the Houses its true that sad Presidents have beene of later times in that kinde and so for want of due attendance Parliaments have been inforced to adjourn to prevent a worse inconvenience but these are infirmities better buried in silence then produced as Arguments of power seeing its evident that Kings themselves were no greater gainers thereby then an Angry man is by his passions It is true also that Kings may make Lords and Corporations that may send their Burgesses to the Parliament and thus the King may make as many as he will as the Pope did with the Bishops in the Councill of Trent yet cannot he unmake them when he pleases nor take the Members from the Parliament without attainder and forfeiture according to the knowne Law Neither can all these Instances prove that the Kings of England have the sole and supreame Power over the Parliament Nor did the Parliament in these times allow of any such Authority and therefore proceeded for the reforming of themselves by themselves in many particulars as the Statutes do hold forth And first in the point of Elections for an error in that is like an error in the first Concoction that spoiles the whole Nutriment they ordained that the Election of Knights shall be at the next County Court after the Writ delivered to the Sheriffe That in full Court betweene the houres of eight and nine in the morning Proclamation shall be made of the day and place of the Parliament That the Suters duely summoned and others there Present shall then proceed to the Election notwithstanding any Prayer or Commandement to the contrary That the names of the Persons elected whether present or absent they be shall be returned by Indenture betweene the Sheriffe and the Elizors and that a Clause to that end shall be added to the Writ of Summons This was enough to make the Sheriffe understand but not to obey till a penalty of one hundred pound is by other Lawes imposed upon him and a yeares imprisonment without Baile or Mainprise besides damages for false return in such Cases and the party so unduely returned Fined and deprived of all the wages for his service Thus the manner of Election is reduced but the Persons are more considerable For hitherto any man of English blood promiscuously had right to give or receive a Vote although his residency were over the wide World But the Parliament in the time of Henry the Fifth reduced these also whether they were such as did chuse or were chosen unto their proper Counties or else rendered them uncapable to Vote or serve for any County And the like Order was made for the Burroughs Viz. That no Person must serve for any City or Burrough nor give Vote in Electing such as shall serve for that Towne unlesse they be both Free and Resiants within that City or Burrough A Law no lesse wholsome then seasonable For the times of Henry the Fourth had taught men to know by experience That a King that hath Souldiers scattered over the Kingdome can easily sway the County-Courts and make Parliaments for their owne tooth Yet this was not enough For all Elizors though of the meanest sort yet are still able to doe as much hurt with their Vote as those of the best sort both for wisedome and publique minde can doe good by theirs This made Elections much subject to parties and confusions and rendered the Parliament much lesse considerable A remedy hereunto is provided in the minority of Henry the Sixth Viz. That no man should give his Vote in Elections in the County unlesse he hath forty shillings yearely in Free Lands or Tenements and this is to be testified upon Oath of the Party And more plainly it is ordered within two yeares after that each Elizor shall have Frank Tenement of that vallue within the same County And thus the Freemen yeilded up their liberty of Election to the Free-holders possibly not knowing what they did Neverthelesse the Parliament well knew what they did this change was no lesse good then great For first these times were no times for any great measure of Civility The Preface of the Statute shewes that the meanest held himself as good a man as the greatest in the Countrey and this tended to parties tumults and bloodshed Secondly where the multitude prevaile the meaner sort are upon the upper hand and these generally ignorant cannot judge of Persons nor Times but being for the most part led by Faction or Affection rather then by right Understanding make their Elections and thereby the Generall Councell of this Nation lesse generous and noble Thirdly there is no lesse equity in the change then policy for what can be more reasonable then that those men onely should have their Votes in Election of the Common Councell of the Kingdome whose Estates are chargeable with the publique Taxes and Assessements and with the wages of those persons that are chosen for the publique Service But above all the rest this advancing of the Free-holders in this manner of Election was beneficiall to the Free-men of England although perchance they considered not thereof and this will more clearly appeare in the consideration of these three particulars First it abated the power of the Lords and great men who held the inferiour sort at their Devotion and much of what they had by their Vote Secondly it rendered the body of the people more brave for the advancing of the Free-holder above the Free-man raiseth the spirit of the meaner sort to publique regards and under a kinde of Ambition to aspire unto the degree of a Free-holder that they may be some what in the Common-wealth and thus leaving the meanest rank sifted to the very branne they become lesse considerable and more subject to Coercive power whiles in the mean time the Free-holder now advanced unto the degree of a Yeoman becomes no lesse carefull to maintain correspondency with the Lawes then he was industrious in the attaining of his degree Thirdly by this means now the Law makes a separation of the inferiour Clergy and Cloystered people from this service wherein they might serve particular ends much but Rome much more For nothing appeareth but that these dead Persons in Law were neverthelesse Fsee-men in Fact and lost not the liberty of their Birth-right by entering into Religion to become thereby either Bond or no Free-Members of the people of England Lastly as a binding plaister above the rest First a Negative Law is made that the Persons elected in the County must not be of the degree of a Yeoman but of the most noted Knights Esquires or Gentlemen of the Countrey which tacitely implies that it was too common to advance those of the meaner sort whether by reason of the former wasting times Knights and Esquires were grown scant in number or by reason of their rudenesse in account Or it may be the Yeomanry grew now to feel their strength and meant not to be further
disabled to understand as in Case of Infancy there the Royall Assent can bear litle weight with it but most of all in the Kings absence where either the Assent is put thereto by Commissioners that know not the Kings particular minde or the Act is done onely by the Houses in nature of Ordinances and yet these of force to binde all Parties but the King But nothing more debased the Royall Assent in these times then a trick that Edward the Third plaid in the middest of the fullest strength of his Government It was in time of War which never is time of good Husbandry and laying up nor of sober advise in laying out nor of equity in levying and collecting money for the nerves of War This forward Warrier in the heat of his Atchievements findes his strength benummed for want of money he leaves off comes home rages against his A. Bishop to whom he had committed the care of Provision for his War and the A. Bishop as hotly falls upon some of the Treasury in the Army on the one side and upon others in the Countrey whose oppressions saith he in stead of bringing in money made the people to give a stop thereto A contest hereupon thus had it was concluded by the Power of the Parliament that such men should be questioned and that the Parliament from time to time should call all Officers of State to account and thereupon ensues a calme After the Parliament ended the King repeats the matter it makes his heart sick he disgorgeth himself by a Proclamation made by advise of Nobles and Wise men as he saith and tells all the World he dissembled with his Parliament and what he did was done by duress of minde to please for the time and to gain his ends which being now had he by his Proclamation revokes what he had done in Parliament or indeavoured it And thus is England put to school to learn to dissolve three hard knots First Whether a King can dissemble with his Parliament Secondly Whether Edward 3. his dissembling assent makes a Law Lastly Whether by a Proclamation by advise of Nobles and Wise men he can Declare that he dissembled with his Parliament and therein not dissemble the Royall Assent so as to bring all the Lawes made in any Kings time into question at least during his life However the result may be its evident the Royall Assent gets no honor hereby and the Statute as little that hath suffered this Proclamation all this time to passe among the number of the Statutes in Print as a Law when as many Statutes that are Lawes of note are left out as uselesse Although in the generall the two Houses joyned in every Act Ad extra yet Ad intra and in relation one to another they had their severall operations the House of Commons intermedled more in the matter of fact the House of Lords in matter of right although in either of these there is a mutuall aspect from both In matters of judicature much rested with the Lords and therefore it is ordained that The House of Lords shall remedy all offences contrary to the Law of Magna Charta And in cases where no remedy is left nor judgment by the Law the matter shall be determined in Parliament and the King shall command execution to be done according to the judgment of the Peeres Which Lawes seeme to bee but declarative of the former Lawe and in the nature of reviving that power into Act which was formerly layd asleep and doth strongly implye that the ultimate act in judicature rested with the Lords in relation not onely to the House of Commons but also in relation to the King whose work in such cases is not to judge above or with the Peers but to execute their sentence and that carries with it a list whereby the power of a King may appeare not to be so supreame in making of the Law as some would have it for if his Judgement and Conscience be bound by the Votes of the Peers in giving a Law in Case of a particuler person where the Law was not formerly known Let others judge of the value of this Negative Vote in giving Law to the whole Kingdome It s true that this Parliament was quarrelled by the King and he kept it at a bay by a Proclamation that pretended Revocation as far as a Proclamation could revoke an Act of Parliament but it effected nothing nor did the contest last long Now though this Jurisdiction thus rested in the House of Lords in such Cases as well as in others yet is it not so Originally in them as to be wholly theirs and onely as they shall order it for the Commons of England have a right in the course and order of Jurisdiction which as the known Law is part of their liberty and in the speedy execution of Justice as well as they have right to have Justice done and therefore whereas in Cases of Error and delayes the Appeale was from the inferiour Court to the Parliament which immediately determined the matter and now the trouble grew too great by the increase of Pleas For remedy hereof a kind of Committee is made of 1 Bishop 2 Earls 2 Barrons who by the advice of the Chancellor Treasurer and the Judges shall make good judgement in all Cases of Complaint of delay in Judgement which Committee is not made by Order of the Lords alone which they might have done in case Jurisdiction had bin wholly and onely shut up in their custody but by Act of Parliament and joynt concurrence of the Commons with the Lords For as the Commons challenge speedy Execution of Justice as one of their liberties So also to be under the jurisdiction of such Judges and Courts as the Lawes in the making whereof themselves challenge a Vote do establish appoint I will conclude this Chapter with the Constitution of the Parliament in these times For the difficulties that befell between the Kings and their people or Houses of Parliament wrought two sad effects Viz. A propensity to decline calling of Parliaments so often as was used and exspected and when it assembled as great a propensity in the Members to decline their attendance by means whereof as the Historians tell us the Parliament was somtimes inforced to adjourn it self for want of number sufficient the first of these arose from want of good will in the Kings the other from want of courage and zeale in the people The first of these was fatall and destructive to good Government for though in distempered Parliaments its good to withdraw yet in distempered times its necessary to meete and gain a right understanding of all parties and therefore these times were so happy as to binde themselves by publique Acts of State to recontinue the Assembling of Parliaments For the face of the Times represented unto all that Agitations were like to be quick violent and to continue for some succession of Time It s
