Reading should direct as also for giving the said Mr. Bedloe 50 Guinies in Hand and promising him greater Rewards for the Ends and Purposes aforesaid To which he pleaded Not Guilty in Thought Word or Deed. Then the Jurors sworn were Sir John Cutler Joshua Galliard Esq Edward Wilford Esq Thomas Henslow Esq Thomas Earsby Esq John Serle Esq Thomas Casse Esq Rainsf Waterhouse Esq Matthew Bateman Esq VValter Moyle Esq Richard Pagett Esq John Haynes Esq Mr. Reading at first challeng'd Sir John Cutler as being in Commission of Peace and labour'd very much to have made his Challenge good But the Court over-rul'd it in regard Sir John was not in the particular Commission then sitting and for that he could not challenge him peremptorily the Indictment not endangering his Life as it might have been laid but only for a Misdemeanour Thereupon the Court proceeded and the Indictment being read to the Jury Edward VVard Esq of Counsel for the King in this Cause opened it and Sir Creswel Levinz opened the Charge After which Mr. Reading to save time admitting those Publick Passages laid in the Preamble of his Indictment as that Coleman Ireland c. were Executed for Treason and that the Lords in the Tower were accused and impeached in Parliament for this Plot Mr. Bedloe was sworn and deposed That Sir Trevor VVilliams brought him first acquainted with the Prisoner who began with him as a friendly Adviser in publick always pressing him to discover what he knew of the Plot but in private advising him to be cautions and not to run at the whole Herd of Men intimating as if the Ld. Ch. Justice also seemed displeased at his forwardness saying that he would make the Parliament his Friends by proving the Plot the King his Friend in not charging all the Lords and the Lords his Friends by being kind to them That the Persons Mr. Reading most sollicited for were the Lords Petre Powis and Stafford and Sir Henry Tichborn Mr. Roper Mr. Caryl and Corker That he should have Mony and an Estate by the negotiation of the Prisoner at the Bar to shorten the Evidence and bring them off from the Charge of High-Treason That he and Mr. Reading had several Consultations about this matter none of which he did conceal but revealed them presently to the Prince the Earl of Essex Counsellor Smith Mr. Kirby and several others And that he did not give in his full Evidence against VVhitebread and Fenwick a Ireland's Tryal because he was then treating with Mr. Reading who had made him easie That the Prisoner in assurance of his Reward told him he had order to draw blank Deeds to be sign'd in ten days after the discharge of those for whom the Sollication was made That he and the Prisoner had a private Consultation in his Bed-chamber March 29. last when Mr. Speke and his own Man Henry VViggens were hid privately in the Room and over-heard the main of the Consultation and Overture of Mr. Reading At what time Mr. Bedloe was to pen his Testimony as the Prisoner should direct him for the mitigation of the Evidence That when that Paper was finished the Prisoner carried it to the Lords to consider of it And that after they had consider'd of it and mended it as they pleas'd Reading return'd with the Emendations written with his own hand and deliver'd them to Mr. Bedloe in the Painted-Chamber who held them so behind him that Mr. Speke as it was agreed took them unobserved out of his hand Which Paper being then Produced was read in open Court Then Mr. Speke was sworn who deposed That on Saturday morning March the 29th last he was hid behind the Hangings between the Bed's-head and the Wall in Mr. Bedloe's Chamber as was agreed on before and there he heard Mr. Reading's and Mr. Bedloes Negotiation together That Mr. Bedloe asked the Prisoner what the Lords said to the Business and what the Lord Stafford said to the Estate in Glocestershire To which the Prisoner answered That the Lord Stafford had faithfully promised him to settle that Estate upon Mr. Bedloe and that he had Orders from that Lord to draw up a blank Deed in order to the Settlement which the said Lord had engag'd to Sign and Seal within 10 days after he should be discharg'd by Mr. Bedloe's contracting of his Evidence And that the Lords Powis and Petre and Sir Henry Tichbourn had faithfully engag'd and promis'd to give Mr. Bedloe a very fair and noble Reward which should be suitable to the Service he should do them in bringing them off from the charge of High-Treason To which when Mr. Bedloe answer'd that he would not rely upon their Promises only but expected to have something under their Hands Mr. Reading reply'd That they did not think it convenient so to do as yet but that Mr. Bedloe might take his Word as he had done theirs and that he would engage his Life for the performance With much other Discourse all tending to the same effect That on the Monday morning he saw Mr. Reading deliver the Paper to Mr. Bedloe from whom he received it and he and Mr. Wharton read it immediately in the Lord Privy Seal's Room After him Henry Wiggen's Mr. Bedloe's Man deposed That he was concealed under the Rugg upon his Master's Bed at the same time and to the same intent as Mr. Speke was giving the same Evidence as to what had been discours'd of between the Prisoner and his Master in the Chamber which afterwards he and Mr. Speke writ down And that he saw Mr. Reading deliver the Paper to his Master in the Painted-Chamber and saw Mr. Speke take it who went with another Gentleman into the Lord Privy Seal's Room with it After this Mr. Reading began his Defence Protesting his own Innocency producing Mr. Bulstrode only to testify that the occasion of his going to the Lord Stafford was his sending for him which yet he did not without leave from the Committee of Secrets That then he was employ'd by the Lords only to get them their Habeas Corpus's And Sir Trevor Williams being called by him declared how he only recommended Mr. Bedloe to him for his Advise about having his Pardon as perfect as could be The Prisoner owning his being in Mr. Bedloe's Chamber at that time and taking his Evidence and carrying it afterwards to the Lords but that it was purely out of Conscience and to prevent Perjury and the Shedding of Innocent Blood and the Deed discoursed of was only for 200 l. to be paid him by the Lord Stafford within 10 days after he should be discharged pro Consilio impenso impendendo to be secured upon an Estate in Glocestershire the which Mony the Lord Stafford indeed told him when he had received he might dispose of it as he thought fit which Confession the Court declared amounted to the Confession of the whole Charge Then he endeavour'd the bespattering the Witnesses Relating how Mr. Bedloe had vilify'd Dr. Stilling-fleet
but e're long he should find a way to get 1000 l. Then offering to speak to Osborn as to the Thing it self he was not suffer'd as being no Evidence against the Defendants till somewhat had been proved upon them Therefore the King's Counsel proposed to prove that Lane and Osborn who tho laid in the Indictment to join was run away did accuse Dr. Oates and afterwards recant it and that Knox had an hand in all this And to this end Sir William Waller was called and deposed That Justice Warcup and he were order'd by a Committee of Lords before whom a Complaint of Dr. Oates had been brought of the horrid abuse of his two Servants Osborn and Lane to take their Examinations which he did and that Lane's Evidence upon Oath was That he had been induced by Mr. Knox to betray his Master and to swear several Things against him which Knox had drawn up and dictated to him which Osborn writ and he signed them That there were four Letters three or four Memorials and three or four Informations which they had carried Knox accompanying them to have sworn them before Mr. Cheney who not caring to meddle with them they applied themselves to Mr. Dewy who refused them likewise After this Knox took Lodgings for them removing them to several places lest Dr. Oates should hunt them out bidding them stand firm to what they were to do and they should not want for Reward that would maintain them with Footmen and to live well That Knox did at the One-Tun Tavern drop a Guiny upon the Table which he said he would not give because then they might swear that he never gave them any Mony And told them that the Lord Treasurer would never have surrendred himself to the Black Rod unless they had promised to stand fast to what he had dictated to them One part of which Information was that Mr. Bedloe should say to Dr. Oates that the Earl of Danby offered him a considerable Sum of Mony to go beyond-Sea and that Dr. Oates had a Design of abusing Lane's Body That Lane further confess'd that Dr. Oates would be something hasty and passionate but was very Religious and was constant in sending his Servants to Prayers and that he had accused him of a Falshood by the instigation of Knox who incouraged him to it by the Promises of a great Reward That also to prevent a Discovery it was agreed among them that if any one should betray it the other two should murder him That he did likewise declare that