Ministers are by Act of Parliament severely commanded to do it BY the late Act before mentioned where the Doubt so it is called there about the Coercive power in Ecclesiastical Courts is clear'd and taken away One Proviso is That that Act nor any thing therein conteined shall extend or be construed to extend to give unto any Archbishop or Bishop or any other Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Judge c. any power or authority to exercise c. If any be peccant that way it ought to be amended Another Proviso forbids any Archbishop Bishop c. to tender or administer unto any person the Oath usually called the Oath Ex officio or any other Oath whereby such person to whom the same is tendred or administred may be charged or compelled to confess or accuse or to purge him or her self of any criminal matter or thing whereby he or she may be lyable to any censure or punishment This being now forbidden by Act of Parliament every Subject ought to give obedience therein But some now insulting and upbraiding the Ecclesiastical Courts that all this while they have oppressed the Subject with that proceeding which the Parliament hath taken away renewing the old cry in Queen Elizabeths time and ever since against such proceedings which never till now I alwayes except what was done in the late times of usurped government were legally prohibited Though I am far from questioning the reasons whereupon that Act passed but do humbly submit to it both in word and practice yet I hope it will be allowed to make some defence against such persons as so tax such proceedings before the passing of this Act. And herein I shall follow that most able Civilian Richard Cosin Doctor of the Laws and Dean of the Arches in that his Apology for sundry proceedings by Jurisdiction Ecclesiastical c. Mr. Cambden as before mentions him with honour as surely he well deserv'd and that work of his if nothing else evinces it Mr. Swinburn in that Work of his of Last Wills and Testaments printed at London for the Company of Stationers 1611. in the first part sect 6. numb 8. fol. 17. writes thus of him and of that Work of his that Apology I find saith he written by that learned and no less religious man Doctor Cosins at I take it in that worthy Work entituled An Apology for sundry proceedings by Jurisdiction Ecclesiastical c. and so he goes on Upon this subject he hath written so fully that I believe little can be added to it and if any should go about it excepting such additions as well may be added by reason of some emergencies since the time he wrote and some other additions and explications not derogatory from him they would be forced very much to plough with his Heyfer which would but look too much like a Plagiary I could wish the book were reprinted and haply it will be so which may serve for Topicks to this subject For as all the Poets after Homer are said to drink of his Fountain according to that picture or statue of his that denotes as much with that Inscription Ridet anhelantem post se vestigia turbam Even so must I conceive all do from Doctor Cosin that shall write upon this subject I was upon Epitomizing that Apology of his and had made some progress therein but upon second thoughts desisted thinking it better to refer the Reader to him rather then to adventure to abbreviate him and thereby perhaps wrong him an offence that too many Epitomizers are guilty of therefore I say I shall onely make use of some Notes as confessed arrows out of his quiver and sippe of some others elsewhere and point the Reader to his full stream where any that list may drink their fill Upon these words in the late Act Provided that this Act. nor anything therein contained shall extend or be construed to extend or give unto any Archbishop Bishop c. any power or authority to exercise or execute c. any jurisdiction which they might not have done before the year of our Lord 1639. or to abridge or diminish the Kings Majesties Supremacy in Ecclesiastical matters or affairs nor to confirm the Canons made in the year 1640. I say upon these words some are ready mistaking questionless the words and meaning of that Act to renew that old exploded Opinion or rather groundless Fancy That a several Royal assent to the executing of every particular Canon is required Hereto Doctor Cosin answers That admitting This were true then all the other opinions of those that oppugn the ordinary Jurisdiction Ecclesiastical stand in no stead and might be spared because this would cut off all at once For none that exercise ordinary Jurisdiction Ecclesiastical have it in particularity which by the oppugners seems to be meant otherwise then by permission of Law to every of their proceedings and impossible were it by reason of the infinity of it and troublesomness to procure such particular assent to the execution of every Canon His Majesties Delegates when Appeals are made to His Majesty in Chancery would signifie nothing could not exercise the power to them delegated by reason of the want of such particular assent and it is a gross absurdity to grant as even the Oppugners and Innovators do That Testamentary and Matrimonial causes are of Ecclesiastical cognizance to say nothing of the rest of Ecclesiastical causes and yet cannot by reason of this want be dispatched nor can be dealt in by any other authority according to any Law in force This would speak a defect in the publick Government that the Subject should have a right but no likely or ready mean to come by it and great offences by Law punishable and yet no man sufficiently authorized to execute these Laws Since the abrogation of Papal pretended Supremacy when the ancient rights of the Kings of England of being Supreme Governors over all persons within their Dominions as well in all spiritual or Ecclesiastical things or causes as Temporal and that no forreign Prince Person Prelate State or Potentate hath or ought to have any jurisdiction power superiority preeminence or authority Ecclesiastical or Spiritual within this Realm and so forth as in the Act and the Oath Since these rights were as it were ex postliminio restored and declared to have been as they ever ought to have been in the Kings of England many Laws have been made in several Parliaments for the strengthning of Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and the more effectual execution thereof and some of the Ecclesiastical Laws were enlarged altered and explained * 25 H. 8.19 The Statutes for Delegates upon Appeals †27 H 8 130. 32 H 8.7 Not long after two Statues for assistance of ordinary Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and for the speedier recovery of Tithes in Courts Ecclesiastical * 34 35 H. 8 19. The like for the recovery of Pensions Procurations c. †1 Ed. 6. c. 2. In the time of Edw. 6.
