assembled is built the oecumenicall Pastor that must keepe them and by them all Christs flocke from going astray the supreame head that by his vertue and influence must sustaine euery member of Christs body here on earth from falling into heresie or approching the territories of hel through any kind of error or infidelity 27 Our Sauiour promised in solemne manner ex Cathedra the gates of hell shall neuer preuaile against his Church What Church the Catholike What Catholike Visible or Inuisible Triumphant or Militant Visible and Militant What Catholike visible militant Church The Romane that consists of diuers members In it some are Pastors some are sheepe whether haue better interest in that promise Pastors Of Pastors some are Prelates some inferiours whether are to be preferred before the other Prelates doubtlesse for of them consists the body of the Church representatiue which is most properly called the Church and next in reuersion vnto Peters prerogatiue Did the gates of hell then neuer preuaile against the greatest Romish Prelates I nominate no particular person I speake onely of them as the Scripture doth of Drunkards Whoremongers Adulterers Dogs Enchanters Many of highst place in that Church haue for a long time liued and for ought their followers can or care to say vnto to the contrary died such as the spirit of God hath excluded from the kingdome of heauen such as Gods word tels vs hell must swallow vp with open mouth Are they the Church and may hell gates preuaile against them and yet not preuaile against the Church 28 But if a woman an whorish woman cannot be taken without an excuse may wee thinke those effemenate sworne creatures of seruitude to that great strumper can want an answere No this distinction is alwaies at hand Their Popes and Cardinals may as erre so goe to hell But how as priuate Doctors not as oecumenicall Pastors not as they speake ex Cathedra so to my remembrance I haue read of a proud Romish Prelate that reproued for his secular pompe made answere hee followed these fashions as hee was a Duke not as an Archbishoppe But the reprouers reply hath made the Apologie better then which no Iesuite can make for the Pope most ridiculous euer since If this be so quoth the shepheard such was the Pastor God had appointed to rebuke the madnes of this false Prophet I pray resolue mee what shall become of my Lord Duke if the Archbishoppe goe to the diuell If many sometimes Popes be now in hell as no Iesuite I thinke will professe any morall hope that all are saued What is becom of the Church representiue which lodged in their brains Hath the number of glorified Saints been encreased by their departure from earth Were they euer a whit more happy for being heires to that glorious promise Thou art Peter and vpon this Rocke will I build my Church or were their comments vpon that place Orthodoxall what was the comfort Saint Peter himselfe could euer haue reaped thence Onely this though Sathan may so sift thee that thy soule may goe to hell before thy body descend to the graue yet rest assured of this that thy faith which in Cathedrall resolutions shall neuer faile thee in thy life time shal suruine in thy successors when thou art dead but to what purpose if notwithstanding this prerogatiue all may descend one after another into hell 29 Or if their doctrine were true to what end did Christ come in the flesh onely to build a Church which like a lampe or candle may gloriously shine whiles there is an interrupted succession of Popes to propagate the splendor but whose glory when that expires for ought that glorious promise addes vnto it must bee extinguished as the light goes out when the oyle is spent Better assurance then euery Pope for his time hath Saint Peter by their doctrine had none from those wordes of our Sauiour For whatsoeuer power or prerogatiue was in them bequeathed to him doth descend by inheritance to his successors And would the meanest Iesuite now liuing haue gloried much in a life graced with no greater visible Church dignity then S. Peters was perpetually exposed to like danger without any other solace to support it saue onely this that his posterity should enioy the same priuiledges But now that the glory and dignity of the Romish Church is becom so great the Iesuites portion thereby grown so fat they can bee well content to sooth vp the Pope in his conceit that howsoeuer his person may goe to hell a place it seems not much dreaded because vnknown yet hell gates shall neuer preuaile against his faith which hath brought such large possessions to the Church both which hee may infallibly entayle to his successors vntill the worlds end But as I said before what then shall become of that cathedrall faith shall it augment the quire of Gods elect or can they make as many S. Faithes as haue beene Popes 30 Herein appeares the excesse of these dayes impietie in respect of former that this imaginary Idea of Romish faith should be more superstitiously adored then any other Idoll in the world euer was Although that of the Apostle may bee more properly said of it then any other nihil est in mundo Other Idols represented either men or beasts some permanent creature or reall quality This is a fancy of a Chimaera a shape of nothing or if by nature and essence ought it is such a conceit or mentall quality as may bee in diuels Existance it hath none but as Eclypses of the sunne by fittes or courses when the Pope shall speake ex Cathedra What shall become of it and the colours in the Rainbow after the day of iudgement are two questions of like vse consequence and of these two obiects the one as fit to direct mens courses by sea or land as the other to conduct vs towardes heauen The dazled imaginations of these Idolaters that can thus conceit this faith to bee spirituall and eternall by succession when it cannot saue them in whom it is are much worse then some foolish heathens dreames of an immortall fame that was to accompany their mortall soules as they esteemed them and argue in these sonnes of Antichrist either an incogitancy or vnbeliefe of Christ who liues for euer come in the flesh or a secure worldly hope hee shall neuer or not this long time come to iudgement 31 Saint Peter hath fortold that there shall come in the last daies mockers which will walke after their lusts and say where is the promise of his comming for since the fathers died all things continue alike from the begiuning of the creation Atheists and Libertines I know here are literally meant But as the Prophets vsually prefigure our future blisse by Ierusalems presēt glory or other known felicity by which perhaps it was represented vnto them So might S. Peter shadow out vnto vs the mystery of iniquity according to that rude draught