the Lords in the Tower would not be wanting to acknowledg the kindness in disparaging the King's Evidence And that at all the Places and several Lodgings and Entertainments they had been at were all at Knox's Charge except twice which might amount to about 18 d. and that he paid And upon the Examinations of Lane and Osborn he found they agreed together to a tittle That he took also the Examination of Knox who said that the Papers he received from Lane and Osborn who said they had writ them out of trouble of Conscience and desired him to go with them before some Justice to swear them denying that he paid for their Lodgings only that he did indeed drop a Guiny and another time 10 s. upon the Bed which they took up but he only lent it them Confessing that the Papers so drawn up and delivered into his Hands were by him delivered into the Hands of the Lord Latimer and were there for some time this Knox belonging to the Lord Dunblane That Knox confess'd also that he sent a Note to Osborn that day he was examin'd which was conveyed to him through the Door to this effect We always Club'd and you paid two Shillings at the Sugar-Loaf Tear this Which was to intimate that they should say he did not bear their Charges Then Justice Warcup being sworn deposed That he also had took Lane's Examination wherein he had confessed as before That also he was by when he was brought before the Lords of the Committee for Examinations and did hear him there first swear the things in these Notes contained and then come afterward and beg their pardon and God's for what he had sworn was false and this too was upon Oath That he heard Knox confess about the Note to Osborn and he took Lodgings for Lane and Osborn in VVhite-Friers by the direction of the Lord Dunblane's Coachman Then one Rix deposed That he help'd Osborn into Dr. Oates's Service and a while after he and Lane came to him and said they were both going off from the Doctor to preferment and should have 100 l. a Year and 500 l. apiece but would not tell how Another time Osborn came to him to borrow a Cravat for he was going to dine with one of the greatest Peers of the Realm at the other end of the Town this Discourse being at VVhite-hall and asking why he would leave Dr. Oates he said Let Dr. Oates look to himself for he had enough against him Then perceiving some Design he gave in his Testimony to Justice VVarcup and upon further inquiry into it the Lords ordered him to send out his Warrants for the taking of Knox Lane and Osborn which he assigned over to him and in a short time after they were taken Osborn then confess'd to Justice VVarcup and Lane to Sir VVilliam VValler Afterwards Rix drinking with Lane in the Prison would have paid but he would not let him for that he had 23 s. which he said Knox had sent him in Another day he came to him and Lane shew'd him a Note which he had put under the Door from a Gentlewoman That if he would stand firm to his Text he should have 500 l. nay he should not want 1000 l. But in case they would not the Lord Treasurer would never have come in and if they did not he would lose his Head And this Lane's Father and Mother told him afterwards and that one Hest did come and tell them so That also Lane told him his Heart was lighter now he had confess'd this and that Knox set him on drew up the Writings and promis'd him those Rewards Then Richard Slightam a Prisoner and Under-Goaler deposed That Knox gave him three half Crowns at one time and promis'd him a considerable Sum to carry Notes between him and Lane and Osborne but he carried none And when Osborne had confess'd he said it would signify nothing because two were better than one Then Mr. Dewy depos'd That at the end of April or beginning of May Knox came to him with two more with him and said the Ld. Latimer wish'd him so to do with Papers ready written which as said were the Informations of one Osborne and Lane who had over-heard Dr. Oates and Mr. Bedloe conspiring against the Lord of Danby but the Parliament then sitting he shifted them off and did not inspect them Then Mr. Henry Wiggens Mr. Bedloe's Clerk deposed That Knox came to him the latter
and he should have a Pardon and that if the King did deny it as he durst not they would rise upon him and force him After him Bernard Dennis being sworn gave some account of his first coming into England and how he began his Acquaintance with the Earl of Shaftsbury and was recommended by him understanding him to be a Clergy-Man to Dr. Burnet and afterward to Mr. Ferguson in order to the bringing him over and how my Lord proffer'd him a Benefice And that one time being with him my Lord asked him How many there might be of his Name in his Country and told him that he would have him to advise those of his Name and Friends to be in a readiness when-ever occasion shall serve to stand by and assist the Common-Wealth of England for that they did really intend to have England under a Common-Wealth and would extirpate the King and all his Family as near as they could And said he admir'd at the Irish Nation to be such Fools for that it was very certain that King James Queen Elizabeth King Charles the First and the King that now is does wrong them to very Destruction But that a Common-Wealth would take more pity of them than any do now in this time wherein the King governs Here the King's Evidence ceasing the Jury enquired upon what Statute the Indictment was grounded and whether any of these Witnesses stood indicted To which the Court returning a satisfactory Answer they withdrew and the Court adjourned till three of the Clock When being sat again the Witnesses were all called one by one and examined by the Jury concerning what they had severally deposed Wherein nothing was remarkable but what they examin'd Mr. Secretary Jenkins Whether he heard not a Debate in the House of Commons about an Association And that Booth acknowledged himself to be in Orders tho now not Beneficed Turbervile and John Macnamarra that though they signed the Petition to the Common-Council for some Maintenance and that they were tempted to revoke their Evidence yet never read it nor knew what was in it And that Haynes further said That he heard the Lord Shaftsbury say at a Pastry-Cook's Shop in Iron-Monger Lane that the King had no more Religion than an Horse That when he came came first to England he was inclined to Popery but since he was degenerated from all the Principles of Christianity being just like a perfect Beast The Witnesses being examined the Jury withdrew and took the Statute-Book with them and returned the Bill Ignoramus Upon which the People fell a Hollowing and Shouting which Mr. Attorn Gen. desired might be recorded The Trial of Charles John Count Conningsmark Christopher Vratz Captain John Stern Lieutenant and Charles George Borosky alias Boratzi before the Lord Chief Justice Pemberton At the Old-Baily on Tuesday February the 28th 1681. THE Prisoners then and there appearing were Arraigned for the barbarous Murder of Thomas Thynn Esq And being Foreigners Mr. Vandore and Sir Nathaniel Johnson were sworn Interpreters They pleaded Not Guilty and desired their Jury might consist of half Foreigners which was granted And the Count desired his Trial might be put off a day or two and that he might be tried by himself neither of which were granted Then after some Challenges on both sides the Jury sworn were Sir William Roberts Bar. Moses Charas Gent. Richard Pagett Esq Charles Beelow Gent. George Hocknal Esq Peter Vandenhagen Gent. Walter Moyle Esq Christopher Ripkey Gent. Thomas Henslow Esq Daniel Griggion Gent. John Haynes Esq John Lebarr Gent. To whom the Indictment was read and Mr. Keen and Sir Francis Withens opened the same and then William Cole deposed That on Sunday Feb. 12. about a quarter after Eight at Night his Master Thomas Thynn Esq was coming up St. James-Street from the Countess of Northumberland's and he was walking with a Flambeau in his Hand before the Coach and coming along at the lower end of St. Albans-Street he heard the Blunderbuss go off and turning his Face back saw a great Smoke and heard his Master cry out he was murdered and saw three Horsemen riding away on the right side of the Coach whom he pursued and cried out Murder He ran to the upper end of the Hay-Market till he was quite spent and then turning back again his Master was got into the House whom he understood was wounded One of the Men was upon a little Bay Horse William Ellers deposed That then and there he coming with his Master from the Lady Northumberland's there came three Men riding by the right side of the Coach and as they rid one of them turned about and said Stop you Dog And just as he looked about the Fire was let into the Coach upon his Master and the Men ran away as fast as they could and that he could not know any of their Faces Mr. Hobbs the Chirurgeon deposed That he was with Mr. Thynn about nine or ten a Clock that Night he was wounded and found him shot with four Bullets which entred into his Body tore his Guts and wounded his Liver and Stomach and Gall and broke one of his Ribs and wounded the