extraordinary great He only hath the patronage of all Bishopricks none can be chosen but by his Conge d'Esâ—ire whom he hath first nominated none can be consecrated Bishop or take possession of the Revenues of the Bishoprick without the King 's special Writ or Assent He is Guardian or Nursing Father of the Church which our Kings of England did so reckon amongst their principal Cares as in the Three and twentieth year of King Edward the First it was alledged in a pleading and allowed The King hath power to call a National or Provincial Synod and with the advice and consent thereof to make Canons Orders Ordinances and Consâ—itutions to introduce into the Church what Ceremonies he shall think sit to reâ—orm and correct all Heresies Schisms and pâ—nish Contempts c The King hath power not only to unite consolidate separate inlarge or contract the limits of any old Bishoprick or other Ecclesiastical Benefice But also by his Letters Patents may erect new Bishopricks as Henry the Eighth did Six at one time and the late King Charles the Martyr intended to do at St. Albans for the Honour of the first Martyr of England and for the contracting the too large extent of the Bishoprick of Lincoln In the 28. of Eliz. when the House of Commons would have passed Bills touching Bishops granting Faculties conferring Holy Orders Ecclesiastical Censures the Oath Ex Officio Non-Residency c. The Queen being much incensed forbade them to meddle in any Ecclesiastical Affairs for that it belonged to her prerogative His Majesty hath also power of Coynage of Money of pardoning all Criminals of dispensing with all Statutes made by him or his Predecessors which are Malum prohibitum and not Malum in se. The diversity between these terms is set down in the Statute made Term. Mich. Anno 11 H. 7. 11. Thus where the Statute doth prohibit a man to coyn Money if he do he shall be hanged this is Malum prohibitum for before the said Statute it was lawful but not after and for this Evil the King may dispense But Malum in se neither the King nor any other can dispense with As if the King would give leave to rob on the High-ways c. this is void yet after the Fact done the King may pardon it So it is in Ecclesiastical Laws for conformity to the Liturgy c. which are Malum prohibitum and the King may by his Prerogative Royal as well dispense with all those penal Statutes as with Merchants to transport Silver Wooll and other prohibited Commodities by Act of Parliament The King cannot devest himself or his Successors of any part of his Royal Power Prerogative and Authority inherent and annext to the Crown nor bar his Heir of the Succession no not by Act of Parliament for such an Act is void by Law These Prerogatives do of right belong to the Crown of England which I have collected out of the most Authentick Modern Authors And to compleat this Chapter I shall proceed to his Superiority and Precedency The King of England acknowledgeth no Superior but God alone not the Emperor Omnem potestatem Rex Angliae in Regno suo quam Imperator vendicat in Imperio yet he giveth Precedency to the Emperor Eo quod antiquitate Imperium omnia regna superare creditur Touching our King's Supremacy before any other these Reasons are offered First Lucius King of this Land was the first Christian King in the World as also Constantine our Country-man the first Emperor that publickly planted Christianity Secondly The King of England is anoynted as no other King is but France Sicily and Ierusalem Thirdly He is crowned which honour the Kings of Spain Portugal Navarr and divers other Princes have not The honour of Precedency amongst Christian Kings is often disputed by their Ambassadors and Commissioners representative at General Councils Diets publick Treaties and other Honourable Assemblies at Coronations Congratulations in Foreign Countries c. which by the best Information I can get is thus stated As to England next to the Imperial Ministers the French take place as being the largest Realm in Christendom and most Noble since Charles le mayne their King obtained the Imperial Diadem the second place in the Western Empire was undisputably the right of our English Kings so enjoyed for hundreds of years 'till Spain grown rich and proud by the addition of the Indies claimed the priority yet could not gain it till their Charles the Fifth was Elected Emperor but after his Resignation the Controversie renewed upon the Treaty of Peace between Queen Elizabeth and Philip the Third King of Spain at â—oloign in France Anno 1600. Our Ambassadors were Sir Henry Nevil Iohn Harbert and Thomas Edmonds Esquires and for Spain Balthazer de Coniga Ferdinando Carillo Io. Ricardett and Lewis Varreyken The English challenged precedency as due to them before the Emperor Charles his time as doth appear by Volatteram in the time of our Henry the Seventh when the like difference being in question 't was joyntly referred to the Pope who adjudged to England the most Honourable place But the Spaniards refusing to stand to that old Award or to admit of an equality the Treaty of Peace broke up neither hath any certain Resolution been hitherto taken in the matter as ever I heard of OF THE PRINCE CHAP. III. THE King 's Eldest Son and Heir apparent from the Day of his Birth is entituled Prince of the Latin word quasi Principalis post Regem The first that we read of in England was Edward eldest Son to King Henry the Third since which time the eldest Son of the King hath been by Patent and other Ceremonies created Prince of Wales and Earl of Chester and Flint By Patent also Edward the Third in the Eleventh year of his Reign added the Dukedom of Cornwal to the Principality of Wales and Anno Regni 36. he makes his eldest Son Edward the Black Prince Prince of Aquitain for which he did Fealty and Homage at Westminster Sed tamen Principatum Walliae Ducatum Cornubiae Comitatum Cestriae Cantii non reliquit Walsing fol. 172. Since the Union of England and Scotland his Title hath been Magnae Britanniae Princeps but ordinarily Prince of Wales As eldest Son to the King of Scotland he is Duke of Rothsay and Seneschal of Scotland from his Birth And so long as Normandy remained in the possession of the English he had always the style of Duke of Normandy At his Creation he is presented before the King in Princely Robes who putteth a Coronet upon his Head a Ring on his middle Finger a Verge of Gold in his Hand and his Letters Patents after they are reaâ— His Mantle which he wears in â—arliament is once more doubled upon the shoâ—â—â—â—rs than a Dukes his Cap of State indenteâ—â—nd his Coronet formerly of Crosses and Flower de lis mixed But since the happy Restauration of his Majesty it was solemnly ordered that the Son and Heir apparent
their Tenures were altered viz. Baronia as appeareth in Matthew Paris A. 1070. fol. 66. and of that Tenure have continued ever since as you may read by the Constitutions of Clarendon in the Reign of Henry the Second and in Glanvile and Bracton But the Tenures of all Abbots and Priors were extinguished by the uniting and coming of them to the Crown by the Statute of Dissolution of Monasteries For though the Nobility of England differ in Titles and certain Ceremonies yet a Baron enjoyeth the same priviledges And by experience it is found That Dukes and all other degrees of Nobility in Cases Criminal are tryed by Barons together with Marquisses Earls and Viscounts as their Peers and Peers of the Realm Nobilitas generally is of the word Nosco signifying in common phrases of speech Men of Generosity of Blood and Degree and therefore it is said Vir nobilis idem est quod notus per omnia or a vulgatus But especially it is applyed and used to express the reward of Vertue in honourable measure Ageneris claritate which being in part of distributive Justice remaineth with the highest Soveraign annexed to the Imperial Crown of this Realm For as Vertue is the gift of none but of God so the reward thereof with Honour cannot be the gift of any but the Supreme Governour being God's Vicegerent on Earth But when Honour and Arms be bestowed upon any if there shall arise contention between Competitors for the same the ancient policy of this Realm hath ordained a Special Court the Judges whereof in all times having been Right Honourable Personages viz. the Lord High Constable and the Earl Marshal and in latter times the Judge thereof only the Earl Marshal The Jurisdiction of the Court consisâ—eth in the Execution of that part of distributive Justice which concerneth the advancement and support of Vertue Nevertheless some men there are not duly considering of what principle and parts the Laws of this Realm do consist have laboured to prove that the Questions and Controversies of Nobility and Arms should not be determined by the Laws of the Realm but by the Civil Law framing to themselves many Arguments to prove the same but being of small value I pass them over The Common Laws as also the Laws of Charity used in the Marshals Court do prohibit any Subject of this Realm to receive Titles of Honour and Dignity by gift or donation from a Forreign Prince King or Emperor for it is a thing greatly touching the Majesty of the King and State of his Kingdom Est vis Majestatis inter insignia summae potestatis And if a man shall bring an Action and in the Writ is styled by such a Forreign Title the Defendant may plead in Abatement of his Writ That he is no Duke Marquis Earl or Baron whereupon if the Plaintiff as demanded take Issue the Issue shall not be tryed by the Jury but by the Records of Parliament wherein he faileth And if any English man be created Earl of the Empire or of any other Forreign Nation and the King also do create him into any Title of Honour in England he shall be named in all Judicial proceedings only by such Name and Title as he hath received from the King of this Realm whose Subject he is And if by the King of England he be not advanced to Title of Honour then he shall bear