must be reduceable to some one certain principle or they are irregular or commotions If then Christian Princes have not a right of calling Assemblies but others as well as they then must it either necessarily follow that Christian Princes have not power sufficient to govern and protect their Subjects and that their Subjects motions cannot be regular and orderly but confounded and irregular and so the law of nature and the end for which God ordained Princes inverted For my part I will not dispute the Power of God in the planting of the Church either under the old or new Law how that he did dispence with the actions and motions of his People and Ministers and set Father against Son c. and that to make his Power known he would plant his Church notwithstanding all Temporal Powers whatsoever but this I do affirm that God after the deliverance of the Israelites out of Egypt did give to Moses only this right of calling Assemblies as appears clearly by Numb 10. 2. for only to him is the charge of making the Trumpets to call the congregation together It is true that vers 8. the sons of Aaron shall blow with their Trumpets but neither Aaron nor the Priests had any Power to make them but only Moses they must therefore have them from him and be his Instruments and this Power was given to Moses as the supreme Magistrate and not as High Priest for Aaron was then High Priest being before consecrated Levit. 8. Nor was this Right given personally to Moses but as a Law to last for ever If any allegation be made against Moses because he was a Priest it must cease with Ioshua and the Kings after him who were none for Ioshua by virtue of this ever lasting Law did call an Assembly of all the Tribes and therefore of Levi to Sichem and vers 28. dissolved it After him did David Joshua 24. 18. 1 Chro. 15. 4. 11. call the High Priest and other Priests not to consult of any secular affair but about the removing the Ark and afterward 1 Chron. 23. 2. he gathered together all the Lords of Israel with the Priests and Levites and as he called them together so his dismissed them 1 Chron. 16. 43. The like did Solomon when the Temple was dedicated called the Assembly 2 Chron 5. 2. dissolved it cap. 7. 10. The like did Asa when Religion was restored and a solemn Oath of association for the restoring of it Jehosophat did it when 1 Chro. 15. 2 King 10. 20. 2 Chro. 34. 29 30. 2 Chro. 29. he proclaimed a publick Fast 2 Chron. 20. 3. Jehu assembled them when a solemn Sacrifice was to be performed Joash in a case of Dilapidations Josias when the Temple was to be purified and a mass of superstition to be removed Hezekiah made a law for the Priests and all their brethren to assemble and in conformity to that law they did assemble nor was this v. 15. Assembly for any other thing then to cleanse the house of God and for the affairs of the service of God being things meerly spiritual And since that God hath promised that Kings shall be nursing fathers and Queens nursing mothers to his Church it must be meant of Christian Kings for this could not be of Josias because he was a King at the time of this prophecy or before it could not therefore be meant of him for the prophecy is de futuro Kings shall be c. Nor could it be meant of the Kings of Judah after him for they were all Idolaters and persecutors of Gods Church It was therefore meant of Christian Kings And how Kings can be Kings or Supreme powers without this right I do not understand Nor can that saying of our Saviour's causing of wars and distraction be otherwise reasonably understood but only where Kings and Supreme powers have not received the Faith And that Christian Kings did generally exercise this power after they became Christians we shall shew hereafter 10. He is a rightful Supreme Governor who is a Sword-bearer that is Who is arightful Supreme Governor whom God hath chosen to be his Minister who hath not taken the sword excited thereunto neither from any ambitious or spightful passion or affection either of himself or other men That may make and abrogate Laws determine all Controversies by himself or such Judges as he shall appoint choose Magistrates and Councellors and in whom is the power of making War and Peace Nor did God give Kings to them only over whom he did reign by Covenant but also to Heathens who had not known him as to the Persians Syrians Assyrians c. he gave Cyrus Hazael Nebuchadnezzar c. And all antique History speaks only of the Government by Kings as Justin says Principio rerum gentium nationumque imperium penes Reges erat before any other Government was usurped and made by Men. 11. He is a Tyrant who is a Sword-taker who in stead of executing Who is a Tyrant the wrath of God upon offenders against all Law kills and murders them who are not of his own faction who hath no power from God but only force from the wills of inconstant and seditious men As Hos 8. 4. says They have set up Kings but not by me they have made Princes and I knew it not Nor is it the Command of One which makes Tyranny The Grecians themselves called the Council of the Thirty after the Athenians were subdued by the Lacedemonians the Thirty Tyrants of Athens I am confident there was never any thing so wildly and variously Annot. 1. ghessed at as the manner how Dominion and Power came into the world by those men who derive all power from the People originally Bodin cap. 6. de Rep. p. 46. makes all Dominion to be gotten at first by force and pag. 46. d. he says It is very like that without greatest force and breaking down the Laws of Nature Liberty could not be taken away And many men will not distinguish between Force and Power but only in the possession And sure Athaliah was as much possessed of the Crown of Judah and as quietly as any King before or after her for six years and yet I do not find Jehojadah or the people reprehended for restoring Joash And the children of Israel did not rebel while they could quietly place 2 Chro. 13. 7. Jeroboam over them but Jeroboam was declared a Rebel after he was possessed 12. When they over whom God hath given power shall submit themselves What is a rightful Government to that power this is a rightful Government When all who owe their subjection shall accept and receive the Laws of him who by Right that is by Birth Revelation Lot First possession or just Conquest ought to command As the Children of Israel answered Joshua All that thou commandest we will do and whithersoever thou sendest we will go According as we hearkened unto Moses in all things so will we
accounted Abrahams faith St. James 2. 23. That he would have offered up Isaac though by the law of nature Abraham should have preserved his sonne and so God ceased the motion of the Sun and Moon upon Joshua's prayer Jos 10. 12. And caused the same to go retrogade ten degrees upon the prayer of Hezekias and Isaiah 2 Kings 20. 11. It is true that nothing less then that power which made a Law can alter it the Laws therefore of God whether positive or natural have an eternal and immutable obligation upon all the men in the world but whatsoever power may make a Law that power may alter it Divine Laws therefore whether positive or natural cannot have any obligation upon God but he may alter them when he pleases CHAP. VI. The Obligation of Divine and Humane Laws upon the Consciences and Persons of Men. 1. COnscience comes of con and scio to know together with reason Conscience or some law Conscientia est animi quaedam ratio lex quâ de recte factis secus admonemur Conscience is a certain reason or law of the Mind whereby we are well or ill advised of our deeds The laws therefore of Man may not only be violated by doing contrary to them but by consenting to them As he which does contrary to that he thinks though the doing of the thing be just yet 't is unjustly done by him for whatsoever is not of faith is sin Rom. 14. 23. 2. The affirmative precepts of God they do semper obligare yet they The obligation of the laws of God do not oblige ad semper As when he commands us to pray continually it is not to be expected a man should be always in the act of prayer but so to live as he does nothing which may indispose him from praying But Gods negative precepts do not only always oblige but oblige ad semper too for there is no time at all wherein it is lawful for a man to kill to steal to commit adultery c. Deut. 5. 17 18 19 20 21. negative in all instances 3. Ecclesiastical laws do oblige in Conscience If thy brother shall neglect Ecclesiastical laws oblige in conscience to hear thee tell it to the Church but if he neglect to hear the Church let him be to thee as a heathen man or Publican Mat. 18. 17. And the Scribes and Pharises sit in Moses chair all therefore whatsoever they bid you observe and do but do not after their works for they say and do not Mat. 23. 2 3. If then by the law of our Saviour the Jews were to observe and do whatsoever the Scribes and Pharises commanded them because they sate in Moses seat sure with as much or much more reason ought Christians to observe and do whatsoever the Church which our Saviour Christ himself hath planted doth command them 4. My kingdom is not of this world Joh. 18. 36. God sent not his Son In conscience only into the world to judge the world but that by him he might save the world Joh. 3. 