part and joined in the making the Statute The SIXTH ARGUMENT From the form of penning of 〈◊〉 of Parliament and expressions in Records in 49 51 54 H. 3. where it is pretended the Commâ—ns first began to be a part of the Legislative Power which agree with the phrases of Records of Acts of Parliament before that time THE King writes to the Bishop of London and to the rest of the Bishops of the Province of Canterbury that his heart was wounded 〈…〉 to dolore that the Earl of Gloucester and other Rebels had by crafty perswasions circumvented pro 〈…〉 r Prince Edward ad partem suam proditoriâ— aâ—â—axeâ—unt proprii contemptu Sacramenâ— contra formam de nostro ejusdem silii nostri Praelatorum Magnatum Communitatis Regni nostri unanimi assensu voluntate nuper London provisam The King per le conseil l'assentement le Rei de Alemain de Countes de Baruns del Commun de la terre pardoned and released the Earl of Gloucester and all his Company c. And the King per le Conseil Passentement le Rei de Alemain les Cuntes de Barons le Commun de la terre pardoned and released the Londoners totes maneres de
ire de rancour de male volente c. The King and Prince having undertaken the Crusado for the Holy Land quia tamen Praelatis Magnatibus Communitati Regni non videtur expediens neque tutum that they should be both out of the Kingdom istis temporibus it was agreed the Prince should go and a Subsidy was granted to the Prince by the Parliament If one should shew the Authors of the novel opinion only these Records and thereupon ask them who the Communitas mentioned in these Records after the words Praelati Barones Magnates were I doubt not but they would say Knights Citizens and Burgesses because they are after the pretended inception of 49 H. 3. but then I desire to know what authority they can shew why the Communitas in 29 32 37 48 H. 3. should not be a part of the Parliament as much as of 49 51 54. of that King since the words or phrases of both are alike in the Records For I do not think it a true way of reasoning That because the notion of 49 H. 3. is generally published by our now Historians and so believed Ergo it unquestionably was so and has always and in all ages been distinctly known and believed The SEVENTH ARGUMENT From the defect and loss of Parliament Rolls of H. 3. and E. 1. and from the universal silence of all Records and our antient Historians contemporary and succeeding 49 H. 3. till our days IT is true indeed for any thing yet appears the Parliament Rolls of H. 3. are all lost or destroyed though references are made to them by several Clause and Patent Rolls of H. 1. and H. 2. yet no direct Writ of Summons ad Parliamentum is extant of that time either of the Lords or Commons so M r Pryn till the Dorse of the Clause Roll 49 H. 3. in a Schedule affixed thereto where there are Writs for Electing and sending to a Parliament at London two Knights Citizens and Burgesses and Barons for the Cinque-Ports and likewise Summons to the great Lords But if that Roll of 49 H. 3. and Rot. Claus. 22 E. 1. had been destroyed as many others of that time were then had there been no footsteps or testimony left us on Record yet discovered of any formal Summons to Parliament of them or the Prelats and temporal great Lords till 23 E. 1. though several Parliaments were in the interim no less than twelve as the Printed Statute Books tell us And the Commons expresly said to be present at some and implyed in all if the Phrase of Commune Concilium Regni implies so much which 〈◊〉 think is unquestionable when compared with the Statute of Westm. 1. made 3 E. 1. which was not eleven years after 49 H. 3. wherein the constituent parts of the Commune Concilium Regni are enumerated and expressed the Statute being made Per l'assentements des Archievesques Evesques Abbes Priors Countes Barons tout le Comminalty de la terre illonques summones Now because from that one Record of 49 H. 3. being the only Roll as yet found out it should be wonderfully observed and from thence infallibly concluded and nicked and by an ominous and influential Asterism of Rebellion and Treason marked that the very first Writs whereby the great Lords are said to be also first Summoned to send two Knights Citizens and Burgesses for each County City and