the name only of his Baptism and Surname unless he be a Knight For experience teacheth that Kings joyned in League together by certain mutual and as it were natural power of Monarchies according to the Laws of Nations have dismissed one anothers Subjects and Ambassadors graced with the Dignity of Knighthood A Duke of Spain or of another Forreign Nation cometh into England by the King 's safe Conduct in which also the King doth style him Duke according to his Creation nevertheless in all proceedings in the King's Courts he shall not be so stiled by his Title of Dignity And although the said Noble person be also by the King's Letters Patents and by his Forreign Name and Title of Dignity made Denizon for that is the right Name so called because his Legitimation is given to him Or if he be naturalized by Authority of Parliament wherein he seemeth to be in all things made as a Subject born yet shall he not be styled by his Foreign Titles of Dignity And so it is if a Nobleman of France or elsewhere come into England as Ambassador and by lawful Marriage hath a Son and the Father dieth the Son is by Birth a Natural Englishman yet he shall not bear the Title of Honour of his Father and the reason thereof is because that Title of Nobility had its Original by a French King and not by any natural Operation which thing is well proved both by Authority of Law and Experience in these days If a Postnaâ—us of Scotland or Ireland who in these days is a Natural Subject to the King of England or if any of his Posterity be the Heirs of a Nobleman of Scotland or Ireland yet he is none of the Nobility of England But if that Alien or Stranger born a Scot be summoned by the King 's Writ to Parliament and therein is styled by his Foreign or other Title whereunto he is invested within England by the King 's Grant then and from thenceforth he is a Peer of this Realm and in all Judicial and Legal Proceedings he ought to be so styled and by no other Name And it was the Case of Gilbert Humfrevile Earl of Angus in Scotland of it appertaineth to the Royal Prerogative of the King to call and admit an Alien born to have place and voice in his Parliament at his pleasure although it is put in practice very rarely and that for great and weighty Considerations of State And if after such Parliamentary Summons of such a Stranger born question do arise and the Issue be whether he is of that Title or no it may well be tryed by the Record which is the only lawful tryal in that Case But there is a Diversity worthy of Observation for the highest and lowest Degrees are universal and therefore a Knight Engglish or Stranger born is a Knight in all Nations in what place soever he received his Title and Dignity and so ought of right and by Law to be named in the King's Courts as aforesaid Also if the Emperor the King of Denmark or other Foreign King come into this Realm by safe conduct as he ought for a Monarch or absolute Prince though he be in League cannot come without the King's Licence and safe Conduct but any Subject to such a Foreign King in League may come without Licence In this Case he shall sue and be sued by the Name of Emperor or King or else the Writ shall abate There is a notable President cited out of Fleta where treating of the Jurisdiction of the King's Court of Marshalsea it is said And these things he might
Scotch Kings to our gracious Soveraign Charles the Second into whose Veins all those several streams of Royal Blood are conjoyned to unite those jarring Nations into one Body under a Head unto which each one may justly claim an interest God hath thus restored our ancient Government and seated our Soveraign in the Throne of his Ancestors giving him a power just and absolute as well to preserve as curb his people being not only Major singulis but Major universis and his power is super totam Rempublicam which I thus prove Either the whole power of the Commonwealth is in one or not if not then he is no absolute King or Monarch but if he be as all must yield a Monarch I ask if there be a power in the Commonwealth which is not in him Is it subordinate to his power or not If subordinate than his power is above that power and so super totam Rempublicam Major universis if it be not then there are a simul semel to Supream Civil Powers in the same individual Kingdom and Gubernation and yet divided against it self which is most absurd and impossible This in Answer to a monstrous Pamphlet which the lasciviousness of our late unhappy Wars produced which asserted Rex minor universis But the Divine Providence hath I hope put a period to all such Trayterous Tenents and concluded such Disputes by Acts of Parliament so that no person for the future shall dare to question who hath the right of making Peace or War the power of Militia by Land and Sea all strong Holds and Forts c. being the inherent right of the English Monarchs by their Prerogative Royal. The King is God's Vicegerent and ought to be obeyed accordingly If good he is a blessing if bad a judgment and then against whom we are to use no other weapons but prayers and tears for his amendment He is styled Pater Patriae Caput Reâ—publicae and because the protection of his Subjects belongs to his care and office the Militia is annext to his Crown that the Sword as well as the Scepter may be in his hand The Parliament then all Roman Catholicks in the behalf of Henry the Eighth writ to the Pope declaring that his Royal Majesty is the Head and the very Soul of us all his Cause is the Cause of us all derived from the Head upon the Members his Griefs and Injuries are ours we all suffer equally with him Camden in his Britannia fol. 100. calls the King the most excellent part of the Commonwealth next unto God He is under no Vassuage he takes his Investure from no man Rex non habet Superiorem nisi Deum satìs habet ad poenam quod Deum expectat ultorem In England France Spain c. Kings are styled Dei Gratia c. and as the French King is said to be Rex Francorum Christianissimus the most Christian King of France The King of Spain the most Catholick The Emperour the Defender of the Church So the Kings of England by a Bull from Pope Leo the Tenth sent to King Henry the Eighth for a Book of Controversie written by him against Luther have the Title of Defenders of the Faith and by Act of Parliament he is declared Supream Head of the Church of England It is the manner also for Kings to write in the plural Number which is God's own style Mandamus Volumus c. and in the Scripture we find them called Gods in which sense they may be styled Divi or Dii quia Dei Vicarii Dei voce judicant Our Lawyers also say Rex est persona mixta cum Sacerdote habet Ecclesiasticam Spiritualem Iurisdictionem This shews the King's power in Ecclesiastical Causes being anoynted with Oyl as the Priests and afterwards the Kings of Israel were which signifies his person to be both Sacred and Spiritual And therefore at the Coronation hath put upon him a Priest's Garment called the Dalmatica or Colobium and other such Vests And before the Reformation the King as a Spiritual person received the Sacrament in both kinds He is capable of holding Tithes all Extra-Parochial Tithes some Proxies and other Spiritual profits belong to the King The Ceremonies at the Coronation of the King are many and with us in England more than in many other Countries As the Anoynting with Oyl which is proved by Mr. Selden to be of above one thousand years standing the Crown set upon his Head with many Religious Ceremonies besides the Ensigns of Regality which are a Ring to signiâ—ie his Faitâ—fulnes a Bracelet for Good Works a Scepter for Justice a Sword for Vengeance Purple Robes to attract Reverence and a Diadem triumphant to blazon his Glory It was the saying of Thomas Becket Archbishop of Canterbury Inunguntur Reges in Capiâ—e etiam pectâ—re brachâ—is quod significat gloriam sanctitatem forâ—â—nâ— inâ—â—n King's are Anoynted on the Head to signiâ—â—e their Glory on the Breast to Emblematize their Sanctity and on their Arms to declare their power He is crowned with an Imperial Crown the Crown set on his Head by the Arch-bishop of Canterbury a prerogative belonging to that See as it is in Spain to Toledo in France to Rheims and in Sueden to Vpsalia But this Imperial Crown hath not been long in use amongst us though our Kings have had Imperial Commands as over Scotland Ireland Man and other Isles being in a manner like that of an Earls now Neither is it found that any such thing as a Diadem was at all in use until the tune of Constantine the Great For before the distinction was some kind of Chaplet or rather a white silk Fillet about the Head which was an ordinary way to distinguish them And we read that Alexander the Great took off his white Diadem to cure the madness of Seleucus The first King that was crowned with this Imperial Crown floried and arched was Henry the Third but some say Henry the First and indeed it is left in dispute However it is very probable and plain That the ancientest Ensign of Regal Authority was the Scepter which is every where spoken of both in Scripture and Prophane History There is another Ensign of their Authority which is a Globe or Mound with a Cross which hath been in use amongst us ever since Edward the Confessor's time which is placed in the left hand as is seen in most of their Coyns The Cross denoting his Faith the Globe his Empire by Sea and Land as 't is said of Iustinian the Emperor who was the first that ever used it The Office of the King of England according to Fortescue Pugnare bella populi sui eos rectissime judicare to fight the Battels of his people and to see Right and Justice done unto them or more particularly as is promised at the Coronation to preserve the Rights and Priviledges of Holy Church the Royal Prerogatives belonging to the Crown the Laws and Customs of the
