Selected quad for the lemma: end_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
end_n	law_n	sin_n	transgression_n	1,511	5	10.7998	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A88080	The glorious truth of redemption by Jesus Christ, rescued out of the hand or unrighteousnes. Or the doctrine of redemption rightly stated: wherein, 1. All Arminian and Pelagian glosses and absurdities are refuted. 2. All carnal allegations and reasonings silenc'd. 3. All concern'd scriptures seemingly discording, reconcil'd. 4. The doctrine of redemption clearly held forth, according to the harmony of scripture, and analogie of faith. By W.L.	Levitt, William.	1652 (1652)	Wing L1828; Thomason E681_7; ESTC R206784	25,340	46

only a Temporal Death from that in Gen. 3. 19. Dust thou art and to the Dust thou shalt return But this being as ridiculous as the former I shall not spend much time upon it for certainly all that know any thing of God as they ought know him to be infinite and eternal both in his Essence and Attributes and that the breach of his Law must inevitably procure and deserve eternal wrath which Adam himself had found sure enough had not he by faith laid hold upon Jesus Christ that Tree of Life But that the vanity of this conceit may appear to all men I shall leave them to consider an Argument or two Arg. 1 That which is the portion of the godly as well as wicked of saints as well as sinners cannot be the only punishment of sin But Temporal death is the portion of godly as well as wicked of Saints as well as sinners Ergo Temporal death is not the only reward and punishment of sin Arg. 2 If Temporal death had been the only reward and punishment due to Original sin then Christ need not to have dyed at all to free us from it every man had been then able to pay his owne debt Arg. 1 Where the effects remain the cause is not removed But the effects of Adam's transgression remain to this day Ergo The cause viz. the transgression is not taken away If the guilt of Adam 's transgression be taken away 1. How is it we dy daily especially if this were the only punishment due to it as the opinion saith it is 2. Why do women still travel in pain and sorrow 3. What 's the reason of all diseases aches pains that befal us in this life Do not men still live by labour Doth not the ground naturally produce Thorns and Thistles 4. Whence are all our actual Transgressions Are they not branches of that old stem If the Tree had been digged up by the roots so many thousand yeers ago and cast into the fire surely it would not bring forth fruit so plentifully as by woful experience we see this doth to this day But to pass this also The third opinion being the master-piece about which the curious Artists of our times are so much busied both to prop and paint I shall speak more largely to In the unmasking and refuting whereof the other two must needs fall to the ground viz. That Jesus Christ hath freed all mankinde by his death from the eternal condemnation due to Adam's sin and hath set all men into a state of innocency and integrity The absurdities attending this error are not few it 's a many headed monster the belly whereof is ready to burst with its prodigious propagations some of which I shall lay down by way of Argument as followeth Arg. 1 That exposition that is unreasonable is false But this exposition of Scripture is unreasonable Ergo False Arg. 2 That Doctrine that destroys the harmony of Scripture is false But this Doctrine destroys the harmony of Scripture Ergo False Arg. 3 That Doctrine that is contrary to the analogie of Faith is erroneous But this Doctrine is contrary to the analogie of Faith Ergo Erroneous Arg. 4 That Doctrine that magnifies the creature and vilifies the blood of Christ is false But this Doctrine magnifies the creature and vilifies the blood of Christ Ergo False Arg. 5 That Doctrine that derogates detracts or denies the omnipotency of God is erroneous and blasphemous But this Doctrine detracts from and denies the omnipotency of God Ergo False and blasphemous Arg. 6 That Doctrine that tramples under foot the eternal Decree of God and denies his Soveraignty over the creature is heretical and blasphemous But this Doctrine tramples under foot the eternal Decree of God and denies his Soveraignty over the creature Ergo Heretical and blasphemous Arg. 7 That Doctrine that holds forth salvation by a law of works and not of grace is false But this Doctrine holds forth salvation by a law of works c. Ergo False Arg. 8 That Doctrine that destroys the end of Christs coming in the flesh is erroneous But this Doctrine destroys the end of Christ's coming in the flesh Ergo Erroneous 1. It 's Vnreasonable For 1. Hereby Christ becomes an half Saviour shedding his blood for the Original sin of millions of men that perish in their actual Transgressions Whereas the blood of Christ clenseth from all sin He never purchases half a 1 Iohn 1. 