circumstances considered it more then probable that this third Chapter is nothing but an history of what was done on the sixth day And so the mention of the Sabbath in the beginning of the second Chapter may well enough in order of things take place at the end of the third and then it will roundly follow That the first sin went before the first Sabbath As to that which is further alledged Exod. 31.17 Ans 3 That on the seventh day God rested and was refreshed I answer It is onely a Metaphorical expression for we may not think that the everlasting God the Lord the Creator of the ends of the earth fainted or was weary in the works of the Creation or that he needed any rest or respiration But when the Holy Ghost speaks to us men he delights to speak after the manner of men respecting more the weakness of our capacity than the exactness and propriety of the Phrase In a word suppose God's resting and being refreshed on the seventh day intimate some delightful satisfaction like that which men take in things that refresh their souls yet it follows not that this satisfaction was taken in the creatures but rather in Christ who had now undertaken God's satisfaction for man's transgression And this indeed is a sweet refreshing as to a guilty creature so to an angry God and in this sense the Scriptures do sweetly harmonize Isai 42.1 Mat. 3.17 Mat. 12.18 unanimously testifying that our blessed Redeemer is the person in whom the eternal God delighteth in whom the Father is well-pleased As for the other Scriptures which T.T. crouds in for company-sake in his Margin as Job 38.7 Luke 2.13 the one speaking of the Angels song at the Creation of the earth the other of their joyful Hymne at the birth of Christ I wonder how they make for his purpose to prove that man had not sinned before the Sabbath But impertinent quotations are no rarities in his book he would make a glorious shew of Scripture to dazle the eies of the simple when the Scriptures he cites are neither in sense nor sound applicable to his purpose which if it be not packing sophistry let the world judg Well his first tripartite argument is weighed and found to light And hitherto for ought appears to the contrary the first Sabbath was not before sin I proceed to the second 2. T. T s Argum. Some time sayes he must be allowed for the sin of Angels and after that for the parley with the woman and it was no little space wherein Adam gave significant names to the creatures For the Angels sin Ans 1 to guesse precisely at the time of it is neither easie nor necessary And in disputes of this nature we must be wise to sobriety not to curiosity a 1 Tim. 3.6 pride was a principal ingredient in their sin and b Job 4.18 God charged them with folly for their pride how much more folly shall sinful man be found guilty of who in the pride of his foolish heart shall presume to be wise above that which is written Some think that place Luke 10.28 may refer to the first fall of the Angels being mentioned as a check to the disciples ready to be lifted up with pride at the success of their ministry Ne factis miraculis superbirent discipuli adduxit Domiuus exemplum Satanae c. Stella in loc However it is most consentaneous to Scripture and Reason to conceive that the Angels being spiritual substances must in their actings whether good or evil be proportionable to their beings And sin being a spiritual evil how quick a progresse it might make in such creatures let any man judg who can but compare things spiritual with spiritual To me it is no great difficulty to apprehend that in a very few moments by an aspiring thought legions of Angels might become legions of Divels Especially being for ought I know linked together in a conjoyned apostasie For Adam's naming the creatures this also might soon be dispatched Answ 2 considering that not every individual creature as T.T. would have it but onely the birds and beasts were made to pass before Adam of which there are not many kinds Primi parentes insignes Philosophi Luther in Gâ—n Cap. 1. and not many of a kind created at first And doubtless it cost Adam no study to impose significant names upon them He had natural Philosophy enough concreated with him to know the properties and qualities of the creaures 1 Kin. 4.33 34 and he needed no dictionary to find out suitable names for them If Solomon after the Fall were so well read in the book of the creatures that he could write a complete Commentary upon it from the Cedar to the Hysop what shall we think of Adam before the Fall But to put all out of doubt Dr. Twisse moral of the Sabbath p. 51. that the naming of the Creatures took up no long time is evident for they were all named before Eve was formed Gen. 2.19 20. So as all this might be done before noon and time enough left before night for the acting of that fatal tragedy the Fall of Man as a judicious Writer concludes For the parley betwixt the Woman and the Serpent Answ 3 we have no reason to judge that long when the Scripture cuts it so short Questionless the Serpent was not onely a subtile but a nimble disputant and it was his policy to be as quick as he could that the woman might be conquered before she had time to recollect her self Besides in the judgment of most Interpreters she began to stagger and give ground at the first assault So that all this Authors conjectures laid together are too weak to bear the weight of that confident conclusion Nothing is more certain then that the Highest himself did both sanctifie and celebrate the first Sabbath and that before sin p. 11. I may well say nothing is more uncertain I have given some Scripture-arguments already to make it more then probable I shall add more in the third branch to make it little less then infallible that man fell on the sixth day For the present I shall onely cast in one Argument against the supposed institution of the Sabbath in Paradise If the Sabbath was instituted in Paradise Argu. then Adam did observe and was bound to observe the first Sabbath in Paradise But neither of these can be proved from Scripture Therefore c. 1. That Adam did unquestionably observe the first Sabbath in Paradise cannot be demonstratively proved from Scripture This is undeniable that whenever or where-ever he kept his first Sabbath he did it in imitation of God's example Now how could he rest a whole day by God's example till God had fully completed the first seventh dayes rest for his example Eph. 5.1 Imitation of God being a subsequent not a concomitant act a following of him as dear children not a fellow-acting with him I can therefore see
no congruity in that passage of T.T. where he reasons thus against reason p. 54. Certainly if Adam were a follower of God as a dear child he must needs keep the Sabbath with his Father With his Father how then could he follow him Certainly God went before if Adam followed him as a dear child I cannot conceive how he could possibly keep a Sabbath that God himself had not first blessed and sanctified to that end I may upon better grounds suppose with a late renowned Champion in this controversie that God alone kept the first Sabbath as Christ alone the first Lord's day that he might afford Adam an example Mr. Cawdrey's Sab. rediv. p. 3. cap. 1. as of working six daies by his being exercised six daies in the work of creation so of resting the seventh in it's next weekly return and so successively week after week But it will be said if Adam were bound to keep the first Sabbath we are bound to believe he did keep it Therefore a word or two of that 2. If he were bound I demand quo jure by what Law By the Law written in his heart why then was he bound to keep a Sabbath before there was a Sabbath to keep for the Law was graven in his heart on the sixth day as a branch of that * Eph. 4.24 Col. 3.10 divine image of God concreated with him Whereas the Sabbath to be sure was not instituted till the seventh day if then Besides the Law written in the table of Adam's heart was the same in this Authors judgment which was afterwards written in Tables of Stone that is the fourth Commandement which if we take his and Mr. Brabournes Comment upon it prescribes six daies for labour before a seventh of rest Now this order Adam could not possibly observe for the first week being created but on the sixth day He must therefore look out some other Law and where he will find it I cannot see unless in Gen. 2.3 and he must be very sharp-sighted to find any thing there that looks like a Law binding our first Parents to observe the first Sabbath For let the words be well pondered And God blessed the seventh day and sanctified it Gen. 2.3 Opened becase in it he had rested from all his works which he had created and made Whence we may clearly gather 'T is not said because he should rest but had rested that God's resting on the seventh day was in order of time before his blessing and sanctifying of the day as those words ver 2. On the seventh day God rested from all his works which he had made See Mr. White of Dorchester Gen. 2. imply the making of the works before God's resting so ver 3. He blessed and sanctified the seventh day because in it he had rested must needs intimate that God's resting on the seventh day went before his sanctifying of the day or setting it apart for a Sabbath Not long before I grant As Chap. 1. where Moses relates God's six daies works as finished by him then followeth the blessing upon them So in the 2. Chap. he makes the blessing to follow upon Gods resting as before upon his working but evidently long enough to discharge our first parents by virtue of those words from any obligation to keep the first Sabbath And whereas T.T. argues that the Sabbath was made for man and if Adam were a man the Sabbath was made for him I grant the whole argument onely with this distinction That although it was made for man yet it follows not that it was made for man as soon as man was made Neither has he alledged any one text of Scripture Valeat quantum valere potest of sufficient evidence to support his grand conclusion That the seventh-day-Sabbath was instituted and observed in pure Paradise Which if it b Yet I grant it not should be granted him yet his feeble cause would receive no invincible strength by it For although it would prove a Sabbath and a weekly Sabbath one day in seven to be moral and perpetual which I deny not and herein I could joyn issue with the contrary-minded yet what is this to the perpetuity and immutability of that old seventh day since in the judgment of all Interpreters both antient and modern except Jews onely one day in seven or a seventh part of weekly time is here perpetually established that old seventh day onely temporarily and