thus related In quem alium crediderunt Gentes universae nisi in ipsum qui jam venit Cui enim alii Gentes crediderunt Parthi Medi Elamitae qui habitant Mesopotamiam Armeniam Phrygiam immorantes Aegyptum regionem Africae quae est trans Cyrenem Romani incolae tunt in Hierusalem Iudei Gentes caeterae ut jam Getulonum varietates Maurorum nulli fines Hispanarum omnes termini Galliarum diversae Nationes Britanorum inaccessa loca Romanis Christo vero subdita Sarmatarum Dacorum Germanorum Seytharum abditarum multarum Gentium Provinciarum Insâ—larum multarum nobis ignotarum quae enumerare non possumus in quibus omnibus locis Christi nomen qui jam venit regnaâ— ad Iudaeos Some have sayd and doe yet say that the Church in this sence is a Visible Organicall Politicall body That its visible is confessed both its matter and farme bespeakes visibility as an unseparable Adjunct of its subsisting That it is a body also in the generall sence wherein that word is used or a society of men embodyed by the profession of the same Faith is also granted Organicall in this businesse is an ambiguous terme The use of it is plainly Metaphoricall taken from the members instruments and Organs of a naturall body Because Paul hath said that in one body there are many members as eyes feet hands yet the body is but one so is the Church It hath been usually said that the Church is an Organicall body What Church Paul speakes of in that place is not evident but what he alludes unto is The difference he speaks of in the individuall persons of the Church is not in respect of Office Power and Authority but gifts or graces and usefullnesse on that account such an Organical body we confesse the Church Catholick visible to be in it are persons indued with varietie of gifts and graces for the benefit and ornament of the whole An Organicall Politicall body is a thing of another nature a Politick body or Common-wealth is a Society of a certain portion of mankind united under some forme of Rule or government whose supreame and subordinate administration is committed to severall persons according to the Tenor of such Laws and Customes as that Society hath or doth consent unto This also is said to be Organicall on a Metaphoricall account because the Officers and Members that are in it and over it hold proportion to the more noble parts of the body Kings are said to be Heads Councellors 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to the constitution of such a Common-wealth distâ—â—ctly as such it is required that the whole hath the same Laws but not that only Two Nations most distinct and different on the account of other ends and interests may yet have the same individuall Laws and customes for the distribution of Justice and preservation of peace among themselves An entire forme of Regiment and government peculiar thereunto is required for the constitution of a distinct Politicall Body In this sence we denie the Church whereof we speake to be an Organicall Politicall Body as not having indeed any of the requisites thereunto Not one Law of Order the same individuall Morall Law or Law for Morall duties it hath but a Law given to the whole as such for Order Polity Rule it hath not All the members of it are obliged to the same Law of Order and Polity in their severall Societies But the whole as such hath no such Law it hath no such head or Governour as such Nor will it suffice to say that Christ is its head for if as a visible Politicall body â—t hath a Politicall Head that Head also must be visible The Commonweal of the Jews was a Politicall body of this God was the Head and King hence their Historian saith their Government was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and when they would choose a King God said they rejected him who was their politicall Head to whom a sickle was paid yearly as Tribute called the sickle of the Sanctuary Now they rejected him not by asking a King simply but a King after the manner of the Nations yet that it might be a visible Politicall Body it required a visible supreame Magistrate to the wholeâ—… which when there was none all Polity was dissolved amongst them Judg. 21. Christ is the head of every particular Church its Lawgiver and Ruler but yet to make a Church a visible Organicall Politicall Body it 's required that it hath visible Governours Rulers and of the whole Nor can it be said that it is a Politicall body that hath a supreame Government Order in it as it is made up and Constituted of particular Churches and that in the Representatives convened doth the supream visible power of it consist for such a Convention in the judgement of all ought to be Extraordinary only in ours is utterly impossible and de facto was not among the Churches for 300 years yea never besides the visible Catholick Church is not made up of particular Churches as such for if so then no man can be member of it but by vertue of his being a Member of some visible Church which is false profession of the Truth as before stated is the formall Reason and Cause of any Persons Relation to the Church visible which he hath thereby whether he belong to any particular Church or no. Let it be evidenced that the Universall Church whereof we speake hath any Law or Rule of Order and Government as such given unto it or that it is in possibility as such to put any such Law or Rule into execution that it hath any homogeneous Ruler or Rulers that have the care of the Administration of the Rule and Government of the whole as such committed to him or them by Jesus Christ that as it hath the same common spirituall and known Orders and Interests and the same Specificall Ecclesiasticall Rule given to all its Members so it hath the same Politicall interest Order and Conversation as such or that it hath any one cause constitutive of a Politicall Body whereby it is such or hath at all the forme of an Instituted Church or is capable of any such forme and they that doe so shall be farther attended to CHAP. VI. Romanists charge of Schisme on the account of separation from the Church Catholick proposed to consideration The importance of this plea on both sides The summe of their charge The Church of Rome not the Church Catholick Not a Church in any sence Of Antichrist in the Temple The Catholick Church how intrusted with interpretation of Scripture Of intepretation of Scripture by Tradition The interest of the Romane Church herein discharged All necessary truths believed by Protestants No contrary principle by them manifested Profane persons no members of the Church Catholick Of the late Romane Proselyts Of the Donatists Their businesse reported and case stated The Present
by his labours in that cause this is acknowledged to be so Believers saith he in great Cityes were not at first divided into Parishes whilst the number of Christians was so small that they might well assemble in the same place Ham Vind. p. 16. Of the Believers of one City meeting in one place being one Church we have the like grant p. 18. In this particular Church He sayes there was one Bishop which had the Rule of it and of the Believers in the villages adjacent to that City which as it sometimes was not so Rom. 16. 1 2. so for the most part it seemed to have been the case and distinct Churches upon the growth of the number of Believers were to be erected in severall places of the Voisinage And this is the state of a particular instituted Church which we plead for Whether in processe of time believers multiplying those who had been of one Church met in severall Assemblies by a setled distribution of them to celebrate the same Ordinances specifically and so made many Churches or met in severall places in parties still continuing one body and were governed in common by the Elders whom they increased and multiplied in proportion to the increase of believers or whether that one or more Officers Elders or Bishops of that first single Congregation taking on him or them the care of those inhabiting the City wherein the Church was first planted designed and sent some fitted for that purpose upon their desire choice or otherwise to the severall lesser companies of the Region adjacent which in processe of time became dependent on subject to the Officer and Officers of that first Church from whence they came forth I dispute not I am satisfied that the first plantation of Churches was as hath been pleaded And I know what was done afterwards on the one hand or the other must be examined as to our concernment by what ought to have been done But of those things afterwards Now according to the course of procedure hitherto insisted on a Declaration of the Vnity of the Church in this sense what it is wherein it doth consist with what it is to be guilty of the breach of that Unity must ensue and this shall be done after I have premised some few things previously necessary thereunto I say then 1. A man may be a member of the Catholick Church of Christ be united to him by the inhabitation of his Spirit and participation of his life from him who upon the account of some providentiall hinderance is never joyned to any particular Congregation for the participation of Ordinances all his daies 2. In like manner may he be a member of the Church considered as professing visibly Seeing that he may doe all that is of him required thereunto without any such conjunction to a visible particular Church But yet 3. I willingly grant that every believer is obliged as in a part of his duty to joyne himselfe to some one of those Churches of Christ that therein he may abide in Doctrine and Fellowship and breaking of Bread and Prayer according to the order of the Gospell if he have advantage and opportunity so to doe for 1. There are some duties incumbent on us which cannot possibly be performed but on a supposition of this duty previously required and submitted unto Math. 18. 15 16 17. 2. There are some Ordinances of Christ appointed for the good and benefit of those that believe which they can never be made partakers of if not related to some such society As publick Admonition Excommunication Participation of the Sacraments of the Lords Supper 3 The care that Jesus Christ hath taken that all things be well ordered in these Churches giving no direction for the performance of any duty of worship meerly and purely of soveraigne Institution but only in them and by them who are so joyned sufficiently evidence his mind and our duty herein Rev. 2. 7. 11. 29. Rev. 3. 6. 7. 12. 1 Cor. 11. 4. The gathering planting and setling of such Churches by the Apostles with the care they took in bringing them to perfection leaving none whom they converted out of that Order where it was possible for them to be reduced unto it is of the same importance Act. 14. 23. Tit. 1. 5. 5. Christs institution of Officers for them Eph. 4. 11. 1 Cor. 11. 28. calling such a Church his Body v. 29. exactly assigning to every one his duty in such Societies in respect of the place he held in them with his care for their preservation from confusion and for Order evinces from whom they are and what is our duty in reference unto them 6. The judging and condemning them by the Holy Ghost as disorderly blameable persons who are to be avoided who walk not according to the Rules and Order appointed in these Churches his care that those Churches be not scandalized or offended with innumerable other considerations evince their institution to be from Heaven not of men or any prudentiall considerations of them whatever That there is an instituted worship of God to be continued under the New Testam untill the second coming of Christ I suppose needs not much proofe With those with whom it hath soe I am not now treating and must not make it my businesse to give it evidence by the innumerable Testimonies which might be alleadged to that purpose That for the whole of his worship matter or manner or any part of it God hath changed his way of proceeding and will now allow the will and Prudence of Man to be the measure and rule of his Honour and Glory therein contrary to what he did or would allow under the Law is so prejudiciall to the perfection of the Gospell infinite Wisdome and All-sufficiency of Christ and so destructive to the whole obligation of the second Commandement having no ground in the Scripture but being built meerly on the conceit of men suited to one carnall interest or other I shall unwillingly debate it That as to this particular under consideration there were particular Churches instituted by the Authority of Jesus Christ owned and approved by him that Officers for them were of his appointment and furnished with gifts from him for the Execution of their employment that Rules Cautions and Instructions for the due settlement of those Churches were given by him that these Churches were made the only seat of that worship which in particular he expressed his will to have continued untill he came is of so much light in Scripture that he must wink hard that will not see it That either he did not originally appoint these things or he did not give out the gifts of his Spirit in reference to the right ordering of them and exalting of his Glory in them or that having done so then yet that his institutions have an end being only for a season and that it may be known when the efficacy of any
