dayes again observed p. 257. VI. Whether it might not be an acceptable service to have an annuall fast for the crimes lately acted in England p. 259. Of a Feast p. 260. Questions I. Whether the feasts of the Church Catholick differ from those of the Church of Rome p. 270. II. Whether the Festivals of the Church of England may lawfully be observed p. 271. III. Why are bonefiers made in England upon the feast of the fifth of November p. 174. IV. Whether the time of a martyrs death be a proper time for feasting p. 275. V. Whether the feast of Philip and Jacob be not prophaned p. 276 Of Church or Temple p. 279. Questions I. Whether those places may be consecrated p. 287. II. Whether those places may be termed holy p. 289. III. Whether such Churches as have been erected by Romanists may be used by Catholicks p. 290. IV. Whether at a Christians entry into those place he may performe his devotion p. 292. V. VVhether it be lawfull to have musick in our Churches p. 294. Of ministerial ordination p. 290. Questions I. VVhether ordination may better a Ministers gifts p. 300. II. VVhether a Minister may renounce his ordination p. 301. III. VVhether the ministerial office be to continue alway in the world p. 302. IV. VVhether it be lawfull to hear an unordained man preach p. 304 V. VVhether an ordained person may have an office in the Common-wealth p. 306 Of Catechising p. 309. Questions I. VVhether or how catechising differs from preaching p. 315. II. Whether preaching be to be preferred before it p. 316. Of preaching p. 319. Questions I. VVhether Gosâ—el preachers ought to have a setleâ— maintenance p. 325. II. VVhether an Heretical or upstart Teacher may be known from the true p. 330. III. VVhether a preacher once setled in a place may leave that place p. 332. IV. VVhether it be expedient to permit one to preach constantly or weekly in a place that hath neither orders from the Church nor charge of the people p. 339. V. VVhether he that is a Gospel Teacher may lawfully own civil titles of honour p. 336. Of a conferrence p. 329. Questions I. VVhether private or night meetings may lawfully be upheld p. 344. II. VVhether it be lawfull for Christians when they meet to make merry one with another p. 344. III. VVhether the conferences or private meetings lately used in England were agreeable to the power of Godlinesse p. 349. Of Admonition p. 351. Questions I. VVhether a heathen may not be admonished p. 359. II. VVhether admonition be alike to be given to all Ibid. Of Excommunication p. 360. Questions I. VVhether reformed Churches are legally excommunicated by the Pope p. 366. II. VVhether Kings ought to be excommunicated p. 367. III. VVhether Excommunication debars from all society of the Church p. 371. Of Singing p. 373. Questions I. VVhether it be lawfull to sing Davids Psalmes in a publick congregation p. 377. II. VVhether those Psalmes containing direfull Imprecations ought to be sung or how with a conscience they may be sung p. 379. Of the Sacraments p. 380. Questions I. Whether these five Sacraments added by the Church of Rome be Sacraments p. 381. II. VVhether the effects of the Sacraments depend upon the worthinesse of the Minister p. 384. III. Whether or how the Sacraments differ from the scriptures p. 386. IV. VVhether the Sacraments of the old differ from those of the new Testament p. 387. V. VVhether two Sacraments be sufficient under the Gospel p. 388. Of Babtisme p. 389. Questions I. VVhether Dipping be essentiall unto Baptisme p. 400. II. VVhether Infants ought not to be baptised p. 404. III. VVhether baptisme is or ought to be readministred p. 412. IV. VVhether witnesses at baptisme according to the Law of the Church of England be to be approved p. 413. V. VVhether the Cross at baptisme according to the Law of the Church of England be to be approved p. 415. Of Conformation p. 420. Questions I. VVhether confirmation be a standing Ordinance in the Gospel p. 426. II. VVhether the Church might not be advantaged by the restoring of confirmation p. 429. Of the Communion p. 431. Questions I. VVhether the Communion ought often to be received or how often p. 447. II. VVhether the Church of Rome hath reason to keep the Communion cup from the people p. 448 III. VVhether kneeling be a gesture lawfull to be used at the Communion p. 451. IV. VVhether it be expedient to keep prefixed times for Administration of the Communion and if offerings be lawfull p. 453. V. VVhether it be a sin to receive the Communion in a mixed congregation and if private examination be necessary p. 455. Of Prayer p. 471. Questions I. Whether men by Industry may obtain a promptnesse in prayer p. 512. II. VVhether the wicked be bound to pray p. 515. III. VVhether the set forms of Prayers used by law in the Church of England be lawfull p. 516. IV VVhether there be not vain repetitions in those formes p. 529. V. VVhether it would be convenient to alter any part of those formes p. 532. Of an Oath p. 535. Questions I. Whether swearing be an ordinance of or under the Gospel p. 538. II. Whether the oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy required by the King of England c. May lawfully betaken p. 540. Curteous Reader be pleased to take notice that these bookes following are Printed for and sold by Edward Brewster at the signe of the Crane in St. Pauls Church yard 1661. Bp. Williams Right way to the best Religion wherein at large is explained the Principle heads of the Gospel in foll Dr. Iermin Chapline to King Charles the first his phrastical Meditations by way of Commentary upon all the Proverbs foll Mr. Elton his Commentary upon 7.8.9 Romans foll Mr. Prinnes Hidden works of Darknesse brought to Light foll Mr. Ball of the Nature and life of faith 40. his large and small Catechise 80. Mr. Bentharns Christian conflict shewing the difficulties and duties armor and speciall Graces to be exercised by every Christian Souldier 40. Mr. Baxter of Crucifying the world by the Crosse of Christ. 40. A Collection of severall Sermons preached before the Parliament 40. Mr. Cawdrey of the inconstancy of the Independent way with Scripture and it self 40. Severall Sermons of Mr. Paul Bayns Mr. Calamys Sermons Compleate Mr. George Newton his Elaborat exposition on Iohn 17. foll Mr. Randoll on the Church 40. on 8. Roman 40. Mr. Stalham against Quakers 40. against Anabaptists 40. Dr. Sclator on 4. Romans Mr. Vdall on the Lamentations Mr. Ieremiah Whittakers Sermons 40. A vindication of the Presbyteriall Goverment and Ministry CHAP. 1. Of the Church 1 Thes. 1.1 Paul and Sylvanus and Timotheus unto the Church of the Thessalonians c. INtending to speak of the nature of some despised Ordinances of the Church of Christ we hold it expedient if not necessary to take our Rise from hence by unfolding the nature of that Church whose practice we