Borough 〈◊〉 Parliamentum in Octabis Sanâ—ti Hillarii were made in this very year at that very Crisis of time nay tested on such very days when the rebellious Barons after the Battel of Lewes had the King and Prince in their power and exercised Regal Authority in his name under good favour seems not at all satisfactory and convincing to me until they give more certain and greater testimonials and evidence and answer these few Records If the Epocha of the Knights Citizens and Burgesses or Commons as now called and distinguished from the great Lords being first admitted a part of the Parliament and Legislative Power had such a Creation and Origine it is more than a wonder though the Parliament Rolls be destroyed that the Lieger Books Charters or Historians of that time either National or Foreign of which there are not a few or our antient Lawyers Bracton Britton Fleta and Hengham had not amongst many Narratives of far less moment and weight given posterity a remark or some short hint or memorial of so suddain so great and so universal a change or Catastrophe of the whole constitution and ancient frame of the English Government as that must unquestionably be admitted to be or some subsequent Chronologer had not so much as dreamed of it till of late or that branch in the ancient Coronation Oath of our Kings demanded by the Archbishop had not been omitted or ne ver administred which runs thus Concedis justas leges consuetudines esse tenendas promittis per te esse protegendas ad honorem Dei corroborandas quas Vulgus elegerit secundum vires tuas Respondebit Rex Concedo promitto The word Elegerit being admitted to be of the praeterperfect tense it certainly shews that the peoples Election had been the foundation and ground of antient Laws and Customs and the term of justas leges seems to allow a liberty of debate reason and argument so much as might be of efficacy and force to demonstrate and convince that the Laws so required by the Commons of the King were just and reasonable the debate and consideration of which certainly was never nor ever could be intended to be done in the diffusive capacity of all the Commons of England separatim but in an intire or in an aggregat body that is in their Communia Concilia or Parliaments And with this agrees the Statute of Provisors An. 25 E. 3. which saith Whereupon the said Commons have prayed our Soveraign Lord the King that upon the mischiefs and damages which happen to his Realm he ought and is bound by his Oath with the accord of his people in his Parliament thereof to make remedy and law and removing the mischiefs and damage which thereof ensue And this they say sith the right of the Crown of England and the Law of the Realm was such Nor indeed can I apprehend any colourable pretence much less a probable reason that if the Barons had 49 H. 3. usurped the Soveraign power into their hands they should 1. So easily and speedily divide and share it with the Commons constitute a new Court of Parliament and make them essential and coordinate with themselves in the Legislative Power sure we know it is natural for all Courts ampliare non diminuere Jurisdictionem 2. That at that Parliament the numerous Barons as they stile them should but summon 23. of their own Order when the Archbishops Bishops Abbots Priors and Deans made 120 if we must be concluded by the Records If there were then
two Houses of Parliament and that the Knights Citizens and Burgesses did not sit with the Lords the Prelates having so great advantage of the Temporal Lords in their Votes were very unkind to the Crown they made not use of their over-ballance for the delivery of the King and Prince then said to be in Custody 3. Nor have I yet met with any reasons given why when the Government of the whole Kingdom was at this Parliament of 49 H. 3. to be setled after so long and bloody a War the Barons being then so victorious and numerous as our modern Authors say they would by their absence hazard and endanger the loss of all by entrusting the Prelates and Commons with the over-ballance Many remarkable observations might be raised upon this Record both as to the Lords and Commons but I will now pass to my eight Argument concluding this with M r Pryâ—â—s opinion how the Parliament Rolls before