the same Court or by any of the Iudges Officers or Ministers thereof be from the first day of August in the yeare of our Lord God 1641. clearly and absolutely dissolved taken away and determined and that from the said first day of August neither the Lord Chancellour or Keeper of the great Seale of England the Lord Treasurer of England the Keeper of the Kings Privie Seale or President of the Councell nor any Bishop Temporall Lord Privie Councellor or Iudge or Iustice whatsoever shall have any power or authority to heare examin or determin any matter or thing whatsoever in the said Court commonly called the Star-Chamber or to make pronounce or deliver any Iudgment Sentence Order or Decree or to doe any Iudiciall or Ministeriall Act in the said Court And that all and every Act and Acts of Parliament and all and every Article clause and sentence in them and every of them by which any Jurisdiction power or authority is given limited or appointed unto the said Court commonly called the Star-Chamber or unto allâ— or any the Iudges Officers or Ministers thereof or for any proceedings to be had or made in the said Court or for any matter or thing to be drawn into question examined or determined there shall for so much as concerneth the said Court of Star-Chamber and the power and authority thereby given unto it be from the said first day of August repealed and absolutely revoked and made void And be it likewise enacted That the like jurisdiction now used and exercised in the Court before the President and Councell in the Marches of Wales and also in the Court before the President and Councell established in the Northern parts And also in the Court commonly called the Court of the Duchy of Lancaster held before the Chancellor and Councell of that Court And also in the Court of Exchequer of the County Palatine of Chester held before the Chamberlain and Councell of that Court The like iurisdiction being exercised there shall from the said first day of August 1641 be also repealed and absolutely revoked and made void any Law prescription custome or usage Or the said Statute made in the third yeare of King Henry the seventh Or the Statute made the one and twentieth of Henry the eighth Or any Act or Acts of Parliament heretofore had or made to the contrary thereof in any wise notwithstanding And that from henceforth no Court Councell or place of Iudicature shall be erected ordained constituted or appointed within this Realm of England or Dominion of Wales which shall have use or exercise the same or the like Iurisdiction as is or hath been used practised or exercised in the said Court of Star-Chamber Be it likewise declared and enacted by authority of this present Parliament That neither his Majestie nor his Privie Councell have or ought to have any Iurisdiction power or authority by English Bill Petition Articles Libell or any other Arbitrary way whatsoever to examine or draw into question determine or dispose of the Lands Tenements Hereditaments Goods or Chattels of any the Subiects of this Kingdome But that the same ought to be tryed and determined in the ordinary Courts of iustice and by the ordinary course of the law And be it further provided and enacted That if any Lord Chancellor or Keeper of the great Seale of England Lord Treasurer Keeper of the Kings privie Seale President of the Councell Bishop Temporall Lord Privie Councellor Iudge or Iustice whatsoever shall offend or doe any thing contrary to the purpâ—rt true intent and meaning of this Law Then he or they shall for such offence forfeit the summe of five hundred pounds of lawfull money of England unto any party grieved his Executors or Administrators who shall really prosecute for the same and first obtain judgement thereupon to be recorded in any Court of Record at Westminster by action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information wherein no Essoine Protection Wager of Law Aid Prayer Priviledge Injunction or Order of restraint shall be in any wise prayed granted or allowed nor any more then one Imparlance And if any person against whom any such Iudgement or Recovery shall he had as aforesaid shall after such Iudgement or Recovery offend again in the same then he or they for such offence shall forfeit the summe of one thousand pounds of lawfull money of England unto any partie grieved his Executors or Administrators who shall really prosecute for the same and first obtaine Iudgement thereupon to be Recorded in any Court of Record at Westminster by action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information in which no Essoine Protection Wager of Law Aid Prayer Priviledge Injunction or Order of Restraint shall be in any wise prayed granted or allowed nor any more then one Imparlance And if any person against whom any such second Iudgement or Recovery shall be had as aforesaid shall after such Iudgement or Recovery offend againe in the same kind and shall bee thereof duly convicted by Indictment Information or any other lawfull way or meanes that such persons so convicted shall be from thenceforth disabled and become by vertue of this Act incapable Ipso facto to beare his and their said Office and Offices respectively and shall be likewise disabled to make any Gift Grant Conveyance or other disposition of any his Lands Tenements Hereditaments Goods or Chattels or to make any benefit of any Gift Conveyance or Legacy to his own use And every person so offending shall likewise forfeit and loose unto the party grieved by any thing done contrary to the true intent and meaning of this Law his trebble dammages which he shall sustain and be put unto by meanes or occasion of any such Act or thing done the same to be recovered in any of His Majesties Courts of Record at Westminster by Action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information wherein no Essoine Protection Wager of Law Aid Prayer Priviledge Injunction or Order of Restraint shall be in any wise Prayed Granted or Allowed nor any more then one Imparlance And be it also provided and enacted That if any person shall hereafter be committed restrained of his liberty or suffer imprisonment by the Order or Decree of any such Court of Star-Chamber or othâ—r Court aforesaid now or at any time hereafter having or pretending to have the same or liâ—e jurisdiction Power or Authority to commit or imprison as aforesaid Or by the Command or Warrant of the Kings Maiestie his Heires or Successours in their own person or by the Command or Warrant of the Councell-board or any of the Lords or other of his Majesties Privie Councell that in every such case every person so committed restrained of his libertie or suffering imprisonment upon demand or motion made by his Councell or other employed by him for that purpose unto the Iudges of the Court of Kings Bench or Common Pleas in open Court shall without delay upon any pretence whatsoever for the ordinary Fees usually paid for the same
them and the said agreement or opinion of the greater part of the said Iustices and Barons and the said Iudgement given against the said IOHN HAMPDEN were and are contrary to and against the Lawes and Statutes of this Realm the right of property the liberty of the Subiects former resolutions in Parliament and the PETITION OF RIGHT made in the third yeare of the Reign of his Maiestie that now is And it is further declared and enacted by the authority aforesaid That all and every the Particulars prayed or desired in the said PETITION OF RIGHT shall from henceforth be put in execution accordingly and shall be firmly and strictly holden and observed as in the same PETITION THEY ARE PRAYED AND EXPRESSED and that all and every the Records and Remembrances of all and every the Iudgement Inrolements Entry and proceedings as aforesaid and all and every the proceedings whatsoever upon or by pretixt or colour of any of the said Writs commonly called Shipwrits and all and every the Dependents on any of them shall be deemed and adiudged to all intents constructions and purposes to be utterly void and disannulled and that all and every the said Iudgement Inrolments Entryes Proceedings and Dependents of what kind soever shall be vacated and cancelled in such manner and forme as Records use to be that are vacated Anno XVII Caroli Regis An Act for the prevention of vexatious proceedings touching the Order of Knighthood VVHereas upon pretext of an antient custome or usage of this Realm of England That men of full age being not Knights and being seised of Lands or Rents of the yearly value of forty pounds or more especially if their seising had so continued by the space of three years next past might be compelled by the Kings writ to receive or take upon them the order or dignity of Knighthood or else to make Fine for the discharge or respite of the same Severall Writs about the beginning of his Majesties reign issued out of the Court of Chancery for Proclamations to be made in every County to that purpose and for certifying the names of all such persons and for summoning them personally to appeare in the Kings presence before a certain day to be there ready to receive the said Order or Dignity Vpon returne of which writs and transmitting the same with their Returns into the Court of Exchequer and upon other Writs for further inquiry of the names of such persons issuing out of the said Court of Exchequer Processe by Distringas was thence made against a very great number of persons many of which were altogether unfit in regard either of estate or quality to receive the said Order or Dignity and very many were put to grievous Fines and other vexations for the same although in truth it were not sufficiently known how or in what sort or where they or any of them should or might have addressed themselves for the receiving the said Order or Dignity and for saving themselves thereby from the said Fines Processe and vexations And whereas its most apparent that all and every such proceedings in regard of the matter therein pretended is altogether uselesse and unreasonable May it therefore please your most Excellent Maiestie that it be by authority of Parliament declared and enacted And be it declared and enacted by the Kings most excellent Maiestie and the Lords and Commons in this Parliament assembled and by the authority of the same That from henceforth no person or persons of what condition quality estate or degree so ever shall at any time be distrained or otherwise compelled by any writ or processe of the Court of Chancery or Court of Exchequer or otherwise by any meanes whatsoever to receive or take upon him or them respectively the Order or Dignity of KNIGHTHOOD nor shall suffer or undergoe any fine trouble or molestation whatsoever by reason or colour of his or their having not received or not taken upon him or them the said order or dignity And that all and every Writ or Processe whatsoever and all and every proceeding which shall hereafter be had or made contrary to the intent of this Act shall be deemed and adiudged to be utterly void and that all and every Processe proceeding and Charge now depending by reason or colour of the said pretended custome or writs aforesaid or of any the dependants thereof shall from henceforth cease and stand be and remain discharged and utterly void Any former Law or Custome or any pretence of any former Law or Custome or any other matter whatsoever to the Contrary in any wise notwithstanding I shall conclude this collection at present with the Bill of Attainder past against Thomas Earl of Strafford this present Parliament as I find it printed in the 303. pag. of a book printed for Will. Cook at Furnifalls Inne gate in Holbourne 1641. called Speeches and Passages of this Parliament from the 3. Novemb. 1640. to this instant Inne 1641. which thus followeth The Bill of Atainder that passed against Thomas Earle of STRAFFORD WHereas the Knights Citizens and Burgesses of the House of Commons in this present Parliament assembled have in the name of themselves and of all the Commons of England impeached Thomas Earle of Strafford of high Treason for endeavouring to subvert the Antient and Fundamentall Lawes and Government of his Maiesties Realms of England and Ireland and to introduce an Arbitrary and Tyrannicall Government against Law in the said Kingdoms and for exercising a tyrannous and exhorbitant power over and against the Lawes of the said Kingdomes over the Liberties Estates and Lives of his Maiesties Subiects and likewise for having by his own authority commanded the laying and asseising of Soldiers upon his Subiects in Ireland against their consents to compell them to obey his unlawfull commands and orders made upon paper Petitions in causes between party and party which accordingly was executed upon divers of his Maiesties Subiects in a warlike manner within the said Realm of Ireland and in so doing did LEVIE WARRE against the Kings Maiestie and his liege people in that Kingdome And also for that he upon the unhappie Dissolution of the last Parliament did slander the House of Commons to his Maiestie and did councell and advise his Maiestie that he was loose and absolved from the rules of Government and that he had an Army in Ireland by which he might reduce this Kingdome for which he deserves to undergoe the pains and forfeitures of high Treason And the said Earl hath been also an Incendiary of the wars between the two Kingdoms of England and Scotland all which offences have been sufficiently proved against the said Earle upon his impeachment Be it therefore enacted by the Kings most Excellent Maiesty and by the Lords and Commons in this present Parliament and by authority of the same that the said Earl of Strafford for the hainous crimes and offences aforesaid stand and be adiudged and attainted of high Treason and shall suffer such pain of
