Selected quad for the lemma: england_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
england_n	act_n	king_n	scotland_n	2,696	5	8.4241	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A91195	An humble remonstrance to his His Maiesty, against the tax of ship-money imposed, laying open the illegalitie, abuse, and inconvenience thereof.	Prynne, William, 1600-1669.	1641 (1641)	Wing P3983; Thomason E207_3; ESTC R209840	30,545	71

imposed by the Kings absolute power and will but by the common consent of all the Peeres in Parliament Fiftly it was payd to save and ransome their lives and liberties from a conquering Enemy not to a Gracious Prince to secure them from an Enemy Sixtly it was then thought and called by all our Historians an Intolerable grievance and oppression which as Speed saith in his History of Great Britaine lib. 7. cap. 44. sect. 147. and others emptied all our Land of all our Coine in the Kingdome Therefore in all these respects no warrant at all of the lawfulnesse of this Tax but a strong Argument against it to prove it both an Intolerable grievance and an unjust vexation The second Tax called Dangilt intended in the Objection is thus defined in Edward the Confessors Lawes Cap. 28. by that famous graund Inquest of twelve of the principall men out of every Countie of England appointed by William the Conquerour in the fourth yeare of his Reigne as Hoveden pag. 602. 603. Dangilt was enacted to be payd by reason of Pirats infesting the Countrey who ceased not to waste it all they could To represse this their Insolency it was enacted that Dangilt should be yearely rendred to wit one shilling out of every Plough land throughout England to hire those that might resist or prevent the occasion or eruption of Pirats The black Booke of the Exchequer Lib. 1. cap. 11. thus defines it to repulse the Danes It was enacted by the Kings of England in Parliament that out of every hide of Land by a certaine perpetuall Rent two shillings should be payd to the use of Valiant men who had diligently and continually should guard the Sea Coasts should represse the force and the assaults of the Enemy because therefore two shillings rent was principally instituted for the Danes it was called Danes gelt But that president of the second sort of Dangilt most insisted upon is so farre from warranting of the lawfulnesse of this present Tax that in truth it is an unanswerable argument against it if well considered For the first it was not imposed upon the subject by the Kings absolute Prerogative as this is but granted and imposed by Parliament with the peoples consent as Tunnage and Poundage hath been since This is evident by the Lawes of the Confessor Et ad eam insolentiam reprimendam statutum est dare geldum reddi conjunctim c. If therefore at first enacted to be payd yearely one shilling out of every hide of Land to finde men to guard the Sea and Sea Coasts against the Danes and Pirates that then this was certainly granted and enacted by Parliament since the King alone by his absolute power much lesse to such a Writ as now issueth could make no such Act or annuall Law Secondly by this the blacke Booke of the Exchequer H. 1. cap. 11. Ad injurias igitur arcendas à Regibus Angliae to wit in Parliament where the Kings of England are said onely to enact Lawes and the Lawes then enacted are said to be the Kings Lawes and Acts because his assent is unto them binding Statutum est ut de singulis hidis Iure quodam perpetuo duos solidos argenti solverent ad usus nostros cum factum hoc legitur antiquâ lege c. If then this were enacted by a certaine perpetuall Law and payd by an annuall Law as by this Exchequer Record appeares then certainly by an Act of Parliament Thirdly by an addition to the Lawes of King Edward the Confessor Cap. 12. cited in Hoveden likewise Annalium posteriorum pag. 603. which saith that every Church wheresoever situated is exempted from this Tax untill the dayes of William Rufus because they put more confidence in the prayers of the Church than in the defence of Armes Donec tandem à Baronibus Angliae auxilium requirebatur ad Normandiam requirendam retinendam de Roberto sue fratre cognomine Curt. concessum est ei non lege sanctum atque firmatum sed hoc necessitatis causa erat de unaquaque hide quatuor solidos ecclesia non excepta dum vero collectio census fieret proclamabat ecclesiae suae reposcens libertatem sed nihil profecit by which exemption of the Church and Church Lands from this Tax and this request of William Rufus to his Barons to grant him their Ayd to gaine and retaine Normandy which they did grant unto him onely for their present necessitie but did not annually establish and confirme the graunt of foure shillings on a hide land by Law as Dangilt first was granted and that upon the lands of the Church as well as others it seemes most apparent that Dangilt and this Tax succeeding in lieu of it and then taken by graunt was first granted by Parliament and that then no such Tax could be imposed by Kings even in times of warre and necessitie to regaine and preserve their proper Inheritance but by Parliament Fourthly by Sir Henry Spilman in his authorized Glossary 1626. title Dangelt pa. 2009. 