17. And O man who has made me a Judge or divider amongst you If then our Saviours kingdom were not of this world if God sent not his Son to judge the world and if our Saviour were not a Judge among men then cannot the Church of Christ have any power from Christ in the kingdoms of the world nor to judge the world nor to be a Judge or divider among men 5. Ecclesiastical laws according to the usage and custom of England To what things Ecclesiastical laws have reference relate to Blasphemy Apostacie from Christianity Heresies Schisms Holy Orders Admissions Institution of Clerks Celebration of Divine Service Rights of Matrimony Divorces general Bastardy Subtraction and Right of Tythes Oblations Obventions Dilapidations Excommunication Reparation of Churches Probate of Testaments Administrations and Accounts upon the same Simony Incests Fornications Adulteries Sollicitation of Chastity Pensions Procurations Appeals in Ecclesiastical cases Commutation of Penance which are determined by Ecclesiastical Judges 6. So that there is a mixt Conusance in the Ecclesiastical Judicature All things determinable by Ecclesiastical Judges are not meerly spiritual viz. of things meerly Spiritual by which they are impowered to judge and take conusance of and that by no humane power but only as they are impowered and sent by our Saviour and are only his Ministers viz. the taking conusance of Blasphemy Excommunication Heresie Holy Orders Celebration of Divine Service c. And this Ghostly power the Church and Ecclesiastical persons had before ever Temporal powers received the Gospel of Christ or were converted to Christianity And also after it pleased God that Nations and Kingdoms were converted to Christianity and that Kings did become nursing fathers and Queens nursing mothers Isa 49. 23. to Gods Church then did Kings cherish and defend Gods Church and endued it with many Priviledges and Immunities which ere while was persecuted by them or other Powers but yet could not these Immunities or Priviledges divest them of that Ghostly power which our Saviour by divine institution gave his Church It is true no question but that originally not only all Bishopricks and their bounds and the division of all Parishes and the conusance the Church hath of Tythes of Probate of Wills of granting of Letters of Administration and Accounts upon the same the right of Institution and Induction and the erection of all Ecclesiastical Courts c. were all originally of the Kings foundation and donation and that to him only by all divine and humane laws belongs the care and preservation of all his Subjects none excepted in all causes And therefore not only all those things which relate to the extern peace and quiet of the Church although exercised by Ecclesiastical persons but all those priviledges and immunities which the Church or Churchmen have in a Church planted which the Primitive Christians and Apostles had not in the persecution of the Church when planting are originally Grants of Kings and Supreme Powers and so Temporal or Secular Laws but in regard they accidentally have reference to the Church and are exercised by Ecclesiastical persons they are not improperly called the Kings Ecclesiastical Laws And sure either ignorance of this or faction hath made men run into two contrary extremes one That Kings have no right to their Crowns but in ordine ad bonum spirituale and so cannot be Kings or That all power and jurisdiction in all causes is from the King and so cannot there be any such thing as Christian faith Religion or any Ghostly power left by our Saviour with his Church to continue to the end of the world which every Christian man de fide ought to believe and submit to before any Temporal Law or Power in the world Object But beeause Ecclesiastical laws have not infallibility affixed to them if they command any thing repugnant to Divine laws do they then oblige Answer No for God
thousand years I do exclude Conquest to be any cause of Regal power where God does not give it For either this Conquest must be made by power or force If it be made by power or one who is Gods Sword-bearer no new power ariseth from thence but only a dilatation of the exercise of the old which was formerly in him But if it be done by Sword-takers then is it no other then unjust usurpation and robbery The World being large and the Men in it alwaies ambitious I will not undertake to answer for the matters of fact which Men have done in all Ages nor do I doubt but that oftentimes the alterations and conversions of Government have happened from the will of God Object But it is evident by the Prophet Daniel c. 4. 23. 25. that God ruleth in the kingdoms of men and giveth them to whomsoever he pleaseth And if that he were pleased to make Saul David Solomon and Jeroboam who reigned over his peculiar people and Hazael Cyrus c. who knew not God Kings and yet neither by Lot Primogeniture from a rightful King or by right of First possession then for ought is known these alterations which have otherwise happened and do come to pass in the world may be from the will and gift of God Sol. I answer If it may be Gods will that these alterations and confusions happen in the world it may not be Gods will affirmanti incumbit probatio Let them therefore or they that make these alterations and confusions prove that Gods will and not their own perverse will was the first cause of them It is true and I grant that God does oftentimes for the punishment of a Nation convert the succession of their Kings into another line yet did he never so far chastise any Nation as to subject it to an Aristocracy or Democracy So it is necessary offences come yet shall that never excuse them by whom they come And so it many times happens that men cannot avoid Gods judgments and die it is no consequence therefore that men should run themselves into them or kill themselves It may be it is Gods will that my Father should die or that he will destroy my Country and Laws c. It does not therefore follow that a man may kill his Father destroy his Country or endeavor to subvert the Laws thereof Men are not alwaies obliged to conform their wills to Gods will but to do what he wills and commands them I am obliged to pray for my Parents and Country when it is Gods will they should be destroyed It was Gods will that Jeroboam for Solomons sin should be King of ten 1 King 11. 13. Tribes of Israel yet because the Tribes did will it and not upon Gods command he pronounced them eternal Rebels and Jeroboam a Rebel because 1 King 12. 19. he took it upon those terms 2 Chron. 13. 6. Nor do we find that ever Israel joyed good day after For the policy of Jeroboam to continue Comparethese times with these and see the event his dominion over them must be preferred before Gods worship and service in order thereunto Jeroboam must take counsel and make Calves which he says brought the Children of Israel out of Egypt any Priests were good enough to sacrifice to them no matter whether they were Priests or of the Tribe of Levi the lowest of the people would serve the turn 1 King 12. 32 33. yea forsooth Jeroboam himself could hold forth to the people and burn incense which before was peculiar to the Priests But it is a strange thing that this invented policie of Jeroboams for the keeping of the ten Tribes in their obedience to him should be the cause of so wonderful a Captivity 2 King 17. 21 22 23. that to this day it is unknown what became of them and their posterity 16. Parum est jus nisi sunt qui possunt jura gerere And men have always The miseries of men when the Supreme power is rejected or unknown by woful experience found that all Tyranny of a rightful and known Prince is not to be compared with the miseries and calamities where the Prince is not known or rejected but every popular and ambitious Man arrogates and usurps to himself what should be justly ascribed to the lawful Prince Nor does the calamities of miserable men in such a condition end so but God no where shewed so great a judgment as upon those men viz. Corah Dathan and Abiram who rejected their rightful and known Prince Num. 16. Nor does he ever denounce a more dreadful judgment then upon those men who resist Higher powers Rom. 13. How great then will his judgment be upon them who reject them 17. He is a natural Prince of right or by the Law of Nature who Who is a Natural Prince de jure truly prescribes from such Ancestors that no mortal creature can make any just exception or superior claim And so great a Lover of Men and Truth is God that scarce in all the world was it not known in any Nation who was the rightful Prince thereof when his Subjects did reject him 18. It is true that there is no visible power under Heaven but only Where there are diversities of titles which is to be preferred mens Consciences that can direct them where Titles of Princes come in question But where diversity of Titles are alleadged that which is truly and indubitably most antient is the best for it is a true rule in all descents whatsoever that Dormit aliquando nunquam moritur jus But this must be jus apparens for De non apparentibus de non existentibus eadem est ratio Whether the Title of the Heir general or Heir male be better we shall treat more at large in Cap. of Succession 19. Jus is duplex Proprietatis Possessionis And that this Right is Who is a Natural King de facto and not de jure divisible as well in Regality as private mens Estates is demonstrated by para 4. of this Chap. And if it be true as it is that no Being can be superior or better then the Cause of its being then will it necessarily follow that all Kings who inherit from Usurpers cannot have a better title then that which the Usurpers had so long as a superior or better claim can be made by another Nor do I fear to affirm Hen. 4. Hen. 5. and Hen. 6. were natural Kings of England and did inherit the Crown of England de facto but not de jure 20. Although nothing which is naught in the beginning can be How Usurpation may be bettered bettered by the continuance of time yet may Usurpation although naught in the beginning be bettered in time viz. if the Usurpation be of that continuance that it outlives all claim that can be justly made by another for Possession is title sufficient against all men who have no jus ad rem Hence it