E. 3. came to be lost or destroyed I will use his own words That there are no Records at all in the Tower except some few antient Charters or Exemplifications of them antienter than the first year of King John all the rest from William the first his Reign till then except some few in the Exchequer not relating to Parliaments being utterly lost the first Parliament Rolls yet remaining are these 5 8 9 and 19 th of King E. 2. the Statute Roll of H. 3. E. 1. E. 2. containing some Statutes made in their Reigns a Parchment Book of some Pleas in Parliament during the Reigns of King E. 1. and 2. and a few Bundles of Petitions in the Parliaments of 6 E. 1. and 1 2 3 and 4 E. 3. none of which are here abridged viz. in the Abridgment by him published only I find in the Clause Patent Charter and Fine Rolls of King John H. 3. E. 1 and 2. some Writs of Summons and some memorials of Acts Ordinances made and Aids Subsidies Dismes Quindisms Customs granted in Parliaments held during their Reigns the Rolls whereof are perished and quite lost either through the negligence of the Record Keepers or the Injury Iniquity of the times during the Civil Wars between the King and Barons in the Reigns of King John and H. 3. and betwixt the two Houses of Lancaster and York for the Title of the Crown wherein it is very probable the prevailing King's parties by their Instruments imbezled suppressed such Parliamentary Records and Proceedings as made most against their Interests Power Prerogatives Titles or through the default of our Kings great Officers and Attornies who sending for the Parliament Rolls out of the Tower upon special occasions never returned them again for reasons best known to themselves by means whereof those Parliament Rolls being no where to be found their defects must be supplied only out of such fragments and memorials of them as are extant in our other Records and antient Historians especially in Matthew Paris Matthew Westm. William of Malmesbury Henry Arch-Deacon of Huntingdon Roger de Hoveden Simeon Dunelmensis The Chronicle of Brompton Radulphus de Diceto Ranulphus Cestrensis and Thomas of Walsingham who give us some accompts of their proceedings and transactions which else had been utterly buried in oblivion as well as their Rolls wherein they were at large Recorded as is evident by the Parliament Rolls yet extant The EIGHTH ARGUMENT From the various opinions of the learned men in and since H. 8. who never dreamed of any such origine nor was it ever heard of till of late IT would be tedious to set down the various and wandring opinions and reasons of our modern Authors in English touching the beginning of our Parliaments and constituent parts thereof especially of the Commons as now called and comprehended in the Knights Citizens and Burgesses in Parliament I will but instance in a few eminent Authors and leave the Croud behind The great Antiquary Mr. Lamberd holds that they were before the time of William the First and there are other learned men who give their assent to that as a great truth Mr. Prynn saith By all the ancient Presidents before the Conquest it is most apparent That all our Pristine Synods and Councils were nought else but Parliaments that our Kings Nobles Senators Aldermen Wisemen Knights and Commons were usually present and voting in them as Members and Judges Polydore Virgil Hollinshead Speed and Martin are of opinion that the Commons were first summoned at a Parliament at Salisbury An. 16 H. 1. Sir Walter Raleigh in his Treatise of the Prerogative of Parliaments thinks it was Anno 18 H. 1. My Lord Bacon in a Letter to the Duke of Buckingham asks Where were the Commons before H. 1. gave them authority to meet in Parliament Dr. Heylin finds another beginning and saith that H. 2. who was Duke of Anjou was the first Institutor of our High Court of Parliament which being an Anjovian he learned in France But I cannot find that any of those ever supposed the Commons were first introduced in Parliament 49 H. 3. by Rebellion Nor was this opinion entertained by any Author I can meet with Anno 1529. 