amongst themselves for love is the bond of perfectnesse Col. 3. 14. Hence then it appears what is the Vnion of such a Church and what is the communion to be observed therein by the appointment of Jesus Christ The joynt consent of all the members of it in obedience to the command of Christ from a principle of Love to walk together in the universall celebration of all the Ordinances of the worship of God instituted and appointed to be celebrated in such a Church and to performe all the duties and offices of Love which in reference to one another in their respective stations and places are by God required of them and doing so accordingly See Phil. 2. 1 2 3. cap. 4. 1 2 3. 1 Cor 1. 10. 2 Cor. 13. 11. Rom. 15. 5. Whereas there are in these Churches some Rulers some Ruled some eyes some hands in this Body some parts visibly comely some uncomely upon the account of that variety of gifts and graces which is distributed to them in the performance of duties regard is to be had to all the particular Rules that are given with respect to men in their severall places and distributions Herein doth the Vnion of a particular Church consist herein have the members of it communion among themselves and with the whole 4. I shall farther grant and adde hereunto Over and above the Vnion that is between thâ— members of severall particular Churches by vertue of their interest in the Church Catholick which draws after it a necessity of the occasionall exercise of duties of Love one towards another and that Communion they have as members of the generall Church visible in the profession of the Faith once delivered unto the Saints There is a Communion also to be observed between these Churches as such which is sometimes or may be exerted in their Assemblies by their Delegates for declaring the sense and determining things of joynt concernment unto them Whether there ought to be an ordinary combination of the Officers of these Churches invested with the Power for the disposall of things Persons that concerne one or more of them in severall subordinations by the institution of Christ as it is not my judgement that so there is so it belongs not unto my present undertaking at all to debate That which alone remaines to be done is to consider what is our concernment as to the breach of this Vnion which we professe to be appointed by Jesus Christ and that both as we are Protestants as also farther differenced according to the intimations given at the entrance of this Discourse What hath already been delivered about the nature of Schisme and the Scripture Notion of it might well suffice as to our Vindication in this businesse from any charge that we are or seem obnoxious unto But because I have noâ— reason to suppose that some men will be so favourable unto us as to take paines for the improvement of principles though in themselves clearely evinced on our behalfe The application of them to some present cases with the removall of objections that lye against my intendment must be farther added Some things there are which upon what hath been spoken I shall assume and suppose as granted in Thesi untill I see them otherwise disproved then as yet I have done Of these the first is That the departing or secession of any man or men from any particular Church as to that communion which is peculiar to such a Church which he or they have had therewith is no where called Schisme nor is so in the nature of the thing it selfe as the generall signification of the word is restrained by its Scripture use but is a thing to be judged receive a little according to the causes and circumstances of it 2. One Churches refusing to hold that communion with another which ought to be between them is not Schisme properly so called 3. The departure of any man or men from the Society or Communion of any Church whatever so it be done without strife variance judging and condemning of others because according to the light of their Consciences they cannot in all things in them worship God according to his minde cannot be rendred evill but from circumstances taken from the persons so doing or the way and manner whereby and wherein they doe it Unto these I adde that if any one can shew and evince that we have departed from and left the communion of any particular Church of Christ with which we ought to walke according to the order above mentioned or have disturbed and broken the Order and Vnion of Christs Institution wherein we are or were inwrapped we put our selves on the mercy of our judges The Consideration of what is the charge on any of us on this account was the first thing aymed at in this Discourse and as it was necessary from the Rules of the method wherein I have proceeded comes now in the last place to be put to the issue and triall which it shall in the Next Chapter CHAP. VIII Of the Church of England The charge of Schisme in the name thereof Proposed and considered Severall considerations of the Church of England In what sence we were members of it Of Anabaptisme The subjection due to Bishops Their power examined It s orginall in this Nation Of the Ministeriall power of Bishops It s present continuance Of the Church of England what it is It s description Forme peculiar and constitutive Answer to the charge of Schisme on separation from it in its Episcopall constitution How and by what means it was taken away Things necessary to the constitution of such a Church proposed and offered to proofe The second way of constituting a nationall Church Considered Principles agreed on and consented unto between the parties at variance on this account Judgement of Amiraldus in this case Inferences from the common principles before consented unto The case of Schisme in reference to a Nationall Church in the last sense debated Of particular Churches and separation from them On what accounts Justifiable No necessity of joyning to this or that Separation from some so called required Of the Church of Corinth The duty of its members Austins Judgement of the practice of Elijah The last objection waved Inferences upon the whole THat which first presents it selfe is a plea against us in the name of the Church of England and those intrusted with the Reiglment thereof as it was setled and established some yeares since the summe whereof if I mistake not amounts to thus much You were sometimes members and Children of the Church of England lived in the communion thereof professing obedience thereunto according to its Rules and Canons you were in an orderly subjection to the Arcsh-Bishops Bishops and those acting under them in the Hierarchie who were officers of that Church in that Church you were baptized and joyned in the outward worship celebrated therein but you have now voluntarily
out of it like Pauls Mariners out of the ship when the storme grew hazardous It being the duty of all the members of such a Church untainted with the evills and corruptions of it upon many accounts to attempt and labour the remedie of those disorders and rejection of these abuses to the uttermost which was that which Paul advised the Corinthians all and some unto in obedience whereunto they were recovered But yet this I say had the Church of Corinth continued in the condition before prescribed that notorious scandalous sinnes had went unpublished unreproved drunkennesse continued and practised in the Assemblies men abiding by the denyall of the Resurrection so overturning the whole Gospell and the Church refusing to do her duty and exercise her Authority to cast all those disorderly persons upon their obstinacy out of her communion It had been the duty of every Saint of God in that Church to have withdrawn from it to come out from among them and not to have been partaker of their sinnes unlesse they were willing to partake of their plague also which on such an Apostacy would certainly ensue I confesse Austin in his single booke against the Donatists post collationem cap. 20. affirmes that Elijah and Elisha communicated with the Israelites in their worship when they were so corrupted as in their dayes and separated not from their Sacraments as he calls them but only withdrew sometimes for feare of persecution a mistake unworthy so great and wise a person as he was The publick worship of those 10 Tribes in the dayes of those Prophets was Idolatrous erected by Jeroboam confirmed by a Law by Omri and continued by Ahab That the Prophets joyned with them in it is not to be imagined But earnestnesse of desire for the attaining of any end sometimes leaves no roome for the examination of the Medium's offering their service to that purpose Let us now see the sum of the whole matter and what it is that we plead for our discharge as to this crime of Schisme allowing the Terme to passe in its large and usuall acceptation receding for the sake of the Truths farther ventilation from the precise propriety of the word annexed to it in the Scripture The summe is we have broken no bond of Vnity no order instituted or appointed by Jesus Christ have causelessly deserted no station that ever we were in according to his mind which alone can give countenance to an accusation of this Nature That on pure grounds of conscience we have withdrawn or doe withhold our selves from partaking in some wayes engaged into upon meer grounds of Prudence we acknowledge And thus from what hath been said it appeares in what a faire capacity notwithstanding any principle or practice owned by us we are to live peaceably and to exercise all fruits of Love towards those who are otherwise minded There is not the least necessity on us may we be permitted to serve God according to our light for the acquitting our selves from the charge which hath made such a noise in the world to charge other men with their failings great or small in or about the ways and worship of God This only is incumbent on us that we manifest that we have broken no bond no obligation or tye to communion which lay upon us by the will appointment of Jesus Christ our Lord and Master what is prudentially to be done in such a Nation as this in such a time as this as to the worship of God we will treate with men at farther leisure and when we are lawfully called thereto It may be some will yet say because it hath been often said there is difference between reforming of Churches already gathered and raised and raising of Churches out of meer materialls The first may be allowed but the latter tends to all manner of Confusion I have at present not much to say to this objection because as I conceive it concernes not the businesse we have in hand Nor would I have mentioned it at all but that it s insisted on by some on every turne whether suited for the particular cause for which it is produced or no. In briefe then 1. I know no other reformation of any Church or any thing in a Church but the reducing of it to its primitive Institution and the order allotted to it by Jesus Christ If any plead for any other Reformation of Churches they are in my judgement to blame And when any society or Combination of men whatever hitherto it hath been esteemed is not capable of such a Reduction and Renovation I suppose I shall not provoke any wise and sober person if I professes I cannot look on such a society as a Church of Christ and thereupon advise those therein who have a due right to the priviledges purchased for them by Christ as to Gospell Administrations to take some other peaceable course to make themselves partakers of them 2. Were I fully to handle the things pointed to in this Objection I must mannage Principles which in this Discourse I have not been occasioned to draw forth at all or to improve Many things of great weight and importance must come under debate and consideration before a cleare account can be given of the case stated in this Objection as 1. The true nature of an instituted Church under the Gospell as to the matter forme and all other necessary constitutive causes is to be investigated and found out 2. The nature and forme of such a Church is to be exemplifyed from the Scripture and the stories of the first Churches before sensibly infested with the poyson of that Apostacy which ensued 3. The extent of the Apostacy under Antichrist as to the ruining of instituted Churches making them to be Babylon and their worship Fornication is duely and carefully to be examined Hic labor Hoc opus Here lyes our disorder and division hence is our darknesse and pollution of our garments which is not an easy thing to free our selves of though we may arise yet we shall not speedily shake our selves out of the dust 4. By what way and meanes God begat anew and kept alive his Elect in their severall Generations when Antichristian darknesse covered the Earth and thick darknesse the Nations supposing an intercision of instituted Ordinances so farre as to make a nullity in them as to what was of simple and pure Institution what way might be used for the fixing the Tabernacle of God againe with men and the setting up of Church worship according to his minde and will And here the famous case of the united Brethren of Bohemia would come under consideration who concluding the whole Papacy to be purely Antichristian could not allow of the Ordination of their Ministers by any in communion with it and yet being perswaded of a necessity of continuing of that Ordinance in a way of succession sent some to the Greek and Armenian Churches who observing
latter sence also The plea about Metropoliticall Churches I suppose will be thought very impertinent to what I have now in hand so it shall not at present be insisted on That the state of Churches in after Ages was moulded and framed after the patterne of the civill Goverment of the Roman Empire is granted And that conformity without offence to any be it spoken we take to be a fruit of the working of the mystery of Iniquity But that there was any such order instituted in the Churches of Christ by the Apostles or any instituted by the Authority from the Lord and Ruler is utterly denyed nor is any thing but very uncertaine conjectures from the sayings of men of after Ages produced to attest any such order or constitution When the order spirituality beauty and glory of the Church of Christ shall returne and men obteine a light whereby they are able to discerne a beauty and excellency in the inward more noble spirituall part indeed life and soul of the worship of God these disputes will have an issue Chrysostome sayes indeed that Corinth was the Metropolis of Achaia but in what sence he sayes not the Politicall is granted the Ecclesiasticall not proved nor are we enquiring what was the state of the Churches of Christ in the dayes of Chrysostome but of Paul But to returne If any one now shall say will you conclude because this evill mentioned by the Apostle is Schisme therefore nothing else is so I Answer that having before asserted this to be the chiefe and only seat of the Doctrine of Schisme I am inclinable so to do and this I am resolved of that unlesse any man can prove that something else is termed schisme by some divine writer or blamed on that head of account by the Holy Ghost elsewhere and is expressly reproved aâ— another crime I will be at Liberty from admitting it so to be But yet for what may hence by a parity of Reason be deduced I shall close with and debate at large as I have professed The Schisme then here described by the Apostle and blamed by him consists in causelesse differences and contentions amongst the members of a particular Church contrary to that of love prudence and forbearance which are required of them to be exercised amongst themselves and towards one another which is also termed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Act. 15. 21. and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rom. 16. 