sore People yet many times Lawes are said to be many when as they are but one branched into many Particulars for the clearing of the Peoples understanding who usually are not excellent in distinguishing and so becomes as new Plaisters made of an old Salve for sores that never brake out before Such sore times were these whereof we now Treate wherein every touch made a wound and every wound went to the heart and made the Category of Treason swell to that bignesse that it became an individuum vagum beyond all rule but the present sence of timerous Judges and a touchy King Thus were many of the ignorant and wel meaning people in an hideous danger of the gulfe of forfeiture before they found themselves nigh the brimme All men do agree that treason is a wound of Majesty but all the doubt is where this Majesty resteth originally and what is that legiance which is due therto the breach whereof amounteth to so high a censure for some men place all Majesty in one man whom they call an absolute Monarch Others in the great men and others in the people and some in the concurrence of the King and body of the people and it is a wild way to determine all in one conclusion when as the same dependeth wholy upon the constitution of the body looke then upon England in the last posture as the rigider sort of monarchiall polititians do and Majesty will never be in glory but in the concurrence of the King and Parliament or convention of Estates so upon the whol account it wil be upon the people whose welfare is the supream Law Rome had Kings Consuls Dictators Decemviri and Tribunes long before the Orators time and he saw the foundation of an Empire or perpetuall Dictatorship in the person of the first of the Caesars any of all which might have challenged the supremacy of Majesty above the people and yet the often change of Government shewed plainly that it rested upon another pinne and the Orator in expresse words no lesse when speaking of the Majesty of that Government he allotteth it not to those in cheife command but defineth it to be magnitudo populi Romani afterwards when the pride of the Emperors was come to its ful pitch in the times of Augustus Tiberius an Historian of those times in the life of Tiberius tels us that he declared the bounds of Treason to be determined in three particular instances of treachery against the Army Sedition amongst the people and violating the Majesty of the People of Rome in al which men were not punishable for words but actions and indeavors I do not herein propound the Government of the Roman Empire as a modell for England but à majori may conclude that if the proper seat of Majesty was in the people of Rome when Emperours were in their fullest glory it s no defacing of Majesty in England to seat it upon the whole body from whom the same is contracted in the representative and so much thereof divided unto the person of the King as any one member is capable of according to the work allotted unto him These severall seats of Majesty making also so many degrees do also imply as many degrees of wounding for it s writen in nature that the offence tending to the immediate destruction of the whol body is greater then that which destroyeth any one member only and when the written Law maketh it treason to compasse the destruction of the Kings Person it leaveth it obvious to common sense that its a higher degree of Treason to compasse the destruction of the representative and above all to destroy the whole body of the People crimes that never entred into the conceit of wickednesse it selfe in those more innocent times much lesse saw they any cause to mention the penalty by any written Law Neverthelesse because many sadd examples had accurred within the memory of this present age of the danger of the person and honor of Kings and yet on the otherside they saw that in such cases of Treason the Kings honor was made of retching leather and might easily be strained within the compasse of a wound of Majesty therefore Edward the third imitating Tiberius reduced the crime of wound of Majesty in the Person of the King into certaine particular instances out of the compasse whereof the Judges of the Law in ordinary course must not determine Treason These concerne either the safety of the Person of the King or of the succession in the Royall Throne or lastly the safegard of the publique right by the board and privy seale the vallue of Mony and by persons in matters of judicature judicially presiding all of them reflecting upon the King considered in his politick capacity for otherwise many crimes might have beene mentioned more fatally reflecting upon the King in his naturall capacity which nevertheless are omitted as not worthy of so high a censure Other Treasons are left to the determination of the Parliament as occasion should offer it selfe whereof divers examples of a new stamp accurred within forty yeares next ensuing which were of a temporary regard and lived and died with the times To these two notions of Majesty and treason I must add a third called Legiance for it is that which maketh Majesty to be such indeed and lifteth it into the Throne and whereof the highest breach makes Treason and because that which hath been already sayd reflecteth upon an opinion or rather a knot of opinions for I find them not punctually adjudged in Calvins case I must a little demur to them because as their sense is commonly taken it alters the fundamental nature of the Government of this nation from a commonweal to a pure Monarchy In handling of this case the ho. Reporter took leave to range into a generall discourse of legiance although not directly within the conclusion of the case and therin first sets down the general nature therof that it is a mutual bond between an English King and his people and then more particularly sets forth the nature of this bond in the severall duties of obedience and fealty fo 5. a. and those also in their severall properties Viz. naturall absolute fo 7. a. due to the King omni soli semper fo 12. a. in his naturall and not politick capacity fo 10. a. whereas he saith this bond is natural he meaneth that its due by birth fo 7. a. By absolute if I mistake him not he meaneth that it is indefinite fo 5. b. Viz. not circumscribed by Law but above Law and before Law fo 13. a. and that Laws were after made to inforce the same by penalties fo 13. b. and therefore he concludeth that this legiance is immutable fo 13. b. and fo 14. a. Thus having stated the point as truely as I can both for the nature of legiance and the object thereof Viz. the King and not the people otherwise then in order to the safety
b. fol. 7. a. which is a word of a vast extent serving rather to amaze mens apprehensions then to inlighten them and therefore the Reporter did well not to trouble himself or the Reader in the clearing or proof thereof but left the Point rather to be beleived then understood nor shall I in the Negative for God himself can have no other Legiance from an English man then absolute Legiance and Kings being as other men subject to erre especially in this Point of Prerogative are much rather subject thereto being misled by such Doctrines as these are The Scripture determines this Point and cuts the knot in sunder The third property of English Legiance which the Reporter insisteth upon is that it is indefinite which he explaineth to be Proprium quarto modo so as it is both Universall and Immutable fol. 5. b. fol. 12. and neither defined by Time Place or Person As touching the Time and Person the Reporter inlarged not at all therefore I shall onely leave the Reader to chew upon the Point supposing himself in the first times of Edward the Fourth when Henry the Sixth was then alive and let him resolve to which of them his Legiance had been due considering them both in their naturall Capacity as the Reporter would have it But as touching the Place it s reported that English Legiance is not onely due from an English man to an English King in England but in all places of the Kings Dominion though otherwise Forrain as to the power of the Law of England yea saith the Reporter as farre as the Kings power of Protection doth extend And yet this had not been enough if the Premises be granted for if this Legiance whereof we speake be absolute and omni soli semper then is it due to the King from an English man ubivis Gentium Neverthelesse to take the Reporter in a moderate sense it is worth consideration whether English Legiance in the dayes of Edward the Third extended as far as the Kings power of Protection when as he had the Crown of France in a Forrain right to that of England In this the Reporter is extreamly Positive upon many grounds which he insisteth upon First he saith that Verus and Fidelis are qualities of the minde and cannot be circumscribed within the predicament of Vbi and upon this ground he might conclude that this Legiance is due to the King from an English man all the world over as well as in all the Kings Dominions but concerning the ground it may be denied for though simply in it selfe considered as a notion Verity or Fidelity are not circumscribed in place yet being qualities of the soul and that being in the body in relation thereunto it may be in the predicament of Vbi for where ever that Body and Soul is there is Faith and Truth according to its modell which though not absolute and indefinite yet if according to the Lawes of the place wherein the man is he is truely said to be Verus Fidelis Secondly the Reporter argueth that the Kings Protection is not Locall or included within the bounds of England therefore also is not the Legiance for Protectio trahit Legiantiam Legiantia Protectionem Had this reason been formed into a Syllogisme it had appeared lesse valuable for the Protection of an English King qua talis of an English man is locall and included within the bounds of the Kingdome But if the same King be also King of France or Duke of Aquitane and an English man shall travell into those parts he is still under the same Kings Protection yet not as King of England but as King of France or Duke of Aquitane otherwise let the party be of France or Aquitane or England all is one he must be whether French or English under an unlimitted absolute Protection without regard had to the Customes or Lawes of the place yea contrary to them which I beleive the Reporter never intended to affirme Thirdly the Reporter falleth upon the matter in Fact and tells us that the King of England did many times De facto grant Protections to Persons in places out of the English Confines and it will not be denied But never was any absolute and indefinite Protection so granted for the Protection extends to defence from injury and all injury is to be expounded and judged according to the Lawes of the place Nor doe any the Presidents vouched by the Reporter clear that the King of England did grant as King of England Protection to any English man in any parts of the Kings Dominion beyond the Seas which was not qualified according to the Lawes and Customes of that place especially it being apparent that an English King may hold Dominion in Forrain parts in Legiance under a Forrain King as Edward the Third held the Dutchy of Guien and therefore cannot grant absolute Protection in such place nor receive absolute Legiance from any person there being Fourthly the Reporter saith that the King of England hath power to command his Subjects of England to goe with him in his Warres as well without the Realm of England as within the same therefore the Legiance of an English man to his King is indefinite and not locall or circumscribed by place or within the Kingdome of England Although the first of these be granted yet will not the inference hold for possibly this may arise from the constitution of a Positive Law and not from naturall or absolute Legiance nor doth any authority by him cited justifie any such Legiance But I cannot agree the first for it is not true that the King hath any such power from his own Personall interest nor doe the authoritie of former Ages warrant any such matter for a fuller disquisition whereof I shall refer the Reader to the eleventh Chapter ensuing because the Whole matter concerning the Militia commeth there to be handled in course Fifthly to close up all the rest the Reporter brings The Testimony of the Judges of the Common Law out of the Testimony of Hengham wherein an Action was brought by a French woman against an English man who refused to answer because the Plaintiffe was a French Woman and not of the Legiance or Faith of England This was disallowed by the Judges because Legiance and Faith was referred to England and not to the King Thereupon the Defendant averred that the Plaintiffe is not of the Legiance of England nor of the Faith of the King And upon this Plea thus amended the Plaintiffe gave over her Action The Reporter from hence observeth that Faith and Legiance is referred to the King indefinitely and generally and therefore it is so due to him The reason might have had more force had the Object of Allegiance or the nature thereof been the point in question but neither of them comming to debate and Allegiance being subjected to England and Faith to the King I see not what more can be concluded from hence but that Allegiance
