Command concerninâ— it * He alludes to Adam in Paradise where we can find no express positive Command and if it be not seated morally in thâ— fourth Commandment it is now certain thâ— the necessary observance of it is taken away 10. On the other extream whether thâ— seventh day from the Creation of the Worldâ—â— be to be observ'd precisely under the New Tâ—â—stament by virtue of the fourth Commanâ—â—ment and no other The assertion hereâ—â— supposeth that our Lord Jesus Christ 〈◊〉 Lord of the Sabbath hath neither chang'd 〈◊〉 nor reform'd any thing in and about the reâ—ligious observation of an holy day of Rest unto the Lord whence it follows that such an Observation can be no part or act of Evangelical Worship properly so call'd but only a moral Duty of the Law †Let our Jewish Sabbatarians consider well what the Doctor positively asserts here 11. Whether on the supposition of a non-obligation in the Law unto the observation of the seventh day precisely and of a new day to be observ'd weekly under the New Testament as a Sabbath of the Lord on what grounds it is to be observ'd 12. Whether from the fourth Commandment as one Day in seven or only unto some part or portion of Time or whether without any respect unto that Command as purely Ceremonial For granting as most do the necessity of the observation of such a Day yet some say that it has no respect at all to the fourth decalogical Precept which is totally and absolutely abolished with the rest of the Mosaical Institutions Others say that there is yet remaining in it an Obligation to the Sacred Separation of some Time or portion of Time unto the solemn Service of God and some say that it precisely requires the sanctification of one Day in seven 13. If a Day be so now to be observed it is enquired on what Ground or on what Authority there is an alteration made from the Day observed under the Old Testament to that now in use that is from the last Day to the first Day of the Week whether was this Translation of the Day of the solemn Worship of God made by Christ and his Apostles or by the Primitive Church c. 14. If this were done by the Authority of Christ and his Apostles whether by an express Institution of this new Day or whether a direct Example be sufficient no Institution being needful for the First Day for if we suppose there is no Obligation to the observance of one Day in seven indispensibly abiding and on the supposition that an Obligation to keep one Day in seven doth abide then no Institution is necessary or can be properly made as to the whole nature of it * No express Institution is needful for the observance of the first Day but Examples only if the 7th part of Time or one day in seven do abide in the 4th Command Thus far the Doctor who says many other things necessary to be considered about the observation of a Day of Worship whether as to the Work of the Day it ought to be kept with the like strictness as the Jewish Sabbath in all respects and what Duties are to be performed on it as also as to the proper Limits of that Day some pleading it ought to be from Evening to Evening as the Jews kept it or from Morning to Evening that is from after twelve a Clock in the Morning to twelve the next Evening c. From what the Doctor notes it appears that the Case in controversy calls for much study and diligence and it may be accounted an Act of great weakness in any Persons to observe the Seventh Day to the disturbance of the Church without enquiring of such as God has enlightned in these things and to whom the care of their Souls are committed to see what can be said against it Is it wisdom to advise with those only that are for it and not with such also as are directly against it This shall suffice for the Propositions I first proposed I shall endeavour to clear most of those things that seem difficult which may have been the occasion of some Persons if not all going astray and falling into the Error I purpose clearly and largely to detect This brings me to the next general Head of Discourse proposed Secondly I told you I should lay down diveâ—â— Arguments to prove the Truth of our Proposition That it is not the Duty of Gentile Believers to keep the Seventh Day as a Sabbath iâ— Gospel-times First The General Proposition I shall lay down one General Proposition to discover the Method I shall pursue foâ— proving what I have taken in hand 1. If the Law of God written in Adam's heart in Innocency did not oblige him to keep the Seventh Day as a Sabbath that Law cannot oblige Gentile Believers to keep it 2. If a positive Law or express Institution supposed to be given to Adam before or just after his Fall doth not oblige Gentile Believers to keep it 3. If the Law written in the Hearts of the Gentiles or the most refined and enlightned among them doth not oblige Gentile Believers to keep it 4. If the Law of Moses or the Law written in the two Tables of Stone doth not oblige Gentile Believers to keep it 5. If the Gospel by any Precept or Example doth not oblige them to keep the Seventh Day as a Sabbath 6. And lastly If the Law written in the Hearts of all Gospel-Believers by the Holy Spirit doth oblige them to keep the Seventh Day as a Sabbath to the Lord Then I infer it is not their Duty to keep the Seventh-Day c. for I know no other way or means whereby Gentile Believers can pretend to know they are obliged to keep the seventh-Seventh-Day as a Sabbath or a Day of Rest and solemn Worship But by none of these ways or means believing Gentiles are obliged to keep the seventh-Seventh-Day as a Sabbath c. therefore it is not the Duty of Gentile Believers to keep it To proceed 1. Let it be considered that if the keeping of the Seventh-Day as a Sabbath i. e. that precise Day from the Creation of the World were a purely natural or simply moral Precept no doubt but it was legibly written in Adam's Heart I mean as a Law of Creation and so part of the holy Image of God or of the same nature with all other moral Precepts that result from the Perfections of God's holy Nature and not from the Soveraignty of his Will only And if it was so written in Adam's Heart in Innocency he needed no positive Law to make it known to him What was any thing that was purely or simply moral even that which belonged to good Manners or to true natural Godliness or Righteousness not made known to Adam to perfect Adam this certainly cannot be That spiritual Worship which is due to God Charnock on the Attributes p. 131. saith Mr. Charnock is known
by the Light of Nature But much more say I was it clearly manifested to Adam in Innocency But furthermore saith he the outward means or matter of that Worship which would be acceptable to God was not known by the Light of Nature the Law for a spiritual Worship by the Faculties of our Souls was natural and part of the Law of Creation tho the determination of the particular Acts whereby God would have this Homage testified was of positive Institution and depended not on the Law of Creation Tho Adam in Innocence knew God was to be worshipped yet by nature he did not know by what outward Acts he was to pay this Respect or at what Time he was more solemnly to be exercised in it than another This depended on the Directions God as the Soveraign Governor and Lawgiver should prescribe you shall therefore find the positive Institution It is observable that this great Man is not here concerned to confute the Seventh-day Sabbatarians but about another thing yet affirms with many other Learned Men that Adam by the Law of Creation did not know in Innocency at what time God was more solemnly to be worshipped than another 2. No doubt but the substance of all the ten Precepts was wrote in Adam's Heart The Substance of all Moral Precepts written in Adam's Heart yet it appears the knowledg of the Seventh-day to be kept as a Sabbath was not written there tho that which was simply and naturally moral of the fourth Commandment was Secondly I argue thus If the precise Seventh-day was written in Adam's Heart The Law of the 7th day Sabbath not written in Adam's Heart there had been no need of an Institution or positive Law to make it known to him for what more need had he of an outward Revelation of this than of the other Commandments Take here what a Learned Man hath said * Mr. P. a Minister at Rouen in France p. 3. If the keeping of the seventh-Seventh-day were a Moral Duty our Father Adam by that Light of Nature God put in his Mind when he created him would have known it as well as he knew all other things in themselves good and necessary but he neither had nor should have had any knowledg thereof if God had not injoined it to him by a particular Command as those which maintain the morality of the Sabbath do avouch So that this followeth manifestly that the observation of the Seventh-day depends merely on Institution My Brethren Let this be considered well that if the knowledg of the Seventh-day wholly depended on the Will of God or on mere Institution and resulted not as all pure and simple moral Precepts do from the holy Rectitude of God's Nature it follows that the precise Day pertains not to the Essence of the Fourth Commandment but the simple Morality of that Precept lies only in a time of Worship And certainly if God by a mere positive Command had not given it to Israel they had no more known it their duty to keep it than the Pagan World did who were wholly ignorant thereof as I shall prove And be sure if God wrote not the Law or knowledg of the Seventh-day Sabbath on Adam's Heart the Seventh-day is not of the same nature with simply moral Precepts which God engraved on his Heart even the substance or tenor of all the Ten Commandments and made him know them naturally without any instruction by word of mouth But it appears by their own Assertion it was instituted c. Therefore the knowledg of the Seventh-day as a special time of Worship was not wrote in his Heart Our Opponents dare not deny but the substance of the whole Moral Law was wrote in his Heart and they foresee it is dangerous to deny it From whence it appears that all the other Precepts are simply moral and so is a time of Worship but the precise Seventh-day by their own concession was instituted in Man's Innocency and so depends wholly upon an express positive Command declared to Adam by audible Words resounding in his Ears Mr. Tillam says Tillam 's Book p. 7. It was instituted before the Fall and founded in Mount Paradise Answ Tho I believe no such matter nor can any Man prove it yet to grant it for Argument-sake then I say it follows it was not written in Adam's Heart for the being perfect he would naturally have known it without being told it was his Duty to keep it For consider that he was created on the Sixth Day and understood what was naturally and universally good i. e. all those Duties that were essential parts of Godliness and Righteousness or things belonging to good Manners Now if so why need he be told he must keep the Seventh-day or why must that Precept come under express Institution and none of the rest Object God saw good to bring all the ten Commandments under express Institution on Mount Sinai as well as he brought the seventh-day Sabbath in Paradise under express Institution Answ I deny it not God did then see good so to do considering how the Nature of Man was corrupted and his Law written in his Heart was blotted and blur'd by the Fall But let it be consider'd that the Law was not written in two Tables of Stone so much for a Rule of Life as for other reasons The Reasons why God added the Ministration of the Law wrote in two Tables of Stone 1. It was added and written there to aggravate Sin on the Conscience It was added saith Pual because of Transgression Gal. 3. 19. it was to make Sin appear exceeding sinful Rom. 7. 13. 2. It was written there to shew the Creature his sad and woful condition and to make known how unable fallen Man was to fulfil the Righteousness of God 3. And as a Schoolmaster to lead such as were under it to Christ in whom perfect Righteousness only is to be found Man being not able to keep perfectly that holy and just Law 4. And to shew them as I conceive that nothing but the Finger of God could write his holy Law in the stony Hearts of Sinners as shall be further demonstrated hereafter for that whole Ministration of the Law and Covenant I shall prove was a shadow and typical and so no standing Law or Ministration as there written but as it is in the hand of Jesus Christ 5. That whole Law and consequently the Seventh-day Sabbath was given on Mount Sinai as it suted the Judaical Oeconomy as well their Political as Ecclesiastical state There are many Additions made to the Seventh-day Sabbath together with other Ends annex'd and Designs and Uses thereto employ'd which is granted by such as assert it was given to Adam in Paradise * This gave a new state to it saith Dr. Owen p. 8 9. Secondly If it had been given to Adam in Innocency he not knowing without an Institution it was his Duty to keep it I argue from hence it follows that he had the
same need of knowing what special Worship he outht to be found exercised in on that day What a Sabbath instituted and no Sabbath-Service appointed on that day But this I shall further handle when I come to speak of the pretended Institution and express Command given to Adam in Innocency Thirdly If the Law of the Seventh-day Sabbath was wrote in Adam's Heart some Remainders of the knowledg of that day would have been left in the Heart of his Offspring as there is of all other Precepts that are simply moral tho much blur'd and almost quite obliterated in some yet there were many Heathens who retain'd or recover'd much knowledg of God's Law first written in the Heart of Man yea they were led to the knowledg of all pure moral Precepts i.e. that there was but one God and that he was to be worshipped and his Name not profan'd that they should not murder commit Adultery steal c. nay and also to the knowledg of the fourth Commandment as to what was simply moral in it viz. a sufficient time to worship that God yet they were none of them led to know that they ought to keep the seventh day as a Sabbath Fourthly Moreover if the Seventh-day Sabbath had been a simple or pure moral Precept and written in Adam's Heart it would have been written in the Hearts of all God's New-Covenant Children as he promised he would write his Law there in Gospel-times and evident it is that all Believers in Christ whether Jews or Gentiles have the Image of God restor'd to them it being stampt upon their Hearts by the Spirit of God hence it is said who after God are created in Righteousness and true Holiness Eph. 4. 24. nay they are all said to be renew'd in Knowledg after the Image of him that created them Col. 3. 10. But in the second Impression of God's holy Law and Image thus written on our Hearts there is not one line nor lineament of any knowledg that it is our Duty to keep the seventh day as a Sabbath to the Lord which I shall further evince hereafter Fifthly Take what a learned Man saith If Adam was bound to keep the Sabbath I demand by what Law by the Law written in his Heart Why then he was bound to keep a Sabbath before there was a Sabbath to keep for the Law was ingraven on his Heart on the sixth day as a branch of that Divine Image of God concreated with him whereas the Sabbath to be sure could not be instituted till the seventh day if then Sixthly Before I close this let me note here what is said concerning this very thing by the Antient Fathers and Primitive Christian Writers who it appears deny'd the knowledg of the Seventh-day Sabbath was written in Adam's Heart Just Mart. Respon ad qu. p. 69. Theod. on Ezek. c. 20. See Justin Martyr Theodoret saith that these Commandments Thou shalt not kill Thou shalt not commit Adultery Thou shalt not steal and others of that kind were generally implanted by Nature in the minds of Men but for the keeping of the Sabbath it came not in by Nature but by Moses's Law Chrysostom affirms saith my Author that neither Adam nor any Man liv'd without the Law imprinted on the Soul of Man as made a living Creature but neither he nor any other of them say the seventh day was one of those Laws Also Rivet and others who plead for the Antiquity of the Sabbath dare not saith he refer the keeping of it to the Law written in Adam's Heart So that I may from what has been said positively affirm the Precept of keeping the seventh day was not written in Adam's Heart in Innocency and therefore that believing Gentiles are not oblig'd to keep the seventh day from that Law From hence also I infer it could not be written in the Hearts of any of the Jews or Gentiles for doubtless Adam by nature knew that which corrupt Man never so perfectly knew and it were great Presumption in any since Sin was so generally prevailing to say they knew in a natural way that which Adam knew not Besides is it not great folly for any to say this since the Law in Adam's Heart was the original And shall a blur'd Copy be deem'd more perfect than that or the muddy Stream be clearer than the Chrystal Fountain Therefore since it appears the Law of the Seventh-day Sabbath was not written in Adam's Heart but that he needed an express positive Law to know it or discover it to him I infer much more need there was for poor Gentiles nay for Believers to have an express Law to discover it to them And since our Opponents affirm that the Commandment of the precise seventh day as a Sabbath is of the same nature and quality with the first Commandment and all other simply moral Precepts i. e. not only a time of Worship or one day in seven but the precise seventh day from the Creation I infer then what a woful condition are all we in that break or violate in the very Letter a simply moral Command nay and teach Men so to do may and how could our Saviour then be without Sin who made Clay on that day and did many other Works and commanded a Burden to be born and also commended Acts of Mercy which was but a moral Duty above keeping of the Seventh-day Sabbath Matth. 12. comparing the strict Observation of that with Sacrifices which all know were but mere positive Laws to Israel under that Legal Dispensation But more of this hereafter Object But tho it was not written in Adam's Heart that he should keep the seventh day as a Sabbath yet it was given to Adam in Innocency by a positive Institution Answ This is sooner said than proved No positive Law given to Adam to keep the seventh-Seventh-day Sabbath but let me tell you that the Law of Nature our Opponents acknowledg was antecedent to the Institution of the Sabbath and that all purely moral Precepts were certainly written in Adam's Heart Now can the precise seventh day be Adam's Duty to keep before it was sanctified to that end this is to say a thing was before it was and that the Law of Creation teaches that which it was impossible to teach and also that Revealed Religion may be known by natural Dictates or Principles which is absurd to affirm besides all confess that mere positive Precepts or Commands in instituted Worship may be alter'd or chang'd as the great Lawgiver pleaseth But to proceed to answer what is affirm'd about its Institution in Paradise as given to innocent Adam we will come to and well weigh the words of this pretended positive Precept given to Adam in Paradise Gen. 2. 2. And on the seventh day God ended his Work which he had made and he rested on the seventh day from all his Work which he had made Ver. 3. And God blessed the seventh day and sanctified it because that in it he had rested from
all Work which God created and made These are the words which contain what is call'd the Institution and Command of the Sabbath to Adam in Paradise Tillam and others make a great noise of the Sabbath instituted in Paradise and given to Adam to keep but Brethren I must tell you that the Learned strangely differ among themselves who would have the Antiquity of the Sabbath thus early some of them affirming it was given to Adam in Innocency others say not till he fell One speaks thus Mr. Geo. Walker's Doctrine of the holy Sabbath p. 10. And for the time when God first instituted the Sabbath I conceiv'd it to have been not in the state of Innocency but after Mans Fall immediately and yet upon the seventh day wherein God rested These are his very words From hence I observe he believ'd Adam did not stand in his Innocency one day and this he endeavours to prove and others as well as he Men of great Learning and Wisdom Let me cite here one more * See Mr. Warren's Jewish Sabbath antiquated I shall propose saith he and endeavour to prove a counter Position namely that it seems more consonant to Scripture tho at the beginning yet after the Fall in Man's corrupt and vitiated state the probation whereof depends much tho not altogether upon the decision of that often canvassed Question whether our first Parents sinned the same day on which they were created Others not of less note and Learning say That the Sabbath did not commence till Israel came into the Wilderness and at the fall of Manna Mr. Primrose in his Treatise of the Sabbath in his Preface it appeareth not at all that God gave any Commandment to Adam either before or after his Fall binding him or his Progeny to the keeping of any such day whatsoever as to a thing moral and necessary neither is there any trace of such a Commandment to be found till the coming of the Israelites to the Wilderness and that God assign'd to them the seventh day of the week P. 20. as a particular point of Ecclesiastical Government whereof he prescrib'd unto them all the particular Rites Now my Brethren I shall shew you 1. What is said by those who affirm it was given to Adam in Innocency whose Arguments seem to me of no weight at all 2. I shall take notice what is said by those learned Men who deny it was given to Adam in Innocency and affirm it was not given as a Command till Israel came into the Wilderness To begin with those who affirm God gave it to Adam before his Fall in Paradise or in his state of Innocency 1. They ground it upon what Moses saith in Gen. 2. because it is there mention'd as the day on which God rested from all his Works 2. Because God blessed the seventh day and sanctified it Owen on the Sabbath p. 42 c. Dr. Owen after he had shew'd that some Jews and Rabbins affirm the Sabbath did not begin till the Israelites came into the Wilderness tho some of them differ'd in their Opinions about its Commencement comes to tell us P. 55. That the Opinion of the Institution of the Sabbath from the beginning of the World is founded principally on a double Testimony First From the Old Testament Gen. 2. 1 2 3. because Moses saith God blessed the seventh day P. 62. and sanctified it not saith he that God kept it holy himself nor that he purified it and made it inherently holy which the nature of the day is not capable of nor that he celebrated that which in it self was holy but that he set it apart to sacred use Secondly The Testimony to the same purpose saith he taken out of the New Testament is in Heb. 4. 3 4. For we which believe do enter into Rest as he said As I have sworn in my Wrath if they shall enter into my Rest altho the Works were finished from the Foundation of the World For he speaketh in a certain place on this wise And God did rest the Seventh Day from all his Works Now saith the Doctor the Works and the finishing of them did not at all belong to the Apostle's Discourse but only as they denoted the beginning of the Seventh-day Sabbath for it is the several Rests of God alone that he is enquiring after But to pass by what the Doctor saith 1. Let this be considered that in this place only of all Paul's Writings mention is made of the seventh-Seventh-day but not one word here intimating that 't was our duty to observe that Day under the Gospel which had it been the Christian Sabbath no doubt he would have given some hint of at this turn 2. By the manner of his Words and Expressions comparing these two Verses together it seems the Sabbath did not commence from the beginning of the world for tho God rested on the seventh-Seventh-day and might then set it apart yet he might give no Command to keep it till after-times when sabbath-Sabbath-day Service or Worship was appointed This I rather think from these words Altho the Works were finished from the Foundation of the World yet the Day as Man's Duty was not given till long after for as our Annotators observe Paul alludes to Exod. 31. 17. For he speaks in a certain place on his wise c. Thus having given you the Proofs of those who assert the Sabbath was given to Man in Inâ—ocency I shall now give you the Reasons urg'd â—y others who affirm it was not given till Israel came into the Wilderness Their Arguments are of two sorts 1. Many of them affirm that Moses wrote â—ere in Gen. 2. by a Prolepsis or way of anticiâ—ation 2. Others do not so much assert that but â—low it might be set apart in the design of God from his finishing his Work and yet afâ—â—rm it was not given to any to keep till Israel's â—oming into the Wilderness when God was aâ—out to form them into an Ecclesiastical and Poâ—itical Church-State and appointed them Laws and Ordinances particularly the Worship Duties and Sacrifices they were to discharge on their Sabbath-day And indeed it may seem unreasonable to believe that the wise God shall give a Sabbath not only for Rest but for Divine Worship before he appointed those Duâ—â—es of Worship he would have them to perâ—orm on that day which were essentially neâ—essary for all to know as well as the special â—recise Day it self 1. But to begin with the first Argument that Moses wrote those words in his History by way of Prolepsis or Anticipation and so to be â—ead as it were in a Parenthesis that is Moses being the first Man that wrote by Revelation or Inspiration and having before he began to write received the Command of the Seventh-day Sabbath and the reason of its Institution coming to write of the Time when God finished his Work put in this concerning the Sabbath by way of Anticipation saying God blessed the
future â—â—mes for he foresaw Man would fall and need 〈◊〉 Sabbath for himself and a particular day to â—orship God in Now 't is evident a Law may 〈◊〉 instituted * Tho I do not say the Sabbath was instituted in Paradise long before the time of its Comâ—encement or being in force Divers great â—en both Antient and Modern Treatise of the Sab. p. 41. as Dr. White â—â—timates affirm that God by a Decree only destin'd that day to religious Service in future time he instances in venerable Bede and before him Justin Martyr Tertullian and Irenâ—us that God sanctified the seventh day Gen. 2. by his Decree and Destination only not by any present Imposition The Arguments on which this Opinion 〈◊〉 grounded are very weighty which shall 〈◊〉 next consider'd First All generally conclude that God gaâ—â— to Adam but one positive Law and in breaâ—â—ing of that as Dr. Lightfoot and others shewâ— he broke all the ten Commandments which 〈◊〉 to the matter or substance of them were wroâ— in his Heart and that this greatened his Siâ— viz. that tho he had but one Commandment he violated it Secondly Suppose Adam had had this positive Law given to him also to keep holy the seventh day and had broke it had he thereby been guilty of the breach of all the others For I have just now shew'd that most believe him guilty of all in breaking that one Command Thou shalt not eat of the Tree of Knowledg of good and evil But being every way guilty it must be supposed he broke both those positive Commands if he had two given him and so was guilty of the breach of the fourth twice Nay if what I say be consider'd and that which I inquire about be granted he was doubly guilty of the breach of them all Thirdly The Law of the Sabbath was as it is conceiv'd that Adam should keep that day holy nay he must be so oblig'd if any Command was given to him yea and keep it more holy than any of the other six Now if so would it not follow that Adam was not perfect in Innocency Doth Perfection admit of any â—urther degree of Holiness or require more â—anctity on that day than any other Certainâ—â— while he stood every day must be kept with â—e Holiness and Sanctity Or I say what â—ason can be given that Adam who was so â—ly and perfect and capable in the same deâ—ree of contemplating every day the Perfectiâ—ns of his blessed Creator should need one â—ecial day to do this in having nothing to â—vert his thoughts nor any need of a day of â—st from toilsom Labor If so doth not what â—ey say argue some Imperfection attending 〈◊〉 how then was he created in the Image of 〈◊〉 and perfect if he was capable of keeping â—y one day more holy than the rest whilst in â—nocency If any should say he was capable 〈◊〉 rest from dressing the Garden on one day 〈◊〉 answer if the dressing the Garden was any â—nderance to him in Divine Contemplation 〈◊〉 any holy Duty it argues still he was not â—erfect nor compleatly happy Fourthly If one special day was appointed to â—orship God in and this he stood in need of â—ill it not follow by the same reason that he â—eeded to be told what special parts of Worâ—ip he should perform to God on that day â—or as I hinted before it seems strange he â—ould need a special day of Worship by a poâ—â—ive Law to be appointed him and no Duties â—f Worship be instituted sutable to such a day â—vident it is when God commanded his Peoâ—le Israel to keep the Seventh-day Sabbath he â—old them how they should do it and what â—cts of Worship they should discharge on that â—ay Fifthly It may seem strange that any wise â—an should affirm that Adam was injoyned to â—eep a Sabbath from what is said in Gen. 2. whenas we read not one word of a Sabbath there all that Moses says is that God blessed the seventh day and sanctified it Now as one observes the seventh day is three times mentioned in this Text but the term Sabbath not at all nor indeed any where else till it came to be given to the Children of Israel in the Wilderness nor can they ever prove that the seventh day mentioned Exod. 16. or 20. waâ— the precise seventh day immediately succeedinâ— the six days of the Creation but more 〈◊〉 that hereafter Sixthly Since we read of no day call'd 〈◊〉 Sabbath till near two thousand years from thâ— Creation how should any before the Floodâ— or before Moses know of such a day for thâ— bear Expression that God sanctified the seventâ— day c. if that was known to the old World and afterwards which I much doubt of could not without some other Revelation discover that they were obliged to keep it as a Sabbath in religious Worship tho it is said God sanctified the seventh day yet it is not said that Adaâ— also sanctified it nor can they tell how Adam should know that God then sanctified it for being not created till the sixth day how could he without some special Revelation know the next day after was the seventh day from the Creation Could he tell how long God was in making the Heavens and the Earth c. Moreover 't is worth noting how strenuously our Opponents do urge that there is no express Command to keep the first day Now may not wâ— say there is no express Command for Adam in Innocency or when fallen or for any till Moses's time to keep the seventh day as a Sabbath yet they boldly affirm it was their duty to keep it Again Should it be granted that God commanded Adam to keep that very seventh day on which he himself rested from his Work and that Adam did sanctify that one day yet it is not â—aid that he did or was bid to keep holy every â—eventh day to the world's end and that he must â—egin every such day just at the same time as God did his seventh day or just at the same time â—f the day as it was in Paradise at that moment â—hen God ceas'd to work Dr. Wallis Answ to Mr. Banfield p. 12 13. Thus Dr. Wallis who â—rther saith It is not expresly said that all Manâ—ind must for ever after observe the seventh day 〈◊〉 every week of days reckoned continually from 〈◊〉 first Creation Let me here add what another Author saith â—s to the words of the Text blessed and sanctiâ—â—ed Mr. Gilb. Ironside on the Sab. p. 20 21. That this was done saith he we all agree when it was done is the question for this Circumstance we have not expresly in the Text. Things are said in Scripture to be sanctified two ways 1. By way of Purpose and Destination only as God sanctified Jeremiah to be a Prophet to him before he was born 2. By way of actual use and imployment as when the Levites were admitted to the actual Service of the
Scriptures which mention the Sabbath speak of it as of a holy Sign looking towards Christ and the state of Grace and Glory in him and not towards the state of Innocency It is most certain Adam in that state was perfect with all natural Perfections and at all times equally disposed to obey and serve God to remember his Creation and to honour his Creator he needed no observation of any day to be put in mind of any thing he had before known and which God had revealed to him his Memory was perfect his Will was every day ready to do whatever he knew to be right he needed no Sign to admonish him of his Duty or to move him to do it in due season he did not labor nor weary himself every day to him was a day of Delight and Pleasure of Rest and Recreation In a word his whole Life was a constant and obedient serving oâ— God and there was no inequality nor lesâ— Worship of God perform'd by him in onâ— day than in another for he fully served God at all times Whoever denies this must needs deny Man's Perfections and constant Conformity to God in the state of Innocency For where one day is kept better than anâ—â—ther there is an inequality and no constaâ— Uniformity in himself nor Conformity to 〈◊〉 Will of God In the second place they who hold the Sabbath was first instituted after Man's Fall and yet written in Man's Heart in Innocency and that he was then bound to keep it fall into many Absurdities as 1. That Man was bound to keep a Sabbath before ever it was instituted 2. That God did by his Word teach Man in vain i. e. that which he was fully taught already and had written in his heart 3. That God gave Man a Law in vain after his Fall because he was become unable to keep it 4. They that hold that the Law of the Sabbath was not written in man's Heart but was by a Positive Law given in the State of Innocency of the same nature with that of eating of the Tree of Knowledg make this Commandment of the Sabbath utterly void by Man's Fall even as that of eating c. is now void Thus far Mr. Walker I might add certainly there was a vast difference as to the Cause and Design of God's giving a Sabbath to Man in Innocency and when fallen Could a Sabbath sute equally with perfect and â—allen Man Or could there be the same need of a Sabbath to both Certainly if God had â—ot given that Command by Moses the keepâ—â—g that precise Day would not have been known 〈◊〉 be the Duty of any of Adam's Off-spring â—om a positive Law given to him in Innocency Ninthly To put the matter further out of â—oubt pray mind the words of this pretended â—ositive Command God rested on the Seventhâ—â—y what then but he also blessed and sancâ—â—fied it what tho Because God sanctified 〈◊〉 Priest may others do so too He might 〈◊〉 the Seventh-day apart for his People in afterâ—â—es Because God sanctified it must Adam â—nctify it or keep it holy without a Comâ—â—and Is it said therefore Thou Adam shalt â—eep this Day as a Sabbath No doubt Moses â—ould not only have mention'd God's blessing â—nd sanctifying that Day had it been given to Adam as a Sabbath but God's express Command would have been mention'd by him and would also have called it the Sabbath-day I might now come to the last Argument viz. If it had been commanded Adam and all his Posterity to keep the Seventh-day after he fell â—he Patriarchs that lived before Moses kept it But more of this next time Tenthly If Adam had the Sabbath positively given to him in Innocency besure it was injoined with some Penalty as the Command of not eating of the Tree of Knowledg was We also find the Penalty of the breach of the Seventh-day Sabbath was Death but as we read of no Positive Command given to him to keep that Day so of no threatning if he broke or violated it therefore certainly it was never enjoyn'd upon him Elevehthly When the Sabbath was institured for the House of Jacob God declared it was a Sign between him and them or a Shadow of things to come Col. 2. 16 17. it referred to Christ or to that Rest all Believers do enter into Exod. 31. 13 14. Speak thou unto the Children of Israel saying Verily my Sabbaths it is a Sign between me and you throughout your Generations Ezek. 20. 21. that ye may know that I am the Lord that sanctify you Exod. 31. 13. Ye shall keep my Sabbath therefore it is holy unto you every one that defileth it shall surely be put to death For every one that doth any work on the Sabbath-day shall be cut off from amongst his People vers 14. It was a sign God set apart that People with a Ceremonial Sanctification to signify that alone by Jesus Christ all the true spiritual Israel should have Gospel-Sanctification as well as it was a sign of the Covenant of Works but it could be no sign of this Sanctification to Adam in Innocency nor of any other Gospel-blessing therefore doubtless the Sabbath was not given to Adam in Innocency Twelfthly What reason can be given that God should allow Adam in Innocency six days to labour in and require but one i. e. the seventh as a day to his Creator No it is evident from hence the Sabbath refer'd to fallen Man who God foresaw would need six days to do all his Labour and it shews God's great Mercy to Man and Beast in that woful condition of Servitude It might not be our Duty to keep the Sabbath tho given to Adam in Innocency under the Curse I might add should it be granted that God gave Adam a positive Command to keep the seventh day in Innocency how can our Opponents thence prove it the Duty of all to keep the said day A Command to him in Innocency may not oblige any Man in his fallen state except the same be renewed I find two of the chiefest Writers I have met with who are approved Orthodox plead not for the Sabbath as given to Adam in Innocency See Sabbatum Redi Part 3. p. 336. viz. Mr. Dan. â—awdrey and Mr. Herbert Palmer Take their words We purpose not to maintain that the Sabbath was given to Adam in Innocency before the Fall but they hint it might be given to him after the Fall and that he fell the same day he was created P. 337. Moreover they say If it was given before his Fall it doth not follow it should oblige at this day for the positive Precept of not eating of the Tree of Knowledg was given in Innocency and yet doth not universally oblige Adam's Posterity nor should if the Tree were at this day known A positive Precept binds only during the pleasure of the Lawgiver c. so say I the same must be granted when it was given Exod. 16. 20.
