feastes of charity And this tradition was receaued of the Ethnicks but somewhat reformed and in better order For the Ethnicks also gaue theyr feasâ—es in the Churches at theyr byrth dayes and burial dayes and afterwardes the Nicene councel and others for bad this pompe at the byrth dayes Therefore like as of the rest I haue declared so heere the testimonies historical in Tertullian doo profit what the former churche did thinke But as for his interpretations and disputations let them not be receaued for good doctrine except so far as they agree with the wryting of the apostles Of Cyprian Cyprian liued about the yeere of our Lorde 275. Hee conteineth profitable testimonies as touching the Trinity as touching baptising of infantes of the vse of the Lordes Supper and of the maner in choosing of Bishops which hee wryteth are to bee elected by them of autority in the church and that the same election is to bee ratified by certaine other bishops dwelling neare vntoo that place which are to be adioyned But the auncient fathers did reproue Cyprian that hee thinketh such are too bee againe baptised of the Heretikes which haue bene once already baptised As he declameth herevppon now and then hee layeth out absurde and corrupt opinions when hee dooth exagerate or amplify with immoderate and superfluous speeches the cause hee taketh in hande as hee wryteth very sharply of Canonicall punishements hee sayeth Absolution of sinnes is not auayleable except those paynes or punishements bee firste performed This saying howe greate inconuenience it hath it is manifest Also hee dooth very vehemently dispute of single life although hee dooth mitigate that place he biddeth those persons contract marriages which haue made their vowes yea if they keepe not promise In his litle booke of Almes hee saith that those sinnes which were committed before baptisme are by meanes of Christes passion forgiuen but hee saieth that after baptisme forgiuenesse of those sinnes then committed must bee sought for and obtained by almose deedes The same man dooth affirme touching such as slyde away from the Church that the benefite of Christe which came by baptisme is vtterly lost But afterwards that remission of sinnes is to be sought for by almose deedes These things are ful of absurdity whereof he being admonished no doubt woulde haue reformed himself Therfore not al his sayinges are to hereputed taken for good doctrine As touching the Lordes Supper hee is wont too vse the woordes of Oblation and Sacrifice lyke as the other wryters before did which say confusedly Wee offer prayers wee offer bread wyne wee offer the body and blood of Christ For that is also founde in Cyprian Heere vpon our aduersaries take their Testimonies too defende the prophanation of the Lordes Supper in their priuate Masse c. Greate is the force of custome and men imitating this doo oftentymes speake improperly As nowe wee cal it the Masse where neuer any man knewe the right sense or meaning of that name So the auncient fathers retained the speeches of oblation and sacrifice not very wel regarding the Etymology or proper signification thereof And bycause Augustyne sawe there was some discommodity in those names hee somwhat mitigateth the same thee sayeth That it is called Sacrifice for the remembrance of the thing Sacrificed and Oblation for the memory of the Oblation These are Metonymiae or figures of denomination as we say the passeouer for the memory or the signe of the passing ouer But I wil not heere subtilly either interprete vpoÌ„ or excuse the vsed phrase of speech in that age For indeede so did the people speake which nowe and then receaued an vnapt phrase of speeche Irenaeus plainly declareth That this oblation is a thankesgiuing The same did others thinke also as the name of the Eucharist or thankesgiuing or supper of the Lorde doth testify wherefore they thought it was a ceremony whereby thankes are giuen That hath no inconuenience in it at al. For we receaue it to the end that we may therby be admonished of the benefit giuen vs by Christ that we may stirre vp and increase our faith thereby furthermore that wee may giue thankes for that benefite Neither doth it therevppon followe That that woorke is to bee doone for others or too bee applyed for others c. These monsters truely were not once thought vppon by the fathers Therefore when wee reade the name of Sacrifice and oblation let vs vnderstande it eyther for a signe of the Sacrifice and oblation or for a thanksgiuing Let vs not imagine that it may be applyed