would have been discontented with the proceedings of the Lords in asserting the Prerogative of a King in that matter of the Scedule if he had perceived any such thing in their purposes Add hereunto that the Lords themselves justified the matter of the Scedule in their own proceedings all which tended to inforce the King to govern according to their Councells and otherwise then suited with his good pleasure By force they removed Gaveston from the Kings presence formerly and afterward the Spencers in the same manner So they removed the King from his Throne and not long after out of the World Last of all I shall make use of one or two Concessions which hath passed the Reporters own Penne in this discourse of his for the maintaining that the Legiance of an English man is neither Naturall nor Absolute nor Indefinite nor due to the Naturall Capacity but qualified according unto Rules The first is this English men doe owe to their Kings Legiance according to the Lawes therefore is it not Naturall or Absolute or Indefinite The inference is necessary for the later is boundlesse and naturall the former is limited and by civill constitution If any branch therefore of English Legiance be bounded by Lawes then the Legiance of an English man is circumscribed and not Absolute or Naturall The major Proposition is granted by the Reporter who saith that the Municipall Lawes of the Kingdome hath prescribed the order and form of Legall Legiance fol. 5. b. And therefore if by the Common Law the Service of the Kings Tenant as of his Mannor be limited how can that consist with the absolute Legiance formerly spoken of which bindeth the Tenant being the Kings Subject to an Absolute and Indefinite Service Or if the Statute-Lawes have settled a Rule according to which each Subject ought to goe to Warre in the Kings Service beyond the Sea as the Reporter granteth fol. 7. 8. Then cannot the Legiance be absolute to binde the Subject to goe to War according to the Kings own pleasure Secondly an English Kings Protection of his Subjects is not Naturall Absolute Indefinite nor Originally extendeth unto them in their Naturall Capacity therefore is not the Legiance of an English Subject to his King Naturall Absolute Indefinite nor Originally extendeth to the King in his Naturall Capacity The dependance of these two resteth upon the Reporters owne words who tells us that Protectio trahit Subjectionem Subjectio Protectionem Protection drawes with it Subjection and Subjection drawes with it Protection so as they are Relata and doe prove mutually one anothers Nature fol. 5. a. And in the same Page a few lines preceding he shewes why this Bond between King and Subject is called Legiance because there is a reciprocall and double Bond for as the Subject is bound in Obedience to the King so is the King bound to the Subject in Protection But the King is not Naturally bound to protect the People because this Bond begins not at his Birth but when the Crown settles upon him Thirdly this Protection is not absolute because the King must maintaine the Lawes fol. 5. a. and the Lawes doe not Protect absolutely any man that is a breaker of the Lawes Fourthly this Protection is not Indefinite because it can extend no further then his Power and his Power no further then his Dominions fol. 9. b. The like also may be instanced in continuance of time Lastly the Kings Protection extendeth not Originally to the Naturall Capacity but to the Politique Capacity therefore till a Forrainer commeth within the Kings Legiance he commeth not within his Protection And the usuall words of a Writ of Protection shewes that the party Protected must be in Obsequio nostro fol. 8. a. The summe then is that as Protection of an English King so neither is Legiance or Subjection of an English man Naturall Absolute Indefinite or terminated in the Naturall Capacity of the King And to make a full Period to the Point and make the same more cleare I shall instance in one President that these times of Edward the Third produced The former English Kings had Title to many Teritories in France but Edward the Third had Title to all the Kingdome And being possibly not so sensible of what he had in possession as of what he had not He enters France in such a way and with that successe that in a little time he gaines the highest Seate therein and so brought much Honour to the English Nation and more then stood with the safety of the Kingdome For in the union of two Kingdoms its dangerous for the smaller least it be swallowed up by the greater This was foreseen by the English who knew England did bear but a small proportion to France and complained of that inconvenience and thereupon a Law was made that the People of England should not be subject to the King or his Heires as Kings of France which manifestly importeth that an English King may put himselfe in such a Posture in which Legiance is not due to him and that this Posture is not onely in Case of Opposition but of diversity when he is King of another Nation and doth not de facto for that Time and Place rule as an English King which if so I suppose this notion of Naturall Absolute and Indefinite Legiance to the King in his Naturall Capacity is out of this Kingdome if not out of the World and then the foot of the whole Account will be that the Legiance of an English man is Originally according to the Lawes The summe of all being comprehended in the joynt safety of the People of England CAHP. IX Of Courts for Causes criminall with their Lawes THe great growth of Courts founded upon Prerogative derogated much in these times from the ancient Courts that formerly had attained the Soveraignty over the People and in the hearts of them all This was a hard Lesson for them to learn but especially of the Kings Bench that was wont to learn of none and yet must be content to part with many of their Plumes to deck the Chancellor much of their work to busie the Prerogative Courts holden Coram Rege and more to those holden Coram Populo I mean The Courts of Oier and Terminer Goale delivery and Juâ—tices of Peace Those of Oier and Terminer were now grown very common but lesse esteemed as being by men of mean regard nominated for the most part by the party that sued out the Commission which for the most part was done in behalfe of those that were in danger and meaned not to be justified by Works but by Grace These escapes though small in the particulars yet in the full summe made the matter so foul as it became a common greivance and a Rule thereupon set by the Parliament for the regulating both of the Judges of such Court and the Causes The Commissions for Goale delivery likewise grew more mean and ordinary The chief sort of men in
the most part grounded upon self respects and private prudence laboured to conceale that which could not be made whole by revealing and by after consent skind over the sore as to themselves which corrupted inwardly and indangered the whole body to cure which a Law is made to restrain such late connivance in the Woman by depriving her both of her Joyncture and Inheritance which otherwise had been saved to her by such compliance as after consent unto such violations CHAP. X. Of the Course of Civill Justice during these Times HOwever the course of the Law concerning matters of the Crown passed in a troubled wave yet in matters of Common Pleas it passed in a calme and full Channell as the Reports in Print doe sufficiently witnesse nor was their any change of Principles but onely some alteration tending to a clearer manifestation of the same I will not touch upon every particular but onely upon two which reflect somewhat upon the Publique pollicy the one touching the course of Inheritance in some particular Cases the other touching pleading in the Courts of Civill Justice The first of these was occasioned from Conjuncture of Affaires the Case being such that Edward the Third had now gotten himselfe a new Kingdome unto that of England and must looke to maintaine that by Power which he obtained by force and conducing thereunto must have continuall imployment of the English in that Service as being most trusty to his Cause And that it is un reasonable that such English as had devoted themselves to his Service in this Cause and in order thereunto had transported themselves and their Families into those Forrain parts should thereby loose the benefit of Leiges in the Birth-right of their Children borne in those Forraine parts Upon consideration had hereof and of a former leading Opinion of the Lawyers and Parliament a Declarative Law was made That all Children borne without the Kings Legiance whose Father and Mother at the time of their Birth shall be under the Faith and Legiance of the King of England shall have the benefit of Inheritance within the same Legiance as other Inheritors have These are the words of the Statute and doe occasion a double observation one from the matter the other from the manner of the Expression The Subject matter is so delivered not as an Introduction of a new Law but as a Declarative of the old that lay more obscurely hidden for want of occasion to reveale it and the substance thereof resteth onely in this to enable the Children of English Natives borne beyond the Seas not the Children of those that are of Forraine birth though within the Kings Teritories in those parts as the opinion hath beene nor doth any ancient President or Case warrant the same as might be at large manifested if it might conduce to the end of this discourse and for the same cause after this Statute when as the Commons would have had a generall Naturalizing of all Infants borne beyond the Sea within the Kings Segniories the same would not be granted otherwise then according to the former Statute and the Common Law That which in the next place concerneth the manner of expression is this That a Childe is said to be borne out of the Kings Legiance and yet the Father and Mother at the same time to be of the Faith and Legiance of the King of England It seemeth to me that it intendeth onely those Children of English Parents borne within the Kings Teritories beyond the Seas because the words insuing concerning Certification of Bastardy of such Children are that the same shall be made by the Bishop of such place upon the Kings Writ directed to him which could never have passed into those places that are not of the Kings Teritories and so the Issue will be that the Legiance of those born in those parts though they are Leiges to the King yet they are not of the Legiance of the King of England but as Lord of that Teritory The other matter to be observed concerning pleading in the Courts of Civill Justice is this That whereas anciently from the Normans time till these times the pleadings were in the Norman tongue they shall be henceforth in English out of an inconvenience I beleive rather supposed then felt for though some kinde of knowledge of Law-termes may be increased thereby yet unlesse that shall be professedly studied it will breed nothing but Notions and they an overweening conceit which many times sets men to suites in Law to their owne losse like some weake influence of the Celestiall bodies that are strong enough to stirre up humours but not to expell them or draw them out However even thus in part is the reproach of Normandy rolled away like that of Egypt from the Israelites at Mount Gilgall CHAP. XI Of the Militia in these Times WArre is ever terrible but if just and well governed majesticall the one may excite resistance and defence but the other Conquers before blow given because it convinceth the judgement and so prevails upon the Conscience For that heart can never be resolute in its own defence that is at Warre with its own understanding nor can such a heart consider such a Warre otherwise then as Divine and bearing the face of an Ordinance of God and then how can the Issue be unsuccessfull It is no strange thing for Kings to miscarry in their Warres because it s rarely seen that they are under good Councell but if a Christian Councell miscarry we may conclude it extraordinary in the efficient Cause and no lesse wonderful in the issue and end Upon this ground it concerneth a Christian Nation not onely in point of Honour but of safety and continuance to settle fundamentall Lawes for War against time of War as of Peace in time of Peace Neither was England deficient herein saving that ancient times were more obscure in the particulars and these dayes revealed them at such a time wherein we may say that Edward the Third approved himself not onely King of England but of himself above the ordinary strain of expectation for being now become a famous Commander and Conquerour having also an Army inured to fight and overcome and so might have given a Law he neverthelesse received the same submitting both it and himself to the Directory of the Parliament in making a Warre with France which was three to one against him in every respect but in the Title besides the disadvantage from Scotland that lay continually beating upon his reare The like may be observed of his Warre with Scotland in both which he evidently telleth the World that he held it unreasonable to enter upon the managing of an offensive Forraine Warre without the concurrence of the common consent of the people and that not onely for the thing it selfe but also for his owne personall ingagement in the Service For a King though he be the Generalissimo yet is he so from the people and his person being of that
THE CONTINUATION OF AN HISTORICALL DISCOURSE OF THE GOVERNMENT OF ENGLAND Vntill the end of the Reigne of Queene ELIZABETH WITH A Preface being a Vindication of the ancient way of Parliaments in ENGLAND By Nath Bacon of Grais-Inne Esquire LONDON Printed by Tho Roycroft for Matthew Walbanck and Henry Twyford and are to be sold at Grais-Inne Gate and in Vine Court Middle Temple 1651. The Contents of the severall Chapters of this Book I. THe sum of the severall Reignes of Edward the third and Richard the second fol. 3. II. The state of the King and Parliament in relation of him to it and of it to him fol. 13. III. Of the Privy Council and the condition of the Lords f. 26. IV. Of the Chancery fol. 35. V. Of the Admirals Court. fol. 41. VI. Of the Church-mens Interest fol. 45. VII Concerning Trade fol. 64. VIII Of Treason and Legiance with some considerations concerning Calvins Case fol. 76. IX Of Courts for causes criminall with their Laws fo 92. X. Of the course of Civill Justice during these times fo 96. XI Of the Militia in these times fol. 98. XII Of the Peace fol. 108. XIII A view of the summary courses of Henry the fourth Henry the fifth and Henry the sixth in their severall Reignes fol. 115. XIV Of the Parliament during the Reignes of these severall Kings fol. 127. XV. Of the Custos or Protector Regni fol. 134. XVI Concerning the Privy Councell fol. 141. XVII Of the Clergie and Church-government during these times fol. 146. XVIII Of the Court of Chancery fol. 162. XIX Of the Courts of Crown Plas and Common Law fo 165 XX. Concerning Sheriffs fol. 168. XXI Of Justices and Lawes concerning the Peace fol. 170. XXII Of the Militia during these times fol. 175. XXIII A short survey of the Reignes of Edward the fourth Edward the fifth and Richard the third fol. 181. XXIV Of the Government in relation to the Parliament fol. 187. XXV Of the condition of the Clergie fol. 191. XXVI A short sum of the Reignes of Henry the seventh and Henry the eighth fol. 194. XXVII Of the condition of the Crowne fol. 202. XXVIII Of the condition of the Parliament in these times fol. 223. XXIX Of the power of the Clergy in the Convocation f. 229. XXX Of the power of the Clergy in their ordinary Jurisdiction fol. 232. XXXI Of Judicature fol. 241. XXXII Of the Militia fol. 245. XXXIII Of the Peace fol. 253. XXXIV Of the generall Government of Edward the sixth Queen Mary and Queen Elizabeth fol. 