of Nature the Waters usually are and by the Will of God were then much decreased the Dove which was sent out had found good footing on the Earth There is greater reason to believe this than to suppose it refer'd to the Sabbath * De Emendat Temp. l. 5. Scaliger saith my Author one while thought the day on which Noah left the Ark and offered Sacrifices to be the seventh day but in the next Edition he fixed that day to be the fourth day of the week Now after the Flood we find God gave to Noah and his Sons some express Laws and Commands i. e. not to eat Blood and forbidding Murder c. Now this is the time doubtless to hear of a Sabbath and of the charge about it if God had given it either to Adam before or after the Fall but not one word is mention'd for 't is not said Remember the seventh day c. or ye shall observe my Sabbath Gen. 9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7. Now from Shem Ham and Japhet both Jews and Gentiles proceeded even the whole World and to me it seems not probable had the Sabbath been commanded that Jehovah should not at this time have given them a charge about it there being then so few positive Laws instituted here is Blood forbid to the whole World and Murder but not one word of a Sabbath or seventh day to be observ'd Seven Precepts given to Noah but no Sabbath The Rabbins speak of seven Precepts given to Noah and his Sons but exclude the Seventh-day Sabbath out of that number If we have it not mentioned here besure we shall not meet with it till we come to Moses but here we have it not nor indeed was it possible for some of them to keep that precise day being scatter'd to the furthermost ends of the Earth We read of Abraham that he kept all God's Commandments yet he kept no Seventh-day Sabbath he built an Altar and sacrificed which were mere positive Precepts and 〈◊〉 the Seventh-day Sabbath is not mention'd â—or commanded him nor a hint given to remember him to keep it Job liv'd also Job liv'd 't is thought about Abraham's time it is concluded about Abraham's time which may be gather'd by the number of years he liv'd which was about two hundred years which few attain'd to after Abraham Joseph liv'd but a hundred and ten 'T is said Job liv'd a hundred and forty years after his sore Trials were ended Job 42. 16. the Jews speak of his living in all two hundred and eighty years â—ow as one observes when he pleads his Inâ—â—grity and Innocence even to very minute Particulars he neither alledges his strict observation of the Seventh-Say Sabbath nor apologizes for the neglect thereof nor do this Friends who rak'd up every thing against him speak a word about this nor of the Sabbath throughout the whole Book which treats in a manner wholly about Worship and Devotion towards God the Sabbath therefore no doubt had not â—â—â—ap'd as he minds if it had been known 〈◊〉 been a Duty in his days As to Isaac he was a most devout Man and 〈◊〉 Life was taken up in a continual course of â—â—ety his custom was to go into the fields to meditate but it is not said he did it on the â—eventh day or that he kept this day as a Sabbath Jacob was a Man that fled from Idolatry 〈◊〉 God's Command and liv'd a godly Life and tho we read of his performing many Acts of Worship yet nothing of his keeping the seventh day as a Sabbath no tho we read of his hard Service when he kept Laban's Sheep both in Winter and Summer which might have caused him to complain of his being incommoded from a strict observation of that day had he known it as his Duty but in all his Complaints not one word of this We know among us how Shepherds are hindered in Sabbath-Observations of which many have complained or may have occasion to do Moreover during Joseph's being in Pharaoh's Court nor before do we read of his observing this Sabbath and when Jacob came into Egypt we read 〈◊〉 of his observation thereof nor of the Egyptian keeping of it or had they forgot it besuâ— there would have been some notice taken of Jacob's keeping it nor would he have avoided iâ— that he might please Pharaoh and his Servants Nor can it be thought on any good grounds that the Children of Israel kept the Seventh-day Sabbath under their Taskmasters in Egypt thâ— some would infer they did from these words that you make the People rest from their Burdens Exod. 5. 5. they would have these words to mean you make them keep a Sabbath where as no such thing seems to have the least countenance because Pharaoh's Officers complain not of their resting or being idle on one day only but two days together see Exod. 5. 14. Wherefore have you not fulfilled your Task in making of Brick both yesterday and to day as heretofore Now since there is no mention that any 〈◊〉 the Patriarchs kept the seventh day as a Sabbath we infer this as the first reason why they observ'd it not Secondly Let it be consider'd that we read 〈◊〉 many positive Commands given to Noah to Abraham Isaac and Jacob but none to keep the Seventh-day Sabbath nor no reminding them of any former Institution or Precept to observe it wherefore we may conclude they kept it not Thirdly The Patriarchs not commended for keeping the Seventh-day Sabbath We read how the faithful Patriarchs were commended for doing whatsoever God commanded them but not of any of them being commended for keeping the seventh day as a Sabbath yet after Moses's time when the Sabbath was instituted and given by God's express Command to Israel he took we find as much notice of their observing his Sabbaths as of any other Duty injoined on them and this to their great Commendation Therefore had the Patriarchs been oblig'd to keep it no doubt they had as faithfully discharged their Duty therein as any of God's Servants did in after times and God besure would have left something on Record to their Commendation Fourthly The old World not charg'd with Sabbath-breaking We read of divers Sins the old World was guilty of which provoked God and brought the Flood upon them but not one word or hint given that they were guilty of Sabbath-breaking Now if it had been known either by the Light of Nature or by any positive Precept given to Adam and handed down to them by Tradition or otherwise they being so universally corrupted and polluted no doubt had profan'd that day and if so the sacred Record had mention'd that great Sin doubtless as well as others Fifthly Sodom not charg'd with Sabbath-breaking Moreover we read of the crying Sins of the People of Sodom c. and no doubt but they had violated all God's Commands or whatsoever were their known Duties but nothing of breaking
the Sabbath is charged against them Now can it be imagin'd they should not have fail'd in this case or that God would overlook or take no notice of it Sixtly We have a Catalogue of almost all immoral Evils before and after the Flood as Idolatry Gluttony Drunkenness Lasciviousness Incest Murder Lying Covetousness Theft c. and how Sin had possessed the Thoughts Hearts and Lives of Men but no account of their Violation of the Sabbath-day Seventhly None from Adam to Moses reprehended for not keeping the Sabbath Let it be consider'd that since God so severely reprehended the Jews for profaning his Sabbaths and hardly reproved them more sharply for any one Sin than for this certainly in his enumerating the Sins 〈◊〉 his People and of the Wickedness of those that liv'd from Adam to Moses he would have reproved them for Sabbath-breaking and not have utterly passed it by in silence had they been guilty of it or can it be rationally supposed that tho they fail'd in all other respects yet that they did not in this No doubt had it been a known Duty and that some of them had been guilty of the breach of it as in all likelihood they would but God would have severely reprehended them for it Eighthly Since we read of no Sabbath till Moses's time Exod. 16. only that God sanctified the seventh day what makes our Brethren so boldly say that Adam in Innocence kept it and all the Patriarchs from Adam to Moses This may seem strange to any thinking Man i. e. that they should affirm this seeing they require an express Command from us for the keeping of the first day or else all is nothing with them Brethren this I will say that had we no more ground to keep the Lord's day in solemn Worship as a day of Rest than they can find for the Patriarchs keeping of the seventh day as a Sabbath we should not say one word more for it I challenge them to shew us one place where a Sabbath is so much as once mention'd or any express or implicit Command given to any to observe it or one Example from the Creation of the World that any Man or Woman ever kept the seventh day as a Sabbath until we come to Moses Exod. 16. I shall God assisting shew that we have more than meer Examples of the Gospel Primitive Churches for observing in a solemn manner the Lord's-day or the first day of the week when I come to that part of my Work Now let them produce but one Example that â—ne tho but one of the Patriarchs did keep the â—eventh day as a Sabbath I will conclude it might be given to Adam after his Fall for before his Fall it could not be a Law to him for the reasons I have urged but if they could produce such an Example yet say some learned Men it doth no more prove that precise day is a moral Precept or that it from hence follows that it is our Duty in Gospel-times to observe it than it proves 't is our Duty to offer Sacrifices which we read before the Ceremonial Law was given they frequently did But since there is not one Instance to be given of any one Person that kept that day till Moses's time but that the Word of God is wholly silent about it we must and may say according to that common Maxim used by Divines i. e. Where God hath not a Mouth to speak we ought not to have an Ear to hear Ninthly The Proofs of the Learned for the Patriarchs keeping the Sabbath Let us now consider what some learned Men have produced for their pretended Proofs that the Patriarchs kept the seventh day as a Sabbath which I fear hath imboldned the Jewish Sabbatarians to affirm with such Confidence that all the Patriarchs did keep it But by the way Dr. Owen who is one that asserted what I utterly deny doth yet confess that many of the Jewish Masters or Rabbins ascribe the original of the Sabbath to the Statute given to them in Mara Exod. 15. and others of them to Exod. 16. yet the said Reverend Doctor cites some of the probable grounds to prove that the Patriarchs kept it Dr. Owen on the Sab. p. 72. 1. The first and chief place I find he mentions is that in Gen. 18. 19. For I know him that he will command his Children and his Houshold after him and they shall keep the ways of the Lord and do Justice and Judgment Answ That Abraham had this Charge and Commandment given to him is granted but what little reason there is from hence to conclude he kept the Sabbath or gave charge to his Children so to do I will leave to all Mens Consideration God gave to Abraham Commands we find that evident enough and some of them not very easy to Flesh and Blood as that of offering up his only Son Moreover none doubt of the faithfulness of the Patriarch Abraham but if the Sabbath was not then instituted nor any Command given to him to keep it there could not be any such Command meant or comprehended in that Charge given to him The truth is my Brethren learned Men who are Men also of great natural Parts can put a fair gloss on any thing and make that seem to be a Truth that there is not the least ground to believe is so Abraham did all he did in Faith and therefore he had Divine Authority for all he did in God's Service Dr. Twiss's main Argument to prove that the Patriarchs observed the Seventh-day Sabbath is this Dr. Twiss on the Christian Sab. p. 57. viz. The Lord blessed the seventh day and sanctified it therefore saith he the Patriarchs did observe it Answ I answer God blessed the seventh day and sanctified it but did not give any Command to Adam to keep it therefore the Patriarchs from thence could not know or see they had any ground to observe it Dr. Twiss saith in the same place i. e. And the truth is until the coming of the Children of Israel out of Egypt we read not of any Church of God any where but in single Families neither do we read of the Patriarchs before the Flood or a long time after that they kept any day consecrated to God's Service But we say with him that it doth not therefore follow that they kept no day at all in God's Service They owned the True God and worshipped him and knew that there must be a time a sufficient time to discharge that Homage or Worship to him and tho perhaps they observ'd one day in seven yet as I conceive they did not know what precise day they ought to observe above any other until God by some express positive Command made it known which was not till he constituted the whole House of Israel into a Typical Church-state and gave them an instituted Worship and commanded their Legal and Typical Sabbath Besides how could the Patriarchs know what Duties proper for Sabbath-observation
it they knew noâ— what they should do with him and this was whilst they were in the Wilderness and they put him in ward for it was not yet declar'd what should be done unto him By which it appears saith he to be a new thing not yet adjusted for had it been a Law from the Creation it is scarce possible that all Men should have been ignorant whether any Punishment or not or what Punishment did belong to the Violation of a Law of such standing Object I know that Dr. Owen saith Dr. Owen on the Sab. p. 62. if the original of the Sabbath was here then the National Observation of it is introduced with a strange abruptness c. Answ To which I answer that it doth not so appear to me however let every Man read the words of Moses again and how he repeats the same over and over To morrow is the Sabbath c. To day is a Sabbath unto the Lord â—gain The Lord hath given you the Sabbath â—an any thing be brought in more solemnly â—ut I see how Men will try their Wits to deâ—â—nd their own Scriptureless Notion of a Sabbath given in Paradise as well as in pleading 〈◊〉 other groundless Practices Object But since you grant a Sabbath before 〈◊〉 Law on Mount Sinai or Ceremonial Laws â—ere given doth not this prove it is a moral Preâ—â—pt Answ No not at all because we find that sacrifices and offering the Firstlings of the â—locks Gen. 4. 7. 7. 2. 14. 20. 28. 2. and first Fruits of the Ground were offered to God from the beginning and therefore should we grant that the seventh-Seventh-day Sabbath had been practised from the beginning â—â—so yet that would no more prove it a moral â—nd perpetual Law than it proves the offering â—f the Firstlings of the Flocks and the First-â—ruits c. to be perpetual Laws or moral Duties the Sabbath being a sign and shadow as well as they were so We come now to the â—â—urth part of our first general Proposition Object The seventh-day Sabbath was given in the 20th Chapter of Exodus The grand Argument for the Jewish Sabbath consider'd and answer'd with all the other â—ine moral and perpetual Commandments wrote in two Tables of Stone by the finger of Jehovah himself and therefore it obliged believing Gentiles to keep it and all Mankind 1. To this I answer that if I can prove it is not the Duty of Gentile Believers nor any Believers in Christ in all the World to keep the Seventh-day Sabbath from hence I shall overthrow our Opponents strongest Fort and so utterly confute them which I doubt not by God's Assistance I shall fully do and in order hereto shall lay down three Propositions First The method proposed in answering this Argument I affirm the Morality of the fourth Commandment lies not in the observation of the precise seventh day from the Creation Secondly That the Law of the ten Commandments as formally given to Moses and written with the finger of God in two Tables of Stone and given to the whole House of Israel were not given to the Gentiles nor to any other People in the World save the Strangers that were within their Gates or were proselyted to the Jewish Religion Thirdly That the whole Law is changed and that what was Ceremonial or shadows 〈◊〉 things to come ceased at the death of Christ and all Precepts of the Moral Law or what 〈◊〉 simply moral as they were formally given by Moses are taken out of his hand and put into the hands of Christ consider'd as Mediator our Lord and only Lawgiver I shall now begin with the first of these Propositious First I shall give you the sense of the Learned about a pure moral Precept First The Term Moral being but a scholastical Expression and not properly signifying that which is usually understood by it Cawdry 's Christian Sabbath p. 1 2 3. say Mr. Cawdry and Mr. Palmer we have ever judg'd it a Bone of Contention Moral relating to a Law signifies in it self any Precept serving to regulate the Manners of Men. Dr. White saith White on the Sab. p. 26. A Divine Law call'd Moral is a just Rule or Measure imposed by God directing and obliging to Obedience of things holy honest and just The same is twofold simply moral or moral only by some external Constitution or Imposition of God Divine Law simply moral commands or prohibits Actions good or evil in respect of their inward nature and quality Dr. Owen saith Owen on the Sab. p. 118. Moral Laws are such as have the Reasons of them taken from the nature of the things themselves requir'd in them for they are good from their respect to the nature of God himself c. Laws Positive as they are occasionally given so they are esteem'd alterable at pleasure being fixed by mere Will and Prerogative without respect to any thing that should make them necessary antecedently to their being given they may by the same Authority at any time be taken away and abolished Mr. Shepherd saith Shepherd on the Sab. p. 6 7. A Law strictly and especially moral is that which concerns the Manners of all Men of which we now speak and may be thus describ'd viz. It is such a Law as is commanded because it is good and it is not therefore merely good because it is commanded And thus Austin saith he describ'd it long since Also Cameron and multitudes of other Writers and learned Men. But mere Divine positive Laws are commanded of God and therefore good Some say that is simply moral that is the Law of Nature or which naturally obligeth all Men and is distinguished from Laws Ceremonial and Judicial Thus one expresseth himself i. e. Primrose of the Sab. p. 4. This Law Moral all Men take to be the Law of Nature and reciprocally they take the Law of Nature for this Law for that which is naturally and universally just Mr. Cawdry and Palmer say Cawdry Sabbatum p. 3. It implys any Law of God exprest in Scripture whether it can be prov'd natural or not which from the time it was given to the end of the World binds all succeeding Generations of their Posterity to whom it was given and more especially it obliges the Church c. I think Mr. Baxter in this case has said excellently well Baxt. on the Sab. p. 77. Moral saith he signifieth that which by nature is universal and perpetually obligatory He answers this Question Do not Divines say the Decalogue written in Stone is the Moral Law and of perpetual Obligation Answ Yes for by moral they mean natural and so take moral not in a large sense as it signifies a Law de moribus as all Laws be whatsoever but in a narrower sense as signifying that which by nature is of universal and perpetual Obligation Now then that which I call a pure of simple Moral Law or Precept is that which is a Transcript
a precise or particular Day 2. Nor in any thing that intervenes between 3. Nor in any thing that expresses the Revolution of Time wherein the day of holy Rest is to be observed Six days shalt thou labor Thus I understand this Limitation or Rule for Direction 1. Six days shalt thou labor unless God otherwise appoint and he did appoint in the old Administration other days to be kept holy which tho not always yet some times fell out on some or other of the six working days c. 2. Further Six days shalt thou labor no excluding the solemn Worship of God out of those six days for it would be no Sin to hear a Sermon or set some hour apart for Prayer any of these six days as it is for a Man to work upon that day of seven which God sets apart for himself 3. And yet further which is most of all to be taken notice of six days c. rest one not injoyning the last of seven which was instituted before but only six parts of the time shall be for your selves the seventh shall be mine So Gen. 47. 14. you shall have four parts saith Joseph the fifth shall be Pharaoh's let all be divided into five parts four shall be for your selves the fifth shall be for the King not telling them which fifth but only one of five Thus Lev. 23. 27. let all be divided into ten you shall have nine the tenth shall be the Lord's not appointing them which tenth but only one of ten So here I find not one word for the last of seven Moreover I perceive nothing at all in God's Example for it nothing there but one day in seven but when the last day of seven is required of Israel that refers to the Covenant of Works their labouring first doing all they had to do and so to rest which was a sign as I have proved of the Covenant of Works and a Pledg of their Obligation in their Restipulation with God according to the Tenour of that conditional Covenant hence their Sabbath was called a perpetual Covenant Exod. 31. and with that Covenant it is gone for ever Yet one day in seven as a day of Rest and solemn Worship is still to be the Lord 's by virtue of the fourth Command and tho God's Example of resting is mentioned yet it must be acknowledg'd to relate to some special end and purpose which may not only refer to Man's good but to God's ceasing from the Work of Creation for ever which being the first and greatest Work then done the day of his finishing his Work was to be observ'd upon that reason But when Christ God-man came and also had finished the Work of Redemption and ceased from his Work as God did from his there is the same moral reason why the Day in which he rested from redeeming i.e. the first day of seven should be our day of Rest because this is a far greater Work than that of Creation as shall be made plain and clear hereafter For we in Gospel-days as foretold shall not remember the old Heavens and the old Earth any more the new carrying away the Glory of that i.e. remember them no more by the observation of that old seventh day To this purpose Mr. B. of Dorchester Now I say God's Example under the Covenant of Works in working six days and then resting is no ways obligatory on us tho it was on Israel under the same old Covenant But we must ground and bottom our Observation of one Day in seven upon Christ's ceasing and resting from his Works and his Institution of a new Day upon the tenor or nature of the Covenant of Grace to rest first and then work six days not for Rest or to rest c. but from that Rest Christ enter'd into on the first day of the week when our Rest and Justification was compleated which we enter actually into when we first believe Now the reason saith Mr. B. to Mr. Banfield why herein I dissent from you Mr. B. of Dorchest p. 40. 't is this God blessed the seventh Day and sanctified it but not as it was the last day of the seven but as it was the day of his Rest declaring thereby Creation-work to be perfected Neither was his resting so far as I can see the ground of his blessing and sanctifying it but as consider'd in conjunction with the reason of his Rest i.e. his finishing his Creation and also with the Result and Consequence of his Rest viz. his magnifying and honouring that day for the time being above all other days for the greatest work in being For 1. God's resting cannot refer to any thing but his ceasing from creating-work because otherwise he ceaseth not working * My Father saith our Lord worketh hitherto and I work and his Example of resting as some learned Men observe is not alledged here to lay an obligation on our Conscience that that same Day we must observe for ever 2. It seems to relate to what God himself did rather than any way propounded as an Argument to prove that for which 't is urged Take a parallel case 1 Cor. 11. 23. where we have the Institution of the Lord's-Supper repeated out of the Evangelists and Christ's Example is related as to the time when which was not only in the Night but that particular Night in which he was betray'd Now this is not recorded as a binding Rule on us for our Imitation That is historically related and so may this of God's Example in the fourth Commandment There is one thing more worth noting Dr. Twiss Dr. Owen and many other learned Men cannot see how it can be said that God sanctified the seventh day Gen. 2. but that it must refer to Adam in Innocence as his duty to keep it and not that God then only by Destination Decree and Purpose set it apart for his Church and People to observe in after-times Now grant it was as I have last hinted pray do not they say as much as this comes to in respect of the gospel-Gospel-Sabbath Do not they say that in the fourth Command both in the first part and close of that Precept God only set apart or sanctified one day in seven and so conclude the original Sanctification of the first day of the week is comprehended in the fourth Commandment which I will not deny but was not this near 2000 years before he design'd his People should observe it or that it was the absolute Duty of any so to do And as there was an interval from Adam to Moses of such a state of God's People and things as render'd them not capable to observe the Seventh-day Sabbath according to the Law of it so there was an interval of such a state of the Church and things under the legal Covenant from Moses to Christ as render'd them not capable to observe the Lord's-day according to the design and purport of God therein tho that Day was by God's Destination set
apart long before Eleventhly Whatsoever is a simple moral Precept or one of the ten Commandments as materially so the Holy Ghost doth convince all Believers of now under the Gospel as I have shew'd before and also he reproves them for the neglect or breach of all such Precepts but the Holy Ghost doth not convince Believers 't is their Duty to observe the Seventh-day Sabbath for reprove them for the neglect or breach of â—t tho they work and bear Burdens on that as well as on any other day of the week therefore 't is no moral Precept Twelfthly That which is a pure moral Precept is written in the Hearts of all true Believers by the Holy Ghost God promised in Gospel-times he would not write his Law in Tables of Stone put in the fleshly Tables of our Hearts now the Law of the Seventh-day Sabbath is not written in the Hearts of Believers by the Spirit therefore 't is no moral Precept Tillam saith the moral Law is written in the Hearts of all Believers and so saith Mr. Soarsby and they say right yea even the whole moral Law we being created again in Christ Jesus in the Image of God but no Law of the Seventh-day Sabbath is written in our Hearts Ergo To conclude we may hereby learn to distinguish between those parts contain'd in some of the ten Commandments that are simply moral and oblige us as the Law is in Christ's hand and what was judicial For 1. The Preface to the whole Ten was Judicial 2. The second Command obliged the Jews to observe the whole Ceremonial Law and that part of God's visiting the Sins of the Fathers on the Children unto the third and fourth Generation belonged to the Covenant of Works and not to us 3. That in the fourth Command also of the seventh precise day belonged to the Covenant of Works and so to them only 4. The Promise annexed to the fifth only belonged to the Israelites that inherited the Land of Canaan 5. In the tenth Commandment Vsury or Interest of Mony Houses c. was forbid to the Jews from their poor Brethren but that was only a Judicial Law and is no Law to us Thus we may see that the moral Law is only a Law to us as in the hand of Jesus Christ SERMON VI. Proving that the Law of the Decalogue was given to no People but the People of Israel That the Moral Law is transferr'd from Moses into the Hand of Christ as Mediator Gal. iv 10 11. Ye observe days and months c. THat it is not the Duty of believing Gentiles to keep the old seventh-Seventh-day Sabbath I have proved by many Reasons The fourth was it is not their Duty by virtue of the Decalogue given to the People of Israel in Exod. 20. First Because the precise seventh-Seventh-day Sabbath is not the moral part of the fourth Commandment this I have proved by Twelve Arguments I shall now proceed and give you the next Reason why it is not the Duty of believing Gentiles to keep the seventh-Seventh-day Sabbath from hence Secondly The Decalogue given to none but the Jews as written Exod. 20. It cannot be their Duty to keep that Day from thence because the Law of the Decalogue and particularly the Seventh-day Sabbath mentioned therein was given to no People or Nation but the People of Israel only and the proselyted Stranger 1. I shall prove this directly from express Texts out of the Old Testament 2. From direct and express Texts out of the New Testament 3. I shall answer some of the chiefest Objections brought by the Seventh-day Sabbatarians against what I shall say But before I proceed let me premise two things 1. That all the World were under the Law of the first Covenant as made with the first Adam All the World under the Law of Works in the first Adam the common Head of all Mankind and that the substance of that natural and simple moral Law is written in the Hearts of all his Off-spring tho much darken'd by the Fall and actual Sin especially in some 2. That whatsoever is naturally or simply Moral contained in the Decalogue is given forth by Jesus Christ anew in the New Testament as I have proved and as so consider'd the sum or substance of those Ten words are obligatory on all Mankind Now First As to the Proofs out of the Old Testament 1. The very Preface to the Decalogue declares to whom all the Commandments contained therein was given Exod. 20. 2. viz. those very People God brought out of the Land of Egypt that People which he sanctified or set apart for himself above all People on the Earth as also by the promise annexed to the fifth Commandment viz. That thy days may be long in the Land which the Lord thy God giveth thee This shews the Laws of the Decalogue were only given to the People of Israel Again 2. 'T is said Deut. 4. 8. What Nation is there so great that hath Statutes and Judgments so righteous as this Law which is set before you this Day Now if this Law was given to all People in the World or to any one Nation or People besides Israel then the whole World or that particular People as well as the Israelites had Laws and Statutes as great and righteous as Israel had tho they might not have them in so clear a Revelation or manner as they had 3. It is expresly said Psal 147. 19 20. He shewed his Word to Jacob his Statutes and his Judgments unto Israel He hath not dealt so with any other Nation and for his Judgments they have not known them Praise ye the Lord. How vain as well as sinful is it to go about to contradict God's Word Here it is laid down Affirmatively and Negatively It was given to Israel and not to any other Nation c. Dr. Chamberlen saith See Mr. Ives's Saturday no Sabbath p. 18 19. It was given to Israel as a Privilege only and to other Nations by way of Punishment to judg them by it Answ Men may say what they please after this manner But I shall prove that no Nation or People but that of Israel who were under that Law shall be judged by it 4. How often doth God by Moses and other of his Servants Exod. 31. 17. declare that the Sabbath was given to Israel It is a Sign between me and the Children of Israel Neh. 9. 14. c. Also Nehemiah speaking of Israel saith God made known to them his holy Sabbath To them and the Psalmist says not to any other Nation Take two or three Arguments further to evince this 1. The Law of the Decalogue was given only to a People in covenant with God The Ten Commandments on Mount Sinai given only to the House of Israel and because the whole House of Jacob were taken into that legal typical Covenant which peculiarly referr'd to that People therefore God gave them that Law and the Sabbath as a
