right of tithes bee determined And Fitzh in his Nat. Br. fol. 30. holdeth that before the Statute of the 18. of E. 3. cap. 7. that right of tithes were determinable in the teÌ„porall Courts at the election of the partie And by that Statute assigned to be determined in the Ecclesiasticall Court and the temporall Courte excluded therof And the Courts of diuers manners of the Kings and of other Lords in auncient times had the probates of last wills and testaments and it appeareth by the 11. Hen. 7. fol. 12. that the probate of testaments did not appertaine to the Ecclesiasticall Courte but that of late time they were determinable there so as of such causes and in such manner as the Kings of the Realme by generall consent and allowance haue assigned to their Ecclesiasticall Courts they haue iurisdiction by force of such allowance The King did by his Charter translate Canons secular into regular and religious persons which hee did by his Ecclesiasticall iurisdiction and could not doe it vnlesse he had iurisdiction Ecclesiasticall The Abbot of VValtham died in the 45. yeare E. 3. and one Nicholas merrit was elected Abbot who for that the Abbey was exempt from ordinarie iurisdiction was sent to Rome to be confirmed by the Pope And because the Pope by his constitutions had reserued all such collations to himself he did recite by his Bull that he hauing no regard to the election of the said Nicolas gaue to him the said Abbey and the spiritualties and temporalties belonging to the same of his spirituall grace and at the request as he fained of the King of England This Bull was read and considered of in Councell that is before all the Iudges of England and it was resolued by them all that this Bull was against the laws of England and that the Abbot for obtaining the same was fallen into the Kings mercie whervpon all his possessions were seased into the Kings hands as more at large by the said Case appeareth Where the Abbot of VVestminster had a Prior Couent who were regular and mort in law yet the King by his Charter did deuide that corporation and made the Prior and Couent a distinct and capable bodie to sue and be sued by themselues The Catholicke Deuine 30. The first case of this instance about tithes and probates of testaments is a verie trifling thing to proue M. Attorneys great coÌ„clusion of supreme authoritie Ecclesiasticall to be in the temporall Prince his Courts For as these things and like other are in parte belonging to spirituall iurisdiction in that they concerne benefices the willes and ordinations of dead men for the benefit of their soules the like partlie also belonging to temporall in that they include temporalities worldly substance they may in different respects appertaine also to differeÌ„t Courts and so they doe in other Catholicke Countreys at this day and namelie for probates of testaments in no other Countrey perhaps besides England are they limited onlie to the Bishops spirituall Courts About which wee haue the foresaid Statutes of Circumspectè agatis vnder K. Edward the first and of Articuli Cleri vnder K. Edward the 2. and diuers other Ordinations vnder this King Edward the 3. But how proueth all this M. Attorneys principall conclusion And how far of is this from inferring supreme Ecclesiasticall iurisdiction to be in the temporall Prince Is it not strange that such a man as M. Attorney would alleadge such toyes But let vs goe forward 31. If K. Edward did translate by his Charter the Canons secular into regular as heere is said wee must presume he did it as before you haue heard K. Henry the 2. to haue done it at VValtham by authority of the Popes Brâ—ue confirmed by his Charter and not otherwise For as well could K. Henry the 2. haue doâ—e it of his owne authoritie if it had been annexed to his Crowne at this K. Edward the 3. And therefore seing the other obserued the Canons of the Church and presumed not to doe it of himself but by the Popes licence and Charter and ratified by his owne it may be presumed that this King did the same for so much as the same Canon-law stood still in force And so it may be suspected that this case hath somewhat omitted couertly that should appertaine to the full declaration therof 32. The other case also of Nicolas Morris chosen Abbot of VValtham that went to Rome and got his inuestiture there by reseruation of the Pope and not by his election in England fell out at that verie time as heere is noted when the contention was most in heat between the King and French Popes about reseruation of benefices to wit vpon the 4. of the Kings raigne the said Popes agreeing soone after to vse no more the said reseruations So as no great maruaile of the Iudges of those dayes did moue the King to make some demonstration of speciall offence against this man the controuersie being then in handling but this is an instance de facto and not de iure 33. Lastlie the case of the Abbot of VVestminster made by the Kings Charter a distinct bodie capable to sue and to be sued was a temporal priueledge which any Prince might giue to a Couent if it vvere commodious for them and they willing to accept thereof and if not they would haue reclaimed in those daies and haue appealed to the Sea Apostolicke for remedie as the vse and right was at that time and as oy diuers examples appeareth of AppellatioÌ„s made against the King himself during his raigne as namelie that of the Bishop of Ely recounted at large by VValsingham in the yeare 1348. and others 34. The six instance consisteth of certaine Statutes made in the 25. 27. 28. and 38. yeares in the raigne of K. Edward the 3. against prouisious and prouisers from Rome reseruations of Bishopricks and benefices by the said Sea vndue appellations vniust citations infamations or molestations of men by Censures from thence All which I thinke not good to set downe at large as they lie in the Statute booke for that they are ouerlonge but breiflie rather to alleadge the summe therof which is sufficient for the point it self of our controuersie First then it is said That in consideration of the manie inconueniences and hurtes that seemed to ensue to the Common-wealth as well Clergie-men as secular by such as went to Rome and there by false suggestions and other such procurements vnworthilie got vnto themselues benefices they being either strangers not able to preach and teach or els if English-men yet vnfit for their learning or manners and that therby particular patrons were depriued of their right of presenting c It was ordained vpon the 25. yeare of this Kings raigne to punish the persons that being subiect to the King should attempt or doe this without the Kings licence or knowledge of the Realme And so the decree
read predecessors Pag. 117. lin 12. for religions read Religious Pag. 118. lin 14. for men desires read mens desires Pag. 122. lin 33. for quetting read quietting Pag. 129. lin 11. for endevving read endowing Pag. 152. lin 12. for Tyrus read Cyrus Pag. 168. lin 31. ovvne his vvords read his owne words Pag. 177. lin 25. for bad read had Pag. 191. lin vlt. in some copyes for hape read haue Pag. 208. lin 39. for sâ—ruiued read suruiued Pag. 209. lin 10. for hir read his Pag. 225. lin 20. for the read she Pag. 229. lin 26. for aginst read against Pag. 254. lin 36. hath said adde hath byn said Pag. 270. lin 26. for my read any Pag. 275. lin 10. for pecular read peculiar Ibid. lin 22. for theraâ—ut read therabout Pag. 278. lin 35. for began read begun In the Margentes Pag. 17. for controsies read controuersies Pag. 85. for lavvoy read lawes Pag. 146. for had read bad Pag. 383. for Castus read Calixtus Pag. 180. for 25. read 35. Pag. 132. for hauing read raigning It may please thee gentle Reader of thy curtesy to pardon these and other like faultes if any shal be found and consider vvith thy selfe the difficultyes we haue in vsing the help of straungers herin A TABLE OF THE PARTICVLAR MATTERS CONTEYNED IN THIS BOOKE A. ABbyes Monasteryes founded in England by Religious Catholicke Princes Cap. 6. à num 37. vsque ad num 49. Abbey of Euesham priuiledged from Rome cap. 6. num 42. Abbey of S. Albans founded by K. Offa. cap. 6. num 43. The priuiledges and exemptions of the same ibid. Abbey of Glastensbury priuiledged by Pope Iohn the thirtenth cap. 6. num 45. Abbey of VVestminster priuiledged at the petition of K. Edward the Confessor cap 6. num 47. 48. Abbot of VValtham punished why cap. 12 num 29. 32. Absurdityes of Statute-decrees in Parlament about spirituall power giuen to secular Princes cap. 3. n. 6.7.18.19.20 21. 22. 23. 24. Absurdity of a womans Supremacy in spirituall matters cap. 4. num 27. Absolution of K. Henry the second by the Popes Legates cap. 9. nu 12 13. S. Adelmus Bishop of Sherborne his voyage to Rome cap. 6. num 40. His booke of Virginity ibid. n. 42. Adelnulph King of England his confirmation of Peter-Pence to Rome cap 6. num 71. Agreement betweene the Pope and K. of England about Prouisions of Ecclesiasticall dignityes in England cap. 12. num 12. 39. S. Ambrose his iudgement of spirituall power cap. 2. n 25. 26. His combattes and conflictes with the Emperour and Empresse about Church-affayres ibid. n. 27.28 29. Ancient-Fathers directions how to find out truth cap. 1 n. 17. 18. Their freedome of speach to Emperours cap. 4. n. 4. 5. 6. S. Anselme Archbishop of Canterbury his commendations cap. 8. num 2. His pall brought from Rome by the Popes Legat. ibid. num 4. His plaine dealing with K. VVilliam Rufus ibid. num 5. His reconciliation with K Henry the first ibid. num 11. Appellations to Rome about Controuersies that fell out in England cap. 6. n. 49. 50. deinceps Appeale of K. Henry the second to the Pope about the controuersie of the death of S. Thomas of Canterbury cap. 9. n. 11. Appeales from K. Richard the first to the Pope cap. 9. num 23. Appeale of Richard Archbishop of Canterbury to Rome against K. Henry the third cap. 10. num 17. Archbishop of Canterbury accused to the Pope by K. Edward the first cap. 11. num 16. Archbishop of Canterbury depriued of spirituall Iurisdiction by Q. Elizabeth cap. 11. num 30. Archbishop of Yorke put to death by commaundement of King Henry the fourth cap. 15. num 23. Arguments of K. Henry the 8. against Luther for the Popes Supremacy cap. 15. num 5. 