such Bulls so purchased or any such Balls to be purchased in time to come upon the pain of a Premunire as by the said Act appeareth In the Reign of King Henry the Fifth IN an Act of Parliament made in the third year of King H. 5. it is declared That whereas in the time of King H. 4. Father to the said King in the 7. year of his Reign to eschew many discords and debates and divers other mischiefs which were likely to arise and happen because of many Provisions then made or to be made by the Pope and also of Licence thereupon granted by the said late King amongst other things it was ordained and established That no such Licence or Pardon so granted before the same Ordinance or afterwards to be granted should be available to any Benefice full of any Incumbent at the day of the date of such Licence or Pardon granted Nevertheless divers persons having Provisions of the Pope of divers Benefices in England and elsewhere and Licences Royall to execute the same Provisions have by colour of the same Provisions Licences and Acceptations of the said Benefices subtilly excluded divers persons of their Benefices in which they had been Incumbents by a long season of the collation of the very Patrons Spiritual to them duely made to their intent to the final destruction and enervation of the states of the same Incumbents The King willing to void such mischiefs hath ordained and established That all the Incumbents of every Benefice of Holy Church of the Patronage Collation or Presentation of Spirituall Patrons might quietly and peaceably enjoy their said Benefices without being inquieted molested or any ways grieved by any colour of such Provisions Licences abd Acceptations And that all the Licences and Pardons upon and by such Provisions made in any manner should be void and of no value And if any feel himself grieved molested or inquieted in any wise from thenceforth by any by colour of such Provisions Licences Pardons or Acceptations that the same molestors grievors or inquietors and every of them have and incurre the pains and punishments contained in the Statutes of Provisors before that time made as by the said Act appeareth A Statute was made for extirpation of Heresie and Lollardry whereby full power and authority was given to the Justices of Peace and Justices of Assise to inquire of those that hold Errours Heresies or Lollardry and of their maintainers c. And that the Sheriffe or other Officer c. may arrest and apprehend them The King by consent of Parliament giveth power to Ordinaries to enquire of the foundation erection and governance of Hospitals other then such as be of the King's foundation and thereupon to make correction and reformation according to the Ecclesiasticall Law In the Reign of King Henry the Sixth EXcommunication made and certified by the Pope is of no force to disable any man within England And this is by the ancient Common Laws before any Statute was made concerning forrein Jurisdiction The King onely may grant or licence to found a Spiritual Incorporation In the Reign of King Henry the 6. the Pope writ Letters in derogation of the King and his Regalty and the Church-men durst not speak against them But Humfrey Duke of Gloucester for their safe keeping put them into the fire In the Reign of King Edward the Fourth IN the Reign of King Edward the Fourth the Pope granted to the Prior of Saint Johns to have Sanctuary within his Priory and this was pleaded and claimed by the Prior But it was resolved by the Judges that the Pope had no power to grant any Sanctuary within this Realm and therefore by judgement of the Law the same was disallowed There it appeareth that the opinion of the King's Bench had been oftentimes that if one Spiritual person sue another Spiritual man in the Court of Rome for a matter spiritual where he might have remedy before his Ordinary that is the Bishop of that Diocese within the Realm quia trahit ipsum in placitum extra regnum incurreth the danger of a Premunire a hainous offence it being contra legiantiae suae debitum in contemptum Domini Regis contra Coronam dignitatem suas By which it appeareth how grievous an offence it was against the King his Crown and Dignity if any subject although both the persons and cause were Spirituall did seek for justice out of the Realm as though either there wanted Jurisdiction or Justice was not executed in the Ecclesiastical Courts within the same which as it hath been said was an high offence contra Regem Coronam dignitatem suas In the King's Courts of Record where Felonies are determined the Bishop or his Deputy ought to give his attendance to the end that if any that is indicted and arraigned for Felony do demand the benefit of his Clergy that the Ordinary may inform the Court of his sufficiency or insufficiency that is whether he can reade as a Clerk or not whereof notwithstanding the Ordinary is not to judge but is a minister to the King's Court and the Judges of that Court are to judge of the sufficiency or insufficiency of the party whatsoever the Ordinary doth inform them and upon due examination of the party may give judgement against the Ordinarie's information for the King's Judges are Judges of the cause The Pope's Excommunication is of no force within the Realm of England In the Reign of King Edward the Fourth a Legate from the Pope came to Calice to have come into England but the King and his Council would not suffer him to come within England until he had taken an oath that he should attempt nothing against the King or his Crown and so the like was done in his Reign to another of the Pope's Legates And this is so reported in 1 Henrici 7. fol. 10. In the Reign of King Richard the Third IT is resolved by the Judges That a Judgement or Excommunication in the Court of Rome should not bind or prejudice any man within England at the Common Law In the Reign of King Henry the Seventh IN the Reign of King Henry the 7. the Pope had excommunicated all such persons whatsoever as had bought Allum of the Florentines And it was resolved by all the Judges of England that the Pope's Excommunication ought not to be obeyed or to be put in execution within the Realm of England In a Parliament holden in the first year of King Henry the Seventh for the more sure and likely reformation of Priests Clerks and Religious men culpable or by their demerits openly noised of incontinent living in their bodies contrary to their Order it was enacted ordained and established by the advice and assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in the said Parliament assembled and by authority of the same That it be lawful to all Archbishops and Bishops
the Treasure and riches of the land carried away the Subjects of the Realm molested and impoverished the Benefices of Holy Church wasted and destroyed Divine service Hospitalitie Almsdeeds and other works of charitie neglected Again 27 Edw. 3. cap. 1. upon the grievous and clamorous complaint for that phrase is there used of the great men and Commons touching Citations and Provisions it is enacted That the offenders shall forfeit their lands goods and chattels and their bodies be imprisoned and ransomed at the King's will But in the Statute of 25 Edw. 3. wherein the first Law against Provisors made 25 Edw. 1. is recited there is a larger declaration of these inconveniences then in the two last Acts before mentioned For there all the Commons of the Realm do grievously complain That whereas the Holy Church of England was first founded in estate of Prelacie by the Kings and Nobilitie of that Realm and by them endowed with great possessions and revenues in lands rents and Advowsons to the end the people might be informed in Religion Hospitality might be kept and other works of Charitie might be exercised within the Realm And whereas the King and other founders of the said Prelacies were the rightfull Patrons and Adowees thereof and upon avoidance of such Ecclesiasticall promotions had power to advance thereunto their kinsmen friends and other learned men of the birth of that Realm which being so advanced became able and worthy persons to serve the King in Counsell and other places in the Commonweal The Bishop of Rome usurping the Seigniory of such possessions and Benefices did give and grant the same to Aliens which did never dwell in England and to Cardinals which might not dwell there as if he were rightfull Patron of those Benefices whereas by the Law of England he never had right to the Patronage thereof whereby in short time all the Spirituall promotions in the Realm would be ingrossed into the hands of Strangers Canonicall elections of Prelates would be abolished works of Charity would cease the founders and true patrons of