during the state of the old world So Chrysostome Here saies he from the beginning God has intimated to us this doctrine 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chrysost Hom. 19. in Gen. 2. instructing us to set apart one day in the circle of every week for spiritual exercises Note by the way he saies not it is expresly determined here that is left for the fourth Commandement but it is intimated and implied here And the like saies Junius But to draw to a conclusion I suppose it is more then probably demonstrative If I may so speak without a Soloecism that the old Sabbath was instituted though in the beginning yet after the Fall in man's corrupt estate when he had put off his publick capacity as the representative of mankind and was looked upon as a single person yea a sinful person and one that stood in need of a Redeemer and so the day must needs be alterable as shall be shortly argued and evinced However if we should suppose the date of the Sabbaths institution to be utterly uncertain as the institution of Sacrifices is I see not but this may argue as to the day mutability stamped upon it It is true the solemne worship of God is unalterable as long as there is a God to be worshipped but the old way of worship by Sacrifices was mutable from the very first original of it Thus I grant the time of worship Rom. 12.1 Chrys in Hebr. Hom. 11. Basil in Isai c. 20. the Sabbath it self being an inseparable adjunct of solemne worship is perpetual but the old day the seventh from the Creation was made mutable in the first institution of it Indeed in some sense we have sacrifices still spiritual sacrifices and we have a Sabbath still yea * Mat. 24.20 a literal Sabbath But old Sabbaths and old Sacrifices being twins though both honorable and serviceable in their generations yet like Hippocrates twins they lived together and died together and let both together in God's name be buried in the grave of Christ so as never to rise again 2 Cor. 5.15 17. But let our Gospel-worship and Gospel-Sabbath take life from our Saviour's Resurrection which brought with it a new Creation a new World making all things new as the Apostle speaks 2. That the old seventh day was made alterable in the first institution will further appear if we consider the Law or command by which it was instituted which is no where to be found but in Gen. 2.3 As for the Law written in Adam's breast it is
in the notation of it for John 20.1 having spoken of the first day of the week verse 19. he reduplicates it most emphatically saying the same day then in the evening that day being the first day of the week as if he would be loth to be mistaken in that point of time and though for the present the Apostles might be ignorant of their own practise what it tended to as Mary was when she poured the box of ointment on our Saviours head that she did it for his burying yet afterwards by Christs second apparition that day seven-night they were better instructed witness their after-assembling on that day Acts 2. and Acts 20. to conclude this why our blessed Saviour should neglect the Jewes Sabbath and afford his-glorious presence in Christian assemblies on the first day of the week thus often and thus eminently but to establish the day for sacred assemblies and to teach us on what day especially we may expect his presence and blessing I confess I am to seek And although this mark may seem obscure to persons possest with prejudice yet the objectors attempts to deface it are utterly invalid he ha's indeed trampled upon it with the Prelates old shoes for his objections are the very same which the Prelatical party so much defied by himself urged long ago but he cannot tread out the divine impression which Christ ha's stampt upon it The apparitions of Christ on this day do further tend to mark out the day especially in a joynt consideration with the next scripture-mark viz. 3. The gracious speeches actions and transactions of Christ at his several appearings tending partly to prove his Resurrection the ground of our hope and the hinge of the day to this purpose we may observe how sweetly our gracious Redeemer condescended to his poor doubting staggering disciples manifesting himself even to all their senses to their hearing by his heavenly voice to their seeing by his visible presence yea to their feeling by offering his sacred body to be touched and handled by them and partly to dignify his Resurrection-day distinguishing it from all other dayes by Sabbath-exercises As 1. By his heavenly instructions opening the Scriptures Luke 24.46 and preaching peace to his disciples and to us as well as them having slain the enmity by his Cross Eph. 2.16 17. he came and preached peace and this day he came with his Olive branch in his mouth saying peace be unto you 2. By giving forth commissions to his Apostles John 20 19. As my father hath sent me so send I you whose sins ye remit they are remitted c. And then breathing upon them the Holy Ghost 3. By convincing demonstrations of his Resurrection to strengthen the faith of Thomas John 20.26 to which some add 4. His celebration of the sacred supper according to that promise I will no more drink of the fruit of the vine Mark 14.25 untill that day I drink it new in the kingdom of God That is after I rise from the dead which therefore t is like that then he did Yea then he brake bread and was known of the disciples in breaking of bread as he sate with them Luke 24.30 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not at meat as we read it the word only implyes his gesture of siting However his first and second apparition together with the forementioned great transactions of instructing inspiring blessing sending his Apostles on this day and performing most of these at their solemn meetings do argue more for this day than any other that it is the day which Christ ha's selected and sealed for the religious assemblies and Sabbath-exercises of his Church in all future ages to the end of the world But I must contract 4 Another indeleble mark of honour fix'd upon the first day of the week is The mission of the Holy Ghost or sending the promise of the father as a princely largess or royal gift of Christ upon his Coronation-day Luke 24.40 John 15.26 Acts 1.4 ch 2. 33. such a gift as was never given before but when God gave his Son Jesus Christ God so loved the world that he gave his son and Christ so loved the world that he gave his spirit And as Christ was given according to the fulness of the promise upon the day of his Resurrection so was the blessed spirit of promise upon the day of Pentecost And the same wonderful providence that ordered the Resurrection of Christ to fall upon the first day of the week did also take order for the sending of the spirit on the same day For that the day of Pentecost Acts 2.1 was the first day of the week as it is generally taken for granted by Christian writers so it may be evidently proved by the Scriptures I shall not puzle the Reader with perplexing intricacies nor lead men into labyrinths to find out the truth Let plain Scripture determin the matter look to the statute-lawes of Moses concerning the feast of Pentecost Exod. 34.21 22. Six dayes shalt thou work but on the seventh day thou shalt rest both in earing-time and in barvest and thou shalt observe the feast of weekes of the first-fruits of Wheat-harvest Levit. 23.10 11 12 15 16. When ye be come into the land which I give you and shall reap the harvest thereof then ye shall bring a sheaf of your first-fruits of your harvest unto the Priest and he shall wave it together with the offering of a lamb without blemish on the morrow after the Sabbath he shall wave it and ye shall count unto you from the morrow after the Sabbath from the day that yee brought the sheaf seven Sabbaths shall be complete even unto the morrow after the seventh Sabbath ye shall number fifty dayes So Numb 28.26 and more fully Deut. 16.9 Seven weekes shalt thou number unto thee begin to number the seven weeks from such time as thou beginnest to put the sickle to the Corn. From the harmony of which four texts it appeares that this feast had three significant names which were all made good at that solemn Pentecost Acts. 2. 1. Deut. 16.10 It was called the feast of weekes or of sevens because from the waving of the sheaf thehy reckoned as many weekes to this feast as there be dayes in the week namely seven weekes Which evidently shadowed out some weekly Festival under the Gospel the day whereof was denoted by that dya of Pentecost Acts 2. 2. Exod. 23.16 Levit. 23.10 It was called the feast of first-fruits and of harvest because as they began their harvest upon the first of the fifty dayes when they offered the sheaf of first-fruits so they had ended it upon the fiftieth day which was properly the Feast-day upon which they offered the wave-loaves and indeed these fiftie dayes or seven weekes Levit. 23.17 were the appointed weekes of their harvest by the offering of the sheaf at the beginning of their harvest there after fruits were sanctified and the
Le. 23.10 which they are expresly forbidden to do upon their weekly Sabbath Ex. 34.21 22. Six dayes shalt thou labour but on the seventh thoushalt rest both in earing-time and harvest And see how this is coupled with the feast of first-fruits in the very same place Thou shalt observe the feast of weekes c. Now observe it if the morrow after the Sabbath Levit. 23. had been the morrow after the Passeover-Sabbath this would often have fallen upon the weekly Sabbath For the Passe-over-Sabbath being fixed upon a certain day of the month viz. the 15th of Nisan when ever this 15th of Nisan fell upon the Friday the morrow after it must needs be on the Saturday and so they must begin to reap their harvest upon the weekly Sabbath against an expresse command of God The Hebrew Doctors foresaw this inconvenience and had no other way to salve it but by affirming * See Ainsworth in Levit. 23. that this reaping did drive away the Sabbath and that it was lawfull on the Sabbath-day A most impious opinion For it crosses the very letter of Gods Law In earing-time and in harvest thou shalt rest Secondly The morrow after the Sabbath at the begining of their account must be such a morrow as concludes it Levit. 