advantage prâ—sâ—â—ibe Lawes and Religion to her blind obedient Prosylites Yet the all disposing power of Heaven which suffered Romes Bishop thus by his own Innovations to darken the light of his neighbour Churches did now and then give him a scourge to let him know he was but a man and in respect of that frail composition was elementary and subject to vicissitudes and alterations in his Constitution and that nothing that was the production of that various body of inconstant humours but was obnoxious to a countermand by its mutable framer or to be troden down by others whose strong bulkes cared not for his too curious preparatives and when a general face of quiet seemed to smile upon the Territories of Romes Church and that she flourished in that height that she thought her self above all opposition behold a sudden destruction overtook her and as the mighty Elephant whose power is able to throw down great and ponderous masses is tamed at the sight of a Ram and trembleth at the gruntling of a little Pigg even so her desolation came from an unsuspected and contemptible hand insomuch that Rome in the heighth of this her glory and though she was the admired Metropolis of the Western world and her Temples adorned with the offerings of severall Nations Yet she was not secure and above the Heathenish suppressions of the runnagate Goths the beggarly Scithians and the spoiling Arrian Vandals that head City of the World not escaping the sacking by Alaricus in Honorius time nor her Temples free from the rapine of the Genserick in Marcianus time and her Capitoll left unransackt by our Belivins and proved no Sanctuary against Totilas and his Northern forces From these Judgments if she reflected upon Gods Justice she could not promise to her self security For if Hierusalem which was the seat of James the beloved of the Lord must not be free from the harrassing of the northern Forces how could Rome promise Immunity to her self from the like afflictions I wish she would call to minde these her former occurrences of misfortune Infra 135.14 chap. and that she would by these examples of Gods Justice and indignation towards her forbear to claim an Universality in respect of her See for she may by them cleerly perceive that she is not the rock against whom the gates of Hell shall not prevail nor are her Temples so immoveable but the battering shot of the Rummishing Canon can strike a palsey into their lofty heads and by Divine permission have laid their honours in the dust This was the day of her Visitation and now sits she in quiet whilst we groan under the calamities of this mischief but let her not laugh to see our candle put under a bushellâ— the rudenesse of some not respecting the priviledges of our Church for there hath no evil befallen us that she her self by experience is not subject to These sad and dreadfull visitations of the Lord may tell both them and us that we are Churches militant and must after the pattern and in imitation of our Head Chrst Jesus suffer her in misery that we may triumph hereafter in Glory there is no particular Church but is subject to these tokens of Gods Wrath When under Dioclesian Christians were so wasted thorow persecution that there were in the Judgement of many none left remaining their Books burnt thâ—ir Churches destroyed and themselves put to death by sundry torments and Pillars erected in every place with this blasphemous Inscription Superstitione Christi ubique delecta Then did we escape that persecution when the glory of Romes Church was much darkned thereby and now that our Church suffers an ecclipse whilst the same occasion of darkness doth not debar the light from Rome Let not this be an occasion of rejoycing to her but rather remember her own former sufferings he that stands take heed lest he fall for there hath no tentation taken us but such as is subject to man and God is faithful who will not suffer us to be tempted above that we are able to bear God for a time may take away the Candle from amongst us thereby to shew we of our selves are not perfect but if we trust in him he can restore our light he is faithfull and his hand is not shortned so but that it can help and he hath power to deliver Esay 50.2 Saint Cyprian complained above 1270 years since that for the great persecution that was against the Church they could not meet as they desired to execute Discipline and who will deny that the discipline of the Church is perpetuall but yet at all times it is not to be had which proves it may be Invisible These vicissitudes and alterations in every place are incident not onely to the Civill but the Ecclesiasticall state Constantine may set up the Crosse in Hierusalem but that cannot free it from Mahomets Banner where Christ to day hath his Church he sometimes suffers the Devill to morrow to make his Chappell The Kingdome of Heaven is said to suffer violence and the societies of men on Earth must not think to go scot-free Christ suffers his Saints to be persecuted for the triall of some and for the utter ruine of others 1 Pet. 1.7 2 Pet. 2.9 Christs Church is the Congregation of Saints and those Saints are subject to persecution and dissipation so that in any particular place or Region this Society may be broke and so the Church made there Invisible which is a truth so plainly demonstrated to us I wonder the Church of Rome should urge the contrary Rev. 2.5 Christ threatned the Church of Ephesus that he would remove her Candlestick unlesse she amended the seven Candlesticks are the seven Churches of Asia and Christ threatens the Church of Ephesus that because of her backsliding he would take her Candlestick away from her because she had forsaken her first Love and if her Candlestick were taken away sure she would be left in darknesse and made Invisible Christ threatens to withdraw his Heavenly Beams from Ephesus and yet he had promised his Spirit to his Church to the worlds end and that the gates of Hell should not prevail against her but that she should be Visible in some one place and not Universally taken from the face of the Earth at the same instant of time But that the Church might be Invisible in any one place is evident by this threatning of Ephesus at which time she was the onely Apostolique See John being theâ—e and Peter being dead when John writ the Apocalipse and if Ephesus be in danger to be made Invisible I wonder how Rome should arrogate that immunity to her self that she alone shall not be made Invisible when as when Christ promised his Spirit to his Church the Church of Rome was Invisible and therefore it cannot be in tended that this mark of Visibility which is to be applyed to the whole Church should onely and meerly be prescribed unto the particular Church of Rome unlâ—sse
superfluous as to the cup the Church of Rome administers in one kind as if nothing were perfect and to be received in the Catholick Church but what his Holiness please to teach and allow And their reasons are so weak they offer for such their alterations that any one may plainly discern it is Will not Reason brings her into such changes Who but knows that Christ as he was man and the Apostles likewise were obnoxious to the same inconveniences of spilling the Wine as the Doctor alledges or part sticking upon their beards as the people of these dayes are But they knowing that it was Christs order to separate the cup from the bread and give it to be divided amongst them thereby denoting to them how his blood should be separated from his flesh and by Christ left as a pattern for them to follow and to have continuance till his comming again they by eating the bread and drinking the cup shew the Lords death till he come and for that the same was to be continued in remembrance thereof and they being commanded likewise hereunto Drink ye all of this Let a man examine himself and let him eat and let him drink They would not and we dare not admit of Romes alteration but desire of God to hold fast this truth we have received and that it would please him to confirm us herein that we may be blameless in the day of the Lord Jesus praying that all other Churches as in this so in all other points of faith and doctrine may be of one consent and firmly united together in one mind and one judgement that we may all proceed in one Rule and walk together as followers of Christ and his Apostles having them for an ensample to us that we may with one mind and one mouth praise God even the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ Amen CHAP. XVII That the Lyturgie and private Prayers ought not to be in an unknown Language which the Congregation doth not understand WHereas Saint Paul in the 1 Cor. 14. is against giving of thanks or praying without understanding because the hearer is not edified nor can say Amen to he knows not what the Doctor to help the lame Dogg over the style and to clear his new step-mother the Church of Rome from the errors which other Churches lay to her charge for that she restrains her Prayers and her Lyturgy universally to the Latine tongue would needs have us to understand that S. Paul doth not hereby impugne the Lyturgie of the Church of Rome which sayes he was for the service and praise of God and he to whom it is directed understands any tongue but it is meant sayes he of Church-meetings which were onely for instruction and edification of the Auditors and not at all to be understood to gainsay the Lyturgie of Romes Church To which I answer 1. S. Paul's meaning is as well meant of the one as of the other for vers 26. When ye come says he together according as every one hath a tongue or hath interpretation let it be done to edifying By which it is plain that both praises and prayers Psalms as well as doctrine ought to be with understanding For vers 28. If any man hath an unknown tongue let him keep silence in the Church and speak to himself and to God That man that hath the spirit of Tongues may speak to God and himself but he must be silent to others unless they can understand him for how shall they say Amen to they know not what God requires from us the heart Give me thine heart David desired to praise the Lord in soul and spirit Praise the Lord O my soul and all that is within me praise his holy Name We must not think that a little lip-labour to say Amen to we know not what can be acceptable unto God 1 Sam. 1. Hannah prayed in her heart to the Lord. Not every one that saith Lord Lord shall be saved Matth. 7. God doth not require lip-service he condemned the Scribes and Pharisees who drew neer unto him with their lips but their hearts were far off Matth. 15. We are commanded to serve God with all our heart and soul Josh 24. We must sing and make melody to the Lord in our hearts Ephes 5. We must approve that which is pleasing to the Lord vers 10. God is King of all the earth sing ye praises therefore with understanding By all which and many more places of Scripture it is plain that the service of the Congregation it must be with the heart that is with the understanding We must not think that God is well pleased with the peoples devotion that proceeds not from the heart I will for the better satisfaction of those that seem to be satisfied with the Doctor 's exposition of S. Paul offer these reasons to his consideration against those he has propounded to justifie the Romane Lyturgie universally Platina writes Laâ—ne service first set up that the first Latine Service that ever was at Constantinople was anno 687. whenas the sixth Councel there held was assembled for before that it was never had in the Latine but in the Greek or Hebrew Tongue But now was the Pope grown to be universal by the late donation of Phocas for countenancing his murder of Mauritius and it did not stand with his new-acquired honour and dignity that the Language of any other Church should be preferred before that of Rome and therefore at a General Councel the representative of the several Churches must the Language of the Romane See be preferred before any other For as the Pope was universal Head he must needs have an Universal Tongue otherwise his Universality were dumb And this was the true ground of composing the Latine Lyturgie and not as the Doctor would perswade us because it was the most general Tongue for whenas this was consented unto by many other Bishops to please the Lordly Pope the Emperours great favourite it gave occasion for the spreading of that Language because the Service began to be in many places in it not that it was so copious or known a Tongue before Nor doth the reason the Doctor brings justifie but rather condemn the Latine Lyturgie for saith he the Lyturgie of the Eastern Churches was used in Greek though all the Eastern parts spoke not that Language therefore why may not Rome prescribe a Lyturgie in Latine to the Western Churches To which I answer It was thought fit by the Fathers of the Primitive Church to have one uniform Lyturgie in all the Churches upon earth and â—o that end did those then-then-visible Churches use the Greek Tongue Why has the Church of Rome set up another form By this the Doctor contradicts her Antiquity and the other mark that she should never have separated from a Society more ancient then her self or else denâ—es her Universality in that she is but to prescribe a Latine Lyturgie to the Western Churcbes and so he makes those marks
