Selected quad for the lemma: earth_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
earth_n bind_v heaven_n loose_v 17,959 5 11.2239 5 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A13322 The vvhetstone of reproofe A reprouing censure of the misintituled safe way: declaring it by discouerie of the authors fraudulent proceeding, & captious cauilling, to be a miere by-way drawing pore trauellers out of the royall & common streete, & leading them deceitfully in to a path of perdition. With a postscript of advertisements, especially touching the homilie & epistles attributed to Alfric: & a compendious retortiue discussion of the misapplyed by-way. Author T.T. Sacristan & Catholike Romanist. T. T., Sacristan & Catholike Romanist. 1632 (1632) STC 23630; ESTC S101974 352,216 770

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View original text

cite_v yet_o have_v he_o other_o in_o the_o same_o place_n which_o do_v sufficient_o declare_v his_o meaning_n in_o that_o manner_n of_o speech_n for_o he_o present_o add_v that_o s._n gregory_n be_v say_v to_o have_v grant_v indulgence_n &_o they_o say_v say_v he_o that_o there_o be_v some_o most_o ancient_a use_n of_o they_o among_o the_o roman_n which_o the_o station_n of_o the_o city_n give_v we_o to_o understand_v and_o hence_o it_o be_v that_o the_o same_o bishop_n in_o the_o same_o place_n turn_v his_o speech_n to_o luther_n his_o adversary_n say_v unto_o he_o wherefore_o thou_o be_v a_o mere_a imposter_n or_o deceiver_n of_o the_o people_n not_o the_o pope_n to_o who_o in_o this_o point_n of_o indulgence_n both_o the_o gospel_n favore_v and_o a_o general_a council_n subscribe_v &_o also_o the_o universal_a company_n of_o modern_a interpreter_n upon_o those_o word_n of_o christ_n math_v 16._o whatsoever_o you_o shall_v bind_v in_o earth_n shall_v be_v bind_v in_o heaven_n &_o whatsoever_o you_o shall_v loose_v in_o earth_n shall_v be_v loose_v in_o heaven_n thus_o he_o so_o that_o it_o be_v plain_a that_o bishop_n fisher_n never_o duobt_v of_o the_o power_n of_o indulgence_n or_o that_o the_o use_n of_o they_o be_v not_o lawful_a or_o profitable_a as_o neither_o do_v he_o bring_v in_o question_n whether_o the_o ancient_a father_n &_o divine_v do_v deny_v or_o not_o acknowledge_v these_o particular_n but_o as_o i_o say_v before_o he_o only_o treat_v of_o the_o antiquity_n of_o the_o use_n of_o the_o same_o as_o manifest_o appear_v even_o by_o the_o same_o word_n which_o the_o knight_n cite_v where_o he_o say_v that_o indulgence_n begin_v not_o till_o a_o while_n after_o the_o saint_n or_o tremble_v of_o purgatotie_n by_o which_o also_o it_o do_v further_o appear_v that_o in_o his_o passage_n that_o renown_a prelate_n who_o not_o only_o with_o his_o pen_n but_o also_o with_o his_o sacred_a blood_n defend_v the_o roman_a faith_n as_o well_o in_o this_o as_o all_o other_o point_n be_v not_o sincere_o deal_v with_o nor_o pertinentlie_o allege_v to_o the_o true_a state_n of_o the_o question_n propose_v by_o our_o adversary_n now_o other_o author_n which_o sir_n humphrey_n city_n only_o affirm_v that_o much_o can_v not_o be_v say_v of_o indulgence_n of_o certainty_n &_o as_o undoubted_o true_a see_v scripture_n speak_v not_o of_o they_o