13.15 16. therefore it could not be the morrow of the Passeover-Sabbath or any Festival-Sabbath for there was no such Sabbath at the end of the account whatever there was at the beginning of it Thirdly The passeover-Passeover-Sabbath was fixed to a certain day of the month * Numb 28.17 namely the fifteenth day of the first month and thus all their other Festivals they had their fixed dayes But this feast of Pentecost is no where affixed in all the bookes of Moses to any one certain day of the month nor indeed could it be unless God should make a ceremonial Law to cross the Law of nature or rather to limit the course of divine Providence to ripen their corn just against such a day of the month which as Dr Vsher observes is a very great presumption that the Feast of Pentecost was a moveable Feast namely as to the day of the month but immoveable as to the day of the week so varying that it might always fall upon the day immediately following the ordinary Sabbath Fourthly The Anti-type is the best key to unlock the type And this is clear in the new Testament for that Christ was our first-fruits in reference to his Resurrection St. Paul assures us 1 Cor. 15.20 and that he rose from the dead on the morrow after the weekly Sabbath all the 4 Evangelists do inform us And T. T. ha's granted us that these things must be punctually fulfilled by Christ as well in the time as in the type From his own grant therefore I conclude That the day of first-fruits was the first day of the week therefore so was the day of Pentecost to the everlasting honour of that Lords day and the glory of God the Holy Ghost who sanctifyed it by his presence and power sending down a new supply of tongues from Heaven as if all the tongues upon earth were not sufficient to sound forth the praises of our Redeemer and spread his Gospel all the world over upon the first day of the week as an earnest whereof there was a glorious beginning made this day the Gospel being now published to some of all nations for there was now a great concourse even of every nation under Heaven met at Jerusalem Acts 2.5 and at this meeting three thousand soules converted and baptized v. 41. a double baptism was indeed dispensed this day the Apostles were now baptized with fire and three thousand converts with water Which was such a solemnity as the Church of God never saw the like from that day to this I need say no more T. T. p. 81. the adversary confesses that this was the most glorious Sabbath that ever Church enjoyed Only he would fain perswade himself and others that it was the Saturday-Sabbath but herein he befooles himself and deceives others His Grammar Logick and Arithmetick never falled him more than in this point See what a Grammarian he is Mr. Aspinwal had objected that the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 translated fully come should rather be rendred fully past to which T. T. learnedly replies that the Greek being a Gerund in do signifies fulfilling now I confesse t is the first time that ever I heard of a Greek Gerund in do it may be this author learnt some Latin-Greek-Grammar while he was a Roman-Catholick I wish he do not stick too much in the Gerund in do stil One passage in his book renders it a little suspicious as p. 146 Let us sayes he celebrate the seventh-day-Sabbath a day of delights to the Lord and so obtain meercy for the Sabbath-pollution of our dayes of ignorance What does he hope to obtain mercy by doing Nay then I do not much wonder at his zeal for the Saturday-Sabbath I rather wonder he does not cry up the old Covenant again To trace him yet further he is a little out in his Arithmetick too For in beginning the count of the fifty dayes on a Saturday he begins at the wrong end making the last day of the week to be the first of the week the seventh day the eighth day the first day the second day the sixth day the last day against his own professed principles and is not here strange confusion Let me ask him in good earnest if the seventh day were the first day in all those seven weeks Deut. 16. how was the fourth Commandment kept all that while which according to his opinion will brook no other weekly Sabbath but the last of the week Thus for his Arithmetick Now for his Logick But here he is quite lost his Conclusions are flat Contradictions and his his best Arguments Barbarous absurdities I do him no wrong let the Reader judge I Affirm sayes he Object 1 Pag. 22. of his last book with the most Learned of this Age That the Sabbath from whence our Reckoning arises Levit. 23.11 15. was not the weekly Sabbath but the first day of the Passeover-Feasts And a little before he calls it The Passeover on the morrow of which Sabbath the waving of the Sheaf was exactly accomplished in Christ by the Crucifying Priests who waved him between Heaven and Earth upon the sixth day of the week from which day began the Count of the Apostles Pentecost punctually beginning and ending upon the Seventh-day-Sabbath Here are strange mysteries indeed First Answ he states the Crucifixion of Christ on the morrow of the Passeover-Sabbath and yet he had argued before That Christ was Crucifyed on the Passeover-Sabbath it self upon the day called Good Friday sayes he was our First-fruits waved by the Priests upon the Cross And what day that was he tell us namely The fifteenth of Nisan which was the first day of the Passeover-Feast say his Learned Authors And I
infant-Baptisme he would not own it as an Ordinance of Christ Or thus whether if the Holy Ghost had expresly affirmed in Scripture that in the Apostles times baptisme was once at least administred to infants in a solemn assembly of Christians Paul himself being present and actually assisting in the administration his own conscience would not tell him nay then surely infant-baptism is an Ordinance of Christ Let him say the same concerning the celebration of the first day of the week For the Holy Ghost ha's expresly declared that this day was solemnly kept at Troas Paul himself being present and principally ingaged in the work of the day For let the Text be consulted Acts 20.6 7 8. We came to Troas in five dayes where we abode seven dayes and upon the first day of the week when the disciples came together or were gathered together in a Church-assemblie to break bread Paul preached unto them ready to depart on the morrow and there were many lights in the upper room where they were assembled together and there sate in a window a certain young man named Eutychus c. Here note 1. Una Sabbati id est Die dominiâ—â— dies dominica recordatio dominicae resurrectionis Ven. Beda In Acts 20. Tom 5. When this solemn assembly met together on the first day of the week saies the Text. The day which all the Evangelists witness to be Christs Resurrection-day This day then the disciples were congregated But why the first day of the week Why not th elast day of the week which was the Jewes Sabbath strange if that had been the Christian Sabbath that these primitive Christians had not have met on that day especially since it was but the day before yet more strange that we read not a word of Pauls keeping it since he tarried at Troas seven dayes But most of all that we read not one word in all the New Testament of his owning that day in any Christian Church at all only the first day of the week a fair argument that the day was changed upon the account of our Saviours Resurrection 2. The Church is assembled on the first day of the week but how Privately it may be No publickly and openly as those times would bear yea probably the company was very numerous for it seemes the room below would not hold them but they were fain to get up into the windowes three stories high as Eutychus did Acts 20.8 doubtless it was no small appearance Well 3. Here is a full assembly met upon the first day of the week but why then To break bread sayes the Text to receive the Eucharist sayes the Syriack translation that is to * Math. 26.26 Acts 2.46 1 Cor. 11.24 receive the Lords Supper upon the Lords day The Lords Supper What without preparatory prayer and other Sabbath-exercises that had been but a faint devotion will some say Mr. Shepard answers it well Breaking of bread is here put Thus prayer is put for the whole worship of God Gen. 4.26 ch 12.8 Acts 2.21 Rom. 10.12 13. Synecdochically the part for the whole there is no more reason to exclude prayer preaching singing of Psalms because these are not mentioned than to exclude drinking of wine in the Sacrament as the blind Papists do because neither is that expressed but breaking of bread only So that the first day of the week in effect is called the day of meeting to break bread which was ever accompanied with prayer preaching and other holy exercises Now as the fore-mentioned * Thes 35. Author observes if ever the Saints used to break bread on any other day yet the day is never mentioned as a speciall time for such a purpose nor do we find in all the Scriptures a day distinctly mentioned for holy duties as this first day of the week is wherein a whole Church meet together for such ends but that day was holy The nameing of the particular day for such ends implies the holiness of it Well the Saints at Troas meet on this day to receive the Sacrament But 4. Have they no Sermon yes and Paul himself preaches it v. 7. And continued his speech till mid-night and about break of day he departed Which yeeldeth us two notes one that the first day of the week is no travelling day St. Paul would not we are sure he did not travel this day but the day after another that the first day of the week is a solemn holy-day to be spent in spirituall exercises and Sabbath-day duties as preaching hearing praying conferring breaking of bread in commemoration of Christ his death and Resurrection Why else does the Holy Ghost story this down so exactly and precisely Is it not written for our learning upon whom the ends of the world are come Yea doubtlesse for our learning that we might forecast our journeyes and other affairs in such sort as to keep holy the Lords day and not intrench upon it by travelling or the like thus we have plain Apostolicall practice for the observation of this day But see how this clear Text and truth is cavill'd at This meeting of the Saints at Troas was occasional Obj. 1 T.T. p. 123. Answ and what was the occasion of it he intimates in the next words viz. Paul's departing by Sea This is a sorry shift for the Text saies not that the disciples were assembled by reason of Paul's departure the next day but they were assembled this day to break bread without the least reference to Paul's journey the day following So that this Church-meeting was not occasional but a thing usual upon the first day of the week And the context clearly implies that the puting off of Pauls journey till the next day was occasioned by the Church's meeting this day not this meeting by his departure the next day for the Apostle seems to stay purposely and wait seven dayes among them that he might have a publick opportunity of preaching and communicating with them upon the usual day of their publick assemblies which appears by this convention to have been the first day of the week here was therefore nothing occasional in all this solemnity neither the assembly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 nor Sacrament no nor the Sermon neither but only the length and continuance of the Sermon till mid-night this indeed was occasional by reason of St. Pauls departure on the morrow so the Text it self imports Paul being to depart on the morrow preached and continued his Sermon till mid-night he preacht a long Sermon because it was his last Sermon he was like to preach among them The Saints assembled and brake bread every day Obj. 2 Acts 2.26 therefore they may as well plead for an every day Sabbath as for the first day Sabbath from Acts 20.7 It cannot be proved by Scripture that the Lords Supper is an every dayes Supper Answ or that ever it was celebrated on any day after the first institution but upon the Lords day which