we defend that baptisme can only lawfully be Administred by the Gospel Minister thereunto appointed by Apopostolical Ordination For 1. Those only have a commission to baptize who have a visible commission to teach Matth. 28.19 Go ye and teach all nations baptizing them or as it is in the Original Disciple all nations batizing them c. teaching them That the Apostles were outwardly visibly called by Christ though extraordinarily to preach to the world the things concerning the Kingdom of God whereof baptisme is one and after their call that Christ called no other in that exordinary way is clear from Scripture whereof Paul is an eminent instance And that the Apostles might be encouraged in this great work he goeth on saying I am with you alway even unto the end of the world Now the world is not yet ended and Peter and Iames are gone with you therefore must be understood to be meant not of the whole multitude of believers but of them that are outwardly visibly called to preach all things that Christ had commanded in an authoritative way as the Apostles were And as it is said that Kings never dye that is regally and successively though personally they do so the Apostles never dye that is successively though personally they do for to the end of the world so oft as any is visibly and outwardly ordained and commissioned to teach and baptize the Apostles are not dead but alive and Christ prospering and blessing the doctrine of any so ordained in his being with his Apostles that is with them who are outwardly commissioned to teach to the end of the world To the multitude of belevers then was never the power to baptize given because not the power of teaching because not thereunto ordained as hath at large been discovered above unto which for brevity sake the Reader at present is referred 2. The nature of the Ordinance is against it baptisme is a declarative sign of the parties admission into the Church and not only so but an outward sign of the parties inward regeneration and a seal of the covenant of promise a manifestation of the forgiveness of sin Heb. 10.22 Acts 2.38 39. Tit. 3.5 And therefore to be given by none but by them unto whom the power of keeping the seals are given and in no age in no time in no place in no Text did ever God give the power of his seals to a multitude or appointed them to be used by any that â—â—d indeed real gifts without an ordinary call even outwardly after the constituting of the Church Stephen Nicanor c. Acts 6.3 though full of the Holy Ghost presume not to exercise the office of Deacons without an ordinary call from the Apostles by imposition of hands the Church being constituted in their Election So Paul and Barnabas though full of worth and eminent in gifts yet must be set apart having given testimony of their abilities by ordination for teaching and baptizing by the Church Acts 13.13 2. Thus also was Timothy set apart for the same work by a Presbytery 1 Tim. 4.14 The baptisme therefore of these Lay persons or gifted brethren whence is it From Heaven or of men if from Heaven shew it from the Apostles for since them Christ ordained and set apart none and we shall believe it if of men let them Repent for the Kingdom of God is at hand or produce the Text that gives power to uncommissioned men purely upon the account of their gifts to exercise the power of the keyes and Administer the seals of the Church and that constantly and then their baptisme shall not be speak against The ability that a man hath to be a Minister is one thing and his putting into the office of the Ministry is another thing Saint Paul thanks God that he had both 1 Tim. 1.12 and we know by the Scriptures he had both by inspiration was he inwardly qualified and by ordination outwardly called he was separated unto the Gospel Rom. 1.1 by fasting prayer with laying on of hands Acts 13.2 3. 3. It is not to be found in all the New Testament implicitely or explicitely that ever any baptized upon the account of their gifts without an outward call from Church officers when those of this perswasion produce a man baptizing in the Church allowed of by the Church upon the account of his gifts then it may be a good argument for him that hath gifts to baptize without a visible commission 4. It would open a door to all irregularity and to all confusion imaginable Once make it lawful for any to baptize upon the account of his gifts we should find that Sacrament to be attempted by many that have no gifts at all what will not arrogance and pride puss men to what will nor ambition cause men to act this doctrine hath taken grace away from some and shame from many each Heretick laying a foundation for a new heresie by this man we are taught that preaching is not tyed to the Gospel Ministery and therefore not baptisme but the spirit that bloweth where it lifteth makes men sitted for that work and by it sufficiently called This being granted by another teaching is not tyed to men but common also with them to women since in Christ there is neither male nor female c. It is time for thee O Lord to work for they have made void thy Law Psal. 119.126 5. It is against the Doctrine of the Reformed Churches of Helv. Art 24. Of Bohe. Art 9. Of Pran Art 23. Of Belg Art 30. Of Ausp Art 14. Of Wirtem Art 21. Of Irel. Art 71. Of Scot. Art 22. and of Eng. Art 23. The Article it self is this Article 23. Of the Church of England IT is not lawful for any man to take upon him the Office of publicke Preaching or Ministring the Sacraments in the Congregation before he be lawfully called and sent to execute the same And those we ought to judge Lawfully called and sent which be chosen and called to this work by men who have publicke Authority given unto them in the Congregation to call and send Ministers into the Lords Vineyard SECT VI. Questions Resolved Quest. 1. VVHether Dipping be essential unto Baptisme Quest. 2. Whether Infants ought to be be baptized Quest. 3. Whether Baptisme is or ought to be readministred Quest. 4. Whether witnesses at Baptisme according to the Law of the Church of England be to be approved Quest. 5. Whether the Cross at Baptisme according to the Law of the Church of England be to be approved Quest. 1. Whether Dipping be essential unto Baptisme That dipping is lawful is not questioned by the Church of Christ but whether it be essential that is If Baptisme be not Baptisme without it or whether none is or cannot be baptized without he be dipped is the ground of our Quere It is to be denied Dipping is not essential to that Sacrament for 1. The word baptize used in the Scripture for that Sacrament signifies not