continue any longer And thus I close with the fourth general Argument viz. It is not the Duty of believing Gentiles to keep the seventh-Seventh-day Sabbath from the Law of the Decalogue given by Moses Exod. 20. Fifthly No Precept to keep the seventh-Seventh-day Sabbath in the New Testament It is not their Duty to keep it by any Precept given by Christ or Precedent we have in the New Testament 1. That which is urged concerning Christ's not coming to destroy the Law c. we have answer'd as also that of Paul we do not make void the Law through Faith That Text also we have answer'd and turn'd the Sword against our Adversaries which says the Son of Man is Lord even of the Sabbath and the Sabbath was 〈◊〉 made for Man 3. And also their great Proof in that of James if ye fulfil the Royal Law Jam. 2. 8 10. This I have given a full Answer to in this Discourse 4. I proceed to another pretended Argument viz. Pray that your flight be not in the Winter nor on the Sabbath-day Mat. 24. 20. Answ This Text some learned Men have not I am satisfied given the right sense of But let us premise three things 1. That Christ gave the old Names to Jewish Ordinances very often and so did his Apostles 2. That our Lord well knew how superstitiously zealous the unbelieving Jews were and would remain for their Sabbath Now pray mind the scope of this Text Christ shews how sudden their flight would be when Jerusalem was to be destroyed ver 16 17. and v. 19. he saith Wo to them that are with Child and them that give suck in those days But pray that your flight be not in the Winter nor on the Sabbath-day for then shall be great Tribulation 3. It is evident there is the same reason they should pray that their flight be not in the Winter as not on the Jewish Sabbath-day Why not in the Winter because of the difficulties of the Ways they might be deep and unpassable then whereby their Escape might be hinder'd Why not on the Sabbath-day because say some their Consciences would not admit them to fly then further than a Sabbath-day's Journy It is strange to me that our Lord should tell them a little before that it was lawful to save the Life of a sorry Animal a Brute on the Sabbath-day and bid a Man take up his Bed or bear a Burden on the Sabbath and now hint that it was not lawful or that they would so think to save their Lives by flying on the Sabbath-day believe this who will Was it not lawful to pull an Ox or Sheep out of a Pit on the Sabbath-day or for Men to carry their Goods out of their Houses on the Sabbath-day if a Fire should then happen I do not think they were ever so superstitiously blind Nay to preserve human Life our Lord shew'd was much more lawful on that day than the Life of Beasts But say some it would be grievous and uncomfortable to them to fly on that day in which they used to find so much delight Answ Our Lord gives a direct contrary Reason i.e. for then will be great Tribulation the unbelieving Jews should they fly on their Sabbath would severely handle them may be knock them on the head on this account our Lord bids them so to pray therefore this could not be the meaning of it Moreover he knew his own Disciples before that time came would be convinced that the Jewish Sabbath was ceased with other Legal Rites Therefore this I take to be the direct meaning of our blessed Lord viz. Because on the Jewish Sabbath-day the unbelieving Jews among whom you will remain or many of you when the Destruction of the City comes may be so strict and superstitious as to keep watch and ward at every Gate and Way that you will not be able to escape at least not above one of their Sabbath-day's Journey therefore pray your flight be not on that day This is all I can see in this Text. Both David and Elijah were fain to fly on the Sabbath-day See Pet. Heylin p. 137. Besides some learned Men from this Passage argue for the Christian Sabbath as 't is not unknown to our Opponents as Dr. Twiss and many more and that our Lord alludes to that Sabbath that he knew his Disciples would observe after his Death but I rather adhere to the former Exposition Obj. But the Women rested on the Sabbath-day according to the Commandment Luke 23. 56. Answ The Men themselves I mean the Disciples before our Lord suffer'd were so ignorant that they knew not their Lord should die and some a great while after did not know that they should preach to the Gentiles and is it any wonder that these good Women should not know so soon that the Sabbath was abrogated Some after that were zealous for Circumcision c. and is that an Argument that Circumcision is our Duty Besides no new day for solemn Worship was then appointed nor till after our Lord rose from the dead Object Paul as his manner was and other Apostles observed the Jews Sabbath-day they preached in the Temple and Synagogue of the Jews on the Sabbath-day Answ 1. They never taught the Jews nor Gentiles to observe the Seventh-day Sabbath 2. No one Church as we read of ever met to celebrate any Gospel-Ordinance on the Jewish Sabbath-day 3. There is not one word of any Saint that ever kept it 4. All that is on Record is that the Apostles preached to the Jews on that day Why so because they could not preach to them but when assembled together and having a Commission first to preach the Gospel to them they went into the Temple and into their Synagogue and preach'd to them on that day and so did Paul at Mars-hill to the Athenians Acts. 17. 22. 16. 13. as well as to the Jews on their Sabbath 'T is said that Paul as his manner was went in unto them Act. 13. 14. and three Sabbath-days reasoned with them out of the Scriptures Acts 17. 2. Not saith one to solemnize the Sabbath after the Jewish manner from the observation whereof the Apostles Dr. Young p. 10 11. because of the Authority committed to them by Christ were far enough especially when Paul himself did most severely reprove the Colossians and Galations because some among them stood for the Sabbath and other Feasts of the Jews but because they then had a fit occasion of communing with the Jews met together that after the readings of the Law were over they might preach the Gospel with more fruit in such a concourse of People which upon other days they could not so easily obtain and for no other end as from the alledged Testimony is evident Which things let the Reader seriously weigh for at any time or in what place soever they could they preached the Gospel to the Jews therefore on the Sabbaths as well in their
Synagogues as elsewhere the Apostles were not wanting in the Office of preaching for this cause they tarried certain days among the Macedonians because no fit occasion for preaching the Gospel offered which the Apostles every where greedily sought after they preached Christ on the Sabbath days out of the City Act. 16. 13. by a River side to Women which resorted to publick Prayers So Paul hastened to keep the Feast of Pentecost at Jerusalem Act. 20. 16. only that he might have many Jews who liv'd dispersed in divers places of the World there together and so preach the Gospel to them Chrysostom says Hom. 43. in Act. What means Paul 's hastning to this Feast it was not for the Feasts but for the Multitudes he made haste to preach the Word Now had any Text said that Paul must needs hast to Jerusalem to keep the Sabbath among the Jews what Improvement would the Sabbatarians have made of it yet that no more would prove the Sabbath ought to be kept than the Feast of Pentecost See what Paul saith Rom. 16. 8. But I will tarry at Ephesus will Pentecost for a great door and effectual is opened to me This shews what his reason was to keep that Feast and also in preaching on their Sabbaths Object But he calls it the Sabbath Answ So he calls that Feast Pentecost and Circumcision by its own Name must we therefore keep Pentecost and be circumcised It was only for distinction-sake the old Names of Jewish Rites being still kept up by the Jews Object But the Gentiles also desired the same Word might be preach'd to them the next Sabbath Act. 13. 42. sure if the Apostles had kept the first day they would rather have desir'd that Paul should preach to them the next first day Answ Paul was but newly come into those parts and there was no Gospel-Church there nor can any think that those poor unbelieving Gentiles should have heard of any other day observ'd than the Jewish Sabbath for they liv'd among the Jews and if it is said the whole City the next Sabbath came together Ver. 44. and no doubt but 't was in the Synagogue of the Jews in which they met some of the Gentiles being Proselytes to the Jewish Religion So that it is evident this is nothing to their purpose for here is no more ground from hence for us to keep the Jewish Sabbath than to meet in Jewish Synagogues Moreover Dr. Young has one Passage worth observation saith he Justin Martyr had satisfied with little ado Trypho the Jew that counselled him to observe their Sabbath for it had been enough for Justin Martyr to have answer'd the Jew that the Christian Church did observe the Sabbath yet this he grants not but plainly denies that the Jewish Sabbath ought by the Christians to be observ'd The same saith he do other Fathers against the Jews c. There are one or two more pretended Reasons out of the New Testament brought to prove that we ought to observe the seventh Day but no more at this time SERMON VII Containing ten Arguments against the observance of the Jewish Sabbath The Law of the Seventh-day Sabbath not written in the Hearts of Believers or God's new Covenant Children which is in Answer to the sixth and last pretended Proof for our Observation thereof Twelve dangerous Consequences that necessarily follow their Principle who assert the precise Seventh-day Sabbath is a pure moral Precept Gal. iv 10 11. Ye observe days and months c. BRethren I have answer'd several pretended Proofs brought from the New Testament for the observation of the old Jewish Sabbath I shall mention one morc viz. Object 5. It is objected further That it is certain that the Jews kept Sabbaths at the time of Paul's writing his Epistles and were zealous for all the Law Thus Mr. Soarsby Ans 1. May be 't is aptly enough put in Sabbaths as comprehending other Sabbaths as well as the Jews weekly Sabbath 2. But were they not as zealous for Circumcision also Nay the Objection allows they were zealous for the whole Law and it is not deny'd but Paul was forced to comply with their weakness for a time till they were fully formed as to the Cessation or Abrogation of â—ose legal Rites nay of the whole Law as in â—e hand of Moses So that Paul's forbearance with them in their â—fancy and Weakness is weakly urged These being the chief Proofs I find brought 〈◊〉 prove it our Duty to keep the seventh Day out 〈◊〉 the New Testament I shall add divers Arguments in opposition to what they say on this â—â—count 1st Several Arguments against the Observation of the old Jewish Sabbath Our Saviour's Carriage and Behaviour â—owards the old Sabbath and his Expressions about it which I have mention'd shews he was far from confirming that either as a Moral or Gospel Duty 2dly Paul's declaring against all Jewish Days without exception as Shadows c. may conâ—â—nce all that he observ'd it not in compliance with the Law of Moses or as a Command given to him by Christ the only Lawgiver 3dly His putting the Estimation of the Jewish Sabbath-day among Meats and Drinks Rom. 14. 5. or as indifferent things which a Christian may do or â—ot do shews that Sabbath was gone I do believe when Paul saith One man esteemeth one day above another and another esteemeth every day alike that he intends not all days of â—he week without exception but every day â—ave the first day or the lord's-Lord's-day because â—e speaks of Jewish Rites Days and Scruples about Meats and Drinks among them For â—e gave Command about the solemn Duties and Observation of the first Day of the week to all the Churches as I shall prove 1. Therefore let none once think that Paul was for the observance of no special day above others in the Worship of God in the Gospel-Dispensation 2. Neither let any conclude from hence thâ—â— he gave liberty to the Saints to keep the Jewish Sabbath any further than they looked upon 〈◊〉 as an indifferent thing nor any longer thâ— till their Understanding was further inlightâ—â—â— and their Consciences better informed Fâ—â— how severe was he with those as in my Teâ—â— who lay any stress upon it i.e. as a moral Dâ—ty or of necessity to a holy Life 4thly This appears because Christ who received from his Father the whole Will of God and was faithful as a Son in declaring all thing commanded him Heb. 2. 2. hath not commanded us 〈◊〉 given the least ground or reason for us to believe we ought to keep the Seventh-day Sabbath Besides he confirms afresh all simple moral Precepts c. as I have shew'd Observe what he saith Joh. 15. 15. For all things th◠〈◊〉 have heard of my Father I have made 〈◊〉 unto you ch 12. 49. The Father that sent me he gave 〈◊〉 Commandement what I should say and what 〈◊〉 should speak 5thly We read Acts 15. 1
c. of falâ—â— Brethren that went from Jerusalem and taughâ— the believing Gentiles that unless they were circumcised and kept the Law of Moses they coulâ— not be saved or that it was needful for them 〈◊〉 to do ver 15. 1. Pray observe the matter well for noâ— we may expect to hear if ever whether 〈◊〉 be the Duty of believing Gentiles or not 〈◊〉 keep the Seventh-day Sabbath because thâ—â— was none of the least Precepts of the Law 〈◊〉 Moses and this was one thing no doubt which these false Brethren taught them to observe 2. All the great and chief Apostles meet together abont this matter and consulted what Answer to send and they had the extraordinary presence of the Holy Ghost with them â—o dictated to them what to write 3. And this was the Result Act. 15. 29. viz. For it seem'd â—â—d to the Holy Ghost and to us to lay upon you greater Burden than these necessary things that â—abstain from Meats offer'd to Idols and from â—ood and from things strangled and from Forâ—cation from which if ye keep your selves ye â—ll do well Fare ye well Note these things were forbidden in the â—â—w and these things they commanded them â—t to do but not one word that they should â—â—ep the Sabbath given in Moses's Law this is â—ne of those things they should observe therefore it is not the Counsel or Mind of the â—oly Ghost that Gentile Believers should keep at Day 6thly Act. 20. 27. Paul says positively that he had not â—â—nned to declare to the Saints all the Counsel of â—d Ver. 20. And how he kept back nothing that was proâ—able to them but had shewed them all things c. â—ow I challenge any Man in the World to â—ew that Paul ever made known or shew'd â—em this thing viz. that it was their Duty to â—â—ep the Seventh-day Sabbath therefore I inâ—â—r this is none of the Counsel of God nor â—ofitable to Believers in Gospel-days From â—hence I argue thus i.e. Arg. 1. Paul declared all or the whole Counâ—â— of God Paul did not declare the Seventh-â—â—bbath Ergo that is none of the Counsel of â—od 2. If he did declare the Seventh-day Sabbath 〈◊〉 make it known to the Saints to be God's Counâ—â— some one Man or another can shew us the â—ace where it is written but no one Man can â—â—ew us the place where it is written that he declared or made known to the Saints that the seventh-day Sabbath was the Counsel of God Ergo it is none of the Counsel of God to 〈◊〉 Saints or Gospel-Believers 7thly The holy Spirit saith our Lord 〈◊〉 receive of mine Joh. 16. 13 14. and shew it unto you Again 〈◊〉 saith The Spirit of Truth shall guide you 〈◊〉 all Truth But the Spirit of Truth neither guides Believers into the observation of the seventh Day c. in the Word or New Testament nor by his inward Motions Influence and Operations on their Hearts therefore it 〈◊〉 none of their Duty to observe that Day 8thly If not one Gospel-Church observed 〈◊〉 seventh-Seventh-day Sabbath in meeting together as 〈◊〉 Church to discharge the Duties of 〈◊〉 Worship then it is not the Duty of Believerâ— in gospel-Gospel-days to observe it But not onâ— Gospel-Church c. observ'd the seventh-Seventh-day Sabbath c. Therefore 't is not Believers Duty in gospel-Gospel-days to observe it Let them shew us where one Gospel-Church did observe that day in meeting together as 〈◊〉 Church to discharge the Duties of Gospel Worship and I will give up the Cause So much in this respect there is in an Apostolical Precedent in my Judgment for what was the Practice of one Church as a Church was the Duty and Practice of every Church 9thly Gentile Believers ought not to observe the seventh-Seventh-day Sabbath because the Churches in the Gospel time observed in Religious Duties and Worship the first day of the week and we are not required to keep two days in every week in God's solemn Worship 10thly Because the Law of God written in the Hearts of all Believers doth not teach them to observe the seventh-Seventh-day Sabbath And this brings me to the last general Argument Sixthly No Law of the seventh-Seventh-day Sabbath written in the Hearts of God's New Covenant Children If it be not the Duty of believing Gentiles to keep the seventh-Seventh-day Sabbath from the Law written by the Spirit of the living God in the Hearts of all his New-Covenant Children it is not their Duty to keep it because by no other Law I have proved it is their Duty and now I shall prove that it is not their Duty to keep it by virtue of this Law 1. If it was their Duty by this Law to keep â—â—t the holy Spirit besure had left it written in the New Testament for whatsoever Law is written in our Hearts it is but the same in substance in respect to all simple moral Precepts with what is written in the New Testament 2. Consider that God expresly says in the new Covenant Jer. 31. 33. I will put my Law in their inward parts and write it in their Hearts Saith Paul 2 Cor. 3. 3. Written not with Ink but with the Spirit of the living God not in Tables of Stone but in the fleshly Tables of the Heart This shews we are not to go to the Tables of Stone to Mount Sinai for the Law of God now the Antitype of that is come God's Finger has wrote his Law in better Tables tho naturally our Hearts were like Stone yet his Spirit can and hath written his Law there What is God's Law but a Transcript or a gracious Impression of his holy Nature or his Divine Image stampt on our Souls Now then read this blessed Book ye New-Covenant Saints look within ye holy and renewed ones and see if you can find the knowledg of the seventh Day or that you have this Precept written in your Hearts and inward parts Were you ever by this Law led to know or reproved for not observing the Seventh-day Sabbath Let me close this with an Answer given to Tillam by Mr. Warren 1. Tillam saith Warren on the Sabb. p. 18 19. It was written in Adam's Heart and for this he quotes Rom. 2. 2. That it was written afterwards in Tables of Stone for which he cites Gal. 3. 19. 3. That it is written in the fleshly Table of renewed Hearts To which Mr. Warren answereth speaking to the latter The Experience of almost all renewed Hearts in Heaven and Earth doth contradict it for to speak in the Language of Eliphas â—ob 5. 1. Call now if there be any that will answer thee and to which of the Saints wilt thou turn either Scripture-Saints or Church-Saints ask St. Paul St. Cyprian St. Chrysostom St. Augustine and they will tell you that your antiquated Sabbath was so far from being in their Hearts that they have wrote against it with their Pens Turn over the Works of the eminent Fathers Add
to these the most judicious pious and zealous Ministers and Martyrs of Christ who have liv'd and dy'd within the compass of these sixteen hundred years and most if not all of them will tell you that they never owned your Saturday Sabbath they liv'd without it dy'd without it and are I doubt not gone to Heaven without it Besides how many faithful Witnesses of late years has the Lord raised up to bear Testimony against it of whom I suppose the greatest part are yet alive tho some are fallen asleep In a word how many precious and gracious and pious Christians are yet upon the Earth Men and Women redeem'd from the Earth and crucified to the World of whom the World is not worthy who look upon your Sabbath as a Cypher can freely labor and travel upon it buy and sell upon it and this after accurate Inquiry about it and to this day their Consciences never reproach them their Hearts never smote them for it What will you say Are all these Hypocrites unrenewed unsanctified ones this were to condemn the Generation of God's Children and canonize your self with your few misled Associates for the only Saints in Christendom which I would hope you dare not do tho I know * Meaning Tillam you dare as much as another Well the Adversary is brought to this Dilemma either God has no People in the World but such as are of his Perswasion or his moral and immutable Laws are not written in their Hearts or the Saturday Sabbath is none of those Laws Thus this Author If the Law of the Seventh-day Sabbath be written in the Hearts of Believers some one Man or another can produce some one Believer that was by the Law written in his Heart convinc'd of it without reading Moses's Law or any Book or Books compiled by Men about the Sabbath But no Man can produce any such Believer that will or can say this therefore it is not written in the Hearts of Believers Thus it appears that it is not the Duty of Gentile Believers to keep the seventh Day from the Law of God written in the Hearts of God's new Covenant Children which was the sixth and last part of the general Argument first proposed The last thing in speaking to the Seventh-day Sabbath I promised to do The dangerous Consequences of the Sabbatarian Principles was to shew you that as some hold and maintain it it is a dangerous Error 1. Is not that dangerous which caused Paul to fear he had bestowed on the Persons he speaks of Labor in vain Was it not because they observ'd Jewish Days laying stress on those things 2. Is not that a dangerous Error that leads Men to ratify or sign the Covenant of Works which binds them to keep the whole Law This I have proved is the natural tendency of this Practice Owen on the Sabb. p. 149. and the same thing Dr. Owen you have heard positively affirms also 3. Is not that dangerous that magnifies the first Creation Work above Redemption It magnifies Creation-work above Redemption or the new Creation Work when God began to create the new Heavens and new Earth which refers to the Gospel or new Creation What saith the Lord the old Heavens and old Earth shall be remembered no more that is in a day kept to that end for otherwise sure the great Works of the first Creation ought not to be forgot but the new Creation excelling the old the new Day must be kept in remembrance thereof and not the old day 4. Is not that a dangerous Error that tends It eclipses the Glory of Christ as the necessary Consequence of it to eclipse the Glory of Christ as the only Lord Head and Lawgiver to his Church and that gives part of this Honour to Moses 5. Is not that dangerous that tends to intangle and bring into Bondage and under legal Terror poor weak Christians as some who have kept the Seventh-day Sabbath have confessed till God open'd their Eyes they fearing they broke the Sabbath in some way or another for indeed no Man can perfectly keep it any more than he can keep the whole Law as has been hinted I was always in a trembling state saith one so long as I kept it c. or to that purpose Brethren it is not to be thought what Bondage it brought the zealous Jews under they not knowing when they had answered the strict observance of that day and if they brake it they must die without Mercy as the poor Man that gathered Sticks on that day they were not to speak their own words c. How should they know when they did this On Mat. 12. 2. p. 361. Nay live and sin not They would not Mr. Trap saith spit nor ease themselves on that day which is hard to believe tho some were superstitiously zealous 't is true yet others who were piously zealous by means of the strictness of the Precept continually were in fear and bondage And sad it is for any to be entangled again thereby 6. Is not that a dangerous thing Jewish Sabbath genders to Bondage that by the necessary consequence of it leads men to observe other Legal Rites and Ceremonies as not to eat Swines-flesh nor wear a Garment of Linen and Woolen nor mar the corner of their Beards Nay some of the chief of them formerly were led to Circumcision and to worse than that also I saw a Book published many years ago by two of them in which they called themselves the Ministers of the Circumcision That these things are the necessary Consequences of their Notion about their Sabbath appears because they go to Moses for it as the Law was in his hand and believe many other things that were meer Judicial Laws to be in force now They are for Moses's Law with the Statutes and Judgments and have declared that that Law is in force to stone to death such as break the Sabbath And no marvel for if that Sabbath be in force the Punishment is in force also Nay they believe I hear that a rebellious Son ought to be put to death 7. Is not that Error dangerous It renders all that keep it not guilty of horrid Immorality and of an evil Nature the necessary Consequence whereof renders all that keep not that precise seventh-Seventh-day as the Sabbath nor can be convinced 't is their Duty to observe it to be guilty of Immorality i. e. in breaking a moral Precept in the very Letter of it nay one of the Precepts of the first Table For it must be thus if the morality of the fourth Commandment lies in the observation of the precise Seventh-day Sabbath and it must be as great an Evil to violate it as 't is to have another God or to bow down to a graven Image or to swear or profane the holy Name of God or commit actual Adultery Murder c. and thus their Doctrin renders all true Christians to be guilty of a most
