the Zwinglian Church of England that composed these formes made no difference betweene a Bishop a Priest and a Christian because that was the current Doctrine in all reformed Churches in those dayes and particularly in the Zwinglian See the 23. of the 39. articles of the Church of England a Priest or a Bishop was he that was appointed by the Congregation to preach their Ghospel it was but an extrinsecall denomination a meere formality taken from the will of the faithfull brethren and from a square cap and a linnen rochet This is made evident by the example of Iohn Hooper who could never be dispensed withall by Cranmer and Ridley in the cap and rochet when he was to be made Bishop of Glocester though they never troubled him with imposition of hands or ordination Pag. 1366. I cannot tell faith Fox what sinister and unlucky contention concerning the ordaining and consecration of Bishops and of their apparrell with other like trifles began to disturb the good and lucky beginning of this godly Bishop c. In conclusion he was faine to agree to this condition t at sometimes he should in his sermons shew himselfe apparailed as the other Bishops were His upper garment was a long scarlet shymar downe to the foote and under that a white linnen rochet that covered all his shoulders Vpon his head he bad a geometricall or mathematicall cap that is a foure squared cap with foure angles dividing the whole world into foure parts albeit his head was Round You may perceive by this how little they valued Ordination in King Edwards dayes all their care was that the appearance and exteriour formality of a Bishop should be maintained because that would maintaine them and keepe them in possession of the Bishops revenues and of a place in the upper House of Parliament All was policy there was nothing of Religion 6 They tooke as little care of Priesthood as of Episcopacy which you may gather also out of Fox his Calendar Pag. 1456. Doctor Ridley saith he that worthy Bishop of London called John Bradford to take the degree of Deacon according to the order that then was in the Church of England but for that this order was not without some such abuse as to the which Bradford would not consent the Bishop then was content to order him Deacon without any abuse even as he desired So that you may guesse how all Protestants were ordered not onely in King Edwards reigne but also in his Fathers Henry the VIII seeing Ordination was not urged but given to every man in the forme that he desired And this is the reason why most Writers say that all who were Hereticks in King Henry his time and are pretended to be ordained Bishops in the latter end of his reigne as Barlow and some Suffragans were really never ordained because Ordination did not agree with their spirit and was contrary to their inclination and to the Tenets and practise of all Churches pretending Reformation Fox also tells us of one Robert Drakes made Deacon by Doctor Taylor of Hadley who was no Bishop and afterwards was admitted Minister of Gods Words and Sacraments by Cranmer and Ridley not after the order then in force but after such order as was after established every one was ordained as he desired And as for Iohn Bradford after his Deaconship he was immediatly without any other orders made Prebend and Preacher of Saint Paules where sharply saith Fox he opened and reproved sinne sweetly he preached Christ crucified pithily he impugned heresies and errours earnestly he perswaded to good life And all this you must knowe was performed with one onely yeares study in Cambridge Bradford having beene all his life before a serving man None that will read what we have said of this Zwinglian Clergy can admire Brookes novell cases Placito 463. sol 101. printed at London 1604. that in Queene Maries reigne all King Edward the VI. Bishops were declared no Bishops both in the spirituall and temporall Courts and therefore all Leases made by them as Bishops were not available It s very like the Judges informed themselves of the matter of the fact before they pronounced the sentence and if Protestants have no exceptions against the sentence of Queen Maries Courts but the Catholick Religion of the Judges how can themselves expect to be heard or credited in any matter of fact or faith that concerns Roman Catholicks 7 This politike Religion and lay Clergy was banished out of England by Queene Mary after the death of her brother King Edward many of the chiefe pillars thereof were burnt as obstinate Hereticks according to the ancient Lawes of Christian Emperours and Kings of England others to escape the sire passed over the Seas to Germany the native soile of their errours No sooner were they arrived to Frankford but Calvin pretended a right in them as agreeing with his Doctrine though they would not admit his Discipline and therefore he writ to Knox and Whittingham Calvin ep 200. ad Knox. In Anglicana Liturgia qualem describitis multas video fuisse tolerabiles ineptias I see that in the English forme of Service as you describe it there were many tolerable fooleries Many there were saith my Protestant Author and that of the learnedst of those that then departed the Realme The survay of the pretended holy Discipline printed an 1593. pag 46. as Doctor Cox Doctor Horne Master Iewell with sundry others who perceiving the tricks of that Discipline did utterly dislike it So as when they came afterwards to Frankford they wholy insisted upon the platforme of England and in short time obtaining of the Magistrats the use thereof they did choose either Doctor Cox or Doctor Horne as I guesse or some such other as had beene of speciall account in King Edwards time to be as it were their Superintendent Now we see clearly how the English Ordination was not in those dayes by imposition of hands but by election according to their translation of Scripture and how the Congregation did make their Bishops for they translate also in their Bible Superintendent for Bishop Why should any rationall man doubt but that the very same men who without any Episcopall consecration made a Bishop in Frankford wold doe the same in the Nags-head at London Iewell Horne Cox and the rest at Frankford were the first pretended Bishops of England in Queene Elizabeths reigne But of this more hereafter in the ensuing Section SECT VII Of the English Protestant Church in Queene Elizabeths reigne 1 IF ever Policy was transformed into Religion it was by Queene Elizabeth and those who favoured her illegitimacy against the knowne right of Mary Steward to the Crowne of England It was as evident that she was right heire as it was that Henry the VIII could not have two lawfull wives at once and in the first yeare of Queene Maries reigne it was declared by Act of Parliament that Queene Catharine was lawfull to King Henry
