call us to seek the alteration which we are required to abjure 10. Lastly by this objection they shew themselves too ignorant of the nature of Church and discipline and Sacrament and Ministery Or else they would better know how far Volunteers are proper objects of Church discipline and have the right to the privileges and Communion of the Church II. The Magistrates Sword will not serve instead of Church discipline 1. Else Christ would not have instituted another office for it 2. Else it might serve also instead of Ministry Preaching and Sacraments 3. The nature of it tendeth not directly to convince men of Errours to lead them into truth to move them by heavenly motions and to bring them to true repentance and godlyness But this will be fuller proved under the next and is confessed by all save the Erastians III. The Magistrates Sword should not be used too forwardly or too much to second or enforce Church discipline much less to be its life and strength and inseparably twisted with it I mean 1. No unbeliever should be forced to say he is a Believer and to professe the Christian faith 2. None upon such profession should be forced to be Baptized 3. None that hath no right to Church Communion in the Sacrament should be forced to receive it 4. None that Apostatizeth from Christ should be forced falsly to professe that he is still a Christian 5. None that are at age should be forced to stay in the Church by local presence or relation as a member of it who is not willing and the practice of the Papists who force no Heathens to be Christians but afterward force Christians by fire and Sword and burn them that were Hereticks Schismaticks or Apostates is self contradicting and self condemning God having left man as much unto his own choice for continuing as for Entring into the Church And as for Obedience to Rulers Infidels may owe it to Christian Kings as well as Christians And none but Magistrates can use the Sword to punish either 6. No Magistrate should punish a Mans body meerly because he is Excommunicate and so punished already Nor should he be made a meer executioner to the Bishop without hearing trying and judging the Cause himself in order to his own execution 7. No Magistrate should force an Impenitent sinner to lie and say he doth repent that thereby he may be admitted to the Church Communion and Sacrament but it is the force of Gods word that must try his Repentance But yet I acknowledge 1. That Magistrates and Parents and Masters may force their Subjects to use those means which tend to make them Christians as to hear Preaching Conference or disputations or to read convincing books But with these two Cautions 1. That it be but when it is like or hopeful to do more good than harme 2. That it be by wise and moderate means of constreint and not hang or burn them to convert them 2. Accordingly Magistrates Parents and Masters may use the like force with their Subjects who are Christians to cause them to use the foresaid meanes of hearing and Reading and conference for the cureing of their dangerous errours or sinful lives 3. And I doubt not but Magistrates may punish men Corporally for their crime according to the nature of them and even for the same that the Church hath excommunicated them If one be excommunicated for Treason Murder Theft Swearing Prophaning the Lords day and holy things c. it followeth not that the Magistrate may not also meddle with him 4. And we doubt not but Magistrates may Restraine false Teachers from seducing others and drawing them from God to sin 5. And the Magistrate may and ought to encourage Ministers in the use of the Church Keyes and to preserve them from the violence of wicked men 7. And they may make a difference in their favours and rewards between Christians obedient to God and their Pastors and Infidels excommunicate in penitent ones and Apostates by denying honors and preferments and rewards to the worse which he giveth to the better sort of men But yet as to the Cases before denied especially the forcing men by fire sword and imprisonment to say they believe and repent and to take the Sacrament and other Church priviledges and making this the strength of Church discipline I have all this against it 1. No force should be used to the hindering and destruction of Christs ordinance of discipline and his Church Laws But such it would be in the case in hand For Christs fundamental Covenant is that the true willing penitent and believer shall be a member of his Church or those only that credibly profess to be so at age He that will may freely drink of the water of life Nemo invitus fit Christianus so that to say that any man hath right to the mystical Church priviledges but Consenters or any man hath right to the visible Church priviledges but credible Professors of consent is to contradict the very condition of the Covenant of life which is the sum of all the Gospel It s true you may compel some men to duty but you cannot compel them to be happy But to force them by perpetual Imprisonment confiscation and the sword to say that they are Christians or repent consent or are willing and so to give them absolution and Church-communion is to make Christs ordinance of none effect For true discipline is to make them penitent and willing and then to use them as such But 1 It is not credible that that person is truly penitent and willing to be a Christian or have Church-communion who will not be perswaded to consent by all that can be said by the Pastors from the word of God but yet on the rack or to prevent undoing will say I consent This is contrary to the nature of true Repentance 2. Or if it did not make this forced consent utterly incredible yet it utterly crosseth the ends of Church discipline which is to discern the voluntary penitent which force so obscureth that no man can tell whether the person be credibly penitent or not If I left a Legacy to so many that are Lovers of the Church and its Communion and my Executors should get the Magistrate to hang or Imprison or undo certain men that are accused as Enemies of the Church unless they will say we Love the Church I think my Will would be ill performed if those men had my Legacy that were forced to say so 2. No man should be forced to his own sin and distruction But he that is forced to take the Sacrament when he is unwilling and had rather be without it in likelihood is forced to his sin and destruction For even the Liturgy telleth the unworthy that they eat and drink damnation to themselves and that the Devil may enter into them as he did into Judas And who is unworthy if the unwilling are not 3. Force is not fitted to cause love and willingness therefore
Pastor must be as bad 2. And as to his appeal to the discipline of the Ancients I leave the Reader to the deceit of this mans arguings 1. If he cannot find it fully proved in this Book that the Churches of the ancient Bishops were not so big as our greatest Parishes as to the number of Souls much less as our Diocesses 2. And if in my abstruct of Church-History of Bishops and Counsels I have not fully proved that Discipline was neglected corrupted or overthrown dy degrees as Bishops-Churches overswelled When we read such doleful complaints in History Fathers Counsels and their Canons of the corruption of the Churches is this the true use to be made of all that we must be like them and not blame them lest we open the nakedness of our Fathers 3. And if men can make themselves willingly so blind as by a story that the Fathers did such things among People and circumstances which we know not to renounce common experience that it is not now any where done nor can possibly be done If men can be so ignorant what our Parishes and Diocesses are and what a Bishop and Chancellor do and can do Let such err for I am unable to cure them any more than if they were confident that my Lord Major can Govern all the Families of London as their Masters by stewards without Family-Masters or that one Physitian or one Tutor could serve instead of many for the City Indeed they that have as low an esteem of true Discipline as Mr. D. in his Letter seems to have may easily believe that a few men may do it And those Papists that can let the Church be the sink of common uncleanness and a Nursery of Ignorance Vice and Prophaneness so they may but keep up their Wealth and Ease and Honour by crying up Order Government and Unity may accordingly believe that no more knowledge Piety or Discipline is a duty than serveth the ends of their worldly Dominion I must again give notice to the Reader that whereas the Common Objections of the greatness of Bishops Churches in the second Centurie are fetcht from the instances of Rome and Alexandria I have answered even those two in the beginning of my Breviate of Church-History to which I must refer you and not again repeat it here I know that poor ingnorant Persons must expect such a shameful Cant of old reproach as this to cheat them into the hatred of Christs Church order and Government into a love of Clergie bondage a scornful smile shall tell them Mr. Baxter would have as many Bishops as Parishes and a Pope in every Parish when men think one in a Diocess too much When every ignorant or rash Priest shall be the Master of all the Parish and you have no remedy against his Tyranny what a brave reformation will this be And such a deceitful scorn will serve to delude the ignorant and ungodly But if they truly understood the case they would see the shame of this deriding objection 1. A Pope is a Monarch or Governour of the world and a Diocesan of a multitude of Parishes And sure he usurpeth not so much who will be but the Church-guide of one A man is abler to guide one School Colledge Hospital or Family than a hundred or thousand without any true Master of a Family School Colledge c. under him 2. Why is not this foolish scorne used against these foresaid relations also Why say they not every Master maketh himself a Pope or Bishop to his own house and every School-Master to his School whereas one Master over a thousand would do better with bare Teaching Ushers that had no Government 3. Let it be remembred that we would have no Parish Pastor to have any forceing power by Fines Mulcts Imprisonments c. But only to prevaile so farr as his management of Divine authority on mens Consciences can prevail And we would not have Magistrates punish men meerly because they stand excommunicate or because they tell not the Clergy that they repent True excommunication is a heavy punishment fitted to its proper use and not to be corrupted by the force of the Sword but to operate by it self And valeat quantum valere potest He that despiseth it will not say he is enslaved by it But is this all that the Bishops desire 4. We would have no man become the Pastor of a Church without the peoples consent if not choice no more than a Physician should be forced on the sick And as the Servant that consenteth to be a Servant consenteth to his Masters Authority and he that consenteth to a Physician consenteth to be ruled by him for his health and neither take this for a slavery So he that consenteth to a Pastor consenteth to his Pastoral conduct And if he think it to his injury he may choose 5. And yet we believe that the Magistrate may constrein Atheists Infidels and such as refuse all proper Church Communion to hear Gods word Preached and make all the Parish allow the Teacher his tythes and maintenance due by Law But he may force no man to Receive the great gift of the Body and Blood of Christ or a pardon delivered and sealed by Baptism or the Eucharist and to be a member of the Church as such against his will For none but desirous consenters are capable of the gifts so that the same Minister may be the common Teacher of all the Parish and yet the Church-Pastor only of fit consenters And when Sacraments are free and no Minister constrained to deliver them against his Conscience nor any unwilling man to receive them who is by this enslaved 6. And if a Church-Pastor do displease the Church and the main body of them withdraw their consent we would not have any man continue their Pastor while they consent not but disclaim him Though in case of need the Rulers may continue him in his Benefice as the publick Preacher if the people be grosly and obstinately culpable in refusing him 7. And we would have that Parish Pastor to have no power to hinder any other Minister from giving any one the Sacrament whom he denyeth it to or that refuseth it from him Though he that for a common cause is cast out of our Church should not be received by others till he repenteth yet that holds not in all private causes between the particular Pastor and him nor in case of unjust excommunication And other Ministers must judge of their own actions whom to receive and an injuring Minister may not hinder any other nor the injured person from communicating elsewhere 8. And we would have Parish Churches be as large as personal communion doth require or allow and every Church to have divers Ministers and if one be chief or Bishop and the rest assistants and if three or four small Parishes make one such communicating Church we resist not 9. And we desire frequent meeting or Synods of neighbour Pastors and that there every single
of the first rank afore-described must govern it statedly as present by himself and not absent by others Chap. 12. The just opening and understanding of the true nature of the Pastoral Office and Church Government would end these Controversies about Prelacy Chap. 13. That there is no need of such as our Diocesâ—nes for the Unity or the Government of the particular Ministers nor for the silencing of the unworthy Chap. 14. The true original of the warrantable sort of Episcopacy in particular Churches was the notorious disparity of abilities in the Pastors And tho original of that tyrannical Prelacy into which it did degenerate was the worldly Spirit in the Pastors and people which with the World came by prosperity into the Church Quaere Whether the thing cease not when the Reason of it ceaseth PART II. Chap. 1. THe clearing of the State of the Question Chap. 2. The first Argument against the aforedescribed Diocesanes that their form quantum in se destroyeth the particular Church form of Gods institution and setteth up a humane form in its stead Chap. 3. That the Primitive Episcopal Churches of the Holy Ghosts Institution were but such Congregations as I before described Proved by Scripture Chap. 4. The same proved by the Concessions of the most learned Defenders of Prelacy Chap. 5. The same proved by the full Testimony of Antiquity Chap. 6. The same further confirmed by the Ancients Chap. 7. More proof of the aforesaid Ancient Church limits from the Ancient Customs Chap. 8. That the Diocesanes cause the Error of the Separatists who avoid our Churches as false in their Constitution and would disable us to confute them Chap. 9. The second Argument from the deposition of the Primitive species of Bishops and the erecting of a humane inconsiâ—tent species in their stead A specifi k difference proved Chap. 10. Whether any form of Church Government be instituted by God as necessary or all be left to humane prudence and choice Chap. 11. Argument third from the destruction of the Order of Presbyters of divine Institution and the invention of a new Order of half Sub-presbyters in their stead Chap. 12. That God instituted such Presbyters as had the foresaid power of the Keyes in doctrine worship and discipline and no other proved by the Scriptures Chap. 13. The same confirmed by the Ancients Chap. 14. And by the Confessions of the greatest and learnedest Prelatists Chap. 15. Whether this Government belonging to the Presbyters be in foro Ecclesiastico exteriore or only in foro Conscientiae vel interiore Chap. 16. That the English Diocesane Government doth change this Office of a Presbyter of God's institution quantum in se into another of humane invention The difference opened Twenty instances of taking away the Presbyters power from them Chap. 17. That the great change of Government hitherto described the making of a new species of Churches Bishops and Presbyters and deposing the old was sinfully done and not according to the intent of the Apostles Chap. 18. Argument fourth from the impossibility of their performance of the Episcopal Office in a Diocesane Church And the certain exclusion and destruction of the perticular Church Government while one man only will undertake a work too great for many hundreds when their work is further opened in perticulars Chap 19. The same impossibility proved by experience 1. Of the ancient Church 2. Of the Foreign Churches 3. Of the Church of England 4. Of our selves Chap. 20. Objections against Parish discipline answered The need of it proved Chap. 21. The Magistrates sword 1. Is neither the strength of Church discipline 2. Nor will serve instead of it 3. Nor should be too much used to second and enforce it The mischeifs of enforcing men to Sacramental Communion opened in twenty instances Chap. 22. An Answer to the Objections 1. No Bishop no King 2. Of the Rebellions and Seditions of them that have been against Bishops Chah 23. Certain brief consectaries Chap. 24. Some Testinonies of Prelatists themselves of the late state of the Church of England its Bishops and Clergy lest we be thought to wrong them in our description of them and their fruits Chap. 25. The Ordination lately exercised by