for Matters meerly of Religion and in particular For meeting together meerly for matter of Religion Doubtless their Answer would have been given with one general Voice That it was not Lawful and that it was against the Rule of Christ and the Law of Nature Quod Tibi non vis fieri Alteri non feceris Do not unto another what thou wouldst not have done unto thy self And that true it is the Jews who Persecuted the Lord of Life and put him to Death for matter of meer Religion did alledge for their Justification That they had a Law and that by their Law he ought to Dye But that that Law and all Laws of that Nature were against the Law of God And that the Christians had no such custom nor the Churches of Christ is I think a most undeniable thing These Ages by the Agreement of all were esteemed the purest Ages of Christianity Religion being then most Pure when the Professors of it were most Poor And if any one shall conceive that the Christians of those Ages would have given any other Answer contrary to what I have here framed for them and shall give a convincing Reason for such his Apprehension I shall confess my mistake In the mean time I must say That I cannot see what other answer they could have given but what must have justified the Persecutions against themselves to have been innocent on the part of the Persecutors who believed those first Christians to Err in Religion and to be Disturbers of the Peace and Government of their Countries and their Meetings to be unlawful Assemblies And much more Innocent on the part of the inferiour Magistrates who took care to put those Laws in Execution they being as much obliged in all civil Respects to put in Execution the Laws of their Superiours as our Inferiour Magistrates are obliged to the Execution of our Laws and they gave the same Reasons And the same is to be said in the Case of the Persecution of our Lord Christ as seems very clear from that Prayer which he offered for his Persecutors Father forgive them they know not what they do here then is a Principle of Christianity undivided In the next place We are to consider Christianity in England when divided only into two distinct Parties viz. Protestants and Papists and when the Protestants had made a Sub division amongst themselves here This I take to be in the times of K. Hen. 8. K. Edw. 6. Q. Mary and part of the Reign of Q. Elizabeth for though there were diversities of Opinions amongst Protestants as well here as in other Countries even in the first beginnings yet they were not divided into Parties being every-where upon the Defensive In the time of K. Hen. 8. which I intend to instance in both Parties were persecuted The Case stands thus That King at his coming to the Crown found the whole Nation in a quiet possession of Popery and holding it as an Article of their Faith and the Principle whereon they believed the Unity of their Faith depended that The Pope was the Supream Pastor and visible Head of Government next under Christ of the Catholick Church of Christ of which the then National-Church of England was a Member The King had defended this Article by Writing so vigorously against M. Luther that the Pope had for that very work conferred upon him the Title of Defender of the Faith to be enjoyed and used by him and his Successors for ever After this by Act of Parliament this Supream Pastor this Visible Head was thrown off and this King put in his place so far as concerned the Church of England by the Title of Supream Head of the Church of England annexed to the Crown and this by a Law 26 Hen. 8. C. 1. And then by another Law 26 Hen. 8. C. 13. it was Enacted That if any by Word or Writing should attempt to Deprive the King of the Title of His Royal Estate he should be adjudged a Traytor This change of the Headship of the Church was and is truly at least in England a Protestant Doctrine and undoubtedly there is no Protestant whatsoever but approves the casting off the Popes Headship as conformable with the Doctrine of Protestants And upon the latter of these two Laws divers suffered Death for their denying the Kings Supremacy This was the first step made in England from Popery towards Protestancy And the Vigorous Execution of this latter Law encouraged several Protestants from Forreign parts to come into England not doubting but to have a Liberty to Exercise their Religion here and it gave confidence to many of the Subjects of England to receive and to others to entertain good thoughts of Protestancy being perswaded that after the shedding of so much Blood as had been shed here upon that Occasion England would never any more admit of the Article of the Popes Supremacy and consequently would every day make greater steps from that Church of which the Pope was owned to be the Supream Pastor And certain it is that Protestancy upon this Occasion also made its entrance into England and gained Ground here and such if not by open application to the King for that purpose yet at least in their Hearts desired a Toleration and to be admitted to Preach and Exercise their Religion here without being