come in the Flesh at least of his being King and Law-giver to his Church And to lay the Foundation of all religious solemn Worship in the observation of a Day as the Seventh-day precisely had no relation to any natural or moral Precept nor was instituted or approved by Jesus Christ cannot but be unpleasing to them who desire to have their Consciences immediately influenced by his Authority in all their approaches unto God But Christ herein is supposed to have built the whole Fabrick of his Worship on the Foundation of Moses and to have grafted all his Institutions into a Stock that was not of his own planting 11. Moreover it is evident that the Consequence of their Opinion concerning the necessary observation of the Seventh-day Sabbath as the Doctor saith It tends to Schism tends to the increasing and perpetuating of Schisms and Differences among Christians And those are the worst saith he and most pernicious which occasion or draw after them any thing whereby men are hindred from joining together in the same publick solemn Worship whereby they yield unto God that reverence of his Glory But now upon a supposition of an adherence by any unto the Seventh-day Sabbath all Communion among Professors in solemn Gospel-Ordinances is rendered impossible For if those of that Perswasion do expect that others will be brought unto a relinquishment of an Evangelical observance of the Lord's Day Sabbath they will find themselves mistaken The evidence which they have of its appointment and the experience they have had of God's presence in its religious observation will secure their practice in this matter c. The Seventh-day Sabbath men on the other hand supposing themselves obliged to meet for solemn Worship on the Seventh-day which the other account unwarrantable for them to do on the pretence of any binding Law to that purpose and esteeming it unlawful saith he to assemble religiously with others on the First-day on the plea of Evangelical Warranty do absolutely cut off themselves from all possibility of Communion in the administration of Gospel-Ordinances with any other Churches of Christ And whereas most other breaches as to Communion are in their nature capable of healing without a renunciation of those Principles in the minds of men which seem to give countenance to them the distance is here made absolutely irreparable while the Opinion maintained is owned by any I will press this saith he no further but only by affirming that Persons truly fearing the Lord ought to be very careful and jealous over their own Understanding before they embrace an Opinion and Practice which will shut them from all visible Communion with the generality of the Saints of God in the World To which let me add How can they have Communion with us if they consider and observe the Consequences of their Principle Are not we guilty of absolute Immorality i. e. the literal breach of one Precept of the first Table Can they or we have Communion with such as bow down to a graven Image or profane the holy Name of God or are guilty of Murder c. And thus you may see what the natural and genuine Consequences of this Principle are and that it not only tends to lay the Generation of the Righteous under the guilt of the breach of a moral Precept and renders them guilty in their sense of the breach of the whole Law but hath other bad Consequents attending it also And this may tend to convince all that consider of what I say that the Morality of the fourth Commandment doth not consist in that precise Seventh-day Sabbath and discovers how blind these Men are Brethren tho I believe many who keep this Day and affirm it is a moral Precept are very pious and good Christians Some of them are for free Grace c. and do not affirm what I say nor may be see it not to be so or will not say thus What then yet I will appeal to all thinking impartial Persons whether I do not infer the direct natural Consequence of their Principle Moreover let me ask here this Question how it can stand consistent with a good Conscience for a Minister to forbear preaching in any Congregation some part of Morality or a moral Precept I grant that Love Wisdom Charity Peace c. may prevent some Men from preaching some Duties of mere positive right for a short time at least that are disputable and not Essentials of Salvation But what are such things to a simple moral Precept both materially and formally one of the Ten Commandments as they affirm their Sabbath is Suppose a Minister preaches to a Congregation that he knows are generally guilty of worshipping a Graven Image or of profane Swearing or of Adultery or of killing their innocent Neighbours would not he preach against these horrid Evils for fear he should offend the Congregation or if he forbear so to do would he not be shamefully guilty of great Sin and of their Blood also Happy is the Man that condemns not himself in the thing he allows I know what some have said about Polygamy if they answer me let them use that Argument I am prepared to reply But let none think I speak thus to expose any of them out of Prejudice for I can appeal to Almighty God I have none against any of their Persons But it is to expose their Principle and Practice in love to their Souls and to the Souls of other Persons But before I conclude with this old Sabbath I must add one dangerous Consequence more of their Principle 12. Is not that a dangerous Error that reflects nay casts Contempt upon the Holy Ghost in respect of his Work and Office which is to convince Believers of all Sin especially of all immoral Evils under his most clear and glorious Ministration since our Saviour's Ascension into Heaven Now I ask our Opponents Whether the holy Spirit doth convince all Believers that they ought to keep the old seventh-Seventh-day Sabbath or reprove them for Immorality in the non-observance thereof Sirs as these things aggravate their Evil in what they affirm so it clearly tends to overthrow the pretended Morality of that precise seventh-Seventh-day Sabbath for the holy Spirit never convinces Believers of any such Duty nor reproves them for working on that day or for bearing of Burdens on it any more than on any other day in the week to their dying day But it lets them silently fall asleep without the least sense of any such pretended immoral Evil. Besides the generality of Believers after their utmost inquiry search and seeking to God in all sincerity cannot be convinc'd it is their Duty to keep this Day Would the Holy Ghost thus leave the Generation of the Godly under Sin and such Ignorance think you were this a moral Duty And as to such as do observe it I am satisfied the Spirit of God never taught them so to do But they in this are left to themselves and have a Zeal
but not according to knowledg which God in time I hope by his Spirit will convince them of Quest If it be thus what think you of them that observe this Sabbath Answ As to such gracious Christians who observe it out of Conscience and because 't is put into the fourth Commandment do think it may be their Duty so to do but attempt not to affirm it is a moral Duty nor dare they neglect to observe the first Day provided they are in a Capacity being not Servants to observe both Days and make no noise nor disturbance about it but keep it to themselves I think it may be as to them a harmless Error And as to others I must leave them to the Lord and judg them not tho I judg and must condemn their Principle And let them take heed how they judg us in respect of the non-observation of a Jewish Rite c. or of Jewish Sabbath-days PART II. The Gospel-Sabbath or The Lord's-Day of Divine Institution Containing four Sermons lately preach'd on a special Occasion SERMON I. Shewing that our Lord Christ did certainly give Directions to his Disciples to observe the first Day of the week under the Gospel That Pentecost was the first Day of the week and that then the first Day was confirmed to be the day of Gospel-worship Mat. xxviii 20. Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you and lo I am with you alway even to the end of the World OUR blessed Lord as Mediator having received all Power in Heaven and Earth as King Head Governor only Soveraign and Law-giver to his Church gave forth here his great Commission to his Discipleâ— In which 1. As our Annotators note He asserts his own Power 2. He delegates a Power to his Disciples 3. He subjoins a Promise to them 'T is a Power to congregate Churches and to proclaim free Justification and remission of Sins thro his perfect Obedience in his holy Life and thro the Death of his Cross as also Power to give forth Laws and Ordinances to his People and to give eternal Life to whomsoever he pleaseth This Power was essentially and inherently in him as God over all blessed for evermore but given to him as Mediator God-man our Soveraign Lord and Redeemer given him when he first came into the World but more especially given and manifested and confirmed to him when he rose from the Dead In which words we have 1. A Command expresly given Teaching them c. 2. The universality of this Command all things whatsoever I have commanded you 3. A gracious Promise annexed by way of Encouragement and lo I am with you alway c. Doct. That many things Christ commanded his Disciples to teach others The Doctrine raised are included or comprehended in this his great Commission which are not expressed This is evident so that if we would know what these things are which are not expressed we must have recourse 1. Either to what things they doctrinally preach'd or by their Example led the Gospel Churches into the practice of But 2. Let it be consider'd that we are obliged to believe that whatsoever the holy Apostles did teach Whatsoever the Apostles preached Christ gave them Command so to do or lead the Churches into the Practice of by their Example were such things as Christ commanded them and this Paul doth positively declare For I will not dare to speak of any of those things to make the Gentiles obedient by word or deed which Christ hath not wrought in me See 1 Cor. 14. 37. or commanded me And indeed should it be thought otherwise 1 Cor. 11. 23. it would render the Apostles unfaithful and guilty of bringing Innovations into the Churches either in respect of any one precise day of Worship or any matter or part of Worship to be perform'd I speak not now of the mode of Worship but any essential part thereof Now that Paul who was the Minister and great Apostle of the Gentiles did teach the Churches to observe the first day of the week by assembling together to discharge the Duties of Religious Worship is evident Nor can it be once supposed since he endeavour'd to take the Churches off from the observance of the Jewish Sabbath as I have proved that he should not direct them or discover to them what day of the week Christ had commanded his People to observe in the time of the Gospel they knowing especially that one day in seven the Lord declared in the fourth Commandment he would have perpetually sequestred to his Service as also the reasonableness or equitableness thereof Therefore my Brethren as I have endeavour'd to answer all the pretended Arguments brought to prove that we ought to observe the old Jewish Sabbath the simple Morality of the fourth Commandment they say consisting in the observation of that precise day So I shall now God assisting attempt to prove that we are obliged to observe the first day of the week as a day of Rest and solemn Worship to God while I esteem such as are for no special or particular day to be observed by Divine Authority both in private Families and in Church Assemblies to be strangely left of God and to be no friends to our sacred Religion but such as open a door to great Licentiousness and Profaneness If therefore any should say that there is no one precise day in seven of Divine Authority under the Gospel-Dispensation but that the Church may appoint what day she pleaseth I reply 1. What force or authority can such a human Precept have upon any Man's Conscience To appoint a weekly day of Worship is not in the power of the Church c. i. e. the observance of one day in every week free from all worldly Business if God requires it not 2. Then also it would follow that God doth admit vile Man to share or partake of equal Honour with himself i. e. that tho he will appoint the Ordinances of his own Worship and have all that Glory to himself yet Man shall have the honour to appoint the precise constant time of his Worship which is next in point of honour to the other 3. And by granting Men that Honour and Dignity it may let in by parity of reason a Power to alter and change if not add new Laws and Ordinances of Worship also 4. Besides it will also follow that the Church on the first day of the week doth not meet together by Divine Appointment if all days are alike but only by human Authority 5. Moreover perhaps one part of the Church may be for one day in four and another less zealous may be for one day in a fortnight nay one day in a month some may say is sufficient So that it would put all things into confusion for how can a human Law or the bare Authority of a Church without the Divine Appointment of Christ Jesus himself awe the Conscience Moreover perhaps some would be
of the very day next after the Jewish Sabbath as much as one a Clock is the proper name of one hour which is next after twelve It must be great ignorance or somewhat worse thus to object I will appeal to himself * That is Mr. Bamfield whether ever he met with that Name in any other sense Object They must on that Day lay by them as God had blessed them i. e. then cast up their Accounts tell their Mony reckon their Stock compute their expences c. and not collect Mony or lay it together on that day A wise Objection saith Dr. Wallis as tho all this could not be done before so far as necessary and they on Sunday put so much into the Poors Box or give it to the Deacons c. 2. According to this childish Objection they were but bid as it were to take so much Money as they purposed to give out of one Pocket on that day and put it by it self into another But I will appeal to them whether this would have prevented any gatherings when the Apostle came to them and no doubt Paul here put them in mind of some extraordinary Occasion that they might have more Money collected and put together against he came than usually on that Day they might collect yet it is clear it was all the Churches practice by the direction of the Holy Ghost on every First-day when the Churches met together for solemn Worship to gather Money for their poor Brethren and Sisters 3. The constant day of the Churches solemn assemblings Owen on the Sabb. p. 391. being fixed saith Dr. Owen Paul here takes it for granted and directs them to the observance of a special Duty on that day Object But here is no mention made of any meeting that was or was to be at this Season or the least prescription binding the Conscience to the weekly observation of the First-day for a Sabbath by divine Appointment Answ As the Doctor saith this and other Churches were before fixed on the constant observance of the First-day of the Week for the solemn Worship of God and his directing them upon this Day to make Collections for the Poor even every First-day c. doth fully shew that it was the precise Day of Church-Assemblies and that among all the Churches 'T is enough that on this day the Churches met not to preach only and make gatherings for the Poor Act. 20. 7. but to administer the Lord's Supper and we read of none that met as a Church to do any of these things on the Seventh-day Besides it is called the Lord's Day our Lord Christ allows us all the other days to work in but this is his Day wholly to be sequestered to his Service and therefore of divine Institution Had it been said on every Seventh-day let every one lay by him c. our Opponents would have urg'd it as a great proof for their Sabbath What some except Owen p. 391 392. saith Dr. Owen that here is no mention of any Church-Assembly but only that every one on that day should lay by him what he would give which every one might do at home or where they pleased is exceeding weak and unsutable to the mind of the Apostle For to what end should they be limited to a day and that the first of the Week for doing of that which might as well and to as good purpose and advantage be performed at any other time or on any other day of the Week whatever Besides it was such a laying aside such a treasuring of it in a common Stock as that there should be no need of any Collection when the Apostle came And now if this Practice and Example of the Primitive Churches be no Rule to us or bind us not certainly nothing they did or practised as Churches can oblige us Nay if so worse will follow also for if their Example in observing the first-First-day be no warrant for us nor it is not our duty from any thing that has been said to observe the Lord's Day it will follow that we in Gospel-times are not obliged to keep any special weekly day at all seeing we are by no Precept nor Precedent obliged to keep the Jewish Sabbath So that these men from hence appear the chiefest Enemies to any Gospel-Sabbath or day of Rest and solemn Worship in the World Note also Dr. Wallis that this day was not observed or to be observed once only but as a thing in course and so presumed by the Apostle when he gave particular Directions concerning a Collection for the poor Saints to be made weekly on that day And in like manner in the Churches of Galatia with like direction to them And we have reason to believe that it was observed in all other Churches also for Paul in another case saith 1 Cor. 7. 17. as he ordained in all Churches of the Saints they all walked by one and the same Rule and observed besure one and the same day and discharged the same Duties upon that day The First-day of the Week therefore being that on which Christ rose from the Dead and upon which the Churches met together in one place to break Bread Acts 2. 1 2. 20. 7. and which is called the Lord's Day and on which they were injoined to make Collections for the poor Saints besure is that day which our Lord commanded them to observe while he was with them forty days giving Commandments to his Apostles about things pertaining unto the Kingdom of God and setling the Affairs of the Christian Church And no doubt the observance of the First-day was one thing he commanded because on that day they afterwards met together and were most eminently owned in so doing Acts 2. 1 2. And what signifies their Objection There is no express Command to observe this Day As if it must be expressed as one observes be it enacted My Brethren an approved practice in God's Worship frequently repeated attested by Miracles incouraged by Christ's own Example with that of the Apostles and Christian Churches and continued ever since is evidence sufficient that it is the Will of God that this Day ought to be observed and such as cannot see it must remain blind As to such as still question whether this was the First-day of the Week let me note one thing more Beza * One or two Learned Men mention this had an antient Manuscript where it is called the Lord's Day Let every one on the Lord's Day lay by him c. But enough was said to that before it was the First-day of the Week and therefore the Lord's day And if this day had not been more holy or more fit for this Work of Love than any other Shepherd on the Sab. p. 219. Paul durst not have limited them to this Day nor have honoured this Day above any other yea above the Jewish seventh-Seventh-day Moreover saith Mr. Shepherd the Apostle doth not in this place immediately
and the Courts at Westminster Saturday is called Sabbati or Dies Sabbati True as supposing by Tradition this day of our week to be what the Jews called the Sabbath in their week but do you not know also in the same Records Sunday is called Dies Dominicus the Lord's-day And if those prove Saturday to be the Jewish Sabbath why should not these as well prove Sunday to be the Lord's-day All the difference is as to that you were quick-sighted but blind as to this You may observe also that the one is Sabbati or Dies Sabbati in the Genitive case in the same form with Dies Saturni and as the other days are but the Lord's-day is Die Dominico in the Ablative meaning I suppose that Saturday is the day which had been the Jewish Sabbath but this the day which is the Lord's-day Which different Construction seems plainly to intend in our Law a different import of the words by Dies Saturni or Dies Lunae we do not mean a Day instituted by Saturn or the Moon as by Dies Dominica we do mean the Day instituted by our Lord like as by Coena Dominica we mean the Supper instituted by our Lord So that these Records do you no Service at all but Disservice I shall here before I close add a few Syllogistical Arguments for our Opponents to answer Arg. 1. If the holy Spirit doth write the whole Moral Law of God in the Hearts of all true Believers but doth not write the Law of the Seventh-day Sabbath in their Hearts then the Seventh-day Sabbath is no Moral Precept but the former is true Ergo. Arg. 2. The holy Spirit doth convince all Gospel-Believers of all immoral Evils or of every simple moral Precept the holy Spirit doth not convince all Gospel-Believers it is an Evil not to observe the seventh Day as a Sabbath nor that this is a moral Precept Ergo 'T is not an immoral Evil to work upon that day c. Or thus Arg. 3. The holy Spirit guides all true Believers into all Truths that result from the holy Nature of God or that are good and therefore commanded the holy Spirit doth not guide all true Believers to observe the seventh Day as a Sabbath Ergo the Seventh-day Sabbath is no such Truth c. Arg. 4. If the New Testament be a perfect Rule of Faith and Practice and there is no Precept nor Precedent for the observance of the seventh-Seventh-day Sabbath the seventh-Seventh-day Sabbath ought not by us to be observed but the former is true Ergo 't is not our duty to observe that Day Arg. 5. If Christ and Paul after him have made known or declared the whole Counsel and Will of God or whatsoever we should believe observe and practise but have not made known or declar'd it is our duty to observe the seventh Day then 't is not our duty to observe it but the former is true Ergo. Arg. 6. If the Law of the Seventh-day Sabbath as given by Moses belonged wholly or was annexed to the Judgments of the Mosaical Oeconomy and the Judgments of the Mosaical Oeconomy belong not to the Gospel-Church then the Law of the Sabbath as given by Moses belongs not to us but this is so because Death was the Penalty of the breach thereof Ergo. Object What if we grant that all the ten Commandments belonged or were annexed to the Mosaical Oeconomy are all the ten Commandments abrogated therefore or not in force to us Answ I have shewed that the whole Moral Law is given forth by Christ considered as Mediator and that we are not obliged to observe them as given by Moses and the precise seventh Day being no simple Moral Precept but merely Judaical pertaining to the Covenant of Works our Lord hath not nor could confirm that Precept in the Gospel so that it appears the Sabbath only belonged to the Mosaical Oeconomy and will you affirm that of all the Ten. One Sabbatarian * Mr. Edw. Stennett on the Sab. p. 50. saith That all the ten Commandments had the Penalty of Death annexed to them to be inflicted by the Magistrate which saith he is an evident distinction between Moral Laws and Laws Ceremonial c. Again he saith Pag. 53. See the Snare broken the Sabbath having the same Penalty that the other nine have it convincingly proves the Morality of it Answ 1. This shews that none of the ten Commandments as given by Moses are in force to Believers or oblige the Gospel-Church but only belong'd to the Jewish Policy as formally deliver'd Exod. 20. and tho the Moral Law given by Christ as Mediator doth oblige us yet the precise seventh Day being no Moral Precept but only Judaical is gone it not being given forth anew in the Gospel nor could be given with its old Sanction viz. the Penalty of Death to be inflicted on such that break it because the Gospel-Church is no Political Body or Civil State they can't inflict Death on such as transgress this or other Precepts 2. Nay nor ought such to die that profane the holy Name of God or disobey their Parents or commit Adultery c. by any Law given by Christ in the Gospel * And do not such as affirm otherwise strangely Judaize those Temporal Punishments only belonged to the Mosaical Oeconomy many in the Gospel-Church before call'd were guilty of the gross breach of divers moral Precepts yet were not to be put to death Christ came not to take away Mens Lives but to save them both from temporal and eternal Death 3. Moreover it is a grand mistake to say that the Penalty of Death distinguisheth Moral Laws from Ceremonial for he that in the days of Atonement did not afflict his Soul Levit. 23. 29. must die or be cut off and whosoever toucheth the Mount shall be surely put to death Exo. 19. 13. And he that was not circumcised must die or he cut off so for divers other Sins †Exod. 30. 33 38. Lev. 7. 20 21 25 27. 17. 4 9. that were not Moral Precepts Pray read Heb. 10. 28. Paul shews that in this respect we are not come to Mount Sinai but to Mount Sion Heb. 12. 18. and sad it is to see any so left as to endeavour to carry the People back again to that fiery Law which was so terrible as the Apostle shews ver 21. But it is no marvel they do thus when they that intimate the Law and Covenant Exod. 20. was the Covenant of Grace If I have an Answer God sparing my Life you shall see what some of their chief Writers have said as to this and some other things that may seem more distasteful to all pious Christians Arg. 7. If the first Day was observed as a day of Worship by the Apostolical Church and no other day of the week then the first Day is that day of Worship which we should observe but the first Day was so observed c. Ergo. Arg. 8. If Moses as
a Lawgiver abode no longer than till Christ put an end to his Ministration See Isa 33. 22 and Christ as Mediator is our only Lawgiver under the Gospel yet hath not commanded us to observe the seventh-Seventh-day Sabbath then 't is not our duty to observe it but Moses as a Lawgiver abode no longer c. Ergo. Arg. 9. If all Sabbaths given to the Jews without exception were shadows of things to come whereof the Body is Christ then was their weekly Sabbath a shadow but all their Sabbaths without exception were shadows c. Ergo. Arg. 10. Whatsoever Practice it be that opens a door to Judaism and genders to Bondage can be no Truth of Christ but the observation of the old Seventh-day Sabbath opens a door to Judaism c. Ergo * They plead for the Law as given in Horeb with the Statutes and Judgments Arg. 11. Whatsoever Principle and Practice reflects upon the Honour of Christ as Mediator King and Lawgiver to his Church who was more faithful than Moses can be no Truth of Christ but the Principle and Practice of the old Jewish Sabbath reflects c. Ergo. evident 't is Christ hath nowhere taught or commanded it so that if it be our duty we must go to Moses's Law for it and 't is foolish to say Christ as Mediator gave the Law of the Decalogue tho as God he gave not that only but the whole Ceremonial Law also Arg. 12. That Principle and Practice that has many evil and dangerous Consequents attending it is no Truth of God but the Principle and Practice of some who keep the seventh Day is so attended c. Ergo. To conclude Let no Christian any more doubt that the Lord's Day is that day we ought to observe to him in all Sacred Devotion and Piety Consider 1. God hath built all things upon Jesus Christ and so this Day of Rest wherefore it stands as fast as its Foundation 2. God the Father declared Thou art my Son this day have I begotten thee that is from the dead and this was on the First-day of the Week 3. This was the First-day of Christ's Kingdom 4. This Day Christ rested from his Work therefore this day remains as a day of Rest to us 5. This Day our Redemption was finished and Christ received our discharge from Sin and Wrath for ever 6. On this Day the Typical Sabbath was ceased and all Shadows of the Law vanquished 7. In him whom the old Sabbath shadowed forth must we seek our Rest and a day of Rest we in him being freed from all legal Labour servile Fear and from the burden of all Sin and Misery 8. On this Day the Disciples met and Christ preached Peace to them and on this day millions of Souls have been converted 9. On this Day John saw Jesus Christ walking in the midst of the seven Churches in Asia 10. This Day was confirmed by the miraculous effusion of the Spirit 11. On this Day the Gospel-Churches met together to break Bread and to discharge all parts of Gospel-Worship 12. This is the Day when preaching the Word is in season 13. On this day Collections were made for the Poor in all the Churches of the Saints 14. This is the Lord's Day all other days he allows us to do work upon but this is wholly his own Day he lays claim to this only O give it wholly up to him 15. This Day all the Godly have observed in every Age of the Church to these present Times 16. For profaning this Day God hath inflicted many sore and fearful Judgments And thus I shall close what I shall say at present for the observation of the First-day of the Week as a Day of Rest and solemn Worship When the Lord's Day begins 1. Some think we ought to begin it at the time when the Jews began their Sabbath When the Lord's Day begins others from Midnight to Midnight others from Morning to Evening Take what Dr. Owen saith to this which I think is very full and clear Some Owen on the Sabb. p. 323. saith he contend that it is a natural Day consisting of 24 hours beginning with the evening of the preceding day and ending with the same of its own and accordingly so was the Church of Israel directed Levit. 23. 32. Altho that doth not seem to be a general direction for the observation of the weekly Sabbath but to regard only that particular extraordinary Sabbath which was thus instituted namely the day of Atonement on the tenth day of the seventh month vers 27. However suppose it to belong also to the weekly Sabbath it is evidently an addition to the Command particularly suted unto the Mosaical Pedagogy that the Day might comprize the Sacrifice of the proceeding Evening in the Service of it from an Obedience whereunto we are freed by the Gospel Neither can I subscribe to this Opinion and that because in the Description and Limitation of the original Seven Days it is said of each of the Six that it was constituted of an Evening and a Morning but of the Day of Rest there is no such description it is only called the Seventh-day without any assignation of the preceding Evening unto it 2. A Day of Rest according to Rules of natural Equity ought to be proportioned to a day of Work or Labour which God hath granted unto us for our own use Now this is to be reckoned from Morning to Evening Psal 104. 20 21 22 23. Thou makest darkness and it is night c. Man goeth forth to his labour until the evening The day of Labour is from the removal of darkness and the night by the light of the Sun until the return of them again which allowing for the alterations of the day in the several seasons of the year seems to be the just measure of our Day of Rest 3. Our Lord Jesus Christ who in his Resurrection gave beginning and being to this especial Day of holy Rest under the Gospel rose not until the Morning of the First-day of the Week when the beamings of the light of the Sun began to expel the darkness of the Night or when it dawned towards Day as is variously expressed by the Evangelists This with me determines this whole matter 4. Meer cessation from Labour in the Night seems to have no place in the spiritual Rest of the Gospel to be expressed on this Day nor to be by any thing distinguished from the Night of any other day in the Week 5. Supposing Christians under the Obligation of the direction given by Moses before-mentioned it may intangel them in the anxious scrupulous Intrigues which the Jews are subject unto about the beginning of the Evening it self about which their great Masters are at variance which things belong not to the Oeconomy of the Gospel Upon the whole matter I am inclinable to judg and do so that the observation of the Day is to be commensurate to the use of our natural