Churches would be disinherited the King's Counsell would be weakened the whole Kingdome impoverished and the Laws and rights of the Realm destroyed Upon this complaint it was resolved in Parliament That these oppressions and grievances should not be suffered in any manner and therefore it was enacted That the King and his Subjects should thenceforth enjoy the rights of patronage That free elections of Archbishops Bishops and other Prelates elective should be made according to the ancient grants of the King's Progenitors and their founders That no Bulls of Provision should be put in execution but that the Provisors should be attached fined and ransomed at the King's will and withall imprisoned till they had renounced the benefits of their Bulls satisfied the partie grieved and given sureties not to commit the like offence again Now Master Lalor what think you of these things Did you believe that such Laws as these had been made against the Pope 200 250 300 years since Was King Hen. 8. the first Prince that opposed the Pope's usurped Authority Were our Protestants the first Subjects that ever complained of the Court of Rome Of what Religion think you were the propounders and enacters of these Laws Were they good Catholicks or good Subjects or what were they You will not say they were Protestants for you will not admit the Reformed Religion to be so ancient as those times neither can you say they were undutifull for they strove to uphold their liege Lord's Sovereignty Doubtless the people in those days did generally embrace the vulgar errours and superstitions of the Romish Church and in that respect were Papists as well as you but they had not learned the new doctrine of the Pope's Supremacie and transcendent authority over Kings they did not believe he had power to depose Princes and discharge Subjects of their allegeance to abrogate the fundamentall Laws of Kingdomes and to impose his Canons as binding laws upon all nations without their consents they thought it a good point of Religion to be good Subjects to honour their King to love their country and to maintain the laws and liberties thereof howsoever in other points they did erre and were miss-led with the Church of Rome So as now Master Lalor you have no excuse no evasion but your conscience must condemn you as well as the Law since the Law-makers in all Ages and all religious Papists and Protestants do condemn you unless you think your self wiser then all the Bishops that were then in England or all the Judges who in those days were learned in the Civil and Canon Laws as well as in the Common Laws of England But you being an Irish man will say perhaps these Laws were made in England and that the Irish Nation gave no particular consent thereunto onely there was an implicite consent wrapt and folded up in generall terms given in the Statute of 10 Hen. 7. cap. 22. whereby all Statutes made in England are established and made of force in Ireland Assuredly though the first Parliament held in Ireland was after the first Law against Provisors made in England yet have there been as many particular Laws made in Ireland against Provisions Citations Bulls and Breves of the Court of Rome as are to be found in all the Parliament-Rolls in England What will you say if in the self-same Parliament of 10 Hen. 7. cap. 5. a special Law were made enacting authorizing and confirming in this Realm all the Statutes of England made against Provisors if before this the like Law were made 32 Hen. 6. cap. 4. and again 28 Hen. 6. cap. 30. the like and before that the like Law were made 40 Edw. 3. cap. 13. in the famous Parliament of Kilkenny if a Statute of the same nature were made 7 Edw. 4. cap. 2. and a severer Law then all these 16 Edw. 4. cap. 4. That such as purchase any Bulls of Provision in the Court of Rome as soon as they have published or executed the same to the hurt of any incumbent should be adjudged traitors Which Act if it be not repealed by the Statute of Queen Mary may terrifie Master Lalor more then all the Acts which are before remembred But let us ascend yet higher to see when the Pope's Usurpation which caused all these complaints began in England with what successe it was continued and by what degrees it rose to that height that it well-nigh over-topp'd the Crown whereby it will appear whether he had gained a circle by prescription by a long and quiet possession before the making of these Laws The first encroachment of the Bishop of Rome upon the liberties of the Crown of England was made in the time of King William the Conqueror For before that time the Pope's Writ did not run in England his Bulls of Excommunication and Provision came not thither no Citation no Appeals were made from thence to the Court of
appeareth 11 H. 7.9 34 H. 6.14 c. And in Bunting and Leppingwells Case in the part of my Reports And this is the usual form of all the Sentences in their Ecclesiastical Courts And this very Point Tr. 23 Reginae Eliz. in this Court between Cheyney and Frankwell all the matter being found as this Case is by speciall verdict was adjudged As to the fourth Objection videlicet That the said Queen had onely power by force of the said Act to nominate Commissioners for Ecclesiasticall causes and therefore the foresaid Nomination not pursuing the authority given unto her by that Act should be void Hereunto a threefold Answer was given and resolved by the whole Court 1. That they which were Commissioners and had places of Judicature over the King's subjects should be intended to be Subjects born and not Aliens But if in veritie they were Aliens yet in respect of the general intendment to the contrary it ought to be alledged and proved by the other party For Stabilitur praesumptum donec probetur in contrarium 2. The Jurors have found that the Queen by her said Letters Patents did authorize them secundum formam Statuti praedicti and therefore it doth by necessary consequence amount to as much as if they had found they had been Subjects born For if they were not Subjects born they could not be authorized secundum formam Statuti praedicti Vide 11 H. 4.4 13 Eliz. Dyer fol. And the rather for that this is found by special verdict 3. It was resolved That the said Act of the first year of the said Queen concerning Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction was not a Statute introductory of a new Law but declaratory of the old which appeareth as well by the Title of the said Act videlicet An Act restoring to the Crown the ancient Jurisdiction over the State Ecclesiastical and Spiritual c. as also by the body of the Act in divers parts thereof For that Act doth not annex any Jurisdiction to the Crown but that which in truth was or of right ought to be by the ancient Laws of the Realm parcell of the King's Jurisdiction and united to his Imperial Crown and which lawfully had been or might be exercised within the Realm The end of which Jurisdiction and of all the proceeding thereupon was that all things might be done in causes Ecclesiasticall to the pleasure of almighty God the increase of vertue and the conservation of the peace and unity of this Realm as by divers parts of the said Act appeareth And therefore as by that Act no pretended Jurisdiction exercised within this Realm being either ungodly or repugnant to the Prerogative or the ancient Law of the Crown of this Realm was or could be restored to the same Crown according to the ancient right and Law of the same So if that Act of the first year of the said Queen had never been made it was resolved by all the Judges that the King or Queen of England for the time being may make such an Ecclesiasticall Commission as is before mentioned by the ancient Prerogative and Law of England And therefore by the ancient Laws of this Realm this Kingdome of England is an absolute Empire and Monarchy consisting of one Head which is the King and of a Body politick compact and compounded of many and almost infinite severall and yet well-agreeing members All which the Law divideth into two several parts that is to say the Clergie and the Laietie both of them next and immediately under God subject and obedient to the Head Also the Kingly Head of this politick Body is instituted and furnished with plenary and entire power Prerogative and Jurisdiction to render Justice and right to every part and member of this Body of what estate degree or calling soever in all Causes Ecclesiasticall or Temporal otherwise he should not be a Head of the whole Body And as in Temporal causes the King by the mouth of the Judges in his Courts of Justice doth judge and determine the same by the temporal Laws of England so in causes Ecclesiasticall and Spiritual as namely Blasphemy