certain end if we take the Word Condition in its vulgar use for the whole stipulated part of the Bargain or Bond to be perform'd wholly by the restipulating party it s more apt to deceive vulgar People who have that Idaea of Condition to say its Conditional without Limitation than to say it 's not Conditional and do they think their Brethren have neither Power nor Skill to add Limitations to their not Conditional as well as they to their Conditional and fewer are Necessary viz. tho' Faith and Repentance are Gifts of Grace yet they are Duties and tho' the Lord calls effectually where he will and when yet our Consent is courted and wooed not forc'd we freely yield to the Spirits Conduct though our yielding is the Spirit 's Effect and Effects bear not the Name of Conditions The Sense then of the Apostle is this That no Works Ceremonial Moral with Faith or without it by the Spirit of Grace or Strength of Nature external or internal perfect or sincere no Works of any Law perform'd by us are either Merits Matter Form Legal Condition or Plea c. for our Justification before God they neither by Efficacy do Constitute it nor by Dignity deserve it What the Apostle has excluded without Limits we should The Arguments for the Truth of this follows next in the Text. So I come now to the second Part of the Verse which is the first Argument that proves we are not Justified by Works He hath whereof to glory but not before God The Argument is from the Topick of Impossibility or Absurdity the Matter is impossible and the Action is absurd that such a Worm as Man or any thing that is a Creature should boast or have ground of boasting before its Maker Much more absurd is it for this Creature becoming a Rebel and a Transgressor to boast of its Meritting a Pardon or rendring its Pardon a Justification If a Slave should break a Vessel of great worth and boast he could restore it or fatisfie for the Dammage when he is not his own it would be unbecoming but too mean a Type of this There are three things to be Treated in the Argument 1. The Form of it 2. The Truth of it 3. The Strength of it 1. The Form of the Argument is thus Maj. If Abraham were Justified by Works he has Matter of glorying Min. But Abraham has no Matter of glorying at least before God Concl. Ergo Abraham is not Justified by Works This is the general Interpretation of Protestants and some others Erasmus Vatablus Calvin Zegerus Beza Piscator Paraeus Dickson Hyperus Melancton Sclater Tuckney But there are Interpreters of great Number and Note that form the Argument in a contrary Method thus Maj. If Abraham were Justified by Works he would have no Matter of Glorying before God Min. But Abraham had Matter of Glorying before God viz. His Faith Concl. Therefore not Justified by Works Origen the first Interpreter says if Faith had not been a real Glory before God he would not have Imputed it to him in place of Works but there is no Reason to Impute this Error to Origen but his Popish Translator for we have no other Origen on this Epistle that I know Rufinus as we may read in his Preface to that Epistle p. 634. Basil They say there is so much of this work thy own that thou shouldst entitle it with thy own Name not Origens But tho' I have had an Herculean Labour in adding diminishing and altering yet I will not steal his Title that laid the Foundation but let the Reader ascribe the Merit of the Work to whom he will to him or to me I shall put both our Names in the Title They who form the Argument thus are of two kinds either 1. Those who differ both in Form of the Argument and in the Truth as the Papist Aquin. Sasbout Estius c. who say that Free-will affords a Man Matter of Glorying by it he has made himself differ from others Converted himself Prepared himself perform'd the Conditions of the Covenant May not a Work-man glory in his Work 2. Those who only differ in Grammar and Form as First The Fathers Chrys Faith thinks highly of God and so glorifies him Therefore he gloried not that he loved God but that God loved him Secondly Some Protestants as Bucer P. Mart. and also L. de Diu. His glorying before God was glorying in God 1 Cor. 1.31 He that glories let him glory in the Lord. Faith sends a Man out of himself to glory in God and in Christ I reject this Form of the Argument and embrace the former for these Arguments 1. The Propositions of the latter Argument are not in the Text but the contrary are the Text says not If Justified by Works he has no Matter of glorying but quite contrary He has Matter of glorying if justified by Works the Text says not He has Matter of glorying before God but Not before God so nothing of their Syllogism in the Text all the other is 2. Both the Propositions of their Argument are false The first is false That Works afford no Matter of glorying for Rom. 3.27 Glorying is not excluded by the Law of Works Eph. 2.9 If we were Sav'd by Works we would boast An Innocent Man has more Matter of Glorying in his Works that deserve a Justification than a Pardoned one whose Works deserve Damnation The Second is false That Abraham had any Matter of glorying for 1 Cor. 4.7 Who maketh thee to differ what hast thou that thou didst not receive if thou didst receive why dost thou glory 3. We find the same Apostle forming the Argument according to the first Eph. 2.9 We are not Sav'd by Works that we may not glory v. 10. 1. Because we are God's Work 2. Thorough Christ so a Relation there before 3. Good Works the End Ergo not the Mean Christ the Mean to our Good Works not Good Works the Mean of an Interest in him 4. From the following Argument v. 3. that Faith is imputed to Abraham for Righteousness proves no matter of glorying in Faith For 1. It is a Gift Eph. 2.8 Heb. 12.2 no glorying in a Gift 1 Cor. 4.7 2. Faith put for its Object or containing its Object makes glorying in God not before God 3. For the Exercise of Faith which is receiving trusting depending affords no more Matter of boasting before God than the Beggar 's glorying of his Receiving before his Benefactor and his Bounty 5. Those who do not Err as to the Matter commit a double Fault in the Grammar of the Words 1. To translate 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 before God or with God in God or from God as we may see from Parallel places 2 Cor. 2.17 As of God in the sight of God speak we Rom. 5.1 Being justified by Faith we have peace with God 1 John 3.21 If our Hearts Condemn us not then have we Confidence towards God So that the Sense is to have Matter of glorying
and ten Years after Christ oh the 12th Chap. 3. he cites Deuteronomy 29.1 These are the Words of the Covenant and thus expounds it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Covenant is nothing else but a Law and the Midrash on Leviticus distinguishes thus between Statutes Judgments and Laws in Chap. 26.46 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Law is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Doctrine Learning and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Statutes are Midrashoth Glosses Expositions and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Judgments are Hadaenin Decisions of Cases in Law and Aben Ezra on psal 19.8 gives this Etymon of it the Law is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Law because it shows the Right way and Converts Souls by taking away their Doubts and Fears But since they mean by Doctrine of Faith the Gospel and the Gospel being regulated by this Mediatorial Law Law of Faith and Doctrine of Faith are the same things and it is usual in Scripture to use a Law and its Works of Righteousness promiscuously Hence without the Law and without Works are the same and so the Law of Faith and the Doctrine of Faith are the same for it 's a Doctrine of what was done in Conformity to this Law Thirdly The Opposition between the two Members in this Text doth Confirm it for Law of Faith cannot be here understood a Law requiring Evangelical Faith as a specifical distinct Duty from the Works the other Law did require For first Faith it self is a Work 2 Thes 1.11 The Work of Faith with Power 1 Thes 1.3 Remembring your Work of Faith and in John To Work the Work of God is to Believe For thus there would be no Distinction betwixt the Law of Works and Law of Faith for the Moral Law required Faith in God and the Ceremonial Law required Faith in him that was Typified by their Sacrifices But to come nigher to this Opposition as it is explained by the Socinians and Arminians it must either lie in the Object or in the Precept or Duty but in none of them As to the Object God and Christ there is no Essential difference there for either it must be between the Persons and then there must be three Faiths specifically distinct Or it must be between the Office and Nature and we cannot say there is any greater Distinction there between God and Mediator than between God and Creator God and Preserver or Governor or Sanctifier all which are Incitements and Motives of our Faith or Love or as Mr. Durham calls it Objectum Considerationis or as Cloppenburgh Objectum Formale sub qua but not Ratio formalis quae vel propter quam and such distinct Formalities make no distinct Worship or Faith We see the Lords bringing the People out of Egypt is set down as an Incitement to their Observation of the Moral Law I am the Lord thy God which brought thee out of the Land of Egypt it is far from making a new Law distinct from the Moral so Gods becoming our Redeemer and delivering us out of the Regions of Darkness and Prisons of Bondage is the strongest Motive that ever was and this Sinning against such a Motive which is a Sin against the Gospel is the greatest Sin and as there is no specifically distinct Object in the first Table so there is none in the second to render our Evangelical Obedience to it distinct from our Moral For the Sympathizing with our Neighbour under Adversity as it s said