to manifest the Benefits that we gain by the Sacraments And consequently the necessity of Receiving Particularly Cap. 6. The generall end why Sacraments were instituted This two-fold A mean of Conveyance A pleadg of Assurance Sacramentarians confuted Sacramentall Vnion Hence the efficacy of the Sacraments and the Translation of Phrases Reall Presence A note touching the spring of Heresies the right use to be made of in-explicable Mysteries Something touching Transubstantiation and Consubstantiation Cap. 7. The special end of either Sacrament the choice of the Elements Baptism the Sacramēt of our Admission Persons having right to Baptism An Argument prooving the lawfulness of baptising Infants Anabaptists objections against the Arguments answered The Lords Supper the Sacrament of Preservavation with the use thereof Cap. 8. The Benefits of the Sacraments in generall sc. Incorporation into Christ hence the secondary Benefit of Baptism 1. Remission 2. Regeneration How farr Baptismall Remission extendeth whether to sinns future Cap. 9. The Benefits of the Lords Supper sc. Incorporation and Vnion continued Consequently strengthning and refreshing of the soul. Spirituall diseases and maladyes They their own greatest enemies who absent themselve Cap. 10. Corollaries drawn from the premisses 1. The Reason why Baptism is received but once and the Lords Supper often How often we are to receive the Lords Supper 2. The Necessity of the Sacraments what and how great it is In the third generall part I set down the Qualification of the Receiver The end usefulness wherof is to prevent if it may be the prejudicate opinion of Opus operatum which is so usually cast upon the former Doctrin and Defenders therof particularly Cap. 11. The Qualification required of them that come to the Sacraments The equity of a Qualification pre-required Particularly what is required of Men what of Infants Cap. 12. Of Repentance The first Branch of Qualification common to both Sacraments The nature of Repentance The Name thereof the Acts of it in the Heart Tongue Hand Touching Confession and Restitution Cap. 13. Of Faith the second branch of Qualification common to both Sacraments The nature of Faith seen in the Act and Object How Faith is a mother-Grace Sacramentall Faith the promise in either Sacrament these two meeting together make a kind of Omnipotency Answer to an Objection touching Transubstantiation Cap. 14. A speciall note touching these two branches of Sacramental Qualification what if profession be counterfeit the case of Simon Magus the School-tenet De obice posito Cap. 15. A Digression handling the case of Infants Baptism An Examination of the Anabaptists Arguments against baptising Infants Their first Argument No Precept nor President answer'd Their second they have no faith answered Shewing that there needeth none actuall faith to qualifie Infants Profession of faith is made by their Suretyes Interrogatories in Baptism how understood Good reason to admit Infants to Baptism and yet not to the Lords Supper Cap. 16. Of Qualification peculiar to the receiving of the Lords Supper viz. Thankfulness Remembrance of the Death of Christ. The Name Eucharist The Means how to stir us up to Thankfulness The manner how to express it Cap. 17. Of Love and Charity what is meant therby Reconciliation the Name Communion a Patheticall exhortation to it Cap. 18. Of Examination what it is what is required to it Persons imployed in it The Object of Examination 1. Repentance the marks therof 2. Faith marks of true Faith A note touching the Vniversallity of Sacramentall Charity The Necessity of this Sacramentall preparation seen in the danger of unworthy Receiving And thus have you the summe of this Treatise By which you may guess whether it be worth the reading yea or no I have been as you see larger in the practicall part than in the Theoreticall this third generall part being equall to the other two And yet I have not been so large as some Readers would think fitting neither in this later and much less in the two former parts therof My Apologie is This is not an age to blot paper in They that most commonly bestow time in reading books are of the Clergie and to them five words spoken with reason and understanding are better than five thousand tautologies and iterations Among the Laity if any one find not full satisfaction by what I have written the Minister is at hand in every parish of whom he may inquire And I humbly intreat my brethren of the Ministery what I faithfully promise to them in the like occasion to do me right in helping their people that desire it to apprehend the best construction of what may seem doubtfull imitating therin that of Saint Austin lib. 2. c. 2. De Anima ad Renatum Vbi mihi animus ergame hominis ignotus est incertus meliùs arbitror meliora sentire quam in-explicata culpare As for the truth of what I have set down doctrinally and positively I know my Brethren of the Clergie if Ministers of the Church of England may not desert me much less oppose me except they will desert their own subscription in as much as what I have written hath been collected totidem ferè verbis out of those books to which they no less than I have heretofore subscribed To this Treatise I have subnected and printed with it the copy of a Sermon preached lately sc. Iun. 24. 