6.7 deinceps Assertions of Protestants and the foundation therof Prefac num 7. S. Athanasius his seuere reprehension of the Emperour Constantius cap. 4. num 8. M. Attorney his imagined ignorance cap. 1. num 12. His condemnation of controuersy-wryters ibid. num 26.27.28 29. His time of study in law ibid. n. 34. His absurd propositions and arguments refuted cap. 3. per totum deinceps per totum librum His arguments and shiftes returned vpon himselfe cap. 4. num 9 12. His new deuise to make Ecclesiasticall lawes the Kinges lawes ibid. num 13. 14. M. Attorney challenged cap. 6. n. 28. Iniuryes offered by him to many in this his booke cap. 16. per totum His false charge of Catholickes ibid. num 2. His iniurious and slanderous calumniations ibid. num 10. His manifest notorious vntruthes ibid. num 11. His Idaea Plaetonica of ancient comon-lawes ibid. num 13. His false information of his Maiesty that now is ibid. num 15. 16. His promise not performeable ibid. num 34. S. Augustines seuere sentence against heretickes and heresies cap. 16. n. 29. S. Augustine of Canterbury his successors by appointment from Rome cap. 6. num 20. Authority spirituall temporall the difference therof cap. 2. n. 4. 5. Authority Episcopall greater then Imperiall cap. 2. num 25. Authority spirituall giuen vnto Q Elizabeth by Parlament cap. 3. num 3. The absurdityes and inconueniences therof ensuing ibid. num 4. 5. Authority of Bishops Courtes from whence it is deriued cap. 13. num 17. Authority of English Prelates when England was Catholike cap. 14. n. 17. B. Bastardy a let or hinderance to Priesthood cap. 14. num 19. S. Benedict of Northumberland his voyage to Rome for priuiledges of his monastery cap. 6. num 39. Benefices collated by lay-men cap. 7. num 26. 29. S. Bertulph his monastery priuiledged from Rome cap. 6. num 39. Bigamy cap. 11. num 30. 31. A statute therof by K. Edward the first ibidem Doubts therabout raised in England ibid. num 31. 32. Bishops made in EnglaÌ„d by the Popes authority cap. 6. num 21. 22. Bishops lands seased into the Kinges handes and why cap. 11. num 28. Bishops how they might be punished for not admitting the Kinges iust presentation cap. 11. num 29. Bishop of Hereford taken from the barre of secular Court by Ecclesiasticall authority cap. 11. num 46. Bishops and Prelates of England sent to the Councell of Constance in Germany cap. 13. num 6. Bishops how they may be called the Kinges spirituall Iudges cap. 13. n. 8. Bishops Courtes from vvhence they haue their authority cap. 13. num 17. Bishops hovv farre they may be commaunded by the King cap. 13. num 18. Birth-right of lavves c. â— n. 18.22 23. Birth-right of Englishmen is Catholicke Religion cap. 1. num 26. Bodyes to the King and soules to the Priest cap. 4. num 5. Booke of K. Henry the 8. against Luther in defence of the seauen Sacraments cap. 15. num 3.4 5. Breach of King Iohn vvith the Sea Apostolicke and occasion therof cap. 9. num 57. Breach of K. Henry the 8. with
Church and Church-men § 2. pag. 165. The first Instance of M. Attorney taken out of the raigne of K. William the Conquerour refuted § 3. pag. 169. Of King William Rufus and Henry the first that were the Conquerours sonnes and of K. Stephen his nephew And how they agreed with the said Conquerour in our Question of Spiritual Iurisdiction acknowledged by them to be in others and not in themselues Chap. VIII pag. 176. Of King Henry the first who was the third King after the Conquest § 1. pag. 180. Of the raigne of King Stephen the fourth King after the Conquest § 2. pag. 189. Of the Raigne of K. Henry the second great Grand-child to the Conquerour the fifth King after the Conquest with his two sonnes K. Richard and K. Iohn and their comformityes in this Controuersy Chap. IX pag. 196. Of the Raigne of K. Richard the first the sixt King after the Conquest § 2. pag. 208. Of the Raigne of K. Iohn who was the seauenth King after the Conquest § 3. pag. 222. Of King Henry the third that was the eight King after the Conquest and the first that left Statutes wrytten And what M. Attorney alleadgeth out of him for his purpose Chap. X. pag. 232. Two Instances alleadged out of the raigne of K. Henry the third by M. Attorney and of what weight they be § 1. pag. 245. Of the liues and raignes of K. Edward the first and second Father and Sonne And what Arguments M. Attorney draweth from them towards the prouing of his purpose Chap. XI pag. 256. Of K. Edward the first who was the nynth King after the Conquest § 1. pag. 257. Of King Edward the second which was the tenth King after the Conquest § 2. pag. 278. Of King Edward the third and K. Richard the second his nephew and successour And vvhat Instances or Arguments M. Attorney dravveth from their tvvo raignes vvhich continued betvveene them for seauenty yeares Chap. XII pag. 285. M. Attorneyes obiections out of the raigne of K. Edward the third aforesaid § 1. pag. 292. Of the raigne of K. Richard the second the tvveluth King after the Conquest § 2. pag. 308. Of the three King Henryes of the house of Lancaster the fourth fifth and sixth vvho raigned for the space of threescore yeares And vvhat is obserued out of their raignes concerning our Controuersy vvith M. Attorney Chap. XIII pag. 312. Instances alleadged by M. Attorney out of the raigne of K. Henry the fourth vvho vvas the thirteenth King after the Conquest § 1. pag. 315. Out of the raigne of K. Henry the fifth that vvas the fourteenth King after the Conquest § 2. pag. 322. Out of the Raigne of K. Henry the sixt the fifteenth King after the Conquest § â— pag. 326. Of the Raigne of fâ—ure ensuing Kinges to vvit Edward the fourth Edward the fifth Richard the third and Henry the seauenth And hovv confoâ—me they vvere vnto their Ancestors in this point of Controuersy vve haue in hand Chap. XIIII pag. 328. Iâ—stâ—nces out of the Raigne of K. Edward the fourth the sixteenth King after the Conquest § 1. pag. 331. Out of the Râ—igne of K. Henry the seauenth vvho vvas the nynteenth King after the Conquest § 2. pag. 337. Of the Raigne of K. Henry the eight and of his three Children King Edward Queâ—ne Mary and Queene Elizabeth And hovv the first innouatiâ—n thout Ecclesiasticall Iurisdiction vvas made and continued in their daies Châ—p XV. pag. 341. The ansvvere to certayne Instances of M. Attorney out of the Raigne of K. Henry the eight § 2. pag. 351. Of King Edward the six the one and tvventith King after the Conquest § 3. pag. 357. Of the Raigne of Queene Mary the tvvo and tvventith Princesse after the Conquest § 4. pag. 359. Of the Raigne of Queene Elizabeth vvho vvas the three and tvventith Princesse after the Conquest and last of K. Henryes race § 5. pag. 361. Certaine Expostulations vvith M. Attorney about euill preceeding iniuryes offered to diuers sortes of men in this his booke of Reportes especially to â—ards the end therof Togeather with the Conclusion of the whole worke Chap. XVI pag. 368. The first expostulation in the behalfe of Recusant-Catholickes of England grieuâ—â—sly iniured by M. Attorney § 1. pag. 369. The second Expostulation in the behalfe of all English Catholickes in generall § 2. pag. 376. The third Expostulation in the name of all moderate and peace-louing subiects whatsoâ—uer § 3. pag. 384. An Index or Table of the particular matters conteyned in the vvhole worke THE PREFACE TO THE READER Concerning the weight and importance of this our Controuersie wherby may be resolued whatsoeuer is in question between men of different Religions at this day in England ALBEIT the moment and vtility of that we haue in hand discreet Reader will best be seene by perusall of the Treatise it self and by thy iudicious consideration therof yet for thy better encouragement to this labour and to stirr thee vp to more attention herin I haue thought good to touch some points in generall at this first entrance remitting the larger and more particular declaration therof vnto that which is to ensue throughout the whole discussion of the Controuersie 2. First then to pretermit the whole view of our English Christian antiquities which heer by fit and necessarie occasion is searched laid open togeather with the liues and laws gouerment and Religion of all our Christian Kings both before and after the Conquest This one point seemeth to me to be of most moment for the present that wheras vnder the raigne of Queen Elizabeth about whome principallie is our question three sortes of Religion did stand vp striue togeather and doe vnto this day the Protestant the Puritane â—nd the Catholicke their whole contention seemeth to mee to ly within the limits of this Controuersie moued by M. Attorney about Q. Elizabeths spirituall iurisdiction and that out of the same the whole may easily be determined as presentlie you shall see 3. For wheras there are two principall partes of any Religion whatsoeuer the one doctrine or precepts for instruction the other power and authoritie for direction and gouerment albeit the first be the ground and foundation wheron to buyld and worke yet is the second that which giueth life and motion to the former and must try and iudge the same for that in euery religion or societie of men professing one and the self same faith those that are the cheife meÌ„bers therof presumed to â—aue principal power and spiritual iurisdiction therin are they that must authorize discerne and iustifie the doctrine therof to their followers For as S. Augustine said in â—is daies to the Manichies that pressed him to beleeue certaine thinges out of the scripture in their sense That he vvould not beleeue the ghospell it self to be the ghospel except the authority of the Chuch did moue him thervnto that is to say the cheife gouernours of the