Bear you one anothers Burdens and so fulfill the Law of Christ it is no farther remote from Loving our Brother being only Charity denominated from his Condition than not stealing of his goods from him killing of him bearing false Witness against him or those other Precepts are but it 's called the Law of Christ because that kind of Love was the Spring of all his Obedience to the Mediatorial Law the principal part of his Work was to bear our Burden but the Socinians are in a greater difficulty here than others who deny the Deity of Christ and yet do Religiously Worship him Their Work should be how to find out a new Table not how to find out a new Law to place a kind of Obedience in that is neither proper to God nor Man nor are they altogether free of this Task who thô they own the Mediator to be God yet as such talk of a specifical distinct Law of Duties to him from what we owe to God as to Repentance the Ability to perform it and the Acceptance of it being interrupted and imperfect Duty flows from the Gospel yet there is a Necessity that the Law it is regulated by be the same Law that was broken It was Mans Duty to Love God to fear him to have Faith in him and to obey him he has now by Sin omitted these Duties what is else the Essence of his Repentance but the repeating and renewing of it again that he that broke the Law now keep it If he observe not the Law he did violate it is no Repentance Repentance and Primitive Obedience differ no more than the Image of God that Man was created in and Regeneration which is a renewing of him to the same likeness of Knowledge Righteousness and Holiness as the Divine Nature is the rule of this Image both in one and the other else it were no Image so that Holy and perfect Law of God founded on what is his due from what he has been and is to the Creature called the Moral Law is the same Rule to our Actions distinct Formalities in Objects make distinct Sciences and Arts and may occasion distinct Precepts or Acts for it is an imperfect Law if it reach not to every Condition of the Subject Hence Suarez says The Law of Nature before and after the fall differ only as the Acts of the same Law in Time of Peace and War The Law says one thing to a Married Man and another to an Unmarried it has distinct Statutes to every Condition but the Law is one A Law meets with many changes and yet remains the same as a Man doth and is yet the same Man in Essence 1. In Use it may serve for directing the Obedient convincing and condemning the Guilty and be the same Law still So the Moral Law was that we were to be justified or condemn'd by in the Primitive State that use of it ceases when the Soveraign Prince Pardons then the Dignity of the Intercessor or his own Bowels of Mercy is his Measure So God now proceeds with us according to what our Mediator has done for us that is the Law of Faith not according to what we have done It is strange to say Faith in a Mediator will justifie and not Faith in God or that Faith in God belongs not to the Moral Law or that it s now having a Pardon for its Object and before a Reward brings it under another Law the Angels have many a new Duty and new Object of Faith but their Law remains the same 2. The
Law may meet with external Changes in its Administration either by Dispensation when positive only as the Ceremonial or an 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Abatement of the Rigor in Words but the Law the same that suffers the change 3. The Law may suffer some Change in particular Precepts which are its Integral Parts A Man is the same Man still thô he lose his Thumb Collective Bodies are capable of Increase or Decrease so Jus Collectum of Derogation Surrogation or Erogation but Abrogation or Obrogation alters the Essence and until the Moral Law is Abrogate we cannot expect one specifically distinct from it But the Opposition is perspicuous thus A Law that requires your Works a Law to be obey'd by you and a Law that requires your Faith a Law fulfill'd by another for you which you ought to believe and it thus Answers the Argument we are justified by most perfect Obedience but we perform'd it not it was Christ Fourthly It is manifest from the Context and Harmony of the Apostles Discourse he had all along join'd the Laws and the Works together which he excluded from Justification First The pure Natural Law among the Gentiles Secondly The manifold Mosaical now he tells us of a Righteousness and a Law that we may and must be justified by if at all is it reasonable or possible to separate these two Ver. 21 22. But now the Righteousness of God is manifested Even the Righteousness of God which is by Faith of Jesus Christ If the one be the Righteousness of Christ the Mediator surely the other is the Law of it shall we separate the Righteousness of Faith and the Law of Faith The Text would not be a good Conclusion from what precedes without this that which he had prov'd was there is no Justification by the Deeds of the Law but only by the Righteousness of God Well says he if the Case be so Where is your Boasting it is excluded He draws his Conclusion Triumphing over them How By the Law of Faith You are justifi'd by the Righteousness of God you are justifi'd in a way that excludes Boasting the Law of Faith excludes Boasting and the Righteousness of God justifies you do not then these two Coincide the one as the Work the other as the Command if it were another Law requiring a new kind of Obedience and Righteousness distinct from what he had spoken of he had drawn a Conclusion without any Premises There are two things should have been enlarged on First To prove that this Righteousness is the Righteousness of Christ as Mediator The Second Whether or not this Law of Faith referrs to the Righteousness as the Rule of it or the Faith by which it is applied Both which I must deferr to some proper Verses in the fourth Chapter only at present as to the first that 2 Pet. 1.1 may perswade any unprejudic'd Person Thorough the Rsghteousness of God and our Saviour Jesus Christ As to the second our Confession of Faith says We are not justifi'd by Faith or that is not imputed to us it self as an Act nor any other Evangelical Obedience But this is to be treated in ver 3. Fifthly This Law is a Law we can be justifi'd by and it is before prov'd that we cannot be by any Law requiring Obedience of us Sixthly The difficulties that attend the Explication of it by Socinians Arminians aliis melioris notae who say this Law is the Law of Christ the Mediator not as made under it but as a Law-giver requiring Faith and Repentance of us as the Condition of an Interest in his Merits and Justification by them I say the difficulties that attend it render it the less credible 1. This Gospel-law or Law of Faith must be a perfect Law requiring Faith in Perfection Repentance in Perfection and so other Evangelical Obedience Mr. Bull in his Examination who is Zealous for this New Law and who as Mr. Pitcarn one of his many Adversaries says is of the greatest Acumen of the kind he not only owns it but proves it from Christs own Words Mat. 5.48 when he was Promulgating his Law Be ye perfect as my Father in Heaven is perfect 2 Pet. 3.18 Grow in Grace and in the Knowledge of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ On which he thus Acutely Comments The Commands of growth have no Bounds nor Limits until we come to the Unity of the Faith and the Knowledge of the Son of God unto a perfect Man unto the Measure of the Stature of the fulness of Christ and it is a certain Truth that there is no Duty in the Gospel wherein Gods Law only requires sincere and not perfect Obedience Patience should have its perfect Work and that 's a special part of Evangelical Obedience Either the Gospel Law or Law of Faith must require Perfection of Obedience in these Duties or some other Divine Law else God would become an Indulger of Sin by Law if it be by another Law viz. the Moral that he requires perfect Obedience and by this sincere only then these two Laws differ but in Degree not in Specie or Kind because both require the same Duties or Works and so this Gospel Law would be no Distinct Law but only the Measure of sincere Obedience would receive a new use which we own it has to wit to be an Index and Mark of our Justification tho' we cannot own that use of its giving Right but to proceed a distinct Law they must hold or quit their Cause or this Foundation of it for the Text sets the Law of Faith down as an opposite Law to that of Works and that they hold 1. Then if it be a perfect Law requiring perfect Obedience there is no possibility of Justification in this Life Poppius the Arminian grants the Conclusion that our Obedience must be consummate before our Assurance and others distinguish between a Compleat and Partial Justification the former is not they say until the day of Judgment But this is not all the difficulty for it 's the adding a Load to a Burden Is this Gospel to a Man that is unable to perform the least part of the Moral Law to tell him that God or the Mediator requires perfect Obedience to it for the Future and another too Or is this Gospel to say you shall perish Aeternally and have the Fire of Hell seven times heated if you obey not this Gospel It s indeed a Conditional Hell but it 's more dreadful than the Law-Hell and the Condition is more impossible because we have less Power to shun this difficulty of two perfect Laws Mr. Bull owns no other perfect Law but this Gospel-Law since Man fell but by shunning one difficulty he falls into two as great 1. Then the Moral Law is abrogated beside the falsness of the Doctrine it self for it is impossible that should cease to be our Duty to love God with all our Heart and Soul what Advantage brings Christs Death To abrogate one perfct Law and