13. And he is a Schismatick that is guilty of this sinne of Schisme that is who raiseth or entertained or persisteth in such differences nor are these termes used by the Divine writers in any other sence That any men may fall under this guilt it is required 1. That they be members of or belong to some one Church which is soe by the institution and appointment of Jesus Christ And we shall see that there is more required hereunto then the bare being a Believer or a Christian 2. That they either raise or entertaine and persist in causelesse differences with others of that Church more or lesse to the interruption of that Exercise of love in all the fruits of it which ought to be amongst them and the disturbance of the due performance of the duties required of the Church in the worship of God As Clement in the forementioned Epistle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 3. That these differences be occasioned by and do belong to some things in a remoter or nearer distance appertaining to the worship of God their differences on a Civill account are elsewhere mentioned and reproved 1 Ep. cap. 6. for therein also there was from the then state of things an 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 v. 7. This is that Crime which the Apostle rebukes blames condemnes under the name of Schisme and tells them that were guilty of it that they shewed themselves to be carnall or to have indulged to the flesh and the corrupt principle of selfe and their own wills which should have been subdued to the obedience of the Gospell Mens definitions of things are for the most part Arbitrary and loose fitted and suited to their severall apprehensions of Principles and conclusions so that nothing cleare or fixed is generally to be expected from them from the Romanists description of Schisme who violently without the least colour or pretence thrust in the Pope and his Head ship into all that they affirme in Church matters least of all I can allow men that they may extend their definitions of things unto what they apprehend of an alike nature to that which gives rise to the whole disquisition and is the first thing defin'd But at this I must professe my selfe to be somewhat entangled that I could never yet meet with a definition of Schisme that did comprize that was not exclusive of that which alone in the Scripture is affirmed so to be Austins Definition contains the summe of what hath since been insisted on saith He Schisma ni fallor est eadem opinantem eodem ritu utentem solo Congregationis delectari dissidio Gâ—n Faust lib. 20. cap. 3. by dissidium congregationis he intends separation from the Church into a peculiar Congregation a definition directly suited to the cause he had in hand and was pleading against the Donatists Basil in Epist ad Amphiloch Con. 44. distiguisheth between 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and as he makes Schisme to be a division arising from some Church controversies suitable to what those dayes experienced and in the substance true so he tells us that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is when either Presbyters or Bishops or Laicks hold unlawfull meetings Assemblyes or Conventicles which was not long since with us the only Schisme Since those days Schisme in generall hath passed for a causelesse separation from the communion and worship of any true Church of Christ the Catholick Church saith the Papist with a relinquishment of its society as to a joynt celebration of the ordinances of the Gospell how farre this may passe for Schisme and what may be granted in this description of it the processe of our discourse will declare In the mean time I am most certain that a Separation from some Churches true or pretended so to be is commanded in the Scriptures so that the withdrawing from or relinquishment of any Church or society whatever upon the plea of its corruption be it true or false with a mind and resolution to serve God in the due observation of Church institutions according to that light which men have received is no where called Schisme or condemned as a thing of that nature but is a matter that must be tryed out whether it be good or evill by vertue of such generall rules and directions as are given us in the Scriptures for our orderly and blamelesse walking with God in all his wayes As for them who suppose all Church power to be invested in some certain Church Officers originally I meane that
which they call of Jurisdiction who on that account are Eminenter the Church the union of the whole consisting in a subjection to those Officers according to Rules Orders and Canons of their appointment whereby they are necessitated to state the businesse of Schisme on the rejection of their Power and Authority I shall speak to them afterwards at large For the present I must take leave to say that I look upon the whole of such a fabrick as a product of prudence and necessity I cannot but feare least some mens surmisings may prompt them to say that the evill of Schisme is thus stated in a compliance with that and them which before we blamed and seemes to serve to raise sleight and contemptible thoughts of it so that men need not be shaken though justly charged with it But besides that sufficient testimony which I have to the contrary that will abundantly shelter me from this Accusation by an assurance that I have not the lea◠aime 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I shall farther add my apprehension of the greatnesse of the evill of this sinne if I may first be borne with a little in declaring what usuall aggravations of it I do either not understand or else cannot assent unto Those who say it is a renting of the seamelesse coat of Christ in which Metaphoricall expression men have wonderfully pleased themselves seem to have mistaken their ayme and instead of an Aggravation of its evill by that Figure of Speech to have extenuated it A rent of the Body well compacted is not heightned to any ones apprehension in its being called the renting of a seamelesse coat But men may be indulged the use of the most improper and groundlesse expressions so they place no power of Argument in them whilest they find them moving their own and suppose them to have an alike efficacy upon the affections of others I can scarce think that any ever supposed that the coate of Christ was a Type of his Church his Church being cloathed with Him not He with it And therefore with commendation of his Successe who first invented that Allusion I leave it in the possession of them who want better arguments to evince the evill of this sinne It is most usually said to be a sinne against Charity as Heresie is against Faith Heresie is a sinne against Faith if I may so speake both as it is taken for the doctrine of Faith which is to be believed and the assent of the mind whereby we doe believe He that is a Heretick I speake of him in the usuall acception of the word and the sence of them who make this comparison in neither of which I am satisfied rejects the doctrine of faith and denyes all assen◠unto it Indeed he doth the former by doing the latter But is Schisme so a sinne against Charity doth it supplant and root out Love out of the heart is it an affection of the minde attended with an inconsistency therewith I much question it The Apostle tells us that love is the bond of perfection Col. 3. 14. because in the severall and various waies whereby it exerts it self it maintaines and preserves notwithstanding all hinderances and opposition◠that perfect and beautifull order which Christ hath appointed amongst his Saints wherein men by Schisme are kept off and withheld from the performance of any of those offices and duties of love which are usefull or necessary for the preservation of the bond of perfection then is it or may in some sence be said to be a sinne against Love Those who have seemed to aime nearest the apprehension of the true nature of it in these days have described it to be an open breach of Love or Charity That that expression is warily to be understood is evident in the light of this single consideration It is possible for a man to be all and doe all that those were and did whom the Apostle judges for Schismaticks under the power of some violent temptation and yet have his heart full of love to the Saints of the Communion disturbed by him It is thus far then in its own nature a breach of Love in that in such men Love cannot exert it selfe in its utmost tendency in wisedome and forbearance for the preservation of the perfect order instituted by Christ in his Church However I shall freely say that the Schoolmens notion of it who insist on this as its nature that it is a sinne against Charity as Heresie is against Faith is fond and becomming them and so will others also shall be pleased to that consider what they intend by Charity Some say It is a Rebellion against the Church that is the Rulers and Officers of the Church I doubt not but that there must be either a neglect in the Church in the performance of its duty or of the Authority of it in so doing wherever there is any Schisme though the discovery of this also have innumerable intanglements attending it But that to refuse the Authority of the Church is to rebell against the Rulers or Guides of it will receive farther light then what it hath done when once a pregnant instance is produced not where the Church signifies the Officers of it but where it doth not signifie the body of the Congregation in contradistinction from them or comprising them therein Adde unto these those who dispute whether Schismaticks doe belong to the Church or no conclude in the Negative seeing according to the discovery already made it is impossible a man should be a Schismatick unlesse he be a Church member Other crimes a man may be guilty of on other accounts of Schisme only in a Church What is the formal reason of any mans Relation to a Church in what sence soever that word is used must be afterwards at large discussed But now this foundation being laid that Schisme is a causelesse difference or division amongst the members of any particular Church that meet together or ought so to do for the worship of God and celebration of the same numericall Ordinances to the disturbance of the order appointed by Jesus Christ contrary to that exercise of love in wisedome and mutuall forbearance which is required of them it will be easy to see wherein the iniquity of it doth consist and upon what consederations its Aggravations doe arise It is evidently a despising of the Authority of Jesus Christ the great soveraigne Lord and head of the Church How often hath he commanded us to forbeare one another to forgive one another to have peace among our selves that we may be known to be his Disciples to beare with them that are in any thing contrary minded to our selves To give light to this consideration let that which at any time is the cause of such hatefull divisions rendred as considerable as the prejudices and most importune Affections of men can represent it to be be brought to the Rule of Love and
However let them at this day silence the Jesuits and Dominicans especially the Baijans and the Jansenians on the one part and the Molinists on the other Take off the Gallican Church from its Schismaticall refusall of the Councell of Trent Cause the King of Spaine to quit his claime to Sicilie that they need not Excommunicate him every yeare compell the Commonwealth of Venice to receive the Jesuits stop the mouths of the Sorbonists about the Authority of a generall Councell above the Pope and of all those whom opposing the Papall omnipotency they call Politicians quiet the contest of the Franciscans and Dominicans about the Blessed Virgin burne Bellarmines books who almost on every Controversy of Ch. Religion gives an account of their intestine divisions branding some of their opinions as haereticall as that of Medina about Bishops and Presbyters some as Idolatricall as that of Thomas about the worship of the Crosse with latria c. and they may give a better colour to their pretences then any as yet it wears But what need I insist upon this supposition when I am not more certaine that there is any instituted Church in the World owned by Christ as such then I am that the Church of Rome is none properly so called Nor shall I be thought singular in this perswasion if it be duely conâ—idered what this amounts unto Some Learned men of latter daies in this Nation pleading in the justification of the Church of England as to her departure from Rome did grant that the Church of Rome doth not erre in Fundamentalls or maintained no errors remedilesly pernitious and destructive of Salvation How farre they entangled themselves by this concession I argue not The foundation of it lyes in this cleer truth that no Church what ever universall or particular can possibly erre in Fundamentalls for by so doing it would cease to be a Church My denying then the Synogogue of Rome to be a Church according to their principles amounts to no more then this The Papistâ— maintaine in their publique Confessions fundamentall errors in which Assertion it s known I am not alone But this is not the principle at least not the sole nor maine principle whereon I ground my judgement in this case but this that there was never any such thing in any tolerable likenesse or similitude as that which is called the Church of Rome allowing the most skillfull of its Rabbies to give in the Characters and delineations of it instituted in reference to the worship of God by Jesus Christ The truth is the whole of it is but an imitation exemplar of the old Imperiall Goverment one is set up in chiefe and made 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Spiritualls as the Emperors were in civill things from him all power flowes to others and as there was a communication of power by the Emperors to the Civill state Praefects Proconsulls Vicars Presidents Governours of the lesser and greater Nations with those under them in various civill subordinations according to the dignity of the places where they did beare rule and preside and ni the military to Generalls Legates Tribun's and the inferior Officers so is there by the Pope to Patriarchs Arch-bishops Bishops in their severall subordinations which are as his civil state and to Generalls of Religious orders Provincialls and their dependants which are as his military And it is by some not in all things agreeing with them confessed that the Goverment pleaded for by them in the Church was brought in and established in correspondency and accommodation to the civill Goverment of the Empire which is undeniably evident and certaine now this being not throughly done till the Empire had received an incurable wound it seemes to me to be the making of an image to the beast giving life to it and causing iâ—to speake So that the present Roman Church is nothing else but an image or similitude of the Roman Empire set up in its declining among and over the same persons in succession by the craft of Sathan through principles of deceit subtilty and Spirituall wickednesse as the other was by force and violence for the same ends of power dominion fleshlinesse and persecution with the former The exactnesse of this correspondency in all things both in respect of those who claime to be the stated body of his Ecclesiasticall Commonwealth and those who are meerly dependent on his will bound unto him professedly by a military Sacrament exempted from the ordinary Rules and Goverment of his fixed Rulers in their severall subordinationâ— under Officers of their own immediately commissionated by him with his mannagement of both those parties to ballance and keep them mutually in quiet and in order for his service especially confiding in his men of warre like the Emperors of old may elsewhere be farther manifested I suppose it will not be needfull to adde any thing to evince the vanity of the pretensions of the Romanists or others against all or any of us on the account of Schisme upon a grant of the principles layd down it lyes so cleare in them without need of farther deduction and I speake with some confidence that I am not in expectation of any hasty confutation of them I meane that which is so indeed The earnestnesse of their clamours importuning us to take notice of them by the way before I enter upon a direct debate of the cause as it stands stated in reference to them I shall only tell them that seeking to repose our consciences in the minde of God revealed in the Scriptures we are not at all concerned in the noise they make in the world For what have we done wherein doth our guilt consist wherein lyes the peculiar concernment of these 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 let them goe to the Churches with whom we walke of whom we are and aske of them concerning our wayes our Love and the duties of it Doe we live in strife and variance Do we not beare with each other doe we not worship God without disputes and divisions have we differences and contentions in our Assemblies doe we break any bond of Union wherein we are bound by the expresse institutions of Jesus Christ if we have let the righteous reprove us we will own our guilt confesse we have been carnall and endeavour Reformation If not what have the Romanists Italians to doe to judge us knew we not your designe your interest your lives your Doctrines your Worship we might possibly think that you might intermeddle out of Love and mistaken zeale but ad populum Phaleras you would be making shrines and thence is this stirre and uproare But we are Schismaticks in that we have departed from the Catholick Church and for our own Conventicles they are no Churches but styes of beasts But this is most false We abide in the Catholick Church under all the bonds wherein by the will of Christ we stand related unto it Which if we prove not with as much evidence as
