as the means to assure themselves of his protection or supply in any thing that they need as Psal 119.73 Jer. 14.22 unto which God himself directs us Isa 45.11 12. Our help stands in the name of the Lord which hath made heaven and earth Psal 121.2 The Lord having made it appear that the consecrating of a day weekly unto God for his worship will be no prejudice to our secular affairs Why we must observe such a particular day gives us next a reason why he makes choice of the seventh day rather then any other to be this day of holy rest even because himself rested from all his works of creation upon that day Now that this rest of God is the ground of appointing this to be the day of rest all men acknowledge but how the reason must be drawn out from this ground and wherein the force of it consists is all the question For whereas in Gods rest there is a double consideration the one of the act it self simply the very resting of God from his work the second of the consequent of it If we draw the reason from Gods act of resting it must be the seventh day If from the honouring of that day thereby it enforceth the observation of the first day as well as of the seventh the advancing and honouring of that day above other daies thereby If we draw the reason of the instituting of this day from Gods simple act it necessarily inforceth the observation of that very seventh day from the creation after Gods example But if we draw it from the consequent of his rest the advancing and honouring of that day thereby it binds us as well to the observation of the first day of the week now as it did the Jews to the observation of the seventh day heretofore Those that oppose the morality of the Sabbath labour to draw the reason which is laid down in this fourth Commandement for the observing of this day of rest Wee cannot make Gods act of resting the ground of instituting the Sabbath from Gods bare act of resting himself upon that day which if they do they must form their argument in this manner That day in which God himself rested from his works he appointed to be a day of mens resting from their works but that was the seventh or last day of the week therefore God ordained that to be the day on which men should rest from their works Now against the argument framed in this manner there lie two main exceptions 1. Gods example is not the ground of any Commandement the first of them is the example of God neither is nor can be any warrant to us to do the like neither do we ever find it proposed unto us as a rule which we must follow This is true that Gods or Christs examples are are set before us sometimes as incitements to stir us up to the performance of such duties as are required of us by the law as Luke 6.36 Be mercifull as your heavenly father is mercifull and Phil. 2.5 Let this mind be in you which was also in Christ but we never find any act of Gods or of Christs proposed unto us as a rule to teach us what we should do Gods actions declare that it is his will that it should be done but when he directs us what he will have us to do he sends us unto the law and to the testimony Isa 8.20 Neither do we ever find that the meer act of God was ever the ground of any law Although as in this particular case and in the institution of some other feasts some consequent or something that accompanies that act may be an occasion of an institution Perhaps to this some may reply Objection 23 that in this fourth Commandement we have first a law given in these words We have the precept first and then Gods example to encourage us to observe it The seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God and then we have Gods example to stir us up to the practice of that duty required in that law To this we answer that we have a law indeed that commands the observation of an holy day of rest unto God Answer We have no precept for the particular day of rest before the reason and a second branch of that law which appoints the proportion of the time of that rest that it shall be one day in the week but concerning the third branch without which the law it self is not perfect that is which day of the week shall be the day of that rest is not expressed as we have partly already shewed in opening the explication of this Commandement but only in the reason annexed unto this law Unlesse therefore it can be proved that the tearm seventh mentioned in the explication of this Commandement signifies the last day of seven we have no law precedent to Gods example here mentioned that commands the observation of the last day of the week for the day of rest As hath been shewed already that seventh in the explication of the Commandement notes not the particular day Now the weaknesse of the reasons alleaged to prove that this tearm seventh used in the explication of this law signifies the last day of the week we have shewed already And by one reason have made it more then probable that this tearm seventh in that place signifies only indefinitely one of seven and not particularly such a certain day of the seven The second reason which farther manifests that truth and makes it evident And is further proved because God mentions it not at all in the conclusion of the Commandement we have deferred untill now and it is this If God had intended to command that the last day of the week should be observed for the Sabbath he must and would have mentioned it in the conclusion of that reason by which he shews us the equity of the observation of that day rather then any other Now he is so far from doing that that he forbears the mentioning of that name of seventh in the conclusion at all That this which we alleage may have the greater sway with us take speciall notice that the conclusion of this Commandement hath the very same words which we find in the first giving of this law Gen. 2.3 whether the words themselves were taken out of that history I will not peremptorily define though it seems most probable Whereas he precisely names it in the Law given to Adam Gen. 2. This is cleer the words in both places are the same in every title else save only that in stead of the tearm seventh in Genesis God useth the name Sabbath in this Law This questionlesse he doth not without reason for God neither forgets nor mistakes nor speaks unadvisedly as men do too often now what may be the reason why God makes choice of this word Sabbath in the conclusion of this Commandement This is evident that by
4. Recordation and application afterward hearing of the word without recordation meditation and particular application after we have heard profits not much more then our meats do without digestion Adde unto all these 5. Instructions to the family 6. Works of mercy instructions to the family Works of mercy in visiting of the sick comforting the afflicted relieving the poor c. and we shall find little spare-time left on the Lords day for other then religious and holy employments As for the objection that the Jews are precisely restrained from going out of their places to gather Manna on the Sabbath day or kindle a fire throughout their habitations on that day Exod. 35.3 For the restraint from going out to gather Manna we know that must needs be taken away when Manna ceased and bound the Jews no longer who had liberty otherwise not only to go out of their places but to go small journies on the Sabbath daies as appears Acts 1.12 As for the inhibition to kindle a fire on the Sabbath day some conceive it respected only the building of the Tabernacle which work though God would have hastned yet he would not have the rest of the Sabbath violated for the furthering thereof nor so much as a fire kindled in any of their tents about that work to which they alleage that charge of building the Tabernacle and of forbidding work on the Sabbath day go both together both Gods direction to Moses Exod. 13.11 13. and in the delivery thereof to the people Exod. 35.2 3 4. Howsoever that inhibition of kindling fire was but temporary during the Israelites peregrination in the wildernesse The reasons by which it appears that this restraint of kindling a fire on the Sabbath day was only temporary Restraint from kindling a fire on the Sabbath was but temporary 1. It hath not the form of a continuing ordinance 2. It crosseth our Saviours rule The Sabbath was made for man 3. The loosing of a beast on the Sabbath allowed 4. Christ was at a great feast on the Sabbath which could not be without a fire are these First we find not the usuall clause which is added in most ordinances which were to continue added in this restraint that it should be observed throughout their generations Secondly this seems to crosse our Saviours generall rule Mark 2.27 That the Sabbath was made for man and not man for the Sabbath he means for mans comfort and refreshing for which kindling of fire and dressing of meat may be and are in a sort necessary Thirdly our Saviour allows the loosing of a beast from the stall and leading of him to the water on the Sabbath day now we know the beast might be provided for by setting water in the stall over-night