Authority of Parliament made in the Eleventh of King Edward aforesaid and therefore to supply that defect in the Fifth of Edward the Third he was created Duke of Cornwall by special Charter Elizabeth eldest Daughter of King Edward the Fourth was not a Dutchess of Cornwall although she was the Firstbegotten Daughter of Edward the Fourth for the Limitation is to the First-begotten Son Henry the Eighth was not in the life of his Father King Henry the Seventh after the death of his eldest Brother Arthur Duke of Cornwall by force of the said Creation for although he was sole Heir apparent yet he was not his eldest begotten Son And the Opinion of Stamford a Learned Judge hath been That he shall have within his Dukedom of Cornwall the King's Prerogative because it is not severed from the Crown after the form as it is given for none shall be Inheritor thereof but the King 's of the Realm For example whereas by Common Law if a man hold divers Mannors or other Lands or Tenements of divers Lords all by Knights Service some part by Priority and ancient Feoffment and other Land by Posterity and a later Feoffment and the Tenant so seized dieth and his Son and Heir within Age in this case the custody and wardship of the Body and his marriage may not be divided amongst all the Lords but one of them only shall have right unto it because the Body of a man is intire And therefore the Law doth say That the Lord of whom some part of those Lands are holden by Priority and by the same Tenure of Chivalry shall have it except the King be any of the Lords for then though the Tenant did purchase that Land last yet after his death the King shall be preferred before any of the other Lords of whom the Tenant did hold the Priority And so shall the Duke of Cornwall in the same Case have the Prerogative if his Tenant die holding of him but by posterity of Feoffment for any Tenure of his Dutchy of Cornwall although the same Duke is not seized of any particular Estate whereof the Reversion remaineth in the King for the Prince is seized in Fee of his Dukedom as beforesaid Iohn of Gaunt the fourth Son of King Edward the Third took to Wife Blanch Daughter and Heir of Henry Duke of Lancaster who had Issue Henry King of England so that the said Dutchy of Lancaster did come unto the said Henry by descent from the party of his Mother and being a Subject he was to observe the Common Law of the Realm in all things concerning his Dutchy For if he would depart in Fee with any thereof he must have made Livery and Seisin or if he had made a Lease for life reserving Rent with a Re-entry for default of payment and the Rent happen to be behind the Duke might not enter without making his Demand or if he had alienated any part thereof whilst he was within Age he might defeat the Purchaser for that Cause and if he would grant a Reversion of an Estate for life or years in being there must also be Attornment or else the Grant doth not take effect But after that he had deposed King Richard the Second and did assume the Royal Estate and so had conjoyned his Natural Body in the Body Politick of the King of this Realm and so was become King then the possession of the Dutchy of Lancaster was in him as King but not as Duke which degree of Dignity was swallowed up in that of the King for the lesser must always give place to the greater And likewise the Name of the Dutchy and the Franchises Liberties and Jurisdictions thereof when in the King's Hands were by the Common Law extinct and after that time the possessions of the Dutchy of Lancaster could not pass from Henry the Fourth by Livery of Seisin but by his Letters Patents under the Great Seal without Livery of Seisin and with Attornment And if he make a Lease for Life being Duke reserving a Rent with a Re-entry for default of payment and after his Assumption of the Crown his Rent happen to be unpaid he might Re-enter without Demand for the King is not bound to such personal Ceremonies as his Subjects are Therefore to have the said Dutchy to be still a Dutchy with the Liberties to the same as it was beâ—ore and to alter the order and degree of the Lands of the Dutchy from the Crown the said King Henry the Fourth made a Charter by Authority of Parliament which is entituled Charta Regis Hen. 4. de separatione Lancastriae à corona authoritate Parliamenti Anno Regni sui primo as by the Tenor thereof may appear And so by Authority of that Parliament the said Dutchy with all the Franchises and Liberties was meerly resigned from the Crown and from the Ministers and Officers thereof and from the Order to pass by such Conveyance which the Law did require in the possessions of the Crown But now the possessions of the Dutchy by force of the said Statute stood divided from the Crown and ought to be demeaned and ordered and pass as they did before Henry the Fourth was King yet there is no Clause in the Charter which doth make the person of the King who hath the Dutchy in any other Degree than it was before But things concerning his pleasure shall be in the same estate as they were before such separation insomuch as if the Law before the Charter by Authority of Parliament adjudged the person of the King always of full Age having regard unto his Gifts as well of the Lands which he doth inherit in the right of his Crown or Body Politick it shall be so adjudged for the Dutchy Land after the said Statute for the Statute doth go and reach unto the Estate Order and Condition of the Lands of the Dutchy but doth not extend unto the person of the King who hath the Lands in points touching his person Neither doth that distinguish or alter the preheminences which the Law doth give to the person of the King For if King Henry the Fourth after the said Act had made a Lease or other Grant of parcel of the Dutchy by the Name of Henry Duke of Lancaster only it had been void for it should have been made in the Name of Henry the Fourth King of England And thus stood the Dutchy of Lancaster severed from the Crown all the Reign of Henry the Fourth Henry the Fifth and Henry the Sixth being politickly made for the upholding of the Dutchy of Lancaster their true and ancient Inheritance however the right Heir to the Crown might in future time obtain his right thereunto as it happened in King Edward the Fourth's time but after the said King Edward obtained his right unto the Crown in Parliament he attainted Henry the Sixth and appropriated and annexed the said Dutchy again to the Crown as by the Statute thereof made in the first of the King's Reign
those ancient Fees in the time of Henry the Third and Edward the Fourth at this day do amount unto most men are not unskilful in Coke's seventh part 33. And in Cases of Decay of Ability and Estate as Senatores Romani amoti Senatu so sometimes they are not admitted to the Upper House of Parliament though they still keep their Title and Dignity Sir Thomas Smith de Republica Aâ—glorum 22. and by the Statute made 31 Hen. 8. cap. 10. the Lords have their places prescribed after this manner as followeth viz. These four the Lord Chancellor the Lord Treasurer the Lord President of the Council and the Lord Privy Seal being Persons of the Degree of a Baron or above are in the same Act appointed to sit in Parliament and in all Assemblies and Councils above all Dukes not being of the Blood Royal viz. the King's Uncle Brother and Nephew And these six viz. the Lord Great Chamberlain of England the Lord High Constable of England the Lord Marshal of England the Lord Admiral of England the Lord High Steward of his Majesties Houshold and the Lord Chamberlain also of his Mâ—jesties Houshold by that Act are to be placed in all Assemblies of Council after the Lord Privy Seal according to their Degrees So that if he be a Baron than he is to sit above all Barons or if an Earl above all Earls And so likewise the King's Secretaries being Barons or Earls have place above all Barons or Earls PRIVILEDGES Incident to the NOBILITY According to the Laws of England CHAP. XIII WHEN a Peer of the Realm and Lord of the Parliament is to be Arraigned upon any Trespass or Felony whereof he is indicted and whereupon he hath pleaded Not Guilty the King by his Letters Patens shall assign some great and sage Lord of the Parliament to be High Steward of England for the day of his Arraignment who before the said day shall make a Precept to his Serjeant at Arms that is appointed to serve him during the time of his Commission to warn to appear before him Eighteen or Twenty Lords of the Parliament or Twelve at the least upon the same day And then at the time appointed when the High Steward shall be set under the Cloth of Estate upon the Arraignment of the Prisoner and having caused the Commission to be read the same Serjeant shall return his Precept and thereupon the Lords shall be called and when they have appeared and are set in their places the Conâ—â—able of the Tower shall be called to bring his Prisoner to the Barr and the High Steward shall declare to the Prisoner the cause why the King hath assembled thither those Lords and himself and perswade him to answer without fear and then he shall call the Clerk of the Crown to read his Indictment unto him and to ask him if he be Guilty or not whereunto when he hath answered Not Guilty the Clerk of the Crown shall ask him How he will be tryed and then he will say By God and his Peers Then the King's Serjeant and Attorney will give Evidence against him whereunto when the Prisoner hath made answer the Constable shall be commanded to receive the Prisoner from the Barr to some other place whilst the Lords do secretly confer together in the Court and then the Lords shall rise out of their places and consult amongst themselves and what they affirm shall be done upon their Honour without any Oath to be ministred upon them And when all or the greatest part of them shall be agreed they shall retire to their places and sit down Then the High Steward shall ask of the youngest Lord by himself if he that is Arraigned be Guilty or not of the Offence whereof he is Arraigned and then the youngest next him and so of the residue one by one until he hath asked them all and every Lord shall answer by himself And then the Steward shall send for the Prisoner again who shall be led to the Barr to whom the High Steward shall rehearse the Verdict of the Peers and give Judgment accordingly The Antiquity and Original of this kind of Tryal by the opinion of several Authors is grounded from the Statute of Magna Charta so called not in respect of the quantity but of the weight of it Coke to the Reader before his eight part fol. 2. cap. 29. beginning thus Millus liber homo c. nec super eum ibimus nec super eum mittemus nisi per legale judicium parium suorum But I take it to be more ancient than the time of Henry the Third as brought into the Realm with the Conqueror being answerable to the Norman and French Laws and agreeable with the Custom Feudale where almost all Controversies arising between the Sovereign and the Vassal are tryed per Iudicium parium suorum And if a Peer of the Realm upon his Arraignment of Treason do stand mute or will not answer directly Judgment shall be given against him as a Traytor Convict and he shall not be prest to death and thereby save the forfeiture of his Lands for Treason is out of the Statute of Westminster 1. chap. 12. 