201 Mr. Selden in his Mare clausum 1636. dedicated to your Majesty and published by your Majesties speciall cōmand 6. 2. cap. 11. 15. who both include to this opinion that the Dangelt was most imposed by royall authority but given by the peoples full consent in Parliament and that the taxes which succeeded were not annually granted nor paid but onely in time of Warre sc. Consult etiam magnatibus Parliament secundum authoritatem the advice of the great men of the Kingdome and by the authority of Parliament If then this taxe of Dangelt to defend the Seas was granted and imposed by Parliament onely with these taxes that succeed it not by the Kings royall prerogative without a Parliament This taxe for the Shipmoney also ought to be thus imposed and not otherwise even by thefe present Examples Secondly the Dangelt was not imposed or enacted in times of Peace but if Warre ceased the taxe also ceased in point of Law and it is Iustice according to the Law and Philosophers rule cessante causa cessat effectus that the taxe lasted and was granted and lawfully taken onely during the warres with the Danes is most apparant by the fore-recited orders of Edw. the Confessors Lawes cap. 12. by the black booke of the Exchequelib 1. cap 11. which addes moreover that when the land had the taxe being vnder Wm. the Conquerour Noluit hoc annuum solvi quod erat urgenti necessitate bellicis tempestatibus exactum non tamen omnino propter Importunarum causas dimitti rerum igitur temporibus ejus vel successoribus ipsius solutum est hoc cum ab exteris periculis bella vel opiniones bellorum fuere which Sir Henry Spilman in the very same words in librum Glossarii If then this Dangelt though granted by Parliament was due and collected by right on the subjects onely in time of forraigne Warres not in dayes of peace we have neither open Warre nor

them in the Sea before they could land for he had a greater Navie then then the King of France whence hee conceived greatest security of resisting the Enemies thus Mat. Westm. Paris History of England Anno 12 13. pag. 224. 225. whose words we have related at large to cleere and take off the edge of this Prime president in answering which since all things will be cleered from these Writs to presse and provide ships your Majesties Officers would inferre the lawfulnesse of these Writs for ships ship-money now But under correction we humbly conceive that this president makes much against and nothing at all for these Writs and taxes which now issue forth for First it was before Magna Charta the taxes and Tallages the Petition of Right or any Subsidie Tonnage or poundage to guard the Sea the statutes are against them Secondly it was onely directly in Port-townes that had ships not to Countries and places that had no ships as the Writs are now Thirdly it was to the Masters and Owners of ships not to any other persons who being exempted from all Land-service were to serve the King and Kingdome at this pinch and extreamity at Sea but these Writs reach to all aswell those that have no ships as others Fourthly it was onely to furnish out their owne ships not to contribute money to hire the Kings ships or others or to build new of other or greater Burthens thē these that had bin These Writs now are contrary to this in all these respects at least in the intention and execution Fifthly here was no leavying of money to be paid to King John his Executors or Officers hands to provide or hire ships as now but every man was left to furnish his owne ships at his best rates with his owne provision and Marriners this quite otherwise Sixthly though the Marriners and Owners of the ships were by this Writ to furnish ships at their owne proper costs yet when they were thus furnished the King was to pay them both wages hire and freight as his successors ever had done since when they pressed any of your subjects ships or Carts for Warre or Carriage these were the