spirituall gouernment to women but placeth it where it ought to bee in S. Peter his Successors aboue all others I shall alleadge the place somewhat more at large which containeth a graue ponderation of those words of our Sauiour vnto S. Peter in S. Iohns ghospell Petre amas me c. Peter dost thou loue mee more then the rest and he answearing that he did Christ replied if thou loue mee feed my sheep Wherof S. Chrysostome doth inferre that Christ in these words did first of al specially commit the supreme charge of his said sheep to S. Peter and his Successors Pecudâ—â— curam saith he quas sanguine suo acquisierat tum Petro tum Petri Successoribus committebat He committed to Peter and to Peters Successours the care of his sheep which he had purchased with his owne bloud And againe Petrum Christus authoritate hac praeditum esse voluit reliquos item Apostolos longe praecellere Christ would haue Peter to bee indued with this supreme authority ouer his sheep and therein far to excell all the rest of the Apostles c. 37. Secondlie S. Chrysostome maketh a deep ponderation vpon these words of our Sauiour of the singular loue which he would haue Pastors to beare vnto his sheep and which hee bare himself giuing his bloud for them and what hee exacted at this high Pastors hands for gouerning and feeding of them in this his demaund or interrogation concerning his loue Atque illi quidem licebat saith he verbis huiusmodi Petrum affari Si me amas Petre Ieiuniae exerce super nudam humum dormi c. Our sauiour Christ might haue spoken to Peter in this sorte vpon his answeare of loue if thou loue me Peter exercise fasting sleep on the bare ground watch continuallie releiue them that bee oppressed shew thy self a Father to orphans and bee vnto widdowes insteed of their husbands But now Christ pretermitting all these other good works what saith hee vnto him Pasce oues meas c. Feed and gouerne my sheep for that all the rest of those good works before meÌ„tioned may bee perfourmed by many subiects not only men but also women At cum de ecclesiae Praefectura de credenda huic vel illi tam multarum animarum cura agitur vniuersa quidem mulieris natura functionis istius moli ac magnitudini caedat oportet itemque bona virorum pars But when the Question is of any gouernmeÌ„t ouer the Church or about committing to this or that person the charge of so many soules then must all women kind yeeld and giue place to the weight and greatnes of this function and so must also a good parte of men to witt all such as are of the lay sorte and haue not Ecclesiasticall iurisdiction laid vpon them by the ordinarie means before mentioned of ordination succession in the Church of God descending originally from this first fountaine of all ecclesiasticall power vpon earth committed by the sonne of God to S. Peter and his Successours to endure to the worlds end 38. And thus haue wee cleerlie the sentence beleife iudgement of S. Chrysostome concerning spirituall authority for gouerning our soules that it was giuen eminently to S. Peter and his Successors aboue the rest of the Apostles but so as only men and those not all but Priests alone and Cleargie-men doe or may succeed therein and that all kinde of women are excluded in respect of their sex from any superiority or prefecture ouer the Church And what-soeuer S. Chrysostome held preached or left written in this behalfe be being so great a Doctor and piller of Christs Church in his dayes the thing it self neuer contradicted or reprehended by any other may assuredly be held for the common doctrine iudgement sense faith and beleife of the vniuersall Catholike Church in that age and consequently also both of the former and following ages vntill our time And how much this consideration ought to preuaile with a prudent man that followeth not passion but reason and hath care of his owne soule is easy to see And so much of this matter 39. And now further I remember that I promised to proue my negatiue also by the ancient common municipall lawes of England of which though I might say as before I said of the Fathers and Doctors of former tymes that they ordayned nothing expresly of this particular case for that they neuer imagined that any such matter would fall out yet doe they determine that expresly which includeth this which is that they confirme euery-where the libertyes preheminencyes and prerogatiues of of the Church and Church-men of England which doe principally consist in this that only Ecclesiasticall men haue Power and Iurisdiction in Ecclesiasticall affayres and that no lay person and much lesse a woman can meddle therin and that there be two distinct swords in a Christian Common-wealth the one temporall in the hands of the Prince the other Ecclesiasticall in the hands of the Bishop and that the Ecclesiasticall is greater and more soueraigne then the temporall that this later must help be subordinate to the former All which yow shall see decreed as well in the lawes of K. Edgar and K. Edward before the Conquest as also of the Conquerour himself which after in due places we shal set downe 40. And to all this now may we ad certaine manifest reasons which besides the foundations before laid or rather out of them all our Deuines doe alleadge whie a woman may not be head of the Church or haue spirituall Iurisdiction in Ecclesiasticall affayres Wherof the first is that Christ our Sauiour being a Priest according to the order of Melchisedech and refusing to be a temporall King as out of the ghospell is euident he left in his place Priests to gouerne his Church as before hath bene declared both out of Scriptures and ancient Fathers but a woman cannot be a Priest as both we and Caluinists doe hold though Luther taught otherwise for a tyme as hath bene said and is refuted at lardge by K. Henry the 8. Q. Elizabeths Father in his booke against him and therefore the said Q. Elizabeth could not hold the place of Christ in spirituall Iurisdiction in the Church of England 41. A second reason is founded vpon the maxime before alleadged by M. Attorney Cui licet quod maius est licet quod minus He that can doe the greater can doe the lesse But it is more to be able to giue authority to others to exercise spirituall functions and Iurisdiction than to doe the same in his owne person ergo if Q. Elizabeth could giue authority to Bishops and Pastors to make Ministers administer the Sacraments preach and teach with the like which belongeth to the head of the Church than could she doe them also her self Which conclusion notwithstanding all English Protestants commonly doe deny yet is the Consequence euident and the Minor proposition is
certaine and the last euidently false For neither doth it appeare by the words of the Charter that the King did exempt the said Abbot from all Iurisdiction spirituall of the Bishop but rather of some temporall interest or pretense that the Bishop of that Diocesse might haue or pretend to haue in those daies Nor doth he seeme to haue giuen Ecclesiasticall Iurisdiction to the Abbot but rather temporall concerning controuersies that might arise about the lands of the lordship of Culnam wherof he had made donation to the said monastery And thirdly howsoeuer this might bee the third point and cheife conclusion is false that he either gaue or tooke away Iurisdiction by his owne power deriued from his temporall crowne for this was impossible as before in the second Chapter of this answere hath been shewed but rather by some spirituall Iurisdiction cōmitted vnto him by some other higher Ecclesiasticall power either of his Bishops gathered togeather in Parlament or Synod or of the Bishop of Rome himself all which three points wee shall breiflie here shew and therby conclude that M. Attorney his inference sett out with a Nota in the margent is worth no note at all but onlie of weaknes and impertinencie 6. For first to begin with the second it doth not appeare by the words of this Charter that the King did graunte to the same Abbot Ecclesiasticall Iurisdiction within his said Abbey but only that in all euents and discussions of causes or controuersies arising about the foresaid Lordship of Culnam giuen vnto the said monasterie the Tenants therof should stande to the Decree of the said Abbot and not haue recourse to the Bishop of the Diocesse who before perhaps pretended temporall Iurisdiction ouer them or at least-wise ouer that Lordship of Culnam And this coniecture is greatlie confirmed by a Canon of a Nationall Synod held in Hereford almost a hundered yeares before this vnder Theodorus Archbishop of Canterbury the 24. of September Anno Christi 670. and related by S. Bede where the third Canon of the Councell decreeth thus Vt Quacunque monasteria c. That all monasteries consecrated to God noe Bishop hath authoritie to inquiet them nor violentlie to take from them any thing of their goods c. wherby appeareth that some Bishops in those daies did pretend also temporall Iurisdiction ouer monasteries and their goodes which heer K. Kenulfus would preuent in this his monasterie to which he gaue his Lordshipp 7. And by this also the other point is confirmed that it doth not appeare by the force of these words that the Abbot was exempted from all spirituall Iurisdiction of the Bishop by this Charter of the King though otherwise by some priuiledge of the Pope I doubt not but he was it being a thing common lightly to all Abbots for he saith only Abomni Episcopali Iure from all right of the Bishop and not Iurisdiction which might be meant as hath been said of some temporall right pretended ouer that Lordship and was found now not to be iust or for that the said Bishop in Parlamēt or otherwise for M. Attorney holdeth that all this was done in Parlament had renounced his temporall right therin which before hee pretended to haue or that the King made this declaration of the monasteries exemption for he seemeth rather to haue declared what was done or graunted then to ordaine it himself by force of the foresaid Synodicall Decree of the Ecclesiasticall Councell before mentioned 8. And truly that the words of this Charter doe seeme rather to meane temporall then spirituall Iurisdiction in this place though I doubt not as I said but that they were exempted in the one and in the other by the priuiledges of the Sea Apostolike accustomed in such cases that which ensueth in the said Charter doth much confirme to witt that the Abbot should be quiet from the Bishops right and that the inhabitants from thence-forward should not be depressed by the Yoke of the Bishops officers Which importeth as much as that they had byn vniustly disquietted depressed before the same noe way seeming fittly to agree to be spoken of Bishops Ecclesiasticall Iurisdiction and consequently it is not improbable that only temporall Iurisdiction is heere talked of and so neither spirituall Iurisdiction taken from the Bishop nor giuen to the Abbot by the King in his Charter 9. But howsoeuer this were or may bee most certaine it is that M. Attorney his inference and conclusion is manifestly false to witt that it vvas deriued from his Crowne For albeit it were euident that the meaning heere were of spirituall Iurisdiction yet might the King haue that power to giue the exemption which he did to the monastery either from the Bishops gathered togeather now in the Parlament or before in Synod as hath been said renouncing all their Iurisdictiō therin or he might haue it from the Pope which is most likely for that all such priuiledges and exemptions were demaunded in those dayes at his hands by Princes and founders of pious workes And the