quo Lanfrancus diratiocinatur and the conclusion that he was to hold his Lands and Customs by Sea and Land as free as the King held his ezcept in three things si regalis via fuerit effossa arbor incisa juxta super eam ceciderit si homicidium factum sanguis in ea fusus fuerit Regi dabit alioquin liber a Regis exactoribus In the same Author were read of a Great Counsel at London in that Normans Reign and of another at Glocester where the Arch Bishop of York jubente Rege et Lanfranco consentiente did consecrate William Bishop of Durham having no help adjunctorium from the Scottish Bishops subject to him which may be added to that before of Scotland belonging to the Province or Diocesse of York Nor can I abstain from the next paragraph in the same Author how Lanfranc did consecrate Donate a Monk of Canterbury ad Regnum Dubliniae at the Request of the King Clergy and people of Ireland Petente Rege clero populo Hiberniae which with divers others might be one Argument for the Antiquity of Irish Parliments and their dependance on England long before King Henry the Second For which I might also cite King Edgars Charters Oswalds Law and divers Historians of his times But the Charters mention Dublin it self and yet our Lawyers are so Courteous as to free Ireland from our Laws and Customs till towards the end of King Iohn and some of them conjecture that the Brehon Law came in again and that our Parliament obliged them not till Poynings Law in Henry the seventh But to return to our Norman King I need not beg proofs of Parliaments in his time at least not to those who know the Priviledge of antient Demesne which therefore is free from sending to Parliaments and from Knights Charges and Taxes of Parliament because it was in the Crowns not only in King William but before him in King Edward and the Rolls of Winchester for which the old Books are very clear with divers Records of Edward the third and Henry the fourth besides natura brevium That I say nothing of the old Tractat. de antiquo Dominico which is stiled a Statute among our English Statutes And besides all the late Reports or Records I find it in the Year Books of Edward the Third that he sued a Writ of Contempt against the Bishop of Norwich for encroaching on Edmondsbury against express Act of Parliament By King William the Conqueror and by the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury and all the other Bishops Counts and Barons of England It is 21 of Ed. 3. Mich. fol. 60. Title 7. Contempt against an Act of Parliament This might well be one of the reasons why the great Judge giveth so much credit to the old Modus of Parliament as it was held in the time of King Edward the Confessor which as the antient copy saith was by the discreet men of the Kingdom recited before King William the Norman and by him approved and in his time used I have cited it before and compared it with Irish Modus which my much honoured friend Mr. Hackewil one of the Masters of Chancery hath under his hand attested from the Great Seal and Charter of Henry the fourth which himself hath seen reciting a former Charter of King Henry R. Angliae Hiberniae conquestor Dominus who sent the same Modus into Ireland Where himself or his Son Iohn sans terre had no great work to reduce them to the civility of Parliaments To which they had been long before accustomed and the Roll saith communi omnium de Hibernia consensu teneri statuit c. nor doth the division of the Irish-Shires seem so lately setled as some have thought although I may not dissent from the great Patron of Civill and Ecclesiastical Learning the late Primate of Ireland Touching that Irish Modus I have very little to add to the fourth part of the great Institutes in several places I shall now only observe that both these old Modi of Parliaments do agree in this Custom of the Kingdom that the King should require no Ayd but in full Parliament and in Writing to be delivered to each in degree Parliament And both they agree that every new difficult case of Peace and any war emergent within or without the Kingdom vel Guerre emergat in Regno vel extra ought to be written down in full Parliaments and therein to be debated which may be considered by all that will argue the Militia To which also we may add one clause of the Jewish Laws of their great Sanhedrim to whom they retain the power of Peace and War especially where it is Arbitrary and not meerly defensive in which the Law of nature maketh many Magistrates and this might with ease be confirmed from the Laws and Customs of all Civil Kingdoms in all ages But I must not wander from our English Laws I had almost forgotten that which should be well remembred Although many would perswade us to seek our Laws in the Custumier of Normandy it is not only affirmed in the Great Reports but also asserted by Guil de Rovell Alenconien and proved by divers Arguments in his Commentaries on that Grand Custumier that the Normans had their chief Laws from Hence As had also the Danes in the time of Canute for which we might have more proof and witness than the Abbot of Crowland So much even strangers did Love and Honour old English Laws Of King William the Second Sirnamed Rufus I shall speak but little for I must discuss his Election and Coronation Oath in a fitter place Some footsteps we find of his Parliaments in divers Wigornensis and Hoveden tell us that when he would have constrained the Scottish King ut secundum judicium Baronum suorum in curia sua Rectitudinem ei faceret Malcolm did refuse to do it but in the Confines or Marches Where he could not deny but the Kings of Scotland were accustomed rectitudinem facere regibus Angliae But he then said it ought to be by the Iudgement of the Parliaments of both Kingdoms secundum judicium utriusque Regni primatum And I find the like Record cited on Fortescue from Godfrey of Malmsbury But Huntingdon and Matthew Paris also relate that the same King Malcolm did submit both to do Homage and to swear Fealty to our English King and Paris addetth a pretty Story of King Malcolms overlooking Treason But again to King William Of his Errors in Government I shall only say that if Edom did really signified Red as hath been thought I could believe that all Historians speaking of Adamites then oppressing the People might allude to the near affinity between Edom and Rufus for Red. For this was his Sirname of King William the Second Henry the First is yet alive in his Laws and Charters Not only in Wendover with other Historians but among the Rolls and Records yet to be seen in the Exchequer They are now in Print
tenens to the Sheriff and he standeth when the King dieth When also so many think there is no Sheriff but it may be more considered I must not stay in the Court of Peepoudres incident to every Fair or Market as a Court Baron to a Mannor although it be a Court of Record and a Writ of Error lyeth on its judgment for which Iones and Hall's Case in the 10th Part of Reports and in the 4th Institutes I need not speak of Writs of Error from the Common Pleas to the Kings Bench from the King's Bench to the Exchequer-Chamber and from thence as from the King's Bench also to the Parliament or of the known Statute of Henry the 6th making it Felony to steal withdraw or avoid Records or any parcel of Record But of no Records is the Law more punctual than in of extraordinary Cases of Oyer and Terminer which were more private oft and less fixed being transient on emergent Cases which yet being heinous seemed to require most exact Records especially because there might be Appeal so just and needful if the Judges exceeded but one tittle of their Commission If it were discontinued or expired then the Indictment and all Records were to meet in their proper Center at the King's Bench but in other Cases Records of Oyer and Terminer were sent into the Exchequer So in Edw. the 3d. As in Elizabeth Results on charitable uses and the like were to the Chancery by Act of Parliament The great Seal was the Soul to inform and actuate the Body of Records in all exemplifications from the Rolls in all Writs Pattents or Commissions and the rather also that by this nothing of moment might be hudled up but duly weighed and considered while it passed so many hands and judgments as it should before the Sealing Nor shall I add that an Act of Parliament it Self is not pleadable in a Court of Record but from Record or under the Seal whence the old custom was to remove the Records of Parliament by a Writ of Certiorari into the Chancery thence by the Lord Chancellor into the Kings Bench and thence by a Mittimus into the Common Plea and Exchequer with an usual Writ commanding all the Courts to keep and observe such Acts of Parliament which of Old were Proclaimed by the Sheriffs and were put under the Seal as we may see by the Proclamation now printed among the Statutes of Edw. the 3d. and they were not hudled into Print in those Days not of such vertue in Print as on Record and under the Seal For there were not then such Printers or Copiers that without much caution our fore-Fathers durst trust with all their Lives and Estates which by one dash of a Pen the change of a not a with a to a for or a from might be soon destroyed or enslaved Much less then should a Court of Record be Created but by Record yea and that be shewed under the Seal also For when the Seal was moulded our Ancestors ordained that no Jurisdiction should be grantable but under the Seal which should be known and obeyed by all the People as the Mirror discourseth at large In Edw. the 4th it was resolved by all the Judges in the Exchequer-Chamber that no man could be a Iudg or Iustice by Writ which was also Sealed but by open Pattent or a publick Commission But the Lord Chief Iustice of England hath of late no such Commission or Pattent yea a Sealed Writ and of Old he was also Created by Pattent till about the end of King Henry the 3d. if good Authors deceive me not It seemeth also somewhat disputable whether he were not included in the Statute of Henry the 8th for Commissions to the Judges by Letters Pattent under the Seal However the words are plain enough for Iustices of Eyre which of Old were also by Writ as those of Oyer and Terminer but now not to be but by Comission or Pattent under the Great Seal Which Commission should also be read and shewed in Court lest there be some kind of Demurrer or exception unto jurisdiction which hath been in some Cases at the Kings Bench and may be by Law to all now Judges by special Commission except it be produced under the Seal if the old Books deceive us not who do do not onely ascribe all jurisdiction to the Seal but in all legal exceptions ever admit of that to the Iudg if he be a Party or have not jurisdiction or be otherwise incompetent That the Parliament also will never Erect or Create any Court of Record but by Record and open Commission under the Great Seal I do the rather believe because the Seal is so proper and peculiar to the Parliament being made by common consent of which the Mirror and others at large and by such common consent used and committed to the special care of the Chancellor or Lord Keeper of England as he was called for keeping that which our Fathers esteemed as the Kingdoms Key or Clavis It is well known how King Henry the 3d. was brought to acknowledg That among all