commanded his Disciples to baptize before he commanded them to teach according to the order of the words of that Text. It is a rule given us by the Rabbies Non datur prims posterius in Scripturae that being first put in on place which is last in another and contrary Unto the case in hand we find baptizing according to the words going before preaching Mark 1.4 2. They find no express Text for it in Scripture such an Argument as this taught the Traskit to deny the Christian Sabbath but to touch these men nearer home have they any express Text for dipping for preaching upon the account of gifts or administring the Sacraments for spending the first day of the weak in holy exercises for administring the Sacrament of the Lords Supper to women or dipping in a River either naked or in linnen garments when they shew express Text for these and many other things I shall shew them one for Infant Baptisme Yea before For When our Saviour expressly commanded his Disciples to make Disciples of all Nations and baptize them who or what meaned he Whether the Earth or Ground of all Nations or the inhabitants that were upon that ground if them then whether Masters or servants husbands or wives parents or children who can say or dare say that he meaned the one and not the other he meaned all without a peradventure so that there is in this precept as express a command to baptize children as to baptize either men or women grown in years 3. They finde Faith in Scripture required of all as a necessary precedent grace unto baptisme so do we in persons that are grown in years as the Eunuch Cornelius and the Jaylor was but that faith was required of the seed of them that once believed as a grace necessary for baptisme is not yet by them demonstrated nor never shall Our Saviour having a little child before him Mat. 18.6 faith Who so shall offend one of those little ones that believe in m c. This is spoken of all that shall be believers to the end of the world and of all that were about him and of that child also that was in the midst of them so that children cannot be said to be without faith though little ones by which onely God is well pleased If children have no faith in Christ or God then why doe they teach their Children to pray or call upon God as I presume they do since without faith it is a taking the Name of God in vain a sin which they would be thought to make conscience of Briefly when men can make a rope of sand then shall we or themselves be able to make something of their own opinions in reference to this of Infant Baptisme teaching that they are without sin yet see them die that all are born holy yeâ— some born children of wrath 2 Eph. 3. That Infants belong to the kingdom of God yet have no interest in the Covenant that they are saved though they want faith without which it is impossible to please God to teach them to call God their Father and yet say they are not in Christ by Adoption when these things are reconciled and made to hang together we shall call them a subtile generation 14. It is against the practice of the whole Church of God in all ages and places of the world and at this day contrary to the Doctrine and practise of the Reformed Churcher of Helvet Art 21. of Bohe. Art 12. of Fr. Art 35. of Belg. Art 34. of Ausp Art 9. of Sax. Art 13. of Wirt Art 10. of Swethland Art 17. of Irel. Art 90. of Scot. Art 23. of Engl. Art 27. The Article it self is this Article 27. of the Church of England Baptisme is not onely a sign of Profession and marke of difference whereby Christian men are discerned from others that be not Christned but it is also a sign of Regeneration c. The baptisme of young Children is in any wise to be retained in the Church as most agreeable with the Institution of Christ. Quest. 3. Whether baptisme is or ought to be readministred It hath been the practice of some among us to throw off their first Baptisme and as they suppose receive a new one Yea Papists who though they teach the contrary Doctrine yet sinfully have practised it upon the children of the Reformed Churches but however Baptisme if given in the name of the Trinity by applying water according to the Institution is not to be received twice For 1. It is against the nature sign end and use of that ordinance Baptisme is a visible sign representing a believer to be new born Hence it is called being born of water Iohn 3.5 Now though men eat and drink often and receive the Sacrament of the Supper often that being our food Spiritual yet we are born but once and therefore ought to receive the Ordinance of Baptisme but once that being our Spiritual birth 2. It opens a gap for one great inconvenience He can give no reason of his being twice baptized but the same reason will make him or perswade him to be baptized the third time the fourth time nec decies repetita placebit the twentieth time Whether this doctrine so brief and current among us did rise and spring from the Popish Holy water which they look upon as a dayly baptisme representing the pardon of actual sin is worth inquiring after and a Question would be seriously thought upon by our governours c. 3. Circumcision was not but once to be administred Nay when through ignorance and blinde zeale some of the circumcised would have become uncircumcised by a way not fitting to be named the Apostle commands the contrary 1 Cor. 7.18 but will have them stick to and own their former Circumcision let those that suppose they are inwardly called remember that they become not unbaptized by receiving baptisme anew 4. The sad events of rebaptizing may be a sufficient testimony of the thing now defended what errors wanderings crooked paths unheard of blasphemies of them that are so used our ears hears toe too much and our eyes have sufficient knowledge c. 5. The Reformed Churches of Christ condemn it in their practice and so many as have published their opinions to the world upon that subject have condemned it in their Confessions particularly the Church of Bohe. Art 12. of Fr. Art 35. of Belg. Art 34. of Sax. Art 13. of Hel. Art 20. The Article it self is this Article 20. of the Church of Helvetia There is but one Baptisme in the Church of God For it is sufficient to be once baptized or consecrated unto God for baptisme once received doth continue all a mans life and is a perpetual sealing of our Adoption to us c. Quest. 4. Whether witnesses at baptisme according to the Law of the Church of England be to be approved N cases of indifferency people are not to Question the reason of a Law given them by