great Bone below of which Wounds he died and believed there as never a Wound but was Mortal He shewed the Court the four Bullets two of which he thought might be Iron one he found in the Stomach one between the Ribs and the Skin and two were lodged in the Back-bone Then Mr. White the Coroner deposed That on Feb. 13. he sat upon the Body and found four Holes on the right Side behind his short Ribbs as if made with Bullets and he gave order to open the Body and saw Mr. Hobbs take out the four Bullets Boresky being then told what was said replied That he fired the Blunderbuss but did not know how many Bullets there were because he did not charge it but he could tell who did But the Ld. Ch. Justice said that would not be material because his Evidence could charge no Body but himself Then Mr. Bridgman and Sir John Reresby deposed That Borosky Vratz and Stern were examined by them and proffer'd to read their Examinations but the Ld. Ch. Justice would not suffer it because their Evidence could charge no Body but themselves and he would not let the Jury be possess'd by that which is not Evidence And therefore they were only suffer'd to help their Memories by the Examinations and to mention only what they had confessed as to themselves Therefore they said that Borosky then confessed that he came into England at the desire of Count Conningsmark But here the Ld. Ch. Justice interrupted again the Evidence and bid Mr. Bridgman only relate his Confession as to himself which was That he fired the Musquetoon by the Captain 's Order who had before bid him to fire as soon as ever he stopped the Coach Capt. Vratz confessed that he came with a Design to fight Mr. Thynn having sent him Challenges by Post from
and Riot The Trial of Capt. Thomas Walcot at the Old-Baily London on a Commission of Oyer and Terminer held there for the City of London and County of Middlesex on Thursday July the 12th 1683. THen and there the Prisoner was Arraign'd together with William Hone John Rouse and Capt. William Blague upon an Indictment for High-Treason for conspiring the Death of the King and raising a Rebellion in this Kingdom To which he pleaded Not Guilty with the other three And after some Exceptions the following Jury was Sworn Nicholas Charlton Christopher Pitts Robert Beddingfield John Pelling William Winbury Thomas Seaton William Rutland Thomas Short Theophilus Man John Genew John Short and Thomas Nicholas To whom the Indictment being read Mr. North of Counsel for the King in this Cause opened the same and Mr. Attorney-General Mr. Serjeant Jefferies and Mr. Sollicitor-General opened the Evidence And then Col. Rumsey deposed That about the latter end of October or beginning of November he was sent by the Lord Shaftsbury to Mr. Shepherd's House near Lombard-street to the D. of Monmouth Lord Russel Lord Grey and Sir Thomas Armstrong to know of them what was done about raising Arms at Taunton who told him that Mr. Trenchard had failed them about the Men and they could proceed no further at that time Whereupon the Lord Shaftsbury said there was no dependance upon those Gentlemen and so prepared to be gone for Holland That about a fortnight or three Weeks afterwards there was a meeting at Mr. West's Chamber where was Mr. West Mr. Goodenough Mr. Wade and another where the taking off the King and the Duke was proposed as the surest way and for that end Mr. Ferguson was writ for out of Holland who came over upon that Letter and Capt. Walcot with him upon Ash-Wednesday And they had several meetings about getting a sufficient number of Men and Mr. Goodenough and Mr. Rumbold brought Notes of many Names and Capt. Walcot was then present and undertook to be one of the Men that should help to kill the King at Rumbold's House near Hodsden in Hertfordshire as he should come from New-Market the Saturday before Easter but Capt. Walcot refused to have an hand in attacking the Coach only he would command a Party that should charge the Guards For there was to be several Parties one small Party was to have killed the Postillion another to kill the Horses and Mr. Rumbold with a certain number to seize the Coach and Captain Walcot the Guards but the Fire at New-Market causing the King to return on the Tuesday before Easter they could not have their Men in a readiness and so were disappointed Immediately upon this it was resolved on in another meeting whereat the Prisoner was that Money and Arms should be provided and Mr. Ferguson undertook the raising of Money and Mr. West the buying of Arms therewith and Mr. Goodenough and Mr. Rumbold the providing of Men to be in a readiness against the first opportunity that happened further designing to kill the King as he came from Windsor to London or from Windsor to Hampton-Court or the Play-House and that Mr. West did tell him he did buy Arms and received 100 l. of Mr. Ferguson for them That the Thursday before the Discovery they met at the Salutation in Lombard-street where was Captain Walcot Mr. West Mr. Wade the two Goodenough's Mr. Nelthrop and himself discoursing about the Division of the City into 20 parts 7 of which Mr. Goodenough gave an account of That on the Saturday following they appointed another meeting at the George on Ludgate-hill but the Discovery coming out there met only four of them And the Monday after the Discovery they met again at Capt. Tracy's there being the Prisoner Mr. West Mr. Wade Mr. Nelthrop the two Goodenough's and Mr. Ferguson who exclaimed against Keeling and resolved to be gone Then Mr. Keeling being Sworn related how before the King went to New-Market he was drawn in by Goodenough and provided Burton Thompson and Barber to join in killing the King whom Rumbold encouraged thereto by telling them the conveniences of his House for that purpose being a lone House and having a Court-Wall using this as an Argument That to kill the King and the D. of York would be a keeping one of the Commandments because unless that were done there would be a great deal of Blood-shed committed telling them the way how they designed to effect it as before and if this way failed then there should be Men in the Habit of Countrey-men with a Cart in the Lane who should run the Cart a-thwart the Lane and so stop the Coach That at the Dolphin-Tavern in Bartholomew-Lane where were Rumbold West Goodenough and Hone the Joyner he heard West talking to Rumbold about the King 's returning from New-Market asking him how many Swan-Quills Goose-Quills and Crow-Quills with Sand and Ink he must have To which was answered 6 Swan-Quills 20 Goose-Quills and 20 or 30 Crows-Quills saying that by Swan-Quills was meant Blunderbusses by Goose-Quills Muskets and by Crows-Quills Pistols and by Sand and Ink Powder and Bullets That he was at the Salutation-Tavern in Lombard-street with the Prisoner and others the Thursday before the Discovery where some of them call'd him Gulick there being then a Report of one Gulick that headed a Rising at Cologn Mr. West telling him that Gulick in Dutch was Keeling in English and that he hoped to see him at the Head of as good an Army in Wapping as Gulick was at Cologn which was all he could say as to the Prisoner He gave them a further account how Goodenough gave him 3 Papers of 3 Divisions of the City one for himself and the other 2 for whom he could trust advising him to take 9 or 10 Men to his Assistance who were to ask several Persons Supposing that the Papists should rise or be a French Invasion Are you in a Posture of Defence Which was all they were to communicate and by this means feel them and see how many Men could be raised telling him moreover of a Design to kill the King and the Duke at the Bull-Feast and lay it upon the Papists as a Branch of the Popish Plot and that one was drawing a Declaration to take away the Chimney-Money that so the common People might fall in with them more readily Saying that it was trouble of Mind caused him to make this Discovery which he did to one Mr. Peckham who brought him to the Lord Dartmouth and thence to Mr. Secretary Jenkins Acknowledging himself to be the Person who arrested the Lord-Mayor and that Goodenough did tell him that the Design was to secure the Lord-Mayor and the Sheriffs and the Tower Then Mr. Zachary Bourne depos'd That he came acquainted with the Prisoner by means of Mr. Ferguson who lodg'd at his House That he was at their Meeting at the Dragon upon Snow-hill where the Prisoner was and their Discourse was about a Design of raising and dividing the