arbitrary power like Turkish Janisaries In the rhird place I answer that it is against reason law conscience justice and equity to subject me at one and the same time or any other free Commoner of England under the sting and power of two distinct Lawes and such a bondage as is insupportable and such a snare of intanglement that no mans life whatsoever can be safe or secure under it that I shall be liable to be questioned and destroyed by the common Law of the Kingdome and then be at the wills of mercenarie Turkish Ianisaries in case the common Law will not reach me to be questioned and destroyed by an unjust arbitrary Martiall law and if it can be justly proved against me that I have made any tumults the Law and the ordinarie Courts of justice are open by which and by no other rules and proceedings J ought to be tryed and if it be said or can be proved that J have belied or scandalized the Generall to the taking away of his good name c. yet scandalum Magnatum is not to be tried by Martiall Law nor yet either by the House of Commons or the House of Lords but only alone now the Star-Chamber is down by an Action at cōmon Law ††As is cleare by the Statutes of 3. Ed. 1. 33. 37. Ed. 3. 18. 38. Ed. 3. 9. 42. Ed. 3. 3. 2. R. 2. 5. 12 R. 2. 11. 5. part Cookes reports pag. 125. 13. H. 7. Kelway 11. Eliz. Dier 285. 30. Affiz pla 19. Liev. Col. John Lilburnes Grand Plea of 20. October 1647. pag. 7. 8. by a Jurie of my equals no where else it being a Maxime in Law That wher remedy may be had by an ordinary course in law the party grieved shall never have his recourse to extraordinaries * * See Vox Plebis pag. 38. Lievt Col. Jo. Lilburnes Anatomie of the Lords Tyranny pag 10. And besides for you to proceed with me and to be both Parties Jury and Iudges is a thing that the Law abhorres ††See 8. H. 6. fol. 21. Eliz. Dier 220. Dr. Bonhams case 8. part of Cooks Repots and Lievt Col. Jo. Lilburnes grand Plea pag. 10. In the fourth and last place J answer that the Parliament it selfe neither by Act nor Ordinance can justly or warrantably destroy the fundamentall liberties and principles of the common Law of England * * See Mr. Henry Martins answer to the Scotchpapers called the Independency of England at the last end it being a maxime in law and reason both That all such Acts and Ordinances are ipso facto null and void in law and bind not at all but ought to be resisted and stood against to the death But for them to give you a power by Marshal Law or under any other name or title whatever by your arbitrary tyrannicall wills without due course and processe of Law to take away the Life or Liberty of me or any free Commoner of England whatsoever yea or any of your own Souldiers in time of peace when the Courts of Iustice are all open and no visible declared enemie in Armes in the Kingdome ready to destroy it is an absolute destroying of our fundamentall Liberties and a rasing of the foundation of the Common Law of England ††But besides all this I doe confidently believe that the Parliament never gave power unto the Generall since the wars ended to execute Martiall Law neither doe I believe that some chiefe Executors of Martiall Law have any Legall Commission from the Parliament who never that I could heare of ever gave power unto the Generall of himself to make generall Officers and besides all the Parliament men that are Officers in the Army were as I have been groundedly told formerly taken off by an Ordinance of both Houses which was never repealed since And therfore such a power of Arbitrary Marshall Law cannot justly by the Parliament in time of peace c. be given unto you nor if it were be justly or warantably executed by you And besides both houses themselves by an Ordinance unlesse they alter the whole constitution of this Kingdome can take away the life of no free Commoner of England whatsoever especially in time of peace And therefore that which is not within their owne power to do they cannot by an Order or Ordinance grant power to Sir Thomas Fairfax c. to do it being a Maxime in nature That beyond the power of being there is nor can be no being But it is in the power of the Parliament or the two Houses or the House of Commons themselves as the present constitutions of this Kingdome stands either by Order or Ordinance to take away the life of any free commoner of England * * See Sir E Cooks 2 part institut fo 47 48. 3. part fol. 22. and 4. part fol. 23. 25. 48. 291. all of which bookes are published for good law to the Kingdom by 2. speciall Orders of the present House of Commons as you may read in the last pa. of the second part institut see also the Petition of Right And therefore they cannot by an Ordinance or Order especially in times of peace give power to Sir Thomas Fairfax by Marshall Law unlesse they totally alter the Constitutions of the Kingdome to take away the life or lives of any free Commoners of England which all Souldiers are as well as others ††See the Armies Declaration of the 14. Iune 1647. Book of their Declarations pag. 39. and their Letter from Royston to the Lord Mayor of London of the 10. Iune 1647. which the Printer hath neglected to print in their book of Declarations * and therefore it is absolute murther in the Generall and the Councell of Warre now to shoot to death hang or destroy any Souldier or other Commoner what ever by Marshall Law for which they may be indicted at the Kings Bench barre And therefore J doe the third time as a friend advise you to cease your illegall arbitrary tyrannicall Marshall Law proceedings with me that am no Souldier and so not under the least pretence of your Marshall Iurisdiction least in time to come you pay as deare for your arbitrarie illegall proceedings with me as Sir Richard Empson and Mr. Edward Dudley Iustices did who as Sir Edward Cook declares in his 2. and 4. part of his Institutes where very officious and ready to execute that illegall Act of Parliament made in the 11. H. 7. cap. 3. which gave power unto Iustices of Assize as well as Iustices of the Peace without any finding or presentment by the verdict of twelve men being the ancient birth-right of the Subject upon a bare information for the King before them made to have full power and authority by their discretions to heare and determine all Offences or contempts committed or done by any person or persons against the form ordinance
this expresse command upon them that they shall in any wise set a King over themselves from amongst their brethren and that they shall not in any wise set a stranger over them which is not their brother but saith God he shall not multiply Horses to himself nor cause the people to return to Aegypt that is to say to vassalage slavery or the house of bondage Neither shall he multiply wives to himself that his heart turne not away neither shall he greatly multiply to himself silver Gold And it shall be when he sitteth upon the Throne of his Kingdome that he shall write him a copy of this law in a book out of that which is before the Priests the Levits And it shall be with him and he shall read therein all the dayes of his life that he might learne to feare the Lord his God to keep all the words of this law and these statutes and do them That his heart be not lifted up above his brethren marke that well and that he turne not aside from the commandement to the right hand or to the left Deut. 17 15 16 17 18 19 20. Here is a cleare declaration by God himself that Kings the single greatest of Magistrates are not to walke and act upon the people by the rules of their own wills but by the law of God which is as binding to them as the meanest of the people and for my part I say and aver that that man whether King or Parliament man that declares himself to be lawlesse was never in that condition of Gods creation but of the Divils And pertinent to this purpose is the compâ—aint of our antient English Lawyer Andrew Horne in his Mirror of Iustice in English ch 5. Sect. the first division the first and second pag. 225. where complaining of the abusions of the Common law he saith the first and chiefe abusion is that the King is above the law whereas he ought to be subiect to it as it is contained in his oath Which as Sir Richard Hutton one of his own Iudges in his Argument in Mr. Iohn Hampdens case against Sip-money pag. 32. which argument was made before this Parliaments doctrine was broached saith that by the Kings Oath he agrees to give consent to such lawes as shall in Parliament be propounded for the profit and good of the Kingdome and be further declares that he is to rule and govern thereby see also the petition of Right in the following pages 1. 2 So that by this it clearely appeares that in his own imagination nor the opinion of his Iudges he is neither omnipotent nor unlimited but his office is an office of trust conferred upon him for the good of the people And therefore saith our forementioned Author Andrew Horne ibim the second abuse of the common Law is That whereas Parliaments ought to bee for the salvation of the soules of Trespassors twice in the yeare at London that they are there but very sildome ond at the pleasure of the King for subsidies and collections of Treasure c. And the Act made the first yeare of this Parliament in the 16. of the present King called an Act for the preventing of inconveniences hapning by the long intermission of Parliaments expresly saith Whereas by the Lawes and Statutes of this Realm the Parliament ought to beholden at least once every yeare for the redresse of Grievances c. Which Lawes and Statutes are the 4. Ed. 3. 14 36. Ed. 3. 10. which are printed virbitum in the following discourse pag. 9 12 and which are expresly ratified and confirmed to be duly kept and observed In which Acts the Parliament are prescribed their worke what to doe which is to maintaine the Lawes and redresse the mischiefes and grievances that dayly happen but not in the least to our destroy Lawes unlesse they give us Letter for them nor to make our mischiefes and grievances greater nor to rob and poule the Kingdome of their treasure by taxations Excize c. and then share it by thousands and ten thousands amongst themselves which iâ— expresly against the Lawes of the kingdome for Feesies in trust and they are no more at most by the Law of this Land can give nothing to themselves and therefore their sharing as daily they doe the Common wealths money amongst themselves is no better then absolute state robbery against whom an indictment or an Action of recovery if not of death †For Andrew Horne declares p. 239 that it is an abuse of the common Law that Iustices and their Officers who kill people by false judgeâ—ent be not destroyed as other murtherers which King Alfrid caused to be done who caused 44 Iustices in one yeare to be hanged as murtherers for their false judgâ—ments and page 241 he saith that he hanged Arnold because he saved Boylife who robbed the people by cullour of distresses whereof some were by selling distresses some by extortions of fines c. ought in equity and reason to lye as well as against robbing and cheating servants and stewards And for them for ever to shelter themselves from the lash and stroak of justice or for ever from being called to accompt for all their Cheats Robberies and murthers by getting the Kings hand to an Act to make them an everlasting Parliament no more lyes in the Kings power Justly and legally to do then to give them power to make us al absolute Vassels and Slaves and to destroy all our Lawes libertys and propertys and when they have so done then to cut the throats of all the men in England besides themselves therefore it behoves the people to keep up the interest of a Parliament but yet annually at least to chuse new Parliament ment to call their predicessors to a strick accompt and for my part J conceive that not onely by the rules of equity and reason but by the strength of the Law of the land which requires a Parliament to be chosen and held at least once every yeare the people that are willing in the severall Sheires Cities and Burrowes may call home their Parliament men and send new ones in their places to call them to accompt and to make Laws to punnish such betrayers of their trust as men as full of unnaturalnesse as those that murder and kill their owne fathers which is an act abhorred even amongst bruts and yet this very thing is acted upon us by the grandees amongst our trustees who themselves have told us that it is as old a law as any is in the Kingdom that the Kingdome never ought to be without a meanes to preserve it selfe 1. part book decl pag. 207. pag. 690. And that those things which are evell in their owne nature cannot be the subject of any command or induce any obligation of obedience upon any man by any authority whatsoever 1. par book p. cl pag. 201. pag. 150. And therefore the conclusion that I draw from Gods subjecting of all men equally