the flesh yet they have an interest in each other as in their teachers as in their hapinesse in their victories in their warrs in their fruits of the Earth which stedfastly to believe the observeing of these days were of great concernment 4 It might put a dayly check to growing sin when men otherwise cold in their acts of repentance and dutys of mortification should observe a solemn quarterly appearance before God for the ends above mentioned It might stirre them up to pray for a blessing on the fruits of the Earth and crave a pardon of their sins formerly committed which by degrees might make them perfect holinesse in the fear of God Quest. 6. Whether it might not be an acceptable service to have anannuall fast for the crimes lately acted in England This Question took its rise from the Authors occasionall reading of a motion made to the late long Parliament by one preaching before them for the keeping of a Fast in regard of that blood that was shed in the dayes of Queen Mary during her five years raign If that was supposed necessary sure this supposition is not to be thought vain It is not to be reflected on particulars either touching crimes or persons that being forgiven by an act of Oblivion here on Earth but since it is not for ought we know ratified in heaven it may not be in vain to sound a trumpet in this our Sion and proclaim a day of humiliation for 1 Flagitious and unheard of crimes have been acted and that that not in a corner but before the Sun such as were it possible should not be told in Gath. 2 God for a time may only keep away wrath some acts were of that nature that the world never knew that sin to compare with them and therefore there may be expected strange judgements God hath them written down and will without question without much entreaty visit for them therefore prayers and tears are to be offered to expiate the guilt 3 The Actors for a great measure seem not yet penitent we might charge many but it were to be desired that such as blew up division for their own ends whom God hath alwayes crossed would not keep up division to the Churches disturbance and their own ruin 4 To remove the scandall that may be in all ages and is in those times cast upon our profession King killing was once a doctrin charged upon the Jesuits who ever denyed it but now our religion bleeds by Turkes Jewes and Papists to let the world see that we are better catechised it is expedient that the Ministers of the Lord weep between the porch and the altar that it may be known those practises are both detested and abhorred by true Christians 5 That future ages might beware of the like crimes to open a story in the eares of the young might have the some influence upon tender yeares as the beholding of old Dâ—unkards had upon the children of the Lacedemonians which was to make them shun the like actions 6 The hypocriticall fasts that have been so many deserve to have one week in the yeare that God may not remember them never greater sinners then those that presumed most to performe this duty of fasting and usually before they undertook notorious actions like Machiavil who sometimes appeares like a Devill and another time like a Saint God hath not forgotten these things and therefore they are to be regarded They were in their own nature sufficient to have made even God himselfe loath the very place they were made in and he often bringing the sins of the Father upon the Children if not upon themselves calls upon this generation to cry aloud CHAP. 7. Of a Feast FRom a fast we come to a feast both are Christian and therefore not an unlawfull transition he is a stranger to the Calender that is ignorant of the vigills ushering in the Saint We have seen two dayes wherein Christians may hear the word taught this is a third wherein possibly there may be a mariage in Cana of Galilee and though the Church Catholick invite neither the mother of Jesus nor his disciples as that of Rome doth it is not out of disrespect to either but out of their incapacity to be present yet Jesus is alwayes called Now every pious soul with David goeth to the house of God with the voice of joy and praise with a multitude that keep holyday Psal. 42.4 Fast or day of uhmiltion is appointed for mercyes to be asked a Feast or day of thanksgiving is designed for returning of praises for favours already received and is Either private or publick 1 Private which is a sweet and holy rejoycing in the Lord for some speciall mercy shown to a mans own soul or familie in particular to this is joyned reading of the word 2 Or publick enjoyned by authority for the returning thanks unto the Father of all good gifts for some peculiar blessing shown that Common-wealth in generall unto this is joyned preaching of the word for the stirring up of affection and of this we are now to speak and shall see as in the Fast. 1. The Nature of it 2. The Ends of it 3. The time of it 4. The manner of it 5. Resolve some questions concerning it SECT I. The nature of it 1. It is an extraordinary solemn and joyful appearance 2. of a Christian people or congregation 3. for thâ— performance of holy duties 4. Especially of praise and thanksgiving 5. for benefits or mercy received It an extraordinary solemn and joyfull appearance is this to distinguish it from the Sabbath or Sunday wherein there is a solemn appearance but that is ordinary this is extraordinary Neh. 8.1 2. Of Christian people or Congregation this is to distinguish it from the Feasts of Turks Jews or Pagans who have days set apart to worship for some special favour shown sometimes privately and sometimes publickly but the feast we are upon is a Congregation of Christians 3. For the performance of holy duties When there is a solemn appearance of a Christian Congregation it ought to be supposed that something sutable to their profession will be done before they part and the duties must be afterwards spoken of 4. Especially of praise and thanksgiving this is the chief end of this extraordinary appearance to return praises for mercies received and to adore the Majesty on high for his peculiar favour Nehem. 8.17 18. From this it is called a day of thanksgiving though prayers and supplications be made for all Saints on it yet thanks and gratulations is especially intended by it 5. For benefits and mercies received It is thankfulness that keeps Gods hand open he that would come to God suing for new favours must come with Iosephs brethren with double money in his hands thanks for the former and faith to procure future favours The Church possibly sees her enemy that wicked Haman fall before her blame her not if there be joy in all her Cities Ester 9.18