the nature of such things will beare though you are not at all concerned in it yet we will give you leave to â—riumph over us And if our own Congregations be not Churches whatsoever we are we are not Schismaticks for Schisme is an evill amongst the members of a Church if S. Paul may be believed But we have forsaken the Church of Rome But Gentlemen shew first how we were ever of it No man hath lost that which he never had nor hath left the place or station wherein he never was Tell me when or how we were members of your Church We know not your language you are Barbarians to us It is impossible we should assemble with you But your Forefathers left that Church and you persist in their evill Prove that your Forefathers were ever of your Church in any communion instituted by Christ and you say somewhat To desert a mans station and relation which he had on any other account good or bad is not Schisme as shall farther be manifested Upon the same principle a plea for freedome from the charge of any Church reall or pretended as Nationall may be founded and confirmed either we are of the Nationall Church of England to give that instance or we are not if we are not and are exempted by our Protestation as before whatever we are we are not Schismaticks if we are fatally bound unto it and must be members of it whether we will or no being made so we know not how and continuing so we know not why shew us then what duty or office of Love is incumbent on us that we doe not performe Doe we not joyne in externall acts of worship in Peace with the whole Church Call the whole Church together and try what we will doe Doe we not joyne in every Congregation in the Nation This is not charged on us nor will any say that we have right so to doe without a Relation to some particular Church in the Nation I know where the sore lyes A Nationall Officer or Officers with others acting under them in severall subordinations with various distributions of power are the Church intended A non-submission to their rules and constitutions is the Schisme we are guilty of Quem das finem Rex magne laborum But this pretence shall afterwards be sifted to the utmost In the meane time let any one informe me what duty I ought to performe towards a Nationall Church on supposition there is any such thing by vertue of an Institution of Jesus Christ that is possible for me to performe and I shall 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 addresse my selfe unto it To close these considerations with things of more immediate concernment Of the divisions that have fallen out amongst us in things of Religion since the last Revolutions of this Nation there is no one thing hath been so effectuall a promotion such is the power of Tradition and prejudice which even beare all before them in humane affaires as the mutuall charging one another with the guilt of Schisme That the notion of Schisme whereon this charge is built by the most if not all was invented by some of the Ancients to promote their plea and advantage them with them with whom they had to doe without due regard to the simplicity of the Gospell at least in a suitablenesse to the present state of the Church in those daies is too evident For on very small foundations have mighty fabricks and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Religion been raised As an Ability to judge of the present posture and Condition of affaires with counsell to give direction for their order and mannagement towards any end proposed not an Ability to contriâ—e for events and to knit on one thing upon another according to a probability of successe for continuance which is almost constantly disturbed by unexpected providentiall interveniences leaving the Contrivers at a perplexing losse will be found to be the summe of humane wisdome so it will be our wisdome in the things of God not to judge according to what by any meanes is made present to us and its principles on that account rendred ready to exert themselves but ever to recoile to the originall and first institution When a man first falls into some current he finds it strong and almost impassable trace it to its fountaine and it is but a dribling gutter Paul tells the members of the Church of Corinth that there were divisions amongst them breaches of that Love Order that ought to be observed in Religious Assemblies Hence there is a sinne of Schisme raised which when considered as now stated doth no more relate to that treated on by the Apostle then Simon Sonne of Jonas lovest thou me doth to the Popes Supremacy or Christs saying to Peter of John If I will that he tarry till I come what is that to thee did to the report that went afterwards abroad that that Disciple should not die When God shall have reduced his Churches to their Primitive Purity and institution when they are risen and have shaken themselves out of the dust and things of Religion returne to their native simplicity it is scarce possible to imagine what Vizards will fall off and what a contrary appearance many things will have to what they now walke up and downe in I wish that those who are indeed really concerned in this businesse namely the members of particular Churches who have voluntarily given up themselves to walke in them according to the appointment of Christ would seriously consider what evill lyes at the door if they give place to causelesse differences and divisions amongst themselves Had this sinne of Schisme been rightly stated as it ought and the guilt of it charged in its proper place perhaps some would have been more carefull in their deportment in their Relations At present the dispute in the World relating hereunto is about Subjection to the Pope and the Church of Rome as it is called And this mannaged on the Principles of Edicts of Councells with the practices of Princes and Nations in the dayes long agoe past with the like considerations wherein the concernment of Christians is doubtlesse very small Or of Obedience and conformity to Metropolitan and Diocesan Bishops in their constitutions and wayes of worship joyntly or severally prescribed by them In more Ancient times that which was agitated under the same name was about persons or Churches renouncing the Communion and Society of Saints with all other Churches in the World consenting with them in the same Confession of Faith for the substance of it And these differences respectively are handled in reference to what the state of things was and is grown unto in the dayes wherein they are mannaged When Paul wrote his Epistle there was no occasion given to any such Controversies nor foundation laid making them possible That the Disciples of Christ ought every where to abound in love and forbearance towards one another especially to carry all things
and visible of any Church or Churches on the pretension and plea be it true or otherwise that the worship Doctrine discipline instituted by Christ is corrupted among them with which corruption he dares not defile himselfe it is no where in the Scripture called Schisme noâ— is that case particularly exemplified or expressely supposed whereby a judgement may be made of the fact at large but we are left upon the whole matter to the guidance of such generall principles and Rules as are given us for that end and purpose What may regularly on the other hand be deduced from the commands given to turne away from them who have only a forme of Godlinesse 2 Tim. 3. 5. to withdraw from them that walk disorderly 2 Thes 3. 6. not to beare nor endure in communion men of corrupt principles and wicked lives Rev. 2. 14. but positively to separate from an Apostate Church Rev. 18. 4 that in all things we may worship Christ according to his mind and appointment what is the force of these commands 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and the like is without the compasse of what I am now treating about Of one particular Church departing from that communion with another or others be it what it will which it ought to hold unlesse in the departing of some of them in some things from the common Faith which is supposed not to relate to Schisme in the Scripture we have no example Diotrephes assuming an Authority over that Church wherein he was placed 3 Joh. 9 10. and for a season hindering the brethren from the performance of the duty incumbent upon them toward the great Apostle and others makes the nearest approach to such a division but yet in such a distance that it is not at all to our purpose in hand When I come to consider that communion that Churches have or ought to have among themselves this will be more fully discussed Neither is this my sence alone that there is no instance of any such separation as that which is the matter of our debate to be found in the Scripture It is confessed by others differing from me in and about Church affaires To leave all ordinary communion in any Church with dislike where opposition or offence offers it selfe is to separate from such a Church in the Scripture sence such separation was not in being in the Apostles time say they Papâ—â—accom p. 55. But how they came to know exactly the sence of the Scripture in about things not mentioned in them I know not As I said before were I unwilling I doe not as yet understand how I may be compelled to carry on the notion of Schisme any farther Nor is there need of adding any thing to demonstrate how little the conscience of a godly man walking peaceably in any particular Church society is concerned in all the clamarous disputes of this Age about it being built on false Hypotheses presumptions and notions no other way considerable but as received by tradition from our Fathers But I shall for the sake of some carry on this Discourse to a fuller issue There is another common notion of Schisme which pleads to an originall from that spoken expressly of it by a parity of reason which tolerable in it selfe hath been and is injuriously applyed and used according as it hath fallen into the hands of men who needed it as an engine to fixe or improve them in the station wherein they are or were wherewith they are pleased Indeed being invented for severall purposes there is nothing more frequent then for men who are scarce able to keep off the force of it from their own heads whilest mannaged against them by them above at the same time vigorously to apply it for the oppression of all under them What is on all hands consented unto as its generall nature I shall freely grant that I might have liberty and advantage thence to debate the restriction and application of it to the severall purposes of men prevailing themselves thereon Let then the generall demand be granted that Schisme is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the breach of Vnion which I shall attend with one reasonable postulatum namely that this union be an union of the appointment of Jesus Christ The consideration then of what or what sort of union in reference to the worship of God according to the Gospell is instituted appointed by Jesus Christ is the proper foundation of what I have farther to offer in this businesse Let the breach of this if you please be accounted Schisme for being an evill I shall not contend by what name or title it be distinguished It is not pleaded that any kind of relinquishment or desertion of any Church or Churches is presently Schisme but only such a separation as breakes the bond of Vnion instituted by Christ Now this union being instituted in the Church according to the various acceptions of that word so is it distinguished Therefore for a discovery of the nature of that which is particularly to be spoken to and also its contrary I must shew 1. The severall considerations of the Church wherein and with which union is to be preserved 2. What that union is and wherein it doth consist which according to the minde of Christ we are to keep and observe with the Church under the severall notions of it respectively 3 And how that union is broken and what is that sinne whereby it is done In handling this triple proposall I desire that it may not be expected that I should much insist on any thing that falls in my way though never so usefull to my end and purpose which hath been already proved and confirmed by others beyond all possibility of controule and such will many if not most of the principles that I proceed upon appeare to be CAP. IV. Severall Acceptations in the Scripture of the name Church Of the Church Catholick properly so called Of the Church visible Perpetuity of particular Churches A mistake rectifyed The nature of the Church Catholick evinced Bellarmine his description of the Church Catholick Vnion of the Church Catholick wherein it consists Vnion by way of consequence Vnity of Faith Of Love The Communion of the Catholick Church in and with itsselfe The breach of the Vnion of the Church Catholick wherein it consisteth Not morally possible Protestants not guilty of it The Papall world out of interest in the Church Catholick As partly profane Miracles no evidence of Holinesse Partly ignorant Selfe Justitiaries Idolatrous Worshippers of the Beast TO begin with the first thing proposed The Church of Christ living in this world as to our present concernment is taken in Scripture three wayes 1. For the Mysticall body of Christ his Elect Redeemed Justifyed and Sanctifyed ones throughout the world commonly called the Church-Catholick-Militant 2. For the Vniversality of men throughout the world called by the preaching of the word visibly professing and yeilding obedience to the Gospell called by some