said Popes made ordinary graunts therof as in our dayes also they doe and this is different sorte and manners For that sometimes they graunted the same immediatly as from themselues sometimes they gaue comission to Princes to giue it in their names and some other times they confirmed that which Princes had done before in this kinde vnder ratihabition or future allowance or ratification by the Sea Apostolike 10. And of all these three sorts many examples might be alleadged but that I shall haue occasion againe in the next Chapter to treate more largly of these points where I shall shew that in this very time when Kenulfus liued his neighbour King Ossa of the Mercians demaunding the Canonization of S. Alban the Protomartyr of England at the hands of Adrian the Pope as also that he might build a Monastery in the place where he was martyred and this as Parisiensis saith Ab omni Episcoporum subiectione emancipandum To be free and exempted from all subiection of Bishops the Pope graunted both his demaunds answering him thus as the same author recordeth VVe doe most willingly giue our cōsent to your petition for building of a monastery and doe priuiledge the same and vvhen you haue made your Charter or priuiledge vvee shall afterwards confirme strengthen your Originall vvith ours and exempt that monastery from all iurisdiction both of Bishops and Archbishops subiecting it immediatly vnto our Apostolike Sea So hee Wherby we see that a temporall King and founder of a monastery or other pious worke might giue priuiledges either by commission or vnder ratihabition as before hath been said 11. The like examples we finde in the liues of King Edgar and S. Edward the Confessor and many others that demaunded obteined confirmation and exemptions for pious works erected by them of the Popes of their times But for that these examples will be more fittly produced in the sequent
and hath these words Chrisicrux antecellit Caesaris aquilas gladius Petri gladio Constantini Apostolius sedes praeiudicat Imperatoriae potestati The crosse of Christ excelleth the spread-eagles in Cesars banners the sword of Peter is of more eminent power then the sword of Constantine and the Sea Apostolike is more potent then any Imperiall authority And this was the opinion sense and iudgement of these Princes and tymes wherin they made this difference degree of these two swordes without any such preiudice of taking away halfe their Monarchies from themselues or other Princes therby as M. Attorney and other such Prince-flatterers doe pretend The Conclusion vpon the former Demonstrations 90. Now therfore gentle Reader by these ten demonstrations thou hast seene what was the opinion iudgement and practise of all our ancient English Kings before the Conquest about this point of temporall and spirituall power and authority and heare I thinke thou wilt not deny but that my manner of proofe is and hath byn according to the rule of the Fathers touched before in the answere to the preface to wit KATH'HOLON or secundum totum bringing forth the whole body of this tyme that M. Attorneys proofe if it had byn a proofe that is to say if he had proued that which he propounded is secundum partem according to a part he only alleadging two sole petite instances out of all the ranke of aboue an hundred Kings for the space almost of fiue hundred yeares and these two also so weake and impertinent as no waye they can subsist in the sense wherin he alleadgeth them And herwithall in like manner thou mayst pleasâ— to call to remembraunce the auncient obseruation of old Tertullian aboue forteene hundred yeares gone Solemâ— est heretick c. It is a solemne tricke of heretickes by the occasion of some one doubtfull sentence or clause to wrest matters contra exercitum sententiarum against a whole army of sentences to the contrary And S. Cyprian in the next age after him noteth the like audacity of hereticke of his tyme that would take a part and leaue out a part and preferre some peece or parch before the whole And whether M. Attorney doe not follow the same spirit heere in peeping forth with two little miserable mistaken instances out of so great an army of plaine testimonyes to the contrary you haue already seene and out of your wisdome will easily iudge The like or worse dealing will you find afterward when we shall haue passed the Conquest whervnto now we hasten and for the euent I remit my self to the experience OF THE KINGS AFTER THE CONQVEST VNTO OVR TYMES And first of the Conquerour himself whether he tooke spirituall iurisdiction vpon him or no by vertue of his Crowne and temporall authority CHAP. VII HAVING pervsed what passed among our Kings before the Conquest to which pervse veiw we were led by M. Attorneys induction of two instances of those dayes as you haue seen we are now to follow him also beneath the said Conquest for tryall of our controversie where albeit as before I haue noted the further wee goe from the origen of our English conuersion and heate of that primitiue spirit of deuotion that God gaue our Kings in those first ages of their said conuersion to Christian religion the more coldnes we shall find in some cases and more worldly and secular spirit in diuers of our Norman and French Princes then waâ—â— the English before them yet for the substance of this point of controuersie between M. Attorney and mee about the acknowledgement of the Popes authority Ecclesiasticall we shall find them in effect no lesse resolute then the other if you respect the substance of the thing it self though in tendernesse of piety and deuotion their different liues and courses as after you shall se be witnesses vnto vs of no small difference 2. And this is seen in none more then in K. VVilliam the first himself the head stocke of al the rest who though in life action as a warryer and Conqueror were rough fierce boysterous especially in the former years of his raigne ouer EnglaÌ„d wherin vpoÌ„ ielosy of his vnsetled state he did many things de facto which were not so iustifiable de Iure for which Authors doe note that he was greatly punished by God both in himself in his children and childrens children yet in this point of true substantiall obedience to the Church when he was void of passion and out of occasion of any coÌ„straining necessity he all-wayes shewed himself dutifull respectiue humble towards the said Church according to his Oath taken at his Coronation before the Altar of S. Peter at VVestminster se velle Sanctas Dei Ecclesias ac rectores defendere saith Florentius that he would defend the holy Churches of God and the gouernours therof which to haue perfourmed he professed also at his death with teares as Iohn Stow more auncient writers then he doe beare him witnes some are of opinion that the long continuance of his line in the Crowne of England considering how he entered how some of them haue gouerned after him may principally be ascribed vnto this that he would not take in hand the enterprice of England but that first it should be consulted and approued by the Sea Apostolike at at Rome as presently you shall heare that it was and for that himself so firmely relied vpon the same afterward in all his greatest occasions and recommended the same especially to his sonnes on his death-bed when he was free from these interests which oftentimes before drew and wrested him to diuers actions which in that last houre he approued not but condemned and much bewayled 3. And of this later point many examples might be alleadged both of much bloudshed in England of spoiling and destroying the countrey of casting downe many townes and Churches for enlarging his hunting of vexing and oppressing the English-nation of ryfling and spoyling monasteryes and Churches where the English had hidden some of their wealth to maintaine themselues withall his detayning in prison all dayes of his life the Archbishop Stigand and diuers other Bishops and Abbots deposed in the Councell at VVinchester by Pope Alexander his legats in the fourth yeare of his raigne and of his brother Otho Bishop of Baion held in prison by him albeit this concerning Ecclesiasticall persons he professed to doe by licence and commission of the Sea Apostolike yet in truth the cheife cause was his owne vehement passion and ielousie of his temporall estate For I find a letter of Pope Gregory the seauenth that succeeded Alexander the second written vnto him vpon the yeare of Christ 1084. which was the 18. of K. VVilliams raigne wherin the said Pope though praising his religious zeale in other things which he would neuer haue done if he had byn opposite to his authority and iurisdiction yet doth he reprehend
partly also by incitation of flatterers that seeke to feed nourish Princes humours in that behalfe he began to lay his hands vpon Inuestitures of Bishops by giuing them Annalum baculum for their induction to their benefices saying that his Father and Brother before him had vsed and exercised the same But S. Anselme Archbishop of Canterbury newly retourned into England with other Bishops opposed himself against the same as a thing vnlawfull and condemned by the Canons of the Church and namely in the late Councell of Bary where himself was present as before hath byn shewed and this contention grew to be so stronge as the next yeare after being the third of K. Henryes raigne the said holy man was forced againe to appeale to Rome to Pope Pascalis and thervpon to leaue the land and once more to goe into Banishment where he liued three years going and returning often from Lions to Rome say Malmesbury Florentius and Houeden about this matter And the first of these three doth set downe diuers epistles of Pope Pascalis both to Anselme the Archbishop and to K. Henrie himself wherin he telleth him first why he could not graunt vnto him the authority of inuesting Bishops which by his letters sent by Clarke VVilliam he had demaunded saying Graue nobis est quia id à nobis videris expetere quod omnino praestare non possumus c. It greiueth vs much that you seeme to demaund at our hands that which no wayes we can graunt for if we should consent or suffer inuestitures to be made by your Excellency it would turne no doubt to the exceeding great daunger both of you and me before God c. Secondly he exhorteth him earnestly to admit S. Anselme to his Bishopricke and fauour againe Prospice fili Charissime vtrum dedecus an decus tibi sit quod sapientissimus religiosissimus Episcopus Anselmus propter hoc tuo lateri adharere tuo veretur in Reguo consistere Qui tanta