Persecuted for their so doing so that their Principle was at that time at least against Persecution for meer Religion But Protestancy being now taken notice of to grow another Law was made 31 Hen. 8. for setling unity of Opinion in the six Articles therein named by which the denyal of Transubstantiation and several other Doctrines therein named are Enacted to be punished with Death And now Persecution in England for matters of meer Religion grew sharp and high so that it is observed by our Historians that upon one and the same day some who were Professed Papists were put to Death for denying the Kings Supremacy which was a Protestant Article And some who were professed Protestants were put to death for denying Transubstantiation which was an Article of the Papists So that at this time the Government could neither be said to be Popish nor Protestant but both Parties were Persecuted most severely for matters of meer Religion And he who should then have said to either Party in justification of the Proceedings of the Magistrate in the Execution of either of those Laws That that Party did not then suffer for any matter of meer Religion but for breaking of the Peace in breaking of the King's Laws would certainly have been taken not to have understood those Laws or the cause of their then Suffering And now suppose each of these Parties separately interrogated when thus under Persecution for Afflictio dat intellectum Is it lawful to Persecute and to make and Execute Laws for the Inflicting of Pains and Penalties upon quiet and peaceable People for matters of meer Religion for it seemed a time to teach both Parties an
daily do involve us in Is it not more calm Judgment to say That the Disordinate Passions of K. Henry the VIII hurried him into those Cruelties which he committed than to impute them to the Principles of any Religion which he profess'd Is it not more becoming us to say that an over-zealous Passion of Fears which our first Reformers had in the time of K. Edw. the sixth made them apprehend that they could not put Popery out of its Possession otherwise than by force and consequently led them unwarily into practices which were contrary to their True Faith then to admit the Charge laid on them by the then Persecuted Papists That Persecution for meer Religion was the first Protestant Principle upon which Protestancy laid its first Politick Foundation in England Were it not more Ingenious to attribute the Cruelties which were inflicted in Q. Mary's time to the Passion of Fear in that Queen and of Fear and Covetousness in her Bishops that nothing could secure her against New Rebellions from the Protestants nor fix the Bishops in their re-gain'd Possessions but Examples of the utmost rigour then to labour to fix those Barbarous Cruelties as a Principle upon the Religion of the Queen Is it not more Charitable to assign all the harsh Laws made and executed in the times of Queen Elizabeth King James and in the several succeeding times since by the Government avowedly Protestant to the Fear Ambition Revenge or other frail Passions cover'd generally under the specious Titles of Reason of State then to give the World a just Ground to charge those Crueltie upon a Principle of Protestancy This we must do or which is as much to our Dishonour we must give a just Ground to the most Civiliz'd Nations of the World to charge those past Barbarities exercis'd so long in England upon the People of our Nation to the Cruelties of our English Natures For what other thing can Forreign Nations impute it unto when they shall observe the same Persecution continued for near one hundred and forty years under all the various Forms of Religion which we have had each Party renouncing the Cruelties to proceed from any Principle of the Religion own'd by that Party yet exercising in Fact what they renounce to be their Faith. But my Charity doth not rest here it compels me to make yet one step further and since it is not to the Dishonour of our Nation I hope none will be displeas'd with it As I am verily perswaded that all those Penal Laws which have been made in this our Nation for the inflicting of Pains and Penalties for matters of meer Religion have not had their Original from any Principle of any of those Religions which have been profess'd by any of those Powers or Governments by which they were made but ought to be imputed to the Passions of those who made and caus'd them to be put in Execution And that a false Reason of State or zeal in Church-men gave those Passions leave to work even against the Religion which every Party Persecuting Profess'd so do I most confidently believe that the True Principles of the common Christianity which every Party own'd and true Reason of State grounded upon those true and commonly own'd Principles restrain'd all and every the respective Parties by whom those Laws were made from all Intentions of having all or any of those Laws rigidly Executed so that those who had from time to time and who still have the Executive and Interpretative Power of those Laws vested in them have always understood and do still continue to understand those Laws not to have been intended by the Legislative Power to be strictly and rigidly or constantly executed My Reason is that had this been otherwise All of All Parties except one who at some time had been in Power must have been e're this totally Butcher'd or destroy'd and our poor Country so far Depopulated as to have become a Prey to some of our Potent Neighbours For even in Queen Mary's times thousandes escaped that never sled and had private Meetings but the most Eminent were Cruelly used I know some there are who have imputed the remiss Execution of these unkind Laws to the Generous Good Nature which is found in the generality of our Nation which abhors Cruelty and hath always a compassion for those who are under Persecution and which well appears to any who reflect upon the tenderness of our Courts of Justice and of the generality both of our Magistrates and our Juries in all the Countries in England and how they have comported themselves under the several Circumstances of past Times when they have been call'd upon and Provok'd yea Threatn'd and endeavour'd to have been forc'd into a Spirit of Persecuting Others there are who have taken the great unwillingness in all sorts of persons to be active in the Execution of these Laws to proceed from the innate zeal that is in every English man to preserve the Liberties and Properties of their Fellow Subjects as well as their own and that they have observ'd that Liberty and Property were never any way so much Entrench'd upon violated and destroyed as by these Cruel Laws of Persecution for meer Religion So that every man considering when he sees his Neighbour though differing in Judgement from himself Persecuted and destroyed for what ought to be call'd rather his mistake then his Fault for no man can believe against his Judgement or take an Oath against his Conscience without sin that though this be his Neighbours turn this year it may be his own turn the next year or next Reign and no mans Life Liberty or Property can be secure in case such Laws be Executed but only such men who have a Conscience fitted for all Changes of Government and for every Religion that is uppermost and who for that reason are as unfit to be Trusted by their Neighbours as by the Government But though I take it to be very true that this natural inclination to Mercy and pity and this real zeal which all men have for the preserving of Liberty and Property may have been great helps to keep off or mitigate the severe Execution of these Laws of Persecution for meer Religion yet when I well consider the great power and Influences which the Supreme Authority always hath upon the Subjects and particularly upon all the Magistrates in general who are always persons nominated and appointed by the Supreme Authority and must be therefore suppos'd to be such in whom the Supreme Authority always Confides as to the due Execution of what the Supreme Authority intends to have Executed I think it will Naturally follow that a forbearance of the rigid Execution of these Laws ought to be chiefly imputed to the Religion and true Christian policy of the Supreme Authority and we ought to believe that though a false Reason of State did sometimes permit Humane Frailty to make such Laws as were contradictory to the true Laws and Principles of
A LETTER FROM A GENTLEMAN in the CITY TO A GENTLEMAN in the COUNTRY ABOUT THE Odiousness of Persecution WHEREIN The Rise and End of the Penal Laws for Religion in this Kingdom are consider'd Occasioned by the late Rigorous Proceedings against Sober Dissenters by certain Angry Justices IN THE COUNTRY It is the Part of the Christian-Religion to Suffer and not to make People Suffer for Religion Tertul. Apol. Printed in the YEAR 1687. THE LETTER SIR THE News of a Persecution meerly for a matter of Religion at this time a day when the whole Nation appears professedly to dislike it and the giving countenance to Informers who are the Pest of every Nation and the common Enemies of Property to the Prejudice of Peaceable and Trading People makes your Friends who have had notice of your late Troubles suspect that there is something in your case more than ordinary Had this fallen out in some remote Country where no Informer had ever yet appeared we might have conceived that through Ignorance that sort of Devil might have been mistaken for an Angel of Light and that upon his bare Averrment some well-meaning Persons even against their own Experience might have been induced to mistake their Peaceable Neighbours for Dangerous Incendiaries and unworthy to enjoy their own proper Goods But to see that sort of Creature concerned a Country so near London and Westminster as not to be capable of knowing what Informers are how detestable their Trade how inconsiderable their Power how generally indigent and dissolute how mean their Skill how little they know more than to subborn Witnesses to commit Perjuries which are discovered to their Confusion is that which raised Wonder in some of your Friends to so great an height that