attributed to an incapacity of learning even by experience the art of governing Therefore it concerns not onely the state but also the honour of Princes to condemne sometimes their owne first choice and judgements by second thoughts and reflections least the world should thinke that they are more wilfull then understanding more besotted upon an unhappy Favorite then attentive to the common good their owne interest and reputation This lesson was inculcated to the late King Charles by his Father when he charged him to beware of Master Laud whom King Iames did foresee to be as unfit for government as afterwards he proved by treating the English Nobility and Gentry with such scorne as if they were borne to be no lesse under his command then de facto they were at his disposall by reason of the Kings favour and commission Had his late Majesty beene as fortunate in taking his Fathers advice as his Father was prudent in giving it their posterity and the poore Cavalleers had beene in a better condition Princes are not so frequently ruined by their owne faults as by their Favorits unlesse you will reckon amongst their owne whatsoever is owned by them to excuse their Ministers Yet politick Princes are more apt to father their owne oversights upon others then adopt those of others to themselves and are seldome so constant in their affection to Favorits as for their sakes to bring their owne judgements in question either by owning their defects or defending their misgovernment 5 Heresy that could not get footing in Scotland during Iames the V. his reigne assaulted the same Kingdome in his daughter Queene Mary Stewards infancy borne but 8. dayes before her Father departed this world Iames Hamilton Earle of Aran taking upon him the government was solicited by Henry the VIII to send the young Queene into England that she might be married to his Sonne Edward Aran condescended but the Queene Mother and Cardinal Beton Chancellor of Scotland opposed Henry the VIII designe as destructive to Catholick Religion and by consent of the three States of the Realme sent the yong Queene to France to be espoused to the Delphin But before her departure Henry the VIII had gained some of the Nobility of Scotland to himselfe who preferring their private interests before Religion encouraged one Friar Williams a Dominican to preach against the Popes supremacy and to exhort all people to read the English Bible not doubting by these meanes to embroyle the Kingdome in such a manner that Henry the VIII sending an Army might not onely have the yong Queene but the whole Kingdome at his command Though the Queene escaped her Kingdome was all wasted with warre Paul the III. Bishop of Rome sent the Patriarch of Venice to comfort the Scots in their affliction exhorting them to be constant in that Faith which they had inherited from their Ancestours 6 By the sermons of Friar William and the liberty of reading the Bible many of the vulgar sort and also of the Nobility were perverted and because Cardinal Beton being Archbishop of Saint Andrews and Chancellor of Scotland was an obstacle to their intended rebellion and destruction of the Catholick Religion they did assassinate him in his owne chamber and hanged his body out at the window in his Cardinals robes It s certaine that his bloud could not be washed of from the stone of the window though great diligence was used to that purpose This murther was revenged by the King of France whose forces tooke the Castle to which the Hereticks retired punished them and suppressed their novelties But in the yeare 1558. when the Queene of Scots married the Delphin of France the Hereticks raised another rebellion The Ringleaders were Paul Meffinus a baker Harlaus a taylor and Iohn Duglas alias Grant who had beene a Carmelite Friar On the first of September the feast of Saint Giles had beene alwayes celebrated very solemnly in Edinburg as being Patron of that City The Saints Image being carried in procession according to the ancient and Catholick manner the Hereticks snatcht it away and committed many other abuses and sacrileges and spared not to exhort all sorts of people to rebell against the present government 7 Iohn Knox an Apostata Religious Priest being accused formerly of too much familiarity with his mother in law of witchcraft and of many other crimes was fled from Scotland into England and from thence to Geneva where he learnt Calvins doctrine and discipline This wicked man having by his Letters and Emissaries perturbed all in Scotland came in person in the yeare 1559. to compleat the worke he rallied all the dispersed Hereticks persuaded them to profane all Churches and Altars pull downe Monasteries banish all Bishops Priests and Religious deny obedience to the Queene Regent to whom Knox gave the lye divers times and to choose a new Councell whereof the chiefe was Iames Steward base sonne to Iames the V. who afterwards was Earle of Murray and liked well to see this confusion not doubting that his ambition might fish in the troubled water Calvin ep 285. Calvin writ to Knox congratulating with him the good successe and progresse of the Ghospel exhorting him to carry on the worke of the Lord like a valiant labourer in Christs Church But by succours from France the rebells were quieted and by the endeavours of Nicholas Pellevins the Popes Nuntius afterwards a Cardinal and of three Sorbon Doctors their heresie did not spread over the whole Nation though every day their number encreased Knox never omitted any opportunity afterwards to plant his Genevian Ghospel in his Countrey which at length by the helpe of the Devill and Iames Steward and other Polititians he perfected When King Iames came first into England being at dinner in a noble mans house he said Knot in his Protestancy condemned fol. 166. edit 1654. at Doway that God thought fit to set a visible mark of reprobation upon Knox even in this life before he went to the Devill which was that being sick in his bed with a good fire of coales by him and a candle light upon the table a woman or maid of his sitting by him he told her that he was extreamly thirsty and therefore willed her to fetch him some drinke She went and returned quickly but found the room all in darknesse for not onely the candle but the cole fire also was utterly extinct and she by that light which her selfe brought in immediatly after saw the body of Knox lying dead in the middle of the floor and with a most gastly and horrid countenance as if his body were to shew the condition of his soule Let Polititians reflect upon this horrid spectacle and consider whether they can invent a plot whereby Gods just judgement may be deluded What did it availe Knox in his last houre to have beene as powerfull in Scotland as Calvin was in Geneva and what will it availe any Polititian or Courtiour to have embroyled Kingdomes and made factions in this
