Selected quad for the lemma: england_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
england_n act_n answer_n apostle_n 20 3 4.3704 3 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A39999 Rectius instruendum, or, A review and examination of the doctrine presented by one assuming the name of ane [sic] informer in three dialogues with a certain doubter, upon the controverted points of episcopacy, the convenants against episcopacy and separation : wherein the unsoundnes, and (in manythinges) the inconsistency of the informers principles, arguments, and answers upon these points, the violence which he hath offred unto the Holy Scripture and to diverse authors ancient and modern, is demonstrat and made appear, and that truth which is after godlines owned by the true Protestant Presbyterian Church of Scotland asserted and vindicated. Forrester, Thomas, 1635?-1706. 1684 (1684) Wing F1597; ESTC R36468 441,276 728

There are 2 snippets containing the selected quad. | View original text

do_v destroy_v that_o distinctione_n mr_n gillespie_n eng_n pop_n cerem_fw-la ames_n conscience_n lib_n 5._o cap._n 11._o mr_n durham_n on_o scandal_n part_n 3_o chap_n 1_o discover_v the_o futility_n of_o his_o doctrine_n on_o this_o head_n page_n 139_o 140_o 141_o 142_o 143_o 144._o the_o doubter_n argument_n for_o presbyterian_a minister_n preach_v in_o the_o manner_n controvert_v take_v from_o christ_n and_o his_o apostle_n preach_v in_o the_o field_n and_o house_n the_o informer_n general_a answer_n anent_o christ_n not_o separate_a people_n from_o the_o synagogue_n weigh_v and_o find_v frivolous_a page_n 145_o 146_o 147._o some_o special_a reason_n wherefore_o our_o lord_n do_v not_o separate_v the_o people_n from_o the_o synagogue_n ibid._n the_o special_a ground_n of_o our_o lord_n practice_n offer_v by_o he_o to_o enervat_fw-la our_o argument_n consider_v and_o answer_v such_o as_o his_o bring_n in_o the_o doctrine_n of_o the_o gospel_n as_o the_o messiah_n his_o be_v head_n of_o the_o whole_a church_n page_n 148_o 149_o 150_o 151._o what_o action_n of_o our_o lord_n be_v mitable_a rule_n hereanent_fw-la allow_v by_o sound_a divine_n apply_v to_o the_o case_n and_o practice_n controvert_v that_o the_o law_n allow_v the_o gospel_n to_o be_v preach_v pure_o and_o faithful_o by_o some_o though_o grant_a to_o the_o informer_n will_v help_v he_o nothing_o ibid._n the_o informer_n answer_n and_o exception_n to_o our_o argument_n from_o act_n 14_o 19_o examine_a his_o answer_n from_o the_o apostle_n extraordinary_a callfrilous_a as_o also_o from_o the_o tendency_n of_o the_o ruler_n prohibition_n to_o silence_n gospel_n page_n 152_o 153_o 154_o 155._o his_o reason_n upon_o solomon_n thrust_v out_o abiathar_n from_o the_o priesthood_n examine_v as_o also_o his_o citation_n of_o bezaes_n letter_n to_o the_o nonconformist_n in_o england_n page_n 156_o 157._o chap_n 6._o page_n 159._o the_o nature_n of_o presbyterian_a minister_n relation_n to_o this_o church_n and_o their_o call_n to_o officiate_v therein_o vindicat_fw-la from_o the_o informer_n simple_a cavil_n mr_n rutherfoord_n and_o mr_n durhame_v acknowledgement_n that_o a_o minister_n isnotmade_v a_o catholic_n minister_n of_o the_o catholic_n church_n but_o by_o his_o ordination_n restrict_v to_o a_o flock_n will_v not_o help_v the_o informer_n which_o be_v clear_v in_o six_o point_n page_n 159_o 160_o 161_o 162_o his_o dilemma_n which_o he_o offer_v to_o we_o viz._n that_o our_o call_n to_o preach_v be_v either_o ordinary_a or_o extraorninary_a answer_v &_o retort_v upon_o he_o his_o cavil_n in_o relationall_a to_o the_o act_n of_o council_n condemn_v this_o encroachment_n as_o he_o call_v it_o and_o the_o doctor_n of_o aberdeen_n their_o charge_v presbyterian_a minister_n therewith_o repel_v ibid._n his_o charge_n anent_o