and therefore I have adventured to lay open the Eâ—ors of his choyce which if he please to consider seriously I may win him again to his proper Sheepfold from whence he is gone astray how ever I hope I shall by the blessing of God hinder others from wandering after him and shall be a means to make up that gap which the Doctor hath made in the pale of our Church which whilest it lay open administred occasion for some to escape into the Wilderness Wherefore I will not hold the Reader longer in suspence with a dilatory Introduction but will briefly shew that the Doctor is not gone to the Catholique Church which is the main thing he perswades though it be obscurely wrapt in general terms in his first Chapter but that he has forsaken the faith once given to the Saints he has gone away from the puâ—e Fountain of Verity to the puddle of Error he has forsaken the living water and chosen the Romish cisterns digged by mens hands which hold no water CHAP. II. That the Roman Church is not the Catholique Church either in respect of the Vniversality of her Doctrine or any Jurisdiction she can claim from Peter or by the consent of the Primitive Churches and that the Pope is not the governing Head of the Catholique Church THe Church is called Catholique in several respects 1. In respect of places as being spread universally through the whole world and is not tyed to any place or Kingdom 2. In respect of Times because but one Church of all Times it having ever been from the beginning of the World and shall continue on Earth till the end thereof Isai 59.21 and Matth. 28. the Church of both Testaments being one and the same 3. In respect of the Collective Body thereof the Catholique Church being gathered of men of both Testaments and the Communion of Saints being the union and coherence of all the Saints in Christ their Head according to that of Paul Ephes 1.10 That he might gather together in one all things both which are in Heaven and which are in Earth even into Christ who is and ever shall be King and Head thereof And generally when we speak of the Catholique Church this Collective Church is to be understood which appellation Catholique was used by the Apostles before ever Rome was a Church So that neither in respect of Place Time or Catholiqueness may Rome justly challenge the onely Title of Catholique she being but a particular part or member of this Catholique Church we the Saints being the Body and Members for our part Eph. 1.22 But for the better illustration of this Point I will examine the Doctors Arguments in particular concerning Romes Catholiqueship and I shall in so doing more plainly disprove her Title thereunto The word Catholique as it is defined by the Doctor is not a word of Belief onely but of Communion also So that that Church which holds the same Belief with the ancient Church and yet doth not communicate with her may not rightly be called Catholique I shall retort this Argument which he intended against the Protestants and prove it to be their Justification and the Church of Romes own Condemnation Catholique as I said in a general sence comprehendeth all the Elect and is the full Body of Christ that filleth all things in all things Eph. 4. And when we in our Creed say We beleeve in the Holy Catholique Church it is understood of all the Elect of God which have been are or shall be of which the Church-Militant on Earth is but part But because I suppose the Doctor means onely of a Church upon Earth I will therefore insist upon his own definition and treat of the Church upon Earth which as it is universally spred over the Earth by the Apostles who had equal commission to teach all Nations no one particular Church can or ought to claim to be the Catholique or Universal Church upon Earth As for the Distinction which the Doctor makes betwixt Doctrine and Discipline thereby to excuse the unproper stile of Roman Catholique That is says he Catholique in respect of Doctrine Roman in respect of Discipline That will no ways strengthen her claim or clear her incongruous Title He doth but thereby shew the World how distinct her Discipline is from her Doctrine and thereby give occasion to the world to suspect both And upon this score may the Presbyterian Church of Geneva be called the Geneva Catholique Church that is Geneva for Discipline Catholique for Doctrine she professing the Catholique Faith of the holy and blessed Trinity and yet the Church of Rome I perswade my self would think much that such a glorious appellation should be given to such an upstart Youngling that wind-egg of a Tumult Geneva Church which being braddened under a Toad of France is become a staring Cockatrice and thinks to center the World within the compass of his contagious Den darting poyson upon whom he first espies as experience tells us how he glancing upon the poor Scot has given him such a deadly wound that he will scarce ever recover it teaching those that have escaped that plague with the Wesel each morning to bite on Rue which says Avicen secures her against the toxicating of that venomous Basilisk I say if the Church of Rome think much that the Geneva Church should arrogate such a glorious stile let her never stand upon her own Title which is equally weak to challenge the same The Doctor proceeds further upon Romes Tiâ—le to her Catholiqueship and gives a further explication of the same Catholique says the Doctor imports both the vast extention of Doctrine to Persons and Places and the union of all these places in communion It cannot be denyed but that there were other Churches of ancienter and more reverend setlement then the Church of Rome as the Churches in the East as Jerusalem Antioch Ephesus c. and in after-times the Gospel was to be carryed before Kings and to the Gentiles by S. Paul being by Jesus ordained a Minister and an Apostle of the Gentiles amongst whom Rome was then a chief City which as she received the Faith by S. Paul or S. Peter cannot properly be called a Mother Church but as a babe and suckling received the sincere milk of the Word She was one of the places to which the Doctrine of the Catholique Church of Christ was extended but no extender of that Doctrine So that by the Doctors own definition she cannot properly be called the Catholique Church she being in her Institution but a private particular Member of the Catholique Church as Englands or any other Church planted by the Embassadors of Christ And if since by the indulgent favors of her nursing Fathers the Christian Princes she has grown to that maturity that she has many Daughter Churches of her own plantation in the dark corners of the old known and the new discovered parts of the World yet she cannot by reason thereof assume to her self any
more super-intendency over them as their Mother then Jerusalem from whence Paul was sent after he had the laying on of hands or Antioch from whence it is pretended Peter to have came may by the same rule challenge over her and hers a Jurisdiction as Mother to her and them And as in respect of extention of Doctrine she may not assume the name of Catholique so neither can she claim that Title to her self in respect of her Communion with the Primitive Churches as every point of this ensuing Discourse will evidently shew So that unless the Universality of Power and Jurisdiction she claims from Peter will support this her Title and Dignity she is altogether at a loss and must henceforth discontinue her claim to be the onely Catholique Church It rests therefore to examine That 1. It may not be called Catholique in respect of Peters having been there Rome not Catholique â—n respect of Peter being there no more then the Church of Antioch of which he certainly was Bishop The power of planting the Gospel was given in charge to all the Apostles Go and teach all Nations And as the Doctor hath it in his Introduction they going forth preached every where And in the Acts it is said That the Apostles sent out Peter and John unto Samaria hearing that they had received the Word who layd hands on them If then Peter was subject to their mission how comes he to give unto Rome any power above other Churches of Apostolical Plantation and by the same mission that Peter was sent out to Samaria are elswhere planted Peter was as wel to observe the directions of the rest of the Apostles as to prescribe any Rules to them or others It is true Christ said to Peter Thou art Peter and upon this Rock will I build my Church Saint Cyprian says Cypr. in Tract simp Praelat This was but to denote the Unity of the Church in that it was built upon one for the power of governing and instructing was alike given to all So that admit it was built upon Peter as the Doctor argues fol. 284. yet that gives nothing of superintendency to Rome for Christ after his Resurrection gave power alike to the rest the naming of him alone in that place was ut Ecclesia una monstretur not to take any power or honor from the rest For should it be granted that the Church was built upon Peter alone so that none else should plant or govern then it would follow that any Church planted by any other of the Apostles who received neither order nor power from Peter were not Apostolical or true Churches of Christ which S. Augustin de Doctrina Christiana lib. 2. cap. 8. plainly affirms to the contrary The Apoâ—tles Foundations of â—e Church We are built says S. Paul Ephes 2.20 upon the foundations of the Apostles and Prophets Jesus Christ being the chief Corner-stone by which it appears that the rest of the Apostles were foundations as well as Peter and when there was a strife amongst them who should be greatest amongst them Mat. 20.26 sayes Christ Whosoever shall be greatest let him be your servant which is not to be understood that Christ did thereby reprove pride and haughtinesse only but was against superiority or preheminence amongst them It is true Christ was not against superiority utterly for he calls himself their Lord and Master John 13.10 and their head but this preheminence he did not delegate to any one amongst them for they were the foundations he the Corner-stone they the body he the Head they ministers he their Master they equall he their superior The Apostles power to plant the Gospell was equall The Apostles power equall and they dispersed themselves for the propagation of the Gospell not by any order received from Peter but by the Commission they received from Christ himself In the eighth chapter of the Acts it is said that Philip went towards the South and baptized the Eunuch the Queen of Ethiopia her chief Governour and to this day the Catholike Faith is professed in Ethiopia being there preached by the said Eunuch Nor doth the Pope exercise any jurisdiction there which he might as well as in any other Countries which received the Faith from some of the Apostles and not from the Bishop of Rome if Peter was chief Governour of the Church and he his successor Doth not the Scripture plainly affirm that the Holy Ghost came upon all Acts 2. and Gal. 2. James Peter and John gave Paul the right hand of fellowship When Christ instituted his Supper he said to them Hoc est corpus meum quod pro vobis datur hoc facite c. He gave to all a like power of administration And Joh. 20. As my Father sent me so send I you he speaks it to all the Disciples and not to Peter alone