Guilty in any kind of such a breach or the breach of such an Vnity This then now insisted on being the union of the Church of Christ as visibly professing the word according to his own minde when I have laid down some generall foundations of what is to ensue I shall consider whether we are guilty of the breach of this Vnion and argue the severall pretensions of men against us especially of the Romanists on this account 1. I confesse that this union of the generall visible Church was once comprehensive of all the Churches in the world the Faith once delivered to the Saints being received amongst them From this unity it is taken also for granted that a separation is made and it continnes not as it was at the first institution of the Churches of Christ though some small breaches were made upon it immediately after their first planting The Papists say as to the Europaean Churches wherein their and our concernment principally lyes this breach was made in the dayes of our forefathers by their departure from the common faith in those Ages though begunne by a few some Ages before We are otherwise minded and affirme that this secession was made by them and their Predecessors in Apostacy in severall generations by severall degrees which we manifest by comparing the present profession and worship with that in each kind which we know was at first embraced because we find it Instituted At once then we say this Schisme lyes at their doors who not only have deviated from the common faith themselves but do also actually cause and attempt to destroy temporally and eternally all that will not joyne with them therein For as the mystery of iniquity began to worke in the Apostles dayes so we have a testimony beyond exception in the complaint of those that lived in them that not long after the operation of it became more effectuall and the infection of it to be more diffused in the Church This is that of Hegesyppus in Eusebius Eccles Hist lib. 3. cap. 26. who affirmes that the Church remained a Virgin whilst the Apostles lived pure and uncorrupted but when that sacred Society had ended it's pilgrimage and the generation that heard and received the word from them were fallen asleep many false doctrines were preached and divulged therein I know who hath endeavoured to elude the sence of this complaint as though it concerned not any thing in the Church but the despisers and persecutors of it the Gnosticks But yet I know also that no man would so doe but such a one as hath a just confidence of his own ability to make passable at least any thing that he shall venture to say or utter For why should that be referred by Hegesyppus to the Ages after the Apostles and their hearers were dead with an exception against its being so in their days when if the person thus expounding this testimony may be credited the Gnosticks were never more busie nor prevalent then in that time which alone is excepted from the evill here spoken of Nor can I understand how the opposition and persecution of the Church should be insinuated to be the deflowring and violating of its chastity which is commonly a great purifying of it so that speaking of that broaching and preaching of errors which was not in the Apostles times nor in the time of their Hearers the chiefest time of the rage madnes of the Gnosticks such as spotted the pure incorupted Virginity of the church which nothing can attaine unto that is forraigne unto it that which gave originall unto sedition in the Church I am of the mind so I conceive was Eusebius that recited those words that the good man intended corruptions in the Church not out of it nor oppositions to it The processe made in after Ages in a deviation from the unity of the faith till it arrived to that height wherein it is now stated in the Papall Apostacy hath been the work of others to declare therein then I statet the rise and progresse of the present Schisme if it may be so called of the visible Church 2. As to our concernment in this businesse they that will make good a charge against us that we are departed from the Vnity of the Church Catholick it is incumbent on them to evidence that we either doe not believe and make profession of all the Truths of the Gospell indispensably necessary to be known that a man may have a communion with God in Christ and be saved Or 2. That doing so in the course of our lives we manifest and declare a principle that is utterly inconsistent with the belief of those Truths which outwardly we professe or 3. That we adde unto them in opinion or worship that or those things which are in very deed destructive of them or doe any way render them insufficient to be saving unto us If neither of these three can be proved against a man he may justly claime the priviledge of being a member of the visible Church of Christ in the World though he never in all his life be a member of a particular Church which yet if he have fitting opportunity and Advantage for it is his duty to be And thus much be spoken as to the state and condition of the visible Catholick Church and in this sence we grant it to be and the unity thereof In the late practice of men that expression of the Catholick Church hath been an Individuum Vagum few knowing what to make of it A Cothurnus that every one accommodated at pleasure to his own principles and pretensions I have no otherwise described it then did Irenaeus of old said he judicabit omnes eos qui sunt extra veritatem id est extra Ecclesiam Lib 4. cap. 62. and on the same account is a particular Church sometimes called by some the Catholick Quandoque ego Remigius Episcopus de hâc luce transiero tu mihi Haeres esto Sancta venerabilis Ecclesia Catholica urbis Remorum Flodoardus lib. 1. In the sence insisted on was it so frequently described by the Ancients So again Irenaeus Etsi in mundo loquelae dissimiles sunt sed tamen virtus traditionis una eadem est neque hae quae in Germania sunt â—undatae Ecclesiae aliter credunt aut aliter tradunt neque hae quae in Hibernis sunt neque hae quae in Celtis neque hae quae in Oriente neque hae quae in Aegypto neque hae quae in Lybia neque hae quae in medio mundi constitutae Sed sicut sol Creatura Dei in universo mundo unus idem est siâ— lumen praedicatio veritatis ubique lucet lib. 1. cap. 3. to the same purpose Jusâ—in Martyr 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Dialog cum Tryphone The generality of all sorts of men worshipping God in Jesus Christ is the Church we speak of whose extent in his daies Tertullian
at large insisted on In briefe put the whole Church of God into that condition of libertie and soundnesse of Doctrine which it was in when the great uproare was made by the Donatists and we shall be concerned to give in our judgements concerning them To presse an example of former dayes as binding unto duty or convincing of evill in respect of any now without stating the whole substratum of the businesse and compleat cause as it was in the dayes and seasons wherein the example was given we judge it not equall Yet although none can with ingenuity presse me with the crime they were guilty of unlesse they can prove themselves to be instated in the very same condition as they were against whom that crime was committed which I am fully assured none in the world can the communion of the Catholick Church then pleaded for being in the judgement of all an effect of mens free liberty and choice now pressed as an issue of the Tyranny of some few yet I shall freely deliver my thoughts concerning the Donatists which will be comprehensive also of those other that suffer with them in former and after ages under the same imputation 1. Then I am perswaded that in the matter of fact the Donatists were some of them deceived and others of them did deceive in charging Caecilianus to be ordained by Traditores which they made the maine ground of their separation however they took in other things as is usuall into their defence afterward Whether any of themselves were ordained by such persons as they are recharged I know not 2. On supposition that he was so and they that ordained him were known to him to have been so yet he being not guilty of the crime renouncing Communion with them therein and themselves repenting of their sinne as did Peter whose sinne exceeded theirs this was no just cause of casting him out of Communion he walking acting in all other things suitable to principles by themselves acknowledged 3. That on supposition they had just cause hereupon to renounce the Communion of Caecilianus which according to the principles of those days retained by themselves was most false yet they had no ground of separating from the Church of Carthage where were many Elders not obnoxious to that charge Indeed to raise a jealousy of a fault in any man which is denyed by him which we are not able to prove which if it were proved were of little or no importance and on pretence thereof to separate from all who will not believe what we surmise is a wild and unchristian course of proceeding 4. Yet grant farther that men of tender consciences regulated by the principle then generally received might be startled at the cōmunion of that Church wherein Caecilianus did preside yet nothing but the height of madnesse pride and corrupt fleshly interest could make men declare hostility against all the Churches of Christ in the world who would communicate with or did not condemne that Church which was to regulate all the Churches in the world by their own fancy and imagination 5. Though men out of such pride and folly might judge all the residue of Christians to be faulty and guilty in this particular of not condemning and separating from the Church of Carthage yet to proceed to cast them out from the very name of Christians and so disanull their priviledges and ordinances that they had been made partakers of as manifestly they did by rebaptizing all that entered into their communion was such unparalleld Pharisaisme and Tyranny as was wholy to be condemned and untollerable 6. The Divisions Outrages and Enthusiasticall furies and Riots that befell them or they fell into in their way werein my judgement tokens of the hand of God against them so that upon the whole matter their undertaking and enterprise was utterly undue and unlawfull I shall farther adde as to the mannagement of the cause by their Adversaries that there is in these writings especially those of Austin for the most part as sweet and gratious spirit breathing full of zeale for the glory of God Peace Love Union among Christians and as to the issue of the cause under debate it is evident that they did sufficiently foyle their Adversaries on principles then generally confessed and acknowledged on all hands though some of them seem to have been considering Learned and dexterous men How little we are at this day in any contests that are mannaged amongst us about the things of God concerned in those differences of theirs these few Considerations will evince yet notwithstanding all this I must take liberty to professe that although the Fathers justly charged the Donatists with disclaiming of all the Churches of Christ as a thing wicked and unjust yet many of the principles whereon they did it were such as I cannot assent unto Yea I shall say that though Austin was sufficiently cleare in the nature of the invisible Church Catholick yet his frequent confounding it with a mistaken notion of the visible generall Church hath given no small occasion of stumbling and sundry unhappy intanglements to diverse in after Ages His own book De unitats Ecclesiae which contains the summe and Substance of what he had written elsewhere or disputed against the Donatists would afford me instances enough to make good my assertion were it now under consideration or proofe Being then thus come off from this part of our Charge and accusation of Schisme for the relinquishment of the Catholick visible Church which as we have not done so to doe is not Schisme but a sin of another nature and importance according to the method proposed a recharge on the Romanists in reference to their present Condition and its unsuitablenesse to the Vnity of the Church evinced must briefly ensue Their claime is known to be no lesse then that they are this Catholick Church out of whose Communion there is no salvation as the Donatists was of old that also the union of this Church consists in its subjection to its head the Pope and worshipping of God according to his appointment in and with his severall qualifications and attendencies Now this claime of theirs to our apprehension and Consciences is 1. Cruell and sanguinary condemning Millions to hell that invocate and call on the name of the Lord Jesus Christ believing all things that are written in the Old and New Testaments for no other cause in the World but because they are not convinced that it is their duty to give up Reason Faith Soule and all to him and his disposall whom they have not only unconquerable presumptions against as an evill and wicked Person but are also resolved and fully perswaded in their Consciences that he is an enemy to their deare Lord Jesus Christ out of Love to whom they cannot beare him Especially will this appeare to be so if we consider their farther improvement of this principle to the killing hanging torturing to death
