Synagogue of the infallibility of their Popes as Peter's successors and of the indeficiency of their Church as built upon Peter when as neither had Peter himself any such priviledge as to be infallible The next story in this 16th of Matthew evinceth the contrary v. 23. Nor by the Rock whereupon Christ builds his Church is meant the person of Peter or Peter's confession personally as it had relation to him but as it is considered really in it self and is common to all the Disciples and to all visible Believers which may be thus confirmed 1. Because Peters confession must have relation to the matter which he confessed But Peter confessed not himself but Christ saying Thou art the Christ the Son of the living God Therefore his confession had relation to Christ not to himself 2. Because Peter confessed no more than that which he knew the other Disciples believed before he speake For Christ's question being general What say ye Peter answered as the mouth of the rest but the Apostles before he speak believed Christ confessed and not Peter confessing 3. Because this Rock is that confession whereupon Christ saith he will build his Church But whosoever shall truly believe that which Peter confessed viz. Christ the Son of the living God and confess or profess it in due order is accordingly built on this Rock though he had never heard of Peter's name Therefore the confession rightly understood had relation unto Christ and not to the person of Peter 4. Because the Rock signifieth that which is immoveable and impregnable such as is Christ and his truth But Peter's confession was movable and shaken at one time thrice denying this confession of his Lord. Therefore this confession which Christ calls the Rock had not relation to Peter but only to Christ Coroll 2 Then they that would have a particular Church to be impregnable stable and firm against the prevailing of the gates of Hell must see that it be built upon this Rock and not upon humane formes 1. That Christ himself be the builder of it according to his own institutions not the policies or customs of men 2. * Ex quo patet quòd Ecclesia non consistit in hominibus ratione potestatis vel dignitatis Ecclesiasticae vel saecularis c. sed in illis personis in quibus est notitia vera confessio fidei veritatis Lyra in loc That the materials of which it consists be such as believe and profess their Faith in Christ publickly before the Lord and his People 3. That they be firmly joyned together in one Congregation by an holy Covenant of subjection and submission to the Lord Jesus Christ and to one another in him and accordingly walk together in obedience to Christ and his Rules resisting Satan in all his Temptations and Machinations through Christ strengthning them without whom they can do nothing Joh. 15.5 and that they improve carefully and faithfully the power which Christ hath given them viz. the Keyes of the Kingdom of Heaven in opening and shutting binding and loosing according to Christ his appointment for the preserving of his Church safe in the purity of their Faith and Order against the gates of Hell which is the next thing to be handled The Second Part. CHAP. VI. Concerning the power given of Christ unto such a Church as the first and proper subject of it THe second branch or part of the Charter is concerning the Power given by Christ unto such Churches to have and use all the means appointed by him for their establishment against the the gates of Hell Mat. 16.19 And I will give unto thee the Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven and whatsoever thou shalt bind on Earth shall be bound in Heaven and whatsoever thou shalt loose on Earth shall be loosed in Heaven These words contain 1. A grant of Power 2. A ratification of that Grant We shall speak to them distinctly 1. To Christ his grant of Power and therein 1. Explicate the terms by shewing what is meant 1 by the Kingdom of Heaven 2. by the Keys of it 3 What this appropriation or application of them imports To thee I will give 1. By the Kingdom of Heaven is meant both the Kingdom of Grace Glory and that the Kingdom of Glory is also meant the following words shew when he saith What you bind on Earth is bound in Heaven c. 2. By the Keys which are a sign of Power and are put by a Metonimy for the Subject the Power it self is meant Church-power which is either Supreme and Soveraign in Christ only as Lord and Head of his Church who alone hath the Key of David which openeth and no man shutteth and shutteth and no man openeth in Rev. 3.7 or subordinate and delegate such as is in Christ's Stewards This is noted by Keys in the Plural number in this place which signifie all power delegated from Christ to dispense and administer all the holy things of his House according to Christ's will and in the order prescribed by him to that end For all power wherewith the Lord Jesus betrusteth his Church aims at this which is here expressed to open and shut to bind and loose 3. To thee I will give The Application of this Grant is to Peter in the name of the Church which Christ promised to build upon