Apostasie from Christianity Heresies Schisms Ordering Admissions Institutions of Clerks Celebration of Divine service Rights of Matrimony Divorces general Bastardy subtraction and right of Tithes Oblations Obventions Dilapidations Reparation of Churches Probate of Testaments Administrations and accounts upon the same Simony Incests Fornications Adulteries Solicitation of Chastity Pentions Procurations Appeals in Ecclesiasticall causes Commutation of penance and others the conusance whereof belong not to the Common Laws of England the same are to be determined and decided by Ecclesiasticall Judges according to the King 's Ecclesiastical Laws of this Realm For as the Romans fetching divers Laws from Athens yet being approved and allowed by the State there called them notwithstanding Jus Civile Romanorum and as the Normans borrowing all or most of their Laws from England yet baptized them by the name of the Laws or Customes of Normandy So albeit the Kings of England derived their Ecclesiasticall Laws from others yet so many as were proved approved and allowed here by and with a general consent are aptly and rightly called The King 's Ecclesiasticall Laws of England which whosoever shall deny he denieth that the King hath full and plenary power to deliver Justice in all causes to all his subjects or to punish all crimes and offences within his Kingdome for that as before it appeareth the deciding of matters so many and of so great importance are not within the conusance of the Common Laws and consequently that the King is no compleat Monarch nor Head of the whole and entire Body of the Realm But to confirm those that hold the truth to satisfy such as being not instructed know not the ancient and modern Laws and Customes of England every man being perswaded as he is taught these few demonstrative proofs out of the Laws of England in stead of many in order serie temporum are here added KEnulphus Rex c. per Literas suas patentes consilio consensu Episcoporum Senatorum gentis suae largitus fuit Monasterio de Abnidon in Comitatu Bark ac cuidam Ruchnio tune Abbati Monasterii c. quandam ruris sui portionem id est quindecim Mansias in loco qui à Ruricelis tunc nuncupabatur Culnam cum omnibus utilitatibus ad eandem pertinentibus tam in magnis quam in modicis rebus in aeternam haereditatem Et quod praedictus Ruchnius c. ab omni Episcopali Jure in sempiternum esse quietus ut inhabitatores ejus nullius Episcopi aut suorum officialium jugo inde deprimantur sed in cunctis rerum eventibus discussionibus causarum Abbatis Monasterii praedicti decreto subjiciantur Ità quòd c. As by the said Charter pleaded in 1 Henr. 7. and vouched by Stamford at large appeareth which Charter granted above 850 years fithence was after confirmed per Edwinum
when such persons have been attainted for Felons have prayed for to have them delivered as Clerks which were made Bigamy before the same Constitution It is agreed and declared before the King and his Council that the same Constitution shall be understood in this wise That whether they were Bigamy before the same Constitution or after they shall not from henceforth be delivered to the Prelates but Justice shall be executed upon them as upon other Lay people In an Act made at a Parliament holden at Carlile in the 25. year of the said King Ed. the First it is declared That the Holy Church of England was founded in the state of Prelacy within this Realm of England by the King and his Progenitors c. for them to inform the people in the Law of God and to keep Hospitality give Alms and doe other works of Charity c. And the said Kings in times past were wont to have the Advice and Counsel for the safeguard of the Realm when they had need of such Prelates The and Clerks so advanced The Bishop of Rome usurping the Seigniories of such Benefices did give and grant the same Benefices to Aliens which did never dwell in England and to Cardinals which might not dwell here c. in adnullation of the state of the Holy Church of England disherison of the King Earls Barons and other Nobles of the Realm and in offence and destruction of the Laws and Rites of this Realm and against the good disposition and will of the first Founders It was enacted by the King by assent of all the Lords and Comminalty in full Parliament That the said Oppressions Grievances and Dammages in this Realm from thenceforth should not be suffered as more at large appeareth by that Act. In the Reign of King Edward the Second ALbeit by the Ordinance of Circumspectè agatis made in the 13. year of Edw. 1. and by general allowance and usage the Ecclesiasticall Court held plea of Tithes Obventions Oblations Mortuaries Redemptions of penance Laying of violent hands upon a Clerk Defamations c. yet did not the Clergy think themselves assured nor quiet from Prohibitions purchased by Subjects untill that King Edw. the 2. by his Letters Patents under the great Seal in and by consent of Parliament upon the Petitions of the Clergy had granted unto them to have Jurisdiction in those cases The King in a Parliament holden in the 9. year of his Reign after particular Answers made to their Petitions concerning the matters abovesaid doth grant and give his Royall Assent in these words We desiring as much as of right we may to provide for the state of the Church of England and the tranquillity and quiet of the Prelates of the said Clergy to the honour of God and the amendment of the state of the said Church and of the Prelates and Clergy ratifying and approving all and singular the said Answers which appear in the said Act and all and singular things in the said Answers contained We do for us and our Heirs grant and command that the same be inviolably kept for ever Willing and granting for us and our Heirs That the said Prelates and Clergy and their Successors for ever do exercise Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction in the premisses according to the tenour of the said Answer In the Reign of King Edward the Third AN Excommunication by the Archbishop albeit it be disannulled by the Pope or his Legates is to be allowed neither ought the Judges to give any allowance of any such Sentence of the Pope or his Legate It is often resolved that all the Bishopricks within England were founded by the King's Progenitors and therefore the Advowsons of them all belong to the King and at the first they were donative And that if an Incumbent of any Church with Cure die if the Patron present not within 6 months the Bishop of that Diocese ought to collate to the end the Cure may not be destitute of a Pastor If he be negligent by the space of 6 months the Metropolitan of that Diocese shall confer one to that Church And if he also leave the Church destitute by the space of 6 months then the Common Law giveth to the King as to the Supreme within his own Kingdome and not to the Bishop of Rome power to provide a competent Pastor for that Church The King may not onely exempt any Ecclesiasticall person from the Jurisdiction of the Ordinary but may grant unto him Episcopal Jurisdiction As thus it appeareth there the King had done of ancient time to the Archdeacon of Richmond All Religious or Ecclesiasticall Houses whereof the King was Founder are by the King exempt from ordinary Jurisdiction and onely visitable and corrigible by the King 's Ecclesiasticall Commission The Abbot of Bury in Suffolk was exempted fron Episcopall Jurisdiction by the King's Charter The King presented to a Benefice and his Presentee was disturbed by one that had obtained Bulls from Rome for which offence he was condemned to perpetuall imprisonment c. Tithes arising in places out of any Parish the King shall have for that he having the Supreme Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction is bound to provide a sufficient Pastor that shall have the Cure of souls of that place which is not within any Parish And by the Common Laws of England it is evident that no man unlesse he be Ecclesiasticall or have Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction can have inheritance of Tithes The King shall present to his free Chappels in default of the Dean by Lapse in respect of his Supreme Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction And Fitzherbert saith that the King in that case doth present by Lapse as Ordinarie An Excommunication under the Pope's Bull is of no force to disable any man within England And the Judges said that he that pleadeth such Bulls though they concern the Excommunication of a Subject were in a hard case if the King would extend his justice against him If Excommunication being the extreme and final end of any Suit in the Court at Rome be not to be allowed within England it consequently followeth that by the ancient Common Laws of England no Suit for any Cause though it be spiritual rising within this Realm ought to be determined in the Court of Rome Quia frustrà expectatur eventus cujus effectus nullus sequitur And that the Bishops of England are the immediate Officers and Ministers to the King's Courts In an Attachment upon a Prohibition the Defendant pleaded the Pope's Bull of Excommunication of the Plaintif The Judges demanded of the Defendant if he had not the Certificate of some Bishop within the Realm testifying this Excommunication To whom the Counsell of the Defendant answered that he had not neither was it as they supposed necessarie for that the Bulls of the Pope under Lead were notorious enough But it was adjudged that they were not sufficiet for that the Court ought not to ave regard to