de te bonae hactenus audierant quid de te sentiant quid lequentur c. Consider my most deere child whether this be an honour or dishonour vnto you that so wise and religious a Bishop as Anselmus is should feare for this cause to liue with you or to remaine in your Kingdome What will men thinke or say of you who hitherto haue heard so great good of your proceedings Thus he and much more which for breuity I omit from his pallace of Lateran vpon the 9. day before the Kalends of December 11. But not long after to wit vpon the yeare 1106. which was the sixt of K. Henryes raigne he being in some difficultyes in Normandy in respect of the warrs he had there against Duke Robert his brother and many great men that tooke his parte and perceiuing great discontentments to be likewise in England as well 〈◊〉 regard of the absence of their holy Archbishop Anselme as of the greiuous exactions which he had made vpon them Non facâ—â—â— potest naerrari miseria saith Florentius quam sustinuit isto tempore â—errâ— Anglorum propter exactiones Regis The miserie can hardly be declared which England did suffer at this time by the Kings exactions All these things I say being laid togeather God mouing his heart to turne to him for remedy he thought best to goe to the monastery of Becke in Normandy where Anselme remayned in continuall fasting and praying for his amendment And there agreeing with him to stand no more in these matters of Inuestitures or any other spirituall iurisdiction he willed him to returne securely into England to pray for him in his Archbishopricke and so he did 12. And this being vpon the Assumption of our B. Lady to wit the 15. of August the K. confident now of Gods fauour as it seemeth vpon this agreement gathered presentlie an armie against his enemies vpon the vigil of S. Michael next ensuing entring battaile with them had a singular victorie tooke therin both Duke Robert his brother VVilliam Earle of Morton Robert Earle of Stutauill VVilliam Crispin and all the head Captaines of Normandy with them wherof presently the King wrote letters of ioy to Archbishop Anselme in England saith Florentius And the next spring abouâ— Easter returned into England with the said prisoners and left Normandy wholie gained vnto him and to his Successours 13. And vpon this he calling togeather vpon the first of August and 7. yeare of his raigne all his Lords both spirituall and temporal consulted for three daies togeather with them not admitting S. Anselme to that consultation least his authoritie might seeme to haue ouer-borne the matter what it was best to doe in that case of inuestitures which he had before vsed albeit diuers saith Florentius did exhorte him not to obey the Pope in this but to retaine the vse which both his Father and brother had practised yet others alleadging the Censures both of Pope Vrbanus and Pascalis against the same and that they left vnto the King all other priuiledges and regalityes the King on the 4. day causing Anselmus to be present Statuit saith Florentius vt ab eo tempore in reliquum nunquam per dationem baculi pastoralis vel annuli quisquam 〈◊〉 Episcopatu aut Abbatia per Regem vel quamlibet laicam manum in Angliâ— inuestiretur The King with his Counsell did decree for that time forward that no man in England should be inuested of any Bishopricke or Abbey by the King or by any lay mans hand or power with giuing him the pastoral staffe or ring as sometymes had byn accustomed And this was done in obedience of the Canonicall constitution made in the Councell of Bary against such inuestitures as we haue declared 14. Aud thus was that controuersie ended which was the only controuersie of importance that this K. Henry had with the Sea of Rome during the tyme of his raigne which Malmesbury then liuinge recounted as done of conscience saying Inuestituras Ecclesiarum post multas controuersias inter eum Anselmum Deo Sancto Petro remisit Hee did release againe to God and to S. Peter the Inuestitures of Churches after many controuersies had there about with Anselmus Which he did perfourme so syncerely from his heart as afterward Anselme being dead and he marrying his only daughter Maude to the Emperour Henry the 5. vpon the yeare 1114. he seemeth to haue induced his sonne-in-law the Emperour to remit also the said inuestitures to Pope Calixtus for which his Father and grand-father had held so longe and scandalous broyles with the precedent Popes yea and himself also that is to say this Emperour Henry not long before going to Rome with a mayne army had taken prisoner and held for certayne dayes Pope Paescalis that sate before Calixtus therby to force him to graunt and confirme the said Inuestitures which now vpon a better mynd he gaue ouer againe For this I
case make directly against M. Attorneys conclusion For that the King acknowledged the Pope to be a superiour Iudge ouer English Bishops aboue himself and then was the iudgement of those Sages named by M. Attorney that thought him so deepely to haue offended in acknowledging the Popes authority farre from the purpose And howsoeuer it were cleere it is that the King seased only vpon temporalityes of the Bishops and tooke not vpon him to depriue them of their spirituall iurisdictions as Queene Elizabeth did when shee fell out with M. Grindall her Primate and Archbishop of Canterbury whome she by her Ecclesiasticall authority depriued of his iurisdiction and appointed Commissaryes of her owne in diuers Countryes to execute the same iurisdiction as immediate from her self which this K. Edward did not nor any of his Predecessors or Successours vntil K. Henry the 8. and therby shewed that they pretended nothing of their spirituall authority so this example or instance of seasing vpon teÌ„poralties either by right or wrong proueth nothing for M. Attorney his purpose Let vs passe then to his 3. instaÌ„ce The Attorney Concerning men twise marryed called Bigami whome the Bishop of Rome by a Constitution made at the Councelll of Lâ—ons hath excluded from all priuiledge of Clergy whervpon certeyne â—relates when such persons haue byn attainted for felloâ—s haue prayed for to haue them deliuered as Clerkes which were made Bigami before the same constitution It is agreed and declared before the King and his Counsell that the same coÌ„stitution shal be vnderstood in this wise that whether they were Bigami before the same constitution or after they shall not from henceforth be deliuered to the Prelates but iustice shal be executed vpon them as vpon other lay people The Catholicke Deuine 31. About this instance taken out of a Statute made in the 4. yeare of K. Edward the first it is first to be noted that albeit mention be made heere only of the late constitution of the Councell of Lyons vnder Pope Gregorie the tenth concerning Bigamies or those that are twise married yet is the thing it self of more antiquity in the Catholicke Church as may appeare throughout the whole title De Bigamis non ordinandis in the first booke of Decretalls that is to say that such as haue byn twise married may not take holy orders But yet for that there was a doubt whether such men hauing primam tonsuram or minores ordines and therby made Clerkes might enioy the priuiledges of Clergy-men for their persons and goods suites in law and the like which could not be decided but by Ecclesiasticall Iudges this controuersie I say which included many braunches consequences especially for England was defined in the said Councell of Lyons and the definitiue sentence or decision was in these words Begamos omni priuilegio Clericali declaramus esse nudatos corrections forisae cidaris addictos consuetudine contraria non obstante ipsis quoque sub anathe mate prohibemus deferre tonsuram vel habitum Clericalem We doe declare that all such as haue byn twise marryed are depriued of all priuiledge of Clergy-men are subiect to the correction of the temporall Magistrate notwithstanding any custome to the contrary And we doe forbidd them also vnder paine of excommunication that they doe not beare Ecclesiasticall tonsure nor Priestly habit or apparell of Clergy-men 32. Which decision or declaration of the said generall Councell coming forth presently there arose a doubt in England whether such Bigamies as had borne that attyre and tonsure before that tyme and were now in present necessity to vse the priuiledge of the Clergy for deliuering themselues out of the secular iustice hand ought to haue the same or no for that it might be presumed that the Councell meant only of these Bigamyes that should beare the habit afterward Vnto which opinion as to the more pious and pittifull the Bishops inclining demaunded to haue deliuered vnto them as Clerkes all such fellons as had bin Clerkes or taken for Clerkes before the Councell But the King and his Counsell were of an other opinion to wit that Pope Gregory his decision was in generall tearmes and excepted none neyther before nor after and thereby vnderstood and meant to exclude all 33. This is the case and this is the decision thereof And now let the discreet Reader iudge whether this example maketh more for M. Attorneys purpose or against him for that here the King his Counsell doe stand more strictly to the obseruaunce of the Popes decree as it lyeth then those Bishops themselues who would haue had these Bigamyes deliuered vnto them as Clerkes and therefore vrge to haue it punctually and exactly obserued And for that men of reason might meruaile why M. Attorney a man of such accompt in the law hath brought in such an instance so impertinent to his purpose he seeketh to remedy the matter by this note in the margent Obserue saith he how the King by the aduise of his Counsell expounded how the said Councell of Lyon should be vnderstood and in what sense it should be receaued and allowed heere And why is all this diligent commentary thinke you Forsooth to the end that you may imagine that the King and his Counsell tooke themselues to be aboue the Pope and generall Councell of Lyons for that they tooke vpon them to expound admit the said Councells decree By which argument M. Attorney may proue also that Archbishop Peckam of Canterbury calling a Sinod as before you haue heard of his Bishops Suffragans and other Prelates for receauing publishing and obseruing the said decrees of the same Pope and Councell the very next yeare after it was held did thinke themselues to be aboue the said Pope and Councell and to haue authority ouer them for that they receaued allowed and expounded the same decrees And doth not euery man see the folly of this kind of reasoning 34. And yet you must note further that for better bringing in of this argument M. Attorney straineth the text extremely in three or foure things to make place for this his note For whereas in the latin text of the Statute for K. Edward the first put forth in latin and so is it extant vntill this day it is said Quidam Praelati sâ—â—quam Clericos exigerunt sibi liberandos c. Certaine Prelates did require or exact to haue such Bigamies deliuered freely vnto them as Clerkes which were made Bigannies before the said constitution M. Attorney saith Certaine Prelates haue prayed to haue them deliuered whereas betwene exigere and rogare to exacte and pray is a great difference in this case 35. And againe where it is written in latin Concordatum est declaratum coram Rege Consilio suo quod constitutio illa intelligenda fit quod siuè effecti fuerunt Bigami ante praedictam constitutionem siuè post de catero non liberentur Praelatis imò fiat de