21 H. 8. for in an answer of that great and excellent person Sir Thomas More Lord Chancellor of England in his supplication of Souls against the supplication of Beggers discoursing about King Johns making in the 14 th year of his Reign and three years before his granting Magna Charta the Realm Tributary to the Pope declares his Judgment without any doubt or hesitation and therein as I take it the universal tradition and belief of all learned men of that and precedent times That the Clergy and all the Lords and Commons of the Realm made the Parliament in the age of King John and that never could any King of England give away the Realm to the Pope or make the Land Tributary without their grant whose Book and so his opinion we find approved of and published by a grave and learned Judge of the Kingdom Mr. Justice Rastall and dedicated to Queen Mary her self An. 1557. not much above a Century ago The NINTH ARGUMENT From the comparison of the antient Generale Concilium or Parliament of Ireland instanced An. 38 H. 3. with ours in England wherein the Citizens and Burgesses were which was eleven years before the pretended beginning of the Commons here AS great a right and priviledge surely was and ought to be allowed to the English Subjects as was to the Irish before 49 H. 3. and if that be admitted and that their Commune Concilium or Parliament had its Platform from ours as I think will not be denied by any that have considered the Histories and Records touching that Land we shall find the two ensuing Records An. 38 H. 3. clearly evince that the Citizens and Burgesses were then a part of their great Council or Parliament That King being in partibus transmarinis and the Queen being left Regent
qui inter alios Principes orbis terrae Catholicum se exhibet Romanae Ecclesiae devotum jura sua libertates consuetudines leges praedictas absque diminutione inquietudine pacifice possidere ac illibata persistere benignius permittatis In cujus rei testimonium Sigilla tam pro nobis quam pro tota Communitate praedicti Regni Angliae praesentibus sunt appensa Datis actis Lincolniae Anno Dom. 1301. 2. The second is the Letter to the Pope made at the Parliament 17 E. 3. touching Provisions Quod Rex tota Nobilitas Regni pati noluit c. thus translated whereby the phrase Nobilitas Regni in the Historian will be explained TO the most holy Father in God Lord Clement by the grace of God of the holy Church of Rome and of the Universal Church Chief and high Bishop His humble and devout Children The Princes Dukes Earls Barons Knights Citizens and Burgesses and all the Communaltie of the Realm of England assembled at a Parliament holden at Westm. the 15 th day of May last past c. In Witness whereof we have hereunto set our Seals Given in the full Parliament at Westm. on the eighteenth Day of May Anno Dom. 1343. And indeed the Commons were so highly incensed that the Parliament Roll of this Year tells us that La dite Commune ne le poet ne le 〈…〉 t plus endurere those strange oppressions of the Pope and Provisors So that the Parliament of 24 H. 8. after great debate and consideration and a diligent search and inspection of the Antient Records of the Kingdom did ground their Statute amongst others upon these great Authorities the Statute saith Whereas the King his most noble Progenitors and the Nobility and Commons of the said Realm at divers and sundry Parliaments as well in the time of King Edw. 1. 〈◊〉 3. R. 2. H. 4. and other noble 〈◊〉 of this Realm made sundâ—â— Or 〈…〉 s Laws Statutes and p 〈…〉 for the entire and sure 〈…〉 tion of the Prerogative Lib 〈…〉 and preheminencâ—â— of th 〈…〉 〈◊〉 Imperial Crown of this Realm and of the Jurisdiction Spiritual and Temporal of the same to keep it from the annoyance as well of the See of Rome as from the authority of other Foreign Potentates attempting the diminution and violation thereof as often and from time to time as any such annoyance or attempt might be known or espied Pulton's Stat. 24 H. 8. c. 12. But to conclude the point of the Various Lections Certainly the different and great variety of words and phrases by which both the antient Historians and Records have in their several Ages and Times expressed and denoted the Communia Concilia Regni or Parliaments as now called and their constituent parts being not well observed and considered by most of our late English Authors who understood them as if they had signified what afterwards they did and