any other way then by the established and received Laws of the Nation where mens vices and depraved manners do not require new ones I designe no more then to demonstrate that it was not your Majesties Father's and your own adherence to the established Laws but the iniquity of the times which made him a Victim and your Sacred self an Exile Nay in reason as well as justice it had been a most imprudent thing in either of your Majesties to have given up the Laws to the arbitrary lusts of your Adversaries or any one Faction For should either of your Majesties have indifferently renounced the Laws to your Adversaries being compounded of such different and contrary humors and affections then there was no visible means under Heaven to have cemented them and by consequence your Adversaries hostility and confusion continued and your own conditions no ways bettered or secured Or should either of your Majesties have renounced the Laws to have advanced any one Faction so above the rest and all your loyal Subjects that their arbitrary wills and lusts should have been the laws of all the rest and your other Subjects also yet should you not only have failed to have contented that Faction it being the nature of Faction never to bear any grateful acknowledgment for benefits received but on the contrary always abuse them to their prejudice from whom they received them and never rest until they have made themselves all and their Benefactors nothing at all or vile and miserable but have animated all the other Factions against your Majesties and it To the fulfilling of all singular and glorious Virtues in Your Sacred person is added Your being a Christian King and a Nursing Father of the Church of Christ and as if immediately sent from Heaven to cure and repair the wounds of this most miserably distracted Church although Your Majesty is descended from innumerable Royal Ancestors who have been Nursing Fathers of Christs Church yet are you not derived from any who have had the least hand in the late Sacrilege thereof And though Sir You are and ought to be a Nursing Father of Gods Church and a Patron and Defence against her ravenous and devouring Adversaries yet none of mortal men have been more Religious Sons of the Church then Your Majesty and Your Saintlike Father How unequal and how unjust then have been the sufferings of Princes so just so religious caused by Christians Your natural Subjects and these pretending Conscience whereas no School teaches men a better lesson of obedience to Princes then the Christian faith whenas the first principle or foundation of Subjects obedience to rightful Princes is founded in the Law of Nature however popular Orators and Atheists have against all sense reason nature and all authorities of sacred and profane History resolved it into the pacts and wills of men And conscience always supposes some superior law informing men to do or not do a thing or suffer when any subordinate power commands contrary to it whereas Your persecutors pretending concience trod underfoot whatsoever might be called sacred to the attaining their seditious and sacrilegious ends That God in his providence doth often permit the good and just to suffer persecution is evidently seen in all ages and places But in reason and prudence neither Your Majesties Father's nor Your own adherence to the established Government of the Church and the Rites Liturgy and Means thereof in Your adversities when they were so zealously persecuted by its and Your adversaries could be any cause thereof Neither would the desertion of it have any ways conduced to either of Your Majesties advantage for should either of Your Majesties have renounced the Church and rites thereof so as to have been a Christian King of such Miscreants who besides that they would not be of any Christian Church or society had by undue ways devoured the patrimony of the Church yet no man in his right wits could have imagined such men would long have been governed in peace or that all other men of their factions would have been content who had not made a prey thereof and there was not sufficient to content all nor indeed any at all or that the canine appetites of those men who had devoured the lands of the Church would not also have hungred after those of the Crown Or should Your Majesty have advanced any one Faction so above the rest that it should not only have tyrannized over the rest of the Factions but also Your Majesty and the rest of Your subjects yet could it not in reason have been expected that this Faction who by all Divine and Humane laws were subject to a Government founded upon our Saviour and his Apostles and by a continued series dispersed over the face of Christianity until of late it became violated in some places of Europe by seditious and sacrilegious men should so unjustly cast off their obedience so rightfully due and yet expect that their wills and lusts should long be received for Laws by the rest of the Factions and all other of their fellow-subjects But certainly Your constant adherence to the Church did proceed from the power and grace of God in You before any prudential or moral cause Notwithstanding that your Majesty is so constant a Preserver of Christs Church and Propagator of Christian religion and that your own conscience hath been so often attempted to be violated by men of none at all indeed yet so tender is your Maiesty of other mens that you will not force the conscience of any of your subjects pretending it A strange condescension any one will judge who considers the parties granting and expecting For should your Majesty command your Subjects any thing in derogation to the Majesty of God or forbid them the worship and service of God your Subjects might then justly plead conscience because the duty and allegiance which they owe to God is in the first place to be paid by all his creatures Or should your Majesty command any thing which were immoral or unjust as that your Subjects should dishonor your Majesty or their Parents c. they might justly plead conscience because that for Subjects to honor their King and children their Parents is founded in Nature and is a Law of God engraven in the minds of all mortal men or should your Majesty have lived in the Primeve times of Christianity when men by the light of Humane Nature apprehending a Deity to be publickly Worshipped and Served yet being ignorant of the manner misplaced it in Osyris Isis Iupiter Apollo an Oak c. then to have compelled them to have Worshipped God after the manner of Christians had been unconscionable and unchristian because they paid an acknowledgement of that Worship due to God by Nature and could not by Nature apprehend this but must wait upon God until that by the ordinary means of the Church or supernaturally inspired by God they should be converted thereunto Or should your Majesty command any thing
Father was wont to say his Son commanded all Greece For the Athenians commanded the other Grecians He commanded the Athenians his Wife him and his Son commanded his Wife How much greater power had our Author in this Government than Themistocles his Child had over the Grecians For in all our Authors Government you shall find two degrees of Comparison above the superlative viz. the peoples Power over their supreme and absolute Governor and our Authors supreme supremest Power who has a Power when he will to make what he list the Peoples Laws which shall oblige and tie up their absolute Governor And when the toy takes him they shall be the Governors Laws And Ground 11. latter end No supreme Magistrate can be bound to any Laws contrary to what our Author or Governor shall call good Government And now who would think so wise a fellow as our Author who in this Government had such a monstrous and most unlimited soveraignty should by shewing his power in giving his Rational multitude liberty to dissolve it lose it all in an instant sure this Icarus if he neither drowns nor otherwise kills himself in the fall will only rise up again to hang himself Well but let us see whether upon our Authors principles this Government can be dissolved or be in the power of his People or Rational multitude All Men who have written of the Cause and Nature of things have put a difference between Natural and Voluntary or Rational causes or things Natural causes or things are those which proceed immediately from God and are above the Will or Reason of Man Voluntary causes or things are those which do not immediately proceed from God but from the Will and Reason of Man But ex Hypothesi this Government Ground 7. page 48. is connatural and Ground 8. page 50. Natural and therefore this Government is superior to the Wills or Reason of the People and cannot be by them dissolved but the resisting of it is a violence upon Nature and not only Irrational but Immoral and unjust Thus have we seen our Author make a Government and thus have wee seen our Author marre his Government Let him tell us Ground 15 â—herein consists the Liberty of the Subject Ground 16. Of the dispossession of a Supreme Governor and his Right And Ground 17. Of a Governor dispossessed only because our Author Ground 17. tells us that Pope Urban the eight was an Intelligent generous Prince and well versed in publick Government and he made a decision that after five years quiet possession of an Estate the Church was not bound to take notice whether the title were lawful or no I will tell our Author that if Pope Urban might not take notice after five years who is the lawful Governor yet Pope Pius the fourth after above twice the time declared by Pope Urban might take notice of it as you may see Hist Con. Triden 423. and 443. So then Pope Pius may do that which Pope Urban is not bound to do or say what he will for me I am content if after all this pains on my part I shall not in the Judgment of wiser and more discerning Men then my Author or self have made my self