1638 in the publique Sermon appointed for S. Pauls Cross. So much the rather because as the Subject Matter is an argument cosen-german to the former treatise so in it I have the more largely insisted upon that doctrin which is most doubted and discussed viz. The efficacy of Baptism In this Sermon to give you a taste therof After the division of the Text and the explication of the phrases you have something interserted touching this Doctrin That death doth free us from the dominion of sinn The which tho a truth and very usefull as there I shew for consolation against the fear of death yet is but briefly touched and passed over as not being that which the text in hand doth chiefly aym at This is indeed as then I come to shew That Christians are dead men and therfore free-men Dead while they are alive not in sinn but to sinn as Theophylact which I pray the Reader to set down in the margent doth out of vers 2. supply the text thus reading Qui mortuus est peccato justificatus est à peccato This is by being baptised into the death of Christ i.e. either into the profession of conformity with Christ in his death or else into the participation and communion of the power and efficacy of Christs death The first is a Truth and the ground of a good Doctrin viz. That by the vow of Baptism Christians are dead to sin An Argument of confusion to carnall-Gospellers But the second I pitch upon because as Beza well noteth Non ex conformitate communio sed ex communione conformitas becaus we partake of the power of Christs death thence it
a separate Ceremony tho in this use Chamier sheweth that it is not appointed at all but only taken up lately by some private spirits but admit it as a separate Ceremony It is used also in Absolution and Ordination take it as a relative Ceremony i. e. as it is used to apply the Element to the party so it is used in Baptism at least when in case of necessity the water is powred upon the childs forhead Lastly add this that every Sacrament of Christs Institution is common to every Minister of the Gospell this therfore say the same of Ordination being reserved to the Bishop of the Diocesse can be no Sacrament properly so called UNCTION hath a materiall Element grant it also to have been of divine Institution for the text of Saint Iames as Interpreters do agree is a repetition of what was done by the command of Christ himself Mark 6.13 yet can it be no Sacrament because it was temporary not perpetuall And whilst it lasted it was appoynted for the cure of the bodie not of the Soul It signified not the Passion of Christ nor doth it conferr the grace of Justification consequently is no Sacrament Ob. Yes Saint James saith if he have committed sinns they shall be forgiven him Sol. True but he saith before the prayer of Faith shall save the sick and the Lord shall raise him up this pertaineth to the body which was the principall end of appointing that Ceremony the benefit of the Soul was adventitiall and consequently tho for the time i.e. so long as the power of miracles lasted in the Church there might be something extraordinary in this Ceremony yet no proper Sacrament not then much lesse now since miracles have ceased To conclude these five Sacraments as the Papish call them were they purged from superstition and abuse might happily at least some of them be tolerated for ecclesiasticall rites and are excellent and profitable customs Thus the Church of England reteineth them all having cast away those adulterate Elements of Chrism and Oyl and findeth the use of them profitable for the furtherance of that religious care that ought to be found in all that professe themselvs Children of the Church and members of Christ. But never may these hope to be acknowledged for the great Sacraments of the Gospell no more Sacraments but two generally necessary to Salvation one for Admission another for Preservation sc. Baptism and the Lords Supper which is further manifested by the end why Sacraments were ordained THE SECOND GENERALL PART CHAP. VI. The end why Sacraments were instituted THis doth our Church expresse in those words of the Definition to be as a meanes by which we receiv the same that is the Grace signified and as a pledge to assure us thereof Note here two Branches of this end why they were ordained 1. A MEAN OF CONVEYANCE and so of receiving the Grace signified Herein differ Sacraments from other signs in that they do not only signifie and represent to the understanding and memory that gracious gift of God but also as Instruments do convey the same Like the Turf and the Twig in Livery and Seiz in like the Sergeants Mace in receiving his office Such are the Sacraments not unfitly compared to Chanells and Conduit pipes which derive the water from the Spring to the Cistern for even so do the Sacraments convey Christ with all his benefits to the worthy receiver 2. A PLEDG OF ASSVRANCE to assure us therof note that word therof must be referred to the verb Receiv not to the noun Grace Sacraments do not only assure us that such a benefit there is but that it is received by receiving the sign and indeed this doth depend upon the former for as by that legall instrument of Livery and Seizin the full possession of the purchase is known to be taken in taking and receiving that Instrument so here whosoever doth as all must and ought acknowledg the Sacrament to be an Instrument of conveying a mean of receiving cannot choos but acknowledg the same Sacrament to be a pledge of assurance Briefly they are first Instruments of conveyance and means of receiving consequently seales and pledges of assurance Prove the first and the later doth follow without constraint Excellently therfore hath reverend Master Perkins in three words set forth the nature of a Sacrament only I would a little invert the order of his words and fit them to the true meaning of our Church thus that Sacraments are signs to represent Instruments to convey and seals to confirm the conveyance of Christ with all his benefits Come we to particulars Baptism doth convey the blood of Christ and the other Sacrament both body and blood Hence and hereupon is the Necessitie of receiving the Sacrament even because the Elements do not transferr the grace as they are consecrated but as received The Turf and Twig the Mace must be received else nothing is done Nor to the Spectator but to the Receiver doth water in Baptism the Bread in the Lords Supper instrumentally convey the