Nolite vocari Rabbi Mat. 23. unus enim magister est vester scilicet Jesus omnes autem vos fratres estis that is saith S. Austin you are all equall And S. Hierome in his Epistle to Evander Omnes Episcopi five Romae five alibie jusdem sacerdotii atque potestatis à Christo collationem habuerunt The Doctor cites Bellarmines argument that Christ is the invisible head but there must be a mysteriall and visible head to govern the whole and therefore when it is said 1 Cor. 12. that the head cannot say to the feet I have no need of you it must not be understood of Christ for he the eternall Word can say J have no need c. The Apostles are called skilfull master-builders 1 Cor. 3. Christ the Head of the Church but another foundation can no man lay then that which is laid Jesus Christ It cannot therefore be understood that Peter was the foundation and rock on which the Church was built Christ as he is head it is of the whole Catholike Church and therefore when Paul Ephes 1. calls him the head he brings in both men and Angells into the rank of members men ver 4. and Angells vers 21. But as touching the particular Churches upon earth they all are but as so many members of the head Christ Jesus and are built upon the Apostles as the Doctor confesses in his Introduction who as I said are called master-builders or the heads of those respective Churches but there was not one of them that was to bear rule over the rest Peter was primus in ordine not supremus in potestate you cannot have twelve without one but every one is as much one as another whether in respect of Power or Ordination as S. Cyprian de unitate Ecclesiae agrees some were ordained Apostles some Prophets some Evangelists for the work of the Ministery for the edification of the body of Christ and to every one of the Apostles was grace given according to the measure of the gift of Christ by whom he ascended into heaven but those that were Apostles were aequales inte se and the
the case stands with the Eastern Churches they I am perswaded would not bogle to condescend hereunto but by no means let her ever hope to have a supremacy of Iurisdiction she may force it but never by argument evince it and so according to its first beginning prosecute to rear up her tower of Universality with the cement of bloud which whilst she prosecutes she forges her Keys into a two-edged sword and when she has done she like a Heathen Roman destroys her self by cutting off some of her fellow-members robbing them of what belongs to their office and makes them uselesse pieces of the mysticall body Christ Jesus of which all the Churches upon earth are fellow-members and though many yet make but one body being all baptized into one body by one Spirit 1 Cor. 12.12 Let us therefore follow the truth in love and in all things grow up unto him which is the Head that is Christ by whom all the body being compleat and knit together by every joynt for the forniture thereof according to the effectuall power which is in the measure of every part receiveth encrease of the body unto the edification of it self in love Ephes 4. The Doctor confesses that Christ is the Head originally but the Pope is the Head derivatively for sayes he with as much reason may we deny a King to be Head of his Kingdome because the Scripture saith God is King over all the earth as deny the Pope to be Head of the Church because Christ is so To which I answer Christ is the Head of the Catholike Church that is comprehensive of all the Elect Pope not Universall Head Saints Angells and men of which the particular Churches on earth are but members and the people the Saints of God assembled together to worship God and call upon him in his Sacraments make a Church Christ being their Head and as they are a people not convened to that purpose their severall Princes and Magistracy is to rule over them which I judge to be the principall reason of the Law of Sanctuaries Now for the Pope to claim an universall headship over them is either to rob Christ of his office or to deny Caesar his due for as Head of the whole Catholike Church he candot be and to be Head of the Universall Church upon earth is not consistent with the plantations of the other Apostles nor was any such universall headship delegated to any one of the Apostles Christ sent out his Apostles to all Nations and they ordained spirituall heads and Governors over their severall plantations none being to intrude upon anothers foundation and ever since Christ there have been superintendents over the severall Churches yet those superintendents were equal amongst themselves none lording it over another but only within their distinct territories did equally exercise the authori y of their headship and every one within his own Province being representative in point of order of Christ the mysticall Head without ascribing a single universality to any one of them although by this means there be many headships over the severall plantations yet it doth no more destroy the representative headship of Christ here on earth then the Spanish French c. acknowledging obedience to their distinct Princes are against Monarchy because the Turk claims to be Soveraign Lord of the Universe Wherefore if the Church of Rome wil needs have the Catholike Church to be understood only of a Universall Church upon earth and some one Bishop to be the governing head thereof I must tell her that she can lay no just claim hereto because if Peter had any power above the other Apostles it doth not appear to succeed to the Bishop of Rome for that it is not proved Peter to have been Bishop there and if he was Bishop there yet there wants a cleare and perfect deraigning of succession from him some affirming Linus some Clemens some Anacletus to succeed him and some Bishops of Rome claiming as Successors to Paul some to Peter or if they could perfect their Succession yet it is not evident that Peters power did succeed to them in respect it was Apostolically in him and either died in him or survived to Iohn besides they cannot agree in the manner how this power of supremacy should be in them for if they have it as universall Bishops Gregory declares it and the Doctor confesses it to be Antichristian for that hereby they deny others to be Bishops and so rob them of their divine order and Ecclesiastique Jurisdiction granted by consent of Councells to Metropolitans to govern within their provinciall precincts without appealing to Rome and if they will have it in respect of Rome see how they make Rome the Rock not Peter and go against the Symbole of our faith The Apostles who composed the Creed as the Doctor confesses 148. and professing faith in the Catholike Church did publish that Creed at Jerusalem before ever the faith was preached at Rome and when her Church was invisible or not in rerum natura and did not therefore intend Rome for the Catholique Church Wherefore for these reasons I hope I may without incurring a censure of presumption with confidence affirm that Rome is not the Catholique Church nor the Pope the universall Head of the Catholike Church either in respect of any Jurisdiction derived from Peter or by the consent of Councells lawfully deraigning any title thereto CHAP. III. That the name Church is proper to England as well as to Rome THe Doctor is pleased in his fifth and thirteenth chapters to take notice of severall definitions of a Church which are distinctions of severall Sectaries that are in England and elswhere but never glanced upon that which is maintained and professed in the Church of England which belike he omitted on purpose to make people believe that we had no Church at all properly distinguished by her self apart from those Sectaries and therefore he fled to Rome to find one if he have forgotten I will put him in mind of it The Church of God is a company of men chosen by him to call upon his name and therefore did the Apostles term it Ecclesia alluding to the custome of Arkens to call together the people to hear the promulgation of any Law or any publike Oration and not Synagogue that is an inordinately met assembly without a lawfull calling together wherefore we say that Ecclesia in the most proper and genuine signification is Vniversitas fidelium credentium invocantium nomen Christi By which interpretation if we be in the faith of Jesus and have our solemn assemblies to worship and call upon his name we may properly be called a Church and a member of the Catholique Church which as I said before is comprehensive of all the Elect of God which have been are or shall be The Doctor cannot deny but that we maintain the Apostles Creed and I may say so doth not Rome The Church of Rome abuses the Apostles
Creed we whilst we say we believe the holy Catholique Church mean thereby the whole Elect of God as well Saints in heaven as the Church upon earth which is the full body of Christ Ephes 4. and Rom. 12. but they thereby will have Rome understood which as I said was not in being before the Creed was composed and it seems strange to some that the Church of Rome should admit of the following Article to wit the Communion of Saints to extend to the Saints in heaven and will exclude them from the Catholique Church but the reason 's plain for it stands not with the Majesty of the Pope for in admitting the first he loses his headship we being all members of the Catholike Church but by the other his honor is not diminished in respect none are to be reputed Saints but such as are of his own making But if the Doctor will not admit of our definition I hope he will not be against our embracing of his which is this A Church is a Society of those whom God hath called to salvation by the profession of the true Faith and sincere administration of the Sacraments and the adherence to lawful Pastors I wonder what the Doctor means by the society of those that God hath called to salvation by the profession of the true Faith sure he will not deny but that those Societies which were gathered by other Apostles were true Churches as well as those which were gathered by Peter He himself fol. 192. confesses the true Church visible in Ethiopia where the Eunuch which Philip baptized preached the Faith and it is hard he should dâ—ny this to his own mother County which he allowes to Ethiopians especially considering wee as is believed by some received the Faith by the same Apostle Philip. But 't is no great matter we need not stand to the Doctors courtesie herein we have a better warrant then his Concession Act. 20.28 the flocks whereof the holy Ghost made the Elders over-seers is called the Church of Gâ—d Paul ordained Elders and committed charge of Flocks unto them A Christian Society makes a Church c. That the distinct Societies of Christians are called Churches is likewise manifest by severall other places of Scripture 1 Cor. 1. Paul writ to the Church that was at Corinth and to all that call upon the name of the Lord Jesus Gal. 1. to the Churches at Galatia Grace c. 1 Thes to the Church of the Thessalonians Col. 1.4 salute the brethren which are of Laodicea and Nymphas and the Church which is in his house Rev. 1.11 there were seven Churches in Asia Ephesus Smyrna Pergamos c. In the same manner Rome may be called a Church if she have a Sociâ—ty of the faithful calling upon the name of Christ Jesus wherefore Peter writing his Epistle from Babylon which the Papists interpret Rome sâ—â—es The Church that is at Bâ—bylon elected together with you saluteth you that is the Saints which dwell here and there dispersed through Pontus Galatia Cappadocia Asia and Bythinia the society of the Saints of Babylon saluteth the several societies of the Saints of those parts which were severall respective Churches members of the Catholike Church elected together in Christ Jesus So that from these places it is evident that the name of Church is applicable to all Christian Societies whether they be of Peters or any other of the Apostles gathering For the Apostles had equal commission from Christ for the gathering together of the Saints for the work of the Ministry and for the edification of the Body of Christ though in the Church were men of different Gifts as Apostles Teachers Evangelists c. yet the Apostles amongst themselves were equall and their severall plantations coordinate and equal as to any power or Jurisdiction If