the Spirit as Faith Humility Charity c. with whcih graces whosoever prays by the spirit and the humble or faithfull soul shall by putting in practise the rules before given make known their humble and faithfull petitions with good apt orderly and found words as well as with unseigned lips Quest. 2. VVhether the wicked be bound to pray That none are exempted from this duty but that it is to be performed by all good or bad wicked and prophane by the sound Christian and by the formall Hypocrite ppeares 1. The duty of prayer is as large and as universall as that of reading hearing c. therefore to be practised by all 2. Prayer is a converting ordinance It is a meanes appointed for the obtaining of pardon of sin of the Holy Ghost of drawing nigh unto God and therefore no sinner exempted from it 3. The neglect of prayer is charged upon them as a sin Psal. 14.2 Psal. 10.4 4. The consciences of wicked men accuseth them when they have not prayed 5. God hath sometimes accepted the prayers of very wicked men even of them that have sold themselves to do wickedly 1 King 21.27 Quest. 3. Whether the set forms of Prayers used by law in the Church of England be Lawfull Before this question be directly answered we shall premise a few things 1. That the book of Common prayer had never been defended in this nature but that the crossnesse and peevishnesse of hot spirited men and passionate writers hath so defamed the the thing it self and also the users of it that it appears to be thought by them a sin unto Death Publickly or privatly to own it in the Church 2. That this defence doth not at all imply its necessity I am perswaded the Church of England might stand without it and may stand in purity by it Unifomity is necessary for the well-being of the Church as was known to the publishers of the Directory and if the Magistrate will have uniformity another way it may be had and if this way it may be used 3. That much of the Common-Prayer is in the Masse may be acknowledged to its honour It is but a furious and blind zeal that makes men inveigh against the Churches practise in this because of its affinity to Rome since we are to preserve the peace of the Church to our utmost we are not to decline too far from any opinion or practise that is lawfull the Jews preists did Sacrifice so did Baals The Papists uses this or that form of prayer if it be lawfull so may I that the breach or quarrel may appear to be one his part not on mine what ever is in the Masse that is lawfull and according to godliness is not to be despised and what ever is otherwise is to be condemned and shunned 4. That the book of Common-prayer might be altered and otherwise framed in some points bettered is not rationally to be denyed what book was ever composed by the wit or art of men but others might alter it and in some measure better it Let the Guisels view their Directory and I doubt not but they will find that somewhat might be left out and something put in part of it expunged and part of it enlarged 5. That by no meanes it ought to jostle out preaching is granted and is easily to be defended Prophecying is that ordinance that cheifly discovers the secrets of the heart that deceitfull part of man Prayer and Sacraments hath done vertuously but this excells them all and therefore for none of them is it to be disesteemed 6. That the Author hath competency of gifts for which he desires to be thankfull to do without Common-prayer as well as others Can they baptise pray bury marry c. without it absit a verbo I. Etantia so can he can they visit or pray sutably over the sick without it so can he can they promptly and readily vary their petitions at any time sutable to the duty in hand so can he In obedience to authority he useth it and so ought others though their gifts were more eminent then they are These things being considered we come now to answer the question And That the Liturgy Service book or Common-prayer of the Church of England is lawfull and with a safe conscience may be used appears by these following reasons 1. From the piety eminency and godlinesse of its composers they were men eminent and famous in their generation opposers of and to death some of them suffered for their not compliance to popish superstition when they were rooting out popery and disclaiming the Pope with all his adherents was that book compiled shall we Imagin the Guisels when they were composing the Directory were establishing Episcopacy if it were found to conjecture that why ought we to conceite the other in collecting the formes of that book of Common-prayer were confirming popery when of any other they most opposed it and suffered most by it It will not be a needlesse digression to spend a little time in shewing the occasion of compiling the book of Common-prayer and see the compilers The occasion of it was breifly this When Edward the sixth was by the Grace of God Crowned King of England c. and it being in his mind to perfect that reformation begun by his Father made many glorious acts for puryfying of the Church from Romish superstition particularly for administring the Sacrament of the supper under both kinds there were some in that time obeyed the King and some that did not so that the Sacraments were given by some one way and by others another way some were for the King some for the Pope and some were neuter to rectify which abuse and to extirpate popery with as little voyce as could be a writ is directed to the Archbishop of Canterbury who afterwards was burned by Queen Mary for his adhering to the Catholick or as the terme now is the protestant faith by the King and his counsell requiring him with others to meet and consult how to prevent for the future and remove that confusion for the present the service of the Church being then various after the use of Sarum Of York of Bangor and of Lincolne and besides them diverse other formes and bookes called Antiphoners Missales Graites Processionals Manuells Legends Pies Portuasses Couchers Iournalls Ordinals In a word every man used what form fashion or manner pleased him best This writ being sent to those persons hereafter to be mentioned they meet and after much debate consulting with the antient liturgyes of the Church expunging from them all what ever was not either in or agreeable to the word of God presented to that Godly King a book entituled The book of the Common-prayer and administration of the sacraments and other rites and Ceremonys of the Church after the use of the Church of England at the reading of which his Majesty being very thankfull both to God and man presented it to both his houses of Parliament assembled