body and blood of the Lord Jesus Vse They therefore are deceived who make no more account nor acknowledge any further end of the Sacraments than to be naked signs of representation and Commemoration Or to be badges of our Profession to distinguish the Assemblies of Christians from the Synagogs of Iewes Turks and Pagans to unite the members of the Christian Church into an holy society Truth it is that all these are considerable in the Sacraments they are Signs Badges Cognizances Ligaments externall Ceremonies of Religion and testifications of our piety towards God But all these come short of that speciall and prime end for which they were ordained Distinctive badges they are in respect of the publike Administration which is the act of the Church Uniting badges they cannot bee except first they be instruments for wee are not united to Christ mediante Ecclesia that is in being first united to the Church but rather wee are united to the Church the body of Christ mediante Capite in being first united to Christ the head and by him one to another So then consider the Sacraments in their Administration and so they be Badges and Cognizances but in respect of their ordination and institution and so they are Means and Instruments Q. Whence is it that Sacraments are means of receiving Resp. Even from that Sacramentall union of the sign and the thing signified which being inseparable hence it is that in receiving the sign we receiv the grace also As by virtue of that personall Union of the two natures he that entertained and worshipped the sonn of man did also entertain and worship the sonn of God he that blasphemed and persecuted the sonn of man did the same to the sonn of God So here by reason of this Sacramentall union who so worthily receiveth the sign receiveth the grace who so unworthily handleth the sign doth also dishonour and dedignifie the grace
a spirituall strengthning and refreshing of the soul to cure those spirituall diseases to which the soul is subject These diseases are spirituall weakness and weariness faintings and defectiveness Apostacie and declination That this is so not only the frequent admonitions and exhortations in sacred Scripture do pre-suppose but also is confirmed by reason and evidenced by too wofull experience Reason to confirm this may be drawn from the nature of grace it self which is no part of the soul nor any faculty in the soul but only a quality dwelling in the soul as light in the Ayr heat in the water or rather as sap in the branches for as they dry up and wither if either the union of them to the root be cut off or the passage of the sap be hindred and interrupted so is it here that is except there be a conscionable use and attendance upon the word and Sacraments we cannot expect that grace should live The seed of the New-birth is termed incorruptible by S. Peter because by using the means appointed it is preserved from decay Not so is it in the naturall birth no use of means no food nor physick can preserv the liveliness of that beyond an appointed time Nay even the preparation of a Remedy is the supposition of a malady As therefore the ordination of Baptism to incorporate us first into Christ doth prov that by nature we are wild Olives so the ordination of this Sacrament to continue this Union and from this Union continued to convey spirituall strength and refreshing doth sufficiently prov what would become of us after we are in the state of grace if God should leav man to himself Behold then the goodness of our God who knowing our malady hath provided a Remedy this Remedy is to partake of the holy Sacrament of Christs most blessed body and blood for which cause our duty is to frequent the same both to prevent but especially to repaire the decays of grace in the soul so then dost thou keep thy standing in grace hast thou as yet not failed nor faultred yet be not high-minded but fear the worst thou knowst not what tentations may encounter thee nor how much strength thou shalt need Go therefore to the Sacrament that thy soul may be strengthned thy strength increased prevent a mischief But now hast thou failed stumbled fallen oh then make haste to this blessed Ordinance that thou mayst be refreshed and recovered See then how much they are Enemies to their own souls who suffer themselvs to be hindred and kept away from this blessed Ordinance whether it be through covetousness or consciousness While men covet revenge or as they use to speak while they desire to right themselves by following the Law they lose the benefit of Receiving not that they must needs forbear but Sathan doth so disturb the passion in them while they prosecute the Law that they cannot settle their thoughts to so holy a work Consciousness also keeps many back from the Sacrament when sinn hath gotten into the soul and guilt hath crept into the conscience we dare not present our selvs before God but like our father Adam do hide our selvs and prov the greatest enemies to our own souls To shut up this point see how each Sacrament doth work as a convenient means to produce that end for which they were ordained Baptism is appointed to admit us into the Covenant of grace to give us our first title and interest in Christ and in it we have wrought in us Remission and Renovation a death unto sinn and a new birth unto Righteousness The Lords Supper doth strengthen and refresh our souls and therefore fitly appointed and designed to this end to be the Sacrament of our Confirmation By Baptism as we heard the soul was regenerate and made partaker of the seeds of grace These seeds being watered and as it were hatched up by the Ministry of the word are strengthned ripened and confirmed by the Sacrament of the Lords Supper and now is the faithfull soul confirmed in the state of grace and certain expectation of eternall Salvation For the close of all that hath been said touching the efficacy