they generally request from your own hand the true state of your Case in all its Circumstances to the end they may know whether there be any thing which can differ it from the common Cases of Persecution meerly for Religion from which the generality of the Country-Gentlemen of England and particularly those of the Country where you live do commonly profess to have as great an abhorrency as they have from Depopulating of Countries which is the Effect that such Persecutions must of necessity produce In the mean time do not I pray take me to be one who think it strange to hear of Troubles what hath been formerly may happen again without Astonishment and you are too well known to be thought to be surprized or afraid Well did that Person consider the Creature Man who distinguished him into two parts viz. the Man and the Beast But it were happy for Mankind if the Beast were less imperious and cruel In truth it is rare to find where the Man is allowed to have any power in Acting every thing seems too much to be governed by the Beast and by the Tyranny of its inordinate Passions and Senses And yet where shall one find a single Person in the World who calls himself a Christian or that Party of Men who desire to be esteemed Christians but he and they will readily grant that Principle Mat. 7. 12. All things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you do even so to them for this is the Law and the Prophets and that other Principle Rom. 3. 8. Let us not do Evil that Good may come to be Gospel-Principles and obliging to all Mankind There is not a Politician or States-man nor a Government any where that owns Christianity to be the true Religion but confesseth That in the Council of the Jews which was assembled in order to the Persecuting of the Apostles for matters of meer Religion Gamaliel advised prudently and according to the Principles of true Religion Acts 5. Let them alone for if this Counsel or this work be of Men it will come to nought but if it be of God we cannot overthrow it least happily we be found even to Fight against God. They will all confess readily when pressed with these charitable and peaceable Principles that the Spirit of Persecuting for meer Religion is a Spirit of Injustice as not doing to others as our selves would be done unto and a Spirit of Diffidence and Incredulity refusing to trust God and his Providence with the Defence and Justification of what is Professed to be of God And yet it is hard to find that single Person and much more to name thaâ— Community or Government amongst Christians now in being whose practice when they have opportunity and power are not contrary to their Principles And not only so but they will take upon them to justifie such practices to be consistent with nay even duties unto which they are obliged by that pure Religion which they take upon them to profess to the whole World. But to the end I may not be esteemed presumptuous or uncharitable in what I here assert and in regard it is impossible to produce evident proofs for what I say as touching single Persons let us a little examine the matter as to Parties and Governments taking this for granted that every particular Party calls it self a true Church or the true Church of Christ If what is here urged of differing Churches shall be proved true the presumption will stand very strong as to single Persons there being no single Person who would be esteemed a Christian but he is in communion or fellowship with some Church which he owns to be the true Church of Christ and by whose Judgment he is willing to be concluded as being a professed Member of it and as taking it for his Principle that every Member of the true Church of Christ ought to be of her Judgment because the Scripture says She is the Pillar and Ground of Truth And though some boggle at this yet nothing is truer than that every Christian Society daily practiseth it Now the better to prepare the way for this intended Tryal we will crave the Liberty first to consider Christianity in the World in general in its first Ages when it was under Persecution for meer matter of Religion and before it gained any civil Power and Dominion From them we shall know what the true Christianity did teach We will then consider Christianity in England when divided only into two distinct Parties viz. The Protestants and the Papists And in the last place We will consider Christianity in England when the Protestants were sub-divided into several Parties viz. The Episcopal or Church of England Protestants the Presbyterians the Independants the Anabaptists and the Quakers and when the Papists were become so small that they were upon the matter inconsiderable and I suppose from these differing times we may hope for a reasonable Information First then Suppose the question put to the Christians of the first and Primitive Times in those first and greatest Persecutions under which Christianity then suffered Is it lawful to Persecute and to make and Execute Laws for the Inflicting of Pains and Penalties upon quiet and peaceable People