for any others Nowe and then in one woorde they cal oblation all that buysinesse which is there in hande That is too say Prayers and the supper of the Lorde This when it happeneth than are Prayers too bee vnderstoode for oblations Also there are certaine woordes read in Cyprian concerning the dead which the later wryters doo wrest contrary to good meaning Wee offer Sacrifices for them But these thinges hee speaketh as touching Martyrs For of them there was mention made in Prayers when thankes were giuen vnto God that hee had assisted them As the Greeke canon sayeth Wee offer for the Patriarkes Prophetes Apostles that is wee doo giue thee thankes that thou hast chosen thy church vnto thee eueÌ„ from the beginning that thou hast redeemed sanctified c. This was the meaning of those words at the beginning they did not require of God that hee would â— mitigatâ— the paines of those which were dead Afterwards in tyme there hapned euil opinions and the former woordes were partly chaunged partly they of the latter age retayning the forme of those woordes vnderstood yet an otherthing than they of the former age did Ergo the testimonies of antiquity doo not maintaine or defende later abuses which are partly straunge and contrary vnto the state of the tyme present partly if in them they haue any faulte they ought not too be obiected vntoo the firme testimonies of the scripture bycause other ages had also their discommodities These thinges most simply without subtil cautilation doo I aunswere touching the wordes of Oblation and Sacrifice Of Basilius In Basilius there are profitable testimonies of the Trinity and of Repentaunce against Nouatus In his sermon of Humility hee setteth downe an excellent opinion touching righteousnes of fayth which doth manifestly defend vs. Hee plucketh away iustification of good workes without subtil cauillation therevppon neither speaketh he of things ceremoniâ—â— but of al vertues neither speaketh he only of works before reuocatioÌ„ but of the vertues in them which be renewed and hee biddes vs beleue that onely by confidence in the mercy for Christs sake promised we are iust and not otherwayes His wordes are these And the Apostle sayth 1. Cor. 1. He that reioyceth let him reioyce in the Lord saying that Christ is made for vs wisdom froÌ„ God righteousnes sanctification redeÌ„ption that as it is
Neither doth the cannon of Basilius containe this oblation but after this I will speake more concerning the Lords Supper These things onely haue I added too the ende I might declare how that in tymes paste the auncient writers now then haue borrowed incoÌ„uenient speeches of the people as it is wont to happen in all ages Somtimes they are ouercome with iudgments examples of the multitude w c is not godly that they bee drawen into superstitious by some humane imagination As in the Nicen CouÌ„cel except Paphnutlus alone had w tstood the same the opinion of them had beene allowed for good w c woulde haue made a decree that priests shuld abstain froÌ„ their wiues So did custome ouercome Cyprian and many others insomuch that they did allowe the forbidding of marriage Also the whole Nicene Councel beyng ouercome with the agreement of a multitude or of time ratified the Canons of penaunce which afterwardes brought foorth intollerable erroures Examples also of greate personages doe oftentimes deceaue the Godly Like as the example of Antonius caused many too erre Hitherto haue I spoken of the godly which although they bee holy yet notwithstanding very many of them are weake Nowe will I proceede further touching those which doe transgresse Sometimes the Godly doe vtterly transgresse and lose the holy Ghost as I do iudge that Origen did vtterly fall especially if hee affirmed those moÌ„struous errours That there shoulde be innumerable worldes That the very Diuels at the last day shoulde be saued Tertullian also doth vngodly disallowe the seconde marriages but peraduenture they haue afterwardes repented For many hauing fallen in deede both in life and doctrine haue and yet at length doe amende And very oftentimes doth it happen that holy men doe thorowly fall and doe not iudge according too the worde and spirituall light but are deceaued by the imagination of reason which notwithstanding afterwardes doe better aduise themselues Like as Gedeon altogether traÌ„sgressed when by mans aduise and counsell he ordayned straunge kindes of woorshipping God Of all these followeth this conclusion although the true Church which is but small in number retaine the