obedience is equally destroyed by Atheisme and Protestancy Though the signes of a supreme Deity be as evident and visible to the eyes of Atheists as this world and all its creatures yet they deny obedience to that supreme Deity and though supernaturall signes as miracles and sanctity of life be as evident to the eyes of Protestants in the Roman Church and no other as any thing can be yet they deny obedience to the said Church both agree in destroying that principle upon which the obligation of beliefe and obedience is grounded Policy and civill government can as little stand without this principle as a house can without out a foundation Atheists and Protestants doe agree in undermining not onely Religion but also the authority of Princes and Commonwealths and therefore both doctrines ought to be equally prohibited and suppressed 4 In one respect Protestancy is more dangerous to civill government then Atheisme An Atheist expects not any invisible power providence to support him because he believeth none a Protestant persuades himselfe that God will second his zeale for the Ghospel and consequently is more resolute and daring if God to punish the sinnes of others permits a Protestant to have good successe in his first attempts he thinks that successe is a new engagement to proceed further looking upon himselfe as an instrument of providence to carry on the imaginary worke or the Lord. The Atheist thinks of no such providence or engagement but attributeth his successe to his owne industry and is not so fierce constant and dangerous an enemy to the civill government as a Protestant Though all this had not beene evident by reason as necessarily following out of Protestant principles yet its manifest by experience and history as we have seene in this Treatise Chap. 7. but because in the next I am to treate of the tyranny and rebellions of Protestancy I will end this with onely assuring my Reader that Polititians were never more unhappy or more grosely mistaken then in the beginning and promoting a pretended Reformation that doth not onely lead men to Atheisme but makes them incapable of being governed after they have shaken of the yoke of obedience to divine Authority appearing more sufficiently and evidently in the Roman Catholick Church then any Kings authority doth appeare in his Lieutenant or subordinate Officers But now let us proceed and descend to particulars by shewing CHAP. VIII That Protestancy inclines the Prince to Tyranny and the Subjects to Rebellion 1 PRinces may be Tyrants though the Religion they professe be good but that Religion cannot be good which inclines Princes to tyranny A Tyrant is he who rules either without or against Law making his owne will and pleasure the modell of his government To rule against the knowne and practised sense of the Law is to rule against Law because the essence of a Law consists in the sense not in the letter The fundamentall Lawes of a Christian Commonwealth are the holy Scriptures to rule against the knowne and practised sense of these Lawes is the greatest tyranny because it is to rule without and against Law it is to rule without Law because Gods sense is left out and the Reformers fancy or the Prince his pleasure is thrust into its place and Scripture is not Gods Law without Gods sense It is also to rule against Law because the Protestant sense of Scripture is contrary to the knowne and practised sense of Gods Word whereby the Church hath beene governed since the time of the Apostles This proves nothing lesse then I supposed in the title of the Chapter it demonstrates clearly that when Protestant Princes are not Tyrants we may thanke themselves and not their Religion which is directly opposite to the Law of God and inconsistent with the duty Princes owe to divine Majesty whence also it followed that it is an inclination to Tyranny against the Lawes and liberties of the Land because he that governeth without and against the Law or God is in a faire way and at least inclined to governe without and against the Lawes of men 2 I heare some Doctors of the English Protestant Church seeme to be much scandalized at Master Hobbes his Leriathan because he attributes so much to a Soveraigne and saith that Christian Subjects may in the exteriour profession of their Faith accommodate themselves with the Prince whether Turke or Jew I cannot answer for Master Hobbes his Christianity but this much I will say in his behalfe that I have not seene Protestancy better expressed nor more consequently deduced out of its principles then in this Authors Leviathan he is a good Protestant and an ill Christian How can any Protestant sinde fault with Master Hobbes See the 39. articles of the Protestant Religion confirmed by K. Charles an 1642. for making the Prince Head of the Church and sole Interpreter of Scripture Why should 12. or 7. men in King Edward the VI. time or a few Ministers in Queene Elizabeth and King Iames his reigne assume to themselves a power of framing a new Religion and coyning a new sense of Scripture contrary to antiquity and the knowne practise of all Christian Churches and in particular that of England Why should they I say assume this unlimited power to themselves and deny it to their Soveraigne 3. Ed. 6.12 5. Ed. 6.1 and his Counsell If they examine well they will finde Master Hobbes doth no more And if they acknowledge this great power in spirituall affaires to be inherent to the Soveraignes person as they doe 8. Eliz. 1. even by their Acts of Parliament how can they deny him in the temporall as absolute and unlimited a power as Master Hobbes is forced to grant by the foundation and principles of Protestant Religion Doe not the Doctors of the English Church averre that from the Popes Primacy and Headship of the Church must evidently follow an Antichristian Tyranny inconsistent with the prerogative dominion and security of Kings and the liberty of Subjects why doe they not inferre die same consequence from the Soveraignes supremacy I am sure they attribute greater power to their Kings Queenes and petty Doctors then Catholicks doe to the Pope or generall Councells who according to our Tenets cannot pare of any thing from the matter and forme of Sacraments nor alter the ancient sense of Scripture contrary to tradition and the practise of the Catholicks Church but Protestancy acknowledgeth all this power to be inseparable from the Kings and Queenes of England and yet doth confesse that both King and Protestant Church may erre against Christian Faith in their Reformations no Subject notwithstanding must speake a word against those errours he must accommodate himselfe to them in all his exteriour actions though he be convinced in judgement that they are against Catholick Religion I would faine knowe in what doth this doctrine of theirs differre from Master Hobbes Both agree in the substance both grant that men may dissemble their Faith and deny