which would refresh it sufficiently and better then meat dressed overnight could comfort many men Fourthly we find our Saviour present at a great feast Luk. 14.1 where many and it seems persons of quality vers 7.12 were bidden now it is very unlikely that the provisions for that feast were dressed over night and if it were dressed on that day neither would the Pharisee have permitted nor our Saviour have countenanced the dinner with his presence if dressing of meat kindling of fires on the Sabbath day had been forbidden by the law Now why the dressing of Manna while the Israelites were in their peregrination in the wildernesse was forbidden though the dressing of other meats might be allowed afterwards there may be some reason given For Manna it may be might be as good and comfortable eaten cold as hot and the preparing overnight might be no inconvenience at all howsoever it is out of question that in that unsetled condition of the Israelites wandring in the wildernesse when they were enforced to pick up fewell where they could get it baking and boyling must needs be more troublesome and laborious then it was afterwards in Canaan where being setled in their dwellings they had all things whereof they were to make use for such works provided and ready at hand But to conclude suppose the strictnesse of the rest unto which the Iews were bound Howsoever such strictnesse of rest was not required of them by the fourth Commandement to have been as great as they imagine it must needs be granted that there is no clause in the fourth Commandement that enjoyns it which requires no more then a rest from our ordinary secular employments that we may be at leisure to attend wholly upon the duties of religious worship that we consecrate the whole day unto God as the words of that law do cleerly expresse it So the rest of the laws that enjoyn such strictnesse of rest being taken away the fourth Commandement may remain fully in force in every clause of it And as it hath been already intimated it concerns us to take speciall notice of Gods expression Six days shalt thou labour and do all thy work by which he can mean nothing else but the works of our particular callings which only may be properly called our works for there be generall works which be proper to all callings and subordinate thereunto as to eat and drink and to cloath our selves and to make use of the rest of the comforts of this life by which we are strengthned and enabled to labour in our particular callings These cannot properly be called our works and are as well to be done on the Sabbath as on other days with this difference only that whereas they are done on other days to enable us to labour they are to be done on the Sabbath to strengthen us to holy duties These reasons which we have laid down before amount to little lesse then a Demonstration that the rest of the Sabbath must be the rest of a whole day or the seventh part of the week which we Christians have both as much cause and as much need to consecrate unto God as ever the Iews had in times past And that we may do it with as little detriment to our selves in our secular affairs and with as much assurance to have our labours of six days so blessed that they shall be sufficient for the dispatch of our needfull employments is evident by the reason which is annexed to that Commandement which proves it by the creation of the world by God in six days a ground of faith which concerns us as well as the Iews Wherefore seeing we have as great reason as great helps and as great encouragements by the assurance of Gods blessing upon our six days labour to sanctifie an entire day of holy rest unto God as the Iews had And seeing the expresse words of the law appoint the whole day to be consecrated unto God why should not we take our selves to be as strongly bound as the Iews were to the keeping of the holy rest of this whole day which we call the Sabbath seeing there appears no sufficient reason why we should judge any jot or title of this law
are in the right way when they are wide of it yet that lets not another man who is in the right way to know and be assured that he is in it This large Description of the nature of a Spirituall man The use of this description of a spirituall man is of singular use both for the encouragement of those that find themselves in some good measure answerable to this patterne that is here set before them to goe on with cheerfulnesse in the study of the Scriptures and in all other holy duties required of them As also for the awakening of others who when upon examination they finde themselves out of this blessed condition may labour with earnest desires and fervent prayers to beg that Spirit at Gods hands that may make them such as finding themselves while they remaine otherwise in a dangerous condition in which neither Gods word nor any of the rest of his ordinances can profit them as they ought CAP. VIII Of the choice of fit Times and Seasons for Reading the Scriptures THere is a season to every purpose under the Sunne saith the wise man Eccl. 3. the observation whereof not onely addes grace unto every good action but many times facilitates the work it selfe which we have in hand and makes it more easie to be compassed The consideration whereof ought to move us in such a weighty work as is the study of the Scriptures to enquire what times and seasons may be most conveniently chosen out and set apart for the exercising of our selves in this so holy a duty No time limited by God for the study of the Scriptures but the Sabbath It is true that besides the Sabbath day God hath limited to men no certain time for the duties of Prayer and study of the Scriptures only we have generall commands to be frequent and continuall in Prayer Eph. 6.18 1 Thess 5.17 and diligent in meditation of the Word Iosh 1.8 of both which we have examples in the practise of holy men Only in generall the often exercising of our selves therein is required Psalme 58.17 Dan. 6.10 Psal 119.97 But the particular times for either duty which are impossible to be directed by any generall rule are left to be determined by Christian wisdome Now times either for Prayer or Reading may be either constant and set Times for studying the Scriptures are 1. Occasionall or uncertain and occasionall For there are times wherein God calles us extraordinarily to Prayer Isa 22.12 either in afflictions felt Iames 5.13 or feared Psalme 116.3.4 and 50.15 or for mercies expected Dan. 9.2 3. or already received Psal 18.1 and 116.12 13. The like occasions we may meet withall for searching the Scriptures to resolve us in doubts Psalme 73.17 To comfort us in afflictions Psalme 119.50 To direct us in matters of advice Psalme 119.24 To guide us in our way verse 105. To assist us in temptations Eph. 6.17 Such or the like occasions may cause us to have recourse to the word extraordinarily besides the ordinary studies of it to make us wise unto salvation and furnish us to every good work 2 Tim. 3.15.17 For the constant and daily study of the Scriptures is required 2. Set and constant And that for All men not onely of the Ministers of the word Tim. 4.15 17. Magistrates Deut. 17.19 although indeed it concernes them above others but besides of all John 5.33 and that by a kind of necessity considering mens ignorance in matters appertaining to godlinesse Psal 73.22 Prov. 30.21 the difficulty of understanding things that never entred into mans heart 1 Cor. 2.9 and the great necessity of attaining the knowledge of those things which are the grounds of Faith the Rules of practice and the power of God to salvation Rom. 1.16 Nay Even such as have attained some good measure of knowledg if we had attained to some good measure of the knowledg of the Mysteries of godlinesse by the Word yet how we should be ready in the use thereof either for directing our own waies Psal 119.50.105 for admonishing others Col. 3.16 for defence in time of temptation with our Saviour Mat. 4.4.7.10 for comforting our Brethren 1 Thess 4.18 for examining our teachers doctrine with the Bereans Acts 17.11 unless besides the knowledge of the Scriptures we keep them fresh in memory by continuall meditation and often perusing of that volume which being so large as it is must of necessity take up some reasonable portion of time daily for this exercise In limiting this time for Reading the Scriptures respect must be had both to Order In choosing times for reading Scriptures we must respect and Proportion For the former godly men have accustomed to begin the day with religious exercises as with Prayer Psal 5.3 and 88.13 and Psal 55.17 1. The Order 1. The morning is a sit time for Prayer Reading the Morning was one of the three times wherein David presented his prayers unto God Now although Prayer and Reading of the Word be two distinct exercises yet that they mutually help one another is most manifest and consequently are fit to be joyned together For the Word ministers matter of Prayer and is the ground of our Petitions who have no promise to be heard unless we ask according to Gods