recommendation unto the young King his Son then lately crowned who hearing of his coming commanded him to forbear to come to his presence untill he had absolved the Archbishop of York and others whom he had excommunicated for performing their duties at his Coronation The Archbishop returned answer that they had done him wrong in usurping his office yet if they would take a solemn oath to become obedient to the Pope's commandment in all things concerning the Church he would absolve them The Bishops understanding this protested they would never take that oath unless the King willed them so to doe King Henry the Father being hereof advertised into France did rise into great passion and choler and in the hearing of some of his servants uttered words to this effect Will no man revenge me of mine enemies Whereupon the 4 Gentlemen named in the Stories of that time passed into England and first moving the Archbishop to absolve the Bishops whom he had excommunicated for performing their Duties at the young King's Coronation and receiving a peremptory answer of deniall from the Archbishop they laid violent hands upon him and slew him for which the King was fain not onely to suffer corporal penance but in token of his humiliation to kisse the knee of the Pope's Legate And this is the abridgement of Becket's Troubles or rather Treasons for which he was celebrated for so famous a Martyr And thus you see by what degrees the Court of Rome did within the space of one hundred and odde years usurp upon the Crown of England four points of Jurisdiction Viz. First sending out of Legates into England Secondly drawing of Appeals to the Court of Rome Thirdly donation of Bishopricks and other Ecclesiasticall Benefices And fourthly exemption of Clerks from the Secular power And you see withall how our Kings and Parliaments have from time to time opposed and withstood this unjust Usurpation Now then the Bishop of Rome having claimed and welnigh recovered full and sole jurisdiction in all causes Ecclesiasticall and over all persons Ecclesiasticall with power to dispose of all Ecclesiasticall Benefices in England whereby he had upon the matter made an absolute conquest of more then half the Kingdome for every one that could read the Psalm of Miserere was a Clerk and the Clergie possessed the moietie of all temporall possessions there remained now nothing to make him owner and proprietor of all but to get a surrender of the Crown and to make the King his Farmer and the people his Villains which he fully accomplished and brought to passe in the times of King John and of Hen. 3. The quarrell between the Pope and King John which wrested the Scepter out of his hand and in the end brake his heart began about the Election of the Archbishop of Canterbury I call it Election and not Donation or Investiture for the manner of investing of Bishops by the Staffe and Ring after the time of King Hen. 1. was not any more used but by the King's licence they were Canonically elected and being elected the King gave his Royall assent to their election and by restitution of their Temporalties did fully invest them And though this course of election began to be in use in the time of Rich. 1. and Hen. 2. yet I find it not confirmed by any Constitution or Charter before the time of King John who by his Charter dated the fifteenth of January in the sixteenth year of his Reign granted this privilege to the Church of England in these words viz. Quod qualiscunque consuetudo temporibus praedecessorum nostrorum hactenus in Ecclesia Anglicana fuerit observata quidquid juris nobis hactenus vindicaverimus de caetero in universis singulis Ecclesiis Mâ—nasteriis Cathedralibus Conventualibus totius regni Angliae liberae sint in perpetuum electiones quorumcumque Praelatorum majorum minorum Salvâ nobis haeredibus nostris custodiâ Ecclesiarum Monasteriorum vacantium quae ad nos pertinent Promittimus etiam quod nec impediemus nec impediri permittemus per ministros nostros nec procurabimus quin in universis singulis Monasteriis Ecclesiis postquam vacuerint praelaturae quemcunque voluerint libere sibi praeficiant electores Pastorum petitâ tamen à nobis priùs haeredibus nostris licentiâ eligendis quam non denegabimus nec differemus Et similiter post celebratam electionem noster requiratur assensus quem non denegabimus nisi adversus eandem rationale proposuerimus legitimè probaverimus propter quod non debemus consentire c. But to return to the cause of his great quarrell with the Pope The See of Canterbury being void the Monks of Canterbury suddenly and secretly without the King's licence elected one Reignold their Subprior to be Archbishop who immediately posted away to be confirmed by the Pope But when he came there the Pope rejected him because he came not recommended from the King Hereupon the Monks made suit to the King to nominate some fit person to whose election they might proceed The King commends John Gray Bishop of Norwich his principall Counsellour who was afterward Lord Justice of this Kingdome who with a full consent was elected by them and afterwards admitted and fully invested by the King These two elections bred such a controversie as none might determine but the Pope who gave a short rule in the case for he pronounced both elections void and caused some of the Monks of Canterbury who were then present in the Court of Rome to proceed to the election of Stephen Langton lately made Cardinal at the motion and suit of the French King who being so elected was forthwith confirmed and consecrated by the Pope and recommended to the King of England with a flattering Letter and a present of four Rings set with precious stones which were of great value and estimation in those days Howbeit the King more esteeming this Jewell of the Crown namely the Patronage of Bishopricks returned a round and Kingly answer to the Pope That inconsiderately and rashly he had cassed and made void the election of the Bishop of Norwich and had caused one Langton a man to him unknown and bred up and nourished amongst his mortal enemies to be consecrated Archbishop without any due form of election and without his Royal assent which was most of all requisite by the ancient laws and customes of his Realm That he marvelled much that the Pope himself and the whole Court of Rome did not consider what a precious account they ought to make of the King of England's friendship in regard that his one Kingdome did yield them more profit and revenue then all the other countries on this side the Alpes To conclude he would maintain the liberties of his Crown to the death he would restrain all his subjects from going to Rome And since the Archbishops Bishops and other Prelates within his dominions were as learned and religious
