the Spirit as Faith Humility Charity c. with whcih graces whosoever prays by the spirit and the humble or faithfull soul shall by putting in practise the rules before given make known their humble and faithfull petitions with good apt orderly and found words as well as with unseigned lips Quest. 2. VVhether the wicked be bound to pray That none are exempted from this duty but that it is to be performed by all good or bad wicked and prophane by the sound Christian and by the formall Hypocrite ppeares 1. The duty of prayer is as large and as universall as that of reading hearing c. therefore to be practised by all 2. Prayer is a converting ordinance It is a meanes appointed for the obtaining of pardon of sin of the Holy Ghost of drawing nigh unto God and therefore no sinner exempted from it 3. The neglect of prayer is charged upon them as a sin Psal. 14.2 Psal. 10.4 4. The consciences of wicked men accuseth them when they have not prayed 5. God hath sometimes accepted the prayers of very wicked men even of them that have sold themselves to do wickedly 1 King 21.27 Quest. 3. Whether the set forms of Prayers used by law in the Church of England be Lawfull Before this question be directly answered we shall premise a few things 1. That the book of Common prayer had never been defended in this nature but that the crossnesse and peevishnesse of hot spirited men and passionate writers hath so defamed the the thing it self and also the users of it that it appears to be thought by them a sin unto Death Publickly or privatly to own it in the Church 2. That this defence doth not at all imply its necessity I am perswaded the Church of England might stand without it and may stand in purity by it Unifomity is necessary for the well-being of the Church as was known to the publishers of the Directory and if the Magistrate will have uniformity another way it may be had and if this way it may be used 3. That much of the Common-Prayer is in the Masse may be acknowledged to its honour It is but a furious and blind zeal that makes men inveigh against the Churches practise in this because of its affinity to Rome since we are to preserve the peace of the Church to our utmost we are not to decline too far from any opinion or practise that is lawfull the Jews preists did Sacrifice so did Baals The Papists uses this or that form of prayer if it be lawfull so may I that the breach or quarrel may appear to be one his part not on mine what ever is in the Masse that is lawfull and according to godliness is not to be despised and what ever is otherwise is to be condemned and shunned 4. That the book of Common-prayer might be altered and otherwise framed in some points bettered is not rationally to be denyed what book was ever composed by the wit or art of men but others might alter it and in some measure better it Let the Guisels view their Directory and I doubt not but they will find that somewhat might be left out and something put in part of it expunged and part of it enlarged 5. That by no meanes it ought to jostle out preaching is granted and is easily to be defended Prophecying is that ordinance that cheifly discovers the secrets of the heart that deceitfull part of man Prayer and Sacraments hath done vertuously but this excells them all and therefore for none of them is it to be disesteemed 6. That the Author hath competency of gifts for which he desires to be thankfull to do without Common-prayer as well as others Can they baptise pray bury marry c. without it absit a verbo I. Etantia so can he can they visit or pray sutably over the sick without it so can he can they promptly and readily vary their petitions at any time sutable to the duty in hand so can he In obedience to authority he useth it and so ought others though their gifts were more eminent then they are These things being considered we come now to answer the question And That the Liturgy Service book or Common-prayer of the Church of England is lawfull and with a safe conscience may be used appears by these following reasons 1. From the piety eminency and godlinesse of its composers they were men eminent and famous in their generation opposers of and to death some of them suffered for their not compliance to popish superstition when they were rooting out popery and disclaiming the Pope with all his adherents was that book compiled shall we Imagin the Guisels when they were composing the Directory were establishing Episcopacy if it were found to conjecture that why ought we to conceite the other in collecting the formes of that book of Common-prayer were confirming popery when of any other they most opposed it and suffered most by it It will not be a needlesse digression to spend a little time in shewing the occasion of compiling the book of Common-prayer and see the compilers The occasion of it was breifly this When Edward the sixth was by the Grace of God Crowned King of England c. and it being in his mind to perfect that reformation begun by his Father made many glorious acts for puryfying of the Church from Romish superstition particularly for administring the Sacrament of the supper under both kinds there were some in that time obeyed the King and some that did not so that the Sacraments were given by some one way and by others another way some were for the King some for the Pope and some were neuter to rectify which abuse and to extirpate popery with as little voyce as could be a writ is directed to the Archbishop of Canterbury who afterwards was burned by Queen Mary for his adhering to the Catholick or as the terme now is the protestant faith by the King and his counsell requiring him with others to meet and consult how to prevent for the future and remove that confusion for the present the service of the Church being then various after the use of Sarum Of York of Bangor and of Lincolne and besides them diverse other formes and bookes called Antiphoners Missales Graites Processionals Manuells Legends Pies Portuasses Couchers Iournalls Ordinals In a word every man used what form fashion or manner pleased him best This writ being sent to those persons hereafter to be mentioned they meet and after much debate consulting with the antient liturgyes of the Church expunging from them all what ever was not either in or agreeable to the word of God presented to that Godly King a book entituled The book of the Common-prayer and administration of the sacraments and other rites and Ceremonys of the Church after the use of the Church of England at the reading of which his Majesty being very thankfull both to God and man presented it to both his houses of Parliament assembled
is himself and his Cardinals saies it a poor bolster God knows for a man to place his rest his confidence his assurance the unchangable estate of his eternal soul upon And why must I believe it because they say it Because they cannot erre and why must I believe they cannot erre because they say so thus may they impose upon mens consciences the very doctrine of Devils as they do 1 Tim. 4.12 3 4. and the poor people are taught that they must believe that oâ— herwise they are no members of the Church out of which indeed there is no Salvation or of Christ though no Scripture be brought in the least to confirm it 2. We were not baptized in the name of the Church this argument Paul brings against the divisions of the Corinthians 1 Cor. 11.3 there were some that would stick to the Doctrine of Paul some hold to that of Cephas what sayes he was Paul Crucified for you or were you baptized in the name of Paul that you should suppose to be saved by me we were baptized in the name of the Triun God and we expect only and we believe throughly to be saved by him alone without the aid of men or Angels for if an Angel should come down and perswade us or teach to us a necessity of believing in him without or against the Scripture as frequently Rome doth he were to be accursed I say again he were to be accursed 1 Gal. 9. 