then we be in the faith of Jesus and have Societies of Christian believers in him we may properly be called a Church and that especially because we are of Apostolical plantation and are not beholding to Rome for that Plantation as coming from Eleutherius successour as they pretend to Peter But if we had our Faith from Rome it came by the means of Paul and certainly we had that Faith long before Eleutherius time as I have already proved in the precedent chapter wherefore we may properly both according to our own and the Doctors definition of a Church assume that title to our selves we being a Society of Christians calling upon the name of Jesus which is called a Church 1 Cor. 1.2 Rome a particular Church and for Rome or any other Church to arrogate more then to be a particular member of the Catholike Church whereof Christ is the Head and Hierusalem which is above free and the mother of us all is Antichristian and abominable especially for Rome that she should stile her self the onely Catholike Church when as Ephesus the See of John and John the surviving Apostle in whom alone survived the Apostleship calls that Church but one of the seven in Asia Rev. 1. Were John Peter or any of the Apostles alive to see to what a lofty pitch ambition has hurried the aspiring Prelates of Rome they would blush to behold such iniquity and reprove any that should call Rome the Catholike Church For alas The Pride of Rome how little doth she resemble Christs Spouse his Church Christs Church was planted in humility Romes Church lords it in Soveraignty Christs Church had her White vest of Innocency Romes Church is clad in her purple of bloud and cruelty how little doth the Scarlet tribe resemble the train of Christ were Peter or any of Christs disciples now at Rome and should see the Pope they would rather take him for Pilate an Officer or Judge of Cesars then for Peter a fisher-man and servant of Jesus and would think his Cardinalls to be rather the Embassadors of Bozra then the Messengers of the Gospel and servants of Christ and should any but assume that Christian boldnes to tel them that their Scarlet Robes did cover and make invisible the Seamlesse coat of Jesus he were in danger of a Councell To such a height of Majesty are they of late aspired that they exercise dominion without restraint little regarding Christs precept to his Apostles the Kings of the Gentiles bear Rule and exercise dominion Vos autem non sic And here by the way I will insert a story of Peter and Simon Magus incertainty of Peter being at Rome Aegesippus lib. 2. de excidio Hierusal cap. 2. reports that Peter came to Rome to withstand Simon Magus 44 Christi Eusebius says he was crucified 36 Christi others that Paul and he together others that Paul was crucified a yeer after and on the same day Prudentius that Paul followed Peter to Rome from which contradictions no certainty of his being there is to be concluded but I return to my story It is said that Simon Magus taking some offence with the Citizens threatned to leave
draw people into mis-belief therefore for avoiding of this Errour and for reforming her evill wayes I may without the compass of censure justly reprove her Bishops whilest I doe not personally traduce the men but reprove the Errours of the Chair or if I personally touch any one it is not I but some one of their own Church that did it 3. I shall not speak evil of any lawful Magistrate that ought to bear Rule and excercise Dominion nor any to whose right of power I stand naturally obliged to respect and Reverence The Doctor would perswade us that the wickednesse of some Popes doth not blemish this Mark which is strange to me she will have it a blemish against the reformed Churches because Luther Beza c. are by Basseck termed with infamous conversations and shall it be a blemish to private Churches to have ungodly Bishops and not to Rome this is unequall dealing The Bishop of Rome is rather a blemish to the Church of Rome then any other Bishop is to a private Church if they both be wicked for the higher a man is lifted in honour and dignity as he is thereby made more neer the similitude of God who is above all so he ought to give a testimony of his good workes above others lest he deface that more noble Image by his unworthy acts besides the Bishops of Rome have of late declared to be above Councels and are in themselves representations of the Catholike Church wherefore for them to be wicked and dissolute must needs deface this Mark of sanctity As for the distinction between the Person of the Bishop Infra 70.9 chap. and his Power that is his judiciall Seat and so that he may erre as a Man not as a Bishop it is a meer juggle and that which savours of the Tenents of those they call Heretiques the Presbyterians who divide person from power Infra 130.14 chap. and it is rediculous and a meer evasion to escape this censure For if a man should affront Clemens Vrbam c. Bishop of Rome it would be construed an injury to the See and not that personall of which more in the 9 chap. I have a warrant from Saint Hierome Causa 11. Questio 3. if any believe that man to be holy that is not holy and joyne him to the company of God he doth villany to Christ whose members we are I say I have a warrant by this rule to lay open the Iniquities of the Bishops of Rome that men may no longer be drawn into the guilt of this injury by exalting hypocrites believing them to be true Apostolick teachers which indeed are ravening wolves not to feed but to destroy the flock of Christ wherefore take a view of some of her Bishops of Rome as I find them described by antient and modern writers Those Popes which were condemned and censured for their intollerable abuses towards Princes I reserve for another chapter take here onely a view of those that in other most loud and vile positions were most notoriously wicked Wernerus exclaimeth that anno 883. Holy men were perished from the earth and he writ to Martin 2d. So that in his time there was wickednesse amongst the pastours of Rome Wallerus Mapes writes of the Romane Clergy that they studdy villany envy reigneth and truth is buried amongst them Peter de Alcaco in lib. de reform eccl notes the luxuriousnesse avarice Idlenesse Blasphemies Magick Arts and other wickednesse of the Bishops of Rome John the 12th was a Dicer and a wicked fellow Gregory the 7th as Beno the Cardinall testifieth was a Magitian Hildebrand Infra 14. chap 142. and what stirs and commotions raised he about the elections of his predecessours Sigebert writes that he confessed when he felt himself at the point of death that he had raised many stirs by the perswasions of the Devil it is likewise recorded that Silvester 2d Gregory 6th Benedict 9th and Paul the third and divers others were Magitians John the 23d was condemned by the Councell of Constance for denying the resurrection of the dead and other points of Atheisme Sixtus the 4th builded the Stewes at Rome a godly foundation and well becoming so Holy a Father Alexander the 6th presently became his successour and much improved the revenues of that delightfull Corporation he was so bold and shamelesse in the sinne of whoredome That he openly acknowledged the Popes Nephews to be his Bastards as Guichard testifies and thus I have given you a brief of some wicked Popes of Rome before they were declared above Councels Wicked heads of the Church and now see what those are which are professed by the the late Latteran and Trent Councells to be above Councels and if so then their wickednesse utterly blots out this mark of Sanctity Leo the which was a Blasphemour insomuch that he was often heard â—ay Quantas nobis divitias Comparavit ista fabula Christi Luther his Reformation Ante 22 44 chap. 2. In his time it being high time to shake off such wicked Society did Luther reforme the Germane Churches Truth and Falshood Christ and Belial are incomparable either he or some one else must write against these damnable Doctours and their diabolicall practices otherwise the Kingdome of Anti-christ would have been universally spred over the face of the Earth and should none stop the furious course of these Cato demonaick Priests they would convert Tiber into Barathrum and plung the whole world into that bottomlesse Abisse mistake me not I doe not approve of all that Luther did onely this that he being of another distinct province apart from Rome and having Cure of Souls and seeing the Errours of Rome and his Flock addicted to follow after Rome for the honour and credit her antient truth drew from the hearts of many might lawfully admonish and was bound in Conscience to check Rome of her Errours now that she flew to so high a pitch of wickednesse and having no hopes of her self-reforming were she not admonished by some one of her faults might therefore take upon him to lay open before her eyes some of her Errors hoping thereby to reclaim her or at least to stay his own Flock from wandring after her by laying before them the present practices of Rome contrary to the antient Truth Luthers Reformation nor was this any more then formerly was practised by the Apostles and confirmed by Councels for Provincials to reforme Saint Paul Peter James and Saint John did write to severall Churches and admonish them and especially Jude sayes It was needfull to write to exhort the people of God earnestly to contend for the maintenance of the Faith which was once given unto the Saints for that there were certain men crept in which were afore ordained unto this condemnation ungodly men which turned the grace of God into wantonnesse and deny God the onely Lord and our Lord Jesus Christ And if ever they must contend for the maintenance of the antient Faith
them and the Church of Rome claimes from Peter who had not commission to carry the light to the Gentiles and to Kings For that as I said in the second Chapter the general commission given to go and teach all Nations Ante 13. 2 Chap. was afterwards restrained as â—o the Gentiles Paul being a chosen vessel thereunto ordained by God himself Besides Spain as I said before is a distinct Province from Rome and has held several councels without the Bishop of Rome as the several councels of Toledo Cardubia c. Wherefore if his priests have planted the Gospel how comes this to denote the truth of Rome But so it is that the Pope has got such a hank upon the Spaniards that he as Superintendent lords it over all his provincial Sees and whatsoever is done or acted which may bring glory or honour to the Church or if any profit may redound from thence his holiness is ready to patrize the action not allowing a jot to any Spanish provincials it not being consistent with his universality and headship to have a partner or sharer in any his exploits But if any thing amiss or enormious arise in these planted Churches his holiness then disclaimes to own them as his and declares them to be members of the Spanish Sees so that it fares with the Spanish Plantation as once it did to the Temple in Rome dedicated to Castor and Pollux which presently after the building obtained a sole name of Castors Temple whereupon Bubulus who was fellow-Conful with Câ—sar and did expend more in the publique Trophies of the City and in that contributed more fâ—â—ely to grace the City then Cesar during his Consulship did and seeing for all that that Cesar had the name and carryed all the honor of those and other actions wherein Bubulus was equally concerned merrily said it fared with him as it did with Pollux who had lost his name in the Temple And thus may the Spaniard and Portugal say of their Westerne and Easterne Plantations that it is with them as with Pollux they must not so much as be named the planters of the Cospel in those parts but his holiness alone must be said the sole converter of those kingdoms as if his painted Sepulcher were not sufficiently notorious without the varnish of the counterfeit Plaister And I wonder the Spaniard and Portugals should suffer themselves to be despoiled of these glorious works of their and thus to suffer the Pope like Venus transformed waiting-maid to minks it and pride himself in this disguise unless it be that the grave Dons have a designe upon the Papacy and for some private ends forbear at present but purpose cre long to shew a mouse before the counterfeit that he may discover his