and allegiance which most Kingdomes of Europe haue for these thousand yeeres and more borne to the See of Rome or from the bloudy victories ouer all other inferiour Churches or priuate spirits that haue oppugned her These or like allegations in their iudgement abundantly proue their Church to be Christs best beloued the Pope to be his Deputy or rather his corriuall here on earth whose words sound as the word of God and not of Man albeit the spirit hath plainely foretold that the beast which had his power from the Dragon and should open his mouth vnto blasphemies against God to blaspheme his name and his tabernacle and them that dwell in heauen should haue power giuen withall to make warre with the Saints and to ouercome them yea ouer euery kindred tongue and nation so as all that dwell vpon the earth should worshippe him whose names were not written in the Booke of life of the Lambe which was slaine from the beginning of the world 5 To the Iesuites bragges that no visible Church since the world beganne did either spread it selfe so farre or flourish so long as theirs hath done I onely oppose that of our Sauiour Ex tuo ipsius ore iudicabere serue nequam Thine owne confession shall condemne thee thou bondslaue of Sathan For if the Romish Hierarchy bee or hath been in the worlds eye the most potent and flourishing that euer was This description of the Beasts power cannot agree so well to any as vnto it Nor doth the Scripture any where intimate the true Church militant should dominere ouer all Nations or be so triumphantly victorious as they boast theirs hath beene To thinke the Antichrist whom they expect should in three yeeres space subdue as many Nations as haue beene tributary to the See of Rome is a conceit that iustifies the Iew as well in his credulity of things to come which are impossible as in his hypocriticall partiality towards his present estate which hee neuer suspects of Apostasie Vnto this obseruation the Reader may adde other like descriptions of this scarlet Whore all so fitly agreeing to the Papacy as hee that will not acknowledge it for the Kingdome of great Antichrist hath great reason to suspect his heart that if hee had liued with our Sauiour he would scarce haue taken him for his Messias nor can the Iesuites bring any better reasons why the Pope should not be the Antichrist then the Iewes did why Christ should not be the Great Prophet Yet this I say not to discourage such as doubt whether the Pope bee that Man of sinne or to bring them out of loue with their beliefe which may be sound without expresse or actuall acknowledgement of this truth not as yet reuealed vnto them as those two Disciples no doubt were neither hypocrites nor infidels albeit they mistrusted the report of Christs resurrection for they were farther from approuing the practises of the Iewes against him then from actuall acknowledgement of it If any man thus doubt whether the Pope be Antichrist so hee doe not approue his hatred and warre against Gods Saints or his other diuelish practises Gods peace bee vpon him and in good time I trust his eyes shall bee enlightned to see the truth in this particular as those two Disciples did in the Article of the resurrection 6 Seeing wee haue proued the Popes authority so farre to exceede Christs it may seeme needlesse to compare it with the Apostles Yet lest any Iesuite should except that their authority might be greater after their Masters glorification then his was before let vs a while examine what they assumed vnto themselues what they gaue vnto the Scriptures before extant CHAP. XIII That the authority attributed to the present Pope and The Romish rule of faith were altogether vnknowne vnto Saint Peterâ— the opposition betwixt Saint Peters and his pretended Successors doctrine 1 TO beginne with Saint Peter the first supposed to be enstalled in this See of Rome It may be presumed that this Supremacy ouer his fellow Apostles were it any was in his life time whiles his miracles were fresh the extraordinary efficacy of his Ministery dayly manifested as well knowne amongst the faithfull as the Popes now amongst Romane Catholickes If necessary it had beene to acknowledge him or his successors as a second Rocke or foundation the commendation of this doctrine vnto posterity had bin most requisite at the time he wrote his second Epistle as knowing then the time was at hand hee should lay downe his Tabernacle when hee endeuoured his auditors might haue remembrance of his former doctrine to make their calling and election sure If euer there had beene a fitte season for notifying the necessity of the See Apostoliques infallibility all the circumstances of this place witnesse this was it If any they to whom hee wrote were most bound to obey it Their faith had beene planted by him his present intent and purpose was more and more to confirm them in the truth wherein they were in some measure established And being thus mindfull will hee not make choice of meanes most effectuall to preuent heresie or Apostasie What are these then absolute reposall in his and his Successors infallibility Had this beene the best rule of faith hee knew his fault were inexcusable for not prescribing it to such as most willingly would haue vsed it His personall testimony and authority was I confesse as great as any mortall mans could be with his owne eyes he had beheld the Maiesty of our Lord Christ whom hee preached vnto them If any trust there bee in humane senses this Saint of God could not possibly be deceiued If any credence to bee giuen vnto miracles or sanctity of life his flocke might rest assured hee would not deceiue his workes so witnesse the sincerity of his doctrine or if his eyes were not in these his auditors iudgements sufficient witnesses of this truth he further assures them when his Lord receiued of God the Father honour and glory there came such a voice vnto him from the excellent glory This is my beloued sonne in whome I am well pleased And this voyce sayth he wee heard when it came from heauen being not a farre off but with him in the mount If Saint Peters seat or chaire had beene as the Pole-starre whereto our beliefe as the Mariners needle should bee directed lest wee floate wee know not whether in the Ocean of opinions were the bosome of the visible Church the safest harbour our soules in all stormes of temptation could thrust into this Apostle was either an vnskilfull Pilot or an vncharitable man that would not before his death instruct them in this course for the eternal safety of their soules whose bodily liues hee might haue commanded to haue saued his owne Had perpetuall succession in his See or Apostolicall tradition neuer interrupted beene such an Ariadnaes thread as now it is thought to guide vs through the Labyrinth of errors Such was
Gods working in miracles effected by his owne immediate peculiar power without the coagencie of any inferiour or created cause he may resolue of himselfe alone not consulting his Cardinals Bishops or others This power and libertie the Trent Councell it selfe seemes to giue vnto the Pope as it were for an vp-shot to all the fooles thunderbolts they had let slie before And least any man should thinke this absolute acknowledgement of the Popes plenarie power to be a Counsell rather then a necessarie precept The Cathechisme published by the Trent Councels authoritie hath inserted amongst the Articles of faith That the present Pope is the sole visible head of the whole Christian Church though Christ the inuisible The meaning of which if I mistake not is this That the Pope concerning the points aboue mentioned hath as absolute power in Christs absence as Christ himselfe should haue were he present or shall haue in that day of finall iudgement wherein if these mens positions bee true he shall haue nothing to doe in matters of saith but onely to ratisie what the Pope hath defined who must not be called to any account of his Spirituall as Kings and Monarchs must be for their Temporall Stewardships nor shall it be said to him as it must be to some of them Well done thou good and faithfull Seruant For such men onely by our aduersaries Doctrine doe well as might haue done ill but the Pope liue as hee list cannot possibly doe a misse in determining matters of Faith which are of all that are of greatest difficultie and consequence 14 When first I reade Iosephus Acoste I much wondred to see a man otherwise of an ingenuous spirit and of partes so excellent so zealous withall for the Popes Supremacie But now I perceiue the reason was all priuate Catechismes were to bee conformed vnto that publique one authorized by the