docebantur ne dum convenit spirituali cultui novi Testamenti If it were saith he a good and pious thing to appoint Holy days this Piety were better imployed in so many Commemorations of the actions of Christ as the Church could bear then in turning aside to the Saints To dedicate a day unto God in remembrance of a man is a thing which the very Jews were never taught to do in those weak and childish times much less doth it agree to the spiritual Worship of the New Testament And though it were lawful saith Mr. Cartwright First Reply p. 153. for the Church to ordain Holy days to our Saviour Christ or the blessed Trinity yet it is not therefore lawful to institute Holy days to the Apostles and other Saints or to their remembrance As to that pretense of honouring their memorial I remember this is alledged by Bellarmine for the keeping of Reliques and Dr. Ames Bellarm Enerv. tom 2. l. 6. c. 6. thes 25. his answer to him De istiusmodi conservatione nihil traditur in Scripturâ ubi tamen omne genus honoris virtuti defertur may be applied here this is such a way of honouring the memorial of Saints departed as the Scripture knows not wherein yet all due honour is given to virtue and holiness For as we reason against the Popish Purgatory saith Mr. Cartwright First Reply p. 153. that it is therefore nought forasmuch as neither in the Old Testament nor in the New there is any mention of Prayer at any time for the Dead so may it be reasoned against these Holy days ordained for the remembrance of the Saints that forasmuch as the old people did never keep any Feast or Holy day for the remembrance either of Moses or Daniel or Job or Abraham or David or any other how holy or excellent soever they were Nor the Apostles nor the Churches in their time never instituted any neither to keep the remembrance of Stephen or of the Virgin Mary or of John Baptist or of any other notable rare personage that the instituting and erecting of them now and this attempt by the Churches which followed is not without some note of presumption for that it undertaketh those things which the primitive Church in the Apostles times having greater gifts of the Spirit of God durst not venture upon And what though some of these Corruptions crept in some what early they are but old sins and grey-headed errors That Antichristian violence of Victor Bishop of Rome for Easter was about the year of Christ one hundred ninety eight but Christmas is not so ancient Pezelius refers the first establishment of it to the Council of Constantinople in the year of Christ five hundred fifty three Celebrata est saith he Constantinopoli Synodus Oecumenica quinta circa annum Christi 553. In eadem Synodo dies natalis Christi dies Purificationis Mariae primum sunt instituti ut solenniter quotannis celebrarentur Pezel Mellific Hist par 2. Justinian 1. pag. 326. But be their antiquity more or less they have been abundantly testified against by the faithful Servants of Christ both in former and later times Socrates who wrote the History of the Church above twelve hundred years ago hath a whole Chapter concerning Easter wherein he hath many notable arguments against those that contend so much for it He saith that as many other things crept in of custom in sundry places so the Feast of Easter prevailed amongst all people of a certain private custom and observation seeing not one of the Apostles hath any where prescribed any thing about it He sheweth also that the Apostles have set the Churches free from the yoke of bondage by their Letters to them Acts 15. But some neglecting these things account of Fornication as a thing indifferent yet they contend about Holy days as it were for life and death they despise the Commandments of God and establish them Canons of their own they set at nought they make no account of the Law published by the Apostles but raise a foul stir about Days and Months c. Thus Socrates Hist lib. 5. cap. 22. Which Testimony of his is so plain and punctual that Bellarmine knew not how to rid his hands of it but by flying out upon Socrates and calling him a Novatian Heretick Bell. de Cultu Sanct. l. 3. c. 10. which is but a poor shift instead of answering his Arguments to reproach his Person But the Book he hath written I mean his Ecclesiastical History is evidence enough for him that he was a man of an excellent spirit It was one of the Articles held and owned by the Waldenses as Mr. Fox sheweth five hundred years ago Constrained and prefixed Fasts bound to days and times difference of Meats superfluous Holy days and all the rabblement of Rites and Ceremonies brought in by Man to be abolished Fox Acts and Mon. vol. 1. p. 300. art 6. It was Luthers desire no less then seven score years ago in his Book de Bonis Operibus set forth anno 1520. that there were no other Festival days amongst Christians but only the Lords day Beza saith Superstitiosum esse docemus arbitrari unum aliquem diem altero sanctiorem Bez. Confes c. 5. art 41. And Reverend Mr. Dod condemns it as Idolatry against the second Commandment either to pray unto the Saints or to swear by them or to dedicate set days and times to the honour of them either by Fasting or Feasting Dod on the second Commandm p. 67 68. In Scotland they were laid aside in the