strength on any other day from morning to night and nothing is hereby lost that is needful to the due sanctification of it For what is by some required as a part of its Sanctification is necessary and required as a due preparation thereunto 1. From what the learned and pious Doctor saith I infer that these Sabbatarians do not only Judaize in respect of the Seventh-day it self but also as to the time when they begin their pretended Sabbath 2. And as to what he says about the beginning of the Lord's Day I see no just cause to dissent from him provided none from thence take liberty to end the Day too soon And I think it would be a reproach to any Person to begin to work before midnight of the Lord's Day or to suffer their Servants to work after twelve a Clock on the Seventh-day at night nay it might be better if they left off sooner that so they may not be hindered in God's Service on his Day for the natural Day with us begins at midnight and ends at midnight and tho 't is the Lord's Day not the Night we are to observe in his solemn Worship yet must we have time for preparation and after the Day is gone for Meditation Prayer c. And let none mistake the Doctor he hints plainly enough that by way of preparation we ought to begin sooner and then certainly to continue our meditation after the day is past till it is fit to go to our natural Rest and the contrary is a scandal and reproach to Religion and true Piety How the Lord's Day should be kept Certainly since the Lord's Day or the First-day of the Week is the Day of holy Rest and solemn Worship in Gospel-times it behoveth us to know and consider well how we should keep it or observe it to the Lord. 1. Evident it is that some are carried away by delusion who believe all days are alike and so every day should be kept as a Sabbath which is nothing less than the design of the Devil who if he can perswade men that there is no such thing as a Sacred Rest or any one day required by Authority from Christ will soon bring them to observe no day at all and so all Gospel-worship Religion Piety and the special Day of Worship will soon fall together 2. Nay and I am satisfied that one grand cause of the lamentable decay of true Zeal and Piety and of the grievous witherings among us in these days is that sad carelesness and looseness about a due and religious observance of the Lord's Day For when more Conscience was made of the Dutys of this Day how did Religion and strict Godliness flourish in this Nation and in the Churches of Christ and godly Families Nor will it be better till a Reformation be attained in this case 3. Yet On the Sab. P. 317. as Reverend Owen observes several Instances there are of the Miscarriages of men on the one hand and on the other Some formerly and may be now think they are obliged to keep the Lord's Day after the manner the Jews kept the old Sabbath To which I might add some are too Pharisaical in this matter There hath been saith the Doctor some excess in directions of many given about the due sanctification of the Lord's Day which indeed he calls severe directions about Dutys and manner of performance on which some others have taken occasion thereby to seek Relief and have rejected the whole Command So that it appears in this as in many other cases men are ready to run into extreams on the one hand or the other Directions Pag. 21. saith he have been given and not a few for the observation of a Day of holy Rest which either for the matter of them or the manner prescribed have no sufficient warrant or foundation in the Scripture Whereas some have made no distinction between the Sabbath as Moral * That is one day in seven as he calls it a moral positive elsewhere and as Mosaical unless it be merely in the change of the Day and so have endeavour'd to introduce the whole practice required on the latter into the Lord's Day Nay as I shall shew you they have asserted the simple morality of the fourth Commandment to consist in the observance of the precise First-day of the Week or the Lord's Day as the Saturday Sabbatarians do on the Seventh which is no small Error on both sides and is attended as I have proved with great Absurdities and dangerous Consequences Therefore if any ask how should we observe the Lord's Day for we are fully satisfied say they that is the Day the Lord hath made as the Day of Rest and solemn Worship under the Gospel I answer First Negatively not after that legal severe or strict manner as was the Jewish Sabbath under the Law I am perswaded some good Men in the last Century have by an over-heated Zeal stumbled many godly Christians by pressing the Lord's Day observance just after the manner of the old Jewish Sabbath as if one precise Day of Worship was a pure moral Precept But if the morality of the fourth Command consisted not in the observation of the precise seventh-Seventh-day as I have shewed besure it doth not in the observance of the first-First-day tho it be our Duty by mere positive Right to keep it wholly to the Lord. And should we press the observance of the Lord's Day with that severity and strictness the Seventh-day Sabbath was to be observed we should bring our People into equal bondage with the Jews of old But let us avoid all Extreams on either hand for as I hinted some Learned Men formerly * And there are too many of this sort also in our days opened a door to loosness and licentiousness on the one hand by not allowing the First-day's observance to be of Divine Institution and so allowed of Sports and carnal Delights on the Lord's Days I might mention Mr. Primrose Dr. Heylin Pocklington c. So others 't is evident have exceeded as much on the other hand but 't is best to keep in a medium betwixt both Therefore in the Negative 1. I do not believe it is unlawful to kindle a Fire on the Lord's-day because 't is not forbid in the Gospel as it was under the Law on the old Sabbath-day 2. I do not believe 't is unlawful to travel further than a Jewish Sabbath-days Journey whether to to hear a Sermon or to visit a sick Person or the like We have no bounds under the Gospel On the Sab. p. 353. saith Dr. Owen for a Sabbath-days Journy provided it be for Sabbath Ends. In brief all Pains or Labour that our Station and Condition in this World as Troubles may befal us make necessary as that without which we cannot enjoy the solemn Ends and Uses of this sacred Day of Rest are no way inconsistent with the due observation of it It may be the lot of one Man to
intimate r. when they intimate The Jewish Sabbath Abrogated or the Saturday Sabbatarian confuted c. SERMON I. The occasion of the Author 's preaching on this Subject The scope and coherence of the Text open'd The Terms explain'd and the Doctrines raised Divers preliminary Propositions shewing what Medium the Author intends to take in treating on this Subject Gal. iv 10 11. Ye observe days and months times and years I am afraid of you lest I have bestowed upon you labor in vain MY Brethren The occasion of the Author 's preaching these Sermons I am troubled I have such a provoking occasion to enter upon this Controversy viz. What day of the Week we under the Gospel Dispensation ought to observe as a day of Rest and of solemn Worship to the Lord since universally the Church and People of God of all Persuasions are agreed about it and have been ever since the new World or Gospel-day did commence except a few Christians formerly and a little Remnant of late times in this Nation who have deserted and err'd in this case And had I not a clear Call to enter upon this Subject thro the inadvertence of some young Men among us I had not meddled with it who have not only without advising with me or the Congregation presum'd to keep the Jewish Sabbath but with an unaccountable and over-heated Zeal have prosecuted their Notion and Practice to the disturbing of the Quiet and Peace of the Congregation My Brethren is it not a lamentable thing to see how Satan hath prevail'd to hinder the Power of Godliness which consisteth not in Meats and Drinks nor in the Observation of Jewish Days but in Righteousness Rom. 14. 17. and Peace and Joy in the Holy Ghost One while he hath endeavour'd to do this by suggesting of strange and uncouth Notions and Principles that edify not into the minds of Christians at another time by raising up needless Cavils and Objections about the mode of the discharge of a Moral as well as a Gospel-Duty I mean that of singing the Praises of God which formerly caus'd no small trouble amongst us as well as in other Churches But when that Controversy was near vanquish'd so another is rais'd which I hope God will make me an Instrument to quell also and utterly drive away hence he having set me for the defence of the Gospel and of all pure Gospel-Truths in this place in opposition to all Innovations and Judaical Rites and Observations which some seem too fond of Yet let none mistake me I shall not censure such as keep the seventh day provided they lay no stress upon it but believe they are oblig'd by the Authority of Christ who is Lord of the Sabbath to observe religiously the Lord's-day or first day of the Week free from Labor in the Worship and Service of God provided also they are such as have the command of their own time and can do it without wronging their Families or are not by the Observation of the seventh day necessitated to violate Precepts that all agree are Moral Duties 1. In not doing their Fathers or Masters Business in not working six days for tho it may be said of some six days Work may be done yet it may be said of others who are Servants six days they must work it being their indispensible Duty so to do 2. In violating the Fifth Commandment as the whole Moral Law is in the hands of Christ which requires Obedience to their Natural and Political Parents in all things wherein they transgress no Law of God they ought carefully to subject themselves to them and in not doing it Eph. 6. 1. they sin and are guilty before God Children obey your Parents in the Lord for this is right the Lord commands it or it is agreeable to his Will Rom. 13. 1. Again it is said Let every Soul be subject to the higher Powers Tit. 3. 1. c. Put them in mind to obey Magistrates c. And again 1 Pet. 2. 13. Submit your selves to every Ordinance of Man for the Lord's sake whether it be to the King as supreme c. Whatsoever Magistrates or Parents do require agreeable to the Divine Will ought faithfully to be done and in Conscience to God And as to the religious observation of the first day of the week I shall prove before I have done that it is agreeable to the Will of God and those who observe it not do violate the Rule of the Gospel or the new Creation and so break both the Law of God and Man nay it grieves my Soul to hear what a Reproach and Scandal some rash young Men who are Apprentices have herein brought upon their Profession and I hear some who know they are Members with us have unjustly blam'd and censured me and the Church upon that account not hearing what Pains I have taken to convince them of their great Evil therein and I do now declare my abhorrence of their Practices and unbecoming Behaviour to their Parents and Masters and let such as encourage or countenance them see how they will answer it in the great day But not to retain you any longer in a way of Introduction I shall proceed to my Text. And first to the occasion of the words The occasion of the words opened which were written by holy Paul the great Minister of the Gentiles to the Churches that were then at Galatia not Church in the singular but to the Churches there were more at Galatia than one so it is express'd 1 Cor. 16. 2. And thus he begins his Epistle i. e. To the Churches of Galatia chap. 1. 2. 1. He kindly salutes them ver 3. Grace be unto you and Peace from God the Father and from our Lord Jesus Christ 2. But soon upon it he sharply reproves them ver 6. I marvel ye are so soon removed from him that called you to another Gospel ver 7. Which is not another but there are some that trouble you and would pervert the Gospel of Christ Query What was the Error they were corrupted with 1. I answer They were by some false Brethren taught to mix the Law and the Gospel together in Justification or to mix Works with Grace and this is to pervert the Gospel of Christ and obscure the Doctrine of Free-Grace 2. They turned to Judaism in respect of the observation of Circumcision and Jewish days How turn ye again to weak and beggarly Elements whereunto ye desire again to be in Bondage chap. 4. vers 9. Ye having as if he should say attained to the knowledg of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ the glorious Mediator Soveraign Lord and only Lawgiver of his Church it is strange you should turn again to Moses and so eclipse the Glory of Christ this doth not comport with your former knowledg and of that Revelation you have had of the Truth as it is in Jesus By Beggarly Elements he doth not only mean
Circumcision but also observation of Jewish Days Ye observe Days c. he doth not mean the Gospel or New Testament days of Worship but Jewish days he could not be afraid of them if they had only observ'd the first day of the Week because he had given charge to these Churches as well as others religiously to keep it as appears 1 Cor. 16. 1 2 3. but they observ'd the Jewish Sabbath and other Old Testament days nay and they laid such stress upon them as to make the observation of them necessary to eternal Life as some do now by affirming the keeping of the seventh-Seventh-day or old Jewish Sabbath is a Moral Duty being of the same nature with the first Commandment viz. Thou shalt have no other Gods before me or any other simple Moral Precept True such at Rome as did esteem some other day besides the first Day of the Week and lookt upon it as an indifferent thing were not reproved as Rom. 14. 5. The converted Jews perhaps thought they might keep the Jewish Sabbath as well as the lord's-Lord's-Day and Paul dealt with them for a time as Children or Babes in Christ But when any came to plead for it as a Moral Duty or as necessary to Salvation how sharp was he with them I am afraid of you From hence by the way observe That Jewish-day and shadowy Ordinances under the Law in comparison of New Testament Ordinances are but weak and beggerly Elements The Explanation 1. By Days The Terms of the Text explained I understand the Jewish weekly Sabbath-days 2. By Months is meant their New Moons or monthly Sabbaths which were every new Moon 3. By Times the Feasts of the Passover the Feast of Pentecost and that of Tabernacles 4. By Years every seventh Year and every fiftieth Year which was their great Jubilee I find divers learned Men thus explaining these Terms Perkins on Gal. p. 285. and tho Mr. Perkins seems to go astray afterwards yet he speaks much to the same purpose Now my Brethren the reasons why I conclude by Days here are meant the Jewish weekly Sabbath-days are First Because when Moses speaks of their Feasts and Holy-days he brings in first of all their Seventh-day Sabbath Levit. 23. Secondly If Days Months Times and Years comprehend all Days Months Times and Years which the Jews observed then their Seventh-day Sabbath is comprehended here but Days Months Times and Years comprehend all Days Months Times and Years that the Jews observed therefore it comprehends their Seventh Day here If the Minor be denyed let our Opponents or any Person shew where Days Months Times and Years are mentioned and yet the Seventh-day not comprehended Perhaps it may be objected by some who keep the Jewish Sabbath Object That the Seventh Day is every where in Scripture expressed in the singular Number i. e. Day not Days That is not true Answ for in several places the Seventh-day is expressed in the plural Number i. e. Days the Jews themselves called it Days And they asked him Mat. 12. 10. saying Is it lawful to heal on the Sabbath Days see Matth. 12. 5. My Sabbaths ye shall keep 't is a Sign c. Deut. 31. 13. In the Greek 't is read Sabbaths Exod. 28. 8. and Deut. 5. 12. as the Learned in that Language shew and all Men of note both Antient and Modern Expositors of Holy Scripture saith my Author Dr. White p. 165. expound St. Paul Col. 2. 17. of Weekly Sabbaths as well as Annual Sabbaths Again it is objected Object 2. That the Days Months Times and Years were not Jewish but Heathenish Days c. Thus Coppinger in his Dispute with Mr. Ives because 't is said they did Service to them who by nature are no Gods That there were Jews among these Galatians is evident Answ Yet if otherwise i. e. tho they were Gentiles 't is clear they desired to be under the Law Tell me ye that desire to be under the Law do you hear the Law You that desire to be circumcised and to observe the Jewish Sabbath and other Mosaical Times and Seasons Do you hear the Law i. e. do you not know that the Bond-woman and her Son are cast out that the Sinai Covenant that gendered to Bondage is abolished and the Law given on Mount Sinai as a Rule of Righteousness is put into the hands of the Son of God considered as Mediator Heb. 12. 2. Ye are not come to Mount Sinai but to Mount Sion and are not now to hear him that spoke of Earth but him that speaketh from Heaven as if Paul should have said Do not you know that Circumcision the Seventh-day Sabbaths and other Jewish Times 2 Cor. 5. 17 18 19 20. Seasons and legal Rites are gone even all old things and that all things are become new My Brethren these Christians did not desire to be under the observation of Heathenish but of Jewish Days They are called the Elements of the World Object 3. therefore not Jewish days 1. The Jewish Rites were called the Elements of the World Answ for does not Paul say We when Children were in bondage under the Elements of the World Gal. 4. 2 3. 2. Besides they were such Rudiments as the Jews were to observe till the appointed time of the Father Now the Father never appointed his Children Gentile idolatrous Rudiments therefore they could not be Heathenish Days 3. What Heathenish Nation kept the seventh or the fiftieth Year as a Sabbath For by Years in our Text our Antagonists confess are meant those Years and I am sure by all Expositors 't is so understood 4. The Jewish Sanctuary is called a Worldly Sanctuary see Heb. 9. 1. Then verily the first Covenant had also Ordinances of Divine Service and a Worldly Sanctuary 5. It is evident the Apostle means Mosaical Rudiments by blaming of Peter who would have the Gentiles live after the manner of the Jews Gal. 2. 14. Moreover he refers as all may see to the Jewish Yoke Gal. 5. 1 2. 6. To put it quite out of doubt what Days he intends read Col. 2. 16. Let no man judg you in Meats or Drinks or in respect of a holy Day or of the New Moons or of the Sabbath Days which are a Shadow of things to come but the Body is of Christ I. Now were any of the Idolatrous Days among the Heathen shadows of things to come or of Christ was he or that Rest he hath brought in the Antitype of them II. He speaks of a Holy Day as a Term given to the Seventh-Day in the Old Testament and of Sabbath-Days and do any think he means by neither the Seventh-Day Sabbath and yet speaks of Sabbath-Days distinct from New-Moons Times and Years Certainly he must intend in one or the other the Jewish weekly Sabbath days I find a very Learned Man writing on this Text speaking thus viz. for which also he cites St. Hierom Paul writ this Epistle in the
still and had its Patrons and Abettors Ebion and Cerinthus two of the wretchedest Hereticks of the Primitive Times And after them Apollinarius is said to countenance and defend it which doubtless made the Antient Fathers declare themselves fully in it as a dangerous Point it seemed to confirm the Jews in their Incredulity and might occasion others to make question of our Saviour's coming in the Flesh Hence Irenaeus Justin Martyr Tertullian and Eusebius Men of Note in the Primitive Times affirm that never any of the Patriarchs before Moses's Law observed the Sabbath which question less they must have done had that Law been moral and dictated by the Light of Nature He cites also Epiphanius and Theodoret on Ezech. 20. Procopius on Gen. 2. Damascen and our venerable Bede concurring with the former Fathers All talk saith he that the Observation of the Jewish Sabbath vanished utterly c I might mention other Authors to the same purpose But to proceed my Brethren because one of my Arguments against the precise Seventh-day Sabbath will be to prove it a Sign or Shadow of that Rest Believers enter into when they first close with Christ I shall say no more now by way of Explanation of my Text but proceed to those Points of Doctrine that arise herefrom Doct. 1. That it is not the Duty of believing Gentiles under the Dispensation of the Gospel The Doctrines raised to keep the Seventh Day as a Sabbath to the Lord. Doct. 2. That it is a dangerous thing for any to plead for and keep the seventh day so i◠to lay the same stress on the observation thereof as on a purely natural or simply mora◠Precept These two Propositions I purpose God assisting to prosecute and confirm in this method First I shall lay down several Explanatory Propositions Secondly Give many Arguments to prove th◠truth of the first Proposition Thirdly I shall taking in the second Proposition endeavour to prove that the observing the seventh day Sabbath so as to lay the same stre◠on it as on a natural and simply moral Precept ◠a dangerous thing Fourthly I shall prove that all Believers 〈◊〉 oblig'd to observe the first day of the week free from secular business in religious Worship as the time in season only under the Gospel-dispensation Fifthly I shall endeavour to answer all the main Objections brought by our Opponents against the Observation of the first day of the week To begin First Proposition premised Let it be considered that the Apostles perceiving the weakness of the Jews who believ'd in Christ to take them off gradually from Jewish Observation of days and other legal Rites and Ordinances did admit of the Practice of some of them for a time till they were better instructed in the Truth as it is in Jesus the nature of the new Creation and the change of the whole Law viz. the utter abolishing of all things Ceremonial or that were Signs and Shadows of things to come and the removing the ministration of all Moral Precepts from Moses as Lawgiver into the hand of Christ as Mediator in which capacity he had all Power delegated to him in Heaven and Earth as our only Lord and Lawgiver Mat. 28. 18 19 20. Thou seest Brother how many thousands of the Jews there are which believe and they are all zealous of the Law Acts 21. 20. Hence Paul complied with them to purify himself and to shave his Head v. 24. and on the like account in compliance with their weakness he circumcised Timothy I might from hence by the way note that had we such a Passage that Paul kept one Jewish Sabbath as we have here of his circumcising Timothy I suppose our Brethren would make no small advantage of it that it is our Duty from thence to keep it but that might have been on the same account and no better ground than it would be for us to plead for Circumcision and be circumcised as Tillam Skip and Cooly were as I am informed who called themselves the Ministers of the Circumcision But to proceed Upon the same reason perhaps the Jewish Rites Days and typical or shadowy Ordinances might and were called by their former and antient names as well as for distinction sake for tho those legal Ordinances were dead yet as our Annotators observe they were not then deadly if look'd upon as indifferent things however God was pleased they being his own appointments to vouchsafe them a gradual and decent funeral Second Proposition But nevertheless after they had been better instructed into the truth of the Gospel and the change or end of the Law they were more plainly dealt with I mean he more fully and clearly informed them and shewed them the great danger if they observed those legal Rites Days and Ordinances especially when he saw they laid such stress upon them as to make them necessary to eternal Life as a Rule of Obedience Hence the Apostle says I Paul testify unto you that if ye be circumcised Christ shall profit you nothing Gal. 5. 1. And why if circumcised because it was a shadow and the keeping up the shadow was a virtual denying that the Substance was come and besides they were thereby bound to keep the whole Law Such was the natural tendency of observing one Legal Rite or Precept as given by Moses it being in that Ministration a Covenant of Works and he that kept one was obliged to keep all and he that broke one was guilty of all 1. And if so why might not Paul have told them the same thing and danger if they kept the legal Sabbath which led them according to the Tenor of it and in the strictest observance to perfect Obedience which is implyed in those words Thou shalt not think thy own thoughts nor speak thy own words 2. Or provided they made it necessary in order to a holy Life in point of Obedience as a pure moral Precept even of the same nature with the first Commandment viz. Thou shalt have no other Gods but me or the second Thou shalt not make to thy self any graven Image c. or the third or fifth or any of the rest I speak not of what is simply moral in the fourth Commandment but of that precise seventh day I say may not their danger be as great if thus they look'd upon those Jewish Sabbaths as if circumcised because then if they kept them not it necessarily must follow it would exclude them the Kingdom of Heaven as all other immoral Acts or actual breach of pure moral Precepts would do 3. Because Paul tells them that those Sabbaths were a Shadow or Sign so far as Circumcision was as I have and shall further make appear and so hereby unwarily they would deny that Christ was come to give us Rest and we do not yet cease working for Life in order to enter into Rest which was held forth as the Tenor of that Ministration of the Moral Law by Moses and particularly in their