this collectio abroad I shall draw towards a conclusion and let my Country men here reape the benefit of the answer I sent to the querys of some of my friends mentioned in the Epistle Dedicatory which was the originall and principall occasion of my compiling this book which thus followeth By the statute of Westminster the first made in the 3. of Edward 1. chap. 26. which you may reade verbatim in the 7. page of the following collection their are no fees due from any free man of England to any Officer of Iustice whatsoever but what they have immediatly from the publique treasure of the Kingdom for ther sallories or wages and it is aginst a Iudges Oath to take any whose oath you may at large read in the 10. page following read also that remarkable page in the merror of Iustice pag. 258. 233. for the proof of this but especially read the marginall notes in the 69. page following and he that exacts any shal by the formencioned statue pay back again twice as much c. but it is true by some latter statues as the 23. Hen. 6. chap. 10. which you may reade verbatim in the 18.19 following pages and 33. Hen. 6.12 and 21. Hen. 7.17 c. there are some small fees to be paid And also Sir Edward Cook in the 1. part of his institutes lib. 3. chap. 13. sect 70. fol. 368. saith such reasonable fees as have been allowed by the Courts of justice of an ancient time to inferior ministers and attendants of Courts for their labour and atâ—tendance if it be asked and taken of the subject it is no extortion But there is none at all due for entring and recording of apperance nor for the removing upon a Certionary But against Sir Edward Cooks opinion in this particular I offer this to consideration that by the Petition of right the King himselfe with all his Lords cannot justifiably lay a penny upon nor take a penny from the meanest man in England without common consent in Parliament and if the King c. the greater cannot doe it then undeniably the Iudges or justices the lesser can much lesse doe it And besides by the same right that under pretence of dues or fees by their arbitrary wills and pleasures they take one farthing from you or me they may take a penny yea a shilling ye a pound yea a thousand pound and so ad infinitum and so Levell and destroy al properrity of meum tuum see for the power of an act of Parliament the notable arguments of Iudg Hutton Iudg Crooke in the case of ship-money but especialy the Parliaments votes annexed to those arguments for which very thing divers of the Iudges in the case of ship-money were this very Parliament impeached of Treason and the Bishops for makeing their cannons by the Kings single authority to binde their Cleargies pursses without authority of Parliament were for that and the like defunct of all their power ††See Mr. Nat. Fines his notable speech against the Bishops Cannons made 1640 and printed in a book called Speeches and passages prsnted for Will-Crook at Furnivals Inne gate in Holborne 1641. page 49. 50. 51. and the house of Commons vote Dec. 15. 1640. ibim page 328. and the statute made this Parliament that abolished Eccelesiasticall Iurisdiction 2. The presentment is often brought in English but it it must be entred and recorded in lattin by the statute of the â—6 Ed. 3. 15. which you may reade in the 12. following page and no processe is to be awarded but af the presentment is entred and recorded in lattin the presentment must mention the offence and so must the writ or processe as clearly appeares in the last foremencioned most notable and remarkable statute see also Sir Edward Cooks second part instituts upon the 29. chap of Magna Charta fol. 51. 52. 53. see Vox plebis page 37 and the merror of Iustice chap. 5. sect 1. division 98. page 238 nay the last author in his 233 page division 71. saith that it is abuse of the Common Law that any plaint is received to be heard without sureties present to testifie the plaint to be true 3. The Iustices siting upon the bench may verbally commit a man for an offence lying under their cognizance but there must be a Mittitur or Commitment entred upon Record See the 14. Henry 7. fol 8. in Sir Thomas Greenes case See also the 70. page of the following discourse 4. The Iustices of peace cannot continue a man bound above two or three Sessions at most and if they continue him more they may aswell continue him for thirteen and so for thirteen score for it is a vexation and the Law gives him remedie by an action of the case against the Iustices wherein they shall be sined to the King for the vexation and pay damages to the partie Plaintiffe 5. An Indictment for extortion must be in the proper County before the Iustices of Oyer and Terminer or Iustices of the peace 6. Vpon an arrest the Officer must declare at whose suit for what and what returne the processe hath see the Countesse of Rutlands case of arrest in the sixt part of Cookes Reports 7. For a Plea against an Indictment for not comming to Church to heare Common Prayer c. It is framed to your hand in the 20 21 22 â—3 pages of my large Epistle to Col. Henry Martin of the 31. of May 1647. called Rash Oaths to which I referre you 8. Thou go you be committed justly and legally be sure as soon as you are committed if possible you can proffer legall Baile in person to those that commit you but for this I wholly referee the Reader to the 70 71 72. pages of the following discourse in which I have given some directions to my Country men how to guide themselves by the rules of the Law of England in all ordinary molestations that can befall them by Knaves malicious men or Tyrants saving in the point of panniling of Iuries upon them in case they come to any triall for their lives c. and for that point I doe wholly referre the Reader to the 24 25 26. pages of my notable book called the Resolved mans resolution where also the cheats and illegallities of Committees procedings are anotamised and to the 1. part of Sir Edward Cooks Inst lib. 2. chap. 12. Sect. 234 fo 156 157 and his 3. part fo 32. 33. My labours herein I desiâ—e may find a courteous acceptation at the hands of my oppressed friends and Country-men and I have my reward and shall therein reioyce and be incouraged for the future improvement of my poore talent to doe them further service Iohn Lilburne From my causelesse captivitie in the Tower of London upon a now account this 17 of Feb. 1647. For upon the 19. of Ian. last the House of Commons committed me to prison as their prisoner for treasonable and seditious practises against the state And
unto the power of the House in committing me J stooped but at their doore desired to be committed by a legall Warrant which by their own Law published in Sir Edward Cooks institutes Votes and Ordinances all warrants of commitments whatsoever ought expresly to containe the certaine particular case wherefore a man is committed and ought to conclude and him safely to keep till he be delivered by due course of Law and for the full proof of this read the 68 69. pages of the following discourse and the 11 12 13 14 15 pages of Mr. Iohn Wildmans late defence called Truths Triumph or Treachery anotamised But if the Warrant be in generall words and be also to keep him during their pleasure and made by the Parliament the prisoner is murthered and destroyed by such an imprisonment For he must either stoop to their wills and so betray his liberties and sin against his own soule or else he must remaine in prison till he starve and rot before any Iudge in Westminster Hall will grant him a Habeas Corpus to bring him up to the barre of Justice either to receive his punishment according to Law or else his liberties as uniustly imprisoned and this made me the other day at the House of Commons to contest for a legal warrant before I would go to Prison but that mercinary Turkish Ianisary Col. Baxster laid violent hands upon me telling me expresly he was not either to reason or dispute the Houses commands but to obey them caused his Soldiers to draw their swords upon me in halling of me away by force violence he stabed Magna Charta the Petition of Right c. to the very heart and soule did asmuch as in him lyes by that act destroy all our Lawes and liberties for if authority must be backt with the sword to put in execution all their unjust commands then farwell all law and liberty forever and accursed be the day that ever the Parliament raised an Army to fight for the preservation of our lawes and liberties if now they convert their power and turne their swords and guns against us by force of armes to destroy our lawes and liberties John Lilburne 6. Feb. 1647. In the third yeare of the reign of Charles King of England Scotland France and Ireland AT the Parliament begun at Westminster the seventeenth day of March An. Dom. 1627. in the third yeare of the reigne of our most gracious Soveraigne Lord Charles by the grace of God of England Scotland France and Ireland King Defender of the Faith c. And there continued untill the 26. day of Iune following and then prorogued unto the 20. day of October now next ensuing To the high pleasure of Almighty God and to the weale publique of this Realme were enacted as followeth The petition Exhibited to his Majestie by the Lords Spirituall and Temporall and Commons in this present Parliament assembled concerning divers Rights and Liberties of the Subiect with the Kings Majesties royall answer thereunto in full Parliament To the Kings most Excellent Majestie HVmbly sheweth unto our Soveraigne Lord the King the Lords Spirituall and Temporall and Commons in Parliament assembled That whereas it is declared aâ—d inacted by a Statute made in the time of the reigne of King Ed. the first commonly called Statutum de Tallagio non concedento a a 34. Ed. 1. chap. 1. That â—o tallage or aid shall be laid or levied by the King or his Heires in this Realme without the good will and assent of the Arch Bâ—shops Bishops Earles Barons Knights Burgesses and other the free men of the Commonalty of this Realme And by authority of Parliament holden in the five and twentieth yeare of the reigne of King Edward the third b b 25. Ed. 3 Rot. Par. it is declared and inacted That from thenceforth no person should be compelled to make any loanes to the King against his will because such loanes were against reason and the franchise of the Land And by other Lawes of this Realme it is provided that none should be charged by any charge or imposition called a Benevolence nor by such like charge c c 25. Ed. 1. 6. 1. Ed. 3. 6 11. R. 2. 9. 1. R. 3. 