the Presbyters in England when the Bishops were put down by the Parliament is valid and Re ordination not to be required jure divino as supposing it null A TREATISE OF EPISCOPACY Confuting by SCRIPTURE REASON And the CHURCHES TESTIMONY That sort of Diocesan Churches Prelacy and Government which casteth out the Primitive Church-species Episcopacy Ministry and Discipline and confoundeth the Christian world by Corruption Usurpation Schismes and Persecution Meditated 1640 when the c. Oath was imposed Written 1671 and cast by Published 1680 by the Call of Mr. H. Dodwel and the Importunity of our Superiors who demand the Reasons of our Nonconformity The designe of this book is not to weaken the Church of England its Government Riches Honour or Unity But to strengthen and secure it 1. By the concord of all true Protestants who can never unite in the present Impositions 2. And by the necessary reformation of Parish-Churches and those abuses which else will in all ages keep up a succession of Nonconformists As an Account why we dare not Covenant by Oath or Subscription never to endeavour any amending alteration of the Church Government by lawful meanes as Subjects nor make our selves the justifying vouchers for all the unknown persons in the Kingdom who vowed and swore it that none of them are obliged to such lawful endeavour by their vow By RICHARD BAXTER a Catholick Christian for love concord and peace of all true Christians and obedience to all lawful commands of Rulers but made called and used as a Nonconformist London Printed for Nevil Simmons at the three Cocks at the West end of Saint Pauls and Thomas Simmons at the Prince's Armes in Ludgate-street MDCLXXXI These Books following are printed for and sold by Nevil Simmons at the three Golden Cocks at the west end of St. Pauls A Christian Directory or sum of practical Theology and cases of Conscience directing Christians how to use their Knowledge and Faith how to improve all helps and meanes and to performe all duties how to overcome temptations and to escape or mortifie every sin in four parts 1. Christian Ethicks or private Duties 2. Christian Oeconomicks or Family Duties 3. Christian Ecclesiasticks or Church Duties 4. Christian Politicks or Duties to Our selves and Neighbours in Folio Catholick Theology Plain Pure Peaceable for Pacification in three Books 1. Pacifying Principles c. 2. Pacifying Praxis c. 3. Pacifying Disputations c. in Folio The Life of Faith in three Parts The first Sermon preached before his Majesty c. The Second Instructions for confirming believers in the Christian faith The third directions how to live by faith or how to exercise it in all occasions in Quarto Naked Popery or the naked Falshood of a book called the Catholick naked Truth
forbear pronouncing of all Traytors Murderers Adulterers Perjured Atheists c. that never profest Repentance at their Burial that God hath of his mercy taken to himself the soul of this our dear brother except the unbaptized c. aforesaid And note 1. that the Parish Priest hath no power to do these things either by himself or in conjunction with the Bishop or any other 2. And that there is not one Suffragan Bishop or Chorepiscopus in England under the 26 Bishops to do any part of their work in these 97025 Parishes CHAP. III. Our Judgment of the History of the Antient Church-Government and of the rise of the Diocesan Prelacy I Shall anon shew more fully that there are two things especially in which we think the very Species of our Diocesan Prelacy to be altered from the antient Episcopacy One is in the Extent of their Office as to their subject Charge a Bishop infimae speciei of the lowest species having then but One Church and now a Bishop infimae speciei having many hundred Churches made into one or nullified to make One 2. In the Work of their Office which was then purely Spiritual or Pastoral and is now mixt of Magistratical and Ministerial exercised by mixed Officers in Courts much like to Civil Judicatures The History of their rise I suppose is this 1. Christ made a difference among his Ministers himself while he chose twelve to be Apostles and special Witnesses oâ— his Doctrine Life and Resurrection and Ascension and to be the Founders of his Church and the Publishers of his Gospel abroad the World 2. As these Apostles preached the Gospel themselves and planted Churches so did many others as their helpers partly the seventy sent by Christ and partly called by the Apostles themselves And all these exercised indefinitely a preparing Ministry before particular Churches were gathered abroad the World and afterwards went on in gathering and calling more 3. Besides this preparing unfixed Ministration the same Apostles also placed by the peoples consent particular fixed Ministers over all the several Churches which they gathered 4. These fixed Ministers as such they named indifferently Bishops Elders Pastors and Teachers Whereas those of the same Office in general yet unfixed are called either by the General name of Christ's Ministers or Stewards of his Mysteries And in regard of their special works some were called Apostles some Prophets and some Evangelists 5. These Apostles though unfixed and having an Indefinite charge yet went not all one way but as God's Spirit and prudence guided them they dispersed themselves into several parts of the World 6. But as they did many of them first stay long at Jerusalem so afterward in planting and setling Churches they sometimes stayed several months or years in one place and then went to another And so did the Evangelists or Indefinite Assistants whom they sent forth on the same work 7. While they stayed in these newly planted Churches they were themselves the chief Guides of the People And also of their fixed Bishops 8. This abode in settling the particular Churches and their particular Bishops or Elders occasioned Historians afterward to call both Apostles and Evangelists such as Timothy Titus Silas Silvanus Luke Apollo c. the Bishops of those Churches though they were not such as the fixed Bishops were who undertook a special Charge and care of one particular Church alone or above all other Churches 9. On this account the same Apostle is said to be the first Bishop of many Churches as Peter of Antioch and Rome Paul of Corinth Ephesus Philippi c. When indeed the Apostles were the particular fixed Bishops of no Churches but the Bishops equally of many as a sort of unfixed Episcopacy is included in Apostleship 10. On this account also it is that Timothy is said to be Bishop of Ephesus because he was left there for a time to settle that and other Churches of Asia near it as an Assistant of the Apostles And so Titus is called the Bishop of Crete because he staid in that Island which was said to have an hundred Cities on this work which belonged not to a particular Bishop but to the more indefinite Ministry 11. How many such fixed Bishops Elders Pastors or Teachers each particular Church must have the Apostles never determined by a Law But did de facto settle them according to the number of souls and store of qualified persons In some Churches it is possible there might be but one with Deacons In others it is evident that there were many as at Jerusalem Corinth c. 12. The particular Churches which were the charge of these fixed Bishops or Elders were Societies of Christians conjoyned for Personal Communion in God's Worship and mutual assistance in holy living And though for want of convenient room or liberty they did not always meet all in the same place yet were they ordinarily no more than could meet in one place when they had liberty and never more than could hold personal Communion if not at once yet at several times in publick worship As it is now in those places where one part of the Family goeth to Church one part of the day and another on the other part And those by-Meetings which any had that came not constantly to the publick Assemblies were but as our House-Meetings or Chapel-Meetings but never as another Church Nor were their Churches more numerous than our Parishes nor near so great 13. At the first they had no Consecrated nor Separated places for their Church-Meetings but Houses or Fields as necessity and opportunity directed them But as soon as they could even nature taught them to observe the same appointed and stated places for such Assemblies Which as soon as the Churches had peace and settlement they appropriated to those sacred uses only though they had not yet the shape or name of Temples 14. Though the Pastors of the Church were all of one Office now called Order being all subordinate Ministers of Christ in the Prophetical Priestly and Regal parts of his Office in the Power and Duty of Teaching Worshiping and Government yet was the disparity of Age Grace and Guifts to be observed among them and the younger Pastors as well as people owed a meet reverence and submission to the Elder and the weaker to the stronger who had notoriously more of God's Grace and Guifts So that in a Church where there were many Pastors it was not unlawful nor unnecessary to acknowledge this disparity and for the younger and weaker to submit much to the judgment of the elder and more able 15. While they kept only to the exercise of the meer Pastoral work of Teaching and Worshiping and that Government which belongeth hereunto they had little temptation comparatively to strive for a preeminence in Rule or for a Negative Voice But aliene or accidental work did further that as followeth 16. The Apostles did reprove those Worldly contentious and uncharitable Christians who went to Law before
no Model of a Gospel Ministry nor proof of our Authority or obligation as instituted from the Instituted Ministry of the Mosaical Church Because the Law of Moses is abrogate and indeed did never bind the Gentiles as I have fullier proved in my Treat of the Lords day Nor is it safe to argue from parity of reason that we must now be or do as they did in point of pure institution while we so little know the total reason of God's institutions and when he himself hath taken them down and set up new ones we must not then plead our Reason against the alterations which God himself hath made 7. Therefore though Christ be now the Head and Fountain of Power both to Magistrates and Ministers yet he did not institute a new Office of Magistracy but add new Laws for them to rule by as part of their Rule of Government Because their Office was so much founded in Nature and so much of their work lay in ruling mankind according to their common Natural Law But a Ministry he did institute a-new as to the species and great essentials of the Office 8. Christ changing both the Instituted Mosaical Law and Priesthood did begin himself in his own person as the Great Prophet High Priest and King of his Church to exercise his Office in the Jewish Nation 9. Being not to continue corporally on earth nor his bodily presence being ubiquitary he designed that the Holy Ghost should be his Agent internally to carry on his work in the World And he appointed the Sacred Office of the Ministry that meet men might be his Agents externally in the Teaching and Governing of his Redeemed ones in a holy order and in conducting them in holy worship in a Ministerial subordination to his Prophetical Regal and Priestly Office 10. As he himself did Officiate among the Jews so he first placed this Ministerial Power in twelve chosen men and seventy Assistants with some relation to the twelve Tribes and seventy Elders of Israel to whom he sent them 11. During the time of Christ's abode among them in the flesh they were but as Pupils and Learners while they were Teachers and their Abilities Commissions Office and Work and so their success were all yet imperfect They were not yet authorized openly and commonly so much as to declare Christ to be the Messiah and Saviour but only to prepare men for that belief Because those works were not yet done which must be the Evidences of their Doctrine and the Instruments of mens Conviction viz. Christ's Death Resurrection Ascension and his sending the miraculous gift of the Holy Ghost 12. When Christ was risen before his Ascension he perfected their Commission both as to their Work and Province but appointed them to stay till the descent of the Holy Ghost upon them as the sealing and full delivery of it giving them full ability for their work before they set themselves about the solemn performance of it 13. Their Commission and Office was 1. to Teach men and make them Christians or Christ's Disciples 2. and then to Baptize them into the name of the Father the Son and the Holy Ghost and so to take them into his Covenant and Church and 3. to Teach them as Covenanted and en-Churched persons to observe all his commands The first part of their work was to be exercised unlimitedly on all the World as far as they were able The second part on the new Converted Believers and their infant seed And the third part on the Baptized that were adult And he added the promise of his presence with them to the end 14. As he now enlarged their Commission to All the World as the object of the first part of their Office so he added one Paul by a voice from Heaven unto the number of the Apostles who was especially made an Apostle to the Gentiles to shew the rest that they were no more confined to the twelve Tribes of Israel 15. Because these Apostles were entrusted not only with a common Preaching of the Gospel but as Founders of the Churches to be the eye and ear witnesses of the life miracles resurrection and doctrine of Christ and to acquaint men certainly with the Laws of Christ therefore he promised them the extraordinary gift of the Holy Ghost to lead them infallibly into all truth and to bring all things to their remembrance which he had taught and given them in Charge and so to enable them to perform all their Commission which he gave them accordingly and so made them the Foundations of his Church and the infallible deliverers of his Will to the World by their preaching and practice first and afterwards by their Writings 16. Therefore since their miraculous reception of the Spirit all their Doctrines Writings and Establishments which were done in the Execution of their Commission are ascribed to the Holy Ghost It was the Holy Ghost that â—ndited the Sacred Scriptures and it was the Holy Ghost that settled the Churches and that wrought the Miracles and that bare witness of Christ and the Christian verity For the Apostles spake not of themselves but as the Holy Ghost inspired them 17. As others in that time were employed as their assistants in propagating the Christian Faith so had they also the same spirit though in several measures and gifts And so far as they had that spirit he was the seal of their doctrine But because it was the Apostles that had the promise of Infallibility we have greater assurance of the Infallibility of their writings than of others It being their approbation which is much of our assurance that the writings of their Assistants were infallible and the testimony which they give of the persons that wrote them viz. Mark and Luke 18. These Apostles with their many Assistants Prophets and Evangelists did by preaching holiness and miracles the effects of Divine Wisdome Goodness and Power convert multitudes and baptize them and did not only thus gather them into the Catholick Church to Christ but also settled them in a holy Order in particular Churches for personal communion among themselves in holy worship and holy living And they made such regular Church-communion a duty to all that could obtain it 19. By the authority of Christ and the Holy Ghost they ordained others to the sacred Office of the Ministry The same office with their own as to the common works of Preaching and Teaching the Gospel Worshiping and Guiding the Churches by holy Discipline which are the common essentials of the sacred Ministry But not the same in respect of their extraordinary endowments and works before described as eye and ear witnesses infallibly delivering the will of Christ 20. Though in the Nature of the Office all Christs Ministers have the Power before mentioned 1. to convert men to the Faith by preaching 2. to take them into the holy Covenant and Church by Baptism 3. to teach worship and rule in particular Churches or 1. to gather Churches by preaching and