like our Author in thus far answering him to his Grounds of Obedience and Government OBSERVATIONS ON Mr. HOBBS De Cive Observ HIs first Axiome or Principle he begs both in the Preface and second Article of the first Book De Cive is That the beginning of Civil Society is from Mutual Fear Yet in his Preface and second Annotation upon this Article He fears that some men may deny it yea it is true that very many men do deny it This therefore being required for a Principle and the first Principle and by consequence not to be proved but to prove all that may be inferred from it and since that he grants that very many do deny this Principle Then by very many men must the whole body of De Cive be rejected For Contra negantes principia non est disputandum But if men will not grant this Principle in the Pref. and Annot. abovesaid he will prove it so that he will make them ashamed of it and how think you It will be somewhat odd sure to prove Principles He tells you That all Cities although they be at peace with their neighbors yet keep Garrisons and Soldiers upon their Frontiers And that when men go to sleep they shut their doors and that men taking a journey do it with a sword and that men treat usually before they fight Observ All Science all Learning and all Reasoning whatsoever by the authority of Aristotle is begotten from pre-existing Principles which prove the Science and Learning but by the judgment of Aristotle and all Philosophers and men in their wits no Science Learning or Reasoning can prove the Principles Besides it is a contradiction to say any thing is a Principle which can be proved for that which proves it is prime and a principle to it Would any man now think that these Critiques and pretended Masters of Reason had ever read one line in Logick or Aristotle who go about to prove Principles by such silly things as have scarce any verisimilitude in them Nor does he only make Fear to be the prime cause of all Humane Government and Civil Society but also chap. 16. art 1. he makes it the cause of all Religion and Worship of God Observ As if that men were not obliged to submit to higher Powers not only for wrath take it in what sense you will either fear of the wrath of the higher Powers or mutual fear of the wrath of other men but also for conscience sake And that God were not in gratitude to be worshiped and served by ingenuous men because he is good and created them intellectual and reasonable creatures but only by a servile fear of his Judgments from whence only vile and vitious men seem to but never truly serve or honor him A pretty institution of Religion and Government for the Men of Bedlam and Wives of Billingsgate He divides the whole Treatise into three titles viz. Liberty Empire and Religion Under the title of Liberty he speaks of men as they are in a state of meer Nature viz. of a state of men before they have by Pact given up their natural right to one Person or one Court or Company of men so that the will of this Man or Court shall be the will of all of them and this he calls cap. 5. art 9. Civitas or Persona civilis If Mr. Hobbs had by a state of Nature understood such a state as S. Paul Observ Rom. 2. 14. does viz. of men who have only the Law of Nature and not Gods Divine Law supernaturally revealed in the Scriptures to be their rule and guide and that men in such a state not having the Law may by Nature do the things contained in the Law for this Law is ingraven in the hearts of all men he
came under one Monarch or King again for the Royal dignity of a Monarch or King from whence all subordinate dignities tanquam lumen de lumine are derived without any diminution will suffer no division Regia dignitas est indivisibilis quaelibet alia derivativa dignitas est similiter indivisibilis The most woful event that fell out in this Kingdome when Gordobug divided this Kingdom between his two Suns Ferrex and Porrex and what heavy event came to pass untill it was reduced again under one Monarch let our Histories tell you and letting pass others I cannot overpass the miserable estate within this Kingdom under the Heptarchy untill all was reunited under one Soveraign and this is the reason that in England Scotland and Ireland the Royal dignity is descendible to the eldest daughter or sister Sir E. Coke Inst 4. 243. c. Regia dignitas est indivisibilis 2. Of these Governments Monarchy is the best as appears by reason by How many ways Monarchy is the best Government the consent of the world by the institution of God and his commanding obedience only to this Government and by woful experience 3. Monarchy in reason is the best Government for the dignity and Monarchy is the best Government in reason majesty of one man is more easie to be maintained then of many The ills that follow from bad Monarchs are no worse than what do and alwaies did happen from the best of humane Laws viz. mischiefs to particular men Nor can the mischiefs which happened to Silus Sabinus Sillanus c. who not well brooking the powers of Tiberius and Caligula Emperors as bad as who were worst had been over lavish of their tongues in vilifying the power of the Caesars and magnifying that of the Senate and probably had they been able would have advanced the power of the Senate to the abdication of Caesars be compared with the inconveniences which came upon the Senate and people of Rome in those times of Silla and Marius of Caesar and Pompey Besides factious and discontented persons cannot hope for that encouragement in their designs where the supreme power is in one individual person as where it is compounded of many The freedome and liberty of the Subject is more under one then more for it is easier to obey one then many The common people of Rome never enjoyed so much liberty as under the Emperors and therefore when after the death of Caligula the Senate endeavored to restore Rome to her antient liberty as they Sueton. in vita Claud. cap. 10. called it and extinguish the name and power of the Caesars and to that end had seised upon the Capitol they aided by the Preterian coherts continued the power of their Emperors in Claudius and the day and night wherein the Senate would not receive him was the cause of much trouble which Josephus notes l. 19. c. 30. 4. By the consent of the world for every where in the known world By the consent of the world before 1641. either in Europe Asia Africa or America over Christians Mahumetans and Infidels except the State of Venice the usurped power of the Cantons in Switzerland the State of the Neatherlands the Hans-towns Genoa and Geneva who seek protection of the Emperor and Kings of France this Government is established 5. By God himself for he never instituted any Government either in By Gods owning it only Priesthood Judges or Kings but only this nor commands obedience to any other Can a man touch the Lords anointed and be guiltless 1 Sam. 26 9. And submit your yelves to every ordinance of man for the Lords sake whether it be to the King as supreame c. St. Pet. 2. 13. Feare God honor the King And I counsel thee to keep the Kings commandments and that in regard of the oath of God And therefore what thing an Unite is in numbers the Minde in the faculties of the soule a Centre in a circle the same is God the most omnipotent King in the world simple in unity indivisible in nature most holy in purity placed by an infinite interval far remote above the fabrick of the highest Heaven joyning this perspirable region with the celestial and intelligible keepes and preserves from ruine as by a secure care the whole universe framed and compounded in such admirable order and harmony to whose great example ought every good King who is the Unite the minde and centre of his kingdome that hopes to govern and preserve his subjects not only safe but honest and happy wholly to betake himself 6. By woful experience I do not find any mans life except the destitute and deposed Princes Arthur Ed. 2. Rich. 2. Hen. 6. and his sonne By wofull experience Ed. 5. and his brother herein and in many other things doubtless more unhappy then private men and the Duke of Clarence after conviction and attainder thought by the consent of Ed. 4. to be drowned in a Butt of Malmsey and Cromwell Earle of Essex condemned and executed unheard in Parliament see a remarkable passage herein by Sir Ed. Co. Insti 4. fo 37. 38. Queen Katherine fifth wife to H. 8. Mary Queen of Scots and the Earl of Strafford or estate taken away by any of the Kings of England for these last 500 years in an extraordinary and extrajudicial manner If the dissolution of the Abbies by Hen 8. be objected I answer it was usual in Parliament to alter many things in the Common law as the statute de donis conditionalibus made a great alteration in the Common law for before all estates which were not for life and under were either in fee absolute or conditional and so the Statutes which gave power of entry where before no remedy was to be had by Common law but by a Cui in vita And to Jointenants to compell others to sue a Writ of partition c. In case of life the ordinary way of trial was by Peers the Nobility by the Nobility and the Commons by the Commons but a Parliament being a body compounded of heterogenial and dissimilary parts viz. King Lords and Commons could not be Peers to any man which was the usual way of Trial with us neither were the Estates so taken from Abbots c. but that they enjoyed them or a full value in lieu of them during their lives so that by this act no wrong was done to any man living Yet it is true which Sir Ed. Co. saies in his Comment upon Magna charta chap. 1. Quod datum est Ecclesiae datum est Deo what was given to the Church was given to God which by the Law of God Numb 16 37 38. is unalterable nor can be be employed to any profane or common use So that I am confident I may safely affirm that the Subject in seaven years under the Long Parliament suffered extraordinarily and extrajudicially five hundred times more then all their Ancestors in 500 years before did