Conviction what Party shall be able to clear it self And who knows not that 't is a Christians part to Suffer but never to Persecute I very well know That the Protestants in general who look upon the Papists as their common Enemies do in their Pulpits in their Writings and in all their Addresses to the People charge them with those Rivers of Blood which streamed in the times of Q. Mary and with the Bloody Intentions which those iâ—l Men had in their Hearts who were engaged in the wicked powder-Plot That the first was done by Authority and chiefly by the Popish Bishops That the other though the Fact but of private Persons was never condemned by Authority and Silence is an implyed consent and approbation Do we well consider what the Papists offer by way of Extenuation in answer to these Charges they justifie none of these Facts But as to the first they recommend to us to be considered the circumstances that Q. Mary was in when she came to the Crown All the chief Heads of the Protestant Party had set up and Proclaimed the Lady June duly Queen in opposition to Q. Mary their Lawful Soveraign They had raised an Army against her She was compelled to gain her Right by Force She was a Conqueror And if we will believe them she had not given any Articles which might have obliged her to Pardon any who were guilty of this Usurpation and Treason She was told It was a Confedracy of the whole Party of the Protestants which gave her a ground to suspect that the Protestants held it for a principle That it was lawful for them to take up Arms against and Depose their Lawful Soveraign if of a Religion contrary to him She might by the Laws then in being the same which we have to this day in force amongst us have taken away the Lives of all who were any ways Guilty of endeavouring to Depose her She did not make any one new Persecuting Law which is considerable by which any of those were taken off who were put to Death But being put into fears by her Council that without making great Examples of Justice in all parts of the Kingdom she would be in danger of having new Insurrections made by the Protestants against her she was perswaded that the only way to prevent the sheding of more Blood for the Future was to punish considerable numbers of those who had then actually broken the old Laws of her Kingdom Her Bishops and that is the chief and justest ground of the charge had their Fears and Revenge also in particular They were newly restored to their Bishopricks and Religion of which they had been dispossessed in the Time of King Edward the Sixth They were afraid of being again disturbed and these fears and passions made them take wrong measures They perswaded the Queen that she might as well make Examples of Justice and prevent future Insurrections by punishing those for their Religion who had been Guilty of Treason as if she had punished them for Treason And they urged that by this way she should do her self the greater right and give a proof to the World that she was more offended with Treason committed against Heaven for so they esteemed Protestant Religion than with Treason committed against her self which might be interpreted Revenge They had forgotten the Principles of the true Christian Religion which required to leave unto God to Revenge whatsoever Injuries are done to him and to leave it to God to judge what Injuries were done to him They did not now think of doing unto others as they would that others should do unto them They did not remember the wise advice of Gamaliel before mention'd but giving Ear only to their own Fears and preferring Humane Policies before Gospel-Rules they misled the Queen and took away the Lives of vast numbers of such against whom nothing could be charged but what was matter of meer Religion thereby giving a Just occasion to charge upon their own Religion the Principle of Persecution for meer Religion which those who now profess that Religion here do pretend to disown and abominate And as to the business of the Powder-Plot they pray us to observe that it was the Treason not of the Papists of England but of a few particular persons of Desperate Fortunes and worse Consciences and not without suspition of being drawn into the Snare by their Enemies That upon the most severe Scrutiny which could be made into that business it clearly appear'd that the number of the Offenders was not greater than what happens sometimes to be engag'd in a particular Burglary and not so many as make up the fourth part of a Foot Company of Souldiers That the Villany of that design hath been as fully and generally yea and as publickly decry'd condemn'd and reprobated by the whole party of English Papists of that Age and of all succeeding Ages as any thing can be by a Party in Persecution who have not ever had any opportunities or allowances to act in any case otherwise then each person of the party only in his private Capacity might do and they Appeal to the Justice of those who profess to have the greatest Aversion of all others against the Religion of the Papists whether they will admit it as a rule that the Villanies of