false habit and prove himself not the only Catholique father in respect of his converting of those kingdomes and thereby at once to manifest the depth of their policy and the Popes foolishness and vaine glory Rome has separated from the Churches more ancient then her self And as the Church of Rome cannot alone be said a true Church in respect of her converting of Nations so may she in no sort lay any just claime to that denomination in respect of the other mark by which she desires to be distinguished viz. her non-separation from Churches more ancient then her self The Doctor confesses that Jerusalem Antioch and other Churches are of more antiquity But Rome cannot be said to have separated from them in respect they were of Romes faith To which I answer it were more proper to say that Rome is of their faith because he confesses her puisnee to them and they to have the faith when Rome had not and they may lay claime to the former mark of conversion in respect they extended the faith to Rome and if Rome have converted any the first foundation coming from the Easterne Churches Rome ought not to chalenge that attribute which belongs to them in that particular And as these Churches were more ancient and had the true faith it is manifest that Romes title to this mark is as improper as her claime to be sole owner of the other for that she has made a separation in forsaking the Primitive faith and publique Decrees of the ancient holy and Catholique Church on earth as may appear by every particular point in question in this Troatise and by some others of which the Doctor not having started the question and I not minding to make her gap of separation wider then the Doctor himself has done do forbear to mention them I do keep my self only to answer those points upon which the Doctor doth insist It is manifest that Rome has in fundamental points changed her faith and though as she inclined or declined she drew these parts being too much addicted to imitate her upon a bare score of the antiquity of Romes having the pure faith to pin their faith upon her sleeve yet all other parts of Apostolical Plantations did not forsake their first faith and turn after the Lateran weather-cock There was a remaining part of the Greeks Church which the black wings of Mahomatisme and Judaisme had not overspread and in Aethiopia the light of the Gospel did still continue to shine neither were all the Indies of Portugal Plantation and so Rome to be their founder in that she claims to convert Portugal Demetrius Bishop of Alexandria sent Pantenus to Preach to the Indies not long after Christ The East Indies not totally converted by the Potugal and when he came thither he found Saint Matthews Gospel writ in Hebrew and left there by Saint Bartholomew which the said Pâ—ntenus brought to Alexandria by which it appears that some part of the Indies received the faith not from Rome with the Westerne Churches Fox Mar. 48. Therefore may we not conclude Rome to be the true Church or else the true Church has been utterly extinguished nor that because it was not of late any where else but where she planted therefore she cannot err or the like We must not with the Doct. upon this score argue that Rome hath not forsaken her first faith he himself confesses fol. Ante 192. that the faith was in Aethiopia by the Plantation of Philip And by this it appears some part of the Indies retaine the faith from the Plantation of Bartholomew nor can the Church of Rome deny this in regard that then she makes the Church universally invisible which is absurd and contrary to Christs promise For in that she in many points maintaines contrary to the Apostles Doctrine contrary to the first councels and contray to her own modern constitutions as shall appear in this next Chapter she may not properly be said the true Catholique Church in respect of her non-separation from a society of Christians more ancient then her self CHAP. IX That any particular Church may err that the Church of Rome is not Infallible that she hath erred in matters of faith as
well as in matters of fact I Know I shall incur the grand displeasure of his Holiness and his pontificial tribe and not altogether please the Doctor in truly laying open some errors of Rome The one will tell me some truths are censured for treason against the triple crown the other will say according to the Proverb Sooth seems not at all times I fear not the censure of the one for I shall as much please him as displease him if I break his head I shall make a plaister of his blood I may displease him in laying open his errors but I shall be his darling whilst in so doing I make his Church visible As for the Doctor I presume when he seriously considers how much we are concerned in this point to lay open Romes errors he will not altogether condemne me for should we in silence pass by and tacitely consent that the church of Rome is infallible in what she maintaines Then it follows we are Hereticks because she sayes so I have partly cleared our selves from this aspersion already it rests now that I prove Rome to have faln into errors and if so according to the Doctors rule folio 210. if sayes he she err in any one point she cannot be prudentially sure of the least tittle she affirmes Mercurius gave the Egyptians laws Je. chall received as he said of the God Mena Licurgus to the Lacedemonians from Apollo Velphicus and Lactantius lib. 1. cap. 15. divinar Institut Minus to the Cretians from Jupiter the Lady Pallas directed the Troâ—ans Caberius the Macedonians Vrania the Carthaginians Phaunus the Latines Juno the Samnites Venus the Paphites and all as they would make us believe proceed from some god or goddess The Turk affirms his Alcaron to have been received from heaven and the Ephesians de Diana sua cogitatarunt eam à Jove delapsam fore Even so doth Rome at this present boast of an infallible Church which to prove she must go to some Heathen Deity or other for as she is a Church militant here upon earth governed by humane flesh and blood and but a particular society or Church and so a member of the Catholique Church comprehensive of all the Elect and Saints of God which have been are or shall be and whereof Christ Jesus is the mystical head she is subject to fall into errors and though she were the See of Peter and that power which Peter received from Christ to be remaining with her which she would faine perswade the world to believe yet notwithstanding she may err For still she is but a particular Church and may err though the universal Church cannot err in respect of Christs Spirit given to her and his promise that she shall continue in her foundation till the end of the world Saint Peter did err after he had received the Holy Ghost Act. 10.34 Saint Peter did err he was of opinion that the Gospel pertained not at all unto the Gentiles untill he was informed by a vision that he should goe to Cornelius for saith he I perceive of a truth that God is no respecter of persons but in every Nation he that feares him whether Jew or Gentile and worketh righteousness is accepted with him so that there was a time whilst Peter was in error and Gal. 2.14 he walked not with a right foot according to the light of the Gospel Paul withstood him to his face and this was not for any smal fault or error of conversation as the Doct. would perswade us for Saint Austin against Saint Jerom doth Justifie the reprehension Besides to say it was an error of fact and not of faith were to charge Saint Peter with dissimulation either against his conscience or with it sure he did it not for any worldly respects against his conscience and if he did it because he thought it was his duty in so doing to bear with the weakness of the Jews and to think that a man may dissemble in such a case then it was matter of faith whether a man may in eo casu dissimulare or no therefore his error was a matter of faith not of fact only I need no other Argument to clear this then what the Doctor has himself framed against our proposed difference between fundamentals and not fundamentals in point of error for saith he fol. 88. There is no distinction of points of faith in regard of the object or motive for which we believe namely the truth of God revealed by his Church we being equally bound to believe all that is by her proposed to us whether the matter be great or small Upon this the Doctors argument I infer That the Church having proposed before That the Jews should not eat with the Gentiles Peter did offend against this injunction which he ought to have believed as the truth of God and therefore it was in him an error of faith Before the vision in the 10. of the Acts Peter was not to preach to the Gentiles he was not to communicate to the Gentiles and would not go to Cornelius before that and therefore in the 2 of the Acts when there were men of all Nations and strangers from Rome at Jerusalem and when they every one heard their own language and therefore mocked the Apostles saying They were full of new wine Peter lifted up his voice and corrected the men of Judea that was only them of the circumcision and did not intermeddle with the Gentiles they not belonging to his charge and therefore did Paul reprove him for eating with them Dissoluteness in manners argues unsoundness in opinion though it be in things wherein the Church has not interposed her decree But if she have injoyned a thing to be done or not done though it were indifferent in it self yet her command takes away the indifferency upon the Doctors own rule and therefore Peters offence against the Churches rule was error of faith Shall Peter the blessed Apostle of Jesus Christ be taxed of errors he being here by Saint Paul and in several other places of Scripture reprehended by our Saviour for his failings before he received the Holy Ghost shewing hereby he was a man and after he had received the Holy Ghost doubting to whom the Gospel was to be preached and offending against the injunctions of the Church shewing hereby he was no God and shall the wicked Popes of Rome think much to be taxed of their errors and daily failings I might easily be reprehended for injustice should I bury their errors in silence and publish to the world Saint Peters failings wherefore I must lay open their aberrations to the publique view In prosecution whereof I will not as a private man chalenge them of error but only put them in minde what councels the ancient fathers of the Church and their own latter writers have given them to understand What is the Pope The Pope may err he is no Samuel under the Ephod no Moses on the Mount no Aaron with