either in Matter or Manner The Use I shall make of this is of Refutation for since none can pretend to be justified by any Works but such as are good and acceptable in the sight of God and none are such that want the foremention'd Qualifications all the distinctions of Adversaries about the Kinds of Works are to no purpose That this may be more evident I shall rank them under these four Kinds 1. The Socinians who say that the Apostle means Works in their Perfection that are excluded from a divine condescendency to our Impotency he will not require what we cannot perform but will justifie us for what we can Resp 1. If we did and always had perfectly fulfill'd the Law we should have been justifi'd by its Works Rom. 2.13 The doers of the Law shall be justified 2 Tit. 3.7 Not by works of righteousness which we have done 2. It would heinously reflect on the Holiness of God as a Law-giver or Judge to make an Imperfect Law or to Judge a Man just for Imperfect Performance of a Perfect Law Gal. 3.10 Cursed is he that continues not in all things c. The Second Opinion is of them who exclude the Mosaical Law and these of two and may be more sorts 1. Some exclude only Ceremonies and indeed the Controversie began about them Act. 15. the Instances by Paul most mention'd are of that kind Gal. 2.14 16. and by their resemblance of a Remedying Nature the Jews mistook them for the thing it self Thus Lombard and the Schoolmen Alphons a Cast Dom. a Soto But the Law the Apostle speaks of as the Rule of the Works he excludes cannot be Confin'd so narrowly for Rom. 2.15 it 's a Law that the Gentiles had Rom. 3.20 28. a Law that bound all Flesh a Law by which the Knowledge of sin Rom. 4.14 a Law that worketh Wrath. 2. By others the whole Works of the Mosaical Law are excluded in the Pharisaical Sense of them that is as separated from the Essential Duties of the Covenant as given to Adam Noah and Abraham Respon 1. I grant that the Pharisees did mistake the Law in its Extent and Intent too the former Christ corrects Mat. 5. but it 's very reasonable to think that they who had now embraced Christ to whom the Apostle writes had forsaken that Error for the Apostle's Dispute is of another kind not what was their Duty or Work but what place this Work or Duty had with respect to its Reward Whether or not it was truly Meriting and his Business is to prove that let their Works be what they would they could never serve for this Use and the Apostle tells them Rom. 10.4 5. that they did not know Christ compleatly viz. that he was the End of the Law who would put such a Value on their own Works Sir Nor. Knat Observes on Rom. 2.14 that the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Work of the Law signifies the Office of the Law this was to Convince a Man of Sin that he might fly to Christ as Galat. 3. 't is called a School-master to bring us to Christ The Law is the Mean He is the End The Moral Law was a Mean to make them sensible of their Need of Christ and the Ceremonial was a Mean to represent him as the End of the other as One who was a Sacrifice and gave satisfaction for their Breach of the Law 2. The Apostle gives no Countenance to this Opinion in his Phrase for Galat. 3.21 If there had been a Law given c. There is an Impossibility in any Law or its Works prescribed to Adam Noah or Abraham since Man was a Sinner to Merit in any sense Justification at the Hand of God 3. Romans 3.20 21 22. The Apostle calls the Works he excludes Works of the Law not in any abstracted sense but Works that the Law required and the Mosaical Law comprehended all the former Laws under it as Joh. 7.32 Ye received Circumcision of Moses not that it was of him but of the Fathers And when the Mâ—saical and the Christian Constitution are opposed Mosâ—ical comprehends the whole Old Testament State 4. The Righteousnesses that are in this Epistle opposed are God's and Mâ—n's not Adam's essential Duties in the first Edition of the Naked Covenant and Moses his in the Political Administration of it Rom. 3.22 The Syriac renders it thus The Righteousness of God by the hand of Faith on that Jesus Christ Not a Righteousness that is God's Gift and is acceptable to God by Virtue of his prescribing it as the Condition he required a Righteousness that lay in the Fruits of Faith or in the Nature of Faith from its Conformity to the Law of the Covenant but a Righteousness that Faith as a Hand takes hold of 5. This Law the Apostle speaks of comprehends all inward Obedience all Righteousness Vid. Ch. 3. and 7. of this Epistle nay the Pharisee Mat. 22. did conclude Love to God to be the great Duty of the Law 3. The third Opinion is of Grotius who if the Writings that go under his Name and have so much Corrupted the Age be his own he was both a Papist and Apostate or if Mr. Baxter's Grotian Errors and that other Book called Grotius Papizans or Walleus in N. T. Preface be to be Credited indeed his Doctrine on this very Point of Justification is a very great Proof it as his Comments on the Epistles doth testifie especially this for tho' they are as Corrupt as he in their Disputes yet rarely in their Expositions are any Papists so Corrupt His Doctrine is thus 1. Works that are only External Civil deserving Praise of Men and by Humane Strength performable are excluded from an Interest in Justification 2. Faith of God is an Esteem of his Attributes and Faith of Christ is the Knowledge of him and his Doctrine 3. To Justifie is to Purifie to Cleanse from Vice so the Works are hypocritical the Faith historical and that which Devils has the Justification papistical Resp 1. It 's very improbable that the Apostle should Dispute so Nervously that a Man cannot be Internally Sanctified by External Works and as improbable that any should be so absurd to maintain it that a Man may become Just by Hypocritical Performances that external Civility is internal Holiness 2. That Law Rom. 7.7 14. requir'd more than external Works 3. Abraham had better Works than External and Paul when he knew nothing by himself yet not thereby Justified did not mean only External 4. They were what Works the Law requir'd and the God that searcheth Hearts nevâ—r made a meer External Law to Judge Men by 4. The fourth Opinion is that which is common among Papists 1. Works before Faith are excluded but not after Faith Sorrow for Sin without the Aids of Grace doth not Merit Preparatory Works to Grace doth not Merit though some and that generally allow a Congruity and Fitness to them others as Becanus deny it This is no more true
in Vain They who did not believe in Christ would grant all his Arguments viz. that Christ died in Vain with respect to that End of Redemption of Sinners under the Law Galat. 4.5 And not only Professors of Faith but real Saints being sanctified in Heart and Life as may be seen by the Apostles answer to that Objection Rom. 6.1 The Objection lies thus If Grace be glorified in pardoning of Sin and our own Works have no Interest in obtaining the Right of Pardon then our Works are useless but our Sin useful Let 's continue in Sin that Grace may abound and the like Rom. 3.5 If our Vnrighteousness commend the Righteousness of God how can God be Righteous in punishing man Had it been the Works of any one kind of Law that the Apostle had been here excluding the most proper Answer had been by Distinction of Laws and Righteousness viz. thô Ceremonial Works be excluded yet Moral Obedience is requisite or thô the Moral Law be excluded and its Works yet Evangelical Obedience is not exâ—luded But the Apostles answer is of another kind viz. How shall we that are dead to Sin live any longer therein and he that 's dead is justified from Sin The Strength of his Answer is founded on the necessâ—ry Connexion between Justification and Sanctification the Blâ—ssing of the one is the Badge of the other Bellarmine's Answer to this Argument savours neither of Honesty nor Subtlety viz. Saints do many things that are not Evangelical Obedience many of their Works have neither Faith as a Principle nor Gods Glory as their End but who did ever expect to be justified before God on the account of their Sins and Transgressions The very Pagans supplicate for the Pardon of such Crimes and here the Apostle is disputing against a Company of seduced Christians 2. Arg. As the Works of all Men are excluded so all kind of Works are excluded There is no Man can do any Works that can be ground of Right to Pardon or Glory We have Apostolical Testimony for this Ephes 2.9 Not of Works lest any Man should boast There are in that Text four Arguments excluding Works from our Salvation 1. An Opposite Principle Grace By Grace are we saved therefore not by Woâ—ks By Gods Gift not your Merit 2. The ill consequent that would follow our Works being exalted to such a Dignity vsz Boasting lest any Man should Boast A third is from the distorting of Divine Order in the Method of our Salvation by putting Works before the Promise We are his Workmanship created in Christ Jesus unto good Works which God had before ordained The Divine Order lies thus 1. A Pre-ordination unto Holiness 2. An Union with Christ as the great mean thrô whom its consistent wiâ—h a just God to bestow Blessings on Man 3. There is the Blessing it self our being new moulded by a New Creation for New Ends Lastly comes in the result of all good Works unto good Works Holiness is a Possession it 's a begun Heaven and the Right of Title must be before the Possession Fourthly The Reason is added why they might be occasion of Boasting because we are the Subjects of that Grace Should Boast for we are his workmanship that we should walk in them What is in us is ours as shall be prov'd which is directly contrary to what is asserted by the Adversaries that Works from Grace will not give occasion to Glory The like is asserted of the Text A Man is justified by Faith without the Deeds of the Law and Galat. 