Selected quad for the lemma: end_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
end_n	day_n	holy_a	week_n	1,262	5	9.5438	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
B09144	An explanation of the solemn advice, recommended by the Council in Connecticut Colony, to the inhabitants of that jurisdiction, respecting the reformation of those evils, which have been the procuring cause of the late judgments upon New-England. By Mr. James Fitch ...	Fitch, James, 1622-1702.; Mather, Increase, 1639-1723.; Fitch, James, 1622-1702. Brief discourse proving that the first day of the week is the Christian Sabbath.; Connecticut. Council.	1683 (1683)	Wing F1063; ESTC W24614	58,047	146

to be our Christian Sabbath we may see in 1 Cor. 16.12 1. That which is there exprest is by way of precept and injunction for so the Apostle saith he had given order concerning the collection of the Saints and therefore not left it as a matter of indifferency or liberty but whosoever did neglect this did transgress the Apostolical precept and order 2. This order for the collection for the Saints was not only sent to the Churches at Corinth but to the Churches at Galatia so that it was an order and injunction common to the Churches 3. The order did not only respect the collection it self but the time and day of it that upon the first day of the week let every one lay by him in store as God hath prospered him so it is express in the 2 d. verse now the Argument follows Arg. The first day of the week was either a common and indifferent day or a holy day the day of the Christian Sabbath but no common and indifferent day for how could the Apostle by his injunction and order make it necessary for the Churches to attend this work of mercy collection for the Saints on the first day of the week if it was but a common day and thus esteem one common day above another contrary to his Doctrine Rom. 14.5 far be it from us to think that the Apostle could so contradict his own Doctrine but it was because the first day of the week was made to be a holy day and such works of mercy are very suitable unto the day 2 Arg. Or thus the Apostle did order collection for the Saints to be on the first day of the week either because it was the Christian Sabbath or for some other reasons but I have so long waited to he●r of some other reasons why the Apostle should lay an injunction upon all Churches to have such an honourable respect to this day without any consideration of it as the Lords Day and Christian Sabbath and all the Objectors and Cavillers against the first day of the week the Lords day have not brought forth the least appearance of any reason to the contrary that I confess I begin to think that the Opponents themselves within themselves have received a Sentence of despair of giving any reason only they have travelled and brought forth one poor Objection that there is not a word spoken of a Sabbath here and who saith there is but the Argument is taken from the Apostles Order and by Apostolical Order advanced the first day of the week above any other day and that the reason of this is either because it is the day of the Christian Sabbath or for some other reason which never yet was brought to light and therefore we conclude as in the former that the Apostle by his Doctrine did settle the first day of the week to be a holy day a Christian Sabbath Now in the next place concerning the practice of the Apostles the practice of the Churches of which much may be said in order to their attendance to holy Duties in the first day of the week because it was a day separated for holy Worship but at present we may consider Acts 20.7 First it was a Church assembly there spoken of for it is said the Disciples came together 2. Secondly the end for the sake of which they came together it was for the sake of religious duties that they might partake of the Lords Supper called breaking of Bread in this place as in Act. 2.42 and did not go alone without other Religious performances viz. Prayer and hearing the Word Preached 3. Thirdly It is spoken of as a custom and usuall practice of the Disciples therefore it is said on the first day of the week when the Disciples came together Paul having waited for and taking this opportunity to Preach to them for he abode seven dayes among them but this was the last day his being ready to depart on the morrow as is exprest in the 7th verse Arg. Hence the Argument is Paul and the Disciples with him either kept the Seventh day Sabbath or the first day of the week a Christian Sabbath or else they kept no Sabbath at all if they had kept the seventh day Sabbath that was the day before this First day of the Week then they had a meeting after a Sabbath manner for Religious Duties then the Evangelist would not have spoken of this Meeting on the First day as the only Church Meeting of the seven dayes of the Apostles abode amongst them therefore it was the first day of the Week in which Paul and the Disciples assembled and kept as a Christian Sabbath Much more hath been said by others and I have somewhat more in readiness to say if the occasion calleth for it and God giveth opportunity But at present having proved that the first day of the Week was by the Lord himself made by his Word and by his Works to be the Lords day and our Gospel and Christian Sabbath and