at Westminister November 4.1548 and being by them perused after thanks returned to the King for his care and pains he is petitioned to let it passe unto an act and by Authority it was enacted that in all Churches and Chappels Sacraments and all other ordinances within the compasse of that bock should be performed solely and wholy by it appointing penaltys to the not users or defamers of the same It might very well be Inquired considering the premisses and our practises whether a set for me may not be as necessary in our days as it was in those considering how various men are in their form manner place or gesture in the administration of ordinances not that I would have mens gifts hindered but their spleen rancour and rage stopped unto which well composed for me would be a proper remedy which truly as it is to be suspected is the cause why a forme is by many called down knowing that it would cut be their extravagant notions their abilitye and parts being neither so high nor so great but a liturgy might be used by them but to let them passe The compilers of the Book of Common-prayer were Doct. Cranmer Arch Bishop of Cant. Doct. Goodrick Bishop of Ely Doct. Skip Bishop of Hereford Doct. Thirlby Bishop of Westminster Doct. Day Bishop of Chichester Doct. Holbeck Bishop of Lincolne Doct. Ridley Bishop of Rochester Doct. May Deane of Pauls Doct. Taylour Deane of Lincolne Doct. Heynes Dean of Exeter Doct. Redman Dean of Westminster Doct. Cox King Eâ—wards Almoner Doct. Mr. Robinson Arch-Deacon of Leinest All these being then owned for sound professors of the faith afterward great sufferers by death exile or banishment for their not yeelding to the errors of the Church of Rome Shall their work be thought to be unlawfull which after much deliberation they composed for the edification of the Church were they difstracted or mad or Hypocrites that they should thus put down and erect Popery For all the zeal of the Guisel before Latimer shall be accused as a Papist let him be indicted for an Atheist he that so says fearing neither God nor regarding man had that holy soul no religion when he gave his body to be burned I do now imagine I smell Cranmâ—ns flesh burning through the Cruelty of the Papists and let my right hand forget her cunning if I should not rather kisse the straw he lay upon and bow to thâ— chain he was fastened to the stake by then kick the ashes he was burned to or condemn him for a cheat a dissembler for a Papist which consequentially must be affirmed when that book of Common prayer is reviled and â—corned and as Popish asserred 2. This book of Common-prayer appears to be lawfull from that authoâ—ity by which it hath been established It is strange that that young Iosiah of England viz King Edward studying to root out Popery should so farre befoole himself and his counsel as to be glad at that bookes compiling if it had strengthâ—ned the Papal power was there nor a wise man in all the Parliaments of his time was there no religion in Qâ— Elizabeth was she such a notorious dissembler as under a pretence of throwing the doctrine of Rome aside would hug the Pope the closser in her armes or if she had been such was there never a holy man nor a religious Parliament in her time to rectifie that abuse â— was King Iames and his Parliaments all out of the way and King Charles of glorious memory and his Parliaments all Papists or Ignoramuses that they knew not what they did when they established this book Certainly those glorious Princes and wise Parliaments in establishing successively that book did find in it nothing that was unlawfull or that was contrary to true Godlinesse 3. From its conformity to sacred Scripture Let the Common-prayer be abserved and the matter of it be marked and bring it to the Bible Old or new Testament to Moses the Prophâ—ts or the Psalms and if there be a word sentence petition or prayer that is not agreeable to either of these all of these or a part of these the Author of these lines at this present engages himself to recant publickly what either here or elsewhere he hath written in defence of that book and become a proselyte to the profession of the Guisels In the book of Common prayer there are two things considerable 1. The matter of it 2. The Ceremonies in it 1. The matter or subject of the book of which it is composed to passe over scripture is either 1. Holy songs 2. Pious prayers 3. Godly exhortations 4. Christian confession 5. Scriptural Comminations Which may be again subdevided into 1. The Priests Versicles 2. The Peoples Responses In all which there is nothing but what is agreeable to holy writ and the will of God revealed in his Scriptures The Ceremonies in it which are those particular gestures or acts to be performed in the administration of such and such particular services and they are cheifly these 1. The crosse in Baptisme 2. Kneeling at the Supper 3. The Preists standing at the north side of the table at the communion 4. Marrying with a ring 5. Standing at the Creed In giveing obedience unto which ceremonys there is no more scripture to prove it a sin then there is to maintaine it unjust to be thrice asked in a Church before marriage as the Guisels in their directory enjoyn or to be married by a minister which there by them is also thought to be expedient 4. From the sutablenesse of it to the Common Christians capacity The service of the Church of Rome were it not repugnant in other points to the word of God yet in this it is sinfull that it is performed in a strange tongue which the common sort of Christians understand not In the Church of England there is no ordinance no service but the exhortations thanksgiveings and confessions therein are all of them so plain so easy that the bluntest understanding may reach them and the shallowest capacity may upon a certain knowledge say Amen So be it unto them all 5. From the agreements of it to the set formes of other Churches to those of Geneva Sweden France yea to the Church of Rome so farre as they are agreeable to scripture and to those formes that were of old used and at this present are in the Easterne Church doth the sevice of the Church of England agree and correspond an argument of it self were there no other of its excellency and dignity the wise composers of it having drained the errours from all other formes and thrown away what ever was a misse in other liturgys retaining what was pure and holy agreeable to found doctrine and religion which being methodicall digested and composed was presented to the King and ratified by Parliament as a standing rule to be used in the house of God which is the Church 7. Fâ—om the excellent order and uniformity that is in the