our_o ordain_v other_o to_o perpetuat_fw-la our_o schism_n a_o manifest_a groundless_a calumny_n page_n 163_o 164._o his_o passage_n cite_v out_o of_o mr_n baxter_n preface_n to_o the_o cure_n of_o church_n division_n answer_v page_n 165_o as_o also_o his_o 5_o heal_a advice_n to_o his_o half-proselyted_n doubter_n page_n 65_o 166_o 167_o 168_o 169_o 170._o mr_n baxter_n rule_n in_o his_o cure_n of_o church_n division_n which_o he_o after_o commend_v unto_o we_o short_o view_v &_o their_o impertinency_n to_o his_o purpose_n discover_v page_n 171_o 172_o 173._o 174._o his_o testimony_n out_o of_o the_o jus_o divinum_fw-la ministerii_fw-la anglicani_fw-la and_o of_o mr_n rutherfoord_n in_o his_o due_a right_n of_o presbytery_n anent_o unwarrantable_a separation_n in_o sufficient_a to_o bear_v the_o weight_n of_o his_o conclusion_n the_o difference_n between_o the_o case_n they_o speak_v to_o and_o our_o case_n clear_v in_o 4._o consideration_n page_n 175_o 176_o 177._o his_o citation_n from_o the_o first_o author_n particular_o consider_v and_o their_o insufficiency_n to_o bear_v the_o weight_n of_o his_o conclusion_n discover_v page_n 178_o 179_o 180_o 181_o the_o citation_n of_o mr_n rutherford_n particular_o examine_v in_o so_o fa●…_n relate_v to_o his_o scope_n page_n 182_o 183_o 184_o 185_o 186_o 187._o in_o his_o citation_n from_o both_o these_o author_n and_o argue_v therefrom_o he_o be_v find_v inconsistent_a with_o himself_o to_o walk_v upon_o groundless_a supposition_n and_o liable_a to_o a_o manifest_a retorsion_n ibid._n the_o informer_n draw_v out_o no_o conclusion_n upon_o these_o citation_n save_o this_o general_a one_o at_o the_o close_a viz_o that_o real_a much_o less_o suppose_a corruption_n in_o the_o worship_n or_o administrator_n will_v not_o warrant_v separation_n the_o impertinency_n of_o this_o position_n to_o help_v he_o clear_v ibid._n he_o plead_v for_o retraction_n and_o present_v at_o the_o close_a a_o character_n of_o schism_n which_o be_v retort_v against_o he_o page_n 187_o 188._o chap_n 7._o misprinted_a chap_n 6._o page_n 189._o animadversion_n upon_o the_o informer_n preface_n and_o title_n page_n prefix_v to_o this_o pamphlet_n he_o pretende_v conscience_n &_o a_o design_n of_o union_n in_o this_o undertake_n how_o unsound_o discover_v page_n 189_o 190._o 191._o his_o testimony_n out_o of_o zanchy_a and_o blondel_n to_o evince_v their_o approbation_n of_o prelacy_n leave_v by_o he_o untranslate_v though_o he_o pretend_v for_o the_o advantadge_n of_o the_o english_a reader_n to_o translate_v all_o other_o testimony_n answer_v a_o confutation_n of_o the_o first_o dialogue_n upon_o the_o point_n of_o episcopacy_n wherein_o it_o be_v demonstrat_fw-la that_o the_o episcopacy_n now_o existent_a both_o in_o its_o diocesian_n &_o erastian_n cut_v be_v contrare_fw-la to_o the_o scripture_n to_o the_o first_o and_o pure_a antiquity_n the_o doctrine_n and_o confession_n of_o reform_a church_n &_o sound_a divine_n and_o the_o informer_n reason_v for_o it_o from_o scripture_n &_o antiquity_n be_v weigh_v and_o find_v want_v chap._n i._n that_o the_o prelate_n now_o establish_v in_o this_o church_n be_v both_o diocesian_n and_o erastian_n clear_v the_o informer_n be_v engage_v to_o defend_v both_o a_o twofold_a state_n of_o the_o question_n propound_v according_o some_o argument_n from_o scripture_n against_o the_o diocesian_a prelate_n as_o a_o pretend_a churchofficer_n such_o as_o 1._o pervert_v the_o scriptural_a term_n episcopus_fw-la common_a to_o all_o pastor_n in_o appropriate_v it_o to_o a_o prelate_n 2._o make_v it_o relate_v to_o pastor_n which_o have_v the_o flock_n for_o its_o immediate_a object_n 3._o invade_v &_o null_v the_o authority_n allow_v unto_o presbyter_n which_o be_v demonstrat_fw-la at_o large_a 4._o impeach_a christ_n