2.16 Knowing that a Man is not justified by the Works of the Law but by the Faith of Jesus Christ I cannot here pass Bellarmine's Exception to this last Text from the Vulgar Translation which renders it thus Nisi Except by the Faith of Jesus Christ so he would make the Sence run thus A Man is not justified by the Works of the Law except these Works flow from Faith so that Evangelical Works here have room in the Matter of Justification For the Refutation of which I shall rejoin these Considerations Nisi signifies sometimes But Cic. De re nihil judicare possum nisi mihi certè persuadeo te talem virum nihil temere facere Ter. Nescio nisi mihi Deos satis scio iratos fuisse The Greek is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which often in the New Testament must be translated but and signifies adversatively Matth. 26.42 If this Cup may not pass away from me except I drink it The Opposition is there Adversative And Matth 12.4 And did eat the Shew-bread which was not lawful for him to eat but only for the Priest John 5.19 The Son can do nothing of himself but what he seeth the Father do 3. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is the Synonymon of it and that is most frequently in the Septuagint and also in the New Testament put adversatively 4. The Syriack in this Text is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from the Hebrew 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and from it is the Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 all which signifies but so thô the Apostle wrote 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he spoke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or rather took 'em both in one Sence 5. These proves that it may be as properly translated but as except but Scripture Interpreting it self shews that it must be translated but and therefore our Translation is preferable to the Vulgar For 1. Other Texts in express Terms put Faith and Works Adversatively and not Conditionally and therefore if it contradict not it self must be so understood here Rom. 3.28 A Man is justified by Faith without the Deeds of the Law Without cannot signifie a Condition 2. The Text shews that the form of the Argument is Disjunctive thus A Man is either to be justified by the Works of the Law or by the Faith in Jesus Christ but a Man is not justified by the Works of the Law but by the Faith of Jesus Christ as we may see Thirdly In the Applicatory Conclusion Even we have believed in Jesus Christ that we might be justified by the Faith of Christ and not by the Works of the Law Any new Law must suppose an Abrogation of the old but that was impossible and thereâ—ore there was a necessity of Christs fulfilling it for us but he having fulfill'd it for us by a kind of Equity our imperfect Obedience is accepted for Duty but not for a Condition of Life which I shall enlarge on the second part of the Text. 3 Arg. As all Mens Works and all Works of all Men are excluded so all Law is requiring Works of us Galat. 3.21 If there had been a Law given which could have given Life verily Righteousness should have been by the Law But this has been spoken to under the third Head 4 All Evangelical Obedience being imperfect it can never be the Matter of our Justification for what needs a Pardon for it self cannot Merit a Pardon for another If it cannot stand the Test of the
Condition Eph. 1.5 Having predestinated us unto the Adoption of Children to the Praise of the Glory of his Grace if the Intention was Free why not the Execution Rom. 9.11 That the purpose of God according to Election might stand not of Works but of him that calleth Rom. 11.6 There is a Remnant according to the Election of Grace and if by Grace then is it no more of Works otherwise Grace is no more Grace but if it be of Works then is it no more Grace otherwise Works are no more Works This Opposition is not between Grace and External Works but between the very Nature of Grace and Works they are repugnant they can no more be the Moral Causes or Motives of any one Action than one individual thing can be White and Black in the same part So our Calling is Free 2 Tim. 1.9 Who hath sav'd us and call'd us with an Holy Calling not according to our Works but according to his own Purpose and Grace as Purpose gives Measure to Calling so Calling gives Measure to Justification Rom. 8.13 Whom he did predestinate them he also Call'd but it is equally free Rom. 3.24 Being justified freely by his Grace What is wrought in the Soul by Calling has no more Influence in our Justification than our Justification has on our being Glorified Whom he Justified them he Glorified But Justification can never merit Glory being Gods Act but is only a Prior Blessing in Order this Equality of Freedom solves an Objection which is to many in appearance a great Argument for Admission of our Evangelical Obedience unto a Subordinate Merit or ground of Right to our Justification The Objection is founded on these Scriptures Rom. 4.14 If they which are of the Law be Heirs Faith is made void and the Promise is of none Effect Gal. 2.21 If Righteousness come by the Law then Christ is dead in Vain Chap. 5.4 Christ is become of none effect to you whosoever of you are justified by the Law ye are fallen from Grace The Objection is thus formed Our Works are no farther excluded from Justification than they exclude Faith Christ and the Promise from Justification but Evangelical Obedience Gospel or gracious Works do not exclude Grace for they are the Fruits of Grace nor Faith for they flow from it nor the Death of Christ for that has purchas'd it nor the Promise for they are conveyed through it therefore Gospel Obedience is not excluded from Justification Resp 1. This Evangelical Obedience does not exclude Grace Faith Christ and the Promise from our Sanctification thus explain'd Because it owns good Works to flow orderly from them all but it does not suffer them to have an equal Freedom in our Justification because these Works though the Fruits of Grace they are as much ours as Adams Works were For God was the Author of the Ability by which they were wrought therefore when what is ours truely and properly is a Legal or Federal Condition in order to enjoying the one and not the other makes a great difference between the Freedom of the one and the other All Christians Experience witnesses the Labour Pains and Sweat that is necessary to Mortification of Lusts and Exercise of Grace and by this Opinion we must look on Justification as the Reward of our own Labour thô we must look on Sanctification as a Free Gift 1. In particular there is a Derogation from the Fulness of Christ his Satisfaction to the Law was not Compleat if our Obedience to the Law be one Penny of the Price 2. From Grace that will be all or nothing in this Affair according to Rom. 11.6 it will admit of no Composition if Works come any way in as a Plea they must either be perfect or we must be condemned for there is no Law in Scripture requires less than Perfection the Law that requires Faith requires perfect Faith and the Law that requires Patience requires perfect Patience Therefore we must fall from Grace that is be certainly Condemned if justified by the Law So Works won't admit of Grace more than Grace will admit of Works Grace will have nothing the Law will have Perfection the Composition is a Contradiction 3. It derogates from Faith that is from its Office which is alone in this Work and that as receiving not as doing we are justified by Faith as we are nourished by our Appetite Hence is it call'd Eating Drinking Hungring Thirsting it is the Food not the Appetite that nourishes us 4. It derogates from the Promise because it Promises Remission of Sin Inheritance of Life freely but this puts in an exceptive Clause of something on our part first to be done Faith will be only Applicative alone in the Office tho' not in the Subject or not at all Christ will be alone the Meriting Cause or not at all Grace alone the End and Motive or not at all and therefore these Arguments are as strong against Compounders of Grace and Works as against Opposers because the Compounding is an Opposing Divine Wisdom and Order A Man that Digs tho' the Spade be borrow'd of his Master will not think his Wages Charity at Night but on as exact Justice due as he that digg'd with his own A Man that walks twenty Miles a day after his Lame Leg restor'd will never impute the Journey to the Physician And thus Christ and Free Grace tho' inabling us to Work would lose their Honour and Glory in Justification I am now come to the last part of the Text viz. The Law we may be justified by without ground and danger of boasting which is the Law of Faith All Christians are generally agreed that this Law is the Evangelical Law the Law of Chancery or Equity but all are not agreed about the Nature and Kind of that All agree that there can be no Salvation or Justification by the Moral Law in its full Rigour requiring Perfect Personal and Perpetual Obedience requiring the Righteousness of our Persons as well as our Works since Sin There must be some Room for Equity or none for Hopes there is a Triple Application of this Equity some applies it to the Sanction of the Law some to the Duty of the Law and some to the Persons subject to the Law The first is Originisme saying the Equity lies in the Mitigation of the Punishment an Eternal Death by Desert is turned into a Temporary by Justice of Equity and a Perpetual Hell into a Transitory Purgatory The second Opinion applies it to the Duty and Works of the Law before there was required Perfect Obedience now imperfect will serve if it be Sincere Divine Government is content to take a Penny in a Pound and of this Way there are several Explications The Socinians who deny Christs Deity and Satisfaction do hold that it 's of meer Soveraign Mercy but Arminians and Papists hold the Merits of Christ as the Fruit of that Soveraign Mercy to be the immediate Foundation of this Justice of Equity They say he