As the heavenly Angels are the Guardians of the Churches so these Stars are those Angels in whose Person I speak to the Churches themselves that are signified by the Candlesticks Or As the Angels are the Guardians of the Churches so by that title I signifie the whole Ministry that guide them and by the Candlesticks the Churches and I write to the whole For as every Message begins with To the Angel so it endeth with To the Churches Obj. The Bishop was to deliver it to the Churches Ans This is precarious 1. The Apostle wrote it that both Pastors and People might immediately read it and did not intrust it as an unwritten tradition to one to be delivered to the rest 2. All the Pastors were to deliver or teach it to the People and not one Bishop only This therefore is no cogent Argument 10. As for the Disputers for Episcopacy at the Isle of Wight with King Charles they manage Saravia's Argument fetcht from the Continuance of the Ordinary part of the Apostles Office as he did before them and many others so well that for my part I cannot confute them but remain in doubt and therefore have nothing to say against them But that 's nothing to our Case whether every particular Organized Church should have a Bishop or the full Pastoral Office in it 11. As to Joh. Forbes his Irenic he maintaineth but such an Episcopacy as we offered to his Majesty in Bishop Usher's Reduction He pleadeth for such a Bishop as is the Moderator of a Presbytery p. 242 243. and as must be subject to censure himself p. 145. and that shall do nothing of weight without the Presbyteries consent p. 145. and as is still bound to the Work of a Presbyters Office p. 146. And that an Orthodox Church that hath no Bishop or Moderator hath but a certain Oeconomical defect but is still a true Church and hath the power that other Churches have that have Bishops p. 158. And that jure divino Presbyters have the Power of Ordaining as well as of Preaching and Baptizing though they must use it under the Bishops inspection in those places that have Bishops page 164. And he is more full for the Power of Presbyters Ordaining and the validity of it than any man that I now remember 12. The two Books of the Bohemian Government of the Waldensian Churches Written by Lascitius and Commenius contain that very Form of Government which I think the soundest of any that I have yet seen 13. The Learned and Judicious Grotius before he turned to Cassander's and Erasmus's temperament in Religion in his book de Imper. sum pot circa sacra in almost all things speaketh the same which I approve and plead for though he be for some Episcopacy 1. As to the Pastoral power it self in whomsoever he affirmeth it to be but Nuntiative Declarative Suasory and per consensum and not any Imperium Like the power of a Physitian a Counsellor and an Embassadour Chap. 4. But then by Imperium he meaneth that which is coactive by the Sword And he acknowledgeth the power of the Ministry by the Word upon Consenters to be of Divine Institution so that they sin against God who do reject it And if the Pastors of the Church did meddle with no other power we should the sooner be agreed For my part I take the very power of the Keys to be no other than a power of applying God's Word to the Consciences of the Penitent and Impenitent and the Church and a power of judging who is fit or unfit for Church-communion according to God's Word which judgment we can no otherwise execute but by the same Word and by forbearing or exercising our own Ministerial actions to the person As a Physitian may refuse to Medicate the unruly In chap. 6. He speaketh justly of the Princes power as in the former And so he doth chap. 7. of the use and power of Synods or Councils Chap. 8. He well vindicateth the Magistrate and denyeth to the Church or Bishops the Legislative power circa sacra and sheweth that Canons are not proper Laws Chap. 9. He sheweth the Jurisdiction properly so called belongeth to the Magistrate and not to the Pastors as such Though of old they might be also Magistrates He sheweth that the use of the Keys is called Jurisdiction but by the same figure by which Preaching is called Legislation which is true as to the Declaration who is bound or loose in foro caeli but Pastors more properly judge who is to be taken into Church-communion or excluded The prescript of Penance he saith is no Jurisdiction but as the Councel of a Physitian or Lawyer or Philosopher That the denying of the Sacraments is not properly Jurisdiction he thus excellently explaineth p. 229. As he that Baptizeth or as the old custome was puts the Eucharist into ones mouth or hand doth exercise an act of Ministry and not of Jurisdiction so also he that abstaineth from the same acts For the reason of the visible signs and of the audible is the same By what right therefore a Pastor denounceth by-words to one that is manifestly flagitious that he is an utter alien to the Grace of God by the same right also he doth not Baptize him because it is the sign of remission of sin or if he be Baptized giveth him not the Eucharist as being the sign of Communion with Christ For the sign is not to be given to him that the thing signified doth not agree to nor are pearls to be given to swine But as the Deacon was wont to cry in the Church Holy things are for the Holy Yea it were not only against Truth but against charity to make him partaksr of the Lords Supper who discerneth not the Lords Body but eateth and drinketh judgment to himself In these things while the Pastor doth only suspend his own act and doth not exercise any Dominion over the acts of others it is apparent that this belongeth to the vse of Liberty and not to the exercise of Jurisdiction Such like is the case of a Physician refusing to give an Hydropick water when he desireth it or in a grave person who resuseth to salute a profligate fellow and in those that avoid the company of the Leprous Only it must be remembred that this avoidance is by a Society governed therein by an Officer of Divine Institution Next he proceeds to the Churches duty and sheweth 1. That as Cyprian saith The Laity that is obedient to God's commands ought to separate themselves from a sinful Pastor or Prelate that is that is grosly bad 2. That they ought to avoid familiarity with scandalous Christians As a Schollar may forsake a bad Teacher and as an honest Man may leave the friendship of the flagitious As for the names of Deposition and Excommunication he saith That we must interpret the name by the thing and not the thing by the name And that the Church deposeth a Pastor when
alterable policy And 2. That this Opinion rose as early as he pretendeth 3. And that these Ancients were not deceived â—â—t our English Bishops rather Bilson Jewel c. who took Patriarchs and Metropolitanes as such for Creatures of Humane Original While Ignatius his being Bishop of a Church in Syria shall prove him the Bishop of all Syria and the Church of God dwelling in Syria in Antiochia shall be equivalent with the Church in Antiochia governing all Syria I shall not undertake to hinder such men from proving any thing that they would have believed His Cap. 6. of the promiscuous use of the Names of Bishop and Presbyter and Cap. 7. that prepareth the stating of the Controversie need no answer but to say that we deny not but where a single Presbyter was he had himself the power of Governing that Church but where there were many though all had the full Office severally they were bound to use it in Concord And whether one amongst them shall have a precedency or guidance of the rest we think as Dr. Stillingfleet hath proved to be a matter alterable by humane prudence according to the various condition of the Churches And if any take both such Bishops and Archbishops to be Jure Divine with Dr. Hammond it will be somewhat to his Cause but nothing to ours Cap. 8. he openeth his conceit which in time I shall shew doth yield us the whole Cause that every place of Scripture which mentioneth Bishops or Presbyters meaneth Diocesan supereminent Bishops only And first he proveth it of the Elders Bishops of Ephesus Acts 20. because the whole flock is meant of all Asia Fully proved because Irenaeus said as he thought that the Bishops were convocate from Ephesus and the nearest Cities But 1. Irenaeus saith not Bishops only but Bishops and Presbyters conjoining them as two sorts and not Bishops or Presbyters as the Doctor doth 2. The nearest Cities and all Asia we take not for words of the same importance 3. We take not your bare word for the validity of the Consequence that because the Bishops of several Cities were there therefore it is all Asia that is singularly called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the whole Flock and not each Bishops Flock respectively q. d. Each of you look to your several Flock 4. We think if you calculate the time Acts 20 and 21. and consider Paul's haste Acts 20. 16. that few impartial men will believe that Paul's Messengers that were wont to go on foot did so quickly go all over Asia and so quickly get together all the Bishops of Asia to Miletum unless they all resided at Ephesus as our English Bishops do at London and Governed their unknown people by a Lay-Chancellour 5. And Irenaeus ibid. p. 312. saith Et omnia hujusmodi per solum Lucam cognovimus we know all such things by Luke alone pretending no other Tradition And if it be in Luke it is yet to be thence proved 6. But he pleadeth our Cause too strongly by supposing that each City then had a Bishop without any subject half Presbyter and so that no such Office was yet made Cap. 9. Of Timothy's Episcopacy concerneth not our Cause Though I hope that neither he nor his Church were so bad as the Angel or Church in Rev. 2. is described And it 's easier to answer the strength of Dr. Hammond than for him to answer the Evidence brought by Prin in his Vnbishoping Timothy and Titus to shew the itinerant life and Ministry of Timothy contrary to the life of a fixed Bishop And if non-residency have such Patrons and Timothy have taught men to leave their Churches year after year and play the Pastor many hundred Miles distant it will make us dream that non-residence is a duty And if all these years Timothy's Metropolitan Church at Ephesus had no ordained Presbyter but Passengers that fell in I blame them not or wonder not at least that they lost their first love for it 's like they seldom had any Church Assemblies to Communicate and Worship God together Cap. 10. Cometh to the case of Philippi Phil. 1. 1 2. And 1. § 3. he saith It is manifest that Epaphroditus Bishop of Philippi was at Rome with Paul when he wrote this Epistle and he supposeth that there were yet no Presbyters but Bishops And so when Paul wrote to all the Saints which are at Philippi with the Bishops and Deacons he meant to those that are not at Philippi where there was no Bishop but in other Cities of Macedonia that had every one a Prelate without ever a Presbyter under him With some this expounding may go for modest if not true Two probable Arguments I object against his improbable Expositions of this Text and that Acts 20. before mentioned 1. Where did he ever read that all the Province of Macedonia was called Philippi and the Saints said to dwell at Philippi that dwelt all over Macedonia 2. Where did he ever read in Scripture many Episcopal Churches under one Metropolitan called One Church in the singular Number as in Acts 20. 28. or One Flock either 3. Will any knowing man deny that he contradicteth not only Hierom and Theodoret but the common Exposition of the Fathers by this his odd Opinion And is it not gross partiality for the same man that can so easily cast off the judgment of almost all the Ancients at once to lay so much of the whole stress of his Diocesan and Metropolitan Cause upon the Fathers assertions yea doubtful reports and to take it for so immodest a thing in others to deny belief to them in such uncertain matters But he setteth Epiphanius his words against Aerius against them all Even that Epiphanius who ordained in the Bishop of Jerusalem's Diocess to his displeasure and that combined with that Theophilus Alexand. of whom Socrates writeth such horrid and unchristian practices to root out Chrysostom and raise a flame in the Church of Constantinople who liker a mad man than a sober Bishop came from Cyprus not only into the City but the Church where Chrysostom used to officiate to inflame his people and declame against and censure their Bishop to whom he was an inferiour and that parted with him in a wrathful Prognostick and dyed by the way home And yet even this one man saith nothing to his advantage but that the Apostles placed Bishops only with Deacons in some Churches that had not fit men to make Presbyters of which we not only grant but doubt whether ever they made any but Bishops though in great Cities there were many of them And § 8 9 10. when it seemed to serve his turn he yet further gratifieth us by granting yea maintaining that one Congregation had not two Bishops yet nothing hindreth but that in the same City there might sometimes be two distinct Assemblies converted by two Apostles perhaps of distinct dialects and rites and these governed by distinct Bishops with a divided or distinct Clergie which is almost as much
but that Metropolitans Primates Patriarcks and the Pope as Head of the Churches in the Empire stood all on the same ground and had the same Original as all Fathers Councells and History shew which truely proveth that as an Universal Papacy is a Treasonable Usurpation so an Imperial Papacy that is through the Roman Empire is but a human Creature and Metropolitans Patriarcks c. are the like and they that will feigne the one to be of Gods institution or necessary must say that the other is so to But after all this one consequence puts the world in hope that Diocesans may come in time to be reformed For seeling Kings may make and unmake Cities and consequently Bishop-pricks at their pleasure whenever it shall please his Majesty or any other wise and Holy Prince to declare every Corporation and Market Town to be a City we must needs have a Bishop in every one of them according to the principles of the Prelates themselves And then the Diocese will not be so great but a diligent Pastor may possibly sometimes see the greater number of his flock Obj. But they that do say that the Apoâ—les took this course do not say that it is so obligatory but that in cases of necessity we may do otherwise Ans 1. They alledge the very Law of nature for it that it must be so even in Heathen Empires ex natura rei as Dr. Hammond before cited 2. All meer positves give places to natural duties caeteris paribus in cases of true necessity we may break the rest of the Lords day we may omit the Lords Supper we may stay from the Church assemblies we may forbear to preach or pray or meditate or read So that the exception only of necessity will but equal this Diocesan model to other possitive ordinances which are indeed Divine Obj. What if we prove but the lawfulness of it though not the Duty Ans If you prove it not of Divine institution I have proved it to be sinful and shall do much more by all the evils which attend it And so much for these City Diocese and Metropolitans and modelling the Church Government to the state CHAP. VII The Definition and reasons of a Diocesan Church considered and overthrown I Have already shewed that we dispute not about aery notions nor Non-existence but about such Dioceses as we see and have and that by a Diocese we Non-conformists mean only a large circuit of ground with its inhabitants conteining many perticular Parishes And by a Diocesan Church we mean all the Christians within that circuit who have but one Bishop over them though they be of many Parish Churches yea few Presbyterians take the word so narrow as this For I think too many of them do with Rutherford distinguish between a worshipping Church and a Governed Church and sadling the horse for Prelacy to mount on do affirm that many about twelve usualy of these worshiping Churches like our Parishes may make but one Governed or Presbyterial Church But a Diocese in England containeth many hundred and some above a thousand Parishes as is said But the Diocesans Hammond and Downam define not a Diocese as we see it as conteining many Churches or holy assemblies but only as being the Church of one City with its territories Now the question is what it is that is the specifying difference by which a Diocesan Church is distinguished from others and constituted 1. Not that it is in a City For an Independent Church or a Presbyterian Church may be in a City When there is but one Church there or many Independent ones these are no other than those allow whom you take for your chief adversaries 2. Is it then the circuit of ground that is the boundary of these Churches either this ground is inhabited or not if not then earth and trees make their Churches If inhabited it is by Infidels or by Christians or both If by Infidels they are no members of any Christian Church and therefore not of a Diocesan Church Unless they will professe to have Churhes of Infidels If they be Christians either they are no more nor more distant than as that they may at least the main body of them come on the Lords daies to the City Church into one assembly or else they are enow to make more or many Church assemblies If the former than what differ they from a Parish Church or an Independent Church which is planted in a City When each of them are but one congregation where is the difference but in the arbitrary Name But if the City and territories have Christians enow for many Churches then either they are formed into many or not If they are they should by their own confession have many Bishops If not either Church Societies are Gods ordinance or not If not the City should have none If they are where hath God exempted the Country from the priviledge or duty any more than the City But if they should say that a Diocesan Church is one Church in a City and its territories consisting of Christians enow to make many of whom the most part take up with oratories for Churches this would suite our Notion of a Diocesan Church but not theirs For they say that it is not necessary that a Diocesan Church have more than one Congregation Therefore it must needs follow that their Diocesan Church must differ from our Parish or Congregational Churches only in potentiâ and not in actu or else earth or Infidels must be the differencing matter Unless they will say that the Order of Prelacy in it maketh the difference which is the office of a Pastor who is actually Governour but of one congregation but is in potentia to be the Governour of more when he can convert them and then is the Governour of them all in that territory when they are converted But if one congregation or many make not the difference a meer possibility in the Infidels of becoming Christians cannot make the difference because the Subjects of that possibility are no members of the Church at all Therefore the difference must be only in the office of the Bishop And if so then an Independent Church that hath a Bishop is a Diocesan Church And so an Independant and a Diocesan Church may be all one And then if a Bishop were but setled in a Parish Church in the City or Countrey it would make it a Diocesan Church And then when we have proved that the Country should have Churches and not meer Oratories and that every Church should have a Bishop and so that a Bishop is not to be appropriated to a City and its territories we have done all And that society which should have all Gods Church ordinances should have a Pastor necessary for the exercising of them all But every true Parish Church should have all Gods ordinances belonging to a single Church therefore they should have a Pastor at least to exercise them And a Pastor authorized to exercise all