wil 1 Io. 5.14 which is no where revealed but in the word which therefore strengthens our faith in Prayer Again Prayer must needs awe us with the reverence of Gods Majesty and consequently prepare our hearts to tremble at Gods word in reading it which God is well pleased withall Isaiah 96.2 The fitnesse of the Morning for these exercises is evident 1. As it is fit to honour God with the first of our time not only because the first of our time as of all things else belongs unto God whose service ought to be our speciall and chiefest care but besides 2. The heart in the morning is freest from worldly thoughts because the heart being then most free from worldly thoughts is fittest for holy meditations And withall when in the beginning of the day the heart of a man is seasoned with holinesse and with the feare of God he findes himself the better fitted to walk humbly with him all the day after It is very fit to close up the day with these duties wherewith we began it 2. It is good to close up the day with these holy exercises The Evening was one of Davids times for Prayer Psalme 55.17 and 141.2 and Isaaks as it seemes Gen. 24.63 Then indeed it is fit to passe our accompts with God concerning our carriage the day before that having made all our reckonings even with him we may with assurance lay down our selves to rest in peace Now we have already intimated how fit it is to joyne Prayer and Reading together so that if the Evening be a fit time for Prayer it must be acknowledged to be fit for Reading also The Mornings then and Evenings
most employed in secular affairs are said to sanctifie a day by leaving of their labours in secular things that they may spend their time in holy duties And how can God sanctifie a day by his act of resting But how God can be said to sanctifie one time above another seeing he is holy in all his works Ps 145.17 who can imagine Others interpret the words Sanctified and Blessed 2. Sanctified means that he decreed to do it only as Jer. 1.5 to expresse not what God did at present but what he decreed then to act and do afterward viz. when he gave his Law to his people by the hand of Moses upon mount Sinai And to give the better countenance to this interpretation they parallel it with another place Jer. 1.5 where God tels Jeremiah that he sanctified him before he came out of the womb In which place Sanctified can signifie no more Answer then he decreed to sanctifie Now to forbear all other exceptions against that parallel place in Jeremiah Where doth Blessed signifie Decreed to blesse admit the word Sanctifie signifie decree to sanctifie where doth the word Blessed signifie decree to blesse But admit such an instance might be found for that also Again it is taken so in one proves not that it must be so in this This were a mad form of reasoning The words Sanctified and Blessed in one place signifie Decreed to sanctifie and blesse where the circumstances of the Text admit other interpretations therefore the same words where they may have a better construction according to their usuall and proper signification must be interpreted in a sense lesse proper and usuall though no necessity urge us thereunto If such a liberty as this were admitted we should never be able to draw any certain conclusion out of any place of Scripture whatsoever A third sort there are who acknowledge that these words 3. It is related in Genesis by anticipation Gen. 2.3 import an institution but that is say they related in that place by way of anticipation referring and pointing out unto us a time when this was done more then 2400 years after when the Law was given by Moses upon mount Sinai Now this interpretation must suppose the whole third Verse Gen. 2. to be inserted there by a Parenthesis and then some clause must be added by way of supply to make up some such sense as this But what enforceth to admit an anticipation This resting of God upon the seventh day was the reason and ground of Gods sanctifying and blessing the seventh day in the Law which God gave unto his people by the hand of Moses upon mount Sinai But first what incongruity with the scope of this place or with any circumstances of the Text in which this is related or with any other place of Scripture or with any principle of faith enforceth us to allow such an anticipation in this place as we are forced to admit in some other places because we cannot otherwise find how they may agree either the words with themselves or with some other place of Scripture without which necessity to admit anticipations were to confound all order of Scripture For the countenancing of this anticipation they say that Moses Gen. 2. having mentioned Gods rest vers 2. upon the seventh day had thereupon a fit occasion to point at the Law which being given afterwards It cannot be proved that the Law was given before Genesis was written was grounded upon that rest of God which is here related To which we answer First this conceit supposeth that which no man in the world shall be ever able to prove that the book of Genesis was written by Moses after the giving of the Law otherwise how could Moses in this place give a reason of that Law which was not then in being but it seems more probable if conjectures may have any place in reasoning that the book of Genesis as it is placed first in order The contrary seems more probable so was first written For it is manifest by Saint Stephens words Act. 7.25 that God had revealed himself to Moses before he went out of the land of Aegypt into Midian and had designed him to be the deliverer of his people Again that Moses during his abode in Midian had leisure enough to pen that history it is evident in it self Lastly that the penning and reading of that history might be of singular use to stir up the children of Israel to go up out of Aegypt to take possession of the land of Canaan in which their Fathers had been so long a time sojourners and so blessed and advanced by God that they were esteemed as Princes amongst those with whom they lived especially God having so freely and fully given that land to them and their posterity is so evident that no man can with any colour deny it So that it must needs follow that in setling their anticipation upon such a supposition they build at the best upon a very uncertain ground Besides 2. The pointing at the Law in Genesis had been superfluous it had been meerly superfluous to have pointed at the ground of instituting the Sabbath in this place in Genesis seeing it is cleerly expressed in the body of the Law given by Moses Now whosoever considereth what brevity Moses useth in penning the history of the world allowing but 6 Chapters to the setting out of an history of 1650 yeares must needs judge it to be very improbable that he would lengthen it with needlesse and uselesse repetitions Lastly all that can be inferred on it the fairest that are produced to countenance this fained anticipation proves no more but this if all were granted that they alleage that there may be an anticipation but how will they prove that it must be and that is it which it concerns them to make good especially seeing there are so many strong if not convincing arguments which prove the contrary as we have shewed already Hitherto there appears for ought that we see no great occasion Arguments against the giving of the Law of the Sabbath to Adam or use at all of this pretended anticipation Gen. 2.3 which notwithstanding we must be enforced to acknowledge if it can be proved that the Sabbath was not Instituted before the giving of the Law by Moses upon mount Sinai or till the first intermission of the raining of Manna which was not long before it Wherefore they endeavour to prove that the Law neither was nor could possibly be given to Adam in Paradise This maintainers of that opinion labour to make good by three Arguments First 1. It was impossible for Adam to observe the Sabbath that it were absurd to conceive that God would give Adam a law which was impossible for him to observe Secondly that he should give him a law 2. It was needlesse which to him in the state of innocency 3. The Patriarchs till Moses his time never kept