expresselie_o as_o durand_n affirm_v to_o which_o purpose_n also_o antoninus_n speak_v &_o yet_o neither_o of_o they_o say_v that_o nothing_o can_v be_v speak_v with_o certainty_n of_o they_o which_o be_v not_o contrary_a to_o the_o doctrine_n of_o the_o romanist_n who_o although_o they_o believe_v there_o be_v sufficient_a ground_n of_o the_o power_n &_o truth_n of_o they_o in_o the_o bible_n yet_o they_o willing_o grant_v with_o all_o that_o diverse_a particular_n concern_v they_o be_v disputable_a among_o divine_n and_o it_o be_v clear_a that_o durand_n &_o s._n antoninus_n as_o they_o say_v only_o that_o pauca_fw-la few_o thing_n can_v be_v say_v with_o certainty_n of_o pardon_n or_o indulgence_n &_o that_o the_o scripture_n do_v not_o speak_v express_o of_o they_o so_o by_o the_o same_o reason_n evident_a it_o be_v that_o the_o same_o author_n grant_v that_o both_o some_o thing_n may_v be_v pronounce_v certain_o of_o they_o &_o also_o that_o at_o the_o least_o there_o be_v implicit_a &_o unexpressed_a mention_n or_o containement_n of_o they_o in_o the_o scripture_n to_o wit_n of_o power_n of_o the_o church_n to_o grant_v &_o use_v they_o which_o a_o lone_a be_v sufficient_a to_o show_v that_o they_o consequent_o maintain_v the_o universalite_n &_o antiquity_n of_o the_o roman_a doctrine_n in_o this_o point_n &_o impugn_v the_o contrary_a position_n of_o the_o false_a reformer_n who_o absolute_o &_o obstinate_o deny_v such_o power_n to_o reside_v in_o the_o church_n of_o god_n and_o as_o for_o that_o which_o durand_n affirm_v that_o diverse_a of_o the_o ancient_a father_n make_v no_o mention_n of_o indulgence_n yet_o he_o do_v not_o say_v that_o it_o do_v thence_o follow_v that_o they_o do_v reject_v the_o power_n or_o use_v of_o they_o in_o the_o church_n &_o much_o less_o do_v durand_n affirm_v that_o other_o ancient_a father_n do_v not_o mention_v they_o yea_o if_o he_o have_v affirm_v this_o yet_o he_o himself_o kewe_n well_o enough_o that_o this_o be_v but_o a_o negative_a argument_n at_o the_o most_o it_o prove_v nothing_o but_o that_o which_o follow_v of_o those_o ancient_a father_n silence_n in_o this_o matter_n be_v that_o they_o have_v not_o occasion_n to_o speak_v of_o they_o as_o other_o have_v or_o at_o the_o most_o that_o indulgence_n be_v not_o much_o in_o use_n in_o their_o time_n which_o do_v not_o contradict_v the_o romanist_n who_o do_v not_o stand_v upon_o defence_n of_o the_o frequent_a use_n of_o they_o in_o the_o primative_a church_n but_o of_o the_o power_n which_o they_o maintain_v to_o be_v as_o ancient_a as_o the_o spiritual_a power_n of_o bind_v &_o lose_v give_v by_o christ_n himself_o to_o the_o pastor_n of_o his_o church_n in_o most_o general_a and_o ample_a manner_n 16._o mat._n 16._o and_o to_o this_o i_o add_v that_o which_o sir_n humphrey_n for_o his_o own_o advantage_n omit_v in_o the_o citation_n of_o both_o durand_n &_o antoninus_n to_o wit_n that_o they_o both_o allege_v the_o testimony_n of_o s._n gregory_n for_o the_o use_n &_o actual_a grant_n of_o indulgence_n 3._o gregorius_n tamen_fw-la loquor_fw-la qu●_n etiam_fw-la indulgentias_fw-la rom●_n iustituit_fw-la instationibus_fw-la ut_fw-la dicitur_fw-la durand_n id_fw-la 4._o send_v d._n 20._o q._n 3._o