Councell and Pope Amongst other contents of that Article of the Catholique Church almost quite omitted in the former Indian Catechismes Acostaes aduise is to haue this inserted as an essentiall part That the Pope is head of the Catholique Church Christs Vicar on earth indued with his plenarie power to whom all other Christians Kings and Princes not excepted owe obedience These allegations may testifie our sinceritie in proposing the state of the question and points of difference betwixt vs gathered not out of one or two but the generall agreement of best Romish Writers and whereunto Valentian were hee aliue would willingly subscribe For he as since I haue obserued proposeth the title of his maine Controuersie concerning the Churches authoritie in tearmes aequiualent to those I vsed Lib. 2. Section 1. Cap. 3. and Lib. 1. Parag. Vlt. SECT II. The first branch of Romish blasphemie in preferring humane authoritie before Diuine AGainst these late recited and infinite other aequiualent assertions frequent in their publique determinations and best priuate Writers our Writers vsually obiect If the Church be iudge of Scriptures her authoritie must be aboue the Scriptures If the sense of Scripture without the Church or Popes asseueration or proposall be not authentique nor apt to beget most firme beleefe then the word of God must receiue strength and authoritie from the word of man Some Romish Writers grant the inference with this restraint In respect of vs and yet wipe their mouthes with the whore in the Prouerbe as if they had neither commited Idolatrie nor spoken blasphemie But Bellarmine was too cunning a Baude to expose his mothers foule face to publique view without more artificiall painting CHAP. I. Bellarmines Reply to the maine obiection iointly vrged by all Reformed Churches against the Romish the Equiuocation which hee sought in the obiection apparently found in his Reply 1 THE former argument howsoeuer much esteemed by such as bring it yet in Bellarmines iudgment is very weake and as hee suspects sicke of his owne disease Totum in aequiuocatione versatur The aequiuocation he seeketh to vnfold with this distinction The former speeches may admit a double sence First their meaning may bee that the Church doth iudge whether that which the Scriptures teach be true or false Or SecoÌ„dly This sure foundation of faith being first laid The words of Scripture are most infallible and true The Church doth iudge which is the true interpretation or meaning of them This distinction he applieth thus The former obiectuns were pertinent if we held the Pope or Councell to determine of Scriptures in the former sence but taking our right meaning they are meere calumnies For we affirme the Church to iudge Scriptures onely in the later and so to iudge them doth not set the Church or Pope aboue Scriptures but aboue the iudgment of priuate men Nor doth the Church by this assertion become a Iudge of Scriptures truth but of priuate mens vnderstanding Neither will it hence follow that the word of God recetueth strength from the word of man but priuate mens knowledge may and doth receiue strength and infallibilitie from the Church Finally the Scripture or Word of God as Bellarmine thinkes is neither more true or certaine because it is expounded by the Church but euerie mans opinion is more true and stable when it is confirmed by the Churches exposition or decision Hee hath said as much as the whole Councell of Trent could haue said for themselues But let vs see if this be enough 2 A priuate mans opinion saith Bellarmine is truer when it is confirmed by the Church If we had only an opinion of the truth or sence of Scriptures the consent of others especially men skilfull in such maters would indeede much confirme vs for all opinions or vncertaine perswasions receiue increase of strength from addition of probabilities But his words are more generall and concerne not onely vncertaine but all perswasions that a faithfull man in this life can haue of Gods Word at least of those writings which wee and they acknowledge for such and the marke he aimes at is That no perswasion in diuine matters can be certaine without the Churches confirmation as hee expressely addeth in his answere to the next argument 3 If the Reader will be attentiue hee shall easily perceiue that not our Writers obiections but Bellaâ—mines answere is tainted with aequiuocation For this speech of his The Church doth iudge whether that which the Scriptures teach be true or false hath a double and doubtfull sence It may be meant either Of Scriptures taken indefinitly or indeterminately for that which God hath spoken whatsoeuer that be Of those particular Scriptures which wee and they acknowledge or any determinate written or vnwritten precepts questionable whether they were from God or no. 4 If we speake of Scriptures in the former sence Bellarmines answere is true For the Romish Church doth not take vpon her to iudge whether that which is supposed or acknowledged by all for Gods word be most true in it proper natiue but
corner stone which onely ocupleth the whole building in which hee is the highest and the lowest first laid in humility for the disobedient to fall vpon but now exalted vnto greatest glory to fall vpon them And as the Apostle cals his owne scarres the markes of Christ because inflicted for Christs sake so may hee call Christ the foundation of the Prophets and Apostles because the onely end whereto both Propheticall and Apostolicall lawes were directed was to lay this sure foundation But granting what they take for granted The Apostle did meane wee were builded vpon the Prophets and Apostles as vpon a second foundation or first row of stones next in order vnto the rocke so they make Peter a rocke or foundation onely in this sense If they doe not hee could not bee the Rocke on which the Church is built If they do let them giue vs the right hand of fellowshippe for wee accuse them not for making him such a foundation as the other Apostles were but suchas it is euident they were not yea such indeed and substance as Christ onely is and should bee acknowledged by all the faithfull For in what sense is Christ said to be the foundation Because hee is the head of his Church both for supporting and directing it Was not Peter such in respect euen of his fellow Apostles Bellarmine can assigne no difference betwixt them but in these very tearmes All of them hee confesseth had occumenicall iurisdiction but not in such sort as Peter had all were infallible because Apostles and Ambassadors but not after the same maner he was yea Peter was their head on whom they did depend so did not hee on them This makes Peter the corner stone that cupleth the building Which doubtlesse was Christs peculiar whilest hee liued on earth not communicated vnto Peter as they acknowledge vntill his resurrection or ascention That they tell vs then they make but one primary foundation and therefore none such as Christ is as if they should say they admit no more such Popes as Pius primus was because there hath neuer beene nor euer shall bee any Pope Pius the First but hee for to make Peter such a Primate is to make him a foundation or head of the same rancke and order that Christ was onely his inferiour as successor in time or to vse their words a foundation in Christs place So Bellarmine expresly auoucheth where prouing Peters Supremacy or Lordship from his name hee thus inferres Peter onely was knowne by Christs owne name of Cephas or Rocke whereby he is called as often as by any other whatsoeuer yea this is the peculiar attribute in which he is set out vnto vs as the foundation and head of the Church therefore Christ communicating this vnto Peter would haue it signified vnto the world that hee meant to make Peter the foundation and head of the Church in his owne place Why doth Christ cease to bee the foundation in becomming the head stone in the corner or doe they to auoid open suspition of Antichristianisme acknowledge him come in the flesh but gone againe to make roome for Peter and his successors Certainely were the Apostle to gather the meaning of Bellarmines speeches his inference would bee thus In that he sayeth a new head is come in his place hee abrogates the formers authority as he was Ambassador betweene God and man nor is it now as the Testament giuen by Moses was in the Prophets time ready to expire but already expired by actuall succession of another vnto whom Christ the first visible head or foundation did at his aduancement to higher dignity seale the same commission hee had from his father for transacting all affaires concerning the state of his visible Church 18 But doth the space betweene heauen and earth more exceed Romes distance from the vtmost ends of the world then hee to whom all power was giuen in heauen and earth doth the present Pope in amplitude of spirituall iurisdiction Whence is it else that Christ regiment cannot so fully and immediately extend it selfe vnto his Church militant wheresoeuer scattered vpon the face of the earth as the Popes may to the East or West Indies from eyther of which he cannot receiue certaine information how his instruction sent thither succed with his flocke vnder a yeeres space at the least Euery Pope in his time is a rocke a foundation an head in Christs absence from the earth Might not euery one of them in like sort admit a Pope a Vicar generall an absolute fellow Monarch from whom in these remote countries there should bee no more appeales to Rome then are from Rome to Christs throne of Maiesty If wee speake not of that Maiesty which hee there enioyes but of that authority which hee sometimes had or wee can imagine hee could haue in regiment of his Church were hee now visibly present in the flesh it is that Saint Peter and his successors may by our aduersaries doctrine be more properly instiled compeeres to Christ then the best man liuing besides vnto the worst of them For it must bee thought that Christ in his absence ratifies all their decrees without exception as wee may not question them more then wee might Christs owne were hee visibly resident in his Church yet was the authority of Christs other Apostles so mightily ouertopped by Peters Supremacy that they could not bee infallible or occumenicall without his approbation If they were Peter was not such an head to them as his Successors are to theirs euen to all Bishops or inferior Ministers throughout the world If they were not the Pope if hee will bee Peters Successor should make Bishops or Cardinals at least eleuen occumenicall Pastors of authority infallible though with such dependancy on his plenarie power as Christs other Apostes had on Peters Or let them resolue vs in other fundamentall difficulties which their doctrine ministers 19. Christ sayd thou art Peter that is say they a Rocke an head a foundation in my place Vnto whom was this sayd to one of the twelue expressed by name Simon the sonne of Iona To whom likewise singularised by the same expresse tearmes of indiuiduall difference and like restraint of present circumstances or occurrences it was said feed my lambes feed my sheepe If any of Christs speeches as the Popes aduocates graunt many were personally directed to Saint Peter questionlesse these two By what analogie of faith or rule of Grammer can they then extend these to euery Pope in his generation or if any such there haue beene or yet may be vnto whom the foeminiue title of Petra by right of sexe may better agree then vnto Simon Bar-Iona Yet might the name or title infallible draw the supreame dignitie after it they are much-ouerseene in not giuing the name of Peter to euery Pope Christ they confesse is come in the flesh and was in person made head and foundation of the Church and at his departure left Peter in
his steed Peter the Scriptures tell vs was to follow Christ but as they pretend left Pope Linus in his place so hath euery Pope his successor since that time Yet these latter mightily faile in not nominating others whiles they themselues are liuing and visible stones as Christ without question did Saint Peter whiles conuersant with the faithfull in the flesh and Peter Linus in his lifetime 20. But howsoeuer they must of necessitie either make Peter Linus and their successors but one ioint permanent foundation and so the Popes should not bee builded vppon the foundation of the Prophets and the Apostles but rather Christs other Apostles vpon them vpon whom likewise all the faithfull since the Apostles time should be immediatly built Or if they doe not make Peter and the Popes one ioint vnseparable foundation they must admit as many seuerall foundations as Popes so as the euerlasting Rocke whereon the Church is built could not be truly said one and the same but by a perpetuall equiualency of alteration or succession as we say corruptible elements fire or water or candles remaine one and the same because as one part consumes another as good comes in the place This glorious aedifice as hath been obserued stands only by faith or firme adherence to the foundation and by the Aduersaries owne confession to disclaime the authority of the present Romish Church or Pope in points of faith is an heresie or Apostasie of the same nature as if a man had renounced Peter for his supreame head and this all one as if he had cut himselfe of from being a member of Christ Wherefore in respect of vs that are now to be edified the authority of this present Pope is equiuale â—t to Christs our adherence to the one in points of faith and manners must be such as it should haue been to the other had we liued in the dayes of his visible conuersation in the world Finally CHRIST Saint Peter and his successors in regiment of the Church militant here on earth differ by the Roman account no otherwise then Romulus Numa Ancus c. Romulus was first Founder of that kingdome but least other of kings of the same ranke and order he was onely his dignity after his departure was acknowledged greater in another world because as his people were made to beleeue be ascended aliue into heauen as a God Much better might the Romanist deriue his Psewdocatholique Romane faith from Romulus the first builder of that great City that sometimes ruleà ouer the Kings of the earth then from Christ who did erect a kingdome indeed but not of this world wherein none was to succeed him because he remaines Yeasterday to day the same for euer Whence the Prophet sayth this kingdome shall neuer be destroied or giuen to another people but shall breake and destroy all former kingdomes and it selfe stand for euer For any especially of that nation whose former kings had put this immortall King to death concerning the flesh to enstile themselues Rockes and foundation of this euerlasting Empire or absolute spirituall Monarchies in this place doth euidently shew they are the feete of that image most of which hath been as shall be broken to peeces by that stone cut without hands out of the Mountaine vntill it become like the chaffe of the summer flowers carried away with the winde and no place bee found for them or as the Apostle interprets the Prophet the Lord shall consume them with the spirit of his mouth and shall abolish them with the brightnesse of his comming 21. Would the Iesuite then know wherein he and his Latian Lord God must take after Saint Peter Me thinks their formal