himself believed on and publickly professed as Peter did before him and his fellow-Disciples in Christs School at this time And the promise is more fitly given to Peter in the name of the Church than to the Church by name because it was not the Church that made this confession but Peter in the name of the Church But here we must make a little stand to examine the sundry claims which have been made to this Right upon several pretences from this Text. 1. Some looking at Peter as representing the Catholick visible-Church conceive that a general Council which they say is the Catholick Church representatively is the Church here meant to which Christ gives the Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven But that cannot be For particular visible Churches in the Apostles dayes had and exercised the Keyes compleatly within themselves yet was there no general Council till the time of Constantine which was three hundred years after Christ 2. Others look at this Grant as peculiar to Peter considered as the Prince and chief of the Apostles and to the Popes of Rome as his successors But this Papal usurpation the Councils of Constance and Basil strongly and justly opposed shewing that the Keys which are here given to Peter are in Joh. 20.21 22 23. given to all the Apostles and that Peter himself is enjoyned in Mat. 18. to tell the Church 3. Others think that the Catholick Church considered not representatively but in it self is the first subject of the Keys Yet these differ among themselves For some affirm it of the invisible others of the visible Catholick Church As for the terms we know that visible invisible
Papam p. 565. was there burnt for denying the primacy of the Pope teaching that the Keys were given Ecclesiae toti non uni Petro to the whole Church and that the Communion should be administred sub utrâque specie and against humane Traditions and the Popes indulgencies and the wicked lives of the Cardinals and Priests and for preaching free Justification by Faith in Christ and that the Pope is Antichrist This was about the year 1499. In our own Land John Lambert in the year Fox Martyrol i' th Reign of Hen. 8th 1538 was burnt to death by the sentence of King Henry the 8th himself sitting in judgement upon him with all his Nobles and Bishops by the wicked counsel of Stephen Gardiner upon 45 Articles whereof this was the 43d Article Whether he believed the Pope was Christs Vicar and had power on earth to bind and loose He denyed that the Pope was Christs Vicar and affirmed that the Keys were given to Peter not for himself alone but in the name of the Church and proved it out of Cyprian Idem ibid. de simplicitate Clericorum and Aug. de Agone Christiano Also Sir John Borthwick a Scottish Knight in the year 1540 was condemned by the Arch Bishop of St. Andrews then Cardinal of Scotland and the Popes Legate with sundry Popish Bishops upon ten Articles of which this was the first touching the Popes Supremacy grounded upon Mat. 16. To thee will I give the Keys which he from that place confuted affirming that the Keys were given to the Church in Peter which name was given him upon his confession of Christ in the name of the whole Church and confirmed his assertion out of Cyprian and Augustine So that this is no new nor singular exposition of these words or practice taken up by some few of late Not new for Cyprian wrote about the year 250 after Christ and Augustine about the year 410 the last of them about 1200 years since and the first above 1400 years past I shall add hereunto that before Cyprian Tertullian about the year 200 shews us that Church-censures were then performed by one particular Church within it self and not in any combination of Churches Tertull. Apolog. Cap. 39. Nor singular for sundry sorts of Writers in several Ages and Countries have consented therein I will not enter into that question about which there seems to be some difference in apprehensions between some Godly learned Brethren Whether the Keys are given to Peter under several considerations as an Apostle and as an Elder and as a professing Believer all being taken joyntly together or to a single Society or condition of men under some special Relation which share alike in the equality of this Power promised unto them For in the substance of the matter they agree 1. That the Keys are promised to Peter in the name of a Congregational-Church 2. That this power of the Keys cannot be given to one single Society formally in all the kinds of it because it requires several sorts of subjects formally different viz. some Ruling some Ruled some Teaching c. 3. That til a Congregational-Church be organized and compleated with all its Officers it cannot compleatly exercise the Keys commited to it 4. That nevertheless before it be compleated it hath power of the Keys and is the first subject of them either formally or virtually whereby all the Ordinances are administred or administrable among them I shall issue this point into one Doctrinal Conclusion 6. Concl. The subordinate ordinary Power of acting Church-affairs in the Order