strangers that had benefices or Ecclesiasticall liuings within the Realme both religious and other To which consideration he had these particular motiues peculiar to his time and state that he hauing for some yeares before proclaimed himself King of France and taken the Armes and Title of that Kingdome vpon him as due vnto him by succession for that he was next heire male in bloud to King Philip the 4. surnamed the faire that by his mother Queen Isabel was his Grandfather and all the Popes at that time being French-men and lying at Auinion in France for seauenty yeares togeather and the most parte of the Cardinals and Courte being in like manner of the same natioÌ„ that were ordinarily prouided by the Popes of benefices and Bishopricks in England and therby not fit as was pretended to teach preach or reside there King Edward besides the regard of other inconueniences entred into ielousie also of state thinking that these men were enemyes to his pretences in France and therevpon was the more pricked to make the prohibitions and lawes which he did 4. But yet writing first therof to the Pope himself in most humble and dutifull manner requesting redresse and remedy immediately from that Sea as by his letters yet extant doth appeare vpon this occasion saith VValsingham for that Pope Clement the 6. which once had byn Archbishop of Roane in Normandy a man of eminent learning but of profuse liberality made prouisions vnto two French Cardinals for their maintenaunce of two thousand markes a yeare vpon Bishopricks and Abbeys in England without the Kings knowledge or consent wherwith he being much offended commaunded first the Procurators of the said Cardinals to surcease and departe the land vpon paine of imprisonment then wrote vnto the said Pope that famous letter saith our Author for the liberty of the Church of England which he and others doe set downe The Title wherof is this Sanctissimo in Christo Patri ac Domino Domino Clemanti diuina prouidentia Sacrosancta Romana Vniuersalâ—◠〈◊〉 Summo Pontifici Edwardus eadem gratia Rex Francia Anglia c. â—â—â—uota pedum oscula beatâ—rum 5. This is the Title and inscription of his letter whereby wee may see what account he made of the Sea Apostolicke and Bishop thereof And in the prosecution of the said letter he layeth downe first how all the Bishopricks Prelacyes and benefices 〈◊〉 England being founded by the deuotion of Christian Kings â—ishops and Noble-men therof to the end that the people might be instructed the poore releiued the Churches serued the Princes assisted by Counsaile and help of the said Prelates according to that we haue heard touched before in the Statute of Carliele vnder this mans Grand-father and otherwise often repeated vpon other occasions all these good ends were said now to be euacuated by that the Sea Apostolike reseruing the collâ—tions of such spirituall liuings to the Courte of Rome vnfit men strangers for the most parte were preferred and therby English-men discouraged and damnified the patrons of benefices depriued of their right of presentation many other such inconueniences ensued 6. Wherfore considering all these points saith the King Pâ—â—sata etiam deuotionis plenitudine quae domus nostra Regia Clerus â—â—pulus dicti Regni perstiterunt hactenùs in obedientia Sedis Apostolica c. Considering also the fulnesse of deuotion wherwith our Kingly family as also the Clergy and people of our Realme haue pâ—â—seuered hitherto in the obedience of the Sea Apostolicke it seemeth right that you as a Father prouiding for his children should with paternall affection alleuiate the burthens of your said children and permit for the time to come that Patrons of benefices may haue that solace as to present fit persons without impeachment to the said benefices wherof they are patrons and that Cathedrall Churches others of the said Kingdome may be prouided of Pastors by free elections c. Wherfore we â—â—seech your Benignity to vouchsafe euen for the honour of God and saluation of soules and for the taking away of the foresaâ—â— scandals and offences to put quickly some whole-some temperament vnto these matters to the end that wee who doe â—â—â—rence as wee ought to doe your most holy person and the holy Roman Church in paternae vestra dilectionis dulcedine quie scamâ—â— may rest in the sweetnes of your fatherly loue towards vs. 〈◊〉 â—â—â—â—lissimus ad regimen Ecclesia Sua Sancta per tempora prospera lonâ—â—â— The most high God preserue you to the gouernment of his holy Church for many and prosperous years Giuen at VVestminster the 26. day of September vpon the 4. yeare of our Raigne ouer France and 27. ouer England 7. Heere we see with what respect to the Sea Apostolicke King Edward pretended to make the restraints which he made of prouisions from Rome and to shew more his confidence and acknowledgement toward the said Sea he sent soone after the very same yeare vnto the said Clement the 6. a most honourable Embassage by Henry Earle of Lancaster and Derby as also the Earls Spenser and Stafford togeather with the Bishop of Oxford to treat with the said Pope and lay before him the right which he pretended to the Crowne of France though not in forme of iudgement or to put the matter in triall saith VValsingham but as to a father and friend he hauing 4. yeares before that written largly of the ground of his said right vnto this mans predecessour Pope Benedictus the 11. and to the whole Colledge of Cardinals himself being then at Antwerpe vpon the 16. of Iuly Anno Domini 1339. and 13. of his Raigne 8. His epistle to the Pope had the same title which the other before and that to the Cardinals Amabilium Deo patrum Sacrosancta Romana Ecclesiae Cardinalium Collegio venerando c. In the prosecution of which letter to the Pope after a large demonstration of his title he hath these words Non igitur apud vestrae viscera misericordia Sanctitatis locum inueniat detrahentium informatio amula c. Let not therefore the emulous informations of detractors find place in the bowells of your mercie and Holines against such a sonne of yours as by hereditary right of all his progenitors doth and will for euer immoueably persist in your obedience and in the obedience and grace of the Apostolicke Sea c. And we doe intimate this processe of our iustice to the said Crowne of France and of the iniury done against vs by detayning the same vnto the preheminence of your holy Highnes that by your supreme and holy measure of right and equity whervnto belongeth vpon earth to open and shut the gates of heauen and to whom appertaineth the fullnesse of power supereminency of tribunall you will fauour our right so much as reson requireth Parati semper ne dum à vestro sancto cunctis presidente iudicio
all appeals in causes Ecclesiasticall to the Court of Rome reducing all spirituall authority of determining the same vnto the body spirituall of the English Clergy for so the words of the statute are The body spirituall of the English Church saith he hauing power when any cause of the law diuine happened to come in question or of spirituall learning c. to declare and determine all such doubts to administer al such offices duties as to their roomes spiritual did appertaine without the intermedling of any exteriour person or persons c. Wherby it appeareth that by this Statute he reduceth all spirituall power to a certaine community of the Ecclesiasticall body of England but in the second Statute that followed in the yeare after against suing for licences dispensations facultyes graunts rescripts or delegacyes to Rome he seemeth to establish all authority in the Archbishop of Canterbury that was then Thomas Cranmer newly made by himself for allowing of his marriage with Lady Anne Bullen for so he saith in the statute That the Archbishop of Canterbury for the tyme being and his successours shall haue power and authority from tyme to tyme by their discretions to giue graunt and dispose by an instrument vnder the seale of the said Archbishop vnto the King and vnto his heirs successours Kings of this Realme as well all maÌ„ner of such licences dispensations compositions facultyes graunts rescrips delegacyes instruments and other writings for causes not being contrary or repugnant to the holy scriptures and lawes of God as heertofore had byn vsed and accustomed to be had and obtained by the King or any his most noble progenitors or any of his or their subiects at the Sea of Rome or any person or persons by authority of the same c. 12. Lo heer King Henry giueth authority to the Archbishop of Canterbury to giue vnto him to wit to King Henry himself and his successors Kings of England and their subiects all dispensations which they were wont to â—â—ke and obtaine at the Popes hand so as heer he acknowledgeth that in former times that authority belonged to the Pope and that his auncestors and progenitors were of that opinion but that now he being offended with him he would take it from him and bestow it vpon the Archbishop of Canterbury subiecting himself and his inheritours to aske and obtaine the said dispensations at his hands and his successours which was as you see to make Archbishop Cranmer Pope and not himself for this yeare as the whole body of the English Clergy was for the yeare past 13. And wheras it is euident that King Henry gaue this authority to Cranmer for dispensing c. to the end he should dispense with him for marrying of the said Lady Anne Bullen it seemeth strange that he would vse this so ridiculous circuyt as first to giue