kingly_a office_n as_o head_n of_o his_o church_n and_o the_o perfection_n of_o his_o word_n in_o obtrude_a one_fw-mi officer_n upon_o the_o church_n of_o a_o different_a moold_v from_o those_o describe_v and_o allow_v by_o he_o the_o state_n of_o the_o first_o question_n in_o the_o first_o conference_n be_v whither_o the_o episcopacy_n now_o establish_v by_o law_n in_o scotland_n be_v warrant_v or_o condemn_v by_o the_o word_n of_o god_n for_o clear_v this_o it_o must_v be_v understand_v what_o that_o prelacy_n be_v which_o be_v now_o existent_a and_o which_o this_o author_n pretend_v be_v consonant_n to_o scripture_n and_o antiquity_n as_o to_o matter_n of_o fact_n it_o be_v undeniable_a 1._o that_o the_o parliament_n 1662._o do_v express_o raze_v presbyterian_a government_n in_o all_o its_o preexistent_a court_n judicatory_n and_o privilege_n declare_v it_o void_a and_o expire_v 2._o they_o do_v redintegrat_fw-la the_o bishop_n to_o their_o episcopal_a function_n presidencie_n in_o the_o church_n power_n of_o ordination_n and_o censure_n and_o all_o church_n discipline_n to_o be_v perform_v by_o they_o with_o advice_n only_o and_o of_o such_o of_o the_o clergy_n only_o as_o they_o shall_v find_v they_o themselves_o be_v judge_n of_o know_a loyalty_n and_o prudence_n and_o they_o redintegrat_fw-la they_o to_o all_o the_o pretend_a privilege_n possess_v be_v they_o in_o anno_fw-la 1637._o what_o time_n their_o power_n be_v at_o the_o great_a height_n since_o of_o themselves_o they_o frame_v the_o book_n of_o canon_n which_o do_v establish_v their_o sole_a power_n and_o dominion_n over_o all_o church_n judicatories_n raze_v classical_a presbytery_n and_o parochial_a session_n and_o draw_v up_o the_o liturgy_n and_o book_n of_o ordination_n without_o the_o least_o shadow_n of_o advice_n from_o this_o church_n threaten_v even_o excommunication_n against_o the_o opposer_n of_o that_o course_n 3._o it_o be_v also_o evident_a that_o all_o this_o power_n and_o authority_n of_o our_o prelate_n be_v fountain_v in_o derive_v from_o and_o referable_a unto_o the_o supremacy_n as_o be_v evident_a by_o the_o act_n restore_v prelacy_n after_o the_o declaration_n of_o the_o supremacy_n as_o his_o majesty_n commissioner_n in_o the_o exercise_n of_o his_o ecclesiastic_a government_n and_o in_o the_o administration_n of_o all_o their_o pretend_a spiritual_a authority_n as_o accountable_a to_o he_o their_o head_n and_o supreme_a legislator_n in_o all_o
of_o prelacy_n in_o scotland_n and_o for_o england_n reserve_v i_o have_v tell_v he_o that_o what_o ever_o gloss_n any_o may_v put_v upon_o that_o 2d_o article_n yet_o if_o the_o general_a clause_n and_o expression_n mention_v will_v exclude_v all_o kind_n of_o prelacy_n their_o gloss_n will_v not_o comport_v with_o the_o simplicity_n and_o genuine_a sense_n of_o the_o oath_n and_o therefore_o be_v not_o to_o be_v admit_v since_o if_o it_o can_v be_v make_v good_a from_o the_o scripture_n that_o all_o kind_n of_o prelacy_n be_v unlawful_a dissonant_n to_o the_o divine_a rule_n and_o repugnant_a to_o the_o power_n of_o godliness_n the_o oath_n do_v most_o clear_o strike_v against_o it_o mr_n crofton_n pag._n 110._o in_o answer_n to_o the_o author_n who_o he_o call_v dr_n featly_n ghost_n object_v that_o in_o the_o covenant_n the_o church_n of_o scotland_n be_v set_v before_o the_o church_n of_o england_n tell_v he_o that_o it_o be_v in_o relation_n to_o different_a act_n the_o reform_a religion_n of_o scotland_n to_o be_v preserve_v of_o england_n to_o be_v reform_v that_o it_o be_v no_o solecism_n to_o put_v the_o factum_fw-la before_o the_o fieri_fw-la to_o swear_v the_o preservation_n of_o good_a acquire_v before_o one_fw-mi endeavour_n to_o obtain_v the_o same_o or_o better_o to_o prefix_v the_o pattern_n to_o that_o which_o be_v to_o