the penall Lawes were enacted but it was a crime to be an Heretick or Apostata before the ancient Emperours and Kings made penall Lawes against heresy The Law supposed and did not make the crime as penall Statutes doe in England making a crime of Christian Religion 2. Hereticks are never condemned by the Inquisition without the testimony of many lawfull witnesses both living and dead all the ancient Fathers Councells and the whole Catholick Church of former ages testify that their errours are new and contrary to the Doctrine of Christ and his Apostles no Rebell was ever more evidently convicted of rebellion against his Prince then Hereticks are by the Inquisition of heresy against God and the Apostolicall Church We Catholicks cannot obtaine so faire play at their hands we are condemned by a new Law because we are not Hereticks and our Judges are convicted of the crime they lay to our charge Surely this is to turne upside downe Justice and Judicature 3. The Inquisition medleth not with those who never were Catholicks but the penall Lawes comprehend them who never were of their Church or communion 4. The Inquisition condemns no Hereticks to death but onely declares their heresy to the end the faithfull may avoid their conversation its true the secular power executeth the secular against them notwitstanding that the Inquisition doth protest against that rigour and desireth that Hereticks may not be punished with death or effusion of bloud this protestation and petition is now and hath alwayes beene the continuall practise of the Roman Church but the penall Lawes of Protestants are written with bloudy caracters all their Courts are stained with the innocent and noble bloud of many learned and loyall Subjects onely because they would not take an oath against their conscience and abjure the Faith of their Christian Ancestours 5. Though the Inquisition were as unjust and rigorous as some of the ignorant Protestants pretend it could be no blemish to the Catholick Religion because it is not an universall practise but limited to Spaine and Italy at the instance of secular Princes who looke upon it as a necessary meanes to keepe their Subjects of those Nations in the feare of God and in awe of their Soveraignes But the penall Lawes of England are spread as farre as their Protestant Church and communion 6. The Inquisition doth seriously wish and endeavour the conversion amendment of Hereticks employing learned Divines to convince them of their errours and instruct them in the way of salvation but the penall Lawes and the oathes of supremacy alleageance and abjuration are like so many nets cast out by Protestants to fish estates in troubled consciences a farre different method from that of the Apostles who were fishers of men and not of estates Protestants fish for estates though not alwayes with successe In King Iames his reigne a Scot begged of his Majesty an English Catholicks estate to whom he procured that the oath of supremacy might be tendered never imagining that the Gentleman would take it or goe to Church and damne his soule to save his estate the Gentleman offered the Scot a faire composition but nothing would satisfy this beggar if he had not made the Catholick also a beggar who at length resolved to shew himselfe in the Church whereupon the Scot made him a most devout and learned exhortation dissuading him from all Protestant assemblies often repeating and explaining the words of our Saviour What doth it availe a man if he games all the world by the losse of his sale Yet the English man remained obstinate and resolved rather to give his soule to the Devill then his estate to a Scot. I believe there are many such beggarly Preachers now adayes in England if they consider well the text of the Scots Sermon they may apply it better to themselves then to Roman Catholicks 6 The last pretext for persecuting of English Catholicks is the massacre and murther of Protestants in Ireland in the beginning of the late troubles and this must be a preamble to all Proclamations and Oathes of abjuration What hath an English Catholick to doe with an lrish massacre I am sure he doth not thirst by nature after the bloud of his owne Nation and his Religion doth neither incline him to murther or rebellion That is a privilege of Protestancy we have a setled sense of Scripture which none can alter without breach of Catholick Faith and we are not Judges of our owne Controversies but must submit to a third and indifferent person But as for the murthers and massacres of Ireland so much and so often exaggerated in Protestant Pamphlets and Pulpits I onely say that Protestancy had a greater hand in them then Catholick Religion because our Tenets arc contrary to cruelty and bloudshead and though Catholicks may be as guilty of murther as other men the Religion cannot Is it not notorious that the Protestants in Ireland signed a bloudy Petition offered to the Parliament of England that all Irish who would not goe to Church might be extirpated or banished This was done before the Irish Catholicks did stirre But suppose that in Vlster some of the rascality or kernes being exasperated by so many and continuall injuries done to them by Protestants had murthered some persons must that reflect upon the English Catholicks and all the Irish Nation It is most certaine and evident that the murthers and massacres done in Ireland by Protestants exceeded without comparison those committed by Catholicks as well in respect of their brutishnesse as numerousnesse Witnesse their marches about Dublin where the Inhabitants were all of English extraction and spoke no other language but the ancient Saxon. There are very few of that populous Countrey called Fingale left alive all perished by fire and sword being a most innocent people and having nothing I rishlike in them but Catholick Religion In the march of the Protestant Army to the County of Wicklo man woman and child was killed a Gentle woman big with child was hanged at an arch of a bridge and the poore Catholick that guided the Army for reward of his service at parting being commanded to blow into a pistol was shot therewith into the mouth though there had beene no murther committed on the Protestants in that County In another march into the same shire one Master Comain an aged Gentleman who never bore armes was roasted alive by one Captaine Gines yea they murthered all that came in their way from within two miles of Dublin In a march into the County of Kildare in or about February 1641. some of the Officers going into Mrs Eustate of Cradogstons house a sister to Sir William Talbot of eighty yeares of age who being unable to shunne entertained them with meate and drinke after dinner her selfe and another old Gentlewoman and a girle of eight yeares of age were murthered by the said Protestant Officers Walter Evers Esquire aged and sickly and of a long time before the warre bed-ridden being carried by