acknowledgement of that generall principle Christ manifested in the flesh made the headstone in the corner compared with their late mentioned Apostacy in seeking to lay another foundation was liuely resembled if not mystically prefigured by Saint Peter faith immediatly after his glorious confession eclipsed by interposition of such earthly conceits as perpetually darken their mindes For vpon our Sauiours declaration what bodily calamity what ignominy reproach should at Ierusalem shortly after befall the Rocke it selfe whereupon that Church against which hee had now sayd the gates of hell should neuer preuaile was founded Peter as Saint Mathew sayth tooke his Master aside and friendly checks him as if he had forgotten his former promise Maister be good to your selfe this shall not be vnto you As if he had sayd if the gates of hell shall not preuaile against your Church or vs your poore Disciples I hope you are able to priuiledge your owne person from such disgrace and scorne as none but they can intend against you So carnally did this great Apostle vpon ignorance conceit Christs spirituall promise as the papacy vpon habituall or affected error doth to this present day For one principall argument most vsuall in the mouthes and pennes of that great Heads chiefe disciples to proue the Romish the only Church vnto which that glorious promise was made or at least hath been perpetually performed is because no temporall or secular power hath euer beene able though many wicked Potentates Kings and Emperors such titles they giue to all their enemies haue attempted either to deface her externall pompe state and splendor or so to vse the Popes or Cardinalls or other of her principall and dearest children as the Iewes did our Sauiour Christ and his Disciples They are of the world and therefore speake they of the world and the world heareth them But could they vnto any child of God more plainly proue themselues heires to that checke giuen by our Sauiour to Saint Peter Goe behinde me Satans ye are an offence because ye vnderstand not the things that are of God but the things that are of men Could they more euidently demonstrate the Pope to be that man of sin that must be inducted to the Church of God by Satan 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the chiefe aduersary or accuser he himself bearing the name of aduersary likewise in his title 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a second foundation in shew subordinate in deede and consequence quite contrary to that which the Prophets and Apostles haue laide eternally priuiledged if wee may beleeue his followers from those spurnings of men from which the pretious stone of Syon was not exempted 22. To collect the summe of late Romanists comments vpon their Churches supposed fundamentall Charter Their confession of Christ come in the flesh and made head stone in the corner though conceiued in forme of words orthodoxal enough proues only this but disabundantly to all the world that the Pope their supreame head sits in the Temple of God whose circumference in respect of men who cannot search other mens hearts is defined by this confession Their attributing the title of Rocks or fun damentall supportance of that spirituall house vnto this head proclaimes vnto all the world that hee
the man Christ Iesus not excepted This conclusion followeth immediately out of three positions generally held and stifly maintained by that Church The first that the Pope liue hee as hee list cannot erre in matters of faith and manners when hee speaketh ex Cathedra that we are bound infallibly to belieue whatsoeuer he so speakes without examination of his doctrine by Gods word or euident externall signe or internall experiment of Gods spirit speaking in him The second that wee cannot assure our selues the Scriptures are the Oracles of God but by the infallible testimony of the Visible Church The third that the true sense and meaning of Scriptures in cases doubtfull or controuersed cannot be vndoubtedly known without the infallible declaration of the same Church CHAP. I. What restraint precepts for obedience vnto the Priests of the Law though seeming most vniuersall for their forme did necessarily admit And how vniuersall Propositions of Scriptures are to be limited 1 SEing wee vndertake to proue that no such authority as the Romish Church doth challenge was euer established on earth The answering of those arguments drawne from the authority of the Priestes in the olde Testament may to the iudicious seeme at the first sight needlesse yet because such as they set the fairest glosses vpon if wee looke into the inside or substance are fullest fraught with their owne disgrace and ignominy It will not be superfluous to acquaint the Reader with some particulars prefixing some generall admonitions to the yonger sort for more commodious answering of all that can be brought of like kind 2 Their common places of consening the world especially smatterers of Logicke or schoole learning with counterfeit proofes of Scripture is either from some vniuersall precept of obedience to the people or generall promises of infallibility made to the Priests in the old Testament Such as come vnto the Scriptures hauing their mind dazled with notions of vniuersale primum or other Logicke rules true in some cases thinke the formerprecepts being for their forme vniuersall may admit no exception limitation or restraint otherwise the holy Ghost might breake the rule of Logicke when as they admit many restraints nor alwayes from one but ofttimes from diuerse reasons from these following especially God sometimes inioynes obedience as wee say in the abstract to set vs a patterne of such true accurate obedience as men should performe vnto authority it selfe or vnto such gouernours as neither in their liues nor in the seat of iudgement would decline either to the right hand or to the left but square all their proceedings to the exact rule of Gods word Vnto such gouernours continuall and compleat obedience was to bee performed because the parties gouerned vpon examination should alwayes finde them iumpe with the law of God vnto which absolute obedience as hath beene shewed is due Nor doth the word of God in setting out such exact obedience lie open to that exception which Polititians take against Philosophers as if it as Philosophers doe did giue instructions onely for happy men of Aristotles making or for the Stoickes wise men who can no where bee found but in Platoes common-wealth whose Metropolis is the Region of Eutopia For the ancient Israel of God had this prerogatiue aboue al the nations of the earth that their Priests lips whilest they themselues were clothed with righteousnesse and bare holinesse vnto the Lord in their breasts should still preserue knowledge and bee able to manifest the will of God vnto the people not onely by interpreting the generall written law but by reuelations concerning particular facts of principall moment as may bee gathered from that law Also thou shalt put in the breast plate of iudgement the Vrim and the Thummim which shall be vpon Aarons heart when hee goeth in before the Lord And Aaron shall beare the iudgement of the children of Israel vpon his heart before the Lord continually 3 To omit the various interpretations and diuers opinions of this brest-plates vse why it was called the breast plate of iudgement Iosephus and Suidas in my mind come neerest the truth That the Reuelation by it was extraordinary that Gods presence or iuridicall approbation of doubts proposed was represented vpon the pretious stones that were set therein is probable partly from the aptnesse of it to allure the Israelites vnto