power which God hath given Fathers and Husbands by the law of Nature 7. The Husband being the head of the Wife she is in all respects of law The Wife has nothing proper against her Husband deemed civiliter mortua nor can take or purchase any thing during the coverture but whatsoever is given to the Wife is ex facto the Husbands Yet Marriage being a Sacrament by the institution of our Saviour and Ephes 5. 25 32. a Mystery of Christ and his Church and so the cognisance thereof due to the Ecclesiastical power the Church upon the penalty of Ecclesiastical censure may compell the Husband to allow his Wife Alimony if without sufficient cause he shall refuse to cohabit with her 8. If Poligamy had not been lawful before our Saviour Christs time Poligamy was lawful before our Saviour then had our Saviour been illegitimate being descended of Bathsheba when David had many other wives Nor can the argument drawn from the necessity of propagating Mankind take place when David reigned for there never was in so small a Continent so great a number of people as the Israelites were when David reigned as appears by the Number which Joab took and for which David was punished with so great a pestilence If it were before the divine law of our Saviour lawful every where for Annot. Men to have many Wives I do wonder why Mr. Hobbs cap. 17. art 8. de Cive says That our Saviour made no laws but the institution of the Sacraments which are Baptism and the Eucharist And if Matrimony be a Civil institution as he affirms then Poligamy is lawful for all Christians who are in subjection to the Turks c. where by the Temporal laws it is permitted and the Kingdom of Congo rejected Christianity for no other reason but because they were not allowed plurality of wives which Mr. Hobbs could easily have dispenced with I do challenge Mr. Hobbs to shew any one instance where ever in the Christian world before all things ran riot here in England since 1642. the Temporal power took cognisance of Marriage 9. Matrimony is the act of two free persons viz. neither precontracted What Matrimony is nor married nor within the degrees prohibited by God Levit. 18. of different sexes capable of performing the end of marriage mutually taking one another for Husband and Wife I N. take thee D. to be my wedded Wife I D. take thee N. to be my wedded Husband But this must be done publiquely and Banns of both parts publiquely pronounced three Holidays or a Licence procured from the Ordinary for dispensation with all the rites and solemnities injoined by the Church or else the Church takes no cognisance of it 10. Where the Matrimony is subsequent to the allegation there the Whether Matrimony be dissolvible Vinculum is dissoluble As if one man marries another mans Wife or a Husband his Wife living marries another or if the parties contracting or marrying be within the degrees forbidden by God or if either party were Lev 18. precontracted or frigid these necessarily preceding the Matrimony do dissolve the bond But where the matter or allegation is subsequent to the Matrimony there the bond of Matrimony cannot be dissolved but only a Divorce upon just cause is grantable to separate the Complainant à mensa à thoro The reason why in this latter case the Matrimony cannot be dissolved is because Marriage being an institution of God it is in the cause superior to any Humane law or act and so by consequence cannot by them be dissolved And indeed in proper speaking where the Matrimony is subsequent it is rather not done then dissolvible the persons marrying being personae incapaces for such an action 11. The Holy Ghost Ephes 5. 25 c. shews the duty of Husbands The duty of Fathers and Husbands And Cato though no lover of women did think it sacrilege in the Husband to strike his wife Plut. vita Caton cens No question the right and careful education of Children is the onely means by which Parents may hope to have any comfort of them here or hereafter for Train a child in the way when he is young and he will not depart from it when he is old says the Preacher Nor can Parents expect to have their Children virtuous if they be vitious themselves for with what face can any Father condemn his Child for any thing which he allows in himself Besides there is nothing ill which naturally Youth doth not more suddenly apprehend then Men therefore Maxima debetur puero reverentia si quid Juveval Turpe paras And ill habits are soon gotten by Children if they be not carefully observed and restrained and hardly if possibly left when they are Men. CHAP. VIII Of Domestical power 1. THere are three sorts of Families either by Affinity or Alliance How many sorts of Families there be or by Consanguinity or a Legal or Houshold-Family Of such a Family and of its Cause and Jurisdiction we shall in this ensuing Chapter treat 2. A Family is not the cohabitation of divers persons in one house A legal family is not the cohabitation of divers persons in the same house for then Inmates and Travellers c. were subject to the power of the Master and Host Besides subjection cannot be where it depends upon the will of the Subject when he will he may choose whether he will obey But it is evident that Inmates and Travellers may when they will cease their subjection by leaving of the house 3. A Family is contained in the mutual offices of commanding and What a legal family is obeying of several persons under one head in the same house And the same head may be of divers Families as when a Master keeps servants in two or more different houses 4. A Family may consist of Paterfamilias who is Father and Husband Of what persons a family in the largest sense is compounded and the head or commanding part of the family of Wife Children and Servants who are the obeying part of the family or of the Mistress of the family who commands and of Children and Servants who obey 5. But because a Family may consist where as parts of the Family In the more proper sense there is neither Father nor Mother Husband nor Wife nor Children A Family is properly where several Servants obey the same Master or Mistress in the same house 6. Servants are twofold either voluntarily serving with their consent Of Servants first given such as are those servants who for such wages serve their Masters for such a terme or where they serve whether they give consent or not as where men are slaves or apprentices The power which the head of the family has over his Servants is called potestas herilis or despotica the Masters or Mistresses power We speak first of Masters power over Servants serving for wages 7. It is impossible that any
he will not deny that the supreme power was in Deborah and yet sure he will not affirm that she had the Sacerdotal power And whereas Mr. Hobbs says That the Kings of Israel had power over the Cap. 11. ar 16. prope finem High-Priests and instanceth in Solomons deposing Abiathar If he means that they had power over their persons he disputes without an adversary for me But it does not follow from thence that they had the Sacerdotal power in them for Solomon did restore Sadoc who was of the line of Eleazer to whom he ascribes so much power whereas Abiathar was of the family of Ithamar one of Aarons younger sons whereof Eli was the first Jos de antiq Jud. l. 8. c. 1. And he may as well infer that the Regal power was subject to the High-Priest because Jehojada restored Jehoash after he had slain Athalia And ch 16 art 16. whereas he says That the Kings being constituted there is no doubt but both powers were in them It is false For if the Sacerdotal power were in the King then might the King execute his power but Uzziah transgressed 2 Chro. 26. 16. against the Lord his God when he went into the temple of the Lord to burn incense upon the altar of incense For as Azariah the Priest told him ver 18. It appertaineth not unto thee Uzziah to burn incense unto the Lord but to the Priests the sons of Aaron that are consecrated to burn incense c. See Num. 18. 7. Exod. 30. 7. And the Lord smote him with leprosie and Ahaziah thrust him out v. 20. See the manner more at large Joseph lib. 9. cap. 11. de antiq Judaeor And Saul was therefore rejected from being King because in case of extreme danger he did offer sacrifice 1 Sam. 13. 14. 7. That our Saviour Jesus Christ God and Man foretold by all the Prophets The new and last Covenant and Revelation of God to Mankind by his Son most especially by that most noble Prophet Isaiah descended from the Kings of Judah took our nature upon him in Augustus Cesars reign when Janus Temple was shut and an universal peace over all the world who by himself once offered for us under Pontius Pilate the deputy was a fulfilling of the ceremonial Law being but a type of him to come and a sufficient propitiation and satisfaction for the sinns of the whole world beleeving on him being the foundation of all Christian faith I will not dispute Note Reader that our Saviour being the Prince of Peace this Prince Nota Bene of Peace was born into the world when there was an universal Peace so being the King of Peace was born as if there could be no peace without it when as there was none but Monarchy and that not elective in all the world 8. But because parum est lex nisi sunt qui possunt jura gerere it had been What Order our Saviour took in his life time for executing of his last Will and Testament and how executed to no purpose for our Saviour to have made his last Will and Testament if he had not made Executors to have executed it he chose and ordained twelve Apostles seventy Disciples or Evangelists his Executors note that in the Gospells the Evangelists are usually called Christs Disciples as well as Apostles but the Disciples the Evangelists are never called his Apostles After our Saviours passion St. Peter in his exhortation for the choosing of another in the place of Judas who had betrayed his Master saies Acts. 1. 