any Excommunication out of he Realm And therefore by the rule of the Court the Plaintif was not thereby disabled Reges sacro oleo uncti sunt Spiritualis Jurisdictionis capaces Where a Prior is the King's debtor and ought to have Tithes of another Spiritual person he may chuse either to sue for subtraction of his Tithes in the Ecclesiastical Court or in the Exchequer and yet the persons and matter also were Ecclesiastical For seeing the matter by a mean concerneth the King he may sue for them in the Exchequer as well as in the Ecclesiastical Court and there shall the right of Tithes be determined And Fitzherbert in his Nabre fol. 30. holdeth that before the Statute of 18 E. 3. cap. 7. right of Tithes were determinable at the Temporal Courts at the election of the party and by that Statute assigned to be determined in the Ecclesiastical Court and the Temporal Court excluded thereof And the Courts of divers Mannors of the King 's and of other Lords in ancient times had the Probates of last Wills and Testaments And it appeareth by 11 H. 7. fol. 12. that Probate of Testaments did not appertain to the Ecclesiasticall Court but that of late time they were determinable there So as of such Causes and in such manner as the Kings of the Realm by general consent and allowance have assigned to their Ecclesiasticall Courts they have Jurisdiction by force of such allowance The King did by his Charter translate Canons Secular into Regular and Religious persons which he did by his Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction and could not doe it unlesse he had Jurisdiction Ecclesiasticall The Abbot of Waltham died in the 45. year of E. 3. and one Nicholas Morris was elected Abbot who for that the Abbey was exempt from ordinary Jurisdiction sent to Rome to be confirmed by the Pope And because the Pope by his Constitutions had reserved all such Collations to himself he did recite by his Bull that he having no regard to the Election of the said Nicholas gave to him the said Abbey and the Spiritualties and Temporalties belonging to the same of his spirituall grace and at the request as he feigned of the King of England This Bull was read and considered of in Councill that is before all the Judges of England and it was resolved by them all that this Bull was against the Laws of England and that the Abbot for obtaining the same was fallen into the King's mercy whereupon all his possessions were seised into the King's hands as more at large by the said Case appeareth Where the Abbot of Westminster had a Prior and Convent who were Regular and mort in law yet the King by his Charter did divide that Corporation and made the Prior and Convent a distinct and capable Body to sue and be sued by themselves At a Parliament holden in the 25. year of King Edward the Third it was enacted by consent of the whole Parliament That as well they that obtained Provisions from Rome as they that put them in execution should be out of the King's protection and that a man might doe with them as with the enemies of the King And he that offendeth against such Provisors in body goods or other possessions should be excused against all people and should never be impeached or grieved for the same By which Law every man might lawfully kill such an Offendor as a common enemy against the King and his Countrey so hainous were such offences then holden Afterwards in the same 25. year of King Edward the Third it was in open Parliament by the grievous complaints of all the Commons of this Realm shewed that the Grievances and Mischiefs aforesaid did daily abound to the great dammage and destruction of all this Realm more then ever before viz. That of late the Bishop of Rome by procurement of Clerks and otherwise had reserved and did daily reserve to his Collation generally and specially as well Archbishopricks Abbies and Priories as all other Dignities and other Benefices of England which were of the Advowrie of people of Holy Church and gave the same as well to Aliens as to Natives and did take of all such Benefices the First-fruits and many other Profits and a great part of the Treasure of the Realm was carried away and dispended out of the Realm by the purchasors of such graces and also by such privy Reservations many Clerks advanced in the Realm by their true Patrons which peaceably had holden their Advancements by long time were suddenly put out Whereupon the said Commons did pray their said Sovereign Lord the King that fithence the right of the Crown of England and the Law of the said Realm was such that upon the mischiefs and dammages which happened to his Realm he ought and was bound of the accord of his said people thereof to provide remedie and law for the avoiding the mischiefs and dammage which thereof came That it might please him thereupon to ordain remedy The said King Ed. the 3. seeing the mischiefs and dammage before named and having regard to the Statute made in the time of his Grandfather King Ed. 1. and to the causes contained in the same which Statute holdeth always his force and was never defeated nor adnulled in any point and forasmuch as he was bound by his Oath to see the same to be kept as a Law of this Realm though that by sufferance and negligence it had been fithence attempted to the contrary also having regard to the grievous complaints made to him by his people in divers his Parliaments holden heretofore willing to ordain remedy for the great dammage and mischiefs which had happened and daily did happen to the Church of England by the said cause by the assent of all the Great men and the Commonalty of the said Realm to the honour of God and profit of the said Church of England and of all his Realm did order and establish That the free Election of Archbishops Bishops and all other Dignities and Benefices electory in England should hold from thenceforth in the manner as they were granted by the King's Progenitors and founded by the Ancestors of other Lords And that all Prelates and other people of Holy Church which had Advowsons of any Benefices of the King's gift or of any of his Progenitors or of other Lords and Donors to doe Divine Service and other charges thereto pertaining should have their Collations and Presentments freely in the manner as they were infeoffed by their Donors And in case that Reservation Collation or Provision be made by the Court of Rome of any Archbishoprick Bishoprick Dignity or other Benefice in disturbance of the Elections Collations or Presentations afore named That at the time of the Avoidance that such Reservations Collations and Provisions ought to take effect the said King Edward the Third and his Heirs should have and enjoy the same Collations to the Archbishopricks and other Dignities