methodically in the interpretation of the Commandement we must first enquire what the scope is at which it aimes The appointing of a day of rest cannot be the scope of the fourth Commandement For all Laws being rules directed to some end proposed cannot so well be interpreted any way as by the end unto which they are directed Now the appointing of a day of rest cannot possibly be the last scope of this Commandement seeing we know rest from labour is enjoyned to give us freedome for holy duties and the exercising of our selves therein But of rest for holy duties which consequently must be the principall thing intended in the fourth Commandement But then it will be questioned to what kind of holy duties this day is consecrated For there are many that imagine that God hath set it apart only for duties of publike worship Publick and private But this opinion seemes not to agree with the letter of the Law which in expresse tearms gives the whole day unto the Lord for his own immediate service in religious worship Now we know publike worship takes not up the whole day It must needs be granted therefore the Lord appointed that day of holy rest for the performance of something more unto God then publike worship and so much is expresly affirmed Isa 58.13 where we are forbidden to find our own pleasure or speak our own words upon that day which as all men must acknowledge must needs extend to the ordering of our carriage in private as well as in publike so that the setting apart of a whole day of rest unto God for his publike and private worship seemes to be the full scope of this fourth Commandement Next to the scope of this Law 3 Parts of the fourth Commandement the 1. Summe 2. Explication 3. Reason we are to consider advisedly the frame and composure of it and therein we are first to take notice of the principall parts of the Law which we shall find to be three First we have laid down unto us the summe of the Law Exod. 20.8 Secondly we have the explication of that sum ver 9. Thirdly we have the reason of all v. 11. Each of these two first parts containe three heads of duties pointed out in the summe and opened and unfolded in the explication and confirmed in the reason of the Law The first duty is Preparation intimated in the word Remember The second the Sequestration from ordinary employments implied in the word Sabbath The third is Sanctification of that rest expressed in the phrase to keepe it holy All these are explained in their order Our Preparation must be by the dispatch of all our Secular affaires in six daies Our rest must be a cessation by all persons from our usuall labours and imployments in secular affaires The Sanctification of our rest must be by employing our selves in holy duties The confirmation of all follows in the reason of the Law of Preparation and rest from Gods own Act of Creating the world in sixe daies and ceasing from his work on the seventh and the Sanctifying of that rest from Gods Commandement and ordaining the seventh day to be a day of rest unto us for ever Now wherein the strength of that Confirmation lies will be the maine point in question of which hereafter To come now to the Explication of the words and phrases in this Commandement The first word in the summe of this Law Remember is diversly interpreted some conceive that it implies the importance of the duty commanded as that word is used many times to intimate some matter of speciall observation as Deut. 9.7 Others there are that think it points at the Antiquity of that Law given many ages before and therefore to be called afresh to minde as the Psalmist saith he will remember the works of the Lord his wonders of old Psal 177.11 and 143.5 and withall some conceive that he taxeth the peoples forgetfulnesse of that Law and neglect of the observation of it in the time of their bondage in Aegypt Some or all of these senses may be implied in this word Remember but beyond all these we may probably conceive that it may import Remember implies Think upon and by dispatching of thy busines provide for the Sabbath Think upon and accordingly before-hand provide for the observation of this holy rest by dispatching of all the works of thy calling that nothing may be undone which providence and diligence might prevent that might hinder thy rest on the seventh day As for those which conceive that in this Law labour upon the sixe daies is commanded as well as rest upon the seventh they are much mistaken The precept for labour is delivered in the eight Commandement as the Apostle interprets that Law Eph. 4.28 In this place is commanded the dispatch of our secular affaires before the Sabbath whether it be done in six daies or fewer it is not materiall as to this Law The next tearme to be explained Sabbath is a day of rest which only and not seventh is expressed in sum and conclusion of the Commandement is the name of the Sabbath or day of rest and easing from labour as that word properly signifies which is repeated againe in the conclusion of the Commandement And it is not to be passed by without observation that whereas the old Sabbath from the beginning till Christ came was the seventh day or last of the weeke and both in the explanation and reason of the Commandement is appointed to be one of the seven yet God mentions not the name of seven either in the Summe or in the Conclusion of the Commandement We have therefore reason to conceive that seeing God in this Law was to prescribe something of the Law of Nature The day of rest being of the law of nature the set day of positive institution which is the appointing of a day of holy Rest to be consecrated unto God for his worship which the very light of nature teacheth and in the explanation and reason of the Law to adde something which is of positive Institution namely the proportion of the time and the set day wherein this rest was to be observed he first settles that which is of the Law of nature and afterwards establisheth that which is Positive God purposely makes choise of such fit expressions especially in his Law in which he is most exact as may best acquaint us with his minde Wherefore seeing this is a fit Method to be observed by him and seeing the composure of this Law agrees with it we have reason to conclude that the Lord himselfe intended it in this place The last phrase in the sum of this Commandement remains which is To keep it holy To keep holy is to employ the day in holy duties of Gods immediate worship Now to keep a day holy is to employ it in holy actions directed to the immediate service and worship of God in the use of such ordinances as he hath left unto his Church and to passe our time therein in holy speeches and meditations Actions may be holy either in the manner of doing them as when we performe duties either to God or men in obedience to Gods will in a reverend and holy fear
It is objected that the Rest commanded in the fourth Commandement was a figure of Christs rest in the grave and therefore is now banished with the rest of those shadowes We answer this typicall relation to Christ Answer was accidentall to the Sabbath not essentiall That was accidentall to the Sabbath it was a Sabbath before it was a Type for it was a Sabbath before Christ was looked upon as a sacrifice for sin that is before man had fallen and consequently before there was any need of our Saviours resting in the grave Seeing therefore it was a Sabbath before it was a type it may remaine a Sabbath though the type be taken away They will it may be grant that there must be a rest from labour upon the Sabbath day Objection 2 but the strictness of that rest such as the Jews observed The strictnesse of the rest enjoyned the Jewes is taken away is ceremonious and abolished The rest say they to be observed of us Christians is only for publike worship and no longer so that the remainder of the day after publike duties are ended is free and then men are at liberty to make use of the time remaining for recreations or for any secular affaires as occasion shall required In answer hereunto we have shewed already that although publike worship be principally yet it is not solely provided for in this Law which as we have proved out of Esay 58.13 reacheth to our private carriage also And the Law calls the whole day the Sabbath or rest of the Lord that is both commanded by him and consecrated to him For the whole week being distributed into seven parts sixe are allowed for labour and the seventh is consecrated unto God which therefore must be a naturall day as the other sixe are To replie that we are not bound by that Law is to begge the question But why should not Christians be bound to rest the whole day as well as the Jews The Jews not bound to rest but for holy duties Surely if the Sabbath were a type of Christs rest in the grave yet there could be no type in a whole day as there was in Jonas his three daies So the rest of the whole day having no type in it is not abolished for that cause What then was it a part of the burthen of those ceremonious observances from which Christ hath freed us To give the fuller answer hereunto let us examine what rest was enjoyned the Jewes that we may discover wherein the burthensomenesse of that rest consisted First I conceive no man will think that the Jewish rest was a totall cessation from all action like that in the Aegyptian darknesse Exod. 10.23 as if men after the publike exercise were to sit still and to do nothing Was it then a ceasing from labours to follow sports that the Sabbath might be like the feast of the Calfe Exod. 32.6 or was it rest from worldly labours to fit men give them the more leisure to attend holy duties Such a rest indeed the Law requires For which we have as much need of rest as they and the Sabbath to be kept holy Now if this were all that God required of the Jews to rest that they might be exercised in hearing reading praying c. Is this the liberty Christ hath purchased unto us that we may be lesse godly then they lesse frequent in