2. by which the Statutes before mentioned and other the good Lawes and Statutes of this Realme your Subjects have inherited this Freedome That they should not be compelled to contribute to any tax tallage aid or other like charge nor set by common consent in Parliament 1. R. 3. 2. Yet neverthelesse of late divers Commissions directed to sundry Commissioners in severall Counties with instructions have issued by meanes whereof your people have been in divers places assembled and required to lend certaine summes of money unto your Majestie and many of them upon their refusall so to do have had an oath administred unto them not warrantable by the Lawes or Statutes of this Realme * * Oaths Ex Officio unlawfull and have been constrained to become bound to make appearance and give attendance before your privie Councell and in other places and others of them have been therefore imprisoned confined and sundry otherwayes molested and disquieted And divers other charges have been laid and levied upon your people in severall Counties by Lord Lievtenants Deputy Lieutenants Commissioners for Musters Iustices of Peace and others by command or direction from your Maiesty or your privie Councell against the Lawes and free customes of the Realme * * All Magistracy in England is bounded by the law thereof e e 28. Ed. 3. 3. And where also by the Statute called THE GREAT CHARTER OF THE LIBERTIES OF ENGLAND d d 9 H. 3. 29. It is declared and enacted f f 25. Ed. 3. That no free man may be taken or imprisoned St. 37. Ed. 3. 18. St. 38. Ed. 3. 9. St. 42. Ed. 3. 3. St. 17. R. 2. 6. or be disseized of his Free hold or Liberties or his free Customs or he outlawed or exiled or in any manner distroyed but by the lawfull iudgement of his PEERS or by the Law of the Land And in the eight and twentieth yeare of the reigne of King Edward the third e it was declared and enacted by authority of Parliament That no man of what estate or condition that he be should be put out of his Land or Tenements nor taken nor imprisoned nor disherited nor put to death without being brought to answer by due processe of Law Neverthelesse against the tenour of the said Statutes and other the good Lawes and Statutes of your Realme to that end provided f divers of your Subiects have of late been imprisoned without any cause shewed * * Imprisonment without cause shewed is illegall See also Cooke 2. part institutes upon the 29. chap Magna Charta And when for their deliverance they were brought before your Iustices by your Majesties Writs of Habeas corpus there to undergoe and receive as the
resident within the Shire where they shall be chosen the day of the date of the Writ of the summons of the Parliament And that the Kniâ—hts and Esquires and other which shall be choosers of those Knights of the Shires be also resident within the same Shires in manner and forme as is aforesaid Rast pl. fo 446. And moreover it is ordained and established that the Citizens and Burgesses of the Cities and Boroughs be chosen men Citizens and Burgesses resiant dwelling and free of the same cities and boroughs and no other in any wise 7. H. 4. 15. 8 H. 6. 7. 10. H. 6. 2. 23. H. â— 15. The 2. of Henry 5. Chap. 1. and 3. fol. 282. What sort of men shall be Iustices of the Peace FIrst that the Iustices of the peace from henceforth to be made within the Counties of England shall be made of most sufficient persons dwelling in the same counties by the advice of the Chancellor and of the Kings Councell without taking other persons dwelling in forain Counties to execute such office except the Lords and Iustices of Assises now named and to be named by the King and his Councell 1. Ed. 3. 16. 34. Ed. 3. 1. And except all the Kings chiefe Stewarde of the Land and Seigniories of the Duchie of Lancaster in the North parts and in the South for the time being 13. R. 2. 7. Chap. 3. Of what estate those Iurors must be which are to passe touching the life of man plea reall to forty markes damages ITem the King considering the great mischiefes and disherisons which daily happen through all the realm of England as well in case of death of a man as in case of freehold and in other cases by them which passe in enquests in the said cases which be common Iurors and other that have for little to live upon but by such inquests and which have nothing to loose because of their false oaths whereby they offend their conscience the more largely and willing thereof to have correction and amendment 2. H. 7. fo 13. 10. H. 7. fo 14. 9. H. 5. fo 5. 10. H. 6. fo 7. 8. 18. 7. H. 6. fo 44. Dyer fo 144 Cook Inst part 1. 272. a. Rast pl. fo 117. hath ordained and established by assent of the Lords and Commons aforesaid that no person shall be admitted to passe in any enquest upon tryall of the death of a man nor in any enquest betwixt party and party in plea reall nor in plea personall whereof the debt or the damage declared amount to forty marks if the same person have not Land or Tenements of the yearly value of forty shillings above all charges of the same so that it be challenged by the party that any such person so impanelled in the same cases hath not Lands or tenements of the yearly value of forty shillings above the charges as afore is said 28. Ed. 3. 13. 8. H. 6 29. The 8. of Henry the 6. Chap. 7. fol. 304. What sort of men shall be choosers and who shall be chosen Knights of the Parliament ITem Whereas the election of Knights of Shires to come to the Parliament of our Lord the King in many Counties of the Realm of England have now of late been made by very great outragious and excessive number of people dwelling within the same Counties of the Realm of England of the which most part was of people of small substance * * This is a Statute of bondage and lesse of liberty 1. H. 5. 1. 10. H. 6. 2. 6. H. 6. 4. 11. H. 4. 1. 23. H. 6. 15. Rast pla fo 440. and of no value whereof every of them pretended a voice equivalent as to such elections to be made with the most worthy Knights and Esquires dwelling within the same Counties whereby manslaughters riots batteries and divisions among the Gentlemen and other peoples of the same Counties shall very likely rise and be unlesse convenient and due remedy be provided in this behalf Our Lord the King considering the premisses hath provided ordained and established by authority of this present Parliament that the Knights of the Shires to be chosen within the same Realm of England to come to the Parliaments of our Lord the King hereafter to be holden shall be chosen in every County of the Realm of England by people dwelling and resident in the same Counties whereof every one of them shall have land or tenement to the value of forty shillings by the year at least above all charges and that they which shall be chosen shall be dwelling and resident within the same Counties And such as have the greatest number of them that may EXPEND FORTY SHILLINGS by yeare and above as afore is said shall be returned by the Sheriffes of every County Knights for Parliament by Indentures sealed betwixt the said Sheriffes and the said choosers so to be made And every Sheriffe of the Realm of England shall have power by the said authority to examine upon the Evangelists every such choosâ—â— how much he may expend by the yeare And if any Sheriffes reâ—urn Knights to come to the Parliament contrary to the said Ordinance the Iustices of Assises in their Seasions of Assises shall have power by the authority aforesaid thereof to enquire And if by enquest the same he found before the Iustices and the Sheriffes thereof be duly attainted that then the said Sheriffe shall incuraâ—â— pain of an hundred pound to be paid to our Lord the King and also that he have imprisonment by a yeare without being leâ— to mainprise or baile And that the Knights for the Parliament returned contrary to the said Ordinance shall loose their wages 10. H. 6. 2. Provided alwayes that he which cannot expend forty shillings by yeare as afore is said shall in no wise be chooser of the Knights for the Parliament And that in every writ that shall hereafter goe forth to the Sheriffes to choose Knights for the Parliament mention be made of the said Ordinances The 18. of Henry the 6. Chap. 11. fol. 332. Of what yearely value in lands a Iustice of Peace ought to be ITem whereas by Statutes made in the time of the Kings noble Progenitors it was ordained that in every County of England Justices should be assigned of the most worthy of the same counties to keep the peace and to doe other things as in the same Statutes fully is contained 1. Ed. 3. 16 18. Ed. 3. 2. 13. R. 2. 7. 17. R. 2. 10. which Statutes notwithstanding now of late in many Counties of England the greatest number have been deputed and assigned which before this were not wont to be whereof some be of small behaviour by whom the people will not be governed nor ruled and some for their necessity doe great extortion and oppression upon the people whereof great inconveniences be likely to rise daily if the King therefore doe not provide remedy The King willing against such inconveniences to provide
have forthwith granted unto him a writ of Habeas Corpus to be directed generally unto all and every Sheriffs Gaoler Minister Officer or other person in whose custody the party so committed or restrained shall be and the Sheriffs Gaoler Minister Officer or other person in whose custody the party so committed or restrained shall be shall at the return of the said writ and according to the command thereof upon due and convenient notice thereof given unto him at the charge of the party who requireth or procureth such Writ and upon security by his own bond given to pay the charge of carrying back the prisoner if he shall be remanded by the Court to which he shall be brought as in like cases hath been used such charges of bringing up and carrying back the prisoner to be alwayes ordered by the Court if any difference shall arise thereabout bring or cause to be brought the body of the said party so committed or restrained unto and before the Iudges or Iustices of the said Court from whence the same writ shall issue in open Court and shall then likewise certifie the true cause of his deteinour or imprisonment and thereupon the Court within three Court dayes after such return made and delivered in open Court shall proceed to examine or determine whether the cause of such Commitment appearing upon the said return be just and legall or not and shall thereupon doe what to iustice shall appertain either by delivering bailing or remanding the prisoner And if any thing shall be otherwise wilfully done or omitted to be done by any Iudge Justice Officer or other person afore mentioned contrary to the direction and true meaning hereof That then such person so offending shall forfeit to the party grieved his trebble dammages to be recovered by such meanes and in such manner as is formerly in this Act limitted and appointed for the like penaltie to be sued for and recovered Provided alwayes and be it enacted That this Act and the severall Clauses therein contained shall be taken and expounded to extend only to the Court of Star-chamber and to the said Courts holden before the President and Councell in the Marches of Wales and before the President and Councell in the Northern parts And also to the Court commonly called the Court of the Dutchy of Lancaster holden before the Chancellor and Councell of that Court And also in the Court of Exchequer of the County Palatine of Chester held before the Chamberlain and Councell of that Court And to all Courts of like Jurisdiction to be hereafter erected ordained constituted or appointed as aforesaid And to the warrants and Directions of the Councell-board and to the Commitments restraints and imprisonments of any person or persons made commanded or awarded by the Kings Majestie his Heires or Successours in their own person or by the Lords and others of the Privie Councell and every one of them And lastly provided and be it enacted That no person or persons shall be sued impleaded molested or troubled for any offence against this present Act unlesse the party supposed to have to offended shall be sued or impleaded for the same within of two yeares at the most after such time wherein the said offence shall be committed Anno XVII Caroli Regis An Act for the declaring unlawfull and void the late proceedings touching Ship money and for the vacating of all Records and Processe concerning the same VVHereas divers Writs of late time issued under the Great Seal of England commonly called Shipwrits for the