of the Sacraments peruse those few lines which our Church hath set down in the first part of that Homily which intreateth of the worthy receiving and reverend esteeming of the Sacrament of the body and blood of Christ. The words are these We need not to think that such exact knowledg is required of every man that he be able to discuss all high points of the doctrin thereof But this much we must be sure to hold that in the Supper of the Lord there is no vain ceremony no bare sign no untrue figure of a thing absent But as the Scripture saith the Table of the Lord the bread and cup of the Lord the memory of Christ the annuntiation of his death yea the Communion of the body and blood of the Lord in a marvelous incorporation which by the operation of the holy Ghost the very bond of our Conjunction with Christ is through faith wrought in the souls of the faithfull wherby not only their souls live to eternall life but they surely trust to winn their bodies a Resurrection to immortality The true understanding of this fruition and union which is betwixt the body and the head betwixt the true beleevers and Christ the Ancient Catholick Fathers both perceiving themselvs and commending to their people were not afraid to call this Supper some of them the salv of immortality and sovereign Preservative against death Others a Deificall Communion Others the sweet dainties of our Saviour the pledg of eternall health the defence of faith the hope of Resurrection Others the food of immortality the healthfull grace and the Conservatory to everlasting life All which sayings both of the holy Scriptures and godly men truly attributed to this celestiall banquet and feast if we often call to mind oh how would they inflame our hearts to desire the participation of these mysteries and oftentimes to covet after this bread continually to thirst for this food CHAP. X. Corollaries drawn from the Premisses FRom the observation of the particular and speciall ends of either Sacrament may the reason be givē why Baptism is administred and received but once the Lords Supper oftentimes The ground of which practice binding us to obedience under correction I speak it I take to be not any direct text of Scripture either commanding the one or prohibiting the other but the tradition of the ancient Church received and approved by the constitution of the present Church Neither is this therfore in the liberty of the Church to alter both because the Antiquity and Universality of it doth prov it to be Apostolicall and also because the originall of this custome may in a certain sence be said to be Divine This originall is the analogie and proportion which holdeth between the Sacraments of the old Testament and the
not unfitly termed Beleevers because they are born within the Profession of Christianity As also the Infants of Pagans are justly accounted Infidels because they are born in the Profession of infidelity And if Saint Paul had disputed the cause I doubt not but as he said of Levi that in Abraham he paid tithes to Melchisedec so he would have said that the seed of the faithfull do in their Parents profess the faith of Christ Add this that this virtuall profession is actuated by the promise of the Sureties and Parents at Baptism And this is the answer of our Church to the former objection And it is plain that that Ab-renunciation is the profession of Repentance in the name of the child so also the Recitation of the Articles a profession of Faith and reputed his according to that well known saying of Saint Austin peccavit in alio credit in alio as his offence so his profession is the act of another but his by Imputation Yea but saith the Anabaptist this is the blasphemous Invention of Pope Higinius where mark I pray you the spirit of Envy and Detraction that can speak well of nothing that is not framed in the modell of his own brain Higinius is said indeed to have appointed Godfathers and Godmothers But the Interrogatories in Baptism were yet more ancient might be the sponsion and profession of Parents in behalf of their children in use long before Higinius The profession of faith as it appeareth by records was at the first direct and plain by recitation of the Creed and forms of Confession Afterward it seemeth that for help of memory to provide a remedy against bashfulness that which the party repeated was put into questions propounded by the Minister and answered briefly as now the form is by the party And what the Men grown answered by themselvs the same did Parents for their children before the time of Higinius But why doth his blackmouth call this custome blasphemous why calls he Higinius by the name of Pope had it not bin enough to have stiled this custome of Interrogatories in Baptism answered by deputed Sureties to have stiled it I say as some others do ridiculous and unreasonable had it not been enough to have stiled this Higinius Bishop of Rome as he was indeed but he must call him Pope But this is the vehemency of the Anabaptisticall spirit to lay on load of rayling words when there wanteth weight of solid reason By the Anabaptists own confession the custome is very ancient for Higinius was the eighth Bishop of Rome lived in the year of Grace 150. long before the Pope was bred and born ever since when it hath continued in the Church Boniface in his Epistle to Saint Augustin seemeth to acknowledg that in his dayes it had Antiquity only to plead for the continuance But neither he nor any since till of late years counted it ridiculous much less blasphemous But passe we over the bitterness of words examine the matter Why should Infants be catechised and asked for a profession of their faith Answer out of Lombard and Bonadventure that it is done not for their instruction but for their obligation not as if the Infant should therby be taught but that therby he may be bound to the profession of Religon So that