prayer and other holy duties then they For if we are bound at least to equall if not to go beyond them in our exercise in those holy duties we have as much need of rest from ordinary employments as they had This will be made more evident unto us if we lay before us these five particulars First 1. As having a more weighty ground for observing this holy rest our ground of consecrating the Sabbath is as great and weighty and more cleer and evident to us then it was to the Jews seeing Gods mercies towards man are more cleerly represented us in mans redemption then they could be to them in the worlds creation and conservation Secondly 2. And are as much bound to advance Gods majesty as they 3. And more helps then they 4. And as much need to prevent distractions as they 5. And our duties are as many or more then theirs the majesty and greatnesse of God to whom we consecrate this day is as fully manifested to us as to them Thirdly our helps and means for the raising up of our spirits to an holy rejoycing in God are greater and more effectuall then they were unto them Fourthly we need as much as they all helps to prevent the distraction of our minds and to the quickning of our spirits Lastly our exercise in spirituall and holy duties is in all respects as much or more then theirs So that if all be laid together the observing of a whole day of rest for our exercise in holy duties is as usefull and as needfull to us Christians as it was heretofore to the Iews To cleer this point yet more fully 1 Private prayer and reading let us lay before us the right manner and order of performing the duties in which the Sabbath day is to be sanctified First therefore all men must needs grant that the private exercises of prayer reading Gods word and meditation which are constantly to be used on other daies are not to be neglected but ought rather to be enlarged on the Sabbath day 2. Recordation of Gods mercies generall and Particular Again as the Sabbath ought to be a day of gladnesse and rejoycing in God Psalm 118.24 for all his mercies to man in generall so it is a time of recounting his extraordinary favours to our own souls in particular which will be of speciall use to quicken and fill our hearts with the love of God by tasting the sweetnesse of his goodnesse and to carry us on with more cheerfulnesse and life of spirit in the performance of all the duties of that day both private and publike Thirdly 3. Preparation to publique duties for the publike duties themselves they can never be rightly performed without precedent preparation David will wash his hands in innocency and so compasse Gods Altar Psal 26.6 and Solomon tels us we must take heed to our feet when we enter into Gods house Eccles 5.1 and bethink our selves of the majesty and greatnesse of that God before whom we present our selves and of our own vilenesse that are but dust and ashes Gen. 18.27 nay which is worse unclean and filthy persons Isa 64.6 unworthy to stand before a God that hath pure eyes and the Apostle tells us of superfluity of naughtinesse that must be laid aside when we come to hear that we may receive the word with meeknesse Jam. 1.21 into an honest and good heart Luk. 8.15 Meditations by which we must prepare our hearts in our private exercises of reading Gods word and prayer much more in these which are more solemn and publike Again
but his own Spirit 1 Cor. 2.11 It is true concerning a mans mind seeing it is moved according to reason in order to the end which he proposeth to himself therefore one that knows another mans end may with some probability guesse at his thoughts and purposes tending to that end which Solomon implies in affirming that though counsell be hidden deep in the heart of man yet a man of understanding may draw it out Prov. 20.5 And so a man knowing that Gods main end in all his ways is his own honour may conclude that Gods law must be such as may direct men in those ways in which they may most glorifie God But what those particular directions must be it is impossible for men to guesse till God himself reveal them It is true that the very light of nature which God hath planted in every man will discover unto him some of the chief heads of the duties that he requires of him as to love the Lord with all our hearts and to fear and serve him Deut. 10.12 And to serve one another through love Gal. 5.13 But in what particular services we are to expresse our piety to God or love to men what man can prescribe or imagine For that the ways by which both these main duties may be performed are various and divers it is evident now to which of these different ways God would direct one it was impossible to guesse till God himself had made it manifest in his own word To give instance of this truth in some particulars Especially laws positive must needs bee given by God alone it was impossible for any man to conceive what ceremonies or outward acts God would accept and be best pleased withall in the duties of his worship No man could divine that the tree of life should be a Sacrament to Adam in Paradise or Circumcision to the Jews or Baptisme and the Lords Supper to Christians For ought any man could conceive to the contrary the Priesthood might have been setled upon the Tribe of Simeon as well as Levi. The rest of the Sabbath might have been fixed on the second or sixth day as well as on the seventh and on the first if God had so appointed it And for the duties of the second Table it was not of absolute necessity that God should establish such a kinde of subordination and subjection of one man to another as he hath done or give every man a propriety in his goods to possesse them as severall to himself or limit one man to one wife and ordain marriage for the onely way of propagation of mankinde seeing that although all these are fit and convenient yet God if hee had pleased might have given other rules for the governing and establishing peace amongst men and it was as lawfull for him to give the creatures what laws he pleased as to give them what natures he pleased So that seeing the law for the right ordering of the creatures depends meerly upon Gods will which cannot be known unlesse himself reveal it it must needs be granted which was first proposed that none could give the law to Gods Church but God himself Next if it had been possible 2ly Nor is it convenient that any other then God should give this law 1 For preserving Gods authority it was no way fit either for the advancing of Gods honour or for the furthering of mans good that any other should give that law then God himself Not fit for Gods honour in two respects First Gods authority could be no way so well preserved as by giving his own law to his people seeing all men acknowledge that giving of laws is an honour annexed to the highest power although the execution of them be committed to Magistrates of a lower degree It may be probably guessed that even heathen Law-givers by pretending either consulting with their gods in giving their laws or allowance of them by them acknowledged law-making to be a divine prerogative which yet is more fully manifested by this that we acknowledge no law to bee just that is not either founded on or consonant to Gods law either written in mans heart or delivered in his word So that it was fit that God should give the law to his own people to preserve his own authority amongst them Again it is requisite for Gods honour in another respect 2 And that we might have a perfect mirrour of him Which none could give but himself that none but God himself should give his own law to his people because none is able to give so perfect a mirrour of God as himself As for men we know none of them hath seen God at any time John 1.17 and it is so little a portion that they know of him Job 26.14 that it is impossible they should set him out as he deserves Now it is for Gods honour that hee should be expressed as fully as may be which neither is nor can be performed so exactly by any man as it may be by his law which represents unto us the image of his minde and will and gives us a more distinct knowledge of him then his works can doe Nay his word serves as a Commentary to his works as laying before us the rule according to which God orders all his ways so that by the help thereof we understand the righteousnesse and holinesse of all his acts as David did Psa 73.17 which he could not finde out before It is true indeed that the very works themselves praise God and shew him in his tender mercies Psal 145.5.8 in his mighty power Job 36.22 37.23 Godhead Rō 1.20 yea commonly in his righteousness in rewarding and punishing Psa 58.11 But they neither expresse him so distinctly nor consequently affect the heart so deeply as they doe when they are illustrated by the word as Job confesseth chap. 42.6 that he never saw God so clearly nor abhorred himself so much as when God described unto him his works in that conference Job 38. c. Wherefore seeing the image of God is most exactly expressed unto us in the word it is most fit that the word that represents him to us should be given by God himself who knowing himself best can give us the most perfect draught of his own face Besides these respects unto Gods honour in regard of mans good it was not convenient that the Scriptures which contain Gods law to his Church should be given by any other then God himself For first 3ly For mās good 1. To subdue his heart to obedience mans heart would hardly be brought to stoop to any power but Gods alone whose voice onely prevails upon the conscience and subdues the very thoughts and imaginations of the spirit which the voice of no man can doe Besides 2. To make his services accepted nothing can make our services performed to God or man to be duties of obedience but the undertaking of them upon Gods command which we do when we know the