great Officers the Lord Keeper or Chancellor did especially belong to the Choice of the Parliament and Ralph Nevil among others refused to yield up the Seal to the King when it was demanded saying that he had received it by the Common Councel of the Kingdom and without their Warrant he would not deliver it of which both Matthew Paris and Matthew of Westminster From the continual use of this Seal in Parliament it is the Law and Custom of the Kingdom that the Lord Keeper shall have place in Parliament still to be there with the Sael although he be often no Peer and have no Vote but for making and Sealing of Charters Pattents Commissions and Writs framed by Parliament For although the Register made or continued by Parliament be now so full that there be little need yet the framing of New Writs was a great work of Old Parliaments as appeareth in the Books and Statutes as in that of Westminster the 2d de Casu consimili And as if the Parliament had made no Laws at all but onely New Writs the Old Modus brancheth out all the Laws of Parliament into Originals Iudicials and Executives which all know to he the Division of Writs Those especially de Cursu drawn by the Cursitors for Brevia Magistralia were let to be framed by the Masters of Chancery as appeareth at large in Bracton and Fleta and in the Oath of the Six Clerks or other Clerks of Chancery in Ed. 3 with that of Ed. 1. de casu continili in which Statute it is asol provided that if the Masters could not agree in framing such a new Writ they might if they saw cause respit the Parties till the next Parliament that so it might be formed by Advice of all the great Lawyers of the Kingdom Yet besides this of making and sealing of Writs there was another work and great use of the Masters of Chancery
Iews in the Laws of the Confessor Some Kingdoms are in Fee to others and must do Homage Swearing Fealty So Scotland unto England so was also our English King but not the Crown or State which hath oft in Parliament been adjudged and declared Imperial Independent when himself did Homage unto France And yet I do not find our English King did ever much Scruple at his waging War with all France and the French King also but did often fight in Person against his Person and he might do so by Law if the King of France did Injure and Oppress him against Law That I say nothing of the Personal Challenges by Rich. the first Edw. the third and Rich. the second Or of King Iohns being cited or Condemned by France for Murther in that Kingdom This might yet be enlarged and further cleared from the good Laws of K. Henry the first which are so strict for Allegiance and due Fealty to every Lord that they seem almost to forget our old English Clemency and yet they speak enough of a Vassals impleading c. his Lord for which divers Chapters from the 40 th to the end are very considerable And the 55 th Chapter limiteth all Homage and Fealty per honestum utile that which is honest and profitable and as Honestum there respecteth God and the common Faith Deum fidem Catholicam so must Utile respect the Kingdom and the Common good it being usual for those times to express the Common Good by such a Phrase of Utile So the Laws of St. Edward for Foromotes Heretokes ad Honorem Coronae ad Utilitatem Regni So King Williams Additions were granted and Confirmed ad utilitatem Anglorum So the Parliament at Merton was to treat de communi utilitate Regni which may be considered in the Writs of those times and the great Charters granted à tout la commune Dengleterre as Articuli super Chartas And the first of Westminster pur le common profit de st esglise de Realm and the Confirmations of the Charters in Edw. the first forbidding all Impositions c. but by Common assent of all the Realm pur le common Profit de ceo which must be determined by Commune Assent and no otherwise So Ethelreds Law Efferatur Concilium quod Populo Utilissimum And Canutes quae ad Reipublicae Utilitatem Commune commodum which there may Paraphrase Regalitas of which before And however the late Oaths of Allegiance are if we consider the old Oaths both in the Saxon and first Norman times we shall find them to respect the Kingdom and its common Good and Profit as well as the Kings Prerogative or private Profit to the Crown By Bracton with others we are led to the Laws of the Confessor for our great Allegiance But in those Laws the Oath is to defend the Kingdom with the King and that by such an Oath we should all be sicut conjurati Fratres ad defendendum Regnum contra Alienigenas contra Inimicos unâ cum Domino Rege c. That it was so also in the Brittish times of K. Arthur whose Parliaments we may assert by more than that in Caius of Cambridge we find in these very Laws and that by Vertue of this Oath King Arthur raised his Subjects and expelled the Saracens and Enemies a Regno from the Kingdom And the same Laws tell us that the same Oath was renewed and Confirmed by K. Edgar whose Laws are severe enough for Treason but against all Lords as well as the King and it is Punished as Theof And the Laws of Canute confirming those of Edgar require Fealty conjoyned with Duty and Virtue and again with Common Justice Iusjurandum datamque fidem Religiosissimè servato injustitiam pro sua quisque virili Parte ditionis nostrae finibus omnem arceto as Lambard translateth the Saxon of those Laws and in another place of them The Leet Oath of Fealty Iure Iurando fidem det omni se in posterum aetate tum furti tum furti Societate Conscientia temperaturum And to this doth King Edwards Oath of Allegiance in Britton seem to allude que ilz nous serrount Feaul Leaux que ilz ne serrount Felons ne a felons assentaunts yet I do not deny but Theof in this Oath might include Treason with other Felony as vvas touched before but however it is as well for the Kingdom or the Common good as for the Kings Prerogative or private Honour o◠the Crown So also the first Norman Laws called the Conquerors require an Oath of Allegiance but for the Publick Peace and common Justice to the Kingdoms good as much as to the Crown for so the words run fint Fratres conjurati ad Regnum N. contra inimicos defendendum Pacem dignitatem N. Coronae N. ad Iudicium rectum Iustitiam constanter modis omnibus pro posse suo as K. Canutes Laws before sine Dolo sine dilatione faciendam This is now continued also through our great Charter and all the Confirmations of K. Edwards and K. Williams Additions in utilitatem Anglorum vvhich may be considered as a good Comment on the usual vvords in Indictments against the Peace and Crown and Dignity vvhich by those Ancient Lavvs vvas to be joyned vvith the publick common good and Justice of the Kingdom So that Allegiance vvas ad Legem to the Laws the Kingdom and the Kingdoms good or Profit together vvith the King And in all the Lavv Books vve may read of Treason done and committed against the Kingdom as against the King So in Hengham Parva cap. 3. If any raise War against the King or against the Kingdom ubi quis movet Guerram contra Regem vel Regnum And his Commentator referreth to several Cases in Edward the third Henry the fourth with Plowden and others which would be considered Nay there are many old Authors and Masters of Law that expresly declare it to be as Real Treason to seduce the King or the Kingdom or an Army for the Kingdoms Safety as to Act against the Kings Life So in Hengham Magna cap. 2. Treason is branched thus de Nece vel Seditione Personae Domini Regis vel Regni vel Exercitus And the very same Division of Treason is in Glanvil both in his first Book and second Chap. and the first Chapter of his 14 th Book To which also may be added Bracton Lib. 3. cap. 3. de Coronâ and Fleta lib. 1. cap. 21. vel ad seductionem ejus vel exercitus sui and Britton cap. 22. disheritur de N. Royalme ou detrahir N Hoste of which also Stanfords Pleas of the Crown lib. 1. cap. 2. and others that Wrote since the Twenty fifth of Edward the third which may seem to limit or to lessen high Treason but not to annul Treason by the Common Law And in Cases of such Treason they declare that although there be no Accuser but only Suspicion sed fama
their limitations by our Laws their Title by Succession or Election at the Common Law If Bracton or if Fleta may be Judges of this Question they will tell us that in their times our King was Elective Non a Regnando dicitur sed a Bene Regendo ad hoc Electus est And again ad haec autem Creatus Rex Electus ut Iustitiam faciat Universis Not only Created but Elected it is where they treat of Iudges and of Iurisdiction And of our Saxon Ancestors the Mirror is very plain that they did Elect or chuse their King from among themselves Eslierent de eux un Roy à reigner sir eux and being Elected they did so and so Limit him by Oath and Laws In this we might appeal to Tacitus of our Ancestors For theirs who did both Elect and Bound their Kings and Generals Reges ex Nobilitate Duces ex Virtute sumunt and of their King he saith the Power was so bounded that he could not call it Free Nec infinita aut libera Potestas and that in Conciliis Their Kings Authority was in perswasion rather than Command Suadendi potius quam jubendi potestate Caesar seemeth to conceive they had no King or fixed Common Governour in time of Peace but for War saith he they Choose out Generals qui Bello praesint ut vitae necisque habeant Potestatem In our Brittish Ancestors he found a King but by Election of a great Common-Council by whose consent he observeth that Cassivelane was chosen King and General against his Landing Summa Imperii Bellique administrandi communi Concilio permissa est Cassivellauno and again Nostro adventu permoti Britanni hunc toti bello imperioque praefecerant That the Brittans agreed much with the Gauls in their Customs I do not deny but I know not why this should make the Gauls to be the Elder Brothers as some teach us because our Britain is an Island Yet it may be much disputed if not proved that it once was joyned to Gaul or France in one Continent for which we might produce some of the old Poets and others before Twine and Verstegan However it is clear enough from Caesar and Pliny that the Gauls were much moulded by the Brittish Druids although they seemed more Polite in Iuvenal's time and afterwards being more Frank they afforded a Christian Queen to Ethelbert and the Model of a great School to Sigesbert which yet must not wrong Alcuinus who from hence moulded the University of Paris if we may Believe all that write of Charlemaign And if we add Strabo to those cited before we shall find they Chose both Generals and all great Magistrates When they had a King the Crown passed by Election and was so limited that Ambiotrix one of their Kings acknowledged Ut non minus in se Iuris Multitudo quà m ipse in Multitudinem So in Caesar. Their Common-Council much consisted of Equites and such perhaps our Knights of Shires Electi de plebe and Druydes their Clergy who did over-rule them all by their Banns and Sacred Oak Misleto as if it had grown in Dodona's Grove Their grand Corporation was dissolved by Roman Edicts in Gaul by Claudius as Seneca Suetonius but in Rome by Tiberius if not Augustus in Pliny but Vopiscus keepeth a Druydess to presage the Empire to Dioclesian when he had killed the Boar and Ammianus may afford them in Rome in Iulian or Constantius But in