be excluded by the Princes or people from the government of the Common-wealth though some of them have beene more mistaken and are more subject to erre in that art then the Clergy their argument therefore may be with more force retorted against themselves 3 Polititians are Joyners by their trade their art consists in joyning the common good with the interest of the Prince It must be a cleare judgement that will not confound these two things and he must be no lesse vertuous then wary that will not incline more to one side then to the other Seculars are pleased to acknowledge more vertue in Churchmen then in themselves but they doubt much of their judgements If study of sciences and knowledge of what passed in former ages doth perfect mans understanding Churchmen have the advantage of seculars in judging of affaires who have not so much time to spare from their passetimes nor so great an inclination and obligation to learne as the Clergy But seculars though they were as learned as Churchmen cannot apply themselves so seriously to the study of the common good because they have much more to consider in particular and domestick affaires they must provide for their wife and dispose of their children Yet in case they should spend but little time in so neare a concernment they cannot deny that the Prince and Commonwealth runne a hazard in trusting them with publick offices and revenues out of which they will be very apt to provide portions for their daughters and employments for their sonnes Clergymen are neither troubled themselves nor trouble the Commonwealth with such burthen and consequently are more fit then seculars to manage the publick affaires A Churchman perhaps may endeavour to promote his Nephew but there is great difference betweene the affection of a Father and of an Uncle 3 The obligation and custome which Church-men have to spend more houres in their devotions then seculars doth give more advantage by perfecting their mindes then it doth prejudice by taking up their time not ouely because with God no time is lost who recompenseth aboundantly by his grace and illustrations other studies and thoughts but also because true policy must direct all things with subordination to Gods Law and the more we meditate therein the better Polititians we are Yet Churchmen after complying with their devotions haue more time to consider of affaires then seculars who are more in the Taverne then in the Church and frequent other passetimes when Churchmen are in their studies 4 All mankinde is so much concerned in the government of Commonwealths that it is not improper for the most retired of the Clergy sometimes to appeare in publick affaires We read of Monks that came along from Egypt to Constantinople to treate with Emperours about matters of great concernment Hermits have returned to the world from the desarts when they judged it necessary for the common good Suppose a man were buried alive in a grot under the walls of a Towne to the end he might shunne humane conversation if he doth heare the Enemy undermining the wall he is bound in conscience to leave his retirement and give notice of the common danger When a house is a fire they who are next must runne to quench it There is no profession so retired or so contrary to the management of State affaires that can excuse men from appearing in publick when they are concerned in the good of a Nation or Religion especially if they be next in trust of a Treaty or knowledge of a danger Much lessâ—â—â—n men separated from the world deny accesse to others who demand their advice in doubtfull and intricate matters of State wherein conscience may runne a hazard Princes and Counsellours consult their Confessours in Cloisters and thinke them more apt to judge of worldly affaires then others that live and negotiate in the world It is no disparagement for that grave and sage Counsell of Spaine that the Kings Confessour hath a place and vote amongst them he may be a witnesse that nothing is resolved which is not agreable to Christian and Catholick principles his profession is not contrary to an office out of which so much good may be derived to others Bishops are Counsellours in France and all other Catholick Countries and Abbots who professe a most retired life came from their Cloisters and Cells to sit in Parliament when Religion did flourish most in England and the same is practised to this day in other Nations with as great satisfaction of the Prince as benefit to the Commonwealth 5 There is nothing more necessary for a Statesman then secrecy whereof Churchmen give continually evident proofes in hearing Confessions Seculars may be secret but the world hath not so much reason to believe it seeing so many designes and great businesses miscarry for want of secrecy which I never heard laid to the charge of a Clergyman that was trusted in a businesse of State It s a received maxime amongst seculars that women are best informers and that they are made acquainted with whatsoever is debated in Counsells or Assemblies Fond husbands thinke they doe not love their wives if they conceale any thing from their knowledge and consequently from that of their Gossips It s thought the English Nation is more inclined to be advised by women then any other but without doubt it is of late since women ruled the Church and were made Popes dispensed with invalid Ordinations and by imposition of hands made Archbishops of Canterbury But seeing no man will trust his wife with his owne conscience and confession methinks he ought not to impart to her the secrecies of others At least the Catholick Clergy cannot be suspected to consult with their wives the secrecy of Princes because they have none but for the Protestant Ministers behaviour in this particular I will not sweare being as I heare more fond of their wives then any others and having notoriously betrayed secrets communicated to them in confession as you may read of Scory the Minister who betrayed the Earle of Essex in Queene Elizabeths time and in our dayes the case of poore Captain Hinde was much lamented who some few yeares since being accused of murther Captain Hindes lamentable case denyed it confidently there being no legall proofe But perswaded by a Minister of the English Protestant Church that the Judge was resolved to hang him and that he had aboundant proofe he exhorted the poore man to confession according to the custome or Common-prayer men and Church or England whereof both were Members Master Hinde told the Minister in confession that he had killed one of his owne Camerades and he promised to visit and comfort his penitent the next day but feigning himselfe sick he sent another Minister of the English Church also and desired Master Hinde to deale as confidently with him as he had done the day before with himselfe which the poore Gentleman did imparting likewise to him in confession what he had told the day