July 13. 1683. THen and there the Prisoner appearing he was Arraigned upon an Indictment of High-Treason for conspiring the Death of the King and subversion of the Government To which being required to plead he desired a Copy of his Indictment but being told nothing could be granted till he had pleaded he pleaded Not Guilty And then complain'd of his being arraign'd and tried at the same time desiring a Copy of his Panel having had only some Names of Persons usually upon Juries and that his Trial might be deferr'd till the Afternoon in regard he had a Witness that was not in Town But the Attorn Gen. urg'd the Jury might be called Then the Prisoner desired a Pen and Ink and some to write for him and to have the use of his Papers all which were granted And then John Martin being named the Lord Russel asked if he were a Free-holder of forty Shillings a Year saying that he thought none were allowed but such as were Free-holders To which the Court replied That no Pannel was made in London by Free-holders for that London Estates belonging either to the Nobility or Gentry that lived out of the City or to Corporations London was excepted To this his Lordship urged the Statute of 2 Hen. 5. wherein he said it was positive that in Cases of Life and Death no Man should be judged but by those that have forty Shillings a Year But the Attorn Gen. not allowing the Prisoners Exceptions his Counsel were called and again assigned him by the Court Mr. Pollexfen Mr. Holt and Mr. Ward who learnedly urged what they took to be Law in that Case and were answer'd by the Attorn Gen. Mr. Sol. Gen. Sir George Jefferies and Mr. North the King's Counsel And then it was adjudged by eight of the Judges being present viz. the Ld. Ch. Justice the Ld. Ch. Baron Mr. Justice Wyndham Mr. Justice Jones Mr. Justice Charlton Mr. Justice Levins Mr. Baron Street and Mr. Justice Withens that in case of Treason Free-hold was no good cause of Challenge The Jury-men therefore were called and after the Lord Russel hah challenged 31 of them the following Persons were sworn viz. John Martin William Rouse Jervas Seaton William Fashion Thomas Short George Toriano VVilliam Butler James Pickering Thomas Jeve Hugh Noden Robert Brough Thomas Oneby To whom the Indictment being read the same was opened by Mr. North and the Attorny-General opened the Evidence And then Col. Rumsey being sworn deposed That about the latter end of October or beginning of November the Lord Shaftsbury sent him from his Lodging by VVapping to Mr. Shepherd's to the Duke of Monmouth the Lord Russel Lord Grey Sir Thomas Armstrong and Mr. Ferguson there met to know what Resolution they were come to about the rising of Taunton Their answer was That Mr. Trenchard had failed them that he had promised 1000 foot and 300 Horse but when he came to perform it he could not He thought the People would not meddle unless they had some time to make Provision for their Families That Mr. Ferguson made this Answer the Lord Russel and the Duke of Monmouth being present and the Lord Grey saying something to the same purpose And upon this it was the Lord Shaftsbury prepared to be gone That he was with them at Shepherd's about a quarter of an hour and that there was some discourse about seizing of the Guards at the Savoy and Mews in case the Insurrection had gone on which was to have been on Novemb. 19. and that the Duke of Monmouth the Lord. Grey and Sir Thomas Armstrong undertook to view the Guards and that the Lord Russel assented to all this and the Witness was to have gone to Bristol by the order of the Earl of Shaftsbury against that time Then Mr. Shepherd deposed that in October Mr. Ferguson came to him in the Duke of Monmouth's Name to request the conveniency of his House for him and some other Persons of Quality to meet That in the Evening came the Duke of Monmouth the Lord Grey the Lord Russel Sir Thomas Armstrong Col. Rumsey and Mr. Ferguson one after another That Sir Thomas Armstrong desired they might be private and therefore what they wanted he fetch'd up himself not suffering his Servants to come up That their Discourse was about seizing the Guards and the Duke of Monmouth Lord Grey and Sir Thomas Armstrong went one time to view them and the next time they met at his House he heard Sir Thomas say the Guards were very remiss in their Places and not like Soldiers and that the thing was feasible if they had strength to do it That they met twice at his House and the Prisoner was there both times That Mr. Ferguson read a Paper in the Nature of a Declaration setting forth the Grievances of the Nation in order to a Rising He could not say the Lord Russel was present at the reading of it but Col. Rumsey was who then deny'd it saying it was over before he came Then the Lord Howard being sworn began his long Evidence with a low Voice pretending the News he had just then receiv'd of the Earl of Essex's Fate had sunk his Voice and a long Story of the Designs of the Earl of Shaftsbury an Account of which he had from Capt. VValcot whom he brought acquainted with the Earl of Shaftsbury and by whom the Earl of Shaftsbury sent for him while he absconded at one VVatson's at the end of VVoodstreet and there discover'd to him his Design of the Rising and that he had 10000 brisk Boys ready to follow him whenever he held up his Finger who were to possess themselves of the Gates and would in an Hour's time be 5 times multiplied But that his Design was much retarded by the backwardness of the Duke of Monmouth and the Lord Russel who failed him in not being ready prepared to concur with him in the Country that he then endeavour'd to shew the Earl of Shaftsbury the necessity of having those Lords concurrence in so weighty an Undertaking and proffer'd his Service to bring them to a right Understanding among themselves to this end he spoke with the Duke of Monmouth who deny'd that either he or the Lord Russel had given the Earl of Shaftsbury any incouragement to be so forward because they knew the Country could not be ready to stir so soon That a Meeting was then propos'd but afterwards put off by reason of the Earl of Shaftsbury's fears of being discover'd That the Duke of Monmouth told him that the Lord Russel had been with the Earl of Shaftsbury and preswaded him to put off his Rendezvouz for only a Fortnight against which time they would try to be ready for him But the Country not being ready that Design was disappointed That in October Captain Walcot acquainted him with the Design upon the King with which he acquainted the Duke of Monmouth who said he would never suffer it and they did all they could to prevent it This failing the
because he had heard that he had confessed many Treasons and desired to know if he was pardoned alledging that otherwise he could not be a good Witness but the Ld. Ch. Justice would not bear of it he having been a Witness at the Ld. Russel's Trial and therefore being sworn he deposed That as to the Plot in general Capt. VValcot had told him in October last the Lord Shaftsbury designed an Insurrection in November which he disswaded him from and a little afterward he told him the thing was disappointed and upon it Shaftsbury went into Holland That Col. Rumsey about Christmass told him the D. of Monmouth E. of Essex Ld. Howard Ld. Russel Mr. Hambden jun. and the Prisoner at the Bar intended an Insurrection but afterwards he said they would not venture thereon till they had a Concurrency in Scotland That Mr. Nelthrop afterwards told him that Colonel Sidney had sent Aaron Smith into Scotland with Letters to invite some Scotish Gentlemen to Town with Mony to bear his charges The Letter bearing a Cant of settling Business in Carolina but really was in order to the Insurrection That afterwards Mr. Smith returned and some Scotish Gentlemen with him And soon after Mr. Ferguson said the Scots proposed That if they might have 30000 l. in ready Money they would undertake to make an Insurrection in Scotland without the Concurrence of England which Proposal he said was agreed to and the Mony would be soon ready and Mr. Shepherd would return it That the Arms were ready bought and the E. of Argile would go into Scotland and head the Scots That some difference arose about raising this Mony but the Ld. Gray did offer to raise 10000 l. out of his own Estate if the rest would pay their Proportion That then the Scots came down to less but were not complyed with That the places for rising were Bristol Taunton York Chester Exeter and London where it was to begin That the Prisoner and Major VVildman were very instrumental in breaking off this Agreement because they could not agree about a Declaration and about the form of Government the English inclining to a Common-wealth which the Scotish Nobility it was supposed would not agree to That as to the Prisoner he knew nothing in particular and never spoke with him till since the Discovery Then Colonel Rumsey being sworn deposed That about the latter end of October or beginning of November he was sent by the E. of Shaftsbury to Mr. Shepherd s to know of the Gentlemen met there who were the D. of Monmouth the Ld. Gray Ld. Russel Sir Thomas Armstrong Mr. Ferguson and Mr. Shepherd what was done about the Rising intended at Taunton who told him that Mr. Trenchard had failed them and that it must cease for that time That afterwards he met several times in March April and May at Mr. West's Chamber and other places with Capt. VValcot Mr. VVest the two Goodenoughs Mr. Bourn and Mr. VVade where they had divided the City into twenty parts of seven parts of which Mr. Goodenough brought an account but said nothing of the other thirteen because he had not spoken with those who were to tell him how many Men they would