appointed by Jesus Christ for attainment of the ends of Church-Communion is given by Christ to a visible Congregation of confederate Believers as the first and proper subject of it In the handling of this point I shall note somethings 1. For Explication 2. Confirmation of it 3. Draw some Consectaries 1. For explication of it I shall endeavour to clear five particulars 1. What I mean by Subordinate Power Subordinate Power is that which wholly dependeth on Christs Ordinance and Institution who is the Supreme and only Monarch and Head of the Church and therefore his revealed Will must be attended in all Church-Administations as the only Rule from which they may not swerve to the right hand or to the left for any humane policies or pretences whatsoever by adding ought thereto or taking any thing therefrom To this Christ limited his Apostles who were the highest Officers in the Church Mat. 28.18 19 20. And accordingly Paul strictly charged Timothy and in him all the Churches and Church-Officers to keep this Commandment without spot unrebukable until the appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ c. 1 Tim. 6.13 14 15. They must assume to themselves only that power which he hath allotted them and not exercise it any otherwise than he hath allowed them 2. Why I add ordinary to subordinate It is added to difference that Power which resideth in the Church for continual use in ordinary dispensations from that which was in the Apostles for a time by the gift of Christ Both Apostolical-Power and Church-Power agree in this that they are received immediately from Christ For as he said to the Apostles whose sins ye remit they are remitted c. Joh. 20.23 So he said to the Church both here in Peter and in Mat. 18.18 Whatsoever ye shall bind or loose on earth c. So that neither did the Apostles receive their Power from the Church nor doth the Church receive its power from the Apostles but both immediatly from Christ and therefore as the Apostles had their Power before visible Christian-Churches were constituted so such Churches have and hold their Power when Apostles cease to be on earth But herein these two Powers differ 1. That Apostolical Power was centred in one single Person and extended it self to the circumference of all Churches Each Apostle had the Power of the whole Church and of all the Officers of the Church when he was absent from the Churches he could administer Seals and Censures as if he had the presence and concurrence of the Church and if he was present in any Church that wanted Officers an Apostle had power to execute every Office for the Church And this their Power extended it self as much to all Churches as to any one Their Line went out into all the World Psal 19.4 with Rom. 10.18 Mat. 28.19 For as the Father sent Christ the Mediator with fulness of Soveragin Power so Christ sent his Apostles with fulness of Ministerial Power Joh. 20.21 But Church-Power is not in one man but in a Society and to be exercised variously by several persons in that society according to variety of callings Are all Teachers 1 Cor. 12.29 Hence 2. That was extraordinary and to last but for a time but this is ordinary and to continue to the end Rev. 4.1 3. What the Church-Affairs are and what the acting them imports The Church-affairs are the Ordinances of Christ called here the
Church The Church may by communion of Churches upon orderly recommendation receive the members of other Churches unto fellowship of such Ordinances as are for the comfort and strengthning of the Saints as the Seals are and the Officers may administer them to such being accepted by the body for we have a warrant for so much from the Rule Rom. 16.1 3 Joh. 9. but not to act in judgement For the Church hath this priviledge proper to be judged by and to judg only those that are within 1 Cor. 5.12 whereas I alledged this Text against Mr. Paget to prove that Church-Ordinances belong only to the Members of some particular Church Mr. Rutterf meeting with that expression saith Mr. D. will have Pastors so far strangers to all Congregations save their own that he saith other Churches are without and have nothing to do to judge them and alledgeth for this 1 Cor. 5.12 But by those that are without Paul meaneth not those that were not of the Congregation but he meaneth Infidels and Heathen as in other Scriptures For Paul judged and excommunicated Hymeneus and Alexander 1 Tim. 1.20 who were without the Church at Corinth Had Mr. Rutt been pleased to cast his eye upon my own defence of that passage In my Apolog Reply pag. 312 313. printed sundry years before he put pen to paper in these disputes about Church affairs he might have found that written by me touching the sense and my application of that Text which might have prevented his exagitating that matter Nor doth he with any congruity argue from Pauls Excommunicating Hymeneus and Alexander who he saith were without the Church at Corinth to prove that Pastors have any thing to do to judge judicially or excommunicate the members of other Congregations For Paul was an Apostle an extraordinary