the former I answer that the same exception lies against all Gods commandements and the supposed impossibility ariseth especially from the unwillingness of their own minds and lastly the expence of time or labour is not so much as may well be spared from their vanities or if an houre or more in a day be spared from labours God can recompence it by his blessing without which early rising and hard labouring are to little purpose Psal 127.2 To the later sort I say that we come far short of our duty in all our services that we deal with a gratious Father who accepts us according to that we have if there be a willing mind 2 Cor. 8.12 as requiring mercy rather then sacrifice Mat. 9.13 Only our endevour must be to do all things as perfectly as we can and for that purpose the rule must be set downe in the exactest manner which also serves best both to direct us and to quicken our endevours and besides to stir us to thankfulness for Gods gracious acceptance of our imperfect services and pardon of our failings CAP. XII Directions for the right interpretation of the Scriptures NOt only the matters and subject which the Scriptures handle being high and mysterious in their nature which the Psalmist calls Wonders Psal 119.18 but besides that the phrase manner of expression which is in many clauses far from vulgar or common use make many things in Scripture hard to be understood as the Apostle acknowledgeth 2 Pet. 3.16 wherefore there is required much wisdome and diligence in searching after the true sense of Gods word without which we cannot but erre dangerously in the grounds of our faith and in the rules of practise It will be therefore needfull to set before us such rules as may help to direct us in finding out the true sense of the Scriptures But before we come to lay downe these rules we must necessarily agree upon two conclusions The first is acknowledged by all men without contradiction which is That there can be no infallible interpreter of the Scriptures but God himselfe The second though it be somewhat more questioned then the former yet is as true as it in all points namely That every Godly man hath within him a spirituall light by which he is directed in the understanding of Gods mind revealed in his word in all things needfull to salvation Concerning the former of these two conclusions we must necessarily acknowledge that seeing no man knows Gods mind but himself as the Apostle affirmes Rom. 11.34 1 Cor. 2.16 therefore none can interpret his word in places doubtfull None can interpret Scriptures but God himselfe but himself For seeing Gods mind cannot be otherwise known to us then by the words wherein it is expressed and when the words are such as may import divers senses who can tell in which of those senses God used them and would have them taken by us but himself that uttered them unlesse some other person were privy to his thoughts As for the second conclusion Every godly man hath a light in himselfe to shew him the mind of God in his word that godly men have a light within their own breasts by which they are able to understand Gods meaning in his word in things necessary to salvation we know that God hath promised by his Prophet that no man shall need to teach his neighbour because every man shall know him from the greatest to the least Jer. 31.34 And the Apostle that the anointing that they have abiding in them shall teach them all things 1 Joh. 2.27 the Anointing there mentioned is that spirit which is given us of God by which we know the things that are freely given us of God 1 Cor. 2.12 by which every man understands spirituall things as every man sees and discovers naturall things with his own eyes That every man should have within himself such a light or spirituall understanding Which conduceth 1. To Gods honour as we have mentioned before by which he may discover and know the mind of God revealed in his word conduceth much to Gods honour two waies 1. As having as many witnesses as believers For first God hath by this means as many witnesses of his truth as there are true believers of whom every one knows what he speaks Ioh. 3.11 by his own understanding and becomes thereby a more authenticall witness unto others of that which he believes upon a more certain ground then if he had seen it with his own eyes Secondly 2. And those more fully discovering his truth and more affected with it every godly man having this inward light by which he discovers the mind of God speaking in his word knows his truth more fully and cleerly then he could possibly do by the helps of any other mans light and finds his heart thereby more affected with those glorious and holy truths which the Word reveals understanding the righteousness and purity of that Word as David did Psal 119.138.140 which indeed is the only true means of admiring and honouring God for that holy word in which are discovered such glorious excellencies that our very souls are ravished with it as Davids was Psal 119.97 upon the discovery of the sweetnesse thereof vers 103. Besides 2. To our comfort when we see with our own eyes it is a singular comfort to every godly soul to see with his own eyes It 's true that it is a great comfort to a blind man to meet with a faithfull guide whom he may trust to lead him on in his way but it comes nothing neer the content which a man that hath eyes takes when with them he sees the way in which he walks This discovery of the truth of God revealed in his word is the only means of grounding our faith preserving us established in the truth against errours and apostasie and of filling our souls both with present comforts and future hopes This inward light may much be cleered and enlarged by 1. The Ministery of the word 2. Conferences It is true that this inward light or anointing as Saint John calls it may be much cleered and enlarged by such helps as God is pleased to afford us by the ministery of his word by private conferences and reading of godly mens writings which are therefore to be made use of diligently and constantly and therefore they are justly to be suspected who rejecting them brag of I know not what inward light which they have received 3. And reading of godlymens books which too many neglecting endanger themselves which too often by the event at least is discovered to be a seducing spirit of errour leading them from one phantasie to an other to the endangering of their own souls and such as cleave unto them These helps therefore which we have mentioned are not to be despised nor yet any farther to be depended on then as spectacles serving to make things clearer unto the light which we have within
the Sabbath was altogether needlesse and superfluous Thirdly they insist strongly upon this that if God had given Adam such a law at that time then had the Patriarchs been bound to the observation of that law Now say they if the Patriarchs had been bound to the observation of that law they had certainly kept it but that neither all or any of them observed any such is manifest by the history of their lives written by Moses wherein there is no mention of any such thing For the first of these three arguments which is Answer to the first that it was impossible for Adam in Paradise to keep a Sabbath they reason thus The Sabbath say they was appointed for the publike worship of God 1. That supposeth publick worship to be the whole duty of the Sabbath as all men must needs acknowledge But Adam and his wife could not make a publike assembly nor consequently worship God publikely nor by the same observe a Sabbath according to the Law To this we answer in the First place Though publike worship be the principall yet it is not the sole duty of the Sabbath Honoring God forbearing to do ones own waies or to find his own pleasure or to speake ones own words are duties of such an holy day of Rest as God delights in Isa 58.13 as well as publike worship And the Fourth Commandement which sets apart an whole day unto the Lord entirely and commands therein a totall cessation from all our employments in our ordinary calling makes it evident The sequestring of our selves from our ordinary secular affaires for religious duties is the full scope of that fourth Commandement which if a single person shut out by sicknesse or any other casuall accident from publike Assemblies perform