7. pardon for any If any man eat of this Bread he shall live for ever now the bread that Christ gives is his flesh John 6. 51. His Redemption is an everlasting Redemption Heb. 9. 12. 2. Unreasonable to think that Jesus Christ should pay as great a price for those that perish as for his own people for a company of damned wretches preordained to condemnaetion before the world was Will any man give a Jude 4. thousand pounds for a trifle a gewgaw a Bartholomew Baby One drop of Christ's blood being worth a thousand worlds surely he would not shed it to so little purpose 3. Unreasonable For if the end of Christ's death were only to free men from the guilt of Adam's transgression By what means then are the actual sins of the Elect. done away Christ died but once and without shedding of blood there can be no remission Heb. 9. 22. Rom. 6. 10. Heb. 9. 28. If any shall reply the Elect or those that are saved are saved by Faith I grant that but yet give them to know Faith is only instrumental not meritoricus the blood of Christ being the proper object of Faith which if only shed to acquit from Original guilt then our Faith becoms Rom. 3. 35. of no effect Rom. 3. 3. 4. Unreasonable Because then Original sin is pardoned without Faith we know as all little children are uncapable of that grace so thousand thousands of men in the world are destitute of it also yet the Scripture tells us that 2 Thes 3 2 except the blood of Christ be drunk by Faith it cannot profit John 6. 53. 5. Unreasonable Because it derogates from the nature of Christ's blood for whom he pardons he purifies His blood clenseth from all sin therefore it 's impossible for any man to perish for whom his blood is shed for whom he justifies he sanctifies yea and glorifies Rom. 8. 30. 2. It crosses and destroys the harmony of Scripture For 1. The Scripture tells us that no man can receive benefit by the blood of Christ but those that drink it by faith John 6. 53. as meat cannot nourish except we eat it so none can receive either life or strength by the blood or flesh of Jesus Christ that eats and drinks it not by faith 2. That without Faith and Repentance there is no remission Acts 3. 19. 3. That all men are born yea the best are conceived and born in sin as holy Iob and David both confess Iob 15. 14. 25. 4. Psalm 51.

Christ in such places of Scripture upon which they would plead a toleration for their intolerable idleness is that men and women in the use of lawful means should have their dependance upon God and that as Christians should not over-incumber themselves with worldly business so as to neglect the one thing necessary so in the midst of the moderate use of the creature and of their lawful callings they should cast of● all immoderate and inordinate care relying upon God who careth for them for it 's an unwarrantable and extreme presumption and a temptati●n of God by a particular or private interpretation of Scripture to serue such a senseless sense as this For although a man rise early and go late to bed and eat the bread of carefulness all will be but as put into a bottomless bag unless God give a blessing And thus these Scriptures that seem so to thwart one another being comparatively and joyntly considered are really reconcil'd and hold forth one and the same thing John 11. 17. For the Law came by Moses but Grace and Truth by Jesus Christ Rom. 3. 19. What the Law saith it saith to them that are under the Law c. v. 20. By the works of the Law shall no slesh be justified Rom. 7. 6. Now we are delivered from the Law Rom. 10. 4. For Christ is the end of the Law to al● that believe Eph. 2. 15. Having abolished the Law of Commandments Mal. 2. 6. Remember the Law of Moses Mat. 5. 17. 18. Think not that I am come to destroy the Law but to fulfil it v. 19. Till heaven and earth perish one jot or tittle of the Law shall not escape till all be fulfilled v. 20. Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments and teach men so shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven but whosoever shall do and teach them the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven Rom. 7. 