in a Statute since repealed by Queen Mary a great number of particular causes of Jurisdiction Ecclesiastical are there by the way rehearsed that Ordinaries and other Ecclesiastical Judges might and did then put in execution So 1 Mar. c. 3. 1 Eliz. c. 1. 5 Eliz c. 23 9. That Perjury or Subornation in a Court Ecclesiastical shall and may be punished by such usual and ordinary Laws as heretofore have been and yet are used and frequented in the said Ecclesiastical Courts Which proveth the usual practice of Jurisdiction Ecclesiastical hitherto used without any special assent to be lawful So 13 Eliz. c. 4. c. 10. and many more in the same Queens time and King James and King Charles the First that blessed King and Martyr I say many are the Laws that have been made for the strengthning of Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and the more effectual execution of it and some of these Laws were enlarged altered and explained But never was there any Law Custom or Act of Parliament that required a several Royal assent to the executing of every particular Canon Many are the reasons which Dr. Cosens gives in the first Chapter of his Apology against that particular Assent wherein he shews his great candor and ingenuity and desire to give abundant satisfaction to all Opponents though never so unreasonable that were it not as clear as the Noon-tide light that no such particular assent is needful some might think that he fear'd his cause and be ready to say that Desensio nimis operosa reatum quasi arguit But touching the validity of the Ecclesiastical Laws there needs I conceive no more be said then what is expressed in that Act of Parliament 25 H. 8.19 the Ecclesiastical Laws that were in use and practice before that Statute are thereby established thus Provided that such Canons Constitutions Ordinances and Synods Provincial being already made which be not contrariant nor repugnant to the Laws Statutes and Customs of this Realm nor to the damage or hurt of the Kings Prerogative Royal shall now still be used and execrated as they were before the making of this Act untill such time as they be viewed c. by the 32. persons mentioned in that Act which is not yet done The Ecclesiastical Laws which have been made since that Act and all that ever hereafter shall be made so long as tht Statute stands in force the requisites in that Act being observ'd are thereby I conceive confirmed or to be confirmed The Submission and Petition of the Clergy mentioned in that Act is That they would not enact or put in ure any new Canons c. in their Convocation without the Kings Royal assent and authority in that behalf There it is said That the Convocation in the time coming shall alwayes be assembled by authority of the King Writ and that the Clergy must have the Kings most royal assent and licence to make promulge and execute such Canons Constitutions and Ordinances Provincial and Synodal else they may not enact promulge or constitute any such Canons c. And this course hath ever since been observed Every Convocation called by His Majesties Writ and the Clergy had especial license from His Majesty to enact such Canons c. and to execute them The Provision following being observed which is this Provided that no Canons Constuurions or Ordinances shall be made or put in execution in this Realm by authority of the Convocation of the Clergy which shall be contrariant or repugnant to the Prerogative Royal or the Customs Laws or Statutes of this Realm any thing contained in that Act to the contrary thereof notwithstanding If any be put in execution contrary to this Proviso and contrary to any after-Acts of Parliament whereby His Majesty hath further power acknowledged in causes Ecclesiastical then 't is illegal but that is much sooner alledged than proved The particular Ecclesiastical Laws in force have by Dr. Cosens and others been sufficiently demonstrated I humbly conceive In case any Jurisdiction Ecclesiastical or Civil within this Realm be not derived or claimed from the Crown as to the execution of it at least then the former objection were of force but another Act of Parliament 8 Eliz. c. 1. shews the contrary sufficiently where all Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction is acknowledged United to the Crown as there fully and that very clause 1 Eliz. 1. together with His Majesties Letters Patents directed forth for confirming Archbishops and Bishops is brought in the preamble thereof as a strong proof without scruple or ambiguity that the authority and jurisdiction by the Clergy executed is thereby given them from Her Majesty This also were there nothing else were sufficient to entitle them the Kings Majesties Ecclesiastical Laws as well as other Laws are called the Kings Majesties Laws But they are up and down in the Acts of Parliament called the Kings and the Queens Ecclesiastical Laws 1 Eliz. c. 2. 5 Eliz. c. 25. 25 H. 8.27 c. and even by the Note gatherer that great oppugner against whom the Doctor writeth they are called the Ecclesiastical Laws of England And in this late Act above mentioned they are called the Kings Majesties Ecclesiastical Laws Yet for executing of these Laws by the Ecclesiastical Judges what out-cries were made against them especially in the beginning of the late Long Panliament by His late Majesty of blessed memory called the Black Parliament Summa imis miscendo and what favours were then afforded to those Boutefeu's as we have since had sad experience of them God grant we may be cafeful of them for the future I am unwilling to recite Ecclesiastical Judges are not onely tyed by their offices and * Canon 117. Canon Constitut 1604. Oaths but at least in some particulars for which they have though most unjustly been much clamour'd against are most severely by Act of Parliament charged to see the execution of if not of others too yet of one especial Ecclesiastical Law for their care wherein some of them have been well-nigh ruined that is that according to that Act of Parliament 1 Eliz. c. 2. For uniformity of Prayer and Administration of Sacraments every person should diligently and faithfully resort to their Parish Church or Chappel where Common prayer and such Services of God shall be used upon every Sunday and other dayes ordeined and used to be kept as Holy-dayes and then and there to abide orderly and soberly during the time of Common prayer Preaching or other Service of God to be used and ministred c. Then follows thus And for due execution hereof the Queens most excellent Majesty the Lords Temporal and all the Commons in this present Parliament assembled doth in Gods name earnestly require and charge all the Archbishops Bishops and other Ordinaries that they shall endeavour themselves to the utmost of their knowledge that the due and true execution hereof may be had throughout their Dioceses and charges as they will answer before God for such evils and