Realm of England and Ireland and to visit reform redresse order correct and amend all such Errors Heresies Schisms Abuses Offences Contempts and Enormities whatsoever which by any manner of Spiritual or Ecclesiastical power authority or jurisdiction can or may lawfully be reformed ordered redressed corrected restrained or amended to the pleasure of Almighty God the encrease of vertue and the conservation of the peace and unity of this Realm And that such persons so to be named assigned and authorized should have full power and authority by virtue of that Act and of such Letters Patents under her Highnesse her Heirs and Successors to exercise use and execute all the premisses according to the tenour and effect of the said Letters Patents any matter or cause to the contrary notwithstanding And afterwards the said Queen by her Letters Patents under the great Seal of England bearing date the ninth day of December in the six and twentieth year of her Reign according to the tenour of the said Act did authorize the Archbishop of Canterbury the Bishop of London and divers others or any three or more of them to enquire amongst others of the Statute of the first year of her Reign concerning the Book of Common Prayer with this Clause also contained in the said Letters Patents videlicet Also we give and grant full power and authority to reform redresse order correct and amend in all places of this Realm all Errors Heresies Schisms Abuses Contempts and Enormities Spirituall or Ecclesiasticall whatsoever which by any Spirituall or Ecclesiasticall power authority or jurisdiction can or may lawfully be reformed ordered redressed corrected restrained or amended by Censure Ecclesiasticall Deprivation or otherwise c. And upon proof thereof had and the offences aforesaid or any of them sufficiently proved against any person or persons by Confession lawful witness or by any due manner c. That then you or three of you shall have full power and authority to order and award such punishment to every such offendor by Fine Imprisonment Censure of the Church or otherwise or by all or any of the said ways and to take such order for the redresse of the same as by your wisedomes and discretions shall be thought meer and convenient as by the said Letters Patents more at large appeareth And further they found the Statute of the first year of the Reign of the said Queen by which it is enacted That the offendor against that Act concerning the Uniformity of Common Prayer being thereof lawfully convicted according to the Laws of the Realm by Verdict of twelve men or by his Confession or by the notorious Evidence of the fact should forfeit for the first offence the value of his Spirituall living for one whole year and should suffer six months Imprisonment for the second offence to be committed after such Conviction he should be deprived ipso facto of all his Spiritual livings and for the third offence to be committed after two Convictions as is aforesaid he should be deprived of all his Ecclesiasticall livings and be imprisoned during his life And that the said Robert Caudrey before the time of the trespass supposed was deprived of his said Benefice before the said High Commissioners as well for that he had preached against the said Book of Common Prayer as also for that he refused to celebrate Divine Service according to the said Book and shewed particularly wherein Which said Sentence of Deprivation was given by the Bishop of London cum assensu A. B. C. D. c. collegarum suorum And the Jury concluded their Verdict That if the said Deprivation were not warranted by Law but void then they found the Defendant guilty of the trespass And if the Deprivation were not void in Law then they found the Defendant not guilty And this Case was solemnly and oftentimes debated at Barre by the Counsel of either party and at the Bench by the Judges and after great and long deliberation and consultation had with the rest of the Judges was in the Term of S. Hillary in the 37. year of the said Queen adjudged And it was argued by the Counsel of the Plaintif that the said Deprivation was void for 4 causes First The said Book of Common Prayer being authorized and commanded to be observed by the said Act of the first year of the Queen upon the forfeitures and punishments therein comprised the offence of the Plaintif is against that Act for that Act onely doth command the observation of the said Book and inflicteth punishments in severall degrees for depraving or not observing of the same and consequently if the offence be against that Act the Plaintif ought to have been proceeded withall and punished according to the same And it was said that the said Act was an Act of great moderation and equity for the offendor for his first offence should not be ipso facto deprived but should onely lose the profits of his Ecclesiasticall livings for one year and suffer Imprisonment for six months to the end that such as were froward might have a time to repent and the well-minded a time to consent And such care had the Act of the offendors in this behalf as if they committed one offence and then another and after the second many more yet should not the offendor be deprived for any of the latter offences unless he had been first judicially convicted of record by verdict of 12 men or by confession or notorious evidence of the fact So as the second offence for which he must be deprived by the said Act must be done and committed after such a judiciall and solemn Conviction and punishment according to the said Act And then if such an open punishment and infliction should not give him understanding and open his heart to repent then upon a like Conviction for a second offence to be committed after such a Conviction Deprivation should follow But in the case now in question Caudrey the Plaintif was deprived from his said Parsonage of South-Luffenham for his said first offence being never convented or convicted for any such offence before And therefore it was concluded for this first point That the said High Commissioners had not pursued the form and order prescribed by the said Act non observata forma infertur adnullatio Actus and consequently the Deprivation of the Plaintif is void and therefore Judgement ought to be given for him And it was said by the Plaintif's Counsell by way of anticipation That albeit there was a Proviso in the same Act for Archbishops Bishops and their Chancellors Commissaries Archdeacons and other Ordinaries having peculiar Jurisdiction yet that did not give any strength to the said Deprivation for two causes First that the Commissioners by force of the said Act of 1 Eliz. and of the said Letters Patents are not within the said Proviso but onely Archbishops and Bishops their Chancellors Commissaries c. in respect of their ordinary Jurisdiction 2. Admitting it should
that is to say the Archbishops Bishops and other Prelates being in the Parliament severally examined making protestations that it was not their mind to deny or affirm that the Bishop of Rome might not excommunicate Bishops nor that he might make Translation of Prelates after the Law of Holy Church answered and said That if any Executions or Processes in the King's Court as before were made by any and censures of Excommunications be made against any Bishop of England or any other of the King's liege people for that they had made execution of such commandments and that if any executions of such Translations be made of any Prelats of the same Realm which Prelats were very profitable and necessary to the King and to his said Realm or that his sage men of his Council without his assent and against his will be withdrawn and eloigned out of the Realm so that the substance and Treasury of the Realm might be destroyed that the same was against the King and his Crown as it was contained in the Petition before named And likewise the same Procurators every one by himself examined upon the said matters did answer and say in the name and for their Lords as the said Bishops had said and answered And that the said Lords Spiritual would and ought to stand with the King in these cases lawfully in maintaining of his Crown and in all other cases touching his Crown and his Regalty as they were bound by their Allegeance Whereupon the King by the assent aforesaid and at the prayer of his said Commons did ordain and establish That if any purchase or pursue or cause to be purchased or pursued in the Court of Rome or elsewhere any such Translations Processes and Sentences of Excommunication Bulls Instruments or any other things which touched the King their Lord against him his Crown and his Regalty or his Realm as is aforesaid and they which bring them within the Realm or them receive or make thereof notification or any other execution within the same Realm or without that they their notorious procurators maintainers fautors and counsellors should be put out of the King's protection and their lands and tenements goods and chattels forfeit to the King and they be attached by their bodies if they may be found and brought before the King and his Council there to answer to the cases aforesaid or that processe be made against them by Premunire facias as it is ordained in other Statutes of Provisors and others which do sue in any other Court in derogation of the Regalty of the King as by the said Act also appeareth In the Reign of King Henry the Fourth IT is resolved that the Pope's Collector though he have the Pope's Bulls for that purpose hath no Jurisdiction within this Realm and there the Archbishops and Bishops c. of this Realm are called the King's Spirituall Judges By the ancient Laws Ecclesiasticall of this Realm no man could be convicted of Heresie being high Treason against the Almighty but by the Archbishop and all the Clergy of that