be_v thereunto_o conform_v he_o add_v that_o his_o antagonist_n have_v little_a reason_n to_o grudge_v that_o scotland_n shall_v be_v propound_v as_o a_o pattern_n of_o reformation_n to_o england_n since_o beda_n report_v that_o this_o nation_n do_v as_o first_o communicate_v the_o science_n of_o divine_a knowledge_n without_o grudge_n or_o envy_v unto_o the_o people_n of_o england_n cite_v his_o eccles._n hist._n gent._n ang._n lib._n 5._o cap._n 23._o hence_o he_o infer_v that_o it_o be_v no_o folecisin_n to_o propound_v we_o as_o a_o pattern_n of_o reformation_n who_o have_v first_o obtain_v it_o and_o from_o who_o christianity_n itself_o be_v be_v first_o transmit_v to_o they_o here_o let_v out_o informer_n inform_v himself_o first_o that_o in_o the_o sense_n of_o the_o english_a presbyterian_o the_o preserve_n of_o our_o establish_a reformation_n be_v that_o article_n wherein_o our_o obligation_n to_o presbyterian_a government_n be_v proper_o include_v and_o that_o the_o article_n of_o reformation_n yet_o in_o fieri_fw-la relate_v proper_o to_o england_n 2._o that_o they_o state_n a_o distinction_n betwixt_o preserve_v and_o reform_v as_o distinct_a act_n the_o one_o relate_v to_o our_o reformation_n in_o scotland_n already_o obtain_v the_o other_o to_o that_o in_o england_n yet_o in_o fieri_fw-la wherein_o they_o check_v this_o man_n blunt_a measure_v our_o obligation_n against_o prelacy_n first_o and_o principal_o by_o the_o second_o article_n and_o his_o deny_v our_o obligation_n to_o preserve_v pretbyterian_a government_n contain_v in_o the_o first_o and_o his_o blunt_a confound_v the_o obligation_n of_o the_o two_o article_n to_o give_v some_o shadduw_v of_o his_o fancy_v contradiction_n which_o he_o will_v fasten_v upon_o we_o viz._n that_o we_o be_v bind_v against_o all_o episcopacy_n in_o the_o first_o article_n and_o yet_o the_o second_o can_v admit_v of_o some_o for_o as_o we_o have_v before_o answer_v so_o mr_n crofton_n tell_v he_o here_o again_o that_o the_o act_n and_o object_n be_v different_a the_o preserve_n of_o the_o reformation_n government_n and_o discipline_n of_o this_o church_n which_o we_o see_v he_o hold_v to_o be_v ptesbyterian_a government_n according_a to_o our_o two_o book_n of_o discipline_n and_o opposite_a to_o diocesan_n prelacy_n as_o such_o be_v a_o different_a act_n and_o object_n from_o these_o of_o extirpate_v prelacy_n out_o of_o the_o church_n of_o england_n and_o three_o that_o with_o mr_n crofton_n and_o the_o english_a presbyterian_o it_o be_v no_o such_o paradox_n as_o this_o man_n afterward_o endeavour_v to_o persuade_v we_o that_o the_o covenant_n oblige_v they_o to_o reform_v england_n according_a to_o our_o pattern_n which_o we_o see_v they_o hold_v to_o be_v the_o scripture_n pattern_n for_o mr_n crofton_n tell_v his_o adversary_n that_o our_o factum_fw-la be_v to_o be_v their_o fieri_fw-la and_o our_o acquire_v good_a in_o point_n of_o government_n the_o measure_n of_o their_o good_a to_o be_v obtain_v and_o that_o the_o good_a they_o be_v to_o obtain_v according_a to_o the_o covenant_n be_v the_o same_o with_o we_o and_o tell_v he_o in_o terminis_fw-la and_o express_o that_o our_o pattern_n be_v in_o the_o first_o article_n prefix_v to_o which_o they_o be_v to_o be_v conform_v from_o what_o we_o have_v say_v out_o of_o mr_n crofton_n touch_v his_o sense_n of_o the_o covenant_n and_o the_o sense_n of_o the_o english_a presbyterian_o who_o adhere_v thereunto_o it_o be_v evident_a that_o it_o strike_v against_o all_o prelacy_n include_v the_o priority_n and_o power_n of_o diocesan_n bishop_n and_o arch-bishop_n that_o prelacy_n dispute_v against_o by_o gerson_n bucer_n in_o his_o dissertation_n the_o gub._n eccl_n didoclavius_n in_o his_o altar_n damascenum_n cartwright_n exception_n paul_n baines_n his_o