Selected quad for the lemma: england_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
england_n	allegiance_n	king_n	oath_n	2,942	5	7.6429	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A25460	Fides Catholica, or, The doctrine of the Catholick Church in eighteen grand ordinances referring to the Word, sacraments and prayer, in purity, number and nature, catholically maintained, and publickly taught against hereticks of all sorts : with the solutions of many proper and profitable questions sutable to to [sic] the nature of each ordinance treated of / by Wil. Annand ...	Annand, William, 1633-1689.	1661 (1661)	Wing A3218; ESTC R36639	391,570	601

dayes again observed p. 257. VI. Whether it might not be an acceptable service to have an annuall fast for the crimes lately acted in England p. 259. Of a Feast p. 260. Questions I. Whether the feasts of the Church Catholick differ from those of the Church of Rome p. 270. II. Whether the Festivals of the Church of England may lawfully be observed p. 271. III. Why are bonefiers made in England upon the feast of the fifth of November p. 174. IV. Whether the time of a martyrs death be a proper time for feasting p. 275. V. Whether the feast of Philip and Jacob be not prophaned p. 276 Of Church or Temple p. 279. Questions I. Whether those places may be consecrated p. 287. II. Whether those places may be termed holy p. 289. III. Whether such Churches as have been erected by Romanists may be used by Catholicks p. 290. IV. Whether at a Christians entry into those place he may performe his devotion p. 292. V. VVhether it be lawfull to have musick in our Churches p. 294. Of ministerial ordination p. 290. Questions I. VVhether ordination may better a Ministers gifts p. 300. II. VVhether a Minister may renounce his ordination p. 301. III. VVhether the ministerial office be to continue alway in the world p. 302. IV. VVhether it be lawfull to hear an unordained man preach p. 304 V. VVhether an ordained person may have an office in the Common-wealth p. 306 Of Catechising p. 309. Questions I. VVhether or how catechising differs from preaching p. 315. II. Whether preaching be to be preferred before it p. 316. Of preaching p. 319. Questions I. VVhether Gos●el preachers ought to have a setle● maintenance p. 325. II. VVhether an Heretical or upstart Teacher may be known from the true p. 330. III. VVhether a preacher once setled in a place may leave that place p. 332. IV. VVhether it be expedient to permit one to preach constantly or weekly in a place that hath neither orders from the Church nor charge of the people p. 339. V. VVhether he that is a Gospel Teacher may lawfully own civil titles of honour p. 336. Of a conferrence p. 329. Questions I. VVhether private or night meetings may lawfully be upheld p. 344. II. VVhether it be lawfull for Christians when they meet to make merry one with another p. 344. III. VVhether the conferences or private meetings lately used in England were agreeable to the power of Godlinesse p. 349. Of Admonition p. 351. Questions I. VVhether a heathen may not be admonished p. 359. II. VVhether admonition be alike to be given to all Ibid. Of Excommunication p. 360. Questions I. VVhether reformed Churches are legally excommunicated by the Pope p. 366. II. VVhether Kings ought to be excommunicated p. 367. III. VVhether Excommunication debars from all society of the Church p. 371. Of Singing p. 373. Questions I. VVhether it be lawfull to sing Davids Psalmes in a publick congregation p. 377. II. VVhether those Psalmes containing direfull Imprecations ought to be sung or how with a conscience they may be sung p. 379. Of the Sacraments p. 380. Questions I. Whether these five Sacraments added by the Church of Rome be Sacraments p. 381. II. VVhether the effects of the Sacraments depend upon the worthinesse of the Minister p. 384. III. Whether or how the Sacraments differ from the scriptures p. 386. IV. VVhether the Sacraments of the old differ from those of the new Testament p. 387. V. VVhether two Sacraments be sufficient under the Gospel p. 388. Of Babtisme p. 389. Questions I. VVhether Dipping be essentiall unto Baptisme p. 400. II. VVhether Infants ought not to be baptised p. 404. III. VVhether baptisme is or ought to be readministred p. 412. IV. VVhether witnesses at baptisme according to the Law of the Church of England be to be approved p. 413. V. VVhether the Cross at baptisme according to the Law of the Church of England be to be approved p. 415. Of Conformation p. 420. Questions I. VVhether confirmation be a standing Ordinance in the Gospel p. 426. II. VVhether the Church might not be advantaged by the restoring of confirmation p. 429. Of the Communion p. 431. Questions I. VVhether the Communion ought often to be received or how often p. 447. II. VVhether the Church of Rome hath reason to keep the Communion cup from the people p. 448 III. VVhether kneeling be a gesture lawfull to be used at the Communion p. 451. IV. VVhether it be expedient to keep prefixed times for Administration of the Communion and if offerings be lawfull p. 453. V. VVhether