259. XXXV Of the Supream power during these times fol. 268. XXXVI Of the power of the Parliament during these times fol. 277. XXXVII Of the Jurisdiction Ecclesiasticall during these last times fol. 283. XXXVIII Of the Militia in these later times fol. 290. XXXIX Of the Peace fol. 297. XL. A summary Conclusion upon the whole matter fol. 300. A PREFACE CONTAINING A Vindication of the Ancient way of the Parliament OF ENGLAND THE more Words the more Faults is a divine Maxime that hath put a stop to the publishing of this second part for some time but observing the ordinary humor still drawing off and passing a harsher censure upon my intentions in my first part then I expected I doe proceede to fulfill my course that if censure will be it may be upon better grounds when the whole matter is before Herein I shall once more minde that I meddle not with the Theologicall right of Kings or other Powers but with the Civill right in fact now in hand And because some mens Pens of late have ranged into a denyall of the Commons ancient right in the Legislative power and others even to adnull the right both of Lords and Commons therein resolving all such power into that one principle of a King Quicquid libet licet so making the breach much wider then at the beginning I shall intend my course against both As touching the Commons right jointly with the Lords it will be the maine end of the whole but as touching the Commons right in competition with the Lords I will first endeavour to remove out of the way what I finde published in a late Tractate concerning that matter and so proceede upon the whole The subject of that Discourse consisteth of three parts one to prove that the ancient Parliaments before the thirteenth Century consisted onely of those whom we now call the House of Lords the other that both the Legislative and Judiciall power of the Parliament rested wholly in them lastly that Knights Citizens and Burgesses of Parliament or the House of Commons were not knowne nor heard of till punier times then these This last will be granted Viz. That these severall titles of Knights Citizens and Burgesses were not known in Parliament till of later times Neverthelesse it will be insisted upon that the Commons were then there The second will be granted but in part Viz. That the Lords had much power in Parliament in point of Jurisdiction but neither the sole nor the whole The first is absolutely denyed neither is the same proved by any one instance or pregnant ground in all that Book and therefore not cleerly demonstrated by Histories and Records beyond contradiction as the Title page of that Book doth hold forth to the World First because not one instance in all that Book is exclusive to the Commons and so the whole Argument of the Discourse will conclude Ab authoritate Negativa which is no argument in humane testimony at all Secondly the greatest number of instances in that Booke are by him supposed to concerne Parliaments or generall Councils of this Nation holden by the Representative thereof whereas indeed they were either but Synodicall Conventions for Church matters whereunto the poore Commons he well knoweth might not come unlesse in danger of the Canons dint or if they did yet had no other worke there then to heare learne and receive Lawes from the Ecclesiasticks And the Lords themselves though present yet under no other notion were they then as Councell to the King whom they could not cast out of their Councell till after Ages though they often endeavoured it Thirdly the Author of that Tractate also well knoweth that Kings usually made Grants and Infeodations by advice of the Lords without the ayde of the Parliament And it is no lesse true that Kings with the Lords did in their severall ages exercise ordinarily Jurisdiction in cases of distributive Justice especially after the Norman entrance For the step was easie from being Commanders in Warr to be Lords in peace but hard to lay downe that power at the foot of Justice which they had usurped in the rude times of the Sword when men labour for life rather then liberty and no lesse difficult to make a difference between their deportment in commanding of Souldiers and governing of Countrey-men till peace by continuance had reduced them to a little more sobriety Nor doth it seeme irrationall that private differences
betweene party and party should be determined in a more private way then to trouble the whole Representative of the Kingdome with matters of so meane concernment If then those Councils mentioned by the Author which concerne the Kings Grants and Infeodations and matters of Judicature be taken from the rest of the Presidents brought by him to maintaine the thing aimed at I suppose scarce one stone will be left for a foundation to such a glorying Structure as is pretended in the Title page of that Booke And yet I deny not but where such occasions have befalne the Parliament sitting it hath closed with them as things taken up by the way Fourthly It may be that the Author hath also observed that all the Records of Antiquity passed through if not from the hands of the Clergy onely and they might thinke it sufficient for them to honour their Writings with the great Titles of Men of Dignity in the Church and Common-wealth omitting the Commons as not worthy of mention and yet they might be there then present as it will appeare they were in some of the particular instances ensuing to which we come now in a more punctuall consideration The first of these by his owne words appeare to be a Church-mote or Synod it was in the yeare 673. called by the Arch-Bishop who had no more power to summon a Parliament then the Author himselfe hath And the severall conclusions made therein doe all shew that the people had no worke there as may appeare in the severall relations thereof made by Matthew Westminster and Sir Henry Spelman an Author that he maketh much use of and therefore I shall be bold to make the best use of him that I can likewise in Vindicating the truth of the point in hand For whatever this Councill was it s the lesse materiall seeing the same Author recites a president of King Aâ—thelbert within six yeares after Austins entry into this Island which was long before this Councill which bringeth on the Vann of all the rest of the Opponents instances which King called a Councill styled Commune Concilium tam Cleri quam Populi and in the conclusion of the same a Law is made upon the like occasion Si Rex populum Convocaverit c. in both which its evident that in those times there were Councils holden by the People as well as the Magnates or Optimates His next instance is in the yeare 694. which is of a Councill holden by the Great Men but no mention of the Commons and this he will have to be a Parliament albeit that he might have found both Abbatesses or Women and Presbyters to be Members of that Assembly and for default of better attested the conclusions of the same notwithstanding the Canon Nemo militans Deo c. But I must also minde him that the same Author reciteth a Councill holden by King Ina Suasu omnium Aldermannorum Seniorum Sapientum Regni and is very probable that all the Wise men of the Kingdome were not concluded within the Lordly dignity The third instance can have no better successe unlesse he will have the Pope to be allowed power to call a Parliament or allow the Arch-Bishop power to doe that service by the Popes command for by that authority this what ever it be was called if we give credit to the relation of Sir Henry Spelman who also reciteth another Councell within three leaves foregoing this called by Withered at Barkhamstead unto which the Clergy were summoned Qui cum viris utique militaribus communi omnium assensu has leges decrevere So as it seemeth in those times Souldiers or Knights were in the common Councels as well as other Great Men. In the next place he bringeth in a Councill holden in the yeare 747. which if the Arch-Bishop were then therein President as it s sayd in the presence of the King was no Parliament but a Church-mote and all the conclusions in the same doe testifie no lesse they being every one concerning Ecclesiasticall matters And furthermore before this time the Author out of whom he citeth this Councill mentioneth another Councill holden by Ina the Saxon King in the presence of the Bishops Princes Lords Earles and all the wise old Men and People of the Kingdome all of them concluding of the intermarriage between the Brittons Picts and Saxons which formerly as it seemeth was not allowed And the same King by his Charter mentioned by the same Penman noteth that his endowment of the Monastry of Glastenbury was made not onely in the presence of the Great Men but Cum praesentia populationis and he saith that Omnes confirmaverunt which I doe not mention as a worke necessary to be done by the Parliament yet such an one as was holden expedient as the case then stood Forty yeares after hee meeteth with another Councill which he supposeth to be a Parliament also but was none unlesse he will allow the Popes Legate power to summon a Parliament It was holden in the yeare 787. and had he duely considered the returne made by the Popes Legate of the Acts of that Councill which is also published by the same Author hee might have found that the Legate saith that they were propounded in publike Councill before the King Arch-Bishop and all the Bishops and Abbots of the Kingdome Senators Dukes or Captaines and people of the Land and they all consented to keep the same Then he brings in a Councill holden in the year 793. which he would never have set downe in the list of Parliaments if he had considered how improper it is to construe Provinciale tenuit Concilium for a Parliament and therefore I shall need no further to trouble the Reader therewith The two next are supposed to be but one and the same and it s sayd to be holden Anno 974. before nine Kings fifteene Bishops twenty Dukes c. which for ought appeares may comprehend all England and Scotland and is no Parliament of one Nation but a party of many Nations for some great matter no doubt yet nothing in particular mentioned but the solemne laying the foundation of the Monastry of Saint-Albans What manner of Councill the next was appeareth not and therefore nothing can be concluded therefrom but that it was holden in the yeare 796. That Councill which is next produced was in the yeare 800. and is called in great letters Concilium Provinciale which he cannot Gramatically construe to be a Parliament yet in the Preface it is sayd that there were Viri cujuscunque dignitatis and the King in his Letter to the Pope saith concerning it Visum est cunctis gentis nostrae sapientibus so as it seemeth by this and other examples of this nature that though the Church-motes invented the particular conclusions yet it was left to the Witagen-mote to Judge and conclude them There can be no question but the next three Presidents brought by the Opponent were all of
set down It belongeth to the Parliament to declare Treason yet if I were a Peere and were commanded I should agree So did Thorning under-write and thereunto also consented Rickill and Sir Walter Clopton the last being chief Justice of the Kings Bench the first chief Justice of the Common-Pleas and the second another Judge of the same Bench. The summe in plainer sense is that if they were Peeres they would agree but as Judges they will be silent And thus the Parliament of England by the first of these foure last mentioned conclusions attainted themselves by the second yeilded up their liberties by the third their lives and by the last would have done more or been lesse And to fill up the measure of all they assigned over a right of Legislative Power unto six Lords and three Commons and yet the King not content superadded that it should be Treason for any man to indeavor to repeal any of their determinations The Common-wealth thus underneath the King tramples upon all at once for having espied the shadow of a Crown fleeting from him in Ireland he pursues it leaves the noble Crown of England in the base condition of a Farme subject to strip and waste by mean men and crosses the Irish Seas with an Army This was one of Englands Climactericall years under a disease so desperate that no hope was left but by a desperate Cure by sudden bleeding in the head and cutting off that Member that is a principle of motion in the Body For it was not many moneths ere the winde of affaires changed the King now in Ireland another steps into the Throne the noise hereof makes him return afarr of inraged but the nigher he comes the cooler he growes his conscience revives his courage decayes and leaving his Army his Lordship Kingdome and Libertie behinde as a naked man submits himself to release all homage and fealtie to resigne his Crown and Dignitie his Titles and Authoritie to acknowledge himself unworthy and insufficient to reign to swear never to repent of his Resignation thus if he will have any quiet this wilfull man he must be content for the future neither to will nor desire And poore England must for a time bee contented with a dolefull condition in which the King cannot rule and the Parliament will not and the whole body like a Chäos capable of any form that the next daring spirit shall brood upon it CHAP. II. Of the State of the King and Parliament in relation of it to him and him to it A King in Parliament is like the first-born of Jacob The excellencie of Dignitie and the excellencie of Power but alone unstable as water Examples of both these we have in these two Kings Whereof the first was Crowned by the Parliament and Crowned it the latter also Crowned it but with Thornes and yet the Parliament in all held on that wise way that it neither exceeded its own bounds nor lost its own right I shall enter into the consideration of particulars under these heads First In relation more immediately to the interest of the King Secondly To the interest of the Kingdome in generall The King though higher then all the people by the head and so hath the Prerogative of Honour as the most worthy yet his strength and abilities originally doe rise from beneath otherwise he is but like a