first Reformation and have been witnessed against by the Godly there ever since They were revived indeed by those backsliders in the Assembly of Perth in the year 1618. For one of the five Articles of that Assembly was concerning Festival days but they found little acceptance with such as adhered to the Reformation of Religion as appears by the Books and Writings of many godly learned men against the Acts of that Assembly Yea King James himself before his Apostasie bore witness against them Right excellent was that Speech of his to a National Assembly in Scotland anno 1590. He praised God that he was King in the sincerest Church in the world sincerer then the Church of England for their Service was an ill said Mass in English sincerer then Geneva it self for they observed Pasche and Yoo le that is Easter and Christmas and what warrant said he have they for that I find this Speech of his recorded in Didoclavius his Altare Damascenum pag. 666. and in the Book intituled Perth Assembly the Proceedings the Nullity thereof c. printed 1619. pag. 64. and in the Re-examination of the five Articles of Perth printed 1636. pag. 340. How far he did sin against these enlightenings and convictions and how the Bishops did poyson him and pervert his Spirit in his declining times it is needless here to discourse But these were his Principles in his first which were his best times
and amongst the rest they had one great Idol called the Rood which if it was as some now think the Picture of an old Man from thence the poor ignorant people came to conceive of God the Father as an old Man sitting in Heaven though it seems rather to be a Wooden Image of Christ hanging on the Cross See Acts and Monuments vol. 2. pag. 302. or a Wooden Cross only without any Image hanging on it From whence is the term Roodmas used still in some parts of England by which they mean the first or third of May the Pope having made that an holy day and called it Inventio Crucis because forsooth on that day the Cross on which Christ was crucified was found if you will believe the Fable Masse or Messe signifying in the old Saxon a Feast or a set time of holy rejoycing and Rood as it seems a Cross But this is to be observed that in all the Ceremonial Worship the Lord took special care to keep his people at a distance from the heathenish Idolatries of those times he would not suffer them to conform at all to those false Worships nor to comply with them in the least And it is a good spirit to be zealous against such things but where there is a slight loose indifferent sceptical frame of spirit in the matters of Gods House and Worship this spirit is not of God this spirit is not of him that calleth you So much for the House it self 2. Now secondly for the Courts of the Temple there were two of them the Scripture mentioneth so many and no more 2 Chron. 33.5 and he Manasseh built Altars for all the Host of Heaven in the two Courts of the House of the Lord. About the Tabernacle we read but of one Court Exod. 27.9 for the whole Camp of Israel was the outer Court But about the Temple there two called the outward and the inner Court The outward Court being the larger is called the great Court 2 Chron. 4.9 and the Court of the people because here the people came together to be taught Ezra 10.9 But though the people came into it yet it was part of the Temple and an holy place For none might enter that were unclean in any thing for it was the Office of the Porters to keep them back 2 Chron. 23.19 And hence it was that the Jews took so much offence at Paul when they thought he had brought Greeks into the Temple and so polluted that holy place Actt 21.28 There was also another Court called the inner Court 2 Kings 6.36 and the higher Court Jer. 36.10 and the Court of the Priests Vid. plura on Rev. 11.12 This Reference in the Authors Notes shews he had written a Discourse on that Text and indeed so he had which may be published in time if God will 2 Chron. 4.9 Both these Courts as it seemeth did compass the Temple on all sides round about and they were four square The length of each side of the outer Court was a furlong as the Jewish Witers report and the whole about half an English mile in compass There were also as they report some other Courts added unto these in after times but because the Scripture takes no norice of them I shall not do it neither Neither shall I say any thing of the Walls about the Courts and the Gates and other Buildings belonging to them as Chambers Porches and Treasuries to lay the Vessels and other things in and for the Priests and Levites to lodge in For there is mention 1 Chron. 