his Apostles were guided by the Holy Ghost to settle it in the room and place of the seventh day both by their Doctrine and by their Practice we proceed to make Reply to John R. his Answers to the Questions And concerning his Preface to his Answers I shall at present omit it until I come to his Conclusion and then consider both his Preface and Conclusion together these and the Superscription being to the same Purpose and the same for substance Quest 1. The first Question Are not just and necessary Consequences from Scripture to be taken for the mind of the Holy Ghost in Scripture or else how shall we Answer the Papists against the error of Transubstantiation John R. his Answer is Ans If the Consequence drawn from Scripture is agreeable to the Scripture and no wayes contrary to the Scripture it must be granted truth because it speaks what the Scripture speaks But as to the Papists John R. saith they had no Scripture that said a piece of Bread was the body of our Lord or that our Lord was turned into a piece of Bread or that Bread was turned into our Lord for our Lord did not say to his Disciples Take eat this Bread is my Body as the Papists did affirm therefore they said that which the Scripture did not say so do you say that which the Scripture doth not say for you call the first day of the Week the Christian Sabbath but the Scripture doth not you call every first day of the Week the Lords Day but the Scripture doth not so Reply The Reply to Iohn R. his Answer follows His Answer consists of two parts 1. First partly of a seeming Concession granting that Consequences drawn from Scripture and agreeable to Scripture are truth c. 2. Secondly he compareth us unto the Papists for saying that which the Scripture doth not say and the Argument he gives is If we say the first day of the Week is the Lords day

obeyed in the same as God the Father in the other so that both these works have some thing to keep them in memory by the appointment of the Workmen Reply The Reply to John R. his Answer is First He saith the work of Creation is the greatest work and his reason is because God made all things The Reply is That if the work of Creation be the greatest then the work of Redemption is not so great as the work of Creation but a work is greater or lesser according to the greatness of wisdom power and goodness manifest in it but the wisdom of God shining in the work of Redemption excels the wisdom shining in the work of Creation 1 Cor. 2.7 wisdom in a mystery and the power made manifest in Redemption is greater than in Creation called the exceeding greatness of his power towards them that do believe Eph. 1.19 And for goodness to finners John R. cannot but confess it is the mercifullest work and yet he denieth that a day shall be appointed for a memorial of this greatest work but as it is worthy of a Day so the Lord hath appointed the first day of the week for that end as hath been proved by the Scriptures abovementioned and therefore it is in vain for John R. to deny it Qu. 5. The fifth Question is Was not the work finished at the Resurrection of Christ on the first day of the week when he entred into his rest as God did into his Ans John R. his Answer is The price was paid as soon as the Sacrifice was offered and the dead raised but the work of Redemption as yet not perfected in us for we are yet under the bondage of corruption Rom. 8.23 but to say that Christ entred into his Rest on the first day of the week I cannot for he did assemble himself with his Disciples after his Resurrection being seen of them forty dayes before he ascended up into Heaven and upon the day of his Resurrection did eat with his Disciples and did travail with them which was Labour Reply The Reply is that Iohn R. denieth that the work of Redemption was finished because it is not finished in us Whence his Argument is That if Redemption be not perfected in Believers then not finished by Christ but this is false reasoning for want of distinguishing between the work of Redemption and the work of Application Christs work of Redemption may be finished although the work of the Holy Ghost as sent from the Father and the Son to apply Redemption may not be finished and is not in this life perfected to the Elect. Obj. The second Objection is That Christ was not entred into rest on the first day of the week and his reason is because he assembled with his Disciples did eat and travail c. Reply The Reply is Either Christ was on the first day of the Week in a state of Humiliation or a state of Exaltation if in a state of Humiliation then his Resurrection was no degree of his Exaltation contrary to Rom 1.3 4 Eph. 1.20 21. if he were in a state of Exaltation then in a state of blessed and glorious Rest And although there are divers degrees of his Exaltation as his Resurrection Ascention Session at the right hand of the Father and his return at the last Day to be the Judge but Resurrection is one degree of his Exaltation and of his Rest and therefore he was entred into Rest although for the conviction and confirmation of His Disciples he did shew himself and by some sensible signs make it manifest that it was himself that very humane nature which had suffered death was raised that he that descended was raised and is the same also that ascended into Heaven Eph. 4.10 Qu. 6. Did not Christ allow this to be called his Day as the Sacrament is called his or the Loras Supper Ans Iohn R. his Answer is I cannot say that ever the first day of the week was called the Lords Day and therefore cannot say whether he allowed it or no I know that the Cup which our Lord communicated to his Disciples they called it the Lords Cup and the Table at which they sa●e to communicate of the Bread and Wine they called the Lords Table and the Apostle Iohn calleth that Day in which the Lord communicated to him those Visions in the Revelations the Lords Day but what day of the Year or of the Week I cannot tell Reply The Reply to this is there hath been Arguments given of all forts to prove both from humane and divine Testimony the word and works of the Lord the Doctrine and Examples of the Apostles of Christ that the first day of the Week was that very day called the Lords day Rev. 1.10 and if John Rogers was asked who his Father was he would be ashamed to say he could not tell and yet he cannot but know that as to humane Test mony there is more clear and infallible proof that the first day of the week was called the Lords Day than he can have who his Father was this being the Testimony of all the Churches in all Ages from the primitive time to this very day until of late some few ha●e risen up and raised the Objection But besides all these Arguments from the Scripture have been given to prove it and if yet Iohn R. will say he cannot sell we must leave him to his ●gnorance and he ought not to be off●nded with us and revile us because we do know Qu. 7. Did not Christ countenance and allow his Apostles in the practice and solemnization of that day in proper Sabbath Ordinances Ans His Answer is before saying not that I know the Ordinance of the Sabbath is rest to Man and Beast for so God ordained in the fourth Command after the six dayes work to rest Qu. 8 Are not Christ and his Apostles therein to be a pattern for Christians to follow and so vertually a divine Institution Ans Iohn Rogers his Answer is that the eighth Question is answered by the Answer to the seventh and the answer to the seventh was the same with the Answer to the sixth viz. that he could not tell that he did not know and thus he makes a quick dispatch of Answers to the Governours Questions But in this he is like those who when the Question was asked them concerning the Baptisme of John whence was it from Heaven or of Men they reasoned with themselves saying if we shall say from Heaven he will say unto us why did you not then believe him but if we shall say of Men we fear the People for all hold John as a Prophet Mat. 21.25 26. and therefore they concluded it was safest for them to say we cannot tell ver 17. Thus likewise if Iohn R. should say that the Patern and the Examples of the Apostles respecting Worship and particularly concerning the Sabbath ought to be followed then he knows it would be said why do you not follow

to his station and work as he had opportunity in relation to God or Man this is called a fulfilling of all righteousness Mat. 3.15 2. Secondly There is an actual fulfilling of the Law literally and in this sence the Priest in his Labour in Sabbath duties of his Office might be said to prophane the Sabbath Mat. 12.5 And a fulfilling spiritually and finally according to the true scope of the Law and thus he was said to be blameless and so may we if we keep that day holy which Christ hath appointed as most suitable to Gospel times and the most spiritual scope of the fourth Command although we prophane the seventh day Sabbath 3. Thirdly To come nearer to the Text mentioned Christ came not to make any destructive change of the Law but to fulfil it and therefore to make a perfecting or persective change And the Godly Learned do note that the word to destroy the Law signifies to dissolve or pull it in pieces Christ came not to dissolve or pull the Law in pieces and leave the wills of Men to a lawless liberty but to bring in a stricter holiness and righteousness and a more perfect Administration and edition of the Law and this is expresly his scope and Christ himself expounds his meaning in the following part of the Chapter in Mat. 5. whilst Christ gives a more spiritual exposition than the corrupt Pharisees did who did cleave to and pervert the Letter of the Law as this Jewish Sabbatarian doth the letter of the fourth Command but when Christ changeth the seventh day Sabbath to the first day of the week that is the Sabbath from the seventh day of the week to the first day of the week with respect to the commemoration not only of the old Creation which is subjected unto corruption but the new Creation the work of Redemption which shall remain what destructive change is this of the Law in any one jott or tittle of it and no more reason for any to complain of a change then they had when Christ changed and made water into wine if John Rogers cannot chuse but refuseth this Gospel wine yet let him not scorn and scoff at us for our thankful receiving of it And if Beza be in so good credit with J. R. as he seemeth to intimate let him credit Beza in this matter also who attesteth that in an ancient Copy he had found it thus Recorded That the Apostle had given order for the Collections in the first day of the week with this added the Lords Day 1 Cor. 16.2 But seeing this