Selected quad for the lemma: england_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
england_n	act_n	king_n	power_n	3,247	5	5.0875	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A29745	A brief remonstrance of the grand grievances and oppressions suffered by Sir William Courten and Sir Paul Pyndar, knts., deceased as also by their heirs, executors, administrators, and creditors : humbly represented to both Houses of Parliament, prorogued to 21 October 1680 : faithfully collected out of several courts of record, orders of counsel, and treaties of peace and common alliance : with several remarks thereupon for the improvement of naviagation, trade, and commerce / by John Brown.	Brown, John, of London.	1680 (1680)	Wing B5025; ESTC R27230	34,787	30

Upon the Complaints of the Commons of England in Parliament an Act passed in the 4th Year of Henry the 5th whereby a remedy was provided for their more speedy Relief in all Cases of Spoyls and Depredations against Leagues Amities Truces and safe Conducts the parties grieved having liberty thereby to Address themselves to the Keeper of the Privy Seal for the time being for Letters of Request who upon Manifest proofs and Evidence of the wrong appearing shall grant Letters of Request in due form if so required for Restitution and Reparations from the parties that did the Injury that is to say from the Prince State or Supream Power which if not made in a convenient time prefixed that then the Lord Chancellour of England shall make to the party grieved Letters of Marque or Reprizals under the Great Seal of England in due form of Law And by a Statute in the 14th Edw. 4th It was Enacted Established and Confirmed that all Statutes and Ordinances against Offences Injuries Damages and Losses done by Breakers of Leagues Amities Truces and safe Conducts shall be in full Force and Effect By which Statute-Law wherein every Subject of England hath an Interest the Lord Privy Seal and Lord Chancellour are bound to grant the said Letters Respectively Ex Officio of Common right they being upon their Oaths to do their Office Iustly otherwise it would be a Uiolation of their trust And therefore without Satisfaction and Reparations first had and obtained in the Case of Courten for the Debt of 151612 l. and Damages the Chancellour cannot legally pass any Act Supersedeas or Proclamation under the Great Seal of England to Revoke or make void the said Letters Patents or to suspend the Execution thereof being the effect and fruit of several Acts of Parliament for Relief of particular Subjects that were Spoyled and Injured against Leagues of Common Amity and Truces Whereas in the High Court of Chancery his Lordship cannot Relieve any Person whatsoever Stranger or Denizon against a Statute-Law Grotius and the Learned Selden agree that after a Depredation Committed by the Subjects of one Nation to those of another and that the Damage hath been Stated and Letters of Request Issued forth and Iustice denied or delayed that Immediatly such Damage becomes a National Debt to the particular Persons Injured and by the Laws of Nations it ought to be recovered and Paid therefore Remedy is provided by the Laws and Statutes of England accordingly When an Authority passeth by the Kings Grant to such injured Persons of Common Right coupled with an interest to Levie and Recover the Debt and Damages when once the Power is Granted as the Law directs the same cannot by any subsequent Act of the King be Bound or Suspended without satisfaction to the Parties Grieved and the reason is plain because such a Grant and Execution upon it is no Breach of Peace or common Alliance between Princes and States And it 's against the Honour and Interest of the King both at Home And Abroad to diminish his own Prerogative and Royal Grant before satisfaction obtained the Patent being published for a President in several Languages amongst all the Neighbouring Nations Answer to the Second Question THat the private Interest of the Subjects of either side upon Debts Accounts Covenants or any civil Contract in Merchandizing upon the Land cannot be in any Measure comprized or comprehended within any Article of the Treaty at Breda under the notion of Offences Injuries Damages and Losses Therefore they cannot fall under that Construction or forced Interpretation of those Words which were intended naturally to Arise from Spoyls and Depredations terms that ought to have been used in the said Articles but that the transgressors would Pallitate Spoyls and Depredations by the names of Losses Injuries and Damages and the two Subsequent Articles being relative to the third having a Dependance upon the said Offences Injuries Damages and Losses no particular or private Debt and Damage can fall under that construction otherwise all English-mens Money in Holland and Consequently all Dutch mens Money in England gotten into the Hands of Bankers on either side might have been confiscated But the Wars being Proclaimed for General Reprizals between the King and States particular Men Traded each with other notwithstanding It was therefore an Apparent Breach of the Laws of Common Amity and of the Alliance with the Crown of England for the States of Holland on the 10th of September 1676. to send their Express Order in Writing to the ordinary Courts of Iudicature in Amsterdam and the Hague