Generall without an Army the Title big but aiery and many times his person subject to so much danger that in stead of drawing the eyes of all the people to look upon him with admiration they are drawn to look to him with observation and in this respect he may be said to be lesse his own man and more the Kingdomes then any of the inferiour sort This befell in both these Kings in a speciall manner each entering upon the grand government of a Kingdome before they were able to understand the work or govern themselves and therefore were under power of Protectors for the guard of their Persons and their Education and of the Parliament for Councell and Direction in Cases relating to the Kingdome The chide of a mean man when its Parents are dead is Filus Amici but of a King is Filius Populi to be by them trained up in such manner that he may be Pater populi when he is come to age In the mean time though he be a King yet his Person like a precious Jem must not out of the ring but must be directed by Councell though under some kind of restraint the Councellors all the while no Offenders in such Cases against the Prerogative Royall And therefore though it be true that Kings grow faster then other men and sooner come to full age then they yet Edward the third now in his sixteenth yeare might not passe over Sea into France though it were for restoring of Peace but by direction of the Parliament nor is it meet in such Cases that Kings should stand upon the Prerogative of a Negative Secondly it may likewise be said that his Family is lesse his owne as he is a man then another mans For private Families are no further under the publique Law then in relation to the publique Peace to punish after breach made But the Families of Kings are looked upon by all in relation to the honour and profit of the Publique not onely because the Kings servants have by their nigh attendance upon his Person a more powerfull influence into his actions which may reflect a malevolent aspect upon the whole course of affaires if they be not better ordered that are so nigh him But more especially in regard that the government and order of the Royall Family trencheth deep upon the Honor of the Kingdome and purses of the People who are concerned to see the same accommodated sutable to the State and Port which the Nation would bear forth to the World And therefore for the Parliament to intermeddle in the Kings Family is not forrain nor new Alice Piers was a Familier if not of the Family of Edward the third yet both her selfe and others of that Family were complained of as a grievance Richard the second was once a young man and ever a young King and what Edward the third wanted onely in his youth and in his infirme old age this man ever wanted for he that knew not how to govern himselfe how much lesse could he govern his Family And if in this condition the Parliament become his Stewards to set a yearely Survey and Check upon his Servants and Family in order to good order of the same and Kingdome otherwise men must conclude it did that which was just though Richard the second and those of his minde thinke not so But this is not all Kings have not onely such as serve the outward man but some that serve their Consciences of old time called Confessors in those dayes without name for feare of Superstition yet the thing remaineth still in some well favored Chaplain and
he made the penalty of Praemuniri to extend to all Farmores or others in nature of Bailiffs that held any Church maintenance to the use of any alien and unto all Aliens that are Purchasors of such Provisions to any use and unto all Lieges that shall in like manner purchase such Provisions But as touching such as shall accept such provisions he ordained Banishment for their Persons and Forfeiture of their Estate Notwithstanding all this the Romane Horse-leach would not so give over The King grew into displeasure with his Subjects and they with him and with one another they see the Pope still on Horseback and fear that the English Clergy their own Countrey men if not Friends and Abbettors yet are but faint and feigned Enemies to the Popes Cause Nor was it without Cause that their fear was such for as the Pope had two hands to receive so they had two hearts making show of forming blowes at the Pope but then alwayes at a distance or when without the Popes Guard and thus the Lawes begin to stammer and cannot speake so plain English as they were wont The people hereat offended resolve to put the Clergy into the Van and to try their mettle to the full At the last Parliament that Richard the Second did hold both the Lords Temporall and Spirituall are opposed one by one The Lords Temporall like themselves resolve and enter their Resolutions to defend the right of the Crowne in the Cases of Provisors although even amongst these great men all were not equally resolute for Sir William Brian had purchased the Popes Excommunication against some that had committed Burglary and he was committed to the Tower for his labour But the Prelates answer was ambiguous and with modifications which was all one to cry as men use to say Craven yet was the Statute made peremptory according to what was formerly Enacted And though the Prelates cautionary way of proceeding might be a principall reason why the Popes power held so long in England in an usurping way yet Kings also much conduced thereto by seeking too much their Personall ease above the Honour of their Place and the Popes blessings and opinion of his Favour more then their owne good or the Peoples liberty for there was no other balme for a distracted minde then that which dropped from the Popes lips In like manner Richard the Second being already at least in purpose estranged from his People sought to get freinds at Rome to hold by the Spirituall Sword what he was in danger to loose by laying aside the Sword of Justice which is the surest Tenure for Kings to hold by And though the Popedome was now under a Schisme between two Popes Clement and Vrban yet he was so farre won for Vrban that he not onely ingaged himselfe and the Parliament to determine his Election and uphold the same but also Ex abundante did by Implication allow to him an Indefinite Power to grant Provisions and so at once he lost the Die and gained a Stake that like a bubble looked faire but soon vanished away Neverthelesse these two Comrades whiles they were together resolved to make the most of each other that they could and therefore though the Popedome liked not the King yet the Pope had his love so farre as he could deny himselfe for he had already denied his Kingdome And if the Articles exhibited against the King by Henry the Fourth be true the Pope had his Faith also For that he might be rid of his reputed Enemy Arch Bishop Arundell he trusted the Pope with that Complement of making Walden Arch Bishop of Canterbury in Arundells stead which the Pope tooke so kindly as he made it a President for Provisors for the future Nor did the King stick in this one Singular but made it his Custome in passing of Lawes especially such as the King was most devoted unto to put more Confidence in the Popes Amen then in all the Prayers of his Commons with his owne Soit fait to boot The summe then will be that the Prize was now well begun concerning the Popes power in England Edward the Third made a fair blow and drew blood Richard the Second seconded him but both retired the former left the Pope to lick himself whole the later gave him a salve and yet it proved a Gangrene in the conclusion The second means used to bring down the power of the Pope in this Nation was to abate the power or height of the English Clergy for though the times were not so cleare as to espy the Root of a Pope in Prelacy yet experience had taught them that they were so nigh ingaged that they would not part And therefore first they let these men know that Prelacy was no Essentiall Member to the Government of the Kingdome but as there was a Government established before that ranke was known so there may be the like when it is gone For Edward the Third being troubled with a quarrell between the two Arch Bishops of Canterbury and Yorke concerning Superiority in bearing the Crosse and the important Affaires of Scotland so urging Summoned a Parliament at Yorke which was fain to be delaied and adjourned for want of appearance and more effectuall Summons issued forth but at the day of Adjournment none of the Clergy of the Province of Canterbury would be there and upon this Occasion the Parliament was not onely interrupted in their proceedings but an ill president was made for men to be bold with the Kings Summons in such Cases as liked not them and thereupon a Statute was made to inforce Obedience upon Citizens and Burgesses and such Ecclesiasticks as held per Baroniam Neverthelesse when the matters concerning Provisors began to come upon the Stage which was within two yeares after that Law was made the Clergy found that matter too warme for them and either did not obey the Summons or come to the Parliament or if they came kept aloofe or if not so would not Vote or if that yet order their tongues so as nothing was certainly to be gathered but their doubtfull or rather double minde These Prelates thus discovered the Parliament depended no more upon them further then they saw meet At sixe or seven Parliaments determined matters without their Advice and such as crossed the Principles of these men and therefore in a rationall way might require their Sense above all the rest had they not beene prepossessed with prejudice and parties in the matter Nor did Edward the Third ever after hold their Presence at so high Repute at such meetings and therefore Summoned them or so many of them as he thought meet for the Occasion sometimes more somtimes fewer and at a Parliament in his fourty and seventh yeare he Summoned onely foure Bishops and five Abbots And thus the matter in Fact passed in these times albeit the Clergy still made their claim of Vote and desired the same to be entered upon Record And
or more or in what place the same be settled untill the Manufacture was grown to some stature and then the place became Litigious The benefit of Exportation pretended much interest in the settling thereof beyond the Sea but in truth it was another matter of State for when it was beyond sea it was a moveable Engine to Convey the Kings pleasure or displeasure as the King pleased for it was a great benefit to the Countrey or place where ever it settled or else it moved or stayed according to the inclination of the people where it was either for Warre or Peace But on the contrary the Interest of the People began to interpose strongly and for these Causes the Parliament likewise intermedâ—ed in the place and thus the Scene is altered some times it s beyond the Seas in one place or in another sometimes in England In Edward the Thirds time we finde it sometimes at Calis sometimes in England In Richard the Seconds time we finde it again beyond the Seas at Middleburgh thence removed to Calis and after into England where at length the People understood themselves so well that the Parliament settled the same it being found to burdensome for the Manufactures to travell tâ— the Staple beyond the Seas for the Commodity that grew at their owne doores besides the inhancing of the price by reason of the carriage which falling also upon the Manufactures must needs tend to the damage of the whole Kingdome This was one way indeed and yet possibly another might have been found for if a Computation had been made of the main Stock and a Staple settled within the Kingdom for that and the overplus exported to a Staple beyond the Sea it might have proved no lesse commodious and more complying It is very true that there are many that call for the liberty of the People that every man may sell his own Commodity as he pleases and it were well that men would consider themselves as well in their Relations as in their own Personall respects for if every man were independent his liberty would be in like manner independent but so long as any man is a Member of a Common-wealth his liberty must likewise depend upon the good of the Common-wealth and if it be not good for the Nation that every man should sell his owne Commodity as he pleaseth he may claim the liberty as a Free man but not as an English man nor is that liberty just so long as his Countrey hath an interest in his Commodity for its safety and welfare as in his own person I doe not assert the manner of buying the Staple Commodities by Merchants of the Staple to sell the same again in kinde for their private advantage divers limitations must concur to save it from an unlawfull ingrossing nor doth it appear to me that the Staplers in these times used such course or were other then meer Officers for the regulating of the Staple in nature of a Court of Piepouders belonging to some Faire or Market Neverthelesse I conjecture that it may well be made evident from Principles of State that Mart Markets and Staples of Commodities that are of the proper Ofspring of this Nation are as necessary to Trade as Conduits are to places that want water The seventh and last means that was set on foot in these times for the advance of Trade was the regulating of the Mint and the current of Money This is the life and soule of Trade for though exchange of Commodities may doe much yet it cannot be for all because it is not the lot of all to have exchangeable Commodities nor to work for Apparell and Victuall Now in the managing of this tricke of Money two things are principally looked unto First that the Money be good and currant Secondly that it should be plentifull As touching the excellency of the Money severall Rules were made as against imbasing of Money against Forrain Money not made currant against counterfeit and false Money For according to the goodnesse of the Money so will the Trade be more or lesse for the Merchant will rather loose in the price of his Commodity in Money then in exchange for other Commodity because the vallue thereof is lesse certain and the Transportation more chargeable Secondly as touching the plentie of Money that is as necessary to