12. Wherefore the Law is holy and the Commandment holy and just and good Divers other Scriptures of like concernment Gal. 3. 10. Rom. 7. 46. Gal. 2. 19. 1 Tim. 1. 9. Rom. 16. 14. Gal. 2. 16 21. Gal. 3. 2. 4. 21. ● 3. Eph. 2. 15. Mat. 11. 13. Luke 16. 16. Acts 13. 39. Rom. 3. 28. 4. 13. 15. 7. 4. 9. 32. c. Other Scriptures of like concernment Mat. 15. 3. Mark 12. 30. Rom. 13. 9. Eph. 6. 2. John 2. 4. Mark 10. 17 19. Luke 1. 6. John 14. 21. Acts 28. 23. Rom. 2. 13. 3. 20. Gal 3. 24. James 2. 11. John 1. 3 4. Mat. 19. 16 18 19. Mark 12. 29 30. John 15. 10. 1 Cor. 7. 19. Neh. 10. 29. Rev. 22. 14. 1 John 2. 4. c. These Scriptures and many more of like import not here mentioned being compared one with another hold a sweet and holy harmony one with another nay although each Text were particularly discussed yet being Evangelically interpreted according to the Analogie of Faith would not at all differ Yet men of corrupt minds by sinister and private construction of them draw forth such a sense as may suit their own fancy although they bring them into a direct opposition although such private Interpretations are quite contrary to the Word of God as in 2 Pet. 1. 20. and is cause of not only that old Antinomian but all other heresie and error it 's an old heresie new vampt to say The Law is of no use to Believers now in Gospel times For certainly as the Gospel was of special use to Believers in times of the Law so is the Law of precious use to Believers in Gospel times viz. the Moral Law I wonder of what use the Law of God the ten Commandments given in Mount Sinai were to Abraham Isaac Jacob Noah Job Daniel c. that it is not to every Believer in these days No man thinks they were saved by the works of the Law or expected Justification by the Law but by faith nevertheless it was the rule of their sanctification and obedience it was the way they walked into life although not the cause of life and so it must be to all the godly in Gospel times although not the cause of Justification yet it 's the standing rule of their sanctification obedience and conversation This error ariseth principally from the mis-interpretation of the word Law which is severally in Scripture to be accepted Somtime intending the Ceremonial Law somtime the Judicial somtime the Moral Law somtime the penalty of the Law as Col. 2. 14. Eph. 2. 15 c. there it intends the Ceremonial Law in Acts 23. 3. 1 Tim. 1. 9 10 11. there the Judicial Law and the penalty thereof is intended the Judicial Law being a rule of life in Civil respects none are concern'd in the penalty thereof but evil doers So although the penalty of the Moral Law belongs to none but unbelievers and ungodly wretches yet it 's a rule of life to all even to the most precious people of God It was the comendation of Zachary and Elisabeth that they walked in all the commands of God unreprovably for any man to say the Law is of no use to Believers is I say an old desparate heresie that brings hundreds of Scriptures by the ears which is prevented by an holy humble judicial and impartial comparing one Scripture with another and interpreting one by another It 's confest that the damnatory the domineering nay the justifying power of the Law is abolished as in a legal sense yet evangelically interpreted every Believer is saved by a Law of works as between God the Father and Jesus Christ the mediator of our peace who hath fulfilled the Law for us and therefore salvation is of free grace to us yet withal know this no man shall ever receive benefit by the fulfilling of the Law by Christ that practises not obedience to that very Law for as Jesus Christ was the Angel of the Covenant that conducted Israel to Canaan that appeared in the Bush Exod. 3. 2. Acts 7. 35. the same hath left this lesson to all that love him and will follow him to the heavenly Canaan to keep his Commandments And thus those Scriptures before mentioned although they seem to speak a contrary language are to be reconciled Come we now to those Scriptures that concern the present Controversie which because very many there can be no expectation of a particular account of every or any one of them neither is it my purpose Yet by Gods grace I intend so to ballanee the account as to give in the summa totalls of them all so far as is necessary to the matter in hand according to the holy Spirit that speaks in them 1 Cor. 15. 22. For as in Adam all dy even so in Christ shall all be made alive Rom. 5. 18. Likewise then as by the offence of one the fault came on all men to condemnation so by the justifying of one the benefit abounded to all