interdicting and Prohibiting the Iudges from Granting any Process or doing any Iustice against Jacob Pergens at the Suit of several English-men for Debts due upon Bills Bonds and Covenants for repayment of Moneys gotten into his Hands under several trusts After this Solemn Debate and Resolution upon those two Points in Question were over a grand Objection was raised by the Civil Lawyers then Present which was Answered as follows in Order Obj. THat a Soveraign Prince having the power of Peace and War in his Hands being the Sole Arbiter thereof may make use of a private Interest for the publique Necessity as Sole Legislator in such Cases Answ. St. Augustin sayes that all Humane Laws are Righteous Decrees agreeing with the Natural and Eternal Law and that there is no Law Iust or Legitimate except it agree with them both All Power being confined within the Bounds of Equity and Reason there is no Plea or Bar to be allowed against the Law of Nature which is Immutable It 's Granted that God Almighty having trusted Soveraign Princes with the Government for the Protection and Preservation of their Subjects in their Goods and Properties It if be just the Supream Power hath sufficient Authority to Restrain any particular Mans Right for every Mans Good yet it was ever found most reasonable in all Ages that when a private Interest was Sacrifized for a Common good a recompence was made for the private Damages out of the publick Purse Cicero Tertullian and other most Learned Authors do all agree in this point Verum etsi nostrae tempore necessitatis Patriae conferre debeamus tamen jure naturae congrui ut Communis salus Communis utilitas periculum non unius duntaxat aut alterius sed Communibus impensis jacturis periculisque comparetur BY the Law of Nature if a Soveraign Prince and State enter into a Contract one with the other upon certain Conditions the Contract is viod if the Conditions are not performed To clear this point we need not go far for Presidents the King of Great Britain having declared both the former Treaties in the year 1662. and 1667. With the States General to be void upon that account The States having been refractory in the performance of Agreements concerning Poleroon and in making reparation for other matters As even the Treaty at Breda was Pronounced null and void upon the like score about Surrinam c. Whereby

praedictorum T. I. ac ceterorum praenominatorum una corporibus eorundem quam citius in ballivis suis inventi fuerint arrestari sub arresto hujusmodi custodiri faciant quosque praedicto S. de transgressione damnis ac de perditis praedictis in forma praedicto fuerit satisfactum T c. THe Ancient Laws of England in the Case of Spoyls were grounded upon right reason for that every English Man living here in an Island had not Moneys to right himself against Forraigners in their own Country so often as they would take advantage by Injuring them to make their own Markets neither could an English Man expect to find Iustice abroad without delay where the Offenders for the most part were Parties and Iudges themselves But when the Persons or Goods of Merchants Strangers were once Arrested or Attached here they would find means suddainly to Retaliate their Dammages at home upon the Offenders Even as at this time if a Fisher Man should be attaqued at Sea for the East-India Companies 〈…〉 in the Towns of Holland and Zealand would quickly make the East-India Companie or their Directors in the Chambers at Amsterdam and Middleburgh Refund their Dammages or otherwise they would Dde Wit them or pull down their Houses in that Popular and Tumultuous Government Now I appeal to all unbiassed and impartial Men whether Iudicial Grants under the Great Seal of England made pursuant to the Laws and Statutes of the Realm obtained by such steps and measures mentioned in the body of the Grant for Reprizing the 151612l with Damages ought not to have the effect of the Law by Seizing the value or by Composition Notwithstanding any such Extrajudicial Acts or Proclamations and pretended Supersedeas The Laws of England having so secured the Distinct Rights and Properties of the Subjects that it is not in the Kings Power by any Act of State unless by Parliament to dispose of His Subjects Goods Or whether there was any necessity the Dutch Ambassador the Here Van Leuven Affirming that the 800000 Pattacones were given to take off the durable Grant for Reprizals by which the Hollanders were bound That three parts of the Pattacones should be Assigned to the Prince of Orange for old Debts and no part to the Proprietors of the Bona Espranza nor for the Great Diamonds Sold to the late King by Sir Paul Pyndar not yet paid for Pawned by the late Queen for half the value in Amsterdam Jure naturae equam est neminem cum alterius detrimento injuria fieri locupletiorem There lies a necessity upon the Creditors to let the World know quod defertur non auferter and that both Nations concerned may remember they did not only Smart but Bleed for the Iniquity and Ingratitude of the times wherein the Grieved and Oppressed could finde no Relief It is necessary also to remember that Sir Albertus Joachimy the Dutch Ambassador Resident in Ordinary in England Anno. 1644. Had notice given him of the Monition out of the High Court of Admiralty fixed upon the Exchange that several Persons were upon Examination in