28.11 of the Porch and of the Houses therof and the Treasuries thereof c. and ver 12. of the Courts of the House of the Lord and of all the Chambers round about of the Treasuries of the House of God and of the Treasuries of the dedicate things Neither need I speak particularly to the mystical significations of the House and the Courts The whole as considered together may be divided into three parts 1. The outer Court 2. The inner Court with the Sanctuary 3. The Oracle or the Holy of holies Some apply these three parts of the Temple to the three parts of a Christian mentioned by the Apostle 1 Thess 5.23 the Spirit Soul and Body The Body say they is signified by the open Court where all may see what is done The Soul say they may be compared to the Sanctuary which as it was more holy than the outward Court so is the Soul of man an higher and more divine part than the Body where by the Lamp of Gods Spirit the Reason and Understanding is enlightened The Spirit say they is as the most holy place where God dwelleth in secret by Faith which saith the Apostle is of things not seen nor comprehended by Reason Others apply it to the three parts of the World thus The outward Court to this inferiour World where all things lye open to the view and use of man The Sanctuary to the starry Heaven which is full of Lights and Stars as the Sanctuary had the seven Golden Candlesticks and Gems and Jewels shining in it The Holy of holies to the third Heaven wherein God dwelleth and indeed the Apostle himself makes it a Type of Heaven Heb. 9.24 There is something of analogy in the thing as to all these But the best accommodation of a Type is from Scripture and from the hints and intimations which the Scripture gives which as hath been formerly shewed makes the Temple a Type of Christ and of the Church Let us consider then what Instructions these parts of the Temple do afford as to both these 1. As to Christ himself The Temple was a Type of Christ especially in regard of that chief part of it the Holy of holies wherein there was a figure or weak representation both of his divine and humane Nature Therefore Christ is called the Holy of holies Dan. 9.24 seventy weeks are determined to anoint the most holy or the Holy of holies that is to initiate and inaugurate the Lord Jesus Christ into his Mediatorial office The Veil of the Holy of holies typified his humane nature Heb. 10.20 through the Veil that is to say his Flesh We may draw forth the analogy more at large in these particulars 1. The Humane nature did veil the Glory of his Deity as the Veil of the Temple did conceal the Holy of holies from the eyes of men 2. There was curious Embroidery of Cherubims and other Ornaments upon the Veil Exod. 26.31 thou shalt make a Veil of blue and purple and scarlet and fine twined Linnen of cunning work with Cherubims shall it be made So Chron. 3.16 This is not unfitly applied to those excellent Graces of the Spirit wherewith the Humane nature of Jesus Christ was filled and adorned 3. The Veil shutting up the Sanctuary from the sight and entrance of the people signified the shutting up the mysteries of the Gospel while the old Temple stood Heb. 9.8 the holy Ghost this signifying that
In England besides the frequent Testimonies of the Martyrs against them Authority hath smitten them once and again the Lord usually carrying on the work of Reformation by degrees The first blow they received by publick Authority was by the Injunctions of King Henry the eighth in the year 1536. in the Preface whereto he reasons thus against them Forasmuch as the number of Holy days is so excessively grown and yet daily more and more by mans devotion yea rather Superstition was like further to increase that the same was and should be not only prejudicial to the Commonwealth by reason that it is occasion as well of much sloth and idleness the very Nurse of Theeves Vagabonds and divers other unthriftiness and inconveniences as of decay of good Mysteries and Arts profitable and necessary for the Commonwealth and loss of mans food many times being clean destroyed through the superstitious observance of the said Holy days in not taking the opportunity of good and serene weather offered upon the same in the time of Harvest but also pernicious to the Souls of many men which being inticed by the licentious vacation and liberty of these Holy days do upon the same commonly use and practise more excess riot and superfluity then upon any other days c. See Mr. Fox Acts and Monum vol. 2. pag. 386. whereupon he abrogates a number of them and especially such as sell in the Harvest time And thus the work was begun But the total extirpation of them was a work and honour reserved by God for the great Parliament who in their Directory pag. ult have declared that Festival days vulgarly called Holy days having no warrant in the Word of God are not to be continued And in their Ordinance of June 8. 1647. they do utterly abolish them in these words Forasmuch as the Feasts of the Nativity of Christ Easter and Whitsuntide and other Festivals commonly called Holy days have been heretofore superstitiously used and observed be it ordained by the Lords and Commons assembled in Parliament that the said Feast of the Nativity of Christ Easter and Whitsuntide and all other Festival days commonly called Holy days be no longer observed as Festivals or Holy days within the Kingdom of England and Dominion of Wales Any Law Statute Custom Constitution or Canon to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding See Mr. Scobels Collection anno 1644. cap. 5â— and anno 1647. cap. 81. And now to see these and other abominations by the Prelatick party conjured up again from the Grave and from the bottom of Hell after such a Funeral he said well who said it is almost as prodigious and as ghastly a sight as to see a dead Ghost walking up and down with his winding-sheet about