Officer had an illimited commission and a fulness of delegated power both in every Church and to administer Church-Ordinances without the fellowship of a particular Church when it could not be had and to execute all Offices in any Church where Officers were wanting But Pastors are ordinary Officers have a limited commission to do only the acts of the Pastoral Office and those only to that particular Church by which they are called unto Office Act. 20.28 1 Pet. 5.2 Therefore though Paul might excommunicate one that was not of that particular Church at Corinth yet the Pastor to the Church at Corinth might not Yet Paul could not excommunicate one that was no member of any Church but without as Infidels and Heathen are For that implies a contradiction To conclude The Apostle doth so appropriate Church-judgment to those that are within that particular Church 1 Cor. 5.12 Ye judge them that are within that he exempts from it in a due proportion all that are not members of that Congregation though there are degrees of being without some being totally without all Church-communion as Infidels and Heathen others though in Church-communion else-where yet not in communion of membership of that Church to whom he wrote to put away from them not one that was a member of another Church but him that was a member of that Church And in this sense Mr. Rutt saith Hymeneus and Alexander were without the Church at Corinth though members of some other Church for which cause the Church at Corinth could not excommunicate them yet Paul might and did by his Apostolical Power Thus by his own confession some are without a particular Church who yet are not Heathen or Infidels To conclude one may be said to be without this or that particular Church two ways 1. Simply and absolutely so Infidels and Heathen that are of no Church 2. Comparatively so the Members of other Churches compared with those that are of this Body 4. Corollary Then Churches gathered and Officers ordained in these days without Apostles are true Churches and true Church-Officers according to Christ and Churches thus Organized according to the Rules of the Word are true and intire Churches and the first subject of all Church-power as well as those Primitive Churches planted by the Apostles For the concurrence of the Apostles is not put into this Charter whereof we speak as a conditional Clause which might not have been omitted if Christ had intended that it should be always necessary He doth not say upon this Rock my Apostles shall build my Church and to my Church built by them I will give the Keys of the Kingdom but upon this Rock I will build my Church viz. by such Instruments as Christ will raise and use and bless in that work in every Age and to this Church thus built he gives the Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven Object But Christ gave the Commission of gathering Churches to his Apostles in Matth. 28.18 19. And when he ascended up on high he gave some Apostles and some Prophets and some Evangelists and some Pastors and Teachers for the perfecting of the Saints for the work of the Ministry and for the edifying of the Body of Christ Ephes 4.8 11 12. Answ Those and the like Texts of Scripture do indeed shew that God used Apostles principally in this work but not only For as to Teach and Baptize is common to other Teaching-Officers as well as Apostles so the gathering of Churches by making men Disciples of Christ was done by others besides Apostles even in the Apostles days Act. 11.20 21. The dispersed Disciples planted the Church at Antioch the Members whereof were first called Christians a Church whose planting Barnabas approved ver 23. 2. They shew that God would use Apostles herein for a time but not alwayes which I prove 1. From the proper work committed to them which was to make the first Models and Patterns of planting and gathering Churches which ordinary Instrumentts are bound to attend in the gathering and constituting of Churches 1 Cor. 3.6 10. and in that sense their work continues to the end of the World though their manner of working viz. from an immediate Call Inspiration and Infallible assistance proper to Apostles in making those Patterns was extraordinary and ended with their Office in the first Age since when there never have been Apostles in the World For though Matthias succeeded in the place of Judas by Gods Election Act. 1.26 yet after James was beheaded no Apostle was chosen to succeed him though the Apostles lived long after 2. The Apostle John who lived longest of the Apostles describeth by Revelation from Christ all the Officers that should be by Gods Ordinance in Christian Churches after that Age under four sorts of living Creatures which note the four sorts of ordinary Officers to continue in the Church after that Age viz. Pastors Teachers Ruling-Elders and Deacons Revel 4.1 6 7. Vers 19. And whatsoever thou shalt bind on Earth shall be bound in Heaven Whatsoever thou shalt loose on Earth shall be loosed in Heaven THese words hold forth the Ratification of Christ's grant of the Keys unto a Congregational-Church with the chiefty