the Treasure and riches of the land carried away the Subjects of the Realm molested and impoverished the Benefices of Holy Church wasted and destroyed Divine service Hospitalitie Almsdeeds and other works of charitie neglected Again 27 Edw. 3. cap. 1. upon the grievous and clamorous complaint for that phrase is there used of the great men and Commons touching Citations and Provisions it is enacted That the offenders shall forfeit their lands goods and chattels and their bodies be imprisoned and ransomed at the King's will But in the Statute of 25 Edw. 3. wherein the first Law against Provisors made 25 Edw. 1. is recited there is a larger declaration of these inconveniences then in the two last Acts before mentioned For there all the Commons of the Realm do grievously complain That whereas the Holy Church of England was first founded in estate of Prelacie by the Kings and Nobilitie of that Realm and by them endowed with great possessions and revenues in lands rents and Advowsons to the end the people might be informed in Religion Hospitality might be kept and other works of Charitie might be exercised within the Realm And whereas the King and other founders of the said Prelacies were the rightfull Patrons and Adowees thereof and upon avoidance of such Ecclesiasticall promotions had power to advance thereunto their kinsmen friends and other learned men of the birth of that Realm which being so advanced became able and worthy persons to serve the King in Counsell and other places in the Commonweal The Bishop of Rome usurping the Seigniory of such possessions and Benefices did give and grant the same to Aliens which did never dwell in England and to Cardinals which might not dwell there as if he were rightfull Patron of those Benefices whereas by the Law of England he never had right to the Patronage thereof whereby in short time all the Spirituall promotions in the Realm would be ingrossed into the hands of Strangers Canonicall elections of Prelates would be abolished works of Charity would cease the founders and true patrons of Churches would be disinherited the King's Counsell would be weakened the whole Kingdome impoverished and the Laws and rights of the Realm destroyed Upon this complaint it was resolved in Parliament That these oppressions and grievances should not be suffered in any manner and therefore it was enacted That the King and his Subjects should thenceforth enjoy the rights of patronage That free elections of Archbishops Bishops and other Prelates elective should be made according to the ancient grants of the King's Progenitors and their founders That no Bulls of Provision should be put in execution but that the Provisors should be attached fined and ransomed at the King's will and withall imprisoned till they had renounced the benefits of their Bulls satisfied the partie grieved and given sureties not to commit the like offence again Now Master Lalor what think you of these things Did you believe that such Laws as these had been made against the Pope 200 250 300 years since Was King Hen. 8. the first Prince that opposed the Pope's usurped Authority Were our Protestants the first Subjects that ever complained of the Court of Rome Of what Religion think you were the propounders and enacters of these Laws Were they good Catholicks or good Subjects or what were they You will not say they were Protestants for you will not admit the Reformed Religion to be so ancient as those times neither can you say they were undutifull for they strove to uphold their liege Lord's Sovereignty Doubtless the people in those days did generally embrace the vulgar errours and superstitions of the Romish Church and in that respect were Papists as well as you but they had not learned the new doctrine of the Pope's Supremacie and transcendent authority over Kings they did not believe he had power to depose Princes and discharge Subjects of their allegeance to abrogate the fundamentall Laws of Kingdomes and to impose his Canons as binding laws upon all nations without their consents they thought it a good point of Religion to be good Subjects to honour their King to love their country and to maintain the laws and liberties thereof howsoever in other points they did erre and were miss-led with the Church of Rome So as now Master Lalor you have no excuse no evasion but your conscience must condemn you as well as the Law since the Law-makers in all Ages and all religious Papists and Protestants do condemn you unless you think your self wiser then all the Bishops that were then in England or all the Judges who in those days were learned in the Civil and Canon Laws as well as in the Common Laws of England But you being an Irish man will say perhaps these Laws were made in England and that the Irish Nation gave no particular consent thereunto onely there was an implicite consent wrapt and folded up in generall terms given in the Statute of 10 Hen. 7. cap. 22. whereby all Statutes made in England are established and made of force in Ireland Assuredly though the first Parliament held in Ireland was after the first Law against Provisors made in England yet have there been as many particular Laws made in Ireland against Provisions Citations Bulls and Breves of the Court of Rome as are to be found in all the Parliament-Rolls in England What will you say if in the self-same Parliament of 10 Hen. 7. cap. 5. a special Law were made enacting authorizing and confirming in this Realm all the Statutes of England made against Provisors if before this the like Law were made 32 Hen. 6. cap. 4. and again 28 Hen. 6. cap. 30. the like and before that the like Law were made 40 Edw. 3. cap. 13. in the famous Parliament of Kilkenny if a Statute of the same nature were made 7 Edw. 4. cap. 2. and a severer Law then all these 16 Edw. 4. cap. 4. That such as purchase any Bulls of Provision in the Court of Rome as soon as they have published or executed the same to the hurt of any incumbent should be adjudged traitors Which Act if it be not repealed by the Statute of Queen Mary may terrifie Master Lalor more then all the Acts which are before remembred But let us ascend yet higher to see when the Pope's Usurpation which caused all these complaints began in England with what successe it was continued and by what degrees it rose to that height that it well-nigh over-topp'd the Crown whereby it will appear whether he had gained a circle by prescription by a long and quiet possession before the making of these Laws The first encroachment of the Bishop of Rome upon the liberties of the Crown of England was made in the time of King William the Conqueror For before that time the Pope's Writ did not run in England his Bulls of Excommunication and Provision came not thither no Citation no Appeals were made from thence to the Court of