1. It is a Righteousness from God as the Author of it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so it 's expressed in the third of the Philippians it is the Gift of his Grace the Contrivance of his Wisdom and the Effect of his Power It is the Gift of his Grace Rom. 5.17 Much more they which receive abundance of Grace and of the Gift of Righteousness 2 Tim. 1.9 It is a Grace given us in Christ before the World began but is now made manifest By this Righteousness of God Death is abolished and Life and Immortality brought to light God that so loved the World as to give his Son for them gave all things with him and this none of the least of the Gifts which is as freely given as any other for we are Justified freely by his Grace It is also a Fruit of the depth of the Riches of the Knowledge of God the Angels stand amazed at the Contrivance the most Sagacious of them would have been non-plus'd if asked by what Righteousness a Sinner could be justified It 's one of those things God hath prepared that neither Eye hath seen nor Ear heard nor ever Heart considered it is also an Effect of Infinite Power what Power less could have united Divine and Humane Nature in one Person What Power less could have made a Virgin Conceive What Power less could have brought a Clean thing out of an Unclean and Caused one to be born of a Woman and partake of Humane Flesh and Blood and yet be Sinless It is a kind of Generation none can declare What Power less could have done that great Work and Service he was appointed by this Law The Angels that excell in Strength being all put together could never have performed a thousand part of it the restoring of all things to their Primitive Beauty and Order What Power less could bear the Burden of Guilt the weight of one Sin is an intolerable burden to a Soul No Man were able to stand if God should mark Iniquity but this sure Foundation Stone bore the guilt of the whole World but never did yield nor give way did neither shrink split or flinch he is a tried Stone and found to be a sure Foundation he could rise again from the Grave notwithstanding the weight of this Grave-stone of Guilt 2. It 's the Righteousness of God Subjectively because the Righteousness of that Person who is God as the Blood of the Humane Nature is called the Blood of God to feed the Church of God which he hath purchased with his own Blood All the Works of his Person by Reason of their Conformity to the Mediatorial Law are called Righteousness Rom. 10.3 Have not submitted themselves unto the Righteousness of God for Christ is the end of the Law So we see the Righteousness of God is the Righteousness of Christ ◠Person in whom the Law gained all its ends for he obeyed all its Precepts he suffered all its Threatnings and he purchased all its Promises too 3. It 's the Righteousness of God in Opposition to all Humane Righteousness it 's his in Opposition to our own he is Jehovah our Righteousness not Adam's or Mans Righteousness 4. It is the Righteousness which alone God can accept a Sinner for he cannot be Just and yet justifie a Guilty Person for any other Righteousness but this he is the Lamb that takes away the Sins of the World This was the Sacrifice God was well pleased with God is pleased with the Sacrifices of a broken Spirit for part of Duty being Sincere but for no part of the price This is my Beloved Son in whom I am well pleased Isa 42.21 The Lord is well pleased for his Righteousness sake Act. 13. For all that Believe by him are justified from all things By the Obedience of one many are made Righteous Rom. 5.19 Secondly It is without Law 1. As to its Existence obliging us it was not directed or regulated by Ceremonial Judicial or Moral Law for tho' it may be call'd the Natural Law of a Mediator because one cannot be a Mediator without performing such Duties yet it 's distinct from any other Law Moral or Natural taken in its whole Latitude these are distinguish'd as a part from the whole 2. It was manifested without the Law now for tho' the Ceremonial did represent it that Dispensation was at an end it was now more perspicuously Taught the Moral never taught it 3. We are interested in it without Law we cannot be interested in any other Righteousness without obeying the Law Directing and Commanding it but we are interested in this by Believing Thirdly It is witness'd to by the Law and Prophets Isa 2.2 Out of Zion shall go forth the Law and the Word of the Lord from Jerusalem Prucknerus thus This is the Law of Faith Rom. 3.27 The Hearing of Faith Gal. 3.2 The Word of Faith Rom. 10.8 This is the Gospel the Gospel is the Narration of all Christ has done for us with the offer of it to us and all he did was ordered by the Mediatorial Law and therefore is called a Law Hackspanus thus Jalkut on this place says All the Consolations which God is to give to Man shall arise out of Sion for it is said Out of Sion shall go forth a Law Hence the Jews did expect their Salvation as well as we and they bear Testimony that it is no new Law but a new Doctrine and the Text it self calls it the Word of the Lord from Jerusalem to wit that Word which was the Subject of the Apostolical Sermons which Rom. 1. was the Gospel Another Testimony we have from the 19th Psalm where it is said The Law of the Lord is Perfect Converting the Soul that by this is meant the Apostolical Doctrine may be seen from Rom. 10.18 where it 's cited that it was Prophesied their sound should go to the Ends of the Earth that the Gospel Light should be as Vniversal as that of Sun and Moon The Papists pretend to prove the Corruption of the Original Text because what the Hebrews calls Lines both the Version of the Seventy and the New Testament translated Sound their sound went unto all the Earth but in Sence they are agreeable For the Sun and Moon have their Course by Lines which Lines do Tipifie the Travels of the Apostles and their Followers or the spreading of a Voice by Lines in the Air Bellarm. Capell and Grot. think the Word was formerly read Kolam and by Corruption turned into Kavam but the Masora Marks it to be an once read Word whereas Kolam by their marks is read fifteen times As the Prophets bare Testimony to this Law so they do to its Righteousness Jer. 23.6.33.16 This is the Name whereby he shall be called The Lord our Righteousness Abravanel reads thus This is the Name whereby the Lord shall call him to wit the Messias our Righteousness wherein he grants the Office of the Messiah but denies his Divinity but the Accent joining Lord and
AN EXPOSITION OF THE SECOND VERSE OF The Fourth CHAPTER OF THE Epistle to the ROMANS WITH AN APPENDIX ON CHAP. III. VER 27. The former being the Summ of Fifteen Sermons the latter of Five for further Explication of that Great Doctrine of JUSTIFICATION By WALTER CROSS M. A. LONDON Printed by J. A. for the Author and are to be Sold by Tho. Parkhurst at the Bible and Three Crowns at the lower end of Cheap-side near Mercers-Chappel 1694. TO The RIGHT HONOURABLE S ir William Ashurst Kt. AND LORD MAYOR OF THE CITY of LONDON My LORD THis little Book is brought forth in due Season to Congratulate your Inauguration into an Office of that Trust and Honour that admits no Citizen in Europe to be your Equal The Subject of it is such as not only becomes the greatest Prince as well as meanest Peasant to Study but it is absolutely Necessary they should for none of their Affairs are of so great a Concern as the Pardon of their Sin and the Salvation of their Souls Yet I am so distrustful of my Management of so great a Subject that neither this nor the Honour of your Acquaintance nor the Knowledge of your Impartial Judgment or Condescending Temper had prevailed with me to prefix your Name to it tho' I often did deliberate upon it but its Edition so immediately following your Election and its Publication being within the Verge and under the first Dawnings of your Authority it could not be Civil without Saluting you and Craving your Patronage and it gives me the Opportunity to tell You that I and I believe thousands more who have no Vote of Election do enjoy our Wishes and are put in great hopes of a Reformed City I bope you will be as far from Patronizing Error as Protecting Vice but there is nothing in this little Piece to my Knowledge contrary to the Confessions of our common Protestant Faith Indeed there is a Notion about Faith that I may call New in it viz. That as the Author of our Faith is the Author of our Justification Christ Jesus and the Object of our Faith the Merit of our Justification Christs Righteousness and the Exercise of our Faith upon this Merit as the great Mean through which Divine Love Grace and Mercy is conveyed to us is the Condition of our Justification so the Gift of Faith is the Sentence of our Justification or Sign of it for if the Spirit be an Earnest of Heaven much more is it of Pardon It 's true by this the Gift is before the Condition which all grant but the Sign or Signification of the Gift which is the Sentence is at least in order of Nature after the Condition for we not only do not perceive but we cannot perceive this Gift and consequently it cannot signifie divine Favour to us untill mixt with our spirit for our Observation is from our Experience This being new I have proposed it to be tried before trusted a Conditionality of the Covenant is a principal Pillar of Popery Socinianism and Arminianism according to their several modes of Explication and therefore the very sound of the Word fills the Heart of sincere Protestants with Jealousie But if we allow Faith and Repentance those absolute Gifts and Effects of special Grace to be Signs of special Grace and Favour or Pardon for a Man cannot be in a state of Grace without Pardon there is room for Duty and Conditional Duty without any Jealousie of these Errors I pray the Lord may Confirm your Election with such an Unction that may signifie his own Approbation