may by the eyes which are given to it for that end 2. The Confirmation or proof that such a Church is the first and proper subject of this power shall be double 1. By Scripture 2. By Reasons 1. By Scripture it may be proved from sundry Texts 1. This in hand clearly confirmeth it if that good ancient rule of expounding Scripture be received Dictorum intelligentia ex causis dictorum sumenda est For Christ's question to the Disciples which was the cause of Peter's confession here was only concerning the Faith common to the Church Whom say ye that I am Hereupon Peter in the name of the Disciples made this confession of Faith Quia Christus Petra Petrus populus Christianus August in Matth. de verbis Domini Ser. 13. Christ testified his approbation of it by calling him Peter not so much in respect of his Office as of his Faith thus publickly professed whence also visible Believers are called lively stones 1 Pet. 2.4 5. and Christ added to this praise of Peter a twofold promise 1. Of edifying and stablishing the Church upon this Rock 2. Of affording it sufficient means for the attainment of those ends viz. the Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven c. Where the Kingdom of Heaven or visible Church of Christ on earth is compared to a City or House the Door or Gate whereof is Christ the Keys are all instituted means whereby an entrance into Christ and his Kingdom visibly is opened and shut the subordinate power whereof is here given to the Church immediately The second Text is in Mat. 18.17 18. Tell the Church if he hear not the Church let him be as an Heathen and a Publican For what you shall bind on Earth shall be bound in Heaven c. This cannot be meant of Elders assembling together and acting apart from the Brethren For no such assembly is called the Church in the New Testament much less is this power given to them for in case of scandal given by them they are under the power of the whole Church as well as other Members to be censured by them though when they keep the Rule they are as Elders Rulers in the Church It must therefore be meant of a Congregational-Church The third Text is in 1 Cor. 5. where Paul exhorted the Church at Corinth to exercise this their power which he calls the power of the Lord Jesus v. 4. whereby they were to deliver unto Satan that incestuous person v. 5. and were to purge out the old leaven v. 7. and were to judge those that are within v. 12. and to put away that wicked person from among them v. 13. and this Paul calls a punishment inflicted by many 2 Cor. 2.6 Thus he establisheth their power to bind and teacheth them how to use it and in like manner he exhorteth them upon the mans repentance to turn the Key and to open the Door of Christian liberties to him and to loose him from the former censure by forgiving him in a legal or judicial sense 2 Cor. 2.7 10. And that this Church at Corinth was a meer Congregational-Church it may be evinced from hence that the whole Church was no larger then was wont to meet together in one place 1 Cor. 14.23 for the ordinary worship of God 2. By Reasons 1. Because in such a Congregational-Church are all the causes of this power 1. Efficient the Institution and Ordinance of Christ who delegateth this subordinate power to whom it pleaseth him by his own appointment 2. The material cause visible Believers 3. The formal cause Covenanting together to walk in all the Ordinances of Christ and to submit mutually one to another in the Lord to be reclaimed if they err from the rules or to be censured by the power of the whole if they be found obstinate 2. Because there is no former subject of this power from whence a Congregational-Church might derive it but it is communicated by means of the Church to all that partake of it and it remaineth in the Church when others are removed They choose their own Elders therefore they had this power virtually in them before they had Elders and so could not derive it from them 2. All particular Churches are of equal power within themselves not one of them subordinate to another Therefore they derive it not from other particular Churches 3. Synods both lesser and larger are made up of the Elders and Messengers sent from particular Churches and have their being from them nor do they send them to them to borrow any Church-power but only light from them as the Church at Antioch did from the Church at Jerusalem Acts 15. Therefore they derive no Church-power from them Again when the Elders of particular Churches are dead or censured or rejected by the power of the whole for obstinacy in scandalous evils the Church still retaineth its power to choose others as a Corporation hath its full power still though the Magistrates be dead or cast out The same holds in Churches in Islands by their own confession when they cannot have the help of Synods Thus we prove Fire to be the first subject of heat because if it be in other things as in Water or Wood it is there by the means of Fire and when they are removed yet still it remains in Fire The like reason holds in this