it be a sin to receive the Communion in a mixed congregation and if private examination be necessary p. 455. Of Prayer p. 471. Questions I. Whether men by Industry may obtain a promptnesse in prayer p. 512. II. VVhether the wicked be bound to pray p. 515. III. VVhether the set forms of Prayers used by law in the Church of England be lawfull p. 516. IV VVhether there be not vain repetitions in those formes p. 529. V. VVhether it would be convenient to alter any part of those formes p. 532. Of an Oath p. 535. Questions I. Whether swearing be an ordinance of or under the Gospel p. 538. II. Whether the oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy required by the King of England c. May lawfully betaken p. 540. Curteous Reader be pleased to take notice that these bookes following are Printed for and sold by Edward Brewster at the signe of the Crane in St. Pauls Church yard 1661. Bp. Williams Right way to the best Religion wherein at large is explained the Principle heads of the Gospel in foll Dr. Iermin Chapline to King Charles the first his phrastical Meditations by way of Commentary upon all the Proverbs foll Mr. Elton his Commentary upon 7.8.9 Romans foll Mr. Prinnes Hidden works of Darknesse brought to Light foll Mr. Ball of the Nature and life of faith 40. his large and small Catechise 80. Mr. Bentharns Christian conflict shewing the difficulties and duties armor and speciall Graces to be exercised by every Christian Souldier 40. Mr. Baxter of Crucifying the world by the Crosse of Christ. 40. A Collection of severall Sermons preached before the Parliament 40. Mr. Cawdrey of the inconstancy of the Independent way with Scripture and it self 40. Severall Sermons of Mr. Paul Bayns Mr. Calamys Sermons Compleate Mr. George Newton his Elaborat exposition on Iohn 17. foll Mr. Randoll on the Church 40. on 8. Roman 40. Mr. Stalham against Quakers 40. against Anabaptists 40. Dr. Sclator on 4. Romans Mr. Vdall on the Lamentations Mr. Ieremiah Whittakers Sermons 40. A vindication of the Presbyteriall Goverment and Ministry CHAP. 1. Of the Church 1 Thes. 1.1 Paul and Sylvanus and Timotheus unto the Church of the Thessalonians c. INtending to speak of the nature of some despised Ordinances of the Church of Christ we hold it expedient if not necessary to take our Rise from hence by unfolding the nature of that Church whose practice we

as appeareth by the second argument 5. It would give a fair opportunity for taking away the wh●●● I desire no● to reflect upon the actions of some men whose gravity is venerable and piety exemplar yet it is worth our consideration that when his Majesty out of free grace did indulge his subjects with their own liberty touching the Crosse in baptisme and wearing of the Surplice except in Collegiat and Cathedral Churches and Colledges what effect did it produce but embolden some to petition his Majesty that the Surplice might not be enjoyned there also expede Herculem by this we may judge what an alteration may do to cancell such or such a phrase out of such or such a service would but open their mouths to beg a blotting out of the whole prayer and therefore it were fittest ●o let the prayer stand or to prorouge the alteration and in the mean time to command these men to instruct the people touching the nature of the Common-prayer and then if the people will not be satisfied to proceed to alteration as it shall seeme Good to them in authority For truly notwithstanding what hath been said I may truly say of altering the Common-prayer as St. Paul said of a single life 1 Cor. 7.26 It is good for the present distresse so to be 1. That many able men that are now dissenters might read it with courage and confidence which it might be presumed they would do if it were altered The reason is because in the days of their errour they roved and rayled at the same and cannot now yea dare not touch it with one of their fingers for shame and blushing but when it is in the least altered they will bow and and confess we have done these things which we ought not to have done 2. The book itself as it stands is not of absolute necessity and therefore for the peace of the present age or at least of this year and for to have some quietnesse in the Church by stopping the mouths of men in that particular the book of Common-prayer might in some few things be altered 3. The same ends for which the book was composed at first and for which it is still preserved might be obtained by an alteration how ever it were fit that the deprovers of that book and the dispisers of them that use it were looked after CHAP. 2. Of an Oath SWearing being an ordinance of God and by many being made a part of prayer we shall speak of it by way of appendix to the foregoing ordinance and that breifly There is a vow and there is an oath A vow is properly that kind of oath that is made by man Immediatly to God whether publick as is probable that of Abraham was Gen. 14.22 or private as that of Iacobs was Gen. 28.20 An oath is properly that kind of vow made directly to man sometimes made by God unto him who swears by his great