been writ about that ridiculous contradiction in adjecto of the two Houses coordination with the King the Monarch when as before is specified the King is the Head the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons the three Estates by several Acts of Parliament specified Lippis tonsoribus notum yet urged for designs mischievous abominably as we have felt As also that trayterous distinction of the Spensers Spensers Treason 'twixt the Kings Person and Office by two Acts of Parliament declared Treason yet in these late times maintained by too many Goodwins book for the justification of the murther of the late King and many other of that kind Goodwins book justifying the murther of the King Mr. Bucks book of Richard the third wherein he seems to impugne the right of the King from the daughter of King Edward the fourth wife to King Henry the seventh Mr. Bucks book of Richard 3. too much leaning to if not affirming Richard the thirds right by that monstrous Act of Parliament that illegitimates Edward the fourths issue In Sir Edward Cooks book entituled The third part of the Institutes of the Law of England Sir Edw. cooks Writings concerning High Treason and other Pleas of the Crown 1658. Printed at London by M. Flesher for W. Lee and D. Pakeman § Le Roy pag. 7. he puts it down there for Law upon the Statute of 25 E. 3. c. 2. De proditionibus That if Treason be committed against a King de facto and non de jure and after the King de jure cometh to the Crown he shall punish the Treason done to the King de facto and a Pardon granted by a King de jure that is not also de facto is void Strange would have been the consequence of this if Cromwell had been made King as some desired and a loyal man should have killed him in order to the restitution of the true King de jure our dread Soveraign King Charles the second Or should a loyal man for the same end have killed him though he had but de facto non de jure the title of Protector how far would that have extended by the words in the same § may be considered where he sayes that Statute of E. 3. is to be understood of a King regnant and as follows there and as he sayes most truly a Queen regnant is within these words Nostre Seigneur le Roy for she hath the Office of a King So perhaps it deserves to be examined whether some of note and power in the time of Cromwells Usurpation did not affirm that Cromwell was within these words Nostre Seigneur le Roy. In regard Sir Edward Cooks Writings are by many held in high repute and some have not stuck to style him the Oracle of the Law therefore his Writings require to be more strictly looked into and that if any errors be found therein they may be detected and expunged as being more dangerous then in other mens Writings not of so great repute Corruptio optimi est pessima Also it was advised Illegal and seditious speeches if it shall be thought fit that such Speeches as have been publickly made by any Judges or noted Lawyers upon the Bench or in any publick Assemblies against the Regal or Subjects Right or the Law of Nations which may give just offence to our Neighbours may be taken notice of and publickly declared against Such us that when that Act of 25 E. 3. was alledged to justifie Cromwells Usurpation and that Seigneur le Roy in that Statute included Cromwell the usurping Protector And that speech of a great Lawyer at the tryal of the Portugal Ambassadors brother when it was alledged that he was by the Law of Nations to be sent back cum postulatu to his Master the King of Portugal to be by him punished for his offence committed here and that that Commission for trying him here without the consent of the Portugal Ambassador was the first Commission that ever was granted here to try any Ambassador or his servant without the Ambassadors consent Even the Bishop of Ross Ambassador from Mary Queen of Scotland though she was de facto deposed or forced to renounce the Crown there when he had committed a great offence yet was onely dismiss'd and not further questioned But to all this and much more that Lawyer replied What have we to do with the Law of Nations if it be contrary to the Law of England One pretended afterwards to excuse him and that he spoke but according to the words in the Statute of 21 H. 8.21 where it is said We are free from any subjection to any mans Laws but onely to such as have been devised made and ordeined within this Realm for the wealth of the same c. which words are intended against the Papal Usurpation imposing Laws upon us As also if it be thought fitting The illegal Preface to the Propositions at the Isle of Wight that that Preface to the Propositions sent by the House to the late King at the Isle of Wight which seem to strike at if not to take away the Kings Negative voice in Parliament expresly contrary to many Acts of Parliament the Kings most known Prerogative and the most known Custom and Law of the Land be declared illegal and derogatory to His Majesties Prerogative and just right As also if it shall be thought fitting Rectifying of translation of some words that the translation of the Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Rom. 13.1 to higher powers altered to the supreme powers for so 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1 Pet. 2.13 is translated whether to the King as supreme The two Houses and Powers inferior many degrees to them have by some been interpreted to be meant by higher powers and strangely hath it been wrested if not exclusive of the King As also if it shall be thought fitting that that expression about the time of His Majesties coming over Illegal Declaration in one of the Declarations or Remonstrances that the Government was by the King Lords and Commons being derogatory to His Majesties Prerogative and Legislative power and the Government being in him radically and but derivatively and subordinately in any others for and under him Therefore to be considered of altered and amended As also The Printing-press if it shall be thought fit that the Presse be carefully looked into that no seditious Books or Pamphlets be vented to poyson the people or to confirm any in their bad principles The want of this care hath grown into a great Seminary of mischief which if nothing but our sad experience of it should make us more wary for the future As also A body of the Law to be framed if it shall be thought fit that according as was begun by the late Lord Chancellor the Lord Viscount St. Albanes which as 't is said King James put him upon a Body of the Laws should be digested and compiled