as you see to prove such a Church as this of which we speak to be the first subject of Church-Power or of the Keys 3. Because all the acts done immediatly by the Church in opening and shutting in binding and loosing flow from this power of the Keys given them by Christ and hold it forth 1. Their admitting Members is an act of this Power and holds it forth for till the Brethren be satisfied and approve ones fitness he cannot be received into their fellowship Act. 9.26 and 10.47 2. Their choosing Officers is an act of this Power which the Apostles would not violate in adding Deacons Act. 6.3 5. and Ruling-Elders to the Church Act. 14.23 and the same holds much more concerning Pastors and Teachers This power Cyprian acknowledged to be in the * Plebs obsequens praeceptis Dominicis Deum metuens ipsa maximè habet potestatem vel eligendi dignos sacerdotes vel indignos recusandi Quod ipsum videmus de Divinâ authoritate descendere Cypr. l. 1. ep 4. People principally to accept or refuse Ministers as they judged them worthy or unworthy 3. Their Ordination of Officers by deputing some chosen out of their own Body thereunto in the want of Officers is an act of this Power of the Keys residing in them For though the Offices of Elders in general and the Authority of their Office as they are Rulers is from Christ immediately yet the investing of this or that elect person with this Office Authority in relation to this or that Church by application of it to him in particular rather than to another this is by the
of power under Christ to manage the same within themselves for the attainment of the ends of Church-Communion And that this is spoken to Peter in the name of such a Church and that Christ intended to establish by this promise the compleat exercise of this power in such a Church being compleated with all itâ— Officers is clear from Matth. 18.18 where the same promise is given by name to such a Church The words therefore in summe hold forth a grant from Christ to his Church of an indispensable power of Church-censures within themselves which may be thus evinced The censure that is established in Heaven cannot be dispensed with nor reversed by any power on Earth But the censure that is administred by a Congregational-Church is established in Heaven Therefore it cannot be dispensed withall nor reversed by any power on Earth The Proposition a man would think might pass without opposition but I find this Objection made against it Obj. The sentence of an inferiour Judge or Court proceeding rightly is established in Heaven yet we may appeal from it Why will not the same hold in Church-censures also Answ 1. Because the promise of binding in Heaven is not given by Christ to the censures of Civil Courts For it is not a Civil but a Spiritual binding that is here meant 2. Because there is not par ratio between them The reason why appeals may be made from the sentence of inferiour Civil Courts and Judges is because there is a Supreme Court in being to which the appeal may be brought and there prosecuted and thereby determined as the inferiour Courts in Israel stood under the highest Synedrion but there is no such Supreme Court ordained by Christ over particular Churches The Assumption That the censure that is administred by a Congregational-Church is established in Heaven is expresly in the Text as it hath been expounded True say some what a particular Church binds on Earth clave non errante is bound in Heaven but the Church may err in Judgement therefore appeal may be made and then their binding power is gone Answ 1. If possibility of erring in Judgment be a warrantable ground of appealing from particular Churches then the appeal must be made to such a Tribunal and Judge as cannot err which is to be found only in Heaven 2. On this ground the universal Church represented in a general Council much more inferiour Synods and Classes should not have power to bind without appeals For a general Council may err and hath erred not seldom but often not in small matters only but in those of the greatest moment yea they may be as much inclined to err as particular Churches For the greatest part of visible Churches in the World are for the most part corrupt If it be said There are more eyes plus vident oculi quam oculus I answer True caeteris paribus viz. if they are equally near the mark but their sight is hindred more than particular Churches are in their proper concernments as they are further from the mark in such cases than particular Churches And if particular Churches have not full power of Excommunication because they may err be corrupt be partial be divided upon the same ground neither Classical National not Oecumenical Assemblies have any such power for they may err be corrupt be partial be divided also 3. Christ who well knew what is in man and what is best for the good of his people hath given unto his particular Churches notwithstanding their possibility of erring an indispensable power of judgment in their own matters within themselves The Doctrinal Conclusion to be insisted upon is this A Congregational