20. Let his habitation be void and no man dwelling therein and his Bishoprick 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 let another take Here the Apostles who are also called Disciples appointed Joseph and Mathias but the lot fell upon Mathias these Appostles created seven Deacons Acts 6. 6. chosen by the multitude after prayer having laid their hands upon them Peter and John Act. 8. 17. confirm and lay hands on the Samaritans converted by the preaching of Philip. Saul is called to the Apostleship after he was striken blind and had seen Jesus whom he had persecuted Act. 9. 3 4 5. Barnabas was sent to confirm the beleevers converted by them who were scattered upon St. Stevens persecution at Phenice and Cyprus Act. 11. 22 23. Paul and Barnabas confirm the Soules of the Disciples and ordain Elders in every Church Act. 14. 22 23. Paul said to Barnabas let us visit our brethren in every City where we have preached Act. 15. 36. neither can it be shewed that any in the Acts did ordain lay on their hands confirme or visit but only the Apostles so that as Apostles that is men sent not only to preach confirm ordain visit c. every where were none made but by our Saviour For St. Paul and Barnabas were Acts. 15. 2. miraculously chosen by him And the Lot fell upon Mathias Act. 1. 26. and the Lot is of the Lord. 9. But because our Saviour would not leave his Church in so short-lived a states as to be but of one Ages continuance God having left with the Jewes Our Saviours promise to his Church sufficient power for the propagation of the Jewish priesthood untill all should be fulfilled by our Saviour he saies Behold I am with you even unto the end of the world Amen St. Matth. 28. 20. But preaching the Gospel ordaining laying on of hands confirming c. are necessary fundamentals for the constituting of a Christian Church unto the end of the world c. Our Saviour therefore will be with his Church unto the end of the world in Preaching the Gospel in ordaining laying on of hands confirming c. 10. It being evident that the Apostles did preach ordain c. our The Apostles did ordain Bishops Presbyters and Deacons Saviour having promised to be with the Apostles and Disciples i. e. the Church unto the end of the world therefore after the Apostles preaching the Gospel ordaining c. should be in the Church let us see to whom our Saviour did bequeath this ghostly power after the Apostles The Apostles did ordain Bishops Elders and Deacons Episcopos Presbyteros Act. 14. 21. Diaconos That Presbyter is not the name of Age but Office is most manifest for when St. Paul had ordained Presbyters or Elders in every City sure he made them no elder then they were Besides he made Timothy a Presbyter when he was but a young man 1 Tim. 4. 12. 10. As our Saviour did usually call his Apostles his Disciples but never The difference between a Presbiter and a Bishop called his Disciples or Evangelists his Apostles so the Apostles did usually call Bishops Presbyters but never called Presbyters Bishops As Act. 20. 17. whom St. Paul calls Elders of the Church v. 28. he calls 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and St. John the Apostle Ep. 2. 3. v. 1. calls himself the elder It is true therefore that every Bishop is
or at least ought to be a Presbyter but every Presbyter is not a Bishop For St. Paul saies Against an Elder or Presbyter receive not an accusation but before two or three witnesses 1 Tim. 5. 19. But equals cannot judge equals therefore Timothy as a Presbyter could not judge a Presbyter therefore he should judge him as being Bishop and so by consequence Presbyters are subject to the judgment of Bishops that is in Episcopal jurisdiction Besides Bishops have power of ordination of Presbyters in every City 1 Tit. 5. 1 Tim. 5. 22. but it is no where found that ever Presbyters did ordain Bishops It is not therefore Ecclesiastical practice only that is the universal practice of all Christians in all ages untill John Calvin but the institution of our Saviour by which Bishops do excell and govern Presbyters It was after the destruction of Jerusalem that Episcopi Presbyteri caepere appellari Pontifices sacerdotes as the most learned Estius observes and that the name of Priest is not a Jewish Distin 24. l. 4. pag. 35 36. word is evident for Melchisedech was not a Jew and yet a Priest and our Saviour a Priest for ever after the order of Melchisedech 11. What St. Paul in the end of his Epistle to Timothy calls Bishop of An Apostle and Bishop the same the Ephesians St. John Revel 2. 1. calls Angel of the Church of the Ephesians So St. Paul and St. John understand the same thing by Angel and Bishop but Angelus and Apostolus are the same and therefore Episcopus and Apostolus are the same But what need that be proved by deduction which the Apostle Gal. 1. 19. expresseth For James was none of the twelve yet being Bishop of Jerusalem St. Paul testifies him to be an Apostle Besides it is evident Episcopatus is the office as well of an Apostle as a Bishop Act. 1. 20. There is therefore no difference between an Apostle and a Bishop only Apostles constituted by our Saviour had their function universal whereas the Bishops or Apostles ordained by the Apostles had but a Topical function that is the exercise of their power was restrained to their City or Diocess And all Ecclesiastical writers do affirm that St. James did preside in the Council of Jerusalem although St. Peter with other of the Apostles were Members of it 12. Our Saviour having promised the ghostly power of Confirmaion Ordination The Power of Bishops which Priests have not c. to be with his Church to the end of the world and the power of Ordination Confirmation and Excommunication being bequeathed only to the Apostles the power of Ordination Confirmation and Excommunication descend only to the Apostles successors viz. Bishops rightly ordained 13. Not the voice and letter but the genuine and true sense of the Of the interpretation of Scriptures Word of God is the Canon of Christian Doctrine for the minde cannot be governed by Scriptures unless understood It is necessary therefore that Scriptures be interpreted before they be made a rule It will therefore follow that either God hath left a Power which may interpret Scripture or else that God hath revealed himself to Men without sense or meaning but the latter of these is most false and blasphemous therefore it is true that God hath left a power upon earth which may interpret the Scriptures 14. If the Scriptures were as Arts and Sciences which are derived from The Scriptures cannot be interpreted by themselves that is one place by another higher Principles or Axiomes which though they cannot be proved but are as Aristotle calls them indemonstrable propositions yet are so clear and manifest that no exception can be taken to them then indeed the Scriptures as well as Arts and Sciences might be proved one place by another untill they were resolved to their first Principles which though granted cannot be proved But it is far otherwise with the Scriptures for there is no Scripture which is not of like Authority with any other every Scripture being the Word of God one place of Scripture therefore cannot be interpreted by the consequents which may follow from another any more then the consequents which follow from Quae eidem sunt aequalia inter se sunt aequalia may be interpreted by Omne totum est majus sua parte 15. There is no prophesie of the Scripture of any private interpretation Not all they who do translate the Scriptures are the intepreters of them 2. Pet. 1. 20. It is not therefore every one who can translate the Scripture out of one language into another with his own private conceptions upon them which renders them to be interpreted by him What then hath God revealed himself to mankind in general without sense or meaning No it does not follow for as in temporal Laws no man can interpret them but he that made them either by himself or them whom he shall constitute yet every man may by his reason and discourse direct his own actions in conformity to those Laws but if he shall do any act upon misconstruction or interpretation of his own his mistaking the meaning of the Law shall not excuse him So private men may endeavor to direct their actions accordingly as they suppose God hath directed them in the Scriptures yet if upon their own heads they undertake to interpret the Scriptures although in order only to their own actions their misunderstanding the Scriptures shall never excuse any unjust act 16. Every Law of God is the Word of God but every Word of God is not the Law of God as Jacob went into Egypt is the Word but not the To whom the Authority of the interpretation of Scripture doth belong the Law of God The Scriptures contain Political Historical Moral and Natural things which are not rules of the mystery of Christian Faith and Religion Those things which concern Morality and Temporal power and Government our Saviour made no alteration in them for he saies St. Matth. 5. 17. Think not that I am come to destroy the Law or the Prophets I am not come to destroy but to fulfil And therefore quid est homicidium quid furtum quid sit meum vel tuum c. belongs to the Temporal power as much since our Saviour as before and truly I do not think I should do the Church of England any wrong if I should with Lindwood affirm that not only the Probate of Wills but also the cognisance of Tithes was in the Church ex consuetudine Angliae but those things which relate to mysteries of Christian faith as our Saviors being the Son of God took humane nature upon him and was born of a Virgin preached repentance died upon the cross for the sinnes of the world rose again the third day c. God to make his power known by the preaching of a few mean men and Fishermen and from the mouths of babes and sucklings all Temporal power not only not permitting but