be taken Quest. 1. Whether swearing be an ordinance of or under the Gospel There are them that live about us and among us who denies that swearing is any part of Gospel worship and therefore though called thereunto refuse least they should sin but erroneously For 1. Swearing was no part of the Ceremonial law but used long before Moses and the ends of it are morall and therefore it is not abolished by the death of Christ. 2. It is prophesyed that the Church of the Gentils shall swear by the Lord and by the God of truth Isa. 65.16 Ier. 4.16 Implying that whereas they did swear by Baal and other false gods they should by knowledge be brought from that Idolatry and give that point of worship to the God of Heaven who alone is the true God 3. By a holy Apostle it is frequently done even by him who was an eminent preacher of the Gospel viz. St. Paul an oath is nothing but a calling of God to witnesse of the truth of that which is done or spoken that it may be received with the greater belief now how often doth that eminent servant of the Lord Jesus deliver himself in the very substance of an oath as God is my witnâ—sse Rom. 1.9 God is my record Pâ—il 1.8 God is my witnesse 1 Thes. 2.5 10. God knoweth 2 Cor. 11 11 31. Before â—od I lie not Gal. 1.20 I say the truth in Châ—istiâ—n Christ I lie not Rom. 9.1 As the truth of Christ is in me 2 Cor. 11.10 I speak the truth in Christ and lye not 1 Tim. 2.7 All which are as substantial oaths as any we read of in the oâ—d â—â—â—pensation 4. Even in the close of the Gospel we find a holy Angell to swear Rev. 10.6 we pray that the will of God may be done by uâ— as it is done by the hoâ—y Angels and hear we have an Anâ—ell for greater certainty sealing his threatning by an oath From these reasons we may without errour conclude that the oâ—dinance of swearing is in full force and power under the Gospell to all intents and purposes any thing that our adversaries can bâ—ing to the Contrary notwithstanding Those texts Math. 5.34 and Iames 5.12 speaks of swearing in our common communication and of such oathes as are sworn by the creatures as may appear by the contexts not of Judicial swearinâ— oâ— any other kind of oathes when necessity and authority draws men to it for clearing of the truth and ending of controversie against which the Gospel speakes not one word but confirms it by severall passages yea St. Paul writing to the Hebrews says Heb. 6.16 That an oath for confirmation is to men an end of all strife not that it was but it is q.d. while I am writing and preaching now when the found of the Gospell is gone over all the world is an oath the end of strife and that not to some only but to men i.e. to all sorts of men whether Jew or Gentile now had it been a sin to have used an oath under the Gospell for that end we should have heard of it in this most proper place or in some other And if any will be contentious let them consider that Pauls before God I lye not 1 Gal. 20. and the Angells by him that lives for ever is more then yea yea and yet who dare reprove either of them of sin To this doctrine consents the reformed Churches of Helva Art 30. of Ausp Art 16. of England Art 39. the Art itself is this Art 39. of the Church of England As we confesse that vain and rash swearing is forbidden Christian men by our Lord Iesus Christ and James his Apostle so we judge that Christian religion doth not prohibit but that a man may swear when the Magistrate requireth in a cause of faith and Charity so it be done according to the Prophets teaching in Iustice Iudgement and truth Quest. 2 Whether the Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy required by the Kings of England c. of their Subjects may lawfully be taken That Covenants or oaths in cases of necessity or suspition may be made by the subjects of a land to their lawful Prince appears by that Act of Iehoiadah at the Coronation of King Iehoash 2 King 11.17 where we have the footsteps of a Coronation and allegiance oath but to come to the matter in hand either of these oaths may lawfully be taken For 1 Swearing is a Gospell Ordinance and therefore under the Gospell may be performed being ratified taken and used by a holy Apostle and blessed Angell 2 There is nothing in them oaths that is contrary to the word of God God who made the heavens is only called to testifie the reallity of the intentions 3 The taking of them gives assurance to his Majesty of his Subjects faithfulnesse and loyalty and indeed as the case now stands he may be suspected of disloyalty that will not satisfie the law in that particular 4. It is but equall that subjects swear to defend his Majesties honours and prerogatives since he hath sworn to maintain his subjects rights and properties Next swear not at all the grand objection is his Majesties supremacy But 1 It is under Christ none acknowledgeth him as absolute head of the Church that being his sole prerogative who is King of Kings and it would be considered whether God hath not made as good and as many Laws touching the government of the State as he hath for that of the Church yet who will thence conclude that the Magistrate is not supreame in civill affairs that is next immediately under God For no otherwise is he head that is governour of the Church 2 It is only to exclude the Popes Authority His holinesse at Rome looks upon all Kings and Emperours as his Vassals and servants and did he not exalt him above all that are called Gods he would want one mark of the Antichrist 1 Thes. 2.4 by the way they being called Gods we are to know that none on earth no no Presbytery their superior nor contain the Pope therfore pretending a power over the Church making himself or giving out himself as head of all civil Ecclesiastical officers and withall making the Church to be so absolute a distinst body from the state that no state officer whether the King though he only be supream ought in the least to meddle with it or if he do to be excommunicated or deposed for his presumption this power is by this Oath taken from the Pope and given to him that is the true as the Pope makes the Church to be so absolute a distinct body from the state as that the state hath nothing to do with it or in it there are them in our dayes to be quit with the Pope that would have no Church officer in the least to meddle with the state supposing such an absolutnesse in the one that it hath no coherence with or dependance upon the other in this absolute sence the