Church of Christ 7. Conclu being compleated with Officers hath by the gift of Christ within it self compleat subordinate Church-power in all Church-affairs proper to it self When I say 1. It hath compleat or sufficient Church-power Thereby I mean 1. That it needeth not the influence of the Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction of any other Church or Churches or Classes or Synods to supply unto it any power that it wanteth in its own matters and 2. That it standeth not in subjection under any other Superior Ecclesiastical Judicatory so as that thereby the judicial Acts of a particular Church may be hindered or made void In a word Potestas uniuscujusque particularis Ecclesiae in re propria summa est The power of such a Church is Chief in things proper to it self 2. I add that this chiefty of power in a particular Church is subordinate To shew that the absolute Supremacy of power is in Christ that which the Church hath is only delegated from Christ When a particular Church is compleated with all its Officers the Government of it in respect of Christ the Head is perfectly Monarchical in respect of the Elders acting their Authoririty or Office-power it is Aristocratical and in respect of the Fraternity acting its Chuch-power in Judgment it is Democratical and in the concurrence of all the Members both Officers and Brethren acting according to their several interests it is Aristocratico-Democratical above which Christ hath not set any higher Ecclesiastical Judicatory on Earth subjecting particular Churches thereunto in re propriâ A clear proof of such power as that which hath been described you may see in the Church at Corinth excommunicating that incestuous person in 1 Cor. 5 1-5 Say not as some do That was not an act of Judicial power in that Church but of subjection to the Apostle who decreed it and judged him before and committed no more to the Church but the publishing of the sentence for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1 Cor. 5.3 though Paul as an Apostle judged that he should be excommunicated yet he so judged only dogmatically by teaching the Church what they ought to do in that case not judicially by his own sentence delivering him to Sathan and acâ—ordingly the Church cast him out by their own sufficiency of Church-power within themselves though in a way of subjection to the command of Christ delivered by Paul For 1. They delivered him to Satan in the Name and with the Power of the Lord Jesus v. 4. and that is the highest Power 2. The end and use of it was for the destruction of the flesh that his Spirit might be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus v. 5. which argueth that it proceedeth from a power of binding in Heaven as well as on Earth 3. When God blessed this sentence by making it effectual to work Repentance in him Paul exhorteth the whole Church to release and forgive him 2 Cor. 2 6-10 and doth not claim the Power over them of a Superiour Judge to absolve him by his own sentence without them Nor did he write to the Elders of sundry Churches but only to that particular Church both Elders and Brethren and thereby acknowledgeth the Power of Ecclesiastical Judgment to be so fully in them that As their not putting it into act retarded the sentence before
Church-Communion by Believers joyning to a particular Congregation and walking in a Memberlike affection and fellowship with their Brethren unto mutual edification but they speak nothing for the subjection of particular Churches to Classes and Synods in re propriâ but rather intimate the contrary For the Apostle by comparing a Congregational-Church compleated with its Officers unto the Body of a man intire in all its Members sheweth that as the Body of a man being intire and sound hath compleat power within it self for all bodily actions so a particular Church being organized and governed by Christ the Head from whom the whole Body fitly joyned and compacted together by Joynts of supply according to the effectual working in the measure of every part maketh increase of the body unto the edifying of it self in love Ephes 4.15 16. without the influence of any Jurisdiction out of it self to supply a Superior Church-power which was wanting in this Body of Chirist a Congregational-Church and as the Body Natural being sound and of a good constitution hath sufficient ability in it self to purge out of it self Malignant Humors so such a Church hath sufficient power in it self to cast out vicious and hurtful Members without the intervention of Classical Jurisdiction over them 2. It is a sin against the second Commandment in such as having means and opportunity neglect to joyn as Members in a particular Congregation because it is God's Ordinance and revealed Will 2 Cor. 8.5 But Classical Jurisdiction over particular Churches and their subjection thereunto is no Ordinance of Christ and therefore it is so far from being necessary that it is not lawful but against the second Commandment which forbiddeth mens inventions in God's worship that it may establish only God's Ordinances therein