now do have imposed on our Historical Faiths and propagated to posterity many palpable and gross errors whereby great and unkind clashings and diversities of opinions as well amongst learned men as others have had their source and spring nay even between Prince and People THE General Conclusion MY only aim and endeavour in this Discourse hath been from publick Records private Manuscripts and the best Historians to search out and discover truth and to assert the just honour of our worthy and famous Ancestors Commoners of England as now phrased great maintainers of the interest and dignity of the King and Kingdom and with submission to better Judgment I hope I have plainly proved 1. That the Freemen or Commons of England were an essential and constituent part of the Saxon Wittena Gemott or Parliament 2. That they so continued in the times of W. 1. W. 2. and H. 1. which last being an Englishman by way of Charter restored and confirmed the Laws of Edward the Confessor as his Father William 1. as well by his Magna Charta or Great Charter as by his Oaths had before done both when he was Crowned and also at Berkhamstead in the seventh Year of his Reign 3. And though the Rolls of Parliament in the succeeding Kings Reigns till E. 2. be lost or not found so as we are at a loss as to the several Orders of Parliament yet by what has been deduced from other Records before cited it is evident I conceive that the Citizens and Burgesses were a part of the Parliament Anno 16. of King John and so had not their beginning by rebellion Anno 49 H. 3. And therefore I may with good reason and warranty conclude That our Ancestors the Commons of England the Knights Gentlemen Freeholders Citizens and Burgesses of a great and mighty Nation were very far from being in former times such Vassals and Slaves or so abject poor and inconsiderable as the absurd and malitious ignorance and falsities of late Writers have been pleased to make and represent them especially the Author of the Grand Freeholders Iâ—quest and Mr. James Howel as if they were only Beasts of carriage and burden ordained to be taxed and tâ—lliâ—â—ed and have their Lives Estates and Liberties given away and disposed of without their own assents under a novel opinion and conceit that they were no part of the Commune Concilium Regni or Parliament before 49 H. 3. Perlege quae Regni clarissima Conciliorum Sunt Monumenta aliter nil praeter somnia cernis Appendix AFter I had compleated the foregoing Arguments a material Objection was by some of my Friends offered me which if not cleared in this discourse might in their judgment give a colour and pretence for a belief of an Opinion which is this That the Commons or people of England were from the time of the Norman Conquest represented by such as held of thâ— K 〈…〉 〈◊〉 Capite until 49 H. 3. and 〈◊〉 by two 〈◊〉 for each County and certain Burgesses for several Burroughs and Barons for the Cinque Ports Having before laid down a clear and plain distinction between Barones Regis and Barones Regni I shall therefore now distinguish upon the phrase Milites libere â—enenâ—es 1. Milites libere tenâ—ntes qui de Rege tenent in Capite 2. Milites libere tenentes de Regno The first Distinction I thus prove Rot. Pal. 2. Johannis m. 9. Rex dilecâ—is fidelibus 〈…〉 s Baronibus Militibus libere tenentibus qui de eo tenent in Hi 〈…〉 rnia Rot. Claus. 19 H. 3. m. 7. 8. dorso Re◠〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sciatis quod Ar 〈…〉 〈◊〉 Aâ—baâ—es Priores C 〈…〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 omâ—â—s alii de Regno qui de nobiâ—â—â—nent in Capite spontanea 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 consuetudine con 〈…〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈…〉 lium ad magna neâ—â—tia 〈◊〉 eâ—pedienda Rot. Claus. 26 H 3. m. 7. dorso Rex 〈…〉 omili Norhamptoniae praecipimus tâ—â—i 〈◊〉 alias praecipimus quâ—d 〈◊〉 facias Archiepi 〈…〉