he keeps an acceptable Sabbath unto God though he cannot joyne with the Congregation in the duties of publike worship Againe why may not two persons where there are no more 2. Two where no more are may be esteemed a publike assembly be esteemed to be a publike Assembly It is cleare that our Saviour esteems the meeting of two or three for prayer a gathering together Mat. 18.20 And then it 's plaine that Adam and Eve meeting together in Paradise and employing the whole day in prayer and other holy and religious exercises may in a true and proper sense be said to worship publikely so that in this argument brought against possibility of keeping a Sabbath by Adam and Eve in Paradise 3. It is no good argument Adam could not then keep the Sabbath therefore he had no Law for it the propositions are both faulty Besides this is no good argument Adam and Eve could not at that present keep a Sabbath therefore they had no Law given them by God to command it The fifth Commandement prescribing the duties of Parents to their Children is questionlesse a Law of nature shall we say that this Law was not at the least written in Adams heart from the beginning because he had then no child We think it wisdome to make laws for warres in time of Peace although there can be no execution of them for the present The Next Argument against the Institution of the Sabbath in Paradise Answer to the second is that then Adam needed no Sabbath neither for his body nor for his mind For his body they say he needed no Sabbath because that he being exercised in no painfull or toylsome labour but exercised only in such work as might be accounted rather a recreation then a labour needed no rest at all or refreshing of his body thereby 1. Ease by rest though it be a consequent is not the scope of the Sabbath To this we answer that the ease of man and beast from labour although it be a consequent of the rest of the Sabbath yet was it never the scope of it seeing the moderation of labour belongs properly to the same commandement which enjoynes labour that is unto the Eight as the Apostle also interprets it Eph. 4.28 The Fourth Commandement forbids labour indeed but not so much for mercy as for Piety nor so much for easing of the toyle of the body as for the preventing of the distraction of the mind by labour seeing we know the body cannot labour but the mind must needs be more or lesse employed withall which therefore at that time cannot so freely be wholly exercised in Spirituall duties as it ought So that Adam might have use of a Sabbath in Paradise although he needed it not for the ease of his body 2. Adam might make use of the Sabbath in respect of his minde Yea but say they Adam much lesse needed a Sabbath in respect of his mind then he did in respect of his bodie because his mind in that state of Innocency being continually filled with heavenly thoughts he could not choose but keep a perpetuall Sabbath To this Objection we have answered in part already that the Sabbath requires of us not only the filling of the mind with heavenly Meditations but besides a totall sequestration of the whole man to the exercise of all holy duties forbidding us to finde our own pleasure or our own waies Isa 58.13 that is take up any employment either of body or minde about any of those affaires which may properly becalled our own such as are all our secular affaires Now although Adam in Paradise had not in that ease and pleasure of his in keeping the Garden his minde so wholly taken up with that businesse as ours are now in our more toylsome works yet it must needs be and was his duty too to attend and to have his minde exercised in the thoughts of those things that he tooke in hand which on the Sabbath ought to be wholly laid aside In one word Adam was and ought on other dayes to be wholly heavenly minded in the use of earthly things but on the Sabbath day he was to be wholly heavenly minded in the use of heavenly things All then that can be made good in this parcular is only this that Adam in some respects lesse needed a Sabbath then we doe whence cannot possibly be inferred that he therefore needed none at all nay upon the same ground it will follow that because he being riper in knowledge stronger in faith and more quickned and fervent in affection lesse needed the Sacraments or other like helps as we doe it was not fit for him to have any Sacrament at all As well as of the Sacraments c. Rather we may conclude that because Adam infinitely excelled us in all these abilities therefore though he lesse needed yet he was more fit to keep a Sabbath then we are having more leisure and being more heavenly minded then we are All this while we speake of the Sabbath as if it were given to man only for his own good whereas the principall scope of it is the honouring of God which was Adam duty as well as ours So that in respect of
it had been so expressed And questionlesse the second Commandement had been plainer if it had been expressed in some such manner as this Thou shalt not worship me with any worship of thine owne devising but in such manner and in the use of such ordinances as I shall prescribe 2. And the Commandement for baptizing of Infants And it had been plainer if our Saviour in giving commission to his Apostles to baptize had exprefly named the Infants of beleeving Parents as he did in commanding them to be Circumcised Many passages in Scripture might have been expressed in plainer tearms then those in which they are delivered It is enough to satisfie any sober mind that God who was at liberty to expresse himselfe as he pleased thought it fit to speak to us in this manner We may adde farther if we observe it well God manifests great wisdome in penning the second The discovery of such changes to follow had brought the services into contempt and fourth Commandements in this obscure manner for if God had in the second Commandement expressed himselfe at full that the Iews should for the present worship him according to the ordinances which Moses gave them but after the comming of the Messiah they should in stead of them use such Rites as he should ordaine And if in the fourth Commandement he had thus expressed himselfe Your Sabbath for the present shall be the last day of the week but after the Resurrection of Christ you shall change it to the first day of the week the discovery of the changes to come in the Rites and form of Gods worship had in all probability bred in Gods people a contempt of those duties which they were to perform at present as being temporary and imperfect and such as were to give place to better ordinances that were to succeed them which they could not endure to heare of Acts. 6.14 It pleased God therefore to pen the Law in such a form that his people might understand out of it as much as concerned them to practise at present and yet we Christians might find in it farther directions when there should be occasion to make use of them Gods wisdome in concealing these changes illustrated by the policy of Princes Thus Princes sometimes to keep their Counsells secret send out their commands with sufficient instructions what to doe at present and with farther Commissions sealed up and not to be opened till they come to the place where those farther directions which are contained therein are to be put in execution Having now examined the reason of this Commandement For in the Law shews the equity of the proportioning of the time set a part for this rest and shewed how it must be deduced and applied let us next consider the words wherein it is expressed This particle For referres both to our labour of sixe daies and rest upon the seventh manifests the equity of the Law in requiring such a rest of us as if we deale providently in managing our affaires needs not to hinder them seeing God allows as much time to us for the dispatch of our business as he took up in the Creation of the world requiring no more of us but the setting apart one day in seven to be kept holy in remembrance of the Creation of the world and that too for our own comfort improvement in grace and for the farther quickning and strengthening of our souls In sixe daies God made all things and therefore by sixe daies labour can and will assist thee to dispatch all thy work as well as for his own honour and glory In sixe daies God made heaven earth c. and therefore both is able and as a faithfull Creator will be ready to assist and prosper thee so in all thy labours that all thy businesse shall be dispatched in sixe daies namely whatsoever thy calling and needfull occasions shall require to be done as God in sixe daies created whatsoever was needfull as is implied in these words All that in them is It hath been before observed that Gods creation of the world is often mentioned as a meanes to move men to depend upon him and it may be probably conceived is remembred here to stay our murmuring at the sparing of one day weekly from our implomyments And rested the Seventh day which must not therefore be the last day of the week And rested c. And 1. thereby established his work 