be a worthy Pastor 2. And to get the best they can For cohabitation or proximity or vicinity is necessary to Church ends both to publick and private communion and mutual help But the Minister that converth them may dwell far off that Therefore indeed the Reasons why all in a City and vicinity were wont to be of the same Church if there were room was not because that Minister converted them but because they were fit for such Communion by cohabitation 9. And were it otherwise the Bishop and his Presbyters preaching to the same people the Presbyter might convert more and become joint Bishop 10. And certainly it would unbishop all the English Bishops almost that I am acquainted with who nether converted their Dioceses from Infidelity nor baptized them nor convert many that ever we hearof from a wicked life to serious holiness which the Presbyters have done by very many and so must there be made the Bishops if they would CHAP. X. That a particular Church of the first or lowest order must consist of Neighbour Christians associated for Personal Communion in local presence in holy worship and conversation and not of strangres so remote as have only an Internal Heart-Communion or an External Communion by the mediation of others LEt it be here noted that none dally with the Name Church as an equivocal that 1. I speak of no meer Community of Christians nor of any accidentall assembly which have no Pastors or no intent of sacred ends Call them what you will But of a proper Christian society constituted of the Pars gubernans and the Pars gubernata the Pastor and Flock 2. That I speak not of a Family Church which consisteth of the Master and the Family 3. Nor yet of the Universal Political Church as visible or as mysticall which consisteth of Christ the head and all visible or sincere believers 4. Nor of any Christian Churches confined by Agreement for Concord of Churches being many 5. Nor of any such Churches accidentaly united in one kingdom under one king or Civil Governor whether Christian or Infidel 6. Nor of many Churches headed by humane appointment with one Metropolitane Primate or Patriack being a Pastor thus exalted by men above the rest 7. Nor yet of many Churches under one Arch-Bishop or general Apostolical Visitor or Pastor claiming this general oversight by Divine right whether rightly or wrongfully I now take no notice 8. But the Church which I treat of is only the political society of Christians of the first ranck and so of a Bishop of the lowest ranck or a meer Bishop that is no Arch-Bishop Not of an Oratory or Chappel of ease where part of a true Church often meet but of a true entire Church of the first magnitude or rank And I take it for granted 1. That such Churches there should be 2. and that every true Church should have its Bishop as Doctor Hummond and many others grant taking the Church in this political notion or if that be not granted I will proove it further anon And that these lowest true political or Organized Churches must be Neighbours united for Personal Communion as aforesaid I prove 1. First from all the Scripture instances The Churches at Jerusalem Antioch Ephesus Corinth c. were all such as is fuller to be opened in the 2d Part. 2. From the instances of all the Churches of the first and second age of which also more is after to be said 3. From the dutyes of Church members which are as followeth 1. To assemble together for Gods publick service Act. 4. Heb. 10. 25. 1. Cor. 14. c. And how can they do this that are utterly out of reach and never know or see each other 2. To have the same Pastors that are among them and over them and preach to them the word of God and go before them by the example of an holy life 1 Thes 5. 12 13. Heb. 13. 7 17 24. 1 Tim. 3. 6 7 c. And how can they hear the Pastors that never Preach to them or be Guided by those that never see them or follow their example whom they never knew or come for counsel to them that are out of their reach and knowledg 3. To send to their Pastors when they are sick to pray with them and advise them which they cannot do to them that are out of their reach Jam. 5. 4. To provoke one another to Love and to good works and to consider one another 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to that end A word that signifieth knowledge and more even Observation of that which we see or know In which and v. 25. saith Dr. Hammond Let us weigh and consider all advantages we can have upon one another to provoke and excite one another to Charity and all actions of piety such as are joyning in the publick service And not suffer our selves to proceed so far towards defections as to give over the publick assemblies the forsaking of which is not is not only deserting the publick profession of Chriâ—t but also of the meanes of growth in grace but stir up one another to the performance of this All which suppose propinquity and and consist not with the distance of uncapable strangers Heb. 3. 13. To exhort one another daily while it is called to day lest any be hardened by the deceâ—tfulness of sin Which we cannot do by men of another Countrey with whom we have no converse All is plainly expressed 1 Thes 5. 11. 12 13. Wherefore comfort your selves together and edifie one another even as also ye do And we beseech you brethren to know them which labour among you and are over you in the Lord and admonish â—ou and to esteem them very highly in love for their work sake and to be at peace among your selves But how can they comfort themselves together that never came together or see each other There can no peace but Negative be among them that are not among each other and have no converse They cannot edifie utter strangers How can I know the Bishop of the Diocese who never saw him nor ever had opportunity to see him tho I live about an hundred miles neerer him being at London than some parts of his Diocese are I know those that Labour among us in this Parish but the Bishop never laboured among us nor was here that ever I heard of nor do I know one in the Parish that useth not to Travaile that ever saw him and few that by heaâ—say know his name Rom. 15. 7. 14. Receive ye one another as Christ also received us to the Glory of God 6. That ye may with one mind and one mouth glorifie God of which saith Dr Hammond That ye may joyn unanimously Jews and Gentiles into one and assembling together worship and serve the Lord wherefore in all humility of condescension and kindness embrace and succour one another help them up when they are fallen instead of despising and driving them from your communion v. 14.
Able also to admonish one another so Col. 3. 16. Teaching and admonishing one another in Psalms and Hymns But more of this in the 2d part 5. Lastly it is their part to admonish a brother that offendeth and if he hear not to take two or three witnesses and if he hear not to tell the Church Matth. 18. 15. of which see Dr. Hammonds Annot. and of the Keys But all this requireth personal knowledge and propinquity Obj. It is not necessary to the being of Church members that every one that is a Church member know them many in London know not their next Neighbours Ans I Speak not 1. Of the Act but of the Power or Capacity and the Relation with its end 2. I speak not of every member but of so great a part as denominateth the Church 1. As a Pastor who by sickness or other impediment preacheth not of a long time may yet be a Pastor because he hath 1. The Power 2. And a Relation whose end is the Instructing of the Flock 3. And he intendeth the exercise as soon as the impediment is removed or if lazyness or any culpable neglect be the cause that altereth not the natuâ—e of the office but proveth him faulty So a member that is 1. Capable 2. Related to the end may be a member though neglect or impediments keep them from the exercise of much of that which they otherwise may do He that dwelleth in the Neighborhood may do all these Offices to another if he will when opportunity calleth for it and therefore may be so obliged to it But so cannot he that dwelleth out of reach Citizens or members of Corporations are in a capacity for officesbelonging to the society though some may neglect them and others want opportunity to do them but one out of reach is uncapable of the duty and therefore uncapable of the Relation which is made up of obligation to that duty when there is cause The Relation is essentially a Power and obligation to the Duty And the Dispositio materiâ— is necessary to the reception of the forme He therefore that is not in a capable means by cohabitation is not materia disposita and can neither have Power nor obligation to the dutyes of a Church member towards the rest and so cannot have the Relative form or be indeed a member And therefore all that write judiciously of the definition of a particular Church do make Propinquity or Cohabitation to be the Dispositio materiae sine qua non From which they are called Parishioners They are not a Church because a Parish but they are therefore the materia disposita as to this part of the capacity extrinsick Christianity being it that maketh them intrinsecally fit materials 2. And I deny not but some few members may be several waies uncapable naturally of the ordinary offices of members Some by infancy some by distraction some by sickness some by the restraint of Parents Masters or Husbands and some by a retired disposition c. And some Churches may be so sinfully over-great as that the number hindereth many of the members from a capacity of the ordinary duty of the relation which is the case of some great Parishes in London But either this is the case of the greater part and main body of the Society or bâ—t of a few If but of a few it may prove it a disordered Church but it cannot prove it no Church no more than a few Hereticks can denominate the Church Heretical or a few mad or leprous persons can denominate it mad or leprous or than the family of Noah David Christ was denominated from a Cham an Absolom a Judas But if it be the main body though in intrinsick qualifications the Church may be denominated from the better part sometimes and not from the greater yet in extrinsick qualifications it is now to be denominated a Church only from the Pastor and that number who are capable of the relation as being the two constitutive parts and all the rest are none of the Church And if there be no such body united to the Pastor for true Church ends and capable of them it is no Church Obj. But it is enough to make one Church if they be all united in one Bishop or Governour though their distance make them uncapable of knowing one another and doing what you have described Ans It is enough indeed to make a Church of another species such as I before named either the Catholick Church through out the world or a Church composed of many particular Churches if it may be called a Church Because their Communion is not to be Local or present nor to the ends of a particular Church but only intrinsical in Faith and Love and extrinsical by Delegates or Mediators But this is not enough to the being of a Church of the first order which now we speak of which should have a Bishop of their own and is not composed of many united Churches For else the Church of a Patriark or a Primate or an Arch-Bishop or Metropolitane should be a Church of the first order and have no Church or Bishop under it For such a Church is united in one Governour To say nothing of the Papal Church which yet pretendeth not to depose all Bishops Therefore the unity of the Governour will not suffice of it self to make one Primary Church though it may make one Compounded or General Church conteining many Churches and Bishops 2. And the nature of the thing telleth us that as the People have their Duties and Priviledges as well as the Pastors so the people must be united among themselves by some common Relation conteining Power of and Obligation to that duty and capacity of that priviledge Which is past all doubt among knowing men Therefore an uncapable body cannot be made one Primary Church by the unity of a Prelate 3. But as we distinguish of a Church single and compounded of many particular and General Primary and Secondary all which termes I use to be clearly understood so do we also of Bishops or Pastors which are particular Bishops of one Church or General Bishops of many Churches Of the first sort we confess all that is said positively that is that one such Bishop maketh one Church Because the very nature of his office as shall be after shewed doth suppose a capable society It being his office in presence personally to conduct them which a General distant Bishop cannot do so that indeed one Present Pastor or more of a flock by Christianity and Uicinity capable and by consent united with him and one another for presential Communion in publick worship and holy conversation are the constitutive parts by which a Primary Church is essentiated and must be defined Obj. But even the Presbyterians say that many worshiping congregations may make up one Governed Church though each congregation have ordinary Communion in the Sacrament c. among themselves distinct from the rest because they may be all united
in the Government of one Presbytery And our ordinary Parishes have Chappels in them and yet are one Church Ans 1. We must be excused from submitting now to the opinions of Presbyterians or any other party while we are giving an account of our own judgment in the case 2. The Presbyterians are not all of a mind in that point whether each of those Parishes be not a true political Church and have not its own plenary Pastor or Bishop and such a Government as belongeth to a particular Church though as they all think subordinate to a Presbytery of many Churches conjunct or as some call it of one Church denominated so from the higher Government 3. And as to our Chappels ordinarily they are but places for the Assembling of such as by age or foul weather or weakness cannot travaile to the Parish Churches and they are for distance and number in those Parishes that have them no more or other than may consist not only with the personal acquaintance of the members of the Parish Church but also with the frequent Communion of them all by turnes in the same Parish Church if they please to travaile to it as they may So that these Chappels of case as they are commonly called are not inconsistent with all the fore-described ends and dutyes of Church-members And even the Independants do confess that age distance persecution c. may allow one of their Churches to meet at once in several houses or places where several Pastors may pro tempore officiate and yet this consisteth with all the forementioned ends of the relation 4. And indeed disorders and confusions in Churches must not be our measure to judge of their Nature and constitution by though one in a Swoone may be hardly discerned from a dead man yet life is nevertheless essential to a man The Principalities in Germany may be so curtaled and intangled that it shall be hard for Lawyers to judge whether the Princes be proper Soverains and Monarchs or not And yet what doth constitute Monarchy and Soveraignity is known A Ship may be made so little and a Barge so big as that it may be hard to distinguish them by name and yet a Ship and Barge are divers If in one great house there be several men with their Wives Children and Servants in several rooms or parts and â—ne have some superiority over the rest they being free journy-men or labourers under him the degree of the Power of the chief Master here may be in several cases so various as that it shall be hard for any man to say whether this be one Family only or many But must we therefore remove all distinction of Families or forsake the old and usual definition The same I say of Primary perticular Churches Stepney Parish or Giles Criplegate or Martins in the fields may be so great as to make a doubt of it whether they are single Churches and so may some Lancashire Parishes that have very distant and large Chapelries But shall the disease or extraordinary case or dicffiulty of such a Parish make us change the old and true definition of a Church And thus some Presbyterians have argued from the Multitude of Converts at Jerusalem and Ephesus that they could not be one particular Church so as to meet all in one place which is the common and strongest objection against us But 1. undoubtedly there were many strangers there that were ready to pass away to other places 2. And the Spirit knew that the Church was quickly by persecution to be scattered 3. And on a suddain there was not time to settle them in exact order as afterward they did in all the Churches Acts. 14. 