15. Ed. 4. 33. Dyer 205. But if he be Arraigned upon Indictment of Felony he may be mute This priviledge hath some restraint as well in regard of the person as in the manner of proceeding As touching the person first the Archbishops and Bishops of this Realm although they be Lords of the Parliament if they be impeached of such offence they shall not be tryed by the Peers of the Realm but by a Jury of Knights and other substantial Persons upon their Oaths the reason thereof alledged is so much as Archbishops and Bishops cannot pass in the like cases upon Peers for that they are prohibited by the Common and Ecclesiastical Laws to be judged of Life and Blood Reason would that the other Peers should not try them for this Tryal should be mutual forasmuch as it is performed upon their Honours without any Oath taken And so by the way you may see the great respect the Law hath to a Peer of the Realm when he speaketh upon his Honour even in a case concerning the life of a man and that of a Peer and therefore ought they much more to keep their Words and Promises in smaller matters when they engage their Honour for any just cause or consideration Secondly as touching these persons no Temporal Lords but they that are Lords of the Parliament shall have this kind of Tryal and therefore out of this are excluded the eldest Son and Heir apparent of a Duke in the life of his Father though he be called an Earl And it was the case of Henry Howard Earl of Surrey Son and Heir apparent to Thomas Duke of Norfolk in 38 Hen. 8. which is in Brook's Abridgment Treason 2. Likewise the Son and Heir apparent of an Earl though he be called a Lord. And all the younger Sons of Kings are Earls
by birth though they have no other Creation but shall not be partaker of these or other Priviledges incident to the Lords of the Parliament Thirdly Those that are Barons and of the Nobility of Scotland or Ireland if upon the like Offence committed in England they be apprehended in England they shall not have this Tryal by Peers no though they were born in England for they received their Dignity from a King of England of other Nations But if the King of England do at this day create one of his Subjects of Scotland or Ireland an Earl Viscount Baron or other Peer of this Realm or by his ordinary Writ of Summons under his Great Seal do call him to the Upper House of Parliament and assign him a place and to have Voice free amongst the Lords and Peers there assembled he shall be partaker with them in all priviledges And thus much concerning the restraint of the Priviledges in respect of the persons 39 Ed. 3. And touching the manner of proceeding it appeareth by the said Statute of Magna Charta chap. 29. That a Peer of the Realm shall be tryed by his Peers only in case where he is indicted at the King's Suit of Treason or Felony for the words of the Statute be Nec super eum ibimus c. But if any Appeal of Murther of Felony be sued by any common person against a Peer of the Realm he shall be tryed by common persons and not by his Peers And so was Fines Lord Dacres tryed in Appeal of Murther The Nobility of this Realm do enjoy this priviledge That they are not to be impannelled on any Jury or Inquest to make tryal or inquiry upon their Corporal Oaths between party and party for they may have a Writ for their Discharge to the Sheriff But it is a Rule in Law Vigilantibus non dormientibus subveniant jura For if the Sheriff have not received any such Writ and the Sheriff have returned any such Lord on Juries or in Assize c. and they thereupon do appear they shall be sworn if they do not appear they shall lose their Issues 35 Hen. 6. and in such case they must purchase a Writ out of the Chancery reciting their priviledges directed to the Justices before whom such Noble persons are so impannelled commanding to dismiss him or them that were so impannelled out of the said Pannel F.N.B. 165. This priviledge hath in two causes not been allowed or taken place 1. If the enquiry concern the King and the Common-wealth in any necessary and important degree or business of the Realm And therefore divers Barons of the Marshes of Wales were impannelled before the Bishop of Ely and other Commissioners of Oyer and Terminer to enquire of a notable outrage committed by Gilbert de Clare Earl of Glocester against Humphrey de Bohun Earl of Hereford and Essex and his Tenants in Wales in the Twelfth year of Edward the First where Iohn de Hastings Edmond de Mortimer Theobald Beardmoe and other Barons of the Marshes challenged their priviledges aforesaid and much insisted upon the same But it was afterwards answered by the Court as by the words in the Record appeareth The Barons aforesaid did persist in the Challenge and in the end both the said Earls between whom the said outrage had been perpetrated submitted themselves to the King's Grace and made their Fines Secondly This priviledge hath no place in case of necessity where the truth of the case cannot otherwise come to light for the words in the Writ in the Register are Nisi sua praesentia ob aliquam causam specialiter exigatur c. If any Nobleman do bring an Action of Debt upon Account in case where the Plaintiff is to be examined which is always intended to be upon Oath upon the truth of his cause by vertue of the Statute of the fifth of Henry the Fourth chap. 8. it shall suffice to examine his Attorney and not himself upon his Oath And this priviledge the Law hath given to the Nobility That they are not Arrested upon any Warrant of a Justice of Peace for their good behaviour or breach of Peace nor by a Supplicavit out of Chancery or from the King's Bench For such an Opinion hath the Law conceived of the peaceable disposition of Noblemen that it hath been thought enough to take their promise upon their Honour in that behalf And as in Civil Causes the like Rule doth the Court of Equity observe in Cases of Conscience for if the Defendant be a Peer of the Realm in the Star-Chamber or Court of Chancery a Subpaena shall not be awarded but a Letter from the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper in lieu thereof And if he do not appear no Attachment shall go out against him For in the Fourteenth year of Queen Elizabeth this Order and Rule was declared in the Parliament Chamber That an Attachment is not awarded by Common Law Custome or President against any Lord of Parliament And if he do appear and make his Bill of Complaint upon his Honour only he is not compelled to be sworn But by the Statute 5 Eliz. cap. 1. it is enacted That all Knights and Burgesses of Parliament shall take the Oath of Supremacy and so shall Citizens and Barons of the Cinque Ports being returned of the Parliament before they enter into the Parliament House which Oath shall be according to the tenor effect and form of the same as is set forth in the Statutue of 1 Eliz. Provided always that forasmuch as the Queens Majesty is otherwise sufficiently assured of the Faith and Loyalty of the Temporal Lords of her High Court of Parliament therefore this Act nor any thing therein contained shall not extend to compel any Temporal person of or above the Degree of a Baron of this Realm to take the said Oath nor to incur any penalty limited by the said Act for not taking the same If a Peer be sued in the Common Pleas in an Action of Debt or Trespass and Process be awarded by Capias or Exigit against him then he may sue out a Certiorari in the Chancery directed to the Justices of the Common Pleas testifying that he is a Peer of the Realm For unless the Court be certified by the King 's Writ out of the Chancery that the Defendant is a Peer of Parliament if a Capias or Exigit issue forth against him it is no Error neither is it punishable in the Sheriff his Bailiffs or Officers if they execute the said Process and arrest the body of such a Noble person for it appertaineth not to them to argue or dispute the Authority of the Court But if the Court be thereof certified as aforesaid they will award a Supersedeas which is in the Books of Entries in the Title of Error Sect. 20. And there are two Reasons or Causes wherefore no Capias or Exigit lieth against any Peer one because of the dignity of their persons and the other by intendment of Law