6. parag 4. he hath these words Ita jam id est sub annum 1145 receptus suit Juris Justinianaei usus ut quoties interpretandi jura sive vetera sive nova sive ratio sive analogia desideraretur aut mos aut lex expressior non reperiretur ad jus illud Justiniaâ—aeum tum veluti rationis juridicae promptuarium optimum ac ditissimum tum ut quòd legem in nondum definitis ex ratione seu analogia commodè suppleret esset recurrendum Certe ita ferme Rhodiam recepere veteres Romani legem in rebut nauticis ut etiam apud nos gentes vicinas leges recipiuntur Oleronianae cùm interim nec hae nec illae ex authoritate sui quà primò conditae sunt vim sic obtinuerint Atque ut Academiae demùm non paucae aliae per Europam Occidentalem hac in re quoad studiorum institutionem Bononiensem Ita etiam Regna alia Respublicae imperium Caesarianum quoad usum juris ejusdem aliquem imitatae sunt retentis semper ac ubique moribus aliâs avitis legibusque sibi pro varia regiminis cujusque formula ante conditis novasque condendi tum libertate tum usu Neque ullibi pro simplici juris norma in Occidente inde usurpatum est jus illud Caesareum sea cum temperamentis quae jam diximus That is About the year One thousand one hundred fourty five Justinians Law came to be used in the Westerne part of Europe in such cases as either the State had made no special provision at all in them or that there was no custome to resolve them by or where in default of both the case that fell out was to be setled by right and sound reason or by some other cases that in all circumstances did resemble the matter in question or lastly where the local statutes themselves were not so clear but that they stood in need of interpretation and were so doubtfully penn'd that solid reason and a deep judgment was to be made use of to explain them In all which cases recourse was had to the Law of Justinian as to the best and richest Treasury of legal reason and equitable knowledge and which could best supply the want of a peculiar Law either with concludent reason or with parallelling the case in question with other express cases of the Law as did exactly suit therewith Much after the same sort were the Rhodian Laws embraced by the ancient Romans to regulate such matters as fell out at Sea as the Laws of Oleron have been in England and elsewhere when as notwithstanding neither the one nor the other have had such a binding power in them as they had when and where they were first ordained And as many Universities at last were guided by that of Bononia where learning after it had layen a long time neglected was first revived in setting up the teaching and reading of all kind of literature so did also other Kingdomes and Common-wealths in some measure make use of the Civil Law as the Empire did reserving to themselves such old Laws and Customes as they had proper to their several formes and wayes of government and the freedome of making new which they practised as oft as they had occasion Neither saith he has that Imperial Law been at any time since observed in the Western Countreys for a positive commanding Law but ever â—â—nder the rules and limits before spoken of The same Mr Selden also in his Mare Clausum c Lib. 1. ca. 24. although he will have the Europaean Nations to practise divers things very opposite to the Civil Law as that there are no Slaves now â—r right of personal Postliminiage as were by the Civil Law and that goods cast away at sea do by the customes and ordiâ—ances of many Countreys accrue to the Princes themselves which by the course of the Civil Law were restored back to the â—wners or if they claimed not went to the first occupant â—t he commends the Princes of Europe for establishing the use of the Civil Law in their Academies and in their Tribunals so far as their own peculiar statutes were not contrary thereunto I cannot also omit what Mr Selden writes in his Review upon his History of Tythes d Ce. 7. Where though he vehemently declaimes against the gross ignorance of those that do not stick to publish here in England commonly that all other States are governed onely by the Civil Law and would have such to understand the difference betwixt the use of Laws in study or argument and the governing authority of them yet he acknowledgeth that in the Empire and a good part of Itaely through the power of Emperours and Popes the authority of the Civil Law doth still continue and that in Portugal the Roman Civil Law is authorized by an Ordinance of State in cases which are not literally comprehended in the customes or constitutions of the Kingdome And as for other Christian States which acknowledge no superiour or any subjection to the Empire as France Spain Denmark Poland the City of Venice and what also in Germany hath made it self free from the Empire though as it is Law he will not have it to binde or rule with them yet he saith in all of them the reason of it brought into method is used and applied commonly to argument when any of their customes or statutes come in question because the practisers studied it in the Universities and had thence their degrees given them And so the old Imperial Civil Law valet pro ratione non pro inducto jure pro ratione onely quantum Reges Dynastae Respublicae intra potestatis suae fines valere patiuntur that is it is of force as Reason not as an introduced Law and no farther as reason then as Kings Rulers and Common-wealths will have it to prevaile within their severall Territories And yet the same Mr Selden also saith within very few lines after that doubtless custome hath made some parts of the Imperials to be received for Law in all places where they have been studied And albeit he be very vehement in asserting that justice is administred in every State by its own peculiar Laws yet he admits also that the interpretation of those Laws in most places save England and Ireland hath of late time been much directed by the reason of the Imperials and onely by the reason of them and not by their authority and that also in case where they are not opposite at all to the special Law of the place but seem to agree with the Law of Nations or common reason And he grants moreover that ever since Frederick Barbarossa's time which is near 500 years ago the Civil Law has grown into a common profession in this Westerne World CHAP. VI. The Civilians themselves do not enlarge the use and practise of the Civil Law in forreign parts further then Mr Selden himself in his writings grants it to