authority by Parlament to Cranmer to be able to dispense with him to wit with King Henry the giuer and would not take immediatly either by himself or by Parlament authority to himself to dispense with himself But it is well seen that he had some remorse or shame-fastnes therin at the first beginning though the very next yeare after he amended the matter or rather made it worse by assuming it to himself For calling another Parlament vpon the 26. of his raigne he made the first Statute of all with this Title An act concerning the Kings Highnes to be Supreme head of the Church of England and to haue authority to reforme and redresse all errors heresies and abuses in the same Wherby you may see what gradation was vsed in this matter or rather mistery giuing this power first to the Community of the English Clergy secondly to the Archbishop of Canterbury and thirdly to himself and all this in three distinct yeares immediately following one the other 14. And now if mens euerlasting saluation must depend vpon these mutations of spirituall iurisdiction as no doubt they did in thousands of our Countrey at that tyme and if the eternall wisdome of our Sauiour Christ hath left no more certainty for direction of our soules by spirituall gouernement and authority then this of our English Parlament which changeth so often and easely as you haue heard vpon euery Princes particuler inclination then are we doubtlesse in a pittifull plight for that as hath byn declared before of the certainty of this spirituall power for binding or loosing of our sinnes for SacrameÌ„ts instructions directions and all other spirituall helps and assistance in this life dependeth the surety of our euerlasting saluation or damnation in the life to come 15. But to goe forward a little further in this matter now we haue King Henry head of the Church and M. Attorney no doubt is glad therof for helping of his cause though it help it but little or nothing at all it being the first example that euer could be giuen therof in England or elswhere throughout the Christian world and so much the more to be misliked if we beleiue Iohn Caluin in his sharp reproofe of this attempt which he calleth Tyrannicall Anti-Christian But M. Attorney perhaps will not care for Caluin or Beza or any of their followers in this point for that it maketh not to his purpose Well then he must notwithstanding graunt this in all reason that if this supreme authoritie spirituall was wel and rightly and by gods direction spirit and allowance taken vpon himself by King Henry then is it likely that he was guided also by the same spirit afterward in making his decrees laws and ordinances for directing and gouerning the English Church by that authority and especially for reforming and redressing of all errors heresies and abuses therin according to the speciall title of his said authority before set down wherof it followeth that when vpon the 31. yeare of his raigne which was fiue after the said authoritie giuen him hee calling a Parlament determined six mayne and principall articles of protestant religion to bee heresies to witt The deniall of the reall presence of the communion vnder one kind only That Priests may marrie That vowes of chastitie may bee broken That priuate masses are not lawfull That sacramentall or auricular confession is not necessarie appointing them that should hould any of these heresies so coÌ„deÌ„ned by him to be burned as notorious hereticks it followeth I say that this was decreed by him out of the same spirit and direction of god for that otherwise his Ecclesiasticall supremacy had byn to small purpose if there were no certainty in his determinations or that God would permit him to erre so grosly in so importaÌ„t a busines as this was for the whole Church of England so soone after he had ginen him his said supreme authoritie Ecclesiasticall 16. And that this was done by him against the Protestants with great deliberation consultation aduise maturity in the fullnes of his power Ecclesiasticall appeareth
and how it extendeth it selfe cap. 1. per totum Error how it differeth from Ignorance cap. 1. num 8. 9. Euesham-Abbey in VVorcester-shire builded by S. Egwyn cap. 6. num 42. The same priuiledged from Rome ibidem Eustachius K. Stephens sonne his violence vsed against Clergy-men of Yorke cap. 8. num 35. Excommunications practised by the Apostles cap. 2. num 15. Exemption of Clergy-men from secular power ex iure diuino cap. 2. num 37. Item by Imperiall lawes ibid. n. 38 By particular Kinges and Princes ib. num 39. Exemptions graunted by diuers Popes to pious vvorkes in England before the Conquest cap. 5. num 10. Expostulations vvith M. Attorney about iniuryes offered to many in his booke of Reportes cap. 16. per totum Exulteration of M. Attorneys booke of Reportes cap. 16. num 33. F. Father Campian and his fellovv-martyrs iniured by M. Attorney cap. 16. n. 11. Their protestations at their death ib. num 12. Founders of pious vvorkes had authority ordinarily to giue Charters for priuiledges and exemptions therof cap. 8. num 23. Foundation of Abbeys and Monasteryes in England before the Conquest cap. 6. à num 37. vsque ad 49. Franquises and priuiledges of Churches and monasteryes procured from the Pope cap. 6. num 37.38.39 deinceps Freedome of speach in the ancient Fathers to Emperours cap. 4. num 4. 5. 6. G. Geffrey K. Richard the first his brother made Archbishop of Yorke cap. 9. num 35. His deposition from his bishopricke ibid. num 45. Againe restored ibid. num 46. Glastenbury-Abbey priuiledged from Rome at the petition of K. Edgar cap. 6. num 45. God the author of all lavvfull povver cap. 1. num 1. 2. Gods miraculous actions in the old testament ascribed to Christ cap. 4. num 30. Gouernment of vvomen in spiritualityes and absurdity therof cap. 4. n. 19. 20.21 22. Great-Charter for Church-priuiledges began by K. Henry the third cap. 10. num 6. S. Gregoryes commission to S. Augustine of Canterbury cap. 6. nu 12. 13. S. Gregory Nazianzens discourse about the nature of spirituall and temporall Iurisdiction cap. 2. num 4. Groundes of spirituall authority Prefac num 6. Groundes of Protestants assertions Prefac num 7. Of Puritans ibid. num 8. Of Catholickes ibid. num 9. Groundes in sectes new-opinions vvhat they are or can be cap. 16. n. 25. Gualter Archbishop of Roane Gouernour of England cap. 9. n. 4. 42. His disgust and appeale against King Richard the first ibid. num 47. Guide to saluation Pref. num 5. H. Head-ship of spirituall matters not possibly in a woman cap. 4. num 26. The absurdityes that would follow therof ibid num 27. K. Henry the first his raigne ouer England cap. 8. num 8. His good beginning ibid. num 9. His resignation of inuestitures ibid. num 14. His conference vvith Pope Calixtus in Normandy ibid num 14. His acknowledgment of the Popes supremacy ibid. num 21. K. Henry the second his raigne out England cap. 9. à num 1. vsque ad n. 22. His temporall greatnesse ibid. num 2. His lamentable end ibid. num 6. Laws attempted by him against the Church ibid. num 7. Made legate of the Pope in England ibid num 9. His humility to the Sea Apostolicke cap. 9. num 10. His appeale to the Pope about S. Thomas of Canterburâ— death ibid num 11. His purgation and absolution by the Popes Legat. ibid. n. 12. 13. His letter to the Pope in great affliction ibid. n. 14. â—â— The straytes vvherunto he vvas driuen ibid. num 19. His pennance at the body of S. Thomas of Canterbury cap. 9. num 19. K. Henry the third his temporall homage done to the Sea Apostolicke cap. 10. num 3. His beginning of the Great Charter for Church priuiledges ibid. num 6. His conference vvith K. Lewes of France ibid. num 9. His obedience and subiection to the Popes cap. 10 n 19. His letter to Pope Innocentius ibid. num 21. His statutes in fauour of the Clergy ibid. num 27. His obedience to the Bishopp of London in spirituall matters ibid. num 34 35 Also to the Deane of Paules ibid. num 38. K. Henry the 4. his raigne cap. 13. n. 1. 2. 3. deinceps His condemnation and execution of the Archbishop of Yorke c. 15. n. 23. K. Henry the seauenth his raigne ouer England cap. 14 n. 15. 16. deinceps His statute for reformation of the Clergy ibid. His deuotion and obedience to the Sea of Rome vntill his death ibid. n. 21. K. Henry the 8. his good beginning cap. 15. n. 1. 2. His booke against Luther ibid. num 3.4 5. His arguments therin for the Popes supremacy ibid num 5. 6. dein His inuectiue against Luthers inconstancy ibid. num 7. His good offices to the Pope continued for many yeares ibid. n. 9. The beginning of his breach vvith the Pope ibid. n. 10. 11. His taking vpon him the Supremacy ibid num 13.14 15. His condemnation of Protestants religion ibid. n. 15. Heretickes their pretence of singularity of knowledge cap. 1. n. 5. 6. 7. Heresy how great and grieuous a synne cap. 16. n. 26. Hubert Earle of Kent Chiefe Iusticer of England cap. 10. num 34. His disgrace vvith the Kinge ibid. His taking of Sanctuary ibid. Hunting hawking disliked in English Bishopps and Prelates c. 9. n. 45. I. Ignorance vvhat it is cap. 1. num 10. Ignorance how it differeth from error ibid. n. 10. 11. Ignorance negatiue and priuitiue ibid. num 10. 11. Ignorance voluntary and inuoluntary ibid. num 11. 12. Inas King of the VVestsaxons his letters in fauour of the Pope cap. 6. n. 69. His Pilgrimage to Rome for deuotion cap. 6. n. 82. Inconueniences by strangers promoted to Ecclesiasticall dignityes in England cap. 11. num 36. Remedyes therof sought from the Pope ibid. n. 38. Iniuryes offered to diuers sorts of men by M. Attorney his booke cap. 16. per totum Insolency of some priuate men and perills that often arise therby cap. 16. num 31. Inuasion of Abbey-landes or goods forbidden vnder payne of damnation cap. 5. num 11. 12. Inuectiue of K. Henry the 8. against Luthers inconstancy cap. 15. num 7. Inuestitures to Benefices desyred by Princes denyed by Popes cap. 7. n. 34. The beginning therof by secular Princes cap. 8. num 16. Inuestitures resigned by K. Henry the first cap. 8. num 14. Inuestitures graunted only by permission of the Sea Apostolicke cap. 8. num 17. K. Iohn of England his variable state in gouernment cap. 9. n. 48. deinceps His obedience to the Sea of Rome ibid. num 50. 51. His piety in the beginning of his raigne ibid num 53. His humility liberality ibid n. 54. His breach with the Church of Rome and occasion therof cap. 9. n. â—7 His indignation against Clergy meÌ„ ibid. num 58,59 60. His offer of subiectioÌ„ to the Mores ibid. num 62.