23. But many Apostles being there they might transiently have divers meetings at once 4. And the number and distance of them all was no greater then might consist with the forementioned Church Ends and definition They that meet one day with one Apostle might meet the next day with another and might have Personal Communion and Conversation And 5. The text saith that they did meet all in one place and as Doctor Hammond aforecited saith they deny the plain text that do deny it they were not distributed into divers assembles and the All that meet together must mean the greater part of the Church members at once And I my self have Preached to a Congregation supposed by understanding persons in it to be six thousand and all to have heard and as many more might have heard the next day and so twenty thousand might make a Church when vicinity maketh them otherwise capable and in Judaea we find that men speaking to Armies yea the Enemies Armies shew that far more could hear at once then can do with us whether voices or aire did make the difference I Know not and if the fore-named Parishes that have but one ordinary meeting place have 30000 or 40000 or 50000 souls in them we may conjecture at the case of Jerusalem hereby For though among those new Converts there were not so many neglecters of the Assemblies yet the passing strangers might be many To make the case plain I would but desire the dissenters to consider 4. Whether that Gods publick worship be not a duty Even the Communion of Christians in Doctrine Prayer and Sacrament 2. Whether there must not be some present Pastors to officiate before the Church in all these 3. Whether this Congregation must not be Christians and persons qualified for Communion and whether the Churches have not alwaies by the holy Spirits appointment differenced between Christians and Infidels and between Heretical or flagitious persons and the orderly and obedient and admitted the first sort only to Communion 4. Whether he that is present and delivereth the Sacrament should not know what he doth and to whom he giveth it and should not in the administring make a difference and keep away the Infidels Heriticks and openly flagitious and should not know the people whom he overseeth 5. And whether he can do all or any of this to a transient multitude that as the waters of a river are passing away when he still seeth strange faces only and those are his Auditors and Commuicants whom he never saw before or knoweth how can he know whether they are Baptized Christians or unbaptized Jews or other Infidels 6. Therefore is not an ordinary Cohabitation or vicinity of necessity to a fixed Church and Pastor that he may know them and they may know each other These things I suppose are past dispute 7. And then I ask whether such a society as this be not a true Church and such as is described in scripture and such as should ordinarily be continued in the world whether it be part of a more compounded general Church and under the general oversight of Apostolical Bishops is none of my question now but whether this be not an ordinary political Church of the first order 8. And if so whether every such Church by Acts. 14. 23 should
Bilson but the generality of the Prelatists disclaime it and confess that it belongeth only to the King and Magistrates and that they receive it from the King if ever they exercise any sâ—â—h 4. What is it then is it to be the Kings Ecclesiastical Council to prepare such Canons as he shall enact Of Canons I shall say more anon But though Pastors may be the fittest to Council Kings yet that giveth them no power nor doth aptitude make an office nor is the King tyed to them but may advise whith whom he please And experienced present Pastors are usually fitter to give advice in the matters of Religion than they And even Civil impartial Noblemen have usually proved wiser sobâ—rer and more peaceable and happy Church Councellours than the interessed partial Clergy I am not of Erastus mind that all Church Government belongeth to the Magistrates I have lately published my judgment of that matter in certain Propositions to Ludov. Molinaeus But I grant to him and all sober impartial Divines do grant that all forceing Government by the Sword belongeth to Magistrates and Parents only and not to any Bishops as such It followeth therefore that no Bishops power extendeth to any other effect but only to work on the Consciences of Volunteers unless as the Magistrates or Parents may constraine them by penalties to submit to it Suppose therefore a while that the Magistrates force were withdrawn from your discipline and left it to itself you would then know better by experience wherein its strength consisted That man would then Rule the people most who did most effectually convince their reason aud prevaile with Conscience and further nothing would be done Are not our Bishops well aware of this Do they not themselves confess how little their Government would signifie above the Government of present Presbyters unless they could give clear convincing Reasons to the people which absent strangers are unlike to do What do you think your peculiar power would signifie in one year above a Presbyrers if the Magistrate left all at liberty in their Church obedience to their Pastors would not the present Pastors carry almost all with the best and soberest of the flocks Especially where Bishops make it their office to forbid the Pastors to do theirs and to keep them from Preaching the word of life Their holding fast the secular conjunct power and using it so much doth shew what they trust to they say themselves what would the Keys signifie without the Sword and the Pishops Government prevail where none are punished for despising it if the Bishop excommunicate a faithfull Preacher neither he nor his flock will much regardit but goe on in the service of the Lord. And perhaps some will excommunicate the Bishop and be even with him O! that the Magistrates would a few Years try what the Keys can do in England of themselves and valeant quantum valere possunt Not that I would wish him to leave off his own duty to punish sin but let it not be mixed with Church Offices so as that all that shall be imputed to the Bishops Keys which is effected only by the Magistrates Sword I deny not but the Magistrate may moderately drive men to hear Gods word and to do the immediate duties of their places But not to profess that they are Christians when they are not or that they consent to Church Communion when they do not Nor to take those Privileges which belong not to them No man hath right to Church Communion who had rather be excommunicated then repent of sin Therefore if Gods word and an excommunication will not bring him to profess Repentance he should not be either Rackt or Imprisoned to force him to say he doth repent when it is certain that he doth not indeed repent who will not profess it by easier means Nor hath that man right to absolutiaon and Church Communion who only prefereth it before a Goale The effects of the Church Keyes are talked of but are indeed unknown where secular force doth deterr men into lyeing professions of repentance and drive unwilling persons in to the Communion of the Church No unwilling person should have the Seal of pardon put into his hands Obj. But we cannot say they are unwilling who consent though moved by the penalty of the Law and Sword Ans Yes he is to be called unwilling who hath not the willingness which Christ maketh necessary He that is not willing to have Church Communion for it self and for Christ and his salvation is not willing of it at all indeed nor in Gods account For it is only freedome from a Prison that he is willing of and of Church Communion as a means to that and not as a means to the end that God appointed it As he that consenteth to be Baptized only to heal the Kings evil or to save his life is not to be Baptized nor taken for a Christian nor is it Baptism indeed but touching only which he consenteth to so is it in this case Obj. But how know you but them in hath righter ends together with these punishment brings many a man to reason and true repentance Ans You suppose your selves that the word and Keys will not prevail with him of themselves and therefore it is that you desire force your own Consciences tell you that it is but to avoid punishment that you suppose him to profess repentance Otherwise when your threats have brought him to repentance try what is the cause by remitting the penalty on his body and after freely leaving him to himself Obj. But some are like Children that will hear reason when their stubbornness is taken down Therefore it may also have better motives for ought you know Ans 1. Men that are dealt with in the matters of Salvation are not to be thus used as Fools and Children about common things but as men that must live and die as they choose 2. And God hath left us no such means to bring men into a right Choice in things of this nature Otherwise you might set Infidels on the Rack till they consent to be Baptized or send them to Prison and then say how know you but this as the Rod doth Children hath brought them to their witts But the Church of Christ never took this course nor never thus understood his will 3. The case is plain to men that will understand When God hath made mens free consent the Condition of their Salvation and the Profession of a free consent to be the Condition of Church Communion and what wise man would have lower that will not make the Church a swine stie It followeth that the Pastors must have the evidence of such a Profession of free and voluntary consent or else they must not receive such persons Now such a one that hath been long tried by the word and by the penalty of Excomunication it self and refuseth to profess Repentance but only professeth it when no other means will escape a Prison doth
and according to that word to declare them Impenitency openly Characterizing them to be persons unmeet for Christian Communion and such as till they repent are under the wrath of God and must expect his dreadful judgment and to command the Church in Christs name to withdraw from the Impenitent person and to have no Communion with him And all this is but the application of Gods word to his Conscience and the Churches If his seared Conscience deride it all we can do no more If he will forcibly intrude into the Communion of the Church against their wills it is like ones breaking into my house the Magistrate must restrain him as a violater of the peace as well as of the Churches liberties If the Magistrate will not the Church most remove from him If they cannot they must pronounce him morally absent as a forcible intruder and none of their Communion If the Church will not obey the Pastors sentence he hath no instrument but the same word to bring them to it Now all this being past denial let us come more particularly to enquire in all this what part there is essential to a Bishops office as such 1. Is it the making of Church Lawes or Canons About what 1. Either these Canons are but the Commanding of that which Gods Law made a duty before or of somewhat newly made a duty by themselves 2. Either they are Lawes or Commands to the Laity only or to the Presbyters or to the particular Bishops or all 1. If they do but urge the performing of some duty already made such by God in Scripture or Nature who ever doubted but Presbyters may do that even to teach and charge the people from God to obey his Laws And note that God daily maketh new duties by the Law of nature even providentially altering the Nature of things And so he maketh this or that to become Decent and Orderly and so a duty And maketh it my duty to speak this or that word to this or that person or to do this or that particular good work Even by varying occasions accidents and circumstances of things 2. But if these Canons make new duties which God hath not made 1. If it be to the Laity the Presbyters may do the like for they are Guides also of the Laity unless they are forbidden by a superior power If it be only to the Presbyters that will not reach our present case as shall be further shewed afterward 3. If it be to the Bishops themselves they cannot be Laws but meer agreements because one Bishop is not the proper Governour of another nor many of one nor the present in Council of the absent as such And here by the way it is worthy to be noted how much the Diocesanes contradict themselves in this claim of Government They say that they are of a distinct order and office from meer Presbyters because they have power to Govern them And yet they make 1. A Council of Bishops to have as high a governing power over particular Bishops of the same order 2. And an Arch-Bishop to be the Governour of Bishops 3. And a Primate or Patriarch to be the Governour of Arch-Bishops and yet not to be of a distinct Order or office but only of a distinct degree in the accidentals of the same order If Government prove a distinct Order or Office in one it will do so in the other And why may not the Magistrate make all the same Canons who ruleth them all But let us consider what these Canons may be 1. The Bishops make Canons how often Synods or Councils shall be held and when and where and when they shall be dissolved But 1. May not the King do the same And can that be proper to Bishops which the King may do Yea which all Emperours have formerly used 2. And is not this Cannon made to rule Bishops themselves who is it but Bishops or so much as them that you think should be called unto Councils And are the Bishops in Council of another order than themselves out of Council Need we an office of Bishops to rule Bishops of the same office 2. Canons are made about Temples Buildings Tithes Glebes Bells Pulpits Seats Tables Cups Fonts and other utensils And 1. who doubteth but the Magistrate may do all this yea that it belongeth to him to regulate such things as these 2. And who knoweth not that even Bishops are under these Canons also who are of the same order 3. And that Presbyters even in England are members of these Synods and so make Canons to rule the Bishops Ergo they are of a superior order to Bishops by your reasoning 3. Canons are made for the regulating of Ministers attire in the Church and out and for officiating garments as surplices c. And of these I say the same as of the former The King may do the same as Bishops may do and Bishops themselves are bound by them and Presbyters make them which three things prove that it is not the proper work of Bishops as a distinct order from meer Presbyters 4. Canons are made for worship Geâ—ures in what gesture to pray to receive the Sacrament to use the Creed c. And the same three answers serve to this also as to the case in hand 5. Canons are made for Holidaies publick Fasts and Thanksgivings and Lecture daies And the same three considerations fall in here 6. Canons are made for the ordering officers fees and such like in Bishops Courts And here all the same three things fall in 1. The King may do it 2. It is Bishops that are ruled 3. Presbyters also make the Canons therefore it is not jure divino the proper work of a distinct Order 7. Canons are made for the choice of what Translation of the Bible shall be used in all the Churches and what version or meetre of the singing Psalmes And of this also the three former things hold true 8. Canons are made to impose a Liturgie in what words Ministers shall speak to God and to the people And 1. This also the King may do and doth 2. And it obligeth Bishops 3. And Presbyters make it 9. Canons are made against Schismaticks new Discipline and constitutions non-subscribers unlicensed Preachers for the book of Articles of ordination for Catechizing Preaching Marrying Burying Christing and such like In all which each of the said three answers hold 10. Canons are made to keep Parents from open covenanting to God for their Children in Baptism that they shall not be urged to be present that God-fathers do that office and not they As also that none be baptized without the transient Image of a Cross and such like whether this be well or ill done the three former answers all hold in this 11. All the Canons that are for the restraint of sin as neglect of Church worship prophaning of it and other abuses have the same censure 12. The circumstantiating Canons how oft Bishops shall confirm and whom they shall
