Selected quad for the lemma: enemy_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
enemy_n death_n life_n reconcile_v 2,136 5 9.4765 5 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A41483 The banner of justification displayed: or; a discourse, concerning the deep, and important mystery of the justification of a sinner wherein the severall causes thereof, being both numerous and various, are from the first to the last diligently enquired after, and their severall contributions towards so great and happy a work, clearly distinguished, and assigned to their proper causes (respectively.) and more particularly is shewed, how God, how the grace of God, how the decree of God, how the soveraign authority of God; how Christ, how the active obedience [of] Christ, how the passive obedience of Christ, how the resurrection of Christ, how the knowledge of Christ; how the spirit of God, how faith, how repentance, how works, how remission of s[in,] how the word, how the minister of the word, how the P[ope?] himself which is justified, may all truly, though upon severall accounts, and after different manners, be sayed to justifie. Goodwin, John, 1594?-1665. 1659 (1659) Wing G1150A; ESTC R221574 62,441 91

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

highly acceptable with God as being every wayes qualified with Innocency Righteousness Holiness c. and so meet by his death to make Attonement for the sin of the World So then as that which the unblemishedness of the Beast for Sacrifice under the Law exhibited towards that Attonement which was made by the offering of it was the meetness of this offering of it for acceptance with God and consequently for this acceptance it self in order to his pardoning or passing by that ceremoniall impurity or uncleanness for which it was offered In like manner the active Obedience of Christ in conjunction with the absolute holiness and inward purity of his person rendered his death or the Oblation of himself a Sacrifice every wayes meet and worthy acceptance with God and consequently accepted with him for the expiation or Attonement of the sins of all men If Christ had been so much as touch'd with the least tincture of defilement with sin he had not been a Priest after the order of Melchisedech holy harmless undefiled separated from sinners c. but rather after the order of Aaron who needed to offer Sacrifice for their own sins Neither had he been in any condition or regular capacity to have made Attonement for the sins of others untill he had first fully expiated his own That the active Obedience of Christ doth not operate in or about or towards justification in that way or notion which some have conceived as viz. by an imputation of the particular acts thereof in the letter and formality of them unto those that believe whereby they should be constituted or made properly and formally righteous we have demonstrated at large in a just treatise upon that Subject where it is made good upon several accounts that the sayd notion hath neither countenance from the Scriptures nor any tolerable consistency wth the clearest Principles of reason Sect. 7 7. What place or interest the Death or passive Obedience of Christ hath in or about justification we have in like manner Briefly intimated in our Fifth Section It rendereth that great Act of God in the justification of a sinner every wayes comely and honourable unto him and worthy of him and consequently makes him most willing and free to it The Holy Ghost speaks plainly enough of that comeliness which the sufferings of Christ put upon the justification of a sinner by God giving some intimation withall that unless this Act had by one means or other been made thus comely for him he would never have lift up his heart or hand unto it For it became him for whom are all things and by whom are all things meaning God in bringing many Sons unto Glory to consecrate or make perfect the Captain of their salvation through sufferings Heb. 2. 10. That meetness or comeliness for God here spoken of intending the salvation and glorification of many to effect it in noother way then by the sufferings of him who was to be the Prince or Captain of their salvation respecteth mainly if not solely his Act in justifying them in order to their salvation and glorification For otherwise supposing them already justified there needed more the life then the death of Christ to save them according to that of the Apostle Paul But God commendeth his love towards us in that while we were yet sinners Christ dyed for us Much more then being now justified by his blood we shall be saved from wrath through him For if when we were Enemies we were reconciled unto God by the death of his Son much more being reconciled we shall be saved by his life Rom. 5. 8 9 10. We see here 1. That our justification is ascribed unto the blood or death of Christ and 2. That our salvation our justification or reconciliation unto God presupposed unto his life i. Unto that power which is given unto him in that life which now he lives in glory at the right hand of the Father to exercise for the saving of all those that believe in him Life frequently imports vigour activity liveliness of strength or power for action as death imports weakness and imbecility for action If you ask me But how or in what respect doth the passive Obedience or death of Christ render the act of justification as now it is exerted or performed by God so comely or honourable for him Or how may we conceive that either it would have been uncomely or less comely for him to have appeared in it in case his hand had not been strengthned by the death of Christ unto it Or doth it not well enough become the great God to forgive sin freely and without satisfaction I answer 1. Whether we conceive the import of those words spoken by God unto Adam and in him unto all his Posterity being yet in his Loyns In the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt dye the death either in the nature or notion of a dreadfull threatning in case of disobedience or of a most sacred and severe Law to restrain sin and disobedience the difference I confess is not much materiall as far as at present I apprehend it was no wayes honourable or comely for God to suffer either the one or the other to be trodden or trampled under foot by the Creature to whom they were given without looking after them or calling for some satisfactory account for the contempt measured out unto them It cannot reasonably be thought but that God by the denunciation of such a threatning or promulgation and sanction of such a Law awakened and amused both Heaven and Earth and raised great expectations in both what the issue or consequence would be Now then Adam and his Posterity being as was sayd now in him rising up in disobedience in the very face as it were and presence of so terrible a threatning if God should have passed by and made no words of this high mis-demeanour he might seem either on the one hand to repent that he had so sorely threatned them and therefore now proceeded not to execution or else on the other hand that he was content and willing enough to be neglected or affronted by his Creature both which would have been very uncomely and dishonourable unto him Nor would it have been of much more comely an interpretation had he accepted any thing of an inferiour value or less considerable instead of a Compensation or satisfaction and had not stood upon a just and full vindication of his Soveraign Authority his excellent Wisdome his Righteousness and Equity in his proceedings with his Creature the glory of all which were very injuriously handled and suffered deeply in Adams prevarication So then Adam and his mis-carrying with so high a hand of disobedience there devolved a necessity upon God if he meant to glorifie himself like himself and as God either to punish the whole brood of Transgressours according to the full exigency of their demerit or which is the same according to the tenor and import of the threatning or