afford for the Insurrection That a Council of six as Mr. VVest and Mr. Goodenough told him did manage the Rising which were the D. of Monmouth E. of Essex Ld. Howard Ld. Russel Colonel Sidney and Mr. Hambden Then Mr. Keeling deposed That in Summer last Mr. Goodenough brought him three Papers one for himself and the other two for whom he could trust in the two Divisions whom asking if he design'd a General Insurrection he reply'd that if he did not if the King was taken off this would do well for then the People would know how to have recourse to a formidable Body And he had heard him also say that Colonel Sidney whom he knew not had a considerable part in the Management of that Affair Then the Ld. Howard deposed That about the middle of January last the D. of Monmouth Colonel Sidney and himself being together who he supposes were the first Movers hereof did think it necessary to an Enterprize that had been long in hand and fallen flat then that it should be revived by some select Cabal not exceeding seven that should be set up to give it Life and govern its Motions To this end the D. of Monmouth undertook to engage the E. of Salisbury the Ld. Russel and Colonel Sidney the E. of Essex and Mr. Hambden Soon after he was told the Persons named had agreed and had appointed a meeting at Mr. Hambden's House that Month where he met them viz. the D. of Monmouth E. of Essex Ld. Russel Colonel Sidney Mr. Hambden and himself and being met Mr. Hambden opened the Session giving an account of the Reason End and Intention of that Meeting That afterwards they discoursed of the time of Rising and of Arms and Mony to be provided the D. of Monmouth propounding 25 or 30000 l. but before any advance should be made a Coalition with Scotland was to be procured and a fit Person thought on to be sent thither That about the middle of February following they had another Meeting at the Ld. Russel's House where it was propounded by Mr. Hambden discoursing of the Government they would terminate in to have all resolved into the Power of a Parliament which though sounding harsh to some there was consented to it being only a publick Good which all intended Then was considered the setting a Correspondency with the E. of Argile the Ld. Melvin Sir John Cockram and the Campbels Colonel Sidney proposing Aaron Smith to be sent taking the care hereof upon himself whom afterwards he sent and he saw about sixty Guinies which the Prisoner told him were for Smith and afterwards told him that he had heard from him from Newcastle after this he going into the Country heard nothing further Sir Andrew Foster then depos'd as to his seeing Sir John Cockram Commissary Monro and the Campbells in Town at the beginning of Summer coming up under a pretence of making a Purchase in Carolina but that after the Rumor of the Plot Cockram absconded and the Campbells Father and Son he heard were seiz'd changing their Lodgings Then Mr. Atterbury deposed that the beginning of July last he was sent for into London upon a discovery of some Scotch Gentlemen that lay bout Black-Fryers and when he came the Common Serjeant had been before him and found Sir Hugh Campbel and Sit John Cockram who had been some little time in Town making an escape into a Boat After this Sir Philip Lloyd swore his seizing of Papers in Colonel Sidney's House the latter end of June last the Colonel being present and that he believed those Papers shewn him now in the Court to be the same Mr. Shepherd swore that he was acquainted with his Hand and that he believed the Writing shewn him was his Hand for that he had seen him write the
in January till he went away about the 10th of June that he saw him particularly the day Mr. Hilsley went away and that whereon Mr. Bournaby came that he could not be absent without missing because he sat at a Table by himself Mr. Haggerston then deposed That he had the honour to be of the same Class which was the Rhetorick Form with the Salamanca Doctor as he called Oates at St. Omers and knew him to be there all February March April May and till the latter end of June 1678. except one Night he was at Watton owning himself likewise a Papist and that he remained seven Years at St. Omers and that he was Sir Thomas Haggerston's Son a Northumberland Man and went by the Name of Henry Howard at St. Omers That particularly in May he heard Dr. Oates preach and that in his Sermon he said That the late King Charles II halted between two Opinions and a Stream of Popery went between his Legs After him Mr. Robert Beeston a St. Omers Student also deposed That he knew Mr. Oates to be at St. Omers the latter end of April May That in April Mr. Oates read in his room only with this Condition that if ever Oates was absent he was to read again But he never being called to read more he was sure that the Prisoner could not be absent That Apr. 21 he saw him at Nine-pins and the next day at their Action Then Mr. Clement Smith another Student of the same Colledg and of the same Class with Dr. Oates whom the Doctor challenged for a Jesuit swore the Prisoner's being at St. Omers from Christmass 1677 to Midsummer 1678 New Stile And that he remembred particularly as to April and May because the 22 st of April he himself fell sick in the Colledg and went into the Infirmary till May 7. In which time the Prisoner oft visited him and told him of Mr. Hilsley's and Mr. Pool's going away and two or three other Particulars which happened in the Colledg at that time That the Prisoner also was in the Infirmary for two or three days in this time and that he spoke this piece of false Latin to his Physician Si placet Dominatio vestra That he heard of the Consult and knew of Mr. Marsh and Mr. Williams two Fathers going over then to it Then Mr. Edward Price another of the same swore to Oates's coming to St. Omers at Christmass and of his going away at Midsummer and remembers particularly his being there when the two Jesuits Marsh and VVilliams were coming over to the Consult And that had he been absent he must needs have been miss'd he was so noted for his Absurdities and frequent Quarrellings with the Students Mr. James Doddington another of the same who went by the Name of Hollis and was a Witness at the Trial of the five Jesuits swore likewise to the same purpose of Oates's being resident from Christmass to Midsummer at St. Omers except one Night at Watton Mr. William Gerrard another also of the same who went by the Name of Clovell swore the same Story of Oates's residency at that time at St. Omers and that he heard of the Consult but that Oates was not capable of being at it because none but Jesuits of 18 Years standing could be present That on May 16 Oates and he were confirm'd together The Lord Gerrard of Bromeley being another of the same going by the Name of Clovell deposed the same Evidence remembring the Prisoner's reading in the Sodality particularly by his Tone Mr. Samuel Morgan now a Benefic'd Minister of the Church of England being reconciled five Years since deposed the same concerning Oates's coming to and going from St. Omers himself being then a Student there and that reading Ireland's Trial the impudence of Oates was much wondred at in the Colledg for swearing that he was at the Consult on April 24 when all the Colledg knew to the contrary and himself did remember that on that very day he was playing at Ball and struck it over into a Court and borrowed Mr. Oates's Key to fetch it Then Mr. Arundel a St. Omer's Student who went there by the Name of Spencer deposed to the same purpose saying That he saw Oates confirm'd on May 16. Mr. Christopher Turbervile another of the same his false Name Farmer deposed to the same purpose and that he particularly saw the Prisoner on April 25 26 1678. he then removing into Mr. Pool's Chamber and saw Oates in the Chamber and at the Chamber-door Mr. Anthony Turbervile another Student his false Name Farmer also deposed to the time of the Prisoner's being at St. Omers from Christmass 1677 to Midsummer 1678 and that he was notorious for his Scurrility and Abusiveness and that he and Mr. Thormon did breakfast with him that Morning he left the Colledg Mr. Clavering another of them deposed to the same purpose giving this Instance that the Prisoner was at St. Omers at that time the Consult was for that he inquired of him what it was they met for and for that a Man came to beg Mony of the Students which himself collected for him and Oates refused to give him any thing And that he knew this to be at that time of the Consult because enquiry being made how the Man came to get so little Mony at Watton it was said it was because the Fathers were gone to the Congregation in England Mr. John Copley another of the same deposed only to the general Testimony of the Prisoner's Residence at St. Omers Mr. Cook a Taylor belonging to the Colledg deposed the like only instancing the 20th of April that he saw him in a Procession from the Sodality to the Church walking at the latter end among the Rhetoricians John Wright Esq another Student deposed only that Oates came to St. Omers the Winter and went away the Summer before the Notice of the Plot was Then Dr. Oates was permitted to make his Defence which he did by excepting something against the Form of the Indictment producing the Records of the Conviction of Ireland and the 5 Jesuits urging them as Proof of the Fact to which he then swore Reciting out of those Trials the Approbations that were then given to his Testimony by the Ld. Ch. Justice Scroggs and the present Ld. Ch. Justice the Recorder attested by Mr. Robert Blayney's Notes who was also sworn Urging also the Credit his Testimony once had with both the Houses of Parliament and to prove it he called several Persons of Quality and Noblemen but those who appeared were Seri Maynard Earl of Devonshire Earl of Clare Mr. Williams late Speaker of the House of Commons Earl of Huntington Ld. Ch. Baron Ld. Bishop of London Sir George Treby some having forgot what had then past in the Houses others expressing but a very indifferent Opinion they had of the Prisoner and his Evidence which made him to say That he found either the distance of time had wrought upon their Memories or the difference