articles of the faith yet notwithstanding the same true Churche may haue her faults obscuring the articles of the fayth Furthermore many doe so fall that they altogether allowe and ratifie wicked errors against the articles of the faith although peraduenture som of them do afterwards ameÌ„d First therefore when the autority of the Church is alleadged wee must searche whether it be the consent of the true Church agreeyng with the worde of God Secondly it is so to be saide that the writers which are extant haue oftentimes fallen and peraduenture some of them were no members of the Church at all Thirdly an other Difference is too bee added In that societie which is called the Churche there is a greate number of vngodly persons of whome many excel the others in autority outward shewe of religion opinioÌ„ of doctrine such as were the people of Iuda in the tyme of Hieremy the Bishoppes wicked priests that alledged against Hieremy the autority of the seate of the lawe the very promises affirming that the lawe shoulde not perishe from the Priestes they denyed that their congregation coulde erre when notwithstanding they did altogither erre and disgereede in matters from Hieremy Also in Christes tyme there were very fewe godly persons namely Zacharias and Symeon Furthermore when the vngodly multitude hath autority in the Churche it ordaineth many false and wicked thinges in the name and vnder the title of the Churche Such alyke multitude firste embraced the application of Masses for the quicke and dead moreouer the estimation of vowes and woorshipping of Sainctes afterwardes the very example of these thinges did hurt the godly And such a multitude decreede in a certaine Synode that marriages of Priestes shoulde vtterly be taken away For it oftentymes comes too passe in the churche that vngodly persons of excellent wittes boldly challenge vnto themselues the ordinance of religion by mans wisedome who when they bee not mooued or affected by the woorde of God but are led therevntoo by the imagination of reason and seeke for apte opinions for their purposes do breede wicked errors lyke as Samosatenus Arius and Pelagius Others seeke to establish merites or seeke for fayre kinde of gouernement good ordering of the people and with these causes are mooued to the institution heaping vppe of sundry ceremonies as the Monks do as Gregory did and as at this day the Popes bishops Princes many learned meÌ„ desiring to ordain a forme of the church are mooued with mans wisedome reiecting the word of God wil establish a church according to their owne imaginations neither doo they see it is a horrible impiety to slide away froÌ„ the word of God to seeke god without his word to ordaine meanes maner of worshipping god by maÌ„s opinioÌ„ without the expres coÌ„maundement of god to chauÌ„ge the true opinions oppresse the purity of gods word When therefore the autority of the Churche is obiected vntoo vs as of the application of Masses the church doth not erre The Churche hath thus many ages vsed Masses Therfore this custome is to bee obserued We must answer vnto the Maior The vniuersal churche which is the multitude of them that gouerne in the church may erre as the Bishops and Priests in Hieremies time in Christs time did alsâ—â—rre And although besides that number there are some godly persons which retaine still the Articles of the faith Notwithstanding euen they beeyng moued with examples doe 〈◊〉 yeelde vnto certaine erroures whereby it comes to passe that they retayne the same articles of faith lesse pure then they ought too doe Like as Bernarde is seene too haue had better iudgement then others although yet hee yeelded and condiscended vnto many errors to the abuses of Masses too the Popes power too vowes and woorshippings of Saintes Therefore the autority of the multitude is not at all to be alleadged against the worde of God But we must returne to the rule If anie man teach any other Gospel let him bee holden accursed Gal. 1. Let the chiefe autority â—e of the worde deliuered by God Afterwards that is to be reputed the church which agreeeth with that worde as Christ saith My sheep heare my voyce Iohn 10. and Sainte Augustine sayeth The question is Where the Churche doeth consist What shall wee then doe Shall wee seeke the same in our woordes or in the woordes of the chiefe head thereof our Lorde Iesus Christe I thinke thâ—â— wee ought too seeke the Churche in his woordes who is the trueth and 〈…〉 â—est his owne body But heere obiection is made if the autoritie of the Church bee refused â—henis graunted too much and 〈◊〉 large liberty vnto the malaperâ—nesse of mens inuentions For