then stand upon our own Legislative authority to which other Princes and people will not be obliged h Consuetudines vel statuta sunt localia sic non obligant nisi subditos Gail obs lib. 2. obs 124. nu 5. but we must be contented to stand and submit our selves to such a Law how forreign soever as is proper for those very matters and to which other Nations do refer themselves which is the Civil Law that Nature has breathed out it self in and Nations have consented unto And if it be so necessary for the carrying on of forreign affairs that they cannot be transacted without it this shews a necessity of admitting of it also in the agitation of certain matters and causes at home and amongst our selves for the more ample reward and encouragement of that profession which can never be maintained or upheld by the transaction of forreign affairs onely which is not desired neither in any greater latitude or measure then has been alwayes allowed it heretofore and where the Common-Law has never known to intermeddle and in which if the Civil Law should not be used questions and differences would arise and there would be no Law or Rule found to settle them which would be a very pernicious thing So that be the authority of the Civil Law forreign which it cannot be except it were imposed upon us by some other Nation or people or be it that it were of no authority at all but what the necessary assent of our own natural reason and the consent of Nations gives it yet it were strange that we should rather chuse to have no Law at all in those matters then to receive or entertain the same for a help to direct our judgments in them It being then so necessary a Law that but by the knowledg and conduct thereof forreign affairs cannot possibly be carried on and there would be a manifest failer of justice in other matters at home without it the supposed inconvenience of having two Laws in one and the same Nation so much urged against it will appear to be a very slender and inconsiderable thing for how can that inconvenience hurt us more then it does other Nations that have Municipal Laws of their own and yet do keep the Civil Law too Besides it is so far from being an inconvenience that it is both a benefit and an honour to a people to abound in justice and to have it rather supplied by two Laws then to fail in the doing thereof by having but one And though where there be two Laws and two distinct professions of them in one State if the matters and causes whereof they are severally allowed the cognizance be not certainly assigned to each that the one may not enterfire with the other there may arise a confusion of jurisdictions and the subject will be uncertain whither to goe for justice and may be in danger to be molested by both Courts for one and the same thing which were an intollerable mischief i Gravius privatorum damno peccatur eùm inter summos magistratus curiasve majores de imperio certatur Bodin de rep lib. 3. ca. 6. Yet the Courts of the Civil Law have alwayes had their limits particularly prescribed them and the causes within their cognisance punctually set down and if they hold plea of any thing else there is a known remedy to be had to stop them by bringing prohibitions from the Common-Law which are never so soon ask'd as granted But if the Common-Law Courts shall draw to their examination such matters as do properly belong to the Civil as they have done too often or do prohibit the Civil from proceeding where they know they can do no right nor give any relief themselves as in the business of allotting portions amongst the deceaseds kindred which they never did nor can do nor will suffer the Civil Law Courts to do it neither this an heavy vexation but the blame must lie upon them But to be sure whilest there is such a correcting hand over the Courts of the Civil Law there is little ground of fear that they can trouble or molest the people further then their just power does authorise them Which may be sufficient also to remove the jealousies of those that fear if the Civil should be admitted it may in time supplant and undermine the Municipal Law of this Nation For it were a vain attempt for subordinate Courts to go about to shake the standing of that Law to whose check and controule they lie continually subject And if in forreign Nations that have their Municipal Laws all of them but no profession nor Lawyers nor Judges but of the Civil Law onely there is not any found so bold and presumptuous that dares at any time to set up the Civil Law above the particular Law or Custome of the place though opportunities to do it are not wanting but that the particular Law or Custome if any be in the case does prevail and has the praeeminence alwayes surely then the Municipal Law and customes of England are much more secure from being invaded and incroched upon when not onely the Law is distinct but there is a distinct profession thereof also from the Civil Law that bears a watchfull eye towards its own greatness and which is more that has a controuling power and as it were a sovereignty over the other Besides the very principles of the Civil Law do run clean counter to any such design it being an express Maxime in that Law That the Municipal Law and custome of any State for what concerns those that are subject to it ought to be preferr'd before any more Universal Law that is 〈◊〉 the contrary Lex Municipalis sive consuetudo juri communi derogat k Gail obs lib. 3. obs 124. nu 2. Lex cujusque loci inspicienda est sive scripta sit sive non l Gl. in l. 5. parag 1. Dig. De jur immunit verb. legem Tam in decidendis litigantium controversiis is qui urâ—sdictiouâ— prâ—â—est conâ—uctud nâ—â— loâ—i in quo conâ—â—actum est observare â—ebet quà m in delictorum puntâ—â—â—ne ejus loci consuâ—tudinem in quo peccatum est â—sequi tenetur l. si fundus Dig. de evict Doct. in l. cunctos Co. De summ Trinit And as I have said before often so I must inculcate it here still The Civil Law where ever it is admitted it comes without the least prejudice to any either Law custome or government nor alters any thing but is an auxiliary supplement or a knowledg assisting in the administration of right and justice both to subjects and between Nation and Nation where there is no Municipal Law in the case or where it is imperfect and obscure or where a locall Law is of no authority at all In the one it supplies in the other it interprets in the last it moderates as a most indifferent Umpire So that of these two Laws the proper office and