of the Season had chang'd their Opinion so that now they disbelived that which they believed before and perhaps for as little Reason as they believed him at first For he could not expect that a Man who believes without a Principle should not recant that Belief without a Reason But the Court call'd this a Reflection and spar'd him not for it The other part of his Defence consisted of his endeavouring to prove that he was here seen in London in April and May 1678. To this end Mrs. Cicilia Mayo Sir Richard Barker's House-keeper deposed That she saw Dr. Oates at her Master's House in Barbacan the latter end of Apr. or beginning of May being about a Week before Whitsontide in that Year the Plot broke out That the Coachman told her he had been there once or twice before but this was the first time she saw him he having on grey Clothes a white Hat and a short Periwig and dined there with her Lady's Sister and others Sir Richard being then sick in the Country That he came afterwards when she saw him in black Clothes a longer Periwig which was brown That she never knew the Prisoner before then but they told her who it was Then John Butler Sir Richard Barker's Coachman deposed That he also saw Mr. Oates at his Master's House the beginning of May before the Plot in a disguise having on a grey Coat and white Hat and his Hair cut short but without a Periwig enquiring for Dr. Tongue Mrs. Mayo then also looking upon him in the Court through the Window And that afterwards he came in a Cinnamon-coloured Coat and green Ribbons and a long black Periwig and that he dined there several â—â—mes Then Philip Page Sir Richard Barker's Man that used to make up his Physick for him deposed That he remembred he did see the Prisoner at his Masters in grey Clothes but he was not certain as to the time only he believes it was in May. Then Mr. Walker a Minister deposed he met the Prisoner in a Disguise between St. Martin's-Lane and Leicester-Fields not exactly remembring the Time when only he thought it about a Year and a quarter before he was first examin'd and that the Elm-Trees were then budded forth as big as an Hazle-Nut After this reflecting on the discredit the St. Omers Witnesses had once been in and of their not prosecuting of this Cause before this time he concluded his Evidence And the King's Counsel proceeded to answer his Defence producing the Records of Sir George Wakeman and Earl of Castlemaine's Trials to prove that his Evidence there was not believed which were read and Sir George Wakeman being sworn deposed what it was the Prisoner then swore against him and protested the falsity of it and his own Innocency The same also the Earl of Castlemain did in like manner And then the Lords Journals were produced where it was recorded that the Prisoner said he could accuse no Body else but those that he named and yet soon after he accused the present King and the Queen-Dowager but this upon search being not found to be a Record upon Oath it was not thought valid Evidence Therefore they proceeded to prove his Subornation of one Clay which was a Witness for the Prisoner at the Trial of the five Jesuits whom now he did not call and of Mr. Smith the School-master of Islington To this end part of Oates's Narative was read out of the Lords Journal wherein he accused this William Smith as concerned in the Plot as endeavouring to vilify the House of Commons c. And then a Certificate was read under Oates's Hand of this Smith's Honesty not three days before the Trial of the five Jesuits whence they would infer he had been tampering with him the which Smith himself being sworn was ready to have deposed but the Ld. Ch. Justice would not admit him to swear that he did forswear himself because such should never have the Countenance of ever being Witnesses again Therefore they proceeded to prove the Subornation of Clay and to this end Lawrence Davenport in whose keeping Clay was in Prison deposed that Sir William Waller and the Prisoner did hang'd for that they could prove him to be a Priest unless he would swear for Oates that he dined with him at Mr. Howards in May which he consented to so he might have his Mony restored that was taken from him saying he had been a Rogue before and did not know what he might be And this another Witness produced swore that Davenport told to him the next day in Prison Then Mr. Howard deposed That Clay was mistaken in his Testimony given at the Trials of the five Jesuits in being July and not May 1678 that he and Oates were at his House about which time there was no question of his being in England Then they read out of Oates's Narrative again wherein he had said how he return'd three or four days after the Consult of April 24 was over observing hence how his own Witnesses contradicted him who had deposed that they saw him here in London the latter end of May. And here the Counsel for the King concluding their Evidence Dr. Oates proceeded with his Defence only shewing out of the Lords Journal a Copy of their Resolve That there was a Plot and of their summoning up before them Thomas Bickley of Chichester for vilifying Dr. Oates and thereupon turning him but out of Commission objecting five things against their Evidence 1. Their Religion A Papist not being a good Witness in a Cause of Religion appealing to the Heavens Which the Ld. Ch. Justice call'd a Common-wealth appeal and bid him to be took away falling very foul upon the poor Doctor But stood in 't that 't was Law and the Lord Cooke's practice quoting Bulstrode's Reports 2d Part 155. He Objected 2. Their Education confessing themselves to be bred up in a Seminary which is against Law quoting 27o. Eliz. cap. 2. and 3. Car. 1. Cap. 2. Which also was over-ruled 3. Their Judgments in Cases of Conscience whereby they own they have Dispensations to swear Lies for the promotion of the Cause 4. It was refused at the Lord Shaftsbury's Trial to suffer the King's Evidence there to be Indicted of Perjury But all this the Ld. Ch. Justice told him was idle and nothing to the Purpose And therefore he went on to sum up his Evidence protesting the Truth of his Evidence and that he was resolved to stand by and seal it with his Blood which the Ld. Ch. Justice told him it was pitty but he should Then Mr. Sol. Gen. summ'd up the Evidence which while he was a doing Dr. Oates beg'd leave to withdraw being weak and ill with the Stone and Gout and having lien in Irons 21 weeks After him the Ld. Ch. Justice summ'd up the Evidence with all the Virulency and Gall his Wit or Malice could assist him And then the Jury withdrawing for about a quarter of an hour deliver'd in their Verdict
against the present or the former King and that he had a material Witness in Lancashire 140 Miles off The Court told him they had ho power to put off his Trial and the King had left him to the course of the Law He complained he had no Copy of the Pannel but was answered it was not his right to have it and the Attorney General told him he had not deserved so well of the Government as to have his Trial delayed He desired then Pen and Ink and having challenged thirty five the Jury were sworn which had passed upon Mrs. Gaunt To whom the Indictment was read and opened by Mr. Phips and Mr. Attorney General and then Colonel Rumsey deposed that about the latter end of October or beginning of November the Earl of Shaftsbury desired him to go to Mr. Shepherd's House where was a meeting of the D. of Monmouth Ld. Russel Ld. Grey Sir Thomas Armstrong Mr. Ferguson and Mr. Shepherd He came late and they were just upon going away He deliver'd his Message and they told him that Mr. Trenchard had disappointed them He had not been there above a quarter of an Hour but Mr. Shepherd was called down and brought up Mr. Cornish who excused his not coming sooner and said that he could not stay for he was to meet about the Charter Whereupon Mr. Ferguson opened his Bosom from under his Stomacher pulled out a Paper They told Mr. Cornish they had had it read and desired to read it to him