to instance the Acts of Parliament which give one Jointenant a power to compell the others to sue a Writ of Partition which was denied at Common-Law and right of Entry where they were put to their Cui in vita c. It may suffice that in no Kings reign there have not been Acts of Parliament which have been so far from making declarations of the Common-Law that they have made manifest alterations in it And as the Common-Law hath no force nor reason against an Act of Parliament so hath no particular Custom any force or reason against it for no man can prescribe against an Act of Parliament and all Lands in Gavel-kind were particular Customs but taken away by Act of Parliament And many Acts of Parliament have not declared the Succession of the English Diadem according to the usual custom thereof but made manifest alteration thereof as in the Succession of Hen. 4. 5. 6. Rich. 3. Hen. 7. 8. which being unjust and the cause not depending upon Humane laws ought not to be obeyed Nor secondly is that a less error that Judicial Records are equivalent to Acts of Parliament for they are so far from being equal to Acts of Parliament that in truth they are no Laws but Inferences and Conclusions which are deduced from Laws For there is not any Judicial Record which is not unjust if it cannot truly and ultimately be resolved in some general or particular Custom Act of the Parliament or grant of the King So that Acts of Parliament the Common Law Particular Customs and Prescriptions and Royal Grants are as Axioms Postulata or Principles in Arts or Sciences and Judicial Records Reported Cases and Yearsbooks are Inferences Conclusions or Sciences deduced from Acts of Parliament the Common Law and particular Customs of this Land or Concessions of the King Touching Royal Government Royal Government being the ordinance of God and from the Law of Nature is paramount to all Humane laws and the prime and efficient cause of them they cannot therefore declare the cause so as to create any obligation of what they are but the effects and from whence derived We have thus far treated of the means by which the Kings of this Nation have until 1640. governed and preserved their Subjects internally But because it is the office of Kings to preserve their Subjects as well from foreign force as internal broil there is yet something wanting of which we have not treated viz. The power of making War and Peace and maintaining Alliance and Traffique Of these in regard they refer to Foreign powers and jurisdictions and are not subject to the Laws of the Nation we shall forbear to treat only affirming that it is necessary that at all times this power must be so vested in the King that at all times he may have the aids and assistance of his Subjects in prosecution of the Ends aforesaid The end of the Third Book The Contents of the Fourth Book HAving thus far treated of all created Rights and the causes of all Laws and created Powers and Vertues and these being previous and necessary to all Justice and Obedience We in this Book descend to treat of Justice in the first Chap. as the most eminent and noble of all Humane vertues it being that which not only conserves private Families but all Nations and Kingdoms in unity peace and society and demonstrate it neither to be in Geometrical proportion as Plato would nor Arithmetical proportion as Zenophon held nor in Harmonical proportion as Bodin taught Nor is that corrective and distributive Justice which Aristotle affirmed to be in Arithmetical and in Geometrical proportion The Second Chap. treats of Obedience and shews how that it necessarily proceeds and yet is different from Justice The Third Chap. treats of Judgment and shews how it differs from Law and Justice The Fourth Chap. treats of Equity and shews how it differs from Judgment and how necessary Courts of Equity as well as Judicature are THE FOURTH BOOK CHAP. I. Of Justice 1. JUstitia est habitus animi communi utilitate Cicero's definition of Justice servata suum cuique tribuens Societatem conjunctionis Humanae munifice atque aequè tuens Justice is a habit of the Minde common utility being conserved giving to every one their right and bountifully and equally Cicero lib. 1. de legibus defending the Society of Mankinde Et Justitia est quae suum cuique distribuit Justice is that which does distribute to every man what is his right Where he says That Justitia est obtemperatio scriptis legibus we will shew that is not properly Justice but Obedience onely 2. Justice is the upright doing of an act conserving Society in that Quid sit Justitia formality as it is commanded or permitted by him who by right may command or permit it Justice is the doing of a just action the doing of a just action is the upright doing of any act as it is commanded or permitted by him who by right may command or permit it preserving Peace and Society I say Justice must have these two properties viz. upright doing that is abstraction from all affections of love hate or self-interest and the Law or Command of him who by right may command or permit such an act Other actions proceeding from Wisdom Reason Experiment or Discourse c. are prudent profitable c. but none are just or honest actions which cannot be truly and ultimately resolved into the Law or Command of him who by right may command or permit such an act So Quotuplex that Justice is twofold either commanded or permitted 3. Injustice is the abuse or falsifying the Law or Command of him What is Injustice who by right commands to the hurt or prejudice of another As a Law preceding and Integrity are inseparable incidents to Justice so Hypocracy seeming just and yet abusing or falsifying a Law and the damage of another or more are incidents inseparable to injustice 4. Let us see who may by right command and who are obliged to do God commands by highest right in conformity to their Laws and Commands I say God by highest right ought to command all the created things in Heaven and Earth and all Creatures are chiefly and absolutely obliged to do whatsoever he commands without any reasoning or disputing why he so commands For the earth is Psal 24. 1. Job 41. 11. Psal 50. 12. the Lords and all that therein is the compass of the World and all that dwell therein And whatsoever is under the whole Heaven is Gods and the World is mine and the fulness thereof All Gods commands therefore have a like and equal influence upon all his Creatures all Creatures as compared to him are alike vile and between him and them is no proportion To abuse then or falsifie any Law of God or Nature to the hurt or prejudice of another is a sin of injustice in all Gods Creatures and
I confess all sins of my body of skin and flesh and bones and nerves and of kidnies and gristles and of my tongue and lips and of my jaws and teeth and hair of my marrow and of every other thing which is soft or hard wet or dry I confess I have observed my Baptism worse then I have promised to my Lord and the profession by which I was bound to keep for the praise of God and his Saints and the eternal health of my self I confess I have often neglected my Canonical hours and have often forsworne the Life of God and taken his Name in vain 9. I ask and beseech my Lord for remission of all these that the Devil may never by his snares prevail against me lest at any time I should die without confession and amendment of my sins even as to day I have confessed all my sins before our Lord and Saviour Christ who governs heaven and earth and before that Altar and those Reliques and before my Confessor and Mass-priest of the Lord and as I have given a pure and true confession and am ready to correct all my sins and as much as in me lies with all carefulness hereafter to avoid them 10. And thou O Jesu Christ my Saviour have mercy upon my soul and forgive I pray and blot out all my sins and transgressions which I have ever either heretofore or lately committed and lead me into thy heavenly kingdom that there I may be conversant with the Elected and thy Saints without end and for ever Now I humbly beseech thee O Priest of God that thou be a witness for me in the day of Judgment that the Devil hereafter may have no power over me and that thou mayst be a pleader for me to the Lord that I may amend my sins and transgressions and desist from committing the like again May God enable me to perform this who liveth and reigneth without end in everlasting Amen The manner of injoining Penance 1. If an old man or young man rich or poor man sound or infirm shall unwillingly offend another of any order it shall not be so taken as if he had wilfully done it or on set purpose And also if any one compelled by necessity shall have committed any sin for this thing because he did by necessity commit it he shall always rather deserve forgiveness and milder censure 2. Each Deed is to be carefully distinguished for Gods and Mans sake These Services are observed in Parts beyond Sea viz. 3. That every Bishop take his Episcopal seat upon that Wednesday which is called the head of the * Fast and then let every one in his Diocese come unto him who is guilty of any grievous crime and when he shall have Ashwednesday confessed this his Confessor shall teach him penance proportionable to the crime he is guilty of And if any one be worthy of a more grievous sentence he shall separate him from the communion of the Church yet shall he grant and exhort him that he follow his necessary imployment and so at length he may return home having obtained pardon 4. And after that upon Maunday-Thursday let all be