charging of the Ports Towns Cities Boroughs and Counties of this Realm respectively to provide and furnish certain Ships for his Majesties service And whereas upon the execution of the same Writs and Returnes of Certioraries thereupon made and the sending the same by Mittimus into the Court of Exchequer Processe hath bin thence made against sundry persons pretended to be charged by way of contribution for the making up of certain sums assessed for the providing of the said Ships and in especiall in Easter Tearm in the thirteenth yeare of the Reign of our Soveraign Lord the King that now is a Writ of Scire facias was awarded out of the Court of Exchequer to the then Sheriffe of BVCKINGHAM-SHIRE against IOHN HAMDEN Esquire to appeare and shew cause why hee should not be charged with a certain summe so assessed upon him upon whose appearance and demurrer to the proceedings therein the Barons of the Exchequer adiourned the same case into the Exchequer Chamber where it was solemnly argued divers dayes and at length it was there agreed by the greater part of all the Justiâ—es of the Courts of Kings Bench and Common Pleas and of the Barons of the Exchequer there assembled that the said Iohn Hambden should be charged with the said summe so as aforesaid assessed on him The maine grounds and reasons of the said Iustices and Barons which so agreed being that when the good and safety of the Kingdome in generall is concerned and the whole Kingdome in danger the King might by writ under the Great Seale of England command all his Subiects of this his Kingdom at their charge to provide and furnish such number of Ships with Men Victualls and Munition and for such time as the King should think sit for the defence and safegard of the Kingdome from such danger and perill and that by Law the King might compell the doing thereof in case of refusall or refractarinesse and that the King is the sole Iudge both of the danger and when and how the same is to be prevented avoided according to which grounds reasons aâ— the Iustices of the said courts of Kings Bench CoÌ„mon Pleas the said Barons of the Exchequer having bin formerly consulted with by his Majestis command had set their hands to an extraiudiciall opinion expressed to the same purpose which opinion with their names thereunto was also by his Maiesties command inrolled in the Courts of Chancery Kings Bench Common Pleas and Exchequer and likewise entred among the Remembrances of the Court of Star-Chamber and according to the said agreement of the said Iustices and Barons judgement was given by the Barons of the Exchequer that the said IOHN HAMPDEN should be charged with the said summe so assessed on him And whereas some other Actions and Processe depend and have depended in the said Court of Exchequer and in some other Courts against other persons for the like kind of charge grounded upon the said Writs commonly called SHIPWRITS all which Writs and proceedings as aforesaid were VTTERLY against the Law of the Land Be it therefore declared and enacted by the Kings most Excellent Maiestie and the Lords and Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by the authority of the same That the said charge imposed upon the Subiect for the providing and furnishing of Ships commonly called Ship-money and the said extraiudiciall opinion of the said Iustices and Barons and the said Writs and every of
death and incurre the forfeitures of his Goods and Chattells Lands Tenements and Hereditaments of any estate of free-hold or Inheritance in the said Kingdoms of England and Ireland which the said Earl or any other to his use or in trust for him have or had the day of the first sitting of this present Parliament or at any time since Provided that no Iudge or Iudges Iustice or Iustices whatsoever shall adiudge or interpret any Act or thing to be Treason nor in any other manner than be or they should or ought to have done before the making of this Act and as if this Act had never been had or made Saving alwayes unto all and singular persons and bodies politique and corporall their Heires and Successors others then the said Earl and his Heires and such as claim by from or under him all such right title and interest of in and to all and singular such of the said Lands Tenements and Hereditaments as he they or any of them had before the first day of this present Parliament any thing herein contained to the contrary notwithstanding Provided that the passing of this present act and his Maiesties assent thereunto shall not be any determination of this present Sessions of Parliament but that this present Session of Parliament and all Bills and matters whatsoever depending in Parliament and not fully enacted or determined And all Statutes and Acts of Parliament which have their continuance untill the end of this present Session of Parliament shall remain continue and be in full force as if this Act had not been Now after these small collection of Statutes I shall give you some generall heads of things that I conceive are very necessary for you to know for the preservation of your lives liberties and estates in this murdering robing plundering and law and liberty destroying age and because tythes are of such concernment to al the honest nown substantive free men of England and so dayly a grievance to the conscientious and moral iust men of this Kingdome by reason of the Priests and persons coveteous indeavouring to rob the people of there truly come by goods which they have no right unto either by the Lawes of God reason equity or nature against which that you may be the better fortified I shall insert here the plea and answer of William Browne unto the bill of the parson of Stepny with some marginall notes upon it and some other things depending upon it The plea thus followeth The Plea answer of William Brown one of the defendants to the Bill of complaint of Josuah Hoyle intituled by the said bil Doctor of Divinity and vicar of the Parochiall church of Stepney alias Stichen heath in the County of Midlesex pretended debtor to the Kings Majesty that now is THe said defendant by protestation not confessing nor acknowledging any thing in the said bil of coÌ„plaint material against the said defendant to be true but rather devised set forth of purpose to put him this defendant to wrongfull vexation costs and charges and expences in Law for plea saith that by the plantifes own shewing forth the complainant hath no just cause to sue this defendant upon his said bill in this honouable Court neither is this defendant compellable to answer the same for that the said complainant by his said bil alleadgeth and saith that there is and time out of minde where of the memory of man is not to the contrary hath been an ancient custome and usage that the inhabitants of the said parish have alwayes paid unto the Vicars of the said parish for the time being a composition rate for milch Cowes orchards gardens lands and sowes and oblations of poultry as in the said bil of complaint is set forth which if any such custome and usage be the same is triable at the COMMON law ††This is a mistake of the councell that drew the plea for tythes by the statute law of this Kingdome are only recoverable in the ecclesiasticall courts and not at the common law as fully and clearly appeares by the 1 of Ed. 6. chap. 13. and the ecclesiasticall Iurisdiction is totally abolished by act of Parliament this present Parliament anno Caroli Regis 17. so that by law the Parsons can recover no tythes and not in this honourable Court upon the said bill of Complaint And therefore this Defendant humbly prayeth judgement of this honourable Court whether he shall make any further answer to the said complainants Bill of Complaints Neverthelesse if he this Defendant shall be ordered to make any further or other answer unto the said Complainants Bill of Complaint then and not otherwise this Defendant all benefit and advantage of exception to the uncertainties insufficiencies of the said Complainants said Bill still to this Defendant now and at all times hereafter saved for further answer thereunto this Defendant saith That he verily beleeveth it to be true that for some hundred of yeares while the Kingdome groaned under the Papall yoake and was subiect to the Popes supremacie Tyths and certaine manner of Tything and other oblations were exacted and taken by the PAPALL Biâ—hops Parsons Vicars and Curates of many Parishes and of a great part of this Kingdome untill â—he Popes supremacie and iurisdiction within this kingdome and all appeale to the sea of Rome were abrogated and annulled by divers severall Statutes * * Penalty for maintaining the authority of the Bishop of Rome 5. Eliz. chap 1. Penalty to draw any subjects from their â—bedience to the King to the Roman religion Idem And this Defendant verily beleeveth that the Popish Bishops Parsons and Vicars and their substitutes since retained and continued in the Church of England did afterwards receive and take tythes and certain manner of tything and other oblations of several parishes within this kingdome for their wages Cure and reading the Book of Common Prayer †And this Defendant saith â—hat the said Inhabitants of the said Parish in the said bill mentioned or any of them did never â—ay or were ever accustomed to pay unto any Vicars of the said parish the said composition for milch Cowes Orchards Gardens Lands and Sowes or other oblations as in the said bill is and set forth or any other composition or rate for the same but only to such Vicars thereof as were made and ordained Ministers by the Bishops some or one of them ††The names functions and stiles of Bishops are taken away Ord. 9. Octob. 1646. and their Episcopall iurisdiction and power with their tythes vicarages personages c. And what composition or rate for milch Cowes Orchards Gardens Lands or Sowes or other oblations the said Inhabitants or any of them did pay unto any of the said Vicars for the time being of the said parish in the said Bill mentioned since the abolishing of the Popes supremacie the same was payed for officiating reading the book of Common Prayer and administring the Sacraments
had beene Engaged to oppose them pay they could not have cashiered one Soldier that joyned in the Engagement for they promised each to other not to suffer themselves to be divided before the ends of their Engagements was accomplished 2. The station of the Members of this new councel in this Army was different from the station of al Mâ—mbers of former Councels by the Engagement there was to be two Soldiers in no office out of every Regiment to have voices equall to the Generall himself in all votes a thing never practised nor heard of in an Army serving the will of a State 3. The number of the Members of this Councel is different from al customes and rules of Martiall Discipline In this Councel there was to be but foure of every Regiment with the General Officers which concurred thus this Councel differed from all Customes in any Army in respect of the Members whereof it was constituted 2. This new Councell differed from the rules of Warre in the manner of its constitution this was not to be constituted by the Gens wil or according to the degrees or offices of men in thâ— Army but in a Parliamentary way by the Soldiers free election the Gen. is bound from calling an Officer to the Councell unlesse he be chosen by his Regiment 3. Reason proving the dissolution of Martiall Government in the Army The Gen. in associating with the Soldiers did in the very Engagement give away all his power of exercising Martial Disciplin he engaged to them they to him that they would not suffer themselves to be disbanded or devided till the ends of their uniting were obtained Hereby he divested himselfe of his arbitrary power of cashiering Officers and Soldiers at his pleasure the cashiering one Officer or Soldier which associated with the body of the Army in the engagement is a disbanding at deviding on part of the Army from another which he the Army mutually â—â—ciprocally engaged neither to attempt nor suffer likewise by this engagment he divested himself of power to command the Soldiers to march to what distance he pleaseth one from an other this is an other kinde of dividing the Army which he enaged neither to effect nor suffer 4. Reason proving the dissolution of the Government of the Army by Law Martiall The whole Army by agreement or joynt consent cashiered all Officers at New maket Heath that would not associate with them and engage to stand for common right and freedom though against the Parliament and so they houted divers Officers out of the field unhorsed some and rent their cloathes and be at them this in the face of the Gen. al which acts weare death by Martiall Law but this was an actuall declaration that the Army did admit of Officers by mutuall agreement onely and therefore Government by law Martiall was dissolved unlesse it had been established by mutuall consent throughout the Army for Officers at that time being only admitted by mutuall consent they could have no power but what was betrusted to them by the Soldiers 2. Plea But in case the Government of the Army by Law Martiall had not been dissolved by a mutuall ingagement yet the very being of peace did dissolve its for in the Petition of * See Poultons collection of statutes p. 1431. 