have found out new ways of justifying our separation from Rome on principles of limiting the Jurisdiction of the Bishop of Rome to a peculiar Patriarchat and granting a power to Kings or Nations to erect a Patriarchate or Metropolitan within their own Territories and the like the Protestant cause is not concerned in their Plea the whole of it on both hands being forraigne to the Scripture relating mostly to humane constitutions wherein they may have liberty to exercise their Witts and Abilities Not receding from what hath by others solidly been pleaded on the Answers above mentioned in answer to the principles I have hitherto evinced I shall proceed to give my account of the Argument proposed That we mistake not I only premise that I take Schisme in this Argument in the notion and sense of the Scripture precisely wherein alone it will reach the Consciences and bear the weight of inferring damnation from it 1. Then I wholly deny the Major Prop. as utterly false in what sense soever that expression True Church of Christ is taken Take it for the Catholick Church of Christ I deny that any one who is once a true member of it can utterly forsake its communion no living member of that body of Christ can perish and on supposition it could doe so it would be madnesse to call that crime Schisme nor is this a meer deniall of the Assertion but such as is attended with an invincible Truth for its maintenance Take it for the generall visible Church of Christ the voluntary forsaking of its communion which consists in the profession of the same faith is not Schisme but Apostacy and the thing it selfe is to be removed from the question in hand And as for Apostates from the faith of the Gospell we question not their damnation it sleepeth not who ever call'd a Christian that turned Jew or Mahumetan a Schismatick Take it for a particular Church of Christ I deny 1. That Separation from a particular Church as such as meerly separation is Schisme or ought to be so esteemed though perhaps such separation may proceed from Schisme and be also attended with other evills 2. That however separation upon jusâ— cause and ground from any Church is no Schisme This is granted by all Persons living Schisme is causelesse say all men however concerned And herein is a truth uncontroulable Separation upon just cause is a duty and therefore cannot be Schisme which is alwayes a sinne Now there are 500 things in the Church of Rome whereof every one grafted as they are there into the stock principle of imposition on the practice and confession of men is a sufficient cause of separation from any particular Church in the world yea from all of them one after another should they all consent unto the same thing impose it in the same manner if therebe any Truth in that Maxime It is better to obey God then man 2 I wholy deny the Minor Proposition also if spoken in reference to the Church of Rome Though I willingly acknowledge our separation to be voluntary from them no more being done then I would doe over againe this day God assisting me were I called unto it But separation in the sense contended about must be from some sâ—ate and condition of Christs Institution from communion with a Church which we held by his appointment otherwise it will not be pleaded that it is a Schisme at least not in a Gospell sense Now though our Forefathers in the faith we professe lived in sub ection to the Pope of Rome or his subordinate engines yet they were not so subject to them in any way or state instituted by Christ so that the relinquishment of that State can possibly be no such separation as to be termed Schisme For I wholy deny that the Papacy exercising its power in its supreame and subordinate Officers which with them is their Church is a Church at all of Christs appointment or any such thing And when they prove it is so I will be of it So that when our Forefathers withdrew their neck from his Tyrannicall yoke and forsook the practice of his abominations in the worship of God they forsook no Church of Christs institution they relinquished no communion of Christs appointment A man may possibly forsake Babylon and yet not forsake Sion For the Aggravations of the sinne of Schisme from some Ancient Writerâ— Austin and Optatus men interested in the contests about it Leo and Innocent gaining by the notion of it then growing in the World Thomas Aquinas and such vassalls of the Papacy we are not concerned in them what the Lord speaks of it that we judge concerning it It is true of the Catholicâ— Church alwaies that out of it no salvation it being the Society of them that shall be saved and of the visible Church in generall in some sense and cases Seeing with the heart man believeth to Righteousnesse and with the mouth confession is made unto Salvation But of a particular Church in no sense unlesse that of contempt of a known duty and to imagine Peter to speak of any such thing is a fancy The consequence of this devesting the Roman Synogogue of the priviledges of a true Church in any sense arising in the thoughts of some to a denyall of that ministry which we have at this day in England must by the way a little be considered For my part be it spoken without offence If any man hath nothing to plead for his ministry but meerly that successive Ordination which he hath received through the Church of Rome I cannot see a stable bottome of owning him so to be I do not say if he will plead nothing â—lse but if he hath nothing else to plead He may have that which indeed constitutes him a Minister though he will not ownâ— that so it doth Nor doth it come here into enquiry whether there were not a true Ministry in some all along under the Papacy distinct from it as were the thousands in Israell in the days of Elijah when in the ten Tribes as to the publick worship there was no true Ministry at all Nor is it said that any have their Ministry from Rome aâ— though the Office which is an Ordinance of Christ was instituted by Antichrist But the question is whether this be a sufficient and good basis and foundation of any mans interest in the office of the Ministry that he hath received Ordination in a succession through the administration of not the woman flying into the Wildernesse under the persecution of Antichrist not of the two witnesses prophesying all along under the Roman Apostacy not from them to whom we succeed in doctrine as the Waldenses but the Beast it selfe the persecuting Church of Rome the Pope and his adherents who were certainly Administrators of the Ordination pleaded for So that in doctrine we should succeed the persecuted Woman and in Office the perseâ—uting Beast I shall not plead this at
of his institutions ceaseth or that he doth not now dispense the gifts and graces of his Spirit to render them usefull is a difficult taske for any man to undertake to evince There is indeed in the institutions of Christ much that answers a naturall principle in men who are on many accounts formed and fitted for society A Confederation and consultation to carrie on any designe wherein the concernment of the individualls doth lye within such bounds and in such order as lyes in a ready way to the end aymed at is exceeding suitable to the principles whereby we are acted and guided as men But he that would hence conclude that there is no more but this and the acting of these principles in this Church constitution whereof we speake and that therefore men may be cast into any prudentiall forme or appoint other wayes and formes of it then those mentioned in the Scripture as appointed and owned takes on himselfe the demonstrating that all things necessarily required to the Constitution of such a Church society are commanded by the Law of nature and therefore allowed of and approved only by Christ so to be wholy morall and to have nothing of instituted worship in them and also he must know that when on that supposition he hath given a probable Reason why never any persons in the world fixed on such societies in all Essentiall things as those seeing they are Naturall that he leaves lesse to the Prudence of men and to the ordering and disposing of things concerning them then those who make them of pure institution all whose circumstances cannot be derived from themselves as those of things purely morall may But this is not of my present consideration 2. Nor shall I consider whether perpetuity be a property of the Church of Christ in this sence that is not whether a Church that was once so may cease to be so which it is known I plead for in the instance of the Church of Rome not to mention others but whether by vertue of any promise of Christ there shall alwayes be somewhere in the world a visible Church visibly celebrating his Ordinances Luc. 1. 33. He shall raigne over the house of Jacob for ever and of his Kingdome there shall be no end is pleaded to this purpose But that any more but the spirituall raigne of Christ in his Catholick Church is there intended is not proved Mat. 16. 18. upon this Rock will I build my Church is also urged but to intend any but true Believers and that as such in that promise is wholly to enervate it and to take away its force and efficacy Mat. 18. 18 20. declares the presence of Christ with his Church where ever it be not that a Church in the regard treated of shall be To the same purpose are other expressions in the Scripture As I will not deny this in Generall so I am unsatisfyed as to any particular instance for the making of it good It is said that true Churches were at first planted in England how then or by what means did they cease so to be How or by what Act did God unchurch them They did it themselves Meritoriously by Apostacy and Idolatry God Legally by his Institution of a Law of rejection of such Churches If any shall aske How then is it possible that any such Churches should be raised a new I say that the Catholick Church mysticall and that visibly professing being preserved entire he that thinketh there needs a miracle for those who are members of them to joyne in such a Society as those now spoken of according to the Institution of Christ is a person delighting in needlesse scruples Christ hath promised that where two or three are gathered together in his name he will be in the midst of them Mat. 18. 20. It is now supposed with some hope to have it granted that the Scripture being the power of God to Salvation hath Rom. 1. 16. a sufficient efficacy and energie in it selfe as to its own kind for the conversion of Soules yea let us till opposition be made to it take it for granted that by that force and efficacy it doth mainly and principally evince its own Divinity or divine Originall Those who are contented for the honour of that word which God delighteth to magnify to grant this Supposition will not I hope think it impossible that though all Church state should cease in any place and yet the Scripture by the providence of God be there in the hand of individualls preserved two or three should be called converted and regenerated by it For my part I think he that questions it must doe it on some corrupt principle of a secondary dependent Authority in the word of God as to us with which sort of men I doe not now deale I aske whether these converted persons may nor possibly come together or assemble themselves in the name of Jesus may they not upon his command and in Expectation of the accomplishment of his promise so come together with Resolution to doe his will and to exhort one another thereto Zech. 3. 10. Mal. 3. 10. Truly I believe they may in what part of the world soever their lot is fallen Here lye all the difficulties whether being come together in the name of Christ they may doe what he hath commanded them or no whether they may exhort and stirre up one another to doe the will of Christ Most certain it is that Christ will give them his presence therewithall his Authority for the performance of any duty that he requireth at their hands Were not men angry troubled and disappointed there would be little difficulty in this businesse But of this elsewhere 3. Upon this supposition that particular Churches are Institutions of Jesus Christ which is granted by all with whom I have to doe I proceed to make enquiry into their Vnion and Communion that so we may know wherein the bonds of them doe consist 1. There is a double foundation fountain or cause of the Vnion of such a Church the one externall procuring commanding the other internall inciting directing assisting The first is the Institution of Jesus Christ before mentioned requiring Peace and Order Vnion Consent and Agreement in and among all the members of such a Church all to be regulated ordered and bounded by the Rules Laws Prescripts which from him they have received for their walking in those Societies The Latter is that Love without dissimulation which alwaies is or which alwaies ought to be between all the members of such a Church exerting it selfe in their respective duties one towards another in that holy combination whereunto they are called and enter'd for the Worship of God whether they are those which lye in the levell of the equality of their common interest of being Church-members or those which are required of them in the severall differences whereby on any account whatever they are distinguished one from another
and that they were to be looked on as no such thing Our Anabaptists doe the same thing but on this plea that though baptisme be yet infant baptisme is not an Institution of Christ and so is null from the nature of the thing it selfe not the way of its Administration but this fals not within the verge of my defence In these severall considerations we were and doe continue members in the Church of God in England And as to our failing herein who is it that convinces us of sinne The second thing inquired after is what subjection we stood or were supposed to have stood in to the Bishops Our subjection being regulated by their power the consideration of this discovers the true state of that They had and exercised in this Nation a twofold Power and consequently the subjection required of us was twofold 1. A power delegated from the supream Magistrate of the Nation conferred on them and invested in them by the Laws Customes and Vsages of this Commonwealth and exercised by them on that account This not only made them Barons of the Realme and members of Parliament and gave them many Dignities and Priviledges but also was the sole fountain and spring of that Jurisdiction which they exercised by wayes and meanes such as themselves will not plead to have been purely Ecclesiasticall and of the Institution of Jesus Christ In this respect we did not cast off our subjection to them it being our duty to submit our selves to every Ordinance of man for the Lords sake Only when ever they commanded things unlawfull in themselves or unto us we alwaies retreated to the old safe Rule whether it be meet to obey you or God judge yee On this foundation I say was all the Jurisdiction which they exercised among and over the People of this Nation built They had not leave to exercise that which they were invested in on another account but received formally their Authority thereby The tenour whereby their Predecessors held this Power before the Reformation the change of the tenour by the Laws of this Land the investituâ—e of the whole originall right thereof in another person then formerly by the same means the Legall Concession and Delegation to them made the enlarging or contracting of their Jurisdiction by the same Laws the civill processe of their Courts in the exercise of their Authority sufficiently evince from whence they had it Nor was any thing herein any more of the Institution of Jesus Christ then the Courts are in Westminster-Hall Sir Edward Cook who knew the Laws of his Country and was skilled in them to a miracle will satisfy any in the rise and tenour of Episcopall Jurisdiction De Jure Regis Eccles What there is of Primitive institution giving colour and occasion to this kind of Jurisdiction and the exercise of it shall farther God assisting be declared when I treat of the state of the first Churches and the waies of their degeneracy Let them or any for them in the mean time evince the Jurisdiction they exercised in respect whereunto our subjection in the first kind was required to derive its originall from the pure Institution of Christ in the Gospell or to be any such thing as it was in an imagined separation from the humane Laws whereby it was animated and more will be asserted then I have had the happinesse as yet to see Now I say that the subjection to them due on this account we did not cast off but their whole Authority Power and Jurisdiction was removed taken away and anull'd by the people of the Land assembled in Parliament But this they reply is the state of the businesse in hand the Parliament as much as in them lay did so indeed as is confessed and by so doing made the Schisme which you by adhering to them and joyning with them in their severall places have made your selves also guilty of But do these men know what they say or will it ever trouble the Conscience of a man in his right wits to be charged with Schisme on this account the Parliament made Alteration of nothing but what they found