in that excellent Booke The Protestants Apology for the Church of Rome 4 Whereas ceremonies be the object of phantasy and ours are so decent that no phantasy can except more against them then against those of the Law of Moyses instituted by God himselfe and approved by Protestants the aversion which they manifest against our Ceremonies cannot proceed so much from their fancy as from their understanding dissenting from that Doctrine to which the Ceremonies relate To kneele is not an object ridiculous or offensive to the fancy the most precise practise it out of Churches and at Court and yet all Protestants cry abomination against kneeling to our Lord Iesus Christ in the Sacrament or worshiping himselfe or his Saints in Images these ceremonies agree well enough with their fancy but their understanding cannot brooke them A weake understanding may occasion as great errours as a strong fancy 5 Some fantasticall and fanaticall fellowes call the Roman Catholick Religion an Apith Keligion because forsooth it hath so many odde ceremonies But the fault is not in the Roman Religion or ceremonies they have Apish understandings they looke as Apes upon our ceremonies without considering the mysteries All the ceremonies of the Masse relate to Christs Passion others to the mysteries of the Trinity and Incarnation If it was lawful and laudable in the old Law to practise ceremonies representing things that were to come why should we Catholicks be censured for ceremonies that put us in minde of past mysteries and mercies We ought not to be unmindfull or ungratefull and there is not a more efficacious way to preserve a gratefull memory of past benefits then by representing them in ceremonies to the light 6 I must confesse that all Sectaries have as great cause to cry downe ceremonies as we Catholicks have to uphold them Because the strongest pillar of the true Church is a continuall tradition of Catholick Doctrine from the primitive times to this present and this pillar of Tradition is much strengthened by the practise of ceremonies relating to that Doctrine delivered from hand to hand which we now maintaine as Catholick against Heresy or pretended Reformation To adore the blessed Sacrament both in Church and Processions is a strong argument of Christs reall presence not onely in the act or use of Communion but also before and after What mervaile therefore that they who deny Christs reall presence or grant it onely in the actuall use of Communion should oppose the adoration whereby their false Doctrine is so clearly condemned by the practise of the faith full these and other Catholick ceremonies are not odious to Protestants because they are ceremonies but because they put them in minde of the ancient Faith and Doctrine of Christs Church To reject some of the ancient ceremonies and retaine others as the Nags-head Congregation doth is to furnish their adversaries Catholicks and Puritans with unanswerable arguments their choice of ceremonies doth prove their choice of Doctrine and their choice of Doctrine demonstrates them Hereticks an Heretick being he who chooseth out of the Doctrine delivered by the Church what he fancies rejecting what he thinkes not fit for his purpose Our Prelaticall Protestants must with the rest cast away their Bishops bonnet lawne sleeves he white surplise and black scarfe if not they may cast their cap and despaire of answering to Catholick or Puritan objections they must keepe all or nothing unlesse they can produce better evidence for their pretended Reformation then the fancy of 7. or 12. men in King Edward the Sixth his time confirmed by the authority of a yong head of the Church and a Parliament called by the Protector Seamour to establish in England Zwinglian fopperies and reject the Christian Doctrine and discipline of our Catholick Ancestors they must not rely upon Queen Elizabeths she supremacy or their Nags-head Ordination and Synod with their London Assemblies and Hampton-Court Conferences of lay Ministers God must be served his owne way and not by framing Religions â—o the humor of people or interests of Kings Queenes Parliaments and Protectors But before we goe further in censuring these Protestant wayes let us prove CHAP. IV. That to believe God and consequently to serve him his owne way its necessary to repaire to an infallible Guide which is no other but the Roman Catholick Church 1 THe first step in the way of Gods service is to believe God a step of no lesse difficulty then necessity Suppose there were a man dropt downe from the heavens graced with this singular privilege that the sound of his words could no sooner be at our eares then the evidence of their truth before our eyes whatsoever he said in the same instant we did see confirmed by the reall appearance of the objects and our own experience This singular privilege would deprive him of another common to all men of worth and integrity it would make him uncapable or being believed all who heare him would assent to what he said but for their owne evidence not for his veracity When any thing is evident to our understanding or to our eyes we believe our selves and not others though they should tell us the same we doe experience If God were pleased to manifest himself to men in such a manner that they had evidence it is he who speaketh to them he had deprived us of the merit of Faith and himselfe of that duty which we are obliged to give every honest man for though Divine Faith doth exclude all doubts and feares of falshood yet it supposeth in the subject a possibility of doubting if men will be obstinate and imprudent but there is none so obstinate and imprudent that can doubt of the truth of Gods words if it be evident to him that God spoke them Though we heare men speak we doe them a courtesie in believing them because they are fallible and we doe not read the truth in their words though we believe them but if we had evidence that God uttered any words the truth of them must be as cleare as it is that he can neither lye nor be mistaken and if the truth be cleare and evident to our understandings we believe our selves and not God though he should speake it To believe is to trust and he that hath evidence of any truth doth as little trust the speaker as we rely upon anothers credit for the money we have in our own coffers 2 Seeing therefore that either God must not be believed by men or that he must disguise himselfe and speake to them by others who can be so impudent as to deny that we deserve damnation if we doe not believe and obey God in that Church which he hath beene pleased to institute as his owne Interpreter Quod autem rogant unde persuadebimur à Deo fluxisse Scripturam nisi ad Eccleisae decretum confugiamus perinde est ac si quu roget unde discemus lucem discernere à tenebris album nigro c. lib. 1. Inst