some private persons who profess themselves to be in Fellowship or Communion with any Church or people calling themselves Christians may in Justice and ought in Reason to be charged as proceeding from the Principles Doctrines or Religion of that Church or people with which private persons profess to be in Communion or Fellowship They cry out God forbid any such Rule should have credit in the World. On the other side I am not ignorant that the Papists who Esteem the Protestants in general as their mortal Enemies by whom they apprehend themselves to have been depriv'd of what is most dear unto them from the time that the Protestant Religion first gain'd a Preheminency in England are as highly Uncharitable towards the Protestants as these are severe in their Censures towards them They have almost look'd upon the Protestants as the Israelites did upon the Egyptians They charg'd upon them the guilt of all Blood that hath been shed of all the Persecutions which have hap'ned for matters of meer Religion since the first Act of Parliament of that nature made by King Henry the VIII unto this hour Insmuating that what was so Cruelly Acted by Q. Mary's Bishops was occasion'd by the Provocations given in the time of King Edward the VI. and warranted as far as ill Acts can be warranted First by the Non-conformists Retaliations towards the Church of England when subdu'd by them upon the Death of King Charles the I. and then by the Retaliation made to the Non-conformists by those of the Church of England since the Restoration of our present Soveraign In short as the Protestants in general to excuse and justifie themselves labour to cast
Persecution for matters of meer Religion upon the Papists as a Principle of Popery so the Papists are as Industrious to perswade the World that it is a Principle of Protestancy I might here by way of Apology and Extenuation refer the Papists as they do the Protestants to consider of Circumstances of times and things which occasion'd their Severities against them as the unruliness which might probably be amongst the people in the time of K. Edw. the VI. to see their Religion alter'd as they conceiv'd by the Protector And in Q. Elizabeth's time besides the rensentment which the Protestants had of the Cruelties which were exercis'd against them in Q. Mary's time It is certain the Papists did not look upon Q. Elizabeth to have any Right to the Crown she having been declar'd by the Judicial Sentence and judgement of Arch-Bishop Cranmer to be Illegitimate and the Marriage between K. Henry VIII and Anne of Bullen her Mother being by the same Sentence declar'd absolutely void ab Initio and that Sentence confirm'd by Act of Parliament 28 Hen. 8. c. 7. So that the Papists took Q. Mary of Scotland to be the Rightful Heir to the Crown and Rightful Queen and Q. Elizabeth was constrain'd by great necessity to keep them under but Apologies are not proper to be made on the behalf of those who have the Authority towards those who are subjected And as the Protestants in general and the Papists reproach'd each other reciprocally charging upon each other that Persecution for matters of meer Religion was a Principle of each others Religion so did the Episcopal Protestants and the Non-Conformists The Episcopal Party who first Persecuted the Non-conformists under the general Name of Puritans or Presbyterians affirm'd That their first beginners in Scotland from whence they deriv'd themselves did more than any Party upon Earth Persecute others for matters of meer Religion and had gain'd a Power by their Vsurpation Oppression and Persecution being a sort of people who wanted the very Essentials as they said of Religion viz. A Right Ordination without which as they alleadged there could be no True Church no True Ministery or True Sacraments And that therefore they ought by Penal Laws timely made to be prevented from making Disturbances in England The Puritans to justify themselves denying Persecution for matters of meer Religion to be their Principle or to be lawful labour'd to fix it upon the Church of England as their Principle and as taken up by them from the Papists And as to the particulars charg'd upon those of Scotland they said That whatsoever those of the Reformation had done in Scotland was approv'd and abetted by Queen Elizabeth and the Protestants of England without whose Advice nothing in Scotland had been Transacted and without whose Assistance things had not been so Effected They further said as to the point of Ordination That the Church of England ought not in Reason to account Episcopal Ordination to be such an Essential of Religion as they charged for that if no Ordination could be valid but by Bishops that then it would follow that no Ordination could be valid but from True and Rightful Bishops of the True Church of Christ and then the Ordination of the Church of England would be as invalid as the Ordination of those of Scotland for the Church of England could make out no Succession of Bishops but through the Popish Church which both parties as well those of the Church of