1. And rejoyced in it but is mentioned here only as one of seven not as the last of seven This was not a totall cessation whereof God being a continuall Act is uncapable but only a resting from works of Creation and implies two acts of God The first the establishing and setling all his works to continue in himselfe according to his own Ordinances Psal 119.89 90 91. The other his rejoycing and delighting himselfe in the work of his hands This Rest of God was not as ours for a day only for he never wrought in the work of Creation any more and may perhaps point at our eternall Rest wherein we shall cease from all our labours for ever Therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day Therefore the Lord blessed c. as declaring by his rest that the Creation was perfected and sanctified it because he had by his resting on that day manifested the perfecting of the Creating of the world all things being made that were needfull so that there was no cause to goe on with that work of Creation any longer wherefore in memory of this great work of the Creation of the world God sanctified this day as being dignified above other daies by perfecting of so glorious a work Gods blessing of the day is the ordaining of it to be a day of blessing a day of thriving in Grace and abounding in spirituall comforts a day of rejoycing in God and his goodnes and encouraging our selves by the remembrance thereof to serve the Lord with chearfulnesse and gladnesse of heart Sanctifying is a setting apart of the day unto God to be imployed in holy exercises as preaching hearing reading praying c. Thus farre then we find in examining the phrases and expressions of the fourth Commandement nothing that may enforce us to acknowledge any thing to be Ceremonious in this Law nor consequently mutable seeing the set day of rest being not commanded there in particular but onely assigned by a generall rule which is appliable to the Sabbath of the Christans as well as to that of the Jewes in changing of the first day of rest there is nothing altered in the Law It remaines only that we examine whether we finde any Ceremony in the rest which if we doe not we must acknowledge that the Church of God is for ever bound to the observation of this Objection 1 as much as to any other of the Morall Laws The rest of the Sabbath was a type of Christs rest in the grave and therefore abolished
nothing to his purpose in this disputation unlesse it be to shew the ground of mans rest at the same time it might sufficiently satisfie any man that is willing to be guided by reason Notwithstanding as we have taken notice of the main drift at which the Apostle aims in this disputation so it will not be amisse to consider the grounds which the Apostle laies for the raising of his argument To prove then that David threatens unbelievers to be shut out of heaven which he here calls by the name of Gods rest he laies this for his ground that this name of Gods rest can be applied onely to three things the Sabbath Canaan and Heaven Now these three being all members under one generall head and distinguished one from another must needs have something common to them all and something proper and peculiar wherein they differ That which is common to them all is first that they are Gods rests that is rests which God ordains for and bestowes upon men Secondly that they are therefore rests into which men may enter The difference between these rests is that two of them were possessed by men already and one of them was yet to come Now the Prophet Davids words expresly mention a rest to come and to conceive and affirm that the Apostle building his argument upon this distinction as it plainly appears he doth should impertinently intend to bring in Gods resting in his own person is to confound this distinction of rests which the Apostle lays for the ground of his Argument and by consequence his whole disputation that is built thereupon To conclude the Apostle not only laies downe a distinction of the severall kinds of Gods rests in that dispute Heb. 4. but farther in applying it to his purpose insists most strongly upon the opposition between the words in Gen. 2. and the words of David Psal 45. by which he makes it manifest that David could not mean that rest of the Sabbath that Moses speaks of Gen. 2. For Heb. 4.3 thus he reasons David speaks of a rest to come but Moses speaks of a rest past therefore David cannot mean the rest of the Sabbath of which Moses speaks which was entred into so long before And again v. 5. he takes up the same opposition in these words And in this place of David again If they shall enter both in the 3. and 5. vers the Apostle insists upon Davids expressions If they shall enter which he shews cannot refer to the rest of the Sabbath which was entred into as Moses relates long before Now wherein stands this opposition between the relation of Moses that God rested the seventh day Davids intermination they shall not enter there is no opposition between these two expressions God hath entred and They shall not enter but between these two They have entred and They shall not enter there is a manifest opposition whereas therefore the Apostle presseth strongly this opposition ver 3. ver 5. it must be granted that though he expresseth only Gods resting on the seventh day yet he specially intends mans resting which was grounded thereupon Some amongst the opposites grant that the Apostle may in the 3. 4. verses of Heb. 4. though he mention Gods resting too as being instituted and grounded upon Gods resting upon the same day But this they say was intended only indirectly and by consequence Neither say they doth the Apostle limit Gods resting and mans resting unto the same time but mentions only Gods rest which was indeed from the foundation of the world but not mans rest which began only from the delivering of the Law by Moses To this we answer that it must needs be that mans resting is principally and directly intended in that place by the Apostle although it be not expresly mentioned that Gods resting is only named as the ground of the institution of mans rest so that when he affirmeth that God rested from the foundation of the world he implies that man rested with him at the same time seeing as we have shewed the whole weight of his Argument lies upon mans and not upon Gods resting And when he affirms that man had already entred into that rest it was fit for him to assigne the time when he entred into that rest as he doth afterwards set down the time when he entred into the rest of Canaan because the expressing of the time of entring into that rest is that which gives most strength to his Argument Besides if mans resting upon the giving of the Law by Moses were meant by the Apostle it was easie for the Apostle to have named that time as it was to name the other But what may be the reason may some say why the Apostle in this place principally intending and meaning mans resting on the Sabbath mentions notwithstanding only Gods resting on the Sabbath day but speaks not a word of mans resting on that day and proves that out of Gen. 2.2 when he might as easily have proved the other out of the verse following To this we answer that the whole course of the Apostles dispute shews evidently what he means Secondly we say that Gods rest sufficiently implies mans resting at the same time as being the very ground and foundation upon which the rest of man on the Sabbath day was grounded Thirdly why the Holy Ghost was pleased rather to imply mans resting on the Sabbath day under the phrase of Gods resting then to expresse in plainer tearms we can no more give a reason then we can tell why the same spirit of God sets downe divers disputations in such broken expressions that need the supply of many clauses to make up the sense cleer and full or why in other places of Scripture he shadows out many things under obscure phrases which might as easily have been expressed in clearer and plainer forms SECT II. Answer to the Arguments against the Institution of the Sabbath in Paradise TO avoid the Institution of the Sabbath recorded Gen. 2.3 Exceptions against this argument from Gen. 2. in expresse and plaine tearms and so distinctly related in that place that any man may justly wonder that any one endewed with reason should oppose so cleer an evidence the opposites have invented strange interpretations of these words Blessed and sanctified which carry the Institution 1. There is related onely what God did not what he ordained Some interpret them as relating an act of God what he did not as his command what he appointed men to do as if the words signified no more but this That God honoured and advanced the day by his resting thereon This absurd interpretation the very letter of the text sufficiently and plainly confutes which relates Gods resting and his sanctifying that rest Answer as two distinct Acts Gods resting and sanctifying are related as two distinct acts the one grounded on the other vers 3. That he sanctified the day because he had rested therein Besides men because they are