of holy Convocation and so is every first day of the week to us which as some conceive the Holy Ghost foretold long since by the Prophet Ezekiel saying Ezek. 43.27 It shall be that upon the eight day and so forward the Priests shall make your burnt offerings upon the altar and your peace-offerings or thank offerings and I will accept you saith the Lord 't is a clear prophecy of Gospel-times if not the special time of Gospel-worship upon the eighth day i.e. the first day of the week Answ 2. Touching our Saviours travelling this day I have answered before That it was without labour such as is the motion of immortal and glorified bodies and therefore no President for us who dwell in these corruptible houses of clay And I add moreover That Christs walking with his Disciples that day was no more an impeachment to the holy rest of the first day than the Fathers working every day to the Sabbatical rest of the seventh day 'T is our Saviours own Argument in answer to a like objection My Father worketh hitherto and I work John 5.17 That I termed this journey to Emmaus a Sabbath-days journey was in reference to the discourse by the way not the length of the way To which upon second thoughts I add this further answer That 't is very uncertain whether Christ travelled all the way on foot to Emmaus and back again The Scripture is silent and therefore we may not speak The Objector indeed has it often up That Christ travelled fifteen miles on his Resurrection-day but he speaks without Book and can never prove it by Scripture for he might overtake the two Disciples near Emmaus and how he came there we read not neither can we tell how he conveyed himself back again to Jerusalem Guesses and conjectures are no arguments Answ 3. That the Saints cast their accounts on this day I utterly deny we have nothing but the bold and bare word of the Objector to prove it and let him not blame us if we look not upon him as such a Pythagoras that his Ipse dixit should carry it More might be added in pursuance and prosecution of this Thesis that the Lords day is the Christian Sabbath but Mr. Cawdrey Mr. Bernard Mr. Ley and sundry others have spared me this labour POSITION VI. That the Sabbath begins in the Morning THis Position hath been also handled and proved abundantly by others chiefly by Mr. Cawdrey and Mr. Pynchon whose Arguments I judge unanswerable 'T is to me an unquestionable conclusion That the Sabbath being a natural day consisting of 24 hours it must begin and end as the natural day it self does Now in Scripture-account the natural day begins and ends at or about midnight that it begins in the dark night is evident from that fore-mentioned place Mark 1.35 Where we read of our Saviours rising in the morning a great while before day or while it was deep in the night Hence also the evening of the natural day is reckoned from about noon or mid-day Matth. 14.13 When the evening was come the Disciples came to Christ The Scripture speaks of two evenings Exod. 30.8 Chap. 16.12 about sending away the multitude to seek their dinner in the Villages and that this was not the sun-set-evening is clear for after the multitude had dined and were dismissed we read of another evening v. 23. so that the former evening all circumstances considered must needs be about mid-day therefore it must have a morning answerable to it which must necessarily begin about mid-night when the a Jonah 4.7 morning-Sun begins to ascend as it does from mid-night till mid-day or b Prov. 4.18 perfect day and then it declines again and the c Jer. 6.4 shadows begin to be stretched out called the shadows of the evening till they fall into the darkness of the night which is deepest at mid-night Against those that begin the natural day and so the Sabbath at Sun-set evening we may object this which they can never answer That by their reckoning Christ must rise from the dead the second not the third day after his burial For 't is clear that he was not buried or inclosed in the heart of the earth till after the sun-set evening Matth. 27.57 Mark 15.42 For Joseph went not to Pilate to beg the body till the even was come namely the later evening which begins at Sun-set and after this there were many things to be done before the blessed body of Christ was laid in the Sepulchre As the (c) Mark 15.46 buying of fine linnen to wrap it in besides the imbalming or perfuming it with d John 19.40 spices and odours as the manner of the Jews was to bury This together with other Funeral rites took up some time so that it must needs be after Sun-set before this sad Funeral was finished Now if the Sabbath had begun with the Sun-set evening Christs Resurrection-day being the morrow after the Sabbath could be but the second day whereas it is a great Article of our faith grounded upon the e 1 Cor. 15.4 Scriptures That Christ rose from the dead the third day to fulfill the type of Jonas Further however the Jews in later times begun their Sabbath at evening as we grant they did superstitiously reckoning their preparation-time part of their Sabbath-time yet it is very considerable that the Holy Ghost keeps a contrary account stating the end of the Sabbath towards the dawning of the day following as Matth. 28.1 in the end of the Sabbath which dawned towards the first day of the week Now if the Sabbath ended at the dawning towards the next day then it must needs begin about the same time the day before and as the old Sabbath began and ended in Gods account so must the Lords day In a word how preposterous is it and incongruous both to Scripture and nature to begin the day at evening how ill does this agree with those Texts of Scripture that make the morning the first part of the day and evening the last The Angels we know are called f Job 38.7 morning stars not evening start because they were created in the beginning of the Creation and the days of the Gospel are called g Zech. 14.7 evening in the evening it shall be light because they are the last days according to the common Dialect of Scripture h Psal 5.3 Psal 143.8 Gen. 49.27 morning time is first evening last and evening never signifies early but late because it is the later part of the day But others have sufficiently cleared this truth already to add any more were but to light a candle to the Sun A word or two in answer to the Objections and we have done First Object 1 T. T. p. 56. We are told that Gen. 1. the day began at evening for the darkness went before the light and this darkness with the ensuing light saies the Objector made the first day and
a fit subject for a devotional pen. But that which I insist upon as argumentative is only the day in which out Lord suffered and dyed which in my judgment doth much help to determine the day in which Adam sinned 3. The parley betwixt the woman and the serpent insinuates as much for both the serpents demand and the womans reply speak plainly that as yet they had not tasted the sweets of Paradise Gen. 3.1 Hath God said ye shall not eate of every tree of the Garden The serpent had not been subtile to ask whether that might be done which had been done already and the womans replying in the future tense we may or shall eate hereafter makes it more probable that as yet they had not eaten 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And it is utterly improbable that they would have continued a whole day in the Garden in the midst of all that delicious fruit and not have tasted of some Besides the tree of life being sacramental as Augustine sayes Erat homini in lignis aliis alimenium in hoc verò Sacramentum Aug. de Gen. ad lit in other trees there was nourishment in this a Sacrament may it not well be thought that if Adam had stood the first Sabbath he had tasted of the tree of life Doubtless he had observed all the ordinances of the day But that he had not yet touched that tree is evident from that speech of God where he resolves upon his speedy banishment out of Paradise Gen. 3.22 lest sayes the Lord he put forth his hand to the tree of life and eate and live for ever which had been spoken too late if he had already done it 4. The policy and activity of Satan in contriving of mischief may assure us that he was tampering with our first parents betimes partly that he might take the advantage to shake them before their habits of grace were setled and confirmed by exercise as new-planted trees are more easily plucked up at first then after they are more deeply radicated but principally that by poysoning the fountain of mankind before any streams issued from it he might the more easily and certainly corrupt the whole current of mans posterity Such as have been taught by sad experience how crafty an adversary that old serpent the Divel is cannot but subscribe to the validity of this argument 5. To all these I may adde the circumstance of time when these malefactors were brought to the bar and arraigned for what they had done viz. in the coole of the day Hebr. in the wind of the day Gen. 3.8 in the wind after midday as Hierom renders it or in the Even-tyde a Adversus haereses lib 5. cap. 15. ad fin as Irenaeus Now it is very observable sayes a late Worthy that this is the first evening mentioned after the creation of Adam Mr. Roberts myster medulla Bibl. p. 39. and the covenant made with him Adam was arraigned and sentenced towards the evening of the sixth day therefore he sinned the same day As for that of the Psalmist Adam being in honour loà ged not a night Psa 49.12 but was like the beasts that perish for so it is in the Hebrew word for word although I will not restrain it to the first Adam for as learned Ainsworth observes it may be meant both of the first man Adam who continued not in his dignity Annot. in locum and his posterity also yet it doth most singularly point at