Province and after abjured thereupon and after that newly convicted and condemned by the Clergy of that Province in their general Council of Convocation But the Statute 2 H. 4. cap. 15. doth give the Bishop in his Diocese power to condemn an Heretick And before that Statute he could not be committed to the Secular power to be burnt untill he had once abjured and was again relapsed to that or some other Heresie Whereby it appeareth that the King by consent of Parliament directed the proceedings in the Ecclesiasticall Court in case of Heresie and other matters more spirituall The Pope cannot alter the Laws of England The Judges say that the Statutes which restrain the Pope's Provisions to the Benefices of the advowsons of Spiritual men were made for that the Spiritualty durst not in their just cause say against the Pope's Provisions So as those Statutes were made but in affirmance of the Common Laws Excommunication made by the Pope is of no fore in England and the same being certified by the Pope into any Court in England ought not to be allowed neither is any Certificate of any Excommunication available in law but what is made by some Bishop of England for the Bishops are by the Common Laws the immediate Officers and Ministers of justice to the King's Courts in Causes Ecclesiasticall If any Bishop do excommunicate any person for a Cause that belongeth not unto him the King may write unto the Bishop and command him to assoil and absolve the party If any person of Religion obtain of the Bishop of Rome to be exempt from obedience Regular or ordinary he is in case of Premunire which is an offence as hath been said contra Regem Coronam Dignitatem suas The Commons did grievously complain to the King at the Parliament holden in the 6. year of H. 4. of the horrible mischiefs and damnable customes which then were introduct of new in the Court of Rome that no person Abbot or other should have provision of any Archbishoprick or Bishoprick which should be void till he had compounded with the Pope's Chamber to pay great and excessive sums of money as well for the First-fruits of the same Archbishoprick or Bishoprick as for the other lesse Services in the same Court and that the same sums or the greater part thereof be paid before hand which sums passed the treble or the double at the least of that that was accustomed of old time to be paid in the said Chamber and otherwise by the occasions of such Provisions whereby a great part of the Treasury of this Realm had been brought and carried to the said Court and also should be in time to come to the great impoverishing of the Archbishops and Bishops within the same Realm and elsewhere within the King's dominions if convenient remedy were not for the same provided The King to the honour of God as well to eschew the dammage of this Realm as the perils of their souls which owen to be advanced to any Archbishopricks and Bishopricks within the Realm of England and elsewhere within the King's dominions out of the same Realm by the advice and assent of the Great men of his Realm in the Parliament did ordain and establish That they and every of them that should pay to the said Chamber or otherwise for such Fruits and Services greater sums of mony then had been accustomed to be paid in old time past they and every of them should incur the forfeiture of as much as they may forfeit towards the King as by the said Act appeareth No person Religious or Secular of what estate or condition that he were by colour of any Bulls containing priviledges to be discharged of Tithes pertaining to Parish-churches Prebends Hospitals Vicarages purchased before the first year of King Richard the 2. or after and not executed should put in execution any
reconciled to the said usurped Authority of the See of Rome and to take Absolution at the hands of the said naughty and subtil practisers whereby did grow great disobedience and boldness in many not onely to withdraw and absent themselves from all Divine Service then most godly set forth and used within this Realm but also to think themselves discharged of and from all Obedience Duty and Allegeance to her Majesty whereby most wicked and unnatural Rebellion did ensue and to the farther danger of this Realm was thereafter very like to be renewed if the ungodly and wicked attempts in that behalf were not by severity of Laws in time restrained and bridled For remedy and redress whereof and to prevent the great mischiefs and inconveniences that thereby might ensue it was enacted by the Queen with the assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in that Parliament assembled and by the Authority of the same That if any person or persons after the first day of July then next coming should use or put in ure in any place within this Realm or in any the Queen's dominions any such Bull Writing or Instrument written or printed of Absolution or Reconciliation at any time theretofore obtained and gotten or at any time thereafter to be obtained or gotten from the said Bishop of Rome or any his Successors or from any other person or persons authorized or claiming authority by or from the said Bishop of Rome his Predecessors or Successors or the See of Rome Or if any person or persons after the said first day of July should take upon him or them by colour of any such Bull Writing Instrument or Authority to absolve or reconcile any person or persons or to grant or promise to any person or persons within this Realm or any other the Queen's dominions any such Absolution or Reconciliation by any speech preaching teaching writing or any other open deed Or if any other person or persons within this Realm or any the Queen's dominions after the said first day of July should willingly receive and take any such Absolution or Reconciliation Or else if any person or persons had obtained or gotten sithence the last day of the Parliament holden in the first year of her Reign or after the said first day of July should obtain or get from the said Bishop of Rome or any his Successors or the See of Rome any manner of Bull Writing or Instrument written or printed containing any thing matter or cause whatsoever Or should publish or by any waies or means put in ure any such Bull Writing or Instrument That then all and every such act or acts offence and offences should be deemed and adjudged by the Authority of the said Act to be high Treason and the Offendor and Offendors therein their Procurors Abettors and Counsellours to the fact and committing of the said offence or offences should be deemed and adjudged high Traitours to the Queen and the Realm and being thereof lawfully indicted and attainted according to the course of the Laws of this Realm should suffer pains of death also lose and forfeit all their Lands Tenements Hereditaments Goods and Chattels as in cases of high Treason by the Laws of this Realm ought to be lost and forfeited as by the said Act appeareth And albeit many of her subjects after the said Bull of Pius Quintus adhering to the Pope did renounce their former Obedience to the Queen in respect of that Bull yet all this time no Law was either made or attempted against them for their Recusancy though it were grounded upon so disloyal a Cause Now that these speechless Bulls were declared by Act of Parliament to be so dangerous then in place of them Jesuites and Romish Priests were sent over who in secret corners whispered and infused into the hearts of many of the unlearned subjects of this Realm that the Pope had power to excommunicate and depose Kings and Princes that he had excommunicated the Queen deprived her of her Kingdome and discharged all her subjects of their Oath Duties and Allegeance to her and therefore they ought not to obey her or any of her Commandments or Laws under pain of the Pope's Curse This was high Treason by the ancient Laws of England And thereupon Campion Sherwin and many other Romish Priests being apprehended and confessing that they came into England to make a party for the Catholick cause when need should require were in the 21. year of the said Queen's Reign by the ancient Common Laws of England indicted arraigned tried adjudged and executed for high Treason against their natural Allegeance which they ought their liege Sovereign But all this time there was no Act of Parliament made either against Recusants or Jesuites or Priests her Majesty still desiring and expecting their conversion and that by clemency and mildness they might be reclaimed to their former obedience and conformity before the said Bull. After Priests and Jesuites were punished by sentence of Law according to their demerits then great numbers of slanderous and seditious Books libri falsidici