him but God will shortly bury them again and seal the Tomb-stone upon them never to rise more For he hath said I hate I despise your Feast-days See Calv in Amos 5.21 I will not smell your Holy days Amos 5.21 wherein as the most judicious Interpreters observe he doth not only reprove their Hypocrisie in reference to his own blessed days but also their Idolatry and Superstition in observing days of their own Oh! that God would set home this Text by the power of his Spirit upon the Consciences of Holiday-keepers to convince and humble them How dreadful are these words I hate I despise your Feast-days I will not smell your Holy days that is I will never accept them THE SUPERSTITIOUS VANITY OF THE POPISH MUSICK IN THE WORSHIP of GOD. THis is such a strange superstitious Vanity that it is generally accounted in these knowing times as it was of old by Justin Martyr Quest Resp 107 childish and ridiculous insomuch that it doth expose the Papists and their way of Worship to much contempt and laughter and therefore I should have thought it needless to speak much against a thing so generally exploded but that Mr. R. B. hath discovered and declared himself for it as a thing in it self lawful and warrantable His words are these For Organs or other instruments of Musick in Gods Worship they being an help partly natural and partly artificial to the exhilerating of the Spirits for the Praise of God I know no argument to prove them simply unlawful but what would prove a Cup of Wine unlawful or the Tune and Meeter and Melody of Singing unlawful but yet if any would abuse it by turning Gods Worship into carnal Pomp and Levity especially by such non-inteligible singing or bleating as some of our Choristers used the common people would have very great cause to be weary of it as accidentally evil Thus he Disp of Humane Cerem p 412. But Bellarmine hath said more then this for it in fewer words Cum habeamus saith he exemplum Testamenti veteris experiamur devotionem per eam excitari taedium minui Bell. de Missa lib. 2. c. 15. and he gives as grave and learned Counsel against the abuse of them In ipsis Organis saith he non nisi res sacras pias sobrie graviter exprimendas neque enim leve peccatum est siquis lascivum aliquid Organis ludat audientium animos non ad pietatem sed ad amorem mundi accendat Bell. de Bon. Oper. in particul lib. 1. cap. 17. The answering of which objections and pretences will sufficiently discover the vanity and groundlesness of this Superstition and that it is more then accidentally evil And first to that plausible Objection of Bellarmine from the use of them in the Old Testament to begin with the strongest Argument first for this is the most specious and hath the greatest seeming weight But though the Jews had Musical Instruments in the Worship of God under the Law yet that they are no part of Gospel-worship these Considerations may evince First There was then a clear word of Institution for them The Trumpets of Silver and Cornets of Horn were instituted by the hand of Moses Numb 10. in the ten first verses and Levit. 23.23 24. we read also in Moses his time of Timbrels used in the publick Praises of God by Miriam the Prophetess Exod. 15.20 and in Davids time we read of Organs also and ten-stringed Instruments and Cymbals of Brass and Harps and Psalteries of fine wood 2 Sam. 6.5 Psal 149.3 and 150.4 2 Chron. 16.4 5. and these Musical instruments were not brought into Gods Worship by David of his own head but by Authority and Direction from God For so was the Commandment of the Lord by his Prophets saith the Text 2 Chron. 29.25 and therefore they are called the musical instruments of God 1 Chron. 16.42 and instruments of Musick of the Lord 2 Chron. 7.6 with relation to God as the Author and Institutor of them For the Lords Name in the Scripture phrase is never set upon things of Humane invention but only upon things of Divine institution as the Lords Supper the Lords Day the Lords Feasts the Lords Altar c. so
of the Lord Exod. 28.38 Ephes 1.6 He hath made us accepted in the beloved Though we and our best works are vile yet the Lord looking upon the Forehead of our High Priest sees Holiness engraven there looking upon the Face of Christ he there also beholds it for us and becomes well pleased with us and we in the Faith thereof persuaded and assured of our acceptance with the Lord through the Faith of him Thou that saiest there is nothing but sin in me sin and vileness in all I do I answer it is true the Lord can see nothing but sin in thee but he cannot look upon the High Priest but there he sees holiness yea the holiness of Jehovah there Thus you have seen something of the holy attire which the Lord ordained and appointed for the Priests of old I shall conclude with two or three general words as by way of Use or Inference from the whole Vse 1. We may here see the evil of the superstitious Garments retained from Antichrist for the Ministers of the Gospel It is to transform Gospel-Ministers into legal Priests yea into Popish Priests The Priests under the Law had a long white Linnen Coat hence Antichrist hath a Surplice The Priests of old were girded with a Girdle hence is the Canonical Girdle as they call it which by many is now commonly called a Circingle by way of contempt and just and righteous scorn The Priests under the Law had an holy Robe hence is the Canonical Coat They had an Ephod hence is the Pall which the Pope was wont to send to Archbishops for their Consecration or Installment Lastly the High Priest of old had a Mitre hence is the Bishops Mitre And Ribera quotes a place out of Josephus where he saith that the High Priest wore a tripple Crown from whence he thinks St. Peter did the like as the Pope now doth that so the Verity might be answerable to to the Figure that Christs High Priests might wear that which the High Priest the Figure of Christ did wear Ribera de sacr Vest cap. 14. apud Willett on Exod. 28. Controv. 