of you Mercy to us by You and that may fit you fully for the place It is a Place that never wanted Difficulties nor are they like to decrease in your Day the greater they grow the more Need you have of the Favour and Fruition of Him who is of God made unto us Wisdom as well as Righteousness and a Councellour as well as a Saviour his providential Conduct in immediate directing of the Judgment and Inclining of the Will of his Favourites when plunged in difficult Affairs or surrounded with dangerous Circumstances fully supplies the want of Urim and Thummim No doubt the Hopes of so many People being terminated on You and so great things being expected from You renders you concerned but both of them may as truly encourage you For what do we expect but that you be of a Publick Spirit that your Aims and Ends be as publick as your Place and Office for the Common Wealth or the common Good of the City It 's but of late that People have enjoyed this Security that their most Supream Magistrates are in no private Plott against their common Good but tho we are now secure as to the Throne we are not as to all Places of Trust under it What do we expect but the Impartial Administration of Justice to great or small high or low rich or poor friend or foe However unjust Mens Actions are their Consciences will cry It is just it is just when they suffer most severe Punishment for their Crimes Honesty is the best Policy and needs least the Volumes of Politick Axioms an upright single-hearted Man with a general Notion of the Laws and Customs of the Land will do more Service with a few obvious Rules that almost every man knows than a Cunning Man can with all his Skill when he makes use of it for upholding him out of the Road of Equity and Righteousness What do we expect but that the Prophanity of this City should now meet with an Hearty Enemy in the Chair and you have a Notable Opportunity for shewing your self so Wickedness being grown to that height that it is an Injury yea a Ruine to many Families who could wink at it while it remained only under the Form of a Sin or an Offence He that will become a Check and a Terror to it now will receive the Praise and enjoy the Hearts of all Parties who would not have their Posterity rot in Bawdy-houses or made publick Examples of Justice at Tyburn or their Estates purchased by labour and industry or preserved by pains parcimony and prudence drank away in Taverns or thrown away at a Game You will become the City's great Benefactor in delivering it from such a Ruine You will receive an Honour far above the Honour of your Office if it may be recorded that Profanity which has so long increas'd did decay and receive its Deaths-wound under the Maioralty of Sir William Ashurst A zealous acting against Vice and Profanity will not only be for your Honour and the City's good but it will be an acting for God who is of purer Eyes than to behold Iniquity the nigher you are brought to him the more you ought to be like him the more he Honours you the more you ought to Honour him He has generally given to you the Hearts of the City will you suffer that Kindness to be in vain He hath promised both Strength and Reward
bear both the Place of a Sentence and a Condition which is needfull to reconcile these two Opinions R. 1. By Condition they mean not a Condition properly in a Law or a foederal Sence as we use the Word in Bargains between Man and Man for the Civilians inform me these three Properties make a Condition 1. Potestative that it be in the Parties Power to perform 2. Casualty in it self and to the other Party uncertain 3. Causal in that it bear a Valuable Consideration The Law will not suffer a Man to injure himself so far or another to deceive him as to get a Title to an Estate of two or three hundred Pounds per Ann. for an hundred Guineas But the Apol. informs us that This Condion is neither in our Power 2. Nor Uncertain 3. Nor Meritorious therefore not a Condition properly Nay further tho' the Gospel be a Law and this Law is the Condition of the Covenant yet it is not a Legal Condition Therefore it must be in a Physical or Logical Sence if not in a Law Sence and a Necessary Connection is enough for the one viz. Logical as if a Man be Reasonable he is capable of Learning and if capable of Learning he is reasonable and Priority enough for the other as that Wood must be laid to the Fire before it can be burnt And this Opinion is very agreeable with Condition in this Sence for there is not only a Necessary Connexion between Faith Repentance and Justification but there is a Priority the Covenant of Grace partakes more of Orderliness it is Order'd in all things than of Conditionalness for the Foundation is before the Relation the Sign before the Signification the Gift of Faith and Repentance is before its Connotation of our Pardon or being receiv'd into Favour Nay further there is not only the Gift of Faith but the exercise of this Grace as mix'd with our Faculties and become a Duty in order of Nature antecedent to this Connotation or Signification of our being now brought under Divine Favour because the way of Communicating this Gift is by Calling speaking immediately to the Soul and representing spiritual Ideas making us behold as in a Glass the glorious Image of the Lord discovering unseen and hoped for things as before and after both is further explained and the Gift cannot be without this exercise by which God and the Soul unite and mutually apprehend one another In short thus That this Gift may not only be long unperceiv'd by the Receiver but that it cannot Signifie untill in Exercise tho' as a Gift it doth signifie There is but one thing more that Justification and Glory are suspended upon these Duties of Faith and Repentance R. Either by Suspension he means no more but Necessary Consequential so we Agree and I do not find his Arguments will prove more For a Testament is fully as proper a Title that gives Name to the whole Bible as Covenant or Bargain and Civilians say the If used in Testaments which is so frequent in Scriptures is a demonstrative If that doth not Suspend but Design the thing Promised and some certain Time or Manner of Conveyance If he understand it a Legal Suspension it 's the same with a Legal Condition which he has deny'd before for Conditio est dispositionis suspensio ex eventu incerto ei opposito and has an Obliging Influence on the Promiser and Conferrs a Title of Right to the Benefit promised I might Conclude this with some Testimonies out of the Fathers but though I find Phrases to answer my Purpose I find the Style sometimes Loose and Oratorical and sometimes they Design another thing which I wish a late Author had minded who Attempts to prove the New Law out of the Fathers when Daille who was better acquainted with them says It 's in vain to make them Judges in many of the Controversies between us and the Papists and yet this Authour would bring them to Prove a more Nice Point become a very late Question In what sense the Law is New thoro the Gospel or the Gospel may be call'd a Law I shall only instance his first Citation out of Justin Martyr p. 228. c. and I am willing to be judged by any of the Subscribers that will take the Pains to read it if Justin intends any thng more than the recommending the Christian Constitution and proving it preferable to the Mosaical For he says This New Law is Posterior to Moses his Law but the Apologist's New Law has been ever since the Fall of Adam He says this New Law is Christ and his Testament Any may see he took Law in no strict Sense when he calls Christ and his Testament a Law he calls it a Testament Eight times in that Page and nigh Seventy times in that Dialogue and seldom I think not above Four times a Law without the Explicatory word Testament added yet I think this Opinion will help to wrest the Fathers out of the Papists Hands The Fathers use the Words Justifie and Sanctifie often promiscuously for making Just and Holy The common Answer by Protestants is the Fathers use the Word according to its Grammatical Signification not Forensical Use To which the Papists answer Then they were not acquainted with that sense This affords another for we may say to Sanctifie is to Justifie in the same Sense that Christ says This Bread is my Body that is a Sign of it And so we may understand the Fathers Est or Is Metonymically for est Signum and we may find enough among their Writings to shew that all the Parts and Degrees of Sanctification are Signs of Justification which doth sufficiently shew that tho' this Phrase is New that the Gift of the Holy Spirit in order to our Sanctification stands in the room and place of a Justificatory Sentence yet the Sense is not for it is the Sign yea the spiritual Initiating Sign of our being in Covenant with God This is the Covenant I will make with them I will pour out my Spirit on them Being in Covenant is a Relative Blessing as well as Justification and they are inseparable Now says the Lord my giving my Spirit imports this I take thee to be one of my People I avouch thee this Day to be mine The Prince's Proclamation of Pardon to a Rebel or the Judges Justificatory Sentence of a Person suspected accused imprison'd is the first Authoritative Signification of the Governments Favour So what is the first Sign of Divine Favour must stand in the place of a Justifying or Pardoning Sentence but these absolute Blessings that are proper to the Elect of Faith and Repentance are the first Intimations of Divine Governments receiving us into Favour therefore the Gift of them is the Absolving Sentence A third Propos'd Head was the Time of our Justification which being meant of the first Act necessarily follows from the former Proposition to be neither later nor sooner than the first Moment of our Conversion