Hen. 1. fol. 3. and so doth Vlpian the Civilian determine And this is one of the three Reasons alledged wherefore by the policy of our Law the King is a Body Politick thereby to avoid the attainder of him that had right to the Crown Coke's seventh part 12. a. lest in the interim there should be an interregnum which the Law will not suffer because of the manifold Incumbrances thereof For it hath been clearly resolved by all the Judges of the Land That presently by the descent of the Crown the next Heir is compleatly and absolutely King without any essential Ceremony or Act to be done ex postfacto And that Coronation is but a Royal Ornament and outward Solemnization of the Descent And this appeareth evidently by abundance of Presidents and Book-Cases Let us take one or two Examples in a Case so clear for all King Henry the Sixth was not crowned till the Eighth year of his Reign and yet divers men before his Coronation were attainted of Treason Felony and the like Crimes and he was as absolute and compleat a King for matters of Judicature Grants c. before his Coronation as he was after Queen Mary reigned three moneths before she was crowned in which space the Duke of Northumberland and others were condemned and executed for Treason which they had committed before she was Queen And upon this reason there is a Maxim in the Common Law Rex nunquam moritur in respect of his ever living and never dying politique capacity In France also the same Custome hath been observed and for more assurance it was expresly enacted under Charles the Fifth That after the death of any King his eldest Son should immediately succeed for which cause the Parliament Court of Paris doth accompany the Funeral Obsequies of those that have been their Kings not in mourning attire but in Scarlet the true Ensign of the never dying Majesty of the Crown Nevertheless certain Cities in France not long since alledged for themselves that because they had not reputed Henry the Fourth for their King and professed Allegiance unto him they were not to be adjudged Rebels Whereupon the chief Lawyers of our Age did resolve That forasmuch as they were original Subjects even Subjects by Birth they were Rebels in bearing Arms against their King although they had never professed Allegiance unto him To conclude this Chapter I shall give you a View of the Ceremonies of the Creation of Henry Prince of Wales which began on the Thirtieth of May 1610. as followeth The Prince accompanied with divers young Noblemen together with his own Servants rode from his Court at St. Iames's to Richmond where he reposed that night on the next day the Lord Mayor Aldermen with the several Companies in their Barges attended his Highness about Barn Elmes where he was entertained with a Banquet and in other places with Speeches by a Neptune upon a Dolphin and a Sea Goddess upon a Whale c. His Highness landing at Whitehall was received by the Officers of his Majesties Houshold according to order viz. by the Knight Marshal and the Serjeant Porter In the Hall by the Treasurer and Comptroller of the Houshold in the great Chamber by the Captain of the Guard and in the presence Chamber by the Lord Chamberlain from whence he went into the Privy Chamber where the King and Queen met him the Saturday after was taken up with the usual Ceremonies of making Knights of the Bath to attend his Highness at his Creation which were Five and twenty in number Upon Monday following these Knights of the Bath met in the Queens Closet where they put on long Purple Satten Robes lined with white Taffata and a Hood like a Batchelor of Law about their Necks and in a Barge prepared for them went before the Prince to Westminster Palace where his Highness landed and proceeded to his Creation thus First the Heralds Next the Knights of the Bath Then the Lords that were imployed in several Services Garter King at Arms bearing the Letters Patents The Earl of Sussex the Robes of Purple Velvet The Earl of Huntington the Train The Earl of Cumberland the Sword The Earl of Rutland the Ring The Earl of Derby the Rod. The Earl of Shrewsbury the Cap and Coronet The Earl of Nottingham and Privy Seal supported his Highness being in his Surcoat only and bareheaded to the Parliament Chamber The King was already set with all the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in their Robes of State all the Knights and Burgesses of the lower House present as also the Foreign Ambassadors the great Ladies of the Realm and the Lord Mayor and Aldermen of London seated upon Scaffolds The Procession entring in manner aforesaid made three several low Reverencies to his Majesty and when they came to the Throne Garter King at Arms kist the Letters Patents and gave them to the Lord Chamberlain who presented them to the King who delivered them to the Earl of Salisbury Principal Secretary of State who read them the Prince kneeling all the while before the King and at the words accustomed the King put on the Robe the Sword the Cap and Coronet the Rod and the Ring The Patent being read the King kist him on the Cheek and the Earl Marshal with the Lord Chamberlain placed him in his Parliament Seat viz. on the left hand of the King which Ceremony being ended they returned to the Palace Bridge in manner as followeth First the Masters of the Chancery the King's Council and others then the Officers of Arms the Knights of the Bath next twenty Trumpets before them then the Judges and after them all the Members of Parliament in order the Barons Viscounts Earls and Marquisses having Coronets on their Heads then Norroy and Clarenceaux King at Arms going next before the Lord Treasurer and the Lord Chancellor then Garter next before the Sword and then the Prince and King They took Barge at the Palace Stairs and landed at Whitehall Bridge where the Officers at Arms the Members of Parliament and the Lords being first landed attended the King and Prince and went before into the Hall and so into his Majestie 's Presence Chamber whence the Prince descended again into the Hall to Dinner himself seated at the upper end of a Table accompanied with the Lords that attended him at his Creation who sate on both sides of the Table with him At another Table on the left hand sate the Knights of the Bath in their Robes along one side attended by the King's Servants At the second Course Garter with the Heralds came to the Prince's Table and after due reverence proclaimed the King's Style with three Largesses viz. King of England Scotland France and Ireland Defender of the Faith c. And then proclaimed the Prince's Titles viz. Prince of Wales Duke of Cornwall and Rothsay Earl of Rothsay Earl of Chester and Knight of the Garter with two Largesses Then with Feasting Masques and all sort of Courtly Gallantry that joyful
his matys most honble privy Councell for England Ireland câ—â— The Right honble Iohn Earle of Bath Viscount â—renvile of Lonsdowne Baron Greenvile of Kilkhampton Bidiford L â— Warden of the Stanneries high Steward of the Dutchy of Cornwall Ld. Leivetenant of Cornwall Governour of Plymouth Groom of the Stoole first Gent. of his matys Bedchamber and one of his Ma â—â— privy Councell câ—t. The Right honble Charles Howard Earle of Carlisle Viscount Morpeth Baron Dacres of Gisland Lord Leivtenant of Cumberland and Westmorland Vice Admirall of the Coast of Northumberland Cumberland Westmoreland Bishoprick of Durham Towne and County of New castle and Maritin parts adjacent and one of the Lords of his Maties most honble privy Councell câ—t The Right honble William Earle of Craven Viscount Craven of Vffington Baron Craven of Hampsted-Marshall Lord Leivtenant of the County of Middâ—x and Borough of Southwark one of the Lords of his Mtys most honble privy Councell câ—t The Right honble Robert Bruce Earle of Alisbury Elgin Viscount Bruce of Ampthill Baron Bruce of Whorâ—â—on Skelton Kinloss Hereditary High Steward of the Honour of Ampâ—hiâ—â— Lord Leivtenant of the County of Bedford and High Steward of Leicester ct. The Right honble Richard Boyle Earle of Burlington Baron Clifford of Lansborow in Englandâ— Earle of Corke Viscount Dungarvan Baron Yaughalâ— and Lord High Trâ—asurer of Ireland â— â— The Right honble Henry Bennet Earle and Baron of Arlington Viscount Thetford Knight of the most noble order of the Garter Lord Chamberlaine of his matys Household and one of the Lords of his most honble Councel ct. The Right honble Anthony Earle of Shaâ—tesbury Baron Ashley of Wimbourne St. Giles and Lord Cooper of Pawleâ— The Right honble Henry Howard â—arle of Norwich Earle Marshall of England Baron Howard of Castle Riseing Now Duke of Norfolkâ— see in the Catalogue of Duâ—es The Right Honourable William Herbert Earle and Baron of Powis ◠〈◊〉 Right Honourable Edward Henry 〈◊〉 of Litchfield Viscount Quarenton â—â—d Baron Spilsbury The Rt. Noble Iohn Maitland Earle of Guilford and Baron of Petersham in England Duke of Latherdale Viscount Maitland Baron of Thirleston Miescleborougâ— and Bolton in Scotland Ld. Comissioner for his present Ma â—y of that Kingdome Kt. of the Garter Gentlemâ—â— of the Bedchamber and one of his matys most honble privy Councell for the Kingdomes of England Irelandâ— The Right honble Chaâ—les Fitz-Charles Earle of Plymouth Viscount Totnes and Baron Dartmouth The Right Honourable Thomas Osborne Earle of Danby Viscount Latimer Baron Osborne of Kiveton Viscount Osborne of Danblaine in Scotland Kt. of the most noble order of the Garter â— L d high Treasurer of Englandâ— ctâ— The Right Honourable George Fitz Roy Earle of Northumberland Viscount Falmouth and Baron Ponteâ—fract c a. The Right Honourable Thomas Leonard Earle of Sussex and Lord Dacres of Giles land c a. The R t Honourable Lovis Earle of Feversham Viscount Sondes Lord Duras Baron of Holdenby and Throwley Captaine of his Royall Highness Troop of his matys Guards Leivtenant Geneâ—rall of his Maties forces and Collonell of his matys owne Royall Regiment of Dragoons The Right Honourable Charles Beauclair Baron of Heddington and Earle of Burford The Right honble William Oâ—Brien Earle Baron of Insiâ—uin Baron of Burren in the Kingdome of Ireland Captaine Generall of his matys Forces in Affrica Gouernor of the Royoll Citty of Tanger vice Admirall of the same and of the parts adjacent and one of his Mat ys most honble privy Councell for the Sd. Kingdom of Ireland The Right Honourable Charles Moore Earle and Viscount