3. The Catholick Church calls upon her members not to do that and good reason too the Son of God would not though he might urge his own authority plead for a beliefe but upon a Scripture account Iohn 5.39 and Paul desires to be followed no further than he follows Christ 1 Cor. 11.1 and those Bereans are made noble for searching the Scriptures whether the things that were spoken by Paul were true or no Acts 17 11. And we have a charge given us to hear the Son the same teacheth the reformed Churches as of France Art 2. Belg. Art 7. Art 20. of the Church of England Art 1. of the Church of Bohem In which Article there are two reasons given for this truth 1. because the Scriptures were inspired and taught by the holy Ghost confirmed by heavenly testimonies which spirit discovers to men how it ought to be understood for Prophecie came not in old time by the will of man but holy men spake as they were moved by the holy Ghost 2 Pet. 1. ult Besides the Lord himself saieth Search the Scriptures And again Ye are deceived not knowing the Scriptures c. 2 Because that is a true and sure testimony and a clear proof of Gods favourable good-will which he hath revealed concerning himself such things as are necessary to doctrine to discipline and government of the holy Church are all fully and absolutely so comprehended then which no Angel can bring any thing more certain and if he should he ought not to be believed For which cause saies that confession in our Churches the Scriptures are rehearsed to the hearers in the vulgar tongue and especially according to the ancient custome of the Church those portions of the Gospel in Scripture which are wont to be read on solemn daies out of the Evangelists and Apostles writings and are usually called the Epistles and Gospels The whole stream of the confessions of reformed Churches runs against Rome in this 4. Our Creed which is the rule of things to be believed as the ten Commandements are of things to be done and the Lords Prayer of things to be asked calls upon him that reads it or hears it to believe only in God the Father and in God the Son and in God the holy Ghost and not to believe in but to believe the Catholick Church i e to be perswaded that there ever was is and shall to the end of the world be a company of men Elected and called unto life by which confession we acknowledge our selves one of them Now to believe in the Church were to set her in as high dignity to rule over the consciences of men as Christ himself or any other person in the Trinity which were a giving his glory to another 5. Men should by this never be assured of their Salvation nor of their good estare it might be necessary for thy Salvation to do that this day which might not be done if I would be saved the next for as the Rulers of the Church uttered their judgments upon the light of reason I must judge my self in a happy or in a forlorn condition which is contrary to that Catholick doctrine Make your calling and Election sure 2 Pet. 1.10 which could never be done did it lye upon the fine flourishes of an Oratour or distinction of a Canonist sitting in counsell And indeed this may be one cause why the Church of Rome denies the possibility of a firm assurance of future glory contrary to the text above named 5. There are but four false religions in the world Heathnism Turcism Judaisme and Papism the Heathen possibly may reason the case for his religion against an Opponent though perhaps as soundly as Cyrus reasoned with Daniel concerning the dignity of Bel Thinkest thou not â—hat Bel is a living God said the King seest thou not how much he eateth and drinketh every day The Jew he will direct thee to the Scriptures see and try if his religion be not according to that most sure word of Prophesie The Turk is stubborn and it is death to dispute or search the truth for the confirming of the faith in the matters of the Alchoran The same it is with the Papist the bell will ring and candle will be put out and the book opened if the authority of the Bishop of Rome be once questioned though in matters of faith Let the Turk and Romanist therefore go together give me that religion that may be tryed and hold out in tryal yet let the Romanist remember that as Mahomet said he found the hand of God seven times colder than ice he may find it seventy times hotter than Purgatory for either adding or taking from the word of God and imposing any thing upon the people as necessary to be done in point of Salvation Illi ergo potius parendum monenti ut omnia exploremus quod bonum est retineamus quoe certe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 instituti non potest nisi ad manum sit Lydius ille Scripiucarum lapis cujus ope aurea ab aereis humana á Divines internoscantur Notwithstanding that the restimony of the Church is not to be taken singly in matters of faith yet the testimony of the Church is of great weight and concernmnst in matters of fact For 1 it may prepare our hearts and move them to believe the thing the surer that the Church hath affirmed This made King Charles the first of glorious memory strongly to assert that what could not be proved by the word of God to be unlawfull
carriage without and some their deportment within the Pulpit we shall see only the chief of them In a Minister there is required 1. Courage Tit. 2.15 2. Sobriety 1 Tim. 3.2 3. Liberality 4. Docibility or aptness to teach 5. Temperance 6. Patience 1 Tim. 3.2 7. A Lover of good things and of good men 8. Holiness 9. Justice 1 Tit. 7.8 We must note that some of these cannot be known by the quickest eye No Bishop is omniscient to know the heart and therefore may ordain a man that wants many of these and also we must observe that a person may come for ordination with many or all of these and yet may backslide which takes not away the force of ordination The Angel of the Church of Ephesus fell from his first purity and love yet was an Angel still Rev. 2.4 5. he may loose his patience his temperance his holiness yet a Minister still and the power of preaching and administring the Sacraments and exercising the keys abide with him these ordinances not depending upon the quality of him that doth administer them more then the force of the Broad Seal of England depends upon the merits of my Lord Chancellour as shall God willing be proved in its own place To all these qualifications above named must be joyned competency of knowledge It is not every man that is just holy or patient must be ordained he must be of understanding competent for the work which competency appears in these particulars from Tit. 1.9 viz. 1. His adhering to the truth known not opinionated 2. In his ability to teach and that soundly for the edification of the Church according to that truth 3. In his dexterity in maintaining of that truth stopping the mouth of Gainsayers he that is so qualified cannot be refused ordination We say competently qualified ' For who is sufficient for these things SECT III. Let us see who they are that must thus ordain whose hands they be that by their laying on the person is qualified in an external way for the publick preaching of the word 1. Not their own Heb. 5.4 It is against the practise of the whole Church of God in all ages for any man though never so well gifted to separate himself or ordain himself as is clear in the examples of Stephen Nicanor c. Nay if it were in a mans own power to separate himself for the work of the Gospel Paul needed not to have left Titus in Creet to ordain Elders in every City Tit. 1.5 It is a practice beyond a president in the Church of Christ for one to ordain himself We read indeed how Frederick the second upon Easter day through necessity crowned himself with his own hands King of Ierusalem in Ierusalem but that ever man made himself a Priest in Ierusalem save Saul Ieroboam and such prophane Wretches whom God did curse even for so doing we read not Neither in old or new Testament is there any instance of one who set himself apart for holy functions or that thought himself qualified in an authoritative way to reach the Gospel upon the sufficiency of gifts as Courage Holiness Knowledge and the like if so Stephen Philip Prochorus c. needed never have been ordained Deacons Acts 6.3 4 5. Nor Paul nor Barnabas Apostle or Evangelist Acts 13.2 nor Timothy a Bishop or E'der 1 Tim. 4.14 2. Not the multitude Never did God give the power of ordination to the people in general before nor after Christ if so where two or three would please to meet they might ordain which in few dayes would make the Church of Christ conâ—ist of Shepherds rather then of sheep yea would make all Apostles all Teachers c. We find the contrary practised For when the multitude had chosen and nominated persons of honest report full of the holy Ghost and Wisdom thâ—y set them before the Apostles who prayed and lâ—id their hands on them Acts 6.3 6. yea as was said before the inhabitants of the Cities of Creet might have ordained Elders Titus might have gone forward with Paul In summe God never giving the people the power of ordination since the creation they can never deliver that power to any untill the dissolution of the world Presumptuous are they therefore that will take ordination from them impudent before the Lord therefore they that will presume to give that authority in matters of so great concernment as the word and Sacraments to any of their own body 3. Only Church officers or the Apostles successors they are only to teach and to baptize unto the end of the world Paul and the Presbytery ordains Timothy he ordains others and they others and so by a moral succession from the Apostles is the Ministerial office upheld but of this we have spoken It were too great a task for me to offer to wade into that troublesome discourse touching Episcopal or Presbyterial ordination least I should drown my self being but of small standing in the Church of Christ yet by vertue of that Proverb It is good to be sure Episcopacy is much to be preferred that being the most ancient way since if not before the Apostles departure from the world and albeit it hath some ruptures or breaches in some of the reformed Churches yet the Acts and Lawes of England make no ordination valid but what originally is Episcopal SECT IV. We are to behold the man thus separated for the Lords use For the perfecting of the Saints for the work of the Ministry for the edifying of the body of Christ Ephes. 