appeareth 11 H. 7.9 34 H. 6.14 c. And in Bunting and Leppingwells Case in the part of my Reports And this is the usual form of all the Sentences in their Ecclesiastical Courts And this very Point Tr. 23 Reginae Eliz. in this Court between Cheyney and Frankwell all the matter being found as this Case is by speciall verdict was adjudged As to the fourth Objection videlicet That the said Queen had onely power by force of the said Act to nominate Commissioners for Ecclesiasticall causes and therefore the foresaid Nomination not pursuing the authority given unto her by that Act should be void Hereunto a threefold Answer was given and resolved by the whole Court 1. That they which were Commissioners and had places of Judicature over the King's subjects should be intended to be Subjects born and not Aliens But if in veritie they were Aliens yet in respect of the general intendment to the contrary it ought to be alledged and proved by the other party For Stabilitur praesumptum donec probetur in contrarium 2. The Jurors have found that the Queen by her said Letters Patents did authorize them secundum formam Statuti praedicti and therefore it doth by necessary consequence amount to as much as if they had found they had been Subjects born For if they were not Subjects born they could not be authorized secundum formam Statuti praedicti Vide 11 H. 4.4 13 Eliz. Dyer fol. And the rather for that this is found by special verdict 3. It was resolved That the said Act of the first year of the said Queen concerning Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction was not a Statute introductory of a new Law but declaratory of the old which appeareth as well by the Title of the said Act videlicet An Act restoring to the Crown the ancient Jurisdiction over the State Ecclesiastical and Spiritual c. as also by the body of the Act in divers parts thereof For that Act doth not annex any Jurisdiction to the Crown but that which in truth was or of right ought to be by the ancient Laws of the Realm parcell of the King's Jurisdiction and united to his Imperial Crown and which lawfully had been or might be exercised within the Realm The end of which Jurisdiction and of all the proceeding thereupon was that all things might be done in causes Ecclesiasticall to the pleasure of almighty God the increase of vertue and the conservation of the peace and unity of this Realm as by divers parts of the said Act appeareth And therefore as by that Act no pretended Jurisdiction exercised within this Realm being either ungodly or repugnant to the Prerogative or the ancient Law of the Crown of this Realm was or could be restored to the same Crown according to the ancient right and Law of the same So if that Act of the first year of the said Queen had never been made it was resolved by all the Judges that the King or Queen of England for the time being may make such an Ecclesiasticall Commission as is before mentioned by the ancient Prerogative and Law of England And therefore by the ancient Laws of this Realm this Kingdome of England is an absolute Empire and Monarchy consisting of one Head which is the King and of a Body politick compact and compounded of many and almost infinite severall and yet well-agreeing members All which the Law divideth into two several parts that is to say the Clergie and the Laietie both of them next and immediately under God subject and obedient to the Head Also the Kingly Head of this politick Body is instituted and furnished with plenary and entire power Prerogative and Jurisdiction to render Justice and right to every part and member of this Body of what estate degree or calling soever in all Causes Ecclesiasticall or Temporal otherwise he should not be a Head of the whole Body And as in Temporal causes the King by the mouth of the Judges in his Courts of Justice doth judge and determine the same by the temporal Laws of England so in causes Ecclesiasticall and Spiritual as namely Blasphemy Apostasie from Christianity Heresies Schisms Ordering Admissions Institutions of Clerks Celebration of Divine service Rights of Matrimony Divorces general Bastardy subtraction and right of Tithes Oblations Obventions Dilapidations Reparation of Churches Probate of Testaments Administrations and accounts upon the same Simony Incests Fornications Adulteries Solicitation of Chastity Pentions Procurations Appeals in Ecclesiasticall causes Commutation of penance and others the conusance whereof belong not to the Common Laws of England the same are to be determined and decided by Ecclesiasticall Judges according to the King 's Ecclesiastical Laws of this Realm For as the Romans fetching divers Laws from Athens yet being approved and allowed by the State there called them notwithstanding Jus Civile Romanorum and as the Normans borrowing all or most of their Laws from England yet baptized them by the name of the Laws or Customes of Normandy So albeit the Kings of England derived their Ecclesiasticall Laws from others yet so many as were proved approved and allowed here by and with a general consent are aptly and rightly called The King 's Ecclesiasticall Laws of England which whosoever shall deny he denieth that the King hath full and plenary power to deliver Justice in all causes to all his subjects or to punish all crimes and offences within his Kingdome for that as before it appeareth the deciding of matters so many and of so great importance are not within the conusance of the Common Laws and consequently that the King is no compleat Monarch nor Head of the whole and entire Body of the Realm But to confirm those that hold the truth to satisfy such as being not instructed know not the ancient and modern Laws and Customes of England every man being perswaded as he is taught these few demonstrative proofs out of the Laws of England in stead of many in order serie temporum are here added KEnulphus Rex c. per Literas suas patentes consilio consensu Episcoporum Senatorum gentis suae largitus fuit Monasterio de Abnidon in Comitatu Bark ac cuidam Ruchnio tune Abbati Monasterii c. quandam ruris sui portionem id est quindecim Mansias in loco qui à Ruricelis tunc nuncupabatur Culnam cum omnibus utilitatibus ad eandem pertinentibus tam in magnis quam in modicis rebus in aeternam haereditatem Et quod praedictus Ruchnius c. ab omni Episcopali Jure in sempiternum esse quietus ut inhabitatores ejus nullius Episcopi aut suorum officialium jugo inde deprimantur sed in cunctis rerum eventibus discussionibus causarum Abbatis Monasterii praedicti decreto subjiciantur Ità quòd c. As by the said Charter pleaded in 1 Henr. 7. and vouched by Stamford at large appeareth which Charter granted above 850 years fithence was after confirmed per Edwinum