in the pulpit on a suddaine he became speechlesse carried out of the Church he recovered strength the use of his toungue but returning to the pulpit his speech failed him the second time returning the third time to preach he never spoke word more and was carried into a Catholick Gentlemans house his great friend and old acquaintance who perceiving that Iewell had not lost his senses with his speech sent for pen inke and paper put the dying man in minde of Gods mercy desired him not to despaire of it and to recant his heresy and his seducing of the simple people contrary to his owne conscience Iewell tooke the pen and he writ these words I am sorry for the many falsifications I have made both of Scripture and Fathers with that the pen fell out of his hand and he expired These are our Protestant Euangelists and Bishops 8 As for their inferiour Clergy I will give you a briefe Catalogue made by that famous Doctor Stapleton Counterblast lib 4. num 481. printed an 1567. who lived in those times And wherein I pray you saith he resteth a great part of your new Clergy but in butchers cookes catchpoules and coblers diers and dawbers fellons carrying their marke in their hand instead of a shaven crowne fishermen gunners harpers in keepers merchants and mariners netmakers potters potycaries and porters of Belingsgate pinners pedlers ruffling ruffins sadlers sheermen and sheaperds tanners tilers tinkers trumpeters weavers Whenrymen c. This rable rout of meane and infamous persons did cast so foule an aspersion upon our Protestant Clergy that even to this day the most ordinary Citizens thinke their family disgraced when any of their nearest kindred become Ministers though they be in a most certaine way to the best preferments an evident argument that either their function is but a meere mockery or that their layty hath no Religion I attibute this contempt to a malediction of God that hangs over the heads of false Preachers unsent uncalled unconsecrated as on the other side it must be a blessing of God that in the Roman Catholick Church Priests and Religious are more esteemed for their function and profession then for their abilities and quality be they never so great notwithstanding that in all Countreys many of the best Nobility and Gentry consecrate themselves to God in a religious and ecclesiasticall state of life a thing so rare amongst Hereticks that when they come to Catholick Kingdomes they are apt to mistake and talke of Priests and Friers as they did at home of their owne Nags-head Ministers but I hope they will learne good manners how obstinate soever they remaine in their errours 9 The triumphant Protestant Church doth not a little resemble their militant described by Stapleton Whosoever will peruse Fox his Acts Monuments and Calendar with Persons his Annotations may easily discerne what great difference there is betweene Protestant and Catholick Saints their miracles and ours The Protestant Legend and Martyrologe is stuffed onely with tinkers coblers butchers taylors and their pratling wives put to death in Queene Maries reigne by vertue of the ancient Lawes of Christian Emperours and Kings of England such as are yet in force against the Jewes but Queene Elizabeth made new Lawes against Catholicks and put them to death for not embracing a new heresy for which her selfe would have beene burnt in any Christian Countrey few yeares before if she had professed the same doctrine that now she imposed upon others That you may guesse at their Saints by their miracles I will give you a sight of Two propheticall and miraculous visions described by honest Iohn Fox in this manner Fox pag. 1843. See Persons his third part of the three Conversions of England cap. 7. n. 62. The Friday night before Master Rough Minister of the Congregation in London who was a Dominican Friar in Scotland was taken being in his bed he dreamed that he saw two of the guard leading to prison Cuthbert Simpson Deacon of the said Congregation Whereupon being sore troubled he awaked and called his wife saying Kate strike light for I am much troubled with my brother Cuthbert this night When she had so done he gave himselfe to read on his booke And then feeling sleepe to come upon him he put out the candle and so gave himselfe to rest againe but being a sleepe he dreamed the like dreame and awaking therewith said 0 Kate my brother Cuthbert is gone And so they lighted a candle and rose This is one miracle which Fox recounteth 10 Now shall you heare another miracle of Simpson himselfe set downe also in Fox his owne words Fox pag. 1844. The day before Simpson was condemned saith he Cloney the keeper of his prison being gone forth about eleven of the clock towards midnight Cuthbert Simpson whether in a slumber or being awaked I cannot say heard one coming in first opening the outward dore then the second after the third and so looking in to the said Cuthbert having no candle nor toarch that he could see but giving a brightnesse and light most comfortable and joyfull to his heart saying Ha unto him and so departed againe Who it was he could not tell neither dare I define saith Fox But I dare say it was Cloney the keeper that came to watch his prisoner with a light in his hand or perhaps the Protestant Deacon dreamed or fancied in the darke that one came in and said Ha unto him which may passe for a Protestant supernaturall vision and miracle Fox maketh a long discourse why the dreame of a married Friar and the imagination of Simpson the Deacon ought to be looked upon and believed as miraculous and would have all Catholick visions mistrusted and rejected though never so authentically related or recorded 11 But the greatest miracle of the English Protestant Church was Queene Elizabeth her selfe that embrued her cruell hands in the royall bloud of Mary Steward lawfull heire to the Crowne of England this English Iezabel not content to usurpe The Kingdome deprived her also of her life and put to death many noble persons that by their innocent bloud she might colour her supremacy and bastardy I will not relate what others write of her life and manners for honour of the English Nation her miracles were to have raised upstarts and hereticks from nothing and annihilated the ancient Nobility and Gentry that continued Catholicks contrary to her penall Lawes and Statutes In the beginning of her reigne was celebrated that venerable Synod or Nags-head Ministers and reverend coblers tinkers c. wherein the Protestant Creed of 39. articles was coyned the greatest part whereof consists in not believing and declaring against the Catholick Religion As her Majesty lived betweene Maid and Wife so did her Protestant Church florish betweene hauke and buzard betweene Calvin and Luthers Reformation It s strange to see how even to this day Protestant Ministers doe extoll this Queene as if she were the patterne of Religion and