Mr. Ferguson read it while Mr. Shepherd held the Candle and afterwards asking Mr. Cornish how he liked it he said he liked it very well The Paper was a Declaration to have been dispersed when the Rising was which was intended about that time and 2 Points he observed and very well remembred the one was for Liberty of Conscience the other for Restoration of Church or King's Lands to them that would assist Mr. Cornish said he liked the Declaration and what poor Interest he had he would join with it That he had been acquainted with Mr. Cornish about 14. Years and had had great concerns together he having returned 3 or 400000 l. for him in 6 years Time while he was Collector of the Kings Customs at Bristol that Mr. Cornish was a very honest Man and it was out of Compassion he had not accused him before Then Goodenough was sworn and his Pardon read who deposed That there was a Design to rise in London and the City was divided into 20 parts and design'd out of each part to raise 500 Men who were to take the Tower and drive the Guards out of Town Before this was agreed on by chance he was at Mr. Cornish's House about the business of the Riot and discoursing alone with Mr. Cornish he said The Law will not defend us some other way was to be thought on Mr. Cornish reply'd he wondred the City was so unready and the Country so ready that he reply'd there was something thought to be done here but that in the first place the Tower ought to be seized where the Magazine is Mr. Cornish paused a little and said I will do what good I can or what I can or to that purpose He afterwards met Mr. Cornish on the Exchange who asked him how affairs went to which he gave a general Answer that not being a Place to talk in of such Discourse To this the Prisoner said It was strange that Col. Rumsey seeing him at Shepherd's about such a thing should never mention it to him afterwards so often as he saw him Protesting his ignorance and appealing to God urging the Improbability and adding that Rumsey at the Lord Russel's Trial swore that he had nothing else to swear against any Man And against Goodenough he urg'd the ill Opinion he had of him and that he never was with him but about the Business of the Riot which he manag'd as their Attorny And I tell you said Mr. Justice Withens then that was a Branch of the Plot take that from me Then Mr. Gosfright testified that Mr. Cornish opposed Mr. Goodenough's being Under-Sheriff and said he would not trust an hair of his Head with him he was so ill a Man obnoxious to the Government and had done ill things and he believ'd Mr. Cornish and Mr. Goodenough were never reconcil'd upon it Alderman Love and Mr. Jekyl testified to the same purpose which the Ld. Ch. Just had scarce Patience to hear saying it was all impertinent and Mr. Just VVithens said of Mr. Jekyl This Gentleman was in a limb of the Plot himself as great a Rioter and as hot as any of them Sir William Turner then testified to Mr. Cornish's aversness to Goodenough's being Under-Sheriff Mr. Cornish then call'd Dr. Tillotson and Dr. Sharp to testify as to his Conversation but neither appear'd Mr. Lane then testify'd that in the Printed Trial of the Lord Russel Rumsey swore he did not hear the Declaration read but he not hearing it himself that was no Evidence Then Dr. Calamy the Minister of his Parish testify'd that he did come often to Church and receive the Sacrament Then also Mr. Reeve Mr. John Cook Mr. John Knap Mr. Carlton Mr. Joseph Smart and Mr. VVilliam Crouch all testify'd as to his Conversation and Loyalty whence he argu'd the Improbability that he should be so concern'd After which the Ld. Chief Justice summ'd up the Evidence and the Jury withdrew and after a considerable time returned And then the Prisoner begg'd one Word desiring to call Mr. Shepherd whom out of tenderness to offend he had omitted though he had him in his Note which with much ado was granted him as a great favour of the Court. And then Mr. Shepherd testify'd that he was Subpoened by Mr. Cornish before by the King and was desired by Mr. Cornish's Son to be at his Trial and had been attending in Court from eleven to three That Mr. Cornish at one of those Meetings at his house came to speak a few Words with the Duke of Monmouth or some other he could not be positive it being so many years ago that he stay'd not above half a quarter of an hour in the house and that there was not one word read nor no Paper seen while he was there and that he never was at his house but once when the Duke of Monmouth was there nor does he remember that Rumsey was there while he was nor that the Declaration was read that night He remembred a Declaration was read which Ferguson pull'd out of his Shoe but was positive Cornish was not by because he was not look'd upon to be one of the Company That there was now an Accompt depending between him and Mr. Cornish whereon there was about one or two hundred Pounds due to Mr. Cornish Then Mr. Sol. Gen. sum'd up the Evidence And the Jury withdrawing for a short time brought Mr. Cornish in Guilty and found 140 l. for the King in Mr. Shepherd's hands Then Mr. Recorder sentenced
where the Case was evident But this Court he took to be of the same Nature though of a Degree higher with the other Ordinary Courts of Judicature where there could be no Adjournment after Evidence given But for satisfaction the Judges were ordered to withdraw to Consult which they did and then the Lords Nottingham and Falconbridge moved that the Peers ought to be the Judges hereof because it concerned their Priviledg and so it was also permitted for them to withdraw And after about half an hour the Judges returned and after an Hour the Peers And then the Ld. Ch. Justice Herbert deliver'd the Opinion of the Judges that this Matter being wholly new to them they could not determin but only tell what the Law was in Inferiour Courts in Cases of the like Nature and the Reason of the Law in those Points and then leave the Jurisdiction of this Court to its proper Judges After which the Ld. H. Steward told them he was the only Judg of that Court and therefore he was to determin it shewing of what ill Consequence the Adjournment of the Court might prove if it should happen to be illegal and therefore he ordered the Prisoner to proceed The Lord Delamere therefore did begin his Defence in Protesting his Innocency and Reflecting on the Loyalty of his Family particularly his Father who had been so signally instrumental in the Restoration of the Royal Family that the late King caused it to be inserted in the Patent which created his Father a Peer which Clause he read out of the Patent to the Court. And as to the Evidence against him he observed that it was all but Circumstantial and by hear-say only except that of Saxon's and therefore he apply'd himself particularly against that and called his Witnesses Mr. Richard Hall testify'd how in 1683 Saxon counterfeited a Letter in the Name of one Richard Hildage to him for 6 l. which he ow'd him and Saxon brought the letter and received the Mony and afterwards Hildage demanded the Mony denying that he ever writ for it Mr. Francis Ling declared how this Saxon received 25 s. at this same Hildage's at Newcastle for Mrs. Wibbram without her order nor did she ever receive any of it Richard Shaw declared how he also forg'd a Letter in William Paugston a Bayliffs Name and sent it to him because he owed him a little Mony Peter Hough declared how Saxon cheated him in making him of a Bond for 20 s. less than was due from Saxon to him reading it false to him at the sealing Edward Wilkinson declared that Saxon hired his Horse June 23d last for only three days at 12 Pence a Day but he never came again nor had he had any satisfaction for his Horse it being supposed this was the Horse he rid into the Rebellion with William Wright said he had dealings with Saxon but never found him so good as his Word Then the Prisoner went off from this part of the Evidence to prove that neither Sir Robert Cotton nor Mr. Offley Crew nor himself were in Cheshire at that time Saxon had sworn he saw them at Mere together And to this end one Billing Margaret Davis Mrs. Sidney Lane Charles Reeves Mr. Ashburnham Sir William Twisden and Mr. Heveningham did all sufficiently testify that Sir Robert Cotton was in Town about that time and some of them being his own Servants that he was never in Cheshire since April 6th last nor never out of London till after June As to Mr. Offley Crew Sir Willoughby Aston declared every day particularly where he was from May 26. to June the 4th on which day he went from Sir Willoughby's House homeward Mr. Gregory and Thomas Kid his Servants testifyed that he went directly Home to Crew-Hall in Cheshire that Night and was not at Mere it not being in his way at all As to the Prisoner himself Mr. Booth one of his Brother's declared that he saw his Brother in Town June 3 4 5 6 and so on to June 10. till he went out of Town himself And another of his Brothers Mr. George Booth said he saw him in Town the 4th And the Lord Lovelace testified that he saw him the 5th of June in the House of Lords at