Britanniae Anglorum Regem Monarcham By which it appeareth that the King by his Charter made in Parliament for it appeareth to be made by the counsell and consent of his Bishops and Senators of his Kingdome which were assembled in Parliament did discharge and exempt the said Abbot from the Jurisdiction of the Bishop c. and by the same Charter did grant to the said Abbot Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction within his said Abbey which Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction being derived from the Crown continued untill the Dissolution of the said Abbey in the Reign of King Henry the Eighth In the Reign of King Edward the Confessor THe King who is the Vicar of the Highest King is ordained to this end that he should govern and rule the Kingdome and people of the Land and above all things the Holy Church and that he defend the same from wrong-doers and destroy and root out workers of mischief And this shall suffice for many before the Conquest In the Reign of King William the First IT is agreed that no man can make any Appropriation of any Church having Cure of Souls being a thing Ecclesiastical and to be made to some person Ecclesiastical but he that hath Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction But William the First of himself without any other as King of England made Appropriation of Churches with Cure to Ecclesiastical persons Wherefore it followeth that he had Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction In the Reign of King Henry the First HEnry by the Grace of God King of England Duke of Normans To all Archbishops Bishops Abbots Earls Barons and to all Christians as well present as to come c. We do ordain as well in regard of Ecclesiasticall as Royall power that whensoever the Abbot of Reading shall die that all the possession of the Monastery wheresoever it is do remain entire and free with all the rights and customs thereof in the hands and disposition of the Prior and Monks of the Chapter of Reading We do therefore ordain and establish this Ordinance to be observed for ever because the Abbot of Reading hath no Revenues proper and peculiar to himself but common with his brethren whosoever by God's will shall be appointed Abbot in this place by Canonicall election may not dispend the Alms of the Abbey by ill usage with his secular kinsmen or any other but in entertaining the poor Pilgrims and Strangers and that he have a care not to give out the Rent-lands in fee neither that he make any Servitors or Souldiers but in the Sacred garment of Christ wherein let him be advisedly provident he entertain not young ones but that he entertain men of ripe age or discreet as well Clerks as Lay-men In the Reign of King Henry the Third IN all the time of H. 3. and his Progenitors Kings of England and ever fithence if any man did sue afore any Judge Ecclesiasticall within the Realm for any thing whereof that Court by allowance and custome had not lawful conusance the King did ever by his Writ under his great Seal prohibit them to proceed And if the suggestion made to the King whereupon the Prohibition was grounded were after found untrue then the King by his Writ of Consultation under his great Seal did allow and permit them to proceed Also in all the Reign of H. 3. and his Progenitors King of England and ever fithence if any issue were joyned â—pon the loyalty of Marriage general Bastardy or such like the King did ever write to the Bishop of that Diocese as mediate Officer and Minister to his Court to certifie the loyalty of Marriage Bastardy or such like all which do apparently prove that those Ecclesiastical Courts were under the King's Jurisdiction and commandment and that one of the Courts wure so necessarily incident to the other as the one without the other could not deliver Justice to the parties as well in these particular cases as in a number of cases before specified whereof the King 's Ecclesiasticall Court hath Jurisdiction Now to command and to be obeyed belong to Sovereign and Supreme Government By the ancient Canons and Decrees of the Church of Rome the issue born before solemnization of marriage is as lawfully inheritable marriage following as the issue born after marriage But this was never allowed or appointed in England and therefore was never of any force here And this appeareth by the Statute of Merton made in the 20. year of King Henry the 3. To the King 's Writ of Bastardy whether one being born afore matrimony may inherit in like manner as he that is born after matrimony all the Bishops answered that they would not nor could not answer to it because it was directly against the common order of the Church And all the Bishops instanted the Lords that they would consent that all such as were born afore matrimony should be legitimate as well as they that be born within matrimony as to the succession of inheritance forsomuch as the Church accepteth such to be legitimate And all the Earls and Barons with one voice answered We will not change the Laws of England which hitherto have been used and approved In the Reign of King Edward the First IN the Reign of King Edward the First a Subject brought in a Bull of Excommunication against another Subject of this Realm and published it to the Lord Treasurer of England and this was by the ancient Common Law of England adjudged Treason against the King his Crown and Dignity for the which the offendor should have been drawn and hanged but at the great instance of the Chancellour and Treasurer he was onely abjured the Realm for ever The said King Edward the 1. presented his Clerk to a Benefice within the Province of York who was refused by the Archbishop for that the Pope by way of Provision had conferred it on another The King thereupon brought a Quare non admisit The Archbishop pleaded that the Bishop of Rome had long time before provided to the said Church as one having supreme Authority in that case and that he durst not nor had power to put him out which was by the Pope's Bull in possession For which his high Contempt against the King his Crown and Dignity in refusing to execute his Sovereign's Commandment fearing to doe it against the Pope's Provision by judgement of the Common Law the Lands of his whole Bishoprick were seized into the King's hands and lost during his life Which Judgement was before any Statute or Act of Parliament was made in that case And there it is said that for the like offence the Archbishop of Canterbury had been in worse case by the judgement of the Sages of the Law then to be punished for a Contempt if the King had not extended grace and favour to him Concerning men twice married called Bigamy whom the Bishop of Rome by a Constitution made at the Council of Lions hath excluded from all priviledge of Clergy whereupon certain Prelates