't is hoped hath no disaffection to that profession or professors of it but rather in a just resentment of their oppression sutable to his birth and noble disposition if so I say they may comfort themselves in this that they were put to the test in the beginning of the Long Parliament when their factious Accusers were sufficiently numerous and virulent and had they been found guilty they had not then escaped punishment severe and infamous enough They could not easily have been highlier justified then that way which made it appear to all the world that that clamorous party through the sides of the Civilians intended to strike at and wound their Superiors and so serve turns and ends and compasse their long-weav'd design If the Civilians do their parts in their Functions uprightly and diligently which their own consciences doubtlesse will prompt them to and the vigilancy of their factious Adversaries over their actions may serve to keep them awake 't is to be hoped they will every way find comfort and encouragement However that peace at the last and the continual Feast in the interim will buoy them up above the greatest waves of envy or malice Good men will be their friends though the contrary be their enemies and one Cato is better then a Theatre And we cannot but be confident that we shall never have cause to say as some said in another case Non nos Resp. sed defuit nobis Respublica We have a gracious KING whom God protect blesse and prolong his dayes Et Spes Ratio studiorum in Caesare He we doubt not will as before him his Royal Father Charles the first King and Martyr and his Grandfather King James of blessed memory look upon us with a favourable eye according as he finds we endeavour faithfully and diligently to serve the Church and State that is to serve him they who faile therein deserve not to be remembred And besides the general His Sacred Majesty hath in particular demonstrated his gracions favour that way by the addition of honour and honourary revenue to the Masters of the Chancery Civilians for the most part an act that if possibly there can be an addition adds to the just obligation of duty service and gratitude which they owe his most excellent Majesty And all due thankfulnesse and honour the same Profession must ever acknowledge and render to the Right Honourable the Earl of Clarendon Lord Chancellor of England for his special favours to that Profession and Professors and for his mediation and being instrumental as none I believe can suppose otherwise in the obtaining that favour and bounty to the Masters of the Chancery and by furthering the continuance of His Majesties gracious inclination towards them We blesse God and His Majesty and his Lordship for it and are I hope and ever shall be most thankful for it ad rejoyce and comfort our selves in it and Rumpatur quisquis rumpitur invidia Now as in the Preface I thought fit to subjoyn that little Manuscript touching the Oath ex officio with that Determination touching the same by that glory of our Church the late Lord Bishop Lancelot Andrews Bishop of Winchester A Manuscript treating of the Oath Ex officio said to be Doctor Davenants late Lord Bishop of Sarisbury 1. THat which the Commons House complained of is that the Commissioners Ecclesiastical proceed Ex officio that is say they without a known Accuser 2. And that they cause men to answer upon their oath that which they would have is this 1. That no man should be dealt with but an Accuser should stand forth and that no Oath should be ministred to a man in his own cause That which your Lordships have enjoyned me is to shew my opinion whether the courses complained of be warrantable by the Word of God or no. Two parts there are distinctly to be spoken to the one of proceeding without a known Accuser the other of proceeding by way of Oath I begin with them generally at large and after as they concern Ecclesiastical proceedings 1. The end of all Judgments in all Courts is to remove evil The Heathen man sayes Interest reipublicae ut malefict tollantur the health of the civil body consisting no lesse in removing evil persons then doth the natural in purging out evil humours And the very same is Gods course in his Common-Wealth ten several times in Deuteronomy he repeats it Vt sic tolletis malum de medio Israëlis 2. Evil then is to be removed not onely civil but Ecclesiastical so doth God take express orders that corrupt Religion contumacy in disobeying his Priest Incontinency Defamation matters all of ecclesiastical cognisance should be removed expresly terming every one of them malum in Israële And so in the New Testament doth the Apostle speak of the case of Incest Vos autem auferetis malum de vobis These then are evils and Ecclesiastical evils and to be removed 3. If they must be removed they must be known for St. Hierom saith well Quod ignorat medicina non curat Physick both corporal and civil must know the peccant humour before they can purge it 4. If know it they must by the parties themselves they shall never know it The first that ever did trespass were not so ready to commit sin but they were twice as ready to conceal it And as Tertullian saith to good purpose Reliqui omnes congeneres primo All other offenders do as the first did seek to keep their offence from being known The offences themselves ye know are called opera tenebrarum and Incontinency that defileth the body as well as the spiritual Whoredom which is corruption in the Worship of God either of them we know is angularis actio and kept from knowledge as much as may be 5. Then if they must be known and will not by the parties themselves some other means must be used to bring them to light where if there be a party to stand up and accuse 't is well and he not to be refused But we know and I refer my self to your Lordships that it is holden an odious matter to be an Accuser and with the better sort of men more odious Few that be well disposed will be gotten to it and even they that will I refer me to your Lordships again whether Salomon saith not true that One evil will not be accused but out of another evil that is grudge or spleen to wreak our selves upon some party that we conceive hath wronged us otherwise the faintness of men to become Accusers will make that much evil will not be removed if this be onely the way to remove it but God saith All evil must be removed so near as may be 6. For that cause God hath authorized those that hold Judicial places for the removing of evil not onely to receive accusations when they be brought against it but if none be brought to make enquiry after it in the 13 17 and 18 of Deuteronomy that