as Bracton before cited Consensâ— communi totius Regni 3. Those Aides were given tam de tenentibus aliorum quam de tenentibus de Domino Rege in Capite levanda quo praetexta dictus Compotus de Auxiliis praedictis were as well for the Fees of the Tenants of the then Prior as for the Fees of the Prior himself which the Prior said would clearly appear to the Court by the Certificate of the Prior his Prodecâ—ssor in the time of H. 3. made to the Barons of the Exchequer so that the Tenants of the Prior did grant an Aid as well as the Prior himself and that in Parliament for as I have observed before Rot. Claus. 32 H. 3. m. 13. dorâ—o there was a Parliament then held 4. That in the Reign of H. 3. and preceding times when the Knights and Freeholders who held not of the King but other Lords did in the Commune Concilium or Parliament graâ—◠〈◊〉 Auâ—â—lium or Aid to the Crown the great Lord or Baron of the Fee of who 〈…〉 the Freeholders held was 〈◊〉 in the Exchequer to answer for 〈…〉 thereof under the title of his 〈◊〉 as the Bishop of every 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 till Queen Elizabeth's time was by Law chargeable for the coll 〈…〉 of 〈◊〉 granted by the Clergy within his Dâ—ocess yet certainly as the Bishop 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 any power to give for or tax his 〈◊〉 no more could or did any great Lord of the Fâ—â—â—ither jure t 〈…〉 or 〈◊〉 tâ—tionis charge or give away the 〈◊〉 of his free T 〈…〉 who were independent in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 solummodo 〈◊〉 this P 〈…〉 not well observed and understood 〈◊〉 late Authors has caused the 〈◊〉 about the T 〈…〉 〈◊〉 representing the 〈◊〉 in Parliament 5. 〈…〉 held of the King in Capite yet very considerable in number and all the Citizens and Burgesses should till 49 H. 3. either be totally excluded from being any part of the Generale Concilium Regni or Parliament or else by a Law of which there is not the least footsteps in History or Law were for so many Ages to be represented by the Tenants in Capite only in Parliament the transcendent Power of which Council in Conjunction with the King as Head thereof Sir Thomas Smith that great and learned man who was Secretary and Privy-Councellor to our famous Queen an old Parliament-man when he comes to write of the Parliament and its largeness of Power says thus In Comitiis Parliamentariis posita est omnis Augustae absolutae que potestatis vis quippe quemadmodum Robur virtus Angliae dieuntur in Acie residere Parliamentaria Comitia veteres leges jubent esse irritas novas indueunt praesentibus juxta ac futuris modum constituunt jura posseâ—siones hominum privatorum commutant spurios Natalibus restituunt Cultum divinum sanctioribus corroborant pondera mensuras variant incerti juris contreverâ—â—as dirimunt ubi nihil lege cautum fuit censum agunt Capitationes vectigalia indicunt delictorum gratiam faciunt afflictas Majorum sceleribus perditas familias erigunt vitae nâ—â—isque potestatem in cos obtinent quos ad hujusmodi disquisitiones Princeps advocaverat atque ut concludam breviter quiâ—quid in Centuriatis Comitiis aut in Tribunitiis Populus Romanus efficere potuisset 〈◊〉 omne in Comitiis Anglicanis tanquam in Coetu Principem populumque represent ante commode transigitur Interesse enim in illo conventu omnes intelligimur â—ujuâ—cunque amplitudinis status aut dignitatis Princepsve aut Plebs fuerit sive per se ipsum hoc fiat five per procuratorem nam omnibus peraeque gratum esse oportet quâ—â—quid ex Senatusconsulto Parliamentario profectum est 6. It is observable that the Prescription of Progenitores Regis in the Record of the Prior of Coventry tempore E. 3. did expresly extend to the Reign of H. 3. his great Grandfather and higher too so that I had good authority and warrant to say before that when the Burgesses of St. Albans in the Parliament 8 E. 2. affirmed That they and their Predecessors sicuâ— caeteri Burgenses de Regno as the rest of the Burgesses of the Kingdom had totis retroactis temporibus in all times past in the time of F. 1. Pregenitorum suorum and of His Progenitors sent Two Burgesses to every Parliament they had as well as other Boroughs of England sent Burgesses to the Generale Corailium or Parliament before mentioned in the 17th year of King John Grandfather to E. 1. at least and so by clear evidence before 49 H. 3. From the aforesaid Authorities and Reasons we may with good consequence conclude 1. That the People or Commons of England from the time of the Norman Conquest till 49 H. 3. were not represented in the Commune Concilium Regni or Parliamâ—nt