1432. Right its declared that â—â— person ought to be adjudged by Law Martiall except in time of Warre and that all Commissions given to execute Martiall Law in time of peace are contrary to the Lawes and Statutes of the Kingdome and it was the Parliaments complaint that Martiall Law was then commanded to be executed upon Soldiers for robbery mutiny or murther And it was setled as the undoubted right of every English man that he should be punishable only in the Ordinary Courts of justice according to the Lawes and Statutes of the Kingdome By all this it appeares that it is illegall and uniust for the Officers of the Army to try or punish any Agent or other by Law Martial upon pretence of Muteny or any other offence the whole Army stand as Englishmen and if they offend are not exempted from the proceeding against them and punishments to be inflicted upon them by the lawes and statutes of the Kingdome and therfore cannot in Iustice be subject also to law martiall so that all Agents and Soldiers now accused for mutiny for their late prosecution of publick freedome according to the agreement of the people without their Officers content shall unworthily betray their owne and their Countreys Liberty if they shall submit to be tryed in any other way then by the knowne Lawes and statutes of the Land The forementioned Plea of William Thompson who was lately a Corporal in Colonell Whaleyes Regiment and was formerly cashiered at the head thereof and yet after that imprisoned and indeavoured to be hanged for his honesty thus followeth Englands Freedome Souldiers Rights Vindicated against all Arbitrary uniust Invaders of them and in partcicular against those new Tyrants at Windsore which would destroy both under the pretence of Marshall Law OR The just Declaration Plea and Protestation of William Thompson a free Commoner of England unjustly imprisoned at Windsore Delivered to his Excellency Sir Thomas Fairfax and that which is called his Councell of Warre the 14. of December 1647. Unto which is annexed his Letter to the Generall wherein the said Plea was inclosed Also a Petition of the rest of his Fellow-Prisoners to his Excellency May it please your Excellency I Am by birth a free Commoner of England and am thereby intailed or intituled unto an equall priviledge with your self or the greatest men in England unto the freedome and liberty of the Lawes of England as the Parliament declares in their Declaration of the 23. of October 1642. 1 part book Decl. pag. 660. And the 29. Chap. of Magna Charta expresly saith That no man shall be taken or imprisoned or be disseised of his Freehold or Liberties or free customes or be outlawed or exiled or any other wayes destroyed nor pest upon nor condemned but by the lawfull Iudgement of his Peers or Equalls and that by due course or processe of the Law of the Land ††See Sir Edw. Cooks Exposition hereof in his 2. part Institut fol. 46 47 50 51. which expresly saith that no man shall he taken or restrained of his libertie by petition or suggestion made unto whomsoever in authority unlesse it be by indictment or presentment of good and lawfull men where such deeds be done and that no man whatsoever be put to answer any crime whatsoever without presentment before Iustices or matter of record or by due processe and writ orinall according to the old law of the land and if any thing from henceforth be done to the contrary it shall be void in law and holden for * * Se the 5. Ed. 3.9 25. Ed. 3.4 28. Ed. 3.3 37. Ed. 3.18 42. Ed. 3.3 and the Petition of
Right in the third of the King and the Statutes that abolished the Starre-Chamber and Ship money made this present Parliament and Lievtenant Col. Iohn Lilburnes Book called the Resolved mans Resolution p. 2. 3 8 9. and his Grand Plea against the Lords pag. 7 8 9. error Therefore Sir for you who are a Generall of an Armie and other of your Marshall Officer's who are are no Civill Court of Iustice nor authorized with the least legall power in the world to administer Iustice and execute the law of the land upon or unto any of the Commoners of England to dare or presume to restraine imprison trie or meddle with me as you have done who am in no other capacitie in the world but barely and altogether as a Commoner of England is the height of arbitrary tyranny injustice and * * Well saith Sir Edward Cook in the 2. part of his Institutes fol. 48. that every oppression against law by colour of any usurped authority is a kind of destruction for when any thing is forbidden all that tends to it is also forbidden and it is saith he the worst oppression that is done by colour of justice See also Lib. 10. fo 74. in the case of the Marshalsea oppression and an absolute destruction of the very fundamentall Lawes of England the bare endeavouring of which cost the Earl of Strafford his head And what the doome of him is that destroyes the fundamentall Lawes of the Land I shall give you out of the very words of your own friend Mr. St. Iohn in his Argument of law concerning the Bill of Attainder of high Treason of Thomas Earl of Strafford at a conference in a Committee of both Houses of Parliament printed by G. M. for John Bartlet at the signe of the gilt Cup neer St. Austins Gate in Pauls Church Yard 1641 who in the 70. page thereof saith That the destruction of the Lawes dâ—ssolves the arteries and ligaments that hold the body together â—he that takes away the Laws takes not away the allegiance of one Subiect alone but of the whole Kingdome it was saith he made treason by the Statute of the 13. El. for her time to affirme that the Lawes of the Realme doe not bind the discent of the Crowne no Law no descent at all No Laws saith he no Peerage no ranks or degrees of men ††And therefore you with your dealings with me that am meerly a free Commoner of England and so not in the least under your Marshall Discipline but solely and only under the discipline of the known declared and established Lawes of England by your arbitrary tyrannicall actings upon me have absolutely as much as in you lyes destroyed the fundamentall Lawes of England and therefore are as absolute Hedge breakers and Levellers as ever were in this Kingdome the same condition to all It 's treason to kill a Iudge upon the Bench this kills not the Iudge but the Iudgement And in page 71. he saith Its felony to imbezell any of the Iudiciall Records of the Kingdome this viz. the destruction of the law sweeps all away and from all It s treason to counterfeit a twenty shilling piece here is a counterfeiting of the Law we can call 〈◊〉 the counterfeit not the true coyne our own It s treason to counterfeit the great Seale for an Acre of Land no property hereby viz. the destruction of the Law is left to any Land at all nothing treason now either against King or Kingdom no law to punâ—sh it And therefore I advise you as a friend to take heed that you goe no further on in your illegall arbitrary tyrannicall and law-destroying practises with and towards me least when for your own lives you claime the benefit of the Law you be answered in the words of your foresaid friend in pag. 72. That he in vaine calls for the help of the Law that walkes contrary unto Law and from the Law of like for like he that would not have others to have law why should he have any himself why should not that be done to him that himself would have done to another it is true saith he Ibid. we give law to Hares and Deers because they be beasts of chase but it was never accounted either crueltie or foule play to knock Foxes and Wolves on the head as they can be found because these be Beasts of Prey the Warrener set traps for Poulears and other vermin for preservation of the Warren And in pag. 76. he saith in the 11. R. 2. Trisilian And some other attainted of treason for delivering opinions in the subvertion of the Law and some other for plotting the like * * Read also to this purpose Mr. Iohn Pyms Speech against the Earle of Strafford the 12. of April 1641. printed for Iohn Battler but especially p. 5. 6. 8. 9. 13. 18. 23. 24. But if you shall object that you deale with me as you are a Generall and Officers of an Army by Marshall Law for endeavouring to make mutinies or tumults in your Armie or by biâ—â—â—ing and defaming your reputations and so drawing your Soldiers from their affection and obedience unto you I answer in the first place there can in this Kingdome be no pretence for Martiall Law but when the Kingdome is in a generall hurly burly and uproare and an Armie or Armies of 〈◊〉 enemies in the Field prosecuting with the sword the destruction of the whole and thereby stopping the regular and legall proceedings of the Courts of Iustice from punishing offenders and transgressors But now there being no Armie nor Armies of declared enemies in the field nor moâ—â— prisons in the possessions of any such men nor no generall hurly-butlies and uproars by any such men in the Kingdome but all such as are visibly subdued and quieted and all Courts of justice open and free to punish offenders and transgressors and therefore even to the Armie is selfe and the Officers and Soldiers therein there is no reason or ground for exercising of Martiall Law much lesse over Commoners that are not under the obedience of the Army which is my case And that in time of peace there neither is nor can be any ground of exercising and executing of Martiall Law I prove out of the Petition of Right which was made in the third yeare of the present King and is printed in Pultons Collection of the Statutes at large fol. 1431 1432. * * And in the 1. 2. 3. pages before which expresly saith that by authority of Parliament in the 25. year of the Reign of King Edward the 3. it is declared and enacted That no man shall be forejudged of life or limb against the forme of the great Charter and the law of the land and by the said great Charter and other the lawes and Statutes of this Realme no man ought to be adiudged to death but by the law established in this Realm ††See the 9. H. 3. 29. 5. Ed. 3.9