called Of which sort were abundance of Christians towards each others Bishops in former ages and such are the Papists now towards you So that neither Papist nor Protestant that I ever knew silenced by you doth forbear upon Conscience of this your pretended authority at all And what a silencing power is that which scarce any man would be ever silenced by You cannot choose but know this to be true 2. And really should Magistrates themselves be so servile to you as to silence all Ministers by the Sword whom a Prelate judgeth to be silent while he knoweth not whether it be deservedly or not God forbid that Protestants like the Popes sheald make Kings to be their Executioners or hangmen A meer Executioner indeed is not bound to know or examine whether the sentence was just or not though in most cases to forbear if it be notoriously unjust but what a King or Magistrate doth he must do as a publick Judge and therefore must hear the cause himself and try whether he be really guilty or not and not only whether a Bishop judged him so Else Magistrates will either be involved in the bloody sin of persecution as oÌ„ft as a Prelate will but command them and so must be damned and help to damn others when Prelates please Or else it is no sin for a Magistrate to silence all the holyest Ministers of Christ to the damnation of thousands of ignorant untaught Souls so be it the Prelates do but bid him and he keep himself unacquainted with the cause And next they must obey the Counsel at Laterane sub Inoc. 3. And exterminate all subjects out of their Dominions though it be all that are there and must burn Holy-Christians to ashes because the Pope or Prelates bid them 3. I need not make also a particular application of this case to the people When they know nothing but wise and sound and holy in the Doctrine or life of their Pastors and God bids them know such as labour among them and are over them in the Lord and highly esteem them in Love for their work sake they will hardly be so debauched as to violate this command of God as oft as a Diocesan will but say I know some Heresie or Crime by your Teacher which you do not and therefore he must Preach no more and you must no more use his ministry Were I one of these people I would be bold to ask the Diocesan Sir what is the Heresie or Crime that he is guilty of If he refuse to tell me I would slight him as a Tyrant General Counsels told the people of the Heresies for which they did despose their Pastors If he told me what it was I would try it by Gods word If I were unable I would seek help If the Diocesan silenced my Teacher and ten neighbour Bishops wiser than he did tell me that it was for Truth and Duty and that the Heresie was the Bishops I would hear my Teacher and believe the other Bishops before him without taking them to be of a higher order The objections against this and what is before said shall be answered in the next Chapter You see when it is but opened how the Diocesans power vanisheth into the air CHAP. XIII That there is no need of such as our Diocesans for the Unity or the Government of the particular Ministers nor for the silencing of the unworthy IT stuck much in the minds of the Ancient Doctors and Christians that Episcopacy was necessary to avoid Schism and discord among the Ministers and the people and that it was introduced for that reason And I am so averse to singularity in Religion that I will not be he that shall gainsay it A double yea a treble Episcopacy though I cannot prove instituted of Christ yet will I not contradict because one sort I cannot disprove and the other two I take to be but a prudential humane determination of the Circomstances of one and the same sacred Ministerial office-worke 1. That which I cannot disprove as to a Divine Institution is a General Ministry over many Churches like the Scors Visiters at their Reformation who as Successors to the Apostles and Evangelists in the durable parts of their office were by a conjunction of Scripture evidence and Divine authority of office to perswade Pasâ—ors and people to their several duties and to have a chief hand in ordaining and removing Ministers 2. That which I will not contradict antiquity in is a Bishop in every particular Church to be as the chief Presbyter like the chief Justice on the bench or one of the Quorum as our Parish Ministers now are in respect to all their Curates of the Chappels under them 3. And I would not deny but at all Ministerial Synods one man may be Moderator either pro tempore or for continuance as there is cause These two last are but Prudential circumstances as Doctor Stiling fleet hath proved And in all these I like the Discipline of the Waldenses Bâ—â—emian and Polonian Churches But no Government of the Presbyters no concord no keeping out of Heresie requireth such as our Diocesans 1. Who put down all the Bishops of the particular Churches under them 2. And pretending Spiritual Power Govern by the force of the Magistrates Sword 3. And obtrude themselves on the people and Pastors without their consent and against their wills being by multitudes taken for the enemies of the Church 4. And visibly before the world introducing so many bad Ministers and silencing so many faithful ones as in this age they have done Without them we have all these means of concord following 1. We have a clear description of the duty of Ministers and people in Gods word 2. We have Ministers to Preach up all these duties by Office 3. The people are taught by Scripture what Ministers to choose 4. We find it natural to the people to before Learned and godly Ministers though many of them be bad themselves And though it be not so with them all yet the sober part do usually perswade the rest So that in London and else where those Parishes where the people choose had usually far worthier Pastors than the rest especially than those in the Bishops presentation 5. The people are obliged by God to marke those Ministers that cause division and contention and avoid them 6. The Ministers are bound to give notice to the people of false teachers and Schismaticks and to command them to avoid them And themselves to renounce Communion with them after the first and second admonition 7. These Ministers may have correspondence by Synods to keep up concord by agreement among themselves So we have over all a Christian King and Magistracy who are the rightful Governours of the Clergy as well as of all other subjects and may constrain the negligent to their duty and restrain the Heretical Schismatical and wicked from their sin And may not all this do much to keep up Concord 2. What our Diocesans really
and as he that will know the nature and difference of fruits or animals must stay till they are come to their full growth and ripeness and not take them green and young so he that will judge either of Schism or of Church-tyranny Lust do 2. And whether the Quakers Ranters Familists and Munster monsters be not Schismaticks ripe and at full growth and therefore a young Schismatick is not â—o tell us what Schism is but should himself see what he will be when he is ripe And so whether Popery be not the Diocesane Prelacy full grown and ripe and whether they should not therefore see what they would come to if that which withoâ—deth in the several Kingdoms were taken out of the way as the Pope hath removed it in the Empire If the Diocesans Metropolitanes Patriarks and Pope as to his Primacy in the Empire did not all stand on the same humane foundation then are they not the things that I am speaking of Obj. But the late and present Schismes in England shew that it is the adversaries of Prelacy that are the causes Ans Very true for Prelacy maketh it self adversaries and so maketh some of the Schismaticks There are two sort of Schismatickâ— some Prelatists as the Papists the Novatians the Donatists and most of the old Schismaticks were and some Anti-prelatists And there are two sorts of Anti prelatists Some Catholick being for the Primitive Episcopacy and some Schismaticks And these last the Prelates make and then complain of them It is their state and practice hereafter described that driveth men to distast them and so precipitateth the injudicious into the Contrary extreme It is Prelacy that maketh almost all the Sects that be in England at this day When they see how the Spiritual Keys are secularly used by Laymen in their Courts when they see what Ministers and how many hundred of them are silenced and what Fellows in many places are set up in their stead they think they can never fly far enough from such Prelates To tell the world It is Schismaticks that we silence and they are obedient and Orthodox persons that we set up may signifie something in another land or age but it doth but increase the disaffâ—ction of those that are upon the place and know what kind of men the Prelates commend and who they discommend and silence A very Child when he is eating his â—pple will not cast it away because a Prelate saith it is a Crab nor when he tasteth a Crab will he eate it if a Prelate Swear it is a sweat apple Though he that doth but look on them may possibly believe him I believe they that thought that Prelacy was the only cure of our Schismes do know by this time by experience that by that time the Prelates had again ruled but seven years there were seven and seven against them for one that was so before And we that dwell among them do take those that dislike their course and waies to be the Generality of the most Religious and sober people of the land alwaies excepting the King and Parliament and those that must be still excepted CHAP. XIV The true Original of the warrantable Episcopacy in particular Churches was the notorious disparity of abilities in the Pastors And the original of that tyrannical Prelacy into which it did degenerate was the worldly Spirit in the Pastors and people which with the world came by prosperity into the Church Quaere Whether the thing cease not where the reason of it ceaseth GOd doth not carry on his work upon mens Souls by names and empty titles but by such real demonstrating evidences of his Power Wisdome and Goodness as are apt to work on the Reason of man And therefore he that would make his Apostles the Foundations or chief Pillars and Instruments in and of his Churches would accordingly endow them with proportionable abilities that in the Miracu'ous demonstrations of Power and the convincing demonstrations of Wisdome and the amiable holy demonstrations of goodness they might as far excelothers as they did in authority And nature it self teaceth us to difference men in our esteem and affection as they really differ in worth and loveliness And this Law of Nature is the Primary Law of God And the holy Scriptures plainly second it telling us oft of the diversity of Gods gifts in his Servants which all make for concord but not for equality of esteem and that there are greater and lesser in the Kingdom of God and that Gods gifts in all men must be honoured Math. 12. 1 Cor. 12. Eph. 4. Heb. 5. 10. 11. 12. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. And God that would have his various gifts variously esteemed did in all ages himself diversifie his Servants gifts All were not Apostles nor all Prophets nor all Evangelists And after their daies all the Ministers or Elders of the Churches were not men of Learning nor of so full acquaintance with the sacred Doctrine nor so grave prudent staied holy charitable or peaceable as some were usually when miraculous gifts did cease and very few Philosophers or men of learning turned Christians Any man may know that had not been told it by Church History that their Elders or Pastors were such as the better sort of our unlearned Christians are who can pray well and worship God sincerely and read the Scripture and in a plain familiar manner can teach the Catechistical points and perswade to duty and reprove vice But as for Sermons in a methodical accurate way as now used and defending the truth and opposing Heresies and stopping the mouths of gainsayers they must needs be far below the Learned But yet here and there a Philosopher was converted and of those that had no such Learning then called secular and the Learning of the Gentiles some few were far better Learned than others in the sacred Scriptures and the customes and Learning of the Jews And it was long before the Christians had Schools and Academies of their own That this was so appeareth 1. In the reason of the thing For no effect can exceed the total cause Therefore they that had not the inspirations prophetical or miraculous guists nor Academies and Schools of secular Learning nor so much as Riches and leisure but Poverty and persecution and worldly trouble and labour were not like to have more Learning than the holy Scriptures taught them 2. And this appeareth by the forecited Canons of Counsels which forbad Pastors ever almost three hundred years after Christ to read the Gentiles books By which the former custome of the Church may easily be perceived And also by abundance of reproaches which are cast upon some Hereticks in the Ancients writings for being too much skilled in Logick and other of the Gentiles Learning 3. And it appeareth by the parity of writers of the second and third Centuries 4. And also by the paucity of famous Divines that are mentioned in the Histories of those times 5. And above all by the
probable sense For 1. If by the Altar they say is meant One Christ 2. or one Species of Altars these are before confuted and are palpably false He that is in another part of the World may come to an Altar of the same species which is nothing to the unity of a particular Church here spoken of 3. If they say It is called one Altar because under one Bishop this maketh not many to be one no more than many Temples And if tropically it were so meant it would be but a vain repetition One Bishop being mentioned besides And it is an Altar which the Bishop with his Presbytery is supposed to be present at which cannot be All in a Diocess called One. Partiality can give no other probable sense Object 1. One Church it is known had many Altars Answ Not then no nor long after except at Rome and Alexandria and then they were but as parts of Chappels and not of Churches Object 2. It is said also There is one Body of Christ and one Cup which cannot be meant literally Answ It is well called One agreeably to our present sence For 1. It is one and the same Bread though not one piece which is there present consecrated and divided to them all and one Cup or present quantity of Wine which is there distributed among them 2. And it is One body and blood or sacrificed Christ which is in every Church represented and offered by One Bishop at one Altar This doth but confirm our Exposition But what can be so plain as to convince the prejudiced and unwilling 2. Pag. 45. he willeth `` the Church to send a Deacon to Antioch as other neighbour Churches sent Bishops and some Presbyters and Deacons And can any man think that a Diocess met to chuse a Deacon to go on a visit or that it was a Diocesane Bishop that was sent by a Diocess yea that all these neighbour Churches that sent them were so many Diocesses VI. The next is the Epistle ad Trallesios Where he saith of the Bishop that came to him That he saw all the multitude in him that is the Assembly And as before he bids them Do nothing without the Bishop and be subject to the Presbytery and that as to the Counsel of God and Conjunction of Apostles adding For without these the Church is not called what can be plainer to shew that it was a Church that had a present Bishop and Council of Presbyters conjunct without whom the Church was not lawfully called together So that every Church had such 2. And pag. 50. he saith again Not inflated but being inseparable from God Jesus Christ and the Bishop and the Orders of the Apostles that is the Confess of Presbyters He that is within the Altar is clean and he that is without the Altar is not clean that is he that doth any thing in the Church without the Bishop Presbytery and Deacon is not clean in Conscience which plainly sheweth that every Church-Assembly had a guiding Bishop Presbytery and ministring Deacon 3. Pag. 52. he saith I salute you from Smyrna with the Churches of God which are present with me He had not then the presence of many Diocesses nor were Bishops alone used then to be called Churches Therefore they were Church-Assemblies which he visited and were with him and about him 4. Again he repeateth Be subject to the Bishop and Presbytery and love one another with an inseparable heart Which hath the sense aforesaid VII In the Epistle to the Romans the words of the Church presiding in locho chori Romanorum is much spoken of already by many The Epistles ascribed to him have much of the like kind as Epist ad Tarsenses pag. 80. Ad Antiochenos pag. 86 87 88. The Epist ad Heroum Diaconum calleth the Presbyters of Antioch Bishops who baptize sacrifice and impose hands So Epist ad Philippenses pag. 112. If after all this evidence from Ignatius any will wrangle let him wrangle what words can be plain enough for such And what a blind or blinding practice is it which too many Writers for Prelacy have used to pretend Ignatius to be for them who is so much and plain against them And to toss about the name of a Bishop and Presbytery as if all that was said for a Parochial Bishop and Presbytery that is in a Church associated for personal presential Communion were spoken for such a Diocesane Prelacy as putteth down and destroyeth all such Churches Bishops and Presbyteries And what falshood is it to perswade the World that we are against Episcopacy because we would have every Church to have a Bishop and would not have all the Churches in England except Diocesane to be unchurched and turned into Chappels or Oratories When yet we refuse not to submit to more general Overseers of many Churches to see that the Pastors do their duty and counsel and exhort them to it whether appointed hereto by the Magistrate or the consent and choice of many Churches IV. Justin Martyr's Testimony is trite but most plain and not to be evaded 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Postea fratrum praeposito panis poculum offertur Postquam praepositus gratias egit totusque populus fausta omnia acclamavit qui inter nos Diaconi vocantur dant unicuique partem panis calicis diluti super quos facta est gratiarum actio atque etiam deferre sinunt absentibus Die solis urbanorum ac rusticanorum coetus fiunt ubi Apostolorum prophetarumque literae quoad fieri potest praeleguntur Cessantâ— Lectore Praepositus verba facit adhortatoria Posthaec consurgunt omnes preces offâ—rimus quibus finitis profertur panis vinum aqua Tum praepofitus quantum potest preces offert gratiarum actiones Plebs vero Amen accinâ—t Inde consecrata distribuuntur singulis absentibus mittuntur per Diaconos Ditiores si libeat pro sua quisque voluntate conferunt Collecta deponuntur apud praepositum Is subvenit pupillis viduis propter morbum aliamve necessitatem egentibus vinctis quoque peregrinis in summa curator fit omnium inopum Thus Justin Apolog. 2. Where he describeth the Church State and Worship which we desire as plainly as we can speak our selves Note here 1. That whether the Country-men and Citizens had several Churches or met in one City Church it sheweth that they were but single Congregations For every Church had a present Bishop For Doctor Hammond maintaineth that by the Praepositus here is meant the Bishop and so do others of them 2. This Bishop performed the Offices of the day every Lord's day praying preaching and administring the Lord's Supper c. 3. All the Alms of the Church was committed to the Bishop at present and therefore he had not many hundred or any other Churches under him where Presbyters did all receive the Alms. 4. He was the common Curator of all the Poor Orphans Sick c. which could not be for more than