Others argue thus As though a Town or Family being alone may govern as a compleat Body yet when it stands in a Common-wealth it may not be so independent but must submit to Combinations So though when a particular Congregation is alone it may govern as compleat yet not so when it is among other Churches Answ 1. There is not a like reason of Churches and of Towns or Families in this respect For civil Societies are more left to Rules of Humane prudence by the great Ruâ—â—â— of the World than Churches are Therefore civil Societies may be of several constitutions have different Laws and Priviledges and admit various forms of Government provided that they be not against Moral Rules and the good of the People But in this Spiritual Kingdom of Christ men may not alter the kind or Form of Church which Christ hath Instituted but must preserve inviolate the Laws Administrations Priviledges and Church-Government ordained by him without Addition Diminution or alteration Hence a particular Church may not alienate from it self in whole or part any Right Power or Priviledge given it by Christ 2. If such a Town or Family hath compleat power and Officers within it self it is not bound to submit to such Combinations in a Common-wealth except it be under a Superiour Power that can command the same Abraham having a compleat Family was not bound to combine with the Governments he dwelt amongst nor did he though he joyned in a League of amity and for mutual help with Aner Eschol and Mamre yet not to submit to their Government So neither is a particular Organical Church bound to submit to such Classical Combinations till it can be proved by Scripture that a Superior Power of other Churches can command the same 3. Though several Families not having compleat Government within themselves must combine in a Common-wealth yet not to yield up their Family-Government over their Wives Children and Servants respectively to rule them in common with other Masters of Families Much less may several Congregational-Churches give up the Government of themselves to Pastors of sundry Churches combined in a Classis to govern them in their proper Affairs such as Admission of Members Election and Ordination of Officers Administration of Seals and Censures 1. Corollary Then the censure of Excommunication is not a light matter but to be looked at as very weighty and formidable You see 1. That it is the Soveraign Remedy prescribde by Christ against the many Diseases whereunto the Body is subject the great preservative of the Churches peace and safety against the gates of Hell 2. That it is such a Power given by Christ to his Church as proveth Church-Societies to be the visible Suburbs of Heaven yea the Kingdom of Heaven begun on Earth seeing such an Heavenly Power is committed to them This is a greater work than Elijah did when he shut up Heaven that it rained not Jam. 5.17 For that was but an outward and temporal Judgment for three years and six moneths But this is Spiritual and for ever upon impenitent persons It is greater than Earthly Kings and Magistrates can do they can bind a Malefactor hand and foot and deliver him to the Jaylor and sentence him to banishment out of their Dominions but this Censure binds the Soul and Conscience delivers them to Satan and excludes obstinate impenitent sinners from the Kingdom of God that when this Censure is applyed by the Church according to Scripture-Rules Jesus Christ is with them to ratifie his Censure according to this Promise What you shall bind on Earth shall be bound in Heaven and to bless it to the attainment of its end the destruction of the flesh that the Spirit may be saved This is a singular Priviledge of Church-Members If they that are out of Church-fellowship bless themselves in their Liberty because they cannot be touched with Church-censures they shew their extream folly therein for they are left to the Sword of the Magistrate or to the immediate judgment of God as forlorn Creatures excluded from Spiritual helps suitable to their needs They are as Sheep whom no man taketh up or careth for in a Spiritual way Isa 3.13 14. It is therefore a special priviledge of Church-Members and much for the furtherance of their eternal Salvation if they improve it aright to the mortifying of those corruptions in them which could not be purged out and healed by easier means And this is the proper end of it that seeing themselves as Adam driven from the Tree of Life by the flaming Sword of a Cherubim or as Cain cast out from Gods face or as the Leper shut out from the fellowship of God's people or as that Incestuous Corinthian delivered up to Satan they may be ashamed humbled and effectually brought to Repentance and to hold it forth according to God's Rules If it work not this effect the fault is their own Yet it will not be without effect For as the Gospel is the savour of Death unto Death when it is not the savour of Life unto Life so this Gospel-Ordinance shall not be in vain but shall work one way or t'other either the destruction of the impenitent or the salvation of those that repent