established by the Laws of this Nation pleading that they had power committed to them to alter abrogate and anull Laws for the good of the people of the Land If their making Alterations in the Civill Laws and Constitutions in the Politicall Administrations of the Nation be Schisme we have very little security but that we may be made new Schismaticks every third year whilest the constitution of a Trienniall Parliament doth continue In the removall then of all Episcopall Jurisdiction founded in the Laws and usages of this Nation we are not at all concerned For the Laws enforcing it doe not presse it as a thing necessary on any other account but as that which themselves gave rise and life unto But should this be granted that the Office was appointed by Christ and the Jurisdiction impleaded annexed by him thereunto yet this whilest we abide at diocesans with the severall divisions apportioned to them in the Nation will not suffice to constitute a Nationall Church unlesse some Vnion of those Diocesans or of the Churches whereunto they related into one society and Church by the same appointment be proved which to my present Apprehension will be no easy work for any one to undertake 2. Bishops had here a power as Ministers of the Gospell to Preach administer the Sacraments to joyne in the Ordination of Ministers and the like duties of Church Officers To this we say let the individualls of them acquit themselves by the qualifications mentioned in the Epistles to Timothy and Titus with a sedulous exercise of their duty in a due manner according to the mind of Christ to be such indeed and we will still pay them all the respects reverence duty and obedience which as such by vertue of any Law or Institution of Christ they can claime Let them come forth with weapons that are not carnall evidencing their Ministry to the Consciences of Believers acting in a Spirit and Power received from Christ and who are they that will harme them I had once formerly said thus much Let the Bishops attend the particular flocks over which they are appointed preaching the word administring the holy Ordinances of the Gospell in and to their own flock there will not be contending about them It was thought meet to returne by one concerned I shall willingly grant herein my suffrage let them discharge them and I beseech all who have any way hindered them at length to let and quietly permit them on condition he will doe this as carefully as I I shall not contend with him concerning the nature of their taske be it as he saith the attending to the particular Churches over which they are appointed the Bishop of Oxford over that flock or portion to which he was and is appointed and so all others in like manner be it their preaching and their
Land but by the voluntary consent of the Officers of the Parochiall Churches and others joyning with them the Saints of God in this Nation who have not formerly been given up unto or disposed of in this order by their own voluntary consent nor are concerned in it any farther then by their habitation within some of these different Precincts that by publick Authority or consent of some amongst them are combined as above nor do believe such Assâ—ciations to be the institutions of Christ whatever they prove to be in the issue I say they are by their dissent and refusall to subject themselves to this Order not in the least liable to the charge of Schisme whatever they are who neglecting the great duty of Love and forbearance would by any means whatever impose upon them a necessity of so doing For besides what they have to plead as to the Non-institution of any such ordinary Associations investiture of them with power and Authority in and over the Churches they are not guilty of the disturbance of any order wherein they were stated according to the minde of Christ nor of the neglect of any duty of Love that was incumbent on them For the latter suppose a man stated in a particular Church wherewith he hath walked for a season He discovers that some perhaps of the Principles of its constitution are not according to to the minde of Christ something is wanting or redundant and imposed in practice on the members of it which renders the communion of it by reason of his doubts and scruples or it may be cleare convictions not so usefull to him as he might rationally expect it would be were all things done according to the minde of Christ that also he hath declared his judgement as he is able and dissatisfaction if no reformation doe ensue This person I say is doubtlesse at liberty to dispose of himselfe as to particular Church Communion to his own best advantage But now suppose this Congregation whereof a man is supposed to be a member is not reformed will not nor cannot reforme it selfe I desire that it may be minded with whom I have to do viz. those who own a necessity of Reformation as to the Administration of Ordinances in respect to what hath been hitherto observed in most Parochiall Assemblyes Those I have formerly dealt withall are not be imposed on with this Principle of Reformation they acknowledge none to be needfull but they are not concerned in our present enquiry Their charge lyes all in the behalfe of the Church of England not of particular Assemblyes or Parishes which it is not possible that according to their principle they should own for Churches or account any separation from any of them to be balme worthy but only as it respecteth the Constitutions of the Church Nationall in them to be observed If any claime arise on that hand as to Parochiall Assemblyes I should take liberty to examine the foundation of the plea and doubt not but that I may easily frustrate their attempts But this is not my present businesse I deale as I said with them who own Reformation and I now suppose of the Congregation whereof a man is supposed to be a member on any account whatever not to be reformed In this case I aske whether it be Schisme or no for any number of men to reforme themselves by reducing the practice of worship to its originall institution though they be the minor part lying within the Parochiall precinct or for any of them to joyne themselves with others for that end and purpose not living within those precincts I shall boldly say this Schisme is commanded by the Holy Ghost 1 Tim. 6. 5. 2 Tim. 3. 5. Hos 4. 15. Is this yoke laid upon me by Christ that to goe along with the multitude where I live that hate to be reformed I must forsake my duty and despise the priviledges that he hath purchased for me with his owne precious blood Is this an unity of Christs Institution that I must for ever associate my selfe with wicked and prophane men in the worship of God to the unspeakable detriment and disadvantage of my own soule I suppose nothing can be more unreasonable then once to imagine any such thing However not to derive this businesse any farther but to put it to its proper issue When it is proved that this is the will and appointment of Jesus Christ that every Believer who liveth within such a precinct allotted by Civill Constitutions wherein the people or Inhabitants do or may usually meet for the celebration of the worship of God or which they have light for on any account whatever doe make profession of how prophane soever that part of them be from whom the whole is denominated how corrupt soever in their worship how dead soever as to the power of Godlinesse must abide with them and joyne with them in the Administration and worship and that indispensably this businesse may come againe under debate In the meane time I suppose the people of God are not in any such subjection I speake not this as laying down this for a principle that it is the duty of every man to separate from that Church wherein evill and wicked men are tollerated though that opinion must have many other attendances before it can contract the least affinity with that of the same sound which was condmned in the Donatists but this only I say that where any Church is over borne by a multitude of men wicked and prophane so that it cannot reforme it selfe or will not according to the minde of Christ a Believer is so farre at liberty that he may desert the Communion of that society without the least guilt of Schisme But this state of things is now little pleaded for It is usually objected about the Church of Corinth that there was in it many disorders and enormous miscarriages divisions and breaches of Love miscarriages through drink at their meetings grosse sins in the incestuous person tolerated false doctrine broached the Resurrection denyed and yet Paul advises no man to separate from it but all to performe their duty in it But how little our present plea defensative is concerned in this instance supposed to ly against it very few considerations will evince 1. The Church of Corinth was undoubtedly a true Church lately instituted according to the minde of Christ and was not fallen from that priviledge by any miscarriage nor had suffered any thing destructive to its being which wholy differences between the case proposed in respect of many particulars and the instance produced We confesse the abuses and evills mentioned had crept into the Church and doe thence grant that many abuses may doe so into any of the best of the Churches of God Nor did it ever enter into the heart of any man to think that so soon as any disorders fall out or abuses creep into it it is instantly the duty of any to fly
This being the next posture of that word from whence it immediately slips into its Ecclesiasticall use expressing a thing morall or spirituall there may some light be given into its importance when so appropriated from its constant use in this state and condition to denote differences of mind and judgement with troubles ensuing thereon amongst men met in some one Assembly about the compassing of a common end and designe In the sence contended about it is used only by Paul in his first Epistle to the Corinthians and therein frequently cap. 1. 10. I exhort you 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that there be no Schismes amongst you cap. 11. 18. when you meet in the Church 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I heare there be Schismes amongst you cap. 12. 25. The word is used in reference to the naturall body but with an application to the Ecclesiasticall Other words there are of the same importance which shall also be considered as Rom. 16. 17 18. Of Schisme in any other place or in reference to any other persons but only to this Church of Corinth we heare nothing Here then being the principall foundation if it hath any of that great Fabrick about Schisme which in latter Ages hath been set up it must be duly conâ—â—â—ered that if it be possible we may discover by what secret engines or Artifices the discourses about it which fill the world have been hence deduced being for the most part universally unlike the thing here mentioned or find out that they are built on certaine prejudices and presumptions nothing relating thereto The Church of Corinth was founded by Paul Act. 18. 8 9 10. with him there was Aquila and Priscilla v. 2 18. After his departure Apollos came thither effectually watered what he had planted 1 Ep. cap. 3. 6. It is probable that either Peter had been there also or at least that sundry persons converted by him were come thither for he still mentions Cephas and Apollo with himselfe cap. 1. 12. 3. 22. This Church thus watered and planted came together for the worship of God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 cap. 11. 20. and for the administration of Discipline in particular cap. 5. 4. After a while through the craft of Sathan various evills in Doctrine Conversation and Church-order crept in amongst them For Doctrine besides their mistake about eating things offered to Idols cap. 8. 4. some of them denyed the Resurrection of the Dead cap. 15. 12. In Conversation they had not only the eruption of a scandalous particular sinne amongst them cap. 5. 1. but grievous sinfull miscarriages when they came together about holy Administrations cap. 11. 21. these the Apostle distinctly reproves in them their Church-order as to that Love peace and union of heart and minde wherein they ought to have walked was woefully disturbed with divisions and sidings about their Teachers cap. 1. 12. And not content to make this difference the matter of their debates and disputes from house to house even when they met for publick worship or that which they all met in and for they were divided on that account cap. 11. 18. This was their Schisme the Apostle dehorts them from charges them with and shewes them the evill thereof They had differences amongst themselves about unnecessary things on these they ingaged into disputes and sidings even in their solemne Assemblyes when they came all together for the same worship about which they differed not Probably much vaine jangling alienation of affections exasperation of spirits with a neglect of due offices of love ensued hereupon All this appeares from the entrance the Apostle gives to his Discourse on this subject 1 Epist chap. 1. v. 10. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I beseech you that you all speake the same thing They were of various minds and opinions about their Church affairs which was attended with the confusion of disputings let it not be so saith the Apostle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and let there be no schismes among you which consist in such differences and janglings he addes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but that you be perfectly joyned together in the same minde and the same judgment They were joyned together in the same Church order and fellowship but he would have them so also in onenesse of minde and judgement which if they were not though they continued together in their Church-order yet Schismes would be amongst them This was the state of that Church this the frame and carriage of the members of it this the fault and evill whereon the Apostle charges them with Schisme and the guilt thereof The grounds whereon he mannageth his reprose are their common interest in Christ cap. 1. 13 The nothingnesse of the instruments of preaching the Gospell about whom they contended cap. 1. 14. cap. 3. v. 4 5. their Church order instituted by God cap. 12. 13. of which afterward This being as I said the principall seat of all that is taught in the Scripture about Schisme we are herè or hardly at all to learn learne what it is and wherein it doth consist The Arbitrary Definitions of men with their superstructions and inferences upon them we are not concerned in At least I hope I shall have leave from hence to state the true nature of the thing before it be judged necessary to take into consideration what by parity of Reason may be deduced from it In things purely morall and of naturall equity the most generall notion of them is to be the rule whereby all particulars claiming an interest in their nature are to be measured and regulated In things of Institution the particular instituted is first and principally to be regarded How farre the generall reason of it may be excluded is of after consideration And as is the case in respect of duty so it is in respect of the evills that are contrary thereto True and false are indicated tried by the same Rule Here then our foote is to be fixed what compasse may be taken to fetch in things of a like kind will in its proper place follow Observe then 1. That the thing mentioned is entirely in one Church amongst the members of one particular society No mention is there in the least of one Church divided against another or separated from another or others whether all true or some true some false or but pretended Whatever the crime be it lyes wholy within the verge of one Church that â—et together for the worship of God and Administration of the Ordinances of the Gospell And unlesse men will condescend so to state it upon the evidence tendered I shall not hope to prevaile much in the processe of this discourse 2. Here is no mention of any paticular man or any number of mens separation from the Holy Assemblyes of the whole Church or of subduction of themselves from its power nor doth the Apostle lay any such thing to their charge but plainely declares that they continued all in the joynt