Scotland or Ireland they remained longer if we may believe their Annals of Columbanus and of William the Irish Abbot But in Dioclesian's time Amphibalus the famous Brittan fled from Rome to his Friend St. Alban who dyed for him in his Cloaths it is said but we find him Condemned by Law and styled Lord of Verulam Prince of Knights and Steward of Brittain in his Shrine and Iacob de Voragine ' Ere long we find him made a Bishop in the Holy Isle and there he did Succeed the Brittish Druyds and his Scholars were enow with their Blood and Carkasses to make the name of Litchfield But the turning of Druyds into our Bishops in Lucius's time is no more certain I think than that those were the Flamins or Arch Flamins of whom we hear so much of late but of old few or none relate it but only Monmouth The Name of Flamin came to Brittain from the Grecians or the Romans who had Druyds from the Brittans where they were most Sacred Priests at first but three but when every God and Godded Man or Daemon had his Flamin they became extreamly innumerable Yet the first three still kept their Distance Place and Seniority from whence the Phrase of Arch-Flamin which yet I dare not assert to have been in Brittain or to be so much as known in the time of Lucius or the name of Archbishop But of this Sir Henry Spelman of Lucius's Epistles in Gratian and Mr. Patrick Young on Clements Epistle to the Corinthians But Fenestella with his Names of Bishop Arch-Bishop Cardinal Patriarch Metropolitan c. is now come out with another Title of a later Age than he that lived in Tiberius But to return to our Brittish Druyds moulding the State and yet they would not speak of State but in or by a Common-Council as was touched before in the Militia and among these the same Caesar will tell us that there was a chief or President but chosen by Deserts and not by a blind way of Succession Si sint Pares plures suffragio adlegitur nonnunquam etiam armis de principatu contendunt Nor is it probable the Brittans should be great Patrons of Monarchical Succession which could hardly well consist with their Gavelkind which is not only in Kent but in divers other Places of England and in Wales from the Brittans as we may learn from Parliament in 27 Hen. 8. and in K. Edwards Statute of Wales with Littletons Parceners And his Commentator makes it one mark of the ancient Brittans and from them also to Ireland and from the Brittish Gavelkind do all the Children yet among us part their Fathers Arms of which also the great Judge on Littletons Villenage But on the Parceners he deriveth the Crowns descent to the Eldest from the Trojans to the Brittans so indeed do many others with Monmouth and Basingstock Yet our Best Herald the Learned Cambden will deride the Story of the Trojans coming hither but his many Arguments to prove the first Inhabitants to be a Kin to the Gauls do no more convince me that the Trojans might not come hither afterwards than that the Normans did not come because the Saxons were before them I repeat nothing from Gyraldus Cambrensis Matthew Paris Hoveden Huntingdon or others who derided Monmouth till they were convinced by some Brittish Writers which themselves found besides all the Greek and Latin Authors cited by Virunnius Leland Sir John Price and divers others that I say nothing of the Scottish Chronicles or of the Learned man that shewed King
of Almain The Learned Author of the late Peleg among divers other Brittish words hath found a new Etymology for the Name of Britain which notwithstanding Brith for Colour or Painting and Bretas in some Greek Poets for a Picture or a Painted Brat he would have to be called by the Phaenicians Berat Anac or the Field of Tin and Lead To which I may add the Northern Sea called of old the Phronean Ocean or the Sea of Saturn whom they feigned to lye asleep in the Bottom of that Sea bound by Iupiter in a Golden Pumice of which Plutarch Eusebius Ptolomy and divers others and of this the Author of the Veyl or Mask of Heaven Of which I must speak but little only this for a Clavis The Scene is the little World or Isle of Brittain Thule some appendant to that Crown or Scotland whose troubles of 1639. are shadowed in the night work called Scotos or Darkness Saturn the Scottish Genius and Mercury the Clergy but in special the late Arch-Bishop of Canterbury Iupiter the Son of Saturn or a great Scottish Lord lately on the Scene that was first sent to reconcile Saturn but he turned Retrograde Mars the Genius of War and in special the great General against Saturn or the Lord Lieutenant of Ireland Venus seemeth to be Queen Mother of France then alive in England Phoebus and Phoebe need no gloss Imperii fata plain enough to those that know that Dialect But Phoebe might have there seen before this Parliament that Peace had been her Work and should have been her Happiness nor is it yet too late or wholly past Habent etiam sua fata Reginae and there is a silent Patience which may Conquer more than all the World can get by Force Who will unmask the Chymical Part which the Poets also Veiled in their Fables of Saturn bound by Iupiter in Golden Pumice and it may be possible that future Ages may be brought to see or know the Treasures in our Chronian Ocean and the meaning of that Riddle In the mean time he that can improve the Sympathy of Mars and Venus or remove the Antipathy of Saturn and Mercury or can bind Saturn by Iupiter and by the Mediation of Phoebe can reconcile all to Phoebus or can live on Herbs may have little need I hope to flatter any But to return to our British Ancestors How Cordiel and Guintoline were Created populi Iussu Archigal Ennianus or others Deposed is observed by divers I shall only add that Proceres and Magnates here are rendred Estates People or Commons in Grafton and Chaucer or the old Fructus by Iulian of St. Albans Molmutius first did wear a Crown of Gold they say he did deserve it for to him we owe divers of our Common Law Principles nay and that for more than is found in Monmouth as I touched before And upon him the Patrons of Succession build a fixed Monarchy which was not such it seems before nor since if we may believe those we can hardly disprove that from this time begin the petty Princes plurimis Regulis supremam Mandandi Iudicandi Authoritatem And themselves divide the Crown between his two Sons Brennus the British Thunderbolt to Rome and some do carry him as Lightning to Delphos while his Brother Belin did return and dye in peace and first of British Kings was burnt to Ashes yet he lived here in Bilingsgate and Key besides his famous Ways or Streets his own and Fathers Laws which with the Mertian came to us through Alfred But we need not go to his Daughter Cambra for the first Affinity between the Brittans and Sicambrian Francks or Gaulish Germans Come we now to Cesar's time Lud is alive in Ludgate London as before he did amend the Laws but by a Common-Council And such Council did reject his Sons and Chose Cassivelane as Caesar doth agree with British Authors He did summon one that slew his Kinsman to appear and submit himself to Judgment Sententiam quam proceres Dictarent subire But the famous Androgeus protected him in London being then the Governour pleading the Custom and priviledge of that City which had also then a Court to hear and determine all the Pleas of Citizens or Quicquid aliquis in Homine suos clamaret and that also by Ancient Prescription ex Veterum traditione Which from Monmouth Virrunnius Ponticus and others may be compared with the Laws of the Confessor for Troinovant or London and its weekly Hustings and Ardua Compota and Ambigua placita Coronae and for the Courts of the whole Kingdom there whence it is called Caput Regni Legum Which may also be compared with that of the Mirror for Parliaments to be in London by ancient Laws which is here expressed Iuxta veteres Consuetudines bonorum Patrum Predecessorum omnium Principum Procerum Sapientum seniorum Regni very full and clear Parliaments of all Estates That which is added of those Courts to sit and hold wherever the King was is British also as well as Saxon. So the Laws of Howel Dha the Good in the Chronicles of Wales but larger in Sir Henry Spelman Ubicunque Sacerdos Destein Iudex ibi Dignitas Curiae Aula Regia licet Rex absens sit and this is one Reason why the King was never Nonsuit because he was supposed present in all Courts and yet his Atturneys Ulterius non vult had the effect of a Nonsuit But for London and its Antiquity before Rome Stephanides a Monk as old as K. Henry the first now in Print may be compared with Tacitus Ammianus Marcelinus nay with Caesar also for the Trinobantes although some think he never saw this City But the Charters of K. William and Hen. the first are in Print so also of Richard the first and K. Iohn in Hoveden and others which yet must not perswade us that Sheriffs were then first Created here For Counts or Viscounts are as old as Counties and the Brittish Authors speak of Dukes of Troynovant such was Androgeus and pro Consulibus vice-comites in Fitz-Stephen and Willielm de Einford vice-comes de London Ioannes Subvicecomes in the Book of Ramsey Wallbrook Case in Hen. the first that I may say nothing of William the Chamberlain de Londonia of whom before in Hen. 1. which may be premised to the Famous Quo Warranto brought in Edward the Second But to return to our British Kings I cannot deny but some Authors do Record the Crown as by Act of Parliament settled on the Heirs of Cassivelane but themselves also can shew us the very next King brought in by Election not from Cassivelane and that both of Lords and Commons too if we may believe Chaucer or the old Fructus Temporum This Theomantius many of their names are Greek was Duke of Cornwall when he was Elected King He doth yet live in a Famous Son great Arviragus whom the Roman Poet and so many others praise he did amend the Laws