25. Ed. 3.4 28. Ed. 3.3 And whereas no offender of what kind soever is exempted from the proceedings to be used and punishments to be inflicted by the lawes and Statutes of this your Realme Neverthelesse of late divers Commissions under your Maiesties great Seale have issued forth by which certaine persons have been assigned and appointed Commissioners with power and authority to proceed within the land according to the iustice of MARTIALL LAW against such Soldiers and Marriners or other dissâ—lute persons ioyning with them as should commit any MVRDER ROBBERIE FELONIE MVTINIE or OTHER outrage or misdemeanor whatsoever and by such summarie course and order as is agreeable to Martiall Law and as is used in Armies in time of Warre to proceed to the tryall and condemnation of such offendors and them to cause to be executed and put to death according to the Law Martial By pretixt wherof your Maiesties Subiects have bin by some of the said Câ—â—mission put to death when and where if by the lawes and Statutes of the land they had deserved death by the same lawes and Statutes also they might and by no OTHER ought to have been been iudged and executed ††Yet it is very observable that at the very time when this Martiall Law complained of was executed the King had warres with France a forraign enemie but there is no such thing now and therefore the Army or the grand Officers thereof have not the least shadow or pretence to execute it in the least or to deale with me a free Commoner as they haue done And also sundry grievous offendors by colour thereof claiming an exemption have escaped the punishment 〈◊〉 to them by the lawes and Statutes of this your Realm by reason that divers of your Officers and Ministers of Justice have uniustly refused or forborn to proceed against such offenders according to the same laws and statutes upon 〈◊〉 that the said offendors were publiâ—able only by Martiall Law and by authority of such Commissioners as aforesaid Which Commissions AND ALL OTHER OF Lâ—â—E NATVRE are wholly and directly contrary to the fall lawes and Statutes of this your Realm Therefore Sin if you have any catâ— of your own heads and lives though you have none of the Liberties and Freedomes of England I againe as a friend advise you to take heed what you doe unto me any further in your illegall arbitrary and tyrannicall way that hitherto you have proceeded with meâ— for I largely understand that Canterbury and Strafford were this Parliament questioned for their arbitrary and tyrannicall actions that they did and acted many years before and the Lord Keepers Finch was by this Parliament questioned for actions that he did when he was Speaker of the House of Commons in the third of the present King An. 1628. and forced to flie to save his head In the second place I answer that if since the warres ended it was or could be judged lawfull for your Excellencie and your Councell of Warre to execute Marshall Law yet you have divested your self of that power upon the 4. and 5. of June last at New market Heath you owned the Souldiers and joyned with them when they were put out of the States protection and declared enemies and further associated with them by a mutuall solemn ingagement as they were a Company of free Commoners of England to stand with them according to the Law of Nature and Nations * * See the late Plea for the Agents printed before pag. 42 43 44. to recover your own and all the peoples Rights and Liberties the words are these We the Officers and Soldiers of the Army subscribing hereunto doe hereby declare agree and promise to and with each other that we shall not willingly disband nor divide nor suffer our selves to be disbandad nor divided untill we have security that we as private men or other the free borne people of England shall not remain subiect to the like oppression iniury or abuse as have been attempted ††See the ingagement in the Armies book of Decl. pag. 24 25. 26 27. Hereby it appeares that from this time you and the Souldiery kept in a body and so were an Army not by the States or Parliaments will but by a mutuall Agreement amongst all the Soldiers and consequently not being an Armie by the Parliaments wills they were not under those rules of Martiall Government which were given by the will of the Parliament and your Excellency could no longer exercise any such power over them as was allowed you by those Martiall lawes nay the Soldiers keeping in a body and continuing an Army only by mutuall consent did by their mutuall Agreement or Ingagement constitute a new kind of Councell whereby they would be governed in their prosecution of those ends for which they associated and made every Officer incapable of being in that Councell which did not associate with them in that Ingagement The words of the Agreement or Ingagement are these we doe hereby declare agree and promise to and with each other that we shall not willingly disband nor divide nor suffer ourselves to be disbanded or divided without satisfaction in relation to our grievances and desires heretofore presented and securitie that we as private men or other the free-born people of England shall not remain subject to the like oppression and injury as hath been attempted and this satisfaction and security to be such as shall be agreed unto by a councell to consist of those generall Officers of the Army who have concurred with the Armie in the premises with two Commission Officers and TWO SOVLDIERS to be chosen for each Regiment who have concurred and shall concurre with us in the premises and in this Agreement So that your Excellency is so farre from having a power to exercise the old Martiall Discipline that you would have been no Officer or Member of the Councell appointed to governe them unlesse you had associated with them and by that Association or mutuall Ingagement the Soldiers were so far from allowing to their Generall who ever it should have been for at that time it was uncertaine the power of exercising the old Martiall Dâ—scipline that according to the Ingagement no Officer or Soldier can be rightly cashiered unlesse it be by the Councell constituted by that Engagement so that your Excellency by your owne Engagement have put a period to your power of exercising your old Martiall Discipline and whatsoever Dâ—scipline shall appeare to the Army to be necessary must be constituted by the mutuall consent of the Army or their representatives unlesse you and they will disclaim the Engagement at New market and those principles upon which you then stood * * And if you do what are you better then a company of Rebels Traytors to the Parliament for your then opposing their power authority orders and ordinances and yeeld up your selves to the Parliaments pleasure as their hirelings to serve their
in Hillary Tearm Anno 16. Caroli Regis after a verdict obtained a Iudgement in his Maiesties Court of Kings Bench of 7000. l. debt and 7. l. 12. d. dammages against Thomas Wright who afterwards was charged in execution for the same in the custodie of Sir Iohn Lenthall Knight then and yet Marshal of the said Court and the said Wright being so in execution for Composition offered your Petitioner above 2000. l. and security for the residue of the said debt all the same appearing to be true by Records and by proceedings in Chancery under the Great Seale of England but before any part thereof satisfied the said Sir Iohn Lenthall suffered the said Wright to escape out of Execution Your Petitioner therefore in Hillary Terme 17. Caroli Regis Ten dayes before the end of that Terme caused an action of debt to be brought for the said 7007. li. 12 d. at your Petitioners suit for the said escape and then filed a declaration against the said Sir Iohn Lenthall for the same But the said Sir Iohn to deprive your petitioner of the said debt and all remedie for the same 10 Trin. 18. Caroli Regis notwithstanding your Petitioner had severall Rules against Sir Iohn Lenthall for judgement upon his declaration so filed in Hillary 17. He the said Sir Iohn Lenthall procured an Order to be made by Sir Iohn Brampston Knight and Sir Thomas Mallet Knight in open Court that your petitioners Declaration filed in Hillary 17. should be filed as of Easter Tearme the 18. contrary to justice the law of this Kingdom the libertie of the Subjuct and the rules of the said Court as your petitioner is advised And for that your petitioners being so advised that the said Order doth utterly barre your petitioner of his said debt Your Petitioner severall times publiquely in Court and otherwise moved the Iudges to alter the same but could not prevaile as appeareth by the Order of the said Court and for that that notwithstanding your petitioner earnest solicitation for his judgement due by the rules of the said Court for the space of above foure yeares together and his great expence after 15. Orders made in the said Court the now Iudges of the said Court Mr. Iustice Bacon and Mr. Iustice Roll hath confirmed the same as appeareth by an Order by them made per Hillar 22. Caroli Regis now readie to be shewed In tender consideration of the premises that your petitioner according to the Law filed his declaration in Hillary 17. when the prisoner was escaped and at liberty and for that the said Iudges Order contrary to Law barreth your petitioner from prosecuting upon that declaration and bindeth your petitioner to file his declaration as of Easter terme 18. Caroli when the said Marshall aleadged that he had retaken the said prisoner again and that he was dead and that your petitioners debt is destroyed by the said Iudges Order to your petitioners dammage above 10000 l. And for that other debts may be destroyed by the like If men be barr'd from the benefit of their just Records duly fil'd as the petitioner is contrary to the Lawes of the Kingdome and the libertie of the Subiect which appeares to be done in this Cause by the Orders themselves Your Petitioner humbly craveth releife according to his damages And your Petitioner shall pray Henry Moore Which petition the said Moore delivered to Col. Henry Martin and divers other Parliament men but can not so much as get his petition read in †Jt is worth the taking notice the Speaker is Sir John Lenthalls brother and it is almost grown to a common proverb in England that Parliament mens neer Allyes as well as themselves are above the reach of all law and justice which I am sure if they look not speedily well about them will destroy them every man the House upon whom he hath long attended and still waiteth most earnestly and deplorably cryeth out to be releived from this intollerable oppression by which the said Moore is damnified as in his printed complaints to the House he declares above ten thousand pound to the hazzard of his utter ruine Now I shal here crave the liberty to insert the epittomy of my own cruel barbarous sufferings with this desire to al that reads it seriously to consider that what hath befaln me by the cruell tyrany of by past Tyrants and oppressors if not strongly remedied and repaired may for future be incouragement for the present Tyrants to inflict when they dare for fear of being dismounted the like if not worse upon the first Nown-Substantive Englishman that shall resolutely stand in their way * And it is the clearest demonstration to me in the world that the present men in power alwayes intended to walk in the oppressive tyranous ways of the Star-chamber High commission councel board in that they have done no man effective iustice or right that suffered by them least their own Acts should be binding presidents to pay their own Acts should be binding Presidents to pay themselves by in future times The summe of what I have here to insert I shall lay down in the very words that J delivered in print to the Members of the House of Commons at the House doore the 23. Novemb. last which thus followeth A new complaint of an old grievance made by Lievt Col. Iohn Lilburne Prerogative prisoner in the Tower of London Novemb. 23. 1647. To every Individuall Member of the Honourable House of Commons SIR MY exceeding urgent necessities and my extraordinary sufferings by your neglect in doing me justice and right according to your many oaths and declarations presseth me above measure still to play the part of the poore importunate widdow mentioned in the Gospel and to resolve whatever befalls 〈◊〉 never to give over till I have attained her end viz. Iustice You may please truly to take notice and the rather because many of you are new Members that in the year 1637. and 1638. I suffered a most barbarous sentence by the Star Chamber occasioned by two false oaths sworne against me by Edmond Chillington ††The substance of which with my defence against them in open Star Chamber and when I stood upon the Pillory at Westminster you may largely read in the relation of my first sufferings called The Christian mans tryall reprinted by Will. Larner 1641. now dwelling at the black boy within Bishops-Gate now a Lievtenant under Col. Whaly and by my refusing to answer interrogatories against my self in executing of which sentence the 18. of April 1638. I was tyed to a Carâ—â— tayle at Fleet bridge and whipt through the streets to Westminster and had given me above the number of 500. stripes with a threefold knotted corded whip the weeles made in my back thereby being bigger then Tobacco pipes c. And set two houres upon the Pillory bare head in an extraordinary hot day and a gag put into my mouth above an houre to