words Iterum in servitium nostrum ad liberationes nostras which imply a Constancie as in all like Cases yea of your Majesty who now pay wages and freight for all the Mariners and Marchants ships your presse resolves as much therefore this makes nothing at all for this enforceing the subjects to set out ships to guard the Seas to serve your Majesty at your owne proper costs and charges but point blanke against it Seventhly this president makes it evident that those who are bound by their Teunres Lands and Lawes of the Kingdome to serve the King and defend the Kingdome by Land as all the horses foote Train'd Bands and Companies throughout England neither have bin ought to be charged with any Sea-services for heere all the Land men are charged to serve the King and defend the Kingdome by Land and these Sea-men onely by Sea neither of them enforced to serve or contribute to any service or defence both by Sea and Land for that had bin double and unreasonable charge therefore now who are charged with Land-service by these very presidents related ought not to be taxed towards the setting out of ships but Sea-men onely are to gùard the seas with such ships as they have and no other vpon your Majesties pay therefore these Writs which charge Land-men to contribute to the setting out of ships are directly against these Presidents and the Lawes and practice of these Lawes Eightly These Land men that were not bound by their Tenures and Lands to fine and yet were able to beare Armes were to receive the Kings pay and not to serve gratis even in this necessary defence of the Kingdome as these words ad capiendum solidos nostros resolve therefore certainly Mariners in those ships received the Kings pay too and the owners freight as now they doe from your Majesty and so the King not the Subjects bare the charge of the shipping then and if so in that time and age before Tonnage and poundage then your Majesty ought much more now to doe it since Tonnage and poundage is taken for that purpose Ninthly this Writ was in an extraordinary cause upon an extraordinary Exigent and occasion The King was heere deprived of his Crowne and Kingdome most unjustly by the Pope and the instigation of these treacherous Prelates and both of them given to King Philip of France a strong Army both by Sea and Land was ready to invade this Land yea to take possession of his Crowne and Kingdome this extraordinary suddaine Exigent put the Kingdome to these two extremities of those Writs there being therefore blessed be GOD no such extraordinary occasion as then this President being extraordinary is nothing pertinent to the Writs now in question nor any proofe at all of the lawfulnesse of this Taxe Tenthly it was in a time of open and eminent Warre and danger onely upon invasion ready to be made upon the Realme by a forraine Prince and Enemy both by Sea and Land therefore no proofe of the lawfulnesse of the present Writs and Taxes in time of peace For instance First Marshall Law may be executed and exercised by your Majesties Commission and Prerogative in time of Warre but not in peace as was lately resolved by your Majesty and the whole Parliament in the Petition of Right Secondly the Kings of England in times of open Warre might compell trained souldiers and others out of their owne Counties to the Sea coast or other parts for the necessary defence of the Realme but this they cannot doe in time of Peace 1. E. 3. 4. 5. Parliament M. Ca. 3. Thirdly the Kings of England in time of forraine Warres might by their Prerogative Royall seize the Land of all Priors Aliens when they were extant in England but that they could not doe in times of Peace 27. Asss. 48. 38. Asss. 20. pag. 27. Asss. lib. 3. 2. Cap. 8. Ed. 3. 38. 27. E. 3. 16. 40. E. 3. 10. 14. H. 4. 36. 22. E. 3. 43. 21. H. 4. 11. 12. Fourthly that the Kings of England when they had defensive Warres with Scotland they might lawfully demand receive and take Escuage of their subjects and so did other Lords of their Tenants but in times of peace they neither did nor could doe otherwise Lit. Sect. 199. 95. 98. 100. 101. 102. Fifthly the Dangelt there granted at first by common consent of the people in PARLIAMENT was due onely in the time of Warre and not of peace as appeares by the Premisses Sixthly subsidies and aides in former times were not demanded by KINGS nor granted in Parliament by the subjects but in time of Warre or to defray the debts of the Prince contracted by the Warres 14 E. 3. Ca 21. 15. E. 3. Ca. 12. 3. stat 2. stat 3. Ca. 1. 25. E. 3. stat 7. 11. H. 4. Ca. 10.