when such persons have been attainted for Felons have prayed for to have them delivered as Clerks which were made Bigamy before the same Constitution It is agreed and declared before the King and his Council that the same Constitution shall be understood in this wise That whether they were Bigamy before the same Constitution or after they shall not from henceforth be delivered to the Prelates but Justice shall be executed upon them as upon other Lay people In an Act made at a Parliament holden at Carlile in the 25. year of the said King Ed. the First it is declared That the Holy Church of England was founded in the state of Prelacy within this Realm of England by the King and his Progenitors c. for them to inform the people in the Law of God and to keep Hospitality give Alms and doe other works of Charity c. And the said Kings in times past were wont to have the Advice and Counsel for the safeguard of the Realm when they had need of such Prelates The and Clerks so advanced The Bishop of Rome usurping the Seigniories of such Benefices did give and grant the same Benefices to Aliens which did never dwell in England and to Cardinals which might not dwell here c. in adnullation of the state of the Holy Church of England disherison of the King Earls Barons and other Nobles of the Realm and in offence and destruction of the Laws and Rites of this Realm and against the good disposition and will of the first Founders It was enacted by the King by assent of all the Lords and Comminalty in full Parliament That the said Oppressions Grievances and Dammages in this Realm from thenceforth should not be suffered as more at large appeareth by that Act. In the Reign of King Edward the Second ALbeit by the Ordinance of Circumspectè agatis made in the 13. year of Edw. 1. and by general allowance and usage the Ecclesiasticall Court held plea of Tithes Obventions Oblations Mortuaries Redemptions of penance Laying of violent hands upon a Clerk Defamations c. yet did not the Clergy think themselves assured nor quiet from Prohibitions purchased by Subjects untill that King Edw. the 2. by his Letters Patents under the great Seal in and by consent of Parliament upon the Petitions of the Clergy had granted unto them to have Jurisdiction in those cases The King in a Parliament holden in the 9. year of his Reign after particular Answers made to their Petitions concerning the matters abovesaid doth grant and give his Royall Assent in these words We desiring as much as of right we may to provide for the state of the Church of England and the tranquillity and quiet of the Prelates of the said Clergy to the honour of God and the amendment of the state of the said Church and of the Prelates and Clergy ratifying and approving all and singular the said Answers which appear in the said Act and all and singular things in the said Answers contained We do for us and our Heirs grant and command that the same be inviolably kept for ever Willing and granting for us and our Heirs That the said Prelates and Clergy and their Successors for ever do exercise Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction in the premisses according to the tenour of the said Answer In the Reign of King Edward the Third AN Excommunication by the Archbishop albeit it be disannulled by the Pope or his Legates is to be allowed neither ought the Judges to give any allowance of any such Sentence of the Pope or his Legate It is often resolved that all the Bishopricks within England were founded by the King's Progenitors and therefore the Advowsons of them all belong to the King and at the first they were donative And that if an Incumbent of any Church with Cure die if the Patron present not within 6 months the Bishop of that Diocese ought to collate to the end the Cure may not be destitute of a Pastor If he be negligent by the space of 6 months the Metropolitan of that Diocese shall confer one to that Church And if he also leave the Church destitute by the space of 6 months then the Common Law giveth to the King as to the Supreme within his own Kingdome and not to the Bishop of Rome power to provide a competent Pastor for that Church The King may not onely exempt any Ecclesiasticall person from the Jurisdiction of the Ordinary but may grant unto him Episcopal Jurisdiction As thus it appeareth there the King had done of ancient time to the Archdeacon of Richmond All Religious or Ecclesiasticall Houses whereof the King was Founder are by the King exempt from ordinary Jurisdiction and onely visitable and corrigible by the King 's Ecclesiasticall Commission The Abbot of Bury in Suffolk was exempted fron Episcopall Jurisdiction by the King's Charter The King presented to a Benefice and his Presentee was disturbed by one that had obtained Bulls from Rome for which offence he was condemned to perpetuall imprisonment c. Tithes arising in places out of any Parish the King shall have for that he having the Supreme Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction is bound to provide a sufficient Pastor that shall have the Cure of souls of that place which is not within any Parish And by the Common Laws of England it is evident that no man unlesse he be Ecclesiasticall or have Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction can have inheritance of Tithes The King shall present to his free Chappels in default of the Dean by Lapse in respect of his Supreme Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction And Fitzherbert saith that the King in that case doth present by Lapse as Ordinarie An Excommunication under the Pope's Bull is of no force to disable any man within England And the Judges said that he that pleadeth such Bulls though they concern the Excommunication of a Subject were in a hard case if the King would extend his justice against him If Excommunication being the extreme and final end of any Suit in the Court at Rome be not to be allowed within England it consequently followeth that by the ancient Common Laws of England no Suit for any Cause though it be spiritual rising within this Realm ought to be determined in the Court of Rome Quia frustrà expectatur eventus cujus effectus nullus sequitur And that the Bishops of England are the immediate Officers and Ministers to the King's Courts In an Attachment upon a Prohibition the Defendant pleaded the Pope's Bull of Excommunication of the Plaintif The Judges demanded of the Defendant if he had not the Certificate of some Bishop within the Realm testifying this Excommunication To whom the Counsell of the Defendant answered that he had not neither was it as they supposed necessarie for that the Bulls of the Pope under Lead were notorious enough But it was adjudged that they were not sufficiet for that the Court ought not to ave regard to