In the Conquest about Investitures K. Henry the first wrote to the Pope that he could not diminish the usual Rights and Dignities of the Crown or Kingdom and that if he should be so Abject as to attempt it his Parliament would not permit it Optimates mei totius Angliae Populus id nullo modo pateretur In the great Moot of Scotlands dependance upon England Edward the First confessed as much to another Pope to whom also the Parliament both Lords and Commons wrote that they they were all obliged by Oath to maintain the Just Rights Liberties Laws and Customs of the Kingdom where we may see their Oath of Allegiance to the Kingdom that nothing should be acted against Them In exheraeditionem Iuris Coronae Regie Dignitatis ac subversionem status ejusdem Regni nec non praejudicium Libertatum Consuetudinum Legum Paternarum These are on the Rolls and printed on the Statute of Merton and in Walsinghams Edward 1. and the Surveigh of Normandy And from other Records of the same King we learn that when the Pope demanded the Grants of K. Iohn he answered That he could not do it without consent of his Parliament Sine Praelatis Proceribus Regni being tyed by his Coronation Oath to keep all the Laws and Rights of the Kingdom Illibati and to do nothing that might touch the Crown without their Consent Which may be added to that before in St. Edwards Laws of the Kings Oath to do all things Ritè per Concilium Procerum Regni When the King of France demanded Homage of K. Edw. the Third he desired Respite till he had the Advice of his Great Council as we may read in Froizard because he could not act without them in such great Affairs And when the Pope demanded Homage of the same King he referred it to Parliament who adjudged and declared that K. Iohns Grants to the Pope were unjust illegal and against his Coronation Oath being done without his Parliaments Assent or Counsel And yet K. Iohn's Charter to the Pope in Matth. Paris doth pretend it done Communi Concilio Baronum And about Stephen Langton the same K. Iohn did write to the Pope that he could not depart from the Liberties of his Crown but would or should defend them to his Death And hence began the Great Excommunication which begot a Confiscation of the Church Revenues hinc ille Lachrymae which could not be stopped till the Crown did stoop to Pandulph which might have excused the poor Hermit Peter from being so cruelly dragged from Corf◠Castle to Warham But when the same King felt his Arms loose he laid about him so that all believed he meant to strike In that Meen the Arch-bishop told him It was against his Oath to raise or make War without the Consent of his Great Court Si absque Iudicio Curiae suae Contra quempiam Bellum moveret to be added to the Militia But the fire was already kindled and the Smoak or Flame brake out at Nottingham I must not touch the Barons Wars except I had leisure to discourse and discuss them freely Only as we found our Great Charters made up of old Laws and Customs so I might now also clear it more that it was not a new Fetter on the King to have some Supervisors set about him for to order all his Actions who by his Coronation Oath was tied to do nothing touching the Kingdom but with Advice and Consent of the Great Council per Concilium per Iudicium Procerum Regni That it was so also among the Britains to all observed before I might add the Old Scottish Custom of choosing Twelve Peers in Parliament to be the Kings Tutors as we may call them for by them the King must be wholly governed Quorum Concilio Rex Regnum gubernare debebat as we may read it in Walsinghams Edward 1. besides their own Chronicles that I say nothing of the Twelve Brittish Peers of which Cambden in Siluribus We need not much wonder at the Writs in K. Iohn's Time requiring all Men of all Conditions to oblige themselves by Oath to maintain the Great Charter and to compel the King thereunto Et quod ipsum Regem pro posse suo per Captionem Castrorum suorum distringerent gravarent ad praefata Omnia Exequenda when as this very Clause was in his Charter Et illi Barones cum Communa totius Terrae distringent gravabat nos modis Omnibus quibus poterunt scilicet per Captionem Castrorum terrarum possessionum aliis modis quibus potuerint donec fuit emendatum secundum Arbitrium eorum Which may be added to that before of our Allegiance or Oath of Fealty to the King with the Kingdom and of the Kings Oath to be guided by the Judgment of his Great Court. Nay as if K. Iohn's Salva persona N. Reginae N. Liberorum N. had been too loose in K. Henry's Charter it was expressed thus Licet Omnibus de Regno N. contra Nos insurgere Nay and to do all things quae gravamen nostrum respiciant ac si nobis in Nullo tenerentur These times seem not to attend our Grand Maxim of State The King can do no wrong or at least they understood it not as some late Courtiers would perswade us Yet it is true he can do nothing but by Law and what he may by Law can do no wrong And if he do against the Law his Personal Acts Commands or Writing do oblige no more than if they were a Childs And the Books call him an Infant in Law though his Politick Capacity be not in Nonage as the Parliament declared in Edward the Sixth which is not to exempt him from Errors or to excuse his Crimes but to shew that he must be guided by his Council and that his own Personal Grants or Commands cannot hurt any more than an Infants which may be reclaimed and recalled by the Council of the Kingdom So the Mirror saith The King cannot grant a Franchise to prejudice his Crown or others because he holds his Right and Dignities but as an Infant Cap. 4. Sect. 22. If I should say The Commons in Parliament are and were the Kingdoms Peers as well as the Lords I might vouch an Old Authority as good as the Ancient Modus of Parliament which doth often call the Commons Peers of Parliament as well as the Lords So debent Auxilia Peti pleno Parliamento in scripto cuilibet graduum Parium Parliamenti oportet quod omnes Pares Parliamenti consentiant duo milites pro Comitatu majorem vocem habent in Concedendo contradicendo quam Major Comes Angliae c. So in doubtful Cases of Peace and War disputetur per Pares Parliamenti and if need be Twenty five shall be chosen de omnibus paribus Regni which are so specified Two Bishops Three Proctors Two Earls Three Barons Five Knights Five Citizens and Five Burgesses And again Omnes Pares
It cannot be expected that I should shew the Original of all Changes or Distempers in this Kingdom It is work enough to shew our first Mould or Constitution yet for this also it cannot be doubted but the Barons Wars and Power might gain upon the Commons more than on the King he had such Bounds before that he could hardly be obliged more or capable of granting much but what was due before to all his People But it might be easie for the Potent Lords to grow upon the Commons in the Name of Barons In that Name I say for I cannot determine but the old Barons being the great Freeholders and the Lords of all the Manors that have left their Names in our Courts Baron had by Law and Reason much more Power than had the Kings Patentees Created Barons by Patent or Writ But this new Creation did but multiply the Iudges or the Kings Councellors for by so taking their Commission from the King they were only as other Judges in Inferiour Courts and so did really lose their great Power of Iudging which was proper only to those who were the Kingdoms Peers and Iudges So that these Lords did justly admit the Commons or rather were admitted by the Commons into the grand Iudicature and it may be that as the Barons did communicate their Power Iudicial so the Commons might communicate their Legislative unto those who had the Name but little of the Nature of the old Barons by Tenure yet by so doing they might bring Confusion or an harsh Discord into Natures Harmony But the main occasion seemed thus the King was tyed by his Coronation Oath to hold keep and defend the just Laws and Customs chosen by the Commons Iustas Leges consuetudines quas vulgus elegerit and this Limitation of Iust seemed to admit of reason or debate so much as might convince the Laws required to be Just for else I know not that the King was ever tyed to them And because he was or might be an Infant he had still a great Council about him to discuss the Laws proposed by the Commons and for this Cause he did and by reason might Summon the Lords or any other Wise and good Man he knew to come and give him Counsel as the Writ speaketh to the Lords and Iudges c. De quibusdam arduis nobiscum tractaturi Concilium impensuri So we find the old Acts passed per Consilium Baronum as we might shew in all Ages And because he used to demurr at Bills till he had the Advice of his great Council hence it may be for more Compendium the Bill was sent up first to the Lords as the Kings Counsellors and if they Counselled him against it then he answered Le Roy s'avisera The King will yet be farther Advised for he did not and I think he could not give a denyal nor of old perhaps Demurred till the Lords advised him against it I dispute not how much the Commons might oblige the Commons without assent of Lords or King Nor have I yet said that in the Coronation Oath the Commons Just Acts are called Laws and to Mould them may be works distinct enough and the plain truth is his Oath is to hold and to keep and to defend the Commons Laws à Tenir Gardir Les Defenderer per se tenendas protegendas as well as to Grant or to Confirm However I do not see either by Reason or Law That the King was so obliged to the Judgment of his own created Lords and there be few or none others left in England that he might not be convinced by the Reason of the Commons either without or against the Lords And beside divers Ordinances without any of the Lords it cannot be denyed but in Divers ages there were Acts of Parliament made without or against all the Lords Spiritual which yet often were the Major part of the Lords House and had as good it may be better Votes as Barons by Tenure than had all the other Lords by Writ and Patent only which might make them Judges or Councellors much rather than Law-makers I should still be far from desiring to obtrude my own Fancies or Opinions upon any least of all to the wrong of others Therefore if any can produce a better Title my Petition is they may be heard and may receive their Just Rights and Priviledges But if this be true which I now only propose and submit to better Thoughts and Judgments then had the Lords of late but a Right Consultative of making Laws And besides all that was said before this seemeth one Reason why our Ancestors did so willingly follow the Vice of Nature in placing the Power Legislative Iudicial and Executive in three distinct Estates as in Animals Aerials Etherials or Celestials three Regions and three Principles in Naturals that so they might be forced to consult often and much in all they did And if this frequent Consultation were retained and observed still it might not only occasion good Reviews but also prevent That which to the Common-wealth I fear and not Alone to private Persons may be sometimes prejudicial in a sudden Vote or Act of one House or one Body and yet one may be better much than Many if they be not good It must be granted that in Bodies of the Best Complexion and Composure here below there may be such Distemper and such Gangrene in some Members that it may be more than fit to cut it off Nay what was best may come to be the worst in Putrefaction That it may be meer Necessity to bury it although it were as Dear as Sarah was to Abraham or set on high by him that raised up the Brazen Serpent which see e're long lye buryed with this Epitaph Nehushtan And to all that is truly Just the Commons of England will not need to plead a bare Necessity for by Law and Reason too it may be said and proved I believe That both the King himself who chooseth by his Writ and All the Lords by several Votes have left the Legislative power so to the House of Commons that they had a Legal Right to do what all the Kingdom and Common-wealth of England Justly could But They are Men and therefore may be much unjust Nay where the Thing they do is Iust They may be much or most unjust I have neither Calling nor Ability to Judge them Nor may I act with force against them for whate're I think Unjust No not if I should think they did Usurp the Crown For if the Law Reports and Books deceive me not it hath been Judged Treason and so is for Private Men to rise conspire or Levy War against one that Usurps the Crown and Rights thereof except it rightly were declared Usurpation or that others should or might oppose him that did so Usurp Of which the Reasons may be Great and obvious Let me then suppose any one Man of all the Commons in Parliament for I will not