celebration of that worship and performance together of those duties which were required of them in their Assemblyes only they had groundlesse causelesse differences amongst themselves as I shall shew afterwards All the divisions of one Church from another or others the separation of any one or more persons from any Church or Churches are things of another nature made good or evill by their circumstances and not that at all which the Scripture knowes and calls by the name of Schisme And therefore was there no such thing or name as Schisme in such a sence known in the Judaicall Church though in the former it abounded All the different sects to the last still communicated in the same carnall Ordinances and those who utterly deserted them were Apostates not Schismaticks so were the body of the Samaritans they worshiped they knew not what nor was Salvation among them Joh. 4. 3. Here is no mention of any substraction of obedience from Bishops or Rulers in what degree soever no exhortation to regular submission unto them much lesse from the Pope or Church of Rome nor doth the Apostle thunder out against them you are departed from the Amity of the Catholick Church have rent Christs seamelesse Coat set up Altare contra altare have forsaken the visible head of the Church the fountaine of all unitie you refuse due subjection to the Prince of the Apostles Nor you are Schismaticks from the Nationall Church of Achaja or have cast off the Rule of your Governors with the like language of after dayes but when you come together you have divisions amongst you Behold how great a matter a little fire kindleth A condition not unlike to this befalling this very Church of Corinth sundry years after the strifes now mentioned were allayed by the Epistle of the Apostle doth againe exhibite us the case and evill treated on Some few unquiet persons among them drew the whole society upon the matter into division and an opposition to their Elders They who were the causes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Clement tells them in the name of the Church at Rome were 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a few men acted by pride and madnesse yet such power had those persons in the Congregation that they prevailed with the multitude to depose the Elders and cast them out of office So the same Clement tells them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 What he intends by his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. he declares in the words foregoing where he calls the Elders that were departed this life happy and blessed as not being subject or liable to expulsion out of their offices 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Whether these men who caused the differences and sedition against those Elders that were deposed were themselves by the Church substituted into their roome and place I know not This difference in that Church the Church of Rome in that Ep. of Clement calls every where Schisme as it also expresses the same things or the evill frame of their minds and their actings by many other words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are laid to their charge That there was any separation from the Church that the deposed Elders or any for their sakes withdrew themselves from the communion of it or ceased to assemble with it for the celebration of the Ordinances of the Gospell there is not any mention only the difference in the Church is the Schisme whereof they are accused Nor are they accused of Schisme for the deposition of the Elders but for their differences amongst themselves which was the ground of their so doing It is alleadged indeed that it is not the single Church of Corinth that is here intended but all the Churches of Achaia whereof that was the Metropolis which though as to the nature of Schisme it be not at all prejudiciall to what hath been asserted supposing such a Church to be yet because it sets up in oposition to some Principles of Truth that must afterwards be improved I shall briefely review the arguments whereby it is attempted to be made good The title of the Epistle in the first place is pretended to this purpose It is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 wherein as t is said on each part the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or whole Province as of Rome so of Corinth the Region and Territorie that belonged to those Metropoli's is intended But as I have formerly elsewhere said we are beholding to the frame and fabrick of Church affaires in after Ages for such interpretations as these the simplicity of the first knew them not They who talked of the Church of God that did 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 at Rome little then thought of Province or Region 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is as much as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Act. 8. 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is a man that dwells at such a place properly one that dwells in anothers house or soyle or that hath removed from one place and setled in another whence it is often used in the same sence with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he is such an inhabitant as hath yet some such consideration attending him as makes him a kind of a forreigner to the place where he is so Eph. 2. 19. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are opposed Hence is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which as Budaeusâ— saies differs from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in that it denotes a temporary habitation this a stable and abiding 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is so to inhabite to dwell in a place where yet something makes a man a kind of a stranger So it is said of Abraham 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Heb. 11. 9. 1 Pet. 2. 11. joyned with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hence this word by the learned publisher of this Epistle is rendered peregrinatur diversatur and more cleerly Luk. 24. 18. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which we have rendred are you only a stranger in Hierusalem whether 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 paroecia is from hence or no by some is doubted 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is convivator and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 praebitio Gloss vetus So that parochiâ—… may be called so from them who met together to breake bread and to eat Allow parochia to be barbarous our only word to be paroecia from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 then it is as much as the Voisinage men living neare together for any end whatever So sayes Budaeus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 thence Churches were called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 consisting of a number of them who were 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Saints of God expressing the place which they inhabited and the manner as Strangers said of the Churches whereof they were 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 this is now made to denote a Region a Territorie the adjacent Region to a Metropolis and such like things as the poor primitive pilgrimes little thought of This
administring the holy ordinances of the Gospell in and to their â—wn flock and whatever else of duty and ratione officii belongs to a rightly constituted Bishop and â—et all that have disturbed this course so duly â—â—tled in this Church and in all Churches of Christ â—â—nce the Apostles planting them discerne their â—â—â—rour and returne to that peace and Vnity of the Church from whence they have causelesly and inexcusably departed Though I was not then speaking of the Bishops of England yet I am contented with the application to them there being amongst them men of piety and learning whom I exceedingly honour reverence Amongst all the Bishops He of Oxford is I suppose peculiarly instanced in because it may be thought that living in this place I may belong to his Jurisdiction But in the condition wherein I now am by the providence of God I can plead an exemption on the same foot of account as he can his Jurisdiction So that I am not much concerned in his exercise of it as to my own person If he have a particular flock at Oxon which he will attend according to what before I required he shall have no let or hindrance from me but being he is as I heare he is a Reverend and Learned person I shall be glad of his Neighbourhood acquaintance But to suppose that the Diocesse of Oxon as legally constituted and bounded is his particular flock or Church that such a Church is instituted by Christ or hath been in Being ever since the Apostles times that in his presidency in this Church he is to set up Courts and exercise a Jurisdiction in them and therewith a power over all the inhabitants of this Diocesse or Shire excepting the exempt peculiar jurisdiction although gathered into particular Congregations and united by a participation of the same Ordinances and all this by the will and appointment of Jesus Christ is to suppose what will not be granted I confesse as before there was once such an Order in this place that it is now removed by Lawes on which foundation alone it stood before And this is that where in I am not concerned Whether we have causelesly inexcusably departed froÌ„ the Vnity of the Church is the matter now in enquiry I am sure unles the Vnity can be fixed our departure will not be proved A law Vnity I confesse an Evangelicall I am yet in the disquisition of But I confesse it will be to the prejudice of the cause in hand if it shall be thought that the determination of it depends on the controversy about Episcopacy for if so it might be righteously expected that the Arguments produced in the behalfe and defence thereof should be particularly discussed But the truth is I shall easily acknowledge all my labour to no purpose if have to deale only with men who suppose that if it be granted that Bishops as commonly esteemed in this Nation are of the appointment of Christ it will thence follow that we have a Nationall Church of Christs appointment between which indeed there is no Relation or connexion Should I grant as I said diocesan Bishops with Churches answerable to their supportment particled into severall Congregations with their inferiour Officers yet this would be remote enough from giving subsistence and Vnion to a Nationall Church What then it is which is called the Church of England in respect whereto we are charged with Schisme is nextly to be considered Now there are two wayes whereby we may come to the discoverie of what is intended by the Church of England or there are two ways whereby such a thing doth arise 1. Descendendo which is the way of the Prelates 2. Ascendendo which is the way of the Presbyterians For the first to constitute a Nationall Church by descent it must be supposed that all Church power is vested in Nationall Officers viz. Arch-Bishops and from them derived to severall Diocesians by a distribution of power limited in its exercise to a certaine portion of the Nation and by them communicated by severall engines to Parochiall Priests in their severall places A man with halfe an eye may see that here are many things to be proved Thus their first Church is Nationall which is distributed into severall greater portions termed Provinces those againe into others now called Diocesses and those againe subdivided into Parochiall or particular Congregations Now the Vnion of this Church consisteth in the due observance of the same worship specifically by all the members of it and subjection according to Rules of their own appointment which were called commonly Canons by way of distinction unto the Rulers before mentioned in their severall capacities And this is that which is the peculiar forme of this Church That of the Church Catholick absolutely so called is its Vnity with Christ and in its selfe by the one Spirit whereby it is animated That of the Church Catholick visibly professing the Unity of the Faith which they doe professe as being by them professed That of a particular Church as such its observance and performance of the same Ordinances of worship numerically in the confession of the same faith and subjection to the same Rules of Love for edification of the whole Of this Nationall as it is called in the subjection of one sort of Officers unto another within a precinct limited Originally wholy on an account forraigne to any Church state whatever So that it is not called the Church of England from its participation of the nature of the Catholick Church on the account of its most noble members nor yet from its participation of the nature of the invisible Church in the world on the account of its profession of the Truth in both which respects we professe our Unity with it nor yet from its participation of the nature of a particular Church which it did not in its selfe nor as such but in some of its particular Congregations but from a peculiar forme of its owne as above described which is to be proved to be of the Institution of Jesus Christ In this description given of their Church state with whom we have now to doe I have purposely avoided the mention of things odious exposed to common obloquy which yet were the very â—ies ligaments of their order because the thing as it is in its selfe being nakedly represented we may not be prejudiced in judging of the strength and utmost of the charge that lyes against any of us on the account of a departure from it The communion of this Church they say we have forsaken and broken its Vnity and therefore are Schismaticks I answer in a word laying aside so much of the Iurisdiction of it mentioned before and the severall ways of its administration for which there is no colour or pretence that it should relate to any Gospell institution passe by also the consideration of all those things which the men enjoying Authority in or exercising