Authority and not elsewhere in such Courts Spiritual and Temporal of the same as the natures conditions and qualities of the Cases and matters aforesaid in contention or thereafter happening in contention should require without having any respect to any custome use or sufferance in hinderance lett or prejudice of the same or to any other thing used or suffered to the contrary thereof by any other manner person or persons in any manner of wise any forrein Inhibitions Appeals Sentences Summons Citations Suspensions Interdictions Excommunications Restraints Judgements or any other Process or Impediment of what natures names qualities or conditions soever they be from the See of Rome or any other forrein Courts or Potentates of the world or from and out of this Realm or any other the King's dominions or Marches of the same to the See of Rome or to any other forrein Courts or Potentates to the let tor impediment thereof in any wise notwithstanding as by the said Act appeareth By an Act of Parliament in 25 H. 8. it is declared by the King the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in that Parliament assembled That neither the King his Heirs nor Successors Kings of this Realm nor any his subjects of this Realm nor of any other his dominions should from thenceforth sue to the said Bishop of Rome called the Pope or to the See of Rome or to any person or persons having or pretending any Authority by the same for Licences Dispensations Impositions Faculties Grants Rescripts Delegacies or any other Instruments or Writings of what kind name nature or quality soever they be for any cause or matter for the which any Licence Dispensation Composition Faculty Grant Rescript Delegacy Instrument or other Writing theretofore had been used and accustomed to be had and obtained at the See of Rome or by authority thereof or of any Prelat of this Realm nor for any manner of other Licences Dispensations Compositions Faculties Grants Rescripts Delegacies or any other Instruments or Writings that in cases of necessity might lawfully be granted without offending of the Holy Scriptures and Laws of God But that from thenceforth every such Licence Dispensation Composition Faculty Grant Rescript Delegacy Instrument and other Writing afore named and mentioned necessary for the King his Heirs and Successors and his and their people and subjects upon the due examination of the causes and qualities of the persons procuring such Dispensations Licences Compositions Faculties Grants Rescripts Delegacies Instruments or other Writings should be granted had and obtained from time to time within this his Realm and other his dominions and not elsewhere in manner and form following and not otherwise That is to say The Archbishop of Canterbury for the time being and his Successors should have power and authority from time to time by their discretions to give grant and dispose by an Instrument under the Seal of the said Archbishop unto the King and unto his Heirs and Successors Kings of this Realm as well all manner of such Licences Dispensations Compositions Faculties Grants Rescripts Delegacies Instruments and all other Writings for causes not being contrary or repugnant to the Holy Scriptures and Laws of God as theretofore had been used and accustomed to be had and obtained by the King or any his most noble Progenitors or any of his or their subjects from the See of Rome or any person or persons by authority of the same and all other Licences Dispensations Faculties Compositions Grants Rescripts Delegacies Instruments and other Writings in for and upon all such causes and matters as should be convenient and necessary to be had for the honour and surety of the King his Heirs and Successors and the wealth and profit of this his Realm so that the said Archbishop or any his Successors in no manner wise should grant any Dispensation Licence Rescript or any other Writing before rehearsed for any cause or matter repugnant to the Law of Almightie God as by the said Act also appeareth If it be demanded what Canons Constitutions Ordinances and Synodals provincial are still in force within this Realm I answer that it is resolved and enacted by Authority of Parliament That such as have been allowed by general consent and custome within the Realm and are not contrariant or repugnant to the Laws Statutes and Customes of this Realm nor are to the dammage or hurt of the King's Prerogative royal are still in force within this Realm as the King 's Ecclesiastical Laws of the same Now as consent and custome hath allowed those Canons so no doubt by general consent of the whole Realm any of the same may be corrected inlarged explained or abrogated For example There is a Decree that all Clerks that have received any manner of Orders greater or smaller should be exempt pro causis criminalibus before the Temporal Judges This Decree had never any force within England First for that it was never approved and allowed of by general consent within the Realm Secondly it was against the Laws of the Realm as it doth appear by infinite precedents Thirdly it was against the Prerogative and Sovereignty of the King that any subject within this Realm should not be subject to the Laws of this Realm In the Reign of Queen Elizabeth BY the said Act of Parliament whereupon the principal case then in question partly dependeth made in the first year of the Reign of Queen Elizabeth it is declared That where in the time of the Reign of King Henry the 8. divers good Laws and Statutes were made and established as well for the utter extinguishment and putting away of all usurped and forrein powers and authorities out of this Realm and other her dominions and countries as also for the restoring and uniting to the Imperial Crown of this Realm the ancient Jurisdiction Authorities Superiorities and Preheminences to the same of right belonging and appertaining by reason whereof her most humble subjects from the 25. year of the said King Henry the 8. were continually kept in good order and were disburthened of divers great and intolerable charges and vexations before that time unlawfully taken and exacted by such forrein power and authority as before that was usurped And to the intent that all usurped and forrein power and authority Spirituall and Temporal might for ever be clearly extinguished and never be used or obeyed within this Realm or any other her dominions or countries It was by the Authority of that Parliament enacted That no forrein Prince person Prelate State or Potentate Spiritual or Temporal should at any time after the last day of that Session of Parliament use enjoy or exercise any manner of Power Jurisdiction Superiority Authority Preheminence or Priviledge Spiritual or Ecclesiastical within this Realm or within any other the Queen's dominions or countries that then were or hereafter should be but from thenceforth the same should be clearly abolished out of this Realm and all other her dominions for ever any Statute