forth Nay till she have leisure to attend with Joy that a Man-child is born to her Some have thought the Travailer to be Gentile Church but it is Interwoven with Bethlem Ephrata I need not spend much time to Parallel the two Estates of our Messiah with this Ioseph and this Benjamin The Lord will dwell between his Shoulders more then when the Holy Place was in the Tribe of Benjamin he also was cut off as Ioseph was but did prolong his Days and prosper Yet a little while I hope and Benjamin shall come down from his good Father and then shall Ioseph Ben Ioseph make himself known to his Brethren who did hate him shout at him cast him into the Pit deliver him to the Gentiles But he was brought from Prison and from Iudgment At thirty Years he stood before the King and was made Governour of all His Brethren must come and bow down to him tho they rememb'red not his Affliction yet he preserveth them in Aegypt and tho Dead yet goeth before them to Canaan in his Coffin of which the Jews have many Stories in the Life of Moses and others They shall see him who they have pierced and shall weep over him For he shall melt them by saying I am Joseph your Brother But he must stay till Aegypt be destroyed by Famine and be glad to yield it self to Ioseph he must sit till his Enemies be put under him And then shall come the Restitution when Babylon is pulled down It filleth all the Scene as yet And whil'st Satan acteth as if he were God it is no Wonder that we see so little done of Good I must not trouble the World with the time of this great Change But it may be sought and perhaps found not only by Types but plain Expressions in Moses and the Prophets besides our Saviour's Words and the Revelation This I may observe that as Aegypt was broken before the Tabernacle was first raised and Edom before the first Temple and Babylon before the Second So both Edom and Babylon before the Third in Ezekiel and St. Iohn for I now seek not the three Temples in Ezekiel Sitnah and Rohoboth digged by Isaac as do many Iews Of all the Crimes of Edom and Babylon this hath a heavy Charge that the afflicted Heber the People of his Love But those that Curse them must be Cursed How great a share in that this Kingdom had I cannot say there are Mistakes on either side We say they Crucifyed a Child or more They do deny it and we prove it not They say we drove them out from hence it is not clear They were in Favour once at Court they did deserve Respect who brought the Crown two hundred thousand Pounds per Annum little less as mony now for divers Years together And King Iohn did give or sell them a Charter of Priesthood or rather Presbytery for I know not that by this they ever Sacrificed And the Charter yet remaineth for old Jacob the Presbyter of all the Jews in England during Life Their Use and Brocage was so burthensom that in King Edward the First one Parliament did quite deny them Leave of Usury and that did draw them but not drive them hence It was their Motion that obtained a Writ for safer Passage which yet secured them not but that the best of them were drowned in the Thames by Fraud of those that undertook to Waft them over But they hanged for abusing those poor Jews The next Parliament did grant a whole Fifteenth pro expulsione Iudaeorum yet they had but a Writ for a Pasport and they were but 15000 and odd if I may believe a great learned Judg who has so Reported and Recorded How they are now I need not say although I might also bear them Witness that they are yet Zealous in their Way nor do they wholly want Ingenious Able Men of whom I cannot but with Honour mention him that has so much obliged the World by his learned Writings â—ab Menasseh Ben Israel a very Learned Civil Man and a Lover of our Nation The more I think upon the great Change now coming on them and all the World the more I would be Just and Merciful to them to all nay Universal Sweetness if I could a Christian overcoming all with Love And such one should be more I believe if one had conquered all the World For then there would be nothing left but Self to Conquer Then one would return in Love and say come forth my Enemies and Live enjoy your Rights your Peace and Liberties with all your Ioyes There shall not an Hair fall off your Heads By this it shall be known that God alone must Reign I know that Antichrist and Babylon must fall and rise no more But these are more in Hearts then any Walls or any City Not only in the Heart much less the Name of King or Lord I Judg my self or so I should much rather and much heavier than I Judg another For I see much cause to fear my self lest I may keep a little Pretty rather Ugly Antichrist within my Breast whil'st I am busie to destroy some others more then it in others or my self There is a sweeping Rain oppressing more then any Thunder There is a Pride most proper to a Leathern Coat And one there was that trod on Pato's Pride with Prouder it was said and fouler Heels I find it in the Scriptures thence I know that Babylon must down and be thrown down with Violence More Force it may seem than Form of Law Yet even in such things God seldom doth that which is not just in Man's Eye also Nor did he ruine Babylon or spoyl Aegypt till they oppressed Israel Nor did he bring the Iews by pure Force to possess Canaan before they had purchased Sechem or Machpela with such a Legal Seisin as might warrant Force or Forcible Disseisors that so held Possession against the true Owners And what ever Force may appear in pulling down of Babylon I do not Read or Know that the new Temple or the new Ierusalem shall be built with Violence or by Violent Men that may ruffle much in forcing Babylon But they may perish by the Sword that use it most Moses was the meekest Man alive yet he had a special Commission that was a Patent sealed with the Arms and Impress of Heaven to ruine or impoverish Aegypt He pulled down indeed but he raised little but a Tabernacle Only a Shadow of good things to come And it must be abolished by him that was typified by Ioshua For Moses could not bring them into Rest altho by Force and a mighty Hand he brought them out of Aegypt David was a Warriour and a mighty puller down He cut off the Head of Goliah and weakened all the Philistins he threshed Ammon Moab was his Washpot and over Edom he casts his Shoe He shall be brought into the strong City and shall harrow Edom and sow it with Salt or cut off all the
hither for Treason or any other Crime whatsoever Another Charter he granted to the same Minister Cum Concilio Decreto Archiep. Episcop Comitum aliorumque Meorum Optimatum And a third Charter addeth Aliorumque omnium Optimatum And a little lower Coram Episcopis Abbatibus Comitibus omnibus Optimatibus Angliae omnique Populo A very clear and full Parliament His Laws are in print I must not so much as glance but as he that followed the great King so swiftly that his steps could not be seen upon the Sand. May not his third Chapter extend to Priviledge of Parliament ad Dedicat. ad Synod ad Capitul venient Si Summoniti sint c. sit summa Pax. Hoveden will help sometimes for a Comment That of Out-Laws should be explained It is Ore Lagali Regis which is Per Iudicium Coronaterum or in the great and old City Per Iudicium Recordatoris See King Ethelred's Charter to Vlfrie of the Lands of Ethelsig outlawed for Theof Rep. part 6. Pref. But of Woolff-head and the Outlaws being slain upon Resistance I have spoken already As also of Tythes and King Ethelbert's Parliaments in these Laws mentioned and of Rome-scot Danegeld and Weigrylds But of these again ere long Of the Kings Duty and Oath we must speak more in due time Of his Pardon before as it might stand with the Oath of his Crown Here also we find that when his Pardoning Power was largest yet it could not reach to Murder or Treason or other Crimes but so as they must abjure and if they stay and be found any might do Iustice on them without Iudgment It is the 19th Chapter Somewhat we said of Degrees or Counts Earls Thanes or Barons The Phrase doth here occur but of elder times by much nay long before King Ethelbert's Barons if we may believe Historians But of this again in due time Of the Iews also before Iudaei omnia sua Regis seemeth hard but it had a gentle Comment in succeeding times and here also they must be defended Sub tutela defensiones Regis Ligeà The Phrase may be remembred till we meet it again King Iohn did but confirm King Richard's Charter to the Iews See Hoveden and Matthew Paris of Richard and Iohn Walsing Edw. 1. Neustria Pax per breve Regis is a short Expression but it might have a long gloss and be compared with all our books laying this for a principle or foundation of Law That Writs were made by Parliament and without such common Consent could not be changed Of which the Mirrour Bracton Fleta divers others But of another Breve de pace before the Combat in Right or Assize Glanvil Hengham and the Register Of Frank-pledge Tythings Counties Hundreds and Wapentake somewhat before This Law may fill up Lipsius on his Tacitus nor is it useless for the Militia Hac de causâ totius ille conventus dicitur Wapentac eo quod per Armorum i. e. Weapun tactum ad vincem confoederati sunt There is an old Comment on that de moribus Germanorum that may help and please in all of Hundreds Wapentakes Cities Counties with Counts or Eolders of which before in State and Church But to these of the Church I did not then adde their Power and Custom of healing the Sick by anoynting them For which the Saxon Canons of Aelfrick may be perused In this Chapter of Greeves with the Appendix de Heretochiis we may see the whole Model of the old Militia with the Power of Headboroughs Constables Bayliffs Aldermen Sheriffs Lieutenants or Generals all the Greeves both in the Gree and Vae Peace and War for so the Law is pleased to criticize and for Peace we do agree The Law is in print and may be read of all in which it is so clearly stated and asserted by these Laws I should do wrong to take them in pieces Not onely in matters of common Justice or serving of Writs or petty Cases of Peace as some have pleased to express it but when any unexpected doubtful mischief ariseth against the Kingdoms or against the Crown Nay when it proceedeth so far as to War Battel or pitched Fields the Heretoches must order the War Ordinabant acies alas constituebans Prout decuit prout eis melius visum est ad honorem Coronae ad Vtilitatem Regni And lest yet there might be any mistake the same Law telleth us That those Heretoches ductores exercitus capitales Constabularii vel Mareshalli exercitus were and still ought to be chosen Per Commune Concilium by Common Council and for the common good and profit of the Kingdom even as the Sheriffs saith that Law ought to be chosen Again the former Laws are renewed for those that flie and those that die in the War and of their Heriots which here are again remitted with all Relief Of which before I am the longer in this because it was this very Chapter which has been so strangely cited and that also from a place as much suspected as any of all these Laws which I do â—ot speak as if I thought they might not be strongly asserted even there where the oldest Copies are defective And for one instance of many I might produce that piece about the Kings Oath which is cleared not onely by the Mirrour and divers others but by another passage in the oldest of these very Laws themselves by comparing it with what is there said of King Edward 's own Oath to his Kingdom Of which much more hereafter on occasion To that of King Arthur's King Edgar's and King Ethelstane's Conquests much might be added in special touching Scotland Of which before And now I adde That what is here ascribed to Eleutherius may be much asserted and enlarged from those that have clearly stated the bounds extent and jurisdiction of the Province and Diocess of York for to it belonged as I find in a very good Author all the Church of Scotland long before it was divided into modern Bishopricks That of Norway and their Affinities with England and Oath of Fealty may now be little worth but in this that is added at the close of that Law So did King Edward establish Per Commune Concilium totius Regni By the Common Council of the whole Kingdom or by Parliament which may well be added to each and every of those Statutes How the Militia was on particular persons or places assessed by Common Assent hath been observed and cleared already I shall now only adde this That when such Assessments were made by Common Council it was then no more in the Kings power to release them than it was to impose them before or without such Common Assent For this might be cited in more than an hundred Charters to religious houses and places of greatest Franchise in which there is such an usual exception to the Trined-necessity of Military Expedition Castle or Burgbote and Bricqbote for here also as with the Romans they were especially Pontifices