Judaizer and others of his perswasion have so wrested this Text Mat. 5.17 we shall add one consideration more for the clearing of the same and our Argument is this Arg. As Christ came to fulfil the Law so likewise he came to fulfil the Prophets so it is expressed in Mat. 5.17 think not saith Christ that I am come to destroy the Law or the Prophets I am not come to destroy but to fulfil But Christ did fulfil the Prophets their prophecies by performing and answering the scope and end of the same and by changing the Prophecies into performances Oh most happy and glorious change without which the Prophets their Prophecies could not have been fulfilled this was far off from a destructive change of one jott or tittle of the Prophecies So likewise Christ did fulfil the Law and particularly that Law the fourth Commandment by performing and answering the scope and end of it and by changing not the Sabbath as a Sabbath but by changing of the Sabbath from the seventh day to the first day of the week and this was no destructive change of one jott or tittle of the fourth Command but a most happy and glorious change with respect to the glory of the Law-giver and the good of his People which blessed ends are more fully and perfectly attained by the change than could possibly be by a seventh day Sabbath as is more fully explicated in my Catechism so that the fourth Command complains not it is wronged not a jott or tittle of it destroyed no more than when vessels of Brass or Earthen Vessels are turned into Gold and that which is less perfect is turned into that which is more perfect for though the Law of God is ever perfect as to the time and subject for whom it is fitted and so as the seventh day Sabbath as it respected the time and subjects for whom it was fitted but yet when the first day of the week is appointed by the Lord of the Sabbath as most suitable to Gospel times and the subjects of Gospel Administrations now that which was less perfect respecting this time and state most give place to that which is more perfect and in this the fourth Command is not destroyed but fulfilled the Law being no Enemy to the Gospel but like Moses and Aaron do kiss one another upon the Mount of the Lord and thus doth the fourth Command and our Christian Sabbath Qu. 11. Whether do you well knowing these Arguments are pleaded and accordingly practised in all Christian Churches and our Laws thereupon founded to disturb our Peace offend our Consciences oppose our Government before you gave us conviction either by writing or otherwise when as you were left to enjoy your own perswasion in private Ans To which John R. his Answer is as followeth I am willing to refer it to the Judgement of God whether I have done well or not well who knows whether you have stood for his truth or I but to say pleaded and practised in all Churches I know it to be otherwise both by Books and Reasonings and as for the Laws respecting these things I know no Authority you have to make such Laws for there is one Law-giver who is able to save or to destroy respecting the things as to matter of Worship you ought to have been obedient to his Laws and not to have adventured to make Laws for him founding them upon notions and so become despisers of his Laws and persecutors of those which will worship God by his own Laws and whatever you think of it it is God opposeth you by us wherein you act in darkness and not Govern according to his will and as for our not giving you conviction as you say you are so far from receiving conviction from our hands that you would not give us liberty for to make our lawful defence but use your unreasonable power by preventing us of lawful plea and also we did write the first time we were brought before you Iohn Allyn the Secretary being Judge which was before you had any first-day Law as since you have made w● not knowing then but that we should have had liberty to have pleaded our innocency but was forthwith took away by the Constable and not suffered to make our defence being fined ten shillings a piece and committed to the Prison and no Law of God or of this Colony produced to convict us by which we

given to the Lord is too manifest and we are prone through fear or favour or not observance to neglect admonishing such the Church doth appoint some Brethren to take notice of such Children and timely meekly wisely and faithfully to admonish them and their Parents as the matter shall require and if private means doth not prevail then to manage the complaint orderly in other steps Fifthly Whereas the Sacrament of the Lords Supper the Seal of Communion ought o●●en to be celebrated for the prevention of neglect we do determine God granting opportunity that we will be in the use of that Ordinance once in every six Weeks Sixthly Whereas it is too often seen that many through fear or favour or sense of inability do behave thems●lves to their Brethren as if they were not concerned in that g●est Duty of Admonishing their Brother for offensive behaviours unless it be in cases wh●rein they themselves suffer wrong and h●nce love decayeth and offences abound and Christs Government in works denied We do sol●mnly pr●mise that we will in any w●s● rebuke a●d ●o● suffer sin to rest upon our Bro●her but deal faithfully according to Christ● Order And seeing we feel by woful Experience