than the others for v. 3. Abraham had Believ'd for Ten Years and yet his Works not Imputed to him and so Paul Gal. 2.16 1 Cor. 4.4 2. If Works after Faith be most Meritorious then there is most Matter of Boasting from them but Abraham had none to boast of therefore none that could Merit 3. The Works of Believers 1. Are Due 2. Not our own 3. Imperfect therefore cannot Merit But tho' there are different Opinions about what Works are excluded there is an Agreement about what Works are included Faith as a Work as the Matrimonial Consent pregnant of all the Duties of Marriage Repentance is included Sincere Obedience is included which I shall endeavour to refute on the fourth Verse The Second thing proposed was In what Sense they are Excluded I shall Treat this 1. Positively 2. Comparatively 3. Give Account of the different Notions and Respects under which others think they may be Included For the First the Text excludes them indefinitely in all respects that may be brought under the Particles with of or by for not by Works without works are the Apostle's Terms For tho' Works are the Effects Evidences Concomitants Properties of our Justification yet Justification is not by them for by denotes some Causal Influence either by Efficacy or Dignity and Works have no such Influence on our Justification 2. Comparatively they are more excluded from our Justification here on Earth before God than at the great Day of Judgment Works have a less Influence on our being Called and Entered a Member of the Church Militant here below than on our Entering the Triumphant State in Heaven for the former is meerly a Matter of Right and our Works have neither Being nor Dignity for that End but the latter is Matter of Possession and many things are requisite to Possession that are not to Purchase Our Justification at the Great Day requires Proof of our being Justified here and many things are Necessary to the Proof of Justification that are not Necessary to the first being of it Yet I much doubt any formal Process the bare appearance of the Persons in Sanctity and Glory is evidence enough 1. In Order to our going to Heaven besides the Necessity of Precept Gratitude For Right good Works are real Means of Order Preparation of our selves and helping of others thither 2. Good Works have a real Efficacy in them as all Actions have to beget and strengthen a Habit. 3. Good Works have a real Congruity in them to make us meet and fit for that Holy Fellowship and Communion above 4. Good Works are the Necessary Effects of Justification and Sanctification the Spirit of God cannot dwell in a Soul without transforming it more and more into a Likeness to Christ 5. Good Works have a real Utility in 'em for heightning our Reward in Heaven Not that they can from their own dignity Merit Degrees of Happiness more than the Being of Happiness but from the beautiful and harmonious Order of Divine Providence in advancing us from one step to another and not Conferring Degrees per saltum there is no End of the Encrease of Christ's Kingdom as to its Blessings but its Encrease is by way of a Life in a perpetual and gradual Growth 6. Heaven is truly a Reward to our Holiness here by Virtue of Divine Order and Connexion from Divine Condescendency as Basil says Manet requies sempiterna non tanquam debitum operibus redditum sed secundum munificentissimi Dei gratiam Hysichius The Kingdom of Heaven is not the Reward of Works but is the prepared Grace of God And as another says It 's proposed as a Reward more to attract us to Duty than a due Debt of our Duty and it is rather the Righteousness of Christ by which all our Actions are rendered acceptable that is Rewarded than our Actions themselves Lastly Our good Works are Necessary to Heaven as the Beginning and Growth of a thing is Necessary to its Perfection as Sowing in the Spring is Necessary to Reaping in Harvest and our being Children in Order to our being Men. Perfect Holiness is as much the Condition of Heaven as Faith is of Justification and Ordinances of Conversion and rather more for there are Exceptions in the last but none in the first The Third thing proposed was the several respects that several Persons plead Works to be necessary in Order to our Justification and herein there is a greater Variety of Terms viz. A Tenor or Hold a Plea the Form or Matter Preparations Dispositions Conditions Moral Means Merits of Dignity or Congruity than there is in Thought and Opinion and so a greater variety of Persons Professions Names and Ages of the World than there is in the thing it self for all these very different Sentiments we may find amongst the Papists themselves 1. The grossest of them as Vasquez and Cajetan fay Our Works Merit from their own Dignity that God in strict Justice could not but Reward such Pains such Mortifications such Fastings and Prayers with Heaven or Eternal Happiness this not true of Adams Covenant But a second and more Moderate sort as Marsilius Leonardus c. admit of a Tripple Allay to render them Meritorious And the first is That Christ hath merited that our Works may Merit Ours as subordinate Conditions to an Interest in his The second is from Divine Ordination because though our Actions are not worth a Pardon yet he hath Promised both a Pardon and a Heaven for them A third that lays Foundation for the former is a natural Congruity and Aptness that the diligent Worker should have a Reward and the sincere Endeavourer should not be slighted when the Bounty doth not Empoverish but Honour the Donor and that a Penitent Person should be pardoned And ever since the Interim at the first Birth of the Reformation there has been a party amongst Protestants in little or nothing differing from them called sometimes Interimists Cassandrians Majorists Conditionalists Calixtians and others that have run as far to a no less dangerous extream as Amsdorfius who said Good Works were so far from being necessary to Justification that they were pernicious and hurtful to it I do not comprehend under Conditionalists all who have asserted the Covenant to be Conditional for they have explain'd themselves that they mean no more by it than the immediate and nearest means of these Blessings viz. Justification and Glory And add many Cautious and Negative Senses that destroy the proper Nature of a Condition some five some ten but I see no Reason for their Zeal against them who say it 's not Conditional since they say it 's three to one five to one more not Conditional than Conditional viz. it 's not Conditional Antecedently it 's not Conditional Naturally it 's not Conditinal Meritoriously it 's not Conditional Legally it 's not Conditional Uncertainly and yet cry Error Error if another say it 's not Conditional and call it a Disposition of Grace thorough means to a
or Vertue in a Mans Conversation towards God or Man is natural as to the Principle for what are Principles of Action in a Man by common Gift of Knowledge or Honest Inclinations are natural Principles Before the Law given to Moses we may find footsteps of all the Ten Commandments for Abel believed in God which is the Duty of the first and Sacrificed which is the Duty of the second and in the third Generation when but very few Families on the Earth and not above three to wit Adam Seth and Enos's that were Worshippers except we Charitably Hope some were Proselites of the Cainitish Race publick worship was established for then Men began to call upon the Name of the Lord This was Obedience both to the second and third Commandment which did suppose Obedience to the fourth to wit a sanctifying some publickly known Time for Worship whose Determination God by Positive Command had fixed though from a natural Reason to wit the Seventh-day in which God had rested from the greatest and best of Works he had yet done in the World The fifth and the seventh Command is manifest in the Practice of Marriage for therein was the Period of Subjection to Parents terminated in leaving Father and Mother and an Aera of faithfulness to the Wife begun express't in cleaving to her and it is probable that last and crowning Duty of Childrens Subjection to their Parents is taxed as broken by these Sons of God who took unto themselves Wives according to their own Choice Gen. 6.7 The sixth and ninth Command were both broke by Cain who murdered his Brother and then not only denied it but denied the Knowledge of such a Fact Gen. 4.8 9. The eighth and tenth Command are thought by some especially the Quietists to have been neither Commands nor broken because there could be no Coveting of enlarging Property but rather of Men to share of the common good and Sin gave occasion to particular Commands though of such a General Nature But we find Adam guilty of both in coveting of a Diety and robbing God of his Property when but one Tree was reserved in all the World for an acknowledgment of Gods having the Primitive Right And we find Gen. 6. that the abounding Lusts of the Heart was the cause of the Deluge and all Lust is coveting The Ordinance of Circumcision was appointed to be a Monument and Conviction of the Lusts of the Heart and the Necessiâ—y of Mortification the Sweat of the Brow and toil of labour were appointed as the means of our Maintenance and the Nimrodical Hunting was a robbing men of what God had blessed their labour in So we find the Moral Law in this Law of Nature The next Enquiry is about the Evangelical Law whether any Prints of that is to be found under it yea or not and taking the natural Law most properly and as here the Apostle explains it in his Discourse for a Sign of Divine Will about our Duty as revealed in Nature or by Creation and Providence we may find footsteps of it here 1. For the Duties of it here are both Faith and Repentance rendred concludable from Divine Forbearance and Goodness Rom. 2.4 Not knowing that the Goodness of God leadeth thee to Repentance but after thy hardness and impenitent Heart c. 2. As there are Evangelical Duties so Evangelical Influence Chap. 1.18 Who hold