And where-ever these are found released as to Peterburg Canterbury Westminster but especially to Glassenbury the first and oldest Church in Britain Fons origo totius religionis It may be a clear Demonstration of the Parliaments assent to such a Charter For otherwise they could not be dispensed with by the King as we may find expressed in divers Charters as in those of Crowland which yet had great immunities And of that Restriction Matth. Paris may afford us the true reason because those three were setled for the Kingdom Propter Publicam Regni Vtilitatem ut per ea resisterent hostium in cursibus And K. William's Laws Castel Burg. Civit. fundatae aedificatae ad tuit Gent. Popul Regni ad Defens Regni idcirco observari debent cum omni libertate integritate Ratione Private Castles for habitation may be given in Dower and divided by Pacerners but so may none for publick defence Yet of such also may a man be Tenant by the Curtesie being able to guard them for Publick service of the Common-wealth One grand Objection must be removed but we need not fear it for it will flie or run away of it self 'T is that of the Conquest as many are pleased to call it not attending how little in this they be the Kings Friends for if this were his onely or his main and best Title there might be found in future ages some that may come to think it as lawful to conquer him as it was or could be to conquer them It must be considered for if the foundation be not sure and low the higher the building is the nearer its fall And it hath been observed that the higher Skale got up by accident is more ready to pop down again than it was before while it hung in due poize It seemeth a great weakness to be apt or prone to Suspition and therefore I shall not say I do suspect some that are most zealous for Prerogative or the Title of Conquest to be least acquainted with the Laws or Histories of England But I cannot be wholly free from wonder that any Lawyer or Historian that was friend to the King should be passionate in these which were so clearly quitted by that King whom they call the Conquerour He stood on Stilts or Patents or Pantofles but on plain English ground with two feet as other men The left and the weakest was Succession to Edward whose Kinsman he was and Heir by Will as appeareth by divers Passages in these very Laws of Saint Edward and William which may be seen and read of all But the right Leg with the strongest and best Foot he had to stand upon was the Peoples Assent Consent Acceptance and Election which we shall yet more fully clear when we discuss the Right of Succession or Election to this Crown and Kingdom But for the present it may suffice to observe That all these Laws we now have of King Edward's come to us through the Hands and Grant and Confirmation of King William the Norman and no otherwise Which I need not prove to any that have either read or seen the Laws themselves of which we speak For in the very Title and Preface thereof besides divers other passages in them all this and much more is fully related and recorded For it is there also further added That all those Laws were so presented to the said King William by a sworn Iury out of every County Who did also assert That these which they did present as the Laws of St. Edward were the undoubted Laws and Customs of the Kingdom that had also been collected into a Body by King Edgar and continued though sopite through the Troubles of succeeding Kings till Edward had the leisure to renew or rather confirm what was the Law before Nay when among all those Laws King William did most encline to those which came from Norway whence his Ancestors and Lords had issued forth and where a Bastard might inherit all the Patriarchs of England Compatriotae Regni qui Leges edixerant did so move and press him with such Arguments as may again be well considered that at length in Parliament Concilio habito precatis Baronum the King himself consented as they did desire This is expressed in his own Laws And by his own desire the Archbishop of Canterbury was one of those entrusted with enrolling or recording of those Laws Which to that very King and to his Successors to this very day became one special Clause of the Coronation-Oath Which was To confirm all the Laws and Customs of the Kingdom but especially the Laws of St. Edward called the Confessor And one of King William's own Laws is That all men observe and keep the Laws of King Edward in all things Adauctis his quas constituimus ad Vtilitatem Anglorum If this be not yet clear enough for the Laws themselves which are now extant and may be read and known of all we might confirm it much by Ingulph living at the same time and bringing those Laws with his own hands from London to his Crowland with such an Endorsement or Title of his own making Leges aequissimi Regis Edwardi quas Dominus meus inclitus Rex Willielmus Autenticas esse perpetuas per totum Regnum Angliae inviolabiliterque tenendas sub poenis gravissimis Proclamarat suis Iustitiis commendarat c. He was like enough to know it And the old Book of Litchfield cited in the great Reports besides that of the Iury from every County addeth also That the same King William did by the Counsel of his Barons call by Writ of Summons Summoniri fecit all the Nobles Wise-men Elders of the Witan and learned Lawyers in each County And in that great Parliament Ad Preces Communitatis Anglorum Rex acquievit c. confirming all by Common Council This of Litchsield is now printed in several places and Roger Hoveden agreeth in Henry the Second Nor did he onely confirm but in some things mitigate and in divers explain and clear what might seem obscure or heavy to the People Ad Vtilitatem Anglorum His Laws are now printed both with Mr. Selden's Notes on Eadmerus and with Mr. Wheelock's Impression of the Saxon Laws and History with a very good Preface of Sir Roger Twisden They do oblige us much that love and clear our Laws so far as just and good What Emendations and Additions King William made to St. Edward's Laws in this also of the Militia we have observed before at our unexpected enterance on this Question Which was not at all intended to be once so much as touched but in one Parenthesis Which was past Recovery before this Discourse was so much as designed But now having wandred so much and so far beyond my own purpose as well as my Subject I could almost be perswaded to step a little further and to touch I must no more upon some few passages between the Conquest as they
call it and the Barons of Wars Or the time of the great Charter For since that time the Rolls and Printed Acts are every where much larger and much better than my little reading or my leasure can present them Two words have sound of horror to the People who are taught to think them both oppressions and the sins of him they call the Conqueror Dane-geld and the Book of Dooms-day Some have added Curfeu with I know not what to make poor Children quake These have been proved to be long before the Normans coming in To that of Dane-geld I may add that good King Edward did also retain it to his Coffers when the Danish Storm was over till he saw the Devil dance upon it As the Crouland Abbot doth Record But it did rise from one to three to four to six shillings on the Hide but so by Parliament as may be much collected from the 11th Chap. of King Edwards Laws compared with Florence of Worcester Hoveden Huntingdon Math. Paris and Math. of Westminster besides some others which we must produce e're long And to say nothing of eleemosyne pro Aratris of which Canute and Ethelred it is clear in King Ethelstanes Laws that single Hides or Ploughlands in England were to maintain two Horsemen with Arms by Act of Parliament And this was more it seems than ever was King Williams Hydage or Dane-geld Which may be added to King Ethelstanes Militia as also his Doom book for all Judgments in one Form of which his Laws speak to what is said of Booca Doom But to King Williams Doomsday I shall now add to what before that besides the Mirror and Fitz-Herberts N. B. with the old Abbot of Crouland There is enough in every segment of that Roll to make one know it was a Review and little but a Review of what was done before They do abuse us else that bid us read the T. E. R. in all that Roll Tempore Edwardi Regis plain enough sometimes without all Divination That it was also confirmed by Parliament may be clear enough from the many exemptions a servitio Regis and a Vice-comit Nay to some inferiour places as Ely and Worcester Besides old Crowland which was not exempted from such service till the latter Saxon or first Normans time though Ingulph spake of divers Ethelreds But the same Abbot will tell us that this Doom Book was now also made juxta Taxatorum fidem qui Electi de qualibet Patria c. And that his Taxors were both kind and merciful non ad verum pretium nec ad verum spatium c. So preventing future Burthens and Exactions Talem Rotulum multum similem ediderat quondam Rex Alfredus c. But Alfreds own Will seemeth to carry it higher Nor was Ingulph's favour at the Court altogether useless for by that we come to know that our Norman King even in little things proceeded by a Great Councel So that our Abbots Charters must be viewed by Parliment Coram Domino meo Rege ac universo Concilio c. Thence he brought St. Edward's Laws as was observed before Huntingdon and Matthew Paris with Matthew of Westminster spake of his Hydage and Dooms-day as done with great Advice and Justice Misit Iusticiarios per unamquamque scyram inquirere fecit per jusjurandum quot Hydae i. e. jugera uni Aratro sufficientia per annum essent in unaquaque c. Nor are they wholy silent of his Parliaments Cum de