may add as to the former Evidences To. 5. Serm. 52. pag. 705. when he had shewed that in the Church there must be no division he expoundeth it by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Qui seipsum ab hoc conventu sejunxerit So that the Assembly was the Church and not a thousandth part of the Church only See more of the Churches feasting together in Baronius ad an 57. pag. ed. Plant. 543. to spare me more labour about this VI. Another Evidence of the Limits of the ancient Churches is that which I oft mentioned in the particular Testimonies that every where all the People either chose or expresly consented to their Bishops and they were ordained over them in their sight And this no more could do than could meet in one place and one part of a Church hath no more right to it than all the rest The Consequence is evident And for them that say that it was only the Parishioners of the Cathedral Church that voted I answer Now Cathedrals have no Parishes and heretofore the Cathedral Parish was the whole Church The Testimonies fully prove that it was All the Church or People that were the Bishop's Flock And for some hundreds of Years there were no Parishes in his Diocess but one and therefore no such distinction Pamelius's heap of Testimonies and many more for the matter of fact I have already cited And however some talk now to justifie the contrary course of our times it is so clear and full in Antiquity that the People chose their Bishops at first principally and after secondarily after the Clergy having a Negative Voice with them and their Consent and Testimony ever necessary even for eight hundred Years at least that it would be a needless thing to cite any more Testimonies of it to any versed in the Ancients Papists and Protestants are agreed de facto that so it was See Cyprian lib. 4. Epist 2. of Cornelius lib. 1. Epist 2. of Sabinus and lib. 1. Epist 4. Euseb Hist lib. 6. cap. 29. tells us that Fabian by the People was chosen to succeed Anterus And Cyprian saith it was Traditione Apostolica vid. Socrat. lib. 4. cap. 14. lib. 2. cap. 6. lib. 7. cap. 35. Sozomen lib. 6. cap. 24. lib. 8. cap. 2. of Chrysostom lib. 6. cap. 13. vid. Augustin Epist 110. Theodoret Hist lib. 1. cap. 9. in Epist Concil Nicaeni ad Alexandr The Bloodshed at the Choice of Damasus was one of the first occasions of laying by that custom at Rome And yet though they met not so tumultuously they must consent Leo's Testimony I gave you before with many more Theodor. lib. 5. cap. 9. of Nectarius sheweth that Bishops were then chosen Plebe praesente universa fraternitate as Cyprian speaketh of Sabinus So the Concil Parisien even an 559. But for more plentiful proof of this see M. A. Spalatens de Rep. Eccles lib. 1. cap. 22. n. 10. lib 6. cap. 7. lib. 3. cap. 3 n. 12. c. Blondel de Jure plebis more copiously and de Epis Presbyt Bilson perpet Govern cap. 15. lib. of Christian Subjection oft And it is to be noted that when the People's Confusion had made them seem uncapable any longer to chuse 1. This was long of the Prelates themselves who by that time had so far enlarged their Churches that the People were neither capable of doing their ancient Work and Duty nor yet of being ruled by the Clergy aright 2. And when the People were restrained from the Choice by Meetings and Vote the Magistrates in their stead did undertake the Power 3. And when it fell out of the People's hands into Great Mens the Proud and Covetous who could best seek and make Friends did get the Bishopricks whereupon the Churches were presently changed corrupted and undone 4. And the sense of this moved the few good Bishops that were left to make Canons against this Power and Choice of Princes and great Men decreeing that all Bishops obtruded by them on the Churches should be as none but be avoided and all avoided that did not avoid them And the Roman and Patriarchal party cunningly joyned with these honest Reformers to get the Choice out of the Magistrate's hands that they might get it into their own and so Christ's Church was abused among ambitious Usurpers The Decrees against Magistrates Choice of Bishops you may see Can. Apost 31. Decret 17. q. 7. c. siquis Episc Sept. Synod c. 3. Decret 16. q. 7. Oct. Synod c. 12. Act. 1. c. 22. Decret 16. q. 7. Nicol. 1. Epist 10. Epist 64. with more which you may find cited by Spalatens lib. 6. cap. 7. pag. 675 676 677. And it is to be noted that though still the Clergy had a Negative or first Choice yet when they procured Charles the Great who was to rise by the Papal help to resign and renounce the Magistrates Election he restored the Church to its Ancient Liberties as far as enlarged Dioceses and ambitious Clergy-men would permit it His words are these Sacrorum Canonum non ignari ut in Dei nomine Sancta Ecclesia suo liberius potiretur honore assensum ordini Ecclesiastico praebuimus ut scilicet Episcopi per Electionem CLERI POPULI secundum statuta Canonum de PROPRIA DIOECESI remota personarum munerum acceptione ob vitae meritum sapientiae donum eligantur ut exemplo verbis sibi subjectis usquequaque prodesse valeant Vid. Baron To. 11. n. 26. Decret Dist 63. c Sacrorum Where note that 1. he includeth the People of the whole Diocess 2. And doth this as according to the sacred Canons So that for Men to dream that only the Parishioners of a Cathedral Church which had no proper Parish or the Citizens only were to chuse is to feign that which is contrary to notorious Evidence of Law and Fact as well as of the reason of the thing For where all are the Bishops Flock and chuse as his Flock there all the Flock must chuse and a parcel can claim no privilege above all the rest VII The next Evidence is this In the first Age it is very fairly proved by Doctor Hammond that there were by the Apostles more Bishops and Churches than one in many Cities themselves And if one City had more than one Church and Bishop then much more many distant places in Towns and Countries That one City had more than one he sheweth by the distinction of Jews and Gentiles Churches As Peter was appointed chiefly for the Jews and Paul chiefly for the Gentiles so he sheweth it very probable that at Rome Antioch and other places they had several Churches And thus he reconcileth the great differences about Linus Clemens and Cletus or Anacletus And especially on this reason that they had not the same Language And indeed when in great Cities there are Christians of divers Languages it is necessary that they be of divers Congregations
a particle of the foresaid proportion But when others do it he saith He doth it by them 3. He doth not at all govern his flock with that which is the true Pastoral Government which is in person among them to guide them and resolve their doubts and admit those to Communion that are fit and refuse the unfit To admonish all the scandalous and unruly as personally known to him to watch over them and confirm the weak and refel seducers when they come among them But instead of this he never seeth them as to the main body of his flock nor knoweth them but summoneth their Teachers and Church-wardens and such as others that dwell among them or his Apparitors will accuse to him to come before his Lay-Chancellours Court as aforesaid and in his Viâ—itation to meet him so that here is none of the same work no nor Government it self but another kind of Government And here note 1. That the foresaid three parts of the office Teaching Worshipping and Ruling are all Essential to the office so that if he wanted but any One of them he were not an Officer of the same species with those that have them all much more if he have but One yea not One of all 2. That the flock or Church is not to be denominated from a small or inconsiderable part of it but from the main Body Therefore he that is the Teacher but of one Congregation of a thousand or many hundreds or scores is not to be therefore called the Teacher of that Church or Flock which consisteth of so many Congregations And so also for Worship and personal conduct He is not a Priest to that flock c. Much less when he undertaketh not one Parish Obj. So you may say of one of the old City Churches such as Alexandria where the Bishop preached but to one Congregation or of our Parishes that have Chappels where the Curate teacheth in the Chappels or wherever there are many Presbyters to a Congregation All do not preach at least to all the people Ans 1. I doubt not but Alexandria and all such places should have had many Churches and Bishops as the Christians grew too many to be in and under one 2. But yet when they had several Churches and Presbyters the people were not at all tyed to their own Parishes but might come to hear and joyn with the Bishop as oft as they pleased which though they could not do all at once they might do by turns some one day and some another And so they did So that still they had personal Communion with him though not every day 3. And they lived in Vicinity where they were capable of Converse and personal notice and private help from one another 4. And the Presbyters all joyned in personal oversight or Government of the whole flock and were each one capable of personal admonition and exhortation to any member 5. And those that attended the Bishop and did not frequently officiate in the chief actions yet were present with the Church and assisted him in officiating and were ready to do the rest when ever he appointed them or there was need so that though quoad exercitium they did not the chief parts of the work every day or usually yet 1. it was all the three parts of the Pastoral office which they did and undertook to do in season 2. And that to the same Church in person by themselves So that though Churches that swell to a disordered bulk are not in that perfect order as more capable Societies may be yet whilest their Communion is personal present as aforesaid the Church species is not altered as in our Dioceses it is III. A divers fundamentum vel ratio fundandi proveth a diversity of Relations But a true Parish Bishop and our Diocesanes have fundamenta that are in specie divers And so have a particular Church and a Diocesane Church Ergo a Parish Church and Bishop and a Diocesane Church and Bishop are specie divers The Major is undeniable The Minor I prove by shewing the diversity 1. The Fundamentum of the Relation of a Particular Church is either 1. Of the Relation of the Church to God 2. Or their relation as fellow members one to another 3. Or of their joynt relation to their Pastors or Bishops 4. Or of their Bishops or Pastors relation to them For certainly a Church is not only compounded of various Materials but its form is a compounded of these Four Relations set together and every one is Essential to it And he that cannot distinguish cannot understand Now everyone of all these compounding Relations is founded in a mutual consent 1. The Relation of the Members Pastors and the whole Church to God is founded in Gods consent and theirs Gods is signified 1. By his Scripture Institution and Command 2. By his qualifying and disposing the persons 3. By his providential giving them opportunity 4. And ad ordinem where it can be had by the Ordainers as to the Pastors relation who are Gods ministers to invest them in the office 5. And by his moving the hearts of the People to consent which belongeth to the giving of opportunity The Relation of all these to God is secondarily founded in their own consent that it may be a Contract The Pastors express theirs in their Ordination in general and in their Induction or fixing in that particular Church to the Ordainers and to the people The members express their consent either plainly in a Contract or impliedly by actual convention and submission and performing of their duties 2. The Relation of the members to each other is founded in their said Explicite or Implicite consent among themselves joyned to their foresaid consent to God 3. The Relation of the Members to their Pastors is founded Remotely in the said signification of Gods will by his Word and Providence and by the Ordainers for they are but Ministers and operate but by signifying Gods will And nextly by the mutual consent of the People and the Pastors 4. The Relation of the Pastors to the flock is accordingly founded 1. Remotely in the said signification of Gods will by his Word Gifts Disposition Opportunity and by the Ministery of the Ordainers 2. And nextly by the consent of Pastors and People Thus is a particular Church-relation founded and all these parts are necessary thereunto But as for our Diocesane Churches which have no particular Churches under them nor Bishops but only Congregations with several Curates being not politically and properly Churches For I meddle not with such A. Bishops Dioceses as consist of many true Churches with their proper Bishops let us see from what foundation they result 1. As to their Relation to God he never expressed his Consent nor owneth them that ever I could hear proved And therefore the Fundamental Contract is wanting Those that go Dr. Stillingfleet's and Bishop Reynold's way and say No Form of Government is of Gods appointment do grant that the