have evidence that his Law or Statute doth not contradict the Law of God his legislative power must be subordinate to Christian Religion Henry the VIII Edward the VI. and Queene Elizabeths penall Statutes are evidently against the Law of God and Christian Religion if we may credit antiquity and stick to the Faith and practise of the Church and Catholick Princes that went before them not onely in England but in all other Christian Kingdomes No persons living have any other evidence for the Law of God and Catholick Religion but the test mony of the immediatly precedent age confirmed with supernaturall signes all former ages speake to us by the mouth of the last with which we conversed we must cake their word for all the rest and for the sense as well as for the letter of Scripture The 14. age delivered to the 15. the Roman Catholick Faith which we now professe assuring that it was the true sense of Scripture which they had learned from the 13. age and so forth to the Apostles What evidence had Henry the VIII or his daughter Queen Elizabeth to oppose against the testimony of all former ages confirmed with so many miracles and to make Statutes against the knowne and practised Law of God and Christianity His luxury and his daughters bastardy are the onely evidence which Protestants can produce for the ground of penall Lawes against the Popes supremacy and other points of the Roman Catholick Religion an excellent foundation of Protestant Lawes Justice and Judicature 3 To pronounce sentence of death losse of goods or banishment against persons without any proose is rather tyranny then injustice The greatest crimes even that of treason require at least one lawfull witnesse let Protestant produce but one lawfull witnesse against the Religion of Catholicks and their sense of Scripture and we will not murmure against their penall Lawes and rigourous proceedings Antiquity affords them none because though in divers ages some odde men did testify sometimes one errour of theirs sometimes another they were in those very times contradicted by the whole Catholick Church and declared infamous Impostours and Hereticks In this present age no Protestants can be lawfull witnesses for their owne Religion or against ours because their testimony cannot be valid against so constant and universall a tradition as we Catholicks have for our Doctrine and sense of Scripture It s as ridiculous and unjust in a Judge to pronounce sentence against Roman Catholicks for their Religion upon the evidence and testimony of Protestancy as if he had in open Court condemned men to forfeit their estates and ancient inheritance upon the word of a mad fellow that produceth no other evidence to confirme his claime but interiour motions of the spirit of coveteousnesse and ambition or some obscure text of the Law appliable to all cases and subjects for all the Protestant evidence is reduced to the private spirit and the pretended clearnesse of Scripture If this be not to destroy the foundation of Justice and the forme of Judicature Protestants have a different way of proceeding from all other Nations and have altered the stile of naturall reason humane nature and the practice of all antiquity 4 They cannot excuse their persecution against Catholicks with the example of Christian Emperours and Kings that both for zeale of Religion and humane Policy to avoid the danger of rebellion made Lawes and Statutes against Hereticks and Innovatours of the ancient Faith and sense of Scripture which descended to them by tradition from the Apostles Protestants take the quite contrary way they make Lawes and Statutes against the ancient Religion and knowne sense of Gods Word and persecute Catholicks for professing it whereas their Predecessours Emperours and Kings punished new Religions and Novelists This last was lawfull in secular Princes but the practise of Protestants is unjust and wicked because it destroyes Justice and the true Religion confirmed by the publike testimony and practise of the Christian world since the Apostles time to this present If the Roman Catholick Religion were not the true Apostolicall Faith but as new as Protestants pretend how is it possible that in history there should be no mention made of any person that suffered as an Heretick for broaching or maintaining any one point which we now professe If any Doctrine of ours were judged an heresy or a novelty by antiquity without doubt we had not all escaped the rigour of penall Lawes made against Hereticks and Novelists I am sure Protestants cannot brag nor say so much for their owne Doctrine many if not all the points whereof have beene condemned as heresy by the Church in ancient times and punished as novelties by Christian Kings and Emperours which was the onely reason that moved the first English Protestants to cause the young child Edward the VI. when he knew not what he did to repeale all the Lawes and Statutes that any Christian King of England and the Kingdome had made against Hereticks being convinced that themselves and not Catholicks were comprehended in that number All who suffered persecution or death for any point of the Roman Religion were looked upon by the Catholick Church in all ages as glorious Confessours and renowned Martyrs Amongst the most pretious jewells of the Easterne Church were accompted such as were put to death for defending the worship of Images against the Iconuclasts Baron an 723. Conc. Nicaen 2. Act. 5. who were the first that persecuted Christians for that Doctrine at the instance of one Serantapicus a Magician and a Jew that promised to Gizedo Prince of the Saracens he should live 30. yeares if he would command all Images to be taken away and not worshipped in his Dominions by the Catholicks But Gizedo dying within a yeare and a halfe his sonne Vlidus condemned the Jew to death as a perfidious lmpostour and the Images were worshipt as formerly untill three yeares afterwards Leo Isaurus the heretick Emperour at the instance also of Jewes Concil Nicaen 2. Baron an 726. raised that most terrible persecution against the Catholick Church for practising so pious a custome which had continued amongst Christians without the least danger of idolatry since the time of the Apostles to that present and t will not be interrupted untill the day of judgement notâ—ithstanding the clamours endeavours and vaine pretended feares of Protestant zealots in behalfe of Serantapicus their Patriarch and his Hebrew tribe their loving brethren 5 Their persecution against Catholicks can be no more excused by the proceedings of the Spanish and Italian Inquisition Of the Inquisition then their penall Statutes have beene by the Lawes of ancient Kings and Emperours against Hereticks 1. Because the Inquisition proceeds according to the rules and forme of Justice none is declared an Heretick or guilty by a new Law or oath made onely to the end that by them men may be intrapped both in soule body and estate it was no crime in England to be a Catholick before