traditions and opinions touching the wil of God neither retaine they the worde and ordinance wherwith god hath manifested his wil towardes vs. Themselues beeing blinde too seeke after God by other meanes For it is manifest that Christe himself neuer deliuered the Sacrament to haue it applyed for the dead For what meÌ„tioÌ„ is there made of the dead Hee bids vs Celebrate his supper that wee may haue in remembraunce his death benefits Are the dead theÌ„ present with vs too remember these with vs But I will briefly adde vnto these other reasons also The secoÌ„d reason this sentence to â—rue assured which by no meanes may be 〈◊〉 or denyed The iust man liueth by his fayth Abac. 2. Wherefore it is needeful that in our life tyme wee do receaue forgiuenesse of our sinnes at Gods handes And it is impossible that forgiuenesse of sinnes shoulde bee graunted too any person by or for any kind of worke doone or sacrifice offered by any Priest Causes obscure and doubtfull require long disputations This error touching oblation is refuced by so euident and firme argumentes that they require not at all any long declaration The doctrine touching forgiuenesse of sinnes is certaine and manifest No man may haue remisiion of sinnes except by his owne faith hee receaue the same This opinion if any man go about too take away hee dooth then blaspheme and iniury Christ himselfe Ergo they blaspheme and iniury Christe which do feigne that the same oblation can deserue remission of sinnes for the dead The thirde reason the vse of the Sacrament only proffiteth them which vsing the same doo remember the death and benefites of Christe Ergo it is impossible that this woorke shoulde profit them that are dead which neither vse the same themselues nor doo make any remembraunce of the death of Christ The antecedent is manifest by the institution of Christe bycause hee biddeth vs celebrate this mystery in remembrance of him And wee ought not by Imagining too adde any thing vnto the institution of Christ if any man imagine moe thinges if any man transferre the same vnto the dead he doth wickedly defile the institution of Christ The fourth reason The scripture sayeth manifestly Blessed are the dead which dye in the Lorde Rom. 8. The body dyeth bycause of sinne but the spirite is life for righteousnes sakeâ— that is they that are iustified in the spirite so long as they cary about them this body where in are as yet the remnauntes of sinne they are afflicted in diuers manners too the ende that by calling vppon God fayth knowledge of GOD and spiritual newnes of lyfe might more and more increase in them But the body being once dead the remnauntes of sinne are abolished And Paule sayth manifestly That the spirite liueth for righteousnes sake That life of the spirite iustified is not feare or feeling of Gods wrath But is ioy in the holy Ghost as Paule sayeth Rom. 15. Therfore there are no paines of Purgatory Christ saide vnto the conuerted theefe This day thou shalt bee with mee in Paradyse that is in a peaceable and blessed life and not in paynes or horrour Therefore the Soules of the iust doe not goe downe too tormentes but ascende vp vnto spirituall ioy and peace In this life the godly are still exercised with horrible afflictions bycause GOD by a woonderfull determination wil haue his Churche Subiecte vntoo the crosse and too taste such afflictions as Christe hymselfe did So Adam Isaack Iacob Ioseph Dauid Esayas Hieremias Iohn Baptist and others the lightes of the Churche were in calamities and perplexities the greatenesse whereof no man can declare Therefore Peter sayeth Humble your selues vnder the mighty hande of God 1. Pet. 5. For although suche are the afflictions which the Godlye suffer in this life whyle they are in the flesh yet notwithstanding this after they be once dead why is it sayed that there are suche punishments For as muche as these afflictions are by GOD preordayned too acknowledge the remnaunte of sinnes in the fleshe and to worke repentaunce of sinnes euen in this life But after death there is then no place of repentaunce Like as Paule playnelie affirmeth 2. Cor 5. Euery one shall carry with him those thinges which he hath done in the body And the Psalmes doe also teache vs this moreouer The dead shall not prayse thee Lorde Againe Bicause ther is none is death which shal remeÌ„ber thee 112. Therfore it caÌ„not bee affirmed that any after death are yet tormented to