question was made whether she had sworn truly or no for proof whereof she was to drink the Bitter waters which would be the confirmers of the Oath if true and the revengers if false Num. 5.24 Against another When the Law had provided that out of the mouth of two or three witnesses who being sworn had given testimony against a man the matter should be established Deut. 19.15 Lest any man should take humane testimonies for Divine Oracles in the next Verse 't is commanded that the suspected witnesse must stand before the Lord the Priests and it must be enquired into whether he hath carried himself sincerely and truly in the testimony he hath given but if he be convicted of falsity then shall he be punished as he should have been whom he complained of But I shall transgress upon the time and upon the Church too the Clock having a while ago called us off if I should further follow these trifles which whoever list my bray with arguments they of their own accord so overflow therefore I restore you to your selves and conclude Isa 28.17 If as the Prophet saith this Judgment which we use be laid to the Line and Righteousnesse to the Plummet of Gods Word there shall be in those things no sin For the Magistrate to require and that from the party guilty or defendant especially if the cause be not capital or a cause of Bloud an Oath and that he may do it so far whether it be that the controversie may thereby be set upon its foundation whilest the state of the cause is sought for or that the truth of the proofs may be made evident whilest the question is handled Nor does the ends of the Oath or the order or the examination offend against Divinity and therefore cannot be declined They that decline it first they do it out of ignorance of Gods Law then the example is dangerous that one may thus for his pleasure enquire into publick judgments without judgment if we may call into question the rest of the affairs of the Kingdom and the moments of the Commonwealth lastly the Law it self if it make not for us That God Almighty may avert this from us to whom turning our selves let us pray that he will give us grace to be modestly wise and sober in all things to see in our minds how irreligious it is how unchristian to decline the judgments of our Nation but rather with all our endeavour with all the strength and force of our Wit to maintain them which maintain the Commonwealth and us all for next after God and his service most true is that saying of Elihu Judgment and Justice maintain all things Job 36.17 Upon the consideration most especially of what hath been written by Dr. Cosens in that Apology touching the Oath Ex officio and Purgation and what is said in that short Manuscript and in the Lord Bishop Andrews Determination thereupon and of the inconveniences and hurt that probably may be feared to ensue upon the prohibiting that Oath and Purgation together with the practice still at Common Law in the like cases and the rest that is here set forth as it is hoped that Act may be thought fit to be revised and re-examined and perhaps altered so with the like humility all that is said or shall be said in this Treatise is most submisly tendered to His Sacred Majesty the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in this happy Parliament now assembled to be weighed by them if so to their Wisdoms it shall be thought fit otherwise to be as unsaid and retracted as is every thing there if it be dissonant to Gods Word His Majesties Prerogative the Laws of Church or State or the known Laws of the Land or the just policy and government in Church or State or against Christian charity or brotherly love Should any man object That some Civilians desired that this Act whereby the Oath Ex officio and Purgation is forbidden should passe at the end of the recess of Parliament the latter end of this last Summer 1661. when many other Acts of great concernment were in agitation and some then passed and some stayed supposed that they will be resumed and considered of at the next meeting of Parliament that I say this Act should not stay as some would have had it till that next meeting but rather pass now though with these Proviso's on it I can say no more then this that Certa incertis praeferenda if they could not have all they would have yet to have something that in a manner wanted all was but reasonable prudence it had perhaps savoured of morosity to have done otherwise especially considering that those that have long fasted would be glad to eat though I hope these that administred this food to them did not fear they would as hungry men use to do feed too fast to their hurt not to their nourishment and therefore did set the less meat before them but upon a pause after this refreshment there may be a supply Neither need I humbly conceive any thing that is already done hinder the review or alteration of this Act in that point For it is no new thing nor discommendable but contrary to make Laws upon present reasons or emergencies and yet upon future accidents or contingencies and variation of the times and occasions and other necessary requisites which could not well be foreseen at the making of these Laws nor perhaps dreamt on till they happened to alter change or repeal the former Hereof many instances might be given but so plain a case I shall mention but one and that in a matter of Ecclesiastical cognisance touching Precontracts of Matrimony in 32 H. 8. c. 38. 32 H. 8. cap. 38. What Marriages are lawful and what not WHereas heretofore the usurped power of the Bishop of Rome hath alwayes entangled and troubled the méer jurisdiction and regall power of this Realm of England and also unquieted much the subjects of the same by his usurped power in them as by making that unlawfull which by Gods word is lawfull both in marriages and other things as hereafter shall appear more at length and till now of late in our Soveraign Lords time which is otherwise by learning taught then his predecessors in times past long time have been hath so continued the same whereof yet some sparks be left which hereafter might kindle a greater fire and so remaining his power not to seem utterly extinct Therefore it is thought most convenient to the Kings Highness his Lords spirituall and temporal with the Commons of this Realm assembled in this present Parliament that two things specially for this time be with diligence provided for whereby many inconveniences have ensued and many moe else mought ensue and follow as where heretofore divers and many persons after long continuance together in Matrimony without any allegation of either of the parties or any other at their marriage why the same matrimony should