rebellion and murdeder at London for though they have different faces yet they are all one blood It was first appointed in England by ercombart a kentish King who destroyed the of the heathen gods Ac. 641. A Feast so câ—â—led from the Saxon word Eâ—sâ—er a gâ—dnesse of the old Saxâ—ns whose feast thâ—y keept in April or as others because Ch. the light of the world then arose or so that word signi in the Saxoâ—ash vedens day was of old called Câ—â—ut â—â—lu nu It was to be admired that our late governours or changlings would not appoint the mock fasts upon the sâ—bbath or some other day and â—ot on these appoâ—nâ—ed and used by the Church It is to be thouâ—ht God would 〈◊〉 suffer them that the faithfull might 〈◊〉 deliverance of the Church on those days appoâ—nted by her self Trap in Mat. c 22 v. 6. A fast in Walingford Chapple by the army officers at the turning out of D.C. there was such speeches such faces as would have made a tender Christian to have fasted a whole week through sicknesse Satan is prince of the power of the ayr and therefore the fit â—est place for such witches to have heads and limbs abid in Cod. Rom Aut. lib. 1.7.87 Ovid lib. 5. fast As a day or place may have relative holinesse though not absolute so a thing or act may be relatively prophane absolutely no hurt be in it â—â— tubae sonitu vocata nudato copore in flora lib. discurat Farn. in Iuven Sat. 6. Cato severe venistii Aâ— ideo tantum vnâ—ras ut exires Mat. epig. lib. 1. Ep. 1. half the mirth is in the poles stealing More people appear at those games then at the Churches devotion Thâ—s suits with the original of those game not with the churches Institution of this day Except it be the selling of the pole by the Erectors though this also eventualy is not good Canon 76. Church of England That Parli which sat Sept. 17. 1659 was long pleased about the nature of blasphmy when J. N. was accused of it before a very worthy society Church his miscel Philo. Theolog. 81. Elisha is also called Lord by the Inhabitants of Ier. 2 Kings 2.19 That adâ— monition which respects excommunication must not be for sins of infirmity but of a deeper dye and colour Forma excom ab Imerto Authoriae The Datch word for a pres as he is Antiepicopall Gal. Instit. l. 4. c. 12. S. 7. Some calls it a natural sacrament which is as much as to to say it is no sacrament at all Loâ—b lib. 4. Dâ—st 25. Si ex contemptu vel negligentia sacramentum hoc pâ—aeteâ—mittic peâ—iculosum est damâ—abile Lomâ— Lib. 4. Dist. 24 B. As it were presumption in aâ—wicked man to expect to be bettered by the holiness of any so it is distrust for a good man to imagine he shall be worse for a prophane man Syntag. Dis. Theolog Pag. 1074. Syn. Trip. Pag. 864. Hytia non sunt multiplicanda sine necessitate Wisdoms seven pillars Prov. 9.1 it is a groundless and roofless foundation being neither able to hold nor keep out water Sin is by degrees abated at length abolished when the party is dissolved 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The word Originally is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from the water which he might do in that being dipped in the water 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a sweet Bath Children not yet begotten are not said to be afar off but very near in their fathers â—ins Heb. 7.10 That place is not to be sound in all the Scripture but by consequence 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This profane custom is thought to take its rise from Esan disdaining his circumcision Atque ex hoc vitu â— c. Jun. Trem. Annot in loc God aut lib. 6.215 It was sad times when the Prophet seek his witnesses â—b Lit. Can. 29. of the Church so England Can. 30. of the Church of England See the Lit. for Pâ—i Bapâ— where no â—tâ—â—ntion of the Cross made nor inquired after What a Parliament establisheth every particular man in his representative Consents to therefore it ought to be spoken against by none As there are many small pins in themselves of no great concernment yet taken away might endanger a whole building witnesse the late removing of some poore Ceremonies brought down the gâ—eat Raâ—ters both of Church and State 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whence the Churches custome of observing Easter Mâ—nday c. took its rise Lomb. Lib. 4. Dist. 9. B. In baptisme Rome anâ—ynis the hieder part of the head but in confirmati the fore part The confirmed hath also given him a box oâ— the ear else all the faâ— is in the fire Can. 60. and 61. of the Church of England Mr. Baxter Mr. Hen. Mr. L.P. Ch. lit for Com. Ch. lit for Con. Cal. Inst. lib. 4. c. 19.5 4. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that of doing it upon the head of peninents câ—me notâ— until after the Aâ—oâ—â—les Mr. Hanmer Ex. on Cons. 1 Infans à non fando Can. 21. of the Church of England It is supposed by some that Christ repeated this whole Psalm upon the Cross. Godwin Moses and Aton lib. 3.105 That man that holds any one gesture necessary since God hath commanded none is a will worshipper and highly superstitioâ—â— in that gesture 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Mat. 26.20 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Mark 14.18 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Luke 22.19 Can. â—7 of the Chuâ—ch of Eng. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Can. 26. of the Church of Engâ—and Weston Octo. 25 1657. Sâ—n. de con chap. 1.32 Sâ— Mr. Pryanes signall loyalty c. In which this truth is fully lâ—arnedly cleaâ—ly and truly handled He raigned over the Germans A.M. 2117. 80 years before the birth of Joseph â— Hall in Gods appearing c. p. 15. Rome will have seven and were there no greater difference between her the reformed Churches we should quickly agree a This gesture we read of only in this place and that privatly Dr. Taylour when he was going to be martyred as his last legacy give his wife the Common-prayer which he constantly used himself during his imprisoâ—ments For Acts and Monâ— 1385. When the Direct was in force and the Guisel in power no tender consciences nor offended Brethren were then pitied but Quakers Ranters and Anabaptists and should these be tolerated and not the Guisel it were but just See Jâ—dg 1.7 See King Charles his meditation upon the ordinance against the common-prayer Of prayer 452. Cabbet prayer 455. I make no doubt but a man may be very formal in the most extemporary variety and very fervently devout in the most wonted expressions King Char. med 16. upon the c. p. See my Panem quatidi p. 25. ad fin Proclamation before Common-prayer It would stop some mens mouths at last and take them out of their studies to the Desk with credit This was never publickly delivered Edwyn the first who ruled in Scot. Am. 3870 was the first King that caused his subjects to be sworne Lan. Chro. 3 Parts 187.