the Pope is not universal Bishop which title the Doctor disclaims nor the Church of Rome universal Councels above the Pope as I already proved so neither may he be said to be above Councels which though not representive of the universal Church upon earth for that all particular Churches and provinces may not be there by suffragans represented yet for all that it is a collective Councel of distinct provincials which provincials are not subordinate nor subjugate to the See of Rome The Pope with his Cardinals the representative church of that particular society may not properly or of right be said above that Councel which is there for order sake and unity convened that those several provinces of which she is collective may concur in unity of Doctrine and conformity of Rules of Faith there decreed which decrees and Rules should by the approbation of the Civil Magistrate be put into execution within those respective provinces and distinct jurisdictions without any further allowance or approbation or controlment of the Pope of Rome who is thereunto equally obliged with any other provincial and to assert the contrary is novelty and the unjust usurpations of the proud pontifical prelates of Rome and those cursed Lordly parasites about him that thus have flattered the chair into this deceivable mischief and erroneous novelty which according to Tertullian's Rule adversus prax in princip Id esse verum quod primum esse adulterum quod posterius semper adjudicandum est Wherefore this new doctrine of the Popes supremacy above Councels representive of many provinces must not be received as true and justifiable doctrine for that it is cleerly opposite to the ancient faith of Rome insomuch that the former Popes of Rome did as Popes did at an Altar promise to hold the faith taught by the traditions of the first Councels of Nice and Constantinople c. Infra 84. which made Romes Bishop but equal with other Patriarks but now contrary to that sacred vow his holiness will be above Councels and utterly destroyes the constitutions of those Councels The Councel of Nice hemmed in the See of Rome into certaine limits The Pope inferior to Councels wherein being included she should not break forth yet such is the restless motions of her troublesome head the Pope that he has made corruptions beyond his bound and like as a violent Tide that has lately overwhelmed some parcel of ground not before made a prey to Neptunes wide swallowing jawes doth for joy of its new mastery tumble it self upon its new-acquired Lordship making new beds of ease whereon it intends the next high-springing flood shall lay his foamy head so doth his holiness having broke down this pale of the Church which kept her within a known and certaine Rule of Faith maners insult over the poor captive Lady having thus trod her down which formerly was a rampire to circumscribe his power and jurisdiction he recommends his lawless president to his successors imitation and proclaimes the See of Rome boundless save only as her will shall please to prescribe unto her self a limited confine And having Samson-like thus tore the Lions whelp of the tribe of Judah he expects to finde a nest of honey in her dead carcase and from his Papal chair puts forth such riddles that none that plows not with his Heifer can declare which riddles and Romane mysteries shall any interpret or put a sense upon them contrary to his will or displease him in abating any jot of his new-acquired Soveraignty he sends his Foxes with fire-brands to destroy the corn of the field and to spoil the vineyard which Christ with his own right hand hath planted Is this Pastor-like is this to follow Pauls rule to the Rom. chap. 11.8 Boast not thy self against the branches for if thou boast thy self thou bearest not the Root but the Root thee Surely no This is rather to pull up the tree of life by the roots because her branches wither and if other branches sprung of the same stock decay it may serve to put Rome in mind that the sap she has robbed from others will not long maintain life in her arms in respect she has thus lopped her self from the bulk of the Church She may for a time flourish like a green Palme-tree but if she do not play the good husband and inoculate her self againe into the old stock it is more then probable she will shortly become a dotard wherefore I heartily pray she would no longer exalt her self against that that gave her what she has I mean a Councel that made her equal with the chief Patriarks and the Princes that gave her honour lifting her head above her fellows Let her no longer triumph above measure knowing this that whilst she rejoyces in her boasting all such rejoycing is evil Now lest any may censure me for slandering the Church of Rome herein I will shew how she has changed by degrees from her primitive faith in point of her honor and confidence in a General Councel and at length quite destroy it by claiming to her self to be above it First Boniface by the edict of Phocas as you have heard claimed to be above a Bishop then in process of time Greg. 7. claimed a power above kings as shal appear in Chap. 14. after which the wings of the succeeding Popes being chipt by four Councels Worms Papia Brixis and Mentz grew again in his successors that at last they flew above Councils till the 3 General Councils of Pise Constance Basil did not onely displace Popes out of the Popedom but decreed that Councils were above the Pope Popes displaced by Councils The Pisen Councels did out two Greg. 12. Benedict and placed Alexander 5. and the Council of Constant deposed John 23. placed Martin 5 in his stead and decreed that the Pope himself for ever should be subject to their decrees The Councel of Basil deposed Eugen. 4. placed Nicholas 5. and declared the Councel of Constant in this point of the Councels supremacy to be a matter of faith so that the late Councels of Laterane and Trent do not only prove the fallibility of Romes Church but that Rome has changed her faith For such is the ambition and pomp of the possessors of the Romane chaire that they could not rest quiet as long as the edicts of the Councels of Constant and Basil were in force it bred heart-burings and struglings in the breasts of the succeeding Popes it being an undervaluing to their claimed Imperial dominion to be Tenants at will of their triple crown and that a Councel should at pleasure put an end to their state and Empire wherefore as a current kept back by some forced rampire if it shall once break down that dam runs head-long with more force and violence even so the Popes having pack't the Councels Laterane and Trent after their own humors did procure them to remove and batter down that bulwarke of Constant and
and that the rather because I will therein give a brief account of the state of the Popes and of the means and wayes by which they have grown to the present height of jurisdiction they now exercise as well over other Churches as over Princes and in that respect it may serve for an answer to the Doctors twentieth additional Chapter without incurring a just censure of an absolute digression from the subject matter of the Doctors discourse CHAP. XIV That the Pope hath no power to depose any Prince although an Heretick That Bishops are not equal with Kings and that the antient practice of Rome's church was against this neither claiming the same in Spiritual or Temporal capacities THe Pope of Rome claimes to be Peters successor and by vertue thereof to be Christs Vice-general universal father of the Church the onely dispensor of Apostolick Benedictions and supreme head of the Catholick Church these are the titles and appellations by which he desires to be distinguished that by these it may be known he is dignified above all the Clergy upon earth I have in the second Chapter given some satisfaction concerning the unjustness of this his claime yet I might admit him what he here desires to be thought to be and notwithstanding prove that that power of jurisdiction will not extend to a warrant his busie intermedling in temporal affaires much less be a sufficient warrant for his dethroning of any Prince or Potentate or disobliging his people and subjects from their obedience and duty to such civil Magistracy as is set over those people to rule and govern them In prosecution of this matter I will first treat of the power of Kings and Bishops in general then examine the Popes power in particular Kings are called sons of the most high Of the prerogative of Kings 2 Sam. 7.14 Gods on earth Psal 82.6 All people are to obey them in all they command Josh 1.28 They have their Commission from Almight God by me Kings reign Prov. 8.15 and Rom. 13. Their wrath is as the roaring of a Lyon Prov. 19.12 And if they transgress none is to question them Psal 51.4 Lyranus upon this Psalm says David had sinned against God alone as a Judge to punish him for being a King he had no superior to punish him and yet he had sinned against Vriah causing him to be murdered but as to be punished he crys out unto the Lord Against thee only have I done this evil And herewith agree Saint Ambrose de Apolog. David cap. 10. pag. 386. and Hugo Cardinalis upon that Psalm Kings shall bear rule and exercise dominion Luk. 22. He is the Minister of God to take vengeance on them that do evil The whole Scripture magnifies the majesty power and dominion of Kings which it witnesses to be given to those absolute Monarches and Kings mentioned in Scripture even by God himself that power which they had being of God Rom. 13. And none should say unto them What dost thou As for Priests it is plain by the Scripture that those under the Law were to offer sacrifice for the sins of the people Of the Office of Bishops 1 Chron. 9.2 Heb. 9.6 5.1 Gods Covenant with them was of life peace and that their lips should preserve knowledge Malach. 2.4 And the Priests under the Gospel are a holy Priesthood to offer up spiritual sacrifice acceptable to God by Jesus Christ 1 Pet. 2.5 they are commanded to pray for all men 1 Tim. 2. For Kings and all that be in authority and Peter the prime Apostle was commanded to follow Christ who left him an example of suffering and obedience which S. Peter himself witnesses to the world 1 Pet. 2.21 For hereunto are ye called for Christ also suffered for us leaving us an ensample that yee should follow his steps From all which places of Scripture may be deduced these conclusions Kings are representatives of God the Father to them is given all power and dominion to rule and command Priests are the lively Images of Christ to whom he has left his precept of humility to be obedient and serve To Kings is left authority to punish evil doers to Priests to pray for all men even their own oppressors not to recompence evil for evil Rom. 12.17 Kings are to use the material sword for vengeance Priests the spiritual sword the Word to make supplication for all Saints Eph. 6.18 Kings are not to be rebuked Priests are to suffer with patience Kings sit in Gods throne Priests serve at his Altar Kings are Angels of God 2 Sam. 14.20 Priests are the Embassadors of Christ beseeching us in Christs stead to be reconciled unto God Yet Kings though they be thus exalted and superintendent over all they have an especial charge to respect the Priests and hearken unto them Num. 27.21 And it is the duty of Priests to reverence them 2 Chro. 13. Priests pay their tribute of obedience and duty but Kings are to recompence it with respect and love The power of the Priest over the people ceased when Saul was King and yet Saul was to hearken to Samuel The Majesty of the one must not despise the humility of the other the King as I said is the Minister of Justice the Priests the Messengers of Mercy These two must not clash against each other but with Princely David ought with harmonious concurrence of spirit to sing of mercy and judgement mercy and truth to meet together righteousness and peace to kiss each other For as there is a Noli me tangere for the one Touch not mine anointed so there is a precept of preservation for the other Do my prophets no harm There is a general tye laid upon all Let every soul be subject to the higher powers wherein the Ministers of the Gospel are included and likewise there is a rule of obedience prescribed to all Heb. 13. Obey them that have the oversight of you for that they watch for your souls c. wherein Princes are not exempted Which shews that Princes are to hearken to their word and doctrine and to be courteous to them and not to grieve the holy Spirit of God Eph. 4. and they are to be obedient to Princes for that they bear not the sword in vain So that these two seem to have a mutual dependencie each on other the Priest must exhort with sound doctrine to which obedience must be given upon paine of damnation and the King may enjoyn the practice of that or any other rule of faith agreeable to the word of God which the Bishop likewise upon the same paine is bound to observe onely here is the difference in point of variance betwixt King and Priest the King is above the Priest to execute Judgement the Priest being bound to obey not to rule which is no confusion of the Ecclesiastical estate they being hereunto ordained to suffer for Christs sake when it shall please God for their sins or the sins of the people to