against her Majesty and the State were dispersed and scattered within this Realm tending to the inciting and stirring of the Subjects to Insurrection and Rebellion Her Majestie in open Parliament having with the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons mature consideration of so weighty and important causes in the 23. year of her Reign made two several Laws One against the makers and publishers of Seditious Books ordaining that offence to be Felony another against Recusants inflicting the penalty of twenty pounds the month for their Recusancie and yet upon their submission according to the Act to be thereof freely and absolutely discharged a milde and merciful Law considering their former Conformity and the cause of their Revolt But after these Jesuites and Romish Priests coming daily into and swarming within the Realm instilling still this poison into the Subjects hearts that by reason of the said Bull of Pius Quintus her Majesty was excommunicated deprived of her Kingdome that her Subjects were discharged of all Obedience to her and by all means endeavouring to withdraw them from their Duty and Allegeance to her Majesty and to reconcile them to the Church of Rome in the 27. year of her Reign by Authority of Parliament her Majesty made it Treason for any Jesuite or Romish Priest being her natural-born Subject and made a Romish Priest or Jesuite sithence the beginning of her Reign to come into any of her dominions intending thereby to keep them out of the same to the end that they should not infect any other Subjects with such treasonable and damnable perswasions and practices as are aforesaid which without controversie were high Treason by the ancient Common Laws of England Neither would ever magnanimous King of England fithence the first establishment of this Monarchy have suffered any especially being his own natural-born
Subjects to live that perswaded his Subjects that he was no lawfull King and practised with them within the heart of this Realm to withdraw them from their Allegeance and Loyalty to their Sovereign the same being crimen laesae Majestatis by the ancient Laws of this Realm BY this and by all the Records of the Indictments it appeareth that these Jesuites and Priests are not condemned and executed for their Priesthood and Profession but for their treasonable and damnable Perswasions and Practices against the Crowns and Dignities of Monarchs and absolute Princes who hold their Kingdoms and Dominions by lawful Succession and by inherent Birth-right and descent of inheritance according to the fundamental Laws of this Realm immediately of Almighty God and are not Tenants of their Kingdomes as they would have it at the will and pleasure of any forrein Potentate whatsoever Now albeit the proceedings and process in the Ecclesiastical Courts be in the name of the Bishops c. it followeth not therefore that either the Court is not the King 's or the Law whereby they proceed is not the King's Law For taking one example for many every Leet or View of Frank-pledge holden by a Subject is kept in the Lord's name and yet it is the King's Court and all the proceedings therein are directed by the King's Laws and many subjects in England have and hold Courts of Record and other Courts and yet all their proceedings be according to the King's Laws and the Customes of the Realm Observe good Reader seeing that the determination of Heresies Schisms and Errours in Religion Ordering Examination Admission Institution and Deprivation of men of the Church which do concern God's true Religion and Service of right of Matrimony Divorces and general Bastardy whereupon depend the strength of mens Discents and Inheritances of probate of Testaments and letters of Administration without which no debt or dutie due to any dead man can be recovered by the Common Law Mortuaries Pensions Procurations Reparations of Churches Simony Incest Adultery Fornication and Incontinency and some others doth not belong to the Common Law how necessary it was for administration of Justice that his Majestie 's Progenitors Kings of this Realm did by publick authority authorize Ecclesiasticall Courts under them to determine those great and important Causes Ecclesiastical exempted from the Jurisdiction of the Common Law by the King's Laws Ecclesiastical Which was done originally for two causes 1. That Justice should be administred under the Kings of this Realm within their own Kingdome to all their Subjects and in all Causes 2. That the Kings of England should be furnished upon all occasions either forrein or domestical with learned Professors as well of the Ecclesiasticall as Temporall Laws THus hath it appeared as well by the ancient Common Laws of this Realm by the Resolutions and Judgements of the Judges and Sages of the Laws of England in all succession of ages as by Authority of many Acts of Parliament ancient and of latter times That the Kingdome of England is an absolute Monarchy and that the King is the onely Supreme Governour as well over Ecclesiasticall persons and in Ecclesiastical causes as Temporal within this Realm to the due observation of which Laws both the King and the Subject are sworn I have herein cited the very words and texts of the Laws Resolutions Judgements and Acts of Parliament all publick and in print without any inference argument or amplification and have particularly quoted the books years leaves chapters and such like certain references as every man may at his pleasure see and reade the Authorities herein cited This Case is reported in the English and Latine tongues as some other Writers of the Law have done to the end that my dear Countrymen may be acquainted with the Laws of this Realm their own Birth-right and inheritance and with such evidences as of right belong to the same assuring my self that no wise or true-hearted English-man that hath been perswaded before he was instructed will refuse to be instructed in the truth which he may see with his own eyes lest he should be disswaded from errour wherewith blindfold he hath been deceived For miserable is his case and worthy of pity that hath been perswaded before he was instructed and now will refuse to be instructed because he will not be perswaded FINIS Of what quality and credit Robert Lalor was His apprehension and first examination His first inditement and conviction His second examination His confession or acknowledgement The Inditement of Lalor upon the stat of 16 Ric. 2. The true cause of making the Statute of 16 R. 2. and other Statutes against Provisors The Statute of Praemunire made at the prayer of the Commons The effect of the Statute of 16 R. 2. c. 5. The effect of the Statute of 38 Edw. 3. cap. 1. The Statute of 27 Ed. 3. cap. 1. The Statute of 25 Edw. 3. reciting the Statute of 25 Ed. 1. These Laws made by such as did professe the Romish Religion Laws against Provisors made in Ireland When the Pope began first to usurp upon the liberties of the Crâ—wn of England A comparison of the spiritual Monarchy of the Church with the temporal Monarchies of the world The Pope had no jurisdiction in England in the time of the Britans The first usurpation of the Pope upon the Crown began in the time of King William the Conquerour By sending Legates into England In the time of William Rufus the Pope attempted to draw Appeals to Rome but prevailed not In the time of K. Henry the first the Pope usurpeth the donation of Bishoprikks c. Histor Jornalensis M S. in Archiv Rob. Cotton Eq. Aur. In the time of King Stephen the Pope gained Appeals to the Court of Rome In the time of K. Henry 2. the Pope claimed exemption of Clerks from the Secular power A brief of Th. Becket's troubles or rather treasons The Constitutions of Claringdon Four points of jurisdiction usurped upon the crown of England by the Pope before the reign of K. John The cause of the quarrell between K. John and the Pope When Canonical election began first in England King John's round and Kingly Letter to the Pope The Pope curseth the King and interdicteth the Realm King Edw. 1. oppâ—seth the Pope's Vsurpation E. 2. suffereth the Pope to usurp again E. 3. resisteth the Vsurpation of the Pope King Rich. 2. The Evidence against Lalor Lalor's Confession publickly read When the distinction of Ecclesiasticall Spirituall causes from Civil and Temporal causes began in the world Caudrey's Case The objections of the Counsell of the Plaintif 1. 2. 3. 4. The resolutions of the Court to the 1. and 2. To the 3. To the 4. What causes belong to the Ecclesiasticall Court. see Circumspectè agatis 13 E. 1. W. 2. 13 E. 1. cap. 5. versus finem Artic. cleri 9 E. 2. 15 E. 3. c. 6.31 E. 3. cap. 11.2 H. 5. c. 7.1 H. 7. cap. 4.23 H. 8. cap.