by such only as held of the King in Capâ—â—e 2. And that the Commons or People 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 â—â—â—in to be represented by Knights Citizens Burgesses and Barons of the Cinque Ports in the said 40 H. 3. And now I shall subjoin some material Records relating to my former Discourâ—â— Inter Communia de Term. Trin. Anno 7 E. 2. Adhuc Recorda PJn nomine Poliarcâ—t Jesu Christi salvatoâ—is mundi totiusque Creature Creatoris cujus Divino Dominatui quique donatores debito servitio subnixe deserviunt cujus etiam omnipotentatui universi potentatus obsecundari examussim preproperant quia bonitas ejus bon 〈…〉 atis est incomprehensibilis miseratio inter minabilis dapsilitas bomtatis ineffabilis longanimitas quoque super pravorum nequitias quantitatis prosixitate cujusâ—ibet longior qui coâ—idiaâ—â—s admonitionibus religiosam conversationem duccntes monet ut pie Seâ—tando justitiae culturam non eam deseren dolinquant quin potius perseverabilt instantia in ejus cultura ut permaneant patâ—rno affectu hortatux qui nihilomâ—nus eadem affectione mandat peccatoâ—ibus ut resipiscant a suis iniquitatibus convertentes quia eorum execratut mortem ejus amoris stimulo fide suffultus cujus largifâ—ua miseratione Ego Cnut Rex totius Albionis Insule aliarum nationum plurimarum in Cathedra Regali promotus cum Consilio decreto Archiepiscoporum Episcoporum Abbatum Comitum aliorumque omnium fidelium eligi sanciend Atque perpeti stabilimento ab omnibus confirmandum ut Monasterium quod Biadricesworth Nuncupatur sit per omne evum Monachorum gregibus deputatum ad inhabitandum ab omni Dominatione omnium Episcoporum Comitatus illius funditus liberum ut in eo Domino servientes Monachi sine ulla inquietudine pro statu Regni Domini prevaleant precari Placuit etiam mihi hanc optionis electionem roborare privilegio isto in quo indere prccepi libertatis donum quod jam olim Edmundus Rex occidentalium SaxonnÌ„ largitus est suo equivoco pro nanciscenda ejus gratia mercede aeterna scilicet Edmundo Regi Martiri quod bone
adjornatur ulterius usque quindenam Sanctae Trinitatis eo statu c. ad quem diem venÌ„ datus est ei dies ulterius usque octabas Sancti Michaelis anno viz. decimo nono Regis hujus ea FINIS Spelm. Concil Tom. 1. p. 34. Erac Beltaunia viginti octo Civitatibus quondam nobiliâ—â—imis insignita praeter Casteila innumera quae 〈◊〉 ipsa muris turribus portis ac seris eraut instructa â—â—rmâ—â—simis 〈◊〉 Erâ—l Hâ—â—t 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Câ—◠〈◊〉 Xiphilin è Dione Cassio p. 601. impress Basiliae Spâ—â—m Con 〈…〉 Toâ—â— 1. p. 126. Idem Tom. 1. pag. 219. â—ed Eccles. Histor. lib. 1. Antiquit. Britanniae p. 75. Parliamentum Synodus magna nuncupatur Somnâ—â—i 〈◊〉 Malmeâ—b lib. 3 p. 56. l. 24. 〈…〉 m. Gloss. 〈◊〉 Gemotum â—ol 261. Camd. Britan. in 8 o. impress 1586. fol. 63. Lambard de priseis Anglor Legibus Cap. 8. sol 139. Bracton 〈◊〉 134. Coke 12. Rep. sol 65. Plouden Commen sol 236 237. 〈◊〉 Conâ—ilia pag. 39. 397. Chron. â—oâ—annis Br 〈…〉 pton Col. 841. I 〈…〉 er Commu 〈…〉 de Term. S 〈…〉 ae 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 7 〈◊〉 2. p 〈…〉 R 〈…〉 Domini Thesaur in Sâ—â—â—caâ—io rema 〈…〉 Chaâ—â—a Regis 〈◊〉 will Malmâ—b de Gestis Reg. Anglor l. 2. pag. 4â— b. 〈◊〉 16. â—g 42. l. 21. Lib. 1. Mat. 〈◊〉 pag. 〈◊〉 〈…〉 A 〈…〉 Lamberdum S 〈…〉 Review of his History of Tythes Sir â—ohâ— Da 〈…〉 Reports in his C 〈…〉 of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 4â— Camd. Britan. Spelmans Glossary verbo Drenches pag. 184. Shaâ—d in Caâ— in â—tin Temp. E. 3. fol. 143. b. Johannes Shardelowe unus Justiâ— de Banco Rot. Pat. 16 E. 3. Parâ— 1. m. 2. In ore gladii saith he Regnum adeptus sum Anglorum devicto Haraldo Rege cum suis complicibus qui mihi regnum cum providentia Dei destinatum beneficio concessionis Domini cognati mei gloriosi Regis Edwardi concesaâ—â— conati sunt aâ—sâ—rre c. Chart. 〈◊〉 in inspex Part. 7. 1â— E. 4. membr 26 MS. penes meipsum 〈…〉 〈…〉 〈…〉 Mainâ—â—â—sh de Gest. Pontif. pag. 154. b. 〈◊〉 Concil Tom. 2. pag. 3â—1 342. 〈◊〉 Pi 〈…〉 is 〈◊〉 saith Pag. â—â—8 nulli Gallo datum quod Anglo cuiquam injustè sterit ablatum Sâ—ldeni ad Eadmâ—rum Spiceleg pag. 190. Net 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Conquest 〈◊〉 pag. â—â—5 257. 