which_o pope_n say_v they_o be_v report_v to_o have_v institute_v the_o roman_a station_n which_o word_n of_o durand_n &_o the_o like_a of_o s._n antoninus_n if_o the_o knight_n have_v rehearse_v as_o he_o ought_v to_o have_v do_v according_a to_o the_o law_n of_o plain_a deal_n the_o use_n of_o indulgence_n will_v have_v appear_v not_o to_o be_v so_o new_a as_o he_o indevore_v to_o persuade_v his_o reader_n touch_v the_o citation_n of_o caietan_n sir_n humphrey_n proceed_v no_o less_o insincere_o for_o in_o the_o same_o place_n which_o be_v his_o 15._o opuscle_n 1._o exit_fw-la his_fw-la hambetur_fw-la textibus_fw-la non_fw-la solum_fw-la quod_fw-la indulgentiarun_n gratia_fw-la antiqua_fw-la est_fw-la in_o christi_fw-la ecclesia_fw-la &_o non_fw-la nova_fw-la inventio_fw-la sed_fw-la habentur_fw-la clarè_v quatuor_fw-la etc._n etc._n caiet_fw-mi opusc_n 15._o c._n 1._o he_o add_v that_o in_o the_o four_o of_o the_o sentence_n it_o be_v allege_v by_o s._n thomas_n that_o s._n gregory_n do_v institute_v the_o station_n of_o indulgence_n &_o produce_v many_o other_o testimony_n out_o of_o the_o ecclesiastical_a decree_n he_o conclude_v thus_o out_o of_o those_o text_n it_o be_v have_v that_o the_o grant_n of_o indulgence_n be_v not_o only_o ancient_a but_o etc._n etc._n where_o also_o the_o reader_n be_v to_o be_v advertise_v that_o caietan_n be_v corrupt_v by_o sir_n humfreys_n translation_n of_o the_o word_n hunc_fw-la or_o hanc_fw-la they_o which_o the_o author_n refer_v to_o the_o begin_n or_o certainty_n of_o their_o begin_n not_o to_o the_o indulgence_n themselves_o or_o power_n to_o grant_v they_o and_o doubtless_o siluester_v prierias_fw-la have_v the_o same_o meaning_n where_o he_o say_v if_o so_o he_o say_v that_o pardon_n be_v not_o know_v unto_o we_o by_o the_o authority_n of_o the_o scripture_n but_o by_o the_o authority_n of_o the_o church_n of_o roman_a for_o the_o sense_n be_v that_o they_o be_v not_o express_o declare_v &_o deliver_v unto_o we_o by_o the_o text_n of_o the_o scripture_n in_o plain_a word_n but_o by_o the_o church_n who_o office_n it_o be_v to_o propose_v such_o doctrine_n in_o particular_a to_o the_o faithful_a as_o she_o find_v not_o so_o plain_o deliver_v in_o the_o scripture_n as_o they_o themselves_o can_v without_o her_o direction_n come_v to_o due_a knowledge_n of_o it_o and_o sure_o this_o athour_n be_v so_o far_o from_o deny_v the_o antiquity_n of_o the_o power_n &_o use_v of_o perdon_n that_o he_o profess_o defend_v the_o same_o against_o his_o profess_a adversary_n luther_n and_o the_o same_o i_o say_v of_o eckius_fw-la &_o tecelius_n who_o as_o sir_n humphrey_n can_v not_o be_v ignorant_a be_v also_o luther_n antagonist_n even_o in_o this_o particular_a to_o omit_v that_o he_o cite_v those_o two_o author_n only_o upon_o relation_n of_o the_o council_n of_o trent_n history_n in_o english_a to_o which_o as_o i_o have_v alreader_n note_v we_o give_v no_o credit_n nay_o &_o since_o i_o write_v this_o at_o first_o i_o find_v that_o prierias_fw-la eckius_fw-la &_o tecelius_n be_v false_o charge_v by_o the_o same_o false_a history_n of_o trent_n to_o have_v lay_v for_o their_o ground_n of_o indulgence_n the_o pope_n authority_n in_o their_o impugnation_n &_o