not be good just and lawful and after the same Matrimony solemnized and consummate by carnal knowledge and also sometime fruit of children ensued of the same Marriage upon pretence of a former contract made and not consummate by carnal copulation for proof whereof two witnesses by that Law were onely required been divorced and separate contrary to Gods Law and so the true Matrimony both solemnized â—n the face of the Church and consummate with bodily knowledge and confirmed also with the fruit of children had between them clearly frustrate and dissolved Farther also by reason of other prohibitions then Gods Law admitteth for their lucre by that Court invented the dispensations whereof they alwayes reserved to themselves as in kindred or affinity between Cousin-germans and so to the fourth and fourth degree carnal knowledge of any of the same kin or affinity before in such outward degrées which else were lawful and be not prohibited by Gods Law and all because they would get money by it and kéep a reputation of their usurped jurisdiction whereby not onely much discord betwéen lawful married persons hath contrary to Gods Ordinance arisen much debate and suit at the Law with wrongful veration and great damage of the innocent party hath béen procured and many just marriages brought in doubt and danger of undoing and also many times undone and lawful heirs disherited whereof there had never else but for his vain-glorious usurpation béen moved any such question since fréedom in them was given by Gods Law which ought to be most sure and certain But that notwithstanding Marriages have been brought into such an uncertainty thereby that no Marriage could be surely knit and bounden but it should lye in either of the parties power and arbiter casting away the fear of God by means and compasses to prove a precontract a kindred and aliance or a carnal knowledge to defeat the same and so under the pretence of these allegations afore rehearsed to live all the dayes of their life in detestable Adultery to the utter destruction of their own souls and the provocation of the terrible wrath of God upon the places where such abominations were used and suffered Be it therefore enacted by the King our Soveraign Lord the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by the authority of the same That from the first day of the Moneth of July next coming in the year of our Lord God 1540. all and every such Marriages as within this Church of England shall be contracted betwéen lawful persons as by this Act we declare all persons to be lawful that be not prohibited by Gods Law to marry such being Marriages contracted and solemnized in the face of the Church and consummate with bodily knowledge or fruit of children or child being had therein betwéen the parties so married shall be by authority of this present Parliament aforesaid déemed judged and taken to be lawful good just and indissoluble notwithstanding any Precontract or Precontracts or Matrimony not consummate with bodily knowledge which either of the parties so married or both shall have made with any other person or persons before the time of contracting that marriage which is solemnized and consummate or whereof such fruit is ensued or may ensue as afore and notwithstanding any Dispensation Prescription Law or other thing granted or confirmed by Act or otherwise And that no reservation or prohibition Gods Law except shall trouble or impeach any marriage without the Levitical degrées And that no person of which estate degrée or condition he or she be shall after the said first day of the Moneth of July aforesaid be admitted to any of the Spiritual Courts within this the Kings Realm or any his Graces other Lands and Dominions to any processe plea or allegation contrary to this foresaid Act. Rep. 1 2 P. M. 8. Rep. 1. El. 1. This Act was not many years after repealed as followeth 2 3 Ed. 6. cap. 23. Part of the Statute of Precontracts repealed WHereas in the two and thirtieth year of the reign of the late King of famous memory King Henry the eighth because that many inconveniences had chanced in this Realm by breaking and dissolving good and lawful marriages yea whereupon also sometime issue and children had followed under the colour and pretence of a former contract made with another the which contract divers times was but very slenderly proved and often but surmised by the malice of the party who desired to be dissolved from the marriage which they liked not and to be coupled with another there was an Act made that all and every such marriages as within the Church of England should be contracted and solemnized in the face of the Church and consummate with bodily knowledge or fruit of children or child being had between the parties so married should be by authority of the said Parliament deemed judged and taken to be lawful good just and indissoluble notwithstanding any precontract or precontracts of Matrimony not consummate with bodily knowledge which either of the persons so married or both had made with any other person or persons before the time of contracting that marriage which is solemnized or consummated or whereof such fruit is ensued or may ensue as by the same Act more plainly appear Sithence the time of the which Act although the same was godly meant the unrulinesse of men hath ungodly abused the same and divers inconveniences intolerable in manner to Christian ears and eyes followed thereupon women and men breaking their own promises and faiths made by the one unto the other so set upon sensuality and pleasure that if after the contract of Matrimony they might have whom they more favoured and desired they could be contented by lightnesse of their nature to overturn all that they had done afore and not afraid in manner even from the very Church door and Marriage feast the man to take another spouse and the espouse to take another husband more for bodily lust and carnal knowledge then for surety of faith and truth or having God in their good remembrance contemning many times also the commandment of the Ecclesiastical Iudge forbidding the parties having made the contract to attempt or do any thing in prejudice of the same Be it therefore enacted by the Kings Highnesse the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in this present Parliament assembled that as concerning Precontracts the said former Statute shall from the first day of Day next comming cease be repealed and of no force or effect and be reduced to the estate and order of the Kings Ecclesiastical Laws of this Realm which immediately before the making of the said Estatute in this case were used in this Realm so that from the said first day of Day when any cause or contract of marriage is pretended to have been made it shall be lawful to the Kings Ecclesiastical Iudge of that place to hear and examine the said cause and