him and is most pregnantly applicable to him as being in the greatest honour that ever man was in upon earth Lord of all the lower world and father of all mankind c Exod. 23.8 Deut. 19.4 2 Sam. 17. Psal 30.5 And the word baal jalin does properly signifie to lodge or tarry for a night What if it be in the future tense as T.T. suggests yet as d Dr. Twiss great a Rabbin as himself has told us that it is nothing strange for the future tense the structure of the words requiring it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Assimulatus fuit as here it does the next word being of the preter tense to signifie the time past Again what if the context does not in every circumstance suit with Adam Is it any unusual thing especially in the book of Psalms for one and the same sentence to point at several persons How often are David and Christ both intended in the same place yea where every thing spoken of the one does not agree to the other The adversary might therefore have spared that passage that this text cannot be applyed to Adam because t is said v. 19. He shall go to the generation of his fathers unless I could shew him what fathers Adam had to go to p. 10. I will answer his Dilemma with another when he himself sayes that innocent Adam had all the Ten Commandments written in his heart let him tell me what father and mother had Adam to honour in a second Table sense But to let that pass enough is said if this text was silent to make it more then probable that the transgression of our first parents presently followed their creation i.e. the same day To be sure there is more evidence of truth in it then all his objections to the contrary are a ble to obscure Indeed his confidence is great but we shall now scan his evidence and accordingly judg of his confidence He argues That man T.T. Obj. 1. yea and the Angels also stood in their integrity with the clo sure of the sixth day for then all things were very good Gen. 1.31 And no sooner did the sixth day end and the seventh begin but God rested and sanctifyed his holy Sabbath and was refreshed and exceeding well satisfyed with the goodness of his creatures which must needs precede sin This great argument has many little ones in the belly of it and accordingly I shall return several answers to it Whereas he dictates Answ 1 That man had not sioned in the closure of the sixth day for then all things were very good I answer the word then is an addition to the text And therefore the whole weight of his argument hanging upon this wooden pin of his own making must needs fall to the ground 'T is a conclusion founded upon a fallacy which the Logicians call a Fallacy of composition when those things are jumbled together which ought to be taken asunder for the detection whereof let it be considered that in the text alledged Gen. 1.31 there be two distinct clauses first Gods approbation of his works He saw every thing that he made and behold it was very good Secondly the conclusion of the day and the evening and the morning were the sixth day Now to take these two clauses conjunctly which are related distinctly and to argue as this Author does that man had not sinned on the sixth day for then all was very good is a meer sophisme such as
every puny in Logick is able to resolve for why might not Gods approbation be given forth in the morning or forenoon of the sixth day and time enough left before night for sin to creep into the world To clear this let it be noted See Dr. Willets Hexapla in Exod. 31. That although God was pleased to parcel out his work into six distinct dayes yet he measured not every dayes work by the hour-glass of time as we creatures do but what he did on each day was done in an instant He did but speak the word and it was done he commanded and it was created Psal 33.9 Psa 146.5 This is evident from principles of reason as well as from the forementioned places of Scripture for creation is the production of something out of nothing or that which is as much as nothing Now betwixt the being of something and nothing there can be no intermediate state and consequently no imaginable space of time but an imperceptible moment Hence that received maxime that Creation is in an instant Now to accommodate this to the work of the sixth day consisting of man and beasts certainly the forming of these creatures being momentaneous in the sense above mentioned took up but little of the day I can see no colour of reason to the contrary but our first Parents might be created and the whole creation compleated in the fore part of the sixth day And doubtless as soon as the creation was ended the divine approbatiom was added And God saw that it was good For surely as soon as the creature was the Creator saw what it was and he saw it to be good for he made it good And although the conclusion of the day be presently added yet 't is without dispute that many other things were transacted though not expressed in the first Chapter before the close of the sixth day as the naming of the creatures the joyning of our first parents together in marriage and disposing of them in the garden yea the giving of the Law and in all likelyhood the breaking of it too And so the first knot is untied Whereas he adds Answer 2 That as soon as the sixth day ended and the seventh began God rested and sanctified the Sabbath I answer This Assertion is built upon a very uncertain if not a false supposition viz. That the order of the words and Chapters is exactly answerable to the order of the things done Whereas in the judgment of the learned here is a manifest dislocation or misplacing of the sacred story as to the order of things for if we regard the exact order of things done the second chapter of Genesis would begin at the fourth verse as learned Junius affirms And the second and third verses would come in at the end of the third Chapter Junij Praelect in Gen. 2. and so the mention of the Sabbaths institution would follow the description of Adam's sin as an acute * De. Lightfoot's Harmony of the Old Testa and he gives this solid reason why the words stand as they do and why the mention of the Sabbath is set down before Adams fall viz. because the Holy Ghost would dispatch the general history of the first seven daies together without the interposition of any particular story Writer of our own hath observed But because the adversary will say these are but humane fancies let us see whether they have not sure footing in the Word it self To this purpose let the Reader turn to Genes 2. and view the texture and composure of the whole Chapter In the three first verses you have an account of God's finishing the heavens and the earth as also his resting on the seventh day From the third to the eighth verse you have the creation of Vegetables herbs and plants which was the work of the third day From ver 8. to ver 15. you have the planting of the garden and adorning of it with trees and rivers which if it were a work of creation was done before the seventh day though it be not mentioned till after it Again ver 7. you have the forming of the man and from ver 18. to 22. the framing of the woman as a also the creating of birds and beasts and the naming of the creatures which you see are all mentioned after the seventh day yet all or most of them done on the sixth So that should we strictly cleave to the letter In Scriptura non est prius posterius The order of time is not alwaies kept in Scripture but sometimes that is placed first which was done last contrà and believe that all things were done in the same order as they are here set down we must believe that herbs and plants birds and beasts man and woman were all created after the creation was ended and God had rested the seventh day Yea if the literal and historical order of the words must be maintained how will T.T. make good his Mount-paradise-notion For according to the order of the words Paradise was not planted till after the Sabbath How then could Adam keep his first Sabbath in Paradise Viderit ipse Hitherto therefore he must of necessity yield a transposition that is that although these things be mentioned after the seventh day yet they were done before it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Haec est un◠de regulis ad intelligendam Scripturam sanctam necessariis Luth. loc com p. 75. and here set down by way of Postscript Now let us see what may be said for that which follows ver 16.17 compared with the three last verses you have the woman given in marriage to the man and the Creators Law touching the forbidden fruit given in charge to both and that all this was done on the sixth day will be readily granted Well then Chap. 3. you have the story of the Serpents temptation the transgression of our first parents their conviction in the cool of the day and lastly their expulsion out of Paradise and the juncture of all this lying so close to the story of the sixth day Chap. 2. that unless you purposely loosen the connexion you may rationally look upon it as one and the same daies work And verily methinks the Serpents first on-set sounds as if there were very little distance of time between God's giving the Law and Satan's tempting the woman to break it Gen. 3.1 Yea hath God said ye shall not eat of every tree in the garden a very abrupt motion if it had not been made immediately upon the giving of the Law The words are as one observes a form of speech used by one who standing aloof and over-hearing what was forbidden Mr. Walker Doctrine of the Sabbath doth presently step in and ask if it were not so as he took it to be and besides the woman's answer as was hinted before being in the future tense we may or shall eat hereafter implies that they had scarce eaten as yet So that all