Subjects to live that perswaded his Subjects that he was no lawfull King and practised with them within the heart of this Realm to withdraw them from their Allegeance and Loyalty to their Sovereign the same being crimen laesae Majestatis by the ancient Laws of this Realm BY this and by all the Records of the Indictments it appeareth that these Jesuites and Priests are not condemned and executed for their Priesthood and Profession but for their treasonable and damnable Perswasions and Practices against the Crowns and Dignities of Monarchs and absolute Princes who hold their Kingdoms and Dominions by lawful Succession and by inherent Birth-right and descent of inheritance according to the fundamental Laws of this Realm immediately of Almighty God and are not Tenants of their Kingdomes as they would have it at the will and pleasure of any forrein Potentate whatsoever Now albeit the proceedings and process in the Ecclesiastical Courts be in the name of the Bishops c. it followeth not therefore that either the Court is not the King 's or the Law whereby they proceed is not the King's Law For taking one example for many every Leet or View of Frank-pledge holden by a Subject is kept in the Lord's name and yet it is the King's Court and all the proceedings therein are directed by the King's Laws and many subjects in England have and hold Courts of Record and other Courts and yet all their proceedings be according to the King's Laws and the Customes of the Realm Observe good Reader seeing that the determination of Heresies Schisms and Errours in Religion Ordering Examination Admission Institution and Deprivation of men of the Church which do concern God's true Religion and Service of right of Matrimony Divorces and general Bastardy whereupon depend the strength of mens Discents and Inheritances of probate of Testaments and letters of Administration without which no debt or dutie due to any dead man can be recovered by the Common Law Mortuaries Pensions Procurations Reparations of Churches Simony Incest Adultery Fornication and Incontinency and some others doth not belong to the Common Law how necessary it was for administration of Justice that his Majestie 's Progenitors Kings of this Realm did by publick authority authorize Ecclesiasticall Courts under them to determine those great and important Causes Ecclesiastical exempted from the Jurisdiction of the Common Law by the King's Laws Ecclesiastical Which was done originally for two causes 1. That Justice should be administred under the Kings of this Realm within their own Kingdome to all their Subjects and in all Causes 2. That the Kings of England should be furnished upon all occasions either forrein or domestical with learned Professors as well of the Ecclesiasticall as Temporall Laws THus hath it appeared as well by the ancient Common Laws of this Realm by the Resolutions and Judgements of the Judges and Sages of the Laws of England in all succession of ages as by Authority of many Acts of Parliament ancient and of latter times That the Kingdome of England is an absolute Monarchy and that the King is the onely Supreme Governour as well over Ecclesiasticall persons and in Ecclesiastical causes as Temporal within this Realm to the due observation of which Laws both the King and the Subject are sworn I have herein cited the very words and texts of the Laws Resolutions Judgements and Acts of Parliament all publick and in print without any inference argument or amplification and have particularly quoted the books years leaves chapters and such like certain references as every man may at his pleasure see and reade the Authorities herein cited This Case is reported in the English and Latine tongues as some other Writers of the Law have done to the end that my dear Countrymen may be acquainted with the Laws of this Realm their own Birth-right and inheritance and with such evidences as of right belong to the same assuring my self that no wise or true-hearted English-man that hath been perswaded before he was instructed will refuse to be instructed in the truth which he may see with his own eyes lest he should be disswaded from errour wherewith blindfold he hath been deceived For miserable is his case and worthy of pity that hath been perswaded before he was instructed and now will refuse to be instructed because he will not be perswaded FINIS Of what quality and credit Robert Lalor was His apprehension and first examination His first inditement and conviction His second examination His confession or acknowledgement The Inditement of Lalor upon the stat of 16 Ric. 2. The true cause of making the Statute of 16 R. 2. and other Statutes against Provisors The Statute of Praemunire made at the prayer of the Commons The effect of the Statute of 16 R. 2. c. 5. The effect of the Statute of 38 Edw. 3. cap. 1. The Statute of 27 Ed. 3. cap. 1. The Statute of 25 Edw. 3. reciting the Statute of 25 Ed. 1. These Laws made by such as did professe the Romish Religion Laws against Provisors made in Ireland When the Pope began first to usurp upon the liberties of the Crâ—wn of England A comparison of the spiritual Monarchy of the Church with the temporal Monarchies of the world The Pope had no jurisdiction in England in the time of the Britans The first usurpation of the Pope upon the Crown began in the time of King William the Conquerour By sending Legates into England In the time of William Rufus the Pope attempted to draw Appeals to Rome but prevailed not In the time of K. Henry the first the Pope usurpeth the donation of Bishoprikks c. Histor Jornalensis M S. in Archiv Rob. Cotton Eq. Aur. In the time of King Stephen the Pope gained Appeals to the Court of Rome In the time of K. Henry 2. the Pope claimed exemption of Clerks from the Secular power A brief of Th. Becket's troubles or rather treasons The Constitutions of Claringdon Four points of jurisdiction usurped upon the crown of England by the Pope before the reign of K. John The cause of the quarrell between K. John and the Pope When Canonical election began first in England King John's round and Kingly Letter to the Pope The Pope curseth the King and interdicteth the Realm King Edw. 1. oppâ—seth the Pope's Vsurpation E. 2. suffereth the Pope to usurp again E. 3. resisteth the Vsurpation of the Pope King Rich. 2. The Evidence against Lalor Lalor's Confession publickly read When the distinction of Ecclesiasticall Spirituall causes from Civil and Temporal causes began in the world Caudrey's Case The objections of the Counsell of the Plaintif 1. 2. 3. 4. The resolutions of the Court to the 1. and 2. To the 3. To the 4. What causes belong to the Ecclesiasticall Court. see Circumspectè agatis 13 E. 1. W. 2. 13 E. 1. cap. 5. versus finem Artic. cleri 9 E. 2. 15 E. 3. c. 6.31 E. 3. cap. 11.2 H. 5. c. 7.1 H. 7. cap. 4.23 H. 8. cap.