England as those of Scotland had condemned and agreed to be a False Church and no True Church of Christ but an Harlot and Anti-christian Thus the Episcopal Protestants and the Puritans charged and recriminated each other the Episcopal Party nevertheless making good their ground so long as they had the Civil Power to support them but when upon the Death of K. Charles the I the Non-conformists gain'd the Civil Power into their Hands the Church of England Party like all Parties oppress'd being under Persecution together with the Papists for matters of meer Religion Did absolutely condemn all such Persecutions as Vnlawful And then the Non-conformists who were at that time sub-divided and branch'd out into several other Parties gave occasion to charge them with the Principle of Persecution for meer Religion and put them to use the same Arguments to clear themselves as the Episcopel Party and Papists had respectively before made use of when the Government was in them to prevail with the World to believe that they abhorr'd the Principle of Persecution for meer Religion and that the Persecutions us'd by them were not for any matters of meer Religion nor in Truth Persecutions but purely Acts of Prudence and doing right to themselves by a just care to keep the Episcopal Party and the Papists out of all possibility of Persecuting them any more for the future But none of them could find any reason of that Nature to excuse the Persecutions which they us'd towards the people called Quakers they could not charge them with ever having Persecuted any Party or Person Yet in Fact both the Non-conformists and the Episcopal Party did Persecute them in their turns and therefore to prevent being charged for persecuting a quiet People for matters of meer Religion They pretended sometimes that the Quakers were all Mad-men and that they Imprison'd them only to keep them out of the way and to preserve them in peace And those who had gotten the Government would upon that Title claim the right of judging what persons were Mad as they did always of judging what was Truth and what Errour At other times they pretended to punish the Quakers as Blasphemers and the Persecutors being the only Judges of what was Blasphemy under their Government they might make what they pleas'd Blasphemy When they grew asham'd of this Charge they then pretended that the Quakers were conceal'd Papists and that every one who spoke or utter'd any thing in their Meetings whether Man or Woman was a Jesuit Disguis'd It was clear that the Quakers suffer'd highly and it was as clear there could not with any shew of Truth be any thing charg'd against them but what was matter of meer Religion Now upon the whole Business what shall such a person judge of these matters who esteems himself in danger of being judged by God if he shall make any rash Judgment Shall we take for a sufficient solid Proof the Charge of an Exasperated Enemy against an Enemy who hath provoked him and this in a matter of so great a Concernment as to render not a single Person but a whole Party unworthy to live This were to judge against the Rules of common Justice and Righteousness as well as to Sin against Charity And this way of judging would render each Party the Quakers only excepted to be Guilty and to give a just Title to each Party where it hath the possession of Power and Government to put to Death all of the other Parties For though we in England should refuse
to admit the Charge of the Papists here to be a sufficient proof against the Protestants in so great a matter yet let us not deceive our selves so far as to suppose that in Popish Countries the Charge of Papists against Protestants would not be taken to be at the least as valid as the Charge of Protestants will be taken to be against Papists here Shall we go another way and say that in regard every Party takes it self to be the only good and true Christian and in regard we see every Party when in Power practising this thing and persecuting the other when in their Power for matters of meer Religion that therefore every Party agrees in this That it is Lawful for those who are the true Christians to Make and Execute Penal Laws against such as are Erroneous Christians and to Inflict Pains and Penalties upon them for matters of meer Religion that is for Errors held by them as Doctrines of Religion But neither will this be reasonable or convenient for this will also give Title to those who have the Actual Power and are in the possession of each respective Government in the Christian World to put to Death and destroy all within their respective Jurisdictions whom they judge to be Erroneous Christians And this will be also to Entitle the Civil Magistrate in every Christian Country to the absolute and uncontroulable right of judging between Truth and Error so as to have no appeal from his definitive Judgment and to entail against common Sense an Infallibility in the Civil Magistrate of every Country of determining in matters of Faith and Religion I say against common Sense for Christianity teacheth us that there can be