the Law is abrogated I look upon them as words ' of course which in a Controversie weigh no more then a feather yea as beggerly fallacies for they all along begge the question taking that for granted which hath been soundly whipt with a denyal by sundry learned pens viz. that the seventh day from the Creation was ever an express tittle of the Commandment a seventh day in a week indeed is more then a tittle of the Law and this number is still continued in the observation of the Lords day all the Christian world over And I doubt not but it shall continue to the end of the world although the old day be changed as in the celebration of the Passeover the precise order of time was sometimes altered for whereas the fourteenth day of the first moneth was the time appointed at first Exod. 12.18 yet Hezekiahs great passeover was kept on the fourteenth day of the second moneth 2 Chron. 30.5 Where you see the precise individual day altered upon occasion yet the number the fourteenth day still observed See this illustration further cleared by Mr. G. Abbot p. 37. and Mr. Walker p. 49. So upon a greater and better occasion the Sabbath is altered as to the day yet the seventh day in number still kept intire in this as the fourteenth in the other And so the Sabbath now as well as the Passeover then for substance preserved notwithstanding the circumstantial and occasional change of the day And thus through the conduct of my gracious Guide leading me by Scripture light and the foot-steps of my dear companions in the cause of Christ I have safely passed the pikes of opposition and vindicated this royal law from the false glosses and erroneous discants of the adversary carrying this conclusion all along before me as a truth triumphing over all contradiction That the old seventh day was never propounded as the substance or special subject of any moral law I shall but touch upon the second 2. That it seems to be pointed at as a sign under the ceremonial law yea it does more then seem so if the text be impartially viewed Exod. 31. from v. 13. to v. 18. where we find a special charge imposed upon the Jews to observe the Sabbath and that upon sundry considerations 1. From the end of it Verily my Sabbath ye shall keep for it a sign between me and you V. 13. throughout your generations to know that I am Jehovah that sanctifieth you 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for so the words run in the Hebrew And this is farther explicated v. V. 14. 14. ye shall keep the Sabbath therefore for it is holy or holiness to you thereby expounding what was meant by his sanctifying of them in the verse before 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 As if the Lord had said the keeping of my Sabbaths shall be a distinctive badge and cognisance of your Covenant-holiness Sabbathum est signum quod Deus Israclem sanctificat ut Sabbathum sanctifionvit scil segregando eosex Gentibns profanls in peculiarem sibi popnlum Lavat in Exek Hom. 26. a sign that I do sanctifie you and separate you to my self above all the people of the earth for an holy and peculiar people for as the Lord is said to sanctifie the Sabbath so also to sanctifie Israel that is by separating it from all other dayes and them from all other nations to be holiness to himfelf And this is the first special reason why they should keep the Sabbath throughout their generations as a sign or mark of distinction to difference them from the rest of the profane world 2. From the perill of profaning it v. 14.15 Every one that defileth it shall surely be put to death for whosoever doth any work therein that soul shall be cut off from amongst his people c. A law shortly after executed in the letter of it by stoning to death one that gathered sticks on the Sabbath day Numb 15.36 which rigour for ought I can find to the contrary lasted no longer then the Israelites peregrination in the wilderness where as one sayes an extraordinary strict rest was imposed upon them because they were extraordinarily accommodated for it Being as the Saints in heaven are immediately at Gods finding having Mannah without means daily provided for them and hence it is said Numb 15.32 While the children of Israel were in the wilderness they found a man that gathered sticks on the Sabbath day and stoned him to death Note the Phrase while they wore in the wilderness not elsewhere for when they were out of the wilderness we never read of the like punishment inflicted It seems then that this strict kind of rest and rigour was restrained to that time and place only 3. Another argument to inforce their observation of the Sabbath is taken from the moral equity of it verse 15. Six dayes may work be done but the seventhis the Sabbath As if the Lord had said ye may well afford me one day in seven since I have given you six in seven And this again is reinforced by Gods example in the latter part of v. 17. For in six dayes the Lord made heaven and earth and rested the seventh day Now it concerns us to inquire in this context what was proper to the Jews and what common with them to us What is moral and perpetual what judicial or ceremonial and temporary For that morals and judicials are here mingled together none can deny and the difficulty will be how to sever the one from the other and to shew in what sense the Sabbath was made a sign what the significancy of it was and especially what kind of sign whether a permanent sign as the Rain bow or a transient sign as the cloudly pillar in the wilderness There are sundry sorts of signs spoken of in Scripture I shall onely instance in those that are of prime note and pertinency to resolve the case in hand 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Josh 4.6 7. So also the Passeover was and the Lords supper is a sign being both memorative Exod. 12.26 Mat. 26.26 1 Cor. 11.24 There are remembrancing signs as the twelve stones taken out of Jordan for every tribe one were set up as a sign to after-ages for a memorial to the childen of Israel that the waters of Jordan were cut off before the ark And such a kind of sign it is commonly thought the Sabbath was a memorial of the Creation But that it is so propounded or intended here cannot easily be proved since the Lord does not say I have given you my Sabbaths as a sign that I created the world but for a sign that I the Lord do sanctifie you And although it be added v. 17. It is a sign betwixt me and the Children of Israel for ever Ainach majoris distinctionis pausae est accentus Buxtorf Thes Gram. for in six dayes the Lord made heaven and earth c. Yet it
is not said it shall be a sign that in six dayes the Lord made heaven and earth For there is a notable pause in the middle which divides the sentence and the sense also The seventeenth verse containes two distinct arguments or reasons why they should keep the Sabbath 1. Because it was a sign 2. Because it was set apart upon the occasion of Gods work and rest in the beginning 2. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1 Joh. 2.3 1 Joh. 3.18 There are indicating or evidencing signes such are the Characters of saving grace But neither can this be the sense of the word sign in this place It is a sign that I the Lord do sanctifie you What savingly why then all were Israel that were of Israel for the Sabbath was given to all neither was it so much their keeping the Sabbath as Gods giving them a Sabbath to keep which is here made a sign Witness Ezekiel Moses his interpretor I have given them my Sabbath for a sign Ezek. 20.13 to know that I the Lord do sanctifie them Therefore 3. There are distinguishing or differencing signs 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 such as do visibly mark out a people for Gods peculiar select and sanctified ones above all other people of the earth And in this sense the Sabbath is here given the Jews as a sign a sign of his sanctifying them that is in one word as Calvin speaks a sign of his segregating and singling them out from the rest of the nations as his peculiar people Siquis un◠verbo reddere vellet sanctificare est segregare Cal. Praelec in Ezek. 20. Ita Simler in Exo Levit. 21.8 ch 2.32 So also Simlerus and to the same effect is that of Lavater aforementioned The Sabbath was a sign of Gods sanctifying them as the Sabbath it self was sanctified that is separated from other common dayes and set a part for holy ends and uses And so the Word sanctifie is usually if not only taken in Scripture when it is applyed to the whole bulk or body of a people as here it is Well the Sabbath was given to the people of Israel as a sign of Gods sanctifying them but how long throughout their generations That is during the Oeconomy of the Law as long as the people of Israel should be the only peculiar people of God Exod. 12.14 The very same Phrase is used concerning the Passeover ye shall keep it a feast to the Lord throughout your generations by an ordinance or ever which clearly speaks it a temporary ordinance But Secondly We must distinguish of Sabbaths as well as of signes very briefly the Word Sabbath signifies one of these three things either 1. The moral duty holy rest or 2. The penal rigour of that rest or 3. The precise day of rest Now 1. It cannot be meant of the moral duty simply considered since that extends beyond their generations for there remaineth a rest Heb. 4.9 10. or keeping of a Sabbath to the people of God still neither 2. Can itwell be understood of that penal rigour resting from all work upon pain of corporal death for this in all likelihood lasted not out half their generations being calculated chiefly for their wilderness estate as was saidbefore Therefore 3. It must be the precise day of rest the old seventh-day-Sabbath or nothing which is here set as a sign throughout their generations and this I take to be the true intent of the Holy-Ghost both here and Ezek. 20. The case seems clearly to me to be stated in this wise The old seventh day was at first given to Adam and his posterity as the only true Sabbath during the pre-eminency of the Creation and Christ in the promise and that it was conscientiously kept by the holy Patriarchs for some ages after I doubt not though some of the Ancients seem to deny it but to be sure in tract of time the sinful race of Adam forsaking the true God did also forget the true Sabbath Now when it pleased God out of that degenerate lump of mankind to form Israel or the seed of Abraham a peculiar people to himself he gave them his old Sabbath again in a new Edition That among other ends it might be a visible sign to distinguish them from the rest of the world Other nations no doubt had their Sabbaths as well as their gods but as Israel must serve the only true God so they must also observe the then only true Sabbath Ezod 31.13 So much is implyed in the text Verily my Sabbath ye shall keep saith the Lord. The Word my is Emphatical 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it points at the precise day of Gods appointment the seventh and last day of the week therefore this and mainly this was made a sign of Gods sanctifying the Jews throughout their generations which being so how evidently doth it follow that the day was design'd for change and that now it is certainly changed by the will and appointment of God For if the Jews generation be extinct and they that were once the people of God have now a Lo-ammi written upon them Ho. 11.20 1 Thes 2.15 16. Ye are none of my people how shall that day any longer stand as a Sabbath wich was given them as a sign of their being the peculiar people of God and that for a season only till their generations were expired Maledic domine Nazarais Lord curse the Christians is one of their daily imprecations vid Trapp in Hosea Either let the adversay say the blaspheming Jews who powre out daily curses instead of prayers are still the Covenant-people of God in so much as still they retain that Saturday-Sabbath And then he shall speak like a true Jew indeed or let him confess their saturday-Sabbath which was once the crown of their glory is now no better then the badge of their blasphemy whereby they would make the world believe that they are still the sanctified people of God though they trample underfoot the blood of his Son whereby they should be sanctified I speak not this as insulting over the misery of the Jews but as lamenting the sin of apostate Christians who take up that day as a badge of their Saintship which the infidel Jews wear as a badge of their blasphemy and enmity against Christ and Christians Indeed it was once an illustrious sign of their sanctification but it was limited to their generations as the Passeover was and therefore if the one be expired so is the other upon the same account And in this respect I dare boldly affirm and I doubt not to maintain it that it is every whit as lawful for a Christian to celebrate that old Sacrament the Passeover as to observe the old Sabbath For the one was as well a sign as the other and the one was ordained for a season as well as the other There are a few feeble objections to face this argument but the bare repetion with the premises will be