this is the meaning of the words I forsake I beleev that is I bind my self to do these hereafter And this interpretation I preferr before others as being more reasonable and more agreeable to that which our Church doth resolv upon for the Minister speaking to the Sureties saith This Infant must promise and afterward hath promised In the Catechism they did promise and vow and again they did promise and vow them both in their names Hence the Church doth stile Godfathers and Godmothers not by the new-fangled name of Witnesses but Sureties which doth intimate an obligation the which is so much the more apparent to be the intent of our Church because that in private Baptisms where there is a present expectation of death neither are these interrogatories used nor sureties appointed By all which it is manifest that this is the sense and meaning of interrogatories in the judgment of our Church which Lombard and Bonaventure do give and confirm out of Dyonisius Hard it may seem and harsh I grant thus to explain these phrases which being of the present tense are strained to the future but he is over-squeamish which will not bear with the harshness of a speech when the explication of it given cannot be rejected To shut up this point since partly in their propagation partly by their Sureties a profession of Repentance and Faith is made the want of actuall profession is no barr to hinder infants from the Sacrament of Baptism The second thing objected is this that there is no more reason why children should be admitted to Baptism than to the Lords Supper in as much as if the profession of faith made by Sureties may admit them to the one Sacrament it may also qualifie them for the other True indeed so it might if this were all that were required but there is much difference betwixt the two Sacraments and so divers reasons why infants may be admitted to the one and not to the other Baptism is for Admission and Regeneration the Lords Supper for Confirmation and Preservation they are fit to receiv the beginnings â—hat as yet are not fit to receiv the ending and consummation Baptism requireth no Sacramentall actions from the party so doth the Lords Supper in that he is a meer patient in this he must be an agent he must take and eat which the infant cannot do Lastly tho Repentance and Faith be required in the way of qualification to both Sacraments yet to fit a man for the worthy partaking of the Lords Supper other graces and gracious actions are required which are incompatible with the age of infancy To the handling of which I now return having thus fairly rid my hands of these brain-sick and froward spirits the Anabaptists and their Abetters CHAP. XVI Of the Qualification peculiar to the Lords Supper and first of Thankfulness THankfulnes for the Death of Christ is a speciall branch of our Qualification for the right and worthy receiving of the Supper of the Lord for which cause the Church hath put words into the mouth of the Minister that after he hath exhorted the people to Repentance Faith and new-obedience he should add this And above all things you must give most humble and hearty thanks to God the Father Sonn and holy Ghost for the Redemption of the world by the Death and Passion of our Saviour Christ both God and Man And in the Catechism amongst other things touching which a man ought to examin himself before he come to the Lords Supper the Church hath interserted this A thankfull Remembrance of the Death of Christ. Note here 1. A REMEMBRANCE The reason
this form of Administration together with the proper element of Baptism by which even the Priests of the worst times baptised Infants into the true faith of Christ and like a leprous and infectious mother is the present Church of Rome she beareth and bringeth forth sound children but presently hazardeth the infection of them with her milk as it were with deadly poyson That this Element together with the Ceremony and the form of words used in the Administration were all of them ordeined by Christ is so plain by that text Mat. 28. that it cannot be denied thus have we manifested both the Essence and Originall of Baptism CHAP. III. The manifestation of the Essence and Originall of the Lords Supper TOuching this our Church saith that the Element or outward part in the Lords Supper is Bread and Wine which the Lord hath commanded to be received thereby teaching us both the number and names of the Elements and also the Originall of this sign or which is all one the ground of our receiving For the NVMBER of Elements there are two yet not two Sacraments no both make but one Sacrament for which they are joyned together in this sacred action to teach us the full sufficiencie of spirituall nourishment which is in Christ. Corporal nourishment must consist of something moist and something dry and he that partaketh not of both hath not sufficient so here we have both in Christ and therefore need not seek elsewhere The NAMES of these two Elements are Bread and Wine not Flesh and Blood which happly would have carried a greater resemblance of that which is thereby signified lest it might have been impiously thought to have been prepared for Cannibals not for Christians but Bread and Wine which have an excellent proportion and Analogicall Representation of what is here remembred as shall be shewed in the seventh Chapter The ORIGINALL of these Elements and the ground of our receiving is the coÌ„mand of the Lord expressely mentioned by S. Matthew Mark and Luke and out of S. Luke repeated verbatim by S. Paul Whence appeareth the abominable impietie and horrible sacriledge of the present Church of Rome which hath not only appointed new ends and uses of the Sacraments Circumgestation and Adoration which Christ and his Church never did once dream of but also hath deprived the Laity of the Cup altogether And whereas Christ saith drink ye all of this She saith no not all of you but only the Clergie must the rest must be content with their wafer cake for more they get not Object That word Omnes All of you is to be restrained to the Apostles who alone were present Sol And to whom must the other Omnes which tho not expressed is yet understood in the precept of eating to whom I say must that be extended To whom doth Saint Paul direct that Canon Cor. 11.28 Let him eat let him drink Why do they not also take away the Bread from the Laitie as well as the Cup since none but the Apostles were present But to let these bellies passe all that desire the benefit of the Sacraments must know it to be their dutie to eat and drink the Bread and Wine which the Lord hath commanded to be received Ob. But blood was never used for nutrition nay the eating or drinking thereof is directly prohibited Gen. 9.4 and Levit. 