the Lord Macclesfield's Trial against Mr. Fitton After it was thus cleared that none of them 3 were where Saxon had sworn they were at that time the Prisoner shew'd the incredibility of his Evidence and proceeded to give an account of his going down so often and so speedily That the first time he went which was betwixt the Coronation and the fitting of the Parliament was to take Possession of a Lease worth 6 or 7000 l. renewed to him by the Bishop of Chester of whose illness he had notice and this he proved by Mr. John Edmonds who said he was a Witness of his taking possession May 5th and by Mr. Henry who was Attorny and delivered him Possession at the same time And for his going out of Town May 27th the occasion of it was to see a sick Child of his and he went so suddenly and privately because he heard there was a Warrant out to apprehend him But while he was at Mere his Wife sent him an Express that as to the Warrant she hoped it was a Mistake but that his eldest Son was very ill and if he intended to see him alive he must make hast up He came but to his House in Cheshire on Sunday May 31. Whence he came on Tuesday morning June 2d and on Wednesday the 3d he was in Town To prove all this Mrs. Kelsey who was his Servant said my Lord told her there was a Warrant out for him which occasioned his coming and moreover his Childs illness The Lady Delamere his Mother testified the illness of his Child in the Country Mr. Kelsey testified his coming to Mere on Sunday Night and going thence on Tuesday Morning and that he had Letters dated June 4. which gave an account my Lord got to London the Night before And Sir Thomas Millington testified the illness of his Son in Town on May 28. he being sent for to him and remembring the time by the date of his Bills After this the Prisoner summ'd up his Evidence and concluded very handsomly and judiciously his Excellent Defence Then Mr. Sol. Gen. having summ'd up the Evidence and the Lord High Steward speaking a few words to this Point of Law which the Prisoner in his Defence seemed to urge That there is a necessity of two Positive Witnesses to convict a Man of Treason and shewing his Mistake about it The Peers withdrew for about half an hour the Prisoner being taken into a little Room appointed for him at the entrance into the Court and then being returned their appearance was took by a Serjeant at Arms and their Verdict took by the Lord H. Steward Seriatim beginning with the Puisne Peer who all declared the Prisoner Not Guilty upon their Honour's Which the Lord H. Steward acquainted him
be proved therein Mr. Solicitor General order'd to be produced in the Court both the Declarations under the Great Seal and the Order of Council for reading the latter was read out of the Council-Book and the Printer call'd and sworn to prove the printing of the Declaration Then the Bishops Petition was deliver'd in also by Sir John Nicholas who being sworn deposed that he received that Paper from the King in Council the 8th of this Month that the King had it from him again the 12th and the 13th he received it again from the King Then the Court went on to prove the Bishops hands to it and for that end Sir Thomas Exton was sworn who viewing the Paper deposed that he did believe it was the Lord Arch-Bishops Writing and that his Name was writ there by himself but that he did not know any of the other Names Then Mr. Brooks being sworn deposed also that he knew the Arch-bishop Hand-writing and viewing the Paper did believe that to be written by him That he knew also the Bishop of St. Asaph's Writing and did believe this to be his That he had seen of the Bishop of Ely's Writing and because this did resemble a Letter that he had by him of his writing to the Bishop of Oxford therefore he did believe this also to be his But this was by the Court adjudged to be but weak Evidence Therefore Mr. Chetwood was sworn to prove the Bishop of Ely's Hand but he only deposed That he had a great while since seen of what was said to be his Writing but that he never saw him write and therefore did not certainly know his Hand And a little after being called to evidence to the Bishop of Bath and Wells and Bishop of Peterborough's Hands he said that he had seen of the Bishop of Bath and Wells Writing but never saw him write his Name and looking on his Name he said he believed that might be his Writing but he was not certain that he rather believed it to be his Hand than that other to be my Lord of Peterborough's After him Mr. Smith deposed viewing the Bishop of Ely's Name that he had a good while since seen of his Writing which this did resemble and therefore he believed it might be his Writing though he could better judg of it when he writ his Name Turner than now it is Ely because there was more Letter to judg by Then Mr. Middleton deposed to the Arch-Bishop and the Bishop of Ely That he had seen their Writing and upon viewing the Paper did believe that this was theirs That also he had my Lord of Peterborough's Writing for some Money two Years ago and he believed this to be like it but he never saw of his Writing but once That once he saw of the Bishop of Bristol's Writing also and did think this like it but could not say more Then Sir Thomas Pinfold deposed to the Bishop of Peterborough's Writing that he never saw but one Letter from him and viewing the Paper that he could not tell upon his own Knowledg that that was his Hand but upon this account that he had heard there was a Paper delivered by my Lords the Bishops to the King and this Paper he supposing to be the same upon that score he did believe it his Hand but upon any other score he could not tell what to say Then Mr. Clavel was sworn who deposed that he had many times seen of the Bishop of Peterborough's Writing and believ'd he knew it and viewing the Paper believ'd that to be his Hand but he could not say that ever he had seen him write Next Mr. James was sworn who deposed to the Bishop of Bristol's Writing that he believ'd he knew his Hand but was not certain because my Lord writ several times several Hands but viewing the Paper he at last acknowledg'd that he believ'd this to be his Then Mr. Nathaniel Powel being sworn deposed to the Bishop of Chichester's writing that he believed he knew his Hand but looking upon his Name said that he did not see his Lordship write that but believ'd it to be like his Hand but would not say positively that he believ'd it was so because for a Man to swear his belief in such a matter seemed to him an extraordinary thing Then the Counsel for the King prayed that the Paper might be read but the Bishops Counsel opposed it First Mr. Serj. Levinz pleaded That a Proof by Comparison of Hands which was the only Proof they had in this case ought not to be received in a Criminal Case and because moreover that Comparison had been proved in such an uncertain manner Then Mr. Serj. Pemberton pleaded that this Evidence did not amount to so much as a Comparison of Hands because none of them had ever seen the Persons write and if it did that was no Evidence in Criminal Cases Then Mr. Pollexfen pleaded that it ought to be consider'd whether Comparison of Hands be Evidence in a Case of Misdemeanour instancing in my Lady Carr's Case in Syderfin's Reports where this Court had adjudg'd it otherwise Or if it be Evidence whether the Belief of a Man that brings nothing to compare with it or ever saw the Party write be good Evidence as a Comparison of Hands Then Mr. Attorney General reply'd that this was Evidence though not so strong as if they had brought those that had seen then write yet Evidence it was and whether it were sufficient that they submitted to the Jury Then Mr. Attorney General prov'd it to be Evidence from Sydney's Case where Evidence upon Comparison of Hands caste him And for the same purpose Mr. Recorder instanced in Sir Samuel Barnardiston's Case but was presently filenc'd by Sir Robert Sawyer who told him that Sir Samuel there owned his Hand Mr. Justice Powel and Mr. Holloway then declared that they thought the Proof too slender in this Case for that it ought to be stronger in Criminal Matters than in Civil Therefore the Court being divided the Ld. Ch. Justice told Mr. Sollicitor he must go on to some other Proof And then Mr. Blathwayt was sworn who looking on the Paper deposed that he did believe that to be the Paper which the Ld. Arch-Bishop and the other six owned at the Council-Table the 8th of this Month where when they appeared the first time they were asked if they did own that Paper they immediately answered that they humbly hoped as they stood there Criminals his Majesty would not take Advantage against them but however they would obey his Majesty's Command Thereupon they were commanded to withdraw which they did That when they came in the second time they seemed unwilling to own the Paper saying as they did before and denying the publishing of it That the third time they attended they did all own it and the Arch-Bishop said it was all written with his own Hand and that he had not made use of his Clerk the King not making any Promise to them that