the advance of the Trade as of the goodness of it for according to the plenty thereof will be the plenty of the Manufactures because Handy-crafts men having no Commodities but their labour cannot work for exchange nor can exchange supply Rents and maintenance to the greater sort of people To this end therefore it is provided against melting of Money and Exportation of Silver and Gold And yet to incourage or not discourage Importation of Silver and Gold liberty was given to every man to Export so much as they did Import provided that what they carry away must be of the new stamp or Minted in this Nation By this means Bullion came in with probability that much thereof would remain in the Nation in liew of Commodities exported or if not the greater part yet at least the Mint gained and that was some benefit to the Nation Thirdly for the fuller currence of the Money the Mint was established in severall parts of this Kingdome according to the ancient custome and this was advantageous both to the Mint and to the stocke of Money in the Kingdome This establishment was with this difference that though the Mint was settled by the Parliament yet the Exchange was left to the Directory of the King and his Councell because the Exchange is an uncertain thing subject to sudden alteration in other Nations and its necessary that in this Countrey it be as suddenly ballanced with the Exchange in other Countreyes or in a short time the Nation may receive extreame damage In regard whereof and many other sudden exigencies in Trade it seemeth to me convenient That a particular Councell were established for continuall influence into all parts of these Dominions to take into consideration the quantity of the Staple Commodities necessary to be retained as a Stock at home for the use of the People and the Manufactures and accordingly to ballance the Trade of Exportation and Importation by opening and inlarging or shutting and straitning the Streame as occasion doth require And lastly to watch the course of the Exchange in Forrain Parts and to parallell the course thereof in this Land thereto For otherwise the Publique must necessarily suffer so long as Private men seeke their own particular interests onely in their course of Trade CHAP. VIII Of Legiance and Treason with some Considerations upon Calvins Case AS times change manners so doe manners change Lawes For it s the wisedome of a State when it cannot over-rule occasion to pursue and turn it to the best issue it can Multitude of Lawes therefore are not so much a sore to the People as a Symptome of a
from the Truth some of the common Books have the words thus None shall be destrained to goe out of their Counties unlesse for cause of necessity and of sudden coming of Strangers or Enemies into the Kingdome Others reade it thus But where necessity requireth and the coming of strange Enemies into the Kingdome The Kings answer to the Parliaments Declaration concerning the Commission of Array would reade it thus Vnlesse in case of Necessity or of sudden coming of strange Enemies c. But the words in the Roll are these Et que nulls ne soient distresses d'aller hors de les Countees Si non pur Cause de necessity de suddaine venue des Stranges Enemies en Reqaulme In English thus word for word And that none be destrained to goe out of the Counties if not for cause of Necessity of sudden coming of strange Enemies into or in the Kingdome which words determine the Point That none shall be by Commission of Array drawn out of their County but in case of Necessity And secondly that this Case of Necessity is onely the coming of strange Enemies into or in the Kingdome so as probably the Invasion must be actuall before they be drawn out of their Counties and not onely feared and it must be a sudden Invasion and not of publique note and common fame foregoing for then the ordinary course either of Parliament or otherwise must be used to call those that are bound by Statute or Tenures or Volunteires to that Service seeing every Invasion is not so fatall as to require a Commission for a Generall Array Against what hath been thus noted the judgement of Sir Edward Coke in Calvins Cafe lies yet in the way who affirmeth that the Subjects of England are bound by their Legiance to goe with the King in his Warres as well within the Realme as without and this Legiance he telleth us is that Naturall Legiance which he saith is absolute and Indefinite c. and not Locall which if not so then were not the English bound to go out of England an inference that is neither necessary nor is the thing affirmed certain It is not necessary because English men may be bound to goe out of England by vertue of their Tenures particular Contract or else by speciall Act of Parliament and not by vertue of that Naturall Legiance which in Truth is no where Now for the maintenance of the Point the Reporter alledgeth two Statutes affirming the thing and Common practice and lastly Authorities of the Judges of the Common Law As touching the Statutes one in Henry the Sevenths time and the other in Edward the Sixths time I shall speake of them in the succeeding times when we come at them for they are no Warrant of the Law in these times whereof we now treat much lesse is the modern practice of these later dayes a Demonstration of the Law in the times of Edward the Third nor of the Nature of the Law in any time seeing that it is obvious to times as well as particular Persons to doe and suffer things to be done which ought not so to be and therefore I shall for the present lay those two Considerations aside But as touching the Opinions of the Judges of the Common Law two Cases are cited in the Affirmative which seeme in the Negative and the rest conclude not to the Point The first of the two cases is the opinion of Justice Thirning in the time of Henry the Fourth word for word thus A Protection lies for the Defendant in a Writ upon the Statute of Labourers and yet the Defendant shall not have such matter by way of Plea Viz. That the King hath retained him to goe beyond the Sea for the King cannot compell a man to goe out of the Kingdome That is as the Reporter saith Not without Wages intimating thereby that if the King shall tender wages to any man he must goe whither the King shall please to send him which is not onely destructive to the opinion of Thirning concerning the Plea but also though granted is destructive to the Reporters judgement in the main point For if an English man may refuse to goe without wages then is he not bound to goe by any naturall absolute Legiance as the Reporter would have it And as touching the second Case which is Bigots and Bohuns Case it cleareth the same thing for it was resolved that they ought to goe but in manner and form according to the Statutes then is not the ground in the absolute Legiance for that is not qualified but in the Positive Statute-Law which tieth onely in manner and form and that by voluntary consent in Parliament The rest of the Cases do neither conclude the main point nor the particular thing that the Reporter intendeth for he would imply to the Reader that English men were anciently used to be imprested for the Warres in France and hereunto he voucheth one Authority out of ancient Reports of Law in Edward the Thirds time one authority in the time of Henry the Fourth and three in the time of Henry the Sixth none of all which doe speake one word concerning impresting and that in Edward the hird doth imply the contrary for the Case is that in a Praecipe quod reddat a Protection was offered by the Defendant as appointed to goe beyond Sea with the Duke of Lancaster and the Plaintiffes Councell alledged that the Defendant had been beyond Sea with the Duke and was returned To this the Defendants Councell answered that the Duke was ready to return again and for this cause the Protection was allowed Yet a Quere is made upon this ground that it might be that the Defendant would not goe over with him nor was it proved that he would which sheweth plainly the party was not imprested for then the thing had not been in his power to will or nill The last instance that the Reporter produceth is that of Forinsecum Servitium or Forrain Service and that seemerh to be Knight Service to be performed abroad But this falleth short of the Reporters intention in three respects First though it belongeth to the King yet not to him onely but to other cheif Lords so saith Bracton Secondly it is not due from every English man And lastly it is a Service due by vertue of Tenure and then the Conclusion will be That which is due by Tenure of Lands is not due by naturall and absolute Legiance and so this Forrain Service arising meerly by compact and agreement between Lord and Tenant and not by the naturall duty of an English born Subject which is the thing that the Reporter driveth at in all this discourse will be so far from maintaining the Reporters opinion as it will evidently destroy the same And thus the Posture of this Nation in the Feild remaineth regular in the rule what ever hath been said against it notwithstanding that in the very instant of Action there may be some
feminine Spirit which they sent over into England to be their Queen and in one Civill Warre shedding more English blood by the English Sword then they could formerly doe by all the men of France were revenged upon England to the full at the English mens own charge For what the English gain by the Sword is commonly lost by discourse A Kingdome is never more befooled then in the Marriage of their King if the Lady be great she is good enough though as Jezabell she will not either reverence her Husband obey her Lord and King nor regard his People And thus was this Kingdome scourged by a marriage for the sinne of the Wise men that building upon a false Foundation advised the King in the breach of Contract with the Earle of Arminiacks Daughter And thus the King also for that hearkning to such Councell he murthered the Duke of Glocester that had been to him a Father yeilded up his Power to his Queen A Masterlesse and proud Woman that made him like a broken Idol without use suffered a Recovery of his Crown and Scepter in the Parliament from his owne Issue to the Line of Yorke then renewing the Warre at his Queens beck lost what he had left of his Kingdome Countrey and Liberty and like the King that forgot the kindnesse of Jehojada lost his life by the hand of his Servant CHAP. XIV Of the Parliament during the Reignes of these Kings THe interest of the Parliament of England is never more Predominant then when Kings want Title or Age The first of these was the Case of Henry the Fourth immediately but of them all in relation to the pretended Law of the Crown but Henry the Sixth had the disadvantage of both whereof in its due place The pretended Law of the Crown of England is to hold by Inheritance with power to dispose of the same in such manner by such means and unto such persons as the King shall please To this it cannot be denied divers Kings had put in their claimes by devising their Crowne in their last Will but the successe must be attributed to some Power under God that must be the Executor when all is done and which must in Cases of Debate concerning Succession determine the matter by a Law best known to the Judge himselfe Not much unlike hereunto is the Case of Henry the Fourth who like a Bud putting up in the place of a fading Leafe dismounts his Predecessor First from the Peoples regard and after from his Throne which being empty some times he pretending the resignation of his Predecessor to him other whiles an obscure Title by descent his Conscience telling him all the while that it was the Sword that wrought the worke But when he comes to plead his Title to Forrain Princes by Protestation laying aside the mention of them all he justifies upon the unanimous consent of the Parliament and the People in his own onely Person And so before all the World confessed the Authority and power of the Parliament of England in disposing of the Crown in speciall Cases as a sufficient barr unto any pretended right that might arise from the House of Mortimar And yet because he never walks safely that hath an Enemy pursuing him still within reach he bethinks himself not sure enough unlesse his next Successors follow the dance upon the same foote to this end an Act of Parliament leades the tune whereby the Crowne is granted or confirmed to Henry the Fourth for life and intailed upon his Sonnes Thomas John and Humphrey by a Petition presented 5. Hen. 4. Thus Henry the Fourth to save his owne stake brought his Posterity into the like capacity with himselfe that they must be Kings or not subsist in the World if the House of Yorke prevailes and so he becomes secured against the House of Yorke treading on his heeles unlesse the Parliament of England shall eat their owne word However for the present the House of Lancaster hath the Crown intailed and the Inheritance is left in the Clouds to be revealed in due time For though this was the first president of this kinde yet was it not the last wherein the Parliament exercised a Power by Grant or Confirmation to direct the Law and Course of the Crown as they pleased The due consideration hereof will make the things that follow lesse strange For the Parliament according to occasion as the Supreame power of this Kingdome exercised Supreame Jurisdiction in order to the safety of the Kingdome as if no King had beene to be found in issuing forth Writs under the great Seale concluding of matters without the Royall assent treating of Peace with Forrain Nations and of other matters and determining their Resolves before discovery made to the King of their Councells making Ordinances and ruling by them 3 H. 6. n. 29. 2 H. 6. n. 27. 8 H. 6. n. 12. referring matters determinable in Parliament to be determined according to their directions Authoritate Parliamenti Confirming Peace made by the King protesting against Peace made without or against their consent making Ambassadours with power to ingage for the Kingdome making Generals of the Army Admiralls at Sea Chancellors Barons and Privy Councellors and giving them instructions 8 H. 4. n. 73. 76. 31. 5 H. 4. n. 57. 31 H. 6. n. 21. and binding them to observance upon Oath 11 H. 4. n. 19.39 Ordering the Person of the King denying his power of Judicature in Parliament and ordering his Houshold and Revenue besides many other particulars Now if such as these things were thus done not by one Parliament which possibly might be overwayed by Factions but by the course of a Series of Parliaments that mightily laboured against Faction and unworthy ends and aimes that man shal determin the same to be unjust or indiscreet should himself first be determined to be very just and exceeding wise Nor was the Parliament partiall in all this but being in a way of Reformation it set upon the work of reforming it selfe Some that are very zealous in the point of Arbitrary and absolute Government of Kings in this Nation and all in other amongst other grounds rest upon this one That an English King hath power to call Parliaments and dissolve them to make and unmake Members as he shal please I do easily grant that Kings have many Occasions and Opportunities to beguile their People yet can they do nothing as Kings but what of right they ought to doe They may call Parliaments but neither as often or seldome as they please if the Statute-Laws of this Realme might take place Nor if they could is that power necessarily and absolutely arising from Supremacy seeing it is well known that such power is betrusted by the Superiour States in other Nations to the Inferiour who dayly attend on publique Affaires and therefore can discern when the generall Conventions are most necessary As touching the dissolving of Parliaments against the wills of