4. But Dr. Willett answers him beside many other just and rational answers as that the Scripture doth not say it was a triple Crown I had thought saith he that Aaron had been a Figure of Christ not of the Pope and temporal things do not prefigure temporal one triple Crown another but that outward Crown shadowed forth the spiritual Kingdom and Regal Dignity of Jesus Christ But against all these Popish Garments in general observe two things 1. That these things were typical and shadowy therefore now that Christ the true High Priest is come in his Divine Glory this external pomp and splendor of bodily Apparel is ceased and vanished away with all the rest of the Ceremonies by the appearing of the Sun of Righteousness The Papists therefore in this matter they do judaize The Priest among the Papists when he comes among the people he comes forth just like a Priest of the Ceremonial Law as if he were going to offer Sacrifice Though withall it is to be observed that some of their superstitious Garments are not borrowed from the Jews but either from the Pagans or invented of their own heads For they have a rich Wardrobe of superstitious Garments as the Crosier Staff the Albe the Chimere the grey Amice the Stole with such like some of which for my part I know not well what they are nor whence they had them nor is it worth the while to make much search in Histories and Fathers after them but as in some they judaize so in others I doubt they paganize 2. Observe this that the false Priests of old were much given to this kind of Superstition and not only they but sometimes good men were a little tainted with it who abhorred the more open sort of gross Idolatry Judg. 8.27 Gideon made an Ephod a sacred ministring Garment but he intended no hurt Good Man for he was no Papist he had broke down the Image of Baal but yet this did offend the Lord and became a snare to Gideon and to his House Suppose men be against the gross Idolatry of the Papists as our reforming Magistrates in England were in the first Reformation yet if they retain any of these Priestly Garments it may offend God and be a snare to them But we have a grosser instance in 2 King 10.22 in Jehu's time who said to him that was over the Vestry Bring forth the Vestments for all the Worshippers of Baal It seems they had not only Worshipping Vestments but such a number of them that it required a special Officer to keep them and look after them There are but two Objections commonly alledged for them Obj. 1. It is decent Ans Decency in Clothing appears in common use and custom and is regulated thereby and by the Light of Nature and therefore those Habits that men do not wear in common use are accounted uncomely and ridiculous And thence though in old time they were wont to were white and in those hotter Climates they did much use Linnen yet now in after-times people having betaken themselves to darker colours as being graver and not requiring such continual washing as it would be ridiculous altogether ridiculous for a man to wear a white Shirt on the top of all his Clothes so to do the like in the Worship of God is a direct and manifest breach of that rule of Decency 1 Cor. 14. ult and so far from decent that it is ridiculous and absurd God having not appointed any such thing Moreover the meaning of that Scripture is not that men should institute and invent decent things but only that they do administer the things of Christ which he hath instituted in a decent manner and further than this that Text gives no liberty nay it restrains men from medling further then only to see that the Appointments and Ordinances of Christ be administred in a decent and orderly manner But there is no decency in wearing a Surplice for then the want of it would be undecent which common sense tells us it is not Nor did Christ or the Apostles worship God undecently and yet they never prayed or preached in a Surplice Obj. 2. Better do it then not preach I had rather preach in a Fools Coat said one then not preach the Gospel Ans We must not do evil that good may come thereof Rom. 3. and therefore we may not preach in a Fools Coat for it is not decent The plain truth is that this pretense which so many have abused themselves withall that they had rather preach in a Fools Coat forsooth then not preach the Gospel it is a weak and sinful speech The first that spake it as I have heard was a French Protestant who being made a Prebend by King James was content to accept of it and made this excuse he not understanding or not rightly considering the English Controversies that were then