called together to the same place and the Bishop singing over them some of the Hymns pronounce absolution to them and give them leave to return home with his benediction to them This is to be observed of all Christians 5. Yet ought the Priest diligently to enquire with what contrition and with what perfection and plenitude every one hath fulfilled the penance enjoined him and accordingly grant this remission 6. If a Layman without cause kill another let him fast seven years in bread and water and four of them as his Confessor shall appoint and also the seven years penance to boot and alwaies bewail his sin all he can because it is unknown to men how much his penance hath prevailed with God 7. If a man desire to kill another and cannot fulfil it let him fast three years viz. one with bread and water the other two as his Confessor shall injoin him 8. If a man shall unwillingly slay a Layman let him fast three years one with bread and water the other two as his Confessor shall appoint and let him always lament his transgressions 9. If he were a Subdeacon let him fast six years if he were a Deacon let him fast seven years if he were a Mass-priest ten years and if a Bishop twelve and always lament 10. If any man so chastise his son that he thereof die although against his will let him fast five years with bread and water ut supra 11. If a Bishop or Mass-priest shall kill any one let him lose the dignity of his Order and his penance be always 12. If a woman shall kill an infant either in her womb or after it shall be born whether by taking a potion or any other way let her fast ten years viz. three in bread and water and the other seven accordingly as her Confessor shall in mercy impose and always bewail the fact 13. If a man without cause in his rage slea his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 let him fast 3 years 14. If a husband shall out of any impious jealousie beat his wife so as she therefore dies guiltless yet let him fast three years and always bewail his misdeed 15. If a man shall of his own accord have killed himself whether with a weapon or any other devilish instigation it is not lawful for any man to sing a Mass for such a man nor to bury him with singing Psalms nor to cover him with earth being laid in a lawful sepulchre The same Judgment is to be given upon him who mischievously ended his life with pain as also a Thief Murderer or Betrayer of his Master 16. If any one of twenty years of age hath defiled himself with a beast be it male or female let him fast fifteen years And if he hath a wife and be forty years old and shall have done such a thing let him both abstain and fast all his life long nor let him presume until he be ready to die to take the body of our Lord. A young man or foolish shall be grievously beaten who shall commit any such fault 17. Whosoever shall break wedlock be it wife or husband shall fast three days in every week with bread and water for the space of 7 years 18. Whosoever repudiates his wife and takes another dissolves the wedlock No man ought to cast off though for life or death any of those things which by due right belong to Christians neither may he be buried who does this among Christians And concerning a Wife let the same thing be done And the Kindred who were present or gave counsel to these things let them be punished with the same sentence unless they sooner repent and diligently amend 19. If a man hath a Wife and also a Concubine let no Priest give them any thing belonging to Christian rights unless he penitently return
the Lord of the Ground go with the Priest and without thanks take away and restore to the Church what shall belong to it and leave the Ninth part to him who would not pay the Tenth let them divide the rest into two parts let the Lord have one half the Bishop the other be he a Kings man or another Romfeath ought to be restored upon the Feast of St. Peter in bonds he who shall keep it beyond that time let him restore that penny to the Bishop and thirty pence let him add to the King 50 s. Who shall keep Cherisceat beyond the Feast of St. Martin let him restore it to the Bishop and pay eleven fold and to the King 50 sol Who married shall commit adultery let the King or Lord of him have the superior the Bishop the inferior Who shall commit perjury upon holy things * * Laying his hand upon the book I think let himlose his hand or half his were viz. half the Cap. 11 price of his head and this is common to his Lord and the Bishop Who shall bear false witness let him not afterwards be admitted for witness but restore to the King or the Lord of the Soyl Helfeng ' * * Neither Mr. Lambert nor Whelock give any construction of Helfeng that I can finde Who shall kill a man in Orders or malign him let him make him amends as is right and the amends of the Altar according to the dignity of his Order to the King or Lord sufficient breach of the peace or deny it with full purgation Plena lada neget If any man guilty of death desires confession let it never be denied him but if any man shall do it let him pay the King one hundred and twenty shillings or swear with five men that he did it not If a free-man work upon Holy days let him amend his helfeng and at least diligently make composition with the Lord. If any man by force holds the Rectitudes of God Rectitudines Dei let a Dane pay lahite an Englishman full witam or deny it with eleven * * Or twelve in Mr. Seldens Ms and Mr. Whelocks if he should there wound any man let him amend this and restore full witam and redeem his hand of the Bishop or lose it If he kill a man let him be outlawed and every man that desires right follow him with clamor if it comes to pass that he be killed by this that he resisted right if this thing be verified let him be unrevenged He who shall make a breach of his Order let him amend it according to the dignity of the Order wera Wita Lahilita * * Lastita Mr. Seldens Mr. Whelocks Ms and with all mercy Let every widow be without a husband twelve moneths afterwards she may choose whom she will and if within a year she take a husband let her lose her Morgangifan * * Dower and all her money which she had from her first husband and let her husband forfeit to the King the price of his head or to whom the King shall grant it If a man unjustly hold a fugitive of God let him restore him to right and pay to him whose he shall be and satisfie the King according to Legergild If any man hath a man excommunicated or keep him outlawed and all his forgiveness and all amendment commonly made better by Christ and the King is utterly lost wheresoever the Law of God shall be refused to be justly kept according to the word of the Bishop and it will be expedient that he be compelled by the Secular power Because Justice and Secular distriction are necessary for the most part in Divine Laws and Secular Institutes for that otherwise many men cannot be recalled from their ill ways many will not be inclined to the worship of God and observance of the Law from whence by the much infesting of ill men it is provided for the profitable dispensation of peace that the more weighty pleas and things more to be punished be brought to Justice alone or the mercy of the Prince that pardon may be more abundantly had to men desiring it and punishment to sinners but in causes which may be amended for the compassion of the Saints it is permitted that the earthly Lords by their leave may presume to take pecunial amends according to the Law of the Countrey Of the kindes of Causes Cap. 21. There are also some kindes of Causes put before as we have said to be more freely expedited in the amendment of which the King does more particularly communicate wheresoever they are done in Divine or Secular things over Kings men and Ecclesiastical and of Barons men and he hath totally or particularly * * Or acephalos âcefalos pauperes sive socham of which are Adultery Fornication homicide in a Church breach of the peace or order or Christianity or Legality if it be needful to be done by the Secular power that right may be done De Christianâ consuetudine locutionum secundum quod sunt 64. Towards the latter end interline 25. and end A Priest who leads a regular life in a simple accusation may swear alone in a threefold with two of his Order a Deacon in a simple compellation may accompany himself with two Deacons in a threefold with six A Countrey Priest may purge himself as a regular Deacon a Priest accused by his Bishop or Archdeacon may swear himself the sixth of lawful Priests as they are prepared at Mass Of killing a Minister of the Altar 66. If any should kill a Minister of the Altar let him be outlawed before God and man unless he repent with worthy satisfaction and justly compound with his parents or throughly deny it with purgation of his head * * Werilada and begin this within thirty nights before God and man above all he hath If any Minister of the Altar kill any man or if it be extraordinarily declared by bad actions let him be both deprived of his Order and go on Pilgrimage as the Pope shall enjoyn him and amend the work But if he will purge himself he may do it triply but unless he shall begin this within thirty nights let him be outlawed before God and men If any man any ways afflict any man Ordained with stripes or bonds let him make him amends as is meet and to the Bishop the amends of the Altar according to the dignity of his Order to the King or Lords sufficient breach of the Kings peace * * Mundbrecho or deny it with sufficient purgation * * Plenlada If any man condemned to death desires to be confessed let it never be denied him but if any man should deny him let him give the King in satisfaction one hundred shillings or swear with six men that he did not do it If any man by force takes away Gods rights let a Dane amend with Lah sliht full Wytam with