I have partly shewed was beyond their compass to take from them The Jesuites being beaten from this hold of the Keys they betake themselves to the treble Pasce which after Christs resurrection was said unto Peter Joh. 21. and would fain deduce this power from thence and so perswade the world that the Shepherds Crook is the Arms of all other Sees not of Rome the Bishop thereof being no ordinary Pastor but one that is known by more Nable bearing viz. Mars a Papal Mitre ensigned with a triple Crown and a Cross Pater Sol which in my opinion stands for no good denotement of Episcopal dignity in respect it doth not sympathize with the Successor of Peter and therefore serves rather to denote him sprung of another tribe But this by the way They would fain perswade the world The treble Pasce doth not extend to depose Kings that this power was given to Peter by vertue of the treble Pasce and by his being Bishop of Rome is devolved upon the Pope which I have already touched in the second Chapter That nothing doth belong to Rome any more then anyother See Apostolique by any power thereby given I will onely for better illustration of the present point add this viz. That Peter and Paul both submitted unto Domitius Nero a cruel Heathen and persecutour neither did they thunder out any Excommunication against him thereby denouncing him uncapable to rule which if they had thought to have been so certainly they would not have concealed it at their sufferings when they saw they must die and all hopes of their natural lives debarr'd from them If Peter suffered at Rome he left no such Testimony behind him nor Paul neither so that for the Pope to aspire to this prerogative upon Peters score is an injury to that blessed Apostle he having received rules from his Master Christ to the contrary of which both he and the rest of the Apostles were faithful witnesses in their sufferings The Papists beaten from all Scripture there being neither from thence nor any practice Apostolical the least warrant for this their presumptuous claim they then begin to strive with flesh blood and forsaking the rules of Christ and the exmples of Peter and the rest of the Apostles notwithstanding they would have Peter to be the Rock of the Catholike Church they quit the harbor adjoyning to that Rock and rove themselves upon the billows of strange contests And as when the Fish Meron perceiving a storm lays hold upon a chance pimple stone thinks to save it self from the tossing of the waves by sticking to that whenas both it and its stone are tumbled to and fro at the will of the sea so these men think by a new-found invention of their own to make good this their bold assertion against all opposition whenas any reasonable Christian may easily refute the same and if with reason they will not be driven off it dash their brains against Peters Rock Wherfore they blush not to affirm that God was not provident enough to his Church if he should leave her without a head to rule and govern her and as a widow to be despoiled by any Heather or persecuting Prince and therefore of necessity the Pope must have this power they are the principal wards in S. Peters Keys to depose Princes and excite subjects to oppose them if occasion be otherwise the Church should want the Pope her Head that Pillar to support and that Eye to direct her as Cardinal Allen in his Apology observes Allen for deposing of Princes This Doctrine of Allen is gross and Heathenish tending to Blasphemy and infidelity infidelity in Gods promise he having promised his Spirit to his Church to the end of the world and that the gates of hell shall not prevail against it she shall not be totally extirpated from off the earth till Shilo come though she may be invisible in this or that Country as I have shewed in the fifth Chapter and therefore Christ bids his Apostles suffer for righteousness sake for Sanguis martyrum shall be semen Ecclesiae Wherfore for Allen to affirme that the Pope must have this power or the Church will be lost argues his distrust in Gods promise to his Church And it likewise savours of Blasphemy to tye Gods providence to the Papal Chair and so denying him a power or will to remove the Candlestick from Rome and to give it to another Providence as Aquinas defines it Aquinas summa contr Gentiles is said to be invisible and remain in Gods secret councel Nondum rebus impressa for after it appears and showes it self in effects sensible then it is called Fate not Providence Now for him to tax God of improvidence unless the Pope should have this visible power of deposing Kings is neither Scholar nor Divine like he might as a Sooth-sayer of Egypt experimentally upon the coincidence of the effect of some inspection or Heathenish observation as that when the black Eagle shall preach upon Laterane Steeple the top of Saint Angelo shall be lifted up as was at the time of Otho 3. and Gregory the 5. c. Or have foretold that it was the Fate of Rome that if any Prince withstood the Pope he should be deposed as was in Henry 4. and Gregory 7. dayes but not to conclude this upon Gods Providence which no man by the reach of humane reason is able to pry into it is more transcendent then the consult of flesh and blood can apprehend Saint Paul cries out How unsearchable are his Iudgements and his waies past finding out who hath knowne the minde of the Lord or who was his Counsellor Rom. 11.34 And will Allen take upon him to circumscribe Gods Providence To know the secrets of mans heart is Gods attribute but such is the gross impiety of this blasphemous man that rather then the Pope should want excuse to depose Kings he will take upon him to know Gods heart and prove this prerogative by Gods Providence whereby he runs himself upon these absurdities He doth hereby spoyle the honour and credit of the glorious Martyrs by accusing them of error or ignorance of error for tamely suffering whenas they should have resisted of ignorance if they suffered because they knew not the will of God herein And he doth likewise give God the lye for if it was God's providence to his Church to resist in case Religion be opposed by the Prince sure he would not have bid Peter go back into Rome as the Papists pretend nor would he have prescribed the forementioned rules of obedience which are diametrically opposite to Allens pretended knowne Providence It is not the revealed will of God that the Crosier should resist the Scepter and the Mitre the Crown none of the Fathers of Romes Church ever practised or published that Doctrine before Hildebrands daies and if it was Gods Providence first known to Allen then Allen proves the Church of Rome to have been invisible for 1074 yeares
practice of the Church That the Sacrifice upon the Altar is superstitious and The authority of the Church no excuse to change the administration of the Lords Supper into one kinde THe Church of Rome having thus gained a general consent though at first forced upon many by the power and domineering of the Popes to her doctrine of Transubstantiation she stuck not long in this station but partly to make good what she had introduced into the Church and partly to shew to the world the divine Legislative power of her Head she soared a pitch higher whereas before this she but maintained an opinion which but to some weak capacities did convince all not being satisfied with the sincerity of her doctrine concerning the nature and quality of this Sacrament of the Lords Supper which Christ himself instituted and by his last Will and Testament left it as a Legacie to his faithful servants her Popes now take upon them after their former opinion was confirmed by Councel and generally received and believed as an Article of Faith to dispense with that Sacrament of Christ Jesus and have in stead thereof instituted one of their own making administring in one kinde and denying the Cup to the Lay-people which is a novel trick of Papal invention and never practised in the Churches upon earth till they forced it upon some over which the Popes did without controul rule at will and pleasure Christ Jesus did institute this Sacrament in both kindes Paul enjoyns both the whole Church did administer in both and the Fathers teach that as well the wine as the bread is to be received and did think wine so necessary that it could not be administred in water much less in the cake alone in which there is no liquid element to represent the shedding of Christs blood for which end it was ordained Cyprian who wrote 260 yeers after Christ in his 3 Epist ad Cecilium lib. 2. Forasmuch saith he as Christ said I am the true vine and the Cup is his blood it cannot be thought that his blood is in the cup if wine be not in the cup whereby the blood is signified unto us Chrysost in Matth. cap. 26. Hom. 83. Christ used wine as well before his Resurrection as after S. Hierome in Sophon cap. 3. doth witness that in his time the Priest did administer the Eucharist and divide the blood unto the people In the Canon of Pope Gelasius and in the Popes Decrees de Consecrat a strict Injunction is laid that all receive in both kindes for that the dividing of that Sacrament is sacriledge I need not instance in this any more particulars in respect that none can deny but that anciently it was in both kindes administred I will therefore examine the reasons the Church of Rome gives for her alteration from this antient way and for administring in one kind and in so doing I shall plainly lay open her errors in this point The Councel of Constance held 1414. Councel of Constance Ses 13. decreed Quod nullus Presbyter sub conditione excommunicationis communicet populo sub utroque specie Panis Vini Which notwithstanding the Councel of Basil did after restore to the people again Anno 1431. So that in this new doctrine of hers Rome has met with much controversie even in her self Gelasius the Pope decreeing it to be sacrilegious to omit either kind by which it is evident that the Church of Rome has erred de fide For Gelasius taught that judicially as Pope and the Council of Constance was approved by Pope John 23. and this Councel of Basil by Eugenius the 4. Which proceedings wound the infallibility of the Church of Rome and spoiles her unity one Pope being against another and one Council against another To decide which strivings the late Prerogative Royal of the Popes being above Councels was therefore decreed which notwithstanding by that means the Church of Rome is made infallible yet it spoiles her of her marks of antiquity and constant visibility and therefore absolutely spoiles her for being taken to be the onely Catholick Church for if so then the Catholick Church was once utterly extinguished from off the earth which is against Gods promise and impious to imagine The Pope being thus grown above Councels he now as he pleases declares this Councel void the other to be of force and by vertue of this his Prerogative he has approved the Councel of Constance and yet but in part for he onely takes as much out of that Councel as makes for his turn he onely confirmes their Decree prohibiting the Cup to the Laity but their other Decree of the power of Councels to be above the Pope that 's abominable and his Holiness commands that Decree to be believed to be Heretical By this is to be noted that the Popish Religion is a nose of wax as pleaseth his Holiness to set it forth it must be received upon the score of his infallibility though it be never so destructive to former Christian principles to the ruine of Councels and overthrowing of the true antient Catholick Faith yet such is the condition of the Pope that his will can guide him into no tenent though never so contrary to truth but his faithful Papal servants the Jesuites will dawb over his rotten Doctrine with the smooth plaisters of humane reason and think with subtile Sophistry to beguile the simple the deluding of whom doth not in their uneven hands counterpoise the pleasing of their Master the Pope and therefore did they strive to varnish over this new point of Communion in one kind with some counterfeit Paint Will you please to take a view thereof and I hope I shall so far convince their reasons that the case will meerly stand upon the Popes will and if so I presume none will be so irreverent to their Master Christ to forsake his institution and to adhere to the Popes institution lest they may be said with the Jewes to reject Christ and chuse Barabbas The Doctor would perswade that it was no precept to receive in both kindes but onely being of institution and not precept the Church has power to alter it as occasion may serve To which I answer 2. It was christs precept to receive in both kinds It was injoyned us by way of command to receive in both kinds for Christ in the 6 of John v. 53 sayes Except ye eat the flesh 〈◊〉 â—rink the blood of the Son of man ye have no life in you Christ took the Bread and said Take eat And also he took the Cup and said Drink ye all of it Matth. 26. This is an absolute precept as well for the Cup as the Bread and Saint Paul delivered it so to the Corinthians according as he had received of the Lord he likewise enjoyning it to them as a precept probet seipsum let a man examine himself let him eat let him drink the Commandment extending to the one as well as to the other which