4.12 We say we are to see what his duty is and what he is to perform amongst men The very naming of his ordination shewes you what he is to do and the distinction above named discovers his duty but to be more particular yet not large 1. He is to take all advantages and opportunities of preaching that word the preaching of which he is separâ—ted for 2 Tim. 4.1 2. The more wicked the times be he lives in the more bold and confident he ought to be 2 Tim. 4.3 yet this excludes not but that he may flee persecution Acts 9.25 3. In preaching of the Word he is to observe the proportion of faith Rom. 1â—2 6 4. He is to teach the word according to the capacity of his people 1 Cor. 14.9 the other parts of his duty are clear and obvious SECT V. Questions resolvedâ— Quest. 1. Whether ordination may better a Ministers gifts Quest. 2. Whether a Minister may renounce his ordination Quest. 3. Whether the Ministerial office be to continue alway in the world Quest. 4. Whether it be lawfull to hear an unordained man preach Quest. 5. Whether an ordained person may bear an office in the Common-wealth Quest 1. Whether Ordination may better a Ministers gifts Though this sacred ordinance be of no account with some yet to the conscionable Receiver it may be very advantageous For 1. It is an odinance of God alwayes practised in his Church it may appear at
and Elijah Ahab and severall others but Kings being Gods immediate deputies upon earth who call them in question though rage universal as to punish him for this faults or correct him for his crimes who first even the Pope upon the one hand and Guisel upon the other These two though at odds between themselves yet ever agree and goe and in hand for the takeing away of that honour annexed by the King of Kings to his vicegerents upon this inferiour world before which be done let them goe about day by day and grudge that they be not satisfied That distinction of the moderate and rigid Presbyterians may be by this time may come into the readers mind a distinction that hides many an ugly face and treacherous heart possibly the moderate Preâ— will with more gravity and deliberation pronounce the sentence of excommunication against the chief magistrate then the other and comes to it with more sorrow of heart through the greatnesse of the crime then the other but yet he will do it being a principle with the Pres. that is the factious one or the Antiepiscopal on for otherwise Pres. is an honorable title and catholical as such and touching the distinction it is as a just one and grounded on nature there being as great difference betwixt these two as there is between staring and stark mad the one drives like Iehu furiously the other like the Spaniard is more grave stayed slye and cunning Quest. 2. Whether excommunication debarres from all society of the Church In regard that we are exacted to withdraw our selves from such and not so much as to eare with them thi◠〈◊〉 on is not to be passed over It is said then that exâ—oâ—munication hinders not 1 The practise of those dutâ—s that are grounded on the Laws of nature as the duties of Husbands and Wives Fathers and Children Masters and Servants Princes and People 2 Nor the practise of those dutys that are grounded on the law of nations as traffique and commerce An Excommunicated person must be to us as an Heathen and with these we may have trade 3 Nor the practise of such that are grounded upon the law of Common charity For we are bound to feed the hungry cloath the naked though they be or should be as Heathens 4 It debars not but in some cases from the hearing of the word Unlesse they be scoffers it being the meanes for converting of very heathens they are admitted to it and ought to be exorted to it but in no other ordinance do they enjoy any society with the Church and in no familiar or unnecessary dealing have we any thing to do with them but are bound to avoyd them that they may be ashamed and returne to the Church by repentance from which they were cast out through obstinacy CHAP. 15. Of Singing THis is the fourth and last direction given above for the words in dwelling and one end why the Apostle would have the word of Christ to dwell richly in the believing Colossians though some who would be thought unblâ—meable before God in love blames the Church for her keeping up this holy practise of singing Psalmes This gospell ordinance being set aside with others by some of this generation we come in the last place to defend and let us see 1. The nature of it 2. Some arguments for it 3. The manner of performing it 4. Resolve some questions SECT I. The nature of this ordinance is better known by practise then it is or can be by art which might be the reason why so many have handled it and few or none define it we shall give some description of it for methods sake and because motus naturae velocior est in fine we shall be the briefer It is a calling upon God by prayer or praise with an elevavation of the voice and prolongation of the words Daviâ— sung unto God by prayer and emptied his mind unto him by confession of sin this way Psal. 51. and again praised and magnified his name for all his mercyes Psal. 18. The same words wee utter quickly and expresse suddenly in praying or reading by keeping them upon our tongue and pronouncing them in parts with an heightâ—ned voice gives a being to that ordinance we call singing suppose we were to read and sing Psal. 35. Lord plead my cause aâ—ainst my foes confound their force and might Fight on my part against all those that seek with me to fight The same words being quickly read over and the letters joyned hastily together makes it a prayer read which deliberally uttered with a separation of the letters through the striking of the tounge and teeth makes it a prayer sung That of Saint Iames. 5. Iames. 13. contradicts not what hath been sayd the words not being preceptive but declarative showing only that in times of mirth the heart is better disposed to sing then otherwise and in times of trouble it is more apt or fit to pray then for any other duty SECT II. Were it not that there were some unreasonable men who want faith this practise need not now to have been disputed but without question used for 1 God hath shown himself eminently well pleased with it 2 Chro. 20.22 he declared his mind and pleasure touching this ordinances when in the celebration of it he sent destruction to his peoples enemys he may give us victory now over our sins as well as them over their foes then 2 Scripture commands it and calls for it Eph. 5.18 19. 〈◊〉 5.13 it is not an ordinance of humane or mans invention but is enjoyned us of God and we cannot find that ever those precepts was revealled and therefore they are now binding 3 The spirits and affections need it this ordinance by experience doth warme the blood and raises the heart in a holy quite to perform divine service men are sometimes dull in there devotion and crosses oftentimes damps their zeale which this act of singing helps and stirrs up 4 The Church of Christ had a promise of it Rom. 15.9 of the times we live in was it promised that this should by us be performed and therfore what ever fond people say against it it is not to be neglected 5 The Church of God in all age hath used it we read of it under Moses Exod. 15.1 and under the judges Iudg. 51. under the Kings under the gospell Mat. 26.30 Acts 16.25 no time can we find that ever had a Church but in and by that Church was this ordinance upheld 6 To no age did God ever limit it It was appointed practised to and in all ages when or where it was to cease was never made known or divulged by which we are as much engaged to sing Psalmes with grace in our hearts in England as ever the Collossians Phrigia 7 The Church militant above all other ordinances comes nearest to the Church triumphant by it In heaven thereis nothing but a continuall singing and praising God both by the Angels and spirits of