perpetuam rei memoriam to prove the Spoyls and Dammages of the Bona Esperanza with the loss of divers Marriners Lives but the said Ambassador would make no defence therein but suffered Iudgment pro confesso by default Although Fellony be Pardonable by the Prince the Trover is not even as in the Case of Murther but not the appeal The Subject hath a natural liberty at his own Suit to take his remedy otherwise all Right and Propertie might be Destroyed It 's Granted that the King may by His Prerogative make a necessary Garrison in time of War in any of His Subjects Houses Castles and Lands for the Common Defence and Protection of His People making compensation But a great Lawyer and Privy Councellor would affirm that the King having the Power of Peace and War may Grant away a Subjects Castle or other his Freeholds in a publick Treaty without any Satisfaction or Price which is against the Law of property and not warrantable by any Reason of State Conclusion VVHen I Consider the sorrows and sufferings of the said George Carew and Iames Bo'evc in Holland and Zealand whereof I was an Eye witness I cannot mention their names in England without Grief and Wonder finding them Groaning under Troubles and Oppressions at home in ascerting their Rights and Properties like true Englishmen who I am Confident at the same time would Sacrifice their Lives and Fortunes for the Crown of England The Case of the Bona Esperanza being prosecuted from the Year 1644. to 1664. Reduced to a certainty under a Grant for Reparation in the Year following could not be violated without a Breach of Trust yet suddainly Suspended for Reason of State The King wanting Seamen in the Summer and the Dukes Privateers Seamen in the Winter In more seasonable times the Creditors were obstructed by Seizures Arrests Proclamations Orders of Council Imprisonments and pretended Supersedeas's all against the known Laws and Liberties of the Subjects while the Proprietors of the Bona Esperanza during all those Arbitrary Prosecutions against them had not the least Overture for their Reparation or once admitted to a hearing at the Council Table for their Relief After Mr. Carew had to my own knowledge Expended Six thousand pounds and upwards in the said Cause having at this time all his Estate in London and Richmond Mortgaged to Sir Iames Butler of Lincolns Inn and Thomas Coleman Esq for 4500 l. Sterling and had paid Interest for the like Sum ever since the Year 1668. to Mr. Iohn Holwerthy Mr. Letton Mr. Iohn Foche Edward Holmewood and others Eminently known in the City of London The Estates of Sir William Courten and Sir Paul Pyndar being Indebted 7000 l. to the said Carew in right of his first Wife the only Daughter of Mr. William Walton a Turkey Merchant whose cause with the others Interested and Concerned being now brought home to this Parliament for Justice they cannot despair of a seasonable Redress according to the measure and nature or then Grievances and Opressions I must not omit therefore in this Conclusion to give a short Abstract of the most Arbitrary and unjust Sentence Pronounced in the Court of Admiralty in England for 1800 l. Damages against Sir Edmond Turnor George Carew Tyrence Birne and Ionathan Frost at the instance of Iacob Neitz and others which was confirmed by the Judges Delegates and Adjuncts in Hillary Term 1678. The Case and unjust Sentence upon it IN the Year 1665. Admiral de Ruiter having taken an old Fly Boat of 200. Tun Dutch Built named the Mary of Bristol belonging to several Merchants of that City bound homewards from Barbadoes with Sugars Cotton Indigo c. The said Ship and Goods so taken were Condemned by the Admiralty Court in Amsterdam as free Prize to the States In the Year 1666. The said Ship being set forth from Amsterdam to Sea by the name of the

desire your Speedy Advice For if you shall find the Terms such as may be imbraced your Advice will have great weight with Me and if you find them Defective I hope you will give Me your Advice and Assistance how to get better Terms Vpon the whole Matter I doubt not but you will have a care of My Honour and the Honour and safety of the Nation which are now so deeply concerned The Substance of the Overtures in the said Letter being communicated to both Houses of Parliament were as follows viz. THat the States General and their Subjects should acknowledge the Kings Dominion and Soveraignty of the Seas by striking to the Kings Ships as was Proposed That a regulation of Trade should be settled and adjusted in the East-Indies by a certain number of Commissioners to be appointed of Each side and a Treaty Marine also settled by the said Commissioners within a certain time to be prefixed That Eight Hundred Thousand Pattacoons should be paid to his Majestie at four equal payments the first upon ratifying the said Treaty and the other by three Yearly payments That the Queen Regent of Spain should be Guarrantee for the performance of the said Articles Whereupon both Houses of Parliament Adressed themselves severally to the King to accept of the said Overtures for a Peace with the States seperate from France which were drawn into formal Articles wherein this Seventh Article was Interlarded concerning the Memorable Treaty at BREDA viz. VII Quod tractatus Bredae conclusus Anno Domini 1667. Sicut Etiam omnes alii precedentes trastatus per illum