said he appeared the first day at evening yet the first day was then as fully ended as the Sabbath at sun-set when they brought their sick which was forbidden on the Sabbath-day Mark 1.32 Christ appeared in the morning of the Resurrection-day as well as at evening very early as well as very late Ans 1 Math. 28.9 Mark 16.9 Discourse of the instic dignity and end of the Lords day p. 33 to teach us that the whole day is his 't is the day which the Lord hath made not a peice of the day Thus I remember Dr. Hakewil long ago stopt the mouth of this objection Christ appeared to his Apostles at night sayes he to instruct them and teach us that even then it ceaseth not to be the Lords day T is so farre from certain that the day in Scripture-account begins in the evening that 't is certainly false Ans 2 as shall appear hereafter The instance of the disciples returning from Emmaus to Jerusalem and that late makes much against himself For as late as it was in the evening before they got home the later the better as to the case in hand yet the Holy Ghost does not call it the second but the first day of the week John 20.19 the same day at evening being the first day of the week note it well First The Evangelist calls this time of evening the same day in which Christ arose from the dead Secondly He calls it the first day of the week by which two expressions he puts the matter out of all doubt that this evening was a part of the first day of the week Thus the Holy Ghost provides against future errors Let the objector now blush to consider how shamefully he has given the lye to the spirit of truth 1. In affirming that Christ never appeared to any assembly any one first day of the week 2 That the first day was then fully ended fully ended then the Evangelist was much mistaken to tells us it was the same day he should rather have said the second day or the next day Mark 1.32 does at most but speak the opinion and practice of the degenerate Jewes who if they stated the end of the Sabbath at the sun-set evening by a traditional account and therefore brought not their sick to be healed till the Sun was down yet their superstitious opinion proves not that according to the true Scripturall account the Sabbath began and ended at evening Besides it is but a bare conjecture that they brought their sick to be healed no sooner out of respect to the Sabbath * See Tremel his Annot. in Math. 12.8 and Ainsworth in Ex. 20.10 for they held that peril of life doth drive away the Sabbath Some think the only reason why they came no sooner was because they had no sooner intelligence of our Saviours Miraculous healing power But to end the controversie however the Jewes Sabbath might be supposed to begin and end at evening yet 't is apparent that the first day of the week ended not with the Sun-set-evening because it is expresly said in this very chapter Mark. 1.35 That the morning of it was a great while before day Thus 't is said of Christ that in the morning rising up a great while before day or * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 greatly in the night as the Greek ha's it he departed into a solitary place to pray And this was on the morrow of the Sabbath as the context shewes So that if it were the morning of the day while it was yet night long before sun-rising then it could not be the evening or end of the day till long after the Sun-setting so Math. 28.1 John 20.1 As for Christs second apparition Obj. 2 t is expresly said it was after eight dayes and therefore could not be on the first day of the week John 20.26 Why Ans did he never read that * Mark 8.31 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Vide Bez. Calv. Rollock Piscat Jansen upon the places See Mr. Cawdry p. 4. ch 1. The reckoning of these eight dayes is inclusive see the like Lu. 9.28 compared wiâ—h Mat. 17.1 See Dr. Gouge Sabb. Sanct. p. 21. Scripture That the son of man must suffer and after three dayes rise again After three dayes therefore it could not be the third day does that follow As much as this after eight dayes therefore it could not be the eighth day or the first day of the week Mr. Sprint p. 138. Observes that 't is as if the Evangelist had said the eighth day after by an Hebraism quoting the like speech Luke 1.59 ch 2.21 or after the eighth day was come Thus the like expression is used Jer. 25.12 When seventy years are fulfilled the people shall return that is on the seventieth year so Acts 2.1 When the day of Pentecost was fulfilled i. e. Fully come This appeares to me to be the vulgar acceptation of the phrase as in a like case Math. 27.63 the cheif Priests and Pharisees told Pilate that Christ should say while he was yet alive after three dayes I will rise again wherefore they intreat him of all loves that he would command the sepulcher to be made sure till the third day Whence t is evident that by this phrase after three dayes they understood Christs purpose of rising on the third day otherwise they would have desired a guard for a longer space than three dayes Christ was ever seen of some or other of his disciples fourty dayes Acts 1 2 3. Obj. 3 That Christ was seen by the space of fourty dayes implies not that he was seen every day of the fourty only that he stayed fourty dayes before he ascended and appeared at times as was said before besides we are not now arguing his apparitions to single persons only but assemblies Oh! Obj. 4 But the disciples were assembled only for fear of the Jewes not to celebrate the Sabbath in honour of Christs Resurrection for they believed not that he was risen the womens tidings therefore seemed idle tales to them The privacy of their meeting and shutting the doors was indeed for fear of the Jewes Ans 1 But why they should fear the Jewes more on those two dayes than any other I see no reason neither can it be any reason of their then assembling T is probable Ans 2 that their first assembly was not on their parts out of any religious respect to the day for as yet they understood not that it was or was to be the Christian Sabbath therefore some of them were travelling into the countrey Luke 24. for fear of the Jewes too it may be Math. 28.13 14 15. because the lying souldiers had given it out that the disciples came by night and had stoln away the body of Jesus yet on Gods part in assembling them and on Christs part in appearing to them there was doubtless some special respect to the day which they understood afterwards and therefore the Evangelist is so precise
the dead For on the day before Saturday they crucified him and on the day following Saturday which is Sunday appearing to his Apostles and Disciples he taught these things Here we have both the Doctrine and practice of the Lord's day in the purest times attested by this holy Man and Martyr First he informs us how they kept the day and secondly why they kept it namely because it was the first day Christs Resur rection-day and the day of his apparition to his Disciples whom he taught and instructed so to do it seems the holy Martyrs in the Primitive times were satisfied with these Scripture-Arguments for the Lords day which now the wrangling wits and lusts of men do nothing but storm against But here it may be objected t is true here is plain and positive testimony for the observation of the Lords day but here is nothing for the Negative nothing against the old Sabbath Why mightn ot both dayes be kept in Justin Martyrs time does he ever deny that the Churches of Christ then kept the Saturday-Sabbath I answer yes his Testimony is as full against the Jews Sabbath as for the Lords day witness his Dialogue or dispute with Trypho that obstinate Jew I shall recite a few passages of it verypregnant to this purpose Trypho's grand Objection was this a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 175. num 30. That the Christians did neither observe the Festival days nor Sabbaths nor Circumcision and mereover that they placed their hope in a crucified man Now see how the blessed Martyr answers him partly by granting his Objection For he tels him b 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 182. n. 10. we also should verily observe your Circumcision and Sabbaths and all your Festival dayes did we not know the reason for which these things were imposed upon you And again c 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 If saies he we patiently endure the most horrible torments that men and divels can devise to inflict upon us why is it that we do not also observe your carnal Circumcision and Sabbaths and Holydays which hurt us not In which words he freely grants that the Christians in his time did not observe the Jews Sabbath and although the Jews condemned them for it yet he justifies them in it and uses many Arguments to vindicate their non-observance of it As 1. Because since the coming of Christ there is no need of it no need of the shadow when the substance is come yea there is no place left for it 't is done away by Christ for in this sense I take it the Father here speaks that d 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as the Sabbath together with Sacrifices Oblations and Festival dayes began with Moses he means I suppose in the second Edition not the