neverthelesse in that interim three Parliaments had been holden one by the Duke of Bedford and two by the Duke of Glocester in the last of which this Law was made And in truth if wee looke upon this title of the Kingdomes Guardianship in its bare lineaments without lights and shadows it will appeare little better then a Crown of feathers worne onely for bravery and in nothing adding to the real ability of the governing part of this Nation Neither were the persons of these Magnificoes so wel deserving nor did the Nation expect any such matter from them Edward the first was a wise King and yet in his absence chose Edward the second to hold that place he being then not above fourteen yeares of age afterwards Edward the seconds Queen and the Lords of her party were wise enough in their way and yet they chose Edward the third to be the Custos regni then not fourteen yeares old his Father in the meane time being neither absent from the Kingdome nor deposed but onely dismissed from acting in the adminstration of the Government Edward the third follows the same example he first makes his Brother John of Eltham Custos regni and this he did at two several times once when he was but eleven yeares old afterwards when hee was about fourteene Then he made his Sonne the Black Prince upon severall occasions three times Lord Warden of the Kingdome once he being about nine yeares old and againe when he was eleven yeares old and once when about fourteen yeares old Lastly Edward the third appointed his son Lionell Duke Clarence unto this place of Custos regni when as he was scarce eight years old all which will appeare upon the comparing their ages with the severall Rolls of 25 E 1. and 3 5 12 14 16 19 E 3. If therefore the worke of a Custos regni be such as may be as wel done by the infants of Kings as by the wisest Councellor or most valiant man it is in my opinion manifest that the place is of little other use to this Common-wealth then to serve as attire to a comely Person to make it seeme more faire because it is in fashion nor doth it advance the vallue of a King one graine above what his personall endowments doe deserve Hitherto of the title and power the next consideration will be of the original Fountain from whence it is derived wherein the presidents are cleare and plaine that ordinarily they are the next and immediate ofspring of Kings if they be present whithin the foure seas to be by them enabled by Letters Patents or Commission But whether present or absent the Parliament when it sate did ever peruse their authority and if it saw need changed inlarged or abridged both it and them Thus was the Duke of Glocester made Lord Warden in the time of Henry the fifth he being then in France in the roome of the Duke of Bedford the like also in Henry the sixths time when as the King was young for then the Parliament made the Duke of Bedford Lord Warden and added unto that title the title of Protector Afterward at the Dukes going over into France they committed that Service to the Duke of Glocester if I forget not the nature of the Roll during the Duke of Bedfords absence and with a Salvo of his right Nor unlike hereunto was the course that was taken by the Parliament in these sullen later times of Henry the sixth whereof more hereafter in the next Paragraph Lastly the limitation of this high power and title is different according to the occasion for the Guardianship of the Kingdome by common intendment is to endure no longer then the King is absent from the helme either by voluntary deserting the worke or imployment in forrain parts though united they be under the Government of the same King together with this Nation such as are these parts of France and Ireland and Scotland then under the English fee This is apparent from the nature of that statute of Henry the fifth formerly mentioned for if there was need to provide by that Statute that the Kings Arrivall and Personall Presence should not dissolve the Parliament assembled by the authority of the Custos regni then doth it imply that the personall presence of the King by and upon his Arrivall had otherwise determined the Parliament and that authority whereby it sate But the presidents are more cleare all of them generally running in these or the like words In absentia Regis or Quamdiu Rex fuerit in partibus transmarinis It is also to be granted that the Kings will is many times subjoyned thereunto as if it were in him to displace them and place others in his absence yet doe I finde no president of any such nature without the concurrence of the Lords or Parliament and yet that the Parliament hath ordered such things without his consent For when Richard the First passing to the Holy Land had left the Bishop of Ely to execute that place during his absence in remote parts the Lords finding the Bishop unfaithfull in his Charge excluded him both from that place and Kingdome and made the Kings Brother John Lord Warden in his stead But in the Case of the Protectorship which supposeth disability in the Person of the King the same by common intendment is to continue during the Kings disability and therefore in the Case of Henry the Sixth it was determined that the Protectorship doth Ipso Facto cease at the Kings Coronation because thereby the King is supposed able to govern although in later times it hath not so beene holden For Kings have been capable of that Ceremony as soon as of the Title and yet commonly are supposed to be under the rule of necessity of Protectorship till they be fourteen years of age or as the Case may be longer For although Henry the Sixth was once thought ripe when he was eight yeares old yet in the issue he proved scarce ripe for the Crowne at his two and twentieth yeare Neverthelesse the default of Age is not the onely incapacity of Kings they have infirmities as other men yea more dangerous then any other man which though an unpleasant tune it be to harp upon yet it is a Theame that Nations sometimes are inforced to ruminate upon when God will give them Kings in his wrath and those also over to their own lusts in his anger In such Cases therefore this Nation sometimes have fled to the refuge of a Protector and seldome it is that they can determine for how long When Henry the Sixth was above thirty yeares old Richard Duke of Yorke was made Protector and Defendor of the Realme and of the Church It was done if the Record saith true by the King himselfe Autoritate Parliamenti It was further provided by the Parliament that though this was to continue Quamdiu Regi placuerit yet the Duke should hold that place till the Kings Sonne Edward should come
Councels and unto that had also a binding Power in making Lawes Decrees and Decretalls out of his own breast but this was gotten by plunder he never had any right to headship of the Church nor to any such Power in right of such preferment nor was this given to the King as head of the Church but with such limitations and qualifications that its evident it never was in the Crowne or rightly belonging thereto First nigh three yeares after this recognition by the Clergy in their Convocation it is urged upon them and they passe their promise In verbo sacerdotii And lastly it is confirmed by Act of Parliament that they shall never make publish or execute any new Canon or constitution provinciall or other unlesse the Kings Assent and License be first had thereto and the offences against this Law made punishable by fine and imprisonment So as the Clergy are now holden under a double bond one the honor of their Preisthood which binds their Wills and Consciences the other the Act of Parliament which bindes their Powers so as they now neither will nor can start Neverthelesse there is nothing in this Law nor in the future practise of this King that doth either give or assert any power to the King and Convocation to binde or conclude the Clergy or the People without an Act of Parliament concurring and inforcing the same And yet what is already done is more then any of the Kings Predecessors ever had in their possession A second Prerogative was a definitive power in point of doctrine and worship For it is enacted that all Determinations Declarations Decrees Definitions Resolutions and Ordinances according to Gods word and Christs Gospell by the Kings advise and confirmation by Letters Patents under the great Seale at any time hereafter made and published by the Arch-Bishops Bishops and Doctors now appointed by the King or the whole Clergy of England in matters of the Christian faith and lawfull rights and ceremonies of the same shall be by the People fully beleeved and obeyed under penalties therein comprized Provided that nothing be done contrary to the Lawes and Statutes of this Realme A Law of a new birth and not an old Law newly revived or restored This the present occasion and the naturall constitution of the Law do fully manifest The occasion was the present Perplexity of the People for in stead of the Statute Ex officio which was now taken away the six articles commonly called the six stringed whip was gotten into power by a more legall and effectuall originall The Parliament had heard the cries of the People concerning this and having two things to eye at once one to provide for the Peoples liberty and further security against forrain pretentions the other which was more difficult for the liberties of the consciences of multitudes of men of severall opinions which could not agree in one judgement and by discord might make way for the Romish party to recover its first ground and finding it impossible for them to hunt both games at once partly because themselves were divided in opinion and the bone once cast amongst them might put their own co-existence to the question and partly because the worke would be long require much debate and retard all other affaires of the Common-wealth which were now both many and weighty In this troubled wave they therefore wisely determine to hold on their course in that worke which was most properly theirs and lay before them And as touching this matter concerning doctrine they agreed in that wherein they could agree Viz. To refer the matter to the King and Persons of skill in that mistery of Religion to settle the same for the present till the Parliament had better leisure the People more light and the mindes of the People more perswaded of the way Thus the Estates and Consciences of the People for the present must indure In deposito of the King and other Persons that a kind of Interim might be composed and the Church for the present might enjoy a kind of twilight rather then lye under continuall darknesse and by waiting for the Sun rising be in a better preparation thereunto For the words of the Statute are that all must be done without any partiall respect or affection to the Papisticall sort or any other sect or sects whatsoever Unto this agreement both parties were inclined by diverse regards For the Romanists though having the possession yet being doubtfull of their strength to hold the same if it came to the push of the Pike in regard that the House of Commons wanted faith as the Bishop of Rochester was pleased to say in the House of Lords and that liberty of conscience was then a pleasing Theame as wel as libertie of Estates to all the People These men might therefore trust the King with their interests having had long experience of his Principles And therefore as supream Head they held him most meete to have the care of this matter for still this title brings on the Vann of all these Acts of Parliament On the other side that party that stood for reformation though they began to put up head yet not assured of their owne Power and being so exceedingly oppressed with the six Articles as they could not expect a worse condition but in probabililty might finde a better they therefore also cast themselves upon the King who had already been well baited by the German Princes and Divines and the outcries of his owne People and possibly might entertain some prejudice at length at that manner of woship that had its originall from that Arch enemy of his Head-ship of the Church of England Nor did the issue fall out altogether unsutable to these expectations For the King did somewhat to unsettle what was already done and abated in some measure the flame and heat of the Statute although nothing was established in the opposite thereto but the whole rested much upon the disposition of a King subject to change As touching the constitution of this Law that also shewes that this was not derived from the ancient right of the Crowne now restored but by the positive concession of the People in their representative in regard it is not absolute but qualified and limited diversly First this power is given to this King not to his successors for they are left out of the act so as they trusted not the King but Henry the eighth and what they did was for his owne sake Secondly they trusted the King but he must be advised by Councell of men of Skill Thirdly they must not respect any sect or those of the Papisticall sort Fourthly all must be according to Gods Word and Christs Gospel And Lastly nothing must be done contrary to the Laws and Statutes of this Realm And thus though they trusted much yet not all nor over long For it was but a temporary Law and during the present condition of affaires Nor did the King or People