tractatum confirmari renoventur maneant in plena vi ac vigore in quantum presenti tractatui nullaetinus contradicunt But as to the Freedom and Advantage of Fishing upon the English Coast a Royalty so inherent to the Crown of England that His Majesty cannot Sell or Depart withall unto Strangers the Hollanders Say was thrown into the Bargain Gratis upon the account of the Prince of Orange so long as he shall injoy the Offices of Stat-holder Lord High Admiral General and other Offices and Honours of his Ancestors This last Treaty being Concluded Ratified and Published the Interested in the Bona Esperanza and Bonadventura Addressed themselves both to the King and the States General respectively to be paid and satisfied out of the Pattacoons Protesting otherwise that they should be necessitated to put their Letters Patents into Execution to Levy and Reprize their Debt and Damages aforesaid The Proprietors were in good hopes they should not meet with any difficulty in attaining their ends when they found the Treaty Signed by five Principal Ministers of State on the Kings side viz. H. Finch C. S. Latimer Ormond Arlington and H. Coventry For that the Warrant and Proceedings concerning the said Patent passed through the Lord Arlington's Office when he was Secretary of State and directed to Sir Heneage Finch to prepare the Bill when he was Sollicitor General in the time that the Lord Roberts kept the Privy-Seal and had been debated by H. Coventry when he was Ambassador at Breda and the Pattacoons left to the disposing of Latimer Lord High Treasurer of England who knew the Kings Honour and Reputation lay at stake with His Subjects concerning that Affair But yet nevertheless a 4th Part of the said Pattacoons were presently Assigned to be paid to Alderman Backwel for other Services and the Six hundred thousand remaining were transferred by the said Latimers advice and another Minister of State much admired in Holland to the Prince of Orange for old Debts due to his Father and Grandfather from the late King as is pretended and no care taken to satisfie the said 151612 l. with Damage either by his Majestie or the States but left in statu quo under all those circumstances aforesaid Wereupon Divers of the Creditors finding there Rights Liberties and Properties Invaded first strictly Examined the several Treaties and then reduced their Case into two Questions as follows and took the Advice of several most Learned Lawyers thereupon viz. 1 Whether the Letters Patents for Reprizals before-mentioned at large in Folio 4 5. and the Powers and Authority thereby granted can be Revoked Repealed or the Execution thereof Suspended by Proclamation Scire facias Supersedeas Articles of Peace or any way whatsoever before Satisfaction and Reparation should be had or made for the said 151612 l. to the Persons Interested and Injured or not 2 Whether any particular Debts due from the Subjects of the States General to Sir William Courten or Sir Paul Pyndar their Executors Administrators or Assigns by Bills of Exchange Bonds Accompts Covenants or other private Contracts in Trade were Released or Discharged by the said Articles of the Treaty at Breda recited in Folio 7. or were ever intended to be Comprized or Comprehended within the said Articles or not Answer to the First Question OUR Forefathers were so careful of Merchants Rights and Properties and so Provident for the Maintenance and Encouragement of Navigation and Commerce that in all Cases of Spoyls and Depredations whereupon any Offences Injuries Damages or Losses at any time happened to the Subjects of England at Sea the Injured applyed themselves for present Relief to the Writ de arresto facto super bonis mercatorum alienigenium pro transgr facta mercatoribus Angliae and the words Recited in the Writ are for that the Offence is done contra Legem Rationem and not contra pacem In those days the Persons and Gods of Merchants Strangers were Arrested in England for the Offences and Injuries committed by the Subjects of the Prince or State unto whom they belonged that did the Damage Whereupon the Subjects belonging to the Maritine Provinces under the Duke of Bourgundy and divers parts of France comming to the Staple and Mart Towns in England made great complaints to the King and Councel of grievous pressures upon them by suffering in English Ports and Harbours for the Offences of other Men. In consequence whereof an Act of Parliament passed in their favour 27. Edw. 3. Statute 2 Chap. 17 That the Rigour of those Writs should be taken away and in liew thereof in all Cases of Spoils the Subjects of England should for their Relief have the Law of Marque without Fraud or Delay therefore to prevent the failer of Iustice such Letters were to be granted Effectually otherwise liberty would be taken to commit the greatest Injuries and Offences whatsoever unpunishable to the prejudice of all Commerce and Humane Society Justinian agreeth herewith in his Book de jure Nat. And Grotius sayes that the later Lawyers calls it the Right of Reprizals the Saxons and old English Withernam and the French Letters of Marque In several Countries they are asked of the Iudges and by the Common Law of England they were used to be asked of the King but the Subjects finding many Delays and great Expences in those proceedings to their vast prejudice by Secretaries of State