9.24 H. 8. c. 12.27 H. 8. c. 20.32 H. 8. c. 7.1 E. 6. ca. 2.2 E. 6. ca. 13.1 Ma. cap. 3.1 Eliz. ca. 1.5 Eliz ca. 23.13 Eliz. ca. 10. Litt. lib. 2. ca. Frankalm fol. 30. F. Na. Br. fol. 41 42 43 44 45 46 47. Regist fol. 33 34 44. c. This King reigned an Dom. 755. Stanford lib. 3. cap. 38. fol. 111. This charter was pleaded 1 H. 7.23.25 Note Rex Edwin regnavit anno Dom. 955. St. K. Edw. laws ca. 19. 7 E. 3. tit Quare Impediâ— 19. The Charter of H. 1. Founder of the Abbey of Reading in the 26. year of his reign and in the year of our Lord 1125. 2 H. 3. Tit. Prohibition .13 4 H. 3. ibidem 15. 15 H. 3. Tit. Prohib 22. Register fol. The Statute of Merton an 20 H. 3. Vide 30 E. 3. Li. ss pl. 19. Brook tit Premunire pl. 10. Note this was by the common Law of England before any Statute made 19 E. 3. tit Quare non admisit 7. Vide 39 E. 3.20 Note The Statute of Bigamie 〈◊〉 4 E. 1. Observe how the King by advice of his Council that is by authority of Parliament expounded how the said Council should be understood and in what sense it should be received and allowed here Statutum de anno 25 E. 1. Carlisle Vide 20 E. 3. tit Essoin 24. Nota The first attempt was to usurp upon such Ecclesiasticall things as pertained to the Clergy of England who at that time stood in great awe of the Church of Rome The Statute of 9 E. 2. Artic Cleri cap. 16. See the Ordinance of Circumspectè agatis an 13 E. 1. to this effect By this Statute of 9 Ed. 2. and the Statutes of 15 E. 3. cap. 6. 31 E. 3. cap. 11. and by other Statutes heretofore mentioned the Jurisdiction of the Ecclesiasticall Court is allowed and warranted by consent of Parliament in all cases wherein they now have Jurisdiction so as these Laws may be justly called the King's Ecclesiasticall Laws or the Ecclesiasticall Laws of England 16 E. 3. Tit Excom 4. In the Reign of E. 3. 17 E. 3.23 20 E. 3. Excom 9. 16 E. 3. tit Bre. 660. 21 E. 3.60 6 H. 7.14 Fit Na. Br. 20 E. 3. Tit. Excom 6. 21 E. 3. fol. 40. 22 E. 3. lib. Ass pl. 75. 27 E. 3. fol. 84. Fit Na. Br. fol. 34. 30. E. 3. lib. Ass pl. 19. 12 H. 4.16 14 H. 4.14 8 H. 6. fol. 3. 35 H. 6.42 28 H. 6.1 7 E. 4.14 12 E. 4.16 Fit Na. Br. fol. 64. F. Vide 9. E. 4. fol. 3. Hereafter fol. 11. It ought to be determined in theâ—â—cclesiasticall Courts in England 31 E. 3. Tit. Excom 6. 33 E. 3. tit â—yde de Roy 103.38 Ass pl. 20. See the Statute of 15 E. 3. cap. 6. 31 E. 3. cap. 11. 38 Lib. Ass pl. 22. 46 E. 3. Tit. Premun 6. 49 E. 3. Lib. Ass pl. 8. Statut. de 25 E. 3. de Provisoribus Statut. de 25 E. 3. Note Note Vide 10 E. 3. fol. 1. 2. Statutum de 27 E. 3. Statut. de 28 E. 3. cap. 1. 2. Statut. de 38 E. 3. ca 3. 12 R. 2. tit Jurisdiction 18. Statutum de 16 R. 2. cap. 5. Note 1 H. 4. fol. 9. Fitz. Na. â—r 269. This had a resemblance to an Attainder of Treason wherein there must be first an Inditement by one Jury and a Conviction by another 11 H. 4.37 11 H. 4. fol. 69.76 14 H. 4. fol. 14. Vide 30 E. 3. lib. Ass pl. 19. before Vide 13 E. 3. Certificate 6. Vide 20 H. 6.1 37 H. 6.42 7 E. 4.14 Fitz. Na. Br. 64. F. 14 H. 4.14 Statut. de 2 H. 4. cap. 3. Statut. de 6 H. 4 cap. 1. Statut. de 7 H. 4. cap. 6. Statut. de 3 H. 5 cap. 4. * Stat. de 2 H. 5. cap. 7. Lollardry à lolio For as Cockle is the destruction of the Corn so is Heresie the destruction of true Religion Infelix lolium steriles dominantur avenae Virgilius Et careant loliis oculos vitiantibus agri Ovidius Statutum de 2 H. 5. cap. 1. 8 H. 6. fol. 3. 9 H. 6. fol. 16. 1 H. 7. fol. 10. 1 H. 7. fol. 20. 9 E. 4.3 Fitz. Na. Br. fol. 44. H. agreeth herewith Note 9 E. 4.28 12 E. 4. fo 16. 2 R. 3. fo 22. 1 H. 7.10 Statut. de 1 H. 7. cap. 4. 10 H. 7.18 11 H. 7.12 Statut. de 24 H. 8. cap. 12. This Statute is declaratorie of the ancient laws of England as manifestly appeareth by that which hath been said See Br. Abridgment tit Presentment al Esglise pl. 12. The Pope was permitted to doe certain things within this realm by usurpation and not of right until the reign of H. 8. This also is declaratory of the ancient Law as it appeareth both by 9 E. 4.3 Fitz. Na. B. 44. and many other cases and statutes abovesaid Statut. de 25 H. 8. cap. 21. This was also declaratory of the ancient Law as by that which hath been said appeareth This appeareth by resolution of all the Judges in 7 H. 8. Lib. Keylw fo 181. And this was long before any Act of Parliament was made against forrein Jurisdiction by King Henry the 8. The Statute of 1 Q. Eliz. 12 Eliz. Reg. Dyer Psalm 109.28 Though they curse yet bless thou O Lord and let them be confounded that rise against me but let thy servant rejoyce Which was the prayer her Majesty made when this Bull was published against her The Statute of 13 Eliz. Note the fruits of the Bull. 1. 2. 3. 4. The parts of the Act. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. The Statute of an 23 Reginae Eliz. The Statute of an 27 Eliz. Reginae