Idolatry partly from that formality which the Egyptians in imitation of the Ephods ancient vse amongst the Iewes retained long after in declaration of the truth in Iudgement For Diodorus tels vs that the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or chiefe Iudge in that famous and venerable Egyptian high Court or Parliament did weare about his necke in a golden chaine Insigne a tablet of pretious stone or if the Reader bee disposed to correct the translator 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which they called as the Septuagint did Aarons breast-plate 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 on which hee stedfastly looked while matters were debating as Suidas saith the High Priest did on his breast plate whilest they asked counsell of God and whilest hee gaue sentence turned it vnto the beter cause exhibited as the fashion was in that Court in writing in signe the truth it selfe did speake for it that the Vrim or Thummim were more then an Embleme yea an Oracle of iustice and right iudgement is apparant out of Scripture When Ioshua was consecrated to bee Israels chiefe gouernour in Moses stead he was to stand before Eleazar the Priest ordained to aske counsell for him by the iudgement of Vrim before the Lord So did Abiathar certifie Dauid of Sauls malitious resolution against him and the Lords of Keylahs treachery if hee should trust vnto them So againe Dauid is assured of victory by the iudgement of Vrim and I Thummim if he would follow the Amalakites that had burnt Ziglag 4 Such Priestes as these were to bee absolutely obeyed in answeres thus giuen from the mouth of God And it is most probable that the parties whom these answeres did concern had perfect notice of the Reuelation made to the Priests howsoeuer the truths of such answeres being confirmed by experiment in those dayes they were to vndertake what the Priests appointed and to obey his aduice at least by cautelous obedience vntill the euent did proue the truth But neither was this certaine manifestation of Gods will so absolutely promised vnto the Priests but not liuing according vnto the direction of Gods law hee might faile in his Oracles Nor was this peoples prerogatiue aboue others without all limit that if they liued no better then others did they should as often as they asked counsell of God infallibly know whether the answere were from him or no albeit there were no defect in the Priest For this reason the Lord answered not Saul when hee asked counsell of him neither by dreames nor by visions nor by Vrim nor by the Prophets for Saul was now cast off by God not willing to vouchsafe
Church and chosen be as we acknowledge it to bee infinite and euerlasting if these or the like arguments make any things for the infallibility of the present Romish they proue as much and as directly for the ancient Iewish Church For that was a visible company of men not of oxen and Asses and of them God had a care also Nay they were his owne peculiar people and without al controuersie the onely visible Church which hee had on earth Wherefore all the former arguments if they conclude any infallible authority in the present Romish Church they conclude much more for the like infallibility of the Iewish And by necessary consequence if I proue that the Church had no such authority my assertion stands sure That this infallible authority which the factors of the Romish Church doe challenge is greater then any visible Company of men had before our Sauiour time And by the same proofe shall the Romish Church bee debarred for euer of both the two former pleas either drawne from the authority of the Priests or from the best forme of gouernment CHAP. V. That iustly it may be presumed the Iewish Church neuer had any absolute infallibility in proposing or determining Articles of faith because in our Sauiours time it did so grieuously erre in the fundamentall point of saluation 1 FOr proofe of the Conclusion proposed that Ierusalem had no such absolute infallibility as Rome pleades for I tooke it for a long time as granted by all that if any such authority had beene established in the law it should not haue varied vntill the alteration of the priesthood For Gods couenant with Leui was in this sence euerlasting that it was to endure without interruption vntill his sacrifice was accomplished that was a Priest after a more excellent order His oblation of himselfe was the common bond to the law and Gospell the end of the one and the beginning of the other Nor did the legall rites or ceremonies themselues though these most obnoxious to corruption vanish by little and little as this sacrifice did approch neerer and neerer as darkenesse doth before the rising of the sunne rather that consummation wrought vpon the Crosse did swallow them vp at once as virility doth youth youth childhood childhood infancy Seeing then our aduersaries suppose this infallibility was annexed as a prerogatiue royall vnto the Priesthood they cannot imagine any tollerable reason why the one should expire before the other was quite abolished Hence it is that most of them hold the Scribes and Pharises in our Sauiours time were absolutely infallible in their Cathedrall consultations And I had iust reasons to presume Bellarmine had been of the same mind For besides his vrging that place without all sense or reason vnlesse grounded on this opinion They sit in Moses chaire All therfore whatsoeuer they bid you that obserue and do these other words of his seemed to imply thus much It cannot be shewed that the Sinagogue of the Iewes did faile in saith vntill Christs comming at what time it did not faile but rather become better by change By his speeches elsewhere I perceiued by the Synagogue thus changed hee meant the Church planted by Christ not the Consistory of the High-Priests and Elders not the Catholike representatiue Iewish Church For sayeth he as it is not necessary the Popes Vicar should bee inerrable when the Pope himselfe doth guid the Church and defend it from error so neither was it necessary that the Iewish high Priest should not erre when Christ the High-Priest of the whole Church was present and did gouerne his Church in person 2 This example were it true might illustrate though ill-fauoredly his assertion once supposed as possible but no way argues it to be probable Herein his similitude failes that the High Priests in our Sauiours time were Aarons lawfull successors their Priesthood as entire then as euer it was and they Deputies to none in this ranke or order That their Predecessors had such infallibility hee faine would proue Can he or any for him shew vs when or by what meanes it should determine whiles the Priesthood lasted To take away the Popes infallibility euen in this last age of the world were in thier construction to deny Christs promise made vnto Saint Peters chaire And was not the former like prerogatiue as inseparably annexed to Moses seat did our Sauiour before his Passeouer either by doctrine or practise derogate ought from any lawfull authority established on earth much lesse from that which God had expresly instituted The greatest prerogatiue the Scribes and Pharises Priests or Rulers euer had was that they were Aarons successors and possessed Moses place and this authority was neuer disanulled but rather ratified by our Sauiour after hee had vndertaken his ministeriall function They sit in Moses seat all therefore whatsoeuer they bid you that obserue and doe And elsewhere Goe and shew thy selfe vnto the Priest c. 3* Yet this Sophister would perswade vs that Isaiah and Daniel had foretold the expiration of this prerogatiue in latter times They both indeed foretell this peoples extraordinary generall blindnesse about the time of our Sauiours conuersation on earth But this directly proues what wee obiect not what Bellarmine should haue answered at least to vs who contend the Priests and Rulers of this people were not infallible in our Sauiours time nor doth Isaiah or Daniel or any Prophet of God say they were at any time such Let any Iesuite proue what easily hee may out of Isaiahs words cited by Bellarmine that the Iewish church representatiue was not infallible in our Sauiours time and from the same wee shall as clearely euince it palpably erroneous in Isaiahs owne dayes or immediately after For the selfe same words which the Euangelist saith were fulfilled in the vnbeleeuing Iewes that heard our Sauiours doctrine were literally and exactly veriâ—ied of their forefathers before the captiuity of Babylon as the Cardinall himselfe would hee take the paines to reade the whole Chapter and reuiue the place cited by him I know would not deny His wordes are these And hee said go and say vnto this people Yee shall heare indeed but yee shall not vnderstand yee shall plainely see and not perceiue Make the heart of this people sat make their eares heauy and shut their eyes lest they see with their eyes and heare with their eares and vnderstand with their hearts and conuert he heale them Then said I Lord how long And he answered vntill the Cities be wasted without inhabitant and the houses without man and the land be vtterly desolate and the Lord haue remoued men far away and there be a great desolation in the midst of land The truth of our assertion is so pregnant that Maldonat the most iudicious expositor amongst the Iesuites takes it as granted the words late cited were literally meant onely of that generation with whome the Prophet liued and brings this very Text as
deny the High Priest himselfe not misled by any witnesses but from Christs owne wordes which hee himselfe had heard pronounceth sentence against him And if this were not enough he proposed the matter to the rest of his associates What thinke yee and they answered and said Hee is worthy to die After all this they vrged the people to approue of this their sentence perswading them to aske Barrabas and to destroy Iesus And so strongly had they coniured the multitude by their pretended authority that they apprehend this their choice as a point of faith or good seruice to God and his Church For when Pilate laieth his blood vnto their charge All the people as the Text sayeth all such as relyed vpon the Scribes and Pharises or their high Priests answered and said His bloud be vpon vs and our children One of your say Papists could not haue been more throughly perswaded of your Churches authority nor more violently bent against Iohn Hus or any other of Christs Martyrs for the like reasons then this whole multitude was against Christ being condemned by the High-priest speaking ex Cathedra Here were 〈…〉 more solemnities obserued in this proceeding 〈…〉 require in the Pope speaking ex Cathedra Theirs 〈◊〉 publike assembly and sentence was giuen by ioint consent in 〈◊〉 story and in the morning you hold it sufficient for the Pope to giue his definitiue sentence alone without euidence of the fact it selfe whereunto hee ties mens faith as shall appeare by your owne confessions Nor do you limit him any time as well in the afternoone as in the forenoone as well for ought wee can gather when drinke is in and his wits out of his head as when he is sober For you hold it not necessary for him to vse any long deliberation But if it be his will to bind all Christians to belieue him the whole Church must belieue that he was herein directed chiefe by the holy Ghost for the Church is bound to heare their Pastor And if hee binde all men to belieue him then must all of necessity belieue that hee was infallibly assisted by the holy Ghost in shewing that which hee binds them to belieue for otherwise the whole Church might erre nay were bound to erre because it is bound to belieue the Pope These consequents are your own not mine as may in part appeare from what hath been already more fully from what shall bee said hereafter Besides the whole multitude of the Iewish people heard the Priestes and Elders vtter their opinions concerning Christ and his doctrine viua voce wee haue the Popes decrees but by heare say Either was this sentence pronounced ex Cathedra or else it will bee hard for you to proue that any sentence in your Church hath beene so pronounced or can bee although the Pope himselfe bee present in the Councell and bee an eye witnesse of all proceedings 8 Yet if any of you should here shufle as yee vsually doe at the last pinch and say Howsoeuer Valentia or some others of our learned but priuate spirites may define what it is to speake ex Cathedra yet wee know not whether our Church hath so defined it or no and therefore although these High-priests and Elders did obserue all the circumstances which these doctors require in a sentence giuen ex Cathedra yet for ought we know they might nay sure they did faile in some circumstance which we know not and did not indeed speak ex Cathedra albeit they seemed so to do wherefore this doth not conclude against the Popes infallible authority when he speakes ex Cathedra if any of you shall take this last hold as I cannot imagine any other left you we shall quickly beate you out of it For let it be granted for disputations sake that the Pope hath as yee suppose these Iewes had an infallible authority when he speakes ex Cathedra yet seeing it is a matter so hard to bee knowne euen by these that heare him whether hee obserue all circumstances required to the exercise and true vse of such infallible authority and whether her hee speake ex Cathedra or no when he may seeme to sundry so to speake it would be the onely safe course for all Christian Churches vtterly to renounce all obedience to him but vpon examination of his doctrine to stand continually vpon their guard lest vnder pretence of this his infallible authority when he speakes ex Cathedra hee may worke some such inestimable mischiefe vnto the Scriptures or Christes chosen here on earth as these High Priests did vnto Christ himselfe by his seeming to speake ex Cathedra when hee doth not If by abusing this his infallible authority he should either make away these Scriptures or animate the people to imbrue their hands in the bloud of Christs deerest Saints it is not his speaking ex Cathedra that can redeem their soules from hell nor restore Gods word againe for these are matters of an higher price then that they should bee purchased with two or three words of his Holinesse vnhallowed mouth 9 To conclude if this authority of your Church be but such as the ancient Church of the Iewes had you cannot expect any faithfull people should otherwise esteeme of your decrees then the faithfull in our Sauiours time were bound to esteeme of the Iewish High-Priests and Elders whom surely they did not take for Christs onely nor best friends If the Popes infallibility bee but such as these high Priests had you may bee as guilty of the bloud of Christs Saints as they were If you will challenge as indeed you doe greater authority then they had yee must of necessity renounce your principall arguments brought to proue it CHAP. VI. That Moses had no such absolute authority as is now ascribed vnto the Pope That the manner of his attaining to such as hee had excludes all besides our Sauiour from iust challenge of the like 1 WHether Moses were a Magistrate as the Papists thinke spirituall or as others meerely ciuill or whereunto vpon grounds in due places to be discussed I most incline actually neither and virtually both it will suffice for proofe of our conclusion that the Pope is no seruant of God but an aduersary in that hee exalts him selfe aboue Moses whom none besides the High Priest and sole Mediator of the new couenant was to equalise in soueraignety ouer Gods people Nor doth the excesse of glory ascribed vnto the new Testament in respect of the old argue greater authority in Christian then was in ordinary legall gouernours whether temporall or spirituall much lesse doth it inferre greater authority in any Christ onely excepted then Moses had 2 If we take Christs Church as consisting both of Priests and people it is a congregation farre more royall and glorious then the Synagogue so taken was If we compare our High-Priest or mediator of the new Couenant with theirs the Apostles comparison is fittest Consider the Apostle and