that the Presbyters office which was instituted by God and used by the ancient Churches contained an obligation and Authority not only to Teach and Worship but also the rest of the Power of the Keys to Rule the Churches committed to their care not by the sword or force but by a pastoral perswasive power judging who is to be taken in and put out and what persons are fit objects for the respective exercises of their own Ministerial acts which was the thing I was engaged to make good CHAP. XV. Whether this Government belonging to the office of Presbyters be in foro Ecclesiae exteriore or only in foro Conscientiae interiore THe last shift that some Prelatists have is to distinguish between the forum internum Conscientiae poenitentiale and the forum externum Ecclesiasticum and to tell us that indeed Presbyters have the Power of the Keys in private or in the first sense but not in Publick or in the second Answ 1. Note that the question is not whether they have the sole power or the chief power or with what limitations it is fit for them to exercise it nor what appeals there should be from them But whether the power of the Keys be part of their office 2. That the question is not of the power of Governing the Church by the sword which belongeth to the King and is Extrinsick to the Pastoral office and to the being of the Church As protecting the Church punishing Church-offenders corporally c. For this is proper to the Magistrate and belongeth neither to Bishops nor Presbyters as such We claim no part with the Prelates in any such secular Government as their Courts use except when they come to Excommunication and Absolution At least no coercive power at all 3. All the question is of the power of the Keys of Admission Conduct and Exclusion of judging who shall have Sacraments and Church-Communion with our assemblies that is Who shall be pronounced fit or unfit for it by our selves And that this belongeth to Presbyters in foro publico Ecclesiae I prove 1. Because they are Publick officers or Pastors over that Church and therefore their power of the Keys is a publick Church power else they had none of the Keys as Pastors of that Church at all For the Keys are to Let in and put out They are the Church Keys and he that hath power only to speak secretly to a single person doth not thereby take in to the Church or put any out nor Guide them publickly A man that is a Minister at least may convince satisfie comfort any mans conscience in secret of what Church soever he be even as he is a member of the Universal Church But he that is a publick Officer and Governour of the Church may publickly Govern the Church But a Presbyter is a publick officer and Governour Ergo. 2. The rest of his office may be publickly performed Coram Ecclesia and not in secret only He may Preach to the Church Pray with the Church Praise God with them Give them the Sacrament Therefore by parity of Reason he may publickly exercise discipline unless any by-accident pro tempore forbid it 3. Else he must be made a meer Instrument of another and not a rational free Agent and Minister of Christ Yea perhaps more like to an Asse who may carry Bread and Wine to the Church or like a Parrot that may say what he is bid than a man who hath a discerning judgment what he is to do I must publickly baptize and publickly preach and pray and publickly give the Lords Body and Bloud And if I must be no Judge my self to whom I must do this then 1. Either I may and must do it to any one without offending God to whom the Bishop bids me do it And if so I may Excommunicate the faithful and curse Gods children and absolve the most notoriously wicked if the Bishop bid me And how come they to have more power than King Balak had over Balaam or than a Christian Emperour had over Chrysostom He that saith to the wicked Thou art righteous Nations shall curse him people shall abhor him Prov. 24. 24. Wo to them that call evil good and good evil But what if the Bishop bid them If I may not preach lies or heresies if the Bishop bid me then I may not lyingly curse the faithful nor bless the wicked if he bid me If I may not forbear preaching the Gospel meerly for the will of man when God calleth me to it much less may I speak slanders yea and lie in the name of God when men bid me The French Priest did wiselier than so that being bid from the Pope to Curse and Excommunicate the Emperour said I know not who it is that is in the right and who is in the wrong but I do Excommunicate him that is in the wrong whoever he be 2. Or else it will follow that I am bound to sin and damn my soul thereby whenever the Bishop will command me which is a contradiction 3. Or else it will follow that I am a beast that am not to judge or know what I do and therefore my acts are neither sin nor duty 4. If he have not the Keys to use publickly in foro Ecclesiae he hath no power of Excommunication and Restitution at all For to Excommunicater is publickly to notifie to the Church that this person is none of them nor to be communicated with and to charge them to avoid his company 5. The Bishops themselves put the Presbyters to proclaim or read the Excommunication and if this be any Ministerial or Pastoral act certainly it is in foro Ecclesiae 6. Most of the Acts before named as their concessions as to be in the Convocation c. are acts in foro publico 7. The full proofs before brought from Antiquity of Presbyters sitting in Councils Judging Excommunicating c. are of publick not private exercise of the Keys 8. They are the same Keys or Office power which Christ hath committed to the Pastors even the Guidance of his Church to feed his lambs And ubi Lex non distinguit non est distinguendum Where doth Christ or Scripture say You shall use the Keys of Church-power privately but not in the Church or publickly 9. All this striving against Power in the Ministers of Christ is but striving against their duty work and the ends and benefits of it He that hath no Power for publick discipline hath no obligation to use it and so he is to neglect it And this is it that the Devil would have to keep a thousand or many hundred Pastors in a Diocese from doing the publick work of Discipline And as if he could confine Preaching to Diocesans only And I verily believe they are better of the two at Preaching than at Discipline he knoweth that it is but few souls of many thousands that would be taught Even so when he can confine Church discipline to the Diocesanes
in our eyes And of such I have oft wondred that the common people should usually choose far better than the Prelates do But the truth is Wisdom and Goodness have their witnesses even in the consciences of natural men which Faction Pride and Fleshly interest doth bribe or silence and cannot endure 3. But what 's all this to us We plead not now for the necessity of the peoples Elections but only for their consent If the Patrons as now or the Clergy as formerly be the Nominators or Electors yet should the peoples consent be acknowledged necessary in the second place 4. For who is fitter to choose or refuse or consent at least than he whose everlasting interest lieth at the stake It is their own soul that must be saved or damned And in good sadness do these Diocesans love the souls of all the people better than they love their own Do you make them believe this by not seeing one of a thousand or many hundred of your flock once in all the time of your lives Doth the silencing of so many Ministers shew it Christ will have all men at age in Covenanting Baptism and the Lords Supper to be Chusers or Refusers for themselves because as Clem. Alexandr Strom. 1. saith they have free will and it is themselves that must have the gain or loss that must be in heaven or hell for ever What if a Prelate a Parliament a Patron or a forefather chuse Masspriests or Hereticks for us must we accept the choice Is this our bewaring of false prophets and of the leaven of the Pharisees and our trying all things and letting no man deceive us c. 5. But how unfit is this objection for a Prelates mouth or pen Are you the Church Governours Is all this contention that you may have the Keys alone without the parish Ministers And is this the fruit of all your Government that the common Church members are so mad so bad so untractable that they are not fit to be free Consenters to them that are to Teach and Guide them to salvation Who then is this Church Ruine and Abomination long of but your selves who have and only will have the Keys Have you not fine Churches and members that are not fit to choose no nor consent to their own Guides Why do you not take care that the Churches by discipline may be better constituted As none should be Pastors who are not fit for the duty of Pastors so none should be members who are not fit for the duty of members It 's excellent Government inded to keep such in the Church as are unfit to be there and then fetch an argument from their unfitness for their neglect of their duty and your depriving them of their power As if you should choose none but ideots or most such to be Jury men and then argue thence that they are unfit for so great a trust and so the people must lose their liberties 6. There are among the ignoranter sort of the people usually divers sober and good men and the rest use much to hearken to them Obj. But what if the people will not consent to any but a Heretick or intolerable person Answ 1. The former answers serve to this You do fairly to keep such people in the Church But as the Foreigner wondered in Henry the Eighth's days to see at once some hanged for being Papists and some burnt for being Protestants and cried out Dii boni quomodo gentes hic vivunt So it is such another case to see at once the same Prelates forcing the unwilling into the Church and to the Sacrament as if this would or could save them if their Church be salvation in despight of them even on pain of undoing and perpetual imprisonment And yet Excommunicating and casting out those that are willing to stay in As if Consent were a mark of an aliene and a reprobate and unwillingness the mark of worthiness 2. Such as you here describe are not fit to be members of a Church If they will not Consent to Church priviledges and duties they should be without the doors And you may force them to hear Teaching whether they are willing or not But you cannot make them Godly nor bring them to heaven nor give them right to Church Communion and Sacraments whether they will or not So much of Election and Consent 2. Moreover the Ordination differeth from that of Gods institution For Presbyters are now Ordained commonly neither by Archbishops Bishops or Presbyters of Christs institution in their way 1. The Bishops themselves profess that they Ordain not as Presbyters For they say such have no power of Ordination 2. They are not Bishops of Christs institution as is before proved but of another species which half themselves confess to be but humane 3. They are not Archbishops because they have no Bishops under them And so having not their power of Ordination as Officers of Gods making they have no power from him to Ordain Obj. By these two last differences you seem to give up the Cause to the Separatists Answ The Prelatists do so but so do not we 1. Because whether the Prelates will or not the people ex post facto do Consent to every worthy Pastor 2. Because we judge of Parish Ministers as God describeth them and therefore as true Bishops and consequently take the Prelates for a kind of Archbishops whatever they call themselves 3. And there is no honest Minister but hath the Consent of some neighbour Ministers and of the People And though imposition of hands be a laudable Ceremony yet it is not that but mutual Consent of themselves and the Pastors and People in which their external call consisteth as is before said II. The different Correlates and Termini make different Relations The Churches which the ancient Presbyters were related to were true entire Churches however their work might be parcelled among the members But according to the Prelates platform each Presbyter hath his charge over no Church of Christ at all but only over a hundredth six hundredth or thousandth part of a Church having no more to do with all the rest than if they were of another Diocese III. But I come to the point intended That they take from the Presbyter his essential Obligation and Authority appeareth 1. In general they commonly affirm that the Governing power belongeth not to them and that they are but the Bishops Curates By which they mean not only that the Bishops rule them but they say that the Bishop doth Teach all his Diocese per alios even by these his Curates And accordingly they have lately blotted out of their Litany Bishops Pastors and Ministers of the Church and have substituted Bishops Priests and Deacons lest the Priests should be supposed Pastors But they altered not the Collect for all Bishops and Curates And they have put out of the Office for Ordination of Priests Act. 20. 28. Now what a Presbyter doth in the person of the Bishop
the true Church or godly people while the Walls were adorned as if Christ had come from Heaven more for Walls than Souls c. of which before In a word nothing is more evident than that true Discipline was shut out at the times and in the degrees as Diocesses were enlarged and that in Aâ—rick and other places where the Churches or Diocesses were more small and numerous discipline was best preserved II. The second sort of experience is that of almost all the Reformed Churches who have found the Pastoral work and Discipline particularly to be so great as that less than all the Parish Ministers concurring could not perform it 1. Those Churches which with Calvin set up Presbytery exclude no Pastor from the Governing part but took in Elders of the people to help them because experience had told them that all the Ministers were too few what then would one Bishop and Chancellour or Vicar have been able to do 2. The Lutherans who set up superintendants commonly so set them over the Pastors as not to take away the true Pastoral power of governing their particular flocks as finding by experience that the old way of Prelacy would not do it And usually they join Magistrates with them as they also in the Palatinate did And it is such an oderate supriority which is exercised in Hungary Transilvania and in Poland till the Papists rooted them out thence 3. The Helvetian Divines exercise a certain measure of power in keeping the unfit from the Sacrament but not what they judge to be the Churches duty because the Magistrate never would consent That the Pastors are for it as needful to the right ordering of the Churches you may see in Polani Syntag. at large and in most of their Divines of Basil Bern Zurich c. I will now only cite the honest hearty words of Musculus above 100 years ago because he was a man most clear and candid and that did mancipate his judgment neither to Luther Calvin nor any party as such but took liberty to differ from them all as in the points of Redemption perseverance c. At Bern in his Loci Commun ed. 1567. p. 421 He proveth Bishops and Presbyters and Doctors and Pastors to be all one And p. 422. that in the Apostolick Primitive Church they governed the Church in common being subject to no head or president But after the Apostles daies as Hierome saith to avoid schism but as he thinketh more out of a desire of Majority one got the name and presidency of a Bishop But saith he whether this counsel did profit the Church or not by which such Bishops were introduced as Hierome saith by custome rather than by truth of divine disposition to be above the Presbyters it hath been better manifested to after ages than when this custome was first brought in which we must thank for all the insolency wealth and tyranny of the Principal and Equestral Bishops yea for the corruption of all the Churches which if Hierome had seen undoubtedly he would have known that it was the devise not of the Spirit of God to take away schisms as was pretended but of Satan himself to lay waste and destroy the ancient Ministers for feeding the Lords flock whereby it might come to pass that the Church might have not true Pastors Doctors Presbyters and Bishops but under the masks of those names idle-bellies and magnisick Princes who will not only not themselves feed the people of God with sound Apostolick Doctrine but also take care by most wicked violence that it be done by no one else By this devise of Satan it is brought to pass that instead of Bishops the Churches have potent Lords and Princes for the most chosen out of the order of Nobles and great men who being upheld by their own and their kindreds power may domineer over the flock of God as they list And p. 423. The office appointed to the Bishops that came after the Apostles times was to preach to the people to adminster the sacred things to prescribe repentance to take the care of the clergy and the people both in City and Country to ordain to visit to take care that the goods of the Church be rightly kept and dispensed and to take the patronage of Church-matters with Princes And if the Bishops had but staid here it had been better with the Church Or if the Prelates and Pastors of our times would return to these Canonical Rules there might be hope that the Eccleasiastical State and order might possibly be reformed and the controversies of these times might be ended by the word of God Hence it is plain that the office of true Presbyters and Bishops in the Church of Christ is to feed the Lords flock with sound Doctrine and to be truly Pastors and Teachers But now the false Bishops pretend a Pastoral Cure when going to the Assembly-Offices they are as they take it Episcopally cloathed They put on a white stole longer than ordinary with a girdle not such as John Baptist wore c. The maskd Pastor thus dressed doth not feed the flock of God but performeth the Church service in such a gesture Ceremony and dralect that all the matters of the Church may be nothing else than certaine vaine and pompous shewes so that if one of the Apostles were there he would never so much as dreame that this were the Episcopal feeding of the Lords flock Thus the Bishop doing once or twice a year doth Suffciently performe his Office what ever he do the rest of the time The ordination of Ministers and other things accounted Ecclesiastical he committeth partly to his suffiragane and partly to his Vicar or Chancellor The office of Teaching he committeth to some Doctor or Monk so sworne as that he shall not dare to speake a word or hisse besides what is prescribed him in the formes of Lawes Thus far I confess he speakes of the Popish Bishops But who would believe he meant not ours that had seen them And how little do they differ Well you shall next hear him speak of Protestant Bishops Pag. 425 Let us now come to other Ministers Pastors and Bishops divers from these who do nothing in the Church of Christ but Preach and teach They have certaine daies of the weeke on which they Preach And that is well They Preach only out of the holy Scriptures And that well too But this is not well that very many of them speak formally and coldly and not from the heart so that what Seneca somewhere saith agreeth to them Animum non faciunt quia animum non habent They make not men hearty or serious because they are not so themselves And that of the Roman Orator thou wouldst never talk thus if thou speakest from the heart Nor do they accommodate the word of God to the Hearers by pertinent and profitable distribution but they think they have well performed their office if they have any how spoken out the hour In the