〈…〉 Sâ—â—â—â—ns Titles of Honor pag. 580. â—em pag 523. Mat. 〈◊〉 in â—â—ta Sanct◠〈◊〉 Abbat 〈…〉 pag. 48. Mat. Pare in vita 〈◊〉 Abbat 〈…〉 〈◊〉 l. 3â— Hoviden pars prior pag. 260. Mat. Paris in â—â—â—a S. Aâ—bani Abbatum pag. 48. * Naturalium Mirror of justices Chap. 1. pag. 9. De Eventibus Anglia Lib. 5. sol 2681. Col. 1 2. â—eâ—â—aâ— Dorob Act. Pont. Cantuar p. 1653. 〈◊〉 5. Relat. 〈◊〉 primi ad 〈◊〉 tractat de 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 pag. 194. 〈◊〉 Tiâ— of Honor pag. 58â— Ex Carâ—â—lario Coenobii 〈◊〉 in Bibliotheca Câ—tton sub Eâ—â—igie 〈◊〉 A. 3. Provincia 〈◊〉 Co 〈…〉 〈◊〉 Tiâ— of Honor pag. 2â—◠〈◊〉 Gloâ—â— Tiâ— Provincia pag. 4â—â— Parliaâ—â—ntum Synodus 〈◊〉 â—gn◠〈◊〉 S 〈…〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 3. fol. 60. Eadmâ—◠〈◊〉 vita 〈◊〉 2. sol 13. l. 5. An. Dom. 1187. 〈…〉 Hoveden pars prior pag. 264. Lin. 40. b. * 〈…〉 ruined 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1. Rot. Parl. 1 〈◊〉 4. Art 1â— Pultons Stat. 20 E. 3. sol 137. King James's first Speech to his first Parlialiament in England Pulton Stat. 1 Jacobi cap. 2. sol 1157. King Charies the First 's Declaration to all his loving Subjects published with the advice of his Privy Council Exact Collectious of Declaraâ—ons pag. 28 29. Mat. Par. A. D. 11â—0 pag. 55. l. 20. In 〈…〉 itio ne qui Magnates viz. Comes Baro Miles seu aliqua alâ— notabiâ—â—s persona transeat ad partes transmarinas Roâ— Câ—aus 3 E. 2. m. 1â— dorâ—o Sie igitur istâ— modo Williâ—â—â—o â—ortuo 〈…〉 rtas frater 〈◊〉 in 〈◊〉 contra inimicos fibi infestos in guerra sua occupatus est in codem tempore iâ—te Ro 〈…〉 s semper contrarius adeo innaturalis extiterat Baroni bus Regâ—â— Arglie quod plenario consensu consilio totius Communi 〈…〉 s Râ—gâ—â— imposuerunt ei illegitimitatem quod non fuerat procreatus de legitimo Thâ—râ— willielmi Conquestoris unde unanimi assensu suo ipsum recutarunt pro Rege omnino recusaverunt Hâ—nricum fratren in Regem 〈◊〉 Henr. de Knighton Coll. 2374. Cap. 8. l. 14. LL. Guliâ—â—â—ni primi Lamb. sol 175 176. Hac etiam Carta habeatur apud Mat. Paâ—is An. Dom. 1118 and 1213. Carta moderaâ—ioni â—â—odi magni siâ—â—lli Anno 〈◊〉 â—ahannis Ex veteâ—â— Registro in Archivis Cantuar. Archiepiscopi Rot. Pat. 〈◊〉 H. 3. m. 12. Cake 2. Instir. sol 79. Rastals Stat. 1 E. 3. LL. G 〈…〉 ni primi Lâ—â—â— sol 175 176. Camd. Britanin 8. De ordin Angli e sol 61. Wâ—â—â— Malmesb. Histor. Novel lib. 1. pag. 101. l. 15. b. Hoveden pars posterior pag. 282. l. 13. MS. vita Thoâ—e Archiepiscopi Cant. in Bibl. Cotton Sâ—lâ—eâ—s Titles of Honor fol. 585. Carta moderationis seodi magni sigilli Mat. Westâ—â— pag. 397. l. 57. Rot. Pat. 50 H. 3. m. 3. dorso Rastalls Stat. pag. 12. Mat. Wâ—â—â—m sol 393. l. 1. Dâ— Hâ—ylins stumbling Block pag. 189. Rot Parl. 40 E. 3. n. 78. Mat. 〈◊〉 An. 1245. p. 191 197. Malmisb lib. 〈◊〉 pag. 56. Oratio Regis Henrici ad Anglos Mat. Paris in vita H. 1. pag. 62 63. Inhibitio nèqui Magnates viz. Comes Baro Miles seualiqua alia Notabilis persona transeat ad partes transmarinas Rot. Claus. 3 E. 2. m. 16. dorso Rot. Parl. 8 E. 2. n. 233. Pro Burgenses de Sanâ—â—o A 〈…〉 Who sent Burgesles to Parliament 28 E. 1. 35 E. 1. 1 〈◊〉 2. 2 E. 2. 5 E. 2. P 〈…〉 's 4. part of Parliamentary Wriâ—s pag. 〈◊〉 Those Rolls lost or destoyed The Statute of Articuli Cleri made the next year after this Record cells us that there were divirsa Parliamenta temporibus Progenitorum suorâ—â— Regum Angâ—â—â— Coke 2. Instit. 〈◊〉 618. Respons est per Concilium Nota Rolls of Summons to Parliament were extant this very Parliament Rot. Claus. 8 E. 2. m. 25. Selden's Titles of Honor fol. 604 605. It appears by the Patent Roll of 26 E. 3. that there were Parliamenta and Summons to Parliament temporibus Progenitorum ante annum 49 H. 3. Rot. Pat. 26 E. 3. Pars 1. m. 23. Rot. Pat. 15 Joh. Pars 2. m. 2. In the antient Subsidy Rolls we often meet with the Tenants in antient Demesne in Parliament and giving Subsidies and it is the opinion of my Lord Hobart sol 48. that by continuance of time they were discontinued and it may be one reason thereof was that it was an ease granted them by the King in favour of their labour of the Earth Vide Rot. de 20. 15 Ed. 2. apud Northampton An. Regni sui primo à Laicis concessis Rot. de 15. Burgorum Regi