diocesan_n trial_n smectymnuus_n mr_n pryn_n in_o his_o public_a and_o positive_a challenge_n for_o th●…_n unbishop●…g_v of_o timothy_n and_o titus_n cite_v by_o crofton_n pag._n 83._o as_o unanswerable_a piece_n yea_o all_o bishop_n who_o office_n and_o authority_n be_v such_o as_o mr_n crofton_n to_o use_v his_o own_o expression_n may_v not_o stand_v up_o a_o peer_n to_o they_o in_o official_a power_n though_o a_o simple_a presbyter_n so_o that_o our_o informer_n be_v quite_o out_o in_o tell_v we_o that_o in_o their_o sense_n the_o covenant_n be_v reconcilable_a to_o our_o prelacy_n and_o strike_v only_o against_o that_o of_o england_n again_o mr_n crofton_n in_o the_o analepsis_n pag._n 129._o answer_v the_o charge_n of_o ambiguity_n put_v upon_o that_o clause_n of_o the_o best_a reform_a church_n tell_v the_o master_n of_o oxford_n that_o the_o sense_n be_v in_o endeavour_v the_o reformation_n of_o england_n the_o word_n of_o god_n shall_v be_v our_o rule_n and_o the_o best_a reform_a church_n our_o pattern_n wherein_o he_o clear_o assert_n with_o we_o that_o the_o obligation_n of_o the_o covenant_n reach_v the_o extirpation_n of_o whatever_o prelacy_n be_v find_v contrary_a to_o the_o word_n of_o god_n but_o so_o it_o be_v that_o the_o apostolic_a church_n as_o we_o shall_v find_v mr_n crofton_n here_o assert_v own_v no_o bishop_n but_o such_o as_o he_o may_v stand_v up_o a_o peer_n unto_o so_o that_o the_o scripture_n rule_n and_o by_o consequence_n the_o covenant_n according_a thereunto_o strike_v against_o and_o cut_v of_o all_o prelacy_n of_o diocesian_n bish_n of_o whatever_o government_n do_v admit_v of_o any_o church_n officer_n above_o presbyter_n and_o in_o his_o sense_n they_o be_v oblige_v to_o reduce_v england_n prelacy_n or_o hierarchy_n to_o a_o complete_a presbyterian_a parity_n the_o scripture_n make_v with_o mr_n crofton_n the_o bishop_n and_o presbyter_n mere_o synonimon_n so_o that_o no_o prelacy_n wherein_o a_o distinction_n be_v admit_v can_v consist_v with_o the_o covenant_n in_o his_o judgement_n nor_o can_v any_o glossing_n of_o man_n prejudge_v this_o rule_n and_o the_o obligation_n result_v from_o this_o clause_n to_o extirpate_v prelacy_n foot_n and_o branch_n our_o informer_n may_v have_v see_v this_o his_o notion_n further_o refute_v by_o the_o author_n of_o that_o piece_n entitle_v the_o case_n of_o the_o accommodation_n examine_v pag._n 39_o 40._o who_o show_v that_o in_o so_o far_o as_o england_n have_v attain_v we_o may_v close_v with_o they_o in_o a_o particular_a oath_n for_o extirpate_v a_o evil_a discover_v and_o yet_o for_o a_o further_o advance_v rest_n upon_o the_o more_o general_a tie_n so_o sure_o caution_v till_o god_n shall_v give_v further_o light_v so_o that_o the_o engadgement_n of_o both_o party_n express_o only_a to_o extirpate_v that_o species_n do_v no_o way_n hinder_v the_o set_n up_o of_o presbyterian_a government_n and_o reject_v of_o all_o prelacy_n to_o be_v covenant_v unto_o under_o the_o general_a provision_n that_o it_o be_v aggreeable_a to_o truth_n and_o righteousness_n for_o we_o to_o concur_v with_o that_o church_n convince_v of_o evil_n but_o not_o so_o enlighten_v as_o to_o remedy_n in_o covenant_v against_o the_o evil_n in_o particular_a and_o also_o to_o endeavour_v a_o reformation_n according_a to_o the_o word_n of_o god_n and_o by_o virtue_n of_o this_o general_a oblidgement_n become_v bind_v to_o make_v a_o more_o exact_a search_n anent_o the_o lawfullnes_n or_o unlawfullness_n of_o thing_n not_o so_o full_o clear_a in_o the_o time_n of_o enter_v into_o the_o oath_n and_o after_o the_o discovery_n to_o reject_v what_o seem_v tolerable_a so_o that_o no_o hesitation_n among_o they_o do_v hinder_v england_n and_o scotland_n respective_a obligation_n to_o extirpate_v all_o episcopacy_n as_o contrary_a