of Drogheda and Baron of Mellefont in the Kingdom of Ireland c a. The Ri t honble Luke Plunkett Earle of Fingall and Baron of Killeene in the Kingdome of Ireland c a. The Rtâ— Honerable Sr. Arthur Chichester Kt Baron of Belfast Vist. Chichester of Carikfergus Earle of Donegall in ye. Kingdom of Ireland Gouernor of Carikfergus ye. Teritoryes Therâ—â—â—â— Belonging one of his mat ys Most Hoâ—â—◠〈◊〉 Councell for ye. S â— Kingdom The Rt. honble Iames Ogilby Earle of Airly Elight and Glentrahen in the Kingdome of Scotland c a. The Right Honourable Iohn Fitz Gerard Earle of Kildeare primier Earle of the Kingdome of Ireland c a. The Right Honourable William Pope Earle of Downe Baron and Lord Pope of Bellterbitt in Ireland c a. The Rt. honble Roger Palmer Earle of Castlemaine and Baron of Lamberick in the Kingdome of Ireland c a. OF EARLES CHAP. VI. THE next Degree of Honour is an Earl which Word and Title came from the Saxons For it is observed That originally within this Realm in the ancient English-Saxon Government Earldomes of Counties were not only Dignities of Honour but Offices of Justice having the charge and custody of the County whereof they were Earls and for their Assistance had their Deputy called Vicecomes which Office is now managed by Sheriffs each County having his Sheriff Annually chosen out of the eminent Inhabitants thereof under the Degree of Nobiles Majores And the Earls in recompence of their Travels concerning the Affairs of the County then received a Salary viz. a third peny of the Profits of the County which Custome continued a long time after the Conquest and was inserted as a Princely Benevolence in their Patents of Creation as by divers ancient Patents may appear which afterwards were turned into Pensions for the better support of that Honour as appeareth by a Book-Case 32 Hen. 6. 28. And therefore in respect of such Pensions or such other Gratuities given in lieu thereof some men have not without probability thereof imagined quod Comites nominabantur quia à multis fisci Regii socii Comites eidem participes essent The word Earl by the Saxons was called Erlig or Ethling by the Germans Graves as Lantgrave Palsgrave Margrave Rheingrave and the like and by the Dutch was called Eorle But upon the coming in of the Normans they were called Comes or Comites that is Counts and for Gravity in Council they are called Comes Illustris a Comitando Principem And as Earls for their Vertues and Heroical Qualities are reputed Princes or Companions for Princes so ought they to deport themselves answerable to the said Dignity as well in their Attendance and Noble House-keeping as otherwise The Dignity of Earl is of divers kinds and is either local or personal Local as from the denomination of some place and Personal as being in some great Office as Earl-Marshal and the like Those Local are also Palatine and Simplices Those that are Palatine or Count Palatine are Chester Lancaster and the Bishopricks of Durham and Ely and retain some of the ancient Priviledges allowed them by the Saxons Hugh Lupus who was the first Hereditary Earl had the County Palatine of Chester given him by the Conqueror who governed it
of the most noble order of the Garter c â— The Right Reverend Father in God Henry Compton by Divine permission Lord Bishop of London Deane of his matys Chappel and one of the Lords of his most honble privy Councell brother to the Rt. honble Iames Earle of Northampton The Right Reverend Father in God Nathaniel Crew by divine permission Lord Bishop of Durham Clerk of the Closetâ— to his Maty and one of the Lords of his most honble privy Councell son to the Rt. honble Iohn Ld. Crew Baron of Steane The Right Reverend Father in God Iohn Pearson by Divine permission Lord Bishop of Chester The Right Reverend Father in God Peter Gunning by Divine permission Lord Bishop of Ely OF THE Lords Spiritual CHAP. VIII ACCORDING to the Laws and Customes of this Realm many are the Ecclesiastical Dignities and Priviledges belonging to the Bishops and Clergymen who in all succeeding Ages have been reverenced with the greatest observance imaginable as being acknowleded by all good Christians to be those Messengers sent and particularly appointed by God to take care of our Souls The Subjects of England are either Clergy or Laymen both which are subdivided into Nobility and Commons Thus we find in our Parliament the Lords Spiritual and Temporal make the Upper House the Commons Spiritual viz. the Clergy elected to sit in Convocation who once had place and suffrage in the Lower House of Parliament and the Commons Temporal viz. the Knights and Burgesses make the Commons Most evident it is by the Consent of all the Councils Fathers Histories and Universal Tradition That for the first Fifteen hundred years continuance of Christianity there is no Example to be found of any Church governed by any Authority Ecclesiastick but that of Episcopacy they were ordained by the Apostles themselves to be their Successors in Christ's Church to have a vigilant eye over the Pastors and Teachers under them as to their Lives and Doctrine for the preservation of Truth and Peace the prevention of Scandal suppression of Heresie and Schism and to have a care of their Flock to bring them to Salvation 'T is not therefore without reason that in all times they have been the first of the two Divisions of the people the Clergy and Laity and as Spiritual Barons take place of Temporal they take their name from the Saxon word Biscoep a Super-intendent or Overseer They are three ways Barons of the Realm viz. by Writ Patent and Consecration They precede all under the Degree of Viscounts and are always placed upon the King 's right hand in the Parliament House They have the Title of Lords and Right Reverend Fathers in God And their Sees by the piety of former times are endowed with fair Revenues for the due administration of what belongs to their places And to keep them from corrupt and sinister affections the King 's most Noble Progenitors and the Ancestors of the Nobility and Gentry have sufficiently endowed the Church with Honour and Possessions Many Priviledges and Immunities were likewise granted to them and the Clergy by the Saxon and Danish Kings as coyning of Money conferring the Order of Knighthood c. which hath been long since appropriate to the Crown Thus Laufranck Archbishop of Canterbury made William the Second Knight in the life time of his Father Of Priviledges remaining some belong to to the Archbishops some to the Bishops as they are so and some to them and all other of the Clergy We read of three Archbishopricks in England before the Saxons came amongst us viz. that of London York and Carleon upon Vske But Christianity being thence expelled by the Pagans the succession of those Sees ceased till it pleased God to restore the Light of his Gospel to the blind Saxons which in this Kingdom had planted themselves by the Ministration of St. Augustin who first preached Salvation to them at Canterbury and was there buried for whose sake they removed the Episcopal See from London unto Canterbury and in process of time placed another Archbishop at â—ork which two Provinces included England and Wales and have Five and twenty Bishops under them Six and twenty Deans of Cathedrals and Collegiate Churches Sixty Arch-Deacons Five hundred forty four Prebendaries many rural Deans and about Ten thousand Rectors and Vicars of Parishes The Archbishop of Canterbury was anciently the Metropolitan of England Scotland Ireland and the Isles adjacent and was therefore sometime styled a Patriarch and had several Archbishops under him His style was Alterius orbis Papa orbis Britannici Pontifex The Date of Records in Ecclesiastical Affairs ran thus Anno Pontificatus nostri primo c. He was Legatus Natus which power was annexed to that See near One thousand years ago whereby no other Legat or Nuntio from Rome could exercise any Legantive power without the King 's special Licence In General Councils he had place before all other Archbishops at the Pope's right Foot Nor was he respected less at home than abroad being according to the practise of most other Christian States reputed the second person in the Kingdom and named and ranked before the Princes of the Blood By the favour of our present King he still enjoys divers considerable preheminences as Primate and Metropolitan of all England hath power to summon the Arch-bishop of York and the Bishops of his Province to a National Synod is primus par Regni preceding not only Dukes but all the Great Officers of the Crown next to the Royal Family He is styled by the King Dei Gratia Archiopiscopus Cantuarii Writes himself Divina Providentia as doth the Archbishop of York other Bishops write Divina permissione and hath the Title of Grace given him as it is to Dukes and Most Reverend Father in God His Office is to Crown the King and wheresoever the Court shall happen to be 't is said the King and Queen are Speciales Domestici Parochiani Domini Archiepisc. Cant. The Bishop of London is accounted his Provincial Dean the Bishop of Winchester his Chancellor and the Bishop of Rochester his Chaplain He hath the power of all the probate of Wills and granting Letters of Administration where the party hath bona notabilia that is Five pounds worth or above out of the Diocess wherein he dieth or Ten pounds worth within the Diocess of London By Statute of Hen. 8. 25. he hath power to grant Licences Dispensations c. and holds divers Courts of Judicature viz. his Courts of Arches of Audience his Prerogative Court and his Court of Peculiars And he may retain and qualifie eight Chaplains which is more by two than a Duke can do The Arch-bishop of York was also Legatus Natus and had that Authority annexed to his See He had all the Bishopricks of Scotland under his Province till the year 1470. He hath the place and precedency of all Dukes not of the Royal Blood and of all great Officers except only the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper
in Devon shire The Right Honourable Richard Butler Second son to his Grace Iames Duke of Ormond Earle of Arran Viscount Tulough â—nd Baron of Clougrenan in Ireland and one of the Lords of his matys most Honourable Privy Councell for the said Kingdome and Baron of Weston in England The Right honble Heneage Lord â—inch Baron of Doventry Lord High Chancellor of England â— a The Rt. honble Walter Ld. Aston Baron of Forfare in the Kingdome of Scotland whose Father Sr. Walter Aston Kt. of the Bath Bart. was in the 3d of K. Ch the ist created to the sd. Dignity The Right Honourable Coecilius Coluert Baron Baltemore de Baltemore in the Kingdome of Ireland Absolute Lord and Proprietary of the Provinces of Maryland and Avalon in America The Right Honourable William Lord Allington Baron of Killard in the Kingdome of Ireland The Right Honourable Iohn Lord Baron of KingstoÌ„ Ld President of the Province of Connaugh Comissary generall of ye. Horse for his matys Army in Ireland and one of the Lds of his matys most honble Privy Councell for â—he said Kingdome plerumque ridicula for saepe numero ubi proprietas verborum attenditur sensus veritas amittitur It may leave some use and serve turn in Schools but it is too light for Judgment in Law and for the Seats of Justice Thomas Aquinas setteth down a more certain Rule In vocibus videndum non tam a quo quam ad quid sumatur and words should be taken sensu currenti for Use and Custome is the best Expositor of the Laws and Words quem penes arbitrium est jus norma loquendi in the Lord Chancellor's Speech in the Case Postnati fol. 61. And forasmuch as the word may aptly be applyed to import men of strength Bracton as before appeareth not unaptly useth the signification thereof in these words Sunt alii potentes sub Rege qui dicuntur Barones hoc est robur belli The Antiquity of the Dignity of Barons and the sundry uses of the Name IT seemeth that the Dignity was more ancient than the Name for in the ancient Constitutions there is no mention made of the name of Barons howbeit the Learned Interpreters do understand that Dignity to be comprehended under those which are there called Valvasores Majores and afterwards called Capitanei For of the Valvasors which are thought to be the Barons Valvasores Minores and Valvasini or Valvasores Minimi The like Dignity before the Conquest had those which of the English-Saxons were called Thaines Mills fol. 28. saith Barons were in France from the beginning nevertheless the name of Baron was not much used in this Kingdom until the Norman Conquest after which the word Baron seemeth to be frequently used instead of Thaine amongst the English-Saxons For as they in general and large signification did sometimes use the same to the sense and meaning and import of a Freeman born of a Free Parentage or such like So did the Normans use the word Baron and therefore called their best esteemed Towns and Boroughs by the name of Barons And so the Citizens of London were called Barons Londonni divers ancient Monuments of whom also Britan. maketh mention fol. 272. lib. 5. cap. 14. Also there are divers Charters wherein mention is made of such like Barons And the Barons of Warwick in the Record of Domesday and unto our time the Free Burgesses of the Five priviledged Ports and for that also divers of the Nobility of Barons as well Spiritual as Temporal did in ancient time sit in the Exchequer to determine the matters there arising The Judges of that Court have been time out of mind called Barons of the Exchequer And â—â—lliam de la Poole was created a Baron by King Edward the Third and made Lord Chief Baron of the Exchequer Moreover as the English Saxons had two kinds of Thaines the like hath been observed as touching Barons â—or the King and the Monarchs of the Realm have their immediate Barons being the Peers of the Realm And in like manner certain others of the Nobility especially the Earls which have Jurisdiction Palatine and Earls-Marshal whose Countries have confined upon the Coasts of the Enemy and had under them for their better defence a kind of Barons as namely under the County Palatine of Chester were these Barons viz. the Barons of Hilton Mountale Molebanck Shipbrooke Malpas Massa Kinderton Stockport c. The Earldom of Pembroke being first erected by Arnulphus Montgomery that conquered part of Wales and therefore the Earl thereof being an Earl-Marshal had also under him his Barons as by the Parliament Rolls 18 Edw. 1. doth appear It hath been therefore a common Opinion received That every Earldom in times past had under it Ten Barons and every Baron Ten Knights Fees holden of him and that those which have Four Knights Fees were usually called and promoted to the Degree of a Baron Also Lords and Proprietors of Mannors were in respect of them in ancient remembrance called Barons but absolutely and the Courts of their Mannors called thereof Courts Barons It resteth now for the more explanation of the use of the name of Barons that we call to remembrance that which hath bin afore spoken That the Custome of our Country is that if a Baron be created Earl the eldest Son of the said Earl taketh upon him in the life time of his Father the Name and Title of the Barony although he want the priviledges belonging to a Baron The Tenor and proper signification of the word Baron BArons Honourable are of three kinds viz. by Tenure by Writ and by Creation or Patent As for Barons by Prescription which some men have spoken of they are intended to be all one with the Barons by Tenure or those whose Ancestors time out of mind have been called to Parliament by Writ for otherwise there are no such to be found as Barons by Prescription only CHAP. X. Barons by Tenure BArons by Tenure are those which do hold any Honour Castle or Mannor as the head of their Barony per Baroniam which is Grand Serâ—eanty And those Barons by Tenure are of two sorts Barons Spiritual by Tenure and Barons Temporal by Tenure Of Barons Spiritual by Tenure sufficient is said whereunto may be added That it appeareth by all the ancient Writers of our Law as Brittan Glanvile Bracton and the rest that the Archbishops and Bishops of the Realm in the ancient Saxons days as well during the time that the Realm was divided into divers Kingdoms as also after the uniting of them into one Monarchy were called to Parliament or Assemblies of State as Wisemen not so much in respect of their Tenure for in those days all their Tenures were by a Frank Almoigne but especially for that the Laws and Counsels of men are then most currant and commendable and have a more blessed Issue and Success where they are grounded upon the Law of God the Root and Beginning of
to prejudice him touching his Mothers Inheritance who also did not offend or contrariwise especially in case where the Mother was seized of an Estate in Feesimple either in Lands or Tenements or Title of Honour And this was the case if I be not mistaken of Philip late Earl of Arundel notwithstanding the Attainder of Thomas Duke of Norfolk his Father for he had that Earldom in right of his Mother But they do agree That if the Lands or Tenements or a Title of Honour be given to a man and to his wife in tayl who hath Issue The Father is attainted of Treason and executed though this forfeiture of the Husband shall be no barr to the Wife concerning her interest by Survivorship yet their Issue is barred by the Statute 26 Hen. 8. cap. 13. and his Blood corrupted For in that case the Heir must necessarily make himself Heir as well of the Body of the one as of the other And yet the words of the Statute 32 Hen. 8. cap. 28. are That no Fine Feofâ—ment or other Act or Acts hereafter to be made or suffered by the Husband only of any Mannors Lands Tenements or Hereditaments being the Inheritance or Freehold of his Wife during the Coverture between them shall in any wise be or make any discontinuance or be prejudicial to the said Wife or to her Heirs or to such as shall have right title or interest to the same by the death of such Wife or Wives but the same Wife or her Heirs and such other to whom such right shall appertain after her decease shall or may then lawfully enter into all such Mannors Lands Tenements and Hereditaments according to their Rights and Titles therein For there is Adversity taken and agreed for Law between a discontinuance which doth imply a wrong and a lawful Baron which doth imply a right And therefore if Land be given to the Husband and the Wife and to the Heirs of their Bodies begotten and the Husband levies a Fine with Proclamation or do commit High Treason and dieth and the Wife before or after Entry dieth the Issue is barred and the Comisee for the King hath right unto the Lands because the Issue cannot claim as Heir unto both And with this doth agree Dyer 351. b. adjudged vide 5 Hen. 7. 