7.14 and much more the blood of man why then are these men blamed that forbeare to drink that in its type and figure which manifestly was forbidden to be drunk in its proper substance Sol We are not to depart from the letter of Christs Precept because we cannot untie the knots of humane Curiosity Blood indeed was never lawfully drunk much lesse the blood of man but alwayes shed for expiation and therefore it might to carnall reason seem as incongruous to drink it in its type and figure as it is congruous to eat flesh in its figure which was allowed for the proper food and nourishment of the body yet since Christ hath commanded us to drink that Wine which he himselfe hath called his blood we must do what he biddeth and leav him to stop the mouths of Cavillers when God calls for obedience by the letter of his word we must not stand to ask him the ground and reason of his Commandement Duties belong to us Reasons to God Note that as the Bread accidentally was unlevened that Bread I mean which Christ our Saviour used at the first institution so also the wine in the Cup was not intentionally provided for this new Sacrament our Saviour took such ordinary provision as the custome of the country used in the Passeover happily also the wine that he used was mingled with water it being the custome of the country to dash their wine to prevent Drunkennesse which things are fit to be noted lest we should place any superstition in the imitation or not imitation of those things whih were but accidentall The Catholick Church hath appointed Wine to be used yet indulgence was granted to the Norwegians to use other drinks The reformed Churches some of them put leaven into the bread some of them banish water out of the wine And in these things tho the text of Scripture impose no necessity but leav a liberty yet is it fitting that men should in conscience use their liberty according to the Canons and Constitutions of the Church CHAP. IV. The inward Grace signified by the outward Elements THE Sign in either of these two Sacraments as we have heard is externall and visible now what is signified by these Elements cometh to be enquired this is called a Grace and it is said to be inward and spirituall Particularly the inward part and thing sâ—gnified by the Bread and Wine saith our Church is the body and blood of Christ by the bread is signified the Body and by the wine the Blood both which being found in Christ do set forth the truth of his Humanity but being considered in their separation that is as separated really one from the other they do set forth the truth of Christs death A reall separation of the blood from the body is here in the Sacrament represented and set forth in the locall distance of the two Elements the bread in one vessell by it selfe the wine in another by it selfe for which cause the Elements ought not to be mingled together The Elements are bread and wine Not a sopp because not the blood of Christ while it was running in the veins but when it was shed upon the ground is signified in the Sacrament so much is plain out of the words of our blessed Saviour touching the Cup This is my blood of the new Testament which is shed for many plain also it is out of the speciall end of the Institution of this Sacrament which saith our Church out of Saint Paul is for a continuall remembrance of the death of Christ c. But of this hereafter Now
full nature of a Sacrament which serveth not only to represent but instrumentally to convey Christ and all his benefits So that well may the Church determine that verely and indeed Christ is present and consequently verely and indeed taken yet after an heavenly manner and received of the faithfull in the Sacrament Verily tho not carnally Really tho not corporally but spiritually in in the Sacrament that is in the exercise of that sacred action not otherwise Provided also that we understand this efficacy of the Sacraments to have place in them only qui sibi non ponunt obicem as the School speaketh which do not barr themselvs or to speak more plainly in the phrase of the Church only in the faithfull But of this herafter viz. cap. 11. CHAP. VII The speciall End of either Sacrament THE speciall end of Baptism is to communicate unto us the blood of Christ for washing the soul from the guilt of sinn and consequently our Admission into the Covenant of Grace The speciall end of the Lords Supper to communicate the body and blood of Christ for feeding and nourishing the soul unto eternall life and consequently our Confirmation in grace and holiness Hence we have the ground of that choice of Elements which our blessed Saviour made viz. not meerly the analogy which is betwixt the sign and the signified but also the excellency and exquisitness of that analogy and proportion In Baptism water is used and none other liquor because none other so proper for washing none other doth wash so clean as doth water and therfore none other so fit to signifie the blood of Christ which cleanseth the soul from all sinn In the Lords Supper bread