name Jer. 44.26 by his right hand Isa. 62.8 by his life Isa. 49.18 and somtimes it is made by one man to another In or by the name of God Thus David did swear unto Bath●heba by the Lord God of Israel 1 King 1.30 and Gideon As the Lord lives Judg. 8.19 To let passe many distinctions we shall speak of an oath betwixt man and man in matter of judgment and shall see 1. It s nature 2. Its ends 3. It s forme 4. Resolve some questions SECT I. The nature of an oath from reason and Scripture may be thus discovered It is an ordinance of God wherein he is called to bear witnesse to the truth asserted for the ratifying of Covenants or deciding of controversies between man and man It is true that we find swearing used by the Saints before God did appoint and institute it as a law in Deut. 6.13 and 10. and 20. God in those places only rectifying or giving caution that oaths should not be made to any God but himself wicked and heathenish men doing it in the name of Idols When the truth of a thing spoken of is doubted and the covenant that is made cannot be firmly ratified by a ye and nay to prevent further strife and take away the cause of suspition an oath may and doth and did alwayes take place for these and the like causes did Abraham say to King● Abimelech I will swear Gen. 21.24 and Isack did swear Gen. 26.21 and Iacob did swear Gen. 31.53 and David did swear to that Egyptian once 1 Sam. 30.15 and to Ionathan often SECT VII The ends why God did institute this part of worship are these cheifly 1. For the glory of his own name he looks upon it as an affront to his Majesty to swear by any God but himself Ier. 12.16 he being only able to search the heart punish the offender protect the innocent and also being every where present and therefore alone sees the contract and hears the promise which are necessary conditions in witnesse bearing 2. For the greater confirmation of the thing promised or attested to take a way all cause of doubt in the least degree thus God did swear in his holynesse to David Psal. 89.35 and the Angel by him that created heaven Revel 10.6 and St. Paul to vow that before God he lyed not Gal. 20.1 Yea this made God swear to Abraham that he would blesse him Heb. 6 13. That no ground might be left of desponding or calling in question the thing promised or affirmed 3. For the putting to an end all striffe and contention among men there would be but affirming and denying now an oath puts a stop to that Heb. 6.16 It s true a man may falsly swear an oath and if it can be known or proved there is a punishment for him that so doth yet this is an ordinance for that purpose designed and therefore not to be thrown off though by some Misused SECT 3. In swearing men verily ought to swear by the greater Heb. 6.17 and therefore an oath is to be made 1. By no creature Mat. 34.35.36 Iames 5.12 2. By God only Ier. 12.16 and to him after this manner 1. Reverendly with fear Eccles. 9.2 2. Cautelously with care Gen. 24 5. 3. Lawfully when Authority requi●es it Exod. 22.10 11. we shall find that Besides the magistrates c●ll or authori●y there are three things that makes an oath lawfull Ier. 4.2 these are when the oath is made 1. In truth from a certaine assurance of the thing promised or reality of thoughts of him that promiseth or from a kn●wledge of the truth of that which is attested 2. In judgment out of prudence or deliberation not rasl●n●●s ignorance or passion 3. In righteousnesse for the ●lory of God the finding 〈◊〉 truth composing of differences not out of f●aud 〈◊〉 or cousenage SECT 4. Questions Resolved Quest. 1. Whether swearing be an ordinance of or under the Gospel Quest. 2. Whether the oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy required by the King of England c. May lawfully

be taken Quest. 1. Whether swearing be an ordinance of or under the Gospel There are them that live about us and among us who denies that swearing is any part of Gospel worship and therefore though called thereunto refuse least they should sin but erroneously For 1. Swearing was no part of the Ceremonial law but used long before Moses and the ends of it are morall and therefore it is not abolished by the death of Christ. 2. It is prophesyed that the Church of the Gentils shall swear by the Lord and by the God of truth Isa. 65.16 Ier. 4.16 Implying that whereas they did swear by Baal and other false gods they should by knowledge be brought from that Idolatry and give that point of worship to the God of Heaven who alone is the true God 3. By a holy Apostle it is frequently done even by him who was an eminent preacher of the Gospel viz. St. Paul an oath is nothing but a calling of God to witnesse of the truth of that which is done or spoken that it may be received with the greater belief now how often doth that eminent servant of the Lord Jesus deliver himself in the very substance of an oath as God is my witn●sse Rom. 1.9 God is my record P●il 1.8 God is my witnesse 1 Thes. 2.5 10. God knoweth 2 Cor. 11 11 31. Before ●od I lie not Gal. 1.20 I say the truth in Ch●isti●n Christ I lie not Rom. 9.1 As the truth of Christ is