more tenuisset curiam suam in Natali ad Gloucestriam and again at Winchester the like at London in another season Tilburiensis telleth us that Mony was paid to the Crown by Cities and Castles that used no Tillage But from the Land or Farms only Victuals till Henry the first And when the Kings foreign Wars did make him press for ready Mony the people murmured offering their Plowshares Horum igitur Querelis inclinatus Rex by advice of his Great council definito magnatum Concilio he sent out discreet prudent men that upon view of all the Lands should assesse the sums which the Sheriffs were to pay into the Exchequer This Gervase lived a while after King William Florence of Worcester near his Reign he telleth us of a Great Councel at Winchester And again of another at a place called Pedred not only by the King Arch-Bishops Bishops Earls but also primatibus totius Angliae a full Parliament for which Florilegius and Walsingham Newstria may be considered with Hoveden following Wigornens That in his Reign there was an High Constable of England ceasing in Henry the Eight appeareth by the Parliament Rolls of Edward the Fourth but Alfigar in the Book of Ely was such in St. Edwards time and to Him some ascribe the Constable of Dover with the Warden and Priviledge of the Cinque Ports with their Hamlets or Circuit including Rye and Winchelsey But all this speaketh Parliament as doth also his New Church Priviledge Communi Concilio Archiep. Episcop Abbat omnium Principum Regni mei Yet to be seen not only at Sir Robert Cottons Jewel House but among the Rolls with King Richards Charters for the Dean and Chapter of Lincoln This exemption of the Church from Seculars c. is the more considerable because it came up with the Norman King at the time of Hildebrand whose Letters missive came hither ad Willielmi Regis Concilium And that this Councel was a full Parliament appeareth by the Charters as I may call them of the Arch-Bishop of York ex praecepto Papae Gregorii 7. and Confirmatione Domini Willielmi Regis sub Testimonio Universalis Anglorum Concilii c. Of which Roger Hoveden is clear telling us also that this King summoned the Arch Bishops Bishops Abbots Counts Barons Vice Comit. cum suis Militibus were these Knights of Shires To this I may add from the Continuer of the Saxon Chronology that Lanfranc came hither from Caen on the Kings call and the Popes Command primatum Regni Anglorum in Ecclesia Cant. suscepit eligentibus eum Senioribus cum Episcopis principibus clero Populo Angliae in curia Regis a very clear and full Parliament Nor may I so wrong our Common Law as to detain that antient Record which the great Judg in his Reports citeth of a Writ of Right brought by this Lanfranc against Odo Bishop of Bajeux and removed by a Toll into the County Court where the King commanded all the good Lawyers to attend the County a toto Comitatu Recordatum atque judicatum est That as the King held his Lands in His Demesn in Dominio suo so was the Arch Bishop to hold his omnino liberas quietas in Dominiquo suo which Judgment was afterward confirmed by the King and Parliament cum consensu omnium principum suorum With which Record I may compare the old Manuscrips in Bennets Coll. Cambridge telling us of a great Moot magnum placitum in loco qui dicitur Pinenden in
bring any Letters of Excommunication or attempt a Voyage beyond Sea without a Licence And for sequestration of the Peter pence till further order If that I have cited already were not clear enough for Parliament in these we may have more from Wendover or Matthew Paris where we are expresly told that the great meeting at Clarendon of which before was made up of a Lord President de mandato ipsius Regis with Arch-Bishops Abbots Earls Barons and to these also are added Proceres Regni which may here speak the Commons as in Hoveden Populus so often expressed of that Parliament For it may be remembred that Virgil himself doth acknowledge the Commons also to be very frequently called to Parliament from the time of King William as we may read in his large description of our Parliaments in Henry the first To which also for this Parliament at Clarendon we might cite very many Historians besides Gervase and the Quadrilogus or Becket's Life by 4 cited on Eadmerus and in Ianus from which there is much to be added to that in Matthew Paris Where it is also asserted that these Constitutions of Clarendon were not only agreed but expresly sworn by all the degrees of Parliament Episcopi Clerus cum Comitibus Baronibus ac Proceribus cunctis Iuraverunt c. as also that these were but a Recognition or Recordation of some part of the Customs and Liberties antecessorum suorum Of which also Florilegus thus coram lege Magnatibus facta est Recordatio regiarum Libertatum Consuetudinum Cui Archiepiscopus assensum non praebuit c. Nor would it be hard to shew very many if not all of them agreed in Elder times Of Foreign Appeals we spake before and the Writ Ne Exeas Regnum is as old as Rufus if we may beleive Polidore or better Authors To that of Appeals from Ecclesiastical Courts to the King or Delegates I can add very little to what is in Caudries Case in the 5th part of the great Reports with the preface to the 6th That against Excommunication of the Kings Tenants or as the Elder Law was of the Barons is cleared enough in the Notes on Eadmerus from the first Norman Records To which may be added a Law of Henry the first of the Wills or Legacies of his Barons vel Hominum with which the Learned Ianus compareth an Old Law of Canute and toucheth the power of the Ordinary in Case of Intestates which is prescribed from most antient Parliaments but the Original doth not appear I must not spend time in heaping up the many proofs of Parliament for the Assizes of Clarendon which were again renued at Northampton Hoveden is large and clear for them all and for the Circuits and Iudges in Eyre by full Parliment Communi omnium Concilio But the Mirror and those that write of Alfred will afford us these in many older Parliaments From that Assize of Arms for every Fee we may learn to expound the Statute of Winchester and others speaking of a former antient Assize which is here found at large To which I may add that what is here spoken of the Iustices presenting to the King may be expounded to the King of Parliament As is fully expressed not only in Fleta but in the said Statute of Winchester The Iustices assigned shall present the dafaults at every Parliament The defaults of Arms for the Militia And by this time I shall not need to speak of Escuage in H. 2d assessed by Parliament for Tholouse Wales and Ireland of which Gervase the red Book in the Exchequer and Matth. Paris with the Notes of Hengham To which I might add Matth. of Westmin de unaquaque Carrucata terrae totius Angliae quatuor denarii Concessi sunt collecti for the Holy Land But when he had the offer of the Kingdom of Ierusalem Convocato Clero Regni ac Populo it was rejected Concilio universo as the Monk of St. Albans speaketh Of K. Rich. Coronation and his Oath before the Nobles Clero Populo Hoveden is very large From him it may be found in others And of the Jews in those times to whom he was a Friend as his Charters shew and very sorry for their sufferings who did help him much for his Eastern Wars as some relate with Polydore See Mr. Selden on Arundeliana Marmora his great Charter to the King of Scotland of many Liberties for which he did recieve 10000 Marks but still retaining the antient Dues to this Crown is every where For which I must not forget what was before in H. the 2d Malcolm became his man 't is said and did him Homage but on some disgust he was not Knighted by our King as was wont and Matth. Paris addeth also that the Scottish Kings Horse was the English Marshals Fee at such a Knighting But Hoveden telleth us that about two years after the same King came again and was then Knighted by King Henry Of his Parliaments and their Power in War and Peace I might cite very clear proofs The League with France was agreed by both Kingdoms Archiep. Episcop in verbo veritatis that was the mode in those days for them as for the Lords since in verbo Honoris Comites Borones Regnorum praestito Sacramento juraverunt And his Sea Statutes were made de Communi proborum virorum Consilio as the Charter it self expresseth it in Hoveden Wendover or Matth. Paris Who doth add that per Consilium magnatum there were made Iusticiarii super totum Navigium Angliae c. Which with divers Records of H. 3d. may be added to the Admiral or Saxon Aen mere eal Over all the Sea How the Lord Chancellor being left the Custos Regni did on pretence of the Kings Warrants pole the People is at large in Hoveden and others But in the Monk of St. Albans we may read that er'e long in Parliament of Commons also assensu Communium definitum est it was enacted that none should so domineer in England to disgrace the Church and oppress the People And that all the Castles which the said L. Chanc. had committed to his Clients or disposed without the Parliaments assent should be presently delivered up and in particular the Tower of London where he then was and was glad to yield and make his peace with much submission for to save his Life For which also Polydore Virgil is worth perusing And in him we also find the North committed to the Bishop of Durham who of an old Bishop was made a young Novice Earl but he paid dear for his honour and how the Chancellor excused himself by the Kings Command As if saith Polydore the Kings Command might disannul the Law Quasi fas esset jus omne principis jussu rescindere Of the Kings Voyage to the East I shall not speak nor of the famous Prophesies he found touching Antichrist and the Revelation They are in Hoveden besides all others Where we also find him ransomed