and wine is used to represent the body and blood of Christ and see I pray you the excellent proportion that is betwixt them specially in the effects bread and wine nourish the body nothing better the body and blood of Christ nourish the soul nothing better yea nothing else So also in the manner of their preparation The bread is made a food for the body of many grains of corn bruised and baked the wine of Grapes trodden and pressed So the Body and blood of Christ became our spirituall food by being bruised and broken upon the Crosse Add this bread and wine do no good nay much harm except the stomack be prepared to digest them nor doth this spirituall food profit the soul nay it doth much hurt to the soul except the soul be worthily prepared BAPTISM is the Sacrament of our Admission nor is there any other ceremony or rite of admitting any into the Covenant of grace but only by Baptism The Church of Israel was admitted by Circumcision But since the time of Christ which we call the time of the new Testament all that will be admitted must be baptised hence that of our Saviour to Nicodemus Except a man be born of water and the spirit c. that is except by submitting himself to Baptism he do receiv the Spirit he cannot enter into the Kingdome of heaven for which cause when he sent forth his Apostles he gave them charge to joyn Baptism with their teaching Goe teach and baptise Matt. 28. The Persons that have right of admission are as of old Beleevers and their children The Ceremony of Admission is altered but still as the Covenant is the same so the parties are the same beleevers and their children this is plain Act. 2.39 You and your children By beleevers we understand such as are converted to the faith Converts and Proselites these have right of Admission because faith is the condition of the new Covenant Mar. 16.16 and Iohn 3.16 You will happily say to me that if they beleev they are already in the Covenant partakers of it by faith and therfore need no further admission yes they are not compleatly within the Covenant till baptised Faith giveth them title and interest but the Sacrament admission Add this that it is one part of their faith to beleev the necessity of the Sacrament as a means to give them full possession of Christ And this doth cause them to seek for it in the Sacrament Children of Beleevers also have a right of Admission becaus they are part of their Parents and heirs of the promise due to their Fathers The faith of the parent intitleth the child unto the Covenant so much the more unjustly do the Anabaptists deal with beleevers and their children in shutting Infants out from Baptism thus questioning that ancient and long approved custome of the Church in all ages ever since Christ and his Apostles Traditions Apostolicall are authenticall and not to be refused because not written if found to be Apostolicall Apostolicall customs mentioned in the Scripture have a more unquestioned certainty than traditions but not greater authority Neither is this to set up Tradition as do the Papists to the prejudice of the Scripture because we admit none as Apostolicall which either are contrarie to the customes mentioned in the Scripture or which may not be confirmed as reasonable from the Scripture And such is the custome of baptising Infants which thus we confirm against the fore-mentioned Sectaries The infants of Christians are as capable of present Incorporation into Christ and Admission into the Covenant of grace as were the Infants of the Jews and if so which we prov out of Cor. 7.14 who shall barr them whom God hath not barred If not then hath not grace abounded in the new Testament but is rather shortned in comparison of the old as being restrained only to the Parent wheras before Infants also were comprehended and admitted The strength of this argument will appear more fully by taking away the cavills which they make against it Object 1. That text of Cor. 7.14 sheweth indeed that children are holy but how As the wife not otherwise viz. as she is sanctified to the use of her husband so the children to the use of their Parents Thus they but they falsifie the text for the text saith not of the children as it doth of the wife 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is sanctified but they are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 holy which is more emphaticall neither doth the text speaking of the wife say she is sanctified to the husband but in or by the husband Nor is the text to be understood of the legitimation but of the sanctification of the bedd namely of federall sanctification or the holiness of the Covenant for it appeareth that the pretence of them that repudiated their wives was a fear lest the infidelity of the wife should deprive the husband of the covenant of grace which he had imbraced Saint Paul denyeth this and sheweth that rather the faith of the Beleevers should so farr prevail as to draw the other after a sort within the Covenant his reason is because the children of such are holy that is heirs of the Covenant Now I pray you mark well