the precise seventh day being there a positive Precept SERMON III. Proving the Patriarchs kept not the Seventh-day Sabbath That the knowledg of the seventh day was not written in the Hearts of all Mankind by Nature Gal. iv 10 11. Ye observe days and months c. MY Brethren there are three sorts of Persons I have little hopes of doing good to in preaching on this Subject 1. Such as thro self-conceit are so fond of their own Apprehensions that they resolve not to regard the strongest Arguments against what they believe thus it is with some who have sucked in dangerous Errors who if a Book be presented to them presently cry away with it we will not read it they are not like him that said What I know not teach thou me nor like the great Appollos who was ready to receive further Light by a poor Man and his Wife much inferior to him both as to Parts Knowledg and Learning Acts 18. 2. The second sort are such as thro the weakness of their Capacities are not able to take in the strength of an Argument and therefore let never so much be said do intimate it is all little or nothing to them 3. The third sort are such as seem indifferent whether they keep the seventh or the first day or perhaps any at all as a special day to the Lord these not seeing the danger of observing the old Jewish Sabbath nor of their indifference about keeping any day at all trouble not themselves at all about this matter But to â—â—ass this and proceed I have proved 1. That the Command for or knowledg of keeping the Seventh-day Sabbath was not written in Adam 's Heart 2. That there was 〈◊〉 positive Command given to him to observe that â—ay above any other either before or immediately after his Fall A time to worship God was wrote in Adam's Heart no doubt and indeed all his time while in Innocency he was naturally led to give up to his blessed Creator All Adam's time in Innocency taken up in adoring his blessed Creator What had he to do but to adore and contemplate the Perfections of his bountiful Creator and could he have done it better on one day than another The best and highest Acts of Worship he was capable of performing would have been his work and delight for ever had he abode in that state for Perfection admits of no greater Number Measure Degrees or Additions Now I may infer from hence If the Command of God to observe the seventh day was not wrote in Adam's Heart then it is not written in the Hearts of any of his Offspring by Nature For as I have said the muddy Stream cannot be clearer than the Chrystal Fountain But our Brethren who keep the seventh day and some others affirm that the Patriarchs from Adam to Moses did keep that day Answ This I deny and if I put them to prove it The Patriarchs did not keep the seventh day Sab. they can never do it First I grant that from Adam to Moses the holy and pious Patriarchs not only discharged all Duties of natural Religion but all Duties given by express Command to them yet we read not that God commanded them to keep the seventh day or reminded them of a former Precept given to Adam and in him to them And no doubt they observed a sufficient time for the Worship of God it may be a part of every day or more than one in seven for they not only improved their natural Light and Knowledg but had a special Revelation of the Will of God to them yet we find not the least intimation that any of them kept the seventh day Abel we read sacrificed and this of offering Sacrifices could not be known by the Light of Nature God therefore commanded him so to do or revealed it some way or another in a supernatural way to him because him and his Offering God had respect unto besides he did it in Faith and Faith must have a Rule to act by but we do not read he offer'd Sacrifices on the seventh day or kept that day as a Sabbath had he kept one Sabbath-day tho no mention is made of any Command he had so to do we should no more doubt of it but conclude he had such a Command as we believe he had for his offering Sacrifices but if he or any other of the Patriarchs had kept the seventh day as a Sabbath would it from thence follow it was a moral Precept and obligatory on us any more than their offering Sacrifices obliges us so to do We read of Men who began to call upon the Name of the Lord Gen. 4. 26. or to call themselves by the Name of the Lord as one reads it See Ainsw Annot. on the place but not a word of such a Sabbath observ'd by them Ainsworth reads it thus Then began Men profanely to call upon the Name of the Lord and one of the Rabins * Rabbi Maimon saith in those days Idolatry took its first beginning so that from hence there can no Proof be taken that they kept the seventh-day as a Sabbath Enoch walked with God three hundred years and certainly if he had kept the Sabbath we should have had â—ome account of it but as we read of no such matter so Justin Martyr as I find him cited by approved Authors declares Enoch was one if those that was not circumcised neither kept the Sabbath Lib. 4. c. 30. Ad Judaeos And Irenaeus mentioning Enoch with my Author speaks thus viz. Enoch that righteous Man being neither circumcised nor a Sabbath-keeper was by the Lord translated And as it cannot be proved that the seventh day was observed before the Flood so we have â—o reason to believe it was kept by Noah in those days the Flood overflow'd the World 〈◊〉 is said Noah was only righteous in that Generation and therefore a true Worshipper of God but we read not of his keeping the Seventh-day Sabbath I know some would catch at that Expression Gen. 8. 10 12. that Noah stay'd seven days before he sent out the Dove as if this might reâ—er to the Sabbath But in Answer to this which indeed needs â—one at all take what a learned Man hath â—id for a reason why Noah stay'd seven days and again other seven days Abulensis Noah saith he desired to know whether the Waters were decreased Now the Waters being regulated by the Moon Noah was most especially to regard her Motions for as she is either in Opposition or Conjunction with the Sun in her increase or wane there is proportionably an increase or falling of the Waters Noah then considering the Moon in her several quarters which commonly we know are at seven days distance sent forth his Dove to bring him tydings for the Text tells us that he sent out the Raven and the Dove four times and the fourth time the Moon being in the last quarter when both by the ordinary course
they should perform except it had by some positive Law or Precept been discover'd to them of which we read not When God gave to Israel a Sabbath he told them how they should keep it as well as the Reasons End and Causes wherefore Tenthly I might also add here what some learned Men seem to affirm i. e. that 't is doubtful whether the Patriarchs had the distinction of Days into Weeks but rather reckon'd by Months and Years so that the precise seventh day from the Creation cannot be certainly known and 't is thought that the Jews observ'd their seventh day from the falling of Manna six days The Jews reckon'd their Seventh-day Sabbath from the falling of Manna but none on the seventh No doubt but it is impossible for any to know that that was the precise seventh day from the Creation But it may not be amiss to answer our Opponents as to what they say about the Scripture not mentioning any Sabbath from Adam to Moses or any Precept or Remembrance of it and yet things of less moment are punctually recited 1. This they say that we read not of Circumcision perform'd during all the time of Israel's being in Egypt which was near four hundred years till Zippora circumcised her Son 2. Also say they we read not of the Sabbath in the Books of Joshua and Judges c. Answ This is no parallel case for after the positive Command given to Israel to keep it there needed no such constant relation of it for no doubt but after that time it was continually observ'd Let me close this with what I find recited by many learned Men concerning the Judgment of divers of the antient Fathers about the Patriarchs observing the Sabbath The Judgment of the anâ—ient Fathers Justin Martyr saith Just Mart. 〈◊〉 cum 〈…〉 that Melchisedec who it is supposed was Shem the Son of Noah was neither circumcised nor kept the Sabbath Irenaeus saith Iren. l. 4. c. 30. Abraham believed and it was imputed to him for Righteousness before he was circumcised and without observing of the Sabbath Tertullian saith Tert. adv Judaeos de praescr c. 2 4. Abel Enoch Noah and Melchisedec observ'd not the Sabbath And again he saith that not any of the Patriarchs kept the Sabbath neither Adam Enoch Noah nor Abraham for 2455 years And hence Tertullian saith Justin de verit l. 2. in Tryph. it is manifest therefore that that cannot be moral nor perpetual that began with Moses as Justin says and ended in Christ Eusebius saith Moses brings in Melchisedec Priest of the most High God Dem. l. 1. c. 6. neither being circumcised nor anointed with Oil as was afterwards commanded in the Law no nor so much as knowing there was a Sabbath Justin Martyr again saith Cont. Tryph. in the days of Enoch People observd not Circumcision or the Sabbath before Abraham there was no Circumcision and before Moses no keeping holy the Sabbath I might also add several of the Jewish Rabbins asserting the same thing But to proceed I infer from hence that that Text Gen. 2. doth not contain in it any present Institution of the Sabbath but signifies God's Destination or Purpose to give it as a Law to his People Israel in after times and was not given to Adam in Innocence for him to sanctify it God might sanctify that precise day to his own Rest after Adam fell with respect had to Christ in whom he took up his perfect Rest and afterwards appointed the seventh day as a sign thereof However it is one thing for God to sanctify or set apart a thing for this or that use and another thing to command that thing or immediately to put it into being Our Lord Jesus was long sanctified or set apart to be our Redeemer Joh. 10. 36. before he was sent into the World actually to redeem us Jeremiah the Prophet was sanctified or set apart to his Work and Office long before he was actually call'd to the execution thereof So that if these words Gen. 2. concerning God's blessing and sanctifying of the seventh day Mr. Sam. Grascom p. 18. are to be extended saith one to relate to any thing further than to that particular seventh day following the Creation it doth not refer to any immediate Institution of the Sabbath but is a historical Narration telling us what was done and not when it was done If therefore we can find out a certain time when the Sabbath was indeed instituted there is good reason to conclude this Text refers to that time as giving us the reason why God in the Institution of the Seventh-day Sabbath made choice of that day And to sum up what I have said take these Arguments 1. We may infer The Arguments against the Patriarchs keeping the Sabbath 〈◊〉 up that if the Patriarchs kept the seventh day they had the knowledg of it by the Light of Nature or by a positive Command but they had not the knowledg of it by the Light of Nature nor by any positive Command therefore they observ'd it not 2. If they kept it by virtue of an express Command and Institution they had no doubt some Directions about the due observation thereof and instituted Sabbath-days Worship but they had no Directions about it nor instituted Sabbath-days Worship therefore they did not observe it 3. Certainly if the Patriarchs were obliged to observe the seventh day as a Sabbath God would either have commended them or some of them for keeping it or else reprehended others for not keeping it but God neither commended any of them for the keeping it nor reprehended any others for profaning and not â—eeping it therefore none of them did observe 〈◊〉 Eleventhly Let me add one Argument more 〈◊〉 prove that the Patriarchs did not observe the seventh day as a Sabbath viz. If the Patriarchs and all Mankind from the beginning of the World were or had been obliged to keep the Seventh-day Sabbath certainly there had â—een some account given of the Penalty or Punishment due to Sabbath-breakers but we read of no Penalty or Punishment to be inflicted on Sabbath-breakers therefore we conclude they were not oblig'd to the observation thereof How can it be thought that the Law of the Seventh-day Sabbath should be imposed upon them and yet God should hide the Punishment due to the breach thereof from the World for more than two thousand years Evident it is that they knew what Punishment was to be inflicted for the breach of other moral Precepts as Murder Adultery c. and if this were of like nature i. e. a pure moral Duty how came it to pass that God discover'd not the Penalty to them for violating this Precept Twelfthly My last Argument is this The Sabbath under the Old Testament had a respect to a stated and stinted instituted Worship in a National Church but the Patriarchs and all God's People from Adam to Moses were not brought into such an Ecclesiastical
and Political Church-state and from hence it seems to me they were not injoyn'd to observe the Seventh-day Sabbath that is they had no instituted stated and stinted Worship nor any in a Magistratical Capacity to inflict Punishment 〈◊〉 such as violated the pretended Sabbath 〈◊〉 had they been put into such a Capacity 〈◊〉 doubt but God had given them his Sabbath with the like Sanction to them as afterward that the Penalty might have been inflicted 〈◊〉 Offenders as he did after the Sabbath was â—â—deed given to the House of Israel in the Wiâ—derness of Sinai Nehemiah clearly intimates that the Saâ—bath was only made known to Israel Tâ—â— madest known to them thy holy Sahbaths was first made known to Moses Exod. 16. 20. and then him to the Children of Israel therefore 〈◊〉 known to him or them before The Scripture is certainly to be taken 〈◊〉 this sense and not in that sense which soâ—â— would have the Holy Ghost intend viz. thâ—â— it was made known more clearly to that People with the mode of its observation c. but certainly it was never known till God reveal'd 〈◊〉 to Moses nor given as a Law to any till giveâ— to the People of Israel in the Wilderness 〈◊〉 Sin SERMON IV. 〈◊〉 the Commencement of the Sabbath and that it was in the Wilderness of Sin What a moral Law or Precept is That the Morality of the fourth Commandment lies not in the precise seventh day Four Arguments urg'd to prove this Gal. iv 10 11. Ye observe days and months c. I Have my Brethren endeavour'd to shew and prove 1. That God did not write the Law of 〈◊〉 Seventh-day Sabbath in Adam's Heart that 〈◊〉 is no Law of Creation wrote in the Hearts of the Gentiles and of all Mankind and so no â—atural or simple moral Precept 2. That it was not given to Adam by any express positive Command either before or immediately after he fell and so none of the Paâ—riarchs did observe it We can find no original of the Seventh-day Sabbath as to any observance of it hitherto therefore must look for its beginning or original or any actual or express Command for the observation thereof somewhere else which indeed we have in Exod. 16. 23. True The 7th day Sab. begun in the Wilderness of Sin some of the Jewish Rabbins affirm that it was given to Israel Exod. 15. 25. at Marah There he made them a Statute and an Ordinance and there he proved them It is called a Statutâ— and Ordinance in the singular not Statutes 〈◊〉 Ordinances and probably it might be the Statute of the Sabbath tho 't is not expressed 〈◊〉 the falling of Manna chap. 16. tho others by 〈◊〉 figure think it may comprehend not only thâ— Sabbath but all other Precepts of the Law I know that Dr. Owen seems not to be of opinion that this Statute refers to the Sabbath neither can we determine the case yet it is very probable it might be that But we find 〈◊〉 directly and expresly commanded chap. 16. 2â— To morrow is the Rest of the holy Sabbath unto the Lord c. And many learned Men do asseâ—â— that here was the Institution and original 〈◊〉 the observance of it Mr. Grascome Thus a late Writer expresses himself The first time we find the observation of the Sabbath-day injoyned is 〈◊〉 the Wilderness of Sin before they came 〈◊〉 Mount Sinai where the ten Commandmentâ— were deliver'd as if it were purposely 〈◊〉 distinguish the day which is Ceremonial anâ— of divine positive Institution from the Woâ—â—ship it self The words in Exod. 16. 23. express plainly enough the Institution of this day by way of Information to the People viz. To morrow is the Rest of the holy Sabbath unto the Lord bake that which you will bake to day c. And when the day came or begun Ver. 25. Moses said Eat that to day for to day is a Sabbath to the Lord And in ver 26. Six days ye shall gather it but on the seventh day which is the Sabbath in it there shall be none Observe by the way that here is not one word on what day the Manna first fell so that none can tell this was the seventh day from the Creation but that it was the seventh day after the six days of its raining of Manna is eviâ—ent But to return to our business in hand Here â—â—ay is the original or first beginning of the â—â—bbath that we read of as to any Precept or â—â—junction on the People or any observation of 〈◊〉 which was as one observes about a month â—â—fore Moses receiv'd the Law on Mount Sinai Some it is true would infer that the Sabâ—â—th was known and observ'd by the Jews beâ—â—re because they say it is here spoken of 〈◊〉 a thing well known 1. I answer in the words of our late Author Grascome's History of the Sab. p. 76. This is a force put upon the words and a gross mistake for it is evidently spoken of as a new thing else what means that frequent Inculcation to make the People take notice of it if it had been familiar to them before And what means the coming of the Rulers of the Congregation to Moses to consult him as on an unusual and unknown matter Exod. 16. 22. 2. And let me add they were told that they should gather it six days and that there should be none found on the seventh and yet some of the People went to gather it on the seventh day as not being yet well acquainted with their Sabbath ver 26 27. and this displeased the Lord and therefore Moses again told them ver 29. See for the Lord hath given you the Sabbath therefore he giveth you on the sixth day Bread for two days He hath given you the Sabbath Doth not â—his imply he had not given it to any before To you and none else to you and to none that went before you as he spake to them afterwards Deut. 5. 2 3. As to his Laws and Covenant on Mount Sinai the Covenant which God made with us in Horeb the Lord made not this Covenant with our Fathers but with us even 〈◊〉 who are alive this day Their Fathers had the Covenant and all the Precepts before materially as to the substance of them or what was simply moral but theâ— had not this Covenant nor those Precepts formally given to them and so not the precise seventh day 3. If the People did know there was a Sabbath given in charge to Moses before Manna it might refer to that chap. 15. yet they might not know what particular day it was to begiâ— on or which day should be the day of their first Sabbath nor know yet how to keep it Foâ— 4. As the same Author notes the case of thâ— Man who gather'd Sticks on the sabbath-Sabbath-day shews they were still unacquainted with sabbath-Sabbath-days Duties Numb 15. 32 33. or rather wholly ignorant of the Penalty of the breach of
Morality of it is 〈◊〉 more holy naturally than any other day of 〈◊〉 week Object If they say but God sanctified thâ—â— Day 1. I answer they will not say that God added any inherent Holiness to that Day 2. But if they should say he did then 〈◊〉 would overthrow the Morality of it i. e. as 〈◊〉 this first property of a simple moral Precept for then it will follow it was made holy 〈◊〉 an Act of God's Arbitrary Will and Pleasure and that it was not so naturally as that Day was created or proceeded from the Holiness of God because as we have shew'd all puâ—â— moral Precepts as to the matter of them are not good merely because God commands them 〈◊〉 are in themselves good as resulting from the Holiness of his Nature For evident it is that every Day of the 〈◊〉 had one and the same efficient Cause namely Divine Creation and all days and things Goâ— made were very good and God's sanctifying the seventh Day was but his setting it apart foâ—â— some holy use Dr. Owen on the Sab. p. 82. the Day saith Dr. Owen was not capable of any inherent Holiness God then sanctified says he this Day not that he kept it holy himself which in no sense the Divine Nature is capable of nor that he purified it and made it inherently holy which the nature of the Day is not capable of nor that he celebrated that which in it self was holy mark that well but he set it apart to holy use So that from hence it follows if the Morality of the fourth Commandment lay in the precise seventh Day it wants the first Character of a simple moral Precept God might have set apart at first any other day if he had pleased as well as the seventh Secondly The seventh Day never known universally to be a Sabbath Every Precept or Law simply moral which obliges all Men to Obedience perpetually must be made known to all Men either by the Law of Nature or by Revelation from God himself in some supernatural way the Righteousness of God requires this because the Violation of simple moral Precepts is damnable 1. Now were there such a Law written in Mens Hearts I mean to keep the seventh Day some one Man or another would that way have known it But no Man hath ever so known it therefore no such Law is written in any Man's Heart and if not one Man that way ever knew it then not all Men universally besure 2. And as the Law of the Seventh-day Sabbath is not revealed to all the World by the Lord this way so he never gave any Commission to Moses nor to any of his Prophets to promulgate it or reveal it to all Mankind therefore I argue it wants the second Character of a simple moral Precept Thirdly That Law which upon urgent necessity may be omitted or laid aside or be broken can be no Precept simply moral but the keeping of the Seventh-day Sabbath upon divers urgent necessities might be omitted or broken Josh 6. 15. the Jews themselves might war and go to battle on that day 1 King 20. 29. and our Saviour shews they might pull a Sheep or any other Beast out of a Pit or Ditch on the Sabbath-day Joh. 5. 10. nay our Lord wrought with his Hands and made Clay on that day did many Miracles and commanded the Man he healed to bear a Burden i. e. to carry his bed on that Day But Precepts simply moral in respect of the negative part oblige perpetually and by no means must be transgressed for as a Divine saith A Man must not tell a Lye to save the World Can any pretended necessity make it lawful to worship another God or prophane his Name or steal murder or commit Adultery I know what is said about the Israelites borrowing of the Egyptians and of God's commanding Abraham to slay his Son but those actions are to be accounted for as being extraordinary cases Obj. Works of Mercy may be done on the Sabbath-day and Christ speaks of Works of Mercy Answ Of what nature are works of Mercy I hope not of a higher concern than the discharge of a simple moral Precept And can one simple moral Precept have more Sanctity in it than another What violate the very letter of one moral Law to do that which is but implyed as the necessary consequence of another nay break a Command of the first Table to keep a Command of the second Table This is a hard case Fourthly That Law or Precept which is equalled to or compared with Sacrifices is no simple moral Precept but such is the Law or Precept of the Seventh-day Sabbath therefore 't is not a simple moral Precept That our Saviour himself doth equal it to or compare it with Sacrifices see Mat. 12. 3 4 5 6. 1. Our Lord justifies his Disciples in plucking the Ears of Corn on the Sabbath-day and compares their so doing to David's eating the Shew-bread vers 3. which was unlawful by a mere positive Law 2. He shews them how the Priests in the Temple prophaned the Sabbath and were blameless vers 5. Some think they slew Beasts on that Day however our Lord saith they prophaned the Sabbath c. But then says he If ye had known what that meaneth I will have Mercy and not Sacrifice ye would not have condemned the guiltless vers 7. What can he intend less than this viz. If ye had known the difference between a pure moral Precept and such a Precept as is nothing more than a Sign a Shadow like those of Sacrifices or a mere positive Law that I am Lord of and can take away and give another at my pleasure you would not have condemn'd the guiltless For tho all God's mere positive Precepts have great Sanctity in them and ought carefully to be kept yet when a simple moral Duty comes in competition with such as are but positive or ceremonial the lesser must give place to the greater as we commonly say Of two evils choose the least But if the precise Seventh-day Sabbath was a pure moral Precept equal with and of the same nature of that Precept of shewing Mercy there had been no ground for our Lord thus to have answered the Jews for if it had been so no doubt he would have said I must indeed blame my Disciples because they have broke one of God's righteous Precepts whose Nature and Quality is above that of David's eating of Shew-bread or Sacrifices But he who was the great Expounder of the Law knew best the vast difference between a moral Precept and such as their Sabbath and Sacrifices were Our late Annotators on this place express themselves to this purpose The meaning is that God preferreth Mercy before Sacrifices where two Laws in respect of some Circumstances seem to clash one with another so as we cannot obey both our Obedience is due to the more excellent Law Now saith our Saviour the Law of Mercy is the more
for a Man to marry his own Sister Answ 1. Where all Uncleanness and Lusts of Concupiscence and Fornication are forbid there a Man is forbid to marry his own Sister 2. Is not this sort of Incest forbidden and condemned 1 Cor. 5. 1. where the incestuous Person is condemned for marrying his Father's Wife If it be unlawful for a Man to marry his Brother's Wife or his Father's Wife it is unlawful to marry his own Sister because nearer of kin 3. All manner of Incest is forbid to believing Gentiles in Acts 15. 29. this was one of those things contain'd in the Law that is given forth anew to believing Gentiles The Holy Ghost inspir'd the Apostles to write to the Gentiles to abstain from Blood Meats offered to Idols things strangled and from Fornication now Incest is by Paul call'd Fornication 1 Cor. 5. 1. I hear there is Fornication amongst you c. Tho in strict speaking say our late Annotators by Fornication we mean Uncleanness of single Persons yet by this word often in Scripture is understood all species of Uncleanness Nor is it probable that the Holy Ghost refers to the Uncleanness of single Persons in Acts 15. but to somewhat more doubtful and therefore I conceive all sorts of Incest in this place are forbidden 4. If any should say How can they know it was unlawful for a Man to marry his own Sister I answer 'T is not only known as I have shew'd by the New Testament and forbid there but also by the very Light of Nature for such Fornication 1 Cor. 5. 1. saith Paul is not so much as once nam'd among the Gentiles that is among the more civiliz'd Heathens who had no other Law than the Light of Nature which teaches Men to abhor such a Marriage For doth the Light of Nature teach a Man that it is a shame to wear long Hair and not teach him it is a shame to marry his own Sister 5. Moreover tho I said the whole Moral Law is transfer'd from Moses as a Lawgiver to Christ as Mediator yet the Old Testament and the Law as written by Moses as well as the Prophets are of great use in many respects 2 Tim. 3. 16. All Scripture is profitable for Doctrine for Reproof for Correction and Instruction in Righteousness c. Sixthly The Seventh-day Sabbath proved to be a sign of the Covenant of Works The Morality of the fourth Commandment consists not in the observation of the precise seventh Day because that day was a sign or shadow of something to come I did at first prove in opening my Text that the weekly Jewish Sabbath is comprehended in those days the false Brethren taught the Galatians to observe Gal. 4. 10. and gave many Arguments to evince that tho there is one day in seven by a positive Law perpetually to be kept Col. 2. 16. yet the old Jewish seventh day from the Creation and under the Covenant of Works was a shadow of things to come But I shall add here something out of an approved Author further to confirm this That Sabbath Warren on the Sab. against Tillam p. 106 107 c. saith he and the particular seventh day which the Jews observed was certainly of a shadowy nature being instituted at first with reference to Christ as all other Shadows were having a Type after fix'd to it And of this we may safely expound that forementioned Text Col. 2. 16. Let no man judg you in Meats or in Drinks or in respect of an holy day or New Moons or Sabbaths which were shadows of things to come but the Body is of Christ The only question is whether their weekly Sabbath was here intended Some are jealous lest in pressing it so far it should prove prejudicial to our weekly Christian Sabbath but this is a mere causless Jealousy For let us ponder the scope and design of the place and it will appear that the Apostles design is not to level Christian Days and Duties but such as the Jews observ'd and would have introduced with Circumcision 'T is apparent that in all those three places Rom. 14. 5 6. Gal. 4. 10 11. Col. 2. 16. he crys down the Ordinances of the Law or Old Testament not the Institutions of the Gospel Look what the Jewish false Teachers cry'd up St. Paul cried down So as to argue from hence against all difference of days under the Gospel is evidently to stretch the Text beyond the Scope but to urge it against all Jewish holy days their weekly Sabbath and all is not to force it For 1. The Apostle seems to speak distinctly and distributively enumerating the several sorts of days in observation among the Jews Holy-days New-Moons Sabbaths and the gradation from yearly Holy-days to monthly New-Moons and from them to weekly Sabbaths is visible enough to such as are not blinded with Prejudice Mr. Shepherd speaks much to the same purpose Sheph. on the Sabb. Part 2. The plural term Sabbaths is usually put for the singular the Sabbath or seventh day Thes 20. p. 204. now under dispute Yea I cannot find any one Text in all the New Testament where it is applied in the same number to any other day or Sabbath but the old Seventh-day Sabbath * Mat. 12. 15. Mark 1. 21. cap. 2. 24. cap. 3. 2. Luk. 4. 31. cap. 13. 10. Act. 13. 14. Seven or eight times the same word as is here set down in the plural number is used for the old weekly Sabbath and not so much as once for any yearly Sabbath therefore in all reason that precise weekly Sabbath must be here I will not say included only but principally intended Even in the Old Testament wherever New Moons and Sabbaths are coupled together unless the Phrase be figurative as in Isa 66. 23. the Jews weekly Sabbath is denoted by it as appears by those Scriptures cited in the Margin †2 Kings 4. 23. 1 Chron. 23. 31. ch 8. 13. ch 31. 3. Neh. 10. 33. Ezek. 45. 17. Amos 8. 5. in most of which their annual Sabbaths are excepted and distinguished by another name scil Feasts to which answers the word Holy-days in this place Col. 2. 16. For indeed the word in the Original signifies a Feast or Festival-day Thus let Scripture expound Scripture and Truth will be Truth in spite of Error take the whole Sentence together Holy-days New-Moons Sabbaths and if it be an Old Testament Phrase it always implies the old Seventh-day Sabbath or take the word Sabbaths singly by it self and if it be a New Testament Term as 't is like it is it ever signifies the same seventh day unless when put for week which here it cannot be The Conclusion then is undeniable that the Jews Seventh-day Sabbath was a shadowy Sabbath Dr. Owen also repeats what some learned Men say upon this place Col. 2. 16. Let no Man judg you in Meats or Drinks or in respect of an Holy-day or the New-Moon