by Commune assent in special of the Clergy And for this Walsinghams Neustria may be added to others in the Road and at his return he is again Crowned before the People as well as the Lords Consilio Procerum Yet Polydore with others is bold to charge his Reign with great exactions on the Clergy in special for his ransome but himself yeilded that the King did send the Bishop of Salisbury into England that by the consent of Parliament Regii Senatus Authoritate he might get his Ransome And himself yeilded that at his return there was a Parliament wherein the King thanked his People for their Faith to him and for that they had helped him in his Wars and Imprisonment And that Ejus Nutu Archiep. Cantuar. was conferred on the said Bishop of Durham and that the Chalices c. were again restored to the Churches and that the Laws with weights and measures were then also corrected or amended K. Iohn's Election must be discussed in another place Of his Military Aids Paris with Wendover is clear that they were granted in and by Parliament Convenerunt ad Colloquium apud Oxoniam Rex magnates Angliae ubi concessa sunt Regi Auxilia Militaria de quolibet scuto duae marcae dimidium Nor are the Records wholly lost of his Parliament summoned about a War with the French or rather defence against them and his Writs are known enough They speak consent of Parliament provisum est de communi assensu Archiep. Comitum Baronum omnium Fidelium nostrorum Angliae quod novem Milites per Angliam inveniant decimum bene parat ad defensionem Regni Besides the Rolls this is found in the 9th part of the great Reports and in divers others His Charter is now so well known in Print that I need not cite any clause thereof No not that so clear for the Militia Nullum scutagium vel Auxilium ponam in regno nostro nisi per commune Consilium Regni nostri Yet I may add that the Aides there excepted and called Reasonable being such by Common Law were afterwards assessed and ascertained by Parliament For which the first of Westminster may be compared with the 25 th of Ed. 3d. and in the 14 th of that King his Aides were remitted by Parliament because for his Wars he had taketh other Assistance than was due by Law which was much excused by himself and divers other Kings And for this I might cite the 48 th of H. 3d. the 25 th and 31 th of Edw. 1st the 10 11 12 and 13 of Edw. 2d the 19 th and 20 th Edw. 3 d. who did buy Souldiers rather than Press them as the Roman Historian of the declining times of that Empire Of the Barons Wars I must not speak a syllable they do deserve a discourse by themselves and it may be possible er'e long to see it Now I shall only observe that our great Charter was rather the Cause or occasion than the Effect of those Wars For had it been so kept as it was made the Crown might have rested in peace enough They which perswade others that this Charter was first created by King Henry and extorted from him only by a prevailing Sword seem not to consider so much as its Title as it now is printed where we find it granted in his 9 th year Although it was so ill performed that it needed confirmation afterwards Matth. Paris is very clear and plain in this that it was wholly the same or exactly agreeing with that of K. Iohn in nullo dissimilis Nay he speaketh of K. Iohns Charter quas sponte promisit Baronagio Angliae and again in K. H. 3 d. sponte liberaliter concessit And the Popes Letters tell us of K. Iohns Charter granted most freely Liberaliter ex mera spontanea Voluntate de Communi consensu Baronum suorum c. Besides the very words in one of those Charters spontanea voluntate nostra dedimus concessimus pro nobis Heredibus nostris Libertates has subscriptas Nor were these new priviledges then first Created by him But the old Rights of the People by long and ancient Custom as we may find at large also in Wendover with Matthew Paris where they are not only Antiquae Leges consuetudines Regni but we are also told they did present the great Charter of H. the first with his Laws and St. Edward's And to these the Barons sware as the King had also done before For so we read their Covenant was that if the King would break his Oath a juramento proprio resilire which they had some cause to believe or suspect propter suam duplicitatem yet they would keep theirs and would do their best to reduce him to keep his Virgil is also clear in this who telleth us K. Iohn's Troubles and proceedure from his not restoring K. Edw. Laws as he had promised And that the Barons urged him ut promissas tandem aliquando Lege daret and again they ask for their Antient Customes vetera instituta quibus olim Reges Pop. Angl bene rexissent and the close is quae ille prius recepisset se sanctissime observaturum And for Henry the Third the same Author affirmeth that instead of his granting ought that was new the People granted him that grand Prerogative of Wardships which that King accepted with many thanks adding also that the People did not intend it for his Successors But of this I may speak in another place I shall now only adde that if there be not yet enough said from all the Saxon Laws and Histories with the first Norman Confirmations and Explications to assert the Great Charter to be more Antient for its matter than K. Henry or K. Iohn I shall only desire those that are yet unsatisfied they would please to peruse the 2 d. part of the Great Institutes or at least so much of it as speaketh of H. 3 d. and Edw. 1st And it may be they will not wonder that at the Prelates motion that Bastards might inherit the Parliament at Merton cryed out so loud nolumus Lages Angliae mutate c. To which also besides the late Declarations of this Parliament and the Petition of Right may be added the Learned arguments of those Grave and Honourable Judges to whom we shall ever owe so much for standing up in an evil day for Truth and Common Justice in the Case of Ship-money Sir Richard Hatton Sir George Crook and Sir Iohn Denham with the truly Noble Oliver St. Iohn Lord Chief Justice of the Common Pleas. Their Arguments are now in Print by publick Command Nor may I presume to add a word in that subject Nor shall I speak of the times following the great Charter which was confirmed more than thirty times in full Parliament with many special Provisions for the Militia It being most just and reasonable that what did so much concern all should be considered by all Quod omnes tangit
see and proceed in a judicial way Nor would he condemn or execute before he had not onely cleared his justice in himself or to his Angels but also to Abraham Lot and other Lookers on that he still might be justified both when he judgeth and is judged For he still did and will put his Actions on Man's Judgment This Process also towards Sodom is by many of our old Lawyers brought for the Pattern of our Laws in that especially that none may be condemned without a Legal Hearing And in this and divers other things do Bracton and Fleta borrow much from the Laws of Henry the First And be the Matter of Fact never so notorious yet may there be some Plea that no man can foresee or ought to forejudge before he heareth for all men may plead necessity or force upon themselves as well as Right and Law for any thing they do amiss And for this and other Reasons the Law doth suppose all men to be just or excusable till they be Legally heard and adjudged This Difference there is between the Judges and the Law-makers For these they say do suppose all men to be evil but the Judges should suppose all men to be good till they be proved to be evil The Charge and Accusation by the Law of Nature ought to be clear distinct and particular with time and place or other Circumstances else the Party accused cannot discharge himself Universalia non premunt omnino vel opprimunt Generals do not press at all or else they are apt to oppress The Witness and the Evidence must also be so clear that these must condemn rather than the Judge who sitteth as Counsel for the Party accused that so he be not oppressed by or against Law And besides the Judges in most Cases and in those also of Life in Scotland there is Counsel allowed by Law which may and ought to be heard in Particulars of Law or whatever may be justly disputable as Treason is by Statute So that of all Crimes by express Acts of Parliament it ought to have no Tryal but clear and plain according to the course and custom of the Common Law In such Cases therefore should the Iudges both in Law and Conscience sit and be instead of Counsel to the Party This they owe to every Subject though they had a special Obligation to the King Who to his own Rights and therefore to his Wrongs was an Infant in Law and so expresly declared in the Old Mirror besides other Books His Politick Capacity never but his Person ever in Nonage or supposed so in Law for it may be a Child or a Woman not able to know the Laws and therefore always had by Law a Legal Mouth assigned in Counsel of Law And so might any man else of old it seems for matter of Demurrers before Judgment or for framing of Legal Appeal by Writ of Error or some other way from any Judgment whatsoever It is also the Law of this Kingdom and of Nature that though there be no Councel assigned yet may any in a good manner move the Court to keep the Party from Injustice or the Court from Error as Stanford and the 3d. part of Institutes Cap. 2.63 and 101. And in such Cases it may be excused and not censured for rash zeal if some do or shall appear where or when it may be thought they be not called Neither can the whole Parliament of England I suppose make any Court to condemn without lawful Accusers or lawful Witnesses which by express Acts of Parliament is most especially provided in Case of Treason in King Edward the Sixth and Queen Maries Reign and Tryal of Treason was most expresly tyed to the course and custom of the Common Law Nay in full Parliament of Hen. the VIII it was declared that Attaint of Treason in or by Parliament was of no more force or strength than it was or ought to be by the Common Law or this as good and strong as that by Parliament Nor can the whole Parliament I think by the Law of Nature and right Reason make any Children Ideots or all others whatsoever to be so much as Accusers or Witnesses that I say not Indictors Tryers or Judges By express Acts of Parliament in Philip and Mary Edw. VI. Hen. VIII Hen. IV. Hen. I. for to him doth the Mirror and his Laws lead us as to a clear Crystal Fountain of our Law Process none should suffer for Treason or other Crime but by lawful Accusers lawful Witnesses before those that by Law might receive Indictments which with all Enquest are to be made by honest lawful able men Neighbours to the Fact And the Law of Nature with the Law of the Kingdom giveth any man leave to except against some for Accusers others for Witnesses and many for Tryers It being the known Law of the Land that one may challenge the Array either the principal Pannel or the Tales as well as the Polls and that the lowest Subject must be admitted if he require it to a perremtory challenge of divers it is now in most Capitals limited to 20. but in Treason it is as at Common Law it was to 3 Juries or 35 which may be challenged without any particular reason And the Law of Nature also seemeth to hear all Reasons and just exceptions against any whatsoever Nor shall I need to shew how sutable our Law is to the Law of Nature in providing that no Infant Ideot Alien Abjured Perjured or Attaint Outlaw'd or in Premunire be of any Enquest or Iury especially in Case of Life and Death And for Tryers besides all other exceptions This was thought enough that any of them had been Indictors which maketh Fortescu so much to Glory in our Law that putteth no man to Death but by the Oath of four and twenty men I should mispend my time to shew it to be the great Law of the Kingdom as well as of Nature that none may be Iudg and Parties in their own Cause which may ere-long be found perhaps to be the reason of the Three Estates and very much of our Common Law which is punctual in nothing more than in providing for a clear distinction of Accusers Witnesses Endictors Tryers and Iudges especially in Cases of Treason which upon divers motions of the Commons in Parliament have been so often Enacted and declared to be onely Tryable by the course and custom of the Common Law and no otherwise Nay in Parliament it self and Parliament Men there was and for ought I find always the like course observed For in Case of a Peer the Custom of the Kingdom is to proceed by a special Commission to one as Lord Steward and 12 others at least for a Iury of Tryors besides Accusers and Witnesses and a formal Indictment And all from Record to Record or all this is Illegal if it be onely by the House of Peers If Charge come from the House of Commons they are as Indictors being more than twelve sworn