suppose that one of the Corinthians should have been so wilfull as to deny this medium this argument of Saint Paul what is there to confirm the argument and to convince the gainsayer but only the practice of Infants-baptism this must of necessity be here presupposed else doth the Argument fall to the ground and overthrow it self 2. Object Circumcision was but a seal of the old Covenant even the law which was made to Abraham and to his children after the flesh this fleshie covenant had a seal in the flesh viz. Circumsion but what is this to the covenant of Grace touching life and salvation which is made only with beleevers thus the Anabaptist to the end he may elude the argument drawn from the Circumcision of Infants and wheras the text of Saint Paul doth directly cross this his base esteem of circumcision honouring it with that worthy title A seal of the righteousness of faith The Anabaptist expoundeth it thus A seal of his faith not in the Messiah but in that promise That he should be the father of the faithfull Wherin he bewrayeth a twofold ignorance First in disjoyning these two viz. his faith in the Messiah and his faith in the promise which are subordinate For in Gen. 12.1.4 divers promises are made to Abraham to wit of the land of Canaan of a numerous off-spring of the Messiah in whom all nations should be blessed these doth Saint Paul in Rom. 4.13 joyn in one and calleth it the promise that he should be the heir of the world Of these three the first and second only are mentioned Gen. 15. but questionless the third included and ratified by a formall Covenant to Abraham who beleeved and was thereupon justified Afterward in Gen. 17. the second alone mentioned but questionless the other included and all ratified by the Sacrament of Circumcision which was to him the seal of the righteousness of faith which Abraham had before he was circumcised That all are included in both places tho not all mentioned may yet further appear by this that in Gen. 22. when God would lastly manifest how his covenants and seals had built up Abraham in faith by that sore triall they are again all three repeated his faith accepted and commended This did not or would not the Anabaptist receiv but disjoyneth those which should be conjoyned as being all apprehended by the same faith Another part of his ignorance is the misinterpretation of that phrase The righteousness of faith A phrase twice used in that fourth chapter equivalent to and therfore to be expounded by that phrase The righteousness which is by faith and that also the righteousness of God Rom. 10.3 Both which are joyned in one Rom. 3.22 The righteousness of God which is by faith which betokeneth not the Essentiall righteousness of God but the benefit of justification or imputed righteousness which he bestoweth on beleevers for their justification This benefit God having bestowed upon Abraham did seal it up to him afterward by circumcision which is therfore called not the seal of his faith as the Anabaptist speaketh full ignorantly but the seal of the righteousness that is of justification which commeth by faith and not by works We conclude therfore that infants of beleevers may be lawfully baptised that by Baptism they may be admitted into the covenant of grace Nay inasmuch as Baptism is the Sacrament of admission and no time fitter to incorporate the buds of Christians into Christ than while they are buds that so betimes grace may prevent the growth of naturall corruption Infancy is the fittest time for Baptism nay the only time in the successive ages of the Church So far is God from barring infants from Baptism that he may rather seem to have allotted them to it and it to them We conclude also touching Baptism that it doth not only admit the baptised into the roll of Christians this indeed is done in Baptism wherupon there is a necessity of witnesses and a conveniencie of publike administration but this is not all it is also an admission into the Covenant of grace here is the ground of Assurance that they are indeed within the Covenant and to be dealt withall by the ministerie as men in covenant with God The LORDS SUPPER is the Sacrament of our preservation and confirmation in the covenant of grace Not enough that men be born living and lively except a care be had of their preservation so in the case of spirituall life not enough that we be admitted into the covenant of grace except we be confirmed in grace we may lose our former hopes of future glorie to begin in the spirit doth not profit them who end in the flesh For which cause as the Scripture is full of exhortations to constancy and perseverance to make our calling and election sure So hath God ordained also a Sacrament for our preservation and certain confirmation in grace and holiness This is to us the tree of life and immortality here is provided for us that bread of life of which who so eateth shall live for ever here is that true Nectar and Ambrosia which doth continually renew the youth and the strength of the spirit of grace within us But of this more when we come to the benefits Now let this only be added That this Sacrament being ordained for this end it will hence follow that all those are to be barred from this Sacrament which without breach of charity may be thought as yet not admitted into the covenant of grace Such I count all persons unbaptized these must be sent first to the Laver of Regeneration before they be admitted to this Sacrament of confirmation In vain is food sought where there is no life This also must be thought upon by them that address themselves to this Sacrament This Sacrament was ordained to this end Do I propound the same end to my self in my partaking if not what good can I expect thence Should I propound to my self another end than that which God hath propounded Is then mine end to gain my confirmation in the state of Grace Doth not preservation presuppose admission and initiation How doth it appear to me further than by Register that I have been incorporated into Christ What fruits of my Baptism do I find and feel in my self Were I unbaptised in the flesh the Church would barr me shall I not barr my self till I find and feel my soul baptised with the blood of Christ Such meditations as these would help to dispose the soul and fit it for the Sacrament and for the benefits This is the next thing that we are to speak of CHAP. VIII The Benefits of Baptism THe Church in the book of Articles doth thus explain her self touching this particular That by Baptism as by an instrument the promises of Remission and of our Adoption to be the sonns of God by the holy Ghost are visibly sealed faith is confirmed and grace increased In the second