in the Regions and Climates aforesaid there be no such particular day as is expressed in the fourth Commandment yet there is a sufficient and equivalent space of time which may be measured by hours My answer is That the Law of the Decalogue requireth the keeping holy of such a Seventh-day as is distinguished from the day before and the day after by a new return arising presence and going down of the Sun But Time and Hours in general do not yield or constitute such a Day And saith another Author Mr. Ironside p. 133 There is no moral Law of Nature in Scripture but is it self possible to all in all parts of the World in regard of the thing commanded But a natural Sabbath-day as made to consist of 24 hours or of a Day and a Night is absolutely impossible for some men in some parts of the World to be observed If it be objected That this makes equally against the first Day as against the Seventh I answer We do not say the observation of the first Day is a moral Precept but merely positive No doubt but the Seventh-day was instituted for Israel whose Habitation was fixed in the Land of Canaan See a late Author on the Sabbath T. C. recommended by Dr. Bates and Mr. How c. 10. p. 40. The day of God's Rest saith he which is the seventh Day from the Creation is the same universal Day with all People but it can't be the same Day of the week with all People If the Day of God's Rest be Saturday with some it must needs be Friday or Sunday with others So likewise the time of Christ's coming to Judgment if it be saith he on the Saturday with some it will be on Friday or Sunday with others This he proves because the Earth is not plain but round The Jews saith he neither did nor could keep the very Seventh-day on which God rested in all places but as we according to God's Command work six days and rest the Seventh so did they And as Sunday with Christians was ever the day following six days of labour so was the Saturday with the Jews If this be so it can't be deny'd that the Seventh-day of God's resting cannot be kept by all nor do any know they do keep it Ninthly Christ Lord of the Sabbath can dispose of it as he pleases The morality of the fourth Commandment consists not in the precise Seventh-day Sabbath because of Christ's Lordship over it as Mediator That Commandment over which Christ was absolute Lord as the Son of Man cannot be moral for a moral Precept is part of God's Eternal Law Ironside p. 53 54. over which the Son of Man can have no power saith a Learned Author being made under the Law But Christ as the Son of Man Mat. 12. 8. was Lord of the Sabbath Mark 2. 27. as himself twice has told us Object So it is said he is Lord of the dead and living Answ This saith our Author is to play with the ambiguity of the words 'T is one thing for Christ to be Lord of the Church to guide govern perfect quicken raise and glorify her Eph. 1. 20 21 22. and another to be Lord of a Law or Constitution to moderate dispense with order alter and abolish it for in what other Construction can any one be said to be Lord of a Law Obj. Christ can't be said to refer to this because he had not then abrogated the Sabbath Answ 1. I have shewed that spiritual Rest signified by the seventh-day's Rest was given to all them that believed in Christ so that the Antitype being come the Type was a flying away and was in a dying state at that very time tho all typical Ordinances were not utterly abolished till his Death and Resurrection 2. 'T is as if our Lord should have said you magnify the Sabbath as if that was one of the greatest Commandments and the main end of Man's Creation but you must know the Sabbath was made for Man and not Man for the Sabbath as were all legal Rites and Ceremonies And if it be thus I that am the Messiah am by my Office Lord of the Sabbath and I can and will abrogate it and appoint another day in its room Certainly Man was made to discharge all pure moral Precepts they being originally stampt on his Heart as Christ who was made under the Law was ordain'd to keep the Law for us and not the Law made for him Man was made in the Image of God and under a holy Law and Covenant of perfect Obedience to serve his Creator and by the observation of that holy Law written in his Heart as the Law of his very Creation he bore the Image of God in the World Mark 2. 27. serving him in Righteousness and Holiness to the Glory of his Name and for this he was made yet Man was not made for the Sabbath but the Sabbath for him i. e. for his good in respect to his Body and Soul 1. As to his outward Rest c. 2. As a help to discharge all Duties of instituted Worship the better for the good of his Soul 3. And chiefly to point out or shadow forth to him the true Rest by Jesus Christ and so that typical Sabbath was to remain no longer than till that true Rest was come and finally established for then it could be of no further use to Man for which end it was chiefly appointed for him Object I know some object from these words the Sabbath was made for Man that therefore it was for every Man Answ The Woman was made for Man also but must every man have a Wife therefore God ne'r design'd that for such to whom he hath given the Gift to live without marrying So neither were all Men to have this Sabbath no none but they to whom it was given tho it was made for Man yet not for every Man in the World but only for the whole House of Israel and the proselyted Stranger within their Gate as I shall shew in the next place Tenthly The pure Morality of the fourth Command consists not in the observation of the precise Seventh-day Sabbath The simple Morality of the fourth Command lies not in one day in seven because it lies not in one day in seven but in a sufficient time for Rest and the Worship of God tho I do assert and stedfastly believe that by a positive Precept contain'd in the fourth Commandment one day in seven God will have observed to the end of the World which I think is the sum 〈◊〉 what the Learned mean by a Law positive â—â—ral Not that precise day for mind the words Exod. 20. Remember the Sabbath-day to keep it holy In this Clause it does not directly point at one peculiar day more than another the Light of Nature requires a time and God positively lays claim to a seventh day or one day in seven perpetually to be observed as a day of Rest
chiefly because to them were committed the Oracles of God Now Stephen shews by the Oracles of God are meant the Ten words Act. 7. 33. who told the Jews Their Fathers received on Mount Sinai the lively Oracles to deliver them saith he to us i. e. us Jews Now I argue thus If the Gentiles had the same lively Oracles or Oracles of God given to them then in this the Jews had not the advantage above the Gentiles He doth not speak of the Advantage the Jews had as to the clearest Revelation of those Oracles to them above the Gentiles but of the giving of them to the Jews and not to the Gentiles 3. Again two or three times Paul expresly affirms that the Gentiles had not the Law and were without the Law For when the Gentiles which have not the Law c. Rom. 2. 14. What is more plainly expressed The Gentiles he saith had not the Law that is as given by Moses tho they had the Law written in their Hearts So elsewhere he says 1 Cor. 9. 21 22. Vnto the Jew I became a Jew that I might gain the Jews to them that are under the Law as under the Law c. to them that are without the Law as without the Law being not without Law to God but under the Law to Christ that I might gain them that are without the Law Three times he here affirms the Gentiles are without the Law Object He means the Ceremonial Law Answ True they were without that Law as well as the Decalogue Law but he cannot here refer to the Ceremonial Law because it is such a Law as the Gentiles were under to Christ or as it is in the hand of Christ which must intend the Moral Law for no Gentile Believer or Unbeliever was under the Ceremonial Law to Christ because utterly abolished but so is not the Moral Law in which sense we are without the Law to God but under the Law to or as it is in the hand of Christ 4. Take this Argument The Gentiles shall not be judged by Moses's Law That Law which the Gentiles shall not be judged by they were never under but the Gentiles shall not be judged by the Law of Moses therefore they were never under that Law For proof of the major Proposition see what Paul saith Rom. 2. 12. For as many as have sinned without Law shall be judged without Law and as many as have sinned in the Law shall be judged by the Law By the first he means the Gentiles and by the latter the Jews And from hence the Apostle proceeds to evince that as the Gentiles shew'd the Works of the Law written in their Hearts they should be judged by that Law but not as that Law was formerly written by Moses in two Tables of Stone ver 15. As to the minor Proposition can any suppose that if the Gentiles had been under Moses's Law yet they should not be judged by it Sure none can Obj. If the Gentiles were not under the Law Christ came not to redeem them for he came to redeem none but such as were under the Law Gal. 4. 5. Answ The old World was under the Law and Covenant of Works and the Curse thereof in the first Adam it was his first Transgression that brought all the World under the Curse of the Law or breach of the first Covenant and not the Law as given by Moses tho that Law 't is true pronounceth that Curse afresh on those that continued not in all things contain'd therein For by one Man's Offence Death reigned by one Rom. 5. 1â— 17 18. c. By one Man Sin entered into the World and Death by Sin Therefore as by the Offence of one Judgment came upon all Men to Condemnation c. Thus we were all under the Law of the first Covenant and as the Law is written in our Hearts but we were not all under that Ministration of the Law given by Moses Obj. If all the World became guilty by the breach of Moses's Law then all the World was under it but this Paul affirms Rom. 3. 19. Now we know whatsoever things the Law saith it saith to them who are under the Law that every mouth may be stopped and all the World may become guilty before God Answ Paul in the precedent Chapter and what goes before in this had proved that the Gentiles were under Sin and were all guilty before God for violating the Law written in their Hearts See Chap. 2. 12. and 3. 10. Well what of this the Gentiles then were cast and found guilty that way yet they were not all but part of the whole World And from hence he in this 19th Verse comes again to speak of the Jews who were under Moses's Law and saith What the Law that is Moses's Law saith it saith to them who are under it meaning the Jews and what the Consequence of this is he shews i. e. that every mouth might be stopped not the mouths of the Gentiles only but the mouths of the Jews also that so all the World that is both Jews and Gentiles might become guilty before God I hope all are and will be convinc'd that this is directly the meaning of Paul if they consider the scope and coherence of the Text. And thus I have clearly proved that the Law of the Decalogue or Moses's Law was not given to any but the Jews and proselyte Strangers and therefore from that it cannot be the Duty of believing Gentiles to keep the Seventh-day Sabbath Object But it is again objected That the Apostle James injoineth the Royal Law upon believing Gentiles and the Royal Law is the Law of the Decalogue therefore all were under the Law of the Decalogue which forbids Adultery Murder c. Answ 1. It is a hard case that Men Jam. 2. 8 10 11 12. about fulfilling the Royal Law opened to prove their fond Notions should put such an Interpretation on a Text of Scripture as is directly contrary to other plain Texts for unless they can prove we mistake those Scriptures newly mentioned which say that Moses's Law was only given to the Jews and not to the Gentiles besure they urge this to no purpose but mistake the sense of the Apostle as others do about what he says concerning Justification 2. We never deny'd but readily grant that all believing Gentiles are oblig'd to keep the whole moral Law or all simple moral Precepts as they are in the hand of our Lord that one Lawgiver of which this Apostle speaks but I have proved that the precise Seventh-day Sabbath is not a simple moral Precept nor any part of the Morality of the fourth Commandment and therefore not intended here Therefore it followeth that Man may fulfil the Royal Law according to the Scripture and yet not observe the Seventh-day Sabbath 3. The Apostle James clears the matter himself So speak and so do as they that shall be judged by the Law of Liberty ver 12. He
can refer in these words to no Law but that of Christ or rather Christ's Gospel or to the Law as in his hands who hath fulfilled the whole Law for us by his own perfect Obedience and hence we are delivered from the Law as in the hand of Moses because as so considered it was not a Law of Liberty but a Law of Bondage or that which gender'd to Bondage And he shews it is a Rule of Righteousness to us only as Christ is our Lawgiver whose Law is a Law of Liberty but as he that offended in one point was guilty of the breach of the whole Law there he clearly alludes to the Law as in Moses's hand and as a Covenant of Works We are not to do nor speak nor live as the Law in Moses's hands directs or as he was a Lawgiver for then we should be under perpetual Bondage and nothing is more plain than that Moses's Law as to the strict observance of its Precepts brought the Jews into Bondage 't is call'd a Yoke of Bondage Gal. 5. 1 c. But so speak and so do as they who shall be judged by the Law of Liberty that is the Gospel for not by the Law as in Moses's hand but by the Gospel we shall be judged at the last day who live only under that Ministration And from hence let such as keep the Seventh-day Sabbath take heed lest they are brought into Bondage by obliging themselves to observe the whole Law since I have prov'd it was appointed as a sign or pledg of the Covenant of Works binding them to universal and perfect Obedience who were on their Sabbath-day not to think their own Thoughts nor speak their own Words but to make the Law of God their delight so as not to sin which none ever did or could do save Jesus Christ who thus kept the Sabbath even as long as he liv'd for us on the Earth that we might enter into his Rest or into the Antiâ—â—pical Sabbath Thirdly The third Argument to prove it is not the Duty of Gentile Believers to keep the Seventh-day Sabbath from the fourth Commandment in the Decalogue is Because that Law as there written and given is taken out of the hand of Moses as a Lawgiver as well as it was a Covenant of Works and put into the hand of Christ as Mediator My Brethren The moral Law taken out of the hand of Moses as a Lawgiver and put into the hand of Christ as Mediator could our Adversaries prove that the Law on Mount Sinai was given to all the World and so to believing Gentiles which I have shewn it was not yet this would not in the least do their business for the believing Jews are now no longer under the Law no not as the moral Law was given by Moses as a Rule of Life any more than they are not under it as a Covenant of Works 1. Indeed my Work is partly done in this respect already by what I have said in opening the plain sense of the Apostle James in that place just now mentioned 2. This appears because we have but one Lawgiver Isa 33. 22. namely Jesus Christ The Lord is Judg the Lord is our Lawgiver the Lord is our King he will save us that is Jehovah our Righteousness who came to save us There is one Lawgiver Jam. 4. 12. who is able to save and to destroy Now is not this our Lord Jesus Christ Obj. He doth not say we have but one Answ But 't is imply'd Paul says there is one God and one Mediator Doth not this imply that there is but one God and but one Mediator Who are you now that will introduce another Lawgiver a Co-partner or a Co-rival with Christ to partake of part of his Honour 3. Because our Lord declares that all Power is given to him in Heaven and Earth Mat. 28. 18 19. all Power consider'd as Mediator for as he is God it was not given to him but was his own essentially But this is a Power delegated to him i. e. all Power as sole Lord and Lawgiver to his Church who only is the Head thereof therefore we must look to him for Laws and how to be governed He governed by a Substitute before but now being come himself the Substitute is utterly devested of his Power 4. The Moral Law as a Rule of Righteousness must only be in the hand of Christ because our Lord saith the Law and the Prophets were until John Luke 16. 16. that is Moses and the Prophets were as Teachers by whom God spake to the People that is at the time of their Ministration and Prophecy but now the date of their Ministration is near expir'd they have Moses and the Prophets But in the Transfiguration which was a Figure or Representation of Christ's glorious Gospel-Church or Kingdom and his Ministration Moses disappear'd with Elias who being one of the chiefest Prophets might signify all the rest and John also The Disciples would have three Tabernacles one for Moses one for Elias and one for Christ i. e. they would have been under their Ministrations as Lawgivers and Teachers and would have them to share with Christ of that Glory But lo a Voice was heard from the Cloud saying This is my beloved Son hear him and when they lifted up their Eyes they saw no man but Jesus only Moses and Elias were gone and tho the Writings of Moses and the Prophets are of great use still for Comfort and Instruction Heb. 1. 1 2. c. yet now God only speaks to us by his Son whom he hath appointed Heir of all things On him all the Father's Love and Glory doth terminate no Lord no Ruler no Lawgiver but he is to be heard he being the Truth it self and having receiv'd the whole Counsel of the Father has revealed all things that we are to believe and practise He is the great Prophet Moses spoke of whom we are to hear in all things Acts 3. 22 23. Must we 〈◊〉 to Moses to know how Christ is to govern â—s Church or take any Law from him No â—is would be to eclipse the Glory of Christ 5. Because the Servant was not to abide in the â—ouse for ever viz. as a Lawgiver that is â—s Ministration of the Law was to cease 6. Because the moral Law or the Decalogue 〈◊〉 deliver'd by Moses had several things in it â—at only pertained to the Israelites or to the â—gal Church-state of the Jews and was given â—y him as a Covenant of Works mind the Preface to that Law Exod. 20. and the Proâ—ise annexed to the fifth Commandment Hoâ—our thy Father and thy Mother that thy days â—ay be long in the Land which the Lord thy God â—veth thee These things shew that the Law â—ven by Moses was not to last but till the end 〈◊〉 that Dispensation and Church-state 7. Because we are not come to Mount Sinai Heb. 12. 18. â—ot to receive the Law as there delivered
Bread What is Paul so thoughtful of eating and drinking to refresh his Body with them as to stay seven days for that No no it was a better Feast he hunger'd after See Mr. Warren p. 201. to break Bread saith the Text to receive the Eucharist says the Syriac Translation that is to receive the Lord's-Supper upon the Lord's-day 3. But why must Paul break the Bread to them ver 11. had it been common Bread no doubt but good Manners had prevented that and not put him upon any such Service as to cause him to carve for them all 4. We know the celebration of the Lord's-Supper is call'd breaking of Bread Acts 2. nor is there reason to conceive it was any other sort of breaking of Bread but that this is meant here That it was no festival Day not the first day of unleavened Bread Mr. Hughes has proved But there is reason Hughes on the Sab. p. 160 162. saith he to believe this was sacramental Bread for the Church came together to break this Bread so they were never said to do in breaking any other kind of Bread and Paul brake that which was properly Bread among them but for breaking of Bread to the hungry it is not always meant of Bread literally but of means whereby they may procure them Bread and Necessaries Neither saith he did the Church purposely come together for this but rather sent it from House to House Nothing hinders then but that this Bread broken put synecâ—ochically as a part for the whole doth note the Lord's-Supper Take what Dr. Du-Veil has said To break Bread Du-Veil on Acts 20. 7. to wit that was consecrated to be a Symbol of the Body of Christ offered for us upon the Cross Hence the Syrian render it That we might break the Eucharist The Arabick that we might distribute the Body of Christ The Ethiopick To bless the Table All understood it of this holy Rite by which the Lord Jesus would have the memory of his bitter Death to be celebrated by his Disciples Compare this with what he says on Acts 2. 42 46. Object Again it is objected That they did not break Bread on the first day because Paul continued preaching till midnight Answ 1. It was principally to this end they came together on the first day which shews it was their usual Practice so to do 2. They might break Bread first and did no doubt and then Paul might renew his Speech and continue preaching till midnight The order of words in a historical Relation are not always to be followed 3. They did break Bread and if it was after midnight yet that extraordinary occasion of Paul's preaching being ready to depart might be by the Lord dispensed with tho the proper season to administer that Ordinance be on the first day of the week For who will say that Ordinance upon an extraordinary occasion may not be administred on another day of the week so that tho this should be granted I see not how it hurts our Cause Object The Greek reads it first of the Sabbaths and say what you will 't is doubtful what day this was Answ Dr. Wallis has said enough to clear this to all that are willing to be satisfied Dr. Young's Lord's-day p. 69. yet I shall add another learned Writer Acts 20. 7. 1 Cor. 16. 2. in which place he shews 't is the same called by the Evangelists 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 * Mat. 28. 1. Mark 16. 1. Luk. 24. 1. John 20. so in those places una Sabbatorum must be expounded by the Lord's-day saith Chrysostom †Hom. 45. in 1 Cor. whose Interpretation Hierom allows and expounds the reason thereof ad Hebidum quaest 4. because saith he every week is divided into the Sabbath into the first and second and third and fourth and fifth and sixth days which the Heathens call'd by the names of their Idols and Elements and therefore in those Fathers opinion una Sabbatorum by Enallage of the plural number for the singular for it 's seldom read in the singular number in the Old Testament which the Writers of the New Testament do imitate and prima Sabbatorum are all one for the name of Sabbath among the Antients denoteth not only the last day of the week but the whole week The Hebrews called the whole week Sabbath And in this sense is the Pharisee to be understood about the Sabbath he glories of fasting 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 quasi twice a Sabbath There by Sabbath we must of necessity understand the whole week by an Hebraism and not the last day thereof For the Pharisees as most learned Searchers of Hebrew Antiquities have often observ'd which thing Epiphanius put us in mind of instituted two Feasts every week Cont. Haer. l. 1. c. 10. namely on Monday and Thursday therefore the Lord's-day was called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or una Sabbatorum as in the Evangelists and Apostles so in the Writers of the following Age. He that will look into their Writings shall find Examples enough Thus this place doth sufficiently tend to prove with 〈◊〉 other Text before mentioned that the first day of the week the Gospel-Churches did observe as the special day of sacred Worship and that it was the first day of the week the generality of the Antients both Greek and Latin it is evident do agree Moreover here are many things worthy of our Consideration 1. That this meeting was for publick Worship as preaching breaking of Bread c. 2. That the Holy Ghost on purpose records the precise day Paul having waited at Troas the six former days till this day the first day of the week came tho no doubt they might have some other private occasional meetings on other days before for Paul besure was not idle 3. That their coming generally then together was not new nor occasional but their common practice or usual day of assembling together to preach and administer the Lord's-Supper 4. It is clear that by a special applying of these Exercises to that Day and by mentioning that Day to this end it was their most solemn Day in season to meet upon and that the old Sabbath was not but was abolished with the Covenant of Works 5. Nor is it likely that Paul would have stay'd there who was ready to depart had not that day been the day of solemn Worship when perhaps many in the adjacent places came together Nor would they have slipt over the seventh Day without any notice taken of that for it necessarily shews they had no regard to the old Sabbath which the Disciples would besure never have done if there had been so great a Sanction for that day as for the first day of the week 6. As Dr. Owen notes On the Sab. p. 390. the Disciples came together without an extraordinary warning or being sent to or call'd together in answer to their Duty which they were accustomed so to do Such saith he is the account
that Justin Martyr gives of the Practice of all Churches in the next Age i. e. on the day called Sunday there is an Assembly of all Christians whether living in the City or Country and because of their constant breaking of Bread on that day it was called Dies Panis August Epist 118. And Athanasius proved that he brake not a Chalice at such a time Socrat. lib. 5. cap. 22. because it was not the first day of the week when it was used And whosoever reads this Passage without prejudice will grant that it is a marvellous adrupt and uncouth Expression if it do not signify that it was the common observance among all the Disciples of Christ which could have no other Foundation but that only laid down before of the Authority of the Lord Christ requiring it of them And saith he I doubt not but Paul preach'd his farewel Sermon after all the ordinary Service of the Church was perform'd which continued till midnight And all the Objections I have met with against this Instance amounts to no more than this i. e. that the Scripture says that the Disciples met together to break Bread yet indeed they did not so And this by what the Doctor says vanishes into Smoak 1. From the whole I may argue If the Apostles and Primitive Christians did observe the first day of the week as their prime and chief time for solemn Worship in season and passed over the old seventh Day then is the first day of the week and not the seventh that precise Day Christ has appointed to be observ'd in his solemn Worship under the Gospel But this was the prime and chief time for solemn Worship in season c. Ergo. 2. And if those meetings on the first day were not such as used to be formerly on the seventh day I desire to know a reason 1. Why their Meetings on the first day should be particularly recorded rather than their Meetings on the seventh 2. And why also the one is so oft mentioned i. e. their Meetings on the first day and no mention at all that they met on the seventh day in the New Testament from the Resurrection of Christ as a Church-assembly to worship God or discharge any part of Religious Duties nor of their meeting on the second third fourth c. Object But it seems as if they came not together till the evening of this day tho it was the first day of the week and so it proves not that this whole day ought to be kept in solemn Worship Answ For this there is not the least shadow of Proof What tho Paul continued his Speech till midnight might not some other Ministers spend the former part of the day in Preaching Exhortation or in Prayer Or might not Paul as some of us do preach twice himself on that day and they refresh themselves about the middle of the day I find one Author speaking thus Durham on the Ten Command p. 264. Paul spending this whole day in that Service and continuing his Sermon till midnight yet accounting it still one day in solemn meeting doth confirm this Day to be more than an ordinary day or than other days of the week as being specially dedicated to these Services and Exercises and totally spent in them It is said that they came together on the first day of the week and no doubt but it was in the morning of that day for so we find they did on the same day of the week Acts 2. 1 2. for when Peter began to preach it was but the third hour which is our nine of the Clock in the morning Sixthly The Lord's day the first day of the week Rev. 1. 10. My sixth Argument to prove that the first day of the week ought to be observed as a day of Rest and solemn Worship under the Gospel shall be taken from that Appellation given to this day Rev. 1. 10. where it is called the Lord's-day I was in the Spirit on the Lord's-day Surely this Royal Name or Title adds no small honour to this illustrious Day as it was the first day of Time mentioned in the beginning of the first Book of the Bible so it is the last day of Fame noted in the beginning of the last Book of the Bible to the Praise of him who is our Alpha and Omega The very Name speaks the Lord Christ to be the Author of it Mr. Warren p. 191. who upon the day of his Resurrection was declared both Lord and Christ I find saith my Author an elegant and pious Poem written by Sedulius an Antient Christian * Vid. Sixti Senensis Biblioth Sanct. p. 308. Jerom's Junior being by him translated to this effect After sad Sabbaths th' happy Day did dawn Whose lofty Name from Lord of Lords is drawn A blessed Day that first was grac'd to see Christ's rising and the World's Nativity I shall endeavour to prove that after Christ's Resurrection and Ascension there was a peculiar Day belonging to the Lord above any other day of the week and that this Day was not the old Jewish Sabbath-day but the first day of the week 1. That there was a peculiar Day or one precise Day of the week observed to the Lord in which the Churches assembled together for the Worship of God none will deny God lays claim to one day in seven as his Day 2. And now that this was not the seventh day of the week appears because we no where read that any one Gospel-Church ever assembled together on that day from the Resurrection of Christ Now if that had been the Day the Lord Christ had appointed as Mediator and Lawgiver besure we should have had it mentioned in some place as the very day in which the Churches or at least some one Church did meet together but this we do not find therefore that is not cannot be the day 3. We read of their meeting together no less than four or five times from our Lord's Resurrection and after his Ascension on the first day of the week Joh. 20. 19. and ver 26. Acts 2. 1 2. ch 20. 7. to which I might add 1 Cor. 16. 1 2. 4. No doubt the Apostle John when he says on the Lord's-day refers to a certain particular Day well known to all the Churches to whom he was to write nay known to all Believers and Saints of that time 5. And evident it is that the Jewish Sabbath-day is no where either in the Old or New Testament Isa 58. 3. called the Lord's Day tho it is called the Lord's Sabbath and the Sabbath of the Lord thy God Lord in the Old Testament as one observes is the usual name of God indefinitely Dr. Walls p. 46. without particularizing this or that of the three Persons And the Sabbath of the Lord thy God doth not appropriate it to the second Person more than to the first or third And tho the second Person or Christ considered as God made the