their rotten praises and uphold their new confuâ—â—d Babell sandy interest though in this book by reason of the great distractions of the kingdome I thought to have been very tender of the House of Commons and its committees yet because slavery and tyranny is already goe over the threshold I must furnish my friends with some weapons to keep it out of the kitchine and Hall least it get possession speedily of the whole house and for that end I shall insert my Defiance to Tyrants in a plea which thus followeth A Defiance to Tyrants Or a Plea made by Lievt Col. Iohn Lilburne Prerogative Prisoner in the Tower of London the 2. of Decemb. 1647. Against the proceedings of the close and illegall Committee of Lords and Commons appointed to examine those that are called London Agents with divers large additions unto which is annexed a Plea for the said Citizens of London against the Committee for plundered Ministers for their illegall imprisoning them for refusing to pay Tithes ALL Magistracy in England is bounded by the â—oâ—wn and declared Law of England a a See the Petition of right and Sir Edw. Cooks 4. part institutes Chap. high Court of Parliament and while they Act according to Law I am bound to obey them but when they leave the rules thereof and walk by the arbitrarie rules of their own Wilt they doe not act as Magistrates but as b b See King Iames his speech to the Parl. at White Hal 1609. and 1. par book Decl. pag. 150. and my book called the Out-cryes of oppressed Commons pag 16 17. 18. and my Epistle to Mr. Martin of the 31. May 1647. called Rash Oaths pag. 56 Tyrants and cannot in such actings challenge any obedience neither am I bound to yeeld it but am tyed in conscience and duty to my self and my native Country therein to resist and withstand them and if their Officers goe about by force and violence to Compell me to obey and stoop unto their arbitrary and illegall command c c See Cooks 2. part inst upon the 29. chap. of Magna Charta fo 52. 53. and fo 590 591. and regall Tyrany p. 78. 79. 80 81. and Vox Plebis p. 37. and my plea before Mr. Martâ—n of the 6. Novem. 1646. called an anatomy of the Lords tyrany pag. 5. 7. â— I may and ought if I will be true to my native and legall freedoms by force to withstand him or them in the same maâ—ner that I may withstand a man that comes to rob my house or as I may withstand a man that upon the high way by force and violence would take my purse or life from me And therefore all Warrants comming from any pretended or reall Committees of Lords and Commons to command me before them that are not formed according to the Law of England I ought not to obey but withstand and resist upon paine of being by all the ambiased understanding men of England esteemed a betrayer and destroyer of the Lawes and liberties of England for the preservation of which I ought to contest as Naboth did with King Ahab for his vineyard 1 King 21.2 3 4 13. And by the Law of England no warrant or processe ought to issue out to summon up any man to any Court of Justice in England whatsoever till a complaint by a certain prosecutor be filed or exhibited in that Court of iustice from whence the warrant processe or Summons comes which warrant processe or Summons ought expresly to containe the nature of the cause to which I am to answer and the name of my prosecutor or complainants or else it is not legall and so not binding but may and ought to be resisted by me and the Court must be sure to have legall jurisdiction over the causes Secondly All the Capacities that either the House of Commons or Lords can sit in is First Either as a Councell and so are to be close and for any man whatsoever in that Capacitie to come or offer to come in amongst them that doe not belong unto them is unwarrantable and so punishable d d Se Cooks 2. part inst fol. 103. 104. 4. part inst Chap. High Court of Parlm and the book called the manner of holding Parlmts Mr. Prinns relation of the triall of Col. Nath Fines p. 13. and regall tirany pag. 82. 83. or else Secondly As a Court of Iustice to try and examine men in criminall causes and in this capacitie they or any of their Committees ought alwayes to Sir open for all peaceable men freely to behold and see e e See 2. part inst fol. 103 104. and my book called the resolved mans resolution p. 56. and regall tyrany p. â—â— â—2 83. Mr. Prinns relation of Col. Nath. Fines his tryall p. 11 12 13. or else I am not bound to go to any tryall with them or answer them a word and therefore in this sense most illegall is the close Committee of Lords and Commons f f See my grand plea and my letter 11. Nov. 1647. to every Jndividuall Member of the House of Commons See Sir Edw. Cooks exposition of the 14. and 29. Chap of Magna Charta in his 2. part inst and regall tyranny p. 43 44 72 73 74 85 86. and Vox Plebis pag. 38 39 40 41 42. and my Epistle to the Lievt of the Tower the 13. Ian. 1646. called the oppressed mans oppressions declared p. 17. 18 19. for examining those they call London Agents or any other whatsoever And Thirdly that Close Committee is most illegall being a mixture of Lords with Commons seeing the Lords are none of their or my Peers and Equalls by Law and so cannot nor ought not to be there to be my examiners tryers or Judges and a traytor I am to the lawes and liberties of England if I stoop or submit to the jurisdiction or power of such a mixt Committee f Thirdly It is contrary to Law and expresly against the Petition of right either for this Committee of Lords and Commons g g See Vox Plebis p. 38. my anatomy of the Lords tyrany p. 10. and Thompsons plea against Marshall Law or any other Court of justice or Committee whatsoever to force mee or any man to answer to interrogatories against my self or my neer relations Fourthly Neither can they legally go about to try or punish me for any crime that is triable or punishable at Common law i i See the proofes in the third Maginall note at the letter C. k k Which Statute you may read before p. 6. and take notice of this that all misdemeanors whatsoever are Baileable l l See the 3. E. 1. c. 26. and 4. E. 3. 10. and 23. H. 6 10. Rast plea. fo 31. 7. Vox Plebis p. 55 56. 57. and my late Epistle to C. West late Liev. of the Tower calleâ— the oppressed mans oppressions declared p. 3 4. 1. part Cooks inst Lib. 3. chap. 13.
exercise a power above and against and to the subversion of the said fundamentall Lawes extending such his power to the goods free-holds inheritances liberties and lives of the people And in the sixt Article of his said impeachment it is laid unto his charge as a transcendent treasonable crime That the said Thomas Earle of Strafford without any legall proceedings and upon a paper Petition of Richard Rolstone did cause the said Lord Mount Norris to be disseized and put out of possession of his free-hold and inheritance without due processe of Law And in the seventh Article he the said Earle is charged That in the terme of holy Trinity in the 13. yeare of his now Maiesties raigne did cause a case commonly called the case of Tenures upon defective Titles to be made and drawne up without any Iury or Tryall or other legall Processe without the consent of parties by colour of which lawlesse proccedings divers of his Maiesties subiects and particularly the Lord Tho. Dillon were outed of their possessions and disseized of there free-hold by colour of the same resolution without Legall proceedings whereby many hundreds of his Maiesties Subiects were undone and their Families utterly ruinated And in the 8. Article he is impeached That upon a petition of St. Iohn Gilford Knight the first day of Febr. in the said 13. yeare of his Maiesties raigne without any legall protesse made a decree against Adam Viscount Loâ—tus of â—lie and did cause the said Viscont to be imprisoned and kept close Prisoner on pretence of disobedience to the said decree or order and without any Legall proceedings did in the same 13. yeare imprison George Earle of Kildare against law thereby to inforce him to submit his Title to the Manner and Lordship of Castle Leigh being of great yearly value to the said Earle of Strafford wil and pleasure and kept him a yeare Prisoner for the said cause two Monethes whereof be kept him close Prisoner ††All which you may at large reade in the 12â— 124 125 pages of a book called Speeches and Pallages printed for Wil. Cook at Furnivalls-Inne gate in Holburn 1641. c. Now the Parliament it selfe or the Members thereof being as Sr. Edward Cook well declares In his 4. part institute published for good Law by their own speciall orders as subiect to the Law as other men saving in the freedome of arrests that so their person may not be hindred from the discharge of their trust in the house which their Country hath inposed in them and unto whom till it be repealled it is a rule as well as to any other man in England whatsoever especially in all actions or differences betwixt party and party and that Parliament man that shall say that any Committee of Parliament or the whole houses is the Law shewes and declares himselfe either ignorant of the Law or a voluntary wilfull deceiver for what is within their breasts I neither can know nor am bound to enquire after for to know or take notice of * * See Englands Birth-right p. 3 4 5 6 7 8. neither is any thing therein till it he legally put in writing legally debated passed and legally published binding in the least unto me or or any man in England and indeed to speake properly the Parliaments worke is to repeale old Lawes and to make new ones to pull downe old Courts of Justice and erect now ones to make warre and conclude peace to raise money and see it rightly and providently disposed of but themselves are not in the least to finger it ††For the third Article in the first impeachment of the Earle of Strafford in the above said book page 118. runs thus that the better to inrich and inable himselfe to go thorow with his traiterous designs he hath detained a great part of his Maj revenue without giving legal account and hath taken great sums out of the Exchequer converting them to his own use when his Maiesty was necessitated for his owne urgent occasions and his Army had been a long time unpaid it being their proper work to punish those that imbezle and wast it but if they should finger it and wast it may not the Kingdom easily be cheated of its treasure and also be left without meanes to punish them for it and most dishonourable it is and below the greatnesse of Legslators to stoop to be executors of the law and indeed it is most irrationall and unjust they should for if they doe me injustice I am robed and deprived of my remedie and my Appeale it being no where to be made but to them whose worke it is to punish all male or evill administrators of justice and therefore I wish they would seriously weigh their owne words in their declaration of the 17. of Aprill 1646. 2. part book declaration page 878. where to the whole Kingdome they declare that they will not nor any by colour of any authority derived from them shall interrupt the ordinary course of justice in the severall Courts and Iudicatories of this Kingdome nor intermeddle in cases of private interest otherwhere determinable unlesse it be in case of male administration of Iustice wherein we shall see say they and provide that right be done and punishment inflicted as there he occasion according to the lawes of the kingdome and the trust reposed in us And therefore seeing that by the law of their owne will without due course or pocesse of Law or any visible shadow or colour of Law the Committe of plundered Ministers will Rob the Citizens of their proper goods which is not in the least justifiable for as Iudge Crook in the 6â— pag. of his Argument in Mr. Hampdens Cause against Ship money saith that the Law book called the Dr. and studient chap. 5. pag. 8. setting down that the Law doth vest the absolute property of every mans goods in himself and that they cannot be taken from him but by his legall consent saith that is the reason if they he taken from him the party shall answer the full value thereof in damage and so saith Iudge Crook I conceive that the party that doth this wrong to another shall besides the damages to the party be imprisoned and pay a fine to the King which in the Kings bench is the tenth part of as much as he payeth to the party so then if the King will punish the wrong of taking of Goods without consent between party and party much more will be not by any prerogative take away any mans goods without his assent particular or generall But if they will either have your goods or your libertie from you by the Law of their one wills be sure you play the Englishman not foolishly or willingly to betray your liberty into their hands but in this case part with them as you would part with your purse to a Theefe that robs you upon the high way for the forementioned Lawyer in the forementioned 8. pag. saith that