the end they might repent them of their sinnes If our Aduersaryes doe say That those tormentes are not therefore layed vppon them that thereby repentaunce might grow but that they shoulde bee as satisfactions for sinnes here committed this opinioÌ„ is a great deale more too be refused For the doctrine of Satisfactions which the Sentenciaries haue deuised is both false and vngodly And truely very many lyes false imaginations haue byn heaped togeather into those disputations euen as it were into a sinkehole and filthy puddle namely of Purgatory of vowes of oblatioÌ„ for the dead many others Seing therfore that purgatory as they cal it caÌ„not be affirmed it is a kind of vngodlines so to institute an oblatioÌ„ to deliuer y e dead out of torments Although yet if there were any purgatory yet coulde not the supper of the Lorde be transferred for the dead But why doe I here dispute The firste mention of Purgatory began of sightes or visions and afterwardes for lucre sake was coÌ„firmed and is now defended and mayntayned of the Popes Cardinalles Byshoppes and Chanons which are manifest Epicures and with great security doe contemne the iudgement of God And whatsoeuer touching punishmentes after death suche persons reade they accept them as Poets fables of Ixion Sisiphus Tantalus or suche like and doe deride the foolishnes of others which affirme that God hath appoynted euerlasting punishmentes for the wicked At this preseÌ„t therfore I let passe any further to dispute The Grecians exhibited vp an oratioÌ„ touching Purgatory at the Councel of Basil w c oration at this day is extant in the Library of Phortia wherin they dispute tuching that place of S. Paule 1. Cor. 3. Which place the latter age hath wrested to confirme purgatorie Whereas it is manifest that the same place intreteth vpon repentance namely Hee shall bee saued so yet as it were by fire 1. Cor. 3. Ergo he woulde that the offender shoulde be corrected or amended by repeÌ„taunce Wherefore hee speaketh touching this present life wherein is the place of repentance Surely it is true that is sayde The Speech of trueth is simple and playne When Paule speaketh of repentaunce this place caÌ„not be wrested to the paynes or tormentes after death Touching that place in the booke of the Machabees there is also a moste playne aunsweare The trueth is not the more corrupted by the errours of thinges done
to be gouerned and preserued not by ordinary succession S. Paule doth witnesse the same Ephes 4. Hee hath giuen giftes vnto men that the Apostles Prophets c For hee teacheth that that is properly the Church wherein Christ is effectuall woorker and giueth true Teachers Therefore when as the name of the Church and the authoritie thereof is obiected vnto vs Let vs first consider whether mention bee made of the true Churche eyther els of the multitude of Bishops and the politique succession thereof neyther let vs suffer our selues to be terrified or discouraged from the worde of God vnder a false pretence of the name of the Church Secondly after that wee haue declared which is the true Churche let vs nowe adde therevnto that this true Church which is but small and a cōpany of holy ones doth retein the true doctrine of the Gospel or the articles of the faith like as S. Paule calleth the same The seate of trueth But this selfe same true church hath her doctrine sometime more and sometime lesse pure manifest She hath also in her many weake and feeble members as the Apostles were the church but yet they vnderstood not before the resurrectiō of Christ what should bee the kingdome of Christ For Peter after the holy Ghoste was geuen did yet suppose that the rites and ceremonies of the lawe was needefull to be vsed but when he was admonished frō heauen he then knew that the kingdome of Christ was not a Iudaicall pollicy but spirituall and continual woorshipping of God Afterwards whē the Apostles begā to prech there did shine in thē a pure cleare doctrine yet notwithstāding in mean seasō there were many weake mēbers w c albeit they were true mēbers of the church held stil amōgst them the articles of the faith yet they added herevnto some error as they which obserued the ceremonies of the law did not sufficiently well vnderstand the abrogation of the law what was the true worshipping of God This was no small error brought in with it some obscurity to the articles of the faith so did christ foreshew as touching the churche in the latter age that there should happen great darknes which shoulde hinder the very electe ones of God