solemn Worship And so all along down to this day 't was kept and observ'd even by our blessed Reformers as the Lord's-day or a Day of his appointing c. Therefore from the whole we note it was no Popish Innovation nor as Tillam falsly affirms a Device of Antichrist who changed Times and Laws c. But no more at this time SERMON IV. Proving there is one day of the week in season to preach the Word and that it is the first Day That Collections by Divine Authority are to be made every first Day c. and that the Churches did meet on that day That God hath inflicted dreadful Judgments on such as have profaned the Lord's-day Several Arguments further urged shewing when the Lord's-day begins and how it ought to be observed SEventhly The Lord's Day is that Day in season in which the Word ought to be preached c Another Argument for the observance of the first Day shall be taken from Paul's Charge to Timothy Preach the Word be instant in season and out of season c. 2 Tim. 4. 2. From whence I note there is one day above all others in the week as the day in season when the Word is to be preached 1. In season implies a fit time for doing a Work and so here a particular day Christ hath appointed for his Worship Prayer Preaching and Administration of all other Ordinances 2. But if there was not one precise day appointed by Christ to the end and all days were alike under the Gospel then on all days the Word would either be in season or out of season but since there is a time in season and times out of season I argue there is one special Day appointed for those great things to be done upon 3. Solomon saith Eccl. 3. 1. to every thing there is a season and a time to every Purpose under Heaven i. e. a certain set time appointed by God to be observed with the greatest diligence to the end for which it is ordained And hath God set a time to every thing and for every Purpose and Work and yet set no particular time for his Worship This cannot be for we have proved one day in seven he claims from the fourth Command and in Gospel-times it must be the first Day of the week 1. Because the old Sabbath is gone 2. Because on this day Christ rested from all his Works as God did from his 3. Because this Day he owned and confirmed by the miraculous effusion of his Spirit 4. Because on this Day his Disciples met together and he approved it by his gracious appearance and preaching Peace to them 5. Because 't is called the Lord's-day 6. Because no Church met in a special manner on any other day in the New Testament So that this Day is the day in season or there is none at all but that can't be because there is a special season appointed to every thing and purpose under Heaven 4. This Day is the day in season because it sutes with the state of Gospel-Believers we first entering into Rest through Jesus Christ who has done for us all we had to do and born all those Burdens we were to bear in order to our entering into Rest therefore it can't sute with us to keep the old Sabbath which injoyn'd the Creature to do and live i.e. to labor to do all that God commanded in obedience even to the whole Law if ever they would have Rest and Peace So that the Jews Day shewed they were to work for Life according to the tenor of the first Covenant but our Day shews we work from Life and we have Rest Life and Peace first or are justified and so obey and this from better more Evangelical Principles So that in Comparison of this day this special season all other days of the week are out of season for Gospel-work and Service Eightly The first day of the week is appointed by Christ under the Gospel to be observed Collections for the poor Saints to be made upon the first day of the week because all the Gospel-Churches were required this day to make Collections for the poor Saints 1 Cor. 16. 1 2. As I have given order to the Churches of Galatia even so do ye upon the first Day of the week let every one lay by him as God hath prospered him that there be no Gatherings when I come 1. Observe what was the Practice of one Church as a Church was the Practice of every Church Besides Paul saith that the same thing he had given Orders about in the Churches of Galatia and so no doubt in all Churches 2. Paul in causing the Churches to be obedient in this matter received this Authority from Christ as he intimates plainly enough in 1 Cor. 14. 37. If any Man think himself to be a Prophet or spiritual let him acknowledg that the things I wrote unto you are the Commandments of the Lord. And elsewhere he shews that without the same Authority he durst not make the Gentiles obedient either by word or deed 3. Here is a Duty injoyn'd then by Christ's Authority on all the Churches and not by Paul any other ways than ministerially which is upon every first Day to make Collections for the poor Saints they must deposite their Alms all on the same day which could not be done unless the Churches did assemble upon that day and besure it was injoyned on that day because they then did meet together for solemn Worship and because such Acts of Mercy suted sabbath-Sabbath-Duties and were well-pleasing to God 4. Besides no Man can assingn a reason why the Churches should be required on every first Day to make Collections for the Poor if it were not the usual Day in which they assembled themselves together Object That 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is Greek for one and therefore 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 may as well be rendered one day of the week as the first day of the week Thus Mr. Bamfield on Acts 20. 7. Answ Take Dr. Wallis's Answer Christian Sab. p. 30 31 40 41. viz. Surely this Author cannot think that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth any where signify other than the first Day of the week Moreover all who well understood the Greek-Tongue agree that the word is here the same as in Mat. 28. 1. Mark 16. 2. Luk. 24. 1. Durham on the Commands p. 269. 'T is clear saith one to be the first Day of the week since the same Phrase used by the Evangelists is made use of here by the Apostle who no question follows the Evangelists Moreover our Adversaries acknowledg and cannot help it that by that Greek Phrase used by the Evangelists is meant the first Day of the week tho call'd one of the Sabbaths or the first from the Jewish Sabbath therefore this is a meer Cavil Now every one knows who understand any Dr. Wallis thing of this nature that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is the proper name
take so much pains and to travel so far for and in the due Celebration of the Lord's-day as if another should do the like without his Occasions and Circumstances it would be a profanation of it 3. I do not believe it unlawful to dress a Dinner or Supper on the lord's-Lord's-day Refreshments helpful to Nature so far as to refresh it that it may have a supply of Spirits to go on chearfully in the Duties of holy Worship saith the Doctor are lawful and useful to macerate the Body with Abstinences on this day is required of none and to turn it into a Fast or to fast upon this day is generally condemn'd by the Antients Wherefore to forbear provision of necessary Food for Families on this day is Mosaical and the enforcement of the particular Precepts about not kindling a Fire on this day baking and preparing the Food of it the day before cannot be insisted on without a Re-introduction of the seventh Day precisely to whose observation they were annexed and thereby of the Spirit of the old Covenant 1. Provided always these Refreshments be seasonable for the time of them and not when publick Duties require our attendance on them And 2. Accompanied with singular regard to the Rules of Temperance As 1. That there be no appearance of Evil. 2. That Nature be not charged with any kind of Excess so far as to be hindered rather than assisted in the Duties of the Day 3. That they are accompanied with Gravity and Sobriety and Purity of Conversation To which let me add certainly Masters of Families ought to take heed they do not put their Servants upon greater Labour on that day * Nor their Beasts neither since God allows them this one day of the Week for Rest than needs must so as to hinder them from a due attendance as often as possible on God's publick Worship Now what Dr. Owen saith quite differs from that overheated Zeal which appeared in some Godly Ministers in former times What think you of what Dr. White †Bishop of Ely on the Sabbath p. 235. Mr. Tho. Rogers Pref. before the Articles relates in his Treatise of the Sabbath concerning some Zealots in his time about sixty years ago I have read and many there be alive which will justify it how it was preach'd in a Market Town in Oxfordshire that to do any servile Work or Business on the Lord's-day is as great a Sin as to kill a Man or to commit Adultery It was preached in Somersetshire that to throw a Bowl on the Sabbath-day is as great a Sin as to kill a Man It was preached in Norfolk that to make a Feast or Wedding Dinner on the Lord's-day day is as great a Sin as for a Father to take a Knife and cut his own Child's Throat It was preached in Suffolk I can name the Man and I was present when he was convened before his Ordinary for preaching the same that to ring more Bells than one on the Lord's-day to call the People to Church is as great a Sin as to commit Murder Such unaccountable Zeal hath done no small mischief to the Cause of Christ Two things I observe from what the Doctor notes 1. That these Men thought we are under the like Obligation in observance of the first Day as the Jews were on their seventh Day 2. That they thought the Morality of the fourth Commandment consisted in the observation of the Lord's-day or the first Day of the week and so is a pure Moral Precept both which I utterly deny and the contrary I have proved Secondly in the Affirmative I do say that the first Day tho it be of mere positive Right ought to be observed wholly to the Lord He that observes a day let him observe it to the Lord and day much more the Lord's-day 1. To the Lord not to our selves i.e. for our external Profit or Pleasure 2. To the Lord that is the whole day not a part of it but the whole day from Morning to Evening III. That we begin the Day early in the Morning first in private and then in Family Devotion 1. In reading some part of God's Word and 2. In Prayer laying aside all worldly business but what is of absolute necessity and as much as in us lies all worldly Discourse and earthly or worldly Thoughts that the Lord on his Day may have our Hearts as well as our Ears Tongues and Feet and then to attend the publick Worship and that early on the first Day of the week to seek Jesus as Mary Magdalen did Certainly it is a horrid shame in any to take more liberty for Sleep or otherwise to gratify the Flesh on this day than they do on other days of the week when imploy'd in doing their own Business Do Men require the whole Day and with the greatest care and diligence to do their Work And doth not the holy God require our utmost care and diligence in his Work and Service Mal. 1. 14. Cursed is the Deceiver which hath in his Flock a Male and voweth and sacrificeth unto the Lord a corrupt thing c. Again it is said Jer. 48. 10. Cursed be he that doth the Work of the Lord negligently or deceitfully that is with a cold and careless Spirit My Brethren God is a great King and a jealous God for his Name and sacred Worship Levit. 10. 3. and he will be sanctified by all that draw near to him And we must I say shew greater Care and Zeal in our serving him on his Day if possible than in doing Work for Man 1. He requires it of us Eccl. 9. 10. Whatsoever thy hand findeth to do do it with thy might 2. He more deserves it from our hands Should a Servant come to his day's Work at ten a Clock certainly his Master would soon turn him off O take heed lest God severely rebuke you for your sloth and carelesness in not attending early on his publick Worship IV. In the Evening to close the Lord's-day in reading instructing our Families and in repeating what we have heard or in meditating thereon and in Prayer and singing of Psalms Hymns and Spiritual Songs Thus the Primitive Christians kept the Lord's Day * Read Dr. Young on the Lord's Day of the next Age to the Apostles V. Preparation for the Publick Worship is very necessary therefore besure you always come into the Church from your Closets bearing your Ministers upon your Hearts that so the Word of God may run and be glorified and your own Souls secretly fed and edified together And let no small matters hinder you neither the length of the way nor weather say with your self Sure I would not make these a plea or excuse were I to receive some great earthly Profit VI. As to the Publick Worship that consists in reading God's Word Preaching Prayer and singing of Psalms with a free and charitable contribution for the poor Saints on every First-day of the Week
and if our Congregations do not need such a weekly Collection yet it ought to be made for others who may need our help In which Contribution every one save Receivers ought to be Givers according to their Ability tho it be but two Mites and often on this day also the Lord's Supper is to be celebrated These were the practices of the Primitive Christians as Dr. Young abundantly hath shewed out of the Writings of the first Antient Fathers as Ignatius Justin Martyr c. VII Meditation is a great Duty on the Lord's Day On the Sab. p. 345. as Dr. Owen shews and this 1. In respect of God himself whose Glory we must make our end in all we do We ought to meditate on the Majesty Greatness Omnisciency and Holiness of God in our Approaches to him in Prayer and hearing his Word c. and so on all the days of our lives 2. We ought to meditate on Jesus Christ in a peculiar manner as the special Author of that Ordinance in which we approach to him and come together to celebrate Consider his Rest God takes up his Rest in Christ his Satisfaction and Complacency in him and in the Way and Covenant of Rest for us thro him therefore this is a sutable Subject of Meditation on this day 3. Let us meditate upon the Glory and Excellency of Christ's Person and of his wonderful Love 4. The Day it self and its sacred Services are to be meditated upon and those Privileges we are partakers of On this Day our Rest was perfected for then Christ rose again for our Justification and spoke Peace to his Disciples and so he doth to us On this day we were justified in Christ accepted in Christ pardoned in Christ as in our Head and Representative on that very First-day he rose from the Dead Therefore let Faith on this day be exercised and let us labour for thankful Hearts and rejoice with singing on this day which the Lord hath made to this end Caution Let all take heed that none profane the Lord's Day nor any way cast contempt upon it which may be done many ways 1. By doing servile Work on this day out of a covetous mind How some profane the Lords Day and so instead of doing the Lord's Work on his day they do their own 2. By walking in the Fields for their own carnal pleasure and recreation O this is an abominable Evil. 3. In gaming and playing or sporting on the Lord's Day 4. In taking upon them needless Journeys to visit their Friends because they cannot they pretend spare any other day to do it for fear of outward loss to themselves and Families Christ shall suffer the loss of his Honour and Service rather than they will lose any part of one of their own days 5. Some will not spare time on working days for themselves or Servants to take a Potion of Physick to remove Distempers of the Body but refer it to the Lord's Day which certainly is a horrid Evil And can they think God will bless that Physick Is it not Sacrilege to rob God of his Day for any external advantage which he hath dedicated and set apart for his own Worship c. He that converts any time of the Lord's Day Watson 's Body of Divinity p. 335. saith one to worldly Business is a worse Thief than he that robs on the High-way for such a Thief does but rob Man but this Thief robs God he robs him of his Day 6. Such as spend part of it in casting up their Debts or setting their Shop-books right 7. Such as take liberty to lie long abed on the Lord's Day and prefer their carnal Ease above the Honour of Christ and his sacred Worship to the reproach of his Church and grief of his Ministers 8. Such as spend more time on the Morning of the Lord's Day to dress and trim their Bodies than they take in Prayer Reading and Meditation to prepare their Souls for God's holy Worship These should be taken notice of and reproved perhaps all the Morning is spent thus and not two Minutes either in Prayer Reading or Meditation 9. Such as neglect coming into the publick Worship of God on the Lord's Day till perhaps near half the Dutys of Worship are over by this God is provoked and shame attends our Assemblies and our Sacred Religion is exposed to reproach How far do the Papists for Zeal in their false Religion out-do many who would be thought the most refined Protestants How early are they at their Devotion on this day as well as on other days of the Week Let us reform in this case for the Lord's sake or else throw off our Profession God's Soul loaths lukewarmness let us either be hot or quite cold lest God spew us out of his Mouth 10. In worldly and needless Discourses how much time on the Lord's Day is this way idly wasted and the day this way profaned as well as in many other ways which I shall now omit to mention To close all Let us make due preparation for the Worship of God on his Day and rejoice at the approach thereof wherein we have a Prize for our Souls put into our hands and may injoy God's Presence if not wanting to our selves This is the Queen of Days as Ignatius called it which God hath crowned with Blessings on which day the Spirit most gloriously descended and the dew of the same Spirit still falls upon our Souls and we may write This was the day of our new Birth and in which Christ often carried our Souls into his Banquetting-house and also feasted us with the fat things thereof This know assuredly as you grow cold in respect of the day of Worship you do certainly grow cold as to the Worship it self and in this lies one of the great Evils of our present Day What Zeal did attend Christians in this Nation in former times and how religiously did they observe the Lord's Day Let us call to mind our espousal Love and do our first Works lest Christ remove our Candlesticks out of their places FINIS ADVERTISEMENT THE confession of Faith put forth by the Elders and Brethren of many Congregations of Christians baptized upon Profession of their Faith in London and the Country The Third Edition with almost forty of the Ministers Names prefixed to it As also the Catechism agreeable to the Confession of Faith owning Election and final Preseverance necessary for the Instruction of Youth in the Fundamentals of Religion The Remainder of the Impressions of these two Books with the full and true Right of printing of them for the future are sold to the Bookseller Mr. Marshal at the Bible in Grace-Church-street London It is desired that all Persons that are desirous to promote such useful Books may apply themselves to the said John Marshal to be furnished with them Books printed for and sold by John Marshall in Grace-Church-street writ by Mr. Benj. Keach THE Display of Glorious Grace or the Covenant of Peace opened in fourteen Sermons lately preached In which the Errors of the present day about Reconciliation and Justification are detected The Breach Repaired in God's Worship or singing of Psalms Hymns and Spiritual Songs prov'd to be an holy Ordinance of Jesus Christ Wherein the chief Arguments of many Learned Divines who have wrote on that Subject are recited as Mr. Cotton of New-England Mr. Sydenham Dr. Roberts Dr. Owen Mr. Caryl Dr. Du-Veil Mr. Wells c. With an Answer to all Objections As also an Examination of Mr. Isaac Marlow's two Papers one called a Discourse concerning Singing c. the other An Appendix wherein his Arguments and Cavils are refuted Spiritual Songs being the Marrow of the Scripture in Songs of Praise to Almighty God c. with 100 Divine Hymns on several occasions as now practised in several Congregations in and about London The second Edition with a Table of Contents
appoint and institute the Sabbath but supposeth it to be so already as Mr. Primrose is forced to acknowledg and we know Dutys of Mercy and Charity as well as of necessary Piety are Sabbath-dutys for which end this Day was more fit for those Collections than any other day being then generally together and their Hearts warmed under the Word c. There must saith another * Mr. Durham be some peculiar thing in this Day making it fit yea more fit for such a purpose as doing Works of Charity on it rather than on any other And the Apostle commanding this in all the Churches doth necessarily presuppose a Reason why he doth it as drawn from some fitness of this Day above another Now if we will saith he enquire no reason can be given but that the Seventh-day Sabbath was expired and the First-day instituted in its place for otherwise any day was alike yea the 7th day being the last of the Week and whereon men usually reckon their week's success it would seem more reasonable that at the close of the Week they should lay up by them as God had blessed them than reserve it to the beginning of another Week The fitness then flows from this that the First-day being the day of their solemn communion with God and one another and of their partaking most liberally of Spiritual Blessings from him therefore they should be most warm'd in their Affections and most liberal in their Communications to such as wanted especially considering the Jews were to partake of this their Charity whose Debtors the Gentiles were according to that in Rom. 15. 26 27. I shall close this with what another noteth on this place Young on the Lord's Day p. 27. The Apostle did ordain in the Church of Corinth when they met for Religion weekly as the Lord's Days returned Alms should be collected for the Poors use and what they seem privately to have laid aside as their condition permitted to bestow for the comfort of the Poor and that which was thus laid aside they kept with themselves till the First-day of the Week when they deposited it with the Rulers of the Church for the Poors use He that shall more considerately weigh the Apostle's Phrase may well enough see this was his meaning for he saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. i. e. against the First-day in every Week or when the first of every Week comes so as it is said among the Grecians 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. Water ready for washing ones hands In like manner the Alms which were privately laid aside of every one were deposited on the First-day of the Week for the help of the needy and then when the Church met are said to be gathered because their Collections were made of those who privately had laid it aside on the Lord's Day or on the First-day of the Week Leo admonished his Hearers because on the Lord's Day there should be a Collection to prepare themselves for a voluntary Devotion and that every one according to his ability might have fellowship in that most Sacred Oblation From which Testimony one may easily gather that the Christians laid aside by themselves their Collections against the Lord's Day which they deposited with the Rulers of the Church to be bestowed Thus Dr. Young So that it appears it was on the close of the 7th day or at the weeks end that they cast up their Accounts computed their Stock and not on the Lord's Day 't was not then to be laid aside but what they had over night laid aside on the Lord's Day they put into the Deacons hand and so prevented gatherings when Paul came 9. And lastly Those fearful Judgments inflicted by God on such as have profan'd the Lord's Day shew it is of Divine Institution Can any think that Jehovah would punish any Person for neglecting or violating an Humane Tradition or an Ordinance of Man 1. A Husbandman grinding Corn in a Mill upon the Lord's Day I find 2 or 3 Authors citing these very Judgments had his Meal burnt to Ashes 2. Another carrying Corn on this Day had his Barn and all his Corn in it burnt with Fire from Heaven the next night after 3. A certain Noble-man profaning the Lord's Day usually in hunting had a Child by his Wife with a Head like a Dog and with Ears and Chaps crying like a Hound 4. A covetous Woman at Kingstaâ—e in France 1659. using to work with her Maids on the Lord's Day on Flax Fire seemed to issue out of the Flax yet did them no harm and was quickly quenched But taking no warning the third Sunday after it took fire again and burnt the House and so terribly scorch'd the wretched Woman and two of her Children that they died the next day yet a Child in the Cradle was taken out of the fire alive and unburnt 5. In Paris Garden 1582. at a Bear-baiting on the Lord's Day the Scaffolds fell down and slew eight Persons 6. Stratford upon Avon was twice almost consumed with Fire for profaning the Lord's Day 7. There was a Market kept at Tiverton on the Lord's-day And their Godly Minister told them some Judgments would fall upon them which fell out for on the third day of April 1598 the whole Town save the Church and a few poor Peoples Houses consisting of 400 Dwelling-houses were consumed to Ashes And again in Aug. 1612. not reforming their evil Practices the whole Town was again consumed by Fire save about thirty Houses of poor People with a School-house and Alms-house 8. Mr. Fenner says that he remember'd above twelve Judgments were shewed within half a year for the breach of the Lord's-day On the Sab. p. 83 84. 9. Another Divine says that a Miller had his Mill twice burned down for grinding on the Lord's-day Sirs let all tremble that despise neglect or profane the Lord's-day But pray who can shew one instance of any Judgment of God that ever since Christ's Resurrection fell upon one Person for working or bearing Burdens on the Jewish Sabbath-day True while the seventh Day continued the Lord's Sabbath there are on Record Judgments that fell on such as profaned it but never since And tho God doth not usually this way punish Sinners for their bold and daring Sins and so not some that slight and contemn this Day yet there is a day coming in which God will reckon with them and set all their Sins in order before their Eyes But one thing I have omitted viz. I find these Sabbatarians would make great Improvement of the Records of Parliament in which Saturday is called Dies Sabbati the Sabbath-day In Answer take what Dr. Wallis hath said in his Rejoinder to Mr. Bampfield Pag. 32. I remember you tell us Enqu p. 117 118. and you mind me of it p. 40 75. that I say nothing to it being it seems a thing on which you lay great weight i. e. that in the Records of Parliament