how pr●ne we are soon to forget the works of the Lord and our own Vows We do agree and determine that this Writing or Contents of it shall be once in every Year read in a Day of Fasting and Prayer before the Lord and his Congregation and shall leave it with our Children that they do the same in their solemn dayes of mourning before the Lord that they may never forget how their Fathers ready to perish in a strange Land and with sore grief and trembling of heart and yet with hope in the tender mercy and good will of him who dwelt in the burning Bush did thus solemnly renew their Covenant with God And that our Children after us may not provoke the Lord and be cast off as a degenerate Off-spring but may tremble at the Commandment of God and learn to place their hope in him who although he hath given us a Cup of Astonishment to drink yet will display his Banner over them who fear him A BRIEF DISCOURSE Proving that the First Day of the Week is the Christian Sabbath Wherein also the Objections of the Anti-Christian Sabbatarians of late risen up in Connecticut Colony are refuted By Mr. James Fitch Pastor of the Church in Norwich in New-England Gal. 4.10 11. Ye observe dayes and moneths and times and years I am afraid of you lest I have bestowed upon you labour in vain Gal. 5.12 I would they were even cut off which trouble you Col. 2.16 17. Let no man therefore judge you in meat or in drink or in respect of an holy day or of the New Moon or of the Sabbath dayes Which are a shadow of things to come but the body is of Christ Printed in the Year 1683. ARguments Grounded upon the Word of God to prove that the First Day of the Week is by Divine Appointment the Day separated for Holy Worship and ought to be kept Holy unto the Lord according to the Rules of Sanctifying the Sabbath and consequently the Cessation of the seventh Day Sabbath in these Gospel Dayes And then a Reply to John Rogers his Answers to some Questions sent to him from the Honourable Governour of Connecticut and likewise an Answer to John R. his seven Questions with which he concluded Concerning the Arguments the Question is not now concerning the Name whether to be called a Christian Sabbath which some take to be Analogically a resemblance to the Jewish Sabbath or whither to be called the Lords Day which some have thought to be a more Gospel Name But the Subject of our Discourse at this time is not concerning the Name but the thing and far be it from me to imagine that I can add any thing to or do so well as those Worthies Doctor Bound Mr. Abbot Dr. Owen Mr. Baxter Mr. Shepard and others have done in their Learned Elaborate Discourses upon this Subject only I shall take some Arguments which to me seem most suitable to my present purpose 1. The first is from Rev. 1.10 in which the Apostle declared that he was in the Spirit on the Lords Day For the opening of which words to make way for the Argument we may Consider First It was some particular Day in the week which the Apostle calls the Lords Day for his Scope is to notifie at what particular time he had the Visions and Revelations of so great concernment to all the Churches in all Ages to the end of the World and this he calleth the Lords Day Arg. Which was either some particular day or some general name applicable to any day of divine Vision if so then the answer should be the same with the Question and prove and make evident nothing for the question is what day he had these divine visions and the Answer then should be in the day of divine Visions far be it from us to think that the Apostle guided by the Spirit of God in every word he said could speak such nonsence therefore it must be understood of some particular day in the week 2. Secondly It was some particular Day well known to the Churches of Christ to whom he wrote by that name of the Lords Day Arg. For it was a Day well known to the Churches by the name of the Lords Day or else unknown and obscure and would want an Exposition far be it likewise from us to think that the Apostle guided by the Spirit of God and having undertaken to make known to the Churches in what particular Day he had those Divine Revelations should put an obscure and unknown name upon the Day by which the Churches could not know what he meant therefore it is to be understood of a particular day well known to the Churches of Christ 3. Thirdly This particular Day so well known to the Churches by the name of the Lords Day was a Day of divine Institution a Holy Day Arg. For it is called the Lords Day either because it was a day of divine Revelation or a Day by divine Institution but it was not called the Lords Day because it was a day of divine Revelation for as we heard before this would be to speak nonsense and nothing to the Question therefore it was called the Lords Day because it was so by divine Institution and so a Holy Day Take one Argument more for the clearing of this That which is honoured by the Holy Ghost in the Apostle with the same honourable and holy Title and Name as belongs to the Lords Supper and other holy Institutions is holy as these are Arg. The reason is for if the Holy Ghost should honour this particular Day with as sacred a Name of Honour as Ordinances are and yet not be a holy Day it would be to honour it above its due and consequently to degrade other divine Institutions but