Whereby they shoulde the lesse inioy amongst them the true doctrine Therfore yet remaineth the true Church in some place w c retaineth the articles of y e faith but now thē lesse pure obscured with some hurtful opinions which haue some error in thē And as yet I speake of the true members of the church of the holy ones not of others w c hauing lost the light of the word do leese y e holy Ghost follow the iudgment of reason when they thinke that they deliuer very godly things they yet say cleane cōtrary things and vngodly Like as euē at this day also ther are excellently learned of good conuersation and outwarde shewe of holinesse which seeme to themselues to speake most holy thinges when in deede they are farre of from the true light that is from the true vnderstanding of the worde of God Concerning such persons I speake not as yet but I onely make mention of the true members of the Churche which for the more parte are weake and infirme So therefore saith Saint Paule 1. Cor. 3. No man can lay any other foundation then that which is already layde But some man buildeth vpon it Golde other wood and other straw or stubble c. By the foundation he meaneth The Articles of the faith that is to say the whole summe and scope of Christian doctrine and the doctrine of Christes benefites but hereunto saith be some shall adde profitable doctrine and interpretation and true spirituall honouring of God and these he calleth Golde Some other shall adde straw and stubble that is hurtful opinions and which are infected with some erroures Like as in the first age of the world ther were ordained ceremonies which brought with them false opinions As I do iudge S. Ambrose to be a true mēber of the Church And yet euen he thus speaketh of the Lent faste Caetera ieiunia sunt voluntatis hoc necessitatis est That is other fastings are voluntary but this is of necessity This opinion of Ambrose is straw stubble added to the doctrine of fayth So Basilius addeth Monkerie as straw and stubble and commendeth this kinde of life with immoderate and false commendations when as in deede hee was therefore reprehended of his owne Bishop Butch at it is no small faulte too ordeine newe woorshippings of God the Scripture warneth vs hereof and this one sentence sufficiently sheweth the same In vaine doe they woorship me with commaundementes of man Matth. 15. It is a grieuous sinne against the first commaundement to ordeine or allow woorshippinges not commaunded by God For the first precepte seeyng of forbiddeth there shoulde be any straunge Gods doth also forbid strange woorshippinges Cyprian vrgeth canonicall punishmentes which then was vsed and hee confirmeth opinions as though they were necessary that by reason of them sinnes might be forgeuen Sometime againe he saith that without thē absolution of sinnes is vnprofitable Peraduenture hee thought more conuenient heerein then he spake Notwithstanding these are no small erroures but very thicke stubble obscuring the doctrine of Christes benefites and of faith which we shoulde haue in him Furthermore oftentimes writers haue writtē more cōmodiously then they haue spoken because for the most part they were very negligent vnperfect in teaching borowed many sentences and methodes of the common people wherein cōsisted some kinde of errors As for example August borroweth the name of satisfactiō frō the vulgar sort yea although he doth openly reprehēd the errors of satisfactions He troubleth himselfe in the interpretation of this sentence that euery sinne is voluntary where he disputed of the sinne originall when notwithstanding the Sentence is a ciuill saying sette downe concerning external offences So cal they the supper of the Lord an oblatiō after the maner of the people whē it is not an oblation but Christ himselfe was the high Priest which offered his owne sacrifice And indeede in times past there was not made in the ceremony of the supper an oblation of the body and blood but before the consecration there was breade offered and other thinges and the Priest saide that he did offer vp prayers and thankesgeuing and all the seruice which was woont there to be done Although therefore the oblation was not vnderstood after one manner yet notwithstanding the name afterwardes was wrested vnto the oblation of the body wherevppon haue ensued great abuses Dionysius in that booke which containeth ceremonies of the Churche when hee doeth diligently describe the order of the Lordes Supper yet doth he not at all make any mention of the oblation of the Lordes body