in that service as it is made manifest in the ensuing Chapter The humble confession of all penitent hearts their acknowledging of Christs benefits their thanksgiving for the same their faith and consolation in Christ their humble submission to his will is a sacrifice of laud and prayse acceptable unto God no less then the sacrifice of the Priest Christ did not ordain this Sacrament that any one might receive it for another but that every one for himself is to be made partaker of this mystery of his salvation For as one may not be baptized for another for the Godfathers answering for the child say he hath faith because he hath the Sacrament of faith by the outward element of water which as it self cleanseth so the childe thereby is born again of water and of the Spirit to newness of life Baptism the infant spiritually receiving regeneration by the outward element of the water according to the effectual working of the holy Spirit unto newness of life the infant being thereby made a member of Christ by faith in Jesus given unto him in that Sacrament of Baptism So may not one receive this holy Sacrament for another Let every man be baptized Act. 2. here is spiritual regeneration to every man by himself And Mat. 26. Christ said to the multitude Take and eat and drink ye all of this and here is spiritual growth and living in Christ every man by himself and by this means we that are many branches become one Vine being baptized into one Spirit and all made to drink into one Spirit 1 Cor. 12.13 Whereas the Doctor urges that those words Drink ye all of this were spoken to the Apostles and that therefore the cup is not to be given to the people He might as well conclude they shall not have the bread because Christ gave that to his Apostles whereas all Divines agree that what was spoken to them was thereby meant of the whole Church upon earth which are all the Saints of God upon earth of particular Churches whensoever assembled into a Society which is manifest by S. Paul who delivered to the Corinthians that which he had received formerly of the Lord Jesus to wit both the bread and the cup enjoyning every one to examine himself and so let him eat and so let him drink By which it is plain that it was to be delivered to the people in both kindes And if one kinde had been sufficiently significant of Christs flesh and blood offered by himself upon the Cross for our redemption sure Christ would never have added the cup as part of that Sacrament thereby to signifie his blood if already it had been sufficiently signified in the bread Wherefore unless the Papists will charge Christ to be superfluous in his institution of this Sacrament they must allow the cup unto the people as well as bread and both as well as one Lastly the Doctor would justifie the change of the Church of Rome in this particular upon the authority of the Church given by Christ to his Apostles so to do And for this he urges S. Austin who was dead five hundred and fifty yeers before ever this doctrine of Rome was heard of S. Austin stood much for the significancie of the bread and wine that this Sacrifice was but a representation of Christs Sacrifice and that which you see on the Altar or Table is the bread and the cup which your eyes shew you is the wine but saith he faith sheweth that that bread is the body and that cup is the blood of Jesus Christ It was the practice of the Church in his time to administer in both kindes he when he lived taught the necessity of wine against those that mingled water and so did Cyprian and others and now that they are dead the Doctor will have them teach another doctrine S. Austin might say that Christ left authority to his Apostles to make such appointments in what order this Sacrament should be received as whether sitting kneeling how often or the like but not that they should institute a new Sacrament Christ gave both Elements Saint Paul delivered both according as he had received and it was to be done in remembrance of Christ and they were commanded to be imitators of him Ephes 5.1 Christ left this as a Legacy to his Church and he made the Apostles Executors of this his last Will and Testament which they were to discharge by dispensing that Legacy to Christs faithful Saints and People Wherefore for them to withhold part of the thing bequeathed to wit the participation of the cup which is by S. Paul called The Communion of his blood is to forfeit that trust Christ has reposed in them and to forget his precept he enjoyned them commanding to teach all Nations whatsoever he had commanded them We are bound to hold fast the traditions we have learned If then the Scripture tell us that Christ with his Apostles did communicate in both kinds and Saint Paul administring to the Corinthians said Traditi vobis quod accepi a Domini how comes the Church of Rome to forsake this tradition which Christ himself taught and practised and the Primitive Church for a thousand yeers held for faith if it ought to be reduced to one kind how came it to pass to be let alone so long and by what Authority doth Rome claim this power sith the ancient Fathers and the Primitive Church did not onely use to administer to the people in both kinds but maintained and defended the necessity of Bread and Wine the outward elements of this Sacrament as may appear by the Testimony of the afore-cited Fathers and particularly it was the profession of the Church of Rome as Gelasius Bishop thereof witnesseth Shall but the Church of Rome prescribe any new rule of faith or manmers and shall any disobey he is straightwaies anathematized for casting off the Tradition of the Church and the Catholick Church upon earth communicated in both k nds and shall the late Popes of Rome alter this and escape the censures Were there nothing for it but the bare usage of the Primitive Churches it were enough to convince the Church of Rome but whenas there is Christs precept and institution for it how doth the Church of Rome justly incur the condemnation of the Pharisees teaching for doctrines the commandments of men and laying aside the commandments of God follow their own traditions Mark 7. But such was the transcendent wickedness of the Church of Rome in these dayes that scarce any Apostolick Rule but has suffered some alteration by his Holiness and his Legislative conclave of Cardinals who being soared to a height above Councels Princes and all other Powers on earth stick not to wrestle against these commandments of the God of Heaven witness their additions to the Baptisme as if the Baptisme wherewith Christ was Baptized were not sufficient without the Romish spittle and salt and as if this Sacrament of Bread and Wine were
variations of mine from the Original not admitting of correction as the Author certifies without ravelling the whole piece and to use his own phrase picking out those knotty ends of mine The Stationer having made a large progress in the work before the Author knew thereof hath prevailed with him to let it pass with its present imperfections both he and I engageing to rectifie all such mistakes in the next Edition It now remains to crave your friendly acceptance hereof and with the help of these noted Erraat's to make a candid construction of the mistaken places Errata Page 5. line 23. read fanes p. 23. l. 29. polipus p. 24. l. 12. Rome p. 26. l. 26. dele only p. 30. l. 6. shall contain Christ till he come p. 31. l. 17. are p. 32. l. 24. Paschalis p. 33. l. 15. fourteenth p. 34. l. 14. fourth p. 36. l. 2. birds l. 20. Homagers l. 21. imperious p. 38. l. 12. their p. 40. l. 14. with Timothy p. 43. l. 17. ninth p. 44. l. 24. they that they might p. 46. l. 29. veruntamen Episcopus Constantinopolitanus habeat honoris primatum post Romanum propteria quod c. p. 48. l. 14. appointed p. 63. l. 10. seas p. 65. l. 20. his p. 71. l. 26. and. p. 25. cannot do it p. 76. l. 2. and although difference p. 90 l. 5. not l. 6. thereby note the difference l. 12. to give obedience to the head p. 91. l. 16. by setting p. 93. l. 1. qui. l. 15. Ecclesiae quae licet c. p. 94. l. 15. true p. 99. l. 18. rites l. 29. sonnes p. 100. l. 15. lost p. 102. denoted p. 104. l. 18. the thing p. 106. l. 16. the and Marcian l. 12. Boniface the first l. 18. 453. p. 108. l. 1. Pope Parasites l. 10. the appointing the Pope l. 29. quod ab inâ—ito non valet in tractu temporis non convalescat p. 109. l. 24. Vatican l. 26. new additions to prove the Bishop p. 112. Vicarius summus p. 114. presente p. 119. l. 24. for by this peace p. 121 l. 1. clasped l. 11. in England which who please p. 123. l. 26. Ignatian p. 124. l. 1. and. l. 23. and. p. 126. received p. 127. nos zelo fidei c. p. 130. l. 13. their l. 16. are by some called holy p. 134. l. 25. so p. 135. l. 24. and there were others in orders which c. p. 137. hypocrites p. 139. l. 20. did p. 140. l. 20. he pleads it visible in Aethiopia p. 141. l. 21. Tame l. 24. Oracle l. 28. Proselytes p. 143. l. 12. and l. 15. the. l. 17. Belinus p. 149. Geminis p. 151. l. 21. stood p. 155. l. 6. have l. 20. vide utrum c. p. 150. l. 14. looks p. 157. l. 1. Conâ—arenus l. 7. pasce l. 9. tame l. 24. constitutions p. 160. l. 2. failings and in the marg read thus Against railing at Princes p. 172. l. 6. worth l. 11. principi l. 13. approves p. 173. l. 5. she hereby drawes l. 26. he l. 29. Bolseck p. 175. l. 26. of the Bishops l. 6. Vrbane p. 176. l. 18. aliaco p. 177. l. 21. Guiciardine p. 178. strange mazes p. 179. l. 3. Bozius de signis l. 15. leud p. 181. these stories he strains at a Gnat. l. 9. he leaps o're blocks p. 182. Chapter of traditions p. 113. l. 29. smiles p. 184. l. 23. so sleightly over p. 188. l. 9. Bank l. 10. Zactan p. 161. l. 8. Plantations p. 193. l. 15. patronize p. 194. l. 1. bibulus l. 23. of this counterfeit l. 26. theirs p. 196. l. 26. those points wherein we differ upon which c. p. 200. Delphicus and minos and Faunus and fuisse p. 202. l. 24. Gentiles p. 203. l. 23. communicate with the Gentiles p. 206. Cheregatus p. 213. Tabescimus l. 12. Oh. p. 215. l. 24. communion and though p. 216. and. l. 13. rules l. 26. is p. 214. l. 26. into which Rome's Salomon enters p. 233. statutis and videamur p. 234. have this priviledge p. 237. l. 5. Constance p. 239. l. 2. did l. 17. irruptious p. 241. l. 3. and cause p. 242. l. 2. destroyes and Constance p. 246. l. 24. that can lay open all l. 26. and expound p. 249. an excuse p. 251. l. 2. contrary to that Councel l. 11. with Euliches p. 254. l. 14. these p. 267. l. 22. error and negligence p. 282. l. 1. are the onely infallible p. 283. l. 13. Austin Tom. 6. contra Donatistas cap. 3. p. 287. l. 19. immediately p. 294. l. 15. as appears by that Councel p. 297. l. 12. suit p. 307. l. 18. Greek p. 312. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 313. l. 19. our antient Fathers p. 319. her p. 316. l. 18. which p. 321. l. 3. Theodoret. p. 322. totum jam and dicatur l. 29. Dei docentis imperium p. 324. l. 2. Scriptures l. 8. the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 oâ—â—tted l. 21. one of the Churches Saints p. 327. l. 14. but not bodily on earth p. 333. l. 2. knacks l. 12. our p. 335. Vicar-General l. 14. equal with the Bishop in order to the derivation p. 348. hair-loomes p. 353. pro se p. 373. l. 11. my p. 374. l. 22. pater p. 376 moron p. 377. l. 24. till Shilo come again p. 378. l. 24. pearch p. 383. l. 26. thought p. 388. l. 18. summi l. 26. Aaron p. 393. l. 20. to claim an eigne portion p. 394. Totilas and Belliâ—arius p. 399. l. 24. of p. 401. l. 2. step p. 403. l. 18. Empire p. 410. are latum and miltiades p. 415. l. 21. agreeing p. 416. l. 9. testamur p. 417. l. 24. Parsons p. 442. passio Christi and causa formalis and gratia and causa finalis p. 457. vercella and l. 15. intualects p. 461. Cimmerian p. 470. l. 10. utraque p. 482. â—surienti and l. 10. charge p. 497. tradidi p. 499. l. 13. in these latter dayes p. 504. l. 29. their p. 508. l. 26. neither p. 510. l. 17. Pope p. 512. l. 5. sufficient and l. 7. notwithstanding and l. 15. real p. 521. l. 28. Aegyptiam and Aâ—mâ—niâ—m and Indicam p. 522 l. 13. in the Romane p. 526. l. 9. sheep l. 29. formerly