but one true Faith and if this Power of judging should be allow'd to the Civil Magistrate there would be as many Faiths as there are Governments amongst Christians That would be true Faith in one Country and the denyal of it punishable with Death which in another Country would be an Error and a False Faith and the affirming of it punishable with Death It would also be to justify not only what the Papists in England but what both the Papists and Protestants in all other parts cast as a Charge upon our Nation That the only Rule of Faith in England is the Parliament of England that nothing is true Christian Doctrine in England nor any Translation or Sense or Interpretation of Scripture a true Translation or Sense or Interpretation of Scripture in England but what is judg'd so to be by the Parliament of England Whereas though in the Statute made 2 3 Edw. 6. c. 1 Entituled An Act for the Vniformity of Service and Administration of the Sacraments throughout the Realm It was affirm'd by that Parliament That the Book of Common-Prayer enjoyn'd by that Statute to be us'd was made by the Aid of the Holy Ghost Yet that very Book was by that very Parliament alter'd and amended as appears by Statute 5 Edw. 6. C. 1. And it hath received several Reformations and Amendments since and was in and by a Parliament in Q. Marys days judged to be Heretical As to my own Judgment in this particular Affair it leads me to another way of reasoning and discoursing I do and I think I am bound in Charity to believe that every Person and Party who professeth Christianity do at least intend to be what they profess and that they do all in their Hearts fully give consent unto all those common Doctrines of Christianity which as standing Principles of that pure Religion were never question'd or deny'd by any sort of Christians such as are those which I have before observ'd Of doing unto others as we would have others do unto us and of not doing Evil that Good may come of it and those others of Loving our Neighbours as our selves yea and of Loving our very Enemies and doing good to them that who hate us and use us despightfully All which when soberly consider'd without Passion or Humane Interest are expresly against all Persecutions for matters of meer Religion and do not only tye up Protestants from destroying of Protestants but even from Persecuting of any sort for any matters of meer Religion as those Commands Thou shalt do no Murther Thou shalt not Steal Thou shalt not commit Adultery and against and tye up all Christians from shedding of Blood Unlawfully and Malitiously and against Rapine and Vncleanness And such do also in their Hearts believe that whatever Counsel or work is of man will fall of it self and that what is of God will stand Maugre all the Persecutions and Oppositions of man and that there is none of them do intend to fight against God or would willingly be found so doing All this being taken by me in my own Thoughts to be most certainly true when ever I come to enquire How then can these things be How can all these Parties among which there are great numbers of Good Sober Judicious and Sincere persons offend against these common Principles of the common Faith of all Christians by making and Executing Penal Laws for matters of meer Religion Immediately adjoyning to this another Question which is And how can so many persons professing to be Christians take revenge by Blood usurp the Goods of their Neighours and commit the Sin of Vncleanness Yet all these were once done by that great and good King and Prophet who was a Man after God's own Heart That which to me Answers this latter Question seems clearly to solve the former That the Beast gets the better of the Man The Passions commit a force upon Reason And Humane Frailty being too weak brings the best of men sometimes though but for a time and careless men oftentimes to contradict their Faith by their Practice until by Afflictions they gain understanding and come to Repentance for the Saving of their Souls This to me seems so evident a Truth that until something more evident shall convince me of my being mistaken in this I should think it as great a Sin against Charity for me to charge it as a Principle of the Religion of any Party professing to be Christians That Persecution for meer Religion is Lawful because I see it practis'd by those who have Power amongst that Party as to charge the same Party to hold it as a Principle of their Religion that Murther Theft and Adultery are Lawful because great numbers of that Party are too often guilty of the practice of those Sins If this way of considering things be not found unreasonable but upon due reflection shall appear to be conformable to the true Principles of Christianity and the Holy Rules and Doctrines of Christ I hope those who are publick persons will forgive me when I wish they would lay it to their Hearts and think well whether it would not be of use to preserve this poor Nation from the further guilt of those additional Injustices and Cruelties which the contrary way of rash Judging must involve and