the Truth in Vnrighteousness here was a Truth preserved alive against their Wills and as Gen. 6.3 the Spirit of the Lord was said to strive with men and 1 Pet. 3.20 Those Souls that are now in Prison had once the Spirit of Christ dealing with them and also Evangelical Acceptance If the Vncircumcision keep the Righteousness of the Law shall not his Vncircumcision be counted for Circumcision for Circumcision is not that which is outward in the Flesh but in the Man whose Praise is of God Therefore the Law of Nature being excluded there is an Evangelical Law excluded which Suarez calls the Con-natural Law and Gratian says Jus naturale est quod in lege Evangelio continetur and Mr. Baxter says It is the first Edition of the Covenant of Grace which two ways was published to all the World 1. By Natural Light discovering God Merciful in his Nature 2. By External Proclamation 1. Once to Adam that there should come a Seed of the Woman who should tread down the Head of the Serpent 2. In Noah and 3. In Christ For altho' none comes to the Father but by the Son and there is no other Name given under Heaven by which men might be saved yet it doth not follow that particular and distinct Knowledge of the Messiah was absolutely Necessary for that many Infants who were saved have not and the Disciples who lived with Christ were doubtful about it yea Peter forbid him to yield to Death when he was very nigh to suffer for it The Third Law excluded is the Moral Law whereof the Decalogue qui 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 receives all things is the Summe To take the Moral Law according to common Sentiments there is by it these three things added to the Natural Law 1. A Positive Institution with great Solemnity from Mount Sinai with several Positive Determinations that are not immediately concludable by the Light of Nature 2. The Spiritual Extension of the Moral Law is manifested through Corruption much of the Law of Nature was obscur'd as whether Fornication or Usury were Sins or Thoughts of the Mind before Formal Consent or latent Inclinations to Unlawful Things A third Edition is of Life and Authority to the Sanction men very much Question whether a Man was liable to Eternal Death for evil Inclinations Yea or No but this Law is added because of Transgression that is both to discover it as the Apostle says Rom. 7. I had not known Sin if the Law had not informed me so the Conviction of Sin was weak until the renewed Sanction of the Law has made it more terrible Sin gets many fair Colours Covetousness gets the Name of Frugality until the Spirit discover both the Sin and the Curse doubtful Duties are establish'd weak and faint Notions reviv'd corrupt Thoughts are corrected the need of a Saviour more Manifested and the Jewish State settled in a more perfect Condition than any State in the World Now we find this Law is excluded for Rom. 3.20 For by the Law is the Knowledge of Sin there is no Law discovers Sin so as the Moral The Natural Law discovers Sin but neither so powerfully nor so plainly the express Word of God discovers the Malignity of Sin the Root and Original of Sin and the dreadful Issue and Event of Sin more plainly and clearly and removes all those Fogs and Mists that created many doubts by which we were apt to think great Sins small small Sins none and no Sins so hateful in the sight of God as they are The Ceremonial Law discovers Sin but by Accident its Primitive Intention
has Conditionally died for all and sincere Obedience to this new Law of Faith is the Condition which they say is called Faith from the Facility and Easiness of obeying it because it requires no more Obedience but with a Proportion to our Faith and the Measure of our Faith is the Perspicuity and Assurance of Divine Revelation The Socinian and Arminian deny Merit but that is from the Odium of the Word only for Crellius the Socinian says No Master of Justice and Equity would rob his Servant of a due Reward for a fault or two God would not lay such a snare in the way of Wicked Men to deprive them of Hopes and discourage them from Duty And Poppius the Arminian describes the Christian Religion by those Works that consist in Obedience to the Commands of God and Christ and on respect to which depends the Reward of Eternal Life yea which he is not to have without the Work be Plenè Consummatum intirely and fully Perfect And the Papists mean no more by Merit they do not think their Works merit Heaven by a strict Commutative Justice that is us'd in Bargains nor Distributive in the rigour of the first Covenant but in Justice attemper'd with Equity and tinctur'd with the meriting Blood of Christ a Justice arising between a Foederal Promise and the most mean Condition And the Sincere as well as Learn'd Mr. Baxter says in his Catholick Theology he only differs from them in the Word because offensive and that we ought rather to rejoice the Papists have so much Truth among them than reject the Truth because they hold it But whether he dy'd in this Opinion that our Works gave such a Right to the Reward I doubt for in his little Book against Dr. Crisps Errors he says I formerly believ'd the formal Nature of Faith to lye in Consent as he elsewhere explains it the Marriage Consent that binds to all the Duties of the Married State and so gives Right to all the Priviledges but now says he â— Recant it which he could not do so often as he us'd without great Measures of Humility I believe says he it lies in Trust this makes the Right to lie in the Object for it is I depend on Christ as the Matter or Merit of my Pardon my Life my Crown my Glory But thirdly the Gospel which is the equal Interpretation of the Law in its exactness plainly teaches us that the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Equity is to be apply'd to the Subject of the Law and the Law by immutable Justice requir'd Death but there was place for Equity in change of Persons a Sponsor or Surety might be admitted to dye and some way there must be Infiniteness in the Death because an Infinite Majesty offended but the Law left it doubtful whether the Infiniteness must be in the Duration of Suffering or Dignity of the Sufferer and Equity has interpreted it of the latter As if a Father was permitted to suffer for a Son or a Summe should be paid in Gold which the Words of the Law required to be paid in Silver or Copper For Equity is saith Aristotle a Correction of the Law wherein it is deficient in Words by reason of its Universality Or I think better an Explication of the Words of the Law according to the Will of the Law-giver in an extraordinary emergent Case Or as Crellius says it is a Justice mixt with Mercy or a Virtue mitigating the Acrimony of the Law from Consideration of Circumstances as St. James says The Wisdom that is from above is Pure Peaceable Gentle and Easie to be entreated full of Mercy and good Fruits the Fruit of Righteousness is sown in Peace And thus generally Protestants expound the Equity of the Law to be Gods admitting yea giving Christ as a Surety for us he was made under the Law as a subsequent Surety The first Covenant did not say Thou Adam either first or second Adam shalt die for then the first Covenant had been the Covenant of Grace still there was no need of another Covenant as the Reverend Mr. Baxter doth strenuously prove but when we were under the Curse of the Law he came in and took our Room and became a Curse to redeem us from it and the Law as fulfilled by him for us is to us truly a Law of Faith according to the Text For farther Explication and Confirmation of which I shall propose these four Heads First That all the Functions and Offices of our Lord Jesus Christ all he said and did or suffered was in Obedience to a Law Secondly I shall a little explain the Nature of this Law and its Righteousness Thirdly That Law he did fulfill for us in our Room and Stead Fourthly That Law and its Righteousness is to us a Law of Faith and consequently the Law here mentioned in the Text it is not proposed to us as a Rule of our Obedience but as a matter of our Faith yea our Faith Interests us in it and makes its Righteousness effectively ours For the Proof of the first We find by Eternal Compact between the Father and the Son in the Mediatorial Covenant the Son came under a Mediatorial Law Psal 40.6 7 8 9. In that Emphatical Account of it we may make these Observations 1. There was a Compact by which he calls God his God O my God 2. By Vertue of that Covenant which was recorded in the Volume of the Book his place was to become a Servant Lo I come I am ready to obey 3. His Service was to fulfill the Divine Will I delight to do thy Will 4. This Will was a Legal Will Thy Law is within my Heart for Law is a just act of a Superiors Will. 5. The Law required him to be a Sacrifice Heb. 10.10 By the which Will we are sanctified through the Offering of the Body of Jesus Christ once for all 6. That no other Sacrifice either pleased God without this or but this Sacrifice and Offerings thou didst not desire 2. By Vertue of this undertaking the Son became under an Obligation to obâ—y this Law Heb. 2.17 Wherefore in all things it behoved him to be made like unto his Brethren And Luke 24.46 And thus it behoved Christ to suffer and to rise from the Dead Yea this Obligation did extend to the most Minute Particles of his Life John 4.4 He must needs go through Samaria 3. In an answerableness to this Obligation he did all he undertook Hence is it said of him He did all things well and John 8.28 29. I do nothing of my self but as my Father hath taught me I do always those things that please him And Chap. 4.34 My Meat is to do the Will of him that sent me and to finish his Work Psal 69.4 5. Then I restored that which I took not away O God thou knowest my foolishness and my Sins are not hid from thee John 15. It is applied to Christ and Theod. in Lat. Graec. expounds it thus It is