Parliament is looked upon as the cheif supporters in the maintaining both the Honour and Power of that Authority that otherwise would fall under contempt A work that must be done with a curious touch or a cleare hand or they must look for the like Censure to that of a King to a great Lord that Crowned him My Lord I like your work very well but you have left the print of your fingers upon my Crown Such was the condition of these times wherein a Child and two Women are the cheifs but ever under the correction and direction of the Common Councel in matters of common concernment Two things declare the point the course of the Title of the Crown and the order of the powers thereof The Title ever had a Law which was at the Helm although diversly expounded Kings ever loved the rule of inheritance and therefore usually strained their Pedegree hard to make both ends meet though in truth they were guilty oftentimes to themselves that they were not within the degrees The People ever loved the Title of Election and though ever they joyned it to the Royall blood and many times to the right Heire to make the same pass more currant without interruption of the first love between them and their Princes yet more often had they Kings that could not boast much of their birth-right in their first entry into their Throne Of three and twenty Kings from the Saxons time foure of the former had no Title by inheritance the two Willams Henry the first and King Steven of two others Viz. Henry the second and Richard the first had right of birth yet came in by compact The seventh which was King John had no title but election The eight Viz. Henry the third came in a Child and contrary to compact between the Nobility and the French Lewes the ninth and tenth succeeded as by unquestionable Title of discent yet the Nobles were preingaged The eleventh which was Edward the third in his entry eldest Son but not Heire for his Father was alive but his Successor was his Heire its true there were other Children of Edward the third alive that were more worthy of the Crown but they were too many to agree in any but a Child that might be ruled by themselves Three next of the ensuing Kings were of a collatterall line Their two Successors Viz. Edward the fourth and Edward the fifth were of the right line yet Edward the fourth came in by dissesin and Edward the fifth by permission Richard the third and Henry the seventh were collatterall to one another and to the right blood Henry the eighth though when he was King might claime from his Mother yet came in as Heire to his Father And if Edward the sixth was right Heire to the House of Yorke by his Grand-Mother yet cannot the Crown be said to descend upon the two Sisters neither as Heires to him nor Henry the eighth nor to one another so long as the Statute of their illigittimation remained which as touching Queen Mary was till three Months after her entry upon the Throne and as touching Queen Elizabeth for ever for that Virago provided for her self not by way of repeale as her Sister had done but more tenderly regarding the Honour of her Father and the Parliament then to mention their blemishes in Government by doing and undoing She overlooked that Act of Henry the Eighth and the Notion of Inheritance and contented her self with her Title by the Statute made by her Father in his thirty fifth yeare which to her was a meere purchase and was not ashamed to declare to all the World that She did have and hold therby and that it was high Treason for any Subject to deny that the course of the Crown of England is to be ordered by Act of Parliament And this power did the Parliament exercise not onely in ordering the course of the Crown to Queen Mary and Queen Elizabeth but during the Reign of Queen Elizabeth so far as to dis-inherit and dis-able any person who should pretend Right to the Crown in opposition to the Right of Queen Elizabeth and upon this point onely did the whole proceedings against Mary Queen of Scots depend who claimed to be and doubtless was Heir unto Henry the eighth after the determination of his right Line and yet She was put to death for pretending Right by the Common Law in opposition to the Act of Parliament True it is that this Doctrine doth not down well with those that do pretend to Prerogative aided as they say by the Act of Recognition made to King James and the Oaths of Supremacy and Allegiance which do make much parly concerning Inheritance and Heirs nevertheless it is as true that the Act of Recognition made no Law for the future nor doth the same cross the Statute of 13 Eliz. nor doth it take away the power of the Parliament from over-ruling the course of the Common Law for after Ages Nor do the Oaths of Supremacy and Allegiance hold forth any such Obligation unto Heirs otherwise then as supposing them to be Successors and in that relation onely And therefore was no such Allegiance due to Edward the sixth Queen Mary or Queen Elizabeth untill they were actually possessed of the Crown as may appear by the Oath formed by the Statute of Henry the eighth touching their Succession Nor did the Law suppose any Treason could be acted against the Heirs of Edward the sixth Queen Mary or Queen Elizabeth untill those Heirs were actually possessed of the Crown and so were Kings and Queens as by express words in the severall Statutes do appear Nor did the Recognition by the Parliament made to Queen Elizabeth declare any ingagement of the People to assist and defend her and the Heirs of her Body otherwise then with this Limitation Being Kings and Queens of this Realm as by the Statute in that behalf made doth appear And lastly had these Oaths bin otherwise understood the Crown had by the vertue of them been pre-ingaged so as it could never have descended to Queen Mary Queen Elizabeth or King James but must have remained to the Heirs of Edward the sixth for ever Secondly the same power that the Parliament exercised in ordering the course of succession in the Crown they exercised likewise in determining and distributing the Powers and Priviledges belonging to the same for these Times were full of Novelties The Crown had formerly fitted a childes head more then once but it never tried to fit a Womans head since the Saxon Times till now that it must make triall of two France might afford us a trick of the Salique Law if it might finde acceptance And the unsettled estate of the People especially in matter of Religion might require the wisest man living to sit at the Helm and yet himself not sufficient to steer a right course to the Harbour Nevertheless the Parliament having the Statute of Henry the
underlings to the great men then they are to their Fethers to were them no longer then they will make them brave Secondly the Person thus agreed upon his intertainment must be accordingly and therefore the manner of taxing in full County and levying the rate of Wages for their maintenance is reformed and settled And lastly their Persons are put under the Protection of the Law in an especiall manner for as their work is full of reflexion so formerly they had met with many sad influences for their labour And therefore a penall Law is made against force to be made upon the Persons of those workmen of State either in their going to that Service or attending thereupon making such Delinquents liable to Fine and Imprisonment and double damages And thus however the times were full of confusions yet a foundation was laid of a more uniforme Government in future times then England hitherto had seen CAHP. XV. Of the Custos or Protector Regni KIngs though they have vast dimensions yet are not infinite nor greater then the bounds of one Kingdome wherein if present they are in all places present if otherwise they are like the Sunn gone down and must rule by reflexion as the Moone in the night In a mixt common wealth they are integrall members and therefore regularly must act Per deputatum when their Persons are absent in another Ligialty and cannot act Per se Partly because their Lustre is somewhat eclipsed by another Horizon and partly because by common intendment they cannot take notice of things done in their absence It hath therefore been the ancient course of Kings of this Nation to constitute Vicegerents in their absence ' giving them severall titles and severall powers according as the necessity of affaires required Sometimes they are called Lord Warden or Lord Keeper of the Kingdome and have therewith the generall power of a King as it was with John Warren Earle of Surry appointed therunto by Edw. the first who had not onely power to command but to grant and this power extended both to England and Scotland And Peter Gaveston though a Forrainer had the like power given him by Edward the second over England to the reproach of the English Nobility which also they revenged afterward Somtimes these Vicegerents are called Lievtenants which seemeth to conferr onely the Kings power in the Militia as a Lievtenant Generall in an army And thus Richard the second made Edmund Duke of Yorke his Lievtenant of the Kingdome of England to oppose the entry of the Duke of Hertford Afterwards called Henry the fourth into England during the Kings absence in Ireland And in the mean while the other part of the Royalty which concerned the revenues of the Crowne was betrusted to the Earle of Wiltshire Sir John Bush Sir James Baggot and Sir Henry Green unto whom men say the King put his Kingdome to farme But more ordinarily the Kings power was delegated unto one under both the titles of Lord Gaurdian of the Kingdome and Lievtenant within the same such was the title of Henry Lacy Earle of Lincolne and of Gilbert De clare Earle of Glocester and of Audomar De valentia Earle of Pembroke all of them at severall times so constituted by Edward the second as by the Patent Roles appeareth So likewise did Edward the third make his Brother John of Eâ—tham twice and the black Prince thrice and Lionell Duke Clarence and his Brother Thomas each of them once in the severall passages of Edward the third beyond the Sea in the third fifth twelfth fourteenth sixteenth nineteenth and thirty third years of his reigne concerning which see the Patent Rolls of those yeares And Henry the fifth gave likewise the same title and authority to the Duke of Bedford upon the Kings voyage into France and afterward that Duke being sent over to second the King in the French Wars the Duke of Glocester obtained the same power and place But Henry the sixth added a further title of Protector and Defendor of the Kingdome and Church of England this was first given to the Duke of Bedford and afterwards he being made Regent of France it was conferred upon the Duke of Glocester And towards the later time of Henry the sixth it was granted by him to Richard Duke of Yorke This title carried along with it a power different from that of a King onely in honor and the Person so adorned may be said to sway the Scepter but not to weare the Crowne And therefore in the minority of Henry the sixth when as the Government was ordered by the Parliament and to that end a Protector was made and he wel guarded with a Privy Councill and they provided with instructions one of them was that in all matters not to be transacted ordinarily but by the Kings expresse consent the Privy Councell should advise with the Prorector but this is not so needfull in regard that it concerneth the power of executing of Lawes which by right of the liberty of the Subject is the known duty of the Scepter in whose hands soever it is holden And therefore I shall passe to the Legislative power wherein its evident that the Protectors power was no whit inferiour to the Kings power For first the Protector Ex officio by advice of the Councell did summon Parliaments by Writs even as the Kings themselves under their owne Teste and if not bear the Royall Assent yet did they direct the same and received Petitions in Parliament to them directed as to Kings and every way supplied the roome of a King in order to the perfecting publishing and inforcing of Law to Execution Secondly the Parliaments holden by Protectors and Lawes therein made are no whit inferiour to those by the King whether for Honour or Power And therefore if a Parliament be-holden by the Lord Warden and sitting the Parliament the King in person shall arrive and be there present neither is the Parliament interrupted thereby nor the power thereof changed at all though the power and place of the Wardenship of the Kingdome doth utterly vanish by the personall accesse of the King because in all Cases where the King is subservient to the Kingdome or the Common-wealth The Lord Warden in his absence is conservient unto him being in his stead and not under him for the very Place supposeth him as not because not present And this was by a Law declaratively published at such time as Henry the fifth was Regent of France and therefore by common presumption was likely to have much occasion of residence in that Kingdome and it holdeth in equall force with all other Lawes of the highest Size which is the rather to be noted because it is though under a Protector obligatory to the King and makes his personall presence no more considerable then the presence of his shadow For the King spent three whole yeares in the French Warres and during that time never saw England where