His reconciliation vvith the Sea of Rome ibid. num 62. 63. His death ibidem n. 66. Iurisdiction spirituall and temporall and the dependance or independance the one of the other cap. 2. n. 6. 7. Iurisdiction-spirituall internall and externall cap. 2. n. 16. Ins how farre the vvord extendeth cap. 1. num 3. K. Key of knowledg cap. 6. num 32. Kinges capable of Ecclesiasticall iurisdiction by commission cap. 12. n. 29. King how he is Persona mixta c. 14. num 1â— King Edward the CoÌ„fessor his Charters and priuiledges for Church-libertyes cap. 5. n. 15. deinceps Item his subiection to the Pope ibid. num 16. 17. 18. King Edward the first excommunicated by Pope Formosus cap. 6. n. 57. King Edvvyn of Northumberland demaunded Bishops from Rome c. 6. nu 22. Priuiledges graunted vnto him by Pope Honorius ibidem King Edgar his reformation of the Clergy of England by authority from Rome cap. 6. num 27. King Ceadwalla of the VVestsaxons his going to Rome and death there cap. 6. num 40. King Ethelbert of kent his Charter for Church priuiledges cap. 5. num 11. His dependance of the Sea of Rome cap. 6. num 20. King Inas his lavves in fauour of the Pope cap 6. num 69. His Peter-pence paid to Rome ibid. num 68. King Kenulphus his Charter for Church priuiledges cap. 5 num 3. 4. His letter and humble petition to Pope Leo. cap. 6. num 30. 32. King Offa of Mercia his atteÌ„pt against Iurisdiction of the Sea of Canterbury cap. 6. num 29. King Offa the younger of Mercia his Confirmation of Peter-pence to Rome cap. 6. n. 70. King Osway of Northumberland his embassage to Pope Vitalianus for an Archbishop into England cap. 6. n. 24. King of Spaine his Ecclesiasticall Iurisdiction in Sicily cap. 15. num 20. Knightes of the Temple suppressed in England cap. 11. nu 43. L. Lanfranke chosen Archbishop of Canterbury cap. 7. n. 4. His letter to Pope Alexander the second ibidem Lawes Ecclesiasticall not made but receaued by secular Princes cap. 1. n. 4. Lawes-birthright cap. 1. num 18. 19. Lawes municipall and their antiquity cap. 1. n. 19. Their commodityes discommoâ—â—â—â—â—â— ibid. num 20. Lawes-canon and how they vvere first receyued in England cap. 4. n. 17. Law-Ciuill and vvhat it is c. 4. n. 24. Law of Nature cap. 4. num 25. Law Euangelicall cap. 4. num 29. Lawes municipall of England cap. 4. num 39. Lawes made before the Conquest by secular princes concerning Ecclesiasticall iurisdiction cap. 6. n. 3. 4.5.6.7 deinceps Lawes Ecclesiastical not made by Princes but by Prelates in England c. 6. n. 9. Lawes attempted by K. Henry the second against the Church of England cap. 9. n. 7. Lawes of K. Edward the first in preiudice of the Clergy of England cap. 11. num 21. Law of Premunire and beginning therof cap. 12. n. 11. 12 Lawes Ecclesiasticall subiect to euery mans particular caluÌ„niation c. 15. n. 19. Legates of the Pope forbidden entrance into England and vvhy cap. 14. num 13. 15. Leopold Duke of Austria his imprisoning of K. Richard the first cap. 9. num 39. Lollards heretickes in England cap. 13. n. 7. Lawes for their apprehension and execution ibid. num 7. 23. Their name and origen ibidem Luther impugned by K. Henry the 8. Cap. 15. num 4. 5. 6. deinceps His inconstancy inueighed at by the same King ibid. num 7. M. Missions into England by authority of the Pope cap. 6. num 33. Monasteryes and Abbeys founded in England before the Conquest cap. 6. à num 37. vsque ad 49. Monasteryes and Churches priuiledges procured from Rome cap. 6. n. 37. 38. 39. Monastery of S. Bertulphes the priuiledges therof cap. 6. num 39. Motiues that indured K. Edw. the 3. to proceed so violently against the Church of England cap. 12. num 3. Mounsieur Lansackes coÌ„ference vvith Queene Elizabeth cap. 15. num 41. N. Name of Lollards from whence it is deriued cap. 13. num 23 24. M. Attorneys ridiculous Etimology therof ibid. num 22. Nature and conditions of spirituall and temporall iurisdiction expressed by S. Gregory Nazianzen cap. 2. num 4. Nicolas Morris Abbot of VValtham punished by K. Edw. the third vvhy cap. 12. num 29. 32. Nouelty of Q. Elizabeths supremacy misliked by Puritans and Protestants cap. 4. num 41.42.43 deinceps O Oath of Supremacy exacted first of all by Queen Elizabeth cap. 4. num 52. 53. Oath of K. Stephen for the maintenance of the libertyes of holy Church of England cap. 8. n. 27. Obedience of Clergy-men due to the Ciuill Magistrate and how cap. 2. num 33. 34 Obedience of K. Edward the Confessor to the Popes of Rome in his tyme. cap. 5. num 16.17 18. Occasion of the breach of K. Iohn with the Sea Apostolicke cap. 9. num â—7 Occasions of K. Henry the 8. his breach from the pope cap. 15. numero 10. 11. Offa King of the Mercians his confirmation of Peter-pence to the Sea of Rome cap. 6. num 70. Ordinances and decrees of Pope Formosus for the Church of EnglaÌ„d cap. 6. num 59. Origens of spirituall and temporall iurisdiction different cap. 15. num 29. Osius his resolute speach to Constantiâ—s the Emperour cap. 4. num 7. P. Palles of the Archbishops of England accustomed to be taken at Rome cap. 7. n. 11. S. Paules esteeme of spirituall Power giuen vnto him other the Apostles and their successors cap. 2. n. 13. 14. His eager reprehension of vvomans superiority in the Church cap. 4. n. 32. Peace of the Church what it is cap. 7. num 16. Pascalis the pope his letter to King Henry the first cap. 8. num 10. Pennance of K. Henry the 2. at the body of S. Thomas of Canterbury cap. 9. num 19. Peter-pence paid to Rome and the beginning therof cap. 6. n. 67.68 69. The same coÌ„firmed by K Offa. ibidem num 70. Also by K. Adelnulph ibid. num 71. In like manner by K. Canutus the Dane ibid. num 72. By K. Edward the Confessor ibidem num 73. Item by K. VVilliam the Conquerour ibid. num 74. And by other kinges vntill K. Henry the 8. ibid. num 75. Perills that often rise by the insolency of priuate men cap. 16. num 3â— Pilgrimage to Rome for deuotion by diuers of our English kinges cap. 6. num 76.77 deinceps Plurality of benefices and vvho can dispense therwith cap. 14. num 20. Pointes commendable in a good pastor cap. 4. num 37. Pope Honorius his priuiledges to K. Edwyn of Northumberland cap. 6. n. 22. Pope Formosus his excommunication of K. Edward the first before the Conquest cap. 6. num 57. His decrees and Ordinances for the Church of England ibid. num 59. Pope Pascalis his letter to K Henry the first cap. 6. num 10. Popes prouisions in EnglaÌ„d for Ecclesiasticall liuinges to straÌ„gers cap. 12. n. â—