Selected quad for the lemma: earth_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
earth_n common_a general_n great_a 41 3 2.1025 3 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A39525 A position and testimony against all swearing under the gospel In which may be seen, I. That Christ hath forbidden all sorts of oaths. II. What Christ hath substituted instead of an oath. III. Reasons for that prohibition and substitution. With an answer to all the material objections that are, or may be, alledged from the scriptures. Fisher, John, fl. 1692. 1692 (1692) Wing F1009; ESTC R215434 22,333 59

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

A POSITION AND TESTIMONY AGAINST All Swearing UNDER THE GOSPEL In which may be seen I. That Christ hath forbidden all sorts of Oaths II. What Christ hath substituted instead of an Oath III. Reasons for that Prohibition and Substitution With an Answer to all the material Objections that are or may be alledged from the Scriptures London Printed in the Year 1692. To the READER COnsidering the Testimonies and Sufferings of several Christians and conscientious Persons formerly against all Swearing and now observing of late that not only the Lawfulness of Oaths themselves has been disputed and pleaded for as by the Athenians and others but also the Definition and Nature of an Oath and what an Oath is and what not have been started and took notice of more than formerly and also considering on one side of the abounding of Swearing and detestable Oaths among many in this Nation enough to draw down Judgments and divine Vengeance upon it as have been lately for an Example in other places beyond the Seas and also on the other side observing the Moderation of many and that in Authority too in Condescention to a People that have formerly suffered because they durst not Swear at all I could not be easy in my mind until I had Written and Publish'd this to the World hoping it may be of some use and service to most if not all Men. As first to the common and prophane Swearers that now so much abound upon the Earth by shewing such the great danger they hazard thereby to their Souls besides the Judgments in general they may draw down upon themselves and others in the Land And Secondly to such as are in Authority by proposing and demonstrating to them by evident Reasons and eminent Authorities the danger of imposing Oaths or any higher Asseverations or Expressions instead thereof than plain and simple Speech which I desire all moderate Magistrates that love and truly affect Liberty of Conscience for whom I have great Respect and Affection seriously to consider of And Thirdly to those that conscientiously scruple any Oath by shewing such the danger of venturing to use instead of an Oath any higher form or manner of Speech than Christ hath prescribed and allowed them lest they be drawn into an Oath unawares So wishing and desiring the good of every one and that the common Swearers may leave off Swearing and the legal or more solemn Swearers be satisfied with Evangelical Truth speaking and those that are come to such Truth speaking may never look back from the simplicity of that Testimony I remain a Friend to all especially the moderate sincere and ingenuous of what Profession or Persuasion soever they may be Philothrenes The Position No Man ought to Swear under the Gospel-dispensation any kind of Oath in any Case neither by reason of any Command from a lawful Magistrate nor upon any other occasion or respect whatsoever for these following Reasons I. BECAUSE Christ Jesus whom all Men ought to obey and fear to break his Commands hath commanded Not to Swear at all Mat. 5. 34. and instead thereof in Verse 37. commands That our Speech be Yea yea and Nay nay and saith That whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil Now any Oath is more than these and therefore being also forbad before it must be of evil II. In Mat. 18. 16. in Case of Trespass where Evidences of Witnesses is required Christ's Command is That in the Mouth of two or three Witnesses every word may be established And not by the Oath of two or three Witnesses nor yet in the Mouth of two or three Swearers III. In James 5. 12. The Apostle commands Above all things not to Swear neither by Heaven nor by Earth nor by any other Oath but instead thereof bids That our yea be yea and our nay nay lest ye fall into condemnation Here the Apostle James is also very express to the purpose agreeing with Christ's Command before in Mat. 5. 34. Therefore he that Swears any Oath does quite contrary to the Apostle's express Command and must hazard Condemnation IV. A true Christian's Oath is needless because such an one dare no more tell a Lie than he dare to Forswear himself if he should Swear And an evil Man's or false Christian's Oath is worthy of no more Credit than a Lier because he that dares to break his Word or be a false Witness in a solemn affirming or denying of any thing has no fear of God nor awe upon his Conscience and therefore what should make such an one fear or scruple to break his Oath if he Swears Therefore now to what purpose is the use of Oaths or Swearing among those that profess Christianity OBJECTIONS Objection 1. In Deut. 6. 13. and in 10. 20. God commanded to Swear by his Name therefore Christ did not forbid such Oaths as was by the Name of God for the Father and the Son are one and Immutable or unchangeable in their Nature and Will and therefore how could the Son forbid that which the Father had commanded Answer That Command of God was to them that were under the Law to prevent them from swearing by Idols and not to such that are under the Gospel to whom Christ spoke And therefore this proves no contrariety between the Father and the Son any more than the Sons taking away the first Things that were commanded by God under the Law that he might establish the second which he himself commanded under the Gospel as in Heb. 10. 9. See also in Heb. 7. 12 18. and 8. 13. Object 2. In Isaiah 19. 18. In a Prophecy relating to Gospel times as seems manifest from Verse 20. it is said That five Cities in the Land of Egypt shall speak the Language of Canaan and Swear by the Lord of Hosts therefore how can Swearing by the Lord of Hosts be forbidden by Christ in Gospel times Answ. If Swearing by the Lord of Hosts be here prophesied of to be in Gospel times then by the same Reason from Verse 21. to do Sacrifice and Oblation must be also in Gospel times as is there said the Egyptians shall do and if so how is the old Testament wherein were the Sacrifices and Oblations abrogated and disannulled when the new Testament came As in Heb. 8. 13. Object 3. In Isa. 45. 23. The Lord speaking concerning such times as wherein all the ends of the Earth shall be saved which surely must be in Gospel times said That every Knee shall bow to me and every Tongue shall Swear Therefore some Swearing must be lawful in Gospel times Answ. The Apostle Paul in Rom. 14. 11. who without doubt knew how to interpret this Prophecy yet he would not express it in such Terms as might contradict Christ's general Prohibition to Swear in Mat. 5. 34. therefore he words it thus Every Knee shall bow to me and every Tongue shall confess to God Here the Apostle hath changed the word Swear that was figuratively spoken in the time of the Law