in me 2 Cor. 11.10 I speak the truth in Christ and lye not 1 Tim. 2.7 All which are as substantial oaths as any we read of in the o●d ●●●pensation 4. Even in the close of the Gospel we find a holy Angell to swear Rev. 10.6 we pray that the will of God may be done by u● as it is done by the ho●y Angels and hear we have an An●ell for greater certainty sealing his threatning by an oath From these reasons we may without errour conclude that the o●dinance of swearing is in full force and power under the Gospell to all intents and purposes any thing that our adversaries can b●ing to the Contrary notwithstanding Those texts Math. 5.34 and Iames 5.12 speaks of swearing in our common communication and of such oathes as are sworn by the creatures as may appear by the contexts not of Judicial swearin● o● any other kind of oathes when necessity and authority draws men to it for clearing of the truth and ending of controversie against which the Gospel speakes not one word but confirms it by severall passages yea St. Paul writing to the Hebrews says Heb. 6.16 That an oath for confirmation is to men an end of all strife not that it was but it is q.d. while I am writing and preaching now when the found of the Gospell is gone over all the world is an oath the end of strife and that not to some only but to men i.e. to all sorts of men whether Jew or Gentile now had it been a sin to have used an oath under the Gospell for that end we should have heard of it in this most proper place or in some other And if any will be contentious let them consider that Pauls before God I lye not 1 Gal. 20. and the Angells by him that lives for ever is more then yea yea and yet who dare reprove either of them of sin To this doctrine consents the reformed Churches of Helva Art 30. of Ausp Art 16. of England Art 39. the Art itself is this Art 39. of the Church of England As we confesse that vain and rash swearing is forbidden Christian men by our Lord Iesus Christ and James his Apostle so we judge that Christian religion doth not prohibit but that a man may swear when the Magistrate requireth in a cause of faith and Charity so it be done according to the Prophets teaching in Iustice Iudgement and truth Quest. 2 Whether the Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy required by the Kings of England c. of their Subjects may lawfully be taken That Covenants or oaths in cases of necessity or suspition may be made by the subjects of a land to their lawful Prince appears by that Act of Iehoiadah at the Coronation of King Iehoash 2 King 11.17 where we have the footsteps of a Coronation and allegiance oath but to come to the matter in hand either of these oaths may lawfully be taken For 1 Swearing is a Gospell Ordinance and therefore under the Gospell may be performed being ratified taken and used by a holy Apostle and blessed Angell 2 There is nothing in them oaths that is contrary to the word of God God who made the heavens is only called to testifie the reallity of the intentions 3 The taking of them gives assurance to his Majesty of his Subjects faithfulnesse and loyalty and indeed as the case now stands he may be suspected of disloyalty that will not satisfie the law in that particular 4. It is but equall that subjects swear to defend his Majesties honours and prerogatives since he hath sworn to maintain his subjects rights and properties Next swear not at all the grand objection is his Majesties supremacy But 1 It is under Christ none acknowledgeth him as absolute head of the Church that being his sole prerogative who is King of Kings and it would be considered whether God hath not made as good and as many Laws touching the government of the State as he hath for that of the Church yet who will thence conclude that the Magistrate is not supreame in civill affairs that is next immediately under God For no otherwise is he head that is governour of the Church 2 It is only to exclude the Popes Authority His holinesse at Rome looks upon all Kings and Emperours as his Vassals and servants and did he not exalt him above all that are called Gods he would want one mark of the Antichrist 1 Thes. 2.4 by the way they being called Gods we are to know that none on earth no no Presbytery their superior nor contain the Pope therfore pretending a power over the Church making himself or giving out himself as head of all civil Ecclesiastical officers and withall making the Church to be so absolute a distinst body from the state that no state officer whether the King though he only be supream ought in the least to meddle with it or if he do to be excommunicated or deposed for his presumption this power is by this Oath taken from the Pope and given to him that is the true as the Pope makes the Church to be so absolute a distinct body from the state as that the state hath nothing to do with it or in it there are them in our dayes to be quit with the Pope that would have no Church officer in the least to meddle with the state supposing such an absolutnesse in the one that it hath no coherence with or dependance upon the other in this absolute sence the