first Institution of them so they were appointed by the Council of God the Father to cease and end with Christ Where by the way observe he useth the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the singular number to shew that it was the old seventh day Sabbath which he chiefly contested against and indeed this was the string that Trypho chiefly harp't upon perswading Justin and his fellow Christians thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 first to be circumcised then to keep the Sabbath and so he might obtain mercy still it must be restrained to the Jewish Saturday-Sabbath matcht with Circumcision and orher Legal Ordinances the Christian Sabbath is not the subject of this dispute this then is his first Argument the Christians neither did nor could observe that old Sabbath because it ended with Christ And 2. e 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 187. Because now there is a new Covenant and a new Law gone out of Zion 3. f 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 118. Because the beleeving Gentiles may attain Gods heavenly inheritance without the observation of it After the proposeal of these and sundry other Arguments Trypho moves a Captious Query viz. whether if a man that knew Christ and beleeved in him still observed these legal customes he could be saved To which our zealous and pious Martyr returns this Christable yet for midable answer g 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 In my Judgment O Tripho such a one shall or may be saved provided he do not industriously labour to perswade others especially those among the Gentiles that are converted to Christ to observe the same things with himself telling them that otherwise they cannot be saved For such it seems he had but little Charity Now to sum up all however the opinion and judgment of this antient and eminent Father may be despised by scorners Yet I hope his Testimony will be embraced by all soberminded Christians And this we have both fully and faithfully transcribed The conclusion is this that the Churches of Christ in Justin Martyr's time had renounced the Saturday-Sabbath and celebrated the Sunday or Lords day for the day of weekly solemn worship and this was long before Anti-Christ came to his throne Which I the rather note as a seasonable check to that blasphemous sacrilegious position of the adversary viz. that the change of the Sabbath was an invention of Anti-Christ Oh impudence Was Justin Martyr who shed his blood for Christ a limb of Anti-Christ Did he plead for Baal in asserting the observation of the Lords day and rejection of the Jewes Sabbath by all the Churches of Christ Were the precious Saints and glorious Martyrs in those early dayes devoted to the inventions of Anti-Christ Yea in those bloody dayes when for Christs sake they were killed all the day long and led like sheep to the slaughter Yea in those extraordinary apostolical dayes while the Spirit of prophecy was yet breathing and the power of miracles yet working in the Churches of Christ witness Justin Martyr himself who testifies h 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Dial. cum Trypho 191. See Mr. Baxter Spirits witness to the truth of Christianity p. 21. That even in his time the Divels did tremble at the name of Christ and that being adjured by that sacred name they became subject unto them Yea for some years after t his for Tertullian and after him Cyprian made publick challenges to the Pagan persecuting rulers to bring their possessed with Divels into the Christian assemblies and if they did not cast them out and make them confess themselves to be Divels and Christ to be the Son of God they were content to suffer Which may conciliate credit to the testimony at least of these renowned antients well the change of the Sabbath is confirmed by the practice of the Church in Justin Martyrs time And now we are upon the year of our Lord 160. Dionysius 3. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Euseb l. 4. c. 22. or thereabout And here we meet with another testimony Of Dionysius Bishop of Corinth who in an Epistle of his Soter Bishop of Rome writes thus we have spent or passed through to the end of it the Lords day to
day an holy day Now to spend the Lords day throughout an holy day is not to spend any part of it in servilework but to sanctifie it as a Sabbath But in regard this Testimony touches but one half of the question I only touch upon it by the way and proceed to a fourth who speakes the truth and the whole truth Tertullian by name Tertullian 4. who flourished in the year of grace 200. or two hundred and four His African phrase is somwhat dark yet some light it affords us as to this controversy In his book of the souldiers Crown he speaks thus On i Die dominico jejunare nefas ducimus vel de geniculis adorare De Colon Mil. the Lords day we hold it unlawful either to fast or to pray kneeling And elswhere he seems to intimate the reason of it viz. k Diem solis laetitiae indulgemus alia longe ratione quam religione solis seeundo loco ab eis sumus qui diem Saturni otio viotui decernunt exorbitantes ipsi a Judaico more quem ignorant Apol. adv Gent. c. 16. â—And ch 3. de anima he speaks of the Lords dayes solemnities namely Scripturarum lectio Psalmi cantus adlocutiones petitiones reading the scriptures singing of Psams conference and prayer Dominica solennia Because it was a day of joy and gladness For upon the Sunday saies he we give our selves to joy or gladness Where note that in Tertullian's time also the title of Lords day Rev. 1.10 was appropriate to Sunday which the primitive Christians so universally observed that the Heathens began to calumniate them as worshippers of the Sun But Tertullian in this place clears them For saies he although upon the Sunday we give our selves to gladness yet it is for another farre wide reason than in honour of the Sun And again in the second place are we from them meaning the Jewes who appoint the Saturday to idleness and eating wandring from the Jewish custom which they know not In which words he gives us to understand that although the Christians then devoted the Lords day to joy and gladness yet they made it not a play-day or a day of pampering their bodies and riotous feastings as the degenerate Jewes did their Sabbath but they spent it in the spiritual exercises of prayer and praise they kept it as a solemn holy day but how often What once a year Nay once a week as he testifies in the 14. ch of his book concerning Idolatry where he speaks l Ethnicis sentel annuus dies quisque festus est tibi vero octavus Excerpe fingulas solennitates nationum in ordinem texe Pentecostem implere non poterunt de Idol p. 736. Edit Basil â—O melior fides nationum in suam sectam quae nullam Christianorum seleuitatem fibi vendicat non dominicam non Pentecostem etiam si nossent nobiscunt non communicassent ne Christiani viaerentur nos ne Ethnici pronunciemur non veremur Ibid. thus to the Christian who observed 52. Lords dayes every year whereas all the Annual festivities of Pagans came short of Pentecost or 50 To the Heathens every Festival is some annual day but to thee every eighth day c. and here he takes up a sad complaint against some Apostatizing Christians who kept heathenish holy-dayes as if there were not Lords dayes enough in the year O the Faith of the nations better than ours to Wards their own sect as who challenge not to themselves any Christian solemnity not that of the Lords day nor that of Pentecost Did they know it they would not communicate with us lest they should seem Christians we Christians are not afraid to be accounted Heathens Where two things are worthy of note First that he stiles the Lords day the Christians solemnity or solemn day Secondly that he makes it the Christians livery or badge of cognizance Therefore the Heathens would not keep it lest they should be taken for Christians and indeed so it was the keeping holy of the Lords day was ever the distinguishing Character of a true Christian Hence as we noted before the persecuting Pagans used to question the primitive Christians upon this interrogatory hast thou kept the Lords day Anno 303. Just as the bloudy Papists in Queen Maries time examined the Protestants about the Lords Supper and the common answer was I am a Christian I date not intermit it for the Law admonishes me of it Lex eos de eo agendo admonuisset seil lex dei ut ipfi martyres exponunt num 51. non ecclesia ut in Margine a Baronio annotatur Num. 48. vide Theoph. Philokur lib. ch 4. Namely The law of God of Christ and Christianity which answer cost many a Christian his life never were two truths more deeply dyed with the blood of Martyrs than the Lords Supper and the Lords day have been the one under Popish the other under Pagan persecution But to return to our Author Tertullian's Testimony is clear for the Christians keeping of the Lord's day But did they not keep the Saturday-Sabbath too in his time No he denies that once and again as in the fore-mentioned Book concerning Idolatry m Nobis quibus Sabbata extranea Sunt Neomenia seriae aliquando à Deo dilectae Saturnalia Januriae frequentantur c. Shall we says he frequent Heathenish Festivals to whom the Sabbaths new Moons and Holy days sometimes so dearly beloved of God are strange Strange through dis-use doubtless not through ignorance therefore 't is clear they did not keep them But more clear is that which he writes in his Apologetick against theGentiles where he acknowledgeth n Neque de victus exceptionibus neque de solennitatibus dierum neque de ipso signaculo corporis neque de consortio nominis cum Judaeis agimus p. 848. That the Christians had no correspondence with the Jews neither in difference of meants nor solemnities of days nor in signature of body meaning Circumcision nor in society of name Mark it they had nothing to do with the Jews in solemnities of dayes i e. Jewish days therefore not in the solemnization of the seventh day which Tertullian expressly calls * Lib. advers Iudaeos p. 125. Sabbatum temporale a temporary Sabbath thus we have the practice of the Church in his time adding further proof to the change of the day Our next Author is Origen whose testimony concerning the Lords day is not to be contemned however his judgement in all things-cannot be approved We are not now pleading his Orthodoxy but his veracity he might erre but sure he would not lie being so ready to die for Christ let us hear what he ha's to say to this Christian cause treating upon the story of the Israelites gathering a double portion of Manna on the sixt day because none was to be found on the seventh day o Quare ergo qua die caeperit Manna caelitus dari