9.24 H. 8. c. 12.27 H. 8. c. 20.32 H. 8. c. 7.1 E. 6. ca. 2.2 E. 6. ca. 13.1 Ma. cap. 3.1 Eliz. ca. 1.5 Eliz ca. 23.13 Eliz. ca. 10. Litt. lib. 2. ca. Frankalm fol. 30. F. Na. Br. fol. 41 42 43 44 45 46 47. Regist fol. 33 34 44. c. This King reigned an Dom. 755. Stanford lib. 3. cap. 38. fol. 111. This charter was pleaded 1 H. 7.23.25 Note Rex Edwin regnavit anno Dom. 955. St. K. Edw. laws ca. 19. 7 E. 3. tit Quare Impediâ— 19. The Charter of H. 1. Founder of the Abbey of Reading in the 26. year of his reign and in the year of our Lord 1125. 2 H. 3. Tit. Prohibition .13 4 H. 3. ibidem 15. 15 H. 3. Tit. Prohib 22. Register fol. The Statute of Merton an 20 H. 3. Vide 30 E. 3. Li. ss pl. 19. Brook tit Premunire pl. 10. Note this was by the common Law of England before any Statute made 19 E. 3. tit Quare non admisit 7. Vide 39 E. 3.20 Note The Statute of Bigamie 〈◊〉 4 E. 1. Observe how the King by advice of his Council that is by authority of Parliament expounded how the said Council should be understood and in what sense it should be received and allowed here Statutum de anno 25 E. 1. Carlisle Vide 20 E. 3. tit Essoin 24. Nota The first attempt was to usurp upon such Ecclesiasticall things as pertained to the Clergy of England who at that time stood in great awe of the Church of Rome The Statute of 9 E. 2. Artic Cleri cap. 16. See the Ordinance of Circumspectè agatis an 13 E. 1. to this effect By this Statute of 9 Ed. 2. and the Statutes of 15 E. 3. cap. 6. 31 E. 3. cap. 11. and by other Statutes heretofore mentioned the Jurisdiction of the Ecclesiasticall Court is allowed and warranted by consent of Parliament in all cases wherein they now have Jurisdiction so as these Laws may be justly called the King's Ecclesiasticall Laws or the Ecclesiasticall Laws of England 16 E. 3. Tit Excom 4. In the Reign of E. 3. 17 E. 3.23 20 E. 3. Excom 9. 16 E. 3. tit Bre. 660. 21 E. 3.60 6 H. 7.14 Fit Na. Br. 20 E. 3. Tit. Excom 6. 21 E. 3. fol. 40. 22 E. 3. lib. Ass pl. 75. 27 E. 3. fol. 84. Fit Na. Br. fol. 34. 30. E. 3. lib. Ass pl. 19. 12 H. 4.16 14 H. 4.14 8 H. 6. fol. 3. 35 H. 6.42 28 H. 6.1 7 E. 4.14 12 E. 4.16 Fit Na. Br. fol. 64. F. Vide 9. E. 4. fol. 3. Hereafter fol. 11. It ought to be determined in theâ—â—cclesiasticall Courts in England 31 E. 3. Tit. Excom 6. 33 E. 3. tit â—yde de Roy 103.38 Ass pl. 20. See the Statute of 15 E. 3. cap. 6. 31 E. 3. cap. 11. 38 Lib. Ass pl. 22. 46 E. 3. Tit. Premun 6. 49 E. 3. Lib. Ass pl. 8. Statut. de 25 E. 3. de Provisoribus Statut. de 25 E. 3. Note Note Vide 10 E. 3. fol. 1. 2. Statutum de 27 E. 3. Statut. de 28 E. 3. cap. 1. 2. Statut. de 38 E. 3. ca 3. 12 R. 2. tit Jurisdiction 18. Statutum de 16 R. 2. cap. 5. Note 1 H. 4. fol. 9. Fitz. Na. â—r 269. This had a resemblance to an Attainder of Treason wherein there must be first an Inditement by one Jury and a Conviction by another 11 H. 4.37 11 H. 4. fol. 69.76 14 H. 4. fol. 14. Vide 30 E. 3. lib. Ass pl. 19. before Vide 13 E. 3. Certificate 6. Vide 20 H. 6.1 37 H. 6.42 7 E. 4.14 Fitz. Na. Br. 64. F. 14 H. 4.14 Statut. de 2 H. 4. cap. 3. Statut. de 6 H. 4 cap. 1. Statut. de 7 H. 4. cap. 6. Statut. de 3 H. 5 cap. 4. * Stat. de 2 H. 5. cap. 7. Lollardry à lolio For as Cockle is the destruction of the Corn so is Heresie the destruction of true Religion Infelix lolium steriles dominantur avenae Virgilius Et careant loliis oculos vitiantibus agri Ovidius Statutum de 2 H. 5. cap. 1. 8 H. 6. fol. 3. 9 H. 6. fol. 16. 1 H. 7. fol. 10. 1 H. 7. fol. 20. 9 E. 4.3 Fitz. Na. Br. fol. 44. H. agreeth herewith Note 9 E. 4.28 12 E. 4. fo 16. 2 R. 3. fo 22. 1 H. 7.10 Statut. de 1 H. 7. cap. 4. 10 H. 7.18 11 H. 7.12 Statut. de 24 H. 8. cap. 12. This Statute is declaratorie of the ancient laws of England as manifestly appeareth by that which hath been said See Br. Abridgment tit Presentment al Esglise pl. 12. The Pope was permitted to doe certain things within this realm by usurpation and not of right until the reign of H. 8. This also is declaratory of the ancient Law as it appeareth both by 9 E. 4.3 Fitz. Na. B. 44. and many other cases and statutes abovesaid Statut. de 25 H. 8. cap. 21. This was also declaratory of the ancient Law as by that which hath been said appeareth This appeareth by resolution of all the Judges in 7 H. 8. Lib. Keylw fo 181. And this was long before any Act of Parliament was made against forrein Jurisdiction by King Henry the 8. The Statute of 1 Q. Eliz. 12 Eliz. Reg. Dyer Psalm 109.28 Though they curse yet bless thou O Lord and let them be confounded that rise against me but let thy servant rejoyce Which was the prayer her Majesty made when this Bull was published against her The Statute of 13 Eliz. Note the fruits of the Bull. 1. 2. 3. 4. The parts of the Act. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. The Statute of an 23 Reginae Eliz. The Statute of an 27 Eliz. Reginae