sits as God in the Temple of God shewing himselfe that he is God For the Hebrew 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 equiualent to the Syriacke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in that sence they take it as affording such impregnable supportance or fortification against the powers of hell world or flesh is oftener by their owne vulgar latine rendred Deus then Petra or Rupes which it directly signifies because considered with these circumstances or effects it is rather a glorious title of the god-head or deity it selfe then a particular attribute taken from some diuine propriety communicable to Gods seruants in the abstract 23. Lastly vnto mee their common exposition of Christs speeches vnto Saint Peter suggest this argument more then demoustratiue that the Papacy is led by the spirite of great Antichrist in that no doctrine of Diuels can more directly contradict or more shamefully deny the vertue and power of Christ come in the flesh nor more peremptorily disanull or cancell his promise there made vnto his Church then Iesuiticall comments vpon it doe Christs promise was a promise of life and sauing health a full assurance of eternall happinesse to all that should bee truely built vpon that Rocke which Peter confessed or which they say Peter was They make the tenure of this glorious couenant to be no more but this that Peters successors and such as will builde their faith vpon them speaking ex Cathedra as vpon Rockes inuincible shall be indefectible in points of Christian faith and manners howsoeuer euen these Rockes themselues may be for life and conuersation as wicked as Annas or Caiphas or other blinded guides of the Iewish Sinagogue that crucified our Saniour 24 Thus by a pretended successiue perpetuity of Peters faith they vtterly abolish that liuely faith whereby he confessed Christ which is alway included as a necessary condition without which none be capable of that glorious promise but with it all are made immediate heirs of saluation Or to speake more plainly none may expect the least portioÌ„ of Peters blessing without Peters faith nor can that be in any but such as are borne of God Euery one saieth Saint IOHN that is borne of God ouer commeth the world and this is the victory that ouer commeth the world euen our faith And again who is he that ouer commeth the world but hee which belieueth what Peter had confessed that Iesus is the sonne of God And our Sauiour himselfe to whom his father had giuen power ouer all flesh that hee should giue eternall life to all giuen him by his father tels vs that this life eternall must grow from that root of faith which first did branch in Peters mouth but must be so planted as it grew in him in euery hart endued with sure hope much more in al such as lay challenge to such preheminency or prerogatiue of faith or hope as Peter had This is life eternall that they may know thee sayeth Christ speaking of his Father to bee the onely very God whom thou hast sent Iesus Christ so then God manifested in the flesh was the Rocke of saluation whereupon the Church is built he that rightly knowes and so belieues this truth hath life eternal dwelling in him 25 But shall such a faith as may be seuerd from charity shall such a knowledge of Christ as may bee in them to whom Christ shall say Depart from mee I neuer knew you I say not make any so impregnable a Rocke but so fasten any to that Rocke so impregnable as the gates of hell shall not bee able to dispossesse him of eternall life Whiles wee produce the late cited or other testimonies alike pregnant to condemne the Pontificians for denying Iustification onely by faith they thinke themselues fully acquitted with this solution that our assurance of saluation relies not vpon faith as alone but as it is the foundation of charity and accompanied with other christian vertues We neuer taught as shall be shewed in that controuersie that faith vnlesse thus attended could with true confidence plead cur cause before God which yet though thus at tended it onely pleades But here our aduersaries must be contented to take their payment in their own coine For if no man can bee iustified or made heyre of saluation it is vnpossible any should bee a liuely stone or liuing member much lesse a supreame head or sure foundation of that spirituall house alwaies victorious ouer death and hell without a faith so appointed as in the former case they require without a faith as clearely testifying Christ dwelling in men by workes flowing from it as their edification vpon him by an Orthodoxal forme of words Whosoeuer is destitute of a faith thus bearing fruit vnto saluation is so farre from being a Rocke or sure foundation for others to build vpon that hee himselfe if we may belieue our Sauiour buildes all hâ—s hopes vpon the sand Whosoeuer heareth these my words and doth them not shall bee likened vnto a foolish man which hath builded his house vpon the sand the rain fell and the stoudes came and the winds blew and beat vpon that house and it fell and the fall thereof was great Not euery one therefore that saieth vnto our Sauiour as Peter did thou art the Christ the sonne of the liuing God but he that expresseth his faith and hope by works answerable to Christs conuersation in the flesh and his fathers will shall enter into the kingdome of heauen because hee onely is built vpon that Rocke which the floud-gates of hell cannot vndermine or ouerthrow For whosoeuer sayeth our Sauiour heareth of mee these words and doeth the same I will liken him to a wise man which builded his house on a rocke And the raine fell and the floudes came and the winds blew and beat vpon that house and it fell not for it was grounded vpon a Rocke 26 Let the Iesuite either produce any heresie broached since our Sauiours Incarnation or frame a conceite of any but Logically possible before his comming vnto iudgement which in outward profession not disclaiming the former maine foundation of christianity God manifested in the flesh can indeed and issue more euidently ouerthrow it more distinctly contradict either those fundamentall precepts of saluation last cited or more fully euacuate the often mentioned promise made vnto Saint Peter then the foundation of Romish religion as Romish doth and I will doe publike pennance in sacke-cloth and ashes for laying the imputation of Antichristianisme vpon it Our Sauiour saith whosoeuer heareth these words and doth them not doth build his house vpon the sand They teach the contradictory as an Article of faith that the Pope or a councel of Bishops assembled by his appointment instructed by his infallability confirmed by his plenary power doe alwaies build vpon the same Rocke as Peter did yea that the Pope himselfe how wicked soeuer is that very Rocke whereupon the Church that is in their language the Bishoppes thus