32. Cott's Assize Coke's eighth part 27. where it is resolved That the Statute 32 Hen. 8. doth extend only unto Discontinuances although the Act hath general words or be prejudicial to the Wife or her Heirs c. but the conclusion if she shall lawfully enter c. according to their right and title therein which they cannot do when they be barred and have no right title and interest And this Statute doth give advantage unto the Wife c. so long as she hath right but it doth not extend to take away a future barr Although the Statute doth give Entry without limitation of any time nevertheless the Entry must attend upon the right and therefore if the Wife be seized in Feesimple and her Husband levy a Fine with Proclamation unto another and dieth now the Wife may enter by force of the Statute for as yet that Fine is not any barr unto her but her right doth remain which she may continue by Entry but if she do surcease her time and the five years do pass without Entry c. now by force of the Fine with Proclamation and five years past after the death of her Husband she is barred of her right and by consequence she cannot enter And the Statute doth speak of Fine only and not of Fine with Proclamation If there be Father and Son and the Father be seized of Lands holden in Capite or otherwise by Knight's Service the King doth create the Son Duke Earl or other Degree of Nobility and afterwards the Father dieth his Son being within the Age of One and twenty years he shall be no Ward but if the King had made him Knight in the life of his Father he should not have been in Ward after the death of his Father neither for the Lands descended nor for his Marriage though he be within Age. NOBILITY AND LORDS IN REPUTATION ONLY CHAP. XIV THERE are also other Lords in Reputation and Appellation who nevertheless are not de jure neither can they enjoy the priviledges of those of the Nobility that are Lords of the Parliament The Son and Heir of a Duke during his Father's life is only in courtesie of Speech and Honour called an Earl and the eldest Son of a Marquiss or an Earl a Lord but not so in legal proceedings or in the King's Courts of Judicature But the King may at his pleasure create them in the life of their Ancestors into any Degree of Lords of the Parliament And according to the German Custom all the younger Sons of Dukes and Marquisses are called Lords but by courtesie only which Title descends not to their Heirs A Duke or other of the Nobility of a Foreign Nation doth come into this Land by the King 's safe Conduct in which said Letters of safe Conduct he is named a Duke according to his Creation yet that Appellation maketh him not a Duke c. to sue or be sued by that name within this Realm but is only so by Reputation But if the King of Denmark or other Sovereign King come into England under safe Conduct he during his abode here ought to be styled by the name of King and to retain his Honour although not his Regal Command and Power And in this case may be observed by the way That no Sovereign King may enter into this Realm without licence though he be in League All the younger Sons of the Kings of England are of the Nobility of England and Earls by their Birth without any other Creation And if an Englishman be created Earl of the Empire or some other Title of Honour by the Emperor or other Monarch he shall not bear that Dignity in England but is only an Earl in Reputation A Lord or Peer of Scotland or Ireland is not of the Nobility or Peerage of England in all Courts of Justice although he is commonly reputed a Lord and hath priviledge as a Peer OF THE QUEEN CONSORT AND OF NOBLE WOMEN CHAP. XV. A QUEEN so called from the Sâ—xon word Cuningine as the King from Cuning by variation of Gender only as was their manner signifieth Power and Knowledge and thereby denotes the Sovereignty due unto them which they enjoyed in those days and do now in most Nations being capable of the Royal Diadem by the common right of Inheritance for want of Heirs Male But in France by the Salique Law the Sex is excluded from their Inheritance by which they debarred the English Title to their Crown There are three kinds of persons capable of the Title and Dignity of Queen amongst us and each of them different in Power and Priviledge The first is a Queen Sovereign to whom the Crown descends by Birth-right
Ceremony ended Of Degrading of Knights DEgrading of Knights is not very customary Examples being seldom found it being used only for great and notable Facts and Offences against Loyalty and Honour as absenting themselves dishonourably from their King's Service for leaving their Colours and flying to the Enemy for betraying Castles Forts and the like hainous Crimes The manner of Degrading a Knight hath been as followeth When a Knight had been found thus disloyal or corrupt he was to be apprehended and armed Cap-a-pe as if he was going to the Wars was to be placed upon a high Scaffold made for that purpose in the Church and after the Priest had sung some Funeral Psalms as are used at Burials as though he had been dead first they take of his Helmet to shew his face and so by Degrees his whole Armour then the Heralds proclaiming him a disloyal Miscreant with many other Ceremonies to declare him Ignoble he was thrown down the Stage with a Rope and this was done about the time of King Arthur as is affirmed by Mills fol. 84. Also about the Degrading of Knights these things have also been used as the reversing their Coat of Arms by seizing of their Equipage except one Horse ne qui dignitate fâ—ctus est eques cogatur pedes incedere bâ— cutting of the Spurs from their Heels and by taking away their Sword and breaking it But of late the Martial Law is usually put in Execution both in our Civil Wars as in France and elsewhere that is to dispatch such trayterous persons by a File of Musquetiers KNIGHTS OF THE Round Table CHAP. XXII THE Founder of this ancient Order of Knighthood was Arthur King of the Britains who reigned about the year of Christ 516. whose Valour was so great and admirable that many now living do believe the same rather fabulous than real This Noble King having as Sir William Segar noteth driven out of England the Saxons conquered Norway Scotland and the greatest part of France where at Paris he was crowned and returning home lived in such great Renown that many Princes and worthy Knights came from all Parts to his Court to give Evidence of their Valour in the Exercise of Arms. Upon this he erected a Fraternity of Knights which consisted as some say of Four and twenty others a greater Number amongst whom he himself was Chief And for the avoiding of Controversies for taking place when they met together he caused a Round Table to be made from whence they took their Name which said Table if you will believe the Inhabitants of Winchester hangs up in their Castle where they used to meet and the time of their meeting was at Whitsontide Into this Society none were admitted whether Britains or Strangers but such as did make sufficient proof of their Prowess and Dexterity in Arms and such as were Renowned for their Vertue and Valour The Articles which they vowed to keep were To be always well armed both for Horse or Foot Service either by Land or Sea and to be always ready to assail Tyrants and Oppressors To protect and defend Widows Maidens and Children and to relieve all that are in necessity To maintain the Christian Faith contribute their Aid to Holy Church and to protect Pilgrims To advance Honour and suppress Vice To bury Souldiers that wanted Sepulchres To ransom Captives deliver Prisoners and administer to the cure of wounded Souldiers hurt in the Service of their Country To Record all Noble Enterprizes to the end that the Fame thereof may ever live to their Honour and the Renown of the Noble Order That upon any complaint made to the King of Injury or Oppression one of these Knights whom the King should appoint was to Revenge the same If any Foreign Knight came to Court with desire to shew his Prowess these Knights ought to be ready in Arms to answer him If any Lady Gentlewoman or other oppressed or injured person did present a Petition declaring the same whether the Injury was done here or beyond Sea he or she should be graciously heard and without delay one or more Knights should be sent to make Revenge And that every Knight for the advancement of Chivalry should be ready to inform young Lords and Gentlemen in the Orders and Exercises of Arms. For what I can find there was no Robe or Habit prescribed unto these Knights nor can I find with what Ceremony they were made neither what Officers did belong unto the said Order except a Register to record all their Noble Enterprizes Not to pass over this Noble Arthur give me leave to repeat what I find mentioned of him by Sir William Segar in the said Chapter This valiant Prince not confining himself to the narrow limits of his own Kingdom left the Government thereof to the management of his Cosin Mordred and began his Journey or rather Conquest for in all places he found Fortune to favour him And after his many Victories gained of the Saxons Scots Norwegians Romans Saracens and French in the end being laden with Honour he returned into England but found Mordred a Traitor as usurping the Government and obstructing his Landing But all that he could do was in vain for being landed he fled to London but the Citizens refusing to give him Entrance he went into Cornwall where King Arthur gave him Battel which proved unfortunate to them both for Mordred was slain by King Arthur who was also desperately wounded and after this wound as some say he was never found alive or dead which made the Poets to feign that he was taken up into the Firmament and there remaineth a Star amongst the Nine Worthies Which phansie is founded upon the Prophesie of old Merlin which was his Counsel and esteemed as a Prophet who for many years before affirmed That King Arthur after a certain time should resuscitate and come unto Carlion to restore the Round Table He wrote this Epitaph Hic jacet Arturus Rex quondam rexque futurus According to Andrew Favin there was an Order of Knighthood called Knights of St. Thomas which was instituted by King Richard the First after the surprisal of the City of Acon and consisted of all English men Their Patron was St. Thomas Becket their Garment was white and their Ensign was a red Cross charged in the midst with a white Escallop But A. Mendo believeth that these Knights were rather some of those which joyned themselves with the Knights Hospitallers for that they wore the same Habit followed the same Rule and observed the same Customes as did the Knights of St. Iohn of Acon KNIGHTS OF THE THISTLE OR OF St. Andrew in Scotland CHAP. XXIII HVNGVS King of the Picts the Night before the Battel that was fought betwixt him and Athelstan King of England saw in the Skie a bright Cross in fashion of that whereon St. Andrew suffered Martyrdom and the day proving successful unto Hungus in memorial of the said Apparition which did presage so happy an Omen the Picts and