their superiours their wisdom in such things consisting in yielding surable obedience yet because this Law is spoken against by some it is not amiss for others to speak for it witnesses or Godfathers may be approved 1. From their unspotted Antiquity the Iews used them at their Circumcision and held the child to be cut in their arms we read of witnesses at the naming of the Prophets Son Mahershalalhash-baz Isa. 8.2 whence learned men have concluded â—the rise of Godfathers And since that have they continued in the Church without check from the best of men 2. From the occasion of their further settlement The primitive Christians seeing themselves in Jeopardy every hour of pain death and torture had other witnesses and Trustees besides the Parent who undertook the education of the child in the true religion in case the death of the Parent or otherwise new how soon the like case may befall this age none can predict especially when they know there was â—o great tract of time between King Edward the sixth of gloriouâ— memory and Queen Mary in such cases Godfathers may be as necessary in England as they were in the Primitive persecution which is one ground of the Law 3. From that love Unity and Concord that by this practice may be preserved among neighbours and believers It is experimentally known that it hath been a quench-fire oftentimes amongst hot spirits may the very nâ—me of a Godfather hath a power in it to work obedience in another and create peace 4. From that harmless profit that hath accrewed to many by that this is so well known that it needs no inlargement a Godfathers or a Godmothers gift is an ordinarly memorial If it be here said that the charge is great that is undertaken by the witnesses c. It must be known that the Parent is not at all disobliged from his duty the witnesses being but asistants to him The particulars of the Churches charge are these 1. To call upon the infant to hear Sermons as soon as capable of admonition 2. To learn the Creed the Lords prayers and the Commandements 3. With all other things which a Christian ought to know for his souls health for his vertuous bringing up so that when he is brought up in these things the witnesses have done their duty and are absolutely discharged either at confirmation of which by and by or at furthest at the day of marriage It is true it seems to be usually objected that even children were admitted to be witnesses for children but let not the Church of England be blamed for that abuse for she hath appointed that No Person be admitted Godfather or Godmother to any childe as Christening or Confirmation before the said Person so undertaking hath received the Holy Communion Quest. 5. Whether the Cross at baptisme accordinâ— to the Law of the Church of England be to be aproved Touching the lawful use of the Cross in baptisme we shall speak no other then what the Church of England hath her self spoken concerning this harmless Ceremony in her Canons Ecclesiastical where after a Preface touching the Princely care of King Iames of blessed memory to recoâ—cile differences by condiscending to remove some things that gave offence which in history we know to be true and in the Canon seems to be implied commends to all her true Members these directions and observations following First It is to be observed that although the Jews and Ethnicks derided both the Apostles and the rest of the Christians for preaching and believing in him who was Crucified upon the Cross Yet all both Apostles and Christitians were so far from being discouraged from their profession by the ignominy of the Cross as they rather rejoyced and triumphed in it yeathe Holy Ghost did by the mouths of the Apostles honour the name of the Cross being hateful to the Jews so far that under it he comprehended not onely Christ Crucified but the force effects and merits of his death and passion with all the comforts fruits and promises which we receive or expect thereby Secondly The honour and dignity of the name of the Cross begat a reverend estimation even in the Apostles times for â—ought that is known to the contrary of the sign of the Cross Which the Christians shortly after used in all their actions thereby making an outward shew and profession even to the astonishment of the Jews that they were not ashamed to acknowlege him for their Lord and Saviour who dyed for them upon the Cross. And this sign they not onely use themselves with a kind of glory when they met with any Jews but signed therewith their children when they were Christened to dedicate them by that badge to his service whose benefits bestowed upon them in baptisme the name of the Cross did represent And this use of the sign of the Cross in baptime was held in the Primitive Church as well by the Greeks as the Latines with one content and great applause At what time if any had opposed themselves against it they would certainly have been censured as enemies of the Cross and consequently of Chrsts merits the sign whereof they could no better endure this continual and general use of the Cross is evident by many testimonies of the ancient Fathers Thirdly It must be confessed that in process of time the sign of the Cross was greatly abused in the Church of Rome especially after that corruption had once possessed it But the abuse of a thing takes not away the lawful use of it Nay so far was it from the purpose of the Church of England to forsake the Churches of Italy France Spain Germany or any such like Churches in all things which they held and preached that as the Apology of the Church of England conâ—esseth iâ— doth with reverence retain those Ceremonies which do neithâ—â— damage the Church of God nor offend the minds of sobermen And onely departed from them in these particular points wherein they were fallen both from themselves in their ancient integrity and from the Apostolical Churches which were their first founders In which respect amongst some other very ancient Ceremonies the sign of the Crosse in baptisme hath been reâ—ained in this Church both by the judgement and practice of those reverend Fathers and great divines in the days of King Edward the sixth of whom some constantly suffered for the profession of the â—ruch and others being exiled in the time of Queen Mary did â—free their return in the beginning of the reign of our late dread Soverâ—ign continually defend and use same c. 3. Because indâ—ed the use of this sign in baptisme was ever accompanied here with such sufficient cautions and exceptions against all Popish superstition and erroâ—s as in the like cases are either fit or convenient The Church of England since the abolishing of Popery hath ever held and taught and so doth hold and teach that the sign of the Cross used in baptisme is no
never so well planted there may be some that will be irregular especially where there are Lyars evill beasts and slow bellies of which sort Crete was full of chap. 1.12 And therefore Titus is further charged that what is wanting that may conduce to the Edification of the Church having a respect to the people they should make such as may curb the veay beastlinesse or irreverence in the House and Worship of God We might insist longer on such Texts but these are sufficient to cause the unprejudiced Christian to consent to the truth that we are now pleading for 3. From the power and practice that was in the Jewish Church touching ceremonies not commanded may we draw arguments for holding the same lawfull in the Christian. Did not David bring in Ceremonies Musicians Qâ—iresters Organists Violers Lutinists with many more into the Worship of God which he had no command nor precept of God and though God had his Prophets Priests Messengers there in and about Davids Court yet never gave he one of them Commission in the least to check David for this his chargeable presumption nor to no King nor to no age after him my Christ himself did never mention it neither do we find any of Gods people scruple at it in his time nor after possibly those sons of Belial that rebelled against his sons might for Rebellion is so â—gly-faced that it never durst appear in the World without a Mask generally it takes that of Religion but seeing God was silent what needed they care We have heard some say that Musick might bee under the Law but nor under the Gospell not that I plead for Musick in the least but using it as a sutable Medium to prove the truth it is now under demonstration ignorantly for it was not under the Law nor mentioned in the Law but a pure invention of Davids own He conjecturing that Musick might tend to the ends before specified From the liberty therefore that was given to the Jewish Tabernacle Synagogue or Temple for we may judge there were after Ceremonies brought in as there occurred necessity or conveniency we may argue the power of the Christian Church even in reference to ceremonies whose liberty is by Christs death more large then theirs in all respects and surely not diminished in this 4. From that Decorum that decent Ceremonies of which still we say the Governours are Judges makes the Ordinance of the Church appear withall Let his soul be bound up in the bundle of life and made higher then the Kings of the Earth who declares that he bears a greater reverence to the Ceremonies of the Church of England by being in those places and seeing those Congregations wherein they were not used or spoken against And indeed Reverent gestures grave Vestments decent and comely Deportments may be compared to that cloathing of Gold with which the Kings daughter is habited Psal. 45.13 making them exceeding beautifull in the eyes and ears of the Beholders and more esteemed of her members and reverenced of all that are partakers 5. It is the Doctrine of all reformed Churches Confes. of the Church of Helve Art 25. of Belg. Art 3â— Ausp Art 15. of France Art 32. of the Church of England Art 20. Church of Bohem. Art 15. with this advice that however such Ceremonies had their beginning whether from Bishops or from Councills or of any other the people were not to care for it nor be disquieted but to use them to good because they are good So the Church of Wittemburge Art 35 holds it lawful to appoint days for to hear and preach Sermons and any other Rites not contrary to Scripture So Sueve Art 14. and withall confesses that they reckon no traditions for mens traditions but such as are condemned in Scripture contrary to the Law of God but for such as agree with Scripture and were ordained for the good of men although they be not expressed in the Scripture yet in that they proceed from the commandment of love which ordereth all things to be done in decency they are worthily to be accounted rather of God then of man and closeth up their Article by showing from Scripture that the more willing a man obeys the civill Laws which are not â—repugnant to Religion the more fully he is enduced with the faiâ—h of Christ. In the mouth of these witnesses let this truth be justifyed And Quae non prosunt singula multa juvant Since my writing this going through the Harmony of confessions and other Authours we find the Church willing to show her own power limiting herself in the eyes of her own people in cases of Ceremony viz. 1. She hath no power to impose any thing contrary to the written Word of God 2. Nor none that are insignificant 3. None that are troublesome 4. Nor with any opinion or thought of necessity as to lay salvation upon them 5. Without all conceits of merit as to deserve Heaven by them 6. Not laying them down as parts of Divine worship 7. Or to conceit that the observance of them will make us the more perfect before God If the Church that imposeth those Ceremonies teach not the necessity of their observance directly or exactly by these arguments she may impose what ceremonies she wil according to the doctrine of most of the Protestant Churches in Christendome yea all of them that have declared their opinions upon that Subject Quest. 3. Whether the Church haâ—h power to compel any irregular Person to her Ordinances For the opening of this Question we must note that when the Church is said to compell it is neither to imprison nor to fine those being altogether out of their Verge and dominion excep you imply that the Church-Officer be likewise in civill authority and exercise Jurisdiction in that capacity or if you consider the civill Officer a Church member and in that sence the Church some way may be said to do it We shall consider the Church-Officer abstractly as no civill Officer but in that capacity that he bears toward the the Church and by compelling we hold out or mean no other thing then the utmost of the Churches power and largest extent and the execution of that highest Act of Justice wherein her Lord and Husband hath invested her to free both him and herself from contempt by which she hath authority to command and to punish those who wilfully absent themselves from her service without such reasons as the Church her self shall be satisfied withal for who ever went to hell without a reason And let none quarrel with the word Compel to omit the Grammer of it which holds out the sence before spoken of we finde in the great Supper Luke 14.6 the Master giving a charge to his servants to call his Guests some excused themselves yea all gave reasons for their absence to flesh and blood satisfactory Then they were to go to the Streets and Lines of the City chief places possibly affording Guests sufficient for
whose riches were from pillâ—ging of the goods burning the houses and murthering the persons of those that were not of an Anabaptistical spirit This Kings Title was The King of Iustice the King of the new Ierusalem he erected a Throne of great cost and coyned Money with this Motto Verbum carâ— factum quod habitat in nobis By this Kings Regall Authority Divorces were frequently made as men grew weary of their Wives all books burned but the Bible all Churches rifled demolished and as from God performed blood sighs tears was only to be seen and heard in this Kings Reign At a feast he gave the Sacrament of the Lords Supper to the Number of 4000. but accusing one of Treason you must note he was a King between them cut off his head himself and with bloody hands consecrated the Elements administring the bread one of his Queens following him delivered the cup. I long to make an end of this Monarch he came in a few days to be tyed to a stake by two Executioners with two hot pincers was his flesh torn from his bones in Munster where his most Sacrilegious Majesty had acted and enacted unheâ—rd of Villany This Sacrilegious King was not without Rebellious Subjects which the German Princes by burning drowning killing not for their consciences but for their â—reasoâ—â—â—tteâ— and hellâ—sh acts put an end to them At which time 〈…〉 of them into England for shelter A. 1535. 〈…〉 were burned and oâ—hers made to recant yet some 〈…〉 â—slily carrying them-themselves did live and became the 〈◊〉 Father of the Brownist Mr. Robert Brown of Northamptonshire venting their Doctrine in a Saw-pit first near Islington obtained Proselytes three years afterward he Recanted his errour and took Orders becoming a faithfull Teacher of the Doctrine of the Church of England though his Disciples remained as thorns in her sides they did somwhat refine the Doctrine of the German Anabaptists and continuing a separation did bring forth that Creature whom we call an Anabapist who must own the Quaker for his first born and all those by-opinions and fancies taught by the whole Rabble of Phanaticks must be acknowledge to grow out of his Roots and are sprigs of the Tame branch all of them being quickned with the same Sap or Spirit of their German Father who by a pretended humility and sâ—ow of Godlinesse got into the affections of the Vulgar which ceased not untill they had put them in the throne which deservedly brought them to the stake I have heard of a Welch-man that being condemned to be hanged by the neck called aloud O good my Lord hang her not by the neck her Father was hanged by the neck and her dyed Let our English Anabaptist remember that Her Father was burned at a stake and hanged by the neck for Treason Her Prince Prophet Her King and all Except I say this King they had never a Nursing Father So far hath it been from all Nations coming in unto it that if these be true Churches they have never had a village to boast of If these be true Churches there are more Churches then one and so the unity of the Church must be denied and consequently there must be more Christs then one Christ is the head of the Church Ep. 1.22 and the Church is his body Why because all the members move according to that life that is communicated unto them from the head Now this rabble hath not one Spirit nor one life neither do they preach all one kind of faith therefore there must be diversity of heads to give life to these several bodies consequently if they be Churches there must be divers Christs to quicken those severall Churches which destroy the unity of the Godhead in Trinity the consent Harmony and agreement of Prophets and Apostles and the unity of the Catholick Church on earth and before that be done let us condemn those segregated meetings for those that separate themselves sensual having not the spirit Iud. 19. Whence the Catholick faith came we know how old it is we know it hath Seniority over and above all other Doctrine as truth hath over error iâ— is of the same standing with the Creation And though heresie hath and must closely follow it yet it was before them the Wheat is first sowed and then the Tares Such is Sathans hast that he begun to lye at the beginning yet from the beginning lyes were not but truth Not to speak of those Heresies that were in the Church before the Time of our Saviour in his time there were those that denied the Resurrection and the being of Angels and Spirits Matth. 22.23 Acts 23.8 Most of those grand Heresies that troubled the Church by false Doctrine the time they came in the Authors that broached them are known by name and the occasion of their so doing is also known not so the Catholick faith We must know that all new lights that now shine are but the stinking snuffs of those old Heresies that were extinguished by the powerful breath of the Catholick Doctrine blown in again by the envious breath of him that fights against the Church and her seed and may be reduced to the same causes that before they of old were kindled by and may be reduced to these heads 1 Envy and discontentednesse when men could not get into those places that either their merit did not deserve or their ambition thought they were worthy of then to revenge themselves like Corah Dathan and Abiram Numb 16.1 they rose up against the Governours of the Church and rebelled against Catholick truth It was this that made Arius rise and swel like a great Sea to overthrow the faith of Christ. An. 310. for not being chosen Bishop of Alexandria of which he was a Deacon when Achillas the Bishop thereof dyed and Alexander a man he thought not so deserving as himself chosen in the place presently he set himself to oppose Episcopal dignity and such Doctrine as plagued the Church for almost three hundred years together purely because he could not be a Bishop whose Doctrine though condemned by 318 Bishops A. 325. gathered together at Nice at the command of the good Emperour Constantin the great is revived again in our Socinians Anabaptists c. for want of discipline in our Church And truly that hideous damp that came upon the Church of England in these last years had it's rise from the same ground viz. from the mouths of those men that were extended in a large measure for the receiving of a Mitre which not coming they vented their ill-favoured breath in the very faces of them that through desert wore it envying the glory that others had because they themselves had but Ordinary respect This made M. M. a principall Pres. break out into extravagancy he Petitioning the King for a Deanry and afterward for a Bishoprick getting neither strove as the King told to undo and overthrow all So D. T. an earnest Suitor for the Deanry of Salisbury or
at Westminister November 4.1548 and being by them perused after thanks returned to the King for his care and pains he is petitioned to let it passe unto an act and by Authority it was enacted that in all Churches and Chappels Sacraments and all other ordinances within the compasse of that bock should be performed solely and wholy by it appointing penaltys to the not users or defamers of the same It might very well be Inquired considering the premisses and our practises whether a set for me may not be as necessary in our days as it was in those considering how various men are in their form manner place or gesture in the administration of ordinances not that I would have mens gifts hindered but their spleen rancour and rage stopped unto which well composed for me would be a proper remedy which truly as it is to be suspected is the cause why a forme is by many called down knowing that it would cut be their extravagant notions their abilitye and parts being neither so high nor so great but a liturgy might be used by them but to let them passe The compilers of the Book of Common-prayer were Doct. Cranmer Arch Bishop of Cant. Doct. Goodrick Bishop of Ely Doct. Skip Bishop of Hereford Doct. Thirlby Bishop of Westminster Doct. Day Bishop of Chichester Doct. Holbeck Bishop of Lincolne Doct. Ridley Bishop of Rochester Doct. May Deane of Pauls Doct. Taylour Deane of Lincolne Doct. Heynes Dean of Exeter Doct. Redman Dean of Westminster Doct. Cox King Eâ—wards Almoner Doct. Mr. Robinson Arch-Deacon of Leinest All these being then owned for sound professors of the faith afterward great sufferers by death exile or banishment for their not yeelding to the errors of the Church of Rome Shall their work be thought to be unlawfull which after much deliberation they composed for the edification of the Church were they difstracted or mad or Hypocrites that they should thus put down and erect Popery For all the zeal of the Guisel before Latimer shall be accused as a Papist let him be indicted for an Atheist he that so says fearing neither God nor regarding man had that holy soul no religion when he gave his body to be burned I do now imagine I smell Cranmâ—ns flesh burning through the Cruelty of the Papists and let my right hand forget her cunning if I should not rather kisse the straw he lay upon and bow to thâ— chain he was fastened to the stake by then kick the ashes he was burned to or condemn him for a cheat a dissembler for a Papist which consequentially must be affirmed when that book of Common prayer is reviled and â—corned and as Popish asserred 2. This book of Common-prayer appears to be lawfull from that authoâ—ity by which it hath been established It is strange that that young Iosiah of England viz King Edward studying to root out Popery should so farre befoole himself and his counsel as to be glad at that bookes compiling if it had strengthâ—ned the Papal power was there nor a wise man in all the Parliaments of his time was there no religion in Qâ— Elizabeth was she such a notorious dissembler as under a pretence of throwing the doctrine of Rome aside would hug the Pope the closser in her armes or if she had been such was there never a holy man nor a religious Parliament in her time to rectifie that abuse â— was King Iames and his Parliaments all out of the way and King Charles of glorious memory and his Parliaments all Papists or Ignoramuses that they knew not what they did when they established this book Certainly those glorious Princes and wise Parliaments in establishing successively that book did find in it nothing that was unlawfull or that was contrary to true Godlinesse 3. From its conformity to sacred Scripture Let the Common-prayer be abserved and the matter of it be marked and bring it to the Bible Old or new Testament to Moses the Prophâ—ts or the Psalms and if there be a word sentence petition or prayer that is not agreeable to either of these all of these or a part of these the Author of these lines at this present engages himself to recant publickly what either here or elsewhere he hath written in defence of that book and become a proselyte to the profession of the Guisels In the book of Common prayer there are two things considerable 1. The matter of it 2. The Ceremonies in it 1. The matter or subject of the book of which it is composed to passe over scripture is either 1. Holy songs 2. Pious prayers 3. Godly exhortations 4. Christian confession 5. Scriptural Comminations Which may be again subdevided into 1. The Priests Versicles 2. The Peoples Responses In all which there is nothing but what is agreeable to holy writ and the will of God revealed in his Scriptures The Ceremonies in it which are those particular gestures or acts to be performed in the administration of such and such particular services and they are cheifly these 1. The crosse in Baptisme 2. Kneeling at the Supper 3. The Preists standing at the north side of the table at the communion 4. Marrying with a ring 5. Standing at the Creed In giveing obedience unto which ceremonys there is no more scripture to prove it a sin then there is to maintaine it unjust to be thrice asked in a Church before marriage as the Guisels in their directory enjoyn or to be married by a minister which there by them is also thought to be expedient 4. From the sutablenesse of it to the Common Christians capacity The service of the Church of Rome were it not repugnant in other points to the word of God yet in this it is sinfull that it is performed in a strange tongue which the common sort of Christians understand not In the Church of England there is no ordinance no service but the exhortations thanksgiveings and confessions therein are all of them so plain so easy that the bluntest understanding may reach them and the shallowest capacity may upon a certain knowledge say Amen So be it unto them all 5. From the agreements of it to the set formes of other Churches to those of Geneva Sweden France yea to the Church of Rome so farre as they are agreeable to scripture and to those formes that were of old used and at this present are in the Easterne Church doth the sevice of the Church of England agree and correspond an argument of it self were there no other of its excellency and dignity the wise composers of it having drained the errours from all other formes and thrown away what ever was a misse in other liturgys retaining what was pure and holy agreeable to found doctrine and religion which being methodicall digested and composed was presented to the King and ratified by Parliament as a standing rule to be used in the house of God which is the Church 7. Fâ—om the excellent order and uniformity that is in the
to leave every thing done and taught in the Churches of France Spaine or Italy for so they should have denyed the Lord that bought them but the errors or false worship of those Churches It is a cause of laughter to read what use men make of that letter the Pope sent Queen Elizabeth of glorious memory promiseing to ratifie the Common-prayer if she would restore his Supremacy It is as clear as the Sun that the Pope and the Guisel will both of them according to the Proverb play a smal game before they stand out It was lately their main study how to reconcile themselves to the independent who had got the start of them and they have now studyed a new art how to reconcile themselves to the Lord Bishop he being now a corner stone in the Church of England if the Pope use the same policy of all men under heaven they have least cause to declare it since they will truckle with Quaker Ranter they whole brood of bastardly Hereticks to procure unto themselves a supremacy It is worthy of observation that by this the Pope could not pick a quarrel even with the Common-prayer all things therein being so lawfull that he had not impudence to speake against and so exactly composed that he would have established it by Papal Authority without diminution or augmentation And yet it gives no strength at all unto his Kingdom that having these three pillars 1. Infallibility 2. Supremacy 3. Purgatory All which the Common-prayer disowns and renounceth yet the Pope will licence it as he doth English bibles that is because he must he will play at a smâ—l gaâ—e because he hath hopes to win the set he proffered to ratifie Common-prayer not for love to it but to get his hand into the Kingdom of England knowing or at least hoâ—ing he might get in his arme and by degrees his whole body for the same reason the Guisel truckeled formerly under the Independent and lately with the Anabaptist and now would hold the stirrop to his spiâ—itual lordship not for love of either but to keep self in credit with the world being concious to himself that from him came all the evils that have befallen either Church or state in the by-past years and least with Cain he should become a vagabond is desireous of any that will befriend him 2. It s giving offence to tender consciences This is a high note and often heard but 1. Who discovered or layd the ground of that offence 2. How easily might that offence be removed if in popular Sermons the innocency and purity of that book were preached the people have for 16 years heard much against it and now they hear nothing at least from you for it no wonder therefore if they be not affected with it We say affected for it seemes to be but a prejudice against that book not conscience that maketh them to oppose the same that being guided by Sripture and reason not spleen and passion When we behold that service rayled at scorned shunned contemned condemned and the users of it scandaled and yet not one sentence word or petition proved unlawfull or not according to scripture we have ground to conjecture that it is stomack not religion maketh them to do so and the over-flowings of their gall not tendernesse of their consciences that makes them to flee out into such depraveing and abusive language They would appear so holy that it is dangerous to offend them or lay a stone of stumbling before them Yet what greater offence can be given then to abuse a national or personall Church by defaming the prayers therein established or by the other made when in the meane time in all their findings one sentence unlawfull in these prayers they cannot find were they as tender as they would seeme to be we should have more argueing lesse rayling The greatest number of them that pretend to receive offence are of that disposition that they desire not to be informed touching those set formes whether by discourse preaching or reading and the other part can produce no unseemly thing in them and yet they being established by good laws and Just authority give still occasion to conjecture that not conscience but wilfulnesse and obstinacy is the mother of their non-conformity There is a God above who often brings mens wicked devices upon their own pate It was piâ—y to see commissioners apointed in every county and ministers as their assistants turning cut ministers from their places to the ruine of their familees for not subscribing to the directory or for reading Common-prayer when they were bound by oath law and allegiance to the same and now men that are enjoyned or desireed to read Common-prayer pretend conscience and cry out they are offended and the same persons complain of persecution when the true owners are restored but c. The Reader can bear us witnesse that we have not mentioned that act of Popish Queen Mary who at her first coming to the Crown seeking to Erect popery in England repealed all acts made in the favour of the Common-prayer and altogether abolished it to facilitate that work Nor of the Practise of those Recusants who being under the penalty of a fine if they came not to the publick Churches of this nation in the days of Queen Elizabeth would commonly refraine themselves from hearing Common-prayer and not enter Church being in this Puritanicall untill the preacher was in the pulpit which are arguments of no smal weight to defend that the Common-prayer is not popishly affected the Papists themselves being witnesses To conclude this question seeing that some men do not grow strong and well favoured through holynesse knowledge and sobriety by other ordinances of the Church Common-prayer which they scornfully call poâ—age is fittest for their weak stomacks and sickly constitutions while those that are strong and of good digestion may receive the more meat and grow in grace and knowledge by their eating that is by a holy using the set formes of the Church together with other dutys Quest. 4. Whether there be not vaine repetitions in those formes This is a grand argument brought by many justifying their non conformity to the Churches liturgy and most heard from those men whose publick prayers were for the most part carried on by empty or at least by many repititons To be brief we must distinguish of repetitions there is a bare repetition and there is a vain repetition 1. Bare repetitions if repetitions of themselves were unlawfull lawfull to be used in prayer that is to repeate or bring over again and again the same thing before asked then many of the Saints of God must be blamed and the son of God must not be Justified who in one prayer repeated the same petition thrice over Mat. 26.44 It is a desireable faculty to vary in prayer yet every one cannot do it and they that can will repeate somtimes 1. Through pinching necessity this made Christ cry earnestly in
be taken Quest. 1. Whether swearing be an ordinance of or under the Gospel There are them that live about us and among us who denies that swearing is any part of Gospel worship and therefore though called thereunto refuse least they should sin but erroneously For 1. Swearing was no part of the Ceremonial law but used long before Moses and the ends of it are morall and therefore it is not abolished by the death of Christ. 2. It is prophesyed that the Church of the Gentils shall swear by the Lord and by the God of truth Isa. 65.16 Ier. 4.16 Implying that whereas they did swear by Baal and other false gods they should by knowledge be brought from that Idolatry and give that point of worship to the God of Heaven who alone is the true God 3. By a holy Apostle it is frequently done even by him who was an eminent preacher of the Gospel viz. St. Paul an oath is nothing but a calling of God to witnesse of the truth of that which is done or spoken that it may be received with the greater belief now how often doth that eminent servant of the Lord Jesus deliver himself in the very substance of an oath as God is my witnâ—sse Rom. 1.9 God is my record Pâ—il 1.8 God is my witnesse 1 Thes. 2.5 10. God knoweth 2 Cor. 11 11 31. Before â—od I lie not Gal. 1.20 I say the truth in Châ—istiâ—n Christ I lie not Rom. 9.1 As the truth of Christ is in me 2 Cor. 11.10 I speak the truth in Christ and lye not 1 Tim. 2.7 All which are as substantial oaths as any we read of in the oâ—d â—â—â—pensation 4. Even in the close of the Gospel we find a holy Angell to swear Rev. 10.6 we pray that the will of God may be done by uâ— as it is done by the hoâ—y Angels and hear we have an Anâ—ell for greater certainty sealing his threatning by an oath From these reasons we may without errour conclude that the oâ—dinance of swearing is in full force and power under the Gospell to all intents and purposes any thing that our adversaries can bâ—ing to the Contrary notwithstanding Those texts Math. 5.34 and Iames 5.12 speaks of swearing in our common communication and of such oathes as are sworn by the creatures as may appear by the contexts not of Judicial swearinâ— oâ— any other kind of oathes when necessity and authority draws men to it for clearing of the truth and ending of controversie against which the Gospel speakes not one word but confirms it by severall passages yea St. Paul writing to the Hebrews says Heb. 6.16 That an oath for confirmation is to men an end of all strife not that it was but it is q.d. while I am writing and preaching now when the found of the Gospell is gone over all the world is an oath the end of strife and that not to some only but to men i.e. to all sorts of men whether Jew or Gentile now had it been a sin to have used an oath under the Gospell for that end we should have heard of it in this most proper place or in some other And if any will be contentious let them consider that Pauls before God I lye not 1 Gal. 20. and the Angells by him that lives for ever is more then yea yea and yet who dare reprove either of them of sin To this doctrine consents the reformed Churches of Helva Art 30. of Ausp Art 16. of England Art 39. the Art itself is this Art 39. of the Church of England As we confesse that vain and rash swearing is forbidden Christian men by our Lord Iesus Christ and James his Apostle so we judge that Christian religion doth not prohibit but that a man may swear when the Magistrate requireth in a cause of faith and Charity so it be done according to the Prophets teaching in Iustice Iudgement and truth Quest. 2 Whether the Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy required by the Kings of England c. of their Subjects may lawfully be taken That Covenants or oaths in cases of necessity or suspition may be made by the subjects of a land to their lawful Prince appears by that Act of Iehoiadah at the Coronation of King Iehoash 2 King 11.17 where we have the footsteps of a Coronation and allegiance oath but to come to the matter in hand either of these oaths may lawfully be taken For 1 Swearing is a Gospell Ordinance and therefore under the Gospell may be performed being ratified taken and used by a holy Apostle and blessed Angell 2 There is nothing in them oaths that is contrary to the word of God God who made the heavens is only called to testifie the reallity of the intentions 3 The taking of them gives assurance to his Majesty of his Subjects faithfulnesse and loyalty and indeed as the case now stands he may be suspected of disloyalty that will not satisfie the law in that particular 4. It is but equall that subjects swear to defend his Majesties honours and prerogatives since he hath sworn to maintain his subjects rights and properties Next swear not at all the grand objection is his Majesties supremacy But 1 It is under Christ none acknowledgeth him as absolute head of the Church that being his sole prerogative who is King of Kings and it would be considered whether God hath not made as good and as many Laws touching the government of the State as he hath for that of the Church yet who will thence conclude that the Magistrate is not supreame in civill affairs that is next immediately under God For no otherwise is he head that is governour of the Church 2 It is only to exclude the Popes Authority His holinesse at Rome looks upon all Kings and Emperours as his Vassals and servants and did he not exalt him above all that are called Gods he would want one mark of the Antichrist 1 Thes. 2.4 by the way they being called Gods we are to know that none on earth no no Presbytery their superior nor contain the Pope therfore pretending a power over the Church making himself or giving out himself as head of all civil Ecclesiastical officers and withall making the Church to be so absolute a distinst body from the state that no state officer whether the King though he only be supream ought in the least to meddle with it or if he do to be excommunicated or deposed for his presumption this power is by this Oath taken from the Pope and given to him that is the true as the Pope makes the Church to be so absolute a distinct body from the state as that the state hath nothing to do with it or in it there are them in our dayes to be quit with the Pope that would have no Church officer in the least to meddle with the state supposing such an absolutnesse in the one that it hath no coherence with or dependance upon the other in this absolute sence the
rebellion and murdeder at London for though they have different faces yet they are all one blood It was first appointed in England by ercombart a kentish King who destroyed the of the heathen gods Ac. 641. A Feast so câ—â—led from the Saxon word Eâ—sâ—er a gâ—dnesse of the old Saxâ—ns whose feast thâ—y keept in April or as others because Ch. the light of the world then arose or so that word signi in the Saxoâ—ash vedens day was of old called Câ—â—ut â—â—lu nu It was to be admired that our late governours or changlings would not appoint the mock fasts upon the sâ—bbath or some other day and â—ot on these appoâ—nâ—ed and used by the Church It is to be thouâ—ht God would 〈◊〉 suffer them that the faithfull might 〈◊〉 deliverance of the Church on those days appoâ—nted by her self Trap in Mat. c 22 v. 6. A fast in Walingford Chapple by the army officers at the turning out of D.C. there was such speeches such faces as would have made a tender Christian to have fasted a whole week through sicknesse Satan is prince of the power of the ayr and therefore the fit â—est place for such witches to have heads and limbs abid in Cod. Rom Aut. lib. 1.7.87 Ovid lib. 5. fast As a day or place may have relative holinesse though not absolute so a thing or act may be relatively prophane absolutely no hurt be in it â—â— tubae sonitu vocata nudato copore in flora lib. discurat Farn. in Iuven Sat. 6. Cato severe venistii Aâ— ideo tantum vnâ—ras ut exires Mat. epig. lib. 1. Ep. 1. half the mirth is in the poles stealing More people appear at those games then at the Churches devotion Thâ—s suits with the original of those game not with the churches Institution of this day Except it be the selling of the pole by the Erectors though this also eventualy is not good Canon 76. Church of England That Parli which sat Sept. 17. 1659 was long pleased about the nature of blasphmy when J. N. was accused of it before a very worthy society Church his miscel Philo. Theolog. 81. Elisha is also called Lord by the Inhabitants of Ier. 2 Kings 2.19 That adâ— monition which respects excommunication must not be for sins of infirmity but of a deeper dye and colour Forma excom ab Imerto Authoriae The Datch word for a pres as he is Antiepicopall Gal. Instit. l. 4. c. 12. S. 7. Some calls it a natural sacrament which is as much as to to say it is no sacrament at all Loâ—b lib. 4. Dâ—st 25. Si ex contemptu vel negligentia sacramentum hoc pâ—aeteâ—mittic peâ—iculosum est damâ—abile Lomâ— Lib. 4. Dist. 24 B. As it were presumption in aâ—wicked man to expect to be bettered by the holiness of any so it is distrust for a good man to imagine he shall be worse for a prophane man Syntag. Dis. Theolog Pag. 1074. Syn. Trip. Pag. 864. Hytia non sunt multiplicanda sine necessitate Wisdoms seven pillars Prov. 9.1 it is a groundless and roofless foundation being neither able to hold nor keep out water Sin is by degrees abated at length abolished when the party is dissolved 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The word Originally is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from the water which he might do in that being dipped in the water 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a sweet Bath Children not yet begotten are not said to be afar off but very near in their fathers â—ins Heb. 7.10 That place is not to be sound in all the Scripture but by consequence 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This profane custom is thought to take its rise from Esan disdaining his circumcision Atque ex hoc vitu â— c. Jun. Trem. Annot in loc God aut lib. 6.215 It was sad times when the Prophet seek his witnesses â—b Lit. Can. 29. of the Church so England Can. 30. of the Church of England See the Lit. for Pâ—i Bapâ— where no â—tâ—â—ntion of the Cross made nor inquired after What a Parliament establisheth every particular man in his representative Consents to therefore it ought to be spoken against by none As there are many small pins in themselves of no great concernment yet taken away might endanger a whole building witnesse the late removing of some poore Ceremonies brought down the gâ—eat Raâ—ters both of Church and State 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whence the Churches custome of observing Easter Mâ—nday c. took its rise Lomb. Lib. 4. Dist. 9. B. In baptisme Rome anâ—ynis the hieder part of the head but in confirmati the fore part The confirmed hath also given him a box oâ— the ear else all the faâ— is in the fire Can. 60. and 61. of the Church of England Mr. Baxter Mr. Hen. Mr. L.P. Ch. lit for Com. Ch. lit for Con. Cal. Inst. lib. 4. c. 19.5 4. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that of doing it upon the head of peninents câ—me notâ— until after the Aâ—oâ—â—les Mr. Hanmer Ex. on Cons. 1 Infans à non fando Can. 21. of the Church of England It is supposed by some that Christ repeated this whole Psalm upon the Cross. Godwin Moses and Aton lib. 3.105 That man that holds any one gesture necessary since God hath commanded none is a will worshipper and highly superstitioâ—â— in that gesture 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Mat. 26.20 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Mark 14.18 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Luke 22.19 Can. â—7 of the Chuâ—ch of Eng. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Can. 26. of the Church of Engâ—and Weston Octo. 25 1657. Sâ—n. de con chap. 1.32 Sâ— Mr. Pryanes signall loyalty c. In which this truth is fully lâ—arnedly cleaâ—ly and truly handled He raigned over the Germans A.M. 2117. 80 years before the birth of Joseph â— Hall in Gods appearing c. p. 15. Rome will have seven and were there no greater difference between her the reformed Churches we should quickly agree a This gesture we read of only in this place and that privatly Dr. Taylour when he was going to be martyred as his last legacy give his wife the Common-prayer which he constantly used himself during his imprisoâ—ments For Acts and Monâ— 1385. When the Direct was in force and the Guisel in power no tender consciences nor offended Brethren were then pitied but Quakers Ranters and Anabaptists and should these be tolerated and not the Guisel it were but just See Jâ—dg 1.7 See King Charles his meditation upon the ordinance against the common-prayer Of prayer 452. Cabbet prayer 455. I make no doubt but a man may be very formal in the most extemporary variety and very fervently devout in the most wonted expressions King Char. med 16. upon the c. p. See my